Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112398200 on June 7, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 31448-31458, August 30, 2002
Physical and Functional Interaction of HIV-1 Tat with E2F-4,
a Transcriptional Regulator of Mammalian Cell Cycle*
Concetta
Ambrosino
,
Camillo
Palmieri
,
Antimina
Puca§,
Francesca
Trimboli§,
Marco
Schiavone§,
Francesco
Olimpico§,
Maria R.
Ruocco§,
Francesca
di Leva§,
Mario
Toriello§,
Ileana
Quinto
§,
Salvatore
Venuta
, and
Giuseppe
Scala
§¶
From the
Department of Clinical and Experimental
Medicine, Medical School, University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro,
Italy, and § Department of Biochemistry and Medical
Biotechnology, Medical School, University "Federico II," 80131 Naples, Italy
Received for publication, December 27, 2001, and in revised form, May 28, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Tat protein of the human immunodeficiency virus
type-1 (HIV-1) plays a critical role in the regulation of viral
transcription and replication. In addition, Tat regulates the
expression of a variety of cellular genes and could account for
AIDS-associated diseases including Kaposi's Sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma by interfering with cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The molecular mechanisms underlying the
pleiotropic activities of Tat may include the generation of functional
heterodimers of Tat with cellular proteins. By screening a human
B-lymphoblastoid cDNA library in the yeast two-hybrid system, we
identified E2F-4, a member of E2F family of transcription factors, as a
Tat-binding protein. The interaction between Tat and E2F-4 was
confirmed by GST pull-down experiments performed with cellular extracts
as well as with in vitro translated E2F-4. The physical
association of Tat and E2F-4 was confirmed by in vivo
binding experiments where Tat·E2F-4 heterodimers were
recovered from Jurkat cells by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting.
By using plasmids expressing mutant forms of Tat and E2F-4, the domains involved in Tat·E2F-4 interaction were identified as the regions encompassing amino acids 1-49 of Tat and amino acids 1-184 of E2F-4.
Tat·E2F-4 complexes were shown to bind to E2F cis-regions with increased efficiency compared with E2F-4 alone and to mediate the
activity of E2F-dependent promoters including HIV-1 long
terminal repeat and cyclin A. The data point to Tat as
an adaptor protein that recruits cellular factors such as E2F-4 to
exert its multiple biological activities.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The human immunodeficiency virus type-1
(HIV-1)1 is the etiologic
agent of the AIDS, a progressive and degenerative disease of the
immune system (1). Although the central defect in AIDS is the depletion
of CD4+ lymphocytes, the infected subjects show a complex
immunological dysfunction that is often associated with the development
of tumors including Kaposi's Sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and
involvement of the central nervous system (2, 3) Among the HIV-1
regulatory proteins, Tat plays a critical role in the regulation of
viral transcription and replication (4, 5). Tat is a small nuclear protein (86 or 101 amino acid residues according to viral strains) that
acts through a cis-acting element termed the transactivation response region (TAR) located within the long terminal repeat (LTR) and
encompasses nucleotides +1 to +44 from the transcription start site (6,
7). Tat binds directly to TAR-RNA (8-11) and promotes the full
activation of viral gene transcription by enhancing the processivity
and the transcription rate of RNA polymerase II (12, 13). The
mutational analysis of the protein revealed two functional domains
coded for by the first exon of tat and required for the
optimal activation of viral gene transcription: the activation domain
extending from the N terminus to residue 48 and the arginine-rich RNA
binding motif from residues 49 to 58, which also encompasses a nuclear
localization signal (14-18). The transcription activation domain
functions as a typical eukaryotic domain as demonstrated by swapping
experiments where the Tat-(1-49) region was fused to the
DNA-binding domain of heterologous proteins (19, 20). Three functional
domains can be identified in the Tat-(1-49) region: the acidic
activation domain (residues 1-21) and the cysteine-rich region
(residues 22-31), which together with the conserved core region are
involved in the in vitro formation of Tat-linked metal
dimers and Tat protein interactions in vivo (21, 22). The
Tat functional interaction with cellular proteins plays a key role in
the regulation of Tat transcriptional activity (23, 24). Tat-mediated
regulation of cellular gene expression is strongly related to its
physical and functional interaction with proteins directly involved in
the basal transcriptional process including TFIID, TFIIB (25-27), and
eukaryotic transcription factors such as Sp1 (28), and CAAT
enhancer-binding protein ((29). Moreover, Tat binds to cyclin T and
recruits CDK9 to increase the processivity of RNA polymerase II (12,
30-32). The second exon of tat codes for the C terminus of
the protein and appears to mediate a large array of cellular activities
by interacting with several cell surface receptors including integrin
receptors (33), vascular endothelial growth factor, and chemokine
receptors (34, 35). Tat protein may be directly involved in the
development of some AIDS-related diseases by interfering with cellular
processes such as proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (36).
In fact, Tat deregulates the expression of several genes including
proto-oncogenes and genes encoding for metabolic enzymes, cytokines,
and cytokine receptors (36-38). The above evidence points to Tat as an
adaptor protein that affects the expression of viral and cellular genes by associating with cellular proteins. In this regard, the complex role
of Tat in the establishment and progression of HIV-1 infection indicates that the yet unknown cellular partners of Tat remain to be
identified. To this end, we took advantage of the yeast two-hybrid
system to identify cellular proteins interacting with HIV-1 Tat. Among
the identified Tat-binding proteins, E2F-4, a member of the E2F
transcription factor family, was selected for further studies.
The family of E2F transcription factors forms heterodimers with pRb and
DP (differentiation regulated transcription factor 1 protein)
family proteins resulting in DNA-binding complexes (39, 40). E2F
proteins share a conserved DNA-binding domain and an acidic
transcriptional activation domain, which includes the "pocket
proteins" binding site. E2F proteins share a similar structural
organization with minor modifications: a N terminus region, which
includes the DNA-binding domain, followed by the dimerization domain
and the transcriptional activation domain located at the C terminus
(41). Functional E2F binding sites have been detected in the promoters
of genes controlling cell cycle progression such as dihydrofolate
reductase (42), thymidine kinase, cyclin A (43, 44), cyclin E (45),
E2F-1, E2F-2, pRb107, and some cellular proto-oncogenes (43). The E2F
DNA-binding complexes can be composed of DP-E2F heterodimers or by
larger complexes containing the pRB pocket proteins (46-49) or cyclin A-CDK2 and cyclin E-CDK2 (49-51) with E2F-4 as a major component of
E2F complexes in every stage of the cell cycle. E2F-4 presents some
structural and functional peculiarities, because it lacks a nuclear
localization signal (52-54) and the cyclin A binding site (located at
the N terminus of the other E2F proteins) (41). E2F-4 transcriptional
activities are regulated by modifications of its phosphorylation status
(41, 46, 49) by association with other cellular proteins (55) and by
its subcellular localization (56, 57). E2F-4 can bind all "pocket
proteins" (pRb, p107, and p130), although a preferential association
with p107 (48, 58) and p130 has been documented (59, 60). The
resulting E2F-4 heterodimers exert different biological roles. In fact, E2F-4·p130 complex is more abundant in the G0 phase of
the cell cycle, whereas E2F-4·p107 complex is mainly found in the S
phase. In addition, the investigation of E2F·pRb complexes is made
difficult by the capacity of Rb proteins to substitute for each other
(56-61). The above evidence points to E2F-4 as a major mediator E2F
cellular activity.
In this work, we provide evidence that Tat physically associates to
E2F-4 in vitro as well as in vivo. The resulting
Tat·E2F-4 complexes enhance the transcriptional activity of
E2F-driven promoters, indicating that Tat recruits E2F-4 to exert
multiple biological activities.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids and Cloning Strategies--
The yeast plasmids
expressing the wild-type and mutated HIV-1 Tat proteins fused to GAL4
DNA-binding domain (amino acids 1-117) were constructed by cloning the
tat cDNA fragments into the NdeI site
(Klenow-filled) of pAS2 plasmid. The DNA fragments coding for either
the wild-type Tat protein (amino acids 2-86) or the activation domain
of Tat (amino acids 2-49) or the basic region of Tat (amino acids
49-86) were recovered from pAS-Tat plasmids (a kind gift of B. Cullen)
by EcoR1/XhoI digestion and were inserted into
pAS2. pACTE2F-4-(1-481) was constructed by cloning the E2F-4 wild type
cDNA downstream of the GAL4 activation domain in pACT vector. The
E2F-4 cDNA was obtained by PCR using the pCDNA3-E2F-4 plasmid
(provided by A. Giordano) as a template for the following primers:
5'-CGCGGATCCCGCGGAGGCCGGG-3' (5' primer) and
5'-CGCGGATCCTGAGAGGTTGAGAACAGGCAG-3' (3' primer). The PCR fragment was
digested with BamH1 and cloned in the BamH1 site
of pACT. The DNA fragments coding for the 3'-truncated forms of E2F-4
were obtained by PCR using the following 3' primers: 5'-CGGCCTCGAGTCACAGGTGAATCTGGTACTTC-3' in the case of E2F-4-(1-184) and 5'-CGGCTCGAGTCACCAAAACATTGGTAATGTCGTAAATCCG-3' for
E2F-4-(1-68). The PCR fragments were digested with
BamH1/XhoI and cloned in the compatible sites of
pACT. The correct sequence of the cDNA fragments was analyzed by
sequencing (Sequenase Version 2, Amersham Biosciences). The
expression of the fusion proteins was verified by Western blot by using
antibodies specific for either the GAL4 DNA-binding domain or the GAL4
activation domain (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). pGEX-Tat plasmid was a
gift of M. Giacca. Mammalian plasmids expressing either the wild type
Tat, pCMVTat-(1-86), or the mutant forms of the viral protein, namely
pCMVTat-(1-21) and pCMVTat-(1-49), were constructed by cloning the
respective PCR fragments in pRC-CMV vector. The PCR was performed with
the following oligonucleotides: 5'-CGGGGTACCATGGAGCCAGTAGATCCTAG-3' as
5' primer; 5'-GGAATTCCATATGGCCTTAGGCATCTCC-3' as 3' primer in the case
of Tat-(1-86);
5'-CTATCCCTGTCTCCGCTTCTTCCTAGCAGTTTTAGGCAGACAACC-3' for
Tat-(1-21); and
5'-CTATCCCTGTCTCCGCTTCTTCCTCCTGCCATAGGAGATCG-3' as 3' primer for Tat-(1-49). The above 3' primers included the nuclear localization signals (bold nucleotides) and the stop codon. The
PCR fragments were subcloned in BKS (Stratagene) and recovered by KpnI/BamH1 digestion. The purified fragments
were cloned in pRC-CMV digested with the same enzymes.
pCMV-5'-FLAG-Tat-(1-86) was obtained by cloning the FLAG-Tat fragment
previously digested with KpnI/BamH1 in the
compatible sites of pRC-CMV. The FLAG epitope (bold sequence)
recognized by the M2 monoclonal antibody (Sigma) was inserted in-frame
upstream of the Tat coding sequence by PCR using the following primers:
5'-CGGGGTACCATGGACTACAAAGACGATGACGACAAGGAGCCAGTAGATCCTAGACTA-3' (5' primer) and the above reported 3' primer for Tat-(1-86). To obtain
pCMVTat-(1-49), the cDNA coding for residues 1-49 of Tat was
amplified by using the primers 5'-CCGGAATTCAGAGCCAGTAGATCTTAGACTA-3' and 5'-GCTCTAGACTAGCCATAGGAGATGCCTAAG-3' followed by
EcoRI-Xba digestion and insertion into the
corresponding sites of p3XFLAG-CMV-7.1 (Sigma). The HIV-1 Tat
expression vectors pSVT8 and pSVT10 carrying the tat gene
cloned downstream of the SV40 promoter in sense or antisense
orientation, respectively, were provided by A. Caputo. The reporter
plasmids pWTcat carrying the HIV-1 promoter from
644 to +78 bp cloned
upstream to the cat gene, pTARcat carrying mutations
abolishing the Tar structure, and pNFAcat carrying mutations of the two
NF
B sites were obtained by A. Rabson (62). pCD23 plasmid harboring
the HIV-1 promoter sequence from
117 to +80 bp and pCD52 lacking the
two NF
B sites were obtained from the AIDS Reference and Reagents
Program. In pCD23
Tar, the Tar region was functionally deleted as
described previously (63). pBLTK/E2F-cat and pBLTK/E2FM-cat were
prepared by inserting a double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding
to two copies of either wild type or mutant E2F binding site upstream
of the TK promoter in the SalI site of pBLCAT2. The
following oligonucleotides corresponding to the E2F binding site
of the promoter of the adenovirus E2 gene were
utilized: 5'-GATCCACTAGTTTCGCGCGTTTCTACACTATTTCGCGCGC-3' (wild type
sequence) and
5'-GATCCACTAGTTTACTCAGATAACTACACTATTTACTCAGATAACTATCGA-3' (mutant oligonucleotides, mutated basis are in bold).
Library Screening by Using the Yeast Two-hybrid System--
Y190
and Y187 yeast strains were described previously (64). For the library
screening, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y190 was grown in
selective minimal medium containing 6.7 g/liter yeast nitrogen base
without amino acids (20 g/liter glucose, 1× amino acid mixture lacking
uracil and lysine, 5 µg/ml cycloheximide, and 20 g/liter Bacto-agar
(Difco). For yeast transformation, a yeast culture from a single colony
was diluted and grown overnight at 30 °C. The day after, the yeast
culture (300 ml) was diluted at A600 = 0.2 and
grown to A600 = 0.5. Yeast cells were
harvested by centrifugation at 6000 × g and
resuspended in 1.5 ml of lithium acetate-TE buffer (100 mM
lithium acetate, pH 7.5, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 1 mM EDTA) and incubated at 30 °C for 1 h in
agitation. For each transformation, 20 µg of library DNA were mixed
with 5 µg of pASTAT-(2-86) and 175 µg of carrier DNA
previously boiled and chilled on ice. 200 µl of yeast suspension were
added to each DNA mix in the presence of 1.3 ml of polyethylene glycol
solution (40% polyethylene glycol 3350, 100 mM lithium
acetate, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 1 mM EDTA)
freshly prepared. After incubation at 30 °C for 45 min, the mixture
of yeast and DNA was heat-shocked at 42 °C for 15 min, resuspended
in 5 ml of synthetic complete medium, and grown for 5 h at
30 °C. The yeast cultures then were harvested and plated on a larger
plate containing selective medium lacking tryptophan, leucine, and
histidine plus 25 mM 3-amino-triazole (Sigma). The plates
were incubated at 30 °C, and the colonies grown after 3-5 days were
tested for
-galactosidase activity by filter assay. To this end,
45-nm nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schuell) were laid onto the
plates that were incubated at 30 °C overnight. The day after, the
filters were lifted and placed at
80 °C for 1 h and laid onto
3-mm chromatography paper soaked with buffer Z containing 1 mg/ml of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal, INALCO). Blue colonies were picked and grown on selective medium lacking leucine plus 5 µg/ml cycloheximide to induce the pAS-Tat-(2-86) plasmid expulsion. A single colony for each yeast clone
was grown in liquid synthetic medium lacking leucine plus cycloheximide, and 200 µl of this culture were mixed with 40 µl of
Y187 stably carrying pACT-laminin or pACT-SNF1. The mixed yeast cultures were incubated at 30 °C onto a nitrocellulose filter laid
on a complete medium plate. After a 4-h incubation, the filters were
recovered, and diploid cells were identified by plating on synthetic
medium lacking tryptophan and leucine. The grown colonies were screened
for
-galactosidase expression by filter assay. To recover the
library plasmids from yeast, positive yeast clones were grown in
synthetic medium minus leucine until saturation, harvested, washed, and
lysed in breaking buffer (0.2% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 1 mM EDTA) with glass beads (Sigma) and an equal volume of
phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol. The DNA was purified and introduced
in Escherichia coli DH5
by electroporation (Bio-Rad
apparatus). Two-hybrid assays were performed with purified plasmids by
using a similar transformation procedure using 5 µg of each of the
tested plasmids.
Cell Cultures and Transfection Experiments--
Jurkat cells
were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics as reported
previously (65). For transfection experiments, 4 × 106 cells were resuspended in 0.3 ml of RPMI 1640 medium
and 20% fetal calf serum and subjected to a double electrical pulse at 200 V, 960 microfarads by a Bio-Rad apparatus (66). CAT activity was
determined 36 h post-transfection as described previously (29).
Each assay contains 15 µg of cell extracts, 30 µl of 4 mM acetyl-coenzyme A (Sigma), 0.5 µCi of
D-threo-1,2-[14C]chloramphenicol (Amersham
Biosciences) in a final volume of 150 µl of 0.25 M
Tris-HCl, pH 7.8. The reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h, extracted with ethyl acetate, dried, and spotted on Polygram Sil G
silica gel plates (Macherey-Nagel). The plates then were run in a thin
layer chromatography tank containing a mixture of chloroform:methanol
(95:5). Following autoradiography, the thin layer chromatography spots
were counted in a Beckman LS5000TD scintillation counter.
Protein-Protein Interactions--
For in vitro
interaction studies, GST and GST-Tat proteins were produced and
purified as described previously (29, 65). For protein interaction, 5 µg of purified GST and GST-Tat proteins were incubated with 400 µg
of whole cellular extracts in binding buffer (20 mM Hepes,
pH 7.9, 0.4 M KCl, 25% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM DTT). After a
2-h incubation at 4 °C on a rocking platform, glutathione-Sepharose
beads (Amersham Biosciences) previously equilibrated in binding
buffer containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin were added to the
samples and left under agitation in a cold room for 2 h. The beads
were collected by centrifugation at 2000 × g for
30 s, washed several times in binding buffer containing 60 mM KCl, and resuspended in modified Laemmli buffer
containing 7 M urea and 10%
-mercaptoethanol. The
proteins were resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gel, blotted onto
nitrocellulose filters, and probed with E2F-4-specific antibody (C-20,
Santa Cruz Biotechnology). A similar protocol was used for the in
vitro interaction between GST proteins and E2F-4 in
vitro translated by using the TNTTM coupled
reticulocyte system (Promega) according to the instruction of the manufacturer.
Co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed as reported
previously (65). 250 µg of whole cellular extracts or 100 µg of
nuclear proteins were precleared in a final volume of 300 µl in
binding buffer with protein G-Sepharose for 2 h at 4 °C on a
rocking platform. Unbound complexes were recovered by centrifugation at
500 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and incubated with 20 µl of M2-anti-FLAG affinity matrix (Sigma) for 3 h in a cold
room under agitation. Bound proteins were collected by centrifugation
at 500 × g for 10 min, washed several times in binding
buffer containing 60 mM KCl, and resuspended in Laemmli
buffer. The samples were boiled for 2 min and centrifuged at
13,5000 × g for 2 min. The recovered supernatants were
run on SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to immunoblotting. The
filters were probed with E2F-4-specific antibody (C-20).
For immunoblotting assay, the samples were resuspended in modified 2×
Laemmli buffer (0.25 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 30% glycerol, 10 mM EDTA, 4% SDS, 0.1% bromphenol blue, 7 M
urea, and 10%
-mercaptoethanol) and boiled before loading on
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The gel was run in running buffer (0.025 M Tris, 0.190 M glycine, and 0.1% SDS) and
blotted onto nitrocellulose filter (Schleicher & Schuell). The filters
were blocked in phosphate-buffered saline, 5% nonfat dry milk, and
incubated with the reported antibodies for 2 h at room
temperature. The filters were then washed several times and incubated
with a peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti rabbit/mouse IgG (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). After a 1 h incubation, the filters were
washed and subjected to enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL,
Amersham Biosciences). Anti-E2F-4 (C-20) antibody was purchased from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay and Northern Blot
Analysis--
Whole cellular extracts were prepared as reported
previously (37). The cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 10%
glycerol, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM
Na2VO3, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin). Cells
lysates were frozen in dry ice, thawed on ice, and pelleted at
13,5000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The cell extracts
were aliquoted and stored at
80 °C. To isolate nuclear and
cytosolic protein fractions, cells were harvested, washed with cold
phosphate-buffered saline, and transferred to a 1.5-ml tube for a
second wash at 4 °C. The pellets were resuspended in NP buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA, 60 mM
KCl, 5 mM DTT, and 0.2% Nonidet P-40 plus protease and
phosphatase inhibitors). After a 3-min incubation on ice, cells were
checked by microscopy, and nuclei were collected by centrifugation for 500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatants
(cytosolic fraction) were recovered, diluted in nuclear extraction
buffer, and centrifuged at 13,5000 × g for 30 min. The
proteins then were aliquoted and stored at
80 °C. The nuclei were
washed twice in lysing buffer without Nonidet P-40 and incubated for
1 h in nuclear extraction buffer (lysis buffer plus 450 mM KCl) on ice. After a centrifugation at 13,5000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, the proteins were aliquoted and
stored at
80 °C. Protein concentration was determined by Bio-Rad
protein assay kit.
For electrophoretic mobility shift assay, the following double-stranded
oligonucleotides obtained by annealing the reported oligonucleotide
with the complementary strand were used as probe and competitors: E2F
binding site, 5'-GATCCACTAGTTTCGCGCGCTTTCTA-3'; mutant E2F
binding site,
5'-GATCCACTAGTTTACTCAGATAACTA-3' (bold
nucleotides represent the introduced mutations); and Sp1, 5'-GGGAGGTGTGGCCTGGGCGGGACTGGGGAGTGGCG-3'. The
oligonucleotides were end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP by
using polynucleotide kinase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). 5 µg of
nuclear proteins were incubated in a reaction mixture (final volume 10 µl) containing 10% glycerol, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 2 µg of poly(dI·dC) (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) for 5 min on ice, and 1 µl of
[
-32P]ATP-labeled double-stranded probe
(0.2 ng, 4-6 × 104 cpm for 5 min on ice). After a
5-min incubation on ice, the cold competitors (200 times) were added,
and the samples were left on ice for 5 min and supplemented with the
labeled probes. The samples were incubated at room temperature for 20 min followed by the addition of 0.5 µg of the monoclonal antibodies
against E2F-4 (RK-13, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-M2-FLAG
epitope (Eastman Kodak Co.), or mouse preimmune serum. The samples were incubated for 1 h on ice and loaded on 4% native acrylamide gel and run in 0.3× Tris borate EDTA for 5 h at 4 °C. A similar
protocol was followed in the case of Sp1 where the reaction buffer
consisted of 10% glycerol, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and 2 µg of poly dI·dC. The gels were
dried and analyzed by autoradiography. Northern blots were performed on
total RNA as reported previously (65).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of E2F-4 as a Tat-binding Protein in the Yeast
Two-hybrid System--
To screen for human proteins interacting with
HIV-1 Tat protein, the Y190 yeast strain (64) was co-transfected with a
pACT-based human B-lymphocyte cDNA library fused to the GAL4 acidic
activation domain together with pAS-Tat plasmid-expressing HIV-1
Tat-(2-86) fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. The characteristics
of the yeast expression vectors and of the library used in the
screening are described elsewhere (67). A total of 2.5 × 106 transformants were placed under selection by spreading
on synthetic medium lacking tryptophan, leucine, and histidine and
containing 25 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT). The
3-AT is a competitive inhibitor of histamine biosynthesis and
increases the stringency of the selection of His3 expression. After
selection for his3 gene expression, the transformants were
screened for their ability to produce
-galactosidase using a filter
lift assay (68). 279 His+ blue colonies were screened for
interaction with Tat-unrelated proteins by mating the type assay. The
colonies were grown in synthetic medium minus leucine and plus
cycloheximide to eliminate the bait plasmid pAS2-Tat, which confers
cycloheximide sensitivity to the Y190 strain. Yeast cells from these
liquid cultures were mated with yeast strain Y187 stably expressing
pAS-laminin or pAS-SNFI plasmids (64). The resulting diploid cells were
selected and assayed for
-galactosidase activity. The yeast colonies
that tested positive in this assay were considered to be not actually positive and were discarded. A sequence analysis from one of the positive clones revealed that the cDNA insert encoded a protein identical to E2F-4 from amino acids 99 to 413. To verify the ability of
wild-type E2F-4 to interact with HIV-1 Tat protein, the full-length E2F-4 cDNA coding for amino acids 2-413 was cloned downstream to
the GAL-4 activation domain in the pACT yeast expression vector. As
shown in Fig. 1, C and
D, the full-length E2F-4 protein interacts with HIV-1 Tat in
a manner similar to the library-derived clone (compare
panel C with D). The specificity of the
interaction was verified by two-hybrid experiments performed with yeast
vectors expressing mutant forms of GAL4-E2F-4. We constructed the
pACTE2F-4-(2-184) and pACTE2F-4-(2-68) plasmids expressing
3'-truncated forms of E2F-4 lacking either the transcriptional
activation domain (amino acids 185-413) or the transcription
activation domain together with the cysteine-rich region (amino acids
68-184), respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, E and
F, the deletion of E2F-4 transcriptional activation domain
(amino acids 185-413) resulted in a reduced interaction with Tat,
whereas the deletion of E2F-4 cysteine-rich region (amino acids
69-184) completely abolished it.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Functional interaction between full-length
Tat and discrete regions of E2F-4 in yeast cells.
A, the strong Tat-Tat interaction (29) as a positive
control. B, the absence of interaction of Tat with Gal4
activation domain. pAS-Tat-(2-86) plasmid carrying a cDNA coding
for the full-length of Tat fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain was
co-transfected in yeast Y190 together with pACT-(99-413) plasmid
expressing the region of E2F-4 encompassing amino acids 99-413 and
identified by screening a human B-cell library as detailed under
"Experimental Procedures" (C). D-F, in
parallel experiments, pACT plasmid expressing either the full-length or
discrete regions of E2F-4 were tested. Results are expressed as the
level of -galactosidase of the yeast colonies selected as detailed
under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
To identify the Tat domain required for the interaction with E2F-4, we
generated the mutant plasmids pAS-Tat-(2-49) and pAS-Tat-(49-86). The
above plasmids were then co-transfected in Y190 together with pACTE2F-4-(2-413). The deletion of a Tat region encompassing the basic
and the C terminus domains (amino acids 49-86) did not affect the Tat
interaction with E2F-4 (Fig.
2F), whereas the tat domain encompassing amino acids 2-21 did not interact with E2F-4 (panel G). Consistently, the Tat C terminus region (amino acids 49-86) failed to sustain a physical interaction between HIV-1 Tat protein and
E2F-4 (panel H). Considered collectively, the results shown in Figs. 1 and 2 indicate that Tat interacts with the cellular transcription factor E2F-4. In addition, this finding demonstrates that
the interaction is mediated by the Tat activation domain (amino acids
2-49) and requires the Cys-rich domain of E2F-4.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Functional interaction between full-length
E2F-4 and discrete regions of Tat in yeast cells. pAS-TAT plasmids
carrying discrete regions of Tat fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain
were co-transfected in Y190 yeast cells with pACTE2F-4 plasmid
expressing E2F-4 full-length. A and B, positive
and negative controls of Tat interaction as detailed in legend to Fig.
1.
|
|
HIV-1 Tat Protein Binds to E2F-4 Both in Vitro and in
Vivo--
Tat was next produced and purified in vitro as a
GST fusion protein as described previously (65). 5 µg of purified GST
or GST-Tat proteins were incubated with whole cellular extracts
prepared from Jurkat cells. The cellular proteins complexed either to
GST or to GST-Tat were recovered by adding a glutathione affinity matrix and subjected to immunoblotting with a E2F-4-specific antibody. As shown in Fig. 3a, GST-Tat
proteins specifically associated with E2F-4. Similar results were
obtained when GST or GST-Tat proteins were added to in vitro
translated E2F-4 (as shown in Fig. 3b), suggesting that the
post-translational modifications of E2F-4 such as phosphorylation do
not play a role in the observed interaction.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
In vitro interaction of Tat and
E2F-4. a, Tat was produced and purified in
vitro as a GST fusion protein as described previously (29). 5 µg
of purified GST or GST-Tat proteins were incubated with whole cellular
extracts prepared from Jurkat cells. The cellular proteins complexed
either with GST or with GST-Tat were recovered by adding a glutathione
affinity matrix and subjected to immunoblotting with a E2F-4-specific
antibody. b, GST or GST-Tat proteins were incubated with
in vitro translated E2F-4. E2F-4 proteins binding to GST or
to GST-Tat were detected by a anti-E2F-4 antibody.
|
|
To further characterize the Tat·E2F-4 interaction, we examined
whether Tat could associate with endogenous E2F-4 proteins. To this
end, Jurkat cells were transfected with pCMV-FLAG and pCMV-FLAG-Tat.
36-h post-transfection nuclear cell extracts were subjected to
immunoprecipitation by using an anti-FLAG affinity matrix for 2 h
at 4 °C followed by immunoblotting with an anti-E2F-4 antibody. As
shown in Fig. 4a, lane
2, E2F-4 was selectively immunoprecipitated from the
Tat-transfected cells, indicating the in vivo presence of
Tat·E2F-4 complexes. Tat expression in the cell extracts was analyzed
by immunoblotting with an anti-FLAG antibody (Fig. 4b).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In vivo interaction of Tat with
cellular E2F-4. a, pCMV-FLAG and pCMV-FLAG-Tat were
used to transfect Jurkat cells. At 36 h post-transfection, nuclear
cell extracts (lanes 1 and 2) were subjected to
immunoprecipitation by using an anti-FLAG affinity matrix for 4 h
at 4 °C followed by immunoblotting with an anti-E2F-4 antibody.
Lane 3 shows the endogenous levels of E2F-4 in nuclear cell
extracts. b, Tat expression in the tested cell extracts was
analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-FLAG antibody.
|
|
Tat·E2F-4 Complexes Bind to a E2F cis-Sequence--
The
Tat·E2F-4 complexes may bind to E2F cis-sequences and
regulate E2F-dependent promoters. To test this possibility,
the nuclear extracts prepared from Jurkat cells transiently transfected with either pCMV-FLAG or pCMV-FLAG-Tat were analyzed for binding to an
oligonucleotide corresponding to the E2F binding site located in the
adenovirus E2 promoter. In these experiments, Tat-transfected cells
expressed a nuclear E2F DNA binding activity higher than the control
cells (Fig. 5a, lanes
2 and 9). The increased DNA binding activity was
mediated by E2F-4 as demonstrated by using a E2F-4-specific antibody
(Fig. 5a, lanes 5 and 12) and by the lack of any activity by a control pre-immune serum (Fig. 5a,
lanes 6 and 13). The addition of an anti-Flag
monoclonal antibody reduced the E2F DNA binding specifically in the
Tat-expressing cells (Fig. 5a, lanes 7 and
14), indicating that Tat was present in the DNA-binding complex. The increased level of E2F-4 nuclear DNA binding activity of
the Tat-transfected cells was not the result of a higher amount of
nuclear E2F-4. In fact, immunoblotting experiments performed with
nuclear, cytosolic, and whole cell extracts prepared from the same
number of pCMV-FLAG or pCMV-FLAG-Tat-transfected cells showed similar
levels of cellular E2F-4 (Fig. 5b). The above results indicate that Tat binds to E2F-4 transcription factors and increases their affinity for the cognate cis-sequence.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Induction of E2F binding activity by
Tat. a, nuclear extracts prepared from Jurkat cells
transiently transfected with either pCMV-FLAG or pCMV-FLAG-Tat were
analyzed for binding to an oligonucleotide corresponding to the E2F
binding site located in the adenovirus E2 promoter. Anti-FLAG or
anti-E2F-4 antibodies were added to the reaction mixture as detailed
under "Experimental Procedures." b, E2F-4 content of
nuclear (lanes 1 and 2), cytosolic (lanes
3 and 4), and whole cell extracts (lanes 5 and 6) prepared from pCMV-FLAG-transfected or
pCMV-FLAG-Tat-transfected Jurkat cells. Cell extracts obtained from the
same cell number were subjected to immunoblotting by using an E2F-4
antibody.
|
|
Bandshift assays performed on nuclear extracts prepared from Jurkat
cells transiently transfected with pCMV, pCMVTat-(1-86), pCMVTat-(1-49), and pCMVTat-(1-21) demonstrated that the Tat
activation domain (Tat-(1-49)) was as efficient as the full-length Tat
in enhancing the E2F DNA binding activity, whereas the N terminus of
the protein (Tat-(1-21)) as well as the control pCMV was ineffective (as shown in Fig. 6a).
Supershift experiments performed in the presence of an anti-E2F-4
antibody confirmed the specificity of the Tat induction of the E2F DNA
binding activity (Fig. 6a, lanes 4, 9,
14, and 19). Thus, consistent with the
interaction results shown in Figs. 1-4, the Tat region encompassing
amino acids 22-49 is required for the generation of Tat·E2F-4
DNA-binding complexes. In other experiments, protein extracts
from Jurkat cells expressing either FLAG-Tat-(1-86) or
FLAG-Tat-(1-49) were tested for E2F DNA binding activity (Fig.
6b). We observed increased levels of E2F binding activity in
FLAG-Tat-expressing cells (Fig. 6b, lanes 7,
8 and 12, 13). The DNA-protein
complexes were supershifted by an anti-E2F-4 and reduced by an
anti-FLAG antibody, indicating that both E2F-4 and Tat contributed to
the E2F-binding complex (Fig. 6b, lanes 9,
14 and 10, 15).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Identification of the Tat region required for
Tat-induction of E2F-binding activity. a, Bandshift
assays were performed on nuclear extracts prepared from Jurkat cells
transiently transfected with pCMV, pCMVTat-(1-86), pCMVTat-(1-21),
and pCMVTat-(1-49) as detailed under "Experimental Procedures."
Oligonucleotides corresponding to an E2F cis-region were
end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP and incubated with 5 µg of nuclear extracts. b, protein extracts from Jurkat
cells expressing either FLAG-Tat-(1-86) or FLAG-Tat-(1-49) were
tested for E2F DNA binding activity. Supershift experiments were
performed by using either an anti-E2F-4 or an anti-FLAG antibody.
Lanes 1, 6, and 11 denote the free
probe. c, E2F-4 proteins were detected in transfected cells
by immunoblotting with an anti-E2F-4 antibody.
|
|
Functional Cooperation between Tat Protein and E2F-4 in the
Regulation of Gene Transcription--
E2F cis-sequences
have been identified in the promoter regions of several viral and
cellular genes (41). To test whether HIV-1 Tat protein could modify the
activity of a E2F-regulated promoter, an oligonucleotide consisting of
two tandem copies of either wild type or mutant E2F binding site was
cloned upstream of the thymidine kinase promoter in pBL-CAT2, a
cat reporter plasmid (Fig.
7a). The resulting
pBLTK-E2F-cat and pBLTK-E2F-4-cat were transiently co-transfected in
Jurkat cells together with pCMVTat-(1-86) alone or in combination with
pCMV-E2F-4 (Fig. 7b). In these experiments, Tat induced a
substantial amount of CAT activity only in cells co-transfected with
pCMV-E2F-4 plasmid, indicating that Tat cooperates with E2F-4 in
regulating the E2F-dependent gene expression.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Tat up-regulates the transcriptional activity
of a E2F-driven promoter. a, an oligonucleotide
reproducing two copies of either wild type or a mutant E2F binding site
was cloned upstream to the thymidine kinase promoter in pBL-CAT2. The
resulting pBLTK-E2F-cat and pBLTK-E2FM-cat were transiently
co-transfected in Jurkat cells together with pCMVTat-(1-86) alone or
in combination with pCMV-E2F-4. Cell extracts prepared 36 h
post-transfection were tested for CAT activity as detailed under
"Experimental Procedures." b, results are expressed as
percentages of acetylated [1,2-14C]chloramphenicol. The
above experiments were repeated three times with similar results.
|
|
Two functional E2F binding sites at positions
454 to
381 and
117
to
80 bp have been identified in the LTR region of HIV-1 and regulate
HIV-1 promoter activity (69). Based on these observations, we tested
whether Tat could cooperate with E2F-4 in the regulation of gene
transcription driven by the HIV-1 LTR. To this end, Jurkat cells were
co-transfected with pWTcat either alone or in the presence of pCMVTat
and pCDNA3-E2F-4. We found that E2F-4 cooperates with suboptimal
doses of Tat (0.5 µg) to induce the HIV-1 promoter activity (Fig.
8a). In these experiments, a
synergistic increase in CAT activity induced by E2F-4 and full-length
Tat was observed. To define the Tat domains involved in the observed
increase in CAT activity, plasmids encoding deletion mutants of Tat
protein, namely pCMVTat-(1-21) and pCMVTat-(1-49), were transfected
in Jurkat cells. We observed that the co-expression of pCDNA3-E2F-4 resulted in a substantial increase in HIV-1 promoter activity only when
pCMVTat-(1-86) or pCMVTat-(1-49) were co-transfected, whereas mutant
Tat-(1-21) was ineffective. These results indicate that Tat activation
domain (amino acids 1-49) was the minimal region required for a
functional interaction with E2F-4 in the context of the HIV-1 LTR (Fig.
8a).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Tat·E2F-4 complexes regulate the HIV-1 LTR
promoter activity. a, Jurkat cells were co-transfected
with pWT-cat, an LTR-driven reporter construct together with the
indicated tat-expressing plasmids (0.5 µg) in combination
with the indicated amounts of pCDNA-E2F-4 plasmid. CAT activity was
assayed on cell extracts at 36 h post-transfection as detailed
under "Experimental Procedures." Results are expressed as
percentages of acetylated [1,2-14C]chloramphenicol.
b, pCMVTat-(1-86) (0.5 µg) was co-transfected with
pCDNA-E2F-4 plasmid (10 µg) together with the indicated LTR-CAT
constructs carrying either the wild-type sequence or deletions of
discrete cis-sequences. CAT activity was assayed on cell
extracts at 36 h post-transfection as detailed under
"Experimental Procedures." Results are expressed as percentages of
acetylated [1,2-14C]chloramphenicol. The results are
representative of four independent experiments.
|
|
We next addressed the role of E2F-4 and Tat-binding
cis-regions in the regulation of HIV-1 LTR-driven
transcription. The expression vectors pCMVTat and pCMV-E2F-4 were
co-transfected in Jurkat cells together with cat reporter
plasmids carrying the deletions of discrete regions of the viral LTR.
As reported in Fig. 8b, the deletion of the TAR region in
pWTCat
TAR strongly reduced the Tat induction of LTR-driven
transcription (bars 3 and 7) and abolished the
TAT-E2F-4 cooperation (bars 4 and 8).
The deletion of the NF
B binding sites and of the overlapping E2F
cis-region in pWTcat
NF
B reduced the induction of viral
transcription by Tat (bars 3 and 11), but it did
not abolish the functional cooperation between Tat and E2F-4
(bars 4 and 12), indicating that the upstream E2F binding site was used in the Tat-E2F-4 regulation of the transcription (bar 12). When pCD23 plasmid carrying a promoter region
encompassing the two NF
B sites and the contiguous E2F site was used
in the assay, a strong cooperation between Tat and E2F-4 was observed, indicating that both the E2F-4 and NF
B cis-sequences are
required for an optimal function of Tat·E2F-4 heterodimers
(bars 15 and 16). The deletion of either the TAR
region (pCD23
TAR) or of the NF
B binding site overlapping
the proximal E2F site (pCD52) completely abolished the Tat·E2F-4
cooperation (bars 17-24).
Induction of Cyclin A Gene Expression by Tat--
We next examined
whether Tat could cooperate with E2F-4 in regulating the transcription
of endogenous genes. In fact, the functional E2F cis-regions
are present in the promoter regions of several genes whose expression
is regulated during cell cycle (19). These include cyclin A, a key
regulator of G1-S transition (44). The results shown
in Fig. 5 suggest that Tat may modulate cyclin A gene expression by
forming E2F-4·Tat complexes acting on the endogenous cyclin A
promoter. To test this possibility, Jurkat cells were transfected with
a tat-expressing plasmid and tested for the expression of
the endogenous cyclin A gene. As shown in Fig.
9, an increase in cyclin A mRNA was
observed in Tat-positive cells at 36 h post-transfection,
suggesting that Tat may deregulate the cell cycle of lymphoid cells by
increasing the levels of cyclin A-CDK2 complexes.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Tat activates the transcription of the
endogenous cyclin A gene in Jurkat cells. a and
b, Jurkat cells were transfected with 10 µg of
pcDNA-Tat-(1-86) as reported previously (37). At the indicated
time points, total RNA was isolated and analyzed by Northern blot by
using a 32P-labeled probe consisting of the cDNA of
human cyclin A gene. b, the panel shows the amounts of RNA
subjected to Northern blot. c, the relative increase in
cyclin A gene expression was assessed by a PhosphorImager-assisted
comparison of the disintegrations/min counts. Results representative of
three independent experiments are shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A wealth of studies have recently shed light on the pleiotropic
activity of HIV-1 Tat on the viral life cycle and host cell physiology
(5). In particular, the molecular mechanisms underlying the
transcriptional function of Tat have been clarified by showing that Tat
interacts with the p-TEFb complex, which includes the Cdk9
cyclin-dependent kinase physically associated to members of
cyclin T such as T1, T2a, and T2b (12, 31, 32, 70). The resulting
Tat·p-TEFb complex binds TAR RNA with high affinity and promotes an
efficient transcription from the viral LTR. In addition, Tat binds
directly to several eukaryotic transcription factors including TFIID
(27), TFIIB (25), TFIIH (71), Sp1 (28), NF-interleukin-6-CAAT
enhancer-binding protein (29), and RNA polymerase II (10). However, the
above studies could not account for the large array of biological
activities ascribed to Tat and may imply that Tat could functionally
interact with additional cell factors. To address this issue, we used
the yeast two-hybrid system to identify Tat-interacting proteins and
identified a cDNA clone encoding for E2F-4, a transcription factor
that plays a key role in the regulation of the cell cycle progression
(42-45). We verified in yeast that the full-length E2F-4 protein
(amino acids 1-413) could specifically interact with HIV-1 Tat in a
similar manner as the library clone (amino acids 99-413) (as shown in Figs. 1 and 2). The interaction requires the E2F-4 residues from 1 to
184, a region encompassing the DNA-binding and dimerization domains of
the protein and the HIV-1 Tat activation domain (amino acids 1-49).
The interaction was confirmed by GST pull-down experiments performed
with cellular extracts as well as with in vitro translated E2F-4. In both cases, Tat interacted with E2F-4 (Fig. 3, a
and b). This interaction was verified in vivo by
co-immunoprecipitation experiments. (Fig. 4). Subsequent DNA-protein
interaction experiments showed that Tat increases the E2F-4 DNA binding
activity and is a component of the DNA-binding complexes (Fig.
5a). Moreover, the enhanced E2F binding activity occurred in
the absence of the increased nuclear level of E2F-4 (Fig.
5c), indicating that Tat increases the affinity of E2F-4 for
its cognate cis-elements. A similar mechanism accounts for
human T-cell lymphotrophic virus, type I Tax activity on transcription
mediated by bZip proteins (72, 73), suggesting that the two viral
transactivators have evolved to regulate the function of crucial cell
transcription factors. In fact, the transcriptional activity of
Tat·E2F-4 complexes was verified by a using a E2F-regulated reporter
plasmid. In these experiments, Tat activation domain (amino acids
1-49) promoted a transcriptional activity similar to the one
contributed by wild type Tat (shown in Fig. 5a). The
biological relevance of the Tat·E2F-4 complex was analyzed in gene
expression experiments where the two proteins were tested for the
capacity to regulate the LTR-driven transcription of a cat
reporter gene. We found that E2F-4 could cooperate with Tat to activate
the transcription of HIV-1 promoter (Fig. 8a). The analysis
of Tat mutants showed that the Tat activation domain strongly increased
the activity of E2F-4. The experiments with HIV-1 promoter mutants
revealed that the deletion of TAR region strongly undermines the
E2F-4-Tat cooperation (Fig. 8b) and points to an
indispensable role of TAR for Tat·E2F-4 cooperation in the context of
HIV-1 LTR. Consistent with this possibility, similar results were
obtained in the case of Tat-CAAT enhancer-binding protein complexes
(29). The deletion of one E2F binding site (
454 to
381 bp) does not
abolish the E2F-4 induction and Tat cooperation, whereas a deletion of
both sites of E2F cis-regions results in the complete lost
of E2F-4 cooperation with Tat. The synergistic cooperation of Tat and
E2F-4 can be explained in the context of the capacity of Tat to
increase the DNA binding activity of E2F-4 as shown by DNA bandshift
assay (Fig. 5a).
The capacity of Tat to promote the transcription of E2F-regulated
endogenous genes was tested by analyzing the amounts of cyclin A
mRNA in Jurkat cell transfected with tat. As shown in Fig. 9, Tat expression resulted in an increase in cyclin A mRNA at
36 h post-transfection. In this regard, cell cycle regulation in
non-transformed cells is characterized by a repression of cyclin A gene
expression during G1 phase followed by an induction at S-phase entry (44). In addition to the G1-S
transition, cyclin A is required throughout S and M phases (74, 75). In
fact, cyclin A may be a component of the DNA replication complex (14, 44). Accordingly, constitutive expression of cyclin A is associated with a tumorigenic phenotype, and its repression results in cell growth
arrest (28, 75). The above evidence together with the functional
interaction results reported in this work points to Tat as a major
regulator of cell cycle. Consistent with this possibility, Tat binds to
p300 (76-78), which in turn associates to cyclin E-Cdk2 to activate
NF
B/rel transcription factors (79). Additional evidence for a role
of Tat in cell cycle regulation comes from the evidence that Tat
modulates cell cycle G1 phase of glial cells (80) and
induces apoptosis by interfering with a proper cyclin E-CDK2 complex
(81). Moreover, Tat transactivation occurs distinctly during
mid-to-late G1 and at G2 phases of the cell
cycle (82). Thus, Tat appears to have evolved as an adaptor protein
that binds to cellular factors such as E2F-4 to promote transcriptional
events required for cell cycle progression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank A. Rabson for providing pWT-CAT and
pTar and pNFA and the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program for
pCD plasmids. We also thank B. Cullen and R. Sternglanz for pGAL4-TAT
and pGAD-424 plasmids, respectively. PSVT8 and pSVT10 plasmids were
provided by A. Caputo, and cyclin A cDNA was obtained from A. Giordano.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants from
Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Istituto
Superiore di Sanita` (ISS) for AIDS project, Telethon, and Ministero
dell'Istruzione dell'Universitè e delle Ricerce (MIUR).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
scala@unicz.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 7, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112398200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HIV-1, human
immunodeficiency virus, type 1;
TAR, transactivation response region;
LTR, long terminal repeat;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase;
E2, ubiquitin carrier protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Fauci, A. S.,
Macher, A. M.,
Longo, D. L.,
Lane, H. C.,
Rook, A. H.,
Masur, H.,
and Gelmann, E. P.
(1984)
Ann. Intern. Med.
100,
92-106[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Beral, V.,
Peterman, T. A.,
Berkelman, R. L.,
and Jaffe, H. W.
(1990)
Lancet
335,
123-128[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Levine, A. M.
(1992)
Blood
80,
8-20[Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Fisher, A. G.,
Feinberg, M. B.,
Josephs, S. F.,
Harper, M. E.,
Marselle, L. M.,
Reyes, G.,
Gonda, M. A.,
Aldovini, A.,
Debouk, C.,
Gallo, R. C.,
et al..
(1986)
Nature
320,
367-371[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Jeang, K. T.,
Xiao, H.,
and Rich, E. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28837-28840[Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Laspia, M. F.,
Rice, A. P.,
and Mathews, M. B.
(1989)
Cell
59,
283-292[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Arya, S. K.,
Guo, C.,
Josephs, S. F.,
and Wong-Staal, F.
(1985)
Science
229,
69-73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Berkhout, B.,
Silverman, R. H.,
and Jeang, K. T.
(1989)
Cell
59,
273-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Roy, S.,
Delling, U.,
Chen, C. H.,
Rosen, C. A.,
and Sonenberg, N.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1365-1373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Wu-Baer, F.,
Sigman, D.,
and Gaynor, R. B.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7153-7157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Cullen, B. R.
(1990)
Cell
63,
655-657[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Wei, P.,
Garber, M. E.,
Fang, S. M.,
Fischer, W. H.,
and Jones, K. A.
(1998)
Cell
92,
451-462[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Herrmann, C. H.,
Carroll, R. G.,
Wei, P.,
Jones, K. A.,
and Rice, A. P.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
9881-9888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Ruben, S.,
Perkins, A.,
Purcell, R.,
Joung, K.,
Sia, R.,
Burghoff, R.,
Haseltine, W. A.,
and Rosen, C. A.
(1989)
J. Virol.
63,
1-8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Garcia, J. A.,
Harrich, D.,
Pearson, L.,
Mitsuyasu, R.,
and Gaynor, R. B.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
3143-3147[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Hauber, J.,
Malim, M. H.,
and Cullen, B. R.
(1989)
J. Virol.
63,
1181-1187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Calnan, B. J.,
Tidor, B.,
Biancalana, S.,
Hudson, D.,
and Frankel, A. D.
(1991)
Science
252,
1167-1171[Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Weeks, K. M.,
Ampe, C.,
Schultz, S. C.,
Steitz, T. A.,
and Crothers, D. M.
(1990)
Science
249,
1281-1285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Southgate, C. D.,
and Green, M. R.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
2496-2507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Green, M.,
Ishino, M.,
and Loewenstein, P. M.
(1989)
Cell
58,
215-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Siderovski, D. P.,
Matsuyama, T.,
Frigerio, E.,
Chui, S.,
Min, X.,
Erfle, H.,
Sumner-Smith, M.,
Barnett, R. W.,
and Mak, T. W.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
5311-5320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Frankel, A. D.,
Bredt, D. S.,
and Pabo, C. O.
(1988)
Science
240,
70-73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Madore, S. J.,
and Cullen, B. R.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
3703-3711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Selby, M. J.,
and Peterlin, B. M.
(1990)
Cell
62,
769-776[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Veschambre, P.,
Simard, P.,
and Jalinot, P.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
250,
169-180[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Yu, L.,
Loewenstein, P. M.,
Zhang, Z.,
and Green, M.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
3017-3023[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Kashanchi, F.,
Piras, G.,
Radonovich, M. F.,
Duvall, J. F.,
Fattaey, A.,
Chiang, C. M.,
Roeder, R. G.,
and Brady, J. N.
(1994)
Nature
367,
295-299[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Jeang, K. T.,
Chun, R.,
Lin, N. H.,
Gatignol, A.,
Glabe, C. G.,
and Fan, H.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
6224-6233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Ambrosino, C.,
Ruocco, M. R.,
Chen, X.,
Mallardo, M.,
Baudi, F.,
Trematerra, S.,
Quinto, I.,
Venuta, S.,
and Scala, G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14883-14892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Herrmann, C. H.,
and Rice, A. P.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
1612-1620[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Zhou, Q.,
Chen, D.,
Pierstorff, E.,
and Luo, K.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3681-3691[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Mancebo, H. S.,
Lee, G.,
Flygare, J.,
Tomassini, J.,
Luu, P.,
Zhu, Y.,
Peng, J.,
Blau, C.,
Hazuda, D.,
Price, D.,
and Flores, O.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2633-2644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Brake, D. A.,
Debouck, C.,
and Biesecker, G.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
1275-1281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Albini, A.,
Soldi, R.,
Giunciuglio, D.,
Giraudo, E.,
Benelli, R.,
Primo, L.,
Noonan, D.,
Salio, M.,
Camussi, G.,
Rockl, W.,
and Bussolino, F.
(1996)
Nat. Med.
2,
1371-1375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Albini, A.,
Ferrini, S.,
Benelli, R.,
Sforzini, S.,
Giunciuglio, D.,
Aluigi, M. G.,
Proudfoot, A. E.,
Alouani, S.,
Wells, T. N.,
Mariani, G.,
Rabin, R. L.,
Farber, J. M.,
and Noonan, D. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13153-13158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Ensoli, B.,
Barillari, G.,
and Gallo, R. C.
(1992)
Immunol. Rev.
127,
147-155[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Scala, G.,
Ruocco, M. R.,
Ambrosino, C.,
Mallardo, M.,
Giordano, V.,
Baldassarre, F.,
Dragonetti, E.,
Quinto, I.,
and Venuta, S.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
179,
961-971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Purvis, S. F.,
Georges, D. L.,
Williams, T. M.,
and Lederman, M. M.
(1992)
Cell. Immunol.
144,
32-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Zhao, L. J.,
and Giam, C. Z.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
7070-7074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Trimarchi, J. M.,
and Lees, J. A.
(2002)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
3,
11-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Slansky, J. E.,
and Farnham, P. J.
(1996)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
208,
1-30[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Wells, J. M.,
Illenye, S.,
Magae, J., Wu, C. L.,
and Heintz, N. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4483-4492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
DeGregori, J.,
Kowalik, T.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4215-4224[Abstract]
|
| 44.
|
Schulze, A.,
Zerfass, K.,
Spitkovsky, D.,
Middendorp, S.,
Berges, J.,
Helin, K.,
Jansen-Durr, P.,
and Henglein, B.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11264-11268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Ohtani, K.,
DeGregori, J.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
12146-12150 |