Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203764200 on June 17, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 32180-32186, August 30, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/35/32180    most recent
M203764200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

beta -Amyloid Enhances Glial Glutamate Uptake Activity and Attenuates Synaptic Efficacy*

Yuji IkegayaDagger§, Sigeru MatsuuraDagger, Sayaka Ueno, Atsushi Baba, Maki K. Yamada, Nobuyoshi Nishiyama, and Norio Matsuki

From the Laboratory of Chemical Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

Received for publication, April 18, 2002, and in revised form, May 29, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Although amyloid beta -protein (Abeta ) has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, little is known about the mechanism by which Abeta causes dementia. Abeta leads to neuronal cell death in vivo and in vitro, but recent evidence suggests that the property of the amnesic characteristic of Alzheimer's disease can be explained by a malfunction of synapses rather than a loss of neurons. Here we show that prolonged treatment with Abeta augments the glutamate clearance ability of cultured astrocytes and induces a dramatic decrease in glutamatergic synaptic activity of neurons cocultured with the astrocytes. Biotinylation assay revealed that the enhancement of glutamate uptake activity was associated with an increase in cell-surface expression of GLAST, a subtype of glial glutamate transporters, without apparent changes in the total amount of GLAST. This phenomenon was blocked efficiently by actin-disrupting agents. Thus, Abeta -induced actin-dependent GLAST redistribution and relevant synaptic malfunction may be a cellular basis for the amnesia of Alzheimer's disease.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Amyloid beta -protein (Abeta ),1 a peptide with 40-42 residues, is a main element of senile plaque, a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD) (1, 2), and is accumulated highly in the forebrain of AD patients, as well as transgenic mice overexpressing mutant beta -amyloid precursor protein (beta APP), which develop AD-like pathology (3, 4). Although numerous studies showed that exogenously applied or endogenously produced Abeta leads to neuronal cell death, the amnesic feature of AD cannot be explained by the neuronal loss alone (5). Indeed, accumulating evidence indicates that Abeta induces severe impairment of excitatory neurotransmission in the hippocampus (6-8) and thereby may cause memory deficits (9). In mutant beta APP transgenic mice, such synaptic malfunction often appears in advance of Abeta plaque formation (10, 11), and cognitive deterioration is also observed without apparent neurodegeneration (4, 12). Abeta -induced synaptic deterioration rather than neuronal loss is, therefore, likely to be a main cause of early AD dementia (5, 13). However, the mechanisms by which Abeta causes such synaptic malfunction remain to be elucidated.

Excitatory neurotransmission is tightly regulated by a rapid clearance of the neurotransmitter glutamate from the extracellular milieu through Na+-dependent L-glutamate transporters that are expressed on astrocytes, i.e. GLAST and GLT-1 (14, 15). We therefore investigated the effect of Abeta on glutamate uptake activity in cultured cortical astrocytes. Here we show for the first time that Abeta ending at 42 residues (Abeta (1-42)) induces an increase in the activity of GLAST. This work further demonstrates that Abeta (1-42) stimulates actin-dependent GLAST redistribution from subcellular compartment to the cell surface. Such up-regulation of GLAST function may attenuate glutamatergic synaptic efficacy.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Chemically synthesized Abeta (1-40) and Abeta (1-42) were gifts from Dr. T. Shirasawa (Department of Molecular Genetics, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan). The Abeta s were purified in basic conditions to avoid aggregation, with the reverse-phase HPLC so that 50 pmol of each of these molecules gave a single and sharp peak on HPLC. Their purity and amino acid composition were confirmed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (16). Affinity-purified rabbit anti-GLAST and GLT-1 primary antibodies were gifts from Dr. K. Tanaka (Tokyo Medical Dental University, Tokyo, Japan). The specificity of these antibodies was reported previously (17, 18). L-[3H]Glutamate and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody were purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Actinomycin D, dihydrokainate (DHK), immobilized avidin, peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody, LY294002, nifedipine, threo-beta -hydroxy aspartate (THA), and wortmannin were obtained from Sigma. Cycloheximide, cytochalasin D, latrunculin A, and thapsigargin were obtained from Wako Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). H-7, propidium iodide, sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin, U-126, and genistein were obtained from Calbiochem, Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR), Pierce, Promega (Madison, WI), and Research Biochemicals (Natick, MA), respectively.

Astrocyte Cultures-- Cortical astrocytes were prepared from postnatal 2-day-old rat pups (SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) as described previously (19). Cortical hemispheres were trypsinized (0.25%) and plated in Eagle's minimal essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. The medium was exchanged every 3-4 days, and on reaching confluence the cells were trypsinized and replated once. The confluent cultures were treated with a serum-free medium for 24 h and used for experiments. In these cultures, more than 97% of cells were astrocytes, and <1% were microglial cell, as assessed by the astrocyte-specific marker GFAP and the microglial marker OX-42, respectively (data not shown). The number of microglia was not changed significantly by Abeta treatment.

Neuron Cultures-- Cultures of embryonic neurons were prepared from E18 rat cerebral cortex (SLC) as described previously (20). For plating on a monolayer of astrocytes, cells were suspended in Neurobasal (Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and plated at 500 cells/mm2. After 24 h, cells were maintained further with serum-free Neurobasal supplemented with 2% B27 (Invitrogen). Experiments were performed at day 7 in vitro.

Electrophysiological Recordings-- Whole-cell voltage clamp (-70 mV) recordings were obtained from cultured hippocampal neurons. Recording solutions contained the following (in mM): 147 NaCl, 3 NaHCO3, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 glucose, 10 HEPES, 25 µM D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid, and 10 µM picrotoxin, adjusted to pH 7.4. Patch recording pipettes (6 megohms) were filled with intracellular solutions containing the following (in mM): 120 CsMeSO3, 20 CsCl, 1 EGTA, 0.4 NaGTP, 4 MgATP, 5 QX314, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.3, with CsOH at 35 °C. Whole-cell recordings were made with Axopatch 200B amplifiers, digitized at 10 KHz by DIGIDATA 1320A interface, and acquisition and analysis were performed with the pCLAMP8 (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Neurons with series resistances in the range of 8 to 17 megohms were selected for analyses. Spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs) were obtained by randomly selecting intervals of 200 s from the stored data for each neuron. The non-NMDA receptor antagonist CNQX blocked sEPSC completely (data not shown).

Glutamate Uptake-- L-[3H]Glutamate uptake of astrocytes was measured as described (19). Briefly, cultures were washed for 30 min with a modified Hanks' balanced salt solution and exposed to a combination of 0.1 µCi/ml [3H]glutamate and 10 µM unlabeled glutamate for 7 min. Uptake was terminated by ice-cold Hanks' solution. Astrocytes were lysed in 0.5 N NaOH. Aliquots were taken for scintillation counting and for protein assays. Because Abeta aggregates spontaneously, the total amount of proteins was increased corresponding to the doses of Abeta . Because the number of astrocytes per well was relatively constant (data not shown), uptake rates were normalized per well (not per unit weight protein).

Biotinylation-- Biotinylation of cell surface proteins was performed as described by Davis et al. (21) and Duan et al. (22) with some modifications. After drug treatment, the astrocyte cultures were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), incubated in sulfo-NHS-biotin solution (1.5 mg/ml in PBS) for 20 min at 4 °C. The cultures were washed twice with PBS containing 100 mM glycine to stop the reaction. After 45 min of incubation with the glycine-containing PBS at 4 °C, the cells were lysed in 300 µl/well of lysis buffer with protease inhibitors (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 250 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor, and 1 mM iodoacetamide) for 1 h at 4 °C and then centrifuged at 16,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C to remove debris. Before the lysate was incubated with avidin-conjugated beads, the aliquot was taken for Western blot analysis as the "total cell lysate" fraction. The remaining lysates (150 µl) were incubated with equal volumes of avidin beads slurry and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min, and the supernatants were taken for Western blot analysis as the "intracellular" fraction. The pellets were washed four times with the lysis buffer with the protease inhibitors and resuspended in 300 µl of Laemmli buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 20% glycerol, and 5% 2-mercaptoethnol) and then treated for 30 min at 70 °C. After centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 15 min, the supernatants were taken as the "biotinylated (cell surface)" fraction. All three samples for Western blot analysis were diluted to be the same aliquot and frozen at -20 °C until analysis. The protein samples were loaded on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and blotted with anti-GLAST or GLT-1 antibody (1:1000) and then with the peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000). Immunoreactive proteins were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).

Immunocytochemistry-- After the treatment with Abeta , the astrocytes cultures in 35-mm dishes were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min, permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 for 5 min, and blocked with 2% horse serum for 30 min. The cultures were incubated with anti-GLAST or GLT-1 antibody (1:2500) overnight at 4 °C and then with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000) and 5 µg/ml propidium iodide for 1 h at room temperature. The dishes were broken and settled on glass coverslips upside down. The fluorescence images were obtained with a laser scanning confocal system Micro Radiance 1000 (Bio-Rad).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Abeta Attenuates Glutamatergic Neurotransmission in Neuroglial Cocultures-- The initial set of experiments was designed to examine the effect of Abeta on synaptic transmission in primary cultures of cortical neurons. After day 7 in vitro neurons were exposed to 20 µM Abeta (1-42) for 12 h, and sEPSCs were recorded by whole-cell patch clamp techniques. Abeta -treated neurons exhibited a slight but significant decrease in both the mean amplitude and the frequency of sEPSCs (Fig. 1). This result is the first evidence that Abeta attenuates neuronal activity in culture.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Abeta attenuates synaptic responses of cortical neurons growing on astrocyte monolayers. Neuron-enriched/astrocyte-poor cultures (neuron enriched) or cocultures of neurons and astrocytes (with astrocytes) were treated with vehicle (Control) or 20 µM Abeta for 12 h. A, representative traces of sEPSCs. B, Abeta caused a significant leftward shift of the cumulative probability histogram in both neuron-enriched cultures and cocultures (each p < 0.01, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). Abeta did not change series resistances: 11.5 ± 0.9 megohms in control neurons and 12.2 ± 0.5 megohms in Abeta -treated neurons. C, summary of the suppressive effect of Abeta on sEPSC amplitude and frequency. Each value in the ordinates was obtained by averaging the percentage changes in mean amplitude or event frequency. The Abeta effect on spontaneous synaptic activities was more severe in neuroglial cocultures than in neuron-enriched cultures. Baseline sEPSC amplitude was 37.0 ± 1.5 (neuron enriched) and 27.5 ± 1.2 pA (with astrocytes). Baseline frequency was 1.60 ± 0.26 (neuron enriched) and 1.10 ± 0.30 Hz (with astrocytes). Thus, the amplitude and frequency were both attenuated in the presence of astrocytes. The effect of this astrocyte was abolished completely by THA (35.6 ± 2.5 pA of amplitude and 1.58 ± 0.31 Hz of frequency in THA), suggesting that the basal activity of astrocytic glutamate transporters decreases synaptic efficacy. This idea is consistent with many previous reports (24, 54-57) showing that glutamate transporters regulate basal synaptic transmission. We also examined the effect on miniature EPSCs, which were recorded in the presence of 1 µM tetrodotoxin to prevent spontaneous spike activity. The Abeta -induced decrease in the amplitude, but not frequency, of miniature EPSCs was enhanced by culturing neurons with astrocytes (data not shown), which is in accordance with a study (24) that THA increases the size, but not frequency, of events. Glial glutamate transporters are, therefore, likely to regulate synaptic activity but not spike generation. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; Student's t test. Data are means ± S.E. of 8-10 neurons from three independent experiments.

In the brain, however, neurons are surrounded by a larger number of astrocytes, which render physical and physiological supports for neurons (23). To measure the Abeta effect under more physiological conditions, neurons were plated onto the monolayer of confluent astrocytes and processed for the same experimental treatment. In this coculture system, a similar decrease in sEPSC amplitude and frequency was produced by Abeta treatment, but surprisingly, the detrimental effect of Abeta was much larger in the presence of astrocytes (Fig. 1C).

Immunohistochemical staining for microtubule-associated protein-2 and glial fibrillary acidic protein revealed that the survival of neurons or astrocytes was unaffected by the exposure to Abeta ; the number of surviving cells was 79.7 ± 4.7 (neurons) and 374.1 ± 13.4 (astrocytes) per mm2 in control cultures and 72.5 ± 3.3 (neurons) and 394.0 ± 15.5 (astrocytes) per mm2 in Abeta -treated cultures (means ± S.E. of 8-11 cultures). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay also indicated that Abeta did not increase the activity of LDH released from astrocyte cultures; the percentages of released LDH to the total cellular LDH are 18.7 ± 5.4% in control cultures and 16.8 ± 4.8% in Abeta -treated cultures (n = 4). Similarly, Western blot analysis showed that glial expression of actin was unchanged by Abeta treatment (see Fig. 4C). Propidium iodide-labeled nuclei displayed no aberration in Abeta -treated astrocytes (see Fig. 5, C and D). All these results indicate that Abeta treatment did not affect the cell viability. Therefore, the result that Abeta -induced synaptic malfunction was aggravated by the presence of astrocytes suggests that the Abeta effect is mediated, at least in part, by an alteration of astrocytic physiological functions.

Because one of the major roles of astrocytes is to terminate neurotransmission by the uptake of extracellular glutamate through high affinity glutamate transporters, our data suggest that Abeta enhances astrocytic glutamate uptake activity. To address this possibility, sEPSCs were recorded at a low temperature, because hypothermal conditions can attenuate efficiently the activity of glial glutamate transporters (24, 25). A significant difference in the Abeta effect between neuron-enriched cultures and neuroglial cocultures was no longer observed at a lower temperature (24 °C). We further attempted to determine whether the Abeta effect is blocked by THA, a potent inhibitor of glial glutamate transporters, but this inhibitor per se induced the swelling of Abeta -treated neurons and disturbed successful whole cell recordings. Nonetheless, the result at a low temperature implies Abeta -induced alteration in glutamate transporter activity. Thus, the following experiments have focused on the effect of Abeta on the glutamate clearance ability of astrocytes.

Abeta Facilitates GLAST-mediated Glutamate Uptake-- Glutamate transport activity in pure cultures of cortical astrocytes was measured as uptake activity of L-[3H]glutamate. Baseline uptake activity was hindered completely in Na+-free medium and abolished by THA in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). These data indicate that the uptake activity was mediated by Na+-dependent secondary active transport via glutamate transporters. The uptake was unaffected by even a high concentration of DHK, a selective GLT-1 inhibitor (Fig. 2A), which suggests that GLAST is a predominant glutamate transporter in our cultures. Consistent with this, Western blot analysis could not detect apparent immunoreactivity for GLT-1 in our cultures (data not shown; see also Refs. 19 and 26). Thus we consider that this culture system is useful in investigating the molecular behavior of GLAST, one of the major glutamate transporters of the adult forebrain (15, 27). Incidentally, when astrocytes were cocultured with neurons for 7 days, the uptake activity was unchanged: 47.9 ± 7.8 pmol/well/min in pure astrocyte cultures and 58.9 ± 11.8 pmol/well/min in cocultures with neurons (p > 0.1, Student's t test; means ± S.E. of four cases). These results suggest that neuronal contribution to the total activity of glutamate uptake assumed in the experiments of Fig. 1 is substantially low as compared with glial transport activity and that neurons do not cause a change in GLAST activity in astrocytes.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Abeta (1-42) enhances THA-sensitive glutamate uptake activity in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. A, confluent cultures of astrocytes were treated with 20 µM Abeta (1-42) for 48 h, and L-[3H]glutamate uptake activity was measured in normal or Na+-free medium or in the presence of THA or DHK. **, p < 0.01 versus Control; ##, p < 0.01 versus None; Tukey's test after ANOVA. B, glutamate uptake activities were measured after a 48-h treatment with Abeta (1-40) or Abeta (1-42) at concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 20 µM. C, uptake activities were measured 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, or 48 h after the incubation with 20 µM Abeta (1-40) or 20 µM Abeta (1-42). The relative activity is expressed as a percentage of baseline uptake of untreated astrocytes. THA-sensitive glutamate uptake activity was significantly augmented 3 h after Abeta (1-42) treatment (p < 0.05) and reached the saturation state within 12 h (p < 0.01), but little effect was observed for Abeta (1-40). Data are means ± S.E. of four different cultures.

As predicted by our electrophysiological data, continuous application of 20 µM Abeta (1-42) for 48 h induced a significant increase in the rate of glutamate uptake (Fig. 2A). This enhancement was inhibited efficiently by THA but not by DHK (Fig. 2A), which suggests that the augmented uptake activity was unlikely because of the emergence of GLT-1 activity and that it was totally attributable to the enhancement of GLAST activity.

The Abeta (1-42)-induced increase in glutamate uptake activity showed a concentration dependence in the range of 0.02 to 20 µM (Fig. 2B). More than 20 µM Abeta (1-42) severely deteriorated the viability of astrocytes (data not shown). The time dependence of the Abeta effect was investigated at a concentration of 20 µM. The facilitation of uptake was observed 3 h after exposure to Abeta and reached apparent steady state after 12 h (Fig. 2C).

The shorter form Abeta (1-40), another type of endogenous Abeta , was virtually ineffective (Fig. 2, B and C). Although the difference in sequence between Abeta (1-42) and Abeta (1-40) is only two residues of C terminus, Abeta (1-42) aggregates more rapidly than Abeta (1-40) (28). Like Abeta (1-42), Abeta (25-35), a biologically active, hydrophobic fragment of Abeta (29), is also highly prone to aggregation (30). This subfragment could also reproduce the effect of Abeta (1-42) (data not shown). Because it is generally believed that aggregated Abeta is responsible for AD progression (1, 2), fresh Abeta (1-40) was incubated at 37 °C for 7 days to allow aggregation (31) and then applied to astrocyte cultures. The preincubated Abeta (1-40) enhanced efficiently glutamate transport activity up to a level comparable with Abeta (1-42) (Fig. 3). The control peptide Abeta (40-1), a reverse-sequence peptide that is stable and does not form aggregates, showed no effect even after preincubation (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the aggregation of Abeta is essential for the enhancement of glutamate uptake.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Aggregated Abeta (1-40) causes an increase in astrocytic glutamate uptake activity. Immediately after being solubilized, Abeta (1-40) or Abeta (40-1) was applied to cultured astrocytes at 20 µM for 48 h (Fresh Abeta ). After the solubilization, the Abeta was incubated at 37 °C for 7 days to allow spontaneous aggregation and applied to astrocytes at 20 µM for 48 h (Preincubated Abeta ). The glutamate uptake activity was enhanced by preincubated Abeta (1-40) but not by fresh Abeta (1-40), fresh Abeta (40-1), or preincubated Abeta (40-1). The ordinate indicates a percentage of the uptake activity in control astrocytes. **, p < 0.01 versus control; Tukey's test after ANOVA. Data are means ± S.E. of four independent experiments.

Abeta Stimulates the Cellular Trafficking of GLAST-- Eadie-Hofstee plots of the uptake activity showed that 20 µM Abeta (1-42) produced a significant increase in the Vmax value from 126.0 ± 6.8 to 202.0 ± 8.3 pmol/well/min with a minimal change in the Km value (Fig. 4A), suggesting that Abeta (1-42) causes an increase in functional GLAST proteins. To determine whether Abeta -stimulated transport requires de novo mRNA/ protein synthesis, we examined the effects of the transcriptional inhibitor actinomycin D and the translational inhibitor cycloheximide. However, neither of these inhibitors affected the activity of glutamate uptake of intact or Abeta (1-42)-treated astrocytes (Fig. 4B), which suggests that Abeta increases the activity of GLAST without mRNA/protein synthesis. Indeed, Western blot analysis revealed that the Abeta (1-42) treatment induced no apparent change in the total amount of GLAST (Fig. 4C). This is consistent with the report showing that the expression level of EAAT1, a human GLAST homologue, is not altered in AD brain (32).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Abeta -induced GLAST translocation to the plasma membrane. A, a concentration dependence of glutamate transport activity was examined in the astrocytes treated with 20 µM Abeta (1-42) for 48 h (left panel). The data were plotted in an Eadie-Hofstee format, and the Vmax and Km values were calculated by a linear regression analysis (right panel). The average Vmax values were 126.0 ± 6.8 nmol/well/min (Control) and 202.0 ± 8.3 nmol/well/min (Abeta ). The average Km values were 19.1 ± 4.0 µM (Control) and 14.2 ± 1.6 µM (Abeta ). Abeta (1-42) induced a substantial increase in the Vmax (but not Km) value (p < 0.01). B, Abeta (1-42) (20 µM) was coapplied with 1 µM actinomycin D or 10 µM cycloheximide for 48 h. Neither inhibitor affected the facilitatory effect of Abeta , which suggests that the up-regulation of glutamate uptake is not mediated by de novo synthesis of mRNA or protein. Data are means ± S.E. of four cases. C, representative immunoblot of the effect of Abeta on the expressions of GLAST (top panel) and actin (bottom panel) in the total cell lysate, biotinylated (cell surface), and nonbiotinylated (intracellular) fractions. Cell surface proteins were labeled with membrane-impermeable biotin. Anti-GLAST antibody recognized a protein with a molecular mass of ~64 kDa (monomer) and also its putative dimer and trimer (58). Treatment with 20 µM Abeta (1-42) for 48 h did not alter the total amount of GLAST but caused an increase in biotinylated GLAST and a compensatory decrease in nonbiotinylated GLAST. The immunoreactivity for actin, an index of intracellular proteins, was not changed in any fractions. These results indicate that Abeta induced the membrane trafficking of GLAST. Experiments were repeated with at least four different cultures, producing the same results. We did not quantify the density of immunoreactive bands, because the edge of each band was somewhat unclear, probably because of GLAST glycosylation (59) and random biotinylation.

Because the membrane trafficking system is known to regulate the activity of some transporters, e.g. the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 expressed in C6 glioma (21), serotonin transporters expressed in HEK293 cells (33), the gamma -aminobutyric acid transporter GAT1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes (34), and dopamine transporters expressed in PC12 cells (35), it is also possible that the Abeta effect is achieved by an increase in GLAST proteins on the cell surface. This possibility was addressed by a membrane-impermeant biotinylation assay. Biotinylated, cell surface protein fractions were separated from nonbiotinylated, intracellular protein fractions by using avidin-conjugated beads. The expression of GLAST in these two fractions was assessed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4C). In Abeta (1-42)-treated astrocytes, GLAST expression increased in the biotinylated (cell surface) fraction and decreased complementarily in the nonbiotinylated (intracellular) fraction. These results indicate that Abeta (1-42) caused GLAST translocation from the intracellular compartment to the plasma membrane.

The cellular distribution of GLAST in Abeta -treated astrocytes was examined further by immunohistochemical staining (Fig. 5). The nuclei were labeled with propidium iodide to distinguish each cell. Abeta (1-42) caused apparent clustering of GLAST immunoreactivity along the edge of the soma and also slightly in the cytoplasmic part, whereas in control astrocytes, GLAST was distributed throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 5). Although Brera et al. (36) reported that long term treatment with Abeta leads to cell death of astrocytes, we found no evidence for shrinkage or degeneration of propidium iodide-labeled nucleus at least after a 48-h treatment with 20 µM Abeta (1-42). Therefore, the possibility that Abeta (1-42)-evoked GLAST redistribution is merely because of cell damage could be ruled out.


View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Abeta alters the cellular distribution of GLAST immunoreactivity in astrocytes. Astrocytes were cultured in the absence (A and C) or presence (B and D) of 20 µM Abeta (1-42) for 48 h and then immunostained for GLAST (green). Propidium iodide (red) was used for counterstaining. Panels C and D show nonspecific signals of the secondary IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate in the absence of anti-GLAST antibody. Abeta -treated astrocytes displayed cluster-like GLAST spots at the outer margins of the cell body (arrowheads). Similar results were obtained in every such experiment conducted (n = 5).

Abeta Induces Actin-dependent GLAST Redistribution-- To determine whether Abeta -induced increase in glutamate uptake is mediated by GLAST translocation, we examined the effect of cytochalasin D and latrunculin A, inhibitors of actin polymerization, which is the cellular event known to be essential for subcellular membrane trafficking (37). The inhibitors attenuated significantly Abeta -induced up-regulation of glutamate uptake without affecting the baseline activity of control astrocytes (Fig. 6). The microtubule disrupter colchicine had no influence on the Abeta (1-42)-stimulated transport (data not shown). These data suggest that the Abeta effect on glutamate uptake activity is mediated by GLAST redistribution dependent on actin rearrangement.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Inhibitors of actin polymerization abolished Abeta -induced enhancement of glutamate uptake activity. Cytochalasin D (A) or latrunculin A (B) was coapplied with 20 µM Abeta (1-42) for 6 h. Both inhibitors attenuated significantly Abeta -induced enhancement of glutamate uptake. **, p < 0.01 versus Control; #, p < 0.01 versus Abeta alone; Tukey's test after ANOVA. Data are means ± S.E. of four independent experiments.

Finally, we attempted a series of pharmacological investigations to clarify the signaling pathway underlying Abeta -induced increase in GLAST activity. EAAC1 translocation is regulated by protein kinase C (21, 37). Because GLAST possesses multiple phosphorylation sites for protein kinase C (38), we tested the effect of H-7, an inhibitor of protein kinase C and A. However, 300 µM H-7 failed to prevent the Abeta (1-42) effect (the relative uptake activity to 20 µM Abeta (1-42) alone, 99.6 ± 4.1%; means ± S.E. of four cases). Although phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is also involved in EAAC1 trafficking (21), the inhibitor LY294002 (30 µM) or wortmannin (100 nM) did not affect the Abeta (1-42)-stimulated uptake (106.0 ± 4.2 and 106.0 ± 9.4%, respectively). Likewise, we found that the effect of Abeta (1-42) was blocked by none of the drugs tested, i.e. the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein (30 µM, 103.0 ± 4.4%) or herbimycin A (10 µM, 96.6 ± 6.6%), the inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase U 0126 (300 nM, 109.0 ± 8.8%), the inhibitor of microsomal Ca2+-ATPase thapsigargin (1 µM, 108.0 ± 6.9%), the L-type calcium channel blocker nifedipine (100 µM, 103.0 ± 6.5%), the disrupter of synaptic vesicle-associated protein botulinum toxin C (100 nM, 101.0 ± 0.8%), the Na+/K+-ATPase inhibitor ouabain (1 mM, 93.5 ± 7.6%), or the antioxidant Trolox (300 µM, 104.0 ± 3.8%). The validity of concentrations of each agent was certified by our recent study (19, 39). Thus, Abeta (1-42)-induced GLAST translocation appears to be independent of classically known signaling pathways.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

AD is the most common form of dementia in elderly individuals and is associated with a progressive, neurodestructive process of the human neocortex, which is characterized by senile plaques containing Abeta (1, 2). Although abnormal Abeta (1-42) accumulation has been implicated as an early and critical event in the etiology and pathogenesis of AD (40), the mechanism by which Abeta causes dementia has not been understood fully. One possible mechanism is that Abeta induces neuronal loss or enhances the vulnerability of neurons to excitotoxicity. Contrary to this simple scheme, however, recent computational analyses of a neural associative memory model indicated that neuronal loss cannot account, by itself, for the property of the amnesic characteristic of AD but rather that a malfunction of synapses, without an associated loss of neurons, can explain all the features of AD (41, 42). In support of this view, a quantitative morphometric analysis using cerebral cortical biopsy tissues from AD patients implied that a major loss of synapses at an early stage of AD forms a fundamental part of the pathological process (43). Furthermore, Abeta potently inhibited high K+-evoked acetylcholine release from hippocampal slices independently of apparent neurotoxicity (44, 45). Therefore, Abeta -induced cell death may be less important for AD dementia than the selective impairment of synaptic function (5, 13). The present study has shown that Abeta induced a decrease in synaptic activities of cortical neurons without apparent cell death. Interestingly, the detrimental effect of Abeta was more severe when neurons were cocultured with astrocytes. Because the astrocyte-induced increase in the Abeta effect was abolished at a low temperature and, because Abeta stimulated the activity of the astrocytic glutamate transporter GLAST, we believe that Abeta -induced synaptic malfunction is attributable, at least in part, to a functional change in GLAST, i.e. the abnormal redistribution of GLAST. These findings are compelling evidence that Abeta alters the physiological property of neural functions without neuronal cell loss. Interestingly, recent evidence shows that GLAST immunoreactivity is evident in pyramidal cells in the cortex of AD patients (32, 46) and mutant beta APP-overexpressed mice (47). It is also possible that a similar GLAST translocation occurs in neurons, contributing to AD pathogenesis.

Previous studies showed that the fragment Abeta (25-35) induces a decrease in glutamate uptake of rat-cultured astrocytes when applied at a high concentration of 100 µM (48, 49). Our study indicated, however, that at less than 20 µM concentration, Abeta (25-35) caused a substantial increase in glutamate uptake. In transgenic mice expressing mutant beta APP, the concentration of Abeta in the brain is not more than the low micromolar range (1 to 4 µM), and such low concentrations are sufficient to cause marked impairment in learning and memory (50). Thus, we speculate that our results represent a pathophysiological action of Abeta and that the Abeta effect at higher doses merely reflects a physical damage to cells. In cultured microglia, indeed, an electrophysiological study suggested that chronic treatment with 20 µM Abeta (25-35) enhances glutamate transport current (51). This supports strongly our findings, although we determined neither the biochemical feature of glutamate transporters nor the effect on synaptic function.

Actin reorganization appears to be involved in GLAST trafficking in Abeta -treated astrocytes, but our pharmacological approach could not determine intracellular signaling pathways underlying the Abeta effect. Some signaling pathways including protein kinase C and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase have been suggested to mediate the cellular translocation of other types of transporters (21, 33-35). However, none of them seems to be associated with Abeta -induced GLAST redistribution. Duan et al. (22) reported that glutamate itself induces rapid up-regulation of GLAST expression at the astrocyte cell surface, but they also failed to identify relevant signal transduction mechanisms. Very recently, several intracellular proteins were shown to interact with the neuronal glutamate transporters EAAC1 and EAAT4 (52, 53). Identifying adaptor molecules of GLAST would be helpful to clarify biochemical targets of Abeta and the signaling pathways responsible for cellular translocation of the transporter.

In summary, we have shown for the first time that Abeta (1-42) stimulates actin-dependent up-regulation of cell-surface expression of GLAST in cultured astrocytes and attenuates synaptic function of cultured neurons. These findings provide new insights into the targets of Abeta . Elucidating the mechanisms underlying the modulation of glial glutamate transporters may lead to a novel therapeutic strategy for AD.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. K. Tanaka (Tokyo Medical Dental University) for providing antibodies against GLAST and GLT-1, Dr. T. Shirasawa (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology) for providing synthesized Abeta (1-40) and Abeta (1-42), and Dr. K. Matsui (Oregon Health Sciences University) for critical comments on this paper.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Contributed equally to this work.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Chemical Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. Tel./Fax: 81-3-5841-4784; E-mail: ikegaya@tk.airnet.ne.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203764200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Abeta , amyloid beta -protein; AD, Alzheimer's disease; beta APP, beta -amyloid precursor protein; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; DHK, dihydrokainate; THA, threo-beta -hydroxy aspartate; sEPSC, spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic current; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Small, D. H., and McLean, C. A. (1999) J. Neurochem. 73, 443-449[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Emmerling, M. R., Watson, M. D., Raby, C. A., and Spiegel, K. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1502, 158-171[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Schenk, D., Barbour, R., Dunn, W., Gordon, G., Grajeda, H., Guido, T., Hu, K., Huang, J., Johnson-Wood, K., Khan, K., Kholodenko, D., Lee, M., Liao, Z., Lieberburg, I., Motter, R., Mutter, L., Soriano, F., Shopp, G., Vasquez, N., Vandevert, C., Walker, S., Wogulis, M., Yednock, T., Games, D., and Seubert, P. (1999) Nature 400, 173-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Chen, G., Chen, K. S., Knox, J., Inglis, J., Bernard, A., Martin, S. J., Justice, A., McConlogue, L., Games, D., Freedman, S. B., and Morris, R. G. M. (2000) Nature 408, 975-979[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Terry, R. D. (2000) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 59, 1118-1119[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Cullen, W. K., Wu, J., Anwyl, R., and Rowan, M. J. (1996) Neuroreport 8, 87-92[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Itoh, A., Akaike, T., Sokabe, M., Nitta, A., Iida, R., Olariu, A., Yamada, K., and Nabeshima, T. (1999) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 382, 167-175[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Fitzjohn, S. M., Morton, R. A., Kuenzi, F., Rosahl, T. W., Shearman, M., Lewis, H., Smith, D., Reynolds, D. S., Davies, C. H., Collingridge, G. L., and Seabrook, G. R. (2001) J. Neurosci. 21, 4691-4698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Stéphan, A., Laroche, S., and Davis, S. (2001) J. Neurosci. 21, 5703-5714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Hsia, A. Y., Masliah, E., McConlogue, L., Yu, G. Q., Tatsuno, G., Hu, K., Kholodenko, D., Malenka, R. C., Nicoll, R. A., and Mucke, L. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3228-3233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Larson, J., Lynch, G., Games, D., and Seubert, P. (1999) Brain Res. 840, 23-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Moechars, D., Dewachter, I., Lorent, K., Reverse, D., Baekelandt, V., Naidu, A., Tesseur, I., Spittaels, K., Haute, C. V., Checler, F., Godaux, E., Cordell, C., and Van Leuven, F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6483-6492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Small, D. H., Mok, S. S., and Bornstein, J. C. (2001) Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 595-598[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Robinson, M. B., and Dowd, L. A. (1997) Adv. Pharmacol. 37, 69-115
15. Danbolt, N. C. (2001) Prog. Neurobiol. 65, 1-105[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Fukuda, H., Shimizu, T., Nakajima, M., Mori, H., and Shirasawa, T. (1999) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 9, 953-956[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Shibata, T., Yamada, K., Watanabe, M., Ikenaka, K., Wada, K., Tanaka, K., and Inoue, Y. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 9212-9219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Yamada, K., Watanabe, M., Shibata, T., Nagashima, M., Tanaka, K., and Inoue, Y. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 5706-5713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Suzuki, K., Ikegaya, Y., Matsuura, S., Kanai, Y., Endou, H., and Matsuki, N. (2001) J. Cell Sci. 114, 3717-3725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Shitaka, Y., Matsuki, N., Saito, H., and Katsuki, H. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 6476-6489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Davis, K. E., Straff, D. J., Weinstein, E. A., Bannerman, P. G., Correale, D. M., Rothstein, J. D., and Robinson, M. B. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 2475-2485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Duan, S., Anderson, C. M., Stein, B. A., and Swanson, R. A. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 10193-10200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Barres, B. A., and Barde, Y. (2000) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 642-648[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Tong, G., and Jahr, C. E. (1994) Neuron 13, 1195-1203[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Bergles, D. E., and Jahr, C. E. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 7709-7716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Matsuura, S., Ikegaya, Y., Yamada, M. K., Nishiyama, N., and Matsuki, N. (2002) Glia 37, 178-182[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Furuta, A., Rothstein, J. D., and Martin, L. J. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 8363-8375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Jarrett, J. T., Berger, E. P., and Lansbury, P. T., Jr. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 4693-4697[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Yankner, B. A., Duffy, L. K., and Kirschner, D. A. (1990) Science 250, 279-282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Pike, C. J., Burdick, D., Walencewicz, A. J., Glabe, C. G., and Cotman, C. W. (1993) J. Neurosci. 13, 1676-1687[Abstract]
31. Beckstrøm, H., Julsrud, L., Haugeto, O., Dewar, D., Graham, D. I., Lehre, K. P., Storm-Mathisen, J., and Danbolt, N. C. (1999) J. Neurosci. Res. 55, 218-229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Qian, Y., Galli, A., Ramamoorthy, S., Risso, S., DeFelice, L. J., and Blakely, R. D. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 45-57[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Quick, M. W., Corey, J. L., Davidson, N., and Lester, H. A. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 2967-2979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Melikian, H. E., and Buckley, K. M. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 7699-7710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Brera, B., Serrano, A., and Ceballos, M. L. (2000) Neurobiol. Dis. 7, 395-405[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Rogers, S. L., and Gelfand, V. I. (2000) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 57-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Dowd, L. A., and Robinson, M. B. (1996) J. Neurochem. 67, 508-516[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Conradt, M., and Stoffel, W. (1997) J. Neurochem. 68, 1244-1251[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Ikegaya, Y., Nishiyama, N., and Matsuki, N. (2000) Neuroscience 98, 647-659[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Iwatsubo, T., Odaka, A., Suzuki, N., Mizusawa, H., Nukina, N., and Ihara, Y. (1994) Neuron 13, 45-53[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Ruppin, E., and Reggia, J. A. (1995) Br. J. Psychiatry 166, 19-28[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Horn, D., Levy, N., and Ruppin, E. (1996) Neural Comput. 8, 1227-1243[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Davies, C. A., Mann, D. M., Sumpter, P. Q., and Yates, P. O. (1987) J. Neurol. Sci. 78, 151-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Kar, S., Seto, D., Gaudreau, P., and Quirion, R. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 1034-1040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Auld, D. S., Kar, S., and Quirion, R. (1998) Trends Neurosci. 21, 43-49[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Scott, H. L., Pow, D. V., Tannenberg, A. E. G., and Dodd, P. R. (2002) J. Neurosci. 22 (RC 206), 1-5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Masliah, E., Alford, M., Mallory, M., Rockenstein, E., Moechars, D., and Van Leuven, F. (2000) Exp. Neurol. 163, 381-387[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Harkany, T., Abraham, I., Timmerman, W., Laskay, G., Toth, B., Sasvari, M., Konya, C., Sebens, J. B., Korf, J., Nyakas, C., Zarandi, M., Soos, K., Penke, B., and Luiten, P. G. (2000) Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 2735-2745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Harris, M. E., Wang, Y., Pedigo, N. W., Jr., Hensley, K., Butterfield, D. A., and Carney, J. M. (1996) J. Neurochem. 67, 277-286[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Chapman, P. F., White, G. L., Jones, M. W., Cooper-Blacketer, D., Marshall, V. J., Irizarry, M., Younkin, L., Good, M. A., Bliss, T. V., Hyman, B. T., Younkin, S. G., and Hsiao, K. K. (1999) Nat. Neurosci. 2, 271-276[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Noda, N., Nakanishi, H., and Akaike, N. (1999) Neuroscience 92, 1465-1474[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Lin, C. I., Orlov, I., Ruggiero, A. M., Dykes-Hoberg, M., Lee, A., Jackson, M., and Rothstein, J. D. (2001) Nature 410, 84-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Jackson, M., Song, W., Liu, M.-Y., Jin, L., Dykes-Hoberg, M., Lin, C. G., Bowers, W. J., Federoff, H. J., Sternweis, P. C., and Rothstein, J. D. (2001) Nature 410, 89-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Mennerick, S., and Zorumski, C. F. (1994) Nature 368, 59-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Otis, T. S., Wu, Y. C., and Trussell, L. O. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 1634-1644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Matsui, K., Hosoi, N., and Tachibana, M. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 4500-4510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57. Diamond, J. S., and Jahr, C. E. (1997) J. Neurosci. 17, 4672-4687[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Dehnes, Y., Chaudhry, F. A., Ullensvang, K., Lehre, K. P., Storm-Mathisen, J., and Danbolt, N. C. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 3606-3619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Conradt, M., Storck, T., and Stoffel, W. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 229, 682-687[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/35/32180    most recent
M203764200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikegaya, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement