![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 37, 33641-33647, September 13, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biophysics, Bose Institute, Calcutta 700 054, India
Received for publication, April 3, 2002, and in revised form, June 24, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The heat shock response in bacteria is a complex
phenomenon in which sigma 32 plays the central role. The DnaK/J
chaperone system binds and promotes degradation of sigma 32 at lower
temperatures. At heat shock temperatures, the DnaK/J-mediated
degradation of sigma 32 is largely abolished by a mechanism, which is
not yet fully understood. In this article we have shown that
interaction of DnaK with sigma 32 is highly
temperature-dependent. This interaction is completely
abolished at 42 °C. To investigate the origin of such strong
temperature dependence, we have monitored the structural changes that
occur in the sigma 32 protein upon upshift of temperature and attempted
to elucidate its functional roles. Upon a shift of temperature from 30 to 42 °C, the CD spectrum of sigma 32 becomes significantly more
positive without significant change in either tryptophan fluorescence
spectra or quenchability to external quenchers. 1,8-Anilinonaphthalene sulfonic acid binding at 42 °C is not
significantly affected. The equilibrium guanidine hydrochloride
denaturation of sigma 32 is biphasic. The first phase shifts to even
lower guanidine hydrochloride concentrations at 42 °C, whereas the
major phase remains largely unchanged. The sigma 32-core
interaction remains unchanged as a function of temperature. This
suggests that increased temperature destabilizes a structural element. We discuss the possible location of this temperature-sensitive structural element.
Stress response in bacteria and other organisms occurs in response
to change in temperature, nutritional deprivation, genotoxic stress,
and other kinds of stress (1, 2). The heat shock response in enteric
bacteria is one of the most intensively studied stress response systems
in bacteria (3, 4). It is clear that upon elevation of temperature,
there is increased synthesis of sigma 32, the heat shock sigma factor,
caused by lifting of translational control (5, 6). It is also clear now
that sigma 32 protein is transiently stabilized upon heat shock. The increased concentration of sigma 32 in heat-shocked cells increases the
concentration of sigma 32 holoenzyme leading to transcription of genes
encoding heat shock proteins (7). The increased transient stability of
sigma 32 after temperature upshift is a result of down-regulation of
DnaK/J-mediated degradation (4). Interestingly, at elevated
temperatures, increased susceptibility of sigma 32 to DnaK/J
independent proteolysis is seen, which ultimately leads to a decrease
in sigma 32 levels in the long run and down-regulation of the heat
shock response (8). The structural basis of the temperature-dependent regulations of proteolysis is still
incompletely understood.
It has been previously thought that one of the mechanisms of
down-regulation of DnaK/J-mediated proteolysis is due to increased concentration of denatured proteins. No information is available regarding whether DnaK-sigma 32 interaction itself is
temperature-dependent. In this article we demonstrate that
DnaK-sigma 32 interaction is highly temperature-dependent
and explored the temperature dependence of sigma 32 structure using
various spectroscopic tools.
Materials--
Ni2+-NTA-agarose1
was purchased from Qiagen. Ampicillin kanamycin, chloramphenicol,
spermidine, dithiothreitol, sucrose, ATP-agarose, heparin-agarose, ATP, lysozyme, isopropyl
Bacterial Strains and Plasmids--
pUHE 211-1 (containing
C-terminally His-tagged gene of Escherichia coli rpoH and
ampicillin resistance marker) was transformed to the bacterial strain
NUT-21 containing pDM I,1 a plasmid that harbors
lacIq gene and the kanamycin resistance marker
(9). BB4708, the Cys mutant of wild type sigma 32 (T128C/N138C),
was also transformed similarly in NUT-21 (9).
Sigma 32 Purification--
The purification was carried out
according to Joo et al. (9). The NUT-21 strain containing
pUHE 211-1 and pDM I,1 plasmids was grown at 30 °C in 1 liter of 2×
YT medium with 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 50 µg/ml kanamycin. At
A600 ~1, isopropyl
DnaK Purification--
DnaK purification followed the procedures
of Cegielska and Georgopoulos (10) with minor modifications. RLM893 was
grown in LB medium containing 25 µg of chloramphenicol/ml. The cells were first cultured at 30 °C to early log phase and then shifted to
42 °C and incubated until late log phase (4-6 h). The purification steps were all carried out at 4 °C. The cell pellet was washed with
buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, containing10% sucrose
(w/v)). The bacterial pellet was then resuspended in buffer K (180 mM spermidine HCl, 50 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM EDTA, 0.9 M ammonium sulfate) containing 2 mg/ml of freshly prepared lysozyme. After 45 min in ice, the mixture
was incubated at 37 °C for 4 min and then returned to ice for
another 10 min. It was then subsequently centrifuged in a Beckmann Type
35 rotor at 30,000 rpm for 30 min at 0 °C. After centrifugation to
pellet cellular debris, the proteins in the supernatant were
precipitated with ammonium sulfate (280 g/1000 ml) followed by another
centrifugation for 30 min at 30,000 rpm (70 Ti rotor; Beckmann). The
pellet was resuspended in 5-10 ml of buffer A (25 mM
imidazole, pH 7.0, 10% sucrose, 25 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM Removal of Bound Nucleotide from DnaK--
DnaK is always
purified with bound nucleotides. The peak fractions were pooled and
loaded onto an AG1-X8 column (Bio-Rad) pre-equilibrated with 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.6, containing 100 mM NaCl, 5%
glycerol, and 5 mM dithiothreitol to remove the bound
nucleotide (11).
Chemical Modification--
Prior to labeling, the protein was
dialyzed in 1 liter of degassed 0.05 M potassium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.9, containing 50% glycerol, 300 mM KCl, and 1 mM EDTA. Labeling of sigma 32 Cys mutant (T128C/N138C)
protein with fluorescein maleimide was done by incubating the protein
at 0.5 mg/ml with continuous stirring in 0.05 M potassium
phosphate buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl and 50%
glycerol with 20-fold molar excess of fluorescein maleimide (added as
N,N'-dimethylformamide (DMF) solution in
such a way that the final DMF concentration did not exceed 1%). It was
then shifted to 25 °C and kept at that temperature for another 15 min. The reaction was then quenched with 1 mM Fluorescence Studies--
All of the fluorescence spectra were
measured in Hitachi F 3010 spectrofluorometer having a facility for
spectra addition and subtraction. The excitation and emission band
passes were 5 nm unless mentioned otherwise. ANS binding to sigma 32 protein was done at both 30 and 42 °C in 0.05 M
potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl
and 25% glycerol. The protein (3.3 µM) was titrated with
increasing concentrations of ANS while keeping the volume change to a
minimum. The excitation wavelength was 360 nm, and the emission
wavelength was 480 nm. The inner filter correction was done as before
(12). Tryptophan fluorescence was studied as a function of temperature
in 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.9, containing
300 mM KCl and 25% glycerol. The protein concentration was
kept at 2 µM. The temperature was steadily increased from
30 to 45 °C at intervals of 1 °C by circulating water through the
cell holder. Approximately 15 min were required for equilibration and
measurement for each time point. Study of protein fluorescence spectra
was done in 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl and 25% glycerol. The temperature
was increased at 1 °C intervals. Excitation was at 295 nm, and the
band passes were 5 nm each. The protein concentration was 2 µM.
Anisotropy Measurements--
Anisotropy measurements were
performed using a Hitachi polarizer accessory. The steady state
fluorescence anisotropy (A) was calculated according to the
following equation.
Light Scattering--
Light scattering was measured at 400 nm in
a Hitachi F3010 spectrofluorometer by setting the excitation and
emission wavelengths to 400 nm. The bandpasses were 5 nm each. The
experiment was conducted in 50 mM potassium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl and 25% glycerol.
The protein concentration was 0.131 mg/ml.
Circular Dichroism--
Circular dichroism measurements were
done on a JASCO J600 spectropolarimeter using a water-jacketed
2-mm-pathlength quartz cuvette. The scan speed was 20 nm/min. For
equilibrium denaturation measurements, 10 scans were signal-averaged to
increase the signal to noise ratio. The spectrum with buffer only was
subtracted from the protein spectrum. To study the spectra of protein
as a function of increasing temperature, the temperature was increased
at intervals of 0.5 °C by circulation of water through the cuvette
from 30 to 45 °C, and the spectra were taken. The protein
concentration was kept at 3.5 µM. For measurement of the
effect of temperature jump on CD spectra, at first the protein was
allowed to equilibrate at 30 °C for about 30 min in a tightly capped
cuvette before spectral measurements. Then the temperature was rapidly
shifted to 42 °C, and the spectral measurements were made at
different times after equilibration. The measurements were done in 0.05 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl and 25% glycerol. A bandwidth of 2 nm was used.
Secondary structure prediction was done using web based k2d program
(www.embl-heidelberg.de/~andrade/k2d/).
Equilibrium Denaturation Studies--
GuHCl denaturation studies
were performed by diluting the stock protein solution with different
volumes of buffer (0.05 M phosphate, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl either in the presence of 25% glycerol or not) and
a standard GuHCl solution in the same buffer so as to attain the
desired final protein, buffer, and GuHCl concentrations. The solutions
were then incubated overnight in a tightly capped tube to attain
complete equilibrium at both 30 and 42 °C. The spectral measurements
were carried at both 30 and 42 °C by circulating water through the
jacket of a jacketed cuvette. The bandwidth was 2 nm, and the time
constant was 2 s. 10 scans were signal-averaged.
Curve Fitting--
The curve fittings were done to various
equations such as two-state equilibrium, three-state equilibrium,
protein-protein association equilibrium, etc., using Kyplot (Koichi
Yoshioka, 1997-1999, version 2.0 beta 4).
Proteolysis--
Proteolysis was carried out at 44 °C with
sigma 32:chymotrypsin ratio (w/w) of 1:50 in 50 mM Tris-HCl
buffer, pH 8, containing 100 mM KCl, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.02% Triton X-100, and 25 mM MgCl2. Five minutes after the addition of chymotrypsin, the
reaction was quenched with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (final
concentration, 1 mM). The protein was then loaded on to a
150-µl Ni2+-NTA-agarose column pre-equilibrated with
buffer X (50 mM KP, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM
KCl, 50 mM isoleucine, and 50 mM
phenylalanine). It was washed subsequently with 1.5 ml of buffer X and
eluted with buffer X containing 300 mM imidazole. The
samples were then analyzed on 16% SDS-PAGE using the Laemmli procedure
(13).
DnaK-Sigma 32 Interaction--
DnaK/J-mediated proteolysis of
sigma 32 plays a crucial role in down-regulating levels of sigma 32 at
lower temperatures. Upon heat shock, this proteolytic down-regulation
phenomenon is abolished. One of the suggested mechanisms is an increase
in the concentration of denatured proteins, which causes titration of DnaK away from its complex with sigma 32. Little is known about how
temperature affects interaction of DnaK with sigma 32. One of the
better ways of measuring interaction of two proteins is by fluorescence
anisotropy. Fig. 1 shows titration of
fluorescein labeled sigma 32 with nucleotide-free DnaK at three
temperatures, 30, 35, and 42 °C. At 30 °C, the anisotropy
increased quickly as a function of DnaK concentration but quickly
saturated. When fitted to a single-site binding equation, it gives a
dissociation constant of 1.4 × 10 Temperature-dependent Conformational Change in Sigma
32--
Fig. 2 shows the far UV circular
dichroism spectra of sigma 32 at two different temperatures, 30 and
42 °C. The spectra were first taken at 30 °C in a sealed cuvette,
and then the temperature was shifted to 42 °C. 15 min after the
temperature shift, the spectra were recorded. In a separate experiment,
when the kinetics was recorded, it was observed that after 5 min of
upshift (first observation point) no further change of spectra
occurred, indicating that the change is not due to progressive
irreversible aggregation, etc. (data not shown). The protein
concentration measured spectrophotometrically after incubation at 30 and 42 °C indicated no change in protein concentration (data not
shown). The light scattering measurements were carried out under
conditions similar to that of the CD experiment. After attaining
42 °C, the light scattering intensity was measured (from the
16th min). Very little change of scattering intensity is
seen (around 5% after 15 min), suggesting that no significant
aggregation takes place under these conditions. Also, greater spectral
intensity change at 208 nm compared with 220 nm also suggests that it
is not merely a loss of protein caused by aggregation or other factors. Such decreased intensity in the far UV range is characteristic of
disorder in an organized secondary structural element. Because the loss
of intensity does not exceed more than 10-15% of the total, it is
likely that it is a relatively small section of the protein that
undergoes an order-disorder transition.
If the reduction in CD spectral intensity is related to functional
properties of sigma 32, it is likely that a major change would be seen
around the temperature where significant heat shock effect is seen,
which is above 37 °C. Fig.
3A shows far UV circular dichroism spectra of sigma 32 as a function of temperature. Above 35 °C, the far UV circular dichroism spectra showed decreased intensity with some leveling off occurring beyond 43 °C.
Increased disorder in protein structure often leads to protein
interiors becoming exposed to solvents. The tryptophans that are
situated in the protein interiors may show red shift if the increased
disorder leads to increased solvent exposure. Fig. 3B shows
the response of emission maximum of tryptophan fluorescence as a
function of temperature. There are six tryptophans that are distributed
throughout the protein sequence. It is clear that there is very little
shift of tryptophan emission maximum. Tryptophan emission is generally
sensitive to solvent polarity, suggesting that this transition does not
involve a significant change in the environment of any of the six
tryptophans of sigma 32. This conclusion is also supported by the fact
that the acrylamide quenching patterns at the two temperatures are
remarkably similar, suggesting no major change in tryptophan
accessibility (data not shown). The lack of tryptophan emission maximum
change and preservation of most of the CD intensity argues in favor of
the conformational change being local in nature.
One possible consequence of order-disorder transition is the exposure
of interior hydrophobic patches. ANS is a hydrophobic probe that has
been used widely for the detection of exposed hydrophobic surfaces in
proteins. We have used such a probe to detect whether at the elevated
temperature sigma 32 shows any excess exposed hydrophobic patches. Fig.
4 shows the ANS binding isotherm at 30 and 42 °C. Their similarity suggests that the disorder-order transition does not cause any increased exposure of interior
hydrophobic sites. It has previously been noted that in other proteins,
elevated temperatures induce molten globule states (15, 16). One of the
common characteristics of the molten globule state is increased binding
of hydrophobic probes like ANS and bis-ANS. Clearly such a situation is
not evident here, suggesting that the structure of sigma 32 is not
a molten globule at 42 °C.
Equilibrium Denaturation of Sigma 32--
Denaturation of proteins
sometimes yields valuable information about domain structure and other
structural elements. The stability of domains or structural elements
can be assessed based on equilibrium denaturation curves. Given the
likely scenario that a small domain/structural element destabilizes at
higher temperature, equilibrium denaturation can shed additional light
on domain structure and stability of sigma 32. Fig.
5 shows the guanidine
hydrochloride-induced denaturation of sigma 32 at 30 °C as monitored
by change of F340/F350
ratio (a measure of emission maximum shift). In contrast to all other experiments, this experiment was done in the absence of glycerol caused
by solubility difficulties of high concentrations of GuHCl in 25%
glycerol containing buffers. It is apparent that the denaturation profile is biphasic. The first phase occurs at low guanidine
hydrochloride concentration, where significant emission maximum shift
occurs along with significant far UV CD change. The second denaturation phase occurs at ~4 M GuHCl, where a large part of the
residual CD (shown in the inset) disappears along with the
complete shift of tryptophan fluorescence emission maximum to greater
than 350 nm (F340/F350
ratio of about 0.86). We interpret this as denaturation of a relatively
small domain at low guanidine hydrochloride followed by unfolding of
rest of the protein at a higher GuHCl concentration. The major
transition centered around 4 M GuHCl is not significantly different at 30 and 42 °C, suggesting that global stability of the
protein is not affected by the temperature upshift. The first phase of
denaturation, however, is affected by temperature upshift.
Because most of the experiments were conducted in the presence of 25%
glycerol, we have also performed the denaturation experiment at low
GuHCl concentration in the presence of glycerol. Fig.
6 shows the denaturation profile of sigma
32 up to 3 M GuHCl at two different temperatures, 30 and
42 °C, in the presence of 25% glycerol. Clearly the two profiles
are different, with the one at 42 °C denaturing at significantly
lower GuHCl concentrations than the one at 30 °C. When fitted to a
two-state unfolding transition,
We have investigated the functional effects of this conformational
change. One of the most important functions of sigma 32 is binding to
core-RNA polymerase. We have used fluorescence anisotropy to
derive the equilibrium binding isotherm. Fig.
7 shows the titration of
fluorescein-labeled sigma 32 with increasing concentrations of core at
30 and 42 °C. The increase in anisotropy shows saturation behavior.
When fitted to a single site binding equation, it yields a dissociation
constant of 24.1 nM at 30 °C. A similar protocol yields
a dissociation constant of 50.6 nM at 42 °C. Clearly,
the binding to the core is not significantly affected by the
temperature-dependent transition. The core-RNA polymerase
binding regions of sigma 32 are now reasonably well documented. The
interface is thought to be extensive, including regions 2.1 and 2.2 (17). We conclude that the domain/structural element that undergoes the
temperature-dependent transition does not significantly
overlap with the regions that are important for core binding.
Regions Involved in Conformational Change--
We have no direct
information on the limits of this domain. Because there is no
significant change in tryptophan fluorescence emission in the
temperature induced order-disorder transition, it is likely that the
part of the domain that undergoes the temperature-induced transition
contains no tryptophan residues. There are six tryptophans (26, 107, 120, 147, 216, and 243) distributed throughout the primary structure.
It is interesting to note that residues 26-107 and 147-216 are
relatively long stretches of amino acids that lack a tryptophan
residue. The 147-216 stretch comprises regions 3.1 and 3.2. Based on
mutational studies it has been concluded that region 3.2 is not
involved in interaction with core (17). It is possible that some
structural elements in this region become disordered upon increase in
temperature. This hypothesis is also compatible with proteolysis data
described below. Yura and co-workers (18) have shown that at elevated
temperatures the protein becomes highly susceptible to proteolysis,
which initially produces a fragment 12 kDa smaller than the native
protein. We have verified this. We have also attempted to locate
whether this 12-kDa fragment originates from the N- or the C-terminal
side using a His tag as a handle. When the C-terminal His-tagged sigma
32 was proteolyzed and loaded onto the Ni+2-NTA-agarose
column, the smaller fragment bound tightly to the column, suggesting
its C-terminal origin (Fig. 8). It thus
suggests that the cleavage takes place ~100 amino acid residues from
the C-terminal end. This is very close to the boundary regions 3.1 and
3.2. Fig. 9 shows the alignment of sigma
70 and sigma 32 sequence. Interestingly, residues 190-205 of sigma 32 has no counterpart in the sigma 70 sequence, raising the possibility
that this region may be an insertion having sigma 32-specific function.
Secondary structure prediction suggests that this region may have a It has been shown previously that DnaK/J-mediated degradation
undergoes temperature-dependent attenuation (4). One
possible mechanism is that at higher temperatures, DnaK binds to other misfolded proteins, thus lowering the DnaK-sigma 32 complex
concentration and consequently its degradation rate. However, it has
been also suggested that this indirect mechanism may not be the only
mechanism for lowering degradation rate at higher temperature (20). We have shown that the DnaK-sigma 32 interaction at elevated temperatures is abolished and that a small domain or structural element in sigma 32 undergoes structural transition at elevated temperatures. The abolition
may contribute significantly to the lowering of the degradation rate
and the initiation of the heat shock response. The structural
transition may have a causal relationship with the abolition of
interaction between DnaK and sigma 32 reported here, leading to
transient stabilization of sigma 32. This same structural transition
may also lead to an increased DnaK/J-independent proteolysis rate,
leading to adaptation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Conclusion
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Conclusion
REFERENCES
-D-thiogalactopyranoside, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
and guanidine HCl were purchased from Sigma. Bacto-tryptone,
bacto-agar, and yeast extract were purchased from Difco Laboratories
(Detroit, MI).
-Mercaptoethanol and glycerol were purchased from
Aldrich. ANS and fluorescein maleimide were purchased from Molecular
Probes Inc. (Eugene, OR). AG-1-X8 was purchased from Bio-Rad. Core RNA
polymerase was obtained from Epicentre Inc. (Madison, WI). All other
reagents were of analytical grade.
-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a final
concentration of 0.5 mM. The cells were grown for another
20 min and poured into tubes of ice. All of the subsequent steps were
performed at 4 °C. After centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 10 min, the
cell pellet was resuspended in 18 ml of ice-cold buffer X (50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM
KCl, 50 mM isoleucine, 50 mM phenylalanine)
containing 20 µg/ml of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and disrupted by
sonication. The cell lysate was centrifuged for 45 min at 12,000 × g. The supernatant was loaded onto a 3-ml
Ni2+-NTA-agarose column pre-equilibrated with buffer X at a
rate 0.4 ml/min. The column was subsequently washed with 40 ml of
buffer X and then with 10 ml of buffer X plus 15 mM
imidazole. Nickel-bound proteins were eluted with 30 ml of 15-150
mM imidazole gradient in buffer X. Pure fractions of sigma
32 proteins were dialyzed against two changes of 1 liter of 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM
KCl and 50% glycerol. The cysteine mutant of sigma 32, BB4708 was also
purified following the same protocol. In this case the only alteration
that was made was that buffer X additionally contained 1 mM
-ME.
-ME) and dialyzed
extensively against buffer A (60 volumes) for 12 h at 0 °C. It
was then applied onto a 2-ml heparin-agarose column. The flow through
was repeatedly applied to a 2.5-ml ATP-agarose column pre-equilibrated
in buffer A. The column was washed with 10 column volumes of buffer A
containing 500 mM NaCl followed by 2 column volumes of
buffer A. The protein was eluted with buffer Q (25 mM
Hepes, pH 7.6, containing 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA,
5 mM
-ME, and 10% glycerol) containing 5 mM
ATP. The protein concentrations were determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay.
-ME and
dialyzed extensively against 0.05 M potassium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl, 15% glycerol, and 1 mM
-ME to remove the excess reagent. The incorporation
ratio was determined using
490 = 83,000 M
1 cm
1 (22). The protein
concentration was determined from absorbance value at 280 nm after
subtraction of the contribution from fluorescein.
where, I|| is the intensity when the
polarizers were in the same direction, I
(Eq. 1)
is
the intensity when the polarizers were crossed, and G is the
grating factor that corrects for wavelength-dependent
distortion of the polarizing system. Fluorescein maleimide-labeled
mutant sigma 32 protein was titrated with increasing concentrations of
core RNA polymerase in 0.02 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing
100 mM NaCl and 25% glycerol at both 30 and 42 °C. The
excitation and emission were at 480 and 530 nm, respectively. The
respective band passes were 10 and 20 nm. Fluorescein maleimide-labeled
mutant sigma 32 protein was titrated with increasing concentrations of
nucleotide-free DnaK in 0.02 M Hepes, pH 7.6, containing
100 mM NaCl and 25% glycerol at 30, 35, 37, and 42 °C.
The excitation and emission were at 480 and 530 nm, respectively. The
respective band passes were 10 and 20 nm.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Conclusion
REFERENCES
6 M.
At 35 °C, the increase of anisotropy occurred at higher DnaK concentrations. When fitted to a single site equation with same limiting anisotropy, it gave a dissociation constant of 2.1 × 10
5 M. At 42 °C, the anisotropy increase
is virtually negligible, suggesting a dissociation constant that is
much higher. Such a large change in
G of interaction
between DnaK and Sigma 32 cannot occur from explicit temperature
dependence of
G (
H
T
S) and is suggestive of large temperature
dependence of
H (heat capacity) or
S. One
of the very likely mechanisms of such a large temperature dependence of
H or
S may originate from a
temperature-dependent conformational change in DnaK or
Sigma 32. Because it has been reported that DnaK interaction with its
substrates are virtually temperature-independent (14), it is likely
that the temperature dependence of sigma 32-DnaK interaction originates
from temperature-dependent conformational change of sigma
32. This is also supported by the fact that a peptide (MQQRITLKDYAM)
binds to DnaK equally well at 30 and 42 °C (data not shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Anisotropy increase of fluorescein-labeled
sigma 32 as a function of DnaK concentration at three different
temperatures, 30 (
), 35 (
), and 42 °C (
). Fluorescein
maleimide-labeled mutant sigma 32 (T128C/N138C) protein was titrated
with increasing concentrations of nucleotide-free DnaK in 0.02 M Hepes, pH 7.6, containing 100 mM NaCl and
25% glycerol at 30, 35, and 42 °C. Anisotropy was determined at
each point. Each point is an average of three independent measurements.
The excitation and emission were at 480 and 530 nm, respectively. The
respective band passes were 10 and 20 nm.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Far UV circular dichroism spectra of sigma 32 at 30 °C (solid line) and 42 °C (dotted
line). The spectra were obtained in a 2-mm-pathlength
tightly capped cuvette with a jacket through which water was
circulated. The protein concentration was 3.5 µM in 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl and 25% glycerol. The protein was equilibrated to
30 °C for 30 min, the spectrum was measured, and then the
temperature was shifted to 42 °C. After equilibration for 15 min,
the spectra were taken. Two scans were signal-averaged. The bandwidth
was 2 nm, and the time constant was 2 s. The actual temperatures
were measured using a thermocouple directly placed into the cuvette
during an identical run with buffer.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A, temperature dependence of circular
dichroism signal at 225 nm of sigma 32. The protein concentration was
3.5 µM. The bandwidth was 2 nm, and the time constant was
2 s. The temperature was increased from 30 to 45 °C at
intervals of ~0.5 °C by circulating water through the jacket. The
actual temperature within the cuvette was calibrated with a
thermocouple placed in the cell. The spectra was taken in a
2-mm-pathlength cuvette. B, temperature dependence of
fluorescence emission maximum. The protein concentration was 2 µM. The excitation was set at 295 nm. The band passes
were set at 5 nm. The temperature was increased from 30 to 45 °C at
intervals of ~1 °C by circulating water through the jacket. The
actual temperature within the cuvette was calibrated with a
thermocouple placed in the cell. For both of the experiments, the
buffer was 0.05 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.9, containing
300 mM KCl and 25% glycerol.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
ANS binding to sigma 32 at two different
temperatures, 30 (
) and 42 °C (
). The protein
concentration was 3.3 µM in 0.05 M potassium
phosphate buffer, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl and 25%
glycerol. The excitation and emission wavelengths were 360 and 480 nm,
respectively. Each point is the average of four separate experiments.
The data were fitted to a straight line.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Equilibrium GuHCl denaturation profile of
sigma 32 at two different temperatures 30 (
) and 42 °C (
), by
fluorescence and CD (in the inset). The buffer
was 0.05 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.9, containing 300 mM KCl. For fluorescence, the excitation wavelength was 295 nm, and the emission wavelength was 340 nm. Both of the bandpasses were
set at 5 nm. The error bars are based on the averages of
five independent measurements. The CD spectra were obtained in a
2-mm-pathlength cuvette. The protein concentration was 1 µM.
Gu values of
2.5 and
0.1 kcal/mol values were obtained for 30 and 42 °C,
respectively. This suggests that a relatively unstable domain or
structural element become destabilized at 42 °C.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Equilibrium denaturation at two different
temperatures, 30 (
) and 42 °C (
), at low GuHCl
concentrations. The solutions conditions are same as for Fig. 5
except 25% glycerol was present. Each error bar is the
result of five independent measurements.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Equilibrium binding of sigma 32 to core RNA
polymerase at two different temperatures, 30 (
) and 42 °C
(
). Fluorescein maleimide-labeled double mutant sigma 32 (T128C/N138C) was titrated with increasing concentrations of core
polymerase, and anisotropy at each point was determined. The excitation
and emission wavelengths were 480 and 520 nm, respectively. The
excitation and emission bandpasses were 10 and 20 nm, respectively. The
solution conditions were 0.02 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 100 mM NaCl and 25% glycerol.
strand and a hairpin loop. Secondary structure content prediction from circular dichroism spectra at two temperatures (30 and 42 °C) suggests a significant loss of
sheet structure. One possibility is
that this region (the insertion) is in an anti-parallel
strand-hairpin turn conformation at lower temperatures that becomes
disordered at higher temperatures, thus allowing the protease to gain
access. In general, the secondary structure prediction reported here
agrees well with the secondary structure of homologous Sigma A of
Thermus aquaticus (derived from x-ray crystal
structure complexed with the core). Insertion region 190-205 aligns
with the long connecting loop between the
35 and
10 recognition
elements (19). Interestingly, a small deletion in sigma 32 (next to the
insertion) also falls in this region, suggesting that this loop may
play important role in sigma factor functions.

View larger version (69K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of
proteolytic fragments at elevated temperature. Lane 1 is purified sigma 32; lane 2 is chicken egg white lysozyme
(molecular mass = ~14 kDa); lane 3 is high imidazole
eluate of Ni+2-NTA-agarose column after loading of the
C-terminally His-tagged protein proteolyzed at 44 °C; lane
4 is flow-through from Ni+2-NTA-agarose column;
lane 5 is the proteolyzed sigma 32 before loading to the
column; and lane 6 shows the molecular weight markers.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
A, secondary structure prediction for
sigma 32. The program used was SOPM (21). H, helix;
E,
strands; C, coil. B, alignment
of sigma 70 and sigma 32 sequence by Blast. The boxes
indicate the putative unstable region in A and the insert in
B.
![]()
Conclusion
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Conclusion
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Prof. Richard Calendar for wild type sigma 32 expression plasmids and strains. We thank Prof. B. Bukau for a mutant sigma 32 strain (BB4708). We thank Dr. Daniel Joo and Dr. Ding Jin-Jun for very useful discussions. We gratefully acknowledge help from Prof. Soumen Basak for running temperature dependent CD spectra. We also thank Mr. Jaganmoy guin for help in running the CD spectrometer.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by a grant from the Department of Science and Technology of the Government of India.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biophysics, Bose Institute, P-1/12, C.I.T. Scheme VII M, Calcutta 700 054, India. Fax: 91-33-334-3886; E-mail: sidroy@vsnl.com and
sidroy@boseinst.ernet.in.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203197200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
NTA, nitriloacetic
acid;
-ME,
-mercaptoethanol;
ANS, 1,8-anilinonaphthalene sulfonic
acid;
GuHCl, guanidine hydrochloride.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Appella, E., and Anderson, C. W. (2000) Pathol. Biol. 48, 227-245[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Michele, T. M., Ko, C.,
and Bishai, W. R.
(1999)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
43,
218-225 |
| 3. | Yura, T., and Nakahigashi, K. (1999) Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 153-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Arsene, F., Tomoyasu, T., and Bukau, B. (2000) Int. J. Food Microbiol. 55, 3-9[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Morita, M.,
Kanemori, M.,
Yanagi, H.,
and Yura, T.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
401-410 |
| 6. |
Morita, M. T.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Kodama, T. S.,
Kyogoku, Y.,
Yanagi, H.,
and Yura, T.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
655-665 |
| 7. | Straus, D. B., Walter, W. A., and Gross, C. A. (1987) Nature 329, 348-351[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Morita, M. T.,
Kanemori, M.,
Yanagi, H.,
and Yura, T.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
5860-5865 |
| 9. |
Joo, D. M., Ng, N.,
and Calendar, R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4907-4912 |
| 10. |
Cegielska, A.,
and Georgopoulos, C.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
21122-21130 |
| 11. |
Skowyra, D.,
and Wickner, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26282-26285 |
| 12. | Bandyopadhyay, S., Mukhopadhyay, C., and Roy, S. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 5033-5040[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Farr, C. D., Galiano, F. J., and Witt, S. N. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 15574-15582[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Irun, M. P., Garcia-Mira, M. M., Sanchez-Ruiz, J. M., and Sancho, J. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 306, 877-888[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Chattopadhyay, K., and Mazumdar, S. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 263-270[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Gross, C. A., Chan, C., Dombroski, A., Gruber, T., Sharp, M., Tupy, J., and Young, B. (1998) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 63, 141-155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Kanemori, M.,
Yanagi, H.,
and Yura, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22002-22007 |
| 19. |
Murakami, K. S.,
Masuda, S.,
and Darst, S.
(2002)
Science
296,
1280-1284 |
| 20. | Tatsuta, T., Joob, D. M., Calendar, R., Akiyama, Y., and Ogura, T. (2000) FEBS Lett. 478, 271-275[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Geourjon, C.,
and Deléage, G.
(1994)
Protein Eng.
7,
157-164 |
| 22. | Haugland, Richard (1992) Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Chemicals , Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. K. Siegenthaler and P. Christen Tuning of DnaK Chaperone Action by Nonnative Protein Sensor DnaJ and Thermosensor GrpE J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 34448 - 34456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Saha, A. Sharma, A. Dhar, B. Bhattacharyya, S. Roy, and S. K. Das Gupta Antagonists of Hsp16.3, a Low-Molecular-Weight Mycobacterial Chaperone and Virulence Factor, Derived from Phage-Displayed Peptide Libraries Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2005; 71(11): 7334 - 7344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Rist, T. J. D. Jorgensen, P. Roepstorff, B. Bukau, and M. P. Mayer Mapping Temperature-induced Conformational Changes in the Escherichia coli Heat Shock Transcription Factor {sigma}32 by Amide Hydrogen Exchange J. Biol. Chem., December 19, 2003; 278(51): 51415 - 51421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang and P. L. deHaseth Sigma 32-Dependent Promoter Activity In Vivo: Sequence Determinants of the groE Promoter J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2003; 185(19): 5800 - 5806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Narberhaus and S. Balsiger Structure-Function Studies of Escherichia coli RpoH ({sigma}32) by In Vitro Linker Insertion Mutagenesis J. Bacteriol., May 1, 2003; 185(9): 2731 - 2738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |