|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204309200 on June 21, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 36, 33235-33241, September 6, 2002
Glia- and Neuron-specific Expression of the
Renin-Angiotensin System in Brain Alters Blood Pressure, Water Intake,
and Salt Preference*
Satoshi
Morimoto §,
Martin D.
Cassell¶, and
Curt D.
Sigmund
From the Departments of Internal Medicine and
Physiology & Biophysics and the ¶ Department of Anatomy and Cell
Biology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University
of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Received for publication, May 2, 2002, and in revised form, June 18, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The purpose of this study is to examine the
regulation of blood pressure and fluid and electrolyte homeostasis in
mice overexpressing angiotensin II (Ang-II) in the brain and to
determine whether there are significant physiologic differences in
Ang-II production in neurons or glia. Therefore, we generated and
characterized transgenic mice overexpressing human renin (hREN) under
the control of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter
(GFAP-hREN) and synapsin-I promoter (SYN-hREN) and bred them with mice
expressing human angiotensinogen (hAGT) under the control of the same
promoters (GFAP-hAGT and SYN-hAGT). Both GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN mice
exhibited the highest hREN mRNA expression in the brain and had
undetectable levels of hREN protein in the systemic circulation. In the
brain of GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN mice, hREN protein was observed almost exclusively in astrocytes and neurons, respectively. Transgenic mice
overexpressing both hREN and hAGT transgenes in either glia or neurons
were moderately hypertensive. In the glia-targeted mice, blood pressure
could be corrected by intracerebroventricular injection of the Ang-II
type 1 receptor antagonist losartan, and intravenous injection of
a ganglion blocking agent, but not an arginine vasopressin
V1 receptor antagonist, lowered blood pressure. These data suggest that
stimulation of Ang-II type 1 receptors in the brain by Ang-II derived
from local synthesis of renin and angiotensinogen can cause an
elevation in blood pressure via a mechanism involving enhanced
sympathetic outflow. Glia- and neuron-targeted mice also exhibited an
increase in drinking volume and salt preference, suggesting that
chronic overexpression of renin and angiotensinogen locally in the
brain can result in hypertension and alterations in fluid homeostasis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The peptide angiotensin II
(Ang-II)1 is the main
circulating effector hormone of the renin-angiotensin system
(RAS) and is able to act not only on peripheral vascular structures but
also on the central nervous system (CNS) to increase blood pressure (BP) (1). Substantial evidence has accumulated that Ang-II has actions
on the CNS including increasing sympathetic outflow, arginine
vasopressin (AVP) release, water intake, and salt appetite (2).
Existence of a local RAS in the CNS has been suggested, since all
components of this system have been reported in the brain. In addition,
several lines of evidence point to a contribution of an overactive
brain RAS to the hypertensive state in spontaneously hypertensive rats,
deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) salt hypertensive rats, Dahl
salt sensitive rats, and renal hypertensive rats (3-6).
Despite numerous studies demonstrating the important cardiovascular
effects of Ang-II or Ang-II receptor antagonists injected into the
brain, it remains unclear whether RAS components synthesized in the
brain, in particular renin and angiotensinogen (AGT), have an important
role in the local synthesis of Ang-II. In the brain, AGT expression is
localized mainly in astrocytes (glia) (7, 8). To determine whether
locally synthesized AGT can be processed to Ang-II in the brain, we
generated a transgenic mouse model expressing human AGT (hAGT) under
the control of an astrocyte-specific (glial fibrillary acidic protein
(GFAP)) promoter (GFAP-hAGT) (9). These mice exhibit hAGT expression
primarily in the brain but have a normal BP because of the strict
species specificity of the enzymatic reaction between AGT and renin
(10). Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of purified recombinant
human renin (hREN) protein elicited a pressor response, which was
prevented by ICV preinjection of an Ang-II type 1 receptor antagonist,
losartan. Accordingly, we concluded that AGT synthesized in the brain
can be converted to Ang-II if renin is present. In addition to glia,
AGT is expressed in select populations of neurons in regions of the
brain, such as the subfornical organ, that can influence cardiovascular
function (7, 11). To determine the relevance of neuronal AGT, we also developed a transgene overexpressing hAGT from a neuronal promoter, synapsin-I (SYN) (12). As above, expression was high in the brain, and
hAGT was exclusively localized in neurons co-expressing the neuronal
marker NeuN. ICV infusion of purified hREN caused a transient pressor
response, suggesting that Ang-II release from either glial cells or
neurons is functional in the brain.
ICV injection of homologous species renin increases BP in several
animals (13, 14), and early studies detected renin activity in the
brain (15, 16). Later, immunoreactive renin was found in the
hypothalamus and cerebellar cortex in the mouse and rat brain and in
neurons in all areas of the human brain (17, 18). Despite these
observations and the clear documentation of the expression of the other
RAS genes in the brain, the notion that renin is endogenously expressed
in brain remains controversial. We recently reported hREN expression in
the brain of a new transgenic model containing a tightly regulated hREN
transgene (19). Renin-containing cells were detected in neurons in the
brain stem, and in glial cells in the hypothalamus and cortex.
We therefore hypothesize that local synthesis of renin may cleave
locally synthesized AGT to produce brain Ang-II. To test this
hypothesis and to determine the functional role of glial and neuronal
hREN expression, we generated two novel transgenic mouse models
expressing hREN under the control of either the GFAP promoter
(GFAP-hREN) or the SYN promoter (SYN-hREN).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Generation of GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN Transgenic Mice--
A
cDNA encoding a modified hREN protein was removed from pRhR1100FM
(generous gift from Dr. Timothy L. Reudelhuber, Clinical Research
Institute of Montreal), modified by PCR to contain XhoI and
MluI ends, and cloned into the
XhoI-MluI sites of pSTEC-1 (20, 21). A 2.2-kb
fragment of human GFAP promoter was excised with EcoRI from
the plasmid gfa2 and was subcloned into pBluescript II
SK+/ to form pGFAP-SK (22). The rat SYN promoter was
amplified by PCR from pBL4.3 Syn-CAT to contain EcoRV and
BamHI ends (23). The modified SYN promoter was cloned into
the EcoRV-BamHI sites of pBluescript II
SK+/ to create pSYN-SK. The intron, renin cDNA, and
SV40 poly(A) site was removed from pSTEC-1 and ligated to pGFAP-SK to
create GFAP-hREN and to pSYN-SK to form SYN-hREN. All cloning junctions
were confirmed by sequencing. The modifications consisted of replacing
the normal prorenin-converting enzyme cleavage site with the ubiquitous
processing protease furin and tagging the carboxyl terminus of the
protein with a Myc epitope (24). The Myc epitope did not provide
sufficient sensitivity to detect the protein using anti-Myc antiserum.
The transgenes were excised by digestion with BssHII and
purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Transgene DNA was
microinjected into one-cell fertilized mouse embryos obtained from
superovulated C57BL/6J X SJL/J (B6SJL F2) mice using
standard procedures. All transgenic mice were heterozygous and were
maintained by breeding with B6SJL F1 mice. Transgenic mice
carrying both GFAP-hREN and GFAP-hAGT transgenes were generated by
breeding heterozygous GFAP-hREN with heterozygous GFAP-hAGT transgenic
mice. The SYN-hREN/SYN-hAGT double transgenic mice were similarly bred.
Mice used for experiments were 15-20 weeks of age. Nontransgenic
age-matched littermates from the same breeding were always used as
controls in the studies described herein. All mice received standard
mouse chow (LM-485; Teklad Premier Laboratory Diets, Madison, WI) and
water ad libitum unless specified. Care of the mice used in
the experiments met the standards set forth by the National Institutes
of Health in their guidelines for the care and use of experimental
animals, and all procedures were approved by the University Animal Care
and Use Committee at the University of Iowa.
Analysis of Nucleic Acids--
Existence of transgene(s) was
identified by PCR of tail genomic DNA using hREN- and/or hAGT-specific
primer sets as described previously (25). Results of PCR for GFAP-hREN
and SYN-hREN founder mice were confirmed by Southern blot analysis.
Tissues were harvested and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and RNA was
purified using TriReagent (Molecular Research Center Inc.). RNase
protection assays were performed using the RPA III kit (Ambion Inc.,
Austin, TX). Total RNA (50 µg) was hybridized to hREN, and mouse
-actin probes were labeled with [ -32P]UTP by
in vitro transcription and purified through a Sephadex G-50
spin column (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Protected fragments for
hREN and mouse -actin were 300 and 245 bp, respectively.
Plasma Renin Assay--
Plasma renin activity and concentration
were determined as described previously (26). Radioimmunoassay was
performed on plasma using the angiotensin I (Ang-I)
125I-labeled RIA kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Samples
were diluted with reagent blank to remain on the linear portion of the
standard curve.
Immunohistochemistry--
Brain sections were permeabilized with
0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS at 25 °C and incubated at 4 °C 18 h with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against hREN (1:2,000 dilution for
GFAP-hREN and 1:100 for SYN-hREN; kindly provided by Professor Pierre
Corvol, INSERM U36, College de France), which had been preadsorbed with
nontransgenic brain sections at 4 °C for 48 h (19). Sections
also incubated with mouse monoclonal antisera (Chemicon
International Inc.) against either GFAP (1:1,000 dilution),
microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2; 1:400 dilution), or neuronal
nuclei (NeuN; 1:500) (Chemicon International) as described (19).
GFAP-hREN samples were incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG
(1:250 dilution), avidin D (1:50), biotinylated anti-avidin (1:125),
fluorescein avidin D (1:250; all from Vector Laboratories), and
rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (1:100 dilution; Chemicon
International); each incubation was at 25 °C for 1 h followed
by rinsing with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS except for the last rinse,
which used PBS.
Physiology--
Measurement of arterial pressure (AP) and heart
rate (HR) and ICV and intravenous infusion studies were
performed in conscious, unrestrained mice as described previously (9).
Briefly, base-line AP and HR were measured continuously for 1 h/day for
3 consecutive days starting 2 days after surgery. The effect of ICV
losartan (10 µg; generous gift of Merck) and artificial cerebrospinal
fluid on basal AP and HR was examined. Intravenous injection of the same dose of losartan was also tested. The effects of intravenous injection of a ganglion blocker, hexamethonium (5 mg/kg intravenously), an antagonist of peripheral arginine vasopressin (AVP) V1
receptors (AVPX; Manning Compound
(d(CH2)5Tyr2(ME)Arg8)-vasopressin; 10 µg/kg
intravenously), and saline on base-line AP and HR were also determined.
All hemodynamic data were collected and analyzed on a computer using
Chart version 4.0.1 in Powerlab.
Drinking volume of water and salt preference were measured as described
previously (9); water intake was measured individually in metabolic
cages with standard chow and tap water ad libitum daily for
3 days. To determine salt preference, mice were fed salt-deficient chow
and given 0.3 mol/liter hypertonic saline and tap water in separate
randomized burettes ad libitum for 3 days. Salt preference
was calculated as a percentage by dividing the volume of saline
consumed by the total volume of fluid consumed. Urinary volume was
measured by collecting 24-h urine in metabolic cages with standard chow
ground with tap water (100 g of chow/150 ml of water) and tap water
ad libitum daily for 3 days. Urinary and plasma osmolality
were measured by using a vapor pressure osmometer (Wescor Inc.).
Statistical Analysis--
Data were expressed as mean ± S.E. Group comparisons were made with unpaired t tests and
confirmed with repeated measures analysis of variance followed by
Student's modified t test with Bonferroni correction. A
value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 |
RESULTS |
GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN transgenic mice were generated by fusing
the GFAP and SYN promoters to a hREN cDNA. Since the mechanisms activating renin in the brain are unknown, we chose to use a hREN cDNA that was modified to contain a ubiquitous furin cleavage site
in place of the prorenin-converting enzyme site normally separating the
prosegment from the active enzyme (Fig.
1A). Three transgenic founders
of each construct were identified, and two GFAP-hREN and three SYN-hREN
founders were successfully bred to establish transgenic lines.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic map and expression. A,
schematic map of the transgenes. The start site of transcription is
indicated as +1. The transgene was excised as a BssHII
(Bss) fragment for microinjection. The mutations made to the
renin cDNA to replace the prorenin-converting enzyme site
(PCE) with furin are shown. B and C,
RNase protection assay of RNA from a male GFAP-hREN (line 10267/4;
B) and male SYN-hAGT (line 11110/2; C) transgenic
mouse are shown. The hREN and -actin transcripts are indicated. +,
kidney of a transgenic mouse expressing hREN under the control of its
own promoter; , liver of a known nontransgenic mouse; Br,
brain; P, peripheral nerve; Lv, liver;
K, kidney; H, heart; Lu, lung;
Ag, adrenal gland; Ao, aorta; Sp,
spleen; Sg, submandibular gland; D, diaphragm;
Wa, white adipose tissue; Ba, brown adipose
tissue; Sm, skeletal muscle; T, testes.
|
|
An RNase protection assay was used to examine the tissue-specific
expression of the transgenes. In GFAP-hREN line 10267/4, low but
clearly detectable expression of hREN mRNA was observed in the
brain with lower expression in other tissues such as heart, lung,
spleen, submandibular gland, and white adipose tissue (Fig. 1B). In SYN-hREN line 11110/2, robust expression of hREN
mRNA was detected in the brain, with low level ectopic expression
evident in brown adipose tissue (Fig. 1C). Table
I shows a quantitative summary of hREN
mRNA expression in all lines of GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN transgenic
mice. GFAP-hREN line 10267/4 and Syn-hREN line 11110/2 were selected
for further analysis, since these exhibited the highest level of
expression in the brain and retained the most brain-restricted pattern
of hREN expression.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Summary of hREN expression in GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN transgenic mice
Expression was quantified by scanning the RPA films and analyzed by NIH
(SCION) IMAGE. Scans were first calibrated with an identical positive
control sample run on each RPA gel and then were normalized for loading
and sample loss using the actin band. Units are arbitrary. Samples with
n = 3 are mean ± S.E. Samples with
n = 2 are the average of both runs. Con, construct; G,
GFAP-hREN; S, SYN-hREN; WAT, white adipose tissue; BAT, brown adipose
tissue.
|
|
Given the presence of "ectopic" hREN mRNA expression in tissues
outside the brain, we were concerned that hREN protein might be
released into the systemic circulation. Therefore, we measured plasma
hREN concentration to determine whether transgene expression outside
the brain results in a significant increase of hREN protein in the
systemic circulation (Table II). The
fidelity and specificity of the assay was confirmed by the observation
of basal levels of mouse renin (24.5 ± 3.7 versus
30.3 ± 3.4 ng of Ang-I/ml/h, transgenic versus
control) and hREN protein (14.1 ± 1.7 versus 3.2 ± 0.8 ng of Ang-I/ml/h, transgenic versus control) in the plasma of transgenic mice expressing hREN under the control of its own
promoter (termed systemic hREN transgenic mice) (27). Although all five
lines of GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN transgenic mice exhibited a slight
increase in hREN concentration in the plasma, these values were not
significantly different from those for nontransgenic mice. Accordingly,
it is unlikely that a significant amount of hREN protein is released
into the systemic circulation in either the glial or neuronal
transgenic models.
To examine the cell-specific expression of the transgene in the brain,
double labeling for hREN and GFAP (a glial marker), MAP-2, or NeuN
(neuronal markers) was performed. In GFAP-hREN transgenic mice, hREN
staining was observed in the cell bodies and processes of astrocytes in
almost all regions of the brain as confirmed by co-staining with GFAP,
but not with MAP-2 (Fig. 2,
A-D; Table III). In
nontransgenic mice, some very light hREN immunostaining of glia-like
elements was observed in cortex (Fig. 2E). This
immunostaining was generally distributed throughout the brain and
showed no regional specificity. The only exception to this was the
subfornical organ (Fig. 2, F-I) and area postrema (data not
shown), where hREN co-localized with both GFAP and MAP-2. We showed
previously that the GFAP promoter targeted expression of hAGT to
neurons in the subfornical organ (9). In addition, hREN-positive radial
astroglia were observed in cerebellum (Fig. 2J). Strong
nonspecific staining was still detected in the Purkinje cell layer of
the cerebellum in both controls and transgenic mice although the
antiserum was preadsorbed with brain sections from control mice (Fig.
2, J and K). In SYN-hREN mice, hREN staining was
observed in the cell bodies of neurons in all regions of the brain as
confirmed by co-staining with NeuN but not with GFAP (Fig.
3, A-D, Table III). Only low
background staining was observed in sections from nontransgenic
controls (Fig. 3E).

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Cell-specific expression of hREN protein in
the brain of GFAP-hREN mouse. Representative photomicrographs of
double labeling for hREN and GFAP or hREN and MAP-2 in brain. In
cerebral cortex, GFAP-positive (B) but not MAP-2-positive
cells (D) were co-stained with hREN (A and
C) in GFAP-hREN mice. In subfornical organ, both
GFAP-positive (G) and MAP-2-positive cells (I)
were double-labeled with hREN (F and H,
arrows). In cerebellum, hREN-positive radial astroglia were
observed (J, white arrow). In
nontransgenic mice, some very light immunostaining of glia-like
elements was observed (E). However, this immunostaining was
generally distributed throughout the brain and showed no regional
specificity, with the exception of the Purkinje cell layer, where
strong immunostaining was observed in both GFAP-hREN and nontransgenic
mice (J and K, respectively, yellow
arrows). A and B, C and
D, F and G, and H and
I are pairs of the same sections.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Distribution of hREN staining in brain of transgenic mice
The symbols are: +, expression positive; , expression negative; +?,
expression likely; ?, expression unclear.
|
|

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Cell-specific expression of hREN protein in
the brain of SYN-hREN mouse. Representative photomicrographs are
shown of double labeling for hREN and NeuN (neuronal marker) or hREN
and GFAP (glial marker) in the cerebral cortex. NeuN-positive
(B) but not GFAP-positive cells (D) were
co-stained with hREN (A and C) in SYN-hREN
transgenic mice. No hREN staining was observed in nontransgenic mice
(E). Panels A and B and
panels C and D are pairs of the same
sections.
|
|
To examine the physiological significance of the local production of
renin and AGT in the brain on BP and electrolyte homeostasis, we
generated GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT and SYN-hREN/SYN-hAGT double transgenic
mice. Because there is a strict species specificity of the biochemical
reaction between AGT and renin (10), there was no difference in
base-line mean arterial pressure (MAP) or HR between single GFAP-hREN
transgenic mice (lacking the human AGT gene) and their nontransgenic
littermates (GFAP-hREN, 118 ± 3 mm Hg, 590 ± 32 bpm,
n = 5; nontransgenic, 116 ± 4 mm Hg, 594 ± 20 bpm, n = 7) or between single SYN-hREN transgenic
mice and their nontransgenic littermates (SYN-hREN, 114 ± 3 mm
Hg, 628 ± 34 bpm, n = 5; nontransgenic, 119 ± 5 mm Hg, 609 ± 28 bpm, n = 5). In contrast,
both the neuronal and glial double transgenic mice (containing both
hREN and hAGT in brain) exhibited a moderate but significant elevation
in MAP on each of the 3 days of measurement (compiled in Fig.
4). Although statistically significant,
the elevation in MAP is probably not enough to consider them overtly hypertensive, since there are some strains of mice with higher base
line arterial pressure (28). Base-line HR was not significantly different between double transgenic and control groups.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Arterial pressure in double transgenic
mice. Shown are resting MAP in GR/GA (black
bar, n = 9), SR/SA (hatched
bar, n = 8) and controls (NT;
open bar, n = 12). *,
p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 compared with
controls.
|
|
ICV injection of losartan (10 µg) caused an approximately 11 mm Hg
fall in MAP in the GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT mice, reducing MAP back to base
line (Fig. 5A). Nontransgenic
mice exhibited only a 5 mm Hg decrease in MAP. The HR change induced by
ICV losartan was variable and did not achieve statistical significance
in either group. Intravenous administration of the same amount of
losartan-injected ICV did not significantly affect MAP or HR in either
group. Because of the possible contribution of increased brain RAS to
the elevated BP in these double transgenic mice, we wanted to
investigate the mechanism of chronic BP elevation downstream of the
CNS. We focused these studies in the GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT mice because
the blood pressure increase was larger than in SYN-hREN/SYN-hAGT. The
major mechanisms of pressor response to ICV Ang-II are via activation of sympathetic nervous system and/or AVP secretion. Consequently, we
examined the effects of intravenous treatment with a ganglionic blocking agent, hexamethonium, and an AVP V1 receptor
antagonist, AVPX, on BP. Intravenous injection of hexamethonium caused
a greater fall in MAP in glia-specific mice than nontransgenic mice
(Fig. 5B). Although the reduction in MAP by intravenous AVPX
tended to be greater in the transgenic mice, the difference did not
achieve statistical significance (Fig. 5C).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mechanism of hypertension in
GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT double transgenic mice. A, blood
pressure responses to ICV injection of losartan (10 µg) in
GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT transgenic mice (black bar,
n = 6) and controls (NT; white
bar, n = 6). B, blood pressure
responses to intravenous infusion of hexamethonium in
GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT transgenic mice (black bar,
n = 5) and controls (white bar,
n = 5). C, blood pressure responses to
intravenous injection of AVPX in GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT transgenic mice
(black bar, n = 5) and controls
(white bar, n = 5). *,
p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 compared with
controls.
|
|
Finally, we measured drinking volume, salt preference, and urinary
volume in both the glia- and neuron-specific double transgenic mice
(Fig. 6). Drinking volume and salt
preference were significantly higher in both models compared with
controls (Fig. 6, A and B). Concomitant with
increased water intake, urinary volume was significantly higher in the
double transgenics (Fig. 6C). Urinary osmolality was lower
in glia-specific mice (1,612 ± 163 mosmol/KgH2O,
n = 11) than controls (2,240 ± 156 mosmol/KgH2O, n = 11, p < 0.01). Urinary osmolality tended to be lower in neuron-specific mice (1,804 ± 168 mosmol/KgH2O, n = 11)
but did not reach statistical significance. In this light, urine output
was lower in the neuron-specific mice than in the glia-specific mice
(Fig. 6C). Plasma osmolality was not different between the
groups (glia-specific, 335 ± 9, n = 5;
neuron-specific, 325 ± 6, n = 9; controls,
316 ± 7, n = 6, in mosmol/KgH2O).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Volume homeostasis in double transgenic mice.
A, drinking volume of water in GR/GA (black
bar, n = 13), SR/SA
(cross-hatched bar, n = 7) and
control mice (NT; open bar,
n = 19). B, salt preference in GR/GA
(black bar, n = 12), SR/SA
(cross-hatched bar, n = 7) and control mice
(white bar, n = 12).
C, urinary volume in GR/GA (black bar,
n = 11), SR/SA (cross-hatched bar,
n = 7), and control mice (white
bar, n = 12). *, p < 0.05;
**, p < 0.01 compared with controls.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Renin is the rate-limiting regulator of the enzymatic cascade
leading to the production of Ang-II in most mammals. The
juxtaglomerular cells of the kidney are the primary site of synthesis,
storage, processing, and release of renin. Classic dogma maintains that renin is released from the kidney into the circulation, where it
cleaves AGT derived from the liver to produce Ang-I, which is further
converted into blood-borne Ang-II. In addition to this, renin is
synthesized in extrarenal tissues such as brain and adrenal gland (29).
Ganten et al. (15) and Fischer-Ferraro et al. (16) published the first reports demonstrating central renin activity.
Renin activity is widely distributed in the brain, with the highest
levels in the pineal gland, pituitary gland, and pons-medulla (30).
Substantial controversy still remains as to the localization of
renin-containing cells in the brain. For example, immunoreactive renin
was detected in most nerve cells throughout the human brain, whereas it
was detected only in hypothalamus and cerebellar cortex in the brain of
rodents (17, 18). We recently examined the cellular localization of
renin in the brain of transgenic mice containing the hREN gene encoded
on a large P1 artificial chromosome. This transgene, because it
contains extensive amounts of 5'- and 3'-flanking DNA exhibits a
tightly regulated and highly specific cell type-restricted expression
of hREN (31). In these mice, hREN immunoreactivity was observed in
glial cells and neurons in the brain stem, hypothalamus, and cerebrum
(19).
Renin activity is increased in the brain of SHR, the most widely used
animal model of human essential hypertension (32). Expression of hREN
and hAGT is evident in the brain of hypertensive double transgenic mice
overexpressing both hREN and hAGT transgenes (33). In SHR and hREN/hAGT
double transgenic mice, ICV injection of Ang-II receptor antagonists is
effective in lowering BP (33, 34). Therefore, it has long been
suggested that renin synthesized in the brain may also have an
important role in the regulation of BP through the local generation of
Ang-II. However, since both SHR and hREN/hAGT double transgenic mice
have systemic factors affecting BP, it remains unclear whether
brain-specific expression of renin per se has an important
role in the regulation of cardiovascular function in these models.
To examine the physiological role of brain-derived Ang-II in the
regulation of BP and to begin to distinguish between the effects of
Ang-II derived from glial cells and neurons, we developed transgenic
models expressing hAGT from the astrocyte-specific GFAP promoter and
the neuron-specific SYN promoter (9, 12). Double transgenic mice
containing the GFAP-hAGT and an hREN transgene expressed systemically
(in plasma, kidney, brain, and other tissues) but not specifically in
the brain resulted in hypertension (9). Interestingly, double
transgenic mice expressing SYN-hAGT and a systemically expressed hREN
transgene were normotensive, despite the pressor response caused by
infusion of purified hREN in the brain (12). These studies allowed us
to conclude that AGT synthesized in brain is the substrate for local
synthesis of Ang-II. However, since hREN was present in the systemic
circulation of that model and could potentially gain access to regions
of the brain outside the blood-brain interface (e.g. the
circumventricular organs), we could not conclude that the Ang-II was
derived from cleavage of AGT from brain-derived renin.
To generate a model of exclusive synthesis of Ang-II in the brain, we
generated two additional transgenic models, expressing hREN under the
control of the GFAP and SYN promoters. As shown herein, hREN mRNA
was expressed in the brain, and hREN protein was localized mainly in
astrocytes and neurons, respectively. Although some hREN expression was
detected outside the CNS, such as in lung and adipose tissue, its
expression was lower than in brain, and importantly, no hREN protein
was detected in the systemic circulation. Double transgenic mice
containing both the GFAP-hREN and GFAP-hAGT and the SYN-hREN and
SYN-hAGT transgenes exhibited a modest increase in arterial pressure.
Determination of whether this increase is clinically relevant will
require additional studies to determine whether these mice exhibit the
typical sequalae associated with hypertension such as vascular and
renal dysfunction and cardiac hypertrophy. It should be noted, however,
that a 10-15 mm Hg rise in pressure is approximately what is
anticipated of a single gene effect in polygenic hypertension.
In the glial model, the elevated blood pressure was corrected by ICV
losartan, whereas the same dose of losartan administered intravenously
did not affect BP. This suggests that the BP elevation was due to the
local generation and action of Ang-II in the brain and not from any
leakage into the systemic circulation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme
and AT1 receptors are present in the same region of the brain that
expresses hREN and hAGT, ensuring that all components of the RAS are
present for the generation and action of Ang-II in our model (35-37).
Consequently, our data are consistent with the notion that Ang-II,
chronically overproduced via processing of brain hAGT by brain hREN and
ACE, stimulated local Ang-II type 1 receptors to raise BP.
In addition to the rise in BP, both double transgenic mice exhibited
increased drinking volume and salt preference, suggesting that chronic
overexpression of renin and AGT within the brain is capable of
affecting water intake and salt appetite. Angiotensin-induced thirst is
primarily mediated in the OVLT, subfornical organ, and median preoptic
nucleus, and angiotensin-induced sodium appetite originates in the OVLT
and median preoptic nucleus, where central osmoreceptors function to
maintain constant extracellular osmotic pressure (2, 38, 39). It is
tempting to speculate that increased concentration of Ang-II in these
areas may be involved in the mechanism of altered behavior in these mice.
Mechanistically, the rise in BP in the glial-specific model may be due,
at least in part, to an increase in sympathetic nerve activity. This is
suggested by the greater fall in BP in double transgenic mice than
control mice treated with hexamethonium. However, there was no
significant difference in the reduction in BP in double transgenic and
control mice treated with an AVP receptor antagonist. This differs from
previous studies of double transgenic mice containing systemically
expressed transgenes (R+/A+), where BP was significantly lowered by AVP
receptor antagonist (33). These data suggest that the mechanisms
maintaining elevated BP in the models may differ. It is possible that
AVP release, and therefore the response to AVP receptor antagonists, is
blunted in the GR/GA model due to feedback inhibition caused by the
elevated drinking. In the glia-specific model, two separate mechanisms may be operating to maintain an elevation in BP, increased sympathetic outflow and increased water intake, caused by the activation of Ang-II
type 1 receptors from local overproduction of Ang-II in distinct nuclei
regulating each process.
This raises an important question regarding the physiological relevance
of these transgenic models. In the GFAP-hAGT model, hAGT is widely
expressed in glial cells throughout the brain, thus emulating the
normal pattern of astrocytic expression of AGT in the brain (8). With
renin, however, we must recognize that hREN expression in the GFAP-hREN
and SYN-hREN model is very likely produced in both normal
renin-expressing cells and by ectopic cells. It is important to
remember that proven tools do not currently exist to specifically
target renin expression to highly restricted regions of the brain, thus
leaving us with tools that may not totally allow us to completely
recapitulate the normal pattern of gene expression. Moreover, it is
equally important to point out that we are just beginning to understand
some of the basic processes governing Ang-II production in the brain.
For instance, we and others recently reported that an altered form of
renin mRNA, deriving from the utilization of an alternative
transcription site may be used in the brain (40, 41). If translated,
this mRNA would encode an intracellular (nonsecreted) and
constitutively active form of the protein, suggesting the intriguing
possibility of an intracellular pathway of angiotensin production in
brain. Intracellular production of Ang-II has been proposed but remains controversial (42). The GFAP-hREN and SYN-hREN models described herein
utilized a mutant renin that should essentially be constitutively active because of the cleavage of prorenin to renin by furin, a
ubiquitous processing protease expressed in the brain (43). Studies are
currently under way to examine the regulation of BP and electrolyte
balance in a new model expressing only the intracellular (nonsecreted)
form of the protein in the brain.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
Transgenic mice were generated and maintained
at the University of Iowa Transgenic Animal Facility, which is
supported in part by the College of Medicine and the Diabetes and
Endocrinology Research Center. DNA sequencing was performed at the
University of Iowa DNA Core Facility. We thank Norma Sinclair,
Patricia Lovell, Brandon Campbell, Debbie Davis, and Xiaoji Zhang
for excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The work described herein was funded by National Institutes
of Health Grants HL58048, HL61446, and HL55006.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the American Heart
Association Heartland Affiliate.
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be
addressed: Depts. of Internal Medicine and Physiology & Biophysics, 3181B Medical Education and Biomedical Research Facility, University of
Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242. Tel.: 319-335-7604; Fax:
319-353-5350; E-mail: curt-sigmund@uiowa.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204309200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Ang, angiotensin;
GR/GA, GFAP-hREN/GFAP-hAGT;
SR/SA, SYN-hREN/SYN-hAGT;
RAS, renin-angiotensin system;
CNS, central nervous system;
BP, blood
pressure;
AVP, arginine vasopressin;
AGT, angiotensinogen;
hAGT, human
AGT;
GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein;
ICV, intracerebroventricular;
hREN, human renin;
SYN, synapsin-I;
AP, arterial pressure;
HR, heart rate;
MAP-2, microtubule-associated
protein-2;
MAP, mean arterial pressure;
AVP, arginine vasopressin;
bpm, beat per minute.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bickerton, R. K.,
and Buckley, J. P.
(1961)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
106,
834-837[CrossRef]
|
| 2.
|
Wright, J. W.,
and Harding, J. W.
(1992)
Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.
17,
227-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Yongue, B. G.,
Angulo, J. A.,
McEwen, B. S.,
and Myers, M. M.
(1991)
Hypertension
17,
485-491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Pochiero, M.,
Nicoletta, P.,
Losi, E.,
Bianchi, A.,
and Caputi, A. P.
(1983)
Pharmacol. Res. Commun.
15,
173-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Lark, L. A.,
and Weyhenmeyer, J. A.
(1992)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
222,
33-37[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Nishimura, M.,
Milsted, A.,
Block, C. H.,
Brosnihan, K. B.,
and Ferrario, C. M.
(1992)
Hypertens.
20,
158-167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Thomas, W. G.,
and Sernia, C.
(1988)
Neuroscience
25,
319-341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Stornetta, R. L.,
Hawelu Johnson, C. L.,
Guyenet, P. G.,
and Lynch, K. R.
(1988)
Science
242,
1444-1446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Morimoto, S.,
Cassell, M. D.,
Beltz, T. G.,
Johnson, A. K.,
Davisson, R. L.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(2001)
Circ. Res.
89,
365-372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Hatae, T.,
Takimoto, E.,
Murakami, K.,
and Fukamizu, A.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
131,
43-47[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Imboden, H.,
Harding, J. W.,
Hilgenfeldt, U.,
Celio, M. R.,
and Felix, D.
(1987)
Brain Res.
410,
74-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Morimoto, S.,
Cassell, M. D.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(2002)
Physiol Genomics
9,
113-120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Buckley, J. P.,
Jandhyala, B. S.,
Doursout, M. F.,
Huang, Y. K.,
and Chelly, J. E.
(1984)
J Physiol (Paris)
79,
485-490[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Kawasaki, H.,
Takasaki, K.,
and Furukawa, T.
(1987)
Eur. J Pharmacol.
138,
351-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Ganten, D.,
Marquez-Julio, A.,
Granger, P.,
Hayduk, K.,
Karsunky, K. P.,
Boucher, R.,
and Genest, J.
(1971)
Am. J. Physiol.
221,
1733-1737[Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Fischer-Ferraro, C.,
Nahmod, V. E.,
Goldstein, D. J.,
and Finkielman, S.
(1971)
J. Exp. Med.
133,
353-361[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Fuxe, K.,
Ganten, D.,
Hokfelt, T.,
Locatelli, V.,
Poulsen, K.,
Stock, G.,
Rix, E.,
and Taugner, R.
(1980)
Neurosci. Lett.
18,
245-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Slater, E. E.,
Defendini, R.,
and Zimmerman, E.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
5458-5460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Morimoto, S.,
Cassell, M. D.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(2002)
Circ. Res.
90,
80-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Stec, D. E.,
Morimoto, S.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(2001)
BioTechniques
31,
256-260[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Chu, W. N.,
Baxter, J. D.,
and Reudelhuber, T. L.
(1990)
Mole. Endocrinol.
4,
1905-1913
|
| 22.
|
Brenner, M.,
Kisseberth, W. C., Su, Y.,
Besnard, F.,
and Messing, A.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
1030-1037[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Hoesche, C.,
Sauerwald, A.,
Veh, R. W.,
Krippl, B.,
and Kilimann, M. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26494-26502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Prescott, G.,
Silversides, D. W.,
Chiu, S. M.,
and Reudelhuber, T. L.
(2000)
Physiol Genomics
4,
67-73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Merrill, D. C.,
Thompson, M. W.,
Carney, C.,
Schlager, G.,
Robillard, J. E.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
1047-1055[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Thompson, M. W.,
Smith, S. B.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(1996)
Hypertension
28,
290-296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Sigmund, C. D.,
Jones, C. A.,
Kane, C. M., Wu, C.,
Lang, J. A.,
and Gross, K. W.
(1992)
Circ. Res.
70,
1070-1079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Ryan, M. J.,
Didion, S. P.,
Davis, D. R.,
Faraci, F. M.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(2002)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
22,
42-48[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Bader, M.,
Peters, J.,
Baltatu, O.,
Muller, D. N.,
Luft, F. C.,
and Ganten, D.
(2001)
J Mol. Med.
79,
76-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Genain, C. P.,
Van Loon, G. R.,
and Kotchen, T. A.
(1985)
J. Clin. Invest.
76,
1939-1945[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Sinn, P. L.,
Davis, D. R.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35785-35793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Schelling, P.,
Meyer, D.,
Loos, H. E.,
Speck, G.,
Phillips, M. I.,
Johnson, A. K.,
and Ganten, D.
(1982)
Neuropharmacology
21,
455-463[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Davisson, R. L.,
Yang, G.,
Beltz, T. G.,
Cassell, M. D.,
Johnson, A. K.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
83,
1047-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Phillips, M. I.,
Mann, J. F.,
Haebara, H.,
Hoffman, W. E.,
Dietz, R.,
Schelling, P.,
and Ganten, D.
(1977)
Nature
270,
445-447[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Kakar, S. S.,
Riel, K. K.,
and Neill, J. D.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.
185,
688-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Rowe, B. P.,
Grove, K. L.,
Saylor, D. L.,
and Speth, R. C.
(1990)
European Journal of Pharmacology
186,
339-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Mendelsohn, F. A.,
Chai, S. Y.,
and Dunbar, M.
(1984)
J. Hypertens. Suppl
2,
S41-S44[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Fitts, D. A.,
and Masson, D. B.
(1990)
Behav. Neurosci.
104,
643-650[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Fitts, D. A.,
Tjepkes, D. S.,
and Bright, R. O.
(1990)
Behav. Neurosci.
104,
818-827[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Sinn, P. L.,
and Sigmund, C. D.
(2000)
Physiol. Genomics
3,
25-31[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Lee-Kirsch, M. A.,
Gaudet, F.,
Cardoso, M. C.,
and Lindpaintner, K.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
84,
240-246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Cook, J. L.,
Zhang, Z.,
and Re, R. N.
(2001)
Circ. Res.
89,
1138-1146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Day, R.,
Schafer, M. K.,
Cullinan, W. E.,
Watson, S. J.,
Chretien, M.,
and Seidah, N. G.
(1993)
Neurosci. Lett.
149,
27-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Hou, S. F. Theriault, I. Dostanic-Larson, A. E. Moseley, J. B Lingrel, H. Wu, S. Dean, and J. W. Van Huysse
Enhanced pressor response to increased CSF sodium concentration and to central ANG I in heterozygous {alpha}2 Na+-K+-ATPase knockout mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
May 1, 2009;
296(5):
R1427 - R1438.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Sigmund
A growing chain of evidence linking genetic variation in angiotensinogen with essential hypertension: focus on "A haplotype of human angiotensinogen gene containing -217A increases blood pressure in transgenic mice compared with -217G," by Jain et al.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
December 1, 2008;
295(6):
R1846 - R1848.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Lazartigues, P. Sinnayah, G. Augoyard, C. Gharib, A. K. Johnson, and R. L. Davisson
Enhanced water and salt intake in transgenic mice with brain-restricted overexpression of angiotensin (AT1) receptors
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
November 1, 2008;
295(5):
R1539 - R1545.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Dickson, X. Tian, X. Liu, D. R. Davis, and C. D. Sigmund
Upstream Stimulatory Factor Is Required for Human Angiotensinogen Expression and Differential Regulation by the A-20C Polymorphism
Circ. Res.,
October 24, 2008;
103(9):
940 - 947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Grobe, D. Xu, and C. D. Sigmund
An Intracellular Renin-Angiotensin System in Neurons: Fact, Hypothesis, or Fantasy
Physiology,
August 1, 2008;
23(4):
187 - 193.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Arnold, A. Sakima, D. Ganten, C. M. Ferrario, and D. I. Diz
Modulation of Reflex Function by Endogenous Angiotensins in Older Transgenic Rats With Low Glial Angiotensinogen
Hypertension,
May 1, 2008;
51(5):
1326 - 1331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sakima, D. B. Averill, S. O. Kasper, L. Jackson, D. Ganten, C. M. Ferrario, P. E. Gallagher, and D. I. Diz
Baroreceptor reflex regulation in anesthetized transgenic rats with low glia-derived angiotensinogen
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
March 1, 2007;
292(3):
H1412 - H1419.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Dickson, M. B. Zimmerman, K. Rahmouni, and C. D. Sigmund
The -20 and -217 Promoter Variants Dominate Differential Angiotensinogen Haplotype Regulation in Angiotensinogen-Expressing Cells
Hypertension,
March 1, 2007;
49(3):
631 - 639.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Campos, R. Iliescu, M. A. P. Fontes, W.-P. Schlegel, M. Bader, and O. C. Baltatu
Enhanced isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy in transgenic rats with low brain angiotensinogen
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
November 1, 2006;
291(5):
H2371 - H2376.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Dickson and C. D. Sigmund
Genetic Basis of Hypertension: Revisiting Angiotensinogen
Hypertension,
July 1, 2006;
48(1):
14 - 20.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A.L. Dampney
Angiotensin Type 1A Receptors on Glial Cells in Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla and Hypertension
Hypertension,
June 1, 2006;
47(6):
1052 - 1053.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Lavoie, X. Liu, R. A. Bianco, T. G. Beltz, A. K. Johnson, and C. D. Sigmund
Evidence Supporting a Functional Role for Intracellular Renin in the Brain
Hypertension,
March 1, 2006;
47(3):
461 - 466.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sherrod, D. R. Davis, X. Zhou, M. D. Cassell, and C. D. Sigmund
Glial-specific ablation of angiotensinogen lowers arterial pressure in renin and angiotensinogen transgenic mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
December 1, 2005;
289(6):
R1763 - R1769.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yoneda, H. Sanada, J. Yatabe, S. Midorikawa, S. Hashimoto, M. Sasaki, T. Katoh, T. Watanabe, P. M. Andrews, P. A. Jose, et al.
Differential Effects of Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Antisense Oligonucleotides on Renal Function in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension,
July 1, 2005;
46(1):
58 - 65.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sherrod, X. Liu, X. Zhang, and C. D. Sigmund
Nuclear localization of angiotensinogen in astrocytes
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
February 1, 2005;
288(2):
R539 - R546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sakai, M. W. Chapleau, S. Morimoto, M. D. Cassell, and C. D. Sigmund
Differential modulation of baroreflex control of heart rate by neuron- vs. glia-derived angiotensin II
Physiol Genomics,
December 15, 2004;
20(1):
66 - 72.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Lavoie, K. D. Lake-Bruse, and C. D. Sigmund
Increased blood pressure in transgenic mice expressing both human renin and angiotensinogen in the renal proximal tubule
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
May 1, 2004;
286(5):
F965 - F971.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Lavoie, M. D. Cassell, K. W. Gross, and C. D. Sigmund
Adjacent Expression of Renin and Angiotensinogen in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Using a Dual-Reporter Transgenic Model
Hypertension,
May 1, 2004;
43(5):
1116 - 1119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Vialou, A. Amphoux, R. Zwart, B. Giros, and S. Gautron
Organic Cation Transporter 3 (Slc22a3) Is Implicated in Salt-Intake Regulation
J. Neurosci.,
March 17, 2004;
24(11):
2846 - 2851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Lavoie, M. D. Cassell, K. W. Gross, and C. D. Sigmund
Localization of renin expressing cells in the brain, by use of a REN-eGFP transgenic model
Physiol Genomics,
January 15, 2004;
16(2):
240 - 246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Davisson
Physiological genomic analysis of the brain renin-angiotensin system
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
September 1, 2003;
285(3):
R498 - R511.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Lavoie and C. D. Sigmund
Minireview: Overview of the Renin-Angiotensin System--An Endocrine and Paracrine System
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2003;
144(6):
2179 - 2183.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Skott
Angiotensin II and control of sodium and water intake in the mouse
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
June 1, 2003;
284(6):
R1380 - R1381.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|