Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204708200 on June 18, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 32220-32227, August 30, 2002
Interaction of Human Breast Fibroblasts with Collagen I
Increases Secretion of Procathepsin B*
Jennifer E.
Koblinski
§,
Julie
Dosescu¶,
Mansoureh
Sameni¶,
Kamiar
Moin¶,
Katherine
Clark
, and
Bonnie
F.
Sloane
¶**
From the
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute and
¶ Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University, School
of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201 and the
Craniofacial
Developmental Biology and Regeneration Branch, NIDCR, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, May 14, 2002, and in revised form, June 5, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Interactions of stromal and tumor cells with the
extracellular matrix may regulate expression of proteases including the
lysosomal proteases cathepsins B and D. In the present study, we
determined whether the expression of these two proteases in human
breast fibroblasts was modulated by interactions with the extracellular matrix component, collagen I. Breast fibroblasts were isolated from
non-malignant breast tissue as well as from tissue surrounding malignant human breast tumors. Growth of these fibroblasts on collagen
I gels affected cell morphology, but not the intracellular localization
of vesicles staining for cathepsin B or D. Cathepsins B and D levels
(mRNA or intracellular protein) were not affected in fibroblasts
growing on collagen I gels or plastic, nor was cathepsin D secreted
from these cells. In contrast, protein expression and secretion of
cathepsin B, primarily procathepsin B, was induced by growth on
collagen I gels. The induced secretion appeared to be mediated by
integrins binding to collagen I, as inhibitory antibodies against
1,
2, and
1 integrin
subunits prevented procathepsin B secretion from fibroblasts grown on
collagen. In addition, procathepsin B secretion was induced when cells
were plated on
1 integrin antibodies. To our knowledge,
this is the first examination of cathepsin B and D expression and
localization in human breast fibroblasts and their regulation by a
matrix protein. Secretion of the cysteine protease procathepsin B from
breast fibroblasts may have physiological and pathological
consequences, as proteases are required for normal development
and for lactation of the mammary gland, yet can also initiate and
accelerate the progression of breast cancer.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The interaction of cells with extracellular matrix proteins can
modulate cell proliferation, polarity, survival, differentiation, adhesion, migration, and tumorigenicity (1, 2). The tight regulation of
the spatial and temporal organization of extracellular matrices is
integral to physiological processes such as embryonic development,
whereas disruptions in this organization can lead to pathologies such
as tumor invasion, metastasis, and fibrosis (2, 3). Degradation of the
extracellular matrix accompanies physiological and pathological
processes; the regulation of this degradation is altered in
pathological processes. The proteases responsible for this degradation
are of the serine, cysteine, aspartic, and metalloprotease classes, the
various proteases interacting to activate one another in a proteolytic
cascade (4, 5).
Extracellular matrix proteins (6, 7) and intact basement membrane (8,
9) can be digested by the cysteine protease cathepsin B and the
aspartic protease cathepsin D in vitro. The in
vitro biochemical data are supported by immunohistochemical studies of several human carcinomas in which the intensity of staining
for cathepsin B and type IV collagen or laminin were inversely
correlated. This is true for bladder (10), colon (11), gastric (12),
and lung (13) carcinomas. In breast carcinoma an inverse correlation
between staining for cathepsin D and basement membrane has been
observed (14). We have recently shown that living human breast cancer
cells employ multiple proteases, including the cysteine protease
cathepsin B, serine proteases of the plasminogen cascade, and matrix
metalloproteases (MMPs),1 to
digest type IV collagen (5). Both cathepsin B and D may play a role in
many different pathological processes, e.g. Alzheimer's disease (15), arthritis (16, 17), and cancer (4), perhaps reflecting
alterations in regulation of these enzymes.
Extracellular matrix is not only a substrate for proteases, but also
plays a role in regulating their expression. For example, growth of
epithelial cells, tumor cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages on
vitronectin, fibronectin, laminin, or collagen I increased expression
and/or activation of the serine protease urokinase plasminogen
activator and of MMPs (18-21). This increase in expression may be
mediated through integrins, as ligation of integrins with collagen I
increases the expression of collagenase-1 (MMP-1) and -3 (MMP-13) (18,
22). This induction is broad-based as MMP-1, gelatinase A (MMP-2),
stromelysin-1 (MMP-3), MMP-13, and membrane type 1 MMP are all induced
by growing fibroblasts on collagen I (18, 22). Interestingly,
fibroblasts surrounding malignant breast tumors exhibit an increased
expression of MMP-13 and stromelysin-3 (MMP-11) (23, 24). We have shown
that cathepsin B expression is increased in breast tumor-associated
stromal cells as well as in the tumor cells themselves (25). Joensuu
et al. (26) made a similar observation for cathepsin D in
breast carcinomas. The ability of extracellular matrix components to
mediate expression of cysteine and aspartic proteases has not yet been examined.
We hypothesize that interactions of breast cancer and stromal cells
with extracellular matrices can modulate expression of cathepsins B and
D and thereby modulate the contribution of these enzymes to degradative
activities of human breast cancer. Expression of both enzymes has been
assessed in breast tumor cells and lymphocytic cells (25) and of
cathepsin B in breast tumor-associated endothelial cells (27). Stromal
fibroblasts are a cell type that contribute extensively to the serine
protease and MMP activities in tumors (23, 24, 28). Therefore, we have
determined the expression of cathepsins B and D in both fibroblasts
from tissue surrounding malignant human breast tumors and those from
tissues obtained from reduction mammoplasties (non-cancerous). The
fibroblasts were compared for the ability of type I collagen, their
normal matrix, to alter the expression of cathepsins B and D. Overall protein expression of cathepsin B was increased, an effect mediated through interaction of
1
1 and
2
1 integrins with collagen I. In
contrast, expression of cathepsin D was not affected. This differential
induction of the two proteases may indicate that they play distinct
roles in human breast pathophysiologies.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12
nutrient mixture (DMEM/F-12), Hanks' balanced salts, saponin,
guanidinium thiocyanate, and Hoechst 33258/bisbenzimide were obtained
from Sigma; fetal bovine serum, trypsin-EDTA, and collagenase
(clostridiopeptidase A, EC number 3.4.2.4.3) from Invitrogen;
DIG-RNA and DNA labeling kits, non-radioactive nucleic acid detection
kits, CDPTM-Star, and anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase
conjugate Fab fragment from Roche Molecular Biochemicals; ECL-Plus and
Hyperfilm ECL from Amersham Biosciences; and Vitrogen-100 collagen
(type I) from Cohesion (Palo Alto, CA). Horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgGs were obtained from Pierce. Monoclonal mouse antibodies directed against human liver cathepsin D
(OS-13A) and human integrin subunits
1 (FB12),
2 (P1E6),
3 (P1B5),
v
(P3G8),
1 (6S6),
3 (25E11), and
2
1 (JBS2) were purchased from Calbiochem
(Cambridge, MA) and Chemicon (Temecula, CA), respectively. The mouse
anti-human
1 monoclonal antibody (K20) was obtained from
Immunotech (Westbrook, ME); the mouse (12G10) and rat (mAb13)
anti-human
1 monoclonal antibodies were a generous gift
from Dr. Kenneth M. Yamada (NIDCR, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD). Sheep anti-human cathepsin D antibody was a kind gift
from Dr. Paul Matthews (Nathan S. Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY), and
mouse anti-human cathepsin D antibody (D101) was obtained from KRKA
(Ljubljana, Slovenia). Fluorescein-conjugated, Texas Red-conjugated,
and unconjugated affinity-purified donkey anti-mouse, anti-rabbit, and
anti-goat IgGs, as well as normal donkey serum, were obtained from
Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA); Slow Fade from Molecular
Probes (Eugene, OR); and Z-Arg-Arg-NHMec and NH2Mec from
Bachem (King of Prussia, PA). CA-O74 was a kind gift from Dr.
Nobuhiko Katunuma (Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima, Japan).
Cell Culture--
Human breast fibroblasts (a kind gift from
Drs. Rafael Fridman and Robert Pauley, Wayne State University and
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI) were maintained in
DMEM/F-12 medium enriched with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum
and 5 mM HEPES. The isolation and characterization of these
fibroblasts has been described elsewhere (29). Briefly, fibroblasts
were obtained from three groups of patients: 1) fibroblasts surrounding malignant human breast tumors (9T, 10T, 11T, and 12T); 2) those from
benign tissues at a grossly non-malignant site as distant as possible
from the tumor (11B and 12B); and 3) those from reduction mammoplasty
tissues from patients without cancer (14RM, 31RM, and 33RM). The human
breast fibroblasts were infected at passages 5-7 with the LXSN16E6E7
recombinant retrovirus encoding the human papilloma virus serotype 16 E6 and E7 transforming proteins (30), which extended their life but did
not result in immortalization (29). All cell lines were shown to be
free of Mycoplasma by routine screening with
4,6-diamidin-2-phenylindol dihydrochloride.
Collagen Gels--
The human breast fibroblasts were grown on
either uncoated or Vitrogen-100 bovine collagen (type I)-coated tissue
culture plates. The latter were prepared by mixing, on ice, eight
volumes of collagen I (2.9 mg/ml), pH 2.5, with 1 volume of 0.2 M Na2HPO4, 1.3 M NaCl,
pH 7.4, followed by one volume of 0.1 M NaOH. Neutralized collagen was added at 1 ml/well to a six-well plate resulting in a
collagen concentration of 0.25 mg/cm2. The formation of
gels was initiated by incubating at 37 °C for 1 h. The human
breast fibroblasts were seeded at a density of 3.0 × 105 or 1.5 × 105 cells/well and grown for
either 1 or 3 days.
Preparation of Cell Lysates and Conditioned Media--
All human
breast fibroblast cell lines, including fibroblast lines that were not
infected with the papilloma virus, were grown for 12 or 60 h on
uncoated or collagen I-coated plates and then serum-starved for 12 h. After the 12-h serum starvation, the cells (~80% confluent) were
harvested using 0.1% collagenase at 37 °C for 30 min. The resulting
cell suspension was centrifuged at 100 × g for 10 min
and the cell pellet resuspended in cold (4 °C) 250 mM
sucrose, 25 mM MES, 1 mM EDTA, pH 6.5, and
0.1% Triton X-100 (SME buffer). The cells were lysed by sonication
(two times, 30 s each with 2-s pulses). An aliquot was used for
determination of DNA as described by Downs and Wilfinger (31). The
conditioned media were centrifuged at 150 × g, passed
through Millipore UltraFree 100 K (Burlington, MA) concentrators to
remove large collagen fragments, and then concentrated by
centrifugation through Millipore UltraFree 10 K concentrators. Samples
were assayed as described below for cathepsin B protein by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblot analysis and for cathepsin B activity.
SDS-PAGE and Immunoblot Analysis--
Samples (cell lysate or
media) normalized based on DNA determinations were subjected to
SDS-PAGE using 12% (w/v) gels. The protein in these gels was
transferred to nitrocellulose and then immunoblotted using 3 µg/ml
rabbit anti-human liver cathepsin B polyclonal antibody (32) or 10 µg/ml mouse anti-human liver cathepsin D monoclonal antibody (OS-13A)
in 5% nonfat milk-PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 (T-PBS). Membranes were
probed with a 1:16,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-labeled
secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG) in 5% nonfat
milk-T-PBS and reactive proteins detected using ECL-PlusTM.
To reprobe, the blots were stripped for 35 min at 65 °C with 2%
(w/v) SDS, 62.5 mM Tris, pH 6.8, and 100 mM
-mercaptoethanol and then washed three times with T-PBS. Immunoblots
were quantified using NIH Image 1.62 and expressed as relative density
units. Standards of cathepsin B and cathepsin D were used to establish linear ranges for quantification.
Continuous Assay for Activity of Secreted Procathepsin
B--
Latent cathepsin B was assayed as previously described (33)
with the following modifications. To assess the amount of procathepsin B present, 100 µl of conditioned medium or PBS (control) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with 25 µl of 0.5 M
sodium formate, 20 mM EDTA, pH 3.2, and 0.2 mg/ml pepsin.
Additionally, two controls in the absence of pepsin were performed: 1)
incubated on ice or 2) at 37 °C. The first assessed the amount of
active cathepsin B in the conditioned media. The second assessed the
amount of active cathepsin B generated autocatalytically during the
incubation at acid pH. Cathepsin B activity was then assayed by adding
125 µl of 200 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.7, containing 4 mM EDTA, 10 mM dithiothreitol,
0.1% Triton X-100, and 200 µM Z-Arg-Arg-NHMec (final
concentration, 100 µM). The final pH of the assay was
6.0. Duplicate samples and controls contained 10 µM
CA-074. Samples and controls were transferred into 96-well plates and
the fluorescence intensities read. Results were expressed as picomoles
(NH2Mec formed)/min/mg of DNA. To determine statistical
differences among the samples, one-way analysis of variance was
performed. Dunnett's multiple comparison test was used as the
post-test to compare pairs of group means with the control.
RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Hybridization--
Total
cellular RNA from fibroblasts grown on collagen I gels and plastic was
collected according to the procedure of Chomczynski and Sacchi (34),
electrophoresed (4 µg/lane) on a 0.8% agarose formaldehyde
denaturing gel according to the procedure of Maniatis et al.
(35), and transferred overnight to a positively charged nylon membrane
using a TurboblotterTM rapid downward transfer system
(Schleicher & Schuell). The membranes were UV-cross-linked and analyzed
by hybridization (68 °C, overnight) to 50 ng/ml DIG-labeled
antisense riboprobe containing exons 7-11 (500 bp) of human cathepsin
B in 0.02% SDS, 5× SSC, 50% deionized formamide, 0.1% sodium
lauroylsarcosine, and 2% blocking reagent. Following
post-hybridization washes (two at 22 °C in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS, and
two at 68 °C in 0.5× SSC, 0.1% SDS, for 15 min each), the
hybridized probes were detected using anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase conjugate Fab fragment and CDP-StarTM chemiluminescent
substrate. Equal loading was determined using a DIG-labeled
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe (Ambion, Austin, TX).
Immunofluorescence Staining--
We localized cathepsins B and D
using a modification (36) of the general immunocytochemical method
described by Willingham (37). Human breast fibroblasts were grown to
~80% confluence for 1 or 3 days on glass coverslips either uncoated
or coated with a thin layer of type I collagen. For surface staining of cathepsins B and D and for staining of actin, cells were fixed for 10 min in 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4,
1.5 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM
CaCl2, and 0.5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4).
For intracellular staining of cathepsins B and D, cells were fixed for
5 min in cold methanol. Fixation and subsequent steps were performed at
25 °C for intracellular staining and at 4 °C for surface
labeling. After washing, the nonspecific binding was blocked with 0.2%
bovine serum albumin in PBS for 45 min. For intracellular labeling,
0.1% saponin was added to all subsequent antibody and wash solutions.
The cells were incubated for 2 h with primary antibodies (for
intracellular double labeling, 230 µg/ml rabbit anti-human liver cathepsin B IgG and 20 µg/ml mouse anti-human liver cathepsin D IgG
(D101); for surface labeling, 230 µg/ml rabbit anti-human liver
cathepsin B IgG or 100 µg/ml sheep anti-human cathepsin D (D-23)) or
FITC-conjugated phalloidin (1:1000). In controls, pre-immune serum
(rabbit or mouse, 225 µg/ml) was substituted for the primary
antibody. After washing, the cells were incubated for 1 h with
fluorescein-conjugated affinity-purified anti-mouse IgG and/or Texas
Red-conjugated affinity-purified donkey anti-rabbit or anti-goat IgG
(20 µg/ml) containing 5% normal donkey serum. The cells were then
washed, fixed, and mounted upside-down on slides with SlowFade reagent
and observed with a Zeiss LSM 310 confocal microscope.
Identification of Integrin Expression Using Flow
Cytometry--
Human breast fibroblasts grown on collagen or plastic
for 1 day were collected by first treating the cells for 30 min with 0.1% collagenase and then trypsin-EDTA for 3 min. Integrin expression was determined following the protocol of Henriet et al. (38) using 10 µg/ml anti-integrin antibodies (
1 (FB12),
2 (P1E6),
3 (P1B5),
v
(P3G8),
1 (6S6), and
3 (25E11)) or
negative control (pre-immune mouse IgG) antibodies and FITC-conjugated
donkey anti-mouse IgG. Ten thousand cells were sorted and their
fluorescence quantified using a FACSCalibur and analyzed by Cell Quest
version 3.1 (Becton Dickinson Immunocytochemistry System, San Jose, CA).
Influence of Inhibitory Anti-integrin Antibodies on Cell Shape
and Cathepsin B Secretion from Fibroblasts Grown on Collagen
I--
Collagen I gels were prepared as described above but with the
addition of 5 µg/ml inhibitory anti-integrin (
1
(FB12),
2 (P1E6), and
1 (mAb13)) or
negative control (pre-immune mouse IgG) antibodies. Fibroblasts were
then treated with 5 µg/ml amounts of these antibodies for 10 min at
37 °C before seeding on collagen I gels containing the same
anti-integrin or control antibodies. Untreated fibroblasts seeded on
collagen I gels without antibody were used as controls. Twelve hours
after seeding, the cells were changed to serum-free media for an
additional 12 h. The fibroblasts were observed with a Zeiss LSM
310 confocal microscope, and then the cells and media were harvested
and assayed for cathepsin B activity as described previously.
Incubation of Fibroblasts Grown on Plastic with Anti-integrin
Antibodies--
Experiments were performed using immobilized
anti-integrin antibodies (inhibitory
1 (FB12),
2 (P1E6), and
1 (mAb13); non-inhibitory
1 (K20); and activating
1 (12G10) and
2
1 (JBS2)) coated onto bacterial culture
plates (Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The plates (60 mm) were coated
with 5, 10, or 20 µg/ml anti-integrin antibodies for 16 h in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, at 4 °C and then washed three times in
PBS. The fibroblasts were seeded on these plates (4.5 × 105 cells/60-mm plate) and incubated for 12 h in
DMEM/F-12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were
serum-starved for an additional 12 h before collecting the media
and cells to measure cathepsin B activity. Fibroblasts seeded on
plastic tissue culture dishes, mouse pre-immune IgG (20 µg/ml), or
collagen I-coated tissue culture dishes were used as controls. The
fibroblasts would only bind to the bacterial culture dishes that were
coated with anti-integrin antibodies; therefore, tissue culture dishes
had to be used for the controls.
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of Cathepsins B and D in Human Breast Fibroblasts Grown
on Plastic or Collagen I--
Interactions with collagen I can
increase expression of MMPs in fibroblasts (18, 22). In the present
study, we determined whether interaction with collagen I affects
expression in fibroblasts of proteases from two other classes: the
cysteine protease cathepsin B and the aspartic protease cathepsin D. These two proteases have been proposed as prognostic markers for breast
cancer (39, 40). We evaluated by immunoblotting the levels of these
enzymes in nine different clones of human breast fibroblasts (9T, 10T,
11B, 11T, 12B, 12T, 14RM, 31RM, 33RM) comparing cells grown on either plastic or collagen I-coated plastic for 1 or 3 days. Similar results
were obtained for all cell lines, including fibroblast lines that were
not infected with the papilloma virus (data not shown). Only the mature
(active) single-chain (SC) and double-chain (DC)
forms of cathepsin B (Fig. 1A,
top panels) and mature (active) double-chain form
of cathepsin D (Fig. 1A, bottom
panels) were present in cell lysates. Only the heavy chain
of the double-chain form (i.e. H-DC) is observed
in the 12% gels used here. Conversion from the single-chain forms of
these enzymes to the double-chain forms occurs in the lysosome (41).
Intracellular levels of cathepsins B and D were comparable in human
breast fibroblasts whether grown on plastic or collagen I for 1 day
(data not shown) or 3 days (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, levels
were comparable in fibroblasts isolated from benign tissue (Fig.
1A, lanes labeled B), areas surrounding malignant human breast tumors (Fig. 1A,
lanes labeled T), or reduction mammoplasties
(data not shown). Cathepsin B was secreted from the fibroblasts in
response to growth on collagen I (Fig. 1B), yet cathepsin D
was not (Fig. 1C). Neither enzyme was secreted from
fibroblasts grown on plastic (Fig. 1, B and C).
One might have anticipated that both enzymes would be secreted from
fibroblasts, as both are secreted from breast cancer cells (42-44).
The form of cathepsin B secreted in response to collagen I was
predominantly the inactive precursor form, i.e. procathepsin B (Fig. 1B). The lower band of ~10 kDa may represent a
degradation product of cathepsin B or an artifact. When we quantified
cathepsin B protein in the cell lysate and conditioned media (Fig.
1D), it was apparent that interaction of breast fibroblasts
with collagen I preferentially increased the total amount (lysate + media) of cathepsin B protein. This was not the case for cathepsin D
protein (data not shown). The percentage of the total expressed
cathepsin B protein that was secreted ranged from 39 to 84%,
indicating a substantial induction of secretion by cellular interaction
with collagen I.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Secretion of procathepsin B from human breast
fibroblasts was induced by growth on collagen I. Fibroblasts were
cultured on plastic (P) or collagen I (C).
Panel A, cathepsin B (CB) and D
(CD) protein in cell lysates: SC, single-chain
enzyme; H-DC, heavy chain of double-chain enzyme. The
uppermost bands above single-chain cathepsin B are artifacts.
Panel B, cathepsin B protein in conditioned
medium. Pro, procathepsin B. Panel C,
cathepsin D protein in conditioned medium; the lane labeled
proCD is a procathepsin D-positive control. Panel
D, graphical representation of total cathepsin B protein:
sum of cathepsin B protein in cell lysates (filled
bars) and conditioned media (open
bars). Data in panels A-C represent
effects of 3 days of growth on collagen I, whereas data in
panel D represent effects of 1 day of growth. The
fibroblast lines are described under "Experimental Procedures."
Samples were resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting.
This figure is representative of five experiments with similar
results.
|
|
To determine whether the increase in cathepsin B protein induced by
collagen I reflected an increase in cathepsin B transcripts, we
isolated total cellular RNA from fibroblasts grown on plastic or
collagen I and evaluated it by Northern blot analysis. Both major
transcripts, 4 and 2.2 kilobases, of cathepsin B were observed (45);
however, the levels of the transcripts were not increased in
fibroblasts grown on collagen I (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 illustrates transcript levels in 12T fibroblasts grown on
plastic or collagen I; comparable results were obtained in 12B
fibroblasts. Increases in cathepsin B protein in the absence of
increases in cathepsin B transcripts have previously been observed in
human breast cells, i.e. MCF-10A epithelial cell lines
(43).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Levels of cathepsin B transcripts in 12T
human breast fibroblasts were not affected by growth on collagen
I. Fibroblasts were cultured on plastic (P) or collagen
I (C) for the periods specified. Cathepsin B (CB)
mRNA levels were determined by Northern blot hybridization of total
RNA (4 µg/lane); glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH) was used as a loading control.
|
|
Cathepsin B Activity in Fibroblasts Grown on Plastic or Collagen
I--
Collagen I-stimulated changes in cathepsin B protein expression
should be predictive of changes in cathepsin B activity. This was true
in cell lysates where cathepsin B activity was not altered (data not
shown), a finding consistent with there being comparable levels of
cathepsin B protein in cell lysates (Fig. 1A). Both the cell
lysates and the conditioned media contain many proteolytic enzymes.
Therefore, we verified that our assay procedure would assess only
cathepsin B activity by establishing that CA-O74, a highly selective
cathepsin B inhibitor (46), totally blocked activity in both cell
lysates and conditioned media (data not shown).
We observed small increases in cathepsin B activity in the conditioned
media of cells grown on collagen I as compared with those grown on
plastic (Fig. 3, bars labeled
C
). Once again this was consistent with the small amounts
of mature cathepsin B secreted into the media in response to growth on
collagen I (Fig. 1B). Procathepsin B, which was the
predominant form of cathepsin B secreted from the fibroblasts (Fig.
1B), requires proteolytic activation. Therefore, we
incubated the conditioned media with pepsin and determined the amount
of "activable procathepsin B" present in the conditioned media
(Fig. 3, bars labeled C+). A small amount of
activable procathepsin B was present in conditioned media of
fibroblasts cultured on plastic (Fig. 3, bars labeled P+). Growing the fibroblasts on collagen I whether they were
from reduction mammoplasties (31RM and 33RM) or from areas surrounding a tumor (12T (Fig. 3B), 12B, 11B, and 11T (data not shown))
increased the amount of activable procathepsin B secreted into the
conditioned media (Fig. 3, bars labeled C+). The
amount of procathepsin B secreted varied among the cell lines, but was
increased by growth on collagen I. Comparisons in the same assay of
cathepsin B activity in conditioned media of cells grown on collagen I
and those grown on plastic revealed that as much as 5-250-fold more
activable procathepsin B was secreted from those breast fibroblasts
grown on collagen I (Figs. 3 and 7, bars labeled
P and C).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Cathepsin B activity in conditioned media of
human breast fibroblasts was increased by growth on collagen I. Fibroblasts were cultured on plastic (P, open
bars) or collagen I (C, hatched
bars) for 3 days. Cathepsin B activity in conditioned media
was assessed against Z-Arg-Arg-NHMec (final concentration, 100 µM). Bars labeled , cathepsin B
activity without pepsin activation. Bars labeled
+, cathepsin B activity after activation with pepsin. Data
are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 3) and were
repeated at least three times with comparable results.
|
|
Localization of Cathepsins B and D in Fibroblasts--
Increases
in cathepsin B secretion and alterations in the localization of
cathepsin B are dependent on a functional cytoskeleton (42, 47). Some
investigators suggest that increased secretion and cell surface
localization are solely caused by changes in cell shape, but we have
not found this to be the case either in vitro (43) or
in vivo (48). We, therefore, compared the morphologies of
living breast fibroblasts grown on glass to fibroblasts grown on
collagen I. On glass, the fibroblasts were flat and spread (Fig.
4A); on collagen I, they were
spindle-shaped (Fig. 4B), resembling fibroblasts in
vivo (49). The morphological differences that we observed appeared
to reflect changes in the actin cytoskeleton, as actin-rich
processes/ruffles were present in the fibroblasts grown on collagen I
(Fig. 4D), but not in those grown on glass (Fig.
4C). Results are shown for 12T, and similar results were observed for 12B, 14RM, 31RM, and 33RM. The presence of ruffles suggests that the fibroblasts grown on collagen I were actively engaged
in endo/exocytic processes (50), an observation consistent with the
increased secretion of procathepsin B from all nine clones of
fibroblasts when grown on collagen I.

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Growth on collagen I altered the morphology
and cytoskeleton of human breast fibroblasts, yet had minimal effects
on intracellular or surface localization of cathepsin B or D. Fibroblasts were cultured on uncoated (left
panels, glass) or collagen I-coated (right
panels, collagen I) coverslips for 3 days. Phase contrast
images of live fibroblasts (A and B). Actin
cytoskeleton stained with phalloidin-FITC (C and
D). Intracellular staining for cathepsins B (red)
and D (green) superimposed on a phase contrast image of the
fibroblasts (E and F). Colocalization of the two
enzymes (yellow) can be seen in some vesicles. Staining for
cathepsin B (G and H) or cathepsin D
(I and J) on the surface of non-permeabilized
fibroblasts. All images were taken with a Zeiss LSM 310 microscope in
the confocal mode; bars, 10 µm. This figure illustrates
results from 12T fibroblasts; comparable results were obtained with
other fibroblast lines.
|
|
We had previously established that increases in cathepsin B secretion
are associated with an altered subcellular localization of the enzyme,
most often a localization at or adjacent to the cell membrane (42, 43).
Therefore, we compared the subcellular localizations of both cathepsin
B and D in the fibroblasts grown on collagen I and those grown on glass
coverslips. Antibodies against cathepsins B and D used in this study
detect both the pro forms and mature single-chain and heavy
double-chain forms of these enzymes (see Fig. 1). Staining for both
cathepsins B and D was vesicular and was localized primarily to the
perinuclear region of the fibroblasts whether grown on glass (Fig.
4E) or on collagen I (Fig. 4F). There was
heterogeneity in staining for cathepsins B and D with some fibroblasts
staining more intensely for cathepsin B than cathepsin D. In addition,
three patterns of vesicular staining were observed: 1) vesicles
staining for both enzymes, 2) vesicles staining for only cathepsin B,
and 3) vesicles staining for only cathepsin D. Similar observations
have been made in human breast cancer cells (36). Intracellular
localization was also studied in 10T, 12B, 14RM, 31RM, and 33RM, and
similar staining patterns were observed (data not shown).
We have observed surface staining for cathepsins B and D on breast
epithelial and tumor cells (36, 43). Furthermore, we have identified
the annexin II heterotetramer to be a binding protein for procathepsin
B that is present on the surface of BT20 human breast cancer cells
(51). Therefore, we determined whether the two enzymes were present on
the surface of the fibroblasts and whether interactions with collagen I
altered surface localization. Both cathepsins B (Fig. 4, G
and H) and D (Fig. 4, I and J) were localized on the surface of fibroblasts grown on glass (Fig. 4, G and I) or on collagen I (Fig. 4, H
and J). Staining in 12T is shown; similar staining was seen
in 10T, 12B, 14RM, 31RM, and 33RM (data not shown). The pattern
resembled what has been previously observed for cathepsins B and D (36,
43). The amounts of the two proteases on the cell surface were not
affected by growth on glass or collagen I. Thus, the increased
secretion of procathepsin B from fibroblasts grown on collagen I was
not accompanied by increased surface localization of this enzyme.
Integrin Expression--
Integrins link the cytoskeleton to the
extracellular matrix, and the ligation of integrins has been shown to
transduce expression of proteases, e.g. expression of MMP-1
is increased in fibroblasts when
2
1 binds
to collagen I (52). As integrin ligation might modulate cathepsin B
expression in breast fibroblasts, we analyzed by immuno-flow cytometry
the integrins expressed on the surface of the human breast fibroblasts
studied herein. Integrins
1,
2,
3,
v, and
1 were present
on the surface of the breast fibroblasts whether grown on plastic or on
collagen I;
3 was not present (Fig.
5). Because
1
1,
2
1, and
3
1 (53) are the main collagen I binding
integrins, our results suggest
1 integrins might mediate cell shape of the breast fibroblasts when grown on collagen I. When
cultured on collagen I in the presence of an inhibitory antibody to
human
1 integrin (mAb 13), the fibroblasts were small
and did not exhibit the extensive cell processes indicative of adhesion to the underlying collagen I matrix (Fig.
6F). The presence of blocking
antibodies to human
1 (FB12),
2 (P1E6),
or
1 and
2 in combination (Fig. 6,
C, D, and E, respectively) did not
have as profound an effect on cell shape as the
1
integrin antibody. These cells had less extensive processes and
appeared thinner but were still well spread as compared with the
control cells grown on collagen I only or in the presence of pre-immune
IgG (Fig. 6, A and B). Our results thus indicate
that
1 integrin mediates the interaction of the breast
fibroblasts with collagen I; the cell spreading on collagen I may
involve modulation of the actin cytoskeleton via outside-in signaling
through the
1 integrin.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Human breast fibroblasts express
1,
2,
3,
v, and
1 integrins on their surface.
Integrin expression was determined by immunofluorescence flow
cytometry, using antibodies directed against specific integrin subunits
(thick line) and a pre-immune IgG control
(thin line). This figure illustrates 12T
fibroblasts cultured on plastic; similar results were obtained on
collagen I and for other fibroblast lines on both substrata (not
illustrated). Experiments were repeated at least three times with
comparable results.
|
|

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of
1 integrin ligand binding reduced cell
spreading, and inhibition of
1,
2, and
1 integrins decreased procathepsin B
secretion from human breast fibroblasts on collagen I. Panel A, fibroblasts on collagen I. Panels B-F, fibroblasts that were incubated with
pre-immune IgG (B), inhibitory anti- 1
(C), 2 (D),
1+ 2 (E), or 1
(F) antibody for 10 min before seeding them on collagen I
containing the same antibody. Bar, 45 µm. Panel
G, fibroblasts were cultured as described above on collagen
I (C), collagen with pre-immune IgG (C+IgG),
or with the specified anti-integrin antibodies. Cathepsin B activity in
conditioned media was assessed against Z-Arg-Arg-NHMec (final
concentration, 100 µM) after activation with pepsin. Data
are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *,
p < 0.001. This figure illustrates results from 12T
fibroblasts; comparable results were obtained with other fibroblast
lines.
|
|
Stimulation of Cathepsin B Secretion by Integrins--
To
investigate the role that integrins have on secretion of procathepsin
B, we performed two experiments: 1) fibroblasts were grown on collagen
I in the presence of inhibitory anti-integrin antibodies
(
1 (FB12),
2 (P1E6), and
1
(mAb13)) to see whether the procathepsin B secretion induced by
interaction of the cells with collagen I could be reduced, and 2)
fibroblasts were cultured on anti-integrin antibodies immobilized on
the culture substrate (inhibitory
1 (FB12),
2 (P1E6), and
1 (mAb13); non-inhibitory
1 (K20); and activating
1 (12G10) and
2
1 (JBS2)) to see whether procathepsin B
secretion could be induced by integrin redistribution and/or
activation. Because the breast fibroblasts examined here expressed
mainly
1
1 and
2
1 integrins, we chose to look at these
receptors. The inhibitory antibodies against
1,
2, and
1 significantly reduced (~50%)
procathepsin B secretion from fibroblasts grown on collagen I (Fig.
6G), suggesting that all three of these integrin subunits
mediate secretion of procathepsin B when fibroblasts are grown on
collagen I. Fibroblasts cultured on antibodies against
1
and
2
1 integrins showed an enhanced secretion of procathepsin B (Fig. 7), but
no change in intracellular cathepsin B was seen under any of the
experimental conditions (data not shown). No increase in procathepsin B
secretion was seen with the inhibitory
1 and
2 antibodies. A dose-dependent increase in
procathepsin B secretion was found only with the antibody that
recognizes active
1 integrins. Our data are consistent
with increased expression of cathepsin B in fibroblasts grown on
collagen I being mediated at least in part by
1
1 and
2
1
integrins.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Anti- 1
and
2 1
antibodies increased secretion of procathepsin B from human breast
fibroblasts. Fibroblasts (12T) were cultured on uncoated plastic
(P), collagen I (C), plastic coated with
pre-immune IgG (IgG), or the specified anti-integrin
antibodies (inhibitory 1 (FB12), 2
(P1E6), and 1 (mAb13); non-inhibitory 1
(K20); and activating 1 (12G10) and
2 1 (JBS2)) at the concentrations
indicated. Cathepsin B activity in conditioned media was assessed
against Z-Arg-Arg-NHMec (final concentration, 100 µM)
after activation with pepsin. Data are presented as mean ± S.D.
(n = 3) and were repeated at least three times with
comparable results.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Culturing fibroblasts in collagen I gels is a well established
model for studying the three-dimensional matrix surrounding fibroblasts
in vivo (for review, see Ref. 54). Increased expression of
several MMPs, e.g. MMP-1, -2, -3, and -13 and membrane type 1 MMP, is seen when skin fibroblasts are grown on collagen I (18, 22).
Here we have demonstrated that the interaction of human breast
fibroblasts with collagen I increases total cathepsin B protein levels,
including increasing secretion of procathepsin B. As integrins binding
to collagen I mediate the increased expression of MMP-1 and -13 in
fibroblasts (18, 22), we investigated whether interaction of integrins
with collagen I was also responsible for the increased expression of
the lysosomal cysteine protease cathepsin B and for increased secretion
of procathepsin B.
Integrins function as transmembrane linkers between the extracellular
matrix and the actin cytoskeleton and thus influence cell morphology
(55). When human breast fibroblasts were grown on collagen I, we
observed changes in cell morphology and the actin cytoskeleton,
i.e. more actin-rich processes/ruffles. The formation of
these processes could be blocked using an inhibitory
1
integrin antibody, indicating that
1 integrins are
important in regulating the cell shape of human breast fibroblasts when they are grown on collagen I. The
1 and
2
inhibitory antibodies did not affect cell shape as profoundly as the
1 inhibitory antibody, suggesting that other
1 integrins may also be involved. All three of these
inhibitory antibodies were able to significantly reduce procathepsin B
secretion from the fibroblasts grown on collagen I, suggesting that
1
1 and
2
1
integrins are important in the induction of procathepsin B secretion.
Previous studies have found that cell shape changes can regulate
protease activity (56). To confirm that our findings were the result of
inhibition of integrin binding to collagen I and not simply the result
of changes in cell shape, we plated fibroblasts on anti-integrin
antibodies immobilized on plastic. Anti-integrin antibodies immobilized
on plastic, regardless of whether they are inhibitory, activating, or
non-inhibitory, can mimic ligand and induce redistribution and/or
aggregation of the integrin. These anti-integrin antibodies allowed the
cells to spread and form processes similar to those seen when the cells
were grown on collagen I. All immobilized anti-
1
integrin antibodies were able to induce secretion of procathepsin B. The same was true for an activating antibody directed against a
heterodimer of
1,
2
1.
Inhibitory antibodies to the individual
1 and
2 integrin subunits were not able to induce secretion.
Our results indicate that stimulation of procathepsin B secretion from
breast fibroblasts can be induced through redistribution of
1 integrin subunits. In addition, activation of
1 integrins seems to be important because only the
antibody that recognizes active
1 integrin showed a dose
response effect.
The increased expression of cathepsin B that resulted from the
interaction of breast fibroblasts with collagen I may be regulated at
the post-transcriptional level, because we found no change in mRNA
message level. Interaction of the fibroblasts with collagen I could
increase translation or stabilize procathepsin B protein. Translational
regulation of cathepsin B has been reported by Yano et al.
(57), who found that cathepsin B mRNA levels in Sarcophaga peregrina (flesh fly) larval and pupal hemocytes are not
different, yet increased cathepsin B protein is present in the pupal
hemocytes. The translational repression of cathepsin B mRNA in the
larval hemocytes is dependent on a 3'-untranslated region-specific
binding protein. Whether a similar mechanism can regulate cathepsin B translation in human cells is not known.
Both cathepsins B and D are synthesized as preproenzymes. The
prepeptide serves as a signal sequence to direct these enzymes to the
endoplasmic reticulum. In the Golgi network, these enzymes acquire
phosphomannosyl residues that target them to the lysosomes primarily
via mannose phosphate receptor pathways. In the acidic environment of
the late endosome, the proenzyme disassociates from the mannose
phosphate receptors. The propeptide is also cleaved at this point,
activating the proteases (for a recent discussion on the trafficking
and processing of cathepsins, see Ref. 58). The collagen I-stimulated
secretion of cathepsin B observed here was predominantly of the
inactive precursor form, i.e. procathepsin B, suggesting
that the enzyme had not yet reached the late endosomes or lysosomes.
The minor amount of mature single-chain cathepsin B that was secreted
in response to collagen I could reflect processing of procathepsin B
extracellularly. It could also reflect exocytosis of cathepsin B from
late endosomes or lysosomes, as a stimulated exocytosis of active
lysosomal enzymes has been shown to occur in a variety of cells
(59).
We speculate that integrin signaling interferes with the targeting of
procathepsin B to the lysosomal pathway. The fact that cathepsin D was
not secreted may reflect differential sorting of the two enzymes in
breast fibroblasts. Putative sorting receptors that bind procathepsin
D, but not procathepsin B, have been identified (60). Clearly the
mechanisms for secretion of cathepsins are complex as both active and
pro forms of cathepsin B are secreted, whereas cathepsin D and
cathepsin L, another lysosomal cysteine protease, are secreted
primarily as proenzymes (9, 44, 61). The ras oncogene is
able to induce secretion of cathepsins B (43) and L (58, 61). This may
be linked to integrin signaling as both
1
1 and
2
1
signal through the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (22).
In ras-transfected murine fibroblasts, procathepsin L is
localized in exosomes (58). Exosomes arise from fusions of late
multivesicular endosomes with the plasma membrane (62, 63) and contain
annexin II (63), the binding partner for procathepsin B on the tumor
cell surface (51). We speculate that association of procathepsin B with
annexin II may be responsible for its secretion. We have shown that
this association leads to activation of procathepsin B (51); thus,
procathepsin B secreted from the breast fibroblasts could be activated
at the surface of breast fibroblasts and participate in local
degradation of extracellular matrices. The multiple pathways for
secretion of cathepsin B in both its active and latent pro form suggest that the secretion of cathepsin B may have functional consequences for
extracellular degradation of matrix proteins. In this regard, a role
for secreted cathepsin B in digestion of type IV collagen by living
human breast cancer cells has recently been demonstrated (5).
In the present study, we obtained similar results with presumably
normal fibroblasts isolated from reduction mammoplasties and those
isolated from areas surrounding malignant tumors. This included
localization of both cathepsins B and D on the cell surface. What might
be the physiological role for this association of cathepsins B and D
with the surface of human breast fibroblasts? Mammary gland development
is a complex process that involves numerous changes in the
extracellular matrix, including remodeling during puberty, pregnancy,
lactation, and menopause. Perhaps cathepsins B and D are involved in
this reorganization. Cathepsin B can degrade extracellular matrix
proteins directly at neutral pH (5, 7) and indirectly through its
ability to activate pro-uPA and thus the plasminogen cascade (17, 64).
Alternatively, cathepsin B may be involved in matrix remodeling through
its ability to directly activate transforming growth factor-
(65), a
growth factor that regulates the expression of collagen I in the
postnatal mammary gland (66). Recently, mature cathepsin B secreted
from human breast epithelial cells has been shown to initiate the
plasminogen cascade leading to activation of transforming growth
factor-
(67). An involvement of cathepsin D in degrading the
extracellular matrix at the fibroblast cell surface is unlikely because
cathepsin D is active at very acidic pH (9). On the other hand,
cathepsin D may be acting as a mitogen rather than a protease, as
procathepsin D on the surface of breast and prostate cancer cells
increases cell proliferation and tumor growth (68, 69). Increased
stromal growth accounts for most of the increase in breast volume in
the post-pubertal years and also occurs in breast tumors. Cathepsin D
at the surface of breast fibroblasts might well be a mitogen that
induces stromal proliferation in both instances.
We have shown that growth of human breast fibroblasts in collagen I
gels in vitro can differentially affect the expression of
two lysosomal proteases, cathepsins B and D. We found that collagen I,
through its interaction with
1
1 and
2
1 integrins, stimulated increased
secretion of procathepsin B. In addition, we found that the
redistribution of
1 integrins increased secretion of
procathepsin B. This is the first examination of cathepsin B and D
expression and localization in human breast fibroblasts and their
regulation by a matrix protein. Whether cathepsins B and D are
localized on the surface of fibroblasts from other tissues and
integrins can mediate regulation of cathepsin B in those fibroblasts is
not known. In breast tissues, the mechanism(s) responsible for
differential induction of cathepsins B and D by collagen I is of
potential importance as both enzymes have been linked to progression of
breast cancer.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge Linda Mayernik for
assistance in generating figures and Dr. Kenneth M. Yamada for helpful
advice and discussion. We also thank Marie Dehem, Steve Santner, and Drs. Robert Pauley and Rafael Fridman for helpful discussions and for
providing the fibroblasts.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by United States Public Health
Service Grants CA36481 and CA56586. The Zeiss LSM-310 confocal
microscope was supported in part by National Institutes of Health NIEHS
Grant P30ES06639 and NCI Grant P30CA22453. The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center Cell Resources and the
Flow Cytometry cores were supported by National Institutes of Health
NCI Grant P30CA22453.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Current address: Craniofacial Developmental Biology and
Regeneration Branch, NIDCR, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
Wayne State University, 540 E. Canfield, Detroit, MI 48201. Tel.: 313-577-1580 (office) and 313-577-1112 (laboratory); Fax: 313-577-6739; E-mail: bsloane@med.wayne.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 18, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204708200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MMP, matrix
metalloprotease;
DIG, digoxigenin;
MES, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid;
FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
DMEM, Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium;
T-PBS, phosphate-buffered saline with Tween
20.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, J. C.,
and Watt, F. M.
(1993)
Development
117,
1183-1198[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Ninomiya, Y., Olsen, B. R., and Ooyama, T.
(eds)
(1998)
Extracellular Matrix-Cell Interaction: Molecules to Diseases
, Japan Scientific Societies Press/Karger, Tokyo
|
| 3.
|
Eckes, B.,
Zigrino, P.,
Kessler, D.,
Holtkotter, O.,
Shephard, P.,
Mauch, C.,
and Krieg, T.
(2000)
Matrix Biol.
19,
325-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Koblinski, J. E.,
Ahram, M.,
and Sloane, B. F.
(2000)
Clin. Chim. Acta
291,
113-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Sameni, M.,
Moin, K.,
and Sloane, B. F.
(2000)
Neoplasia
2,
496-504[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Humphries, M. J.,
and Ayad, S. R.
(1983)
Nature
305,
811-813[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Buck, M. R.,
Karustis, D. G.,
Day, N. A.,
Honn, K. V.,
and Sloane, B. F.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
282,
273-278[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Baricos, W. H.,
Zhou, Y.,
Mason, R. W.,
and Barrett, A. J.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
252,
301-304[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Briozzo, P.,
Morisset, M.,
Capony, F.,
Rougeot, C.,
and Rochefort, H.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
3688-3692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Visscher, D. W.,
Sloane, B. F.,
Sameni, M.,
Babiarz, J. W.,
Jacobson, J.,
and Crissman, J. D.
(1994)
Mod. Pathol.
7,
76-81[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Khan, A.,
Krishna, M.,
Baker, S. P.,
and Banner, B. F.
(1998)
Mod. Pathol.
11,
704-708[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Khan, A.,
Krishna, M.,
Baker, S. P.,
Malhothra, R.,
and Banner, B. F.
(1998)
Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.
122,
172-177[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Sukoh, N.,
Abe, S.,
Ogura, S.,
Isobe, H.,
Takekawa, H.,
Inoue, K.,
and Kawakami, Y.
(1994)
Cancer
74,
46-51[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Visscher, D. W.,
Sarkar, F. H.,
Sakr, W.,
and Crissman, J.
(1993)
Pathol. Res. Pract.
189,
867-872[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Mackay, E. A.,
Ehrhard, A.,
Moniatte, M.,
Guenet, C.,
Tardif, C.,
Tarnus, C.,
Sorokine, O.,
Heintzelmann, B.,
Nay, C.,
Remy, J. M.,
Higaki, J.,
Van Dorsselaer, A.,
Wagner, J.,
Danzin, C.,
and Mamont, P.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
244,
414-425[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Ermis, A.,
Muller, B.,
Hopf, T.,
Hopf, C.,
Remberger, K.,
Justen, H. P.,
Welter, C.,
and Hanselmann, R.
(1998)
J. Rheumatol.
25,
208-213[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Ikeda, Y.,
Ikata, T.,
Mishiro, T.,
Nakano, S.,
Ikebe, M.,
and Yasuoka, S.
(2000)
J. Med. Invest.
47,
61-75[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Mauch, C.,
Adelmann-Grill, B.,
Hatamochi, A.,
and Krieg, T.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
250,
301-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Khan, K. M.,
and Falcone, D. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8270-8275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Bafetti, L. M.,
Young, T. N.,
Itoh, Y.,
and Stack, M. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
143-149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Stanton, H.,
Gavrilovic, J.,
Atkinson, S. J.,
d'Ortho, M. P.,
Yamada, K. M.,
Zardi, L.,
and Murphy, G.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
2789-2798[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Ravanti, L.,
Heino, J.,
Lopez-Otin, C.,
and Kahari, V. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2446-2455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Basset, P.,
Bellocq, J. P.,
Wolf, C.,
Stoll, I.,
Hutin, P.,
Limacher, J. M.,
Podhajcer, O. L.,
Chenard, M. P.,
Rio, M. C.,
and Chambon, P.
(1990)
Nature
348,
699-704[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Uria, J. A.,
Stahle-Backdahl, M.,
Seiki, M.,
Fueyo, A.,
and Lopez-Otin, C.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
4882-4888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Castiglioni, T.,
Merino, M. J.,
Elsner, B.,
Lah, T. T.,
Sloane, B. F.,
and Emmert-Buck, M. R.
(1994)
Hum. Pathol.
25,
857-862[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Joensuu, H.,
Toikkanen, S.,
and Isola, J.
(1995)
Br. J. Cancer
71,
155-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Lah, T. T.,
Kalman, E.,
Najjar, D.,
Gorodetsky, E.,
Brennan, P.,
Somers, R.,
and Daskal, I.
(2000)
Hum. Pathol.
31,
149-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Christensen, L.,
Wiborg Simonsen, A. C.,
Heegaard, C. W.,
Moestrup, S. K.,
Andersen, J. A.,
and Andreasen, P. A.
(1996)
Int. J. Cancer
66,
441-452[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Pauley, R. J.,
Santner, S. J.,
Tait, L. R.,
Bright, R. K.,
and Santen, R. J.
(2000)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
85,
837-846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Bright, R. K.,
Vocke, C. D.,
Emmert-Buck, M. R.,
Duray, P. H.,
Solomon, D.,
Fetsch, P.,
Rhim, J. S.,
Linehan, W. M.,
and Topalian, S. L.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
995-1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Downs, T. R.,
and Wilfinger, W. W.
(1983)
Anal. Biochem.
131,
538-547[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Moin, K.,
Day, N. A.,
Sameni, M.,
Hasnain, S.,
Hirama, T.,
and Sloane, B. F.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
285,
427-434[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Keppler, D.,
Waridel, P.,
Abrahamson, M.,
Bachmann, D.,
Berdoz, J.,
and Sordat, B.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1226,
117-125[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162< |