Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204309200 on June 21, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 36, 33235-33241, September 6, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/36/33235    most recent
M204309200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morimoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sigmund, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morimoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sigmund, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Glia- and Neuron-specific Expression of the Renin-Angiotensin System in Brain Alters Blood Pressure, Water Intake, and Salt Preference*

Satoshi MorimotoDagger §, Martin D. Cassell, and Curt D. SigmundDagger ||

From the Dagger  Departments of Internal Medicine and Physiology & Biophysics and the  Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242

Received for publication, May 2, 2002, and in revised form, June 18, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The purpose of this study is to examine the regulation of blood pressure and fluid and electrolyte homeostasis in mice overexpressing angiotensin II (Ang-II) in the brain and to determine whether there are significant physiologic differences in Ang-II production in neurons or glia. Therefore, we generated and characterized transgenic mice overexpressing human renin (hREN) under the control of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter (GFAP-hREN) and synapsin-I promoter (SYN-hREN) and bred them with mice expressing human angiotensinogen (hAGT) under the control of the same promoters (GFAP-hAGT and SYN-hAGT). Both GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN mice exhibited the highest hREN mRNA expression in the brain and had undetectable levels of hREN protein in the systemic circulation. In the brain of GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN mice, hREN protein was observed almost exclusively in astrocytes and neurons, respectively. Transgenic mice overexpressing both hREN and hAGT transgenes in either glia or neurons were moderately hypertensive. In the glia-targeted mice, blood pressure could be corrected by intracerebroventricular injection of the Ang-II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan, and intravenous injection of a ganglion blocking agent, but not an arginine vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist, lowered blood pressure. These data suggest that stimulation of Ang-II type 1 receptors in the brain by Ang-II derived from local synthesis of renin and angiotensinogen can cause an elevation in blood pressure via a mechanism involving enhanced sympathetic outflow. Glia- and neuron-targeted mice also exhibited an increase in drinking volume and salt preference, suggesting that chronic overexpression of renin and angiotensinogen locally in the brain can result in hypertension and alterations in fluid homeostasis.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The peptide angiotensin II (Ang-II)1 is the main circulating effector hormone of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and is able to act not only on peripheral vascular structures but also on the central nervous system (CNS) to increase blood pressure (BP) (1). Substantial evidence has accumulated that Ang-II has actions on the CNS including increasing sympathetic outflow, arginine vasopressin (AVP) release, water intake, and salt appetite (2). Existence of a local RAS in the CNS has been suggested, since all components of this system have been reported in the brain. In addition, several lines of evidence point to a contribution of an overactive brain RAS to the hypertensive state in spontaneously hypertensive rats, deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) salt hypertensive rats, Dahl salt sensitive rats, and renal hypertensive rats (3-6).

Despite numerous studies demonstrating the important cardiovascular effects of Ang-II or Ang-II receptor antagonists injected into the brain, it remains unclear whether RAS components synthesized in the brain, in particular renin and angiotensinogen (AGT), have an important role in the local synthesis of Ang-II. In the brain, AGT expression is localized mainly in astrocytes (glia) (7, 8). To determine whether locally synthesized AGT can be processed to Ang-II in the brain, we generated a transgenic mouse model expressing human AGT (hAGT) under the control of an astrocyte-specific (glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)) promoter (GFAP-hAGT) (9). These mice exhibit hAGT expression primarily in the brain but have a normal BP because of the strict species specificity of the enzymatic reaction between AGT and renin (10). Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of purified recombinant human renin (hREN) protein elicited a pressor response, which was prevented by ICV preinjection of an Ang-II type 1 receptor antagonist, losartan. Accordingly, we concluded that AGT synthesized in the brain can be converted to Ang-II if renin is present. In addition to glia, AGT is expressed in select populations of neurons in regions of the brain, such as the subfornical organ, that can influence cardiovascular function (7, 11). To determine the relevance of neuronal AGT, we also developed a transgene overexpressing hAGT from a neuronal promoter, synapsin-I (SYN) (12). As above, expression was high in the brain, and hAGT was exclusively localized in neurons co-expressing the neuronal marker NeuN. ICV infusion of purified hREN caused a transient pressor response, suggesting that Ang-II release from either glial cells or neurons is functional in the brain.

ICV injection of homologous species renin increases BP in several animals (13, 14), and early studies detected renin activity in the brain (15, 16). Later, immunoreactive renin was found in the hypothalamus and cerebellar cortex in the mouse and rat brain and in neurons in all areas of the human brain (17, 18). Despite these observations and the clear documentation of the expression of the other RAS genes in the brain, the notion that renin is endogenously expressed in brain remains controversial. We recently reported hREN expression in the brain of a new transgenic model containing a tightly regulated hREN transgene (19). Renin-containing cells were detected in neurons in the brain stem, and in glial cells in the hypothalamus and cortex. We therefore hypothesize that local synthesis of renin may cleave locally synthesized AGT to produce brain Ang-II. To test this hypothesis and to determine the functional role of glial and neuronal hREN expression, we generated two novel transgenic mouse models expressing hREN under the control of either the GFAP promoter (GFAP-hREN) or the SYN promoter (SYN-hREN).

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Generation of GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN Transgenic Mice-- A cDNA encoding a modified hREN protein was removed from pRhR1100FM (generous gift from Dr. Timothy L. Reudelhuber, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal), modified by PCR to contain XhoI and MluI ends, and cloned into the XhoI-MluI sites of pSTEC-1 (20, 21). A 2.2-kb fragment of human GFAP promoter was excised with EcoRI from the plasmid gfa2 and was subcloned into pBluescript II SK+/- to form pGFAP-SK (22). The rat SYN promoter was amplified by PCR from pBL4.3 Syn-CAT to contain EcoRV and BamHI ends (23). The modified SYN promoter was cloned into the EcoRV-BamHI sites of pBluescript II SK+/- to create pSYN-SK. The intron, renin cDNA, and SV40 poly(A) site was removed from pSTEC-1 and ligated to pGFAP-SK to create GFAP-hREN and to pSYN-SK to form SYN-hREN. All cloning junctions were confirmed by sequencing. The modifications consisted of replacing the normal prorenin-converting enzyme cleavage site with the ubiquitous processing protease furin and tagging the carboxyl terminus of the protein with a Myc epitope (24). The Myc epitope did not provide sufficient sensitivity to detect the protein using anti-Myc antiserum.

The transgenes were excised by digestion with BssHII and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Transgene DNA was microinjected into one-cell fertilized mouse embryos obtained from superovulated C57BL/6J X SJL/J (B6SJL F2) mice using standard procedures. All transgenic mice were heterozygous and were maintained by breeding with B6SJL F1 mice. Transgenic mice carrying both GFAP-hREN and GFAP-hAGT transgenes were generated by breeding heterozygous GFAP-hREN with heterozygous GFAP-hAGT transgenic mice. The SYN-hREN/SYN-hAGT double transgenic mice were similarly bred.

Mice used for experiments were 15-20 weeks of age. Nontransgenic age-matched littermates from the same breeding were always used as controls in the studies described herein. All mice received standard mouse chow (LM-485; Teklad Premier Laboratory Diets, Madison, WI) and water ad libitum unless specified. Care of the mice used in the experiments met the standards set forth by the National Institutes of Health in their guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals, and all procedures were approved by the University Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Iowa.

Analysis of Nucleic Acids-- Existence of transgene(s) was identified by PCR of tail genomic DNA using hREN- and/or hAGT-specific primer sets as described previously (25). Results of PCR for GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN founder mice were confirmed by Southern blot analysis. Tissues were harvested and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and RNA was purified using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center Inc.). RNase protection assays were performed using the RPA III kit (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX). Total RNA (50 µg) was hybridized to hREN, and mouse beta -actin probes were labeled with [alpha -32P]UTP by in vitro transcription and purified through a Sephadex G-50 spin column (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Protected fragments for hREN and mouse beta -actin were 300 and 245 bp, respectively.

Plasma Renin Assay-- Plasma renin activity and concentration were determined as described previously (26). Radioimmunoassay was performed on plasma using the angiotensin I (Ang-I) 125I-labeled RIA kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Samples were diluted with reagent blank to remain on the linear portion of the standard curve.

Immunohistochemistry-- Brain sections were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS at 25 °C and incubated at 4 °C 18 h with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against hREN (1:2,000 dilution for GFAP-hREN and 1:100 for SYN-hREN; kindly provided by Professor Pierre Corvol, INSERM U36, College de France), which had been preadsorbed with nontransgenic brain sections at 4 °C for 48 h (19). Sections also incubated with mouse monoclonal antisera (Chemicon International Inc.) against either GFAP (1:1,000 dilution), microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2; 1:400 dilution), or neuronal nuclei (NeuN; 1:500) (Chemicon International) as described (19). GFAP-hREN samples were incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (1:250 dilution), avidin D (1:50), biotinylated anti-avidin (1:125), fluorescein avidin D (1:250; all from Vector Laboratories), and rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:100 dilution; Chemicon International); each incubation was at 25 °C for 1 h followed by rinsing with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS except for the last rinse, which used PBS.

Physiology-- Measurement of arterial pressure (AP) and heart rate (HR) and ICV and intravenous infusion studies were performed in conscious, unrestrained mice as described previously (9). Briefly, base-line AP and HR were measured continuously for 1 h/day for 3 consecutive days starting 2 days after surgery. The effect of ICV losartan (10 µg; generous gift of Merck) and artificial cerebrospinal fluid on basal AP and HR was examined. Intravenous injection of the same dose of losartan was also tested. The effects of intravenous injection of a ganglion blocker, hexamethonium (5 mg/kg intravenously), an antagonist of peripheral arginine vasopressin (AVP) V1 receptors (AVPX; Manning Compound (d(CH2)5Tyr2(ME)Arg8)-vasopressin; 10 µg/kg intravenously), and saline on base-line AP and HR were also determined. All hemodynamic data were collected and analyzed on a computer using Chart version 4.0.1 in Powerlab.

Drinking volume of water and salt preference were measured as described previously (9); water intake was measured individually in metabolic cages with standard chow and tap water ad libitum daily for 3 days. To determine salt preference, mice were fed salt-deficient chow and given 0.3 mol/liter hypertonic saline and tap water in separate randomized burettes ad libitum for 3 days. Salt preference was calculated as a percentage by dividing the volume of saline consumed by the total volume of fluid consumed. Urinary volume was measured by collecting 24-h urine in metabolic cages with standard chow ground with tap water (100 g of chow/150 ml of water) and tap water ad libitum daily for 3 days. Urinary and plasma osmolality were measured by using a vapor pressure osmometer (Wescor Inc.).

Statistical Analysis-- Data were expressed as mean ± S.E. Group comparisons were made with unpaired t tests and confirmed with repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Student's modified t test with Bonferroni correction. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN transgenic mice were generated by fusing the GFAP and SYN promoters to a hREN cDNA. Since the mechanisms activating renin in the brain are unknown, we chose to use a hREN cDNA that was modified to contain a ubiquitous furin cleavage site in place of the prorenin-converting enzyme site normally separating the prosegment from the active enzyme (Fig. 1A). Three transgenic founders of each construct were identified, and two GFAP-hREN and three SYN-hREN founders were successfully bred to establish transgenic lines.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic map and expression. A, schematic map of the transgenes. The start site of transcription is indicated as +1. The transgene was excised as a BssHII (Bss) fragment for microinjection. The mutations made to the renin cDNA to replace the prorenin-converting enzyme site (PCE) with furin are shown. B and C, RNase protection assay of RNA from a male GFAP-hREN (line 10267/4; B) and male SYN-hAGT (line 11110/2; C) transgenic mouse are shown. The hREN and beta -actin transcripts are indicated. +, kidney of a transgenic mouse expressing hREN under the control of its own promoter; -, liver of a known nontransgenic mouse; Br, brain; P, peripheral nerve; Lv, liver; K, kidney; H, heart; Lu, lung; Ag, adrenal gland; Ao, aorta; Sp, spleen; Sg, submandibular gland; D, diaphragm; Wa, white adipose tissue; Ba, brown adipose tissue; Sm, skeletal muscle; T, testes.

An RNase protection assay was used to examine the tissue-specific expression of the transgenes. In GFAP-hREN line 10267/4, low but clearly detectable expression of hREN mRNA was observed in the brain with lower expression in other tissues such as heart, lung, spleen, submandibular gland, and white adipose tissue (Fig. 1B). In SYN-hREN line 11110/2, robust expression of hREN mRNA was detected in the brain, with low level ectopic expression evident in brown adipose tissue (Fig. 1C). Table I shows a quantitative summary of hREN mRNA expression in all lines of GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN transgenic mice. GFAP-hREN line 10267/4 and Syn-hREN line 11110/2 were selected for further analysis, since these exhibited the highest level of expression in the brain and retained the most brain-restricted pattern of hREN expression.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of hREN expression in GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN transgenic mice
Expression was quantified by scanning the RPA films and analyzed by NIH (SCION) IMAGE. Scans were first calibrated with an identical positive control sample run on each RPA gel and then were normalized for loading and sample loss using the actin band. Units are arbitrary. Samples with n = 3 are mean ± S.E. Samples with n = 2 are the average of both runs. Con, construct; G, GFAP-hREN; S, SYN-hREN; WAT, white adipose tissue; BAT, brown adipose tissue.

Given the presence of "ectopic" hREN mRNA expression in tissues outside the brain, we were concerned that hREN protein might be released into the systemic circulation. Therefore, we measured plasma hREN concentration to determine whether transgene expression outside the brain results in a significant increase of hREN protein in the systemic circulation (Table II). The fidelity and specificity of the assay was confirmed by the observation of basal levels of mouse renin (24.5 ± 3.7 versus 30.3 ± 3.4 ng of Ang-I/ml/h, transgenic versus control) and hREN protein (14.1 ± 1.7 versus 3.2 ± 0.8 ng of Ang-I/ml/h, transgenic versus control) in the plasma of transgenic mice expressing hREN under the control of its own promoter (termed systemic hREN transgenic mice) (27). Although all five lines of GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN transgenic mice exhibited a slight increase in hREN concentration in the plasma, these values were not significantly different from those for nontransgenic mice. Accordingly, it is unlikely that a significant amount of hREN protein is released into the systemic circulation in either the glial or neuronal transgenic models.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Plasma hREN concentration

To examine the cell-specific expression of the transgene in the brain, double labeling for hREN and GFAP (a glial marker), MAP-2, or NeuN (neuronal markers) was performed. In GFAP-hREN transgenic mice, hREN staining was observed in the cell bodies and processes of astrocytes in almost all regions of the brain as confirmed by co-staining with GFAP, but not with MAP-2 (Fig. 2, A-D; Table III). In nontransgenic mice, some very light hREN immunostaining of glia-like elements was observed in cortex (Fig. 2E). This immunostaining was generally distributed throughout the brain and showed no regional specificity. The only exception to this was the subfornical organ (Fig. 2, F-I) and area postrema (data not shown), where hREN co-localized with both GFAP and MAP-2. We showed previously that the GFAP promoter targeted expression of hAGT to neurons in the subfornical organ (9). In addition, hREN-positive radial astroglia were observed in cerebellum (Fig. 2J). Strong nonspecific staining was still detected in the Purkinje cell layer of the cerebellum in both controls and transgenic mice although the antiserum was preadsorbed with brain sections from control mice (Fig. 2, J and K). In SYN-hREN mice, hREN staining was observed in the cell bodies of neurons in all regions of the brain as confirmed by co-staining with NeuN but not with GFAP (Fig. 3, A-D, Table III). Only low background staining was observed in sections from nontransgenic controls (Fig. 3E).


View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Cell-specific expression of hREN protein in the brain of GFAP-hREN mouse. Representative photomicrographs of double labeling for hREN and GFAP or hREN and MAP-2 in brain. In cerebral cortex, GFAP-positive (B) but not MAP-2-positive cells (D) were co-stained with hREN (A and C) in GFAP-hREN mice. In subfornical organ, both GFAP-positive (G) and MAP-2-positive cells (I) were double-labeled with hREN (F and H, arrows). In cerebellum, hREN-positive radial astroglia were observed (J, white arrow). In nontransgenic mice, some very light immunostaining of glia-like elements was observed (E). However, this immunostaining was generally distributed throughout the brain and showed no regional specificity, with the exception of the Purkinje cell layer, where strong immunostaining was observed in both GFAP-hREN and nontransgenic mice (J and K, respectively, yellow arrows). A and B, C and D, F and G, and H and I are pairs of the same sections.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Distribution of hREN staining in brain of transgenic mice
The symbols are: +, expression positive; -, expression negative; +?, expression likely; ?, expression unclear.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Cell-specific expression of hREN protein in the brain of SYN-hREN mouse. Representative photomicrographs are shown of double labeling for hREN and NeuN (neuronal marker) or hREN and GFAP (glial marker) in the cerebral cortex. NeuN-positive (B) but not GFAP-positive cells (D) were co-stained with hREN (A and C) in SYN-hREN transgenic mice. No hREN staining was observed in nontransgenic mice (E). Panels A and B and panels C and D are pairs of the same sections.

To examine the physiological significance of the local production of renin and AGT in the brain on BP and electrolyte homeostasis, we generated GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT and SYN-hREN/SYN-hAGT double transgenic mice. Because there is a strict species specificity of the biochemical reaction between AGT and renin (10), there was no difference in base-line mean arterial pressure (MAP) or HR between single GFAP-hREN transgenic mice (lacking the human AGT gene) and their nontransgenic littermates (GFAP-hREN, 118 ± 3 mm Hg, 590 ± 32 bpm, n = 5; nontransgenic, 116 ± 4 mm Hg, 594 ± 20 bpm, n = 7) or between single SYN-hREN transgenic mice and their nontransgenic littermates (SYN-hREN, 114 ± 3 mm Hg, 628 ± 34 bpm, n = 5; nontransgenic, 119 ± 5 mm Hg, 609 ± 28 bpm, n = 5). In contrast, both the neuronal and glial double transgenic mice (containing both hREN and hAGT in brain) exhibited a moderate but significant elevation in MAP on each of the 3 days of measurement (compiled in Fig. 4). Although statistically significant, the elevation in MAP is probably not enough to consider them overtly hypertensive, since there are some strains of mice with higher base line arterial pressure (28). Base-line HR was not significantly different between double transgenic and control groups.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Arterial pressure in double transgenic mice. Shown are resting MAP in GR/GA (black bar, n = 9), SR/SA (hatched bar, n = 8) and controls (NT; open bar, n = 12). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 compared with controls.

ICV injection of losartan (10 µg) caused an approximately 11 mm Hg fall in MAP in the GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT mice, reducing MAP back to base line (Fig. 5A). Nontransgenic mice exhibited only a 5 mm Hg decrease in MAP. The HR change induced by ICV losartan was variable and did not achieve statistical significance in either group. Intravenous administration of the same amount of losartan-injected ICV did not significantly affect MAP or HR in either group. Because of the possible contribution of increased brain RAS to the elevated BP in these double transgenic mice, we wanted to investigate the mechanism of chronic BP elevation downstream of the CNS. We focused these studies in the GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT mice because the blood pressure increase was larger than in SYN-hREN/SYN-hAGT. The major mechanisms of pressor response to ICV Ang-II are via activation of sympathetic nervous system and/or AVP secretion. Consequently, we examined the effects of intravenous treatment with a ganglionic blocking agent, hexamethonium, and an AVP V1 receptor antagonist, AVPX, on BP. Intravenous injection of hexamethonium caused a greater fall in MAP in glia-specific mice than nontransgenic mice (Fig. 5B). Although the reduction in MAP by intravenous AVPX tended to be greater in the transgenic mice, the difference did not achieve statistical significance (Fig. 5C).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mechanism of hypertension in GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT double transgenic mice. A, blood pressure responses to ICV injection of losartan (10 µg) in GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT transgenic mice (black bar, n = 6) and controls (NT; white bar, n = 6). B, blood pressure responses to intravenous infusion of hexamethonium in GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT transgenic mice (black bar, n = 5) and controls (white bar, n = 5). C, blood pressure responses to intravenous injection of AVPX in GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT transgenic mice (black bar, n = 5) and controls (white bar, n = 5). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 compared with controls.

Finally, we measured drinking volume, salt preference, and urinary volume in both the glia- and neuron-specific double transgenic mice (Fig. 6). Drinking volume and salt preference were significantly higher in both models compared with controls (Fig. 6, A and B). Concomitant with increased water intake, urinary volume was significantly higher in the double transgenics (Fig. 6C). Urinary osmolality was lower in glia-specific mice (1,612 ± 163 mosmol/KgH2O, n = 11) than controls (2,240 ± 156 mosmol/KgH2O, n = 11, p < 0.01). Urinary osmolality tended to be lower in neuron-specific mice (1,804 ± 168 mosmol/KgH2O, n = 11) but did not reach statistical significance. In this light, urine output was lower in the neuron-specific mice than in the glia-specific mice (Fig. 6C). Plasma osmolality was not different between the groups (glia-specific, 335 ± 9, n = 5; neuron-specific, 325 ± 6, n = 9; controls, 316 ± 7, n = 6, in mosmol/KgH2O).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Volume homeostasis in double transgenic mice. A, drinking volume of water in GR/GA (black bar, n = 13), SR/SA (cross-hatched bar, n = 7) and control mice (NT; open bar, n = 19). B, salt preference in GR/GA (black bar, n = 12), SR/SA (cross-hatched bar, n = 7) and control mice (white bar, n = 12). C, urinary volume in GR/GA (black bar, n = 11), SR/SA (cross-hatched bar, n = 7), and control mice (white bar, n = 12). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 compared with controls.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Renin is the rate-limiting regulator of the enzymatic cascade leading to the production of Ang-II in most mammals. The juxtaglomerular cells of the kidney are the primary site of synthesis, storage, processing, and release of renin. Classic dogma maintains that renin is released from the kidney into the circulation, where it cleaves AGT derived from the liver to produce Ang-I, which is further converted into blood-borne Ang-II. In addition to this, renin is synthesized in extrarenal tissues such as brain and adrenal gland (29). Ganten et al. (15) and Fischer-Ferraro et al. (16) published the first reports demonstrating central renin activity. Renin activity is widely distributed in the brain, with the highest levels in the pineal gland, pituitary gland, and pons-medulla (30). Substantial controversy still remains as to the localization of renin-containing cells in the brain. For example, immunoreactive renin was detected in most nerve cells throughout the human brain, whereas it was detected only in hypothalamus and cerebellar cortex in the brain of rodents (17, 18). We recently examined the cellular localization of renin in the brain of transgenic mice containing the hREN gene encoded on a large P1 artificial chromosome. This transgene, because it contains extensive amounts of 5'- and 3'-flanking DNA exhibits a tightly regulated and highly specific cell type-restricted expression of hREN (31). In these mice, hREN immunoreactivity was observed in glial cells and neurons in the brain stem, hypothalamus, and cerebrum (19).

Renin activity is increased in the brain of SHR, the most widely used animal model of human essential hypertension (32). Expression of hREN and hAGT is evident in the brain of hypertensive double transgenic mice overexpressing both hREN and hAGT transgenes (33). In SHR and hREN/hAGT double transgenic mice, ICV injection of Ang-II receptor antagonists is effective in lowering BP (33, 34). Therefore, it has long been suggested that renin synthesized in the brain may also have an important role in the regulation of BP through the local generation of Ang-II. However, since both SHR and hREN/hAGT double transgenic mice have systemic factors affecting BP, it remains unclear whether brain-specific expression of renin per se has an important role in the regulation of cardiovascular function in these models.

To examine the physiological role of brain-derived Ang-II in the regulation of BP and to begin to distinguish between the effects of Ang-II derived from glial cells and neurons, we developed transgenic models expressing hAGT from the astrocyte-specific GFAP promoter and the neuron-specific SYN promoter (9, 12). Double transgenic mice containing the GFAP-hAGT and an hREN transgene expressed systemically (in plasma, kidney, brain, and other tissues) but not specifically in the brain resulted in hypertension (9). Interestingly, double transgenic mice expressing SYN-hAGT and a systemically expressed hREN transgene were normotensive, despite the pressor response caused by infusion of purified hREN in the brain (12). These studies allowed us to conclude that AGT synthesized in brain is the substrate for local synthesis of Ang-II. However, since hREN was present in the systemic circulation of that model and could potentially gain access to regions of the brain outside the blood-brain interface (e.g. the circumventricular organs), we could not conclude that the Ang-II was derived from cleavage of AGT from brain-derived renin.

To generate a model of exclusive synthesis of Ang-II in the brain, we generated two additional transgenic models, expressing hREN under the control of the GFAP and SYN promoters. As shown herein, hREN mRNA was expressed in the brain, and hREN protein was localized mainly in astrocytes and neurons, respectively. Although some hREN expression was detected outside the CNS, such as in lung and adipose tissue, its expression was lower than in brain, and importantly, no hREN protein was detected in the systemic circulation. Double transgenic mice containing both the GFAP-hREN and GFAP-hAGT and the SYN-hREN and SYN-hAGT transgenes exhibited a modest increase in arterial pressure. Determination of whether this increase is clinically relevant will require additional studies to determine whether these mice exhibit the typical sequalae associated with hypertension such as vascular and renal dysfunction and cardiac hypertrophy. It should be noted, however, that a 10-15 mm Hg rise in pressure is approximately what is anticipated of a single gene effect in polygenic hypertension.

In the glial model, the elevated blood pressure was corrected by ICV losartan, whereas the same dose of losartan administered intravenously did not affect BP. This suggests that the BP elevation was due to the local generation and action of Ang-II in the brain and not from any leakage into the systemic circulation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme and AT1 receptors are present in the same region of the brain that expresses hREN and hAGT, ensuring that all components of the RAS are present for the generation and action of Ang-II in our model (35-37). Consequently, our data are consistent with the notion that Ang-II, chronically overproduced via processing of brain hAGT by brain hREN and ACE, stimulated local Ang-II type 1 receptors to raise BP.

In addition to the rise in BP, both double transgenic mice exhibited increased drinking volume and salt preference, suggesting that chronic overexpression of renin and AGT within the brain is capable of affecting water intake and salt appetite. Angiotensin-induced thirst is primarily mediated in the OVLT, subfornical organ, and median preoptic nucleus, and angiotensin-induced sodium appetite originates in the OVLT and median preoptic nucleus, where central osmoreceptors function to maintain constant extracellular osmotic pressure (2, 38, 39). It is tempting to speculate that increased concentration of Ang-II in these areas may be involved in the mechanism of altered behavior in these mice.

Mechanistically, the rise in BP in the glial-specific model may be due, at least in part, to an increase in sympathetic nerve activity. This is suggested by the greater fall in BP in double transgenic mice than control mice treated with hexamethonium. However, there was no significant difference in the reduction in BP in double transgenic and control mice treated with an AVP receptor antagonist. This differs from previous studies of double transgenic mice containing systemically expressed transgenes (R+/A+), where BP was significantly lowered by AVP receptor antagonist (33). These data suggest that the mechanisms maintaining elevated BP in the models may differ. It is possible that AVP release, and therefore the response to AVP receptor antagonists, is blunted in the GR/GA model due to feedback inhibition caused by the elevated drinking. In the glia-specific model, two separate mechanisms may be operating to maintain an elevation in BP, increased sympathetic outflow and increased water intake, caused by the activation of Ang-II type 1 receptors from local overproduction of Ang-II in distinct nuclei regulating each process.

This raises an important question regarding the physiological relevance of these transgenic models. In the GFAP-hAGT model, hAGT is widely expressed in glial cells throughout the brain, thus emulating the normal pattern of astrocytic expression of AGT in the brain (8). With renin, however, we must recognize that hREN expression in the GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN model is very likely produced in both normal renin-expressing cells and by ectopic cells. It is important to remember that proven tools do not currently exist to specifically target renin expression to highly restricted regions of the brain, thus leaving us with tools that may not totally allow us to completely recapitulate the normal pattern of gene expression. Moreover, it is equally important to point out that we are just beginning to understand some of the basic processes governing Ang-II production in the brain. For instance, we and others recently reported that an altered form of renin mRNA, deriving from the utilization of an alternative transcription site may be used in the brain (40, 41). If translated, this mRNA would encode an intracellular (nonsecreted) and constitutively active form of the protein, suggesting the intriguing possibility of an intracellular pathway of angiotensin production in brain. Intracellular production of Ang-II has been proposed but remains controversial (42). The GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN models described herein utilized a mutant renin that should essentially be constitutively active because of the cleavage of prorenin to renin by furin, a ubiquitous processing protease expressed in the brain (43). Studies are currently under way to examine the regulation of BP and electrolyte balance in a new model expressing only the intracellular (nonsecreted) form of the protein in the brain.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Transgenic mice were generated and maintained at the University of Iowa Transgenic Animal Facility, which is supported in part by the College of Medicine and the Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center. DNA sequencing was performed at the University of Iowa DNA Core Facility. We thank Norma Sinclair, Patricia Lovell, Brandon Campbell, Debbie Davis, and Xiaoji Zhang for excellent technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* The work described herein was funded by National Institutes of Health Grants HL58048, HL61446, and HL55006.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the American Heart Association Heartland Affiliate.

|| To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Depts. of Internal Medicine and Physiology & Biophysics, 3181B Medical Education and Biomedical Research Facility, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242. Tel.: 319-335-7604; Fax: 319-353-5350; E-mail: curt-sigmund@uiowa.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204309200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Ang, angiotensin; GR/GA, GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT; SR/SA, SYN-hREN/SYN-hAGT; RAS, renin-angiotensin system; CNS, central nervous system; BP, blood pressure; AVP, arginine vasopressin; AGT, angiotensinogen; hAGT, human AGT; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; ICV, intracerebroventricular; hREN, human renin; SYN, synapsin-I; AP, arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; MAP-2, microtubule-associated protein-2; MAP, mean arterial pressure; AVP, arginine vasopressin; bpm, beat per minute.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Bickerton, R. K., and Buckley, J. P. (1961) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 106, 834-837[CrossRef]
2. Wright, J. W., and Harding, J. W. (1992) Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 17, 227-262[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Yongue, B. G., Angulo, J. A., McEwen, B. S., and Myers, M. M. (1991) Hypertension 17, 485-491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Pochiero, M., Nicoletta, P., Losi, E., Bianchi, A., and Caputi, A. P. (1983) Pharmacol. Res. Commun. 15, 173-182[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Lark, L. A., and Weyhenmeyer, J. A. (1992) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 222, 33-37[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Nishimura, M., Milsted, A., Block, C. H., Brosnihan, K. B., and Ferrario, C. M. (1992) Hypertens. 20, 158-167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Thomas, W. G., and Sernia, C. (1988) Neuroscience 25, 319-341[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Stornetta, R. L., Hawelu Johnson, C. L., Guyenet, P. G., and Lynch, K. R. (1988) Science 242, 1444-1446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Morimoto, S., Cassell, M. D., Beltz, T. G., Johnson, A. K., Davisson, R. L., and Sigmund, C. D. (2001) Circ. Res. 89, 365-372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Hatae, T., Takimoto, E., Murakami, K., and Fukamizu, A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 131, 43-47[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Imboden, H., Harding, J. W., Hilgenfeldt, U., Celio, M. R., and Felix, D. (1987) Brain Res. 410, 74-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Morimoto, S., Cassell, M. D., and Sigmund, C. D. (2002) Physiol Genomics 9, 113-120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Buckley, J. P., Jandhyala, B. S., Doursout, M. F., Huang, Y. K., and Chelly, J. E. (1984) J Physiol (Paris) 79, 485-490[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Kawasaki, H., Takasaki, K., and Furukawa, T. (1987) Eur. J Pharmacol. 138, 351-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ganten, D., Marquez-Julio, A., Granger, P., Hayduk, K., Karsunky, K. P., Boucher, R., and Genest, J. (1971) Am. J. Physiol. 221, 1733-1737[Free Full Text]
16. Fischer-Ferraro, C., Nahmod, V. E., Goldstein, D. J., and Finkielman, S. (1971) J. Exp. Med. 133, 353-361[Abstract]
17. Fuxe, K., Ganten, D., Hokfelt, T., Locatelli, V., Poulsen, K., Stock, G., Rix, E., and Taugner, R. (1980) Neurosci. Lett. 18, 245-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Slater, E. E., Defendini, R., and Zimmerman, E. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 5458-5460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Morimoto, S., Cassell, M. D., and Sigmund, C. D. (2002) Circ. Res. 90, 80-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Stec, D. E., Morimoto, S., and Sigmund, C. D. (2001) BioTechniques 31, 256-260[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Chu, W. N., Baxter, J. D., and Reudelhuber, T. L. (1990) Mole. Endocrinol. 4, 1905-1913
22. Brenner, M., Kisseberth, W. C., Su, Y., Besnard, F., and Messing, A. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 1030-1037[Abstract]
23. Hoesche, C., Sauerwald, A., Veh, R. W., Krippl, B., and Kilimann, M. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26494-26502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Prescott, G., Silversides, D. W., Chiu, S. M., and Reudelhuber, T. L. (2000) Physiol Genomics 4, 67-73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Merrill, D. C., Thompson, M. W., Carney, C., Schlager, G., Robillard, J. E., and Sigmund, C. D. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 1047-1055[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Thompson, M. W., Smith, S. B., and Sigmund, C. D. (1996) Hypertension 28, 290-296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Sigmund, C. D., Jones, C. A., Kane, C. M., Wu, C., Lang, J. A., and Gross, K. W. (1992) Circ. Res. 70, 1070-1079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Ryan, M. J., Didion, S. P., Davis, D. R., Faraci, F. M., and Sigmund, C. D. (2002) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22, 42-48[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Bader, M., Peters, J., Baltatu, O., Muller, D. N., Luft, F. C., and Ganten, D. (2001) J Mol. Med. 79, 76-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Genain, C. P., Van Loon, G. R., and Kotchen, T. A. (1985) J. Clin. Invest. 76, 1939-1945[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Sinn, P. L., Davis, D. R., and Sigmund, C. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35785-35793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Schelling, P., Meyer, D., Loos, H. E., Speck, G., Phillips, M. I., Johnson, A. K., and Ganten, D. (1982) Neuropharmacology 21, 455-463[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Davisson, R. L., Yang, G., Beltz, T. G., Cassell, M. D., Johnson, A. K., and Sigmund, C. D. (1998) Circ. Res. 83, 1047-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Phillips, M. I., Mann, J. F., Haebara, H., Hoffman, W. E., Dietz, R., Schelling, P., and Ganten, D. (1977) Nature 270, 445-447[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Kakar, S. S., Riel, K. K., and Neill, J. D. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 185, 688-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Rowe, B. P., Grove, K. L., Saylor, D. L., and Speth, R. C. (1990) European Journal of Pharmacology 186, 339-342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Mendelsohn, F. A., Chai, S. Y., and Dunbar, M. (1984) J. Hypertens. Suppl 2, S41-S44[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Fitts, D. A., and Masson, D. B. (1990) Behav. Neurosci. 104, 643-650[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Fitts, D. A., Tjepkes, D. S., and Bright, R. O. (1990) Behav. Neurosci. 104, 818-827[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Sinn, P. L., and Sigmund, C. D. (2000) Physiol. Genomics 3, 25-31[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Lee-Kirsch, M. A., Gaudet, F., Cardoso, M. C., and Lindpaintner, K. (1999) Circ. Res. 84, 240-246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Cook, J. L., Zhang, Z., and Re, R. N. (2001) Circ. Res. 89, 1138-1146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Day, R., Schafer, M. K., Cullinan, W. E., Watson, S. J., Chretien, M., and Seidah, N. G. (1993) Neurosci. Lett. 149, 27-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
X. Hou, S. F. Theriault, I. Dostanic-Larson, A. E. Moseley, J. B Lingrel, H. Wu, S. Dean, and J. W. Van Huysse
Enhanced pressor response to increased CSF sodium concentration and to central ANG I in heterozygous {alpha}2 Na+-K+-ATPase knockout mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): R1427 - R1438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
C. D. Sigmund
A growing chain of evidence linking genetic variation in angiotensinogen with essential hypertension: focus on "A haplotype of human angiotensinogen gene containing -217A increases blood pressure in transgenic mice compared with -217G," by Jain et al.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): R1846 - R1848.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. Lazartigues, P. Sinnayah, G. Augoyard, C. Gharib, A. K. Johnson, and R. L. Davisson
Enhanced water and salt intake in transgenic mice with brain-restricted overexpression of angiotensin (AT1) receptors
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): R1539 - R1545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. E. Dickson, X. Tian, X. Liu, D. R. Davis, and C. D. Sigmund
Upstream Stimulatory Factor Is Required for Human Angiotensinogen Expression and Differential Regulation by the A-20C Polymorphism
Circ. Res., October 24, 2008; 103(9): 940 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
J. L. Grobe, D. Xu, and C. D. Sigmund
An Intracellular Renin-Angiotensin System in Neurons: Fact, Hypothesis, or Fantasy
Physiology, August 1, 2008; 23(4): 187 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. C. Arnold, A. Sakima, D. Ganten, C. M. Ferrario, and D. I. Diz
Modulation of Reflex Function by Endogenous Angiotensins in Older Transgenic Rats With Low Glial Angiotensinogen
Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1326 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Sakima, D. B. Averill, S. O. Kasper, L. Jackson, D. Ganten, C. M. Ferrario, P. E. Gallagher, and D. I. Diz
Baroreceptor reflex regulation in anesthetized transgenic rats with low glia-derived angiotensinogen
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1412 - H1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. E. Dickson, M. B. Zimmerman, K. Rahmouni, and C. D. Sigmund
The -20 and -217 Promoter Variants Dominate Differential Angiotensinogen Haplotype Regulation in Angiotensinogen-Expressing Cells
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 631 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. A. Campos, R. Iliescu, M. A. P. Fontes, W.-P. Schlegel, M. Bader, and O. C. Baltatu
Enhanced isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy in transgenic rats with low brain angiotensinogen
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2371 - H2376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. E. Dickson and C. D. Sigmund
Genetic Basis of Hypertension: Revisiting Angiotensinogen
Hypertension, July 1, 2006; 48(1): 14 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. A.L. Dampney
Angiotensin Type 1A Receptors on Glial Cells in Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla and Hypertension
Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1052 - 1053.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. L. Lavoie, X. Liu, R. A. Bianco, T. G. Beltz, A. K. Johnson, and C. D. Sigmund
Evidence Supporting a Functional Role for Intracellular Renin in the Brain
Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 461 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Sherrod, D. R. Davis, X. Zhou, M. D. Cassell, and C. D. Sigmund
Glial-specific ablation of angiotensinogen lowers arterial pressure in renin and angiotensinogen transgenic mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1763 - R1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Yoneda, H. Sanada, J. Yatabe, S. Midorikawa, S. Hashimoto, M. Sasaki, T. Katoh, T. Watanabe, P. M. Andrews, P. A. Jose, et al.
Differential Effects of Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antisense Oligonucleotides on Renal Function in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 58 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Sherrod, X. Liu, X. Zhang, and C. D. Sigmund
Nuclear localization of angiotensinogen in astrocytes
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): R539 - R546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
K. Sakai, M. W. Chapleau, S. Morimoto, M. D. Cassell, and C. D. Sigmund
Differential modulation of baroreflex control of heart rate by neuron- vs. glia-derived angiotensin II
Physiol Genomics, December 15, 2004; 20(1): 66 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. L. Lavoie, K. D. Lake-Bruse, and C. D. Sigmund
Increased blood pressure in transgenic mice expressing both human renin and angiotensinogen in the renal proximal tubule
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): F965 - F971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. L. Lavoie, M. D. Cassell, K. W. Gross, and C. D. Sigmund
Adjacent Expression of Renin and Angiotensinogen in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Using a Dual-Reporter Transgenic Model
Hypertension, May 1, 2004; 43(5): 1116 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. Vialou, A. Amphoux, R. Zwart, B. Giros, and S. Gautron
Organic Cation Transporter 3 (Slc22a3) Is Implicated in Salt-Intake Regulation
J. Neurosci., March 17, 2004; 24(11): 2846 - 2851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. L. Lavoie, M. D. Cassell, K. W. Gross, and C. D. Sigmund
Localization of renin expressing cells in the brain, by use of a REN-eGFP transgenic model
Physiol Genomics, January 15, 2004; 16(2): 240 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
R. L. Davisson
Physiological genomic analysis of the brain renin-angiotensin system
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2003; 285(3): R498 - R511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. L. Lavoie and C. D. Sigmund
Minireview: Overview of the Renin-Angiotensin System--An Endocrine and Paracrine System
Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2179 - 2183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
O. Skott
Angiotensin II and control of sodium and water intake in the mouse
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): R1380 - R1381.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/36/33235    most recent
M204309200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morimoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sigmund, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morimoto, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sigmund, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement