|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202841200 on June 21, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 36, 32947-32953, September 6, 2002
Cloning and Characterization of a Protein Kinase A
Anchoring Protein (AKAP)-related Protein That Interacts with and
Regulates Sphingosine Kinase 1 Activity*
Emanuela
Lacaná §,
Michael
Maceyka ¶,
Sheldon
Milstien , and
Sarah
Spiegel ¶**
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, D. C. 20007, the ¶ Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics,
Medical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia Commonwealth University,
Richmond, Virginia 23298, and the Laboratory of Cellular and
Molecular Regulation, National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, March 25, 2002, and in revised form, June 13, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive
sphingolipid metabolite that has novel dual actions. S1P is the ligand
for a family of G protein-coupled receptors known as S1PRs that mediate various physiological functions. Growth factors rapidly activate sphingosine kinase type 1 (SPHK1) resulting in phosphorylation of
sphingosine to form S1P, which plays important roles in cell growth
regulation and protection from apoptosis. However, little is known of
the mechanism(s) by which SPHK activity is regulated. Using a yeast
two-hybrid screening approach, we cloned a 3-kb cDNA encoding a
SPHK1-interacting protein (SKIP). BLAST analysis revealed that SKIP
corresponded to the C-terminal region of a larger (~7 kb) cDNA
that encoded a protein with a high degree of similarity to a family of
protein kinase A anchor proteins (AKAP). In confirmation of the yeast
two-hybrid assay, glutathione S-transferase (GST)-SPHK1
specifically pulled down SKIP, whereas GST did not. Moreover,
immunoprecipitation of in vitro translated SPHK1 and SKIP
revealed that SKIP and SPHK1 are tightly associated. Furthermore, SKIP
overexpression in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts reduced SPHK1 activity and
interfered with its biological functions. The apoptotic-sparing effect
of SPHK1 against serum deprivation was reduced when co-transfected with
SKIP. In addition, SPHK1-enhanced cell proliferation was also abolished
by SKIP, with a corresponding decrease in activation of ERK. Taken
together, these results indicate that SKIP is a novel protein likely to
play a regulatory role in the modulation of SPHK1 activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Sphingolipid metabolites such as ceramide, sphingosine, and
sphingosine 1-phosphate
(S1P),1 have been the subject
of extensive studies in recent years and are implicated in the
regulation of cell growth, survival, motility, and apoptosis (reviewed
in Refs. 1-3). Ceramide (N-acylsphingosine) is generated
from sphingomyelin hydrolysis by sphingomyelinase. This enzyme is
activated by a variety of stress stimuli, including proimflammatory
cytokines, growth factor withdrawal, radiation, and anti-cancer drugs
(2, 4). Ceramide, in turn, regulates various events leading to cell
growth arrest and apoptosis (2, 4, 5). Recent data also indicate that
apoptosis can be mediated by de novo synthesis of ceramide
(2, 4). Ceramide is further metabolized by ceramidase to sphingosine,
which also exerts diverse biological effects, including inhibition of
protein kinase C and induction of apoptosis (1, 4, 6).
In contrast to the growth inhibitory and pro-apoptotic effects of
ceramide and sphingosine, a further metabolite, S1P, has been
implicated in cell growth (7) and inhibition of ceramide-mediated apoptosis (8-13). S1P is produced by phosphorylation of sphingosine catalyzed by sphingosine kinase (SPHK). SPHK is activated by a variety
of stimuli, including PDGF, EGF (epidermal growth factor), NGF (nerve
growth factor), vitamin D3, TNF- , and cross-linking of
Fc RI and Fc RI (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 14). The relative cellular
levels of sphingosine and S1P determined by SPHK are decisive for mast
cell activation after Fc RI triggering (15). It has also been
suggested that the intracellular balance of ceramide and sphingosine
versus S1P acts as an internal sensor that can regulate the
decision of a cell to either undergo apoptosis or survive (8-10, 12).
This has important clinical implications, including prevention of
sterility after chemo- or radiation therapy, as increased S1P or
decreased ceramide can prevent anti-cancer drug and radiation-induced
oocyte loss, the event that drives premature ovarian failure and
infertility in female cancer patients (11, 13).
Recently, S1P was identified as the ligand for a family of G
protein-coupled receptors known as the endothelial
differentiation gene-1 (EDG-1) family, now collectively named S1PRs
(14, 16-18). To date, five members, EDG-1/S1P1,
EDG-5/S1P2, EDG-3/S1P3, EDG-6/S1P4, and EDG-8/S1P5 have been identified (14, 16-18). All bind
both S1P and sphinganine 1-phosphate (dihydro-S1P) with high
specificity. These receptors can couple to different G proteins to
elicit a wide array of cellular responses including vascular maturation and angiogenesis (19-22), motility (23, 24), and heart development (25).
There is abundant evidence that S1P can also function as a second
messenger important for regulation of calcium homeostasis (26-29) and
suppression of apoptosis (8, 13, 30-32). However the intracellular
targets of S1P have not yet been identified, making this a
controversial issue (18). Understanding of the complex interplay
between intra- and extracellular actions of S1P is further complicated
because endogenously produced S1P activates S1P1 in an
autocrine or paracrine manner, and this transactivation plays a
critical role in PDGF-directed cell migration (23, 32). Conversely,
binding of S1P to its receptors can activate SPHK and increase S1P
levels (33).
The importance of S1P as a lipid mediator prompted the purification and
cloning of SPHK1 (34, 35) and of SPHK2 (36). Overexpression of SPHK1
promotes cell survival and protects cells from apoptotic insults, such
as serum withdrawal (31). Recently it has been suggested that
spk1 may be an oncogene as its overexpression induces colony
formation in soft agar and formation of tumors in NOD/SCID mice (37).
In agreement, it has been shown that -radiation sensitivity of
prostate cancer cells correlates with SPHK1 activity (38). Despite its
central roles, little is known of how SPHK1 activity is regulated. In
this study, we used the yeast two-hybrid screening system to identify
proteins that interact with SPHK1 and potentially regulate its
function. We cloned a SPHK-interacting protein (SKIP) that interacts
with SPHK1 in vitro and in vivo to regulate its
activity and biological functions.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Lines, Cell Culture, and Transfection--
HEK 293 cells
were cultured in DMEM (Biofluids) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum (FBS) and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts in DMEM supplemented with 10% calf
serum. HEK 293 cells were seeded at 2 × 105
cells/well 1 day prior to transfection. DNA (5 µg) was complexed with
calcium phosphate and added to cells for 14-18 h as described (39).
Cells were then washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS,
Biofluids). NIH 3T3 cells were transfected using LipofectAMINE Plus
(Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Transfection efficiencies were typically 80 and 30% for HEK 293 and
NIH 3T3 cells, respectively.
Cloning and in Vitro
Transcription/Translation--
Human SPHK1 was cloned by
PCR into the EcoRI and BamHI cloning sites of
pGKBT7. The forward primer sequence was
5'-ACCCTGGAATTCCCCCGGGGCGTG-3', and the reverse primer sequence
was 5'-TGCAGGATCCTCATAAGGGCTC-3'. PCR was carried out with the
following conditions: 3 min at 94 °C, 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min
at 52 °C, 1.5 min at 72 °C (30 cycles), 7 min at 72 °C.
In vitro transcription/translation was performed using
rabbit reticulocyte lysates (Promega), in the presence of [3H]leucine (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Two-hybrid Screening--
Two-hybrid screening was performed
using the Matchmaker III system (CLONTECH). The
bait construct was transformed in yeast and plated on synthetic medium
lacking tryptophan. One positive clone was amplified, mated with a
pretransformed Matchmaker library generated from human brain in the
yeast strain Y187, and plated on synthetic medium lacking tryptophan
and leucine. Transformants were then scored for the ability to grow on
medium lacking histidine and adenine and activation of the
lacZ promoter. A total of 12 × 106
independent clones were screened. 181 clones scored positive for growth
capability, and of these, 96 also scored positive for LacZ
activation. The 96 positive clones were analyzed by frequent cutter
restriction analysis, and the group was further reduced to 40. The 40 independent clones were re-transformed and tested for transcriptional
activation either with SPHK1 or with laminin, an unrelated protein.
Five clones were then confirmed to be true positives.
Lysate Preparation and Sphingosine Kinase Assay--
Cells were
scraped and lysed by seven cycles of freeze-thawing in buffer A (0.2 M
Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
deoxypyridoxine, 15 mM NaF, 0.1 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, 10 µg/ml each leupeptin, aprotinin, and trypsin
inhibitor, 40 mM glycerol phosphate, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10% glycerol). Lysates were centrifuged
at 100,000 × g for 40 min at 4 °C, and the pellet was resuspended in buffer A with a Dounce homogenizer. Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford microassay (Bio-Rad). Cytosolic and membrane-associated SPHK activity was determined in the
presence of 50 µM sphingosine, dissolved in 5% Triton
X-100 (final concentration 0.25%), and [32P]ATP (10 µCi, 1 mM) containing MgCl2 (10 mM) as described previously (35) and expressed as pmol of
S1P formed per min per mg of protein.
Western Blotting and Immunoprecipitation--
For Western blot
analysis, cytosolic fractions (10-25 µg) were separated on 12%
SDS-PAGE, blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad), probed with
antibodies, and immunocomplexes detected by enhanced chemiluminescence
(ECL). The antibodies used were: anti-phosphotyrosine clone 4G10
(Upstate Biotechnology), anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (New England Biolabs),
anti-ERK1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-c-Myc (Zymed
Laboratories Inc.), anti-HA clone 3F10 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), anti- -tubulin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and
anti-c-Src (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY).
Immunoprecipitation of in vitro translated proteins was
performed by diluting reactions in 500 µl of PBS and incubating
overnight at 4 °C in the presence of anti-AU1 antibody (Covance) and
protein A/G (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Immunoprecipitates were washed six times with PBS and resuspended in SDS loading buffer.
Proliferation Assay--
NIH 3T3 cells stably transfected with
either SPHK1 or vector were transfected either with SKIP or empty
vector together with pCEFL-GFP, which encodes green fluorescent protein
(a generous gift of Dr. Silvio Gutkind) at a 5:1 ratio, to visualize
transfected cells. 24 h after transfection, cells were
serum-starved in DMEM for 8 h and then stimulated with 10% calf
serum. After 16 h, cells were incubated for 3 h with
bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) (10 µM) and then fixed
in 4% paraformaldehyde containing 4% sucrose, pH 7.0, for 20 min at
room temperature. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated in
permeabilization buffer (0.5% Triton/PBS, pH 7.4, containing 10 mg/ml
BSA) for 20 min at room temperature and then incubated for 1 h at
room temperature with monoclonal anti-BrdUrd antibody in the presence
of DNase (1000 units/ml) (31). After washing with PBS, cells were
stained with Texas Red-conjugated anti-mouse antibody in 5% BSA/PBS
for 1 h, washed with PBS, and then photographed using a Nikon
Eclipse TE200 inverted fluorescence microscope connected to a Sony
DKC5000 digital camera. Cells expressing GFP and positive BrdUrd
staining were counted. At least three different fields were scored with
a minimum of 100 cells scored per field.
Staining of Apoptotic Nuclei--
NIH 3T3 cells stably
transfected with either SPHK1 or vector were co-transfected either with
SKIP or empty vector together with GFP, treated, and fixed as described
above. Apoptosis was assessed by staining cells with Hoechst (8 µg/ml in 30% glycerol/PBS) for 10 min at room temperature as
described previously (40). Cells expressing GFP were examined with an
inverted fluorescence microscope. Apoptotic cells were distinguished by
condensed, fragmented nuclear regions. The percentage of intact and
apoptotic nuclei in cells expressing GFP fluorescence was determined. A
minimum of 100 cells per sample in triplicate were scored in a double blinded manner to minimize subjective interpretations.
Visualization of SKIP--
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were plated on
glass coverslips and transfected with the indicated plasmids
essentially as described (41). Cells were cultured for 24 h and
fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 20 min. After washing with PBS
containing 10 mM glycine, cells were permeabilized for 3 min with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS-glycine, washed again, and incubated
with mouse monoclonal anti-AU1 (Babco, Richmond, CA) or rat monoclonal
anti-HA (3F10, Roche Diagnostics) for 20 min at room temperature. After
washing, cells were incubated with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse and Texas Red-conjugated anti-rat
secondaries (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 20 min.
Coverslips were then mounted with glycerol containing 10 mM
n-propylgallate. Images were collected using an Olympus
Fluoview confocal system.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning and Characterization of SKIP--
SPHK activity and
formation of S1P have been shown to be rapidly and transiently
increased by many stimuli (3, 14), yet little evidence has surfaced to
suggest this is due to posttranslational modifications. Thus, the yeast
two-hybrid approach was employed to identify potential
SPHK1-interacting proteins that might regulate its activity in
vivo. Human SPHK1 fused to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 was used
as bait, and the prey consisted of a human brain cDNA library fused
to the transcriptional activation domain of GAL4. The yeast two-hybrid
system that we used mitigates against false positives by having three
different promoter-reporter gene constructs, each with differing
affinities for the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. Prior to screening, we
verified that the prey construct did not activate on its own by binding
regions around the GAL4 DNA binding site or to specific TATA boxes.
After putative SPHK1 interactors were pulled out, they were tested for
duplicate clones and then transformed back into yeast and re-screened,
to ensure that the activation was due to the prey plasmid and not
mutations in the yeast. These plasmids were also transformed into yeast containing a control protein-DNA binding domain fusion, to remove prey
that did not require interaction with the SPHK1 bait to activate transcription. Using the most stringent interaction tests, five cDNA clones were considered to be SPKH1-specific two-hybrid
interactors. Three of these clones contained 3-kb cDNAs with
identical sequences, and the corresponding encoded protein (Fig.
1A) was named SKIP (sphingosine kinase-interacting
protein).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cloning of SKIP. A, predicted
amino acid sequences of SKIP and KIAA1678. Identical amino acid
substitutions are shaded gray. There is 99% identity
between SKIP and KIAA1678. B, tissue-specific expression of
SKIP. The coding region of SKIP was end-labeled and hybridized to
poly(A)+ RNA blots from the indicated human tissues
(CLONTECH) as described under "Materials and
Methods."
|
|
Northern blot analysis using labeled SKIP cDNA as probe revealed a
single cDNA species of about 7 kb, whose expression was restricted
to spleen, ovary, brain, and heart, with highest expression in the
heart (Fig. 1B). BLAST analysis revealed that SKIP was 99%
identical to the C-terminal region of a larger cDNA (KIAA1678) previously identified from a brain cDNA library (42), encoding for
a protein of about 140 kDa. Surprisingly, as shown in the ClustalW
alignment (Fig. 2), there was strong
sequence homology with the C-terminal region of protein kinase A
anchoring proteins (AKAPs), with 75-80% amino acid similarity and
35-40% identity between SKIP and AKAP110 and human and rat AKAP220.
AKAP110 is a testis-specific protein that may participate in
PKA-mediated sperm functions (43). Rat AKAP220 is a peroxisomal anchor
protein that is expressed abundantly in testis and brain, and its human homologue has recently been identified (44).

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
SKIP has a high degree of similarity to
AKAPs. Sequence alignments of SKIP and the C terminus of the
indicated AKAP family members were made with ClustalW. Dark
shaded boxes represent identical residues, while light
shaded boxes represent similar residues. There is 35-40%
identity and 70-75% similarity between SKIP and the C-terminal region
of AKAPs.
|
|
To confirm that SKIP interacts with SPHK1, SKIP was transcribed and
translated in vitro, and a GST pull-down assay was
performed. Labeled SKIP was incubated with GST-SPHK1-conjugated
glutathione beads or with GST-conjugated glutathione beads. As shown in
Fig. 3A, GST-SPHK1
specifically pulled down SKIP, whereas GST did not. In another
experiment, in vitro translated SKIP was incubated with
in vitro translated SPHK1 containing an AU1 N-terminal tag, and the latter was immunoprecipitated with anti-AU1 antibody. SKIP was
co-imunoprecipitated with SPHK1 (Fig. 3B). Collectively, these results suggest that SKIP and SPHK1 interact in
vitro.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
In vitro interaction between SKIP
and SPHK1. A, 20 µl of in vitro translated
[3H]leucine-labeled SKIP was incubated either with
GST-agarose beads or GST-SPHK1 bound to glutathione-conjugated agarose
beads. After overnight incubation at 4 °C, beads were washed and
bound proteins separated by SDS-PAGE. GST-SPHK1 precipitated 21-kDa
radiolabeled SKIP. In lane 1, 5 µl of total in
vitro reaction were loaded for control. B, in
vitro translated [3H]leucine-labeled SKIP was
incubated in the absence (lane 1) or presence of in
vitro translated SPHK1 with an N-terminal AU1 tag (lane
2). The samples were immunoprecipitated with anti-AU1 antibodies
(Covance) overnight at 4 °C, washed, and resolved by SDS-PAGE.
|
|
Effect of SKIP Overexpression on Sphingosine Kinase
Activity--
To assess whether SKIP overexpression has a functional
effect on SPHK1 activity, Myc-SPHK1 stably transfected HEK 293 cells were transfected either with HA-tagged SKIP or with empty vector. 12 h after transfection, cells were serum starved for 24 h
and then stimulated with 10% FBS for 10 min. In agreement with
previous reports (31, 45), serum stimulated SPHK1 activity. SKIP
transfection markedly reduced SPHK1 activity in untreated as well as in
FBS stimulated cells (Fig.
4A). The same cell lysates
were also analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Myc antibody, to
identify SPHK1, or with anti-HA antibody, to identify SKIP. Both
proteins were readily detected in the cell lysates, and their levels
were not affected by the co-transfections (Fig. 4B).
Furthermore, when HEK 293 cells were transfected with SPHK1, in
agreement with previous studies (31, 35), 80% of the SPHK1 activity
was cytosolic and 20% was membrane associated. Co-transfection with
SKIP significantly decreased SPHK1 activity in both fractions. The
activity in the cytosol was reduced 2-fold, while the
membrane-associated activity was reduced by almost 5-fold, suggesting
that SKIP also affected SPHK1 distribution between the cytosolic and
particulate fractions (Fig. 4C).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
SKIP affects SPHK1 activity but not its
expression. A, Myc-SPHK1-HEK 293 cells were transfected
either with HA-tagged SKIP or empty vector. SPHK1 activity was measured
in lysates from serum-starved cells ( ) or cells stimulated with 10%
FBS (+) for 10 min. B, the same lysates were resolved by
SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot with anti-Myc, anti-HA and
anti- -tubulin as a loading control. C, HEK 293 cells were
transiently transfected with SPHK1 plus empty vector or SKIP by the
calcium phosphate method. 24 h after transfection, cells were
lysed, and SPHK1 activity was assessed in both cytosolic (open
bars) and crude membrane fractions (filled bars).
|
|
Localization of SKIP and SPHK1--
As SKIP contains several
putative nuclear localization motifs, and SPHK1 is mainly expressed in
the cytosol (Fig. 4C and Ref. 31), it was of interest
to examine the effect of their co-expression on cellular
localization. To this end, NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were transiently
transfected with either HA-tagged SKIP, AU1-tagged SPHK1, or both and
analyzed by confocal microscopy after staining with the appropriate
antibodies. SPHK1 is mainly cytoplasmic, in agreement with previous
results (31). SKIP appears to have a cytoplasmic expression pattern
(Fig. 5) as well despite the presence of
a putative nuclear targeting sequence and signal peptide determined by
PSORTII (psort.nibb.ac.jp), although occasionally, nuclear
envelope localization could be observed (Fig. 5A). When the
proteins were co-expressed, there was clear co-localization, and no
change was observed in the localization of SPHK1 (Fig. 5, B
and C). Overexpression of SKIP, particularly in the presence of SPHK1, appeared to cause the cells to be more rounded than cells
expressing only one of the constructs (Fig. 5C).

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Cellular localization of SKIP.
A, NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were transiently transfected
with SPHK1-AU1 or HA-tagged SKIP. 24 h later, cells were fixed and
incubated with monoclonal mouse anti-AU1 (10 µg/ml) or monoclonal rat
anti-HA antibodies (10 µg/ml). Cells were then stained with
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:200 dilution)
and Texas Red-conjugated anti-rat IgG (1:200 dilution) and analyzed by
confocal microscopy using an Olympus Fluoview system. Cells nuclei were
visualized by Nomarski. Vector transfectants did not show any
significant fluorescence. B and C, NIH 3T3
fibroblasts were transiently transfected with both SPHK1-AU1 and HA
tagged SKIP. Cells were visualized by dual wavelength confocal
microscopy. The right panels show the superimposed merged
pictures, with the yellow color indicating
co-localization.
|
|
SKIP Overexpression Blocks the Biological Effects of
SPHK1--
Previously, it was found that SPHK1-overexpressing cells
proliferate faster than vector-transfected cells and have an increased proportion of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle (31). Because SKIP
expression markedly reduced SPHK1 activity, we examined whether this
also affects the growth promoting ability of SPHK1. To this end,
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts stably expressing SPHK1 or empty vector were
transfected with SKIP together with GFP to visualize transfected cells.
After 8 h of serum starvation, cells were stimulated overnight with serum and analyzed for their capability to incorporate BrdUrd into
nascent DNA. In agreement with previous studies (31, 37, 46), after
stimulation with serum, NIH 3T3 cells overexpressing SPHK1 had a higher
proportion of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle than the vector
transfectants (Fig. 6A).
However, overexpression of SKIP reduced the incorporation of BrdUrd in
NIH 3T3-SPHK1 cells to levels comparable with NIH 3T3-vector cells,
indicating that SKIP abolished the ability of SPHK1 to promote
proliferation. Moreover, SKIP transfection also inhibited serum-induced
proliferation of vector cells, albeit to a lesser extent.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The effect of SKIP on SPHK1-enhanced cell
growth. NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing Myc-SPHK1 or Myc vector
were transiently transfected with either SKIP or empty vector, together
with pCEFL-GFP. Cells were then serum-starved and cultured without
(open bars) or with 10% calf serum (filled
bars). After 16 h, BrdUrd was added for an additional 3 h. Double immunofluorescence was used to visualize transfected cells
and BrdUrd incorporation, and the proportion of cells incorporating
BrdUrd among total transfected cells (expressing GFP) was determined.
Data are means ± S.D. of duplicate cultures from a representative
experiment. At least three different fields were scored with a minimum
of 100 cells scored per field. Similar results were obtained in two
independent experiments.
|
|
Overexpression of SPHK1 has been shown to specifically protect cells
from apoptosis induced by serum deprivation, but not from cell death
induced by staurosporin, a protein kinase inhibitor (30, 31). Thus it
was relevant to also assess whether SKIP inhibits the cytoprotective
effect of SPHK1. As expected (31), NIH 3T3 cells overexpressing SPHK1
were more resistant to apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal. SKIP
overexpression not only blocked the cytoprotective effect of SPHK1, it
also slightly enhanced apoptosis of serum-starved cells (Fig.
7). Moreover, enforced expression of SKIP
induced cell rounding, particularly when co-expressed with SPHK1.
Together, these data suggest that SKIP blocked the ability of SPHK1 to
protect from cell death.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
SKIP abolishes the cytoprotective effect of
SPHK1 on serum withdrawal. NIH 3T3 cells stably transfected with
Myc-SPHK1 or vector were transiently transfected with either SKIP or
empty vector together with pCEFL-GFP and serum-starved (empty
bars) or cultured in the presence of 10% serum (solid
bars) for 24 h. Total GFP-expressing cells and GFP-expressing
cells displaying fragmented nuclei indicative of apoptosis were counted
as described under "Materials and Methods." Data are means ± S.D. Three independent wells were counted for each treatment, with a
minimum of 100 cells scored per well. Data are representative of three
independent experiments.
|
|
SKIP Overexpression Reduces Prolonged Activation of ERK--
The
mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK is known to play an important role
in cell growth and survival (47). In agreement with many previous
studies (reviewed in Ref. 47), serum transiently stimulated ERK1/2,
reaching a maximum within 10 min and decreasing thereafter (Fig.
8A). Interestingly,
overexpression of SPHK1 resulted in robust and sustained activation of
ERK1/2 in response to serum stimulation that was abolished by SKIP
co-expression. Moreover, SKIP reduced ERK activation induced by serum
in vector-transfected cells. In contrast to its effect on ERK
activation, SKIP did not have significant effects on tyrosine
phosphorylation of other proteins (Fig. 8B).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effects of SKIP expression on ERK
activation. A, prolonged ERK activation is abolished
when SKIP is overexpressed. HEK 293 cells stably transfected with
Myc-SPHK1 or empty vector were transiently transfected with SKIP or
vector. After serum starvation, cells were treated without or with 10%
FBS for the indicated minutes. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotted with an antibody that recognizes the phosphorylated,
active form of pp42/pp44 ERK. Blots were then stripped and re-probed
with an antibody against total ERK to show loading. B, SKIP
overexpression does not affect tyrosine phosphorylation. Lysates from
cells treated as in A were immunoblotted with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. The arrows on the
left indicate proteins whose phosphorylation level increased
following serum addition. Blots were then stripped and re-probed with
anti-Src antibodies to demonstrate equal loading.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
SPHK1 belongs to a family of enzymes expressed in a wide variety
of organisms from plants through higher mammals (48). Despite its
importance in regulating sphingolipid metabolite levels, and its
potential roles in cell growth and survival, there are only a few
studies on its regulation. Previously, it was shown that acidic
phospholipids activate SPHK1 in vitro (49). In agreement, aggregation of the high-affinity receptor Fc RI in monocytes resulted in activation of phospholipase D by tyrosine kinases, leading to
activation of SPHK, which in turn resulted in transient release of
stored calcium (50). However, no phospholipid binding motifs are
present in SPHK1 or SPHK2. Initially, protein kinase C (PKC) was
thought to be involved in SPHK activation (51). However, more recently,
using tyrosine phosphorylation site mutants of PDGFR, it was shown that
although the tyrosine residue responsible for binding of phospholipase
C is required for PDGF-induced activation of SPHK1, calcium
mobilization downstream of phospholipase C , but not PKC activation,
seems to be required for activation of SPHK by PDGF (52). SPHK1 is
rapidly activated in many cell types by a variety of stimuli (reviewed
in Refs. 14 and 53), but almost nothing is known of the molecular
mechanisms involved. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we have now
identified SKIP as a SPHK1-interacting protein that regulates its
activity both in vitro and in situ. Several lines
of evidence indicate that SKIP is a bona fide SPHK1
interactor, including specific SPHK1-GST pull-down assays and
co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Moreover, transfection of SKIP
reduced SPHK1 activity without affecting its expression and abolished
its biological effects, namely the ability to protect cells from
apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal and enhanced cell proliferation.
Interestingly, SKIP also suppressed ERK activation induced by serum or
by SPHK1 overexpression, implicating ERK activation in signaling
pathways downstream of S1P.
Surprisingly, SKIP has high sequence homology to several members of the
AKAP family. AKAPs were identified on the basis of their interaction
with PKA, and their major role is to function as scaffolds and anchors
to a variety of subcellular structures for its regulatory subunit (54,
55). Since PKA has pleiotropic functions in many aspects of signaling,
specificity is achieved through its targeting to the precise site of
action. However, recent structural and functional analysis of AKAPs
indicate a more complex role for these proteins in signal transduction.
AKAPs also bind to a variety of other important signaling kinases and phosphatases, including PKC, PP1, PP2A, and Abl (56-58). For example, the AKAP Yotiao directly binds to the
N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor and
targets both PKA and PP1 to the receptor, bringing together signaling
enzymes with a potential substrate (58). The similarity between the
AKAP family and SKIP suggests that it might also act as a SPHK1
scaffolding or anchoring protein. For example, SPHK1 distribution
within cells is mainly cytoplasmic (31), although its substrate
sphingosine is membrane-associated. SKIP might participate in tethering
SPHK1 to membranes in the proximity of sphingosine and thereby
promoting its activity. Recent studies have shown that following PDGF
stimulation, SPHK1 shows a late phase of activation and nuclear
localization, concomitantly with the initiation of DNA synthesis (41),
and SKIP might be involved in recruiting SPHK1 to the nucleus.
A novel mechanism of SPHK activation by TNF- was recently described
(59). This study revealed an association of SPHK with TNF
receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) one of the major mediators of TNF
actions. This interaction between SPHK and TRAF2 was important for
TNF-induced activation of NF- B and prevention of apoptosis (59).
However, there is little sequence homology or similarity between TRAF2
and SKIP, raising the intriguing possibility that there are different
families of SPHK-interacting proteins that play different roles in its regulation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Debyani Chakravarty and Samantha
Poulton for technical assistance and Francis Flomerfelt for kindly
providing the Matchmaker III yeast two-hybrid system and brain library.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Research Grant RO1 CA61774 from
the National Institutes of Health (to S. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Laboratory of Immunology, Division of Therapeutic
Proteins, Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 29A, 9000 Rockville Pike,
Bethesda, MD 20892.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biophysics, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia
Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0614. Tel.: 804-828-9330;
Fax: 804-828-8999; E-mail: sspiegel@vcu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202841200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
S1P, sphingosine 1-phosphate;
AKAP, protein kinase A anchoring
protein;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine;
EDG, endothelial differentiation gene;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated
kinase;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth
factor;
PDGFR, PDGF receptor;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein
kinase;
PKC, protein kinase C;
SKIP, SPHK-interacting protein;
SPHK, sphingosine kinase;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
TRAF2, TNF
receptor-associated factor 2;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
HA, hemagglutinin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Merrill, A. H., Jr.,
Schmelz, E.-M.,
Dillehay, D. L.,
Spiegel, S.,
Shayman, J. A.,
Schroeder, J. J.,
Riley, R. T.,
Voss, K. A.,
and Wang, E.
(1997)
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
142,
208-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Kolesnick, R.,
and Hannun, Y. A.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
224-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Spiegel, S.,
and Milstien, S.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
476,
55-67[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Hannun, Y. A.,
and Luberto, C.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
73-80[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Venkataraman, K.,
and Futerman, A. H.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
408-412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Hannun, Y. A.,
and Bell, R. M.
(1987)
Science
235,
670-674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Olivera, A.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1993)
Nature
365,
557-560[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Cuvillier, O.,
Pirianov, G.,
Kleuser, B.,
Vanek, P. G.,
Coso, O. A.,
Gutkind, S.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1996)
Nature
381,
800-803[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Edsall, L. C.,
Pirianov, G. G.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
6952-6960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Kleuser, B.,
Cuvillier, O.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
1817-1824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Perez, G. I.,
Knudson, C. M.,
Leykin, L.,
Korsmeyer, S. J.,
and Tilly, J. L.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
1228-1232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Xia, P.,
Wang, L.,
Gamble, J. R.,
and Vadas, M. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34499-34505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Morita, Y.,
Perez, G. I.,
Paris, F.,
Miranda, S. R.,
Ehleiter, D.,
Haimovitz-Friedman, A.,
Fuks, Z.,
Xie, Z.,
Reed, J. C.,
Schuchman, E. H.,
Kolesnick, R. N.,
and Tilly, J. L.
(2000)
Nat. Med.
6,
1109-1114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Pyne, S.,
and Pyne, N. J.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
349,
385-402[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Prieschl, E. E.,
Csonga, R.,
Novotny, V.,
Kikuchi, G. E.,
and Baumruker, T.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
1-8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Goetzl, E. J.,
and An, S.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
1589-1598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Spiegel, S.,
and Milstien, S.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1484,
107-116[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Hla, T.,
Lee, M. J.,
Ancellin, N.,
Paik, J. H.,
and Kluk, M. J.
(2001)
Science
294,
1875-1878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Wang, F.,
Van Brocklyn, J. R.,
Hobson, J. P.,
Movafagh, S.,
Zukowska-Grojec, Z.,
Milstien, S.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35343-35350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Lee, M. J.,
Thangada, S.,
Claffey, K. P.,
Ancellin, N.,
Liu, C. H.,
Kluk, M.,
Volpi, M.,
Sha'afi, R. I.,
and Hla, T.
(1999)
Cell
99,
301-312[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Liu, Y.,
Wada, R.,
Yamashita, T., Mi, Y.,
Deng, C. X.,
Hobson, J. P.,
Rosenfeldt, H. M.,
Nava, V. E.,
Chae, S. S.,
Lee, M. J.,
Liu, C. H.,
Hla, T.,
Spiegel, S.,
and Proia, R. L.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
106,
951-961[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Garcia, J. G.,
Liu, F.,
Verin, A. D.,
Birukova, A.,
Dechert, M. A.,
Gerthoffer, W. T.,
Bamberg, J. R.,
and English, D.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
108,
689-701[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Hobson, J. P.,
Rosenfeldt, H. M.,
Barak, L. S.,
Olivera, A.,
Poulton, S.,
Caron, M. G.,
Milstien, S.,
and Spiegel, S.
(2001)
Science
291,
1800-1803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Okamoto, H.,
Takuwa, N.,
Yokomizo, T.,
Sugimoto, N.,
Sakurada, S.,
Shigematsu, H.,
and Takuwa, Y.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
9247-9261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Kupperman, E., An, S.,
Osborne, N.,
Waldron, S.,
and Stainier, D. Y.
(2000)
Nature
406,
192-195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Mattie, M.,
Brooker, G.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3181-3188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Meyer zu Heringdorf, D.,
Lass, H.,
Alemany, R.,
Laser, K. T.,
Neumann, E.,
Zhang, C.,
Schmidt, M.,
Rauen, U.,
Jakobs, K. H.,
and van Koppen, C. J.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2830-2837[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Meyer zu Heringdorf, D.,
Lass, H.,
Kuchar, I.,
Alemany, R.,
Guo, Y.,
Schmidt, M.,
and Jakobs, K. H.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
461,
217-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
van Koppen, C. J.,
Meyer zu Heringdorf, D.,
Alemany, R.,
and Jakobs, K. H.
(2001)
Life Sci.
68,
2535-2540[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Edsall, L. C.,
Cuvillier, O.,
Twitty, S.,
Spiegel, S.,
and Milstien, S.
(2001)
J. Neurochem.
76,
1573-1584[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Olivera, A.,
Kohama, T.,
Edsall, L. C.,
Nava, V.,
Cuvillier, O.,
Poulton, S.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
545-558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Rosenfeldt, H. M.,
Hobson, J. P.,
Maceyka, M.,
Olivera, A.,
Nava, V. E.,
Milstien, S.,
and Spiegel, S.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
2649-2659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Meyer zu Heringdorf, D.,
Lass, H.,
Kuchar, I.,
Lipinski, M.,
Alemany, R.,
Rumenapp, U.,
and Jakobs, K. H.
(2001)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
414,
145-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Olivera, A.,
Kohama, T., Tu, Z.,
Milstien, S.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12576-12583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Kohama, T.,
Olivera, A.,
Edsall, L.,
Nagiec, M. M.,
Dickson, R.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23722-23728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Liu, H.,
Sugiura, M.,
Nava, V. E.,
Edsall, L. C.,
Kono, K.,
Poulton, S.,
Milstien, S.,
Kohama, T.,
and Spiegel, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
19513-19520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Xia, P.,
Gamble, J. R.,
Wang, L.,
Pitson, S. M.,
Moretti, P. A.,
Wattenberg, B. W.,
D'Andrea, R. J.,
and Vadas, M. A.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
1527-1530[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Nava, V. E.,
Cuvillier, O.,
Edsall, L. C.,
Kimura, K.,
Milstien, S.,
Gelmann, E. P.,
and Spiegel, S.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
4468-4474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Smith, J. A.,
Seidman, J. G.,
and Struhl, K.
(1992)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, Green Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York
|
| 40.
|
Cuvillier, O.,
Rosenthal, D. S.,
Smulson, M. E.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2910-2916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Kleuser, B.,
Maceyka, M.,
Milstien, S.,
and Spiegel, S.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
503,
85-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Nagase, T.,
Kikuno, R.,
Hattori, A.,
Kondo, Y.,
Okumura, K.,
and Ohara, O.
(2000)
DNA Res.
7,
347-355[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Vijayaraghavan, S.,
Liberty, G. A.,
Mohan, J.,
Winfrey, V. P.,
Olson, G. E.,
and Carr, D. W.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
705-717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Reinton, N.,
Collas, P.,
Haugen, T. B.,
Skalhegg, B. S.,
Hansson, V.,
Jahnsen, T.,
and Tasken, K.
(2000)
Dev. Biol.
223,
194-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Pitson, S. M.,
Moretti, P. A.,
Zebol, J. R.,
Xia, P.,
Gamble, J. R.,
Vadas, M. A.,
D'Andrea, R. J.,
and Wattenberg, B. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33945-33950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Vann, L. R.,
Payne, S. G.,
Edsall, L. C.,
Twitty, S.,
Spiegel, S.,
and Milstien, S.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
12649-12656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Chang, L.,
and Karin, M.
(2001)
Nature
410,
37-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Liu, H.,
Maceyka, M.,
Chakravarty, D.,
Milstien, S.,
and Spiegel, S.
(2002)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res.
71,
493-511[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Olivera, A.,
Rosenthal, J.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1996)
J. Cell. Biochem.
60,
529-537[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Melendez, A.,
Floto, R. A.,
Gillooly, D. J.,
Harnett, M. M.,
and Allen, J. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9393-9402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Buehrer, B. M.,
Bardes, E. S.,
and Bell, R. M.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1303,
233-242[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Olivera, A.,
Edsall, L.,
Poulton, S.,
Kazlauskas, A.,
and Spiegel, S.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
1593-1600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Olivera, A.,
and Spiegel, S.
(2001)
Prostaglandins
64,
123-134[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Edwards, A. S.,
and Scott, J. D.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
217-221[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Diviani, D.,
and Scott, J. D.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
1431-1437[Abstract]
|
| 56.
|
Egloff, M. P.,
Johnson, D. F.,
Moorhead, G.,
Cohen, P. T.,
Cohen, P.,
and Barford, D.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1876-1887[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Takahashi, M.,
Shibata, H.,
Shimakawa, M.,
Miyamoto, M.,
Mukai, H.,
and Ono, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17267-17274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Westphal, R. S.,
Tavalin, S. J.,
Lin, J. W.,
Alto, N. M.,
Fraser, I. D.,
Langeberg, L. K.,
Sheng, M.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1999)
Science
285,
93-96[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Xia, P.,
Wang, L.,
Moretti, P. A.,
Albanese, N.,
Chai, F.,
Pitson, S. M.,
D'Andrea, R. J.,
Gamble, J. R.,
and Vadas, M. A.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
7996-8003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Karliner
Sphingosine kinase regulation and cardioprotection
Cardiovasc Res,
May 1, 2009;
82(2):
184 - 192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Li, H.-Y. Guan, L.-Y. Gong, L.-B. Song, N. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Yuan, Y.-J. Zheng, Z.-S. Huang, and M. Li
Clinical Significance of Sphingosine Kinase-1 Expression in Human Astrocytomas Progression and Overall Patient Survival
Clin. Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2008;
14(21):
6996 - 7003.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Maceyka, S. E. Alvarez, S. Milstien, and S. Spiegel
Filamin A Links Sphingosine Kinase 1 and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 1 at Lamellipodia To Orchestrate Cell Migration
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 15, 2008;
28(18):
5687 - 5697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Leclercq, P. A. B. Moretti, M. A. Vadas, and S. M. Pitson
Eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A Interacts with Sphingosine Kinase and Directly Enhances Its Catalytic Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 11, 2008;
283(15):
9606 - 9614.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Karliner
Toward Solving the Riddle: The Enigma Becomes Less Mysterious
Circ. Res.,
September 1, 2006;
99(5):
465 - 467.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. W. Wattenberg, S. M. Pitson, and D. M. Raben
The sphingosine and diacylglycerol kinase superfamily of signaling kinases: localization as a key to signaling function
J. Lipid Res.,
June 1, 2006;
47(6):
1128 - 1139.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kihara, Y. Anada, and Y. Igarashi
Mouse Sphingosine Kinase Isoforms SPHK1a and SPHK1b Differ in Enzymatic Traits Including Stability, Localization, Modification, and Oligomerization
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 17, 2006;
281(7):
4532 - 4539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. V. Stahelin, J. H. Hwang, J.-H. Kim, Z.-Y. Park, K. R. Johnson, L. M. Obeid, and W. Cho
The Mechanism of Membrane Targeting of Human Sphingosine Kinase 1
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 30, 2005;
280(52):
43030 - 43038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sano, A. Kihara, F. Kurotsu, S. Iwaki, and Y. Igarashi
Regulation of the Sphingoid Long-chain Base Kinase Lcb4p by Ergosterol and Heme: STUDIES IN PHYTOSPHINGOSINE-RESISTANT MUTANTS
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 4, 2005;
280(44):
36674 - 36682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. Mastrandrea, S. M. Sessanna, and S. G. Laychock
Sphingosine Kinase Activity and Sphingosine-1 Phosphate Production in Rat Pancreatic Islets and INS-1 Cells: Response to Cytokines
Diabetes,
May 1, 2005;
54(5):
1429 - 1436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yamanaka, D. Shegogue, H. Pei, S. Bu, A. Bielawska, J. Bielawski, B. Pettus, Y. A. Hannun, L. Obeid, and M. Trojanowska
Sphingosine Kinase 1 (SPHK1) Is Induced by Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} and Mediates TIMP-1 Up-regulation
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 24, 2004;
279(52):
53994 - 54001.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Delon, M. Manifava, E. Wood, D. Thompson, S. Krugmann, S. Pyne, and N. T. Ktistakis
Sphingosine Kinase 1 Is an Intracellular Effector of Phosphatidic Acid
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 22, 2004;
279(43):
44763 - 44774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Urtz, A. Olivera, E. Bofill-Cardona, R. Csonga, A. Billich, D. Mechtcheriakova, F. Bornancin, M. Woisetschlager, J. Rivera, and T. Baumruker
Early Activation of Sphingosine Kinase in Mast Cells and Recruitment to Fc{varepsilon}RI Are Mediated by Its Interaction with Lyn Kinase
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 1, 2004;
24(19):
8765 - 8777.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Igarashi, T. Okada, S. Hayashi, T. Fujita, S. Jahangeer, and S.-i. Nakamura
Sphingosine Kinase 2 Is a Nuclear Protein and Inhibits DNA Synthesis
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 21, 2003;
278(47):
46832 - 46839.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Funato, R. Lombardi, B. Vallee, and H. Riezman
Lcb4p Is a Key Regulator of Ceramide Synthesis from Exogenous Long Chain Sphingoid Base in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 21, 2003;
278(9):
7325 - 7334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|