|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202602200 on May 28, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 35, 32282-32293, August 30, 2002
A Spindle Checkpoint Arrest and a Cytokinesis Failure by the
Dominant-negative Polo-box Domain of Plk1 in U-2 OS Cells*,
Yeon-Sun
Seong ,
Keiju
Kamijo§,
Jae-Seon
Lee§,
Ester
Fernandez¶,
Ryoko
Kuriyama ,
Toru
Miki§, and
Kyung S.
Lee **
From the Laboratory of Metabolism, § Basic
Research Laboratory, ¶ Laboratory of Cellular Carcinogenesis and
Tumor Promotion, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4258 and
Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development,
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Received for publication, March 18, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Polo kinases play critical roles for proper
M-phase progression. They are characterized by the presence of two
regions of homology in the C-terminal non-catalytic domain, termed
polo-box 1 (PB1) and polo-box 2 (PB2). Here we demonstrate that both
PB1 and PB2 are required for targeting the catalytic activity of Plk1 to centrosomes, midbody, and kinetochores. Expression of either kinase-inactive PLK1/K82M or the C-terminal
plk1 N induced a pre-anaphase arrest with
elevated Cdc2 and Plk1 activity. Prophase-arrested cells exhibited
randomly oriented spindle structures, whereas metaphase cells exhibited
aberrant bipolar spindles with Mad2 localization at kinetochores of
misaligned chromosomes. Microtubule nucleation activity of centrosomes
was not compromised. In vivo time-lapse studies revealed
that expression of plk1 N resulted in
repeated cycles of bipolar spindle formation and disruption, suggestive
of a defect in spindle stability. A prolonged arrest frequently led to
the generation of micronucleated cells in the absence of
sisterchromatid separation and centrosome duplication, indicating that
micronucleation is not a result of accumulated cytokinesis failures.
Interestingly, bypass of the mitotic arrest by dominant-negative
spindle checkpoint components led to a failure in completion of
cytokinesis. We propose that, in mammalian cells, the
polo-box-dependent Plk1 activity is required for proper
metaphase/anaphase transition and for cytokinesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The polo-like protein kinases (Plks) are a conserved subfamily of
Serine/Threonine protein kinases that play a variety of roles during
M-phase progression. Characterization of mutations in the prototype of
these members, Drosophila polo, revealed that polo is
important for the function of spindle poles and bipolar spindle
formation at several developmental stages (1, 2). Microinjection of
anti-Plks antibodies into either Xenopus embryos or
cultured mammalian cells resulted in the formation of monopolar spindles (3, 4) with centrosome maturation defect, as evidenced by a
decreased amount of -tubulin and MPM-2 antigens recruited to the
centrosomes (4). Overexpression of a kinase-inactive form of mammalian
polo-like kinase Plk1 in most tumor cell lines was shown to induce
centrosome maturation defect in combination with mitotic catastrophe
and apoptosis (5). These observations raised the possibility that, in
Plk1-deficient cells, a defect in centrosome maturation is the primary
cause of a defect in bipolar spindle formation, which ultimately leads
to cell death.
A growing body of evidence suggests that Plks also play important roles
in mitotic entry, mitotic exit, and cytokinesis. Xenopus polo-like kinase Plx1 phosphorylates and activates Cdc25, which in turn
dephosphorylates and activates Cdc2 (6), suggesting a direct role of
Plx1 in regulating mitotic entry. In addition, studies in various
organisms have demonstrated that Plks are important in mitotic exit.
Plk1 has been suggested to directly phosphorylate components of
anaphase-promoting complex
(APC)1 including Cdc27 and
activate the latter (7). Activated APC subsequently ubiquitinates
mitotic cyclins, leading to their degradation and the inactivation of
Cdc2 (for review, see Refs. 8 and 9). Plks also appear to contribute to
the onset of cytokinesis in various low eucaryotic organisms (for
review, see Ref. 10). In addition, recent studies show that
Drosophila polo9 and
polo10 mutants are defective in the
metaphase/anaphase transition due to the activation of a
tension-dependent spindle checkpoint (11), suggesting that polo
activity is required to promote the onset of anaphase.
Microtubule organization is facilitated by both centrosomes and
kinetochores of sisterchromatids. -Tubulin, a highly conserved centrosomal protein, plays a critical role in microtubule nucleation (12-14). The plus end of growing microtubules attach to the
kinetochores before sisterchromatid separation. This separation is
normally prevented by the spindle checkpoint until all the kinetochores are properly attached with stable bipolar spindles. Genetic analyses in
budding yeast have identified Bub1, Bub3 (15), Mad1, Mad2, Mad3 (16),
and Mps1 (17) as components regulating this pathway. In metazoan cells,
homologues of these checkpoint proteins were shown to localize to
unattached kinetochores to inactivate Cdc20/fizzy, a protein that
directs the APC to a specific set of substrates (for review, see Refs.
18 and 19). Recent studies in mammalian cells show that Mad2 detects
spindle attachment to the kinetochores, whereas Bub1 and BubR1 sense
kinetochore tension (20, 21). Although distinct Mad2/Cdc20 and
BubR1/Cdc20 complexes have been suggested (22), they may function in
a concerted manner since loss of either one abrogates spindle
checkpoint arrest in vivo (23, 24).
In addition to the kinase domain, the polo subfamily members are
characterized by the presence of conserved regions of homology in the
C-terminal non-catalytic domain. Alignment of the C-terminal regions of
known polo kinases revealed that they are composed of two domains with
significant homology (polo-box 1 (PB1), from amino acids 405 to 494, and polo-box 2 (PB2), from amino acids 505 to 598 in Plk1) (25). In
budding yeast, a highly conserved motif in PB1 of the budding yeast
polo kinase Cdc5 is critical for its subcellular localization and
mitotic functions. In mammalian cells, however, it is not yet known
whether the PB1 and PB2 are important for subcellular localization or
for a specific function of Plk1 during M-phase progression. To address
these issues, we expressed various forms of Plk1 in U-2 OS cells using
an adenovirus expression system. We show that both PB1 and PB2 are
required for efficient subcellular localization of Plk1. Expression of plk1 N, which contains both PB1 and PB2,
induces a pronounced defect in establishing normal bipolar spindles and
leads to the activation of a Mad2-dependent spindle
checkpoint pathway. These arrested cells exhibited apparently normal
centrosome maturation and microtubule nucleation activity, suggesting
that expression of plk1 N induced a defect in
forming normal bipolar spindles without influencing centrosome
function. In addition, bypass of the spindle checkpoint arrest led to a
failure in completing cytokinesis. Our data suggest that the
polo-box-dependent Plk1 function is required for bipolar
spindle formation and cytokinesis.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Synchronization--
U-2 OS osteosarcoma cell
line (American Type Culture Collection) was maintained in McCoy's 5A
medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone Laboratories
Inc.) and 100 units/ml penicillin G plus 100 µg/ml
streptomycin (Invitrogen). For the double thymidine block and release
experiment, U-2 OS cells were arrested for 14 h with 2.5 mM thymidine (Sigma) with a 7-h release interval. Arrested
cells were either released into fresh medium to follow cell cycle
progression or into the medium containing 400 ng/ml of nocodazole
(Sigma) to trap the cells at prometaphase. To examine the effect of
various forms of Plk1 expression on cell cycle progression, cells were
infected with various Plk1 viruses at a multiplicity of infection
(m.o.i.) of 10, 4 h before release from the double thymidine
block. To carry out microtubule re-growth assay, U-2 OS cells were
treated with 200 ng/ml nocodazole for 16 h, washed, and released
into prewarmed medium at 37 °C. Cells were allowed to recover for 5, 10, or 20 min. These cells were fixed and subjected to immunostaining
with an anti- -tubulin antibody (see below).
Plasmid Construction and Generation of Plk1
Adenoviruses--
Recombinant adenoviruses were made according to the
procedure described previously (26). Briefly, a 1.8-kilobase
SalI-NotI (end-filled) fragment containing the
full-length murine Plk1 cDNA N-terminally tagged with hemagglutinin
(HA) epitope was first cloned into pShuttle-CMV vector digested with
SalI and EcoRV. A copy of EGFP
(CLONTECH) was inserted into the XhoI
site of the N-terminal Plk1 sequence to generate
pSuttle-CMV-HA-EGFP-Plk1. The C-terminal form of Plk1
(plk1 N) lacking amino acids 51-356 was
generated by digesting the pSuttle-CMV-HA-EGFP-Plk1 with
NaeI and SmaI and re-ligating the resulting
fragment. The triple plk1 N/W414F/V415A/L427A (plk1 N/FAA)
mutant was generated by using the Sculptor in vitro mutagenesis system (Amersham Biosciences). PB1 (amino acids 357-502) and PB2 (amino acids 503-603) constructs were generated by replacing the full-length Plk1 with respective PCR fragments. All the viruses were generated in HEK293 (ATCC) cells and purified two times by CsCl
ultracentrifugation. To determine viral titers, viruses were serially
diluted and infected into U-2 OS cell in 24-well plates, and then the
percentage of GFP-positive cells were counted.
Flow Cytometry Analysis and Mitotic Indices--
To analyze cell
cycle progression, flow cytometry analyses were carried out using
FACSCalibur (BD PharMingen), and data were analyzed by Cellquest
software (BD PharMingen). To determine the percentage of mitotic cells,
cells were harvested, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and then stained
with 0.1 µg/ml 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The
percentage of mitotic figures was determined by counting more than 200 cells/time point using fluorescence microscopy.
Transfections--
U-2 OS cells were transiently transfected
with 2 µg of plasmid DNA using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's protocol. To
determine the effect of dominant-negative spindle checkpoint components
on plk1 N-induced mitotic arrest, various
constructs were co-transfected with pDsRed2-N1 (CLONTECH)-plk1 N at a 5:1
ratio. Mitotic indices of co-transfected cells were determined by
counting only the red fluorescent cells.
Immunoblot Analyses--
An affinity-purified C-terminal
anti-Plk1 antibody (Zymed Laboratories Inc.), a
monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Berkeley Antibody Co.), an
anti-Cdc2 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology Inc.), an anti-Cdc27 antibody
(Santa Cruz Biotechnologies), and an anti-phospho-histone H3 antibody
(Upstate Biotechnology Inc.) were used at 0.5 µg/ml. Immunoblotting
was carried out as described previously (27).
Immunoprecipitation and Kinase Assays--
Anti-Plk1
immunocomplex kinase assays were carried out as described previously
(28). Briefly, supernatants (S15) obtained from centrifugation at
15,000 × g for 20 min were incubated with an anti-Plk1
antibody (Zymed Laboratories Inc.) in the presence or
absence of its epitope peptide for 2 h, then protein A-Sepharose 4B (Zymed Laboratories Inc.) was added to precipitate
the antibodies. To determine Cdc2 kinase activity, the S15 was
incubated with 10 µl of yeast p13suc1-agarose
conjugate (Calbiochem), then the precipitates were subjected to kinase
reactions using 3 µg of histone H1 (Calbiochem) as a substrate.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
U-2 OS cells were grown on
collagen (Vitrogen 100; Celtrix)-coated glass coverslips and extracted
for 5 min with a microtubule-stabilizing (PMEG) buffer (100 mM Pipes, 5 mM MgSO4, 5 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.9 M
glycerol, pH 6.9) plus 0.25% Triton X-100 for staining kinetochores or
PMEG without detergent for staining centrosomes and microtubules. Cells
were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and washed 4 times
with PBST (PBS plus 0.1% Triton X-100). The coverslips were then
incubated for 2 h in PBS plus 3% bovine serum albumin containing
a rabbit anti-Plk1 antibody (Zymed Laboratories Inc.), a rabbit anti-Cep135 antibody (A5-CEP) (29), a rat anti- -tubulin antibody (Accurate), a scleroderma CREST autoimmune antiserum (Cortex
Biochem), a mouse anti- -tubulin (Sigma), or a rabbit anti-Mad2 antibody (a gift of Rey-Hui Chen, Cornell University). After
washing 5 times with PBST for 5 min each, coverslips were further
incubated for 1 h with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled goat
anti-rabbit IgG for Plk1 staining, a Texas Red-labeled goat anti-rabbit
IgG for Mad2 and Cep135 staining, a Texas Red-labeled goat anti-rat IgG
for -tubulin staining, a Texas Red-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG for
-tubulin staining, or a Texas Red-labeled goat anti-human IgG for
CREST staining. All the secondary antibodies were purchased from
Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories and were used at a 1:200 dilution.
To stain chromosomes, cells were treated with PBST containing 0.1 µg/ml of DAPI (Sigma). Confocal fluorescent images were collected
with a Leica TCS spectrophotometer confocal microscope or with a Zeiss
Axiovert 100M confocal microscope.
In Vivo Time-lapse Microscopy--
Generation of U-2 OS cell
lines expressing EGFP-tubulin (human -tubulin;
CLONTECH), DsRed-centrin (30),
GFP-histone H2B will be described
elsewhere.2 Cells were
cultured on a 35-mm dish on the stage of the Axiovert S-100 inverted
microscope equipped with an environmental chamber (Zeiss). Time-lapse
images were captured every 3 min by a SenSys digital camera
(Photometrics) and analyzed by Openlab software (Improvision).
Videos of cells depicted in Fig 4, A-C, and Fig. 5D are available as on-line supplemental material.
 |
RESULTS |
Both PB1 and PB2 Are Required for Efficient Subcellular
Localization of Plk1 in U-2 OS Cells--
Studies in budding yeast
show that the highly conserved motif (amino acids 410-439 in Plk1)
present in PB1 of both mammalian Plk1 and budding yeast Cdc5 is
critical for the subcellular localizations and mitotic functions of
these kinases (27, 31). To determine the role of the PB1 and PB2
domains of Plk1 in its own organism, we expressed various forms of
PLK1 in U-2 OS cells using an adenoviral expression system
(Fig.
1A).
These proteins were N-terminally fused with both HA and EGFP to
facilitate protein detection and subcellular localization.
Asynchronously growing cells were infected with various viruses at a
m.o.i. of 10 to examine the expression level of these constructs. Total
cellular proteins were prepared for immunoblotting with an anti-HA
antibody 24 h post-infection. As shown in Fig. 1B, each
of the HA-EGFP-fused proteins were expressed at similar levels,
although the expression level of control HA-EGFP was severalfold higher
than those of Plk1 fusions (Fig. 1B). Previous studies show
that Plk1 localizes to centrosomes, midbody, and kinetochores (28, 32,
33). Thus, we examined the ability of these mutant proteins to localize
to these sites. Expression of either EGFP-PLK1/K82M or
EGFP-plk1 N, which contain the entire C-terminal domain of Plk1, yielded two distinct fluorescent dot signals
and a single strong band at an apparent midbody (Fig. 1C).
Punctate signals were also apparent in nucleus (Fig. 1C and see also 1E). Immunostaining with an antibody
specific to Cep135 pericentriolar protein revealed that the two strong
green fluorescent dots localized at the centrosomes (Fig.
1C). In addition, an anti- -tubulin staining revealed that
both EGFP-Plk1/K82M and EGFP-plk1 N clearly localized to the
central midbody, which was flanked by the remnants of spindle
microtubules (Fig. 1D and data not shown). In contrast, both
EGFP-PB1 and EGFP-PB2 constructs largely yielded diffused signals in
cytoplasm (Fig. 1, C and D; see Table
I for quantification), suggesting that
PB1 or PB2 alone is not sufficient to localize at distinct subcellular
structures. In addition, introduction of the triple
W414F/V415A/L427A mutations into the PB1 of
plk1 N severely impaired the ability of this
protein to localize properly (Table I).


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, diagram depicting structures
of various adenoviral Plk1 constructs used in this study. The
hatched box indicates the kinase domain present in the
N-terminal region. Dotted boxes indicate the polo-box 1 (PB1) and the polo-box 2 (PB2) present in the non-catalytic C-terminal
domain. Numbers denote amino acid residues in the Plk1
protein sequence. Plk1/K82M, Plk1 with the K82M
mutation in the putative ATP binding motif;
plk1 N, Plk1 lacking residues 50-356;
plk1 N/FAA, plk1 N
with triple W414F/V415A/L427A mutations introduced into the highly
conserved amino acid motif in the polo-box 1 domain; PB1, a
Plk1 peptide expressing residues 357-502; PB2, a Plk1
peptide expressing residues 503-603; control, virus
expressing HA-EGFP fusion only. X, XhoI;
N, NaeI; S, SmaI;
B, BamHI. B, ectopic expression of
various adenoviral Plk1 constructs in U-2 OS cells. Total cellular
proteins prepared 15 h post-infection were separated in 10%
SDS-PAGE then subjected to immunoblotting analysis with an anti-HA
antibody. C, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde
12 h post-infection and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100
for 10 min before incubating with an anti-centrosome antibody, A5-1
CEP. EGFP, EGFP signals for various Plk constructs;
Cep135, anti-Cep135 staining with A5-1 CEP antibody;
DAPI, DAPI staining of chromosomal DNA; Merge,
overlapped images. D,
immunostaining was carried out as in C, except that cells
were not extracted with detergent. Arrows indicate spindle
microtubules flanking the central midbody. E,
endogenous Plk1 was stained with an anti-Plk1 antibody and a
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody.
Arrows indicate Plk1 signals at centrosomes.
Association of Plk1 with spindle structures was apparent by
use of the extraction/fixation protocol described under
"Experimental Procedures." CREST, CREST serum
staining.
|
|
We then examined whether punctate nuclear signals observed with
EGFP-Plk1/K82M or EGFP-plk1 N are indicative of Plk1 localization at kinetochores. In prophase, endogenous Plk1 was detected as two
strong dots (most likely centrosomes as observed above) and punctate
dotted signals (Fig. 1E, fluorescein isothiocyanate
(FITC) panel). The dotted signals were
co-localized with CREST antigens at kinetochores (Fig. 1E,
merged panel). In late stages of mitosis, strong Plk1
localization was also detected at midzone and midbody structures (Fig.
1E). EGFP-plk1 N efficiently localized at kinetochores, whereas EGFP-PB1 and EGFP-PB2 did not (Fig. 1E and data not
shown). These observations indicate that, as with centrosome and
midbody localization, the C-terminal domain of Plk1, but not the PB1 or PB2 alone, is sufficient to localize to kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes.
Expression of PLK1/K82M or plk1 N Leads to a Pre-anaphase
Arrest--
The ability of both EGFP-Plk1/K82M and EGFP-plk1 N to
properly localize to specific subcellular structures led us to
investigate whether overexpression of these proteins alters cell cycle
progression. To this end, U-2 OS cells were doubly blocked with
thymidine, infected with various viruses, and then synchronously
released from the G1/S block. Flow cytometry analyses
indicate expression of either EGFP-PLK1/K82M or
EGFP-plk1 N induced a cell cycle arrest after
achieving DNA replication (Fig.
2A). Cells with
greater than a 4N DNA content were also apparent after a prolonged
arrest (Fig. 2A). In contrast, as with control
EGFP, expression of localization-incompetent plk1 N/FAA, PB1, or PB2 failed to
induce cell cycle arrest (data not shown), suggesting that the polo-box
domain-dependent localization is likely responsible for
this arrest.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A, expression of PLK1/K82M
or plk1 N induces mitotic arrest. Four hours
before release from double thymidine block, U-2 OS cells were infected
with indicated viruses at an m.o.i. of 10. Samples were harvested at
the indicated time points for analysis. Control, control
EGFP virus; Plk1/K82M, EGFP-Plk1/K82M virus;
plk1 N, EGFP-plk1 N virus; 1N, 1N
DNA content; 2N, 2N DNA content. B, cells were
infected with the indicated viruses then released from
G1/S block as in A. Total cellular proteins
prepared at the indicated time points were subjected to immunoblotting
analyses with an anti-Cdc2 antibody (top panel), an
anti-Cdc27 antibody (middle panel), or an
anti-phospho-histone H3 antibody (bottom panel).
control/noc., control EGFP virus-infected cells released
into nocodazole-containing medium; P-Cdc2, phosphorylated
Cdc2; P-Cdc27, phosphorylated Cdc27; P-H3, phosphorylated
histone H3. noc., nocodazole-treated total lysates.
Numbers indicate hours after G1/S release.
C, mitotically arrested cells induced by expression of
plk1 N. Merged images
(EGFP-plk1 N (green), tubulin
(red), and DAPI (blue)) of a field of mitotically
arrested cells are shown. D, quantification of cells at
different stages of the cell cycle after release from
G1/S block. U-2 OS cells were infected and released from
the double thymidine block as in Fig. 2A then fixed and
stained with DAPI. Data are an average of three independent
experiments. More than 200 cells were counted for each time point.
E, quantification of cells with binucleated and
micronucleated morphologies. Asynchronously growing U-2 OS cells were
infected with indicated viruses. Samples were fixed and stained with
DAPI at the indicated time points to determine the percentage of cells
with bi- and multinucleated chromosome morphologies.
plk1 N/FAA, EGFP-plk1 N/FAA virus;
PB1, EGFP-PB1 virus; PB2, EGFP-PB2 virus.
F, expression of PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N does not influence Plk1 and Cdc2
activation. Left, cells infected with indicated viruses and
released 9 h from G1/S block were harvested and
subjected to anti-Plk1 immunocomplex kinase assays. Right,
samples prepared as in B were subjected to anti-Plk1
immunocomplex kinase assays. IP, immunoprecipitation.
K82M, EGFP-Plk1/K82M virus; N, EGFP-plk1 N
virus; N+pep, N sample immunoprecipitated with an
anti-Plk1 antibody preincubated with its epitope peptide;
noc., nocodazole-treated sample; p13 ppt,
p13suc1 precipitation; H1, histone H1.
|
|
In vertebrates, Cdc2 is negatively regulated by phosphorylation of
Thr-14 and Tyr-15. Removal of these phosphorylations by the
dual-specificity phosphatase Cdc25C is a key event at the onset of M
phase (34, 35). Upon entry into mitosis, histone H3 becomes
phosphorylated, which appears to be important for chromosome condensation and segregation in Tetrahymena (36). Plk1
phosphorylates Cdc27, a component of APC, to activate the latter (7).
Thus, to determine a precise cell cycle-arresting point associated with EGFP-PLK1/K82M or EGFP-plk1 N
expression, we closely monitored the phosphorylation status of these
proteins upon releasing cells from the G1/S block.
Control cells infected with virus expressing EGFP alone were
released either into nocodazole-containing medium to trap the cells in
prometaphase or into normal medium to monitor cell cycle progression.
In the presence of nocodazole, the
Thr-14,Tyr-15-dephosphorylated, faster migrating, isoform of
Cdc2 was first detected 9 h after G1/S release. As
cells continue to accumulate in mitosis, the amount of faster migrating
Cdc2 steadily increased (Fig. 2B,
control/noc.). In normal medium, however, the
dephosphorylated Cdc2 was transiently enriched at the 9 h time
point, indicative of normal cell cycle progression (Fig. 2B,
control). In contrast to the control cells released into the
normal medium, expression of either EGFP-PLK1/K82M or
EGFP-plk1 N resulted in accumulation of the
dephosphorylated and activated isoform of Cdc2 (Fig. 2B),
suggestive of an early mitotic arrest. Consistent with this notion,
accumulation of the phosphorylated forms of both Cdc27 and histone H3
were also evident in these cells (Fig. 2B).
To determine the arrested morphologies, U-2 OS cells prepared as above
were subjected to DAPI and -tubulin staining. Microscopic examination of these cells revealed that they were arrested after chromosome condensation but before sisterchromatid separation (see Fig.
3A). Apparent
bipolar spindles were formed in a large fraction of the arrested cells
(Fig. 2C, see Table II for
quantification). At the 24-h time point, after release from the
G1/S block, nearly 45% of the PLK1/K82M- or
plk1 N-expressing cells were arrested before
anaphase, whereas cells expressing the control EGFP were not
(Fig. 2D). In addition, a prolonged arrest led to the
generation of cells with binucleated and micronucleated morphologies
(see Fig. 4C and
5D). To examine whether an
intact polo box is required for these events, asynchronously growing
U-2 OS cells were infected with various Plk viruses. Expression of
PLK1/K82M or plk1 N, but not the
control EGFP, induced these phenotypes in a time-dependent manner. Approximately 15% of the cells became binucleated, and 20%
exhibited micronucleated morphology 48 h after infection with the
plk1 N-expressing virus (Fig. 2E).
In contrast, expression of PB1, PB2, or the
plk1 N bearing the triple FAA mutations
(plk1 N/FAA) failed to induce these
phenotypes (Fig. 2E). These observations indicate that
induction of both binucleated and micronucleated morphologies are
likely the consequence of the polo-box-dependent mitotic
arrest.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, aberrant spindle morphologies induced
by expression of plk1 N. U-2 OS cells were
infected with indicated viruses as in Fig. 2A. Fifteen hours
after release from double thymidine block, cells were fixed with
paraformaldehyde and then subjected to immunostaining with an
anti- -tubulin antibody. Cells expressing
plk1 N exhibited randomly oriented and
disorganized (first panel), monopolar (second
panel), multipolar (third panel), and apparent bipolar
(fourth panel) spindle morphologies. Cells with bipolar
spindle structures frequently exhibited misaligned chromosomes
(arrows). EGFP, EGFP signals for the indicated
constructs; -tubulin, an anti- -tubulin staining;
DAPI, DAPI staining of chromosomal DNA; Merge,
overlapped images. B, cells with randomly oriented spindles
exhibit two microtubule-organizing centers. U-2 OS cells infected with
EGFP-plk1 N virus were prepared as in A and
then subjected to double immunostaining with an anti- -tubulin
(green) and an anti- -tubulin (red).
EGFP+ -Tub, EGFP-plk1 N + -tubulin signal;
-Tub, -tubulin signal. C, expression of
plk1 N does not inhibit microtubule nucleation
activity. Cells expressing either control EGFP or
EGFP-plk1 N were treated with nocodazole to
depolymerize microtubules. Upon allowing the cells to re-grow
microtubules for various length of time, cells were fixed and subjected
to an anti- -tubulin staining.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Induction of abnormal spindle morphologies by ectopic expression of
dominant-negative Plk1 mutants in U-2 OS cells
|
|

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In vivo time-lapse studies in
cells expressing plk1 N. Time in all
panels is given in hours and minutes after mitotic onset. A,
cells stably expressing EGFP-tubulin were transiently
transfected with DsRed-plk1 N to monitor
spindle structures during mitotic arrest. Formation of cleavage
furrow-like structure (arrows) was evident at the 11:01 time
point. However, this structure was soon regressed (12:42).
B, cells stably expressing DsRed-centrin were
transfected with EGFP-plk1 N to monitor centrin
movements during mitotic arrest. Arrows in untransfected
cells indicate duplicated centrins poised to enter mitosis.
Arrows (8:04 and 8:21) in
EGFP-plk1 N-expressing cells indicate cleavage
furrow formation followed by regression, whereas four arrows
(22:37) indicate duplicated mother and daughter centrins after
generating micronucleated morphologies. C, cells stably
expressing EGFP-H2B were transfected with
DsRed-plk1 N to monitor chromatin structures.
The arrow indicates an apparent cleavage furrow formation.
Two examples exhibiting a typical arrest phenotype are shown.
|
|

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Bypass of
plk1 N-dependent spindle checkpoint
arrest leads to a failure in cytokinesis. A, Mad2
localization to the kinetochores of
plk1 N-expressing cells. Arrows
indicate Mad2 signals at misaligned chromosomes. Control,
control EGFP virus; plk1 N, EGFP-plk1 N
virus; Mad2, anti-Mad2 staining; DAPI, DAPI
staining of chromosomal DNA; Merge, overlapped images.
B, quantification of Mad2 localized at metaphase
kinetochores. Only metaphase cells with congressed chromosome
morphologies were counted. Cells were classified into three groups (0, 1-10, and >11) for tabulation. Plk1/K82M,
EGFP-Plk1/K82M virus. C, the mitotic indices of cells
co-transfected with pDsRed2-N1-plk1 N and other
various plasmids. The results are the average and S.D. derived from
three independent experiments. Greater than 200 cells was counted
for each experiment. Control, pCI-neo vector (Promega,
Madison, WI); bub11-331,
pCI-neo-bub11-331; BubR1/K795A,
pCS2-BubR1/K795A; bubr1d (351-700),
pCS2-bub1d; CDC20, pCI-neo-CDC20;
cdc201-153,
pCI-neo-cdc201-153. D, U-2 OS cells
stably expressing EGFP-H2B were co-transfected with
DsRed-plk1 N and bubr1d constructs.
Arrows (0:49 and 1:01) indicate
non-refractile midbody structures. A binucleated cell with two distinct
nuclei is shown in the 4:00 time point. Time is given in hours and
minutes after the onset of mitosis.
|
|
To investigate whether the expression of PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N alters the endogenous Plk1 activity, U-2
OS cells infected with various Plk1 viruses were harvested 9 h
after G1/S release, a period when Plk1 becomes active.
In vitro immunocomplex kinase assays revealed that
expression of either PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N did not inhibit the Plk1 kinase activity
(Fig. 2F).
Because expression of PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N alters the cell cycle progression, we
then closely examined whether the expression of these proteins
influences the timing of Plk1 activation in cells synchronously
releasing from the G1/S block. In control cells, Plk1
activity increased at 9- and 12-h time points, then decreased as the
cell cycle progressed. In both PLK1/K82M- and plk1 N-expressing cells, Plk1 activity appeared
to increase at a similar rate as in control cells and remained active
up to 18 h after release (Fig. 2F), suggesting that the
Plk1 activation step is not impeded in these cells. These observations
are consistent with the steadily increased Cdc27 phosphorylation during
the mitotic arrest (Fig. 2B). As with Plk1 activation, Cdc2
activation appeared to occur normally (Fig. 2F).
Expression of PLK1/K82M or plk1 N Leads to a Defect in Proper
Bipolar Spindle Formation--
Anti-Plk1 microinjection (4) or
overexpression of a kinase-inactive Plk1 studies (5) suggests that
Plk1-deficient cells are defective in centrosome maturation, which
leads to monopolar spindle formation and mitotic catastrophe. To
examine whether the apparent pre-anaphase arrest induced by
PLK1/K82M or plk1 N expression is
the result of a defect in centrosomes or other subcellular structures,
cells released from the G1/S block for 15 h were
fixed and subjected to immunostaining with anti- -tubulin,
anti- -tubulin, or anti-Cep135, a pericentriolar matrix component.
Under various conditions, the amount of -tubulin and the
localization of Cep135 appeared to be normal in comparison to the
control cells (Fig. 3B and data not shown), suggesting that
centrosome maturation occurred properly in these cells. In contrast,
anti- -tubulin staining revealed that most prophase cells exhibited
defects in spindle structures in varying degrees. The most prominent
defect associated with PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N expression was the presence of randomly
oriented, disorganized spindles (Fig. 3A, first
panel in EGFP-plk1 N). Approximately 55% of the prophase cells
(~27% of total mitotic cells) exhibited this phenotype (Table II).
This observation was in sharp contrast to control cells, which have already established strong bipolar spindles in prophase (Fig. 3A, first panel in EGFP control). In addition, a
small fraction of monopolar or multipolar spindle structures (Fig.
3A, second and third panels in
EGFP-plk1 N, and Table II) were also observed. However, structures
resembling bipolar spindles were observed in most metaphase-like cells
(Fig. 3A, fourth panel in EGFP-plk1 N, and
Table II), although they often looked abnormal, with uneven bipolarity.
Close examination of these cells revealed that the majority of them
(62% for Plk1/K82M and 60% for plk1 N; see Table III) exhibited either misaligned or
non-congregated chromosome morphologies (Fig. 3A,
arrow in the fourth DAPI panel
in EGFP-plk1 N), suggesting that these cells have a defect in
establishing normal bipolar spindles.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Occurrance of misaligned chromosomes by ectopic expression of
dominant-negative Plk1 mutants in U-2 OS cells
|
|
Cells expressing EGFP-plk1 N were doubly
stained with both anti- - and anti- -tubulin antibodies to examine
whether the cells with randomly oriented spindle structures possess
proper microtubule-organizing centers. Two closely placed -tubulin
signals were apparent in all the cells examined (n = 152) (Fig. 3B). In addition, the amount of -tubulin
reactivity, which reflects a functional maturation of centrosomes,
appeared to be normal. To determine directly whether the expression of
plk1 N influences the microtubule nucleation capacities of microtubule-organizing centers, cells expressing either
EGFP-plk1 N or control EGFP were
treated with nocodazole to depolymerize microtubules. After removing
nocodazole, cells were transferred to fresh medium to allow for the
re-growth of microtubules. Immunostaining for -tubulin indicated
that nocodazole treatment completely depolymerized the microtubules of
both EGFP-plk1 N- and control
EGFP-expressing cells (Fig. 3C, 0 min). Comparison of the length of re-grown microtubules for 5 or
10 min revealed similar kinetics of microtubule polymerization
activities between these two samples (Fig. 3C), indicating
that expression of EGFP-plk1 N did not
influence the microtubule nucleating activity of the centrosomes under
these conditions.
Relapse of Mitotic Progression by Expression of plk1 N--
To
closely investigate the nature of the pre-anaphase arrest associated
with plk1 N expression, we conducted in
vivo time-lapse studies using U-2 OS cell lines stably expressing
either GFP-tubulin, DsRed-centrin, or
GFP-H2B. These cell lines were transfected with a plasmid
expressing either control DsRed or DsRed
N-terminally fused to plk1 N. GFP-tubulin cells
expressing control DsRed appeared to grow normally with a
doubling time similar to that of parental cells (data not shown). In
contrast, as with EGFP-plk1 N expression, a
large fraction of cells expressing
DsRed-plk1 N resulted in mitotic
arrest. Twenty-four hours post-transfection, 19 interphase cells, which
weakly expressed DsRed-plk1 N, were
chosen to closely monitor phenotypic changes during the arrest. Among
them, 12 cells remained arrested at pre-anaphase for more than 20 h, whereas 7 cells died about 10-15 h after entering mitosis. One of
the latter cells is shown in Fig. 4A. Consistent with normal
microtubule nucleation activity, these cells all established apparent
bipolar spindles ~10-15 min after the onset of mitosis (Fig.
4A). However, these cells exhibited repeated cycles of
bipolar spindle formation and disruption during the arrest (Fig.
4A), suggesting that these cells were not able to maintain
stable bipolar spindle structures to execute metaphase/ anaphase
transition. One interesting observation was the induction of a cleavage
furrow-like structure (arrow in Fig. 4A) after a
prolonged arrest. However, this furrow soon regressed, and cell death
followed (Fig. 4A), suggesting the occurrence of an aborted cytokinesis.
Because centrosomes play a critical role in bipolar spindle formation,
we then investigated whether centrosome separation occurs normally upon
plk1 N expression. Cells expressing control EGFP steadily increased the distance between two strong
centrin signals (presumably two mother centrioles) and executed
cytokinesis ~35 min after onset of mitosis (Fig. 4B,
top panels). In contrast, similar to the relapse of bipolar
spindles, cells expressing EGFP-plk1 N (n = 11) frequently retrogressed centrosome separation
even after achieving a full separation (Fig. 4B; compare
between 0:12 and 2:06 time points). Similar to Fig. 4A, a
prolonged mitotic arrest led to an aborted cytokinesis (Fig.
4B, arrow in DsRed-centrin + plk1 N panel) followed by
micronucleation. The number of centrioles did not increase in these
cells (Fig. 4B), suggesting that another round of cell cycle
did not occur during the arrest.
Normal bipolar spindle formation is critical for proper sisterchromatid
separation. To determine whether the generation of micronuclei is due
to a defect in chromosome separation or due to accumulated cytokinesis
failures, the behavior of chromosome structures were closely monitored
in cells stably expressing GFP-H2B. Among 15 cells examined,
most cells congregated chromosomes at the metaphase plate within 20 min
after the onset of mitosis (Fig. 4C). However, all the cells
expressing plk1 N resulted in repeated cycles
of chromosome congregation to and relapse from the metaphase plate
(Fig. 4C), reminiscent of a defect in bipolar spindle
formation. In addition, prolonged arrest at pre-anaphase resulted in an
apparent cytokinesis defect (Fig. 4C, top panel,
25:47 time point) or abrupt generation of micronucleated
cells in the absence of chromosome separation (Fig. 4C,
bottom panels). Mitotic exit is thought to be a prerequisite
step for the onset of cytokinesis. Thus, these observations together
with the results above suggest that micronucleated morphology is not
the result of accumulated cytokinesis failures in the presence of
continuous cell cycle progression. Rather, it is more likely the result
of fragmentation of unseparated chromosomes after mitotic exit in the
absence of proper bipolar spindle formation.
Bypass of plk1 N-induced Spindle Checkpoint Arrest Leads to a
Failure in Completion of Cytokinesis--
To examine whether the
apparent spindle defect induced by PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N expression resulted in spindle
checkpoint activation, immunostaining with an anti-Mad2 antibody was
carried out. Control prophase cells expressing EGFP alone
exhibited distinct Mad2 localization. A low number (between 1 and 10)
of localized Mad2 signals (Fig. 5, A, first panel
under control, and B) was still evident in
~45% of control metaphase cells, whereas Mad2 localization was not detectable in cells progressing through anaphase (Fig. 5A,
the second panel under control). In contrast, all
the PLK1/K82M or plk1 N-expressing
cells (n = greater than 32 for each) possessed clear
Mad2 localizations at kinetochores of metaphase-like chromosomes under
the same conditions (Fig. 5, A and B), indicative
of improper spindle attachment to the metaphase kinetochores.
It is possible that the observed pre-anaphase arrest could be due to an
unknown defect at a step before the dissociation of Mad2 from metaphase
kinetochores. In budding yeast, overexpression of CDC20
allows cells to bypass the spindle damage checkpoint, because elevated
Cdc20 activates APC (37, 38). A recent report showed that a
C-terminally truncated cdc201-153, which binds
constitutively to Mad2 but not to APC, alleviates the spindle
checkpoint (39). In addition, a C-terminal deletion bub11-331 mutant (40) or a truncated form of BubR1, bubr1d
(22), disrupts the mitotic checkpoint. Thus, we examined whether
introduction of these components alleviates the mitotic block induced
by expression of plk1 N. Expression of
CDC20 strongly alleviated the mitotic arrest. In addition,
expression of either cdc201-153,
bub11-331, or bubr1d allowed cells
to bypass the mitotic block (Fig. 5C), indicating that the
plk1 N-dependent pre-anaphase arrest is due to
the activation of a spindle checkpoint pathway. Under these conditions,
neither the control vector nor the kinase-inactive BubR1/K795A mutant
alleviated the mitotic arrest (Fig. 5C).
To investigate the effect of plk1 N expression
on M-phase progression after bypassing the mitotic block, EGFP-H2B
cells co-transfected with DsRed-plk1 N and
bubr1d were closely monitored by in vivo time-lapse microscopy. Cells with a high level of
DsRed-plk1 N fluorescent signals
became micronucleated or apoptotic (data not shown). However, most
cells with moderate DsRed-plk1 N
signals (5 of 8 cells) exhibited an apparently normal mitotic
progression until the formation of condensed, non-refractile, midbody
structures with a clear fissure developing between the two dividing
cells (Fig. 5D, 0:49 time point). The fissure,
however, gradually regressed, resulting in a binucleated cell with two
distinct nuclei (Fig. 4D, 4:00 time point). These
observations suggest a defect in completion of cytokinesis. The
remaining 3 cells exhibited a similar defect but with somewhat delayed
sisterchromatid separation (data not shown). These
observations suggest that the polo-box-dependent Plk1
activity is also required for the completion of cytokinesis.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The C-terminal Domain of Plk1 Is Sufficient for Subcellular
Localization in U-2 OS Cells--
Plk1 has been shown to localize to
centrosomes and spindle kinetochores early in mitosis and also to
interzone and midbody structures during late mitosis and cytokinesis.
This dynamic subcellular localization presages multiple functions of
Plk1 during M-phase progression (28, 33). Our data demonstrated that,
as with Plk1/K82M, the C-terminal domain of Plk1 (plk1 N)
efficiently localizes to centrosomes, midbody, and kinetochores,
whereas PB1 or PB2 alone does not. In addition, introduction of the
triple W414F/ V415A/L427A mutations at the highly conserved motif
in PB1 severely impaired the capacity of plk1 N
to localize to these sites. Taken together, these data indicate that
both intact PB1 and PB2 are required for efficient subcellular
localization of Plk1. Although our data do not completely rule out a
differential role of PB1 or PB2 for a specific event, both PB1 and PB2
appear to function together to interact with the binding target(s) at distinct subcellular structures. Understanding how Plk1 localization to
these multiple sites is temporally and spatially regulated during
mitotic progression and which proteins it interacts with at specific
locations will require further investigation.
Expression of Dominant-negative Forms of Plk1 Leads to Unstable
Bipolar Spindles without Interfering with Centrosome
Function--
Previously, anti-Plk1 microinjection studies (4) showed
that Plk1-deficient cells are defective in centrosome maturation and,
consequently, in bipolar spindle formation. However, these studies
failed to address whether Plk1 activity is required for proper bipolar
spindle formation independently of centrosome maturation. To
investigate whether expression of PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N interferes with various cellular events
at an early stage of mitotic block, we examined the cells released from
G1/S block for 15 h. Under these conditions,
centrosome maturation did not appear to be influenced, as evidenced by
apparently normal microtubule nucleation activities. Consistent with
this notion, in vivo time-lapse studies revealed that, as
with control cells, plk1 N-expressing cells
established apparent bipolar spindles within 10-15 min after the
onset of mitosis. In contrast to normal microtubule nucleation,
however, expression of either PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N induced randomly oriented, disorganized
spindles in a large fraction of prophase cells. The majority of cells
with metaphase-like chromosome structures exhibited largely defective
bipolar spindle structures with misaligned chromosomes. In addition,
repeated cycles of formation and collapse of bipolar spindles were
evident, indicating a clear defect in spindle stability during mitotic
arrest. These data suggest that the dominant-negative capacity of
Plk1/K82M or plk1 N might not be sufficient to interfere with
centrosome maturation, whereas it could impair spindle function. Thus,
we suggest that proper bipolar spindle formation or maintaining stability is likely the most critical step that requires the
polo-box-dependent Plk1 activity. Consistent with this
notion, a recent report suggested that Xenopus polo kinase,
Plx1, promotes microtubule stabilization and spindle assembly by
inhibiting the function of a microtubule-destabilizing protein, Op18
(41).
A Mad2-dependent Spindle Checkpoint Activation by
Dominant-negative Forms of Plk1--
Plk1 has been reported to
phosphorylate a subset of APC components and activate APC (7). This
step is critical for inactivation of Cdc2 and mitotic exit. It is
generally believed that the checkpoint-dependent inhibitory
complex binds to Cdc20 and inhibits APC-mediated ubiquitination until
all the kinetochores of sisterchromatids are properly attached with
spindles under tension. Cells expressing PLK1/K82M or
plk1 N exhibited a typical phenotype of cells
unable to pass beyond the metaphase/anaphase checkpoint, as they have
high levels of Cdc2 activity with Mad2 localized at the kinetochores of
metaphase chromosomes. In addition, Plk1 is activated and Cdc27 is
phosphorylated normally in these cells, suggesting that spindle
checkpoint activation is likely to be the cause of the pre-anaphase
arrest. Consistent with this notion, introduction of either
cdc201-153, bub11-331,
or bubr1d alleviated this mitotic arrest. Whether spindle
checkpoint activation directly resulted from a primary failure to
correctly assemble and establish the bipolar spindle structures is not
yet clear. Endogenous Plk1 localized to centrosomes and kinetochores throughout M phase, suggesting that it may have a role in spindle attachment at these structures. However, expression of
PLK1/K82M or plk1 N did not appear
to disrupt localization of endogenous Plk1 (data not shown). Neither
did the expression of these constructs appear to interfere with
endogenous Plk1 activation (Fig. 2F). Thus, we speculate
that Plk1/K82M or plk1 N may bind to and titrate out physiological
substrates or binding targets of Plk1 at these sites essential for
bipolar spindle formation or stability.
Recent studies with Drosophila polo9 and
polo10 mutants revealed that these mutations led
to a mitotic arrest as a consequence of tension-dependent
spindle checkpoint activation (11). However, the arresting phenotype of
polo9 or polo10 mutants
differs from the Plk1 dominant-negative phenotype in that these mutants
exhibit apparently normal bipolar spindles with partially separated
sisterchromatids. Whether these apparent differences in arresting
phenotypes reflect the different regulatory hierarchies of spindle
checkpoint pathway in these evolutionarily distant organisms are not
clear at present. In both systems, however, polo activity appears to be
important for proper metaphase/anaphase transition.
Generation of Micronucleated Cells as a Consequence of Mitotic
Exit--
Previous transient transfection experiments in HeLa cells
(42) revealed that expression of either wild-type or a kinase-inactive form of Plk1 induces abnormal interphase cells with multinucleated morphology. How these cells are generated and whether these
morphologies are indicative of a failure in cytokinesis have not been
clear. Our in vivo time-lapse studies revealed that
plk1 N-expressing cells often attempted an
aborted cytokinesis before generating micronucleated morphology.
Because it is thought that mitotic exit is a prerequisite step before
cytokinesis, a prolonged mitotic arrest may have led to an adaptive
mitotic exit. Interestingly, centrosome duplication did not occur
during the arrest, indicating that cells did not proceed through
another cell cycle. Taken together, our data suggest that the
previously described Plk1-dependent multinucleated
morphology (42) is not the result of accumulated cytokinesis failures
with continuous cell cycle progression. Rather, it is likely to be the
result of an abrupt exit from mitosis in the absence of proper bipolar
spindle formation and chromosome separation. These uncoordinated events
may ultimately lead to cell death.
A requirement for the Plks to promote the onset of cytokinesis has been
suggested in various organisms (for review, see Ref. 10). However, it
has not been clear whether Plk1 directly contributes to cytokinesis in
mammalian cells. The plk1 N-expressing cells exhibited aborted cytokinesis with partial contraction, although it
could be an indirect effect of a prolonged mitotic arrest. Interestingly, when mitotic block was bypassed, these cells exhibited a
failure in completion of cytokinesis. These data suggest that the
polo-box-dependent Plk1 activity is likely to be required in this process. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms as to how
Plk1 contributes to cytokinesis will require the identification of
polo-box-interacting proteins and additional Plk substrates important
for this event.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to T.-C. He and B. Vogelstein
for providing pShuttle-CMV and pAdEasy-1 plasmids, W. Dai, Tim Yen, and
H. Yu for providing BUB1, CDC20,
pCS2-BubR1/K795A, and pCS2-bubr1d constructs, and R.-H. Chen for providing an anti-Mad2 antibody. We also thank Douglas K. Ferris for communicating results before publication.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The on-line version of this article (available at
http://www.jbc.org) contains videos of cells
depicted in Fig. 4, A, B
(DsRed-centrin + EGFP-plk1 ), and C
(upper and lower) and Fig. 5D.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of
Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, NCI/NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike,
Bldg. 37, Rm. 3D25, Bethesda, MD 20892-4258. Tel.: 301-496-9635; Fax:
301-496-8419; E-mail: kyunglee@pop.nci.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202602200
2
Shin'ichi Saito, Keiju Kamijo, Veena Kapoor,
Jae-Seon Lee, and Tom Miki, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
APC, anaphase-promoting complex;
HA, hemagglutinin;
EGFP, enhanced green
fluorescent protein (GFP);
DAPI, 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole;
Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
PBT, phosphate-buffered saline;
m.o.i., multiplicity of infection.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sunkel, C. L.,
and Glover, D. M.
(1988)
J. Cell Sci.
89,
25-38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Llamazares, S.,
Moreira, A.,
Tavares, A.,
Girdham, C.,
Spruce, B. A.,
Gonzalez, C.,
Karess, R. E.,
Glover, D. M.,
and Sunkel, C. E.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
2153-2165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Qian, Y. W.,
Erikson, E., Li, C.,
and Maller, J. L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4262-4271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Lane, H. A.,
and Nigg, E. A.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
1701-1713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Cogswell, J. P.,
Brown, C. E.,
Bisi, J. E.,
and Neill, S. D.
(2000)
Cell Growth Differ.
11,
615-623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Kumagai, A.,
and Dunphy, W. G.
(1996)
Science
273,
1377-1380[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Kotani, S.,
Tugendreich, S.,
Fujii, M.,
Jorgensen, P.,
Watanabe, N.,
Hoog, C.,
Hieter, P.,
and Todokoro, K.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
371-380[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Morgan, D. O.
(1999)
Nat. Cell Biol.
1,
47-53
|
| 9.
|
Page, A. M.,
and Hieter, P.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68,
583-609[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Glover, D. M.,
Hagan, I. M.,
and Tavares, A. A. M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3777-3787[Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Donaldson, M. M.,
Tavares, A. A.,
Ohkura, H.,
Deak, P.,
and Glover, D. M.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
153,
663-676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Oakley, B. R.,
Oakley, C. E.,
Yoon, Y.,
and Jung, M. K.
(1990)
Cell
61,
1289-1301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Stearns, T.,
Evans, L.,
and Kirschner, M.
(1991)
Cell
65,
825-836[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Joshi, H. C.,
Palacios, M. J.,
McNamara, L.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1992)
Nature
356,
80-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Hoyt, M. A.,
Totis, L.,
and Roberts, B. T.
(1991)
Cell
66,
507-517[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Li, R.,
and Murray, A. W.
(1991)
Cell
66,
519-531[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Weiss, E.,
and Winey, M.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
111-123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Amon, A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9,
69-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Gorbsky, G. J.
(2001)
Curr. Biol.
11,
1001-1004[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Waters, J. C.,
Chen, R. H.,
Murray, A. W.,
and Salmon, E. D.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
1181-1191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Skoufias, D. A.,
Andreassen, P. R.,
Lacroix, F. B.,
Wilson, L.,
and Margolis, R. L.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
4492-4497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Tang, Z.,
Bharadwaj, R., Li, B.,
and Yu, H.
(2001)
Dev. Cell
1,
227-237[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Chan, G. K.,
Jablonski, S. A.,
Sudakin, V.,
Hittle, J. C.,
and Yen, T. J.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
941-954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Dobles, M.,
Liberal, V.,
Scott, M. L.,
Benezra, R.,
and Sorger, P. K.
(2000)
Cell
101,
635-645[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Hudson, J. W.,
Kozarova, A.,
Cheung, P.,
Macmillan, J. C.,
Swallow, C. J.,
Cross, J. C.,
and Dennis, J. W.
(2001)
Curr. Biol.
11,
441-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
He, T. C.,
Zhou, S.,
Costa, L. T. d.,
Yu, J.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2509-2514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Song, S.,
Grenfell, T. Z.,
Garfield, S.,
Erikson, R. L.,
and Lee, K. S.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
286-298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Lee, K. S.,
Yuan, Y.-L.,
Kuriyama, R.,
and Erikson, R. L.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
7143-7151[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Ohta, T.,
Essner, R.,
Ryu, J. H.,
Palazzo, R. E.,
Uetake, Y.,
and Kuriyama, R.
(2002)
J. Cell Biol.
156,
87-100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Errabolu, R.,
Sanders, M. A.,
and Salisbury, J. L.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
9-16[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Lee, K. S.,
Grenfell, T. Z.,
Yarm, F. R.,
and Erikson, R. L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9301-9306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Arnaud, L.,
Pines, J.,
and Nigg, E. A.
(1998)
Chromosoma (Berl.)
107,
424-429
|
| 33.
|
Golsteyn, R. M.,
Schultz, S. J.,
Bartek, J.,
Ziemiecki, A.,
Ried, T.,
and Nigg, E. A.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
1509-1517[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Gabrielli, B. G.,
Lee, M. S.,
Walker, D. H.,
Piwnica-Worms, H.,
and Maller, J. L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18040-18046[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Gu, Y.,
Rosenblatt, J.,
and Morgan, D. O.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
3995-4005[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Wei, Y., Yu, L. L.,
Bowen, J.,
Gorovsky, M. A.,
and Allis, C. D.
(1999)
Cell
97,
99-109[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Hwang, L. H.,
Lau, L. F.,
Smith, D. L.,
Mistrot, C. A.,
Hardwick, K. G.,
Hwang, E. S.,
Amon, A.,
and Murray, A. W.
(1998)
Science
279,
1041-1044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Schott, E. J.,
and Hoyt, M. A.
(1998)
Genetics
148,
599-610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Zhang, Y.,
and Lees, E.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
5190-5199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Taylor, S. S.,
and McKeon, F.
(1997)
Cell
89,
727-735[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Budde, P. P.,
Kumagai, A.,
Dunphy, W. G.,
and Heald, R.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
153,
149-158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Mundt, K. E.,
Golsteyn, R. M.,
Lane, H. A.,
and Nigg, E. A.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
239,
377-385[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kishi, M. A. T. M. van Vugt, K.-i. Okamoto, Y. Hayashi, and M. B. Yaffe
Functional Dynamics of Polo-Like Kinase 1 at the Centrosome
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 1, 2009;
29(11):
3134 - 3150.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Watanabe, T. Sekine, M. Takagi, J.-i. Iwasaki, N. Imamoto, H. Kawasaki, and H. Osada
Deficiency in Chromosome Congression by the Inhibition of Plk1 Polo Box Domain-dependent Recognition
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 23, 2009;
284(4):
2344 - 2353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Chi, K. Haller, M. D. Ward, O. J. Semmes, Y. Li, and K.-T. Jeang
Requirements for Protein Phosphorylation and the Kinase Activity of Polo-like Kinase 1 (Plk1) for the Kinetochore Function of Mitotic Arrest Deficiency Protein 1 (Mad1)
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 19, 2008;
283(51):
35834 - 35844.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-Y. Lu, J. L. Wood, K. Minter-Dykhouse, L. Ye, T. L. Saunders, X. Yu, and J. Chen
Polo-Like Kinase 1 Is Essential for Early Embryonic Development and Tumor Suppression
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 15, 2008;
28(22):
6870 - 6876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Asiedu, D. Wu, F. Matsumura, and Q. Wei
Phosphorylation of MyoGEF on Thr-574 by Plk1 Promotes MyoGEF Localization to the Central Spindle
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2008;
283(42):
28392 - 28400.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Archambault, P. P. D'Avino, M. J. Deery, K. S. Lilley, and D. M. Glover
Sequestration of Polo kinase to microtubules by phosphopriming-independent binding to Map205 is relieved by phosphorylation at a CDK site in mitosis
Genes & Dev.,
October 1, 2008;
22(19):
2707 - 2720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Umeyama and C. C. Wang
Polo-Like Kinase Is Expressed in S/G2/M Phase and Associated with the Flagellum Attachment Zone in both Procyclic and Bloodstream Forms of Trypanosoma brucei
Eukaryot. Cell,
September 1, 2008;
7(9):
1582 - 1590.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Ludlow, M. K. Lo, J. J. Rodriguez, P. A. Rota, and C. M. Horvath
Henipavirus V Protein Association with Polo-Like Kinase Reveals Functional Overlap with STAT1 Binding and Interferon Evasion
J. Virol.,
July 1, 2008;
82(13):
6259 - 6271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. P. Seeburg and M. Sheng
Activity-Induced Polo-Like Kinase 2 Is Required for Homeostatic Plasticity of Hippocampal Neurons during Epileptiform Activity
J. Neurosci.,
June 25, 2008;
28(26):
6583 - 6591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Nishi, E. Rogers, S. M. Robertson, and R. Lin
Polo kinases regulate C. elegans embryonic polarity via binding to DYRK2-primed MEX-5 and MEX-6
Development,
February 15, 2008;
135(4):
687 - 697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Fink, K. Sanders, A. Rippl, S. Finkernagel, T. L. Beckers, and M. Schmidt
Cell type dependent effects of Polo-like kinase 1 inhibition compared with targeted polo box interference in cancer cell lines
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
December 1, 2007;
6(12):
3189 - 3197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Santamaria, R. Neef, U. Eberspacher, K. Eis, M. Husemann, D. Mumberg, S. Prechtl, V. Schulze, G. Siemeister, L. Wortmann, et al.
Use of the Novel Plk1 Inhibitor ZK-Thiazolidinone to Elucidate Functions of Plk1 in Early and Late Stages of Mitosis
Mol. Biol. Cell,
October 1, 2007;
18(10):
4024 - 4036.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Matsumura, F. Toyoshima, and E. Nishida
Polo-like Kinase 1 Facilitates Chromosome Alignment during Prometaphase through BubR1
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 18, 2007;
282(20):
15217 - 15227.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Burkard, C. L. Randall, S. Larochelle, C. Zhang, K. M. Shokat, R. P. Fisher, and P. V. Jallepalli
Chemical genetics reveals the requirement for Polo-like kinase 1 activity in positioning RhoA and triggering cytokinesis in human cells
PNAS,
March 13, 2007;
104(11):
4383 - 4388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Lansing, R. T. McConnell, D. R. Duckett, G. M. Spehar, V. B. Knick, D. F. Hassler, N. Noro, M. Furuta, K. A. Emmitte, T. M. Gilmer, et al.
In vitro biological activity of a novel small-molecule inhibitor of polo-like kinase 1
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
February 1, 2007;
6(2):
450 - 459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-J. Jang, J.-H. Ji, Y.-C. Choi, C. J. Ryu, and S.-Y. Ko
Regulation of Polo-like Kinase 1 by DNA Damage in Mitosis: INHIBITION OF MITOTIC PLK-1 BY PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2A
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 26, 2007;
282(4):
2473 - 2482.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N.-K. Soung, Y. H. Kang, K. Kim, K. Kamijo, H. Yoon, Y.-S. Seong, Y.-L. Kuo, T. Miki, S. R. Kim, R. Kuriyama, et al.
Requirement of hCenexin for Proper Mitotic Functions of Polo-Like Kinase 1 at the Centrosomes
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 15, 2006;
26(22):
8316 - 8335.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Jiang, X. Wang, M. Jhanwar-Uniyal, Z. Darzynkiewicz, and W. Dai
Polo Box Domain of Plk3 Functions as a Centrosome Localization Signal, Overexpression of Which Causes Mitotic Arrest, Cytokinesis Defects, and Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 14, 2006;
281(15):
10577 - 10582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Astrinidis, W. Senapedis, and E. P. Henske
Hamartin, the tuberous sclerosis complex 1 gene product, interacts with polo-like kinase 1 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
January 15, 2006;
15(2):
287 - 297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Kumar and C. C. Wang
Dissociation of Cytokinesis Initiation from Mitotic Control in a Eukaryote
Eukaryot. Cell,
January 1, 2006;
5(1):
92 - 102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hanisch, A. Wehner, E. A. Nigg, and H. H.W. Sillje
Different Plk1 Functions Show Distinct Dependencies on Polo-Box Domain-mediated Targeting
Mol. Biol. Cell,
January 1, 2006;
17(1):
448 - 459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Guan, P. Tapang, J. D. Leverson, D. Albert, V. L. Giranda, and Y. Luo
Small Interfering RNA-Mediated Polo-Like Kinase 1 Depletion Preferentially Reduces the Survival of p53-Defective, Oncogenic Transformed Cells and Inhibits Tumor Growth in Animals
Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2005;
65(7):
2698 - 2704.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Tsvetkov and D. F. Stern
Interaction of Chromatin-associated Plk1 and Mcm7
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 25, 2005;
280(12):
11943 - 11947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Rapley, J. E. Baxter, J. Blot, S. L. Wattam, M. Casenghi, P. Meraldi, E. A. Nigg, and A. M. Fry
Coordinate Regulation of the Mother Centriole Component Nlp by Nek2 and Plk1 Protein Kinases
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
February 15, 2005;
25(4):
1309 - 1324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-E. Park, C. J. Park, K. Sakchaisri, T. Karpova, S. Asano, J. McNally, Y. Sunwoo, S.-H. Leem, and K. S. Lee
Novel Functional Dissection of the Localization-Specific Roles of Budding Yeast Polo Kinase Cdc5p
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 15, 2004;
24(22):
9873 - 9886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. T. M. van Vugt, B. C. M. van de Weerdt, G. Vader, H. Janssen, J. Calafat, R. Klompmaker, R. M. F. Wolthuis, and R. H. Medema
Polo-like Kinase-1 Is Required for Bipolar Spindle Formation but Is Dispensable for Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cdc20 Activation and Initiation of Cytokinesis
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 27, 2004;
279(35):
36841 - 36854.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Liu, A. L. Lewellyn, L. G. Chen, and J. L. Maller
The Polo Box Is Required for Multiple Functions of Plx1 in Mitosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 14, 2004;
279(20):
21367 - 21373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Einarson, E. Cukierman, D. A. Compton, and E. A. Golemis
Human Enhancer of Invasion-Cluster, a Coiled-Coil Protein Required for Passage through Mitosis
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 1, 2004;
24(9):
3957 - 3971.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Park, S. Song, T. H. Giddings Jr., H.-S. Ro, K. Sakchaisri, J.-E. Park, Y.-S. Seong, M. Winey, and K. S. Lee
Requirement for Bbp1p in the Proper Mitotic Functions of Cdc5p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Biol. Cell,
April 1, 2004;
15(4):
1711 - 1723.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Chen, A. Purohit, E. Halilovic, S. J. Doxsey, and A. C. Newton
Centrosomal Anchoring of Protein Kinase C {beta}II by Pericentrin Controls Microtubule Organization, Spindle Function, and Cytokinesis
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 6, 2004;
279(6):
4829 - 4839.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Lindon and J. Pines
Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute to proper mitotic exit in human cells
J. Cell Biol.,
January 19, 2004;
164(2):
233 - 241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-S. Seong, C. Min, L. Li, J. Y. Yang, S.-Y. Kim, X. Cao, K. Kim, S. H. Yuspa, H.-H. Chung, and K. S. Lee
Characterization of a Novel Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1 Inhibitor, BMI-1026
Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2003;
63(21):
7384 - 7391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-R. Lin, N. S. Y. Ting, J. Qin, and W.-H. Lee
M Phase-specific Phosphorylation of BRCA2 by Polo-like Kinase 1 Correlates with the Dissociation of the BRCA2-P/CAF Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 19, 2003;
278(38):
35979 - 35987.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Neef, C. Preisinger, J. Sutcliffe, R. Kopajtich, E. A. Nigg, T. U. Mayer, and F. A. Barr
Phosphorylation of mitotic kinesin-like protein 2 by polo-like kinase 1 is required for cytokinesis
J. Cell Biol.,
September 1, 2003;
162(5):
863 - 876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Aumais, S. N. Williams, W. Luo, M. Nishino, K. A. Caldwell, G. A. Caldwell, S.-H. Lin, and L.-y. Yu-Lee
Role for NudC, a dynein-associated nuclear movement protein, in mitosis and cytokinesis
J. Cell Sci.,
May 15, 2003;
116(10):
1991 - 2003.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gromley, A. Jurczyk, J. Sillibourne, E. Halilovic, M. Mogensen, I. Groisman, M. Blomberg, and S. Doxsey
A novel human protein of the maternal centriole is required for the final stages of cytokinesis and entry into S phase
J. Cell Biol.,
May 12, 2003;
161(3):
535 - 545.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Reynolds and H. Ohkura
Polo boxes form a single functional domain that mediates interactions with multiple proteins in fission yeast polo kinase
J. Cell Sci.,
April 1, 2003;
116(7):
1377 - 1387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. H. Elia, L. C. Cantley, and M. B. Yaffe
Proteomic Screen Finds pSer/pThr-Binding Domain Localizing Plk1 to Mitotic Substrates
Science,
February 21, 2003;
299(5610):
1228 - 1231.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-J. Jang, S. Ma, Y. Terada, and R. L. Erikson
Phosphorylation of Threonine 210 and the Role of Serine 137 in the Regulation of Mammalian Polo-like Kinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 8, 2002;
277(46):
44115 - 44120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|