![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 31441-31447, August 30, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
,
From the Department of Atherosclerosis and Endocrinology and the
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Merck Research
Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065
Received for publication, January 16, 2002, and in revised form, June 5, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bile salt export pump (BSEP) is a major bile acid
transporter in the liver. Mutations in BSEP result in progressive
intrahepatic cholestasis, a severe liver disease that impairs bile flow
and causes irreversible liver damage. BSEP is a target for inhibition and down-regulation by drugs and abnormal bile salt metabolites, and
such inhibition and down-regulation may result in bile acid retention
and intrahepatic cholestasis. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed
the regulation of BSEP expression by FXR ligands in primary human
hepatocytes and HepG2 cells. We demonstrate that BSEP expression is
dramatically regulated by ligands of the nuclear receptor farnesoid X
receptor (FXR). Both the endogenous FXR agonist chenodeoxycholate (CDCA) and synthetic FXR ligand GW4064 effectively increased BSEP mRNA in both cell types. This up-regulation was readily detectable at as early as 3 h, and the ligand potency for BSEP regulation correlates with the intrinsic activity on FXR. These results suggest BSEP as a direct target of FXR and support the recent report that the
BSEP promoter is transactivated by FXR. In contrast to CDCA and GW4064,
lithocholate (LCA), a hydrophobic bile acid and a potent inducer of
cholestasis, strongly decreased BSEP expression. Previous studies did
not identify LCA as an FXR antagonist ligand in cells, but we
show here that LCA is an FXR antagonist with partial agonist activity
in cells. In an in vitro co-activator association assay,
LCA decreased CDCA- and GW4064-induced FXR activation with an
IC50 of 1 µM. In HepG2 cells, LCA also
effectively antagonized GW4064-enhanced FXR transactivation. These data
suggest that the toxic and cholestatic effect of LCA in animals may
result from its down-regulation of BSEP through FXR. Taken together, these observations indicate that FXR plays an important role in BSEP
gene expression and that FXR ligands may be potential therapeutic drugs
for intrahepatic cholestasis.
Bile salt export pump
(BSEP)1 mediates the
rate-limiting step in overall hepatocellular bile salt excretion, the
transport of bile acids across the canalicular membrane (1-3).
Mutations in BSEP result in progressive familial intrahepatic
cholestasis type 2, a severe liver disease characterized by
impaired bile flow and irreversible liver damage (4). Progressive
familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 patients secret less than 1%
of biliary bile salts compared with normal individuals (5). Inhibition or down-regulation of BSEP by drugs and abnormal bile salt metabolites results in hepatic bile acid retention and subsequent intrahepatic cholestasis (6).
Lithocholate (LCA) is a hydrophobic secondary bile acid that is formed
in the intestines by bacterial 7 FXR is a bile acid receptor (10-13). Bile acids such as CDCA,
deoxycholate, cholate, and their conjugates bind to and activate FXR,
which consequently regulates transcription of FXR targets. FXR controls
expression of critical genes in bile acid and cholesterol homeostasis.
It has been shown that FXR inhibits expression of cholesterol
7 Reagents--
The following reagents were obtained from
Invitrogen: tissue culture media of DME, M199, and Opti-MEM I;
regular and charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum (FBS); TRIZOL
reagents; PCR Supermix; and oligonucleotide primers for gene cloning.
FuGENE6 transfection reagent was obtained from Roche Diagnostics.
Reagents for Plasmid Constructs--
pGST-hFXR (LBD) was constructed by
inserting the cDNA encoding the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of
human FXR (amino acids Leu-193 to Gln-472) into pGEX-KG vector (23) at
BamHI/XhoI. The expression vector
pcDNA3.1-GAL4-hFXR (LBD) was constructed by inserting the cDNA
fragment (also encoding amino acids Leu-193 to Gln-472) of human FXR
into pcDNA3.1GAL4 (24), which contains the GAL4 DNA-binding domain
(DBD). In both constructs, the N terminus of hFXR (LBD) was fused to
the C terminus of GST or GAL4 (DBD). The integrity of the sequence was
confirmed by DNA sequencing. The expression vectors of pUAS(5X)-tk-LUC
and pCMV-lacZ were described previously (24). pcDNA3.1-RXR Preparation of GST-FXR (LBD) Fusion
Protein--
Escherichia coli strain BL21 (Stratagene)
harboring pGST-hFXR (LBD) was cultured in LB medium to a density of
A600 0.7-1.0 and induced for overexpression by
the addition of
isopropyl- FXR Co-activator Association Assays--
A homogeneous
time-resolved fluorescence-based FXR and co-activator SRC-1 interaction
assay was used to examine the interaction of FXR with various ligands
according to methods previously described for other nuclear
receptors (23, 25) with minor modifications. Briefly, 198 µl of
reaction mixture (100 mM HEPES, 125 mM KF, 0.125% (w/v) CHAPS, 0.05% dry milk, 4 nM GST-FXR LBD, 2 nM anti-GST-(Eu)K, 10 nM
biotin-SRC-(568-780), 20 nM SA/XL665) were added to
each well, followed by the addition of 2 µl of
Me2SO or ligands (in Me2SO) into
appropriate wells in the presence or absence of 9 µM CDCA
or 100 nM GW4064. Plates were incubated overnight at
4 °C, followed by measurement of fluorescence reading on a Packard Discovery instrument. Data were expressed as the ratio of the emission
intensity at 665 nm to that at 620 nm multiplied by a factor of
104.
Cell Treatment--
HepG2 cells, a human hepatoma cell line,
were obtained from ATCC. HepG2 cells were maintained in DMEM
containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1 mM
sodium pyruvate, and 5 mM HEPES. For determination of
gene-specific expression by TaqMan analysis, cells were seeded in
six-well plates at a density of 1.2 million cells/well in M199 medium
containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 25 mM
HEPES. 24 h after seeding, cells were treated with various concentrations of compounds in M199 medium containing 0.5%
charcoal-stripped FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 25 mM HEPES. Unless specified, cells were treated for 24 h.
Transient Transfection Assay--
HepG2 cells were seeded at a
density of 3.2 × 104 cells/well of 96-well plates in
DMEM containing 10% FBS 24 h prior to transfection. Cells were
transfected with transfection mixes in serum-free Opti-MEM I medium
using the FuGENE6 transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostics) according to
the manufacturer's instructions. Typically, transfection mixes for
each well contained 0.405 µl of FuGENE6, 3 ng of
pcDNA3.1-GAL4-hFXR (LBD) expression vector, 3 ng of
pcDNA3.1-hRXR Primary Human Hepatocytes--
Plated primary human hepatocytes
were obtained from In Vitro Technologies (Baltimore, MD). Cells
were seeded at a density of 2 × 106 cells/well of
six-well plates in DMEM with 5% FBS. Upon arrival, cells were switched
in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 25 mM HEPES and
cultured at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 for
24 h. Cells were then incubated with various concentrations of
CDCA and GW4064 in phenol red-free DMEM containing 0.5%
charcoal-stripped FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1 mM
sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 25 mM HEPES for various periods of time as indicated in the
legend to Fig. 3.
RNA Isolation--
Total RNA was extracted from the cultured
cells using the TRIZOL reagent according the manufacturer's
instructions. RNA was then extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl
alcohol and dissolved in water. RNA concentration was determined by a spectrophotometer.
TaqMan Primers and Probes--
Oligonucleotide primers and
probes for human BSEP and Cyp 7a were designed using the Primer Express
program and were synthesized by Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA).
These sequences (5' to 3') are as follows: human BSEP, forward primer
(GGGCCATTGTACGAGATCCTAA), probe
(6FAM-TCTTGCTACTAGATGAAGCCACTTCTGCCTTAGA-TAMRA), and reverse primer (TGCACCGTCTTTTCACTTTCTG); human Cyp 7a, forward primer (GAGAAGGCAAACGGGTGAAC), probe
(6FAM-TGGATTAATTCCATACCTGGGCTGTGCTCT-TAMRA), and reverse primer
(GGTATGACAAGGGATTTGTGATGA); human Cyp 3A4, forward primer
(GCAGGAGGAAATTGATGCAGTT), probe
(6FAM-ACCCAATAAGGCACCACCCACCTATGA-TAMRA), and reverse primer
(GTCAAGATACTCCATCTGTAGCACAGT). Primers and probe for human 18 S
RNA were also purchased from Applied Biosystems.
Real Time Quantitative PCR--
Reverse transcription reactions
and TaqMan-PCRs were performed according to the manufacturer's
instructions (Applied Biosystems). Sequence-specific amplification was
detected with an increased fluorescent signal of FAM (reporter dye)
during the amplification cycles. Amplification of human 18 S RNA was
used in the same reaction of all samples as an internal control.
Gene-specific mRNA was subsequently normalized to 18 S mRNA.
Levels of BSEP, Cyp 7a, and Cyp 3A4 mRNA were expressed as -fold
difference of ligand-treated cells against Me2SO-treated cells.
CDCA Up-regulates Expression of BSEP--
To determine
whether BSEP is a target of FXR, HepG2 cells were treated
with various doses of CDCA for 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. BSEP
mRNA levels were analyzed at each time point by TaqMan-PCR. Consistent with previous reports, HepG2 cells expressed very low levels
of BSEP with an average threshold cycle of 40 in untreated cells
(data not shown). CDCA treatment greatly increased BSEP mRNA
production in a dose-dependent manner with a half-maximum (EC50) of 10-30 µM and a maximum induction
of 500-600-fold (Fig. 1,
A-E). Up-regulation of BSEP was readily detectable within
3 h with a maximum induction of 20-fold (Fig. 1A),
which increased to 120-fold at 6 h and 250-fold at 12 h (Fig.
1, B and C). 24-h treatment yielded a 400-fold
induction (Fig. 1D), which increased slightly at 48 h
(Fig. 1E). The EC50 at each of the time points was around 10-30 µM, which correlates with the
EC50 of CDCA in the FXR transactivation assay (Fig.
6B). This correlation, together with the observation that
BSEP up-regulation by CDCA was readily detectable at 3 h, suggests
that BSEP is a direct target of FXR.
GW4064 Up-regulates Expression of BSEP--
GW4064 was reported to
be a potent and selective synthetic agonist of FXR (26). To further
confirm that BSEP up-regulation was mediated by FXR, HepG2 cells were
treated with GW4064 for 24 h and assayed for BSEP expression.
Similar to the results of CDCA treatment, GW4064 also robustly
increased BSEP mRNA in a dose-dependent manner with an
EC50 of about 0.1 µM (Fig.
2). This value also correlates with its
potency in FXR transactivation (Fig. 6C). This result,
together with the result of CDCA treatment, suggests that BSEP
up-regulation is mediated by FXR and that BSEP is a direct FXR
target.
BSEP Up-regulation by CDCA and GW4064 in Primary Human
Hepatocytes--
Since HepG2 cells expressed low levels of BSEP,
primary human hepatocytes were also investigated for BSEP gene
regulation by FXR ligands. The basal expression of BSEP in primary
hepatocytes was more than 1000-fold higher than that in HepG2 (data not
shown). Despite the relatively high basal level, BSEP expression in
primary hepatocytes was further induced by GW4064 in a
dose-dependent fashion with an EC50 of 0.1 µM (Fig. 3A).
The induction of BSEP expression by CDCA and GW4064 was
time-dependent (Fig. 3B). Similar to the results
in HepG2, the up-regulation of BSEP in primary hepatocytes was readily
detectable at 3 h with a 1.5-2-fold induction (Fig.
3B). During the period of 3-48 h, BSEP induction showed a
linear increase with time. The induction reached 8-9-fold for CDCA and
10-12-fold for GW4064 (Fig. 3B) at 48 h.
LCA Decreases GW4064-stimulated BSEP Expression--
LCA,
a hydrophobic bile acid with a single hydroxy group at
position 3, is a potent inducer of cholestasis when administered to
animals (8, 9). We hypothesized that the cholestatic effect of LCA
could result from down-regulation of BSEP expression. To test this
hypothesis, HepG2 cells were treated with LCA in the presence or
absence of GW4064, and BSEP expression was analyzed by TaqMan-PCR. In
the absence of GW4064, LCA alone slightly increased BSEP mRNA to a
maximum of 16-fold (Fig. 4A).
This is about 5% of the maximal stimulation of BSEP mRNA by CDCA
(Fig. 1D). This partial stimulation is consistent with the
partial agonist activity of LCA in FXR transactivation (Fig.
6A).
Treatment of HepG2 with 100 nM GW4064 alone resulted in an
induction of BSEP expression by 350-fold (Fig. 4B). This
induction was effectively decreased by LCA in a
dose-dependent manner with a half-maximum inhibition
(IC50) of 10-20 µM (Fig. 4B).
LCA inhibited GW4064-induced BSEP expression by 90% at 30 µM (Fig. 4B). At concentrations above 30 µM, LCA treatment caused cell toxicity (data not shown).
LCA Is an FXR Antagonist--
Although previous studies
did not identify LCA as an FXR ligand, we reasoned that inhibition of
BSEP expression by LCA was mediated through FXR. A homogeneous
time-resolved fluorescence-based FXR co-activator association assay was
set up and used to determine LCA activities on FXR in vitro.
This assay measures ligand-dependent association of FXR
with the co-activator SRC-1 (see "Materials and Methods"). In the
agonist mode, LCA alone failed to activate FXR (Fig.
5A). As a control, CDCA
activated FXR with an EC50 of 8 µM (Fig.
5A). In the antagonist mode, LCA decreased CDCA- or GW4064-induced FXR activation with an IC50 of 0.7 and 1.4 µM, respectively (Fig. 5, B and C).
These results demonstrate that LCA is indeed a bona fide
antagonist ligand of FXR.
LCA Weakly Activates but Strongly Antagonizes FXR
Transactivation--
The FXR antagonist activity of LCA was also
confirmed in HepG2 cells using the Gal4-based FXR transactivation
assay. LCA alone partially activated FXR with a maximal activation of
35-fold at 40 µM (Fig.
6A). In parallel experiments,
CDCA activated FXR with a maximum of 1300-fold (Fig. 6B).
Thus, LCA has less than 5% of the agonist activity of CDCA. This
partial agonist activity of LCA may explain the partial induction of
BSEP by LCA in HepG2 (Fig. 3A). Compared with CDCA, GW4064
was a superagonist of FXR, with a maximum induction of 2800-fold and an
EC50 of 100-200 nM (Fig. 6C).
In the antagonist assay, consistent with the in vitro
results, LCA effectively antagonized GW4064-induced FXR transactivation in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50 of
20-30 µM (Fig. 6D). These results indicate
again that LCA is an antagonist ligand of FXR.
LCA Down-regulates Cyp 7a Expression--
It is well known that
FXR agonists inhibit transcription of Cyp 7a. LCA, although an FXR
antagonist, significantly inhibited Cyp 7a expression in HepG2
cells in a dose-dependent manner with an IC50
of 20 µM (Fig.
7A). This inhibition reached
90% at 30 µM. As a control, CDCA effectively decreased
Cyp 7a mRNA production (Fig. 7B). The extent of Cyp 7a
inhibition by LCA cannot fully be explained by its partial agonist
activity (less than 5% of CDCA) on FXR. Indeed, two recent
publications identified LCA as a PXR/SXR agonist, and PXR
activation also results in repression of Cyp 7a expression (27, 28).
Thus, it is likely that the observed Cyp 7a down-regulation by LCA
involves pathways in addition to FXR activation.
Rifampicin Does Not Regulate BSEP Expression--
To eliminate the
possibility that BSEP regulation by LCA could be mediated through PXR,
rifampicin, a PXR-specific ligand (29, 30), was used to treat HepG2
cells and was examined for its effects on BSEP transcription.
Rifampicin had no activities on FXR in co-activator association assay
and FXR transactivation (data not shown). As predicted, rifampicin
alone did not change BSEP expression (Fig.
8A). In contrast to LCA,
rifampicin did not decrease GW4064-induced BSEP mRNA (Fig.
8B). In the same experiment, rifampicin increased Cyp 3A4
expression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8C),
indicating activation of PXR by rifampicin, since Cyp 3A4 is a direct
target of PXR (31, 32). These results suggest that PXR is not involved
in BSEP regulation and further support the conclusion that the
down-regulation of BSEP by LCA is mediated through the antagonist
activity on FXR.
BSEP is a major bile acid transporter. BSEP expression is
critically important for maintenance of bile flow and protecting the
liver from bile acid toxicity. It has been reported that BSEP is
up-regulated by dexamethasone and hypoosmolarity and down-regulated by
endotoxin (33). In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the
regulation of endogenous BSEP expression by various FXR ligands in
primary human hepatocytes and HepG2 by TaqMan-PCR. We demonstrate that
BSEP expression in both cell types is up-regulated by the FXR agonists
CDCA and GW4064 in a time- and dose-dependent fashion. BSEP
up-regulation was readily detectable at as early as 3 h in both
HepG2 and primary hepatocytes. The ligand potency for BSEP regulation
correlates well with the ligand in vitro potencies on
FXR. All of these data suggest BSEP as a direct target of FXR. Consistent with our results, Ananthanarayanan et al. (20)
recently reported that the BSEP promoter contains an FXR response
element (IR-1) and that FXR directly binds to the BSEP promoter.
Indeed, BSEP expression is greatly decreased in FXR knockout mice
(34).
We also provide evidence to explain the molecular basis for a long
standing issue of LCA-induced cholestasis. LCA effectively down-regulates agonist-dependent BSEP expression. This
down-regulation would result in a decreased hepatic bile acid excretion
and thus an increased liver bile acid concentration, which in turn
could cause intrahepatic cholestasis and liver damage. Furthermore, we
show that LCA is an FXR antagonist and that down-regulation of BSEP by
LCA is mediated by FXR antagonist activity.
Bile acids such as CDCA, deoxycholate, and cholate were previously
identified as FXR ligands (10, 12, 13). CDCA was thought to be the most
potent agonist. Here, we show that LCA binds to FXR with a higher
affinity than CDCA in the FXR co-activator association assay. In this
assay, LCA acted as a pure antagonist with no detectable agonist
activity (Fig. 5A). In the FXR transactivation assay
performed in HepG2 cells, LCA acted as an antagonist with partial
agonist activity (<5%) (Fig. 6, A and D). We
believe that this partial agonist activity resulted in the partial
induction of endogenous BSEP expression in HepG2 cells (see Fig.
4A). The lack of partial agonist activity in the
co-activator association assay may due to 1) co-activator specificity,
since only the co-activator SRC-1 was included in the assay, or 2)
assay sensitivity. The co-activator association assay had an
approximate 10-fold window; however, both FXR transactivation and BSEP
mRNA assay had a window of several hundredfold. Thus,
co-activator association assay may not be sensitive enough to detect
the less than 5% agonist activity of LCA.
LCA was recently identified as a PXR/SXR agonist ligand. PXR is
thought to be the second bile acid receptor and plays a critical role
in liver detoxification (27, 28). However, there is no evidence
supporting the involvement of PXR in BSEP gene regulation. Indeed, the
PXR-specific ligand rifampicin did not regulate BSEP expression,
suggesting that PXR is not involved in BSEP regulation and further
supporting the conclusion that the down-regulation of BSEP by LCA is
mediated through the antagonist activity on FXR.
BSEP expression is critically important for liver protection. The
identification of FXR as an important regulator of BSEP not only
provides a molecular mechanism for FXR-mediated BSEP gene regulation
but also suggests a potential for FXR ligands as therapeutic drugs for
intrahepatic cholestasis and lipid disorders.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-dehydroxylation of chenodeoxycholate (CDCA). LCA comprises 2-4% of total bile acids in
humans (3). Its level is elevated in patients with chronic cholestasis
and other liver diseases (7). Administration of LCA or its conjugates
to animals is known to cause intrahepatic cholestasis (8, 9). The
mechanism for LCA-induced cholestasis remains unknown. In this study,
we show that LCA down-regulates BSEP expression through its antagonist
activity on the nuclear hormone receptor FXR. This down-regulation may
explain the cholestatic effect of LCA.
-hydroxylase (Cyp 7a) (14-17), the enzyme catalyzing the first and
rate-limiting step of bile acid synthesis (18), and activates
expression of intestinal bile acid-binding protein (11), phospholipid
transfer protein (19), BSEP (20), and dehydroepiandrosterone
sulfotransferase (21). In this study, we demonstrate that CDCA and a
synthetic FXR agonist, GW4064 (22), dramatically up-regulate
expression of BSEP mRNA in primary human hepatocytes and HepG2. The
BSEP up-regulation by CDCA and GW4064 was readily detectable within
3 h of ligand treatment. The ligand potency for BSEP regulation in
cells correlates with several measures of agonist activities on FXR
in vitro. In addition, the FXR antagonist LCA effectively
down-regulates BSEP gene expression. Taken together, these data support
the notion of BSEP as a direct target of FXR.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase and luciferase assays were purchased
from Promega (Madison, WI). Bile acids were obtained from Steraloids,
Inc. (Newport, RI). GW4064 was synthesized at Merck. TaqMan reagents
for cDNA synthesis and real time PCR and TaqMan oligonucleotide
primers and probes for human BSEP, Cyp 7a, and Cyp 3A4 were
purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). SA/XL665 and (Eu)K
were from CIS Biointernational (Bagnols-sur-Ceze, France) and
Packard Instrument Co. The goat anti-GST antibody and
glutathione-Sepharose were from Amersham Biosciences. Dry milk was from
Bio-Rad.
was
constructed by inserting the cDNA encoding the full-length of
RXR
into pcDNA3.1
-D-thiogalactopyranoside) to a final
concentration of 0.2 mM. The
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside-induced cultures were
grown at room temperature to an additional 2-5 h. The cells were
harvested by centrifugation for 10 min at 5000 × g.
The cell pellet was used for GST fusion protein purification according
to the recommended procedure from Amersham Biosciences using
glutathione-Sepharose beads.
expression construct, and 60 ng of pUAS(5X)-tk-LUC
reporter vector and 60 ng of pCMV-lacZ as an internal control for
transfection efficiency. Cells were incubated in the transfection
mixture for 4 h at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 10%
CO2. The cells were then incubated for ~40-48 h in fresh DMEM containing 5% charcoal stripped FBS with or without various concentrations of ligands. Cell lysates were produced using reporter lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's directions. Luciferase activity in cell extracts was determined using
luciferase assay buffer (Promega) in an ML3000 luminometer (Dynatech
Laboratories).
-Galactosidase activity was determined using
-D-galactopyranoside (Calbiochem) as described
previously (24). Luciferase activities were normalized to
-galactosidase activities individually for each well. When assayed
for antagonist activity of LCA, cells were incubated with increasing
concentrations of LCA in the presence of 100 nM GW4064.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Time course for induction of BSEP mRNA by
CDCA. HepG2 cells at a density of 1.2 million cells/well in
six-well plates were treated with various concentrations of CDCA for 3 (A), 6 (B), 12 (C), 24 (D),
and 48 h (E) in M199 medium containing 0.5%
charcoal-stripped FBS. Total RNA was prepared and BSEP mRNA was
analyzed by TaqMan-PCR (described under "Materials and Methods").
Results are normalized as -fold control value (treated cells
versus vehicle), and data are the mean ± S.D. of four
determinations.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Induction of BSEP mRNA by GW4064.
HepG2 cells at a density of 1.2 million cells/well in six-well plates
were treated with various concentrations of GW4064 for 24 h in
M199 medium containing 0.5% charcoal-stripped FBS. Total RNA was
prepared and BSEP mRNA was analyzed by TaqMan-PCR (described under
"Materials and Methods"). Results are normalized as -fold control
value (treated cells versus vehicle), and data are the
mean ± S.D. of four determinations.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Time course for induction of BSEP mRNA by
CDCA and GW4064 in primary human hepatocytes. Primary human
hepatocytes at a density of 2 million cells/well in six-well plates
were treated with various concentrations of GW4064 for 24 h
(A) or with 60 µM CDCA or 5 µM
GW4064 at various time points (B) in DMEM containing 0.5%
charcoal-stripped FBS. Total RNA was prepared, and BSEP mRNA was
analyzed by TaqMan-PCR (described under "Materials and Methods").
Results are normalized as -fold control value (treated cells
versus vehicle), and data are the mean ± S.D. of four
determinations. DMSO, Me2SO.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of LCA on BSEP mRNA. HepG2
cells at a density of 1.2 million cells/well in six-well plates were
treated with various concentrations of LCA in the absence
(A) or presence of 100 nM GW4064 (B)
for 24 h in M199 medium containing 0.5% charcoal-stripped FBS.
Total RNA was prepared, and BSEP mRNA was analyzed by TaqMan-PCR
(described under "Materials and Methods"). Results are normalized
as -fold control value (treated cells versus vehicle), and
data are the mean ± S.D. of three determinations.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of LCA on interaction of FXR with
co-activator SRC-1. 4 nM purified GST-FXR was
incubated with 2 nM anti-GST-(Eu)K, 10 nM
biotin-SRC-1-(568-780), 20 nM SA/XL665, and various
concentrations of LCA or CDCA in the absence (A) or presence
of 9 µM CDCA (B) or 10 nM GW4064
(C). The mixture was incubated at 4 °C overnight. The
fluorescent signal was measured, and results were calculated as
described under "Materials and Methods." Each value represents the
mean ± S.D. of six determinations.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of LCA on FXR transactivation.
HepG2 cells (3.2 × 104 cells/well of 96-well plates)
were transfected with 0.405 µl of FuGENE6, 3 ng of
pcDNA3.1-GAL4-hFXR (LBD) expression vector, 3 ng of
pcDNA3.1-hRXR
expression construct, 60 ng of pUAS(5X)-tk-LUC
reporter vector, and 60 ng of pCMV-lacZ in serum-free Opti-MEM I medium
using the FuGENE6 transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The transfected cells were treated with various
concentrations of LCA (A), CDCA (B), or GW4064
(C). LCA treatment was also carried out in the presence of
100 nM GW4064 (D) to determine the antagonist
activity. After 24 h of treatment, cells were harvested, and the
cell lysate was used for determination of luciferase and
-galactosidase activities as described under "Materials and
Methods." Luciferase activities were normalized to
-galactosidase
activities individually for each well. Each value represents the
mean ± S.D. of six determinations.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of LCA on Cyp 7a mRNA. HepG2
cells at a density of 1.2 million cells/well in six-well plates were
treated with various concentrations of LCA and CDCA (B) for
24 h in M199 medium containing 0.5% charcoal-stripped FBS. Total
RNA was prepared, and BSEP mRNA was analyzed by TaqMan-PCR
(described under "Materials and Methods"). Results are normalized
as -fold control value (treated cells versus vehicle), and
data are the mean ± S.D. of four determinations.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Effect of rifampicin on BSEP and Cyp 3A4
mRNA. HepG2 cells at a density of 1.2 million cells/well in
six-well plates were treated with various concentrations of rifampicin
in the absence (A and C) or presence of 100 nM GW4064 (B) for 24 h in M199 medium
containing 0.5% charcoal-stripped FBS. Total RNA was prepared, and
BSEP mRNA (A and B) or Cyp 3A4 mRNA
(C) was analyzed by TaqMan-PCR (described under "Materials
and Methods"). Results are normalized as -fold control value (treated
cells versus vehicle), and data are the mean ± S.D. of
three determinations.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank John Menke for providing the plasmid vectors of pUAS(5X)-tk-LUC and pCMV-lacZ.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Atherosclerosis and Endocrinology, Merck Research Laboratories, 126 E. Lincoln Ave., P. O. Box 2000, RY80W-107, Rahway, NJ 07065. Tel.: 732-594-6369; Fax: 732-594-7926; E-mail: jisong_cui@merck.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200474200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
BSEP, bile salt
export pump;
FXR, farnesoid X receptor;
LCA, lithocholate;
CDCA, chenodeoxycholate;
Cyp 7a, cholesterol 7
-hydroxylase;
RXR
, retinoid X receptor
;
SRC-1, steroid receptor coactivator protein-1;
PXR, pregnane X receptor;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
LBD, ligand-binding
domain;
DBD, DNA-binding domain;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
Cyp 3A4, cytochrome P450 monooxygenase 3A4;
6FAM, 6-carboxyfluorescein;
TAMRA, N,N,N,N-tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine;
SXR, steroid and xenobiotic receptor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Lecureur, V., Courtois, A., Payen, L., Verhnet, L., Guillouzo, A., and Fardel, O. (2000) Toxicology 153, 203-219[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Stieger, B., Hagenbuch, B., and Meier, P. J. (2000) Semin. Liver Dis. 20, 273-292[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Hofmann, A. F.
(1999)
Arch. Intern. Med.
159,
2647-2658 |
| 4. | Strautnieks, S. S., Bull, L. N., Knisely, A. S., Kocoshis, S. A., Dahl, N., Arnell, H., Sokal, E., Dahan, K., Childs, S., Ling, V., Tanner, M. S., Kagalwalla, A. F., Nemeth, A., Pawlowska, J., Baker, A., Mieli-Vergani, G., Freimer, N. B., Gardiner, R. M., and Thompson, R. J. (1998) Nat. Genet. 20, 233-238[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Jansen, P. L., Strautnieks, S. S., Jacquemin, E., Hadchouel, M., Sokal, E. M., Hooiveld, G. J., Koning, J. H., De, Jager-Krikken, A., Kuipers, F., Stellaard, F., Bijleveld, C. M., Gouw, A., Van Goor, H., Thompson, R. J., and Muller, M. (1999) Gastroenterology 117, 1370-1379[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Stieger, B., Fattinger, K., Madon, J., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., and Meier, P. J. (2000) Gastroenterology 118, 422-430[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Fischer, S., Beuers, U., Spengler, U., Zwiebel, F. M., and Koebe, H. G. (1996) Clin. Chim. Acta 251, 173-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Fisher, M. M., Magnusson, R., and Miyai, K. (1971) Lab. Invest. 25, 88-91[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Javitt, N. B. (1996) Nature 210, 1262-1263 |
| 10. |
Makishima, M.,
Okamoto, A. Y.,
Repa, J. J., Tu, H.,
Learned, R. M.,
Luk, A.,
Hull, M. V.,
Lustig, K. D.,
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
and Shan, B.
(1999)
Science
284,
1362-1365 |
| 11. |
Grober, J.,
Zaghini, I.,
Fujii, H.,
Jones, S. A.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Willson, T. M.,
Ono, T.,
and Besnard, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
29749-29754 |
| 12. |
Parks, D. J.,
Blanchard, S. G.,
Bledsoe, R. K.,
Chandra, G.,
Consler, T. G.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Stimmel, J. B.,
Willson, T. M.,
Zavacki, A. M.,
Moore, D. D.,
and Lehmann, J. M.
(1999)
Science
284,
1365-1368 |
| 13. | Wang, H., Chen, J., Hollister, K., Sowers, L. C., and Forman, B. M. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 543-553[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Chiang, J. Y.,
Kimmel, R.,
Weinberger, C.,
and Stroup, D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
10918-10924 |
| 15. | Bramlett, K. S., Yao, S., and Burris, T. P. (2000) Mol. Genet. Metab. 71, 609-615[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Goodwin, B., Jones, S. A., Price, R. R., Watson, M. A., McKee, D. D., Moore, L. B., Galardi, C., Wilson, J. G., Lewis, M. C., Roth, M. E., Maloney, P. R., Willson, T. M., and Kliewer, S. A. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 517-526[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Lu, T. T., Makishima, M., Repa, J. J., Schoonjans, K., Kerr, T. A., Auwerx, J., and Mangelsdorf, D. J. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 507-515[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Russell, D. W., and Setchell, K. D. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 4737-4749[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Urizar, N. L.,
Dowhan, D. H.,
and Moore, D. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
39313-39317 |
| 20. |
Ananthanarayanan, M.,
Balasubramanian, N.,
Makishima, M.,
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
and Suchy, F. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
28857-28865 |
| 21. |
Song, C. S.,
Echchgadda, I.,
Baek, B. S.,
Ahn, S. C., Oh, T.,
Roy, A. K.,
and Chatterjee, B.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
42549-42556 |
| 22. | Maloney, P. R., Parks, D. J., Haffner, C. D., Fivush, A. M., Chandra, G., Plunket, K. D., Creech, K. L., Moore, L. B., Wilson, J. G., Lewis, M. C., Jones, S. A., and Willson, T. M. (2000) J. Med. Chem. 43, 2971-2974[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Zhou, G.,
Cummings, R., Li, Y.,
Mitra, S.,
Wilkinson, H. A.,
Elbrecht, A.,
Hermes, J. D.,
Schaeffer, J. M.,
Smith, R. G.,
and Moller, D. E.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol
12,
1594-1604 |
| 24. |
Elbrecht, A.,
Chen, Y.,
Adams, A.,
Berger, J.,
Griffin, P.,
Klatt, T.,
Zhang, B.,
Menke, J.,
Zhou, G.,
Smith, R. G.,
and Moller, D. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
7913-7922 |
| 25. | Zhou, G., Cummings, R., Hermes, J., and Moller, D. E. (2001) Methods 25, 54-61[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Willson, T. M., Jones, S. A., Moore, J. T., and Kliewer, S. A. (2001) Med. Res. Rev. 21, 513-522[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Staudinger, J. L.,
Goodwin, B.,
Jones, S. A.,
Hawkins-Brown, D.,
MacKenzie, K. I.,
LaTour, A.,
Liu, Y.,
Klaassen, C. D.,
Brown, K. K.,
Reinhard, J.,
Willson, T. M.,
Koller, B. H.,
and Kliewer, S. A.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
3369-3374 |
| 28. |
Xie, W.,
Radominska-Pandya, A.,
Shi, Y.,
Simon, C. M.,
Nelson, M. C.,
Ong, E. S.,
Waxman, D. J.,
and Evans, R. M.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
3375-3380 |
| 29. | Kikuchi, H. (2002) Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 56, 622-628[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Kliewer, S. A.,
and Willson, T. M.
(2002)
J. Lipid Res.
43,
359-364 |
| 31. | Pascussi, J. M., Jounaidi, Y., Drocourt, L., Domergue, J., Balabaud, C., Maurel, P., and Vilarem, M. J. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 260, 377-381[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Bertilsson, G.,
Heidrich, J.,
Svensson, K.,
Asman, M.,
Jendeberg, L.,
Sydow-Backman, M.,
Ohlsson, R.,
Postlind, H.,
Blomquist, P.,
and Berkenstam, A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12208-12213 |
| 33. | Warskulat, U., Kubitz, R., Wettstein, M., Stieger, B., Meier, P. J., and Haussinger, D. (1999) Biol. Chem. 380, 1273-1279[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Sinal, C. J., Tohkin, M., Miyata, M., Ward, J. M., Lambert, G., and Gonzalez, F. J. (2000) Cell 102, 731-744[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. L. Urquhart, R. G. Tirona, and R. B. Kim Nuclear Receptors and the Regulation of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Transporters: Implications for Interindividual Variability in Response to Drugs J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 47(5): 566 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jung, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and U. A. Meyer Pregnane X Receptor Is a Target of Farnesoid X Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19081 - 19091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Deng, D. Yang, J. Yang, and B. Yan Oxysterol 22(R)-Hydroxycholesterol Induces the Expression of the Bile Salt Export Pump through Nuclear Receptor Farsenoid X Receptor but Not Liver X Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2006; 317(1): 317 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S W C van Mil, R H J Houwen, and L W J Klomp Genetics of familial intrahepatic cholestasis syndromes J. Med. Genet., June 1, 2005; 42(6): 449 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fiorucci, C. Clerici, E. Antonelli, S. Orlandi, B. Goodwin, B. M. Sadeghpour, G. Sabatino, G. Russo, D. Castellani, T. M. Willson, et al. Protective Effects of 6-Ethyl Chenodeoxycholic Acid, a Farnesoid X Receptor Ligand, in Estrogen-Induced Cholestasis J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2005; 313(2): 604 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Savkur, J. S. Thomas, K. S. Bramlett, Y. Gao, L. F. Michael, and T. P. Burris Ligand-Dependent Coactivation of the Human Bile Acid Receptor FXR by the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Coactivator-1{alpha} J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2005; 312(1): 170 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Erranz, J. F. Miquel, W. S. Argraves, J. L. Barth, F. Pimentel, and M.-P. Marzolo Megalin and cubilin expression in gallbladder epithelium and regulation by bile acids J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2004; 45(12): 2185 - 2198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Alvarez, P. Jara, E. Sanchez-Sabate, L. Hierro, J. Larrauri, M. C. Diaz, C. Camarena, A. De la Vega, E. Frauca, E. Lopez-Collazo, et al. Reduced hepatic expression of farnesoid X receptor in hereditary cholestasis associated to mutation in ATP8B1 Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2004; 13(20): 2451 - 2460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishimaki-Mogami, M. Une, T. Fujino, Y. Sato, N. Tamehiro, Y. Kawahara, K. Shudo, and K. Inoue Identification of intermediates in the bile acid synthetic pathway as ligands for the farnesoid X receptor J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 1538 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Lew, A. Zhao, J. Yu, L. Huang, N. de Pedro, F. Pelaez, S. D. Wright, and J. Cui The Farnesoid X Receptor Controls Gene Expression in a Ligand- and Promoter-selective Fashion J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 8856 - 8861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Echchgadda, C. S. Song, A. K. Roy, and B. Chatterjee Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfotransferase Is a Target for Transcriptional Induction by the Vitamin D Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2004; 65(3): 720 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Huang, A. Zhao, J.-L. Lew, T. Zhang, Y. Hrywna, J. R. Thompson, N. de Pedro, I. Royo, R. A. Blevins, F. Pelaez, et al. Farnesoid X Receptor Activates Transcription of the Phospholipid Pump MDR3 J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 51085 - 51090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zhao, J.-L. Lew, L. Huang, J. Yu, T. Zhang, Y. Hrywna, J. R. Thompson, N. de Pedro, R. A. Blevins, F. Pelaez, et al. Human Kininogen Gene Is Transactivated by the Farnesoid X Receptor J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 28765 - 28770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kitada, M. Miyata, T. Nakamura, A. Tozawa, W. Honma, M. Shimada, K. Nagata, C. J. Sinal, G. L. Guo, F. J. Gonzalez, et al. Protective Role of Hydroxysteroid Sulfotransferase in Lithocholic Acid-induced Liver Toxicity J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 17838 - 17844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |