|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203764200 on June 17, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 32180-32186, August 30, 2002
-Amyloid Enhances Glial Glutamate Uptake Activity and
Attenuates Synaptic Efficacy*
Yuji
Ikegaya §,
Sigeru
Matsuura ,
Sayaka
Ueno,
Atsushi
Baba,
Maki K.
Yamada,
Nobuyoshi
Nishiyama, and
Norio
Matsuki
From the Laboratory of Chemical Pharmacology, Graduate School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Received for publication, April 18, 2002, and in revised form, May 29, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Although amyloid -protein (A ) has long been
implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, little is known
about the mechanism by which A causes dementia. A leads to
neuronal cell death in vivo and in vitro, but
recent evidence suggests that the property of the amnesic
characteristic of Alzheimer's disease can be explained by a
malfunction of synapses rather than a loss of neurons. Here we show
that prolonged treatment with A augments the glutamate clearance
ability of cultured astrocytes and induces a dramatic decrease in
glutamatergic synaptic activity of neurons cocultured with the
astrocytes. Biotinylation assay revealed that the enhancement of
glutamate uptake activity was associated with an increase in
cell-surface expression of GLAST, a subtype of glial glutamate
transporters, without apparent changes in the total amount of GLAST.
This phenomenon was blocked efficiently by actin-disrupting
agents. Thus, A -induced actin-dependent GLAST redistribution and relevant synaptic malfunction may be a cellular basis for the amnesia of Alzheimer's disease.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Amyloid -protein
(A ),1 a peptide with
40-42 residues, is a main element of senile plaque, a hallmark
of Alzheimer's disease (AD) (1, 2), and is accumulated highly in the
forebrain of AD patients, as well as transgenic mice overexpressing
mutant -amyloid precursor protein ( APP), which develop AD-like
pathology (3, 4). Although numerous studies showed that exogenously applied or endogenously produced A leads to neuronal cell death, the
amnesic feature of AD cannot be explained by the neuronal loss alone
(5). Indeed, accumulating evidence indicates that A induces severe
impairment of excitatory neurotransmission in the hippocampus (6-8)
and thereby may cause memory deficits (9). In mutant APP transgenic
mice, such synaptic malfunction often appears in advance of A plaque
formation (10, 11), and cognitive deterioration is also observed
without apparent neurodegeneration (4, 12). A -induced synaptic
deterioration rather than neuronal loss is, therefore, likely to be a
main cause of early AD dementia (5, 13). However, the mechanisms by
which A causes such synaptic malfunction remain to be elucidated.
Excitatory neurotransmission is tightly regulated by a rapid clearance
of the neurotransmitter glutamate from the extracellular milieu through
Na+-dependent L-glutamate
transporters that are expressed on astrocytes, i.e. GLAST
and GLT-1 (14, 15). We therefore investigated the effect of A on
glutamate uptake activity in cultured cortical astrocytes. Here we show
for the first time that A ending at 42 residues (A (1-42))
induces an increase in the activity of GLAST. This work further
demonstrates that A (1-42) stimulates actin-dependent
GLAST redistribution from subcellular compartment to the cell surface.
Such up-regulation of GLAST function may attenuate glutamatergic
synaptic efficacy.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Chemically synthesized A (1-40) and A
(1-42) were gifts from Dr. T. Shirasawa (Department of Molecular
Genetics, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan).
The A s were purified in basic conditions to avoid aggregation, with
the reverse-phase HPLC so that 50 pmol of each of these molecules gave
a single and sharp peak on HPLC. Their purity and amino acid
composition were confirmed using matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (16).
Affinity-purified rabbit anti-GLAST and GLT-1 primary antibodies were
gifts from Dr. K. Tanaka (Tokyo Medical Dental University, Tokyo,
Japan). The specificity of these antibodies was reported previously
(17, 18). L-[3H]Glutamate and fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody were purchased from
Amersham Biosciences. Actinomycin D, dihydrokainate (DHK),
immobilized avidin, peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody,
LY294002, nifedipine, threo- -hydroxy aspartate (THA), and wortmannin
were obtained from Sigma. Cycloheximide, cytochalasin D, latrunculin A,
and thapsigargin were obtained from Wako Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). H-7,
propidium iodide, sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin, U-126, and genistein were obtained from Calbiochem, Molecular Probes
(Eugene, OR), Pierce, Promega (Madison, WI), and Research Biochemicals
(Natick, MA), respectively.
Astrocyte Cultures--
Cortical astrocytes were prepared from
postnatal 2-day-old rat pups (SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) as described
previously (19). Cortical hemispheres were trypsinized (0.25%) and
plated in Eagle's minimal essential medium with 10% fetal
bovine serum. The medium was exchanged every 3-4 days, and on reaching
confluence the cells were trypsinized and replated once. The confluent
cultures were treated with a serum-free medium for 24 h and used
for experiments. In these cultures, more than 97% of cells were
astrocytes, and <1% were microglial cell, as assessed by the
astrocyte-specific marker GFAP and the microglial marker OX-42,
respectively (data not shown). The number of microglia was not changed
significantly by A treatment.
Neuron Cultures--
Cultures of embryonic neurons were prepared
from E18 rat cerebral cortex (SLC) as described previously (20). For
plating on a monolayer of astrocytes, cells were suspended in
Neurobasal (Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and
plated at 500 cells/mm2. After 24 h, cells were
maintained further with serum-free Neurobasal supplemented with 2% B27
(Invitrogen). Experiments were performed at day 7 in
vitro.
Electrophysiological Recordings--
Whole-cell voltage clamp
( 70 mV) recordings were obtained from cultured hippocampal neurons.
Recording solutions contained the following (in mM): 147 NaCl, 3 NaHCO3, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 glucose, 10 HEPES, 25 µM
D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid, and 10 µM picrotoxin, adjusted to pH 7.4. Patch recording
pipettes (6 megohms) were filled with intracellular solutions
containing the following (in mM): 120 CsMeSO3,
20 CsCl, 1 EGTA, 0.4 NaGTP, 4 MgATP, 5 QX314, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.3, with CsOH at 35 °C. Whole-cell recordings were made with Axopatch
200B amplifiers, digitized at 10 KHz by DIGIDATA 1320A interface, and
acquisition and analysis were performed with the pCLAMP8 (Axon
Instruments, Foster City, CA). Neurons with series resistances in the
range of 8 to 17 megohms were selected for analyses. Spontaneous
excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) were obtained by randomly
selecting intervals of 200 s from the stored data for each neuron.
The non-NMDA receptor antagonist CNQX blocked sEPSC completely (data
not shown).
Glutamate Uptake--
L-[3H]Glutamate
uptake of astrocytes was measured as described (19). Briefly, cultures
were washed for 30 min with a modified Hanks' balanced salt solution
and exposed to a combination of 0.1 µCi/ml
[3H]glutamate and 10 µM unlabeled glutamate
for 7 min. Uptake was terminated by ice-cold Hanks' solution.
Astrocytes were lysed in 0.5 N NaOH. Aliquots were taken
for scintillation counting and for protein assays. Because A
aggregates spontaneously, the total amount of proteins was increased
corresponding to the doses of A . Because the number of astrocytes
per well was relatively constant (data not shown), uptake rates were
normalized per well (not per unit weight protein).
Biotinylation--
Biotinylation of cell surface proteins was
performed as described by Davis et al. (21) and Duan
et al. (22) with some modifications. After drug treatment,
the astrocyte cultures were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS), incubated in sulfo-NHS-biotin solution (1.5 mg/ml in PBS) for 20 min at 4 °C. The cultures were washed twice with PBS containing 100 mM glycine to stop the reaction. After 45 min of incubation
with the glycine-containing PBS at 4 °C, the cells were lysed in 300 µl/well of lysis buffer with protease inhibitors (100 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1%
Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 µg/ml leupeptin,
250 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor, and 1 mM iodoacetamide) for 1 h at 4 °C
and then centrifuged at 16,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C to
remove debris. Before the lysate was incubated with avidin-conjugated
beads, the aliquot was taken for Western blot analysis as the
"total cell lysate" fraction. The remaining lysates (150 µl) were incubated with equal volumes of avidin beads slurry and
centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min, and the
supernatants were taken for Western blot analysis as the "intracellular" fraction. The pellets were washed four times
with the lysis buffer with the protease inhibitors and resuspended in
300 µl of Laemmli buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2%
SDS, 20% glycerol, and 5% 2-mercaptoethnol) and then treated for 30 min at 70 °C. After centrifugation at 16,000 × g
for 15 min, the supernatants were taken as the "biotinylated
(cell surface)" fraction. All three samples for Western blot analysis
were diluted to be the same aliquot and frozen at 20 °C until
analysis. The protein samples were loaded on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide
gels, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and blotted
with anti-GLAST or GLT-1 antibody (1:1000) and then with the
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000). Immunoreactive proteins
were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Immunocytochemistry--
After the treatment with A , the
astrocytes cultures in 35-mm dishes were washed twice with PBS and
fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min, permeabilized with 0.25%
Triton X-100 for 5 min, and blocked with 2% horse serum for 30 min.
The cultures were incubated with anti-GLAST or GLT-1 antibody (1:2500)
overnight at 4 °C and then with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000) and 5 µg/ml
propidium iodide for 1 h at room temperature. The dishes were
broken and settled on glass coverslips upside down. The fluorescence
images were obtained with a laser scanning confocal system Micro
Radiance 1000 (Bio-Rad).
 |
RESULTS |
A Attenuates Glutamatergic Neurotransmission in Neuroglial
Cocultures--
The initial set of experiments was designed to examine
the effect of A on synaptic transmission in primary cultures of
cortical neurons. After day 7 in vitro neurons were exposed
to 20 µM A (1-42) for 12 h, and sEPSCs were
recorded by whole-cell patch clamp techniques. A -treated neurons
exhibited a slight but significant decrease in both the mean amplitude
and the frequency of sEPSCs (Fig. 1).
This result is the first evidence that A attenuates neuronal
activity in culture.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A attenuates
synaptic responses of cortical neurons growing on astrocyte
monolayers. Neuron-enriched/astrocyte-poor cultures (neuron
enriched) or cocultures of neurons and astrocytes (with
astrocytes) were treated with vehicle (Control) or 20 µM A for 12 h. A, representative
traces of sEPSCs. B, A caused a significant leftward
shift of the cumulative probability histogram in both neuron-enriched
cultures and cocultures (each p < 0.01, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). A did not change series resistances:
11.5 ± 0.9 megohms in control neurons and 12.2 ± 0.5 megohms in A -treated neurons. C, summary of the
suppressive effect of A on sEPSC amplitude and frequency. Each value
in the ordinates was obtained by averaging the percentage changes in
mean amplitude or event frequency. The A effect on spontaneous
synaptic activities was more severe in neuroglial cocultures than in
neuron-enriched cultures. Baseline sEPSC amplitude was 37.0 ± 1.5 (neuron enriched) and 27.5 ± 1.2 pA (with astrocytes). Baseline
frequency was 1.60 ± 0.26 (neuron enriched) and 1.10 ± 0.30 Hz (with astrocytes). Thus, the amplitude and frequency were both
attenuated in the presence of astrocytes. The effect of this astrocyte
was abolished completely by THA (35.6 ± 2.5 pA of amplitude and
1.58 ± 0.31 Hz of frequency in THA), suggesting that the basal
activity of astrocytic glutamate transporters decreases synaptic
efficacy. This idea is consistent with many previous reports (24,
54-57) showing that glutamate transporters regulate basal synaptic transmission. We also
examined the effect on miniature EPSCs, which were recorded in the
presence of 1 µM tetrodotoxin to prevent spontaneous
spike activity. The A -induced decrease in the amplitude, but not
frequency, of miniature EPSCs was enhanced by culturing neurons with
astrocytes (data not shown), which is in accordance with a study (24)
that THA increases the size, but not frequency, of events. Glial
glutamate transporters are, therefore, likely to regulate synaptic
activity but not spike generation. *, p < 0.05; **,
p < 0.01; Student's t test. Data are
means ± S.E. of 8-10 neurons from three independent
experiments.
|
|
In the brain, however, neurons are surrounded by a larger number of
astrocytes, which render physical and physiological supports for
neurons (23). To measure the A effect under more physiological conditions, neurons were plated onto the monolayer of confluent astrocytes and processed for the same experimental treatment. In this
coculture system, a similar decrease in sEPSC amplitude and frequency
was produced by A treatment, but surprisingly, the detrimental
effect of A was much larger in the presence of astrocytes (Fig.
1C).
Immunohistochemical staining for microtubule-associated protein-2 and
glial fibrillary acidic protein revealed that the survival of neurons
or astrocytes was unaffected by the exposure to A ; the number of
surviving cells was 79.7 ± 4.7 (neurons) and 374.1 ± 13.4 (astrocytes) per mm2 in control cultures and 72.5 ± 3.3 (neurons) and 394.0 ± 15.5 (astrocytes) per mm2
in A -treated cultures (means ± S.E. of 8-11 cultures).
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay also indicated that A did not
increase the activity of LDH released from astrocyte cultures; the
percentages of released LDH to the total cellular LDH are 18.7 ± 5.4% in control cultures and 16.8 ± 4.8% in A -treated
cultures (n = 4). Similarly, Western blot analysis
showed that glial expression of actin was unchanged by A treatment
(see Fig. 4C). Propidium iodide-labeled nuclei displayed no
aberration in A -treated astrocytes (see Fig. 5, C and
D). All these results indicate that A treatment did not
affect the cell viability. Therefore, the result that A -induced synaptic malfunction was aggravated by the presence of astrocytes suggests that the A effect is mediated, at least in part, by an
alteration of astrocytic physiological functions.
Because one of the major roles of astrocytes is to terminate
neurotransmission by the uptake of extracellular glutamate through high
affinity glutamate transporters, our data suggest that A enhances
astrocytic glutamate uptake activity. To address this possibility,
sEPSCs were recorded at a low temperature, because hypothermal
conditions can attenuate efficiently the activity of glial glutamate
transporters (24, 25). A significant difference in the A effect
between neuron-enriched cultures and neuroglial cocultures was no
longer observed at a lower temperature (24 °C). We further attempted
to determine whether the A effect is blocked by THA, a potent
inhibitor of glial glutamate transporters, but this inhibitor per
se induced the swelling of A -treated neurons and disturbed
successful whole cell recordings. Nonetheless, the result at a low
temperature implies A -induced alteration in glutamate transporter
activity. Thus, the following experiments have focused on the effect of
A on the glutamate clearance ability of astrocytes.
A Facilitates GLAST-mediated Glutamate Uptake--
Glutamate
transport activity in pure cultures of cortical astrocytes was measured
as uptake activity of L-[3H]glutamate.
Baseline uptake activity was hindered completely in
Na+-free medium and abolished by THA in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig.
2A). These data indicate that
the uptake activity was mediated by
Na+-dependent secondary active transport via
glutamate transporters. The uptake was unaffected by even a high
concentration of DHK, a selective GLT-1 inhibitor (Fig. 2A),
which suggests that GLAST is a predominant glutamate transporter in our
cultures. Consistent with this, Western blot analysis could not detect
apparent immunoreactivity for GLT-1 in our cultures (data not shown;
see also Refs. 19 and 26). Thus we consider that this culture system is
useful in investigating the molecular behavior of GLAST, one of the
major glutamate transporters of the adult forebrain (15, 27).
Incidentally, when astrocytes were cocultured with neurons for 7 days,
the uptake activity was unchanged: 47.9 ± 7.8 pmol/well/min in
pure astrocyte cultures and 58.9 ± 11.8 pmol/well/min in
cocultures with neurons (p > 0.1, Student's
t test; means ± S.E. of four cases). These results
suggest that neuronal contribution to the total activity of glutamate
uptake assumed in the experiments of Fig. 1 is substantially low as
compared with glial transport activity and that neurons do not cause a
change in GLAST activity in astrocytes.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A (1-42) enhances
THA-sensitive glutamate uptake activity in a concentration- and
time-dependent manner. A, confluent
cultures of astrocytes were treated with 20 µM A
(1-42) for 48 h, and L-[3H]glutamate
uptake activity was measured in normal or Na+-free medium
or in the presence of THA or DHK. **, p < 0.01 versus Control; ##, p < 0.01 versus None; Tukey's test after ANOVA. B,
glutamate uptake activities were measured after a 48-h treatment with
A (1-40) or A (1-42) at concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 20 µM. C, uptake activities were measured 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, or 48 h after the incubation with 20 µM
A (1-40) or 20 µM A (1-42). The relative activity
is expressed as a percentage of baseline uptake of untreated
astrocytes. THA-sensitive glutamate uptake activity was significantly
augmented 3 h after A (1-42) treatment (p < 0.05) and reached the saturation state within 12 h
(p < 0.01), but little effect was observed for A
(1-40). Data are means ± S.E. of four different cultures.
|
|
As predicted by our electrophysiological data, continuous application
of 20 µM A (1-42) for 48 h induced a significant
increase in the rate of glutamate uptake (Fig. 2A). This
enhancement was inhibited efficiently by THA but not by DHK (Fig.
2A), which suggests that the augmented uptake activity was
unlikely because of the emergence of GLT-1 activity and that it was
totally attributable to the enhancement of GLAST activity.
The A (1-42)-induced increase in glutamate uptake activity showed a
concentration dependence in the range of 0.02 to 20 µM (Fig. 2B). More than 20 µM A (1-42)
severely deteriorated the viability of astrocytes (data not shown). The
time dependence of the A effect was investigated at a concentration
of 20 µM. The facilitation of uptake was observed 3 h after exposure to A and reached apparent steady state after
12 h (Fig. 2C).
The shorter form A (1-40), another type of endogenous A , was
virtually ineffective (Fig. 2, B and C). Although
the difference in sequence between A (1-42) and A (1-40) is
only two residues of C terminus, A (1-42) aggregates more
rapidly than A (1-40) (28). Like A (1-42), A (25-35), a
biologically active, hydrophobic fragment of A (29), is also highly
prone to aggregation (30). This subfragment could also reproduce the
effect of A (1-42) (data not shown). Because it is generally
believed that aggregated A is responsible for AD progression (1, 2),
fresh A (1-40) was incubated at 37 °C for 7 days to allow
aggregation (31) and then applied to astrocyte cultures. The
preincubated A (1-40) enhanced efficiently glutamate transport
activity up to a level comparable with A (1-42) (Fig.
3). The control peptide A (40-1), a
reverse-sequence peptide that is stable and does not form aggregates, showed no effect even after preincubation (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the aggregation of A is essential for the enhancement of glutamate uptake.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Aggregated A (1-40)
causes an increase in astrocytic glutamate uptake activity.
Immediately after being solubilized, A (1-40) or A (40-1) was
applied to cultured astrocytes at 20 µM for 48 h
(Fresh A ). After the solubilization, the A was
incubated at 37 °C for 7 days to allow spontaneous aggregation and
applied to astrocytes at 20 µM for 48 h
(Preincubated A ). The glutamate uptake activity was
enhanced by preincubated A (1-40) but not by fresh A (1-40),
fresh A (40-1), or preincubated A (40-1). The ordinate
indicates a percentage of the uptake activity in control astrocytes.
**, p < 0.01 versus control; Tukey's test
after ANOVA. Data are means ± S.E. of four independent
experiments.
|
|
A Stimulates the Cellular Trafficking of
GLAST--
Eadie-Hofstee plots of the uptake activity showed that 20 µM A (1-42) produced a significant increase in the
Vmax value from 126.0 ± 6.8 to 202.0 ± 8.3 pmol/well/min with a minimal change in the Km
value (Fig. 4A), suggesting
that A (1-42) causes an increase in functional GLAST proteins.
To determine whether A -stimulated transport requires
de novo mRNA/ protein synthesis, we examined the effects
of the transcriptional inhibitor actinomycin D and the translational
inhibitor cycloheximide. However, neither of these inhibitors affected
the activity of glutamate uptake of intact or A (1-42)-treated
astrocytes (Fig. 4B), which suggests that A increases the
activity of GLAST without mRNA/protein synthesis. Indeed, Western
blot analysis revealed that the A (1-42) treatment induced no
apparent change in the total amount of GLAST (Fig. 4C). This
is consistent with the report showing that the expression level of
EAAT1, a human GLAST homologue, is not altered in AD brain (32).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A -induced GLAST
translocation to the plasma membrane. A, a
concentration dependence of glutamate transport activity was examined
in the astrocytes treated with 20 µM A (1-42) for
48 h (left panel). The data were plotted in an
Eadie-Hofstee format, and the Vmax and
Km values were calculated by a linear regression
analysis (right panel). The average
Vmax values were 126.0 ± 6.8 nmol/well/min
(Control) and 202.0 ± 8.3 nmol/well/min
(A ). The average Km values were
19.1 ± 4.0 µM (Control) and 14.2 ± 1.6 µM (A ). A (1-42) induced a
substantial increase in the Vmax (but not
Km) value (p < 0.01). B,
A (1-42) (20 µM) was coapplied with 1 µM actinomycin D or 10 µM cycloheximide for
48 h. Neither inhibitor affected the facilitatory effect of A ,
which suggests that the up-regulation of glutamate uptake is not
mediated by de novo synthesis of mRNA or protein. Data
are means ± S.E. of four cases. C, representative
immunoblot of the effect of A on the expressions of GLAST (top
panel) and actin (bottom panel) in the total cell
lysate, biotinylated (cell surface), and nonbiotinylated
(intracellular) fractions. Cell surface proteins were labeled with
membrane-impermeable biotin. Anti-GLAST antibody recognized a protein
with a molecular mass of ~64 kDa (monomer) and also its
putative dimer and trimer (58). Treatment with 20 µM A
(1-42) for 48 h did not alter the total amount of GLAST but
caused an increase in biotinylated GLAST and a compensatory decrease in
nonbiotinylated GLAST. The immunoreactivity for actin, an index of
intracellular proteins, was not changed in any fractions. These results
indicate that A induced the membrane trafficking of GLAST.
Experiments were repeated with at least four different cultures,
producing the same results. We did not quantify the density of
immunoreactive bands, because the edge of each band was somewhat
unclear, probably because of GLAST glycosylation (59) and random
biotinylation.
|
|
Because the membrane trafficking system is known to regulate the
activity of some transporters, e.g. the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 expressed in C6 glioma (21), serotonin transporters expressed in HEK293 cells (33), the -aminobutyric acid transporter GAT1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes (34), and dopamine
transporters expressed in PC12 cells (35), it is also possible that the
A effect is achieved by an increase in GLAST proteins on the cell surface. This possibility was addressed by a membrane-impermeant biotinylation assay. Biotinylated, cell surface protein fractions were
separated from nonbiotinylated, intracellular protein fractions by
using avidin-conjugated beads. The expression of GLAST in these two
fractions was assessed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4C). In A (1-42)-treated astrocytes, GLAST expression increased in the
biotinylated (cell surface) fraction and decreased complementarily in
the nonbiotinylated (intracellular) fraction. These results indicate
that A (1-42) caused GLAST translocation from the intracellular compartment to the plasma membrane.
The cellular distribution of GLAST in A -treated astrocytes was
examined further by immunohistochemical staining (Fig.
5). The nuclei were labeled with
propidium iodide to distinguish each cell. A (1-42) caused apparent
clustering of GLAST immunoreactivity along the edge of the soma and
also slightly in the cytoplasmic part, whereas in control astrocytes,
GLAST was distributed throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 5). Although Brera
et al. (36) reported that long term treatment with A
leads to cell death of astrocytes, we found no evidence for shrinkage
or degeneration of propidium iodide-labeled nucleus at least after a
48-h treatment with 20 µM A (1-42). Therefore, the
possibility that A (1-42)-evoked GLAST redistribution is merely
because of cell damage could be ruled out.

View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
A alters the
cellular distribution of GLAST immunoreactivity in astrocytes.
Astrocytes were cultured in the absence (A and
C) or presence (B and D) of 20 µM A (1-42) for 48 h and then immunostained for
GLAST (green). Propidium iodide (red) was used
for counterstaining. Panels C and D show
nonspecific signals of the secondary IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate in
the absence of anti-GLAST antibody. A -treated astrocytes displayed
cluster-like GLAST spots at the outer margins of the cell body
(arrowheads). Similar results were obtained in every such
experiment conducted (n = 5).
|
|
A Induces Actin-dependent GLAST
Redistribution--
To determine whether A -induced increase in
glutamate uptake is mediated by GLAST translocation, we examined the
effect of cytochalasin D and latrunculin A, inhibitors of actin
polymerization, which is the cellular event known to be essential for
subcellular membrane trafficking (37). The inhibitors attenuated
significantly A -induced up-regulation of glutamate uptake without
affecting the baseline activity of control astrocytes (Fig.
6). The microtubule disrupter colchicine
had no influence on the A (1-42)-stimulated transport (data not
shown). These data suggest that the A effect on glutamate uptake
activity is mediated by GLAST redistribution dependent on actin
rearrangement.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inhibitors of actin polymerization abolished
A -induced enhancement of glutamate uptake
activity. Cytochalasin D (A) or latrunculin A
(B) was coapplied with 20 µM A (1-42) for
6 h. Both inhibitors attenuated significantly A -induced
enhancement of glutamate uptake. **, p < 0.01 versus Control; #, p < 0.01 versus A alone; Tukey's test after ANOVA. Data are
means ± S.E. of four independent experiments.
|
|
Finally, we attempted a series of pharmacological investigations to
clarify the signaling pathway underlying A -induced increase in GLAST
activity. EAAC1 translocation is regulated by protein kinase C (21,
37). Because GLAST possesses multiple phosphorylation sites for protein
kinase C (38), we tested the effect of H-7, an inhibitor of protein
kinase C and A. However, 300 µM H-7 failed to prevent the
A (1-42) effect (the relative uptake activity to 20 µM A (1-42) alone, 99.6 ± 4.1%; means ± S.E. of four cases). Although phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is also
involved in EAAC1 trafficking (21), the inhibitor LY294002 (30 µM) or wortmannin (100 nM) did not affect the
A (1-42)-stimulated uptake (106.0 ± 4.2 and 106.0 ± 9.4%, respectively). Likewise, we found that the effect of A
(1-42) was blocked by none of the drugs tested, i.e. the
tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein (30 µM, 103.0 ± 4.4%) or herbimycin A (10 µM, 96.6 ± 6.6%), the
inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase U 0126 (300 nM, 109.0 ± 8.8%), the inhibitor of microsomal
Ca2+-ATPase thapsigargin (1 µM, 108.0 ± 6.9%), the L-type calcium channel blocker nifedipine (100 µM, 103.0 ± 6.5%), the disrupter of synaptic
vesicle-associated protein botulinum toxin C (100 nM,
101.0 ± 0.8%), the Na+/K+-ATPase
inhibitor ouabain (1 mM, 93.5 ± 7.6%), or the
antioxidant Trolox (300 µM, 104.0 ± 3.8%). The
validity of concentrations of each agent was certified by our recent
study (19, 39). Thus, A (1-42)-induced GLAST translocation appears
to be independent of classically known signaling pathways.
 |
DISCUSSION |
AD is the most common form of dementia in elderly individuals and
is associated with a progressive, neurodestructive process of the human
neocortex, which is characterized by senile plaques containing A (1,
2). Although abnormal A (1-42) accumulation has been implicated as
an early and critical event in the etiology and pathogenesis of AD
(40), the mechanism by which A causes dementia has not been
understood fully. One possible mechanism is that A induces neuronal
loss or enhances the vulnerability of neurons to excitotoxicity.
Contrary to this simple scheme, however, recent computational analyses
of a neural associative memory model indicated that neuronal loss
cannot account, by itself, for the property of the amnesic
characteristic of AD but rather that a malfunction of synapses, without
an associated loss of neurons, can explain all the features of AD (41,
42). In support of this view, a quantitative morphometric analysis
using cerebral cortical biopsy tissues from AD patients implied that a
major loss of synapses at an early stage of AD forms a fundamental part of the pathological process (43). Furthermore, A potently inhibited high K+-evoked acetylcholine release from hippocampal
slices independently of apparent neurotoxicity (44, 45). Therefore,
A -induced cell death may be less important for AD dementia than the
selective impairment of synaptic function (5, 13). The present study has shown that A induced a decrease in synaptic activities of cortical neurons without apparent cell death. Interestingly, the detrimental effect of A was more severe when neurons were cocultured with astrocytes. Because the astrocyte-induced increase in the A
effect was abolished at a low temperature and, because A stimulated the activity of the astrocytic glutamate transporter GLAST, we believe
that A -induced synaptic malfunction is attributable, at least in
part, to a functional change in GLAST, i.e. the abnormal redistribution of GLAST. These findings are compelling evidence that
A alters the physiological property of neural functions without
neuronal cell loss. Interestingly, recent evidence shows that GLAST
immunoreactivity is evident in pyramidal cells in the cortex of AD
patients (32, 46) and mutant APP-overexpressed mice (47).
It is also possible that a similar GLAST translocation occurs in
neurons, contributing to AD pathogenesis.
Previous studies showed that the fragment A (25-35) induces a
decrease in glutamate uptake of rat-cultured astrocytes when applied at
a high concentration of 100 µM (48, 49). Our study indicated, however, that at less than 20 µM
concentration, A (25-35) caused a substantial increase in glutamate
uptake. In transgenic mice expressing mutant APP, the concentration
of A in the brain is not more than the low micromolar range (1 to 4 µM), and such low concentrations are sufficient to cause
marked impairment in learning and memory (50). Thus, we speculate that
our results represent a pathophysiological action of A and that the
A effect at higher doses merely reflects a physical damage to cells.
In cultured microglia, indeed, an electrophysiological study suggested that chronic treatment with 20 µM A (25-35) enhances
glutamate transport current (51). This supports strongly our findings, although we determined neither the biochemical feature of glutamate transporters nor the effect on synaptic function.
Actin reorganization appears to be involved in GLAST trafficking in
A -treated astrocytes, but our pharmacological approach could not
determine intracellular signaling pathways underlying the A effect.
Some signaling pathways including protein kinase C and
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase have been suggested to mediate the
cellular translocation of other types of transporters (21, 33-35).
However, none of them seems to be associated with A -induced GLAST
redistribution. Duan et al. (22) reported that glutamate itself induces rapid up-regulation of GLAST expression at the astrocyte
cell surface, but they also failed to identify relevant signal
transduction mechanisms. Very recently, several intracellular proteins
were shown to interact with the neuronal glutamate transporters EAAC1
and EAAT4 (52, 53). Identifying adaptor molecules of GLAST would
be helpful to clarify biochemical targets of A and the
signaling pathways responsible for cellular translocation of the transporter.
In summary, we have shown for the first time that A (1-42)
stimulates actin-dependent up-regulation of cell-surface
expression of GLAST in cultured astrocytes and attenuates synaptic
function of cultured neurons. These findings provide new insights into the targets of A . Elucidating the mechanisms underlying the
modulation of glial glutamate transporters may lead to a novel
therapeutic strategy for AD.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. K. Tanaka (Tokyo Medical
Dental University) for providing antibodies against GLAST and GLT-1,
Dr. T. Shirasawa (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology) for
providing synthesized A (1-40) and A (1-42), and
Dr. K. Matsui (Oregon Health Sciences University) for critical
comments on this paper.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Contributed equally to this work.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Chemical
Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The
University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Tel./Fax: 81-3-5841-4784; E-mail: ikegaya@tk.airnet.ne.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203764200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
A , amyloid
-protein;
AD, Alzheimer's disease;
APP, -amyloid precursor
protein;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography;
DHK, dihydrokainate;
THA, threo- -hydroxy aspartate;
sEPSC, spontaneous
excitatory postsynaptic current;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
LDH, lactate dehydrogenase;
ANOVA, analysis of variance.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Small, D. H.,
and McLean, C. A.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
73,
443-449[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Emmerling, M. R.,
Watson, M. D.,
Raby, C. A.,
and Spiegel, K.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1502,
158-171[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Schenk, D.,
Barbour, R.,
Dunn, W.,
Gordon, G.,
Grajeda, H.,
Guido, T., Hu, K.,
Huang, J.,
Johnson-Wood, K.,
Khan, K.,
Kholodenko, D.,
Lee, M.,
Liao, Z.,
Lieberburg, I.,
Motter, R.,
Mutter, L.,
Soriano, F.,
Shopp, G.,
Vasquez, N.,
Vandevert, C.,
Walker, S.,
Wogulis, M.,
Yednock, T.,
Games, D.,
and Seubert, P.
(1999)
Nature
400,
173-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Chen, G.,
Chen, K. S.,
Knox, J.,
Inglis, J.,
Bernard, A.,
Martin, S. J.,
Justice, A.,
McConlogue, L.,
Games, D.,
Freedman, S. B.,
and Morris, R. G. M.
(2000)
Nature
408,
975-979[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Terry, R. D.
(2000)
J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.
59,
1118-1119[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Cullen, W. K., Wu, J.,
Anwyl, R.,
and Rowan, M. J.
(1996)
Neuroreport
8,
87-92[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Itoh, A.,
Akaike, T.,
Sokabe, M.,
Nitta, A.,
Iida, R.,
Olariu, A.,
Yamada, K.,
and Nabeshima, T.
(1999)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
382,
167-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Fitzjohn, S. M.,
Morton, R. A.,
Kuenzi, F.,
Rosahl, T. W.,
Shearman, M.,
Lewis, H.,
Smith, D.,
Reynolds, D. S.,
Davies, C. H.,
Collingridge, G. L.,
and Seabrook, G. R.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
4691-4698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Stéphan, A.,
Laroche, S.,
and Davis, S.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
5703-5714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Hsia, A. Y.,
Masliah, E.,
McConlogue, L., Yu, G. Q.,
Tatsuno, G., Hu, K.,
Kholodenko, D.,
Malenka, R. C.,
Nicoll, R. A.,
and Mucke, L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3228-3233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Larson, J.,
Lynch, G.,
Games, D.,
and Seubert, P.
(1999)
Brain Res.
840,
23-35[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Moechars, D.,
Dewachter, I.,
Lorent, K.,
Reverse, D.,
Baekelandt, V.,
Naidu, A.,
Tesseur, I.,
Spittaels, K.,
Haute, C. V.,
Checler, F.,
Godaux, E.,
Cordell, C.,
and Van Leuven, F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
6483-6492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Small, D. H.,
Mok, S. S.,
and Bornstein, J. C.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
2,
595-598[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Robinson, M. B.,
and Dowd, L. A.
(1997)
Adv. Pharmacol.
37,
69-115
|
| 15.
|
Danbolt, N. C.
(2001)
Prog. Neurobiol.
65,
1-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Fukuda, H.,
Shimizu, T.,
Nakajima, M.,
Mori, H.,
and Shirasawa, T.
(1999)
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
9,
953-956[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Shibata, T.,
Yamada, K.,
Watanabe, M.,
Ikenaka, K.,
Wada, K.,
Tanaka, K.,
and Inoue, Y.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
9212-9219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Yamada, K.,
Watanabe, M.,
Shibata, T.,
Nagashima, M.,
Tanaka, K.,
and Inoue, Y.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
5706-5713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Suzuki, K.,
Ikegaya, Y.,
Matsuura, S.,
Kanai, Y.,
Endou, H.,
and Matsuki, N.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
3717-3725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Shitaka, Y.,
Matsuki, N.,
Saito, H.,
and Katsuki, H.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
6476-6489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Davis, K. E.,
Straff, D. J.,
Weinstein, E. A.,
Bannerman, P. G.,
Correale, D. M.,
Rothstein, J. D.,
and Robinson, M. B.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
2475-2485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Duan, S.,
Anderson, C. M.,
Stein, B. A.,
and Swanson, R. A.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
10193-10200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Barres, B. A.,
and Barde, Y.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
10,
642-648[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Tong, G.,
and Jahr, C. E.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
1195-1203[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Bergles, D. E.,
and Jahr, C. E.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
7709-7716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Matsuura, S.,
Ikegaya, Y.,
Yamada, M. K.,
Nishiyama, N.,
and Matsuki, N.
(2002)
Glia
37,
178-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Furuta, A.,
Rothstein, J. D.,
and Martin, L. J.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
8363-8375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Jarrett, J. T.,
Berger, E. P.,
and Lansbury, P. T., Jr.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
4693-4697[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Yankner, B. A.,
Duffy, L. K.,
and Kirschner, D. A.
(1990)
Science
250,
279-282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Pike, C. J.,
Burdick, D.,
Walencewicz, A. J.,
Glabe, C. G.,
and Cotman, C. W.
(1993)
J. Neurosci.
13,
1676-1687[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Beckstrøm, H.,
Julsrud, L.,
Haugeto, O.,
Dewar, D.,
Graham, D. I.,
Lehre, K. P.,
Storm-Mathisen, J.,
and Danbolt, N. C.
(1999)
J. Neurosci. Res.
55,
218-229[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Qian, Y.,
Galli, A.,
Ramamoorthy, S.,
Risso, S.,
DeFelice, L. J.,
and Blakely, R. D.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
45-57[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Quick, M. W.,
Corey, J. L.,
Davidson, N.,
and Lester, H. A.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
2967-2979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Melikian, H. E.,
and Buckley, K. M.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
7699-7710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Brera, B.,
Serrano, A.,
and Ceballos, M. L.
(2000)
Neurobiol. Dis.
7,
395-405[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Rogers, S. L.,
and Gelfand, V. I.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
57-62[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Dowd, L. A.,
and Robinson, M. B.
(1996)
J. Neurochem.
67,
508-516[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Conradt, M.,
and Stoffel, W.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
68,
1244-1251[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Ikegaya, Y.,
Nishiyama, N.,
and Matsuki, N.
(2000)
Neuroscience
98,
647-659[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Iwatsubo, T.,
Odaka, A.,
Suzuki, N.,
Mizusawa, H.,
Nukina, N.,
and Ihara, Y.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
45-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Ruppin, E.,
and Reggia, J. A.
(1995)
Br. J. Psychiatry
166,
19-28[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Horn, D.,
Levy, N.,
and Ruppin, E.
(1996)
Neural Comput.
8,
1227-1243[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Davies, C. A.,
Mann, D. M.,
Sumpter, P. Q.,
and Yates, P. O.
(1987)
J. Neurol. Sci.
78,
151-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Kar, S.,
Seto, D.,
Gaudreau, P.,
and Quirion, R.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
1034-1040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Auld, D. S.,
Kar, S.,
and Quirion, R.
(1998)
Trends Neurosci.
21,
43-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Scott, H. L.,
Pow, D. V.,
Tannenberg, A. E. G.,
and Dodd, P. R.
(2002)
J. Neurosci.
22 (RC 206),
1-5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Masliah, E.,
Alford, M.,
Mallory, M.,
Rockenstein, E.,
Moechars, D.,
and Van Leuven, F.
(2000)
Exp. Neurol.
163,
381-387[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Harkany, T.,
Abraham, I.,
Timmerman, W.,
Laskay, G.,
Toth, B.,
Sasvari, M.,
Konya, C.,
Sebens, J. B.,
Korf, J.,
Nyakas, C.,
Zarandi, M.,
Soos, K.,
Penke, B.,
and Luiten, P. G.
(2000)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
12,
2735-2745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Harris, M. E.,
Wang, Y.,
Pedigo, N. W., Jr.,
Hensley, K.,
Butterfield, D. A.,
and Carney, J. M.
(1996)
J. Neurochem.
67,
277-286[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Chapman, P. F.,
White, G. L.,
Jones, M. W.,
Cooper-Blacketer, D.,
Marshall, V. J.,
Irizarry, M.,
Younkin, L.,
Good, M. A.,
Bliss, T. V.,
Hyman, B. T.,
Younkin, S. G.,
and Hsiao, K. K.
(1999)
Nat. Neurosci.
2,
271-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Noda, N.,
Nakanishi, H.,
and Akaike, N.
(1999)
Neuroscience
92,
1465-1474[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Lin, C. I.,
Orlov, I.,
Ruggiero, A. M.,
Dykes-Hoberg, M.,
Lee, A.,
Jackson, M.,
and Rothstein, J. D.
(2001)
Nature
410,
84-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Jackson, M.,
Song, W.,
Liu, M.-Y.,
Jin, L.,
Dykes-Hoberg, M.,
Lin, C. G.,
Bowers, W. J.,
Federoff, H. J.,
Sternweis, P. C.,
and Rothstein, J. D.
(2001)
Nature
410,
89-93[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Mennerick, S.,
and Zorumski, C. F.
(1994)
Nature
368,
59-62[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Otis, T. S., Wu, Y. C.,
and Trussell, L. O.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
1634-1644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Matsui, K.,
Hosoi, N.,
and Tachibana, M.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
4500-4510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Diamond, J. S.,
and Jahr, C. E.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
4672-4687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Dehnes, Y.,
Chaudhry, F. A.,
Ullensvang, K.,
Lehre, K. P.,
Storm-Mathisen, J.,
and Danbolt, N. C.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
3606-3619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Conradt, M.,
Storck, T.,
and Stoffel, W.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
229,
682-687[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|