Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202932200 on June 24, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 31601-31611, August 30, 2002
Differential Roles of Insulin Receptor Substrates in the
Anti-apoptotic Function of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 and
Insulin*
Yu-Hua
Tseng,
Kohjiro
Ueki,
Kristina M.
Kriauciunas, and
C. Ronald
Kahn
From the Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center,
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts 02215
Received for publication, March 26, 2002, and in revised form, June 13, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)
and insulin are known to prevent apoptosis. The signaling network of
IGF-1 and insulin occurs via multiple pathways involving different
insulin receptor substrates (IRSs). To define their roles in the
anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 and insulin, we established brown
pre-adipocyte cell lines from wild-type and IRS knockout (KO) animals.
In response to 16 h of serum deprivation, IRS-1-deficient cells
showed a significant decrease in response to IGF-1 protection from
apoptosis, whereas no changes were observed in the IRS-2, IRS-3, or
IRS-4 KO cells. Five hours after serum withdrawal, cells already began
to undergo apoptosis. At this early time point, IGF-1 and insulin were
able to protect both wild-type and IRS-1 KO cells from death by
85-90%. After a longer period of serum deprivation, the protective
ability of insulin and IGF-1 was decreased, and this was especially
reduced in the IRS-1 KO cells. Reconstitution of these cells with
IRS-1, IRS-2, IRS-3, or IRS-1/IRS-2 chimeras restored the
anti-apoptotic effects of IGF-1, whereas overexpression of IRS-4 had no
effect at long time points and actually reduced the effect of IGF-1 at the short time point. The biochemical basis of the defect in
anti-apoptosis was not dependent on phosphorylation of
mitogen-activated protein kinase; whereas phosphoinositide
3-kinase activity was decreased by 30% in IRS-1 KO cells. Akt
phosphorylation was slightly reduced in these cells. Phosphorylation of
the transcription factors cAMP response element-binding protein and
FKHR by IGF-1 and insulin was markedly reduced in IRS-1 KO cells. In
addition, both IGF-1 and insulin prevented caspase-3 cleavage in the
wild-type cells, and this effect was greatly reduced in the
IRS-1-deficient cells. These findings suggest that the IRS proteins may
play differential roles in the anti-apoptotic effects of IGF-1 and
insulin in brown pre-adipocytes, with IRS-1 being predominant, possibly
acting through caspase-3-, CREB-, and FKHR-dependent mechanisms.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The pleiotropic effects of
IGF-11 and insulin on
metabolism, mitogenesis, and cell survival are mediated by a
complex network of intracellular signaling pathways (1). The biological
effects of both of these peptides are mediated by the activation of
their respective cell surface receptors. Activation of these receptors results in phosphorylation of several IRSs. These, in turn, interact with SH2 domain-containing proteins such as PI3K, Grb2, SHP2, and
others. Activation of PI3K leads to activation of the main downstream
effector Akt and stimulation of several biological responses, including
glucose metabolism and cell proliferation and survival. Association of
IRS proteins with Grb2 leads to recruitment of SOS and Ras and
results in activation of the MAPK pathway, a major regulatory pathway
for gene expression.
The IRS proteins are a growing family of proteins that are
phosphorylated by the activated insulin and IGF-1 receptors as well as
growth hormone and cytokine receptors. There are at least four members
of this family that have been identified (IRS-1, IRS-2, IRS-3, and
IRS-4). With the exception of IRS-3, which is about 60 kDa in size and
not found in the humans, the other IRS proteins range in size between
160 and 185 kDa and are present in both humans and rodents.
To obtain a better understanding of the physiological role of the four
different IRS proteins, we and others have established mice with a
targeted knockout (KO) of each IRS gene. IRS-1-deficient mice have a
phenotype of growth retardation and insulin resistance (2, 3), whereas
IRS-2 KO mice are overtly diabetic due to reduced
-cell mass and
insulin resistance (4). In contrast, mice with disruption of IRS-3 do
not show any obvious defect in growth or glucose metabolism (5), and
mice lacking IRS-4 exhibit very mild defects in growth, reproduction,
and glucose homeostasis (6). Our laboratory has successfully
established brown pre-adipocyte cell lines derived from different KO
mice and begun to use these cells as a model system to study the roles
of various IRS proteins in cell growth, survival, and differentiation.
We have found that differentiation of IRS-1 KO cells is impaired,
suggesting that IRS-1 plays an essential role in differentiation of
brown adipocytes (7). In contrast, IRS-2 KO cells can be differentiated
into matured adipocytes but have an impaired insulin-induced glucose uptake (8). Recently, we have found that IRS-3 and IRS-4 act as
negative regulators of IGF-1 signaling pathway by suppressing the
function of IRS-1 and IRS-2 in embryonic fibroblasts (9). However, the
extent to which the various IRS proteins may play unique
versus redundant or complementary roles in other
insulin- and IGF-1-mediated responses is still poorly understood.
Apoptosis is a form of programmed cell death, which plays a critical
role in controlling cell number and eliminating misplaced cells, and is
characterized by chromatin condensation, cytoplasmic blebbing, and DNA
fragmentation (10). At the molecular level, apoptosis involves at least
three major components: the Bcl-2 protein family; the caspases, which
belong to a family of cysteine proteases; and the Apaf-1/CED-4 protein
that relays the signals integrated by Bcl-2 protein family to caspases
(11). Depletion of growth factors is a common cause of apoptosis.
Several peptide growth factors are considered to generate signals for
growth and survival, including IGF-1 and insulin. Multiple mechanisms
have been proposed by which these factors protect cells from apoptosis, including the PI3K/Akt pathway (12-14), the Ras/MAPK pathway (13), Jun
N-terminal kinase (15), and p38 MAPK (16). These pathways lead to
phosphorylation of several downstream proteins involved in apoptosis,
such as the Bcl-2 family member Bad (17), caspase-9 (18), the forkhead
transcription factors (19), CREB (20), NF-
B (21), and others.
Although intensive studies have been done to elucidate the involvement
of different downstream signaling molecules in the anti-apoptotic
function of IGF-1 and insulin, little is know about the contribution of
different IRS proteins in mediating these responses.
In the present study, we have investigated the role of the IRS proteins
in the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 and insulin by using KO cell
lines derived from all four IRS KO mice. IRS-1 deficiency causes a
significant reduction in response to IGF-1 and insulin protection from
serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis. Caspase-3 and the
transcription factors CREB and FKHR appear to be downstream mediators
of IRS-1, which may mediate the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 and insulin.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Human recombinant IGF-1 was obtained from Pepro
Tec. Inc. (Rocky Hill, NJ). Human recombinant insulin was purchased
from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN). Chemicals were
obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise
specified. Antibodies to IRS-1 (JD287 and JD288, which recognized amino
acid residues 511-859 and 859-1233 of mouse IRS-1, respectively) and IRS-2 (JD250) were prepared as described previously (22). The antibody
against IRS-3 was prepared by immunizing rabbits with a glutathione
S-transferase fusion protein containing amino acids 240-491
of rat IRS-3 as previously described (9). Anti-mouse IRS-4 antibody is
a generous gift from Dr. G. E. Lienhard (Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, NH). Monoclonal antibody to phosphotyrosine (PY20) was
purchased from Transduction Laboratories (San Diego, CA).
Anti-phospho-CREB (Ser-133), anti-CREB, anti-phospho-FKHR (Ser-256), anti-FKHR, anti-phospho-Bad (Ser-112 and Ser-136), anti-Bad,
anti-phospho-Akt (Ser-473), anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Tyr-204), and
anti-cleaved caspase-3 (17 kDa) antibodies were purchased from Cell
Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-phospho-FKHRL1 (Ser-253)
antibody was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY).
Cell Culture, Plasmids, Transfection, and Retroviral
Infection--
Brown pre-adipocytes were isolated and immortalized as
previously described (7, 23). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% FBS at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 environment.
Retroviral expression vectors of human IRS-1, mouse IRS-2, mouse IRS-3,
and mouse IRS-4 were prepared as previously described (7-9). N1.C2 and
N2.C1 chimeras were constructed by using the AflIII sites of
IRS-1 and IRS-2, which located approximately half of each protein. The
N1.C2 chimera had N-terminal half of IRS-1 and C-terminal region of
IRS-2. Conversely, the N2.C1 chimera contained the N-terminal domain of
IRS-2 and C-terminal half of IRS-1. 3 µg of these plasmids was
transfected into
NX-packaging cells in 6-cm-diameter plates using
the calcium phosphate method (24). The cells were refed 10 h
later, and viral supernatants were harvested 48 h after
transfection. KO cells were infected at 70% confluence in a 12-well
plate with Polybrene (8 µg/ml)-supplemented virus-containing
supernatant for overnight. 48 h after infection, cells from each
well were trypsinized and transferred to a 15-cm-diameter plate. Stable
cell lines were established by selection in medium containing 250 µg/ml bleomycin analogue, ZeocinC.
For transient transfection, 5 × 105 cells were plated
on a well of six-well plates and grown overnight at 37 °C. 5 µg of
pEBG-mBad DNA (Cell Signaling Technology) was transfected into the
cells using LF2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 5 h.
Then the cells were washed twice with medium and incubated in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% FBS for overnight.
24 h after transfection, cells were serum-deprived for 4 h
and stimulated with 10 nM IGF-1 or insulin for 10 min. Cell
lysates were prepared as described below.
Apoptosis Assays--
Cells were plated at 4000 cells per well
in multiple 96-well plates and incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. Then
the cells were washed twice with medium containing no FBS and
serum-deprived in medium supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin
alone or treated with 100 nM IGF-1 or insulin for indicated
times. Cells cultured in serum-containing medium were used as negative
controls. Apoptosis was measured by detection of DNA fragmentation
using a cell death detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN). The enrichment of
mono- and oligonucleosomes released into cytosol was calculated using the formula suggest by the manufacture: (absorbance of sample cells)/(absorbance of negative control cells). The protective effects
of IGF-1 and insulin were calculated by using the following formula:
(enrichment factors of serum-deprived cells subtracts enrichment
factors of IGF-1- or insulin-treated cells)/(enrichment factors of
serum-deprived cells). The numbers were then multiple by 100 to give
the percentage of protection. Mean and standard error values from three
or four independent experiments were calculated as percentage of
wild-type control within each experiment.
Immunoblotting--
Cells grown on a 100-mm dish were
serum-deprived overnight in medium containing 0.1% bovine serum
albumin and then treated for the indicated times with IGF-1 or insulin
at a final concentration of 10 nM. After stimulation, cells
were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and scraped
into 0.5 ml of lysis buffer as previously described (25). Protein
concentrations were determined using the Bradford protein assay
(Bio-Rad). Lysates (30-50 µg) were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by
immunoblotting using specific antisera and detection with
chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ).
For detection of caspase-3 cleavage, cells were grown to confluence and
serum-deprived for 4 or 7 h in the absence or presence of IGF-1 or
insulin. Cells cultured in serum-containing medium were used as a
negative control. Both floating and attached cells were collected and
subjected to lysis and immunodetection as described above.
Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Assay--
Cell lysates were obtained
as described above, and supernatants containing 500 µg of protein
were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody (4G10) overnight at 4 °C. Immune complexes were collected
with protein A-Sepharose, washed three times with lysis buffer, washed
twice with PI3K reaction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.5 mM EDTA), and resuspended in 50 µl of PI3K reaction buffer containing 0.1 mg/ml phosphatidyl inositol (Avanti Polar Lipids). The reactions were performed, and phosphorylated lipids were separated by thin-layer chromatography as described previously (26).
Statistical Analysis--
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. Differences between two groups were evaluated by an unpaired
Student t test. p < 0.05 was defined as
indicating the presence of a statistically significant difference.
 |
RESULTS |
IRS-1 Plays a Critical Role in the Anti-apoptotic Function of
IGF-1--
To determine if the brown pre-adipocyte cell lines were
sensitive to serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis, we grew the wild-type cells in media deprived from serum in the absence or presence of IGF-1
or insulin for various times (Fig.
1A). Cells began to undergo
apoptosis at as early as 5 h after serum deprivation as measured
in the DNA fragmentation assay and reached a maximal level at 13 h. Both IGF-1 and insulin were able to protect these cells from
apoptosis, with IGF-1 having the greater effect. At 13 h, IGF-1
was able to reduce cell death about 75%, whereas insulin could only
protect 40% of the cells, and little or no apoptosis occurred when
cells were cultured in the presence of serum. These results were
confirmed by using other assays for apoptosis, such as propidium iodide
staining coupled with flow cytometry analysis, and TUNEL assays (data
not shown).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Protection of cells from serum
withdrawal-induced apoptosis. Cells were grown on 96-well
plates and serum-deprived for indicated time in the absence or presence
growth factors. Apoptosis assay were performed by detection of DNA
fragmentation as described under "Experimental Procedures."
A, effects of IGF-1, insulin, and serum on protection from
apoptosis in wild-type cells. Data are presented as the degree of
apoptosis as measured by a cell death detection enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kit over a time course. B, IGF-1
protection from serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis in wild-type and
different IRS KO cells. Data are from three independent experiments and
are presented as the protective effects of IGF-1 from apoptosis caused
by 16-h serum deprivation as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
Using the quantitative real-time PCR, we estimated the relative amount
of different IRS variants in wild-type
cells.2 Both IRS-1 and IRS-2
were abundant in these cells with IRS-1 expressed at a slightly higher
level than IRS-2. IRS-3 was expressed at a low level in the
pre-adipocytes, whereas IRS-4 was barely detectable. We next examined
the ability of IGF-1 to protect cells from 16-h serum
withdrawal-induced apoptosis in different IRS KO cells (Fig.
1B). There was a significant 30% decrease of IGF-1 protection in the IRS-1 KO cells as compared with the wild-type cells.
In contrast, the anti-apoptotic effect of IGF-1 appeared to be normal
in the IRS-2-, IRS-3-, or IRS-4-deficient cells. Basal rates of
apoptosis following serum withdrawal were similar in all KO cells to
that of the wild-type cells (data not shown). These data suggested that
IRS-1 played an important role in the anti-apoptotic function of
IGF-1.
Biphasic Responses of IGF-1 and Insulin in Protection from Serum
Withdrawal-induced Apoptosis--
To further investigate the role of
IRS-1 in mediating the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 and insulin, we
assessed the time course of apoptosis and rescue in wild-type and IRS-1
KO cells (Fig. 2). In both cell types,
there was a time-dependent decrease in the ability of IGF-1
and insulin to protect against cell death. Interestingly, during the
first 5 h, both hormones were able to protect at least 85% of the
cells from apoptosis in both cell lines. After 5 h, deficiency of
IRS-1 caused a significant reduction in the anti-apoptotic ability of
IGF-1 and insulin. Based on these observations, we defined a biphasic
response to IGF-1 and insulin protection of cells during serum
withdrawal-induced apoptosis. At the early phase (e.g.
5 h), IRS-1 deficiency did not affect the anti-apoptotic function
of both factors, whereas at the late phase (e.g. 13 h)
IRS-1 played an important role.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Biphasic response of IGF-1 and insulin in
protection from apoptosis. Cells were grown and serum-deprived for
the indicated times in the absence or presence of growth factors.
Apoptosis was measured by detection of DNA fragmentation as described
in Fig. 1. Data are presented as percentage of protection by IGF-1
(A) and insulin (B) using the formula described
under "Experimental Procedures." The experiment shown is a
representative of two experiments.
|
|
We also examined other downstream effectors that may mediate the
anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 and insulin. Caspase-3 is one of the
key executioners of apoptosis. Activation of caspase-3 requires
proteolytic processing of its inactive zymogen into active p17 and p12
subunits. Using an antibody that specifically recognized the large
fragment (17 kDa) of activated caspase-3, we detected significant
accumulation of cleaved p17 subunit of caspase-3 at as early as 4 h of serum deprivation (Fig.
3A, lanes 1 and
5). In the wild-type cells, both IGF-1 and insulin were able
to prevent the occurrence of caspase-3 cleavage, although with insulin
the effect was not complete (Fig. 3A, lanes 2 and
3). In the IRS-1 KO cells, there was a slight increase of
cleaved caspase-3, even in the presence of IGF-1 (Fig. 3A,
lane 6), and this process was dramatically increased in the
insulin-treated cells (Fig. 3A, lane 7). As a
control, serum completely block caspase-3 cleavage in both wild-type
and IRS-1 KO cells (Fig. 3A, lanes 4 and
8). After 7 h of serum deprivation, there was an
increase in the amount of cleaved caspase-3 in both wild-type and IRS-1
KO cells treated with either IGF-1 or insulin, but a similar pattern
was observed (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these data suggest
that, in the early phase, although we could not detect any defect in
the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 and insulin in the IRS-1 KO cells
by DNA fragmentation assay, these cells already displayed the defect in
response to IGF-1 and insulin protection as measured by other earlier
apoptotic event, such as caspase-3 cleavage.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Prevention of serum withdrawal-induced
caspase-3 cleavage by IGF-1, insulin, and serum. Cells were grown
to confluence and serum-deprived for 4 h (A) or 7 h (B) in the absence or presence of IGF-1, insulin, or FBS.
Western blot analysis was performed using a specific antibody against
cleaved p17 subunit of caspase-3. The experiments shown are
representatives of three experiments.
|
|
Re-expression of IRS-1 in IRS-1-deficient Cells Reconstitutes the
Anti-apoptotic Function of IGF-1 at the Late Phase--
To confirm
that the lack of IRS-1 was responsible for impaired responses to IGF-1
and insulin protection from apoptosis, and to examine the possible
complementary versus redundancy among IRS family members
with respect to their ability to mediate the anti-apoptotic function of
IGF-1 and insulin, the IRS-1 KO cells were infected with retroviruses
expressing full-length of IRS-1, IRS-2, IRS-3, or IRS-4. Western blot
analysis revealed about 30-80% (average 65%) IRS-1 re-expression of
that seen in the wild-type cells (Fig.
4A). IRS-2 protein was present
in both wild-type and IRS-1 KO cells (Fig. 4B). The IRS-1 KO
cells exhibited a slight increase in IRS-2 protein expression compared
with the wild-type cells. This is consistent with previous observation
by Valverde et al. (27) in fetal brown adipocytes and was
not altered by IRS-1 re-expression. Using retroviral-mediated gene
transfer, we could increase the level of IRS-2 protein to about 2-fold
over that in the parental cells. Both IRS-3 and IRS-4 proteins could be
detected only in cells infected with retroviruses encoding the
respective genes (Fig. 4, C and D). All IRS
proteins became tyrosine-phosphorylated upon 5 min of IGF-1 stimulation
(Fig. 4E). Consistent with our previous findings in
embryonic fibroblasts (9), expression of either IRS-3 or IRS-4 in the
IRS-1 KO cells showed a significant decrease in both IRS-2 protein
expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2 (Fig. 4, B
and D). To estimate the relative "functional"
concentration of each IRS protein in the reconstituted cells, we
quantified the corresponding phosphorylated IRS protein (Fig.
4E). This revealed reconstitution of IRS tyrosine phosphorylation to about 90, 100, 110, and 140% of that of wild-type in cells reconstituted with IRS-1, -2, -3, and -4, respectively. This
result indicated that all the isoforms were sufficiently and almost
equally expressed in the reconstituted cells.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression of different IRS proteins in
wild-type and IRS-1 KO cells. Reconstituted cell lines were
generated as described under "Experimental Procedures." Equal
amounts of cell extracts from untreated or IGF-1-treated cells were
separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting using indicated
antibodies. Representative gels are shown.
|
|
We next examined the ability of IGF-1 to protect these cell lines from
16-h serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis (Fig.
5A). IRS-1-reconstituted cells
showed a very significant increase in response to IGF-1 protection from
apoptosis as compared with the IRS-1-deficient cells (p < 0.001). Expression of IRS-2 or IRS-3 in these cells also increased
the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 (p < 0.05). In
contrast, IRS-4 overexpression did not improve the deficiency in
response to IGF-1 protection from cell death.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Protection of cells from serum
withdrawal-induced apoptosis by IGF-1 at the late and early
phases. Cells were grown onto 96-well plates and serum-deprived
for 16 h (A) or 5 h (B) in the absence
or presence of 100 nM IGF-1. Apoptosis was measured by
detection of DNA fragmentation. The protective effects of IGF-1 were
calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are
from four independent experiments. Significance was determined relative
to IRS-1 KO cells by Student's t test. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001.
|
|
Overexpression of IRS-4 in IRS-1-deficient Cells Inhibits the
Anti-apoptotic Function of IGF-1 at the Early Phase--
Brown
pre-adipocytes are very sensitive to serum withdrawal-induced
apoptosis. By 5 h of serum deprivation, we observed cell death as
marked by DNA fragmentation (Figs. 1A and 2), caspase-3 cleavage (Fig. 3A), by microscopy (data not shown), and
annexin staining coupled with flow cytometry analysis (data not shown). At the early phase (e.g. 5 h), IRS-1 was not required
for the anti-apoptotic effect of IGF-1 and insulin, because both
hormones produced almost equal protective effects in both the wild-type and IRS-1 KO cells. Interestingly, overexpression of IRS-4 in the
IRS-1-deficient cells caused an almost 50% reduction of IGF-1 protection from 5-h serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis, while other IRS
proteins did not show any effect at this time point (Fig.
5B). These data suggested that IRS-4 might act as a negative regulator in the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1.
Deficiency of the Anti-apoptotic Effect of IGF-1 in IRS-1 KO Cells
Can Be Restored by IRS-1/IRS-2 Chimeras--
To further address the
structure-function relationship of IRS proteins, we generated cell
lines expressing IRS-1/IRS-2 chimeric proteins. Fortuitously, both
IRS-1 and IRS-2 contained an AflIII site located
approximately in the middle of each protein, and this site was in-frame
with the coding sequence of IRS-1 and IRS-2 allowing for simple
exchange of the two halves of each protein (Fig.
6A). This resulted in two
different IRS-1/IRS-2 chimeras. The N1.C2 construct contained an
N-terminal half of IRS-1 and C-terminal region of IRS-2. Conversely,
the N2.C1 chimera had all the N-terminal domains of IRS-2 and
C-terminal half of IRS-1. Both chimeras were expressed in the IRS-1 KO
cells by retroviral-mediated gene transfer. Using two different
antibodies, JD 287 and JD 288, which recognize amino acids 511-859 and
859-1233 of IRS-1, respectively, we found that the N1.C2 construct was
expressed at a similar level to that seen in the wild-type cells, but
the N2.C1 chimera was expressed only about 10% of that of the
wild-type cells (Fig. 6B). We also noticed that the levels
of IRS-1 re-expression varied from 30% to 80% of that seen in the
wild-type cells, which was consistent with the findings in Fig. 4.
Interestingly, both chimeras appeared to be able to enhance the
protective effect of IGF-1 from apoptosis caused by 16-h serum
deprivation (Fig. 6C). Expression of the N1.C2 construct in
IRS-1-deficient cells displayed a greater effect than that of
expression of IRS-1 or IRS-2 alone or the N2.C1 chimera in the IRS-1 KO
cells. The enhancing effect of N1.C2 construct may be due to
overexpression of this chimeric protein in the cells or to an important
role of the N terminus in mediating the anti-apoptotic effects of
IRS-1.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
IRS-1/IRS-2 chimeras restore IGF-1-mediated
anti-apoptotic function in IRS-1 KO cells. A,
schematic diagram shows the structures of IRS-1, IRS-2, and
IRS-1/IRS-2 chimeras N1.C2 and N2.C1. B, Western blot
analysis shows the expression of reconstituted IRS-1 and chimeras in
IRS-1 KO cells using two different anti-IRS-1 antibodies. C,
protection of cells from apoptosis by IGF-1 in wild-type, IRS-1 KO, and
reconstituted cells. Cells were grown onto 96-well plates and
serum-deprived for 16 h in the absence or presence of 100 nM IGF-1. Apoptosis was measured by detection of DNA
fragmentation. Data are from three independent experiments and
presented as the protective effect of IGF-1 as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Significance was determined relative to
IRS-1 KO cells by Student's t test. *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001.
|
|
Impact of Expression of Different IRS Proteins on IGF-1-induced
PI3K Activity, Akt Phosphorylation, and MAPK Phosphorylation in IRS-1
KO Cells--
To address the potential signaling pathways involved in
the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1, we determined PI3K activity, Akt
phosphorylation, and MAPK phosphorylation in wild-type, IRS-1 KO, and
IRS-1 KO cells reconstituted with different IRS proteins (Fig.
7). As all the IRS proteins became
tyrosine-phosphorylated by IGF-1 stimulation (Fig. 4E), we
measured phospho-tyrosine (pY)-associated PI3K activity in these cells.
The IRS-1-deficient cells showed about 30-40% decrease of
pY-associated PI3K activity. It was slightly increased by IRS-1
re-expression. Overexpression of IRS-2 in these cells also increased
PI3K activity, whereas IRS-3 overexpression showed no effect.
Interestingly, overexpression of IRS-4 in the IRS-1-deficient cells
increased pY-associated PI3K activity to the level above that in the
wild-type cells, although it did not rescue the anti-apoptotic effect
of the hormone (compare Figs. 7A and 5A).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Changes of IGF-1 induced PI3K activity, Akt
phosphorylation, and p44/42 MAPK phosphorylation in wild-type cells,
IRS-1 KO cells, and IRS-1 KO cells reconstituted with different IRS
proteins. Cells were stimulated with 10 nM IGF-1 for 5 min, and cell lysates were prepared as described under "Experimental
Procedures." A, 500 µg of proteins was
immunoprecipitated with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody and subjected to
PI3K assay. B and C, 50 µg of whole cell
lysates was separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
anti-phospho-Akt (Ser-473) antibody (B) or anti-p44/42 MAPK
(Tyr-204) antibody (C). Blots were exposed to Kodak BioMax
films, and the films were scanned by densitometer and quantified by
ImageQuaNT software. Data were obtained from three or four independent
experiments.
|
|
Activation of PI3K leads to the recruit of Akt to membrane and promotes
its phosphorylation by other membrane-associated phospholipid-depend kinase (28, 29). Ser-473 phosphorylation plays a critical role in the
activation of Akt. Activation of Akt by Western blotting with a
phospho-specific antibody against Akt Ser-473 revealed a slight
decrease in the IRS-1-deficient cells (Fig. 7B). None of the
IRS proteins significantly affected IGF-1-stimulated Akt phosphorylation. Interestingly, IRS-3 or IRS-4 overexpressing cells
showed an increased basal level of Akt phosphorylation, and this is
consistent with our previous finding in the embryonic fibroblast cells
(9).
The MAPK cascade is another major signaling pathway activated by IGF-1
and insulin stimulation (1). As previously observed in tissues of IRS-1
KO mice (30), activation of MAPK detected by Western blotting with a
phospho-specific p44/p42 MAPK antibody was not altered in the
IRS-1-deficient cells (Fig. 7C). Overexpression of different
IRS proteins in the IRS-1 KO cells had no influence on MAPK phosphorylation.
Phosphorylation of Transcription Factors CREB and FKHR Is
Significantly Reduced in the IRS-1 KO Cells--
To investigate other
downstream molecules that may involve in the anti-apoptotic function of
IGF-1 and insulin via IRS-1-dependent pathway, we
investigated three molecules, which have been described to be involved
in anti-apoptosis by IGF-1 or insulin in other studies. CREB is a
transcription factor that binds to its specific sequence known as CRE.
IGF-1 is known to prevent apoptosis in neuronal cells through a
CREB-dependent pathway (31). IGF-1 induces Bcl-2 promoter
activities through CREB and CRE (20). Phosphorylation of the serine 133 residue of CREB increases its transcriptional activities (32). ATF-1 is
a CREB-related transcription factor that shares identical consensus
phosphorylation sequence of CREB and is detected by the same
phospho-specific antibody (31). We found that phosphorylation of CREB
(Ser-133) was induced by 5 min of IGF-1 or insulin stimulation in the
wild-type cells (Fig. 8A).
This stimulation was markedly diminished in the IRS-1-dificient cells
and fully restored by IRS-1 reconstitution. Expression of IRS-2 or
IRS-3 in the IRS-1 KO cells also slightly restored CREB phosphorylation
by IGF-1 stimulation. In general, the phosphorylation pattern of ATF-1
was paralleled that of CREB. These data suggest an important role of
IRS-1 in IGF-1- and insulin-stimulated CREB/ATF-1 phosphorylation.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Changes of protein phosphorylation in IRS-1
KO cells. Cells were stimulated with 10 nM IGF-1 or
insulin for indicated times, and cell lysates were prepared as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Equal amounts of
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting
with anti-phospho-CREB (Ser-133) antibody (A),
anti-phospho-FKHR (Ser-256) antibody (B, upper
panel), or anti-phospho-FKHRL1 (Ser-253) (B,
lower panel). C, cells were transiently
transfected with a pEBG-mBad expression vector. 24 h after
transfection, cells were serum-deprived for 4 h and stimulated
with 10 nM IGF-1 or insulin for 10 min. Cell lysates were
prepared, separated by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with
anti-phospho-Bad antibodies. All the blots were stripped and reprobed
with their respective non-phospho-specific antibodies to normalize for
variation in loading and transfer of proteins. The experiments were
repeated at least three times, and representative blots are
shown.
|
|
Forkhead transcription factors, such as FKHR, have been demonstrated to
be phosphorylated by insulin (33) and IGF-1 (34) and negatively
regulated by these survival factors through an Akt-dependent pathway, leading to anti-apoptosis (19, 35, 36). Phosphorylation of FKHR (Ser-256), but not FKHRL1 (Ser-253), was
greatly induced by IGF-1 stimulation for 30 min in wild-type cells and
diminished in the IRS-1 null cells (Fig. 8B). However, IRS-1
reconstitution was unable to restore this response.
Bad is an apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family. Survival factors
inhibit the apoptotic activity of Bad by phosphorylation at Ser-112 and
Ser-136 (37). In brown pre-adipocytes, expression of Bad protein was
barely detected with immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting
(data not shown). Therefore, we transiently transfected wild-type and
IRS-1 KO cells with a eukaryotic expression vector carrying the
cDNA of mouse Bad. IGF-1 and insulin slightly increased Bad
phosphorylation in both cell lines, however, no significant difference
was observed between wild-type and IRS-1 null cells (Fig.
8C).
 |
DISCUSSION |
IGF-1 and insulin evoke diverse biological effects through
receptor-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of the IRS proteins. The
four known IRS proteins share similar overall architecture. Disruption
of each individual IRS gene causes distinct phenotypes in mice (2,
4-6), suggesting that the four IRS proteins play different roles in
regulation of metabolism, cell growth, survival, and differentiation.
One of the best approaches in determining the degree to which the IRS
proteins play unique versus redundant or complementary roles
in insulin- and IGF-1-mediated responses is to examine the ability of
these proteins to replace one another in mediating the actions of
insulin and IGF-1. This approach, however, requires a cell system that
lacks IRS proteins or in which an IRS protein is removed and replaced
by other IRS proteins. Thus far most of work in the field has relied on
32D leukemia cells (38-40) or cells derived from IRS-deficient
mice (7-9, 27, 30). Using SV40 T antigen-immortalized brown
pre-adipocytes, we previously demonstrated that IRS-1 plays a critical
role in brown adipocyte differentiation (7), whereas IRS-2 is essential for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in cells (8).
Brown adipose tissue is specialized for non-shivering thermogenesis and
regulated energy expenditure. It has been shown that age-related
decline in thermogenesis and energy expenditure in humans and rodents
is associated with a significant reduction in the mass of functional
brown fat tissue (41). The exact factors contributing to this decrease
in brown adipose tissue are largely unknown. In this study, we find
that brown pre-adipocytes are very sensitive to apoptosis under
conditions of serum withdrawal. In this tissue, both IGF-1 and insulin
exhibit anti-apoptotic effects. These effects are impaired in the
IRS-1-deficient cells and restored by re-expression of IRS-1,
emphasizing a specific role of IRS-1 in the anti-apoptotic effects.
IRS-1 deficiency also defines a biphasic nature of the apoptosis.
During the first 5 h, IRS-1 deficiency does not affect the
protective effect of IGF-1 and insulin, whereas during the second phase
of apoptosis (e.g. 13-16 h), cells lacking IRS-1 show an
attenuated response to IGF-1 and insulin protection.
Reconstitution studies show that IRS-1 re-expression not only fully
restores but also enhances the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 in
IRS-1-deficient cells at 16 h. The enhancing effect seen in the
IRS-1-reconstituted cells may due to a combination of IRS-1
re-expression and the compensatory response of the cells to overcome
IRS-1 deficiency, such as an increase in IRS-2 protein synthesis.
Whereas this increase is not sufficient to completely overcome the
IRS-1 deficiency, retrovirally induced overexpression of IRS-2 or IRS-3
in IRS-1 KO cells is also able to restore the defect of these cells in
response to IGF-1 protection from apoptosis caused by 16-h serum
deprivation, suggesting that these three IRS proteins may be in part
interchangeable in mediating the anti-apoptotic effect of IGF-1. This
finding is further supported by the experiments using IRS-1/IRS-2
chimeras, N1.C2 and N2.C1, both of which are able to effectively
mediate the protective effect of IGF-1, indicating that at least the
anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 is mediating through common features
shared by IRS-1 and IRS-2, such as the PH and PTB domains and/or
the conserved tyrosine phosphorylation sites.
Interestingly, overexpression of IRS-4 in the IRS-1 KO cells inhibits
the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 at the early phase, suggesting
that IRS-4 may act as a negative regulator. This is not due to
insufficient expression of IRS-4 in the IRS-1 KO cell, because, in
fact, tyrosine phosphorylation of the reconstituted IRS-4 reached the
level of 140% of combined tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and IRS-2
seen in wild-type cells. Moreover, using two IRS-1 KO cell lines
expressing different levels of IRS-4, we find a dose-responsive effect
of IRS-4 to inhibit the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 (data not
shown). One possible explanation for the negative role of IRS-4 in
mediating the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 is that IRS-4 may
attenuate the IRS-2 signaling. Support for this possibility stems from
our previously studies using IRS-1-deficient embryonic fibroblasts (9).
In that study, we have found that overexpression of IRS-3 and IRS-4
impair IRS-2-mediated signaling through the mechanisms of decreasing
IRS-2 mRNA and protein levels and IGF-1-stimulated tyrosine
phosphorylation of IRS-2. Similarly, in this study, we observe a
significant decrease of IRS-2 protein expression and a diminished
IGF-1-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2 in IRS-1 KO cells
overexpressing IRS-4. When overexpressed in these cells, IRS-3 also
slightly reduces tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-2 stimulated by IGF-1
but does not affect IRS-2 protein synthesis. IRS-4 most likely
decreases IGF-1-stimulated IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation by competing
for receptor interaction. Because IRS-4 is clearly
tyrosine-phosphorylated, it may bind to the NPXY
motif in the juxtamembrane domain of the IGF-1 receptor that binds the
IRS proteins (42). Alternatively, different subcellular localizations
of the IRS proteins (43) may also contribute to the efficiency of
interaction between the IGF-1 receptor and the various IRS proteins.
Whether or not IRS-4 can attenuate IRS-1-mediated signaling in brown
pre-adipocytes is currently under investigation and beyond the scope of
the current study.
Multiple signaling pathways have been suggested to mediate the
anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 and insulin; however, there is still
uncertainty as to the "essential" components for this response,
which may due to the usage of different model systems in which
expression of receptors and signaling molecules vary from one system to
the other. The most frequent paradigm involves signaling through IRS
proteins, PI3K and Akt (14). In the IRS-1-deficient cells, we find a
30-40% decrease in IGF-1-stimulated pY-associated PI3K activity as
compared with that of the wild-type cells. This decrease could
contribute to the defect in anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1, however,
IRS-1 reconstitution in these cells only partially restores PI3K
activity while completely restoring anti-apoptosis, and overexpression
of IRS-4 causes an enhanced increase of PI3K activity without rescue of
anti-apoptosis. Likewise, there is a very slight decrease in Ser
phosphorylation of Akt in the IRS-1 null cells, and none of the IRS
proteins significantly affect this pathway in these cells. Furthermore,
treatment of the wild-type cells with the PI3K inhibitor, LY294002,
only slightly inhibited the protective effects of IGF-1 and insulin
from apoptosis caused by 5- and 16-h serum deprivation (data not
shown). Thus, changes in PI3K activity and Akt phosphorylation do not
correlate well with the IGF-1-induced anti-apoptotic phenotypes
observed in different cell lines, suggesting that some alternative
pathways may also involved. This is consistent with the work of Kulik
and Weber (44) suggesting IGF-1 may utilize PI3K- and
Akt-dependent and -independent pathways to regulate cell
survival depending on the backgrounds of the cells.
Two additional potential anti-apoptotic pathways activated by the IGF-1
receptor are activation of MAPK and mitochondrial translocation of Raf
(17). Phosphorylation of MAPK is unchanged in the IRS-1 KO cells, and
treatment of the wild-type cells with MEK inhibitors (PD98059 and
UO126) had no effect on the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 (data not
shown), indicating that, at least in the brown pre-adipocytes, MAPK
activation is not required for the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1.
Although the exact signaling pathway or pathways utilized by IGF
to exert its anti-apoptotic function in these cells are still not
clear, it appears that multiple different pathways may be utilized to
achieve the full protective effect. When one major pathway is not
available, alternative pathways take over part of these functions (17).
Nevertheless, our data suggest among the several signaling pathways
elicited by IGF-1 and insulin, the IRS-1-dependent pathway
plays a more important role in anti-apoptotic function of
these growth factors in the brown pre-adipocytes. In addition,
significant apoptosis is detected in the wild-type cells even with
hormone treatment, suggesting the existence of IRS-independent pathways
or the requirement of other receptor pathway for full protection of the
cells from apoptosis. Growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor
or platelet-derived growth factor, may be potential candidates for this
action, because they are known to utilize pathways independent of IRS
to protect cells from apoptosis in many other systems (56). Moreover,
the presence of
-adrenergic receptors in these cells (23) and the roles of these receptors in anti-apoptosis (57) suggest that
-adrenergic stimulation may also contribute to protection of these
cells from death.
In searching for other downstream molecules involved in the
anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1, we find that cleavage of caspase-3 caused by growth factor withdrawal is strongly inhibited by IGF-1 and
insulin. Since caspase activation is required for complete apoptotic
phenotype, and caspase-3 is one of the executioners in this process
(11), prevention of caspase-3 cleavage is certainly one of the most
powerful sites by which IGF-1 and insulin protect cells from apoptosis.
In addition, this preventive effect of IGF-1 and insulin is impaired in
the IRS-1 KO cells, suggesting that caspase-3 is involved in the
IRS-1-dependent pathway by which these growth factors
protect cells from death.
Transcription factor CREB is known to regulate
IGF-1-dependent anti-apoptosis in a
phosphorylation-dependent manner (Ser-133), presumably via
increasing the transcription of Bcl-2 (20). IGF-1- and insulin-induced
CREB phosphorylation is dramatically reduced in the IRS-1-deficient
cells and can be fully restored by reconstitution of these cells with
IRS-1, but not other IRS proteins, suggesting that IRS-1 is an
essential factor in CREB phosphorylation by IGF-1 and insulin
stimulation. Many kinases have been suggested to activate CREB,
including protein kinase A (32), protein kinase C (45), PI3K/Akt (46),
ERK 1/2 (47), p38 MAPK (31, 48), and
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (49). We
recently found that IGF-1-induced CREB phosphorylation in wild-type
brown pre-adipocytes is blocked by inhibitors of MEK and
calcium/calmodulin.2 Because MAPK phosphorylation remains
unchanged in the IRS-1 KO cells, IGF-1 may utilize pathways coupling
IRS-1 and calcium/calmodulin to regulate CREB activity. Previously we
have identified an insulin-dependent interaction between
IRS proteins and the calcium ATPases of the sarcoplasmic and
endoplasmic reticulum, SERCA 1 and SERCA2, in muscle and heart (50).
Whether or not that the coupling of IRS-1 and
calcium/calmodulin-dependent pathways is involved in the
activation of CREB by IGF and insulin or plays a role in the
anti-apoptotic effect of these factors is currently under investigation.
Forkhead transcription factors are other potential targets
that may be involved in IGF-1- or insulin-dependent
anti-apoptosis. Recently, several lines of evidence have suggested a
critical role of these factors in cell death (19, 35, 36, 51); both
IGF-1 and insulin are able to regulate FKHR activity through a
phosphorylation-dependent mechanism (33, 34, 52, 53). Phosphorylation of FKHR by IGF-1 and insulin stimulation is markedly reduced in the IRS-1 KO cells, but IRS-1 reconstitution failed to
completely restore this deficiency. This may reflect the fact that a
normal concentration of IRS-1 is required for restoration of FKHR
phosphorylation, and the 65% reconstitution of IRS-1 that occurs for
retroviral infection of IRS-1-deficient cells may not be sufficient to
recover FKHR phosphorylation.
A third potential target for the protective effect of IGF-1 and insulin
is Bad (54). Although many studies have emphasized an important role of
Bad in regulation of cell death (17, 37), we did not find a significant
change in Bad phosphorylation by IGF-1 or insulin stimulation between
wild-type and IRS-1 KO cells. Constitutive activation of Akt has also
been shown to regulate cell survival in human macrophages through a
mechanism independent of Bad (55). Thus, Bad may not be the critical
factor in the anti-apoptotic function of IGF-1 and insulin in brown
pre-adipocytes.
In summary, using the brown pre-adipocytes derived from different IRS
KO animals, we have shown that IRS-1 plays a critical role in the
anti-apoptotic effect of IGF-1 and insulin. This defect can be restored
by reconstitution of these cells with IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-3. IRS-4 may
act as a negative regulator in this function. The anti-apoptotic
pathways of IGF-1 and insulin are very complex and may involve
caspase-3, CREB, and FKHR. These data suggest that the IRS proteins may
play unique as well as complementary roles in IGF-1- and
insulin-mediated anti-apoptosis, which may be due to activation of
different signaling pathways.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank M. F. White and G. E. Lienhard for providing knockout mice and reagents used in this study.
We also acknowledge M. Fasshauer, J. Klein, K. Tsuruzoe, and R. Emkey
for preparation of cell lines and constructs. We are also
grateful to S. Paquette and J. Marr for excellent secretarial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK33201 and DK55545 (to C. R. K.) and DK101183 (to
Y.-H. T.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Joslin Diabetes
Center, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215. Tel.: 617-732-2635; Fax:
617-732-2593; E-mail: c.ronald.kahn@joslin.harvard.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202932200
2
Y.-H. Tseng and C. R. Kahn, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IGF-1, insulin-like
growth factor-1;
IRS, insulin receptor substrate;
KO, knockout;
SH2, Src homology 2;
PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase;
CREB, cAMP response
element-binding protein;
pY, phosphotyrosine;
MAPK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
TUNEL, terminal
deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling;
SOS, son
of sevenless;
Grb2, growth factor receptor binding protein 2;
PH, pleckstrin homology;
PTB, phosphotyrosine binding;
CRE, cAMP
response element.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Virkamaki, A.,
Ueki, K.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
931-943[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Araki, E.,
Lipes, M. A.,
Patti, M. E.,
Brüning, J. C.,
Haag, B. L., III,
Johnson, R. S.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
Nature
372,
186-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Tamemoto, H.,
Kadowaki, T.,
Tobe, K.,
Yagi, T.,
Sakura, H.,
Hayakawa, T.,
Terauchi, Y.,
Ueki, K.,
Kaburagi, Y.,
Satoh, S.,
Sekihara, H.,
Yoshioka, S.,
Horikoshi, H.,
Furuta, Y.,
Ikawa, Y.,
Kasuga, M.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Aizawa, S.
(1994)
Nature
372,
182-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Withers, D. J.,
Gutierrez, J. S.,
Towery, H.,
Burks, D. J.,
Ren, J. M.,
Previs, S.,
Zhang, Y.,
Bernal, D.,
Pons, S.,
Shulman, G. I.,
Bonner-Weir, S.,
and White, M. F.
(1998)
Nature
391,
900-904[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Liu, S.,
Wang, Q.,
Lienhard, G. E.,
and Keller, S. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
18093-18099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Fantin, V. R.,
Wang, G. E.,
Lienhard, G. E.,
and Keller, S. R.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
E127-E133
|
| 7.
|
Fasshauer, M.,
Klein, J.,
Kriauciunas, K. M.,
Ueki, K.,
Benito, M.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
319-329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Fasshauer, M.,
Klein, J.,
Ueki, K.,
Kriauciunas, K. M.,
Benito, M.,
White, M. F.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
25494-25501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Tsuruzoe, K.,
Emkey, R.,
Kriauciunas, K. M.,
Ueki, K.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
26-38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Hengartner, M. O.
(2000)
Nat. Insight
407,
770-776
|
| 11.
|
Budihardjo, I.,
Oliver, H.,
Lutter, M.,
Luo, X.,
and Wang, X.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
15,
269-290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Minshall, C.,
Arkins, S.,
Dantzer, R.,
Freund, G. G.,
and Kelley, K. W.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
4542-4549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Parrizas, M.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
and LeRoith, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
154-161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kulik, G.,
Klippel, A.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1595-1606[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Krause, D.,
Lyons, A.,
Fennelly, C.,
and O'Connor, R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19244-19252[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Heron-Milhavet, L.,
Karas, M.,
Goldsmith, C. M.,
Baum, B. J.,
and LeRoith, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18185-18192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Peruzzi, F.,
Prisco, M.,
Dews, M.,
Salomoni, P.,
Grassilli, E.,
Romano, G.,
Calabretta, B.,
and Baserga, R.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
7203-7215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Cardone, M. H.,
Roy, N.,
Stennicke, H. R.,
Salvesen, G. S.,
Franke, T. F.,
Stanbridge, E.,
Frisch, S.,
and Reed, J. C.
(1998)
Science
282,
1318-1321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Brunet, A.,
Bonni, A.,
Zigmond, M. J.,
Lin, M. Z.,
Juo, P., Hu, L. S.,
Anderson, M. J.,
Arden, K. C.,
Blenis, J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1999)
Cell
96,
857-868[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Pugazhenthi, S.,
Miller, E.,
Sable, C.,
Young, P.,
Heidenreich, K. A.,
Boxer, L. M.,
and Reusch, J. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27529-27535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Madrid, L. V.,
Wang, C. Y.,
Guttridge, D. C.,
Schottelius, A. J. G.,
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.,
and Mayo, M. W.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1626-1638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Sun, X. J.,
Rothenberg, P. L.,
Kahn, C. R.,
Backer, J. M.,
Araki, E.,
Wilden, P. A.,
Cahill, D. A.,
Goldstein, B. J.,
and White, M. F.
(1991)
Nature
352,
73-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Klein, J.,
Fasshauer, M.,
Ito, M.,
Lowell, B. B.,
Benito, M.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34795-34802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Morgenstern, J. P.,
and Land, H.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
3587-3596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Moyers, J. S.,
Bilan, P. J.,
Zhu, J.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11832-11839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Kimura, K.,
Hattori, S.,
Kabuyama, Y.,
Shizawa, Y.,
Takayanagi, J.,
Nakamura, S.,
Toki, S.,
Matsuda, Y.,
Onodera, K.,
and Fukui, Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18961-18967[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Valverde, A. M.,
Kahn, C. R.,
and Benito, M.
(1999)
Diabetes
48,
2122-2131[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
Andjelkovic, M.,
Caudwell, B.,
Cron, P.,
Morrice, N.,
Cohen, P.,
and Hemmings, B. A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6541-6551[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
and Cohen, P.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
55-62[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Brüning, J. C.,
Winnay, J.,
Cheatham, B.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1513-1521[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Pugazhenthi, S.,
Boras, T.,
O'Connor, D.,
Meintzer, M.,
Heidenreich, K. A.,
and Reusch, E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2829-2837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Gonzalez, G. A.,
and Montminy, M. R.
(1989)
Cell
59,
675-680[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Tomizawa, M.,
Kumar, A.,
Perrot, V.,
Nakae, J.,
Accili, D.,
and Rechler, M. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7289-7295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Nakae, J.,
Barr, V.,
and Accili, D.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
989-996[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Kops, G. J. P. L.,
de Ruiter, N. D.,
de Vries-Smits, A. M.,
Powel, D. R.,
Bos, J. L.,
and Burgering, B. M.
(1999)
Nature
398,
630-634[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Tang, E. D.,
Nunez, G.,
Barr, F. G.,
and Guan, K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16741-16746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Zha, J.,
Harada, H.,
Yang, E.,
Jockel, J.,
and Korsmeyer, S.
(1996)
Cell
87,
619-628[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Dews, M.,
Nishimoto, I.,
and Baserga, R.
(1997)
Recept. Signal. Transduct.
7,
231-240[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Yenush, L.,
Zanella, C.,
Uchida, T.,
Bernal, D.,
and White, M. F.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6784-6794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Uchida, T.,
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
and White, M.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
126-138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
McDonald, R. B.,
and Horwitz, B. A.
(1999)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
31,
507-516[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Lavan, B. E.,
Fantin, V. R.,
Chang, E. T.,
Lane, W. S.,
Keller, S. R.,
and Lienhard, G. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21403-21407[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Razzini, G.,
Ingrosso, A.,
Brancaccio, A.,
Sciacchitano, S.,
Esposito, D. L.,
and Falasca, M.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
823-836[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Kulik, G.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6711-6718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Xie, H.,
and Rothstein, T. L.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
1717-1723[Abstract]
|
| 46.
|
Wang, J. M.,
Chao, J. R. R.,
Chen, W.,
Kuo, M. L.,
Yen, J. J. L.,
and Yang-Yen, H. F.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
6195-6206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Bonni, A.,
Brunet, A.,
West, A. E.,
Datta, S. R.,
Takasu, M. A.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1999)
Science
286,
1358-1362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Tan, Y.,
Rouse, J.,
Zhang, A.,
Cariati, S.,
Cohen, P.,
and Comb, M. J.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
4629-4642[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Deisseroth, K.,
Heist, E. K.,
and Tsien, R. W. L.
(1998)
Nature
392,
198-202[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Algenstaedt, P.,
Antonetti, D. A.,
Yaffe, M. B.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23696-23702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Nakamura, N.,
Ramaswamy, S.,
Vazquez, F.,
Signoretti, S.,
Loda, M.,
and Sellers, W. R.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
8969-8982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Guo, S.,
Rena, G.,
Cichy, S., He, X.,
Cohen, P.,
and Unterman, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17184-17192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Rena, G.,
Guo, S.,
Cichy, S. C.,
Unterman, T. G.,
and Cohen, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17179-17183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Korsmeyer, S. J.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
1693s-1700s[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Liu, H.,
Perlman, H.,
Pagliari, L. J.,
and Pope, R. M.
(2001)
J. Exp. Med.
194,
113-125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Chaudhary, L. R.,
and Hrusha, K. A.
(2001)
J. Cell. Biochem.
81,
304-311[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Ma, Y. C.,
and Huang, X. Y.
(2002)
Trends Cardiovasc. Med.
12,
46-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore