![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 36, 32409-32412, September 6, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12 but Not G
13 to Lipid Rafts*
From the Metabolic Diseases Branch, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, July 1, 2002, and in revised form, July 11, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The heterotrimeric G proteins, G12
and G13, are closely related in their sequences, signaling
partners, and cellular effects such as oncogenic transformation and
cytoskeletal reorganization. Yet G12 and G13
can act through different pathways, bind different proteins, and show
opposing actions on some effectors. We investigated the
compartmentalization of G12 and G13 at the
membrane because other G proteins reside in lipid rafts, membrane
microdomains enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids. Lipid rafts
were isolated after cold, nonionic detergent extraction of cells and
gradient centrifugation. G Heterotrimeric G proteins,1
consisting of A recent report shows that G Compartmentalization of eukaryotic cell membranes into dynamic
microdomains, referred to as lipid rafts, has been detected in numerous
studies using different methodologies (23-25). These microdomains are
enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids and can be isolated by their
resistance to cold, nonionic detergent extraction. Proteins modified
with multiple acyl chains or glycosylphosphatidylinositol groups are
targeted to lipid rafts (23, 26). The G We investigated the lipid raft localization of G Materials--
The QE antibody specific for
G Cell Culture and Treatment with Methyl- Preparation of Detergent-resistant Membranes (DRMs)--
DRMs
were prepared as described previously with some modifications (36).
Cells were washed twice and harvested in ice-cold phosphate-buffered
saline (pH 7.4). Cell pellets were obtained by centrifugation at
1,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The cell pellet was
suspended in phosphate-buffered saline, and the protein concentration was determined (Bio-Rad). An aliquot of the cell suspension
corresponding to 1 mg of protein was centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The cell pellet was resuspended in
0.5 ml of TNET buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100)
containing protease inhibitors, incubated on ice for 20 min, and then
homogenized with 10 strokes in a Dounce homogenizer. The cell lysate
was adjusted to 35% OptiPrep and overlaid with 3.0 ml of 30% OptiPrep
in TNET and then with 200 µl of 5% OptiPrep in TNET in Beckman SW55
tubes. Samples were centrifuged for 4 h at 170,000 × g at 4 °C and fractionated from the top (0.52 ml each for
a total of nine fractions). The pellet was suspended in 0.52 ml of TNET
buffer. SDS sample buffer containing 2-mercaptoethanol was added to
aliquots of each fraction of the gradient.
Subcellular Fractionation and Triton X-100 Solubilization
Experiments--
NIH 3T3 cells expressing the wild-type
G Immunoblotting and Miscellaneous Procedures--
Equal volumes
of gradient fractions were loaded on 12% polyacrylamide gels (Novex
precast gels, Invitrogen) and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting
using Enhanced Chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences) for detection
of the antibodies per the manufacturer's directions. Densitometry was
performed using a UMAX scanner (model UTA-II) and Scion Image software.
DRM Partitioning of G Acylation and the DRM Localization of G
Given the importance of the cysteine site of acylation for the DRM
partitioning of G Hsp90 Interactions--
Hsp90 binds to G
We also tested the effect of geldanamycin treatment on the DRM
localization of the nonpalmitoylated C11S mutant of G
We investigated whether Hsp90 interactions maintain G
To our knowledge, this is the first report of a change in lipid raft
localization after disruption of Hsp90 binding. Hsp90 is an abundant
cytosolic protein that is not directly targeted to lipid rafts so its
role in the targeting of G The Higher Molecular Weight Form of G
The correlation of the loss of G Functional Implications--
Signal transduction requires not only
affinity between molecules but also proximity. Some of the defects seen
in G12 signaling after mutation of Cys-11, which prevents
palmitoylation (32, 33), or geldanamycin treatment, which blocks Hsp90
interactions (18, 21), may be due to mistargeting of G
Heterogeneity and compartmentalization within cellular membranes can
also keep signaling partners apart to prevent interactions and increase
the specificity of signaling. The differential membrane targeting of
G
G12 and G13 are like fraternal twins, similar
but different. Our finding that they play their roles at different
sites on the membrane gives a framework for understanding their
regulation and the unfolding story of Hsp90 and G12
signaling. More studies are needed to discover the ramifications of
their interactions and membrane targeting for G protein signaling.
12 was in the lipid raft
fractions, whereas G
13 was not associated with lipid
rafts. Mutation of Cys-11 on G
12, which prevents
its palmitoylation, partially shifted G
12 from the lipid
rafts. Geldanamycin treatment, which specifically inhibits Hsp90,
caused a partial loss of wild-type G
12 and a complete
loss of the Cys-11 mutant from the lipid rafts and the appearance of a
higher molecular weight form of G
12 in the soluble fractions. These results indicate that acylation and Hsp90 interactions localized G
12 to lipid rafts. Hsp90 may act as both a
scaffold and chaperone to maintain a functional G
12 only
in discrete membrane domains and thereby explain some of the
nonoverlapping functions of G12 and G13 and
control of these potent cell regulators.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
,
, and
subunits, act as molecular switches
that transmit signals from heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors at
the cell surface to intracellular effectors (1). This family of
proteins can be divided into four groups, Gs,
Gi, Gq, and G12, based on sequence
homology of their
subunits. The G12 proteins,
G
12 and G
13, are ubiquitously expressed
and share 67% amino acid sequence identity (2). Both G12
and G13 can couple to the same receptors, bind to the same RGS (regulators of G protein signaling) proteins, regulate the same downstream pathways, and produce the same effects such as cytoskeletal rearrangements, oncogenic transformation, and apoptosis (2-8). However, despite these appearances, the cellular and
physiologic functions of G
12 and G
13 do
not completely overlap. They act through different pathways to regulate
Na+/H+ exchange (9), activate serum response
factor (10), and form Rho-dependent actin stress fibers (6,
11). G
12 is more potent in inducing oncogenic
transformation (12), and G
13 is more potent in inducing
apoptosis (8). Between G
12 and G
13,
G
12 regulates paracellular permeability (13), and
G
13 activates depolarizing chloride channels (14) and
stimulates p115 RhoGEF to catalyze nucleotide exchange on Rho (15). The
most striking difference is that G
13-deficient mice die
at midgestation with defects in angiogenesis (16), whereas
G
12-deficient mice are alive and without an obvious
phenotype (17).
12 interacts with Hsp90
(heat shock protein of 90 kDa), and this interaction is required for G
12 signaling (18). The Hsp90 interaction was specific
for G
12 because G
13 did not bind or show
functional interactions with Hsp90. Hsp90 is an abundant and
ubiquitously expressed molecular chaperone with the unique property of
binding and maintaining the activity of numerous signal transduction
proteins (19, 20) including steroid hormone receptors, signaling
kinases, nitric-oxide synthase, and thrombin receptors (21). Recently
Hsp90 was discovered to serve as a scaffold to promote the interactions
of the Akt kinase and its substrate, endothelial nitric-oxide synthase,
through their binding to two of the multiple protein binding sites on Hsp90 (22).
subunits of the
Gs, Gi, and Gq classes undergo
palmitoylation and/or myristoylation on their amino-terminal ends (27)
and localize to lipid rafts (28-31). G
12 and
G
13 also undergo palmitoylation, the reversible addition
of palmitate to cysteine residues through a thioester bond (32-35). A
single cysteine residue (Cys-11) for G
12 (32, 33) and
two or three cysteine residues (Cys-14, Cys-18, and Cys-37) for
G
13 are critical for this posttranslational modification (34, 35).
12 and
G
13 to better understand the different signaling
functions of these proteins. We found a distinct segregation of
G
12 and G
13 at the membrane.
G
13 was not in lipid rafts, whereas G
12
was in lipid rafts with both acylation and Hsp90 interactions critical for this targeting.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
12, HD antibody specific for G
13, AS
antibody specific for G
i, and SW antibody specific for G
were prepared by immunizing rabbits with the
carboxyl-terminal peptide sequence of the respective subunits
and affinity-purified. Antibodies against the following proteins were
purchased: G
12 and G
13 against their
amino-terminal sequences and Fyn (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), caveolin
and Hsp90 (BD PharMingen), and
Na+/K+-ATPase (Biomol Research
Laboratories). OptiPrep was purchased from Invitrogen. Geldanamycin was
obtained from Tocris Cookson Inc. MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, was
from Calbiochem. Methyl-
-cyclodextrin, hydrocortisone, and epidermal
growth factor were from Sigma.
-cyclodextrin and
Geldanamycin--
Simian kidney (COS-7) and human
embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagles medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. Human dermal
microvascular endothelial cells that were transformed with SV-40
(HMEC1) (Biological Products Branch, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, GA) were maintained in MCBD 131 medium
supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, hydrocortisone (1 µg/ml),
and epidermal growth factor (0.01 mg/ml). NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts
that were stably transfected with wild-type and mutant plasmids of
G
12 were prepared and maintained as described previously
(32). In geldanamycin experiments, cells were incubated in serum-free
medium for 1 h and preincubated with 10 µM MG132 for
10 min, and then 1 µg/ml geldanamycin was added and incubated for
1 h. In cholesterol depletion experiments, COS cells were
preincubated with serum-free medium for 2 h and then treated with
20 mM methyl-
-cyclodextrin in serum-free medium at
37 °C for 30 min.
12 or COS cells were homogenized in TNE buffer
(TNET without Triton X-100) containing protease inhibitors by passing
through a 25-gauge needle 12 times. The particulate and soluble
fractions were separated by centrifugation at 125,000 × g for 1 h. Aliquots of soluble and particulate
fractions were treated with 200 µM MG132 for 10 min and
then treated with 20 µg/ml of geldanamycin for 1 h. Triton X-100
was added to give a final concentration of 0.5% and incubated at
4 °C for 20 min, then diluted 3-fold in TNE buffer, and
further incubated for 4 h. Detergent-soluble and -insoluble
fractions were separated by centrifugation at 15,000 × g and analyzed by immunoblotting.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
12 but Not
G
13--
To determine whether G
12 and
G
13 reside in lipid rafts, we prepared DRMs by treatment
of COS cells with 0.5% Triton X-100 and centrifugation on an OptiPrep
gradient. Caveolin, Fyn, and G
i were found in fractions
1 and 2 consistent with their known partitioning to DRMs and
lipid rafts (Fig. 1A) (25).
Na+/K+-ATPase, an integral plasma membrane
protein not found in lipid rafts (36), was in the higher density
fractions 6-8. Endogenous G
12 was found in the DRM
fraction 1; G
13 was in the higher density fractions
7-9. We found the same pattern of partitioning after detergent
solubilization and gradient centrifugation for the endogenous G
12 and G
13 proteins in two other cell
lines, HMEC (Fig. 1B) and HEK293 (data not shown). In these
cells, G
12 and the lipid raft markers were in the DRM
fractions, and G
13 and
Na+/K+-ATPase were in the higher density
fractions. The partitioning of G
12 and the lipid
raft-associated proteins to the DRM fraction was abolished and
decreased, respectively, by treatment with 20 mM
methyl-
-cyclodextrin, which depletes cellular cholesterol and
disrupts lipid rafts (Fig. 1C). These results show
that G
12 segregates with proteins that prefer lipid
rafts and G
13 segregates with a plasma membrane protein
that avoids lipid rafts.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
DRM localization and
methyl-
-cyclodextrin treatment. COS-7
(A) and HMEC (B) cells were treated with 0.5%
Triton X-100 on ice, homogenized, and subjected to floatation on an
OptiPrep gradient and fractionated as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Equal volumes from each fraction were subjected to
SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with the carboxyl-terminal antibody
to G
12 or the amino-terminal antibody to
G
13. Immunoblotting was also carried out with antibodies
to the raft marker proteins, caveolin, G
i, and Fyn, and
a non-raft marker protein, Na+/K+-ATPase.
C, COS cells were incubated with 20 mM
methyl-
-cyclodextrin at 37 °C for 30 min and subjected to Triton
X-100 solubilization, OptiPrep density gradient centrifugation, and
immunoblotting as described above.
12 but Not
G
13--
We investigated the role of the cysteine site
of palmitoylation for targeting G
12 to lipid rafts.
Mutation of Cys-11 on G
12 prevents
[3H]palmitate incorporation, but the protein is still
found in the particulate fraction (32). Both the wild-type
G
12 and a GTPase-deficient mutant of G
12
(Q229L) were in the DRM fractions in transfected NIH 3T3 cells (Fig.
2A). Most of the nonpalmitoylated
C11S mutant of G
12 was shifted to the higher density
fractions (Fig. 2A). This result is consistent with other
studies showing that acylation can target proteins to lipid rafts (23,
26). Further mutation of the amino terminus of G
12 at
Ser-2 and Arg-6 changes the acylation to myristoylation (32) and
restored a small amount of the DRM localization of G
12
(Fig. 2A). Therefore, the less hydrophobic myristate on the
amino terminus could partially substitute for palmitate in targeting
G
12 to the DRM fractions.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Lipid raft localization of wild-type and
mutant G
12 in stably transfected
NIH 3T3 cells. A, NIH 3T3 cells expressing wild-type
G
12 and its mutants were homogenized in cold 0.5%
Triton X-100 and separated into gradient fractions as described in the
Fig. 1 legend. The antibody to the carboxyl terminus of
G
12 was used for all the G
12-expressing
cells except the C11S mutant for which the amino-terminal antibody was
used. B, NIH 3T3 cells transfected with wild-type
G
12 were prepared as described above. Immunoblotting was
performed with antibodies to G
13 (amino-terminal
antibody), caveolin, G
i, and
Na+/K+-ATPase. C, NIH 3T3 cells
stably transfected with vector alone (V) or containing the
cDNA of the wild-type (WT) or mutant G
12
proteins (C11S or S2G,C11S) were homogenized, and 40 µg of
protein from the total cell lysate were separated by SDS-PAGE and
analyzed by immunoblotting with either carboxyl- (C-term Ab)
or amino-terminal (N-term Ab) antibodies to
G
12.
12 and the lipid raft localization of other biacylated G
subunits including G
i in this
study (29-31), we were surprised that G
12 with only one
putative acylation site (32, 33) was in the DRM fraction and that
G
13 with two or three putative acylation sites (34, 35)
was in the higher density fractions. Not all palmitoylated proteins
reside in lipid rafts (37), and the stoichiometry of palmitoylation on
G
13 is not known, but our present result suggests that
G
13 evades lipid rafts. Clearly further studies are
required to understand the interaction that may prevent
G
13 targeting to lipid rafts.
12 but
not G
13 (18), and Hsp90 can be part of a complex
with caveolin (38). Therefore, we investigated whether Hsp90 may be
involved in the targeting of G
12, but not G13, to the DRM fractions. To probe the interaction between
G
12 and Hsp90, we used geldanamycin, a fungal
benzoquinone ansamycin, that specifically and tightly binds to the ATP
binding site in Hsp90 and inhibits the ability of Hsp90 to form
complexes with its substrate proteins (20). We included the proteasome
inhibitor MG132 (39) because geldanamycin can increase protein
degradation through the ubiquitin/proteosomal pathway (19, 40).
Treatment with MG132 alone did not change the DRM localization of
G
12 (data not shown). Geldanamycin and MG132 treatment
of COS cells displaced G
12 from the DRM fractions and
led to the appearance of a 220-kDa band in fractions 6-9 (Fig.
3A). Densitometric analysis showed a loss of G
12 from the DRM fraction of about 60 ± 10% (mean ± S.E. for three experiments) for cells treated
with geldanamycin plus MG132 compared with cells treated with vehicle
alone. The lipid raft localization of caveolin, G
i,
G
, and Fyn was not changed by geldanamycin treatment (Fig.
3B). Likewise, geldanamycin treatment did not alter the
localization of G
13 (Fig. 3B) and Na+/K+-ATPase (data not shown) to the higher
density fractions. Only a trivial amount of Hsp90 was found in the DRM
fraction, consistent with a previous report (41) and with the cytosolic
location of this abundant protein (Fig. 3B) (19, 20). Hsp90
was not found in the DRMs after geldanamycin treatment. Treatment with geldanamycin alone or with MG132 did not change the total amount of
G
12 (data not shown) in agreement with a previous report
(18). These results indicate that the loss of G
12 from
the DRM fractions after geldanamycin treatment was not due to a general
disruption of lipid rafts or degradation of G
12 but
rather suggest it was due to a loss of Hsp90 binding.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Geldanamycin treatment of COS cells.
A, COS cells were preincubated with 10 µM MG132 for 10 min, and then treated with 1 µg/ml
geldanamycin for 1 h. Cells underwent cold detergent extraction
and OptiPrep gradient centrifugation as described in the Fig. 1 legend.
Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with a mixture
of carboxyl- and amino-terminal antibodies against G
12.
B, immunoblotting was also carried out with antibodies to
caveolin, G
i, G
, Fyn, G
13
(amino-terminal antibody), and Hsp90.
12
to determine the relationship between acylation and Hsp90 binding in
the lipid raft localization of G
12. Geldanamycin
treatment of the transfected NIH 3T3 cells led to a further loss of the nonpalmitoylated C11S mutant from the DRM fraction so that the mutant
G
12 was only in the higher density fractions (Fig.
4A). An increase in the intensity
of the 220-kDa band was also seen after geldanamycin treatment in these
cells. This result indicates that acylation and Hsp90 binding act
independently to promote the DRM localization of
G
12.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Geldanamycin treatment of intact NIH 3T3
cells and its subcellular fractions. A, NIH 3T3 cells
expressing C11S mutant were preincubated with 10 µM MG132
for 10 min and then treated with 1 µg/ml geldanamycin for 1 h.
Cells underwent cold detergent extraction and were subjected to
OptiPrep gradient centrifugation as in Fig. 1. A mixture of carboxyl-
and amino-terminal antibodies was used to detect G
12.
B, NIH 3T3 cells expressing wild-type G
12 were
homogenized and separated into cytosol and crude membrane fractions by
centrifugation. Aliquots of these fractions were treated with 200 µM MG132 for 10 min and then treated with 20 µg/ml
geldanamycin (GA) for 1 h. Triton X-100 at a final
concentration of 0.5% was added and incubated at 4 °C for 20 min,
then diluted 3-fold with TNE buffer, and further incubated for
4 h. Triton X-100-soluble (S) and -insoluble
(P) fractions were separated by centrifugation and analyzed
by immunoblotting with a mixture of carboxyl- and amino-terminal
antibodies to G
12.
12
at lipid rafts. The crude membrane fraction of NIH 3T3 cells stably transfected with wild-type G
12 was treated with
geldanamycin and MG132 followed by solubilization with Triton X-100
under conditions similar to DRM preparation. Geldanamycin treatment
increased the detergent solubility of G
12 (Fig.
4B, membrane) suggesting that Hsp90 interactions
maintain G
12 in the lipid rafts in addition to any
possible role in directing G
12 to these membrane microdomains.
12 would be either 1)
maintenance of G
12 in a conformation that permits direct
interaction of G
12 with lipids and proteins in lipid
rafts or 2) formation of a complex with proteins that have a high
affinity for lipid rafts. In regard to the latter, Hsp90 has multiple
protein binding sites (22) and readily forms complexes with other
proteins including proteins that directly associate with lipid rafts
(38) or translocate to lipid rafts (41).
12--
The
presence of a 220-kDa band detected with an antibody to
G
12 in the high density fractions after geldanamycin and
MG132 treatment is a novel finding. Higher molecular weight bands of G
13 were not detected after geldanamycin treatment with
antibodies to the amino and carboxyl terminus of G
13
(data not shown). The 220-kDa band was not due to immunoreactivity of
another protein that is expressed after geldanamycin treatment because
we saw an increase in the 220-kDa band after geldanamycin treatment of the cytosolic fractions of NIH 3T3 cells transfected with the wild-type
G
12 (Fig. 4B, cytosol) or COS
cells (data not shown). The relative amounts of the 43- and 220-kDa
bands could not be determined because the antibody to the amino
terminus poorly detects the 43-kDa form probably because palmitoylation
obscured the epitope (Fig. 2B), and the antibody to the
carboxyl terminus did not detect the 220-kDa form (data not shown).
12 immunodetection at 43 kDa in the DRMs (Figs. 3A and 4A) with an
increase at 220 kDa suggests that this band is likely to contain the
G
12 protein, possibly as part of another protein or an
SDS-resistant aggregate or oligomer. Hsp90 as a molecular chaperone
maintains the proper folding of signal transduction proteins, which
have an inherent instability because they undergo conformational
changes as part of relaying signals (19). The presence of the 220-kDa
band after geldanamycin treatment suggests that Hsp90 may be preventing
aggregation of G
12.
12
away from its signaling partners. Concentrating G12 in
lipid rafts may significantly improve the kinetics of its signaling.
12 and G
13 may be responsible for
increased specificity of receptor coupling seen for G
12
and G
13 in intact cells under physiologic conditions
compared with results using cell membranes (11). Specific control of
the membrane location of G12 and G13 is
especially important because they are potent inducers of cell growth,
differentiation, shape change, and apoptosis. G12
interactions with Hsp90 may explain the tight regulation of
G12 signaling and the nonoverlapping functions of
G12 and G13 because Hsp90 is both a scaffold
and chaperone. If G
12 remains bound directly or
indirectly to Hsp90, it maintains a functional conformation to interact
with its signaling partners. If it strays from Hsp90 and its membrane microdomain, G
12 aggregates and loses activity.
G
12 would then only work when it is in the correct
location and thus effectively prevent random collisions with signaling
partners during diffusion in the membrane. The inability of
G
12 to compensate for the loss of G
13 in
the G
13-deficient mice (16) may be the result of its
poor mobility. Besides Hsp90, G
12 has also been found to interact with two other scaffold proteins in specialized cells (6,
13).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Fransisco Candal for the HMEC1 cells and Dr. Silvio Gutkind for valuable discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: National Institutes of
Health, Bldg. 10/Rm. 9C101, Bethesda, MD 20892-1802. E-mail: tlzj@helix.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C200383200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: G protein, guanine nucleotide-binding protein; Hsp90, heat shock protein of 90 kDa; HMEC, human dermal microvascular endothelial cells; DRM, detergent-resistant membrane.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hamm, H. E., and Gilchrist, A. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 189-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Dhanasekaran, N., and Dermott, J. M. (1996) Cell. Signal. 8, 235-245[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Kozasa, T.,
Jiang, X.,
Hart, M. J.,
Sternweis, P. M.,
Singer, W. D.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Bollag, G.,
and Sternweis, P. C.
(1998)
Science
280,
2109-2111 |
| 4. |
Buhl, A. M.,
Johnson, N. L.,
Dhanasekaran, N.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24631-24634 |
| 5. | Fukuhara, S., Chikumi, H., and Gutkind, J. S. (2000) FEBS Lett. 485, 183-188[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Diviani, D.,
Soderling, J.,
and Scott, J. D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
44247-44257 |
| 7. |
Meigs, T. E.,
Fields, T. A.,
McKee, D. D.,
and Casey, P. J.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
519-524 |
| 8. |
Althoefer, H.,
Eversole-Cire, P.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24380-24386 |
| 9. |
Dhanasekaran, N.,
Vara Prasad, M. V. V. S.,
Wadsworth, S. J.,
Dermott, J. M.,
and van Rossum, G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
11802-11806 |
| 10. |
Mao, J.,
Yuan, H.,
Xie, W.,
and Wu, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12973-12976 |
| 11. |
Gohla, A.,
Offermanns, S.,
Wilkie, T. M.,
and Schultz, G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17901-17907 |
| 12. | Vara Prasad, M. V. V. S., Shore, S. K., and Dhanasekaran, N. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2425-2429[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Meyer, T. N.,
Schwesinger, C.,
and Denker, B. M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
24855-24858 |
| 14. | Postma, F. R., Jalink, K., Hengeveld, T., Offermanns, S., and Moolenaar, W. H. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11, 121-124[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Hart, M. J.,
Jiang, X.,
Kozasa, T.,
Roscoe, W.,
Singer, W. D.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Sternweis, P. C.,
and Bollag, G.
(1998)
Science
280,
2112-2114 |
| 16. |
Offermanns, S.,
Mancino, V.,
Revel, J.-P.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1997)
Science
275,
533-536 |
| 17. | Offermanns, S. (2001) Oncogene 20, 1635-1642[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Vaiskunaite, R.,
Kozasa, T.,
and Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
46088-46093 |
| 19. |
Young, J. C.,
Moarefi, I.,
and Hartl, F. U.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
154,
267-273 |
| 20. | Richter, K., and Buchner, J. (2001) J. Cell. Physiol. 188, 281-290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Pai, K. S.,
Mahajan, V. B.,
Lau, A.,
and Cunningham, D. D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
32642-32647 |
| 22. |
Fontana, J.,
Fulton, D.,
Chen, Y.,
Fairchild, T. A.,
McCabe, T. J.,
Fujita, N.,
Tsuruo, T.,
and Sessa, W. C.
(2002)
Circ. Res.
90,
866-873 |
| 23. |
Brown, D. A.,
and London, E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
17221-17224 |
| 24. | Simons, K., and Toomre, D. (2000) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 31-39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Shaul, P. W., and Anderson, R. G. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, L843-L851 |
| 26. | Resh, M. D. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1451, 1-16[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Mumby, S. M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 148-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Miura, Y., Hanada, K., and Jones, T. L. Z. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 15418-15423[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Pike, L. J.,
and Miller, J. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22298-22304 |
| 30. |
Moffett, S.,
Brown, D. A.,
and Linder, M. E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2191-2198 |
| 31. |
Galbiati, F.,
Volonte, D.,
Meani, D.,
Milligan, G.,
Lublin, D. M.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Parenti, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5843-5850 |
| 32. | Jones, T. L. Z., and Gutkind, J. S. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3196-3202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Ponimaskin, E., Harteneck, C., Schultz, G., and Schmidt, M. F. G. (1998) FEBS Lett. 429, 370-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Ponimaskin, E., Behn, H., Adarichev, V., Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T. A., Offermanns, S., and Schmidt, M. F. G. (2000) FEBS Lett. 478, 173-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Bhattacharyya, R.,
and Wedegaertner, P. B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14992-14999 |
| 36. |
Lindwasser, O. W.,
and Resh, M. D.
(2001)
J. Virol.
75,
7913-7924 |
| 37. |
Melkonian, K. A.,
Ostermeyer, A. G.,
Chen, J. Z.,
Roth, M. G.,
and Brown, D. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3910-3917 |
| 38. |
Gratton, J.-P.,
Fontana, J.,
O'Connor, D. S.,
Garcia-Cardena, G.,
McCabe, T. J.,
and Sessa, W. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
22268-22272 |
| 39. | Lee, D. H., and Goldberg, A. L. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 397-403[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Busconi, L.,
Guan, J.,
and Denker, B. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1565-1569 |
| 41. |
Triantafilou, M.,
Miyake, K.,
Golenbock, D. T.,
and Triantafilou, K.
(2002)
J. Cell Sci.
115,
2603-2611 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Alaamery and C. S. Hoffman Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hsp90/Git10 Is Required for Glucose/cAMP Signaling Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 1927 - 1936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sabath, H. Negoro, S. Beaudry, M. Paniagua, S. Angelow, J. Shah, N. Grammatikakis, A. S. L. Yu, and B. M. Denker G{alpha}12 regulates protein interactions within the MDCK cell tight junction and inhibits tight-junction assembly J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2008; 121(6): 814 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Katz, P. Waridel, A. Shevchenko, and U. Pick Salt-induced Changes in the Plasma Membrane Proteome of the Halotolerant Alga Dunaliella salina as Revealed by Blue Native Gel Electrophoresis and Nano-LC-MS/MS Analysis Mol. Cell. Proteomics, September 1, 2007; 6(9): 1459 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Zhu, R. I. Tate, R. Ruediger, T. E. Meigs, and B. M. Denker Domains Necessary for G{alpha}12 Binding and Stimulation of Protein Phosphatase-2A (PP2A): Is G{alpha}12 a Novel Regulatory Subunit of PP2A? Mol. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 71(5): 1268 - 1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yang, S. Qu, M. Perez-Tores, A. Sawai, N. Rosen, D. B. Solit, and C. L. Arteaga Association with HSP90 Inhibits Cbl-Mediated Down-regulation of Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 66(14): 6990 - 6997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Andreeva, R. Vaiskunaite, M. A. Kutuzov, J. Profirovic, R. A. Skidgel, and T. Voyno-Yasenetskaya Novel Mechanisms of G Protein-Dependent Regulation of Endothelial Nitric-Oxide Synthase Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2006; 69(3): 975 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhai, D. Chaturvedi, and S. Cumberledge Drosophila Wnt-1 Undergoes a Hydrophobic Modification and Is Targeted to Lipid Rafts, a Process That Requires Porcupine J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33220 - 33227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Z. Gerges, I. C. Tran, D. S. Backos, J. M. Harrell, M. Chinkers, W. B. Pratt, and J. A. Esteban Independent Functions of hsp90 in Neurotransmitter Release and in the Continuous Synaptic Cycling of AMPA Receptors J. Neurosci., May 19, 2004; 24(20): 4758 - 4766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Luo and J. L. Benovic G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase Interaction with Hsp90 Mediates Kinase Maturation J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 50908 - 50914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Sreedhar, K. Mihaly, B. Pato, T. Schnaider, A. Stetak, K. Kis-Petik, J. Fidy, T. Simonics, A. Maraz, and P. Csermely Hsp90 Inhibition Accelerates Cell Lysis: ANTI-Hsp90 RIBOZYME REVEALS A COMPLEX MECHANISM OF Hsp90 INHIBITORS INVOLVING BOTH SUPEROXIDE- AND Hsp90-DEPENDENT EVENTS J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 35231 - 35240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hiol, P. C. Davey, J. L. Osterhout, A. A. Waheed, E. R. Fischer, C.-K. Chen, G. Milligan, K. M. Druey, and T. L. Z. Jones Palmitoylation Regulates Regulators of G-protein Signaling (RGS) 16 Function: I. MUTATION OF AMINO-TERMINAL CYSTEINE RESIDUES ON RGS16 PREVENTS ITS TARGETING TO LIPID RAFTS AND PALMITOYLATION OF AN INTERNAL CYSTEINE RESIDUE J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(21): 19301 - 19308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamaguchi, H. Katoh, and M. Negishi N-terminal Short Sequences of alpha Subunits of the G12 Family Determine Selective Coupling to Receptors J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 14936 - 14939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Holleran, E. Barbar, M. D. Payet, and G. Dupuis Differential recruitment of {alpha}2{beta}1 and {alpha}4{beta}1 integrins to lipid rafts in Jurkat T lymphocytes exposed to collagen type IV and fibronectin J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2003; 73(2): 243 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||