Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203275200 on June 10, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 31327-31334, August 30, 2002
Synthetic Miniprion PrP106*
Valentina
Bonetto
§¶
,
Tania
Massignan§,
Roberto
Chiesa
**
,
Michela
Morbin
,
Giulia
Mazzoleni
,
Luisa
Diomede§,
Nadia
Angeretti
,
Laura
Colombo§,
Gianluigi
Forloni
,
Fabrizio
Tagliavini
, and
Mario
Salmona§
From the
Dulbecco Telethon Institute (DTI),
§ Department of Molecular Biochemistry and Pharmacology,
Department of Neuroscience,
Istituto di Ricerche
Farmacologiche Mario Negri, via Eritrea 62, Milan 20157 and the

Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Celoria 11,
Milan 20133, Italy
Received for publication, April 5, 2002, and in revised form, May 28, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Elucidation of structure and biological
properties of the prion protein scrapie (PrPSc) is
fundamental to an understanding of the mechanism of conformational transition of cellular (PrPC) into disease-specific
isoforms and the pathogenesis of prion diseases. Unfortunately, the
insolubility and heterogeneity of PrPSc have limited these
studies. The observation that a construct of 106 amino acids (termed
PrP106 or miniprion), derived from mouse PrP and containing two
deletions (
23-88,
141-176), becomes protease-resistant when
expressed in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cells and sustains prion
replication when expressed in PrP0/0 mice prompted us to
generate a corresponding synthetic peptide (sPrP106) to be used for
biochemical and cell culture studies. sPrP106 was obtained successfully
with a straightforward procedure, which combines classical stepwise
solid phase synthesis with a purification strategy based on transient
labeling with a lipophilic chromatographic probe. sPrP106 readily
adopted a
-sheet structure, aggregated into branched filamentous
structures without ultrastructural and tinctorial properties of
amyloid, exhibited a proteinase K-resistant domain spanning residues
134-217, was highly toxic to primary neuronal cultures, and induced a
remarkable increase in membrane microviscosity. These features are
central properties of PrPSc and make sPrP106 an excellent
tool for investigating the molecular basis of the conformational
conversion of PrPC into PrPSc and prion disease pathogenesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Prion-related encephalopathies are characterized by the
accumulation of pathogenic forms of the prion protein
(PrP),1 termed PrP scrapie
(PrPSc), in the central nervous system. Unlike the normal
cellular isoform (PrPC), PrPSc has a high
content of
-sheet secondary structure, is insoluble in nondenaturing
detergents and partially resistant to protease digestion, and has the
propensity to form amyloid fibrils. Elucidation of the structure of
both PrP isoforms is fundamental to an understanding of the molecular
mechanism of the conformational transition from PrPC to
PrPSc. Unfortunately, structural studies of the pathogenic
form have been hampered by the insolubility, heterogeneity, and
complexity of PrPSc preparations. Synthetic and recombinant
fragments of PrP have been more useful for such investigations (1). A
construct of 106 amino acids (designated as PrP106 or miniprion),
derived from mouse PrP and containing two deletions (
23-88,
141-176), was expressed in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cells
generating a protease-resistant polypeptide, displaying better
solubility than PrPSc (2). PrP106 has been found to sustain
prion replication when expressed in transgenic mice with a PrP knockout
genetic background (3). Recombinant PrP106 (rPrP106) shows properties
similar to those of PrPSc106 extracted from
scrapie-infected PrP106 transgenic mice, such as high
-sheet
content, resistance to limited digestion by proteinase K (PK), and high
thermodynamic stability (4). These observations have emphasized the
importance of studying the structure and biology of PrP106, which can
be considered a model of protein folding intermediates that feature in
PrPC to PrPSc conversion.
In the present study, we report the synthesis, physicochemical
properties, and in vitro neurotoxicity of PrP106. Synthetic proteins are devoid of any biological contaminant and are especially desirable for biological assays. In prion research, homogeneity of the
protein studied has a particular relevance because it has been
discussed in the role of potential cofactors, such as protein X, in
PrPC to PrPSc conversion (5). In addition,
modified amino acids can be introduced easily into specific sites of
the primary structure of synthetic proteins to facilitate structural
and functional studies. However, classical stepwise solid phase
synthesis (SSPS) is not convenient for the production of long
polypeptides because of the progressive decrease of synthetic
efficiency with the increase of the number of amino acids. This leads
to difficult or almost impossible purification of the full-length
protein from its truncated side products. To overcome these problems,
new sophisticated but laborious chemistries, such as native chemical
ligation, have been developed for total synthesis of wild type and
engineered proteins (6, 7).
Here we describe a straightforward protocol to produce relatively large
amounts of PrP106, combining classical SSPS with a special purification
strategy based on specific and transient labeling of the polypeptide
with a lipophilic chromatographic probe (8). Furthermore, we found that
synthetic PrP106 (sPrP106) possesses physicochemical and biological
properties similar to those of PrPSc. Accordingly, this
synthetic miniprion is an excellent tool for investigating the
molecular basis of the conformational conversion of PrPC
into PrPSc and the biology of prion diseases.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Peptide Synthesis, Derivatization, and Purification--
PrP106
(GQGGGTHNQWNKPSKPKTNMKHMAGAAAAGAVVGGLGGYMLGSAMSRPMIHFDCVNITIKQHTVTTTTKGENFTETDVKMMERVVEQ- MCVTQYQKESQAYYDGRRS)
was synthesized by SSPS on an automated Applied Biosystems
synthesizer model 433A at 0.1 mM scale with
p-hydroxymethylphenoxymethyl resin from
Fmoc-protected L- amino acid derivatives. Amino acids
were activated by reaction with
N-[(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)(dimethylamino)methylene]-N-methylmethanaminium hexafluorophosphate N-oxide and
N,N-diisopropylethylamine. A capping step
with acetic anhydride after the last coupling cycle of each amino acid
was included.
PrP106 still attached to the resin was derivatized at the N terminus
with a lipophilic probe (4-dodecylaminocarbonylfluorene-9-ylmethyl succinimidyl carbonate) following the method described by Ball and Mascagni (8) with some modifications. Briefly, 4 equivalents of the
probe was dissolved at a concentration of 0.2 M in
trifluoroethanol (TFE):dichloromethane (DCM) (1:3 v/v) and added to the
polypeptidyl resin suspended in DCM. The reaction mix was incubated for
2 h, and the completion of the reaction was determined by the
ninhydrin test (9).
After evaporation of the DCM under a stream of nitrogen, the peptide
was cleaved from the resin with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA):thioanisole:water:phenol:ethanedithiol (82.5:5:5:5:2.5 v/v), precipitated, and washed with diethyl ether. The precipitate was further washed with acetonitrile:water (7:3), dissolved in 60% formic
acid, and purified by reverse phase HPLC on a semipreparative C4 column
(Symmetry 300, 19 × 150 mm, particle size 7 µm, Waters), with a
mobile phase of 0.1% TFA:water (eluent A) and 0.08% TFA:acetonitrile (eluent B) using a linear gradient of 15-50% eluent B in 40 min. The
300 nm-absorbing peak was collected and characterized by
matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry
(MS). The pooled fractions containing the homogeneous labeled miniprion were lyophilyzed. The probe was removed by a 2-h treatment with 10%
triethylamine in acetonitrile:water (1:1). After lyophilization, the
peptide was dissolved in concentrated TFA and precipitated with diethyl
ether. The pellet was redissolved in acetonitrile:water (1:1) and
relyophilized. Typically this produces about 50 mg of pure sPrP106,
representing an overall yield of ~5%.
Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy--
CD spectra were recorded
with a Jasco J-710 CD spectrometer (Jasco, Easton, MD) scanning spectra
at a speed of 20 nm/min, with a bandwidth of 2 nm and a step resolution
of 0.2-1 nm using quartz cells with an optical path of 0.1 cm.
Aliquots of lyophilized sPrP106 were dissolved in deionized water; 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5; saline; 1 mM sodium
acetate containing liposomes or 20% TFE; or deionized water containing
20, 40, or 60% TFE, at a concentration of 0.05-1 mg/ml as specified
in Table I. Protein solutions were incubated at room temperature for different times (from 1 h to 1 week) before measurement. No substantial variations were observed at
different incubation times. Background spectra were subtracted, and the
data were converted to molar ellipticity. Each spectrum shown is the
result of the accumulation of four or five individual spectra. The
secondary structure content was calculated using a program DICROPROT
version 2.5, which contains a least square method based on the
Gauss-Jordan elimination (10), the self-consistent method, and the
variable selection method (11).
Liposome Preparation--
Multilamellar vesicles of different
composition were prepared as described previously (12).
Phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidic acid
(PA), sphingomyelin, and cholesterol purchased from Sigma were mixed at
the following molar ratios: PC:cholesterol (1:1), PC:sphingomyelin
(1:1), PC:PA:cholesterol (1:1:1), and PG:cholesterol (1:1). For the
experiments liposomes were resuspended in 1 mM sodium
acetate, pH 5.5. CD experiments were performed after the addition of
liposome suspensions to sPrP106 solution in the same buffer, to obtain
a final peptide concentration of 0.1 mg/ml and a protein:lipid molar
ratio of 1:25.
Proteinase K Digestion--
sPrP106 was digested with PK in the
presence or absence of detergents. In a first set of experiments, 0.2 mg/ml protein was incubated in 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate
at 37 °C up to 1 h. The PK:protein ratios employed were 1:320,
1:160, 1:32, 1:16, and 1:3.2. The reaction was stopped by adding
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to a final concentration of 5 mM. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and visualized by
Coomassie staining or by Western blotting using monoclonal antibody 3F4
and polyclonal antibody R340. Alternatively, 1 mg/ml protein was
incubated at 37 °C in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, with
an enzyme:protein ratio of 1:50. During PK digestion, aliquots were
taken every 30 min up to 5 h. After addition of an equal volume of
1% TFA, the samples were analyzed by MALDI MS.
MALDI MS--
Fragments or full-length sPrP106 was
analyzed by a Bruker BiflexTM or a Reflex IIITM MALDI mass
spectrometer. A few µl of the sample was mixed with an equal volume
of a saturated solution of sinapinic acid (Sigma) in acetonitrile + 0.1% TFA (1:3 v:v), and 1 µl of the mixture was deposited on the
MALDI target.
Electron Microscopy--
Aliquots of lyophilized PrP106 were
suspended in aqueous solutions with different pH values and ionic
strengths at a final concentration of 0.1 and 0.3 mM. The
solvents included deionized water, pH 5.0; 10 mM
Tris·HCl, pH 5.5; 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5; and 1 mM sodium acetate + 120 mM NaCl, pH 5.5. In
some experiments, the peptide was subjected to reduction and partial
denaturation in 10 mM Tris·HCl, 100 mM
dithiothreitol, 2 M GdnHCl, pH 5.5, for 24 h, followed
by refolding by dialysis against deionized water before analysis. After
incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, 48 h, and 7 days, 10 µl of
each sample was air dried on gelatin-coated slides, stained with Congo
red, and viewed under polarized light. Samples for ultrastructural
examination were taken after short (1, 4, or 8 h) and long (1, 2, 3, or 7 days) incubation. At each time point, 5 µl of suspension was
applied onto Formvar-carbon 200 mesh nickel grids for 5 min and
negatively stained with freshly filtered uranyl acetate. After drying,
samples were observed with an electron microscope (EM109 Zeiss,
Oberkoken, Germany) operated at 80 kV at a standard
magnification of 30,000. The magnification was calibrated using an
appropriate grid. At day 7, samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min. The pellet was fixed in 2.5%
glutaraldehyde in 0.05% phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, postfixed in osmium
tetroxide, dehydrated in graded acetone, and embedded in epoxy resin
(Spurr, Electron Microscopy Science, Fort Washington, PA). Ultrathin
sections (500 Å) were collected on 200 mesh copper grids, positively
stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed with the
electron microscope. The mean diameter and length were measured on
printed photographs at a final magnification of 90,000 using a
computer-assisted image analyzer (Nikon Corporation, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokio, Japan).
Neurotoxicity--
Primary cultures of rat cortical neurons were
prepared as described previously (13). Briefly, brains were removed
from fetal rats on embryonic day 17. Cortical cells were dissociated
and plated at the density of 5 × 105 cells/well. The
cells were cultured in basal Eagle's medium (Hanks' salt, Invitrogen)
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen) and 2 mM glutamine. sPrP106 was dissolved in deionized water and added to the medium for the acute treatment (final concentration 5 and
10 µM), on day 5 of culture, and the cell viability was determined 24 h later. For the chronic treatment SPrP 106 was added to the medium on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture, reaching final concentrations of 0.5, 1. 5, and 10 µM in the well, and
the cell viability was determined at day 7. Cell viability was assessed quantitatively by the
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
method (14) with an automated microplate reader (PerkinElmer Life Sciences lambda reader).
Microviscosity--
Membrane microviscosity was assessed in
suspensions of rat primary neurons and liposomes using
1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene as a fluorescent probe as described
previously (15, 16). The reported fluorescence polarization (FP) value
is a function of the emission (420 nm) detected through an analyzer
oriented parallel (p1) and perpendicular
(p2) to the direction of the polarization of the
exciting light (365 nm), according to the equation FP = (p2 - p1)/(p2 + p1) (17). Membrane microviscosity (
, poise) is related to FP according to the formula
= 2p/(0.46 - p) (17). Neuronal cells were detached
mechanically, centrifuged gently at 550 × g for 10 min, washed with saline, resuspended in 2.5 ml of 2 µM
1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene in 5 mM sodium acetate, pH
5.5, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The FP value (expressed as arbitrary units) was determined at 25 °C, before and
10 min after the addition of an increasing concentration of sPrP106 to
the cells or liposome suspensions placed in the cuvette. Each value is
the mean ± S.D. of at least four determinations.
Secondary Structure and Transmembrane Helix Predictions--
For
secondary structure prediction the Double Prediction Method was used
(18) (www.npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/). For prediction of membrane protein
topology the TMHMM method, based on a hidden Markov model
developed by Anders Krogh and Erik Sonnhammer, was applied (19)
(www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/).
 |
RESULTS |
Synthesis, Purification, and Characterization of
PrP106--
PrP106 was synthesized by Fmoc-based SSPS with some
modifications. It was necessary to introduce several double coupling
cycles to enhance the coupling efficiency because of the difficult
sequences identified by conductivity measurements. In addition, three
deprotection cycles were added after the coupling of each amino acid.
This step was found to improve the yield of the synthesis greatly.
A special strategy was adopted for the purification of sPrP106 from its
truncated forms, which were coeluting or eluting very closely to the
full-length protein (Fig. 1A).
The target protein was labeled with a specific and transient labeling,
a lipophilic Fmoc-based chromatographic probe. The probe reacted
efficiently with the free N terminus of the protein as checked by
ninhydrin reaction. It should be recalled that the N terminus of
sPrP106 is the only available site for the reaction because the N
termini of truncated peptides are acetylated in the capping step after each coupling cycle. On reverse phase HPLC the derivatized synthetic PrP106 (dsPrP106) eluted considerably later than the closely related impurities (Fig. 1B) and was monitored easily at 300 nm
(Fig. 1C). The purified dsPrP106 was characterized by MALDI
MS (Fig. 2A). The probe was
removed by basic hydrolysis with triethylamine and discharged simply by
extraction with diethyl ether, thus avoiding an additional
chromatographic step. Finally, the pure protein was characterized by
MALDI MS (Fig. 2B). The observed molecular masses of
dsPrP106 and sPrP106 were 11,998.6 and 11,572.6 Da, respectively, which
are in good agreement with the calculated molecular masses (12,001.7 and 11,570.1 Da).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Analytical reverse phase HPLC on
C18 media. A, crude material from the synthesis
of PrP106. directly after the cleavage from the resin, monitored at 214 nm. B, crude material from the synthesis of PrP106 after
derivatization with lipophilic probe and cleavage from the resin,
monitored at 214 nm. The arrow indicates the peak
correspondent to the derivatized peptide. C, same as
B but monitored at 300 nm.
|
|
sPrP106 Adopts a Stable
-Sheet-rich Secondary
Structure--
The secondary structure of sPrP106 in different
environments was investigated by CD spectroscopy in the far UV.
Measurements were performed at protein concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/ml. The protein adopted a stable conformation with high
percentage of
-sheet (around 40%, calculated with different
deconvolution programs), independently from its concentration (Fig.
3A), ionic strength (Fig.
3B), and time of incubation (Table I). All spectra showed
the characteristic
-sheet single minimum between 210 and 220 nm. The
secondary structure was not affected substantially by the addition of
20% TFE or liposomes to peptide solutions in 1 mM sodium
acetate, pH 5.5 (Fig. 3B). A similar result was observed when 20% TFE was added to sPrP106 dissolved in deionized water at a
concentration of 1 mg/ml (Table I). Conversely, at a low protein
concentration (0.1 mg/ml), the addition of 20, 40, or 60% TFE to
deionized water resulted in progressive increase in
-helical
structure (Fig. 3C and Table I); with high percentage of TFE
(40-60%), the 208 nm band clearly showed a larger intensity than the
222 nm band, a typical feature of a protein where
-helices and
-sheets are located in separate domains and do not intermix along
the polypeptide chain (20).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Far UV CD spectra. A, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 mg/ml sPrP106 in water. B, 0.1 mg/ml sPrP106 in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, in the same buffer + 20% TFE,
in the same buffer + liposomes, and in saline solution. C,
0.1 mg/ml sPrP106 in water + 20% TFE, in water + 40% TFE, in water + 60% TFE. D, 0.5 mg/ml sPrP106 denatured in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, + 8 M GdnHCl + 100 mM dithiothreitol and refolded in 20 mM sodium
acetate, pH 5.5, 0.5 mg/ml sPrP106 in 20 mM sodium acetate,
pH 5.5, without the denaturation and refolding process.
|
|
To verify whether the structural characteristics and stability of
sPrP106 were the result of intermolecular disulfide bridge formation
during the purification process, the protein was denatured with 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, + 8 M GdnHCl + 100 mM dithiothreitol and refolded after dialysis against 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5. The CD spectrum of refolded
sPrP106 was marked by a high
-sheet content, although a broader
minimum band was observed in the 210-220 nm region (Fig.
3D).
In addition to CD determinations, the Double Prediction Method (18) was
used for secondary structure prediction. The algorithm indicated that
the region of the protein comprising residues 138-217 has propensity
to acquire
-sheet structure (Fig.
4).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Primary structure of sPrP106 and predictions
of secondary structure and topology. The synthetic protein
corresponds to residues 89-140 and 177-230 of mouse PrP and contains
a deletion in the region 141-176. The protein differs from the wild
type at positions 108 and 111, where Met replaces Leu and Val,
respectively. These substitutions generate the epitope for the
monoclonal antibody 3F4. The PK-resistant fragment is defined by
bold and underlined letters. Corresponding to the
PrP106 sequence the secondary structure prediction is shown, where
t stands for -turn, c for random coil,
h for -helix, and e for extended strand. For
the secondary structure prediction the Double Prediction Method was
used (18). Results from the application of a membrane protein topology
prediction method (19), TMHMM, are also reported. The segment
designated with an m is a transmembrane helix; o
and i segments are extracellular and cytoplasmic domains,
respectively.
|
|
sPrP106 Contains a PK-resistant C-terminal Domain--
Experiments
of PK resistance were performed in different conditions. In a first set
of experiments sPrP106 was digested in the presence of detergents
(Nonidet P-40 and sodium deoxycholate) at increasing PK:protein ratios
from 1:320 to 1:3.2. The digestion products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and visualized by Coomassie staining or Western blotting using two
different antibodies. Fig. 5A
shows that an ~5-6-kDa resistant core, constituted probably by more
than one component, withstood digestion even at a PK:protein ratio of
1:3.2 after a 60-min incubation. The PK-resistant fragments were not
detected by Western blotting using monoclonal antibody 3F4 (Fig.
5B), whose epitope is located on the N-terminal segment of
the protein. Conversely, the antibody R340, which recognizes epitopes
on the C-terminal portion (beyond amino acid 134) of mouse PrP,
immunoreacted with the PK-resistant C-terminal fragments of sPrP106
(Fig. 5C).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
SDS-PAGE of the PK digestion products of
sPrP106 in 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, + 100 mM NaCl + 0.5% Nonidet P-40 + 0.5% sodium
deoxycholate. sPrP106 is shown in the absence of PK (lane
1), after incubation wih PK at 37 °C for 30 min (lanes
2-6), and for 60 min (lanes 7-9). The PK:protein
ratio was 1:320 (lane 2), 1:160 (lane 3), 1:32
(lanes 4 and 7), 1:16 (lanes 5 and
8), and 1:3.2 (lanes 6 and 9).
A, Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE. B, Western blot
analysis using monoclonal antibody 3F4. C, Western blot
analysis using polyclonal antibody R340.
|
|
The PK-resistant fragments were characterized by MALDI MS. To be able
to analyze the samples on MALDI MS directly, the digestion was carried
out in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, in the absence of
detergents. The information obtained from Western blot analysis, the
purity and the relatively small size of sPrP106, and the accuracy of
the mass measurements allowed us to identify unambiguously the sequence
of PK-resistant fragments. Already after a 30-min digestion, sPrP106
lost its N-terminal portion, generating peptides starting at Ser-134
and having a ragged C terminus corresponding to residues 224, 220, 218, 217, and 215 (Table II) in agreement with
published results obtained with rPrP106 (4). The most abundant fragment
was 134-224 after a 30-min incubation (data not shown) and 134-217
after 2 up to 5 h of PK digestion (Fig. 6).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
MALDI MS of the PK-resistant fragments after
a 5-h digestion in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, with E:S
1:50, at 37 °C, where peaks at m/z
5,326.3, 5,620.5, 5,751.5, 6,005.7, and 6,457.4 correspond,
respectively, to 134-215, 134-217, 134-218, 134-220, and 134-224
PK-resistant sPrP106 fragments.
|
|
sPrP106 Assembles in Branched Filamentous Structures--
The
nature of aggregates generated by sPrP106 was determined by electron
microscopy after negative and positive staining and by polarized light
microscopy after incubation with Congo red. The peptide was soluble in
deionized water, 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 5.5, and 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, at concentrations of up to 4 mg/ml. Under these conditions, a few spherical particles with a
diameter of 20-30 nm and poorly defined, short, filamentous structures
of irregular thickness ranging from 4 to 10 nm were observed by
electron microscopy after a 1-h incubation. These aggregates were not
birefringent after Congo red staining and increased significantly in
number during the first 24 h. No substantial modifications were
detected at longer times (up to a 7-day incubation) except for an
increased packing of aggregates; in particular, no amyloid-like fibrils
were ever observed. Enhancing the ionic strength by the addition of 120 mM NaCl to 1 mM sodium acetate buffer resulted
in increased aggregation of the peptide, without apparent modifications
of the structure and staining properties of the aggregates. On the
other hand, reduction and partial denaturation of sPrP106 followed by
refolding yielded an increase in thickness, length, and number of the
filamentous structures, which formed dense meshworks in the absence of
definite amyloid-like fibrils. Electron microscopic examination of the
pellets obtained by centrifugation of peptide suspensions after 7 days
allowed a better definition of the fine morphology of different types
of aggregates and the evaluation of their relative amount (Fig.
7, A-C). After incubation in
acidic water, 10 mM Tris·HCl (Fig. 7A), or 1 mM sodium acetate (data not shown), the preparations
contained comparable amounts of finely granular, osmiophilic material
and filamentous structures. The filaments had an irregular diameter
ranging from 4 to 10 nm (mean ± S.D. 7.3 ± 2.3) and a
length of 0.1-2 µm; they were usually twirled and branched and built
loose meshworks. After reduction, denaturation, and refolding, peptide
assemblies were more structured and better defined (Fig.
7C). They consisted of slightly curved, often branched
filaments with a diameter ranging from 8 to 22 nm (19.7 ± 3.7)
and a length ranging from 0.8 to 4 µm. The filaments had a
rosary-like profile without a clear twisting or crossover. Spherical
and ring-shaped structures, likely representing the cross-section of
single filaments, were also observed. Conversely, finely granular,
amorphous material was almost absent. After incubation in sodium
acetate containing 120 mM NaCl, the peptide aggregates showed intermediate features in that they consisted of very abundant, thin, short, often branched filaments with a diameter ranging from 5 to
12 nm (9.4 ± 2.6) and a length of 0.5 to 2 µm, mixed with a
small amount of finely granular, osmiophilic material (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Electron micrographs of the aggregates
generated in vitro by sPrP106 in different
conditions. Positively stained ultrathin sections of the pellets
obtained by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 15 min
after incubation of the peptide at 37 °C for 1 week in 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 5.5 (A), 1 mM
sodium acetate, pH 5.5, + 120 mM NaCl (B), and
deionized water (C) are shown. The sample in C
was subjected to reversible denaturation in 2 M GdnHCl + 100 mM dithiothreitol for 24 h followed by refolding
by dialysis against deionized water. Magnification bar, 100 nm.
|
|
sPrP106 Is Neurotoxic to Primary Rat Cortical Neurons--
To
evaluate the effects of sPrP106 on cell viability, primary rat cortical
neurons were exposed for 24 h (5 and 10 µM) or for 7 days (0.5-10 µM) to the synthetic protein. The 24-h
exposure did not affect the neuronal viability (data not shown),
whereas a statistically significant neurotoxic effect was detected
after the chronic treatment at the higher protein concentrations (Fig. 8). The cell viability was reduced by
about 40 and 60%, compared with the controls, with the exposure to
sPrP106 at 5 and 10 µM, respectively (Fig. 8).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The neurotoxic effect of sPrP106 on rat
primary cortical neurons was determined after 7 day of chronic exposure
to increasing concentrations of the protein, from 0.5 to 10 µM. Data are the mean ± S.E.
of four determinations (for 0.5 and 10 µM) and eight
determinations (for 1 and 5 µM); Asterisks (*)
indicate p < 0.01 versus control (Tukey's
test).
|
|
sPrP106 Increases Membrane Microviscosity--
The ability of
sPrP106 to affect membrane microviscosity was analyzed on suspensions
of primary rat cortical neurons after incubation with
1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene fluorescent probe. Table
III reports the FP value before and after
the addition of increasing concentrations of sPrP106. A striking,
dose-dependent rigidifying effect on nerve cell membranes
was detected at 5, 10, and 20 µM protein, with a 56, 64, and 105% increase in basal FP value, respectively. This effect was
higher than that observed with the synthetic peptide PrP106-126, which
yielded a 48% increase in membrane microviscosity at 25 µM. sPrP106 was also tested on artificial membranes of
different composition and charge, using 10 µM protein.
The rigidifying effect was consistent with neutral liposomes prepared
with PC:cholesterol (1:1) and PC:sphingomyelin (1:1) and negatively
charged PG:cholesterol (1:1) liposomes, with an increase in FP of 31, 45, and 24% of basal value, respectively. Conversely, the effect was
much lower (7% increase) with positively charged liposomes prepared
from PC:PA:cholesterol (1:1:1).
The membrane protein topology prediction method (19), TMHMM, gave a
high score for the insertion of sPrP106 in the membrane through a
transmembrane helix spanning residues 111-133, with the N-terminal
extracellular domain corresponding to residues 89-110 and the
C-terminal cytoplasmatic domain comprising residues 134-230 (Fig.
4).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Synthetic peptides derived from discrete PrP regions have been
used extensively to identify protein domains that could be involved in
the conformational transition of PrPC to PrPSc
and in disease pathogenesis (1). In particular, the peptide PrP106-126
was found to possess many of the PrPSc properties,
including the propensity to adopt a
-sheet conformation and form
amyloid fibrils, the partial resistance to PK digestion, and the
ability to induce nerve cell degeneration and glial cell activation
in vitro (1, 13, 21).
A major concern in using small PrP peptides is that they can adopt
conformations that may differ from their actual structure in the entire
protein. Moreover, although such peptides are very useful for cell
culture studies, they are not capable of inducing disease when
administered to animals. Supattapone et al. (3) showed that
the minimal sequence that sustains prion replication corresponds to a
redacted version of PrP lacking residues 23-88 and 141-176. This
peptide, termed PrP106 or miniprion, is currently regarded as an
excellent model to unravel both the conversion of PrPC to
PrPSc and prion pathogenesis.
Our decision to generate synthetic rather than recombinant PrP106 was
based on the assumption that accurate mechanistic studies can be
carried out only with a pure protein devoid of any cellular contaminant. This idea is substantiated by the knowledge that several
proteins with high affinity for PrPC or PrPSc
may play an important role in the conversion reaction and disease propagation (5). Ball et al. (7) have recently reported the
synthesis of PrP polypeptides by highly optimized
Fmoc/t-butoxycarbonyl protocols and chemical ligation. Our
procedure to generate relatively large amounts of sPrP106 was
straightforward and simple. Its strength resides in a special
purification strategy based on the use of a lipophilic chromatographic
probe (8), which enables us to purify the full-length protein from the
side products by a single chromatographic step. This fact minimizes the
losses and compensates for the low yield of the chemical synthesis of a
long polypeptide by classical Fmoc-based SSPS. Following this strategy,
the overall yield of PrP106 was ~ 5%, which is satisfying for
an easy-to-aggregate PrP polypeptide.
sPrP106 showed interesting biochemical features. First, the protein had
a high propensity to adopt a secondary structure with high
-sheet
content. The amount of
-sheet was similar in different conditions,
at variance with PrP106-126, which shows an
environmental-dependent conformational polymorphism.
Furthermore, the behavior of the synthetic protein was slightly
different from that of its recombinant counterpart, rPrP106 (4). In
fact, sPrP106 exhibited a well ordered structure already at a low
concentration (0.1 mg/ml, i.e. 8.6 µM) in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, whereas rPrP106 was found to
undergo a concentration-dependent conformational transition from an unfolded monomeric state to an ordered
-sheet multimeric assembly in the range of 30-100 µM (4). Second, sPrP106
contains a C-terminal domain, which is notably insensitive to PK
degradation. Even at stringent conditions of PK:protein ratio and
prolonged digestion times, a protease-resistant core composed mainly of a fragment spanning residues 134-217 was consistently detected. The
results from CD determination and PK digestion suggest that the
tertiary structure of sPrP106 may consist of a flexible N-terminal domain and a C-terminal
-sheet domain starting approximately at
Ser-134. This hypothetical structure is supported by the algorithm of
the Double Prediction Method (18).
The macromolecular assemblies generated by sPrP106 in different
conditions were analyzed by electron microscopy. Protein suspensions in
aqueous solutions contained a few spherical particles with a diameter
of 20-30 nm, short filamentous structures of irregular thickness
ranging from 4 to 10 nm, and amorphous granular material. The
heterogeneity of sPrP106 aggregates was no longer observed when the
protein was subjected to reversible denaturation followed by refolding.
Under these conditions, the preparations essentially contained branched
filaments with a relatively regular, rosary-like profile and a diameter
ranging from 8 to 22 nm. The filamentous aggregates were not
birefringent under polarized light after Congo red staining. It remains
possible that further manipulations, such as reducing conditions, low
pH, partially denaturing environments (0.5-1 M GdnHCl)
could favor the formation of amyloid-like fibrils (22, 23).
Nonetheless, the formation of ordered but not amyloid-like structures
might be compatible with the peculiar parallel
-helix fold, which is
the feature of PrPSc106 crystals as shown recently by
electron crystallography studies (24).
Evidence suggests that the neuropathological changes observed in prion
diseases are caused, at least in part, by the accumulation of
PrPSc. This view is supported by the observation that the
protease-resistant core of PrPSc has a variety of
pathogenic effects in vitro, including neurotoxicity and the
ability to interact with plasma membrane, yielding increased microviscosity. Similar effects have been observed with short synthetic
peptides, in particular with PrP106-126. Our study shows that sPrP106
not only maintains these properties, but it is more effective than
PrP106-126. In fact, the concentrations required to obtain the same
extent of nerve cell death and a similar increase in membrane
microviscosity were five times lower with sPrP106 than with PrP106-126
(13, 16). At variance with PrP106-126, the interaction of sPrP106 with
multilamellar vesicles was influenced by their net charge and
composition (12). This is likely related to a distinctive interaction
of sPrP106 with membranes rather than to the net charge of the
polypeptides because sPrP106 and PrP106-126 are both positive. sPrP106
contains the membrane spanning domain (roughly residues 113-135) of
PrP (25, 26). Interestingly, the application of a membrane protein
topology prediction method (19), TMHMM, indicated that sPrP106
possesses the characteristics to insert into the membrane through a
transmembrane helix spanning residues 111-133.
In conclusion, our study shows that sPrP106 readily adopts a stable
-sheet conformation, contains a protease-resistant core, assembles
in relatively regular filamentous structures, is highly neurotoxic, and
interacts with membranes inducing a remarkable increase in
microviscosity. These properties make sPrP106 a promising model for
investigating the PrPC
PrPSc conversion
process and disease pathogenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank P. Mascagni for supplying the
lipophilic probe for sPrP106 purification and for fruitful suggestions
and C. Weissmann and R. Kasaks for kindly providing the R340 and 3F4
antibodies, respectively.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Telethon-Italy Grants 466/bi (to
V. B.) and 83CP (to R. C.), Italian Ministry of Health Grant RF99.38, Italian Ministry of University and Research Grant PRIN2001, and European Union Grants QLRT 01-00283, BMH4 98-605, and QLTR-2000-02353.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Assistant Telethon Scientist (DTI, Fondazione Telethon). To
whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 39-023-901-4548; Fax: 39-023-546-277; E-mail: bonetto@marionegri.it.
**
Assistant Telethon Scientist (DTI, Fondazione Telethon).
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 10, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203275200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PrP, prion protein;
PrP106, PrP-derived construct of 106 amino acids;
PrPC, cellular isoform of PrP;
PrPSc, scrapie isoform of PrP;
dsPrP106, derivatized synthetic PrP106;
rPrP106, recombinant PrP106;
sPrP106, synthetic PrP106;
DCM, dichloromethane;
Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl;
FP, fluorescence
polarization;
GdnHCl, guanidine hydrochloride;
HPLC, high
performance liquid chromatography;
MALDI MS, matrix-assisted
laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry;
PA, phosphatidic acid;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
PG, phosphatidylglycerol;
PK, proteinase K;
SSPS, stepwise solid phase synthesis;
TFA, trifluoroacetic acid;
TFE, trifluoroethanol.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Tagliavini, F.,
Forloni, G.,
D'Ursi, P.,
Bugiani, O.,
and Salmona, M.
(2001)
Adv. Protein Chem.
57,
171-201[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Muramoto, T.,
Scott, M.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
15457-15462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Supattapone, S.,
Bosque, P.,
Muramoto, T.,
Wille, H.,
Aagaard, C.,
Peretz, D.,
Nguyen, H. O.,
Heinrich, C.,
Torchia, M.,
Safar, J.,
Cohen, F. E.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Scott, M.
(1999)
Cell
96,
869-878[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Baskakov, I. V.,
Aagaard, C.,
Mehlhorn, I.,
Wille, H.,
Groth, D.,
Baldwin, M. A.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Cohen, F. E.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
2792-2804[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Prusiner, S. B.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13363-13383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Dawson, P. E.,
Muir, T. W.,
Clark-Lewis, I.,
and Kent, S. B.
(1994)
Science
266,
776-779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Ball, H. L.,
King, D. S.,
Cohen, F. E.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Baldwin, M. A.
(2001)
J. Pept. Res.
58,
357-374[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Ball, H. L.,
and Mascagni, P.
(1992)
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
40,
370-379[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Sarin, V. K.,
Kent, S. B.,
Tam, J. P.,
and Merrifield, R. B.
(1981)
Anal. Biochem.
117,
147-157[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Sreerama, N.,
and Woody, R. W.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
242,
497-507[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Manavalan, P.,
and Johnson, W. C.. Jr.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
167,
76-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
De Gioia, L.,
Selvaggini, C.,
Ghibaudi, E.,
Diomede, L.,
Bugiani, O.,
Forloni, G.,
Tagliavini, F.,
and Salmona, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7859-7862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Forloni, G.,
Angeretti, N.,
Chiesa, R.,
Monzani, E.,
Salmona, M.,
Bugiani, O.,
and Tagliavini, F.
(1993)
Nature
362,
543-546[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Manthorpe, M.,
Fagnani, R.,
Skaper, S. D.,
and Varon, S.
(1986)
Brain Res.
390,
191-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Diomede, L.,
Sozzani, S.,
Luini, W.,
Algeri, M., De,
Gioia, L.,
Chiesa, R.,
Lievens, P. M.,
Bugiani, O.,
Forloni, G.,
Tagliavini, F.,
and Salmona, M.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
320,
563-570
|
| 16.
|
Salmona, M.,
Forloni, G.,
Diomede, L.,
Algeri, M., De,
Gioia, L.,
Angeretti, N.,
Giaccone, G.,
Tagliavini, F.,
and Bugiani, O.
(1997)
Neurobiol. Dis.
4,
47-57[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Shinitzky, M.,
and Barenholz, Y.
(1978)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
515,
367-394[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Deleage, G.,
and Roux, B.
(1987)
Protein Eng.
1,
289-294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Krogh, A.,
Larsson, B.,
von Heijne, G.,
and Sonnhammer, E. L.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
305,
567-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Manavalan, P.,
and Johnson, W. C., Jr.
(1983)
Nature
305,
831-832[CrossRef]
|
| 21.
|
Kourie, J. I.
(2001)
Chem. Biol. Interact.
138,
1-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Jackson, G. S.,
Hosszu, L. L.,
Power, A.,
Hill, A. F.,
Kenney, J.,
Saibil, H.,
Craven, C. J.,
Waltho, J. P.,
Clarke, A. R.,
and Collinge, J.
(1999)
Science
283,
1935-1937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Morillas, M.,
Vanik, D. L.,
and Surewicz, W. K.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
6982-6987[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Wille, H.,
Michelitsch, M. D.,
Guénebaut, V.,
Supattapone, S.,
Serban, A.,
Cohen, F. E.,
Agard, D. A.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99,
3563-3568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Hegde, R. S.,
Mastrianni, J. A.,
Scott, M. R.,
DeFea, K. A.,
Tremblay, P.,
Torchia, M.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Lingappa, V. R.
(1998)
Science
279,
827-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Tompa, P.,
Tusnady, G. E.,
Cserzo, M.,
and Simon, I.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
4431-4443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bate and A. Williams
Role of glycosylphosphatidylinositols in the activation of phospholipase A2 and the neurotoxicity of prions
J. Gen. Virol.,
December 1, 2004;
85(12):
3797 - 3804.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bate, M. Salmona, L. Diomede, and A. Williams
Squalestatin Cures Prion-infected Neurons and Protects Against Prion Neurotoxicity
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 9, 2004;
279(15):
14983 - 14990.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Bahadi, P. V. Farrelly, B. L. Kenna, J. I. Kourie, F. Tagliavini, G. Forloni, and M. Salmona
Channels formed with a mutant prion protein PrP(82-146) homologous to a 7-kDa fragment in diseased brain of GSS patients
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
October 1, 2003;
285(4):
C862 - C872.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|