Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204955200 on June 28, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 37, 34150-34160, September 13, 2002
A Rhodopsin Mutant Linked to Autosomal Dominant Retinitis
Pigmentosa Is Prone to Aggregate and Interacts with the Ubiquitin
Proteasome System*
Michelle E.
Illing
§¶,
Rahul S.
Rajan§
,
Neil F.
Bence
**, and
Ron R.
Kopito

From the Departments of
Biological Sciences and
Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
Received for publication, May 20, 2002, and in revised form, June 26, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The inherited retinal degenerations are typified
by retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a heterogeneous group of inherited
disorders that causes the destruction of photoreceptor cells, the
retinal pigmented epithelium, and choroid. This group of blinding
conditions affects over 1.5 million persons worldwide. Approximately
30-40% of human autosomal dominant (AD) RP is caused by dominantly
inherited missense mutations in the rhodopsin gene. Here we show that
P23H, the most frequent RP mutation in American patients, renders
rhodopsin extremely prone to form high molecular weight oligomeric
species in the cytoplasm of transfected cells. Aggregated P23H
accumulates in aggresomes, which are pericentriolar inclusion bodies
that require an intact microtubule cytoskeleton to form. Using
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), we observe that P23H
aggregates in the cytoplasm even at extremely low expression levels.
Our data show that the P23H mutation destabilizes the protein and targets it for degradation by the ubiquitin proteasome system. P23H is
stabilized by proteasome inhibitors and by co-expression of a dominant
negative form of ubiquitin. We show that expression of P23H, but not
wild-type rhodopsin, results in a generalized impairment of the
ubiquitin proteasome system, suggesting a mechanism for photoreceptor
degeneration that links RP to a broad class of neurodegenerative diseases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Retinitis pigmentosa
(RP)1 is a heterogeneous
group of inherited diseases that cause blindness due to progressive
degeneration of rod and cone photoreceptors in the human retina
(reviewed in Ref. 1). Approximately 43% of RP is inherited as
autosomal dominant (AD) alleles of genes that are expressed
predominantly or exclusively in rod photoreceptors. The recessive forms
of RP are primarily the result of null mutations eliminating enzymes critical to photoreceptor function. More than 100 distinct mutations in
the rhodopsin gene have been documented, accounting for 30-40% of
ADRP. The most common abnormality found to cause RP (2) is a
single-base substitution in codon 23 (P23H) of the rhodopsin gene,
accounting for ~7% of all cases of dominant retinitis pigmentosa in
the United States (3, 4).
Although the signal transduction cascades leading to caspase activation
in RP are unknown (reviewed in Ref. 5), studies in rats and mice
expressing rhodopsin transgenes with mutations that are equivalent to
those known to cause ADRP in humans suggest that photoreceptor loss is
due to apoptotic cell death (6-8). Humans (9) and mice (10, 11) with a
single null rhodopsin allele exhibit minimal photoreceptor
degeneration, suggesting that ADRP is not the result of
haploinsufficiency at the rhodopsin locus.
Studies of mutant rhodopsin molecules expressed heterologously in
mammalian cells in culture have suggested that ADRP-linked rhodopsin
mutations fall into two classes based on the differing intracellular
fates of the mutant proteins. Class I mutants are expressed at
wild-type levels in HEK293 or COS cells, where they traffic to the
plasma membrane and produce functional photopigment when reconstituted
with 11-cis-retinal, suggesting that they are correctly
folded (12-14). These mutants, the majority of which are strikingly
clustered within the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of rhodopsin,
appear to be defective in their ability to traffic correctly to rod
outer segments (15, 16), possibly because of defective interaction with
the retrograde microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein (17). By contrast,
the vast majority of ADRP-causing rhodopsin mutations are class II
mutants, which are defective in their ability to fold (18, 19). How
rhodopsin misfolding causes ADRP is unknown, although misfolding has
recently been suggested to be closely linked to the gain-of-function
that underlies disease pathogenesis (19).
When expressed in HEK293 or COS cells, class II mutants fail to acquire
complex oligosaccharides indicative of transit through the Golgi
apparatus and are severely defective or unable to produce functional
photopigment on reconstitution with 11-cis-retinal (12, 14).
These findings strongly support the conclusion that class II mutants
are unable to fold correctly within the endoplasmic reticulum. This
conclusion is also supported by the observation that class II mutants
fail to accumulate to high levels in transfected cells (as wild-type
rhodopsin), suggesting that they are subject to enhanced intracellular
degradation (12). The mechanism by which class II mutants are
degraded, however, is unknown.
Despite an extensive body of data, the mechanisms by which rhodopsin
mutations initiate the signaling events leading to photoreceptor death
and retinal degeneration remain a mystery. The dominant inheritance
pattern, together with the lack of a haploinsufficient phenotype, imply
that that rhodopsin-linked ADRP results from a toxic gain of function
at the rhodopsin locus. However, the only phenotypic consequence to be
attributed to class II mutations in rhodopsin, an inability to fold
correctly, is a loss of function.
The discovery that most class II mutants are folding-defective places
ADRP within a family of conformational diseases that includes most
neurodegenerative disorders (20, 21). Like ADRP, the familial forms of
these diseases are usually inherited as delayed onset, highly
penetrant, dominant traits. In some cases, pathogenesis has been linked
to enhanced susceptibility of the mutant gene product to degradation by
the ubiquitin proteasome system (22, 23). Degenerating neurons in these
diseases accumulate high molecular weight forms of mutant gene product
that are usually segregated within intracellular inclusion bodies that
are often heavily modified with ubiquitin (Ub) (24-26). By contrast,
inclusion bodies and Ub immunoreactivity have not been reported to be
prominent histopathological features of degenerating photoreceptors in
transgenic animals or in retinas from human RP patients in early stages
of the disease (27). Thus, although RP and other central nervous system
neurodegenerations appear to share a common etiology, insofar as they
are all linked to the production of abundantly expressed, folding-defective polypeptides, they differ in that overt inclusion bodies have not been reported in RP. A simple explanation for this
difference might be that the retina may be more effective at
eliminating misfolded proteins or preventing the accumulation of
aggregated protein products than other central nervous system tissues.
In this study, we have investigated the role of the
ubiquitin-proteasome system in the disposal of RP-linked mutant
rhodopsin. Our data reveal that the class II rhodopsin mutant, P23H, is
a substrate for Ub-dependent degradation by the proteasome.
We find that high molecular weight, ubiquitinylated forms of
P23H accumulate when expressed in cultured cells. We have used
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to demonstrate that the
aggregation of P23H is intracellular, and furthermore, occurs even at
very low expression levels, unlike wild-type rhodopsin and the class I mutant, V345M. Finally, our data indicate that aggregation of P23H in
cells leads to impairment of the function of the ubiquitin proteasome
system, as has recently been demonstrated for other aggregated
proteins, including the mutant form of huntingtin linked to
Huntington's disease (28). Therefore, rhodopsin aggregation may
represent a toxic gain of function associated with class II mutations
in the pathogenesis of ADRP, raising the possibility that retinal
degeneration may share a common pathogenic mechanism with other
late-onset neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Antibodies and Plasmids--
The following antibodies were used
in this study: Rho1D4 (29) (gift from R. Molday, University of British
Columbia), B6-30 (gift from P. Hargrave, University of Florida),
anti-His6 (MMS-156P, BAbCO/Covance Research Products,
Denver, PA), monoclonal
-tubulin (GTU-88, Sigma Chemical Co., St.
Louis, MO). The c-myc-Ub plasmids have been described previously (30).
Wild-type and P23H rhodopsin in pRK were obtained from J. Nathans
(Johns Hopkins University). V345M was made by site-directed mutagenesis
using QuikChange (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). YFP and CFP rhodopsin and
P23H plasmids have been previously described (31).
Cell Culture--
Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK) cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and
transfected as described previously (30). Transient transfections were
carried out by adding plasmid DNA as a calcium phosphate precipitate
(32).
Biochemical Characterization of Rhodopsin Aggregates--
Cell
pellets from transfected and washed HEK cells were lysed in 250 µl of
ice-cold buffer A (PBS, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 1% TX-100) plus
protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 30 min on
ice. Insoluble material was recovered by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 15 min and solubilized in 50 µl (PBS, 1% SDS) for 10 min at room temperature. After addition of 200 µl of buffer A,
samples were sonicated for 20 s with a microtip sonicator.
For immunopurification of the Ub-rhodopsin complexes, 150 µl of the
detergent-soluble fraction from His6-myc-Ub-rhodopsin co-transfected cells was incubated with 5 µl of 1D4 Sepharose beads
(a kind gift of D. Oprian, Brandeis University) at 4 °C for 1 h. The beads were washed extensively with cold buffer A, and protein
was eluted into 20 µl of SDS sample buffer
-mercaptoethanol).
Endoglycosidase H and PNGase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim,
Germany) digestion was performed on detergent-soluble and insoluble
fractions for 1 h at 37 °C in a 10:1 dilution with the buffer
supplied by the manufacturer.
For immunoblotting, cell fractions were separated on Ready Gel precast
4-20% gradient SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and electroblotted to
Immobilon (Millipore, Bedford, MA) membranes. Chemiluminescence
detection was carried out with the ECL detection kit (Amersham
Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). Band intensities were quantified from
non-saturated exposures using IMAGE software (National Institutes of Health).
Fluorescence Microscopy--
Cells were seeded onto #1
coverslips. For drug treatments, ALLN (5-10 mg/ml, Calbiochem,
La Jolla, CA) and nocodazole (10 mg/ml, Sigma Chemical Co.) in
Me2SO were added to the culture medium 12 h before
fixation. Cells were fixed in
20 °C methanol or 4%
paraformaldehyde (20 min). After fixation, cells were washed extensively in PBS and blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin for 10 min and then incubated with primary antibodies for 60 min at room
temperature. Cells were washed 5× for 5 min each in PBS and incubated
with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies at a 10 µg/ml final
concentration. Cells were washed again (5× 5 min each) and then
incubated for 3 min in PBS plus 10 µg/ml bisbenzimide (Sigma
Chemical Co.) to stain DNA. Cells were washed a final time, mounted onto slides in Fluoromount-G (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA). For C/YFP fusion proteins, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Epifluorescence micrographs were obtained on a Zeiss Axiovert microscope with a 63× oil objective (numerical aperture, 1.4). Digital (12-bit) images were acquired with a
cooled charge-coupled device (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ) and
processed by using Metamorph software (Universal Imaging, Media, PA).
The excitation filters used were: 355DF20 (DAPI), 440 DF20 (CFP),
490DF10 (YFP and FITC), and 570DF10 (Texas red). Emission filters were:
460DF20 (DAPI), 475 DF20 (CFP), 535DF25 (FITC and YFP), and 630 DF20
(Texas red). The dichroic measurements were: 420 DCLP (DAPI), 445DCLP
(CFP), 505 DCLP (FITC and YFP), and 595DCLP (Texas red).
FRET Measurements--
FRET was determined as previously
described (31). Fluorescence spectra were recorded on suspended cells
(~106 cells/ml) in a Spex Fluorolog fluorometer with a
Spex 1620 dual grating emission monochromator (Spex Industries,
Metuchen, NJ). FRET measurements were made by exciting the donor (CFP)
at 425 nm and monitoring the emission spectrum between 450 and 600 nm. All FRET spectra were corrected for background YFP fluorescence using a
non-FRET pair consisting of identical amounts of YFP fusion construct
and unlabeled rhodopsin (wild-type or mutant). To quantify FRET, the
ratio of fluorescence at 525 nm (YFP) to the fluorescence at 476 nm
(CFP) was measured. For P23H-CFP alone, this ratio was found to be
0.42 ± 0.013 (S.E., n = 5). This value was
subtracted from the ratio obtained for any given sample to yield the
"FRET value." Intrinsic YFP fluorescence was recorded by excitation at 490 nm and emission between 505 and 600 nm. Slit widths were 2 mm
for all experiments.
Ubiquitin Proteasome System Activity--
GFPu-1
cells (28) were transiently transfected using the calcium phosphate
method. Cells were harvested by trypsinization 48 h
post-transfection and fixed in 4% p-formaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were permeabilized in a solution of
PBS, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 2% bovine serum albumin and stained in
suspension using the indicated antibody at room temperature for 1 h followed by phycoerythrin-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500) for
1 h at room temperature. GFP and phycoerythrin intensities were
simultaneously measured on 50,000 cells for each sample using an XLII
analyzer (Coulter). Histograms were generated using FlowJo software
(Tree Star, Inc.).
 |
RESULTS |
P23H Rhodopsin Is Prone to Aggregate--
Aggregation of wild-type
rhodopsin and the RP-linked mutants P23H and V345M was assessed by
SDS-PAGE immunoblot analysis of detergent-soluble and
detergent-insoluble extracts from HEK293 cells transiently expressing
these constructs at varying levels (Fig.
1A). At low expression levels
(<0.5 µg), wild-type rhodopsin migrated predominantly as a
detergent-soluble, diffuse band at a molecular mass of ~40-43
kDa. This species corresponds to monomeric, mature rhodopsin
containing complex N-linked glycans, as evidenced by its
mobility and by its sensitivity to cleavage by
protein:N-glycanase (PNGase) but not by endoglycosidase H
(Fig. 1B). Endoglycosidase H is specific for high mannose
N-linked oligosaccharide structures typical of proteins that
have not matured beyond the endoplasmic reticulum, whereas PNGase
cleaves all N-linked glycans. At higher expression levels of
wild-type rhodopsin (Fig. 1A), additional high molecular
weight species, suggestive of SDS-resistant multimers, were also
detected. All of the monomeric rhodopsin partitioned into the
detergent-soluble fraction, whereas the slower migrating forms
partitioned into both detergent-soluble and -insoluble fractions. These
data, together with the results from immunofluorescence studies (Figs.
2 and 3), are in agreement with previous
studies (12), which concluded that the majority of rhodopsin, expressed in HEK293 cells, folds into a native conformation. At high levels of
expression, a minor fraction of wild-type rhodopsin forms high molecular weight complexes that are insoluble in SDS and non-ionic detergent, suggesting that the capacity of these cells to fold rhodopsin is limited.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
High molecular weight complexes and
intracellular processing of ADRP-linked rhodopsin mutants in HEK293
cells. A, formation of high molecular weight oligomers
is a function of expression and genotype. Cells were transiently
transfected with the indicated amount of plasmid-encoding wild-type
(WT) rhodopsin or the ADRP mutants P23H (class II) or V345M (class I),
separated into detergent soluble (upper panels) or insoluble
fractions (lower panels), and subjected to immunoblot
analysis with a rhodopsin (1D4) mAb. Control cells (lane v)
were transfected with vector alone. Some cells were incubated in the
presence of the proteasome inhibitor ALLN as indicated. B,
glycosylation status of mutant and wild-type rhodopsin species.
Detergent-soluble and -insoluble fractions of lysates from HEK293 cells
transfected with 1 µg of plasmid were subjected to digestion with
endoglycosidases H or PNGase, as indicated, prior to immunoblot
analysis. The data in this analysis are representative of at least
three independent experiments.
|
|

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Aggregated rhodopsin accumulates in
aggresomes. A, intracellular distribution of wild-type,
V345M, and P23H in HEK293 cells. Low levels of each plasmid (0.5 µg)
were transfected into cells, and immunostained for rhodopsin with
monoclonal antibody B6-30 (red) and for DNA with
bis-benzimide (blue). B, effect of proteasome
inhibition and microtubule disruption on localization of P23H
rhodopsin. Cells were transfected with low levels (0.5 µg) of
rhodopsin plasmid and treated with the drugs indicated and
immunolocalized for rhodopsin (red pseudocolor) and DNA
(blue). C, P23H aggresomes are pericentriolar.
Cells were transfected with 8 µg of P23H in the absence of drugs and
immunostained with antibodies against rhodopsin (red) and
-tubulin (green). Bar, 10 µm. D,
microtubules are not required for rhodopsin aggregation. Cells were
transfected and treated overnight with ALLN and nocodazole as indicated
and subjected to detergent solubilization and immunoblotting with
anti-rhodopsin mAb (1D4).
|
|
P23H differed markedly from wild-type rhodopsin both in terms of
mobility and detergent solubility. The small amounts of monomeric P23H
detected migrated with a slightly faster mobility than that of
monomeric wild-type rhodopsin and were sensitive to cleavage by
endoglycosidase H (Fig. 1B), indicating that they were
retained within the ER. The majority of P23H, however, migrated as
dimers and higher molecular weight oligomers. These oligomers are
evidence of a non-native conformation, because rhodopsin is monomeric
in its native membrane (33). A substantial fraction of P23H partitioned into the detergent-insoluble fraction, suggesting that P23H is more
prone to aggregate than wild-type rhodopsin (Fig. 1). In contrast to
P23H, both the mobility and the detergent solubility behavior of the
class I mutant, V345M, were indistinguishable from those of wild-type
rhodopsin (Fig. 1, A and B).
Exposure of cells expressing low levels of wild-type or V345M rhodopsin
to the proteasome inhibitor (ALLN) resulted in a substantial increase
in the abundance of all electrophoretic rhodopsin species (Fig.
1A), suggesting that some folding-competent rhodopsin
molecules are degraded by the proteasome in HEK cells.
Indistinguishable results were obtained in cells exposed to the more
specific inhibitors MG132 (34) and lactacystin (35) (data not shown).
In contrast, exposure of P23H-expressing cells to ALLN increased the
proportion of oligomeric P23H species but failed to promote the
formation of mature monomer, suggesting that proteasomes also
participate in the degradation of this folding-incompetent class II
mutant rhodopsin.
Together, these data confirm that, in HEK cells, wild-type rhodopsin
and a class I mutant (V345M) are able to fold and mature beyond the ER,
whereas the class II mutant P23H is unable to fold productively.
Moreover, our data suggest that P23H is considerably more prone to
forming non-native oligomers than is wild-type or V345M.
Misfolded Rhodopsin Accumulates in Aggresomes--
We used
immunofluorescence microscopy to determine the intracellular
localization of wild-type and mutant rhodopsins. As shown in Fig.
2A, wild-type and V345M were present in a predominantly plasma membrane distribution, consistent with previous reports and with
our observation (Fig. 1) that wild-type and V345M rhodopsin are
detergent soluble and modified by complex oligosaccharides. In
contrast, under the same conditions, P23H was present in a predominantly ER distribution (Fig. 2A), consistent with its
designation as a class II mutant and with data indicating that it
remains core-glycosylated (Fig. 1B). Exposure to ALLN (or
other proteasome inhibitors, not shown) led to the accumulation of
wild-type and mutant rhodopsins in juxtanuclear inclusion bodies
resembling aggresomes (Fig. 2B).
Aggresomes are pericentriolar inclusion bodies into which aggregated
proteins are sequestered by active retrograde transport on microtubules
(26, 36). To test whether P23H-containing inclusion bodies are
aggresomes, we compared the distribution of P23H foci to that of
-tubulin, a centrosomal protein (Fig. 2C). As observed
for other aggresome substrates, P23H inclusions were localized around
-tubulin-immunoreactive sites. Rhodopsin inclusions were also
associated with pericentriolar depositions of rearranged vimentin
intermediate filaments and were distinct from markers for Golgi
apparatus and ER (data not shown).
To assess the role of microtubules in the formation of P23H inclusion
bodies, cells expressing low levels of P23H were treated simultaneously
with ALLN to induce accumulation of aggregates and the
microtubule-destabilizing agent, nocodazole (Fig. 2B, right-hand panel). In contrast to cells treated with ALLN
alone (Fig. 2B, left panel), cells treated with
ALLN and nocodazole together had numerous intense, small foci of P23H
that were diffusely distributed throughout the cytoplasm. However, the
extent of rhodopsin aggregation, as assessed by detergent solubility
and electrophoretic mobility (Fig. 2D) and by fluorescence
resonance energy transfer (31), was unaffected by nocodazole treatment.
These data demonstrate that protein aggregation and inclusion body
formation are distinct, separable processes and that delivery of
misfolded mutant or wild-type rhodopsin to cytoplasmic inclusion bodies
requires an intact microtubule cytoskeleton. A direct inference from
this observation is that the absence of rhodopsin-containing inclusion
bodies, as in retinas from human ARDP and animal models thereof, does
not necessarily rule out a role for rhodopsin aggregation in pathogenesis.
Aggregation Is a Gain of Function Linked to the P23H
Mutation--
To elucidate the relationship between protein expression
and aggregation, we examined the cellular distribution and steady-state levels of P23H, V345M, and wild-type rhodopsin in HEK cells transfected with varying levels of plasmid (Figs. 3
and 4). To study the intrinsic aggregation properties of these
proteins, these studies were conducted in the absence of any added
proteasome inhibitors. We used fusion proteins between the C terminus
of wild-type, V345M, or P23H rhodopsin with GFP or the spectrally
shifted variants cyan (CFP) or yellow (YFP) fluorescent protein (31).
As shown in Fig. 3 (A-C), the appended fluorescent proteins
did not influence the intracellular distribution of the rhodopsins
studied. Wild-type rhodopsin and V345M were predominantly localized at
the plasma membrane, whereas the majority of P23H exhibited a diffuse,
ER-like distribution. Cells expressing wild-type or V345M rhodopsin
fusions were 4- to 5-fold brighter than those expressing P23H,
consistent with the suggestion (12-14) that the P23H mutation
destabilizes rhodopsin (Fig. 3E). At low expression levels
(0.5 µg), inclusion bodies were found only in rare (~1%) cells
expressing wild-type rhodopsin-YFP or V345M-YFP, but more frequently
(~3%) in cells transfected with equal amounts of P23H-YFP plasmid
(Fig. 3D, left). At higher transfection levels,
the fraction of cells with inclusion bodies increased for both
wild-type and P23H rhodopsin fusions (Fig. 3D,
right). This reveals that rhodopsin inclusion bodies can
form in the absence of proteasome inhibitor. However, the increased
tendency of P23H-YFP to aggregate (compared with wild-type) is
dramatically illustrated when the fraction of cells with inclusion
bodies is normalized to the total rhodopsin fluorescence. Total
rhodopsin expression was quantified by monitoring the intrinsic CFP or
YFP fluorescence, because the absolute fluorescence is not
significantly influenced by subcellular localization or non-linearity
in the detection system. Total wild-type rhodopsin-YFP accumulation
increased much more steeply as a function of transfected DNA than did
P23H-YFP (Fig. 3E). In contrast, the steady-state levels of
V345M-YFP and wild-type-YFP were indistinguishable. When the fraction
of cells with inclusion bodies was normalized to total rhodopsin levels ("inclusion body index" = percentage of cells with inclusion
bodies/total rhodopsin) (Fig. 3F), it is apparent that P23H
is far more aggregation-prone than is wild-type rhodopsin.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Rhodopsin expression and spontaneous
inclusion body formation in the absence of proteasome inhibitors.
A-C, fusion of YFP to rhodopsin does not alter its
trafficking. HEK cells were transfected with 0.5 µg of wild-type-YFP
(A), V345M-YFP (B), or P23H-YFP (C)
and fixed 48 h later, and visualized for YFP (green).
DNA was stained (blue) with bis-benzimide. The
arrow in C indicates a spontaneous P23H inclusion body. Exposure times have not been normalized.
Bar, 15 µm. D, percentage of cells, transfected
as indicated, with a microscopically observable inclusion body. Each
bar represents a mean of three independent transfections
(n = 400 for each count). E, dose-response
curves for the three fusions. HEK cells were transfected with
increasing amounts of plasmid DNA corresponding to wild-type YFP
(open squares), V345M-YFP (open circles), or
P23H-YFP (closed squares) and harvested 42-48 h later. YFP
fluorescence was quantified by spectrofluorometry. F,
inclusion body index for the same set of transfections as in
D, as determined by dividing the percentage of cells with
inclusion bodies by the total rhodopsin (wild-type or mutant) level as
assessed by YFP fluorescence.
|
|
We have recently reported that FRET is a highly sensitive method to
monitor, in vivo, the aggregation of misfolded proteins (31). FRET results from the transfer of energy from a fluorescent donor
(CFP) in its excited state to another excitable moiety, the acceptor
(YFP), via non-radiative dipole-dipole interactions. To establish that
P23H aggregation occurs intracellularly and is not an artifact of
cellular lysis or proteasomal inhibition, we used FRET between
rhodopsin C/YFP fusions to monitor rhodopsin aggregation in living
cells, in the absence of drugs. The fluorescence emission spectrum
obtained from a mixture of HEK cells singly transfected with either
P23H-CFP or P23H-YFP revealed distinct peaks at 476 and 505 nm,
corresponding to CFP emission (Fig.
4A, solid line). In
contrast, the spectrum of cells co-transfected with both plasmids
revealed a reduction in the CFP emission peaks and an appearance of a
shoulder at 525 nm, corresponding to the sensitized emission from YFP
as a result of FRET. We then monitored FRET (using a FRET scale based
on the ratio of fluorescence emission at 525-476 nm (31)) in cells
expressing wild-type, V345M, and P23H as a function of total rhodopsin
expression level. Total rhodopsin levels were quantified either by the
intrinsic CFP (Fig. 4B) or YFP (Fig. 4C)
fluorescence emission. At low expression levels, FRET was undetectable
in cells expressing wild-type rhodopsin-C/YFP, despite a robust
fluorescence signal (Fig. 4B). The FRET value increased with
increasing wild-type rhodopsin expression, reaching a plateau at a
level of ~0.4. In contrast, in cells expressing P23H, FRET was
essentially maximal at the same plateau as the wild-type protein, even
at the lowest levels of expression. The aggregation behavior of V345M,
assessed using FRET (Fig. 4C), is similar to that of
wild-type rhodopsin.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Aggregation is a gain of function for
P23H. A, fluorescence resonance energy transfer was
used to study rhodopsin aggregation in the absence of proteasome
inhibitor. The solid line represents cells singly
transfected with P23H-CFP mixed with cells singly transfected with
P23H-YFP. The dashed line represents cells that were
co-transfected with P23H-CFP and P23H-YFP and mixed with mock
transfected cells. The spectra were corrected for cellular
autofluorescence and background YFP fluorescence. B,
relationship between extent of wild-type (open squares) or
P23H (closed squares) rhodopsin aggregation (determined by
FRET) and total rhodopsin expression (assessed by CFP fluorescence).
C, a comparison of FRET in wild-type, P23H, and V345M at low
and high protein expression levels (mean of n = 5 observations). Protein expression was quantified by intrinsic YFP
fluorescence and divided into two regimes of low (<5 × 105 counts per second) and high (>106 counts
per second) YFP fluorescence. All experiments had equal amounts of CFP
and YFP plasmids. D, relationship between the fraction of
oligomeric wild-type (open squares) or P23H (closed
squares) rhodopsin (determined from the immunoblot in Fig.
1A) and DNA used for transfection.
|
|
Remarkably, the aggregation behavior of wild-type and P23H rhodopsin,
as assessed by FRET, correlates extremely well with the extent of
association of these molecules into SDS-insoluble non-native oligomers
(Figs. 1A and 4D). Together these results confirm
that P23H is more aggregation-prone than wild-type rhodopsin and
further demonstrate that the propensity to aggregate is a gain of
function attributable to the P23H mutation.
Misfolded Rhodopsin Is Degraded by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome
System--
The increased steady-state level of mutant and wild-type
rhodopsin induced by exposure of cells to proteasome inhibitors (Fig. 1A) suggests a role for proteasome-dependent
proteolysis in rhodopsin turnover. Because degradation of misfolded
integral membrane proteins from the ER requires a functional Ub pathway
(30, 37), we used two different approaches to evaluate the role of Ub
in the degradation of mutant and wild-type rhodopsin expressed in HEK cells (Fig. 5). In the first approach, we
used immunopurification to show that P23H is ubiquitinylated to
a far greater extent than is wild-type rhodopsin. Cells were
transfected with rhodopsin or P23H plasmids, together with either a
control plasmid (empty vector) or a plasmid encoding
His6-myc-tagged Ub. Immunopurified rhodopsin, harvested
from cell lysates using anti-rhodopsin antibody, was subjected to
immunoblotting with anti-His6 antibody (Fig. 5A). The amount of His6-immunoreactive material
present in anti-rhodopsin immunoprecipitates from cells expressing
wild-type rhodopsin was not significantly higher in
His6-myc-Ub expressing than in vector-transfected controls
(compare lanes 1 and 2). This indicates that, at
the expression level used, wild-type rhodopsin expressed in HEK cells is not detectably modified with Ub. In sharp contrast, high molecular weight P23H Ub conjugates were readily detected even in the absence of
proteasome inhibitor, indicating the presence of steady-state P23H-Ub
conjugates (lanes 3 versus 4).
Following treatment of the co-transfected cells with proteasome
inhibitor, we observed an increase in steady-state ubiquitinylation of
both rhodopsin and P23H, consistent with our observation that
proteasome inhibitors also increase the steady-state level of both
forms of rhodopsin, and supporting the conclusion that turnover of both
forms of rhodopsin is mediated by the Ub-proteasome system.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Rhodopsin is a substrate of the ubiquitin
proteasome system. A, undegraded P23H is
ubiquitinylated. Cells were co-transfected with wild-type or mutant
rhodopsin (4 µg) together with His6-myc-tagged Ub (4 µg) and treated overnight with Me2SO (control) or ALLN as
indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibody to
rhodopsin and subjected to immunoblotting with anti-His6
antibody. B, dominant negative Ub inhibits rhodopsin
degradation. Cells were co-transfected with wild-type or mutant
rhodopsin (4 µg) together with plasmid encoding
His6-mycUb or His6-mycK48R-Ub or control vector
(4 µg) as indicated. Lysates were separated into detergent-soluble
and -insoluble fractions and probed with anti-rhodopsin mAb.
|
|
In the second approach, we tested the effect of dominant negative Ub on
the steady-state level of wild-type and mutant rhodopsin. Protein
degradation by the proteasome is strongly enhanced by attachment of
multiple Ub moieties in a polymer formed by isopeptide linkages between
the carboxyl terminus of one Ub and the
-amino group of
Lys-48 of another Ub (38-40). Mutations at Lys-48 can function
as chain-terminating dominant negative modulators of proteolysis (38).
To confirm a role for Ub in rhodopsin and P23H turnover, cells were
co-transfected with the respective rhodopsin plasmid together with
excess wild-type or K48R-Ub plasmid (or empty vector control). The
steady-state levels of both wild-type and P23H were substantially
increased by co-expression of K48R-Ub when compared with vector
co-transfection. This strongly supports the conclusion that the
turnover of both forms is Ub-dependent (Fig.
5B). As with the proteasome inhibitors, K48R-Ub
co-expression increased rhodopsin levels in both detergent-soluble and
-insoluble fractions, indicating that undegraded rhodopsin molecules
aggregate. Interestingly, co-expression of wild-type Ub led to a
reproducible and significant decrease in steady-state levels of the
rhodopsin proteins, suggesting that, under these experimental
conditions, the levels of free Ub may be rate-limiting for degradation.
P23H Aggregation Leads to Impairment of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome
Pathway--
Recently we reported that cytoplasmic aggregation of a
mutant form of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (
F508-CFTR) and a mutant form of huntingtin (Q103) causes a decrease in the function of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) (28). We
developed a novel reporter (GFPu) of UPS activity
consisting of GFP conjugated to a Ub-specific degron (28).
Because GFPu is a rapidly degraded UPS substrate, impaired
UPS function leads to increased steady-state GFPu
concentration, which can be monitored as a change in mean fluorescence. To investigate the cellular consequences of P23H aggregation, we
measured the fluorescence of GFPu-1, an HEK293 line
harboring stable expression of GFPu, following transient
expression of wild-type or mutant rhodopsin. As controls,
GFPu-1 cells were transfected with high levels of a
fragment of wild-type huntingtin Q25, a soluble protein that is very
resistant to aggregation, or with
F508 CFTR, an integral membrane
protein, which we have previously shown to be extremely
aggregation-prone (36). Transfected cells were immunostained for
rhodopsin (or Q25 and CFTR), and the levels of the transfected protein
and GFPu were analyzed simultaneously by two-color flow
cytometry. GFPu levels in the cells expressing low or high
levels of transfected protein are represented as normalized population
histograms (Fig. 6). The control
experiments (Fig. 6, A and B) confirmed our
previous finding that GFPu fluorescence was increased by
expression of
F508 CFTR but not by expression of Q25. Similarly,
there was no detectable increase in GFPu fluorescence in
cells expressing wild-type rhodopsin (Fig. 6C) even at
levels up to 4 µg. However, expression of P23H resulted in a
significant and reproducible increase in GFPu fluorescence
that was evident even at expression levels below those used for
wild-type (Fig. 6D). Together, these data indicate that
P23H, like other aggregation-prone proteins, leads to a generalized impairment of the ubiquitin proteasome system and suggests a mechanism by which mutations affecting the folding of rhodopsin might be linked
to the biochemical events leading to photoreceptor death.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Aggregation of P23H rhodopsin impairs the
function of the Ub-proteasome system. GFPu-1 cells
(harboring the GFPu UPS reporter) were transfected with 4 µg of plasmid encoding huntingtin Q25-myc (A), F508
CFTR (B), wild-type rhodopsin (C), or P23H
(D). Transfected cells were fixed, immunostained with c-myc
antibody (A), CFTR antibody (B), or rhodopsin
(1D4) mAb (C and D) and analyzed simultaneously
by flow cytometry for expression of the respective antigens and
GFPu fluorescence. Traces shown are histograms
(normalized to total cell number) of GFPu fluorescence in
cells containing high (dashed line) or low (solid
line) levels of each transgene.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Accumulation of aggregated, multiubiquitinylated proteins
within intracellular inclusion bodies in affected neurons has long been
recognized as a hallmark of most neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting
that these diverse disorders may be related through a common pathogenic
mechanism linked to protein misfolding and aggregation. The presence of
highly elevated levels of multiubiquitinylated protein within inclusion
bodies in affected neurons in most sporadic and inherited
neurodegenerative diseases (24-26), together with recent biochemical
(28) and genetic studies (41-45), suggests that dysfunction of the
ubiquitin proteasome pathway (UPS) is also intimately tied to the
underlying cellular pathogenesis. The data presented in this study
reveal that a mutation linked to ADRP, a leading cause of adult onset
blindness, results in the production of a misfolded and highly
aggregation-prone form of rhodopsin that in cultured cells is both a
substrate and an inhibitor of the UPS.
These data suggest that UPS impairment may contribute to ADRP
pathogenesis and, therefore, that retinal degeneration may share hitherto unsuspected common pathogenic features with other adult onset
degenerative diseases of the central nervous system. Class II mutants
like P23H fail to acquire complex oligosaccharides and are not able to
bind 11-cis-retinal to form a rhodopsin chromophore, suggesting that class II ADRP, like many other dominantly inherited neurodegenerative diseases, is associated with defective protein folding (12-14). Our finding that P23H is ubiquitinylated and is a
substrate for the UPS, reveals a second feature common to ADRP and
other neurodegenerative diseases such as familial amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis (FALS), in which disease-causing mutations enhance the
susceptibility of the affected protein (copper and zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD)) to degradation by the UPS (23, 46, 47). Finally, the
data in the present study show that the P23H mutation renders rhodopsin
highly prone to aggregation, revealing a third feature common between
ADRP and nearly all other neurodegenerative diseases.
In this study, three lines of evidence, formation of high molecular
weight SDS-resistant oligomers, enhanced sequestration of P23H in
aggresomes and FRET, all support the conclusion that P23H is
significantly more prone to aggregation than is wild-type rhodopsin.
Strikingly, unlike other aggregation-prone proteins, like
SOD, CFTR, and mutant huntingtin, in which we find a mixture of
aggregated and non-aggregated forms at steady-state, P23H is remarkable
in that aggregates are the predominant form detectable in cells at all
expression levels. Whether this property results from the extremely
hydrophobic nature of rhodopsin or an increased propensity to form
-sheet structures, which underlie the aggregation of many other
proteins (48), will require further investigation.
It is essential to distinguish between aggregates, which can
be defined as non-native protein oligomers, and inclusion
bodies, which are microscopically distinct cellular regions into
which aggregated proteins are sequestered (26). For example, formation of inclusion bodies composed of aggregated mutant SOD is a relatively late event in the progression of spinal motor neuron disease in a
transgenic mouse model of FALS, occurring several months after the
onset of detectable cellular pathology (46, 49). In contrast to
inclusion bodies, formation of biochemically distinct,
detergent-insoluble, SOD oligomers and high molecular weight aggregates
precedes by several months the appearance of inclusion bodies and
coincides with the earliest manifestations of cellular pathology (23). These findings suggest that it is the adoption of a non-native oligomeric conformation, i.e. aggregation, and not inclusion
body formation, that underlies FALS and perhaps other
aggregation-linked neurodegenerative diseases. The oligomeric forms of
rhodopsin, much like those of SOD, are non-native structures, given the
fact that the wild-type is monomeric (33). Thus, they fit our
definition of aggregates, being "non-native oligomers."
One possible explanation for the apparent absence of inclusion bodies
in photoreceptors from degenerating retina is that photoreceptors may
be more susceptible to the toxicity of protein aggregates than are
other central nervous system neurons or transfected HEK cells.
Microtubules in photoreceptors are organized around the basal bodies
within the specialized non-motile connecting cilium at the junction
between the light sensitive outer segment and the metabolically and
biosynthetically active inner segment (50, 51). Perhaps this highly
specialized microtubule array organization limits the capacity of
photoreceptors to clear protein aggregates by the type of
dynein-mediated processes, which operate in non-ciliated cells to concentrate aggregated proteins in pericentriolar inclusion bodies (26). Lacking such a mechanism to sequester toxic P23H aggregates into inclusion bodies could lower the threshold for aggregate toxicity and cause photoreceptors to die without the formation of readily detectable foci.
It is also possible that the absence of detectable inclusion bodies
within photoreceptors in ADRP reflects an increased capacity of the
retina to eliminate damaged cells compared with other central nervous
system regions. Lysis of the photoreceptor inner segment is a prominent
and early feature of ADRP pathogenesis, suggesting that cells with the
highest aggregate burden sufficient to produce detectable inclusion
bodies may be eliminated preferentially. Because of the laminar
organization of the retina and the close proximity of the retinal
pigmented epithelium, a layer of highly phagocytic cells contacting the
photoreceptor outer segments, it is likely that removal of moribund
neurons or fragments thereof is more efficient in retina than in other
regions of the brain. In Drosophila, mutations affecting
rhodopsin folding also cause photoreceptor degeneration (52). However,
in flies, which lack the equivalent of a retinal pigmented epithelium,
expression of folding-defective rhodopsin mutants does lead to the
formation of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies and a generalized disruption
of internal membranes (53). These observations confirm that aggregation into cytoplasmic inclusion bodies is a property intrinsic to
folding-defective mutant forms of rhodopsin and suggest that the
mammalian retina may possess specialized mechanisms to prevent their
accumulation. Our observation that P23H-expressing cells that have
negligible inclusion bodies (<3%) still have maximal FRET ties in
very well with the lack of observable inclusion bodies in ADRP. It
suggests that aggregates, and their potential toxicity, can persist in the absence of observable inclusion bodies.
Although it is formally possible that the high molecular weight
rhodopsin and P23H species observed in this study are post-lysis artifacts generated during sample preparation, three lines of evidence
argue strongly that these species are generated intracellularly. First,
the observation of aggresomes in cells expressing P23H strongly
indicates that P23H aggregation occurs in vivo. Aggresome formation by P23H does not require proteasome inhibitors, because they
are observed in cells in the absence of any drug treatment. Second,
because FRET is efficient only for C/YFP fluorophores that are within
100 Å of each other (54), our data suggest that the P23H mutation
endows the rhodopsin molecule, normally a monomer even at the high
concentrations present within the rod outer segments (33), with the
ability to self-associate into compact structures. Finally, we observe
identical patterns of electrophoretic motilities of P23H rhodopsin when
the cells are lysed in the presence of alkylating agents such as
iodoacetamide, which prevent the formation of non-native
disulfide-linked species in the highly oxidizing environment of
SDS-PAGE (55).
The data presented here demonstrate that an increased propensity to
self-associate into high molecular weight aggregates is a robust gain
of function, which is directly linked to pathogenesis caused by a class
II ADRP mutant rhodopsin. One way in which this property might be
cytotoxic is by interfering with the function of the UPS, a proteolytic
system that plays a crucial role as a cellular "master regulator"
in all eukaryotic cells (56). Whether or not rhodopsin aggregation and
UPS impairment are general features of other class II mutants must
await future studies. Nevertheless, our data suggest a novel link
between ADRP and other hereditary neuropathies and suggest that the
consequences of protein aggregation may have a more general role in
neurodegeneration than hitherto anticipated.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank J. Flannery and E. Lee for useful
discussions and R. Molday, J. Nathans, D. Oprian, and P. Hargrave for
reagents. We are also grateful to J. Johnston and members of the Kopito laboratory for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Grants 1R01-DK43994 and
1R01-DK52795 from the National Institutes of Health (to R. R. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
¶
Supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian
Institutes of Health Research. Present address: Ingenuity
Systems, 2160 Gold St., Alviso, CA 95002.
**
Supported by a predoctoral training grant from National Institutes
of Health.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 650-723-7581;
Fax: 650-723-8475; E-mail: kopito@stanford.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204955200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RP, retinitis
pigmentosa;
ADRP, autosomal dominant RP;
Ub, ubiquitin;
FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
YFP, yellow fluorescent protein;
CFP, cyan fluorescent protein;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PNGase, protein:N-glycanase;
ALLN, N-acetyl-Leu-Leu-norleucinal;
DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
UPS, ubiquitin-proteasome system;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
CFTR, cystic
fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator;
FALS, familial
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis;
SOD, superoxide dismutase;
mAb, monoclonal antibody.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Milam, A. H., Li, Z. Y.,
and Fariss, R. N.
(1998)
Prog. Retin. Eye Res.
17,
175-205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Dryja, T. P.,
McGee, T. L.,
Reichel, E.,
Hahn, L. B.,
Cowley, G. S.,
Yandell, D. W.,
Sandberg, M. A.,
and Berson, E. L.
(1990)
Nature
343,
364-366[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Dryja, T. P.,
and Li, T.
(1995)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
4,
1739-1743[Abstract]
|
| 4.
| Retinal Information Network (2001)
www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet/disease.htm
|
| 5.
|
Reme, C. E.,
Grimm, C.,
Hafezi, F.,
Marti, A.,
and Wenzel, A.
(1998)
Prog. Retin. Eye Res.
17,
443-464[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Chang, G. Q.,
Hao, Y.,
and Wong, F.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
595-605[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Chen, J.,
Flannery, J. G.,
LaVail, M. M.,
Steinberg, R. H., Xu, J.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7042-7047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Green, E. S.,
Menz, M. D.,
LaVail, M. M.,
and Flannery, J. G.
(2000)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
41,
1546-1553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Rosenfeld, P. J.,
Cowley, G. S.,
McGee, T. L.,
Sandberg, M. A.,
Berson, E. L.,
and Dryja, T. P.
(1992)
Nat. Genet.
1,
209-213[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Lem, J.,
Krasnoperova, N. V.,
Calvert, P. D.,
Kosaras, B.,
Cameron, D. A.,
Nicolo, M.,
Makino, C. L.,
and Sidman, R. L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
736-741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Humphries, M. M.,
Rancourt, D.,
Farrar, G. J.,
Kenna, P.,
Hazel, M.,
Bush, R. A.,
Sieving, P. A.,
Sheils, D. M.,
McNally, N.,
Creighton, P.,
Erven, A.,
Boros, A.,
Gulya, K.,
Capecchi, M. R.,
and Humphries, P.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
15,
216-219[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Sung, C. H.,
Schneider, B. G.,
Agarwal, N.,
Papermaster, D. S.,
and Nathans, J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
8840-8844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Sung, C. H.,
Davenport, C. M.,
and Nathans, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26645-26649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kaushal, S.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
6121-6128[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Li, Z. Y.,
Wong, F.,
Chang, J. H.,
Possin, D. E.,
Hao, Y.,
Petters, R. M.,
and Milam, A. H.
(1998)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
39,
808-819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Sung, C. H.,
Makino, C.,
Baylor, D.,
and Nathans, J.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
5818-5833[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Tai, A. W.,
Chuang, J. Z.,
Bode, C.,
Wolfrum, U.,
and Sung, C. H.
(1999)
Cell
97,
877-887[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Sung, C. H.,
and Tai, A. W.
(2000)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
195,
215-267[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Chapple, J. P.,
Grayson, C.,
Hardcastle, A. J.,
Saliba, R. S.,
van der Spuy, J.,
and Cheetham, M. E.
(2001)
Trends Mol. Med.
7,
414-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Carrell, R. W.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(1997)
Lancet
350,
134-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Soto, C.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
498,
204-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Hoffman, E. K.,
Wilcox, H. M.,
Scott, R. W.,
and Siman, R.
(1996)
J. Neurol. Sci.
139,
15-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Johnston, J. A.,
Dalton, M. J.,
Gurney, M. E.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
12571-12576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Alves-Rodrigues, A.,
Gregori, L.,
and Figueiredo-Pereira, M. E.
(1998)
Trends Neurosci.
21,
516-520[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Lowe, J.,
Blanchard, A.,
Morrell, K.,
Lennox, G.,
Reynolds, L.,
Billett, M.,
Landon, M.,
and Mayer, R. J.
(1988)
J. Pathol.
155,
9-15[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Kopito, R. R.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
524-530[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Flannery, J. G.,
Farber, D. B.,
Bird, A. C.,
and Bok, D.
(1989)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
30,
191-211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Bence, N.,
Sampat, R.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(2001)
Science
292,
1552-1555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Molday, R. S.,
and MacKenzie, D.
(1983)
Biochemistry
22,
653-660[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Ward, C. L.,
Omura, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
121-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Rajan, R. S.,
Illing, M.,
Bence, N.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
13060-13065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Graham, F. L.,
and van der Eb, A. J.
(1973)
Virology
52,
456-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Downer, N. W.,
and Cone, R. A.
(1985)
Biophys J
47,
277-284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Rock, K. L.,
Gramm, C.,
Rothstein, L.,
Clark, K.,
Stein, R.,
Dick, L.,
Hwang, D.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1994)
Cell
78,
761-771[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Fenteany, G.,
Standaert, R. F.,
Lane, W. S.,
Chois, S.,
Corey, E. J.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1995)
Science
268,
726-731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Johnston, J. A.,
Ward, C. L.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1883-1898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Yu, H.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36852-36858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Chau, V.,
Tobias, J. W.,
Bachmair, A.,
Marriott, D.,
Ecker, D. J.,
Gonda, D. K.,
and Varshavsky, A.
(1989)
Science
243,
1576-1583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
van Nocker, S.,
and Vierstra, R. D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
24766-24773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Thrower, J. S.,
Hoffman, L.,
Rechsteiner, M.,
and Pickart, C. M.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
94-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Cummings, C. J.,
Reinstein, E.,
Sun, Y.,
Antalffy, B.,
Jiang, Y.,
Ciechanover, A.,
Orr, H. T.,
Beaudet, A. L.,
and Zoghbi, H. Y.
(1999)
Neuron
24,
879-892[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Fernandez-Funez, P.,
Nino-Rosales, M. L.,
de Gouyon, B.,
She, W. C.,
Luchak, J. M.,
Martinez, P.,
Turiegano, E.,
Benito, J.,
Capovilla, M.,
Skinner, P. J.,
McCall, A.,
Canal, I.,
Orr, H. T.,
Zoghbi, H. Y.,
and Botas, J.
(2000)
Nature
408,
101-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Kitada, T.,
Asakawa, S.,
Hattori, N.,
Matsumine, H.,
Yamamura, Y.,
Minoshima, S.,
Yokochi, M.,
Mizuno, Y.,
and Shimizu, N.
(1998)
Nature
392,
605-608[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Saigoh, K.,
Wang, Y. L.,
Suh, J. G.,
Yamanishi, T.,
Sakai, Y.,
Kiyosawa, H.,
Harada, T.,
Ichihara, N.,
Wakana, S.,
Kikuchi, T.,
and Wada, K.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
47-51[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Leroy, E.,
Boyer, R.,
Auburger, G.,
Leube, B.,
Ulm, G.,
Mezey, E.,
Harta, G.,
Brownstein, M. J.,
Jonnalagada, S.,
Chernova, T.,
Dehejia, A.,
Lavedan, C.,
Gasser, T.,
Steinbach, P. J.,
Wilkinson, K. D.,
and Polymeropoulos, M. H.
(1998)
Nature
395,
451-452[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Bruijn, L. I.,
Houseweart, M. K.,
Kato, S.,
Anderson, K. L.,
Anderson, S. D.,
Ohama, E.,
Reaume, A. G.,
Scott, R. W.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1998)
Science
281,
1851-1854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
| Johnston, J., Illing, M., and Kopito, R. (2002) Cell Motil.
Cytoskel., in press
|
| 48.
|
Fink, A. L.
(1998)
Fold Des.
3,
R9-R23[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Bruijn, L. I.,
Becher, M. W.,
Lee, M. K.,
Anderson, K. L.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Sisodia, S. S.,
Rothstein, J. D.,
Borchelt, D. R.,
Price, D. L.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
327-338[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Wolfrum, U.,
and Salisbury, J. L.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
242,
10-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Wolfrum, U.
(1995)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
32,
55-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Leonard, D. S.,
Bowman, V. D.,
Ready, D. F.,
and Pak, W. L.
(1992)
J. Neurobiol.
23,
605-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Kurada, P.,
and O'Tousa, J. E.
(1995)
Neuron
14,
571-579[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Lakowicz, J. R.
(1999)
Principles of fluorescence Spectroscopy
, 2 Ed.
, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York
|
| 55.
|
Crow, M. K.,
Karasarras, N.,
and Sarris, A. H.
(2001)
BioTechniques
30,
311-316[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Ciechanover, A.,
Orian, A.,
and Schwartz, A. L.
(2000)
Bioessays
22,
442-451[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore