![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 36, 32624-32631, September 6, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the a Gastrointestinal Research Laboratory, Veterans
Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94121, the
Departments of e Medicine and g Anatomy, University of
California, San Francisco, California 94143, the f Gonda
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, House Ear Institute, and the
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Southern California,
Los Angeles, California 90057, and h Roche Bioscience,
Palo Alto, California 94304
Received for publication, January 11, 2002, and in revised form, June 4, 2002
MUC2 is a secretory mucin normally
expressed by goblet cells of the intestinal epithelium. It is
overexpressed in mucinous type colorectal cancers but down-regulated in
colorectal adenocarcinoma. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)
treatment of colon cancer cell lines increases MUC2
expression, so we have undertaken a detailed analysis of the effects of
PMA on the promoter activity of the 5'-flanking region of the
MUC2 gene using stably and transiently transfected promoter
reporter vectors. Protein kinase C inhibitors (bisindolylmaleimide, calphostin C) and inhibitors of
mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal regulated
kinase kinase (MEK) (PD98059 and U0126) suppressed up-regulation
of MUC2. Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor PP2, a protein
kinase A inhibitor (KT5720), and a p38 inhibitor (SB 203580) did not
affect transcription. Western blotting and reverse transcription-PCR
analysis confirmed these results. In addition, co-transfections with
mutants of Ras, Raf, and MEK showed that the induction of
MUC2 promoter activity by PMA required these three
signaling proteins. Our results demonstrate that PMA activates protein
kinase C, stimulating MAP kinase through a Ras- and
Raf-dependent mechanism. An important role for nuclear
factor Mucins are very large proteins featuring
O-glycosylated, tandemly repeated serine- and threonine-rich
regions. They are synthesized by the epithelial cells lining the
gastrointestinal, respiratory, and genitourinary tracts. Genomic and
cDNA sequencing has identified at least fifteen different mucin
genes, which encode either secretory or membrane-associated proteins
(1-3). Mucins are expressed in a characteristic tissue- and cell
type-specific manner. MUC2 is one of four structurally related but
differentially expressed secretory mucins located on chromosome 11p15.
Within the intestinal epithelium, MUC2 is highly expressed in goblet
cells but absent from the absorptive cell type (4-7). Altered
expression of mucin genes occurs in many epithelial cancers.
Specifically, low expression of MUC2 has been reported in colorectal
adenocarcinoma, whereas a very high level of MUC2 expression is
observed in mucinous colorectal carcinomas, a distinct histological
type of colorectal cancer (4, 5, 7, 8). However, relatively little is
known about the mechanisms responsible for regulation of
MUC2 gene expression in vivo.
Phorbol esters such as PMA1
function as tumor promoters and have been reported to modulate diverse
cellular responses such as gene transcription, cellular growth and
differentiation, programmed cell death, the immune response, and
receptor desensitization through protein kinase C (PKC) signaling
pathways. PMA can substitute for diacylglycerol, the endogenous
activator of PKC, and it has been used as a model agent to study the
mechanisms utilized by growth factors, hormones, and cytokines to
regulate growth and differentiation of cells (9-11). Phorbol esters,
as well as cytokines and bacterial lipopolysaccharides, have been shown
to up-regulate mucin genes (12-17). We recently reported that PMA
up-regulates several mucin genes, including MUC2, in colon
cancer cell lines (18). However, detailed analysis of the downstream
signaling pathways involved in PMA/PKC-induced up-regulation of
MUC2 has not been done. One well studied mode of
PKC-mediated signaling involves transmission of signals from PKC to
mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). MAPK activation by PMA has
been reported to occur via both Ras-dependent and
Ras-independent pathways: PC-12 rat adrenal pheochromocytoma (19, 20),
Jurkat leukemic T cells (21), and primary rat ventricular myocytes (22)
have exhibited Ras-dependent activation of MAPK by PMA; but
in NIH3T3 mouse myeloma cells (23), COS-1 (24), and 293 embryonal
kidney cell lines (25), this activation appears to be Ras-independent. Thus, the involvement of Ras in signaling processes initiated by PMA
appears to be cell type- dependent and specifically determined by which
signaling pathways have been activated and/or the cell's repertoire of kinases.
HM3 human colon cancer cell line contains the most common
K-ras mutation type found in colorectal cancers, the
glycine to aspartate mutation at codon 12. Because many growth factors
and cytokines utilize Ras-dependent signaling pathways,
this cell line serves as a model system for studying alterations in
gene expression that occur in the progression of colorectal cancers. In
this study we show that PMA stimulates expression of the
MUC2 gene in HM3 cells through activation of PKC. Such
MUC2 up-regulation is Ras- and Raf-dependent,
requires activation of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway, and ultimately
involves activation of a nuclear factor, NF- Materials--
TriReagent and PMA were obtained from Sigma.
Bisindolylmaleimide I, calphostin C, KT5720, PD98059, U0126, CAPE,
AG126, PP2, PP3, and SB203580 were purchased from Calbiochem.
Antibodies for ERK1/2 (p44/42 MAPK), SAPK/JNK, and p38 were purchased
from New England Biolabs/Cell Signaling. Secondary antibodies were
purchased from Zymed Laboratories Inc., South San
Francisco, CA. Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Operon, Alameda, CA.
Tissue Culture--
HM3, a subclone of the LS174T adenocarcinoma
cell line, was maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's minimum medium containing 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum with penicillin and streptomycin.
HM3 cells stably transfected with MUC2 promoter ( Inhibitor Assays--
The HM3M2 cells were serum-starved
overnight and then pretreated with inhibitors for 1 h before
exposure to 0.25 µM PMA for 4 h. Calphostin C was
used under a fluorescent lamp of 15 watts located 15 cm above the plates.
RNA Isolation and RT-PCR--
Total RNA was isolated using
TriReagent (Molecular Research Center Inc.), and 3 µg was primed with
random hexamers and reverse transcribed using Superscript II
(Invitrogen) in a final volume of 50 µl. One microliter of
this mixture was PCR-amplified in a 10-µl reaction using AmpliTaq DNA
polymerase (Applied Biosystems) with the addition of 5% dimethyl
sulfoxide. Primers for MUC2 were (forward) 5'-TGC CTG GCC
CTG TCT TTG-3' and (reverse) 5'-CAG CTC CAG CAT GAG TGC-3'. 18 S
rRNA was simultaneously amplified as an internal standard, using a 9:1
ratio of 3' blocked/unblocked (alternate) primers from Ambion
QuantumRNATM 18 S Internal Standards kit. The PCR
reaction mixture was denatured at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C
for 30 s. Alternatively, blocked and unblocked primers for
Plasmids, Transient Transfection, and Luciferase Reporter
Assays--
Plasmids were prepared using the Plasmid MAXI Prep Kit
from Qiagen. The expression vectors for Ha-Ras,
dominant-negative N17Ras, and constitutively activated v-Ha-Ras were a
gift from Geoffrey Cooper (Boston University, Boston, MA). HMEK1(K97R)
was a gift from Alan Saltiel (Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research
Division, Ann Arbor, MI). Expression vectors for wild type and
dominant-negative pp90rsk (pp90rsk Western Blotting--
After various treatments, total cell
lysates were prepared in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 0.4 mM EDTA, 2% SDS, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml
aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 0.4 mM sodium
orthovanadate, and 10 mM pyrophosphate. The protein
concentration of supernatant was determined by using the bicinchoninic
acid-based BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce). Equal amounts of protein
were subjected to 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
transferred to nitrocellulose (28), which was blocked with 3% bovine
serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 10 mM Tris-HCl
with 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), probed with specific primary
antibodies, washed with TBS containing 0.1% Tween, and then probed
with secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase.
Immunoreactive bands were visualized by chemiluminescence using the
Renaissance kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA)--
Nuclear
extracts were prepared according to Ref. 29. Protein concentrations
were determined using the Bradford Assay method (Bio-Rad). A
double-stranded oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the human
MUC2 promoter region from PMA Up-regulates MUC2 mRNA Level and Induces MUC2
Transcriptional Activity--
PMA increased MUC2 mRNA
in a time- and dose-dependent manner with the peak effect
at 4 h (Fig. 1A).
Densitometric analysis revealed that PMA caused a 4-fold increase in
mRNA levels after 4 h at 0.5 µM concentration
(Fig. 1B). In addition, PMA up-regulated transcriptional
activity of the MUC2 luciferase reporter in HM3M2 cells in a
dose-dependent manner up to 0.5 µM (Fig.
1C).
PMA Increases the Transcriptional Activity of MUC2
Promoter Reporter Constructs--
Transiently transfected
MUC2 promoter deletion constructs all showed significant
(p < 0.001) increases in activity upon treatment with
PMA (Fig. 2). As reported previously
(26), constructs containing sequence up-stream of base PKC but Not PKA Mediates the Activation of MUC2 Promoter Activity
by PMA--
Bisindolylmaleimide I is a highly selective cell-permeable
PKC inhibitor that acts as a competitive inhibitor for the ATP-binding site of PKC. 0.1 µM bisindolylmaleimide inhibited PMA
induction of MUC2 promoter activity by 80% (Fig.
3A). Another specific
inhibitor of PKC, calphostin C, also inhibited PMA-induced
MUC2 promoter activation by ~80%. RT-PCR was used to
confirm that bisindolylmaleimide and calphostin C also caused a
reduction in endogenous MUC2 transcript levels (Fig.
3B). It should be noted that in these experiments RT-PCR
provides a less sensitive measurement of the effects of PMA and
inhibitors due to the relatively high levels of MUC2 in untreated cells, resulting from the stable nature of the
MUC2 transcript (26). KT5720, a potent specific inhibitor of
PKA, did not inhibit the induced up-regulation of MUC2
promoter activity or message (Fig. 3). Similarly, Src-tyrosine kinase
inhibitor PP2 (0.5 µM) had no significant effect
(p < 0.05) on MUC2 promoter activity. PP3,
a negative control for PP2, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor
kinase inhibitor also failed to inhibit PMA-induced MUC2
up-regulation. Thus, PKC inhibitors were able to block the
up-regulation of MUC2 promoter activity, suggesting that
this kinase is responsible for PMA-induced MUC2
up-regulation.
Activation of MEK and ERK1/2 but Not p38 Mediates MUC2 Promoter
Activation by PMA--
To investigate the role of MEK, we used PD98059
and U0126 to selectively block the activity of MEK. These inhibitors
completely blocked MUC2 induction by PMA (Fig.
4A) and reduced
the level of endogenous MUC2 transcript, estimated using
RT-PCR (Fig. 4B). SB203580, a highly specific and
cell-permeable inhibitor of p38 MAP kinase, failed to inhibit the
MUC2 promoter activity induced by PMA (Fig. 4A).
AG126, an inhibitor of ERK2 tyrosine phosphorylation also significantly
inhibited PMA-induced MUC2 up-regulation in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4C). Because pp90rsk
is a possible downstream effector of ERK1/2 signaling,
dominant-negative pp90rsk was tested for its ability to block
PMA-stimulated MUC2 promoter activation (Fig.
4D). Surprisingly, no inhibition was observed. Results shown
are representative of four independent experiments.
The results obtained using MAP kinase inhibitors were confirmed with
Western blots using antibodies to phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2, p38,
and JNK. Fig. 5 shows that both ERK1
(p44) and especially ERK2 (p42) were phosphorylated within 10 min of
PMA treatment. p38 was shown to be constitutively phosphorylated in this cell line and slightly affected by PMA (not observed in all experiments). SAPK/JNK, which typically occurs as multiple bands due to
alternate splicing of long (p54) and short (p46) forms, exhibits some
basal phosphorylation, but this was unaffected. Lysates from
PD98059-treated cells served as a control showing no effect on p38 or
JNK but inhibiting ERK phosphorylation.
Involvement of MEK, Raf, and Ras in Induction of MUC2 Promoter
Activity by PMA--
Transient transfections with dominant-negative
MEK significantly (p < 0.001) inhibited basal and
PMA-stimulated activity of the MUC2 promoter. On the other
hand, transfection with wild-type MEK activated the MUC2
promoter in the absence of PMA, and this activation was not
significantly augmented by the addition of PMA (Fig.
6A). Transient
co-transfections with dominant-negative Raf completely blocked
PMA-mediated MUC2 induction in a dose-dependent manner
(Fig. 6B). MUC2 promoter reporter
co-transfections using wild-type Ha-Ras did not affect
transcriptional activities, with or without addition of PMA. On the
other hand, dominant-negative N17Ras inhibited both MUC2
promoter activation by PMA and basal promoter activity as well.
v-Ha-Ras induced a 5-fold increase in MUC2 transcription
rate, similar to levels observed upon PMA treatment. When HM3 cells
transfected with v-Ha-Ras were also treated with PMA, a
significant (p < 0.001) synergistic effect was
observed (Fig. 6C).
NF- In this study, we first determined that PMA increased
MUC2 message levels in HM3 cells. The transcriptional
activity of a MUC2 To identify the signaling pathways involved in PMA-mediated
MUC2 up-regulation, the effects of various chemical
inhibitors and dominant-negative expression vectors on PMA-stimulated
MUC2 transcription were measured. A schematic summary our
findings is shown in Fig. 8. As expected,
PKC inhibitors bisindolylmaleimide I and calphostin C blocked
MUC2 up-regulation by PMA, indicating that PKC activation by
phorbol ester is directly responsible for the induction of
MUC2 promoter activity. The induction of MUC2 transcription by PMA was not suppressed by either PKA inhibitor KT5720
or by Src type tyrosine kinase inhibitor PP2. The slight, significant
up-regulation by both KT5720 and EGF receptor kinase inhibitor PP3 are
consistent with relief of feedback inhibition of Raf by PKA (30). PP3
is used as a negative control for PP2; however, the failure of PP3 to
inhibit PMA-stimulated up-regulation also indicates that EGF receptor
transactivation via PMA-induced shedding of EGF likely does not occur.
The apparent lack of involvement of Src type tyrosine kinases is in
contrast to previous results obtained using the same cell line, which
showed that lipopolysaccharide-induced MUC2 up-regulation
was Src-dependent. This indicates that PKC phosphorylation
of Raf circumvents the requirement for Src-mediated phosphorylation of
Raf.
PKC-mediated activation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway has
been well studied, but the exact nature and order of events leading to
Raf activation remain to be fully elucidated, involving phosphorylation
reactions catalyzed by several kinases, conformational changes, and
translocation to the plasma membrane by Ras (30). Dominant-negative
N17Ras is a membrane-associated H-Ras with an asparagine-to-serine
substitution at codon 17, yielding a Ras protein with a high affinity
for GDP. The resulting N17Ras-GDP complex is thought to function as a
dominant-negative inhibitor of Ras activation through sequestration of
the guanine nucleotide exchange factor(s) required for normal GDP
release from the (inactive) Ras-GDP complex (31, 32). The ability of
N17Ras to inhibit PMA-mediated Raf activation has been reported to be
cell line-dependent (19-25). In the case of HM3 cells,
co-transfection with the dominant-negative mutant N17Ras was able to
inhibit basal as well as PMA-stimulated MUC2 transcription.
Thus Raf activation requires interaction with activated Ras and
phosphorylation by PMA-activated PKC. In addition, dominant-negative
Raf very effectively inhibited MUC2 transcriptional activity
induced by PMA. This inhibition occurred in a
dose-dependent fashion, demonstrating that Raf, along with
Ras, participates in MUC2 transcriptional activation by PMA
and that both are required.
Ras is thought to activate a number of signaling pathways, including
the Raf/MEK/ERK MAP kinase pathway, the MEKK/SEK/JNK pathway, a
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/NF- We were not able to demonstrate any PMA effect on SAPK/JNK. p38 was
shown to be constitutively activated in this cell line, and it showed a
small increase in phosphorylation upon by PMA treatment in some
experiments. However, the SB203580 inhibitor of p38 did not affect
MUC2 transcriptional activity, indicating that p38 is not
required for stimulation of MUC2 transcription. This is an
important observation because it has been shown that p38 is a
downstream kinase responsible for Raf-independent Ras activation of
NF- Inhibition of basal MUC2 transcription by N17Ras indicates
that there is some basal activation of Ras and downstream effectors, which may derive from the fact that HM3 cells express mutant G12D K-Ras. This glycine-to-aspartate mutant form of K-Ras is the most common form found in colorectal carcinomas, occurring more frequently than the more intensely studied G12V mutant forms. The G12D K-Ras has
been reported to be less active than the G12V forms and, consequently, has biological and biochemical properties intermediate to the wild-type
and G12V isoforms (37). It has also been reported that N17Ras will only
inhibit wild-type but not oncogenic Ras forms; the latter, because of
their very low GTPase activity, remain in the active GTP-bound form and
thus do not rely on exchange factors for reactivation. However, the
ability of N17Ras to inhibit basal MUC2 transcription
suggests that the G12D K-Ras form, because of its 4-fold higher GTPase
activity (37), is susceptible to inhibition by N17Ras.
The occurrence of the G12D K-Ras mutation in HM3 cells may be expected
to produce a low-level activation of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway and the
resulting basal MUC2 expression. Dominant-negative mutants
of both Raf and MEK, as well as MEK inhibitors PD98059 and UO126,
negatively affected basal as well as PMA-up-regulated MUC2
transcription, consistent with low-level constitutive activation of the
Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. Lending further support for this possibility is
the observation of low-level phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in Western blots
of lysates from untreated HM3 cells. Transfection with activated (G12V)
v-H-Ras produced an up-regulation of MUC2 transcription. The
ability of PMA to further up-regulate MUC2 transcription in the presence of v-H-Ras suggests that there may be further activation of the endogenous, functionally distinct K- and N-Ras isoforms or that
oncogenic v-H-Ras is capable of activating MUC2-responsive pathways that are not activated by wild-type Ras.
Many (>50) different proteins, including transcription factors and
kinases, have been identified as downstream targets of ERK1/2,
including S6 kinase p90rsk and EGF receptor, as well as transcription
factors such as Elk-1, Ets1, c-Myc, and signal transducer and activator
of transcription proteins (30, 33). Whereas dominant-negative pp90rsk
was previously shown to inhibit MUC2 transcription
stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (27), we were unable to demonstrate
the same effect on PMA-induced transcription. This indicates that
events downstream of ERK1/2 may be different for lipopolysaccharide
versus PMA. Thus, whereas pp90rsk was proposed to mediate
lipopolysaccharide-stimulated NF- Transcription factor NF- In conclusion, we demonstrate that treatment of HM3 cells with PMA
results in activation of PKC, stimulating the ERK MAP kinase pathway
and up-regulating MUC2 in a Ras- and
Raf-dependent manner. NF- We thank Drs. Roger H. Erickson and Guoren
Deng for helpful discussions, Drs. Geoffrey Cooper, Warner Greene, and
Alan Saltiel for plasmids, and James Hicks, Roy Lai, and Stacey Yang
for technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by the Department of Veterans
Affairs Medical Research Service, United States Public Health Service Grant CA 24321 from the National Institutes of Health and the Theodora
Betz Foundation Fund.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
b
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
c
Present address: Dept. of Surgery, Chunchon Sacred
Heart Hospital, Chunchon, Korea 200-060.
d
Present address: Dept. of Surgery, College of Medicine,
Pundang CHA Hospital, Kyonggi-do, 463-712, Korea.
i
Present address: Dept. of Medicine, Dong-A University
College of Medicine, Pusan, Korea 602-715.
j
Present address: Dept. of General Surgery, Hallym
University, Chunchon, Korea 431-070.
k
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Gastrointestinal
Research Laboratory (151M2), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA 94121. Tel.: 415-750-2095; Fax:
415-750-6972; E-mail: youngk@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200353200
2
H.-W. Lee, D.-H. Ahn, S. C. Crawley, J.-D. Li,
J. R. Gum, Jr., C. B. Basbaum, N. Q. Fan, D. E. Szymkowski, S.-Y.
Han, B. H. Lee, M. H. Sleisenger, and Y. S. Kim, unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
PMA, phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate;
PKC, protein kinase C;
MAPK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase;
PKA, protein kinase A;
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase;
MEK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase;
NF-
Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate Up-regulates the
Transcription of MUC2 Intestinal Mucin via Ras, ERK, and
NF-
B*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B (NF-
B) was also demonstrated using the inhibitor caffeic
acid phenethyl ester and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Such identification of pathways involved in MUC2 up-regulation
by PMA in the HM3 colon cancer cell line may serve as a model for the effects of cytokines and growth factors, which regulate
MUC2 expression during the progression of colorectal cancer.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2864/+19)
pGL2 (Promega) luciferase construct (HM3M2) were maintained in medium
containing 600 µg/ml G148 (Geneticin).
-actin (forward: 5'-ATC TGG CAC CAC ACC TTC TAC AAT GAG CTG C-3';
reverse: 5'-CGT CAT ACT CCT GCT TGC TGA TCC ACA TCT G-3') were used to
amplify this message as an internal control. All PCR products were
separated on ethidium bromide-stained gels, and band intensities were
integrated using NIH Image software.
C) were a gift from Warner Greene,
University of California San Francisco. MUC2 promoter
reporter assays employed pGL2 vector (Promega) containing various
regions of the MUC2 gene 5'-flanking sequence described
previously (26, 27). In addition, the MUC2 promoter region
1528/
1307, subcloned upstream of the thymidylate kinase promoter in
a luciferase expression vector TK-32, was used to evaluate the ability
of the NF-
B site to enhance transcription from a minimal promoter
(27). Cells were typically transfected in 12-well plates with 8.0 µl
of Superfect (Qiagen), plus 2 µg of test plasmid, and 0.1 µg of
pRLO (a promoterless Renilla luciferase vector; Promega) as
an internal control to correct for transfection efficiency. After 1 day
the cells were serum-starved overnight in 1.25% fetal bovine serum and
then treated with PMA or vehicle as indicated in the figure legends.
The cells were harvested and luciferase activities were measured using
dual LuciferaseTM Reporter Assay System (Promega) with
the Monolight 2010 Luminometer (Analytical Luminescent Laboratory).
Firefly luciferase activity measurements were normalized with respect
to pRLO Renilla luciferase activity to correct for
variations in transfection efficiency. Inhibitor experiments using
stably transfected HM3M2 cells were carried out similarly with
overnight serum starvation, 1 h of inhibitor pretreatment, and
then 4 h of PMA treatment. Promoter activity was assessed using
the Luciferase Assay Kit from Promega. Data is presented graphically as
the average of four replicates from a representative experiment with
standard deviation provided by error bars and statistical significance
determined by Student's t test with confidence levels
indicated in the figure legends.
1458 to
1430
(5'-CGTCCTTGGGTTTCCCCAGGGCTAGTGC-3') was prepared by
annealing forward and reverse primers and labeled with
[
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England
Biolabs). Mutated versions of the same probe were also used, where
MT3 = 5'-CGTCCTTGGGTTGAATAAGGGCTAGTGC-3' (27). Nuclear
proteins were incubated with radiolabeled probe for 20 min in a
solution containing 3 µg of poly(dI-dC) in 10 mM
HEPES-KOH at pH 7.9, 210 mM NaCl, 0.75 mM
MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 12.5% glycerol before separation on a 4% (19:1
acrylamide/bisacrylamide) polyacrylamide gel in Tris acetate-EDTA
buffer. Specificity of protein binding to radiolabeled oligonucleotides
was demonstrated by addition of a 100-fold excess of unlabelled
competing oligonucleotide. For supershift assays, antibodies specific
for p50, p65, or c-Rel subunits of NF-
B (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) were preincubated with nuclear extracts for 30 min
on ice.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
PMA up-regulates MUC2 RNA
and transcriptional activity. HM3 or HM3M2 cells were treated with
vehicle or PMA for various times and concentrations as indicated.
A, ethidium bromide-stained gel of MUC2 amplified
by RT-PCR. B, relative integrated band intensities from
A. Values represent averages from two independent
experiments with standard deviations represented by error
bars. C, HM3M2 cells were treated with vehicle or PMA,
and then luciferase activity was measured and normalized with respect
to untreated cells. Values represent average of four assays, and
standard deviation is provided by error bars.
1308 were
significantly more active than smaller constructs. The
1628/+19
construct was chosen for further experiments as it exhibited the
highest level of PMA responsiveness.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
PMA increases the transcriptional activity of
MUC2 promoter deletion constructs. HM3 cells were
transiently transfected with deletion constructs as indicated and then
treated with PMA before harvesting for luciferase assay. Values
represent the average of four replicates normalized to
Renilla luciferase activity with standard deviation
indicated by error bars. (**, p < 0.001 with respect to untreated controls)

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of PKA, Src tyrosine kinase, and PKC
inhibitors on the induction of MUC2 promoter activity
by PMA. A, HM3M2 cells were pretreated with increasing
concentrations of inhibitors for 1 h prior to 4 h of
treatment with vehicle or PMA. Values for luciferase activities were
normalized with respect to untreated controls. Inhibitor concentrations
were: 0, 100, and 500 nM KT5720; 0, 100, and 500 nM bisindolylmaleimide I; 0, 100, and 150 nM
calphostin C; 0, 50, and 500 nM PP2; and 0, 2.7, and 27 µM PP3. Values are the average of four replicates with
standard deviation represented by error bars. (**,
p < 0.001, for inhibition compared with assays without
added inhibitor). B, RT-PCR analysis of RNA from HM3M2 cells
pretreated with inhibitors as above prior to isolation of RNA.
Inhibitor concentrations are: 500 nM KT5720, 500 nM bisindolylmaleimide I, 100 nM calphostin C,
5 nM PP2, and 2.7 µM PP3. Results shown are
representative of at least two independent experiments.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
MUC2 promoter activity is reduced by
inhibitors of MEK and ERK. A, HM3M2 cells were treated with
PMA or vehicle after 1 h of pretreatment with various inhibitors
at increasing concentrations. Inhibitor concentrations were: 0, 50, and
100 µM PD98059; 0, 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 µM
UO126; and 0, 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 µM SB20358. Luminometer
readings were normalized with respect to values obtained from untreated
cells. Values for activities are the average of four replicates with
standard deviation represented by error bars. (**,
p < 0.001, compared with assays without added
inhibitor). B, HM3M2 cells were treated as above, and then
total RNA was analyzed by RT-PCR. Inhibitor concentrations were: 75 µM PD98059, 5 µM UO126, 2 µM
SB203580. Results shown are representative of at least two separate
experiments. C, HM3M2 cells were pretreated with indicated
concentrations of AG126, exposed to PMA for 4 h, and then assayed
for luciferase activity. Values were normalized with respect to
untreated controls and are given as the average of four assays with the
standard deviation shown by error bars. (**,
p < 0.001, compared with assays without added
inhibitor). D, HM3 cells were co-transfected with 4 µg
each of
1628/+19 MUC2 promoter construct and expression
vector for wild-type (WT) or dominant-negative
(DN) pp90rsk. After 2 days, cells were treated with PMA and
assayed as usual. Activities were normalized to readings for
Renilla luciferase internal control and are shown as the
average of four assays with standard deviation shown as error
bars.

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
ERK1/2 is activated by PMA. HM3 cells
were treated with PMA (0.25 µM) for the indicated periods
of time; 20 µg/lane of total cell lysate protein was subjected to
electrophoresis. Nitrocellulose blots were probed with antibodies to
phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2, JNK (p54/p46),
and p38 as indicated. In one experiment (20 +PD,
right lane) cells were pretreated for 1 h
with PD98059 inhibitor (75 µM) before addition of PMA for
20 min as a control.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Dominant-negative mutants of MEK, Raf, and
Ras inhibit MUC2 up-regulation induced by PMA.
A, HM3 cells were co-transfected with the
1628/+19
MUC2 promoter construct plus expression vectors (1.5 µg)
encoding dominant-negative or wild-type MEK. Forty hours later,
transfected cells were treated with vehicle or PMA and then harvested
for measurement of luciferase activities. B, HM3 cells were
co-transfected with the
1628/+19 MUC2 promoter
construct plus the indicated amounts of expression vector
encoding dominant-negative Raf. Transfected cells were treated with
vehicle or PMA and then harvested for measurement of luciferase
activities. C, HM3 cells were transfected with
1628/+19
MUC2 promoter construct plus expression vectors (1.5 µg)
for wild-type Ha-Ras, dominant-negative N17Ras, or active mutant (G12V)
Ha-Ras. Activities were normalized to readings for Renilla
luciferase internal control and are shown as the average of four assays
with standard deviation shown as error bars. (*,
p < 0.01; **, p < 0.001 compared with
transfections without added vector).
B Is Involved in the Induction of MUC2 Promoter Activity
by PMA--
CAPE, an inhibitor of NF-
B activation, completely
blocked the induction of MUC2 by PMA (Fig.
7A). This result was confirmed using RT-PCR to estimate changes in endogenous MUC2
transcript levels (Fig. 7A, inset). In EMSA,
nuclear extracts from untreated HM3 cells failed to exhibit binding of
the transcription factor to the NF-
B oligonucleotide probe. However,
nuclear extracts from PMA-treated cells contained a protein that bound
to the probe and was displaced by the addition of unlabeled competitor
oligonucleotide. Incorporation of a mutation within the NF-
B
consensus site (MT3) produced an oligonucleotide that failed to block
binding to the labeled oligonucleotide, indicating the specificity of
the interaction of the transcription factor. Addition of the p65
antibody caused this band to supershift (Fig. 7B). Addition
of p50 antibody seemed to have little effect in this experiment, but in
other experiments a slight decrease in the intensity of the band was
observed upon addition of the p50 antibody, indicating a possible
interaction. Thus it appears that the p65 subunit is involved with
MUC2 up-regulation by PMA, but involvement of the p50
subunit remains to be demonstrated. Antibody to c-Rel failed to cause a
supershift. A luciferase reporter vector (TK-LUC) containing the
thymidylate kinase minimal promoter inserted downstream from the
NF-
B site of MUC2 (
1528/
1307) was activated by PMA
(Fig. 7C), indicating that the NF-
B binding site in this
region functions as an enhancer of MUC2 transcription.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
NF-
B is involved in
the induction of MUC2 promoter activity by PMA.
A, HM3M2 cells were pretreated with or without 15 µg/ml
CAPE, a specific inhibitor of NF-
B, for 1 h and then treated
with vehicle or PMA for 4 h before harvest for measurement of
transcriptional activity or MUC2 RNA (inset). (*,
p < 0.01, **, p < 0.001 compared with
assays without added inhibitor.) B, double-stranded
oligonucleotide probes corresponding to the human MUC2
NF-
B site (wild-type (WT) or mutated MT3) were incubated
with nuclear proteins (10 µg) from HM3 cells pretreated with vehicle
or PMA (1 µM) for 1 h. Antibodies (Ab)
used for supershift are indicated, as are oligonucleotides used as cold
competitors (comp). TK-32 promoter-reporter vector with
(MUC2-TK-LUC) or without (TK-LUC) the MUC2 NF-
B
promoter region
1528 to
1307 was transfected in to HM3 cells. Forty
hours later, transfected cells were treated with vehicle or PMA for
4 h before harvest. Values are the average of four assays with
standard deviation shown as error bars. (**,
p < 0.001 compared with transfections with empty
TK-LUC vector).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2864/+19 promoter/reporter construct
stably transfected into HM3 human colon cancer cell line HM3M2 was
similarly increased by PMA, indicating that PMA-induced up-regulation
occurs at the transcriptional level. We also determined that PMA
treatment was able to significantly up-regulate transcription from all
MUC2 deletion constructs containing the previously
identified proximal Sp1/CACCC box element(s). The greatest promoter
activities, however, were observed for larger constructs (
1308/+19,
1628/+19, and
2864/+19). The
1628/+19 construct was chosen for
further experiments because of its high basal activity and
because it contained two cis elements previously determined to be
functional, namely the Sp1/CACCC box and the NF-
B sites (26,
27).

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Schematic summary of signal
transduction by PMA. Essential activating steps demonstrated in
this study are indicated with solid arrows; pathways that
remain to be confirmed are shown with broken arrows.
B pathway, a p120GAP/p190/Rac/NF-
B pathway, and a Raf/MEKK1/I
K/I
B/NF-
B pathway (30, 33-35). To identify relevant events downstream from Raf
and, in particular, to identify which MAP kinase pathways were involved
in MUC2 expression, various kinase inhibitors were tested
for their ability to reduce MUC2 transcription. Specific inhibitors of MEK (PD98059, U0126) completely inhibited basal as well
as PMA-induced MUC2. To confirm the involvement of MEK in
mediating the effects of PMA, we co-transfected wild-type and dominant-negative forms of MEK with the
1628/+19
MUC2 promoter construct and showed that PMA induction of
MUC2 transcriptional activity was inhibited by
dominant-negative MEK. These findings indicate that the induction of
MUC2 transcriptional activity by PMA is
MEK-dependent. Additionally, AG126, which is an inhibitor of ERK2 phosphorylation, caused a significant decrease in
MUC2 transcriptional activity. Western blots using
antibodies specific for phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2, p38, and JNK
showed that ERK1/2 is rapidly phosphorylated in response to PMA treatment.
B (36).
B activation (27), it appears that
pp90rsk is not responsible for PMA-mediated activation of NF-
B.
Further experiments are required to confirm and elucidate this
point. Recently, ERK2 has been reported to phosphorylate Sp1 (38). A
functional Sp1 binding site was previously identified in the proximal
region of the MUC2 promoter between bases
94 and
65
(26). In our analysis of the effect of PMA on MUC2 deletion constructs, this region also appears to confer PMA responsiveness. As
well as Sp1, a number of other unidentified proteins also bound to this
94/
65 oligonucleotide, giving a complex pattern in EMSA (26).
However, using this same oligonucleotide we were unable to detect any
differences between PMA-treated and -untreated
cells.2 It is possible that
this region of the promoter is important but that PMA-induced
up-regulation involves increased transcriptional activity of Sp1 or
other nuclear factors that are already bound to this proximal region of
the MUC2 promoter. Further experiments are required to
identify the PMA-responsive, ERK-activated MUC2 promoter elements.
B plays a crucial role in the regulation of
numerous genes involved in the inflammatory response and control of
cell death. Activation of NF-
B is mediated through phosphorylation,
ubiquination, and subsequent degradation of inhibitor I
B. This
enables the free NF-
B dimer (p50/p65) to translocate to the nucleus
and activate target genes (39). The ultimate upstream mediators of
NF-
B activation, for example the I
B kinase complex and its
activating kinases, are still in the process of being identified. The
transcriptional activity of NF-
B is also enhanced directly by
phosphorylation at various sites on both subunits. The kinases
responsible for these phosphorylations may include Ras, PKA, and PKC.
These enzymes and the consequences of phosphorylations at multiple
sites are currently being elucidated (39, 40). MUC2 was
previously shown to be up-regulated by lipopolysaccharide via
Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK/pp90rsk/NF-
B in lung epithelial cells (27). CAPE, an
inhibitor of NF-
B translocation, reduced endogenous as well as
PMA-up-regulated MUC2 transcription, indicating that NF-
B
is also involved in MUC2 transcription induced by PMA. Furthermore, EMSAs using an oligonucleotide containing the previously identified MUC2 NF-
B site demonstrated that nuclear
extracts from PMA-treated HM3 cells gave more intense bands than
nuclear extracts from untreated cells. Finally, the transcriptional
competence of the NF-
B cis element was demonstrated using
promoter-reporter constructs containing the same region of the
MUC2 promoter from bases
1528 to
1307 inserted upstream
of the minimal thymidylate kinase promoter. Because pp90rsk was not
shown to be involved in MUC2 up-regulation,
NF-
B is likely activated via another Ras-activated pathway, such as Raf/MEKK1/I
K/I
B or Ras/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/I
K/I
B.
B was also shown to be directly
involved in MUC2 up-regulation by PMA. In contrast to
previous work on MUC2 transcription using lipopolysaccharide
as an inducer, the effects of PMA are independent of Src and pp90rsk
and are complicated by the involvement of other, proximal cis elements
within the MUC2 promoter.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
B, nuclear
factor
B;
CAPE, caffeic acid phenethyl ester;
RT, reverse
transcription;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assays;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Moniaux, N.,
Escande, F.,
Porchet, N.,
Aubert, J. P.,
and Batra, S. K.
(2001)
Front. Biosci.
6,
D1192-D1206[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Williams, S. J.,
Wreschner, D. H.,
Tran, M.,
Eyre, H. J.,
Sutherland, G. R.,
and McGuckin, M. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18327-18336 3.
Yin, B. W.,
and Lloyd, K. O.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
27371-27375 4.
Ho, S. B.,
Niehans, G. A.,
Lyftogt, C.,
Yan, P. S.,
Cherwitz, D. L.,
Gum, E. T.,
Dahiya, R.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
641-651 5.
Audie, J. P.,
Janin, A.,
Porchet, N.,
Copin, M. C.,
Gosselin, B.,
and Aubert, J. P.
(1993)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
41,
1479-1485[Abstract]
6.
Chang, S.-Y.,
Dohrman, A. F.,
Basbaum, C., Ho, S. B.,
Tsuda, T.,
Toribara, N. W.,
Gum, J. R.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1994)
Gastroenterology
107,
28-36[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Sylvester, P. A.,
Myerscough, N.,
Warren, B. F.,
Carlstedt, I.,
Corfield, A. P,
Durdey, P.,
and Thomas, M. G.
(2001)
J. Pathol.
195,
327-335[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Hanski, C.,
Riede, E.,
Gratchev, A.,
Foss, H. D.,
Bohm, C.,
Klussmann, E.,
Hummel, M.,
Mann, B.,
Buhr, H. J.,
Stein, H.,
Kim, Y. S.,
Gum, J.,
and Riecken, E. O.
(1997)
Lab. Invest.
77,
685-695[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Nishizuka, Y.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
484-496[Abstract]
10.
Jaken, S.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
168-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Parekh, D. B.,
Ziegler, W.,
and Parker, P. J.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
496-503[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Velcich, A.,
and Augenlicht, L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13956-13961 13.
Hong, D.-H.,
Petrovics, G.,
Anderson, W. B.,
Forstner, J.,
and Forstner, G.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
G1041-G1047[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Levine, S. J.,
Larivee, C. L.,
Logun, C. W.,
Angus, C. S.,
Ognibene, F. P.,
and Shelhamer, J. H.
(1995)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
12,
196-204[Abstract]
15.
Yoon, J.-H.,
Gray, T.,
Guzman, K.,
Koo, J. S.,
and Nettesheim, P.
(1997)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
16,
724-731[Abstract]
16.
Koo, J. S.,
Jetten, A. M.,
Belloni, P.,
Yoon, J.-H.,
Kim, Y.-D.,
and Nettesheim, P.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
338,
351-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Basbaum, C.,
Lemjabbar, H.,
Longphre, M., Li, D.,
Gensch, E.,
and McNamara, N.
(1999)
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
160,
S44-S48 18.
Han, S. Y.,
Lee, M. S.,
Kim, H. R.,
Baek, S. H.,
Ahn, D. H.,
Chae, H. S.,
Erickson, R. H.,
Sleisenger, M. H.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(2000)
Int. J. Oncol.
17,
487-494[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Thomas, S. M.,
DeMarco, M.,
D'Arcangelo, G.,
Halegoua, S.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1992)
Cell
68,
1031-1040[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Wood, K. W.,
Sarnecki, C.,
Roberts, T. M.,
and Blenis, J.
(1992)
Cell
68,
1041-1050[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Li, Y. Q., Hi, C. S. T.,
Costabile, M.,
Goh, D.,
Der, C. J.,
and Ferrante, A.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
3316-3320 22.
Chiloeches, A.,
Paterson, H. F.,
Marais, R.,
Clerk, A.,
Marshall, C. J.,
and Sugen, P. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
19762-19770 23.
deVries-Smits, A. M.,
Burgering, B. M.,
Leevers, S. J.,
Marshall, C. J.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1992)
Nature
357,
602-604[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Howe, L. R.,
Leevers, S. J.,
Gomez, M.,
Kakielny, S.,
Cohen, P.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1992)
Cell
71,
335-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Ming, X. F.,
Burgering, B. M. T.,
Wennstrom, S.,
Claesson-Welsh, L.,
Heldin, C. H.,
Bos, J. L.,
Kozma, S. C.,
and Thomas, G.
(1994)
Nature
371,
426-429[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Gum, J. R.,
Hicks, J. W.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
325,
259-267[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Li, J.-D.,
Feng, W.,
Gallup, M.,
Kim, J.-H.,
Gum, J.,
Kim, Y.,
and Basbaum, C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
95,
5718-5723 28.
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
29.
Andrews, N. C.,
and Faller, D. V.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
2499 30.
Kolch, W.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
351,
289-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Feig, L. A.,
and Cooper, G. M.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
3235-3243 32.
Marais, R.,
Light, Y.,
Mason, C.,
Paterson, H.,
Olson, M. F.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1998)
Science
280,
109-112 33.
Widmann, C.,
Gibson, S.,
Jarpe, M. B.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
143-180 34.
Shields, J. M.,
Pruitt, K.,
McFall, A.,
Shaub, A.,
and Der, C. J.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
147-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Rebollo, A.,
and Martinez-A, C.
(1999)
Blood
94,
2971-2980 36.
Norris, J. L.,
and Baldwin, A. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13841-13846 37.
Al-Mulla, F.,
Milner-White, E. J.,
Going, J. J.,
and Birnie, G. D.
(1999)
J. Pathol.
187,
433-438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Merchant, J. L., Du, M.,
and Todisco, A.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.
254,
454-461[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Karin, M.,
and Ben-Neriah, Y.
(2000)
Ann. Rev. Immunol.
18,
621-663[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Mercurio, F.,
and Manning, A. M.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
226-232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Assidi, I. Dufort, A. Ali, M. Hamel, O. Algriany, S. Dielemann, and M.-A. Sirard Identification of Potential Markers of Oocyte Competence Expressed in Bovine Cumulus Cells Matured with Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and/or Phorbol Myristate Acetate In Vitro Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 209 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Y. C. Wu, R. Wu, Y. Chen, N. Tarasova, and M. M. J. Chang PMA Stimulates MUC5B Gene Expression through an Sp1-Based Mechanism in Airway Epithelial Cells Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., November 1, 2007; 37(5): 589 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yuan-chen Wu, R. Wu, S. P. Reddy, Y. C. Lee, and M. M.-J. Chang Distinctive Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/Extracellular Regulated Kinase-Independent and -Dependent Signaling Pathways in the Induction of Airway Mucin 5B and Mucin 5AC Expression by Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 170(1): 20 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T. Park, H. K. Oh, J. R. Gum Jr., S. C. Crawley, S. Kakar, J. Engel, C. C. Leow, W.-Q. Gao, and Y. S. Kim HATH1 Expression in Mucinous Cancers of the Colorectum and Related Lesions. Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 12(18): 5403 - 5410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hokari, H. Lee, S. C. Crawley, S. C. Yang, J. R. Gum Jr, S. Miura, and Y. S. Kim Vasoactive intestinal peptide upregulates MUC2 intestinal mucin via CREB/ATF1 Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): G949 - G959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |