JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203275200 on June 10, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 31327-31334, August 30, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/35/31327    most recent
M203275200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonetto, V.
Right arrow Articles by Salmona, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonetto, V.
Right arrow Articles by Salmona, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Synthetic Miniprion PrP106*

Valentina BonettoDagger §dagger , Tania Massignan§, Roberto ChiesaDagger ||**dagger , Michela MorbinDagger Dagger , Giulia MazzoleniDagger Dagger , Luisa Diomede§, Nadia Angeretti||, Laura Colombo§, Gianluigi Forloni||, Fabrizio TagliaviniDagger Dagger , and Mario Salmona§

From the Dagger  Dulbecco Telethon Institute (DTI), § Department of Molecular Biochemistry and Pharmacology, || Department of Neuroscience, dagger  Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, via Eritrea 62, Milan 20157 and the Dagger Dagger  Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Celoria 11, Milan 20133, Italy

Received for publication, April 5, 2002, and in revised form, May 28, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Elucidation of structure and biological properties of the prion protein scrapie (PrPSc) is fundamental to an understanding of the mechanism of conformational transition of cellular (PrPC) into disease-specific isoforms and the pathogenesis of prion diseases. Unfortunately, the insolubility and heterogeneity of PrPSc have limited these studies. The observation that a construct of 106 amino acids (termed PrP106 or miniprion), derived from mouse PrP and containing two deletions (Delta 23-88, Delta 141-176), becomes protease-resistant when expressed in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cells and sustains prion replication when expressed in PrP0/0 mice prompted us to generate a corresponding synthetic peptide (sPrP106) to be used for biochemical and cell culture studies. sPrP106 was obtained successfully with a straightforward procedure, which combines classical stepwise solid phase synthesis with a purification strategy based on transient labeling with a lipophilic chromatographic probe. sPrP106 readily adopted a beta -sheet structure, aggregated into branched filamentous structures without ultrastructural and tinctorial properties of amyloid, exhibited a proteinase K-resistant domain spanning residues 134-217, was highly toxic to primary neuronal cultures, and induced a remarkable increase in membrane microviscosity. These features are central properties of PrPSc and make sPrP106 an excellent tool for investigating the molecular basis of the conformational conversion of PrPC into PrPSc and prion disease pathogenesis.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Prion-related encephalopathies are characterized by the accumulation of pathogenic forms of the prion protein (PrP),1 termed PrP scrapie (PrPSc), in the central nervous system. Unlike the normal cellular isoform (PrPC), PrPSc has a high content of beta -sheet secondary structure, is insoluble in nondenaturing detergents and partially resistant to protease digestion, and has the propensity to form amyloid fibrils. Elucidation of the structure of both PrP isoforms is fundamental to an understanding of the molecular mechanism of the conformational transition from PrPC to PrPSc. Unfortunately, structural studies of the pathogenic form have been hampered by the insolubility, heterogeneity, and complexity of PrPSc preparations. Synthetic and recombinant fragments of PrP have been more useful for such investigations (1). A construct of 106 amino acids (designated as PrP106 or miniprion), derived from mouse PrP and containing two deletions (Delta 23-88, Delta 141-176), was expressed in scrapie-infected neuroblastoma cells generating a protease-resistant polypeptide, displaying better solubility than PrPSc (2). PrP106 has been found to sustain prion replication when expressed in transgenic mice with a PrP knockout genetic background (3). Recombinant PrP106 (rPrP106) shows properties similar to those of PrPSc106 extracted from scrapie-infected PrP106 transgenic mice, such as high beta -sheet content, resistance to limited digestion by proteinase K (PK), and high thermodynamic stability (4). These observations have emphasized the importance of studying the structure and biology of PrP106, which can be considered a model of protein folding intermediates that feature in PrPC to PrPSc conversion.

In the present study, we report the synthesis, physicochemical properties, and in vitro neurotoxicity of PrP106. Synthetic proteins are devoid of any biological contaminant and are especially desirable for biological assays. In prion research, homogeneity of the protein studied has a particular relevance because it has been discussed in the role of potential cofactors, such as protein X, in PrPC to PrPSc conversion (5). In addition, modified amino acids can be introduced easily into specific sites of the primary structure of synthetic proteins to facilitate structural and functional studies. However, classical stepwise solid phase synthesis (SSPS) is not convenient for the production of long polypeptides because of the progressive decrease of synthetic efficiency with the increase of the number of amino acids. This leads to difficult or almost impossible purification of the full-length protein from its truncated side products. To overcome these problems, new sophisticated but laborious chemistries, such as native chemical ligation, have been developed for total synthesis of wild type and engineered proteins (6, 7).

Here we describe a straightforward protocol to produce relatively large amounts of PrP106, combining classical SSPS with a special purification strategy based on specific and transient labeling of the polypeptide with a lipophilic chromatographic probe (8). Furthermore, we found that synthetic PrP106 (sPrP106) possesses physicochemical and biological properties similar to those of PrPSc. Accordingly, this synthetic miniprion is an excellent tool for investigating the molecular basis of the conformational conversion of PrPC into PrPSc and the biology of prion diseases.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Peptide Synthesis, Derivatization, and Purification-- PrP106 (GQGGGTHNQWNKPSKPKTNMKHMAGAAAAGAVVGGLGGYMLGSAMSRPMIHFDCVNITIKQHTVTTTTKGENFTETDVKMMERVVEQ- MCVTQYQKESQAYYDGRRS) was synthesized by SSPS on an automated Applied Biosystems synthesizer model 433A at 0.1 mM scale with p-hydroxymethylphenoxymethyl resin from Fmoc-protected L- amino acid derivatives. Amino acids were activated by reaction with N-[(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)(dimethylamino)methylene]-N-methylmethanaminium hexafluorophosphate N-oxide and N,N-diisopropylethylamine. A capping step with acetic anhydride after the last coupling cycle of each amino acid was included.

PrP106 still attached to the resin was derivatized at the N terminus with a lipophilic probe (4-dodecylaminocarbonylfluorene-9-ylmethyl succinimidyl carbonate) following the method described by Ball and Mascagni (8) with some modifications. Briefly, 4 equivalents of the probe was dissolved at a concentration of 0.2 M in trifluoroethanol (TFE):dichloromethane (DCM) (1:3 v/v) and added to the polypeptidyl resin suspended in DCM. The reaction mix was incubated for 2 h, and the completion of the reaction was determined by the ninhydrin test (9).

After evaporation of the DCM under a stream of nitrogen, the peptide was cleaved from the resin with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA):thioanisole:water:phenol:ethanedithiol (82.5:5:5:5:2.5 v/v), precipitated, and washed with diethyl ether. The precipitate was further washed with acetonitrile:water (7:3), dissolved in 60% formic acid, and purified by reverse phase HPLC on a semipreparative C4 column (Symmetry 300, 19 × 150 mm, particle size 7 µm, Waters), with a mobile phase of 0.1% TFA:water (eluent A) and 0.08% TFA:acetonitrile (eluent B) using a linear gradient of 15-50% eluent B in 40 min. The 300 nm-absorbing peak was collected and characterized by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry (MS). The pooled fractions containing the homogeneous labeled miniprion were lyophilyzed. The probe was removed by a 2-h treatment with 10% triethylamine in acetonitrile:water (1:1). After lyophilization, the peptide was dissolved in concentrated TFA and precipitated with diethyl ether. The pellet was redissolved in acetonitrile:water (1:1) and relyophilized. Typically this produces about 50 mg of pure sPrP106, representing an overall yield of ~5%.

Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy-- CD spectra were recorded with a Jasco J-710 CD spectrometer (Jasco, Easton, MD) scanning spectra at a speed of 20 nm/min, with a bandwidth of 2 nm and a step resolution of 0.2-1 nm using quartz cells with an optical path of 0.1 cm. Aliquots of lyophilized sPrP106 were dissolved in deionized water; 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5; saline; 1 mM sodium acetate containing liposomes or 20% TFE; or deionized water containing 20, 40, or 60% TFE, at a concentration of 0.05-1 mg/ml as specified in Table I. Protein solutions were incubated at room temperature for different times (from 1 h to 1 week) before measurement. No substantial variations were observed at different incubation times. Background spectra were subtracted, and the data were converted to molar ellipticity. Each spectrum shown is the result of the accumulation of four or five individual spectra. The secondary structure content was calculated using a program DICROPROT version 2.5, which contains a least square method based on the Gauss-Jordan elimination (10), the self-consistent method, and the variable selection method (11).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Percentage of sPrP106 secondary structure in various conditions

Liposome Preparation-- Multilamellar vesicles of different composition were prepared as described previously (12). Phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidic acid (PA), sphingomyelin, and cholesterol purchased from Sigma were mixed at the following molar ratios: PC:cholesterol (1:1), PC:sphingomyelin (1:1), PC:PA:cholesterol (1:1:1), and PG:cholesterol (1:1). For the experiments liposomes were resuspended in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5. CD experiments were performed after the addition of liposome suspensions to sPrP106 solution in the same buffer, to obtain a final peptide concentration of 0.1 mg/ml and a protein:lipid molar ratio of 1:25.

Proteinase K Digestion-- sPrP106 was digested with PK in the presence or absence of detergents. In a first set of experiments, 0.2 mg/ml protein was incubated in 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate at 37 °C up to 1 h. The PK:protein ratios employed were 1:320, 1:160, 1:32, 1:16, and 1:3.2. The reaction was stopped by adding phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to a final concentration of 5 mM. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie staining or by Western blotting using monoclonal antibody 3F4 and polyclonal antibody R340. Alternatively, 1 mg/ml protein was incubated at 37 °C in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, with an enzyme:protein ratio of 1:50. During PK digestion, aliquots were taken every 30 min up to 5 h. After addition of an equal volume of 1% TFA, the samples were analyzed by MALDI MS.

MALDI MS-- Fragments or full-length sPrP106 was analyzed by a Bruker BiflexTM or a Reflex IIITM MALDI mass spectrometer. A few µl of the sample was mixed with an equal volume of a saturated solution of sinapinic acid (Sigma) in acetonitrile + 0.1% TFA (1:3 v:v), and 1 µl of the mixture was deposited on the MALDI target.

Electron Microscopy-- Aliquots of lyophilized PrP106 were suspended in aqueous solutions with different pH values and ionic strengths at a final concentration of 0.1 and 0.3 mM. The solvents included deionized water, pH 5.0; 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 5.5; 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5; and 1 mM sodium acetate + 120 mM NaCl, pH 5.5. In some experiments, the peptide was subjected to reduction and partial denaturation in 10 mM Tris·HCl, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2 M GdnHCl, pH 5.5, for 24 h, followed by refolding by dialysis against deionized water before analysis. After incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, 48 h, and 7 days, 10 µl of each sample was air dried on gelatin-coated slides, stained with Congo red, and viewed under polarized light. Samples for ultrastructural examination were taken after short (1, 4, or 8 h) and long (1, 2, 3, or 7 days) incubation. At each time point, 5 µl of suspension was applied onto Formvar-carbon 200 mesh nickel grids for 5 min and negatively stained with freshly filtered uranyl acetate. After drying, samples were observed with an electron microscope (EM109 Zeiss, Oberkoken, Germany) operated at 80 kV at a standard magnification of 30,000. The magnification was calibrated using an appropriate grid. At day 7, samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min. The pellet was fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.05% phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, postfixed in osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in graded acetone, and embedded in epoxy resin (Spurr, Electron Microscopy Science, Fort Washington, PA). Ultrathin sections (500 Å) were collected on 200 mesh copper grids, positively stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed with the electron microscope. The mean diameter and length were measured on printed photographs at a final magnification of 90,000 using a computer-assisted image analyzer (Nikon Corporation, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokio, Japan).

Neurotoxicity-- Primary cultures of rat cortical neurons were prepared as described previously (13). Briefly, brains were removed from fetal rats on embryonic day 17. Cortical cells were dissociated and plated at the density of 5 × 105 cells/well. The cells were cultured in basal Eagle's medium (Hanks' salt, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen) and 2 mM glutamine. sPrP106 was dissolved in deionized water and added to the medium for the acute treatment (final concentration 5 and 10 µM), on day 5 of culture, and the cell viability was determined 24 h later. For the chronic treatment SPrP 106 was added to the medium on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture, reaching final concentrations of 0.5, 1. 5, and 10 µM in the well, and the cell viability was determined at day 7. Cell viability was assessed quantitatively by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide method (14) with an automated microplate reader (PerkinElmer Life Sciences lambda reader).

Microviscosity-- Membrane microviscosity was assessed in suspensions of rat primary neurons and liposomes using 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene as a fluorescent probe as described previously (15, 16). The reported fluorescence polarization (FP) value is a function of the emission (420 nm) detected through an analyzer oriented parallel (p1) and perpendicular (p2) to the direction of the polarization of the exciting light (365 nm), according to the equation FP = (p2p1)/(p2 + p1) (17). Membrane microviscosity (eta , poise) is related to FP according to the formula eta  = 2p/(0.46 - p) (17). Neuronal cells were detached mechanically, centrifuged gently at 550 × g for 10 min, washed with saline, resuspended in 2.5 ml of 2 µM 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene in 5 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The FP value (expressed as arbitrary units) was determined at 25 °C, before and 10 min after the addition of an increasing concentration of sPrP106 to the cells or liposome suspensions placed in the cuvette. Each value is the mean ± S.D. of at least four determinations.

Secondary Structure and Transmembrane Helix Predictions-- For secondary structure prediction the Double Prediction Method was used (18) (www.npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/). For prediction of membrane protein topology the TMHMM method, based on a hidden Markov model developed by Anders Krogh and Erik Sonnhammer, was applied (19) (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Synthesis, Purification, and Characterization of PrP106-- PrP106 was synthesized by Fmoc-based SSPS with some modifications. It was necessary to introduce several double coupling cycles to enhance the coupling efficiency because of the difficult sequences identified by conductivity measurements. In addition, three deprotection cycles were added after the coupling of each amino acid. This step was found to improve the yield of the synthesis greatly.

A special strategy was adopted for the purification of sPrP106 from its truncated forms, which were coeluting or eluting very closely to the full-length protein (Fig. 1A). The target protein was labeled with a specific and transient labeling, a lipophilic Fmoc-based chromatographic probe. The probe reacted efficiently with the free N terminus of the protein as checked by ninhydrin reaction. It should be recalled that the N terminus of sPrP106 is the only available site for the reaction because the N termini of truncated peptides are acetylated in the capping step after each coupling cycle. On reverse phase HPLC the derivatized synthetic PrP106 (dsPrP106) eluted considerably later than the closely related impurities (Fig. 1B) and was monitored easily at 300 nm (Fig. 1C). The purified dsPrP106 was characterized by MALDI MS (Fig. 2A). The probe was removed by basic hydrolysis with triethylamine and discharged simply by extraction with diethyl ether, thus avoiding an additional chromatographic step. Finally, the pure protein was characterized by MALDI MS (Fig. 2B). The observed molecular masses of dsPrP106 and sPrP106 were 11,998.6 and 11,572.6 Da, respectively, which are in good agreement with the calculated molecular masses (12,001.7 and 11,570.1 Da).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Analytical reverse phase HPLC on C18 media. A, crude material from the synthesis of PrP106. directly after the cleavage from the resin, monitored at 214 nm. B, crude material from the synthesis of PrP106 after derivatization with lipophilic probe and cleavage from the resin, monitored at 214 nm. The arrow indicates the peak correspondent to the derivatized peptide. C, same as B but monitored at 300 nm.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   MALDI MS of purified dsPrP106 (A) and sPrP106 after removal of the chromatographic probe (B).

sPrP106 Adopts a Stable beta -Sheet-rich Secondary Structure-- The secondary structure of sPrP106 in different environments was investigated by CD spectroscopy in the far UV. Measurements were performed at protein concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/ml. The protein adopted a stable conformation with high percentage of beta -sheet (around 40%, calculated with different deconvolution programs), independently from its concentration (Fig. 3A), ionic strength (Fig. 3B), and time of incubation (Table I). All spectra showed the characteristic beta -sheet single minimum between 210 and 220 nm. The secondary structure was not affected substantially by the addition of 20% TFE or liposomes to peptide solutions in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5 (Fig. 3B). A similar result was observed when 20% TFE was added to sPrP106 dissolved in deionized water at a concentration of 1 mg/ml (Table I). Conversely, at a low protein concentration (0.1 mg/ml), the addition of 20, 40, or 60% TFE to deionized water resulted in progressive increase in alpha -helical structure (Fig. 3C and Table I); with high percentage of TFE (40-60%), the 208 nm band clearly showed a larger intensity than the 222 nm band, a typical feature of a protein where alpha -helices and beta -sheets are located in separate domains and do not intermix along the polypeptide chain (20).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Far UV CD spectra. A, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 mg/ml sPrP106 in water. B, 0.1 mg/ml sPrP106 in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, in the same buffer + 20% TFE, in the same buffer + liposomes, and in saline solution. C, 0.1 mg/ml sPrP106 in water + 20% TFE, in water + 40% TFE, in water + 60% TFE. D, 0.5 mg/ml sPrP106 denatured in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, + 8 M GdnHCl + 100 mM dithiothreitol and refolded in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 0.5 mg/ml sPrP106 in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, without the denaturation and refolding process.

To verify whether the structural characteristics and stability of sPrP106 were the result of intermolecular disulfide bridge formation during the purification process, the protein was denatured with 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, + 8 M GdnHCl + 100 mM dithiothreitol and refolded after dialysis against 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5. The CD spectrum of refolded sPrP106 was marked by a high beta -sheet content, although a broader minimum band was observed in the 210-220 nm region (Fig. 3D).

In addition to CD determinations, the Double Prediction Method (18) was used for secondary structure prediction. The algorithm indicated that the region of the protein comprising residues 138-217 has propensity to acquire beta -sheet structure (Fig. 4).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Primary structure of sPrP106 and predictions of secondary structure and topology. The synthetic protein corresponds to residues 89-140 and 177-230 of mouse PrP and contains a deletion in the region 141-176. The protein differs from the wild type at positions 108 and 111, where Met replaces Leu and Val, respectively. These substitutions generate the epitope for the monoclonal antibody 3F4. The PK-resistant fragment is defined by bold and underlined letters. Corresponding to the PrP106 sequence the secondary structure prediction is shown, where t stands for beta -turn, c for random coil, h for alpha -helix, and e for extended strand. For the secondary structure prediction the Double Prediction Method was used (18). Results from the application of a membrane protein topology prediction method (19), TMHMM, are also reported. The segment designated with an m is a transmembrane helix; o and i segments are extracellular and cytoplasmic domains, respectively.

sPrP106 Contains a PK-resistant C-terminal Domain-- Experiments of PK resistance were performed in different conditions. In a first set of experiments sPrP106 was digested in the presence of detergents (Nonidet P-40 and sodium deoxycholate) at increasing PK:protein ratios from 1:320 to 1:3.2. The digestion products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie staining or Western blotting using two different antibodies. Fig. 5A shows that an ~5-6-kDa resistant core, constituted probably by more than one component, withstood digestion even at a PK:protein ratio of 1:3.2 after a 60-min incubation. The PK-resistant fragments were not detected by Western blotting using monoclonal antibody 3F4 (Fig. 5B), whose epitope is located on the N-terminal segment of the protein. Conversely, the antibody R340, which recognizes epitopes on the C-terminal portion (beyond amino acid 134) of mouse PrP, immunoreacted with the PK-resistant C-terminal fragments of sPrP106 (Fig. 5C).


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   SDS-PAGE of the PK digestion products of sPrP106 in 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, + 100 mM NaCl + 0.5% Nonidet P-40 + 0.5% sodium deoxycholate. sPrP106 is shown in the absence of PK (lane 1), after incubation wih PK at 37 °C for 30 min (lanes 2-6), and for 60 min (lanes 7-9). The PK:protein ratio was 1:320 (lane 2), 1:160 (lane 3), 1:32 (lanes 4 and 7), 1:16 (lanes 5 and 8), and 1:3.2 (lanes 6 and 9). A, Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE. B, Western blot analysis using monoclonal antibody 3F4. C, Western blot analysis using polyclonal antibody R340.

The PK-resistant fragments were characterized by MALDI MS. To be able to analyze the samples on MALDI MS directly, the digestion was carried out in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, in the absence of detergents. The information obtained from Western blot analysis, the purity and the relatively small size of sPrP106, and the accuracy of the mass measurements allowed us to identify unambiguously the sequence of PK-resistant fragments. Already after a 30-min digestion, sPrP106 lost its N-terminal portion, generating peptides starting at Ser-134 and having a ragged C terminus corresponding to residues 224, 220, 218, 217, and 215 (Table II) in agreement with published results obtained with rPrP106 (4). The most abundant fragment was 134-224 after a 30-min incubation (data not shown) and 134-217 after 2 up to 5 h of PK digestion (Fig. 6).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Identification of PK-resistant sPrP106 fragments


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   MALDI MS of the PK-resistant fragments after a 5-h digestion in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, with E:S 1:50, at 37 °C, where peaks at m/z 5,326.3, 5,620.5, 5,751.5, 6,005.7, and 6,457.4 correspond, respectively, to 134-215, 134-217, 134-218, 134-220, and 134-224 PK-resistant sPrP106 fragments.

sPrP106 Assembles in Branched Filamentous Structures-- The nature of aggregates generated by sPrP106 was determined by electron microscopy after negative and positive staining and by polarized light microscopy after incubation with Congo red. The peptide was soluble in deionized water, 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 5.5, and 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, at concentrations of up to 4 mg/ml. Under these conditions, a few spherical particles with a diameter of 20-30 nm and poorly defined, short, filamentous structures of irregular thickness ranging from 4 to 10 nm were observed by electron microscopy after a 1-h incubation. These aggregates were not birefringent after Congo red staining and increased significantly in number during the first 24 h. No substantial modifications were detected at longer times (up to a 7-day incubation) except for an increased packing of aggregates; in particular, no amyloid-like fibrils were ever observed. Enhancing the ionic strength by the addition of 120 mM NaCl to 1 mM sodium acetate buffer resulted in increased aggregation of the peptide, without apparent modifications of the structure and staining properties of the aggregates. On the other hand, reduction and partial denaturation of sPrP106 followed by refolding yielded an increase in thickness, length, and number of the filamentous structures, which formed dense meshworks in the absence of definite amyloid-like fibrils. Electron microscopic examination of the pellets obtained by centrifugation of peptide suspensions after 7 days allowed a better definition of the fine morphology of different types of aggregates and the evaluation of their relative amount (Fig. 7, A-C). After incubation in acidic water, 10 mM Tris·HCl (Fig. 7A), or 1 mM sodium acetate (data not shown), the preparations contained comparable amounts of finely granular, osmiophilic material and filamentous structures. The filaments had an irregular diameter ranging from 4 to 10 nm (mean ± S.D. 7.3 ± 2.3) and a length of 0.1-2 µm; they were usually twirled and branched and built loose meshworks. After reduction, denaturation, and refolding, peptide assemblies were more structured and better defined (Fig. 7C). They consisted of slightly curved, often branched filaments with a diameter ranging from 8 to 22 nm (19.7 ± 3.7) and a length ranging from 0.8 to 4 µm. The filaments had a rosary-like profile without a clear twisting or crossover. Spherical and ring-shaped structures, likely representing the cross-section of single filaments, were also observed. Conversely, finely granular, amorphous material was almost absent. After incubation in sodium acetate containing 120 mM NaCl, the peptide aggregates showed intermediate features in that they consisted of very abundant, thin, short, often branched filaments with a diameter ranging from 5 to 12 nm (9.4 ± 2.6) and a length of 0.5 to 2 µm, mixed with a small amount of finely granular, osmiophilic material (Fig. 7B).


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Electron micrographs of the aggregates generated in vitro by sPrP106 in different conditions. Positively stained ultrathin sections of the pellets obtained by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 15 min after incubation of the peptide at 37 °C for 1 week in 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 5.5 (A), 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, + 120 mM NaCl (B), and deionized water (C) are shown. The sample in C was subjected to reversible denaturation in 2 M GdnHCl + 100 mM dithiothreitol for 24 h followed by refolding by dialysis against deionized water. Magnification bar, 100 nm.

sPrP106 Is Neurotoxic to Primary Rat Cortical Neurons-- To evaluate the effects of sPrP106 on cell viability, primary rat cortical neurons were exposed for 24 h (5 and 10 µM) or for 7 days (0.5-10 µM) to the synthetic protein. The 24-h exposure did not affect the neuronal viability (data not shown), whereas a statistically significant neurotoxic effect was detected after the chronic treatment at the higher protein concentrations (Fig. 8). The cell viability was reduced by about 40 and 60%, compared with the controls, with the exposure to sPrP106 at 5 and 10 µM, respectively (Fig. 8).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   The neurotoxic effect of sPrP106 on rat primary cortical neurons was determined after 7 day of chronic exposure to increasing concentrations of the protein, from 0.5 to 10 µM. Data are the mean ± S.E. of four determinations (for 0.5 and 10 µM) and eight determinations (for 1 and 5 µM); Asterisks (*) indicate p < 0.01 versus control (Tukey's test).

sPrP106 Increases Membrane Microviscosity-- The ability of sPrP106 to affect membrane microviscosity was analyzed on suspensions of primary rat cortical neurons after incubation with 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene fluorescent probe. Table III reports the FP value before and after the addition of increasing concentrations of sPrP106. A striking, dose-dependent rigidifying effect on nerve cell membranes was detected at 5, 10, and 20 µM protein, with a 56, 64, and 105% increase in basal FP value, respectively. This effect was higher than that observed with the synthetic peptide PrP106-126, which yielded a 48% increase in membrane microviscosity at 25 µM. sPrP106 was also tested on artificial membranes of different composition and charge, using 10 µM protein. The rigidifying effect was consistent with neutral liposomes prepared with PC:cholesterol (1:1) and PC:sphingomyelin (1:1) and negatively charged PG:cholesterol (1:1) liposomes, with an increase in FP of 31, 45, and 24% of basal value, respectively. Conversely, the effect was much lower (7% increase) with positively charged liposomes prepared from PC:PA:cholesterol (1:1:1).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Effect of sPrP106 on fluorescence polarization value of neuronal cells

The membrane protein topology prediction method (19), TMHMM, gave a high score for the insertion of sPrP106 in the membrane through a transmembrane helix spanning residues 111-133, with the N-terminal extracellular domain corresponding to residues 89-110 and the C-terminal cytoplasmatic domain comprising residues 134-230 (Fig. 4).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Synthetic peptides derived from discrete PrP regions have been used extensively to identify protein domains that could be involved in the conformational transition of PrPC to PrPSc and in disease pathogenesis (1). In particular, the peptide PrP106-126 was found to possess many of the PrPSc properties, including the propensity to adopt a beta -sheet conformation and form amyloid fibrils, the partial resistance to PK digestion, and the ability to induce nerve cell degeneration and glial cell activation in vitro (1, 13, 21).

A major concern in using small PrP peptides is that they can adopt conformations that may differ from their actual structure in the entire protein. Moreover, although such peptides are very useful for cell culture studies, they are not capable of inducing disease when administered to animals. Supattapone et al. (3) showed that the minimal sequence that sustains prion replication corresponds to a redacted version of PrP lacking residues 23-88 and 141-176. This peptide, termed PrP106 or miniprion, is currently regarded as an excellent model to unravel both the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc and prion pathogenesis.

Our decision to generate synthetic rather than recombinant PrP106 was based on the assumption that accurate mechanistic studies can be carried out only with a pure protein devoid of any cellular contaminant. This idea is substantiated by the knowledge that several proteins with high affinity for PrPC or PrPSc may play an important role in the conversion reaction and disease propagation (5). Ball et al. (7) have recently reported the synthesis of PrP polypeptides by highly optimized Fmoc/t-butoxycarbonyl protocols and chemical ligation. Our procedure to generate relatively large amounts of sPrP106 was straightforward and simple. Its strength resides in a special purification strategy based on the use of a lipophilic chromatographic probe (8), which enables us to purify the full-length protein from the side products by a single chromatographic step. This fact minimizes the losses and compensates for the low yield of the chemical synthesis of a long polypeptide by classical Fmoc-based SSPS. Following this strategy, the overall yield of PrP106 was ~ 5%, which is satisfying for an easy-to-aggregate PrP polypeptide.

sPrP106 showed interesting biochemical features. First, the protein had a high propensity to adopt a secondary structure with high beta -sheet content. The amount of beta -sheet was similar in different conditions, at variance with PrP106-126, which shows an environmental-dependent conformational polymorphism. Furthermore, the behavior of the synthetic protein was slightly different from that of its recombinant counterpart, rPrP106 (4). In fact, sPrP106 exhibited a well ordered structure already at a low concentration (0.1 mg/ml, i.e. 8.6 µM) in 1 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, whereas rPrP106 was found to undergo a concentration-dependent conformational transition from an unfolded monomeric state to an ordered beta -sheet multimeric assembly in the range of 30-100 µM (4). Second, sPrP106 contains a C-terminal domain, which is notably insensitive to PK degradation. Even at stringent conditions of PK:protein ratio and prolonged digestion times, a protease-resistant core composed mainly of a fragment spanning residues 134-217 was consistently detected. The results from CD determination and PK digestion suggest that the tertiary structure of sPrP106 may consist of a flexible N-terminal domain and a C-terminal beta -sheet domain starting approximately at Ser-134. This hypothetical structure is supported by the algorithm of the Double Prediction Method (18).

The macromolecular assemblies generated by sPrP106 in different conditions were analyzed by electron microscopy. Protein suspensions in aqueous solutions contained a few spherical particles with a diameter of 20-30 nm, short filamentous structures of irregular thickness ranging from 4 to 10 nm, and amorphous granular material. The heterogeneity of sPrP106 aggregates was no longer observed when the protein was subjected to reversible denaturation followed by refolding. Under these conditions, the preparations essentially contained branched filaments with a relatively regular, rosary-like profile and a diameter ranging from 8 to 22 nm. The filamentous aggregates were not birefringent under polarized light after Congo red staining. It remains possible that further manipulations, such as reducing conditions, low pH, partially denaturing environments (0.5-1 M GdnHCl) could favor the formation of amyloid-like fibrils (22, 23). Nonetheless, the formation of ordered but not amyloid-like structures might be compatible with the peculiar parallel beta -helix fold, which is the feature of PrPSc106 crystals as shown recently by electron crystallography studies (24).

Evidence suggests that the neuropathological changes observed in prion diseases are caused, at least in part, by the accumulation of PrPSc. This view is supported by the observation that the protease-resistant core of PrPSc has a variety of pathogenic effects in vitro, including neurotoxicity and the ability to interact with plasma membrane, yielding increased microviscosity. Similar effects have been observed with short synthetic peptides, in particular with PrP106-126. Our study shows that sPrP106 not only maintains these properties, but it is more effective than PrP106-126. In fact, the concentrations required to obtain the same extent of nerve cell death and a similar increase in membrane microviscosity were five times lower with sPrP106 than with PrP106-126 (13, 16). At variance with PrP106-126, the interaction of sPrP106 with multilamellar vesicles was influenced by their net charge and composition (12). This is likely related to a distinctive interaction of sPrP106 with membranes rather than to the net charge of the polypeptides because sPrP106 and PrP106-126 are both positive. sPrP106 contains the membrane spanning domain (roughly residues 113-135) of PrP (25, 26). Interestingly, the application of a membrane protein topology prediction method (19), TMHMM, indicated that sPrP106 possesses the characteristics to insert into the membrane through a transmembrane helix spanning residues 111-133.

In conclusion, our study shows that sPrP106 readily adopts a stable beta -sheet conformation, contains a protease-resistant core, assembles in relatively regular filamentous structures, is highly neurotoxic, and interacts with membranes inducing a remarkable increase in microviscosity. These properties make sPrP106 a promising model for investigating the PrPC right-arrow PrPSc conversion process and disease pathogenesis.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank P. Mascagni for supplying the lipophilic probe for sPrP106 purification and for fruitful suggestions and C. Weissmann and R. Kasaks for kindly providing the R340 and 3F4 antibodies, respectively.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Telethon-Italy Grants 466/bi (to V. B.) and 83CP (to R. C.), Italian Ministry of Health Grant RF99.38, Italian Ministry of University and Research Grant PRIN2001, and European Union Grants QLRT 01-00283, BMH4 98-605, and QLTR-2000-02353.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Assistant Telethon Scientist (DTI, Fondazione Telethon). To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 39-023-901-4548; Fax: 39-023-546-277; E-mail: bonetto@marionegri.it.

** Assistant Telethon Scientist (DTI, Fondazione Telethon).

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 10, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203275200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PrP, prion protein; PrP106, PrP-derived construct of 106 amino acids; PrPC, cellular isoform of PrP; PrPSc, scrapie isoform of PrP; dsPrP106, derivatized synthetic PrP106; rPrP106, recombinant PrP106; sPrP106, synthetic PrP106; DCM, dichloromethane; Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl; FP, fluorescence polarization; GdnHCl, guanidine hydrochloride; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; MALDI MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry; PA, phosphatidic acid; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PK, proteinase K; SSPS, stepwise solid phase synthesis; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid; TFE, trifluoroethanol.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Tagliavini, F., Forloni, G., D'Ursi, P., Bugiani, O., and Salmona, M. (2001) Adv. Protein Chem. 57, 171-201[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Muramoto, T., Scott, M., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 15457-15462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Supattapone, S., Bosque, P., Muramoto, T., Wille, H., Aagaard, C., Peretz, D., Nguyen, H. O., Heinrich, C., Torchia, M., Safar, J., Cohen, F. E., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B., and Scott, M. (1999) Cell 96, 869-878[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Baskakov, I. V., Aagaard, C., Mehlhorn, I., Wille, H., Groth, D., Baldwin, M. A., Prusiner, S. B., and Cohen, F. E. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 2792-2804[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Prusiner, S. B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13363-13383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Dawson, P. E., Muir, T. W., Clark-Lewis, I., and Kent, S. B. (1994) Science 266, 776-779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Ball, H. L., King, D. S., Cohen, F. E., Prusiner, S. B., and Baldwin, M. A. (2001) J. Pept. Res. 58, 357-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Ball, H. L., and Mascagni, P. (1992) Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 40, 370-379[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Sarin, V. K., Kent, S. B., Tam, J. P., and Merrifield, R. B. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 117, 147-157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Sreerama, N., and Woody, R. W. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 242, 497-507[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Manavalan, P., and Johnson, W. C.. Jr. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 167, 76-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. De Gioia, L., Selvaggini, C., Ghibaudi, E., Diomede, L., Bugiani, O., Forloni, G., Tagliavini, F., and Salmona, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7859-7862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Forloni, G., Angeretti, N., Chiesa, R., Monzani, E., Salmona, M., Bugiani, O., and Tagliavini, F. (1993) Nature 362, 543-546[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Manthorpe, M., Fagnani, R., Skaper, S. D., and Varon, S. (1986) Brain Res. 390, 191-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Diomede, L., Sozzani, S., Luini, W., Algeri, M., De, Gioia, L., Chiesa, R., Lievens, P. M., Bugiani, O., Forloni, G., Tagliavini, F., and Salmona, M. (1996) Biochem. J. 320, 563-570
16. Salmona, M., Forloni, G., Diomede, L., Algeri, M., De, Gioia, L., Angeretti, N., Giaccone, G., Tagliavini, F., and Bugiani, O. (1997) Neurobiol. Dis. 4, 47-57[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Shinitzky, M., and Barenholz, Y. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 515, 367-394[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Deleage, G., and Roux, B. (1987) Protein Eng. 1, 289-294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., and Sonnhammer, E. L. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 305, 567-580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Manavalan, P., and Johnson, W. C., Jr. (1983) Nature 305, 831-832[CrossRef]
21. Kourie, J. I. (2001) Chem. Biol. Interact. 138, 1-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Jackson, G. S., Hosszu, L. L., Power, A., Hill, A. F., Kenney, J., Saibil, H., Craven, C. J., Waltho, J. P., Clarke, A. R., and Collinge, J. (1999) Science 283, 1935-1937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Morillas, M., Vanik, D. L., and Surewicz, W. K. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6982-6987[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Wille, H., Michelitsch, M. D., Guénebaut, V., Supattapone, S., Serban, A., Cohen, F. E., Agard, D. A., and Prusiner, S. B. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 3563-3568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Hegde, R. S., Mastrianni, J. A., Scott, M. R., DeFea, K. A., Tremblay, P., Torchia, M., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B., and Lingappa, V. R. (1998) Science 279, 827-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Tompa, P., Tusnady, G. E., Cserzo, M., and Simon, I. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 4431-4443[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
C. Bate and A. Williams
Role of glycosylphosphatidylinositols in the activation of phospholipase A2 and the neurotoxicity of prions
J. Gen. Virol., December 1, 2004; 85(12): 3797 - 3804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Bate, M. Salmona, L. Diomede, and A. Williams
Squalestatin Cures Prion-infected Neurons and Protects Against Prion Neurotoxicity
J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 2004; 279(15): 14983 - 14990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R. Bahadi, P. V. Farrelly, B. L. Kenna, J. I. Kourie, F. Tagliavini, G. Forloni, and M. Salmona
Channels formed with a mutant prion protein PrP(82-146) homologous to a 7-kDa fragment in diseased brain of GSS patients
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): C862 - C872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/35/31327    most recent
M203275200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonetto, V.
Right arrow Articles by Salmona, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonetto, V.
Right arrow