|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 37, 33698-33703, September 13, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pharmacology, The University of Michigan
Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Received for publication, April 29, 2002, and in revised form, June 7, 2002
A minimal system of five purified proteins,
hsp90, hsp70, Hop, hsp40, and p23, assembles glucocorticoid receptor
(GR)·hsp90 heterocomplexes and causes the simultaneous opening of the
steroid binding cleft to access by steroid. The first step in assembly is the ATP-dependent and hsp40
(YDJ-1)-dependent binding of hsp70 to the GR, which primes
the receptor for subsequent ATP-dependent activation by
hsp90, Hop, and p23 (Morishima, Y., Murphy, P. J. M., Li,
D. P., Sanchez, E. R., and Pratt, W. B. (2000)
J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18054-18060). Here we have
examined the nucleotide-bound states of the two essential chaperones in
each step. We show that it is the ATP-bound state of hsp70 that
interacts initially with the GR. After rapid priming and washing, the
primed GR·hsp70 complex rapidly binds hsp90 in the second step
reaction in a nucleotide-independent manner. The rate-limiting step is
the ATP-dependent opening of the steroid binding cleft
after hsp90 binding. This activating step requires the N-terminal
ATP-binding site of hsp90, but we cannot establish any role for a
C-terminal ATP-binding site in steroid binding cleft opening. The
reported specific inhibitors of the C-terminal ATP site on hsp90
inhibit the generation of steroid binding, but they have other effects
in this multiprotein system that could explain the inhibition.
In the absence of hormone, steroid receptors are recovered from
cells as multiprotein heterocomplexes
containing a dimer of hsp90,1 substoichiometric
amounts of hsp70,2 an acidic
23-kDa protein, p23, and a tetratricopeptide repeat domain protein,
such as an immunophilin or protein phosphatase 5 (for review see Refs.
1 and 2). The receptor·hsp90 heterocomplexes can be formed by
incubating immunoadsorbed, hsp90-free receptors with reticulocyte
lysate (3, 4). Because the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the
glucocorticoid receptor (GR) must be bound to hsp90 for the receptor to
have high affinity steroid binding activity (1), incubation of the
hsp90-free GR with reticulocyte lysate results in generation of steroid
binding activity in direct proportion to the number of GR·hsp90
heterocomplexes that are assembled (5). Thus, generation of steroid
binding activity provides a functional assay for proper heterocomplex
assembly. Both biochemical data (6) and data derived from GR mutants (7, 8) support a model in which a hydrophobic cleft in the LBD is
opened upon formation of the GR·hsp90 heterocomplex such that it can
be accessed by steroid.
The assembly of receptor·hsp90 heterocomplexes is an
ATP-dependent process that is carried out by a multiprotein
system that is apparently ubiquitous among cells of the animal and
plant kingdoms (1). The assembly system in reticulocyte lysate has been
reconstituted (9), and a mixture of five purified proteins, hsp90,
hsp70, Hop, hsp40, and p23, is now used to achieve optimal
receptor·hsp90 heterocomplex assembly (10, 11). Hsp90 and hsp70 are
both essential for opening the steroid binding cleft, and Hop, hsp40, and p23 act as co-chaperones that increase the rate or extent of
GR·hsp90 heterocomplex assembly (12). Hop (hsp70/hsp90 organizing protein) binds via different TPR domains to hsp70 and hsp90 (13), bringing these two essential chaperones together into a machinery. The
machinery as it is immunoadsorbed from reticulocyte lysate also
contains the hsp70 co-chaperone hsp40 (10), and it has all of the
activity required for converting the GR LBD to the steroid binding
state (10, 14). All of the Hop and ~30% of the hsp90 in reticulocyte
lysate exist in this hsp90·Hop·hsp70·hsp40 complex (15), which
has been called the foldosome (16) or the hsp90/hsp70-based
chaperone machinery. Receptor-bound hsp90 must achieve the
ATP-bound conformation for the receptor to be in the steroid
binding state (17), and when this state is achieved, p23, which
binds only to ATP-bound hsp90 (18), binds dynamically to stabilize
the receptor·hsp90 heterocomplex (19).
Acting separately, hsp70 and hsp90 are classically thought of as
chaperones that bind to denatured regions of proteins to promote their
refolding. However, there is no evidence that steroid receptors that
have been stripped of hsp90 by mild salt treatment are in any way
denatured prior to their reactivation by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. When hsp90 and hsp70 are acting together in this
machinery, they act at a very focal site on the surface of the LBD (7)
of the native GR to open the hydrophobic steroid binding cleft to
access by hormone. In initial experiments to understand the mechanism
of cleft opening and GR·hsp90 heterocomplex assembly, we have carried
out two-step reactions in which the immunoadsorbed GR is first
incubated with purified hsp70 and YDJ-1 (the yeast hsp40 homolog) in
the presence of an ATP-regenerating system (20). This produces a
GR·hsp70 complex that can be washed free of unbound hsp70 and then
incubated with purified hsp90, Hop, and p23. In this first reaction the
GR is "primed" to be activated by hsp90 during the second
incubation. Both the initial priming step with hsp70 and the second
activating step with hsp90 are ATP-dependent, and steroid
binding activity is generated only during the second step (20). The
two-step assembly differs somewhat from single step assembly when all
five proteins are present simultaneously in the respect that the
priming reaction with hsp70 is highly dependent upon the presence of
YDJ-1 (21), whereas the single step assembly is less dependent upon
YDJ-1 (12).
The conformation of both hsp70 (22) and hsp90 (23) is determined by
their nucleotide binding state, and in both cases it is the ADP-bound
conformation that possesses high affinity for binding hydrophobic
substrates. To advance our understanding of the assembly process, it is
important to determine what nucleotide binding state of hsp70 interacts
initially with the GR and what state of hsp90 interacts with the primed
GR·hsp70 complex. On the basis of indirect evidence, we have
previously speculated that hsp70 binds to the GR in its ATP-bound form
(20), and in this work, we demonstrate that it is the ATP-bound state
of hsp70 that interacts initially with the hsp90-free GR. In the second assembly step, binding of hsp90 is rapid, and the rate-limiting step is
the ATP-dependent opening of the steroid binding cleft. We
do not detect any difference between the ATP-bound, the ADP-bound, and
the unbound state of hsp90 in the ability to bind to the primed GR·hsp70 complex. In addition to the N-terminal ATP-binding site that
acts as a conformational switch (23), hsp90 has a second ATP-binding
site at the C terminus (24-27). Using inhibitors reported to be
specific for one site or the other, we confirm a requirement of the
N-terminal site for GR activation. However, when the GR is activated by
the multiprotein machinery, we find that other effects of C-terminal
inhibitors, such as inhibition of hsp70 function, do not permit
determination of any requirement for ATP binding at the C-terminal site
on hsp90.
Materials
[6,7-3H]Triamcinolone acetonide (38 Ci/mmol) and
125I-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgGs were
obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Untreated rabbit
reticulocyte lysate was from Green Hectares (Oregon, WI). Protein
A-Sepharose, novobiocin, cisplatin, and goat anti-mouse horseradish
peroxidase conjugate were from Sigma. Complete-Mini protease inhibitor
mixture was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany). The
BuGR2 monoclonal IgG antibody against the GR was from
Affinity Bioreagents (Golden, CO). The AC88 monoclonal IgG against
hsp90 and the N27F3-4 anti-72/73-kDa hsp monoclonal IgG (anti-hsp70)
were from StressGen (Victoria, BC, Canada). Escherichia
coli-expressing human p23, YDJ-1, or Hop was kindly provided by
Drs. David Toft (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), Avrom Caplan (Mount Sinai
School of Medicine), and David Smith (Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ),
respectively. Hybridoma cells producing the FiGR monoclonal IgG against
the GR were generously provided by Dr. Jack Bodwell (Dartmouth Medical
School). Geldanamycin was obtained from the Drug Synthesis and
Chemistry Branch of the Developmental Therapeutics Program, NCI,
National Institutes of Health.
Methods
Expression of Mouse GR in Sf9 Cells--
Sf9 cells
were grown in SFM900 II serum-free medium (Invitrogen) supplemented
with Cytomax (Kemp Biotechnology, Rockville, MD) in suspension cultures
maintained at 27 °C with continuous shaking (150 rpm). Cultures were
supplemented with 0.1% glucose at infection and 24 h
post-infection as described by Srinivasan et al. (28). Cells
were harvested, washed in Hanks' buffered saline solution, resuspended
in 1.5 volumes of buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.35, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM molybdate, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) with 1 tablet of Complete-Mini protease
inhibitor mixture per 3 ml of buffer, and ruptured by Dounce
homogenization. The lysate was then centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant was collected,
aliquoted, flash-frozen, and stored at Glucocorticoid Receptor Heterocomplex
Reconstitution--
Receptors were immunoadsorbed from 50-µl
aliquots of Sf9 cytosol by rotation for 2 h at 4 °C with
14 µl of protein A-Sepharose precoupled to 7 µl of FiGR ascites
suspended in 200 µl of TEG buffer (10 mM TES, pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol). Prior to
incubation with various mixtures of purified proteins as noted,
immunoadsorbed receptors were stripped of associated hsp90 by
incubating the immunopellet for an additional 2 h at 4 °C with
300 µl of 0.5 M NaCl in TEG buffer. The pellets were then
washed once with 1 ml of TEG buffer followed by a second wash with 1 ml
of Hepes buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.35). For single step
assembly of GR·hsp90 heterocomplexes, FiGR immunopellets containing
GR stripped of chaperones were incubated with the five-protein assembly
system (20 µg of purified hsp90, 15 µg of purified hsp70, 0.6 µg
of purified human Hop, 6 µg of purified p23, 0.4 µg of purified
YDJ-1) adjusted to 50 µl with HKD buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH
7.35, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol),
containing 20 mM sodium molybdate and 5 µl of an
ATP-regenerating system (50 mM ATP, 250 mM
creatine phosphate, 20 mM magnesium acetate, and 100 units/ml creatine phosphokinase). The assay mixtures were incubated for 20 min at 30 °C with suspension of the pellets by shaking the tubes
every 2 min. At the end of the incubation, the pellets were washed
twice with 1 ml of ice-cold TEGM buffer (TEG with 20 mM sodium molybdate) and assayed for steroid binding capacity and for
receptor-associated hsp90 and hsp70. For two-step assembly, stripped GR
immune pellets were mixed with hsp70, YDJ-1, and the ATP-regenerating
system in a final volume of 55 µl adjusted with HKD buffer. After 5 min of incubation at 30 °C, the pellets were washed twice with TEG
buffer and once with Hepes buffer and then incubated for 20 min at
30 °C with the purified heterocomplex assembly system without hsp70.
At the end of the second incubation, steroid binding was assayed.
Assay of Steroid Binding Capacity--
Immune pellets to be
assayed for steroid binding were incubated overnight at 4 °C in 50 µl of HEM buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.35, 1 mM
EDTA, 20 mM molybdate) plus 50 nM
[3H]triamcinolone acetonide. Samples were then washed
three times with 1 ml of TEGM buffer and counted by liquid
scintillation spectrometry. The steroid binding is expressed in counts
per min of [3H]triamcinolone acetonide bound/FiGR
immunopellet prepared from 50 µl of Sf9 cytosol.
Western Blotting--
To assay GR and associated proteins,
immune pellets were resolved on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and
transferred to Immobilon-P membranes. The membranes were probed with
0.25 µg/ml BuGR for GR, 1 µg/ml AC88 for hsp90, or 1 µg/ml
N27F3-4 for hsp70. The immunoblots were then incubated a second time
with the appropriate 125I-conjugated or horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated counterantibody to visualize the immunoreactive bands.
Protein Purification--
hsp90 and hsp70 were purified from
rabbit reticulocyte lysate by sequential chromatography on DE52,
hydroxyapatite, and ATP-agarose as described previously (29). Human p23
was purified from 10 ml of bacterial lysate by chromatography on DE52
followed by hydroxyapatite chromatography as described (30). For
purification of YDJ-1, bacterial sonicates were cleared by
centrifugation, and YDJ-1 was purified by sequential chromatography on
DE52 and hydroxyapatite as described previously (10). The bacterial
expression of YDJ-1 has been described (31) as has the expression of
human Hop (9). Purification of human Hop was carried out in a similar
manner by sequential chromatography on DE52 and hydroxyapatite. In all cases the protein-containing fractions were identified by
immunoblotting, and fractions from the final purification step were
pooled, concentrated by Amicon filtration, dialyzed against HKD buffer,
flash-frozen, and stored at Determination of Nucleotide-bound States of hsp90--
Purified
rabbit hsp90 was incubated with 5 mM ATP, 5 mM
ADP, or with HKD buffer alone for 10 min at 30 °C. Following the
incubation, 17 µg of hsp90 protein was subjected to four rounds of
charcoal adsorption to remove free nucleotide. Bound nucleotides were
extracted with ice-cold 0.4 N perchloric acid from purified
hsp90. The ATP and ADP were then separated and quantitated by strong
anion-exchange, high performance liquid chromatography using a Waters
(Milford, MA) gradient system controlled by Millenium software as
described previously (32). Briefly, samples were loaded onto a 5 µm
Partisphere 4.6 × 250 mm SAX column (Whatman, Hillsboro, OR), and
nucleotides were eluted with a linear gradient of ammonium phosphate
buffer ranging from 0.15 (pH 3.6) to 0.60 M (pH 3.8) at a
flow rate of 2 ml/min. Retention times were 7.7 min and 23.3 min for
ADP and ATP, respectively. Nucleotides were identified by their
absorbance between 240 and 350 nm using a Waters photodiode array
detector. ADP and ATP were quantitated by comparison of their peak
areas with that of a known amount of appropriate standard at
wavelengths 254 and 281. The concentration of purified hsp90 was
determined by Bradford assay. All perchloric acid extracts were
filtered prior to the high performance liquid chromatography step, and after correcting for the amount of nucleotide removed during
filtration, the percent of the protein that could be accounted for in
the nucleotide-bound form was calculated. In the samples of Fig. 3, we
can say that at least 60% of the hsp90 is converted to the ATP-bound
form and at least 28% to the ADP-bound form.
Binding of Different States of hsp90 to the Primed GR·hsp70
Complex--
hsp90-stripped GR immune pellets were incubated with
YDJ-1 and an ATP-regenerating system in the presence (primed) or
absence (unprimed) of hsp70 for 5 min at 30 °C. The immunopellets
were then washed once with TEG buffer and once with Hepes buffer.
Purified hsp90 was preincubated for 10 min at 30 °C with 5 mM ATP, 5 mM ADP, or HKD buffer. The
washed unprimed or primed GR·hsp70 pellets were then incubated for
30 s at 30 °C with each preparation of preincubated hsp90 in
the presence of Hop, YDJ-1, p23, and molybdate and in the presence of
0.01% Nonidet P-40 to reduce nonspecific binding. The pellets were
then washed three times with TG buffer (8 mM TES, 25 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol (w/v) pH 7.6) and immunoblotted for GR, hsp90, and hsp70.
The ATP-dependent State of hsp70 Binds to GR--
We
have previously shown that our purified hsp70 is predominantly
(~90%) in the ATP-bound state (21). Eukaryotic DnaJ homologs, like
YDJ-1, bind to hsp70 to activate its ATPase activity and convert the
chaperone to the ADP-dependent conformation, which binds
hydrophobic peptide substrate (33). To determine whether it is the
ATP-bound or ADP-bound state of hsp70 that initially interacts with the
salt-stripped, hsp90-free GR, purified hsp70 was preincubated at
30 °C with an ATP-regenerating system to maintain the ATP-bound
state, or it was incubated with YDJ-1 to convert it to the ADP-bound
conformation. In the experiment of Fig.
1, immune pellets with stripped GR were
incubated on ice with the preincubated samples of hsp70, and the
pellets were then washed. It can be seen that untreated hsp70 bound to
the receptor, and the amount of binding was increased when hsp70 was
preincubated with the ATP-regenerating system (EGS). Preincubation of
hsp70 with YDJ-1 essentially eliminated binding to the receptor, and we
conclude that the ADP-bound conformation of hsp70 does not recognize
the GR.
These data are consistent with the ATP-dependent form of
hsp70 being the form that interacts initially with the receptor. The
receptor is primed in the initial step by incubating with both YDJ-1
and the ATP-regenerating system (21), and as shown in Fig. 1, hsp70
that is preincubated under this condition also binds to the receptor.
We have previously assayed nucleotide in the complex after the priming
reaction and find that approximately one-third of the GR-bound hsp70 is
bound by ADP and approximately two-thirds is bound by ATP (21). The
ATPase activity of hsp70 is minimal in the absence of K+
(34), and we have shown that priming of the receptor by hsp70 is
K+-dependent (21). hsp70 is typically purified
as a dimer (35), and ATP hydrolysis is reported to dissociate dimers to
monomers (36). Our purified hsp70 behaves as a dimer on gel
electrophoresis under nondenaturing conditions (15), and we have
reported the stoichiometry of the primed GR·hsp70 complex to be
~1.1 molecule of hsp70 bound per molecule of GR (20).
These observations are consistent with a priming step in which purified
hsp70 in its ATP-dependent conformation binds to the GR,
probably initially as a dimer. During the priming reaction, which
occurs very rapidly (within 1 min at 30 °C) (21), YDJ-1-stimulated ATPase activity converts it to a GR·hsp70 complex containing one (certainly no more than two) molecule of hsp70 that can now accept hsp90 in the subsequent activating step with the hsp70-free assembly system. The initial GR·hsp70 complex shown in Fig. 1 is different from the primed complex, in that no steroid binding activity is generated when it is incubated with the hsp70-free assembly system. Because this temperature-dependent and
K+-dependent priming step requires both YDJ-1
and sustained high levels of ATP for optimal activity, we have
suggested that the GR-bound hsp70 may ratchet between ATP- and
ADP-dependent conformations as it primes the receptor (21).
This is consistent with the observation (21) that both ATP- and
ADP-bound hsp70 are recovered in the primed complex.
State of hsp90 Interacting with the Primed GR·hsp70
Complex--
We have previously proposed that hsp90 binds to the
primed GR·hsp70 complex in its ADP-bound state (20). The purified
hsp90 that we use is not bound by nucleotide (21), but this form may be
the same as the ADP-bound state in terms of the overall conformation of
hsp90 (18). Scheibel et al. (37) have calculated that about 70% of the hsp90 in cells would be in the ATP-bound form; thus, we
wanted to find out what form of hsp90 binds to the primed GR·hsp70 complex. In the experiment of Fig. 2,
purified hsp90 was preincubated at 30 °C with buffer, ATP, or ADP,
and the mixtures were added to unprimed GR pellets or to primed
GR·hsp70 complexes. After 30 s at 30 °C, the pellets were
washed and immunoblotted. All three of the hsp90 preparations bound to
the primed GR·hsp70 complex. Purified hsp90 that was preincubated
with nucleotide under the same conditions was assayed for bound
nucleotide. As shown in Fig. 3, our
purified hsp90 is in nucleotide-free form, and preincubation with ATP
or ADP converts a significant portion to the ATP- or ADP-bound
form.
In Fig. 2, it appears that somewhat less of the ADP-preincubated sample
is bound, but over several experiments we cannot detect any difference
in the amount of hsp90 that binds to the primed GR·hsp70 complex when
the hsp90 is added in the unbound, ADP-bound, or ATP-bound state. We
have shown previously that unbound, ADP-bound, and ATP-bound
preparations of hsp90 all yield the same rate of generation of steroid
binding activity when added to the second step reaction mixture (21).
Thus, the primed GR·hsp70 complex does not appear to bind
preferentially a particular nucleotide-bound state of hsp90 when it is
added under the second step conditions where Hop is present. Inasmuch
as purified Hop has been reported to bind preferentially to hsp90 that
is in the unbound or ADP-bound state (38), this result was unexpected.
Binding of hsp90 to the Primed GR·hsp70 Complex Is Rapid, and
Cleft Opening Is Rate-limiting--
To determine what step is
rate-limiting for assembly of steroid-binding GR·hsp90 complexes, we
performed a time course of the second step reaction. In the experiment
of Fig. 4A, unprimed receptors
and primed GR·hsp70 complexes were incubated under second step
conditions with hsp90, Hop, YDJ-1, and p23. At the indicated times,
samples were assayed for both steroid binding and hsp90 binding. It is
clear that binding of hsp90 to the primed GR·hsp70 complex is rapid,
and steroid binding activity increases more slowly. As reported
previously (20), hsp70 dissociates from the receptor during the second
step reaction. In the procedure of Fig. 4A, the pellets are
washed after the second step incubation and then incubated with steroid
to assay steroid binding activity. This procedure assays the formation
of stable GR·hsp90 heterocomplexes that remain intact during
subsequent incubation with steroid. To be sure that we measure the rate
of steroid binding cleft opening, we carried out the second step
reaction at 30 °C in the presence of steroid (Fig. 4B).
Under these conditions, as soon as the steroid binding cleft is opened,
the steroid enters and binds, yielding a direct estimate of the rate of
cleft opening. Steroid binding is generated only when the ATP
regenerating system is present. Thus, cleft opening is
ATP-dependent and is the rate-limiting step.
Inhibition of GR Activation with Nucleotide Site
Inhibitors--
Although the second step in which the primed
GR·hsp70 complex is activated by hsp90 to the steroid binding state
is ATP-dependent (20), it is not known whether one ATP
binding site or both sites on hsp90 are involved in opening the steroid
binding cleft. In the experiment of Fig. 4, primed GR·hsp70 complexes
were incubated with the hsp70-free activating system in the presence of
three hsp90 nucleotide site inhibitors, geldanamycin, novobiocin, and cisplatin. All three compounds inhibited GR activation by hsp90 in the
second step reaction.
The natural product inhibitors geldanamycin and radicicol bind
specifically to the atypical N-terminal nucleotide-binding site on
hsp90 (23, 39), and the crystal structure of the N-terminal hsp90
fragment complexed with geldanamycin or ATP has been reported (40, 41).
Geldanamycin ablates glucocorticoid binding activity in intact cells
(42) and prevents cell-free activation of GR to the steroid binding
state by reticulocyte lysate (43) and by the purified five-protein
system (12). Geldanamycin does not affect formation of a primed
GR·hsp70 complex (data not shown), but it blocks receptor activation
when it is present during the second step of assembly with hsp90 (Fig.
5), confirming a requirement for
N-terminal nucleotide binding in GR activation.
Novobiocin and some related coumarins have been shown to interact with
hsp90 in vitro and to cause increased turnover in
vivo of hsp90 client proteins (e.g.
p60v-src, Raf-1, p185erbB2), much like
geldanamycin and radicicol (44). By deletion analysis, the
novobiocin-binding site was located to a region in the C terminus of
the chaperone that also binds ATP, and ATP and novobiocin competed with
each other for binding (26). Although it was thought that novobiocin
was a specific inhibitor at the C-terminal ATP-binding site (26), Soti
et al. (27) have recently reported that novobiocin disrupts
N-terminal nucleotide binding as well. As shown in Fig. 5, 10 mM novobiocin blocks GR activation when it is present
during the second assembly step.
Millimolar concentrations of novobiocin have been used to study effects
on hsp90 client proteins in vivo (44) and to study effects
on hsp90 directly in vitro (27). As shown in Fig.
6A, half-maximal inhibition of
GR activation is achieved with 1-2 mM novobiocin when it
is present during the second step of assembly. As shown in Fig.
6B, the presence of novobiocin during single-step GR·hsp90
heterocomplex assembly with the five-protein system, inhibited the
binding of hsp70 to the GR as well as the binding of hsp90. Thus,
novobiocin appears to inhibit GR activation by the multiprotein system
by affecting hsp70 as well as hsp90, although hsp90 appears to be
somewhat more sensitive in that its binding is blocked at a somewhat
lower concentration.
The antineoplastic drug cisplatin has been reported to inhibit the
chaperone activity of hsp90 in vitro via an interaction with
the C terminus of the chaperone (25). In contrast to novobiocin, which
disrupted both C- and N-terminal nucleotide binding by hsp90, Soti
et al. (27) found cisplatin to be a selective C-terminal nucleotide competitor. The model that has evolved from studies with
cisplatin is that nucleotide binding to the N-terminal site causes a
conformational change that unmasks a C-terminal binding site that is
cryptic in the nucleotide-free, full-length hsp90 (27). Selective
inhibition of this C-terminal site by cisplatin might thus
provide a pharmacological tool for dissecting contributions of hsp90
C-terminal nucleotide binding to opening of the steroid binding cleft
in the GR.
The effect of cisplatin on single step GR·hsp70 heterocomplex
assembly is shown in Fig. 7. It can be
seen from the immunoblot in Fig. 7A that, as the
concentration of cisplatin is increased, cross-linking of GR-bound
proteins occurs, as indicated by the generation of cross-linked
hsp90-hsp90 dimers. At high drug concentrations, there is a marked loss
of recovery of GR, hsp90 and hsp70 migrating at normal
Mr for these denaturing gel conditions. Not only
are GR-bound hsp90 dimers being cross-linked, but the receptor itself is being cross-linked to its accompanying chaperones, as indicated by
the generation of a cross-linked GR-hsp90 species. As shown in Fig.
7B, there appears to be a close parallel between the
concentration dependence for cisplatin inhibition of conversion of GR
to the steroid binding state and generation of cross-linked hsp90
dimers bound to the receptor. Thus, although cisplatin is a specific inhibitor for the C-terminal nucleotide site on hsp90, the
cross-linking that occurs during assembly by the multiprotein chaperone
system does not permit any conclusion that ATP binding to the
C-terminal site is involved in opening of the steroid binding cleft in
the GR.
We thank David Smith, Avrom Caplan, David
Toft, and Jack Bodwell for providing reagents used in this work, and we
thank Peter Csermely for his very helpful dicussion.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant DK31573 (to W. B. P.) and CA76581 (to D. S. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204164200
2
In this paper, we will use the term hsp70
collectively to refer to both the heat shock-induced hsp70 and the
constitutively expressed heat shock cognate hsc70.
The abbreviations used are:
hsp, heat shock
protein;
GR, glucocorticoid receptor;
LBD, ligand binding domain;
Hop, hsp70/hsp90 organizing protein;
TES, 2-{[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]amino}ethanesulfonic
acid.
Nucleotide Binding States of hsp70 and hsp90 during Sequential
Steps in the Process of Glucocorticoid Receptor·hsp90 Heterocomplex
Assembly*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
70 °C.
70 °C.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The ATP-bound form of hsp70 interacts
initially with the GR. Purified hsp70 was preincubated for 10 min
at 30 °C with HKD buffer, with YDJ-1, with an ATP-regenerating
system (EGS), or with both YDJ-1 and EGS as indicated.
Nonimmune (NI) or immune (I) pellets with
stripped receptors were then incubated for 20 min on ice with each
preparation of preincubated hsp70. The pellets were then washed three
times with Hepes buffer and immunoblotted for GR and hsp70.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The nucleotide state of hsp90 does not affect
the initial interaction with the primed GR·hsp70 complex.
Unprimed GR (U) or primed GR·hsp70 complexes
(P) were incubated for 30 s at 30 °C with purified
hsp90 that was preincubated with buffer, ATP, or ADP in presence of
Hop, YDJ-1, and p23 as described under "Methods." The pellets were
washed and immunoblotted for GR, hsp90, and hsp70.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Nucleotide binding states of hsp90.
Purified hsp90 was incubated for 10 min at 30 °C with 5 mM ATP or ADP or buffer alone, and following charcoal
adsorption, protein-bound nucleotide was assayed by high performance
liquid chromatography as described under "Methods."

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
hsp90 binds rapidly to GR·hsp70 complexes,
and cleft opening is rate-limiting. A, time course of
second step reaction in the absence of steroid. Unprimed GR
(lanes 1, 3, and 5) and primed
GR·hsp70 complexes (lanes 2, 4, and
6) were incubated at 30 °C with the purified activating
system (hsp90, Hop, YDJ-1, p23) in the presence of 0.01%Nonidet P-40
and an ATP-regenerating system. At the indicated times, samples were
washed three times with 10 mM Hepes and incubated with
[3H]triamcinolone acetonide for assay of steroid binding
and immunoblotted for GR, hsp90, and hsp70. The solid
squares represent steroid binding by primed GR·hsp70 complexes,
and open squares represent unprimed receptors. B,
time course of the second step reaction in the presence of steroid.
Conditions are the same as in A except that 50 nM [3H]triamcinolone acetonide was present
during the assembly reaction.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of hsp90-dependent
activation of the primed GR by nucleotide site-specific
inhibitors. Stripped GR immune pellets were incubated for 5 min at
30 °C with hsp70, YDJ-1, and an ATP-regenerating system, and the
pellets were washed to remove the free proteins. The primed GR·hsp70
complexes (Pr) were then incubated for 20 min at 30 °C
with the purified activating system (AS) consisting of
hsp90, Hop, YDJ-1, and p23 in the presence of 10 µM
geldanamycin (GA), 10 mM novobiocin
(NB), or 100 µM cisplatin (CP). The
pellets were washed and incubated with [3H]triamcinolone
acetonide to determine steroid binding activity.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Concentration dependence of novobiocin on GR
activation in two-step and single step assembly. A,
two-step assembly. Primed GR·hsp70 complexes, prepared as described
in the legend to Fig. 4, were incubated for 20 min at 30 °C with the
purified activating system without hsp70 in the presence of increasing
concentrations of novobiocin. The pellets were then washed and
incubated with [3H]triamcinolone acetonide to determine
steroid binding activity (expressed as percent of control sample
without novobiocin). B, single step assembly. Stripped GR
immune pellets were incubated for 20 min at 30 °C with the complete
five-protein assembly system and various concentrations of novobiocin.
Samples were then washed and assayed for steroid binding activity and
immunoblotted for GR, hsp90, and hsp70. Str, stripped GR
pellet alone.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Concentration dependence of cisplatin on GR
activation in single step assembly. Stripped GR immune pellets
were incubated for 20 min at 30 °C with the complete five-protein
assembly system and various concentrations of cisplatin. Samples were
then washed and assayed for steroid binding and immunoblotted for GR,
hsp90, and hsp70. A, immunoblot. Lane 1, stripped
GR; lanes 2-7, stripped GR incubated with the assembly
system without cisplatin (lane 2) and with cisplatin at 2 µM (lane 3), 5 µM (lane
4), 10 µM (lane 5), 50 µM
(lane 6), and 100 µM (lane 7). The
immunoblot above the GR was blotted with AC88 to show cross-linked
hsp90 species. Although not shown here, this immunoblot was stripped
and probed with BuGR to identify GR in the top band. B,
comparison of the effect on steroid binding versus
cross-linking. The immunoblot of A was scanned in a
densitometer to determine the relative amounts of hsp90 monomer (
)
and hsp90 dimer (
), which are plotted relative to steroid binding
activity (
).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
The University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Medical Science
Research Building III, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0632. Tel.: 734-764-5414;
Fax: 734-763-4450.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Pratt, W. B.,
and Toft, D. O.
(1997)
Endocr. Rev.
18,
306-360 2.
Pratt, W. B.
(1997)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
217,
420-434[Abstract]
3.
Smith, D. F.,
Showalter, D. B.,
Kost, S. L.,
and Toft, D. O.
(1990)
Mol. Endocrinol.
4,
1704-1711[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Scherrer, L. C.,
Dalman, F. C.,
Massa, E.,
Meshinchi, S.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
21397-21400 5.
Hutchison, K. A.,
Czar, M. J.,
Scherrer, L. C.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
14047-14053 6.
Stancato, L. F.,
Silverstein, A. M.,
Gitler, C.,
Groner, B.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8831-8836 7.
Xu, M.,
Dittmar, K. D.,
Giannoukos, G.,
Pratt, W. B.,
and Simons, S. S., Jr.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13918-13924 8.
Giannoukos, G.,
Silverstein, A. M.,
Pratt, W. B.,
and Simons, S. S., Jr.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36527-36536 9.
Dittmar, K. D.,
Hutchison, K. A.,
Owens-Grillo, J. K.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12833-12839 10.
Dittmar, K. D.,
Banach, M.,
Galigniana, M. D.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7358-7366 11.
Kosano, H.,
Stensgard, B.,
Charlesworth, M. C.,
McMahon, N.,
and Toft, D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32973-32979 12.
Morishima, Y.,
Kanelakis, K. C.,
Silverstein, A. M.,
Dittmar, K. D.,
Estrada, L.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6894-6900 13.
Chen, S.,
Prapapanich, V.,
Rimerman, R. A.,
Honoré, B.,
and Smith, D. F.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
682-693[Abstract]
14.
Dittmar, K. D.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13047-13054 15.
Murphy, P. J. M.,
Kanelakis, K. C.,
Galigniana, M. D.,
Morishima, Y.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
30092-30098 16.
Hutchison, K. A.,
Dittmar, K. D.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27894-27899 17.
Grenert, J. P.,
Johnson, B. D.,
and Toft, D. O.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17525-17533 18.
Sullivan, W.,
Stensgard, B.,
Caucutt, G.,
Bartha, B.,
McMahon, N.,
Alnemri, E. S.,
Litwack, G.,
and Toft, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8007-8012 19.
Dittmar, K. D.,
Demady, D. R.,
Stancato, L. F.,
Krishna, P.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21213-21220 20.
Morishima, Y.,
Murphy, P. J. M., Li, D-P.,
Sanchez, E. R.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18054-18060 21.
Morishima, Y.,
Kanelakis, K. C.,
Murphy, P. J. M.,
Shewach, D. S.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
1109-1116[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Hartl, F. U.
(1996)
Nature
381,
571-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Grenert, J. P.,
Sullivan, W. P.,
Fadden, P.,
Haystead, T. A. J.,
Clark, J.,
Mimnaugh, E.,
Krutzsch, H.,
Ochel, H. J.,
Schulte, T. W.,
Sausville, E.,
Neckers, L. M.,
and Toft, D. O.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23843-23850 24.
Csermely, P.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4943-4950 25.
Itoh, H.,
Ogura, M.,
Komatsuda, A.,
Wakui, H.,
Miura, A. B.,
and Tashima, Y.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
343,
697-703
26.
Marcu, M. G.,
Chadli, A.,
Bouhouche, I.,
Catelli, M.,
and Neckers, L. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
37181-37186 27.
Soti, C.,
Racz, A.,
and Csermely, P.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
7066-7075 28.
Srinivasan, G.,
Post, J. F. M.,
and Thompson, E. B.
(1997)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
60,
1-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Hutchison, K. A.,
Dittmar, K. D.,
Czar, M. J.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
5043-5049 30.
Johnson, J. L.,
and Toft, D. O.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
24989-24993 31.
Caplan, A. J.,
Tsai, J.,
Casey, P. J.,
and Douglas, M. G.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18890-18895 32.
Boucher, P. D.,
Ruch, R. J.,
and Shewach, D. S.
(1998)
Hum. Gene Ther.
9,
801-804[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Minami, Y.,
Hofeld, J.,
Ohtsuka, K.,
and Hartl, F-U.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19617-19624 34.
O'Brien, M. C.,
and McKay, D. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2247-2250 35.
Sadis, S.,
and Hightower, L. E.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
9406-9412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Schmid, S. L.,
Braell, W. A.,
and Rothman, J. E.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
10057-10062 37.
Scheibel, T.,
Neuhofen, S.,
Weikl, T.,
Mayr, C.,
Reinstein, J.,
Vogel, P. D.,
and Buchner, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18608-18613 38.
Johnson, B. D.,
Schumacher, R. J.,
Ross, E. D.,
and Toft, D. O.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3679-3686 39.
Schulte, T. W.,
Akinaga, S.,
Murakata, T.,
Agatsuma, T.,
Sugimoto, S.,
Nakano, H.,
Lee, Y. S.,
Simen, B. B.,
Argon, Y.,
Felts, S.,
Toft, D. O.,
Neckers, L. M.,
and Sharma, S. V.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
1435-1448 40.
Stebbins, C. E.,
Russo, A. A.,
Schneider, C.,
Rosen, N.,
Hartl, F. U.,
and Pavletich, N. P.
(1997)
Cell
89,
239-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Prodromou, C.,
Roe, S. M.,
O'Brien, R.,
Ladbury, J. E.,
Piper, P. W.,
and Pearl, L. H.
(1997)
Cell
90,
65-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Whitesell, L.,
and Cook, P.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
705-712[Abstract]
43.
Czar, M. J.,
Galigniana, M. D.,
Silverstein, A. M.,
and Pratt, W. B.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
7776-7785[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Marcu, M. G.,
Schulte, T. W.,
and Neckers, L.
(2000)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
92,
242-248
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Farhana, M. I. Dawson, M. Leid, L. Wang, D. D. Moore, G. Liu, Z. Xia, and J. A. Fontana Adamantyl-Substituted Retinoid-Related Molecules Bind Small Heterodimer Partner and Modulate the Sin3A Repressor Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 318 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Y. Fan, M. K. Bhangoo, and J. C. Young Hsp90 Functions in the Targeting and Outer Membrane Translocation Steps of Tom70-mediated Mitochondrial Import J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33313 - 33324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H Stolte, B M L. V. van Kemenade, H. F J Savelkoul, and G. Flik Evolution of glucocorticoid receptors with different glucocorticoid sensitivity. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2006; 190(1): 17 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Moraes, M. J. Paul-Clark, A. Rickman, R. J. Flower, N. J. Goulding, and M. Perretti Ligand-specific glucocorticoid receptor activation in human platelets Blood, December 15, 2005; 106(13): 4167 - 4175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. O. Leonard, C. Godson, H. R. Brady, and C. T. Taylor Potentiation of Glucocorticoid Activity in Hypoxia through Induction of the Glucocorticoid Receptor J. Immunol., February 15, 2005; 174(4): 2250 - 2257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Billecke, D. I. Draganov, Y. Morishima, P. J. M. Murphy, A. Y. Dunbar, W. B. Pratt, and Y. Osawa The Role of hsp90 in Heme-dependent Activation of Apo-neuronal Nitric-oxide Synthase J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30252 - 30258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Rosenhagen, C. Soti, U. Schmidt, G. M. Wochnik, F. U. Hartl, F. Holsboer, J. C. Young, and T. Rein The Heat Shock Protein 90-Targeting Drug Cisplatin Selectively Inhibits Steroid Receptor Activation Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2003; 17(10): 1991 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Adinolfi, M. Kim, M. T. Young, F. Di Virgilio, and A. Surprenant Tyrosine Phosphorylation of HSP90 within the P2X7 Receptor Complex Negatively Regulates P2X7 Receptors J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 37344 - 37351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Paul-Clark, F. Roviezzo, R. J. Flower, G. Cirino, P. D. Soldato, I. M. Adcock, and M. Perretti Glucocorticoid Receptor Nitration Leads to Enhanced Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Novel Steroid Ligands J. Immunol., September 15, 2003; 171(6): 3245 - 3252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. M. Murphy, Y. Morishima, H. Chen, M. D. Galigniana, J. F. Mansfield, S. S. Simons Jr., and W. B. Pratt Visualization and Mechanism of Assembly of a Glucocorticoid Receptor{middle dot}Hsp70 Complex That Is Primed for Subsequent Hsp90-dependent Opening of the Steroid Binding Cleft J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 34764 - 34773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Pratt and D. O. Toft Regulation of Signaling Protein Function and Trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-Based Chaperone Machinery Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2003; 228(2): 111 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||