JBC Advanced Glycation Endproducts

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203358200 on June 26, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 37, 34229-34238, September 13, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/37/34229    most recent
M203358200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strand, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strand, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, K. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Cobalt Substitution of Mouse R2 Ribonucleotide Reductase as a Model for the Reactive Diferrous State

SPECTROSCOPIC AND STRUCTURAL EVIDENCE FOR A FERROMAGNETICALLY COUPLED DINUCLEAR COBALT CLUSTER*

Kari R. StrandDagger , Solveig Karlsen§, and K. Kristoffer AnderssonDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1041, Blindern, Oslo N-0316, and the § Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo, P. O. Box 1033, Blindern, Oslo N-0315, Norway

Received for publication, April 8, 2002, and in revised form, June 26, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The R2 dimer of mouse ribonucleotide reductase contains a dinuclear iron-oxygen cluster and tyrosyl radical/subunit. The dinuclear diferrous form reacts with dioxygen to generate the tyrosyl radical essential for the catalytic reaction that occurs at the R1 dimer. It is important to understand how the reactivity toward oxygen is related to the crystal structure of the dinuclear cluster. For the mouse R2 protein, no structure has been available with a fully occupied dinuclear metal ion site. A cobalt substitution of mouse R2 was performed to produce a good model for the very air-sensitive diferrous form of the enzyme. X-band EPR and light absorption studies (epsilon 550 nm = 100 mM-1 cm-1/Co(II)) revealed a strong cooperative binding of cobalt to the dinuclear site. In perpendicular mode EPR, the axial signal from mouse R2 incubated with Co(II) showed a typical S = 3/2 Co(II) signal, and its low intensity indicated that the majority of the Co(II) bound to R2 is magnetically coupled. In parallel mode EPR, a typical integer spin signal (Ms = ±3) with g ~ 12 is observed at 3.6 K and 10 K, showing that the two Co(II) ions (S = 3/2) in the dinuclear site are ferromagnetically coupled. We have solved the 2.4 Å crystal structure of the Co(II)-substituted R2 with a fully occupied dinuclear cluster. The bridging Co(II) carboxylate ligand Glu-267 adopts an altered orientation compared with its counterpart Glu-238 in Escherichia coli R2. This might be important for proper O2 activation of the more exposed native diferrous site in mouse R2 compared with E. coli R2.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The enzyme ribonucleotide reductase (RNR)1 catalyzes the conversion of ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides, providing the cell with the essential building blocks for DNA synthesis and repair (1, 2). A common feature for all RNRs isolated so far is a similar reaction mechanism involving free radicals and redox-active cysteines. The RNR enzymes can be grouped into three major classes based on the mechanism used for radical generation and on structural differences (3-6). RNR from mouse belongs to class Ia. RNRs in this class are composed of alpha 2beta 2 tetramers. The alpha 2 dimers are called R1, and each subunit hosts an active site and binding sites for allosteric effectors. Each subunit of the beta 2 dimers (called R2) contains a µ-oxo-bridged diferric center (iron-oxygen cluster) (7) and a free tyrosyl radical in its active form. Upon binding of the substrate to the R1 protein, the enzymatic reaction is initiated. The radical originating from the tyrosyl radical of the R2 protein is transferred 35-40 Å to the active site cysteines in the R1 protein (5, 7-11). This radical or hydrogen atom is proposed to be propagated via a conserved chain of hydrogen-bonded amino acid residues within the R2 and the R1 proteins. Mutations of the amino acids in this chain lead to either a decreased or a total loss of enzyme activity, which supports this radical transport pathway (12-14).

RNR isolated from Escherichia coli is so far the best characterized enzyme and prototype of class Ia. For mammalian RNRs, the mouse enzyme may serve as a better model because there are a number of significant differences between the E. coli enzyme and RNR in higher organisms (7, 15). The sequence identity between mouse R2 and E. coli R2 is only about 25% (15), although the identity is higher among the eukaryotic R2 proteins (60-82%) (16). The newly characterized human p53R2, which is possibly important in DNA repair, also shows large sequence similarity to the mouse R2 protein (17, 18).

The three-dimensional structure of mouse RNR R2 has been determined at 2.3 Å resolution (16). The x-ray structure of Kauppi et al. (16) showed that the iron center of mouse R2 had a more water-exposed and less hydrogen-bonding environment around the metal site than in E. coli R2. So far it has only been possible to crystallize the R2 mouse protein at pH 4.7, and at this pH only one of the metal binding sites is occupied by iron. Structures of the biologically relevant diferric and diferrous forms of the E. coli R2 enzyme have been solved. Both structures showed fully occupied di-iron sites (8, 19). No crystal structure has been published on the active form harboring a tyrosyl radical. In this paper, we present a model for the diferrous form of mouse R2, the form that reacts with dioxygen and forms the essential tyrosyl radical and the µ-oxo-diferric cluster (20-22). The diferrous form of R2 is difficult to work with because it is very O2-sensitive. Substitution studies with other divalent metals that are less air-sensitive can provide useful information about this biological relevant form of the enzyme. In this study, Co(II) was chosen because cobalt ions exhibit characteristic spectra depending on ligand environments and thus provide the electronic structure for the metal ion site of mouse R2 (23, 24). Analogous studies where the metal ion cluster has been replaced have provided significant structural information for many metalloproteins, among which are manganese- (25-27) and cobalt- (28) substituted R2 RNRs. The x-ray manganese structures have served as good models for the reduced form of the E. coli R2 enzyme.

Among the isolated and characterized non-corrin-cobalt-containing enzymes, the most relevant for comparison with R2 is the methionine aminopeptidases isolated from E. coli. The x-ray structure revealed a dinuclear cobalt site with carboxylate and histidine ligands (29). This rich carboxylate coordination environment is very similar to the carboxylate-bridged dinuclear iron centers we find in the iron-oxygen proteins such as class I R2 RNR, methane monooxygenase hydroxylase (MMOH), and acyl-carrier-protein Delta 9-desaturase, which are all capable of activating dioxygen for subsequent oxidation chemistry. However, this is not the case for the cobalt-containing methionine aminopeptidases, which from E. coli requires two Co(II) atoms for hydrolytic activity to cleave the N terminus from newly translated polypeptide chains.

In this study we report the first crystal structure of a fully occupied dinuclear site of mouse R2 RNR at pH 6. A structure at this pH is more physiologically relevant than the previous structure at pH 4.7. It also gives new insights into the structure and spectroscopic properties of the reduced diferrous center of mouse R2. Our EPR studies show that the cobalt atoms in the dinuclear site are ferromagnetically coupled in contrast to cobalt-substituted E. coli R2 (28). Several other non-corrin-cobalt enzymes other than methionine aminopeptidases have been isolated and characterized (prolidase, nitrile hydratase, glucose isomerase, methylmalonyl-CoA carboxytransferase, aldehyde decarbonylase, lysine 2,3-aminomutase, and bromoperoxidase) (30), and the ferromagnetic coupled dinuclear Co(II) cluster in mouse R2 can serve as a model for active dinuclear cobalt-containing proteins.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein-- The cloned mouse R2 apoprotein was prepared as reported by Mann et al. (21). The apoR2 protein obtained after purification was pretreated with hydroxyurea and EDTA and passed down a 10-ml Sephadex G-25 column to remove all iron and reduce the tyrosyl radical before reconstitution with Co(II). The protein concentration was determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay (31) or the molar extinction coefficient epsilon 280-310 nm = 124 mM-1 cm-1/90 kDa (R2 dimer) (21).

UV-Visible Measurements-- Optical absorption spectra were collected on a Hewlett-Packard 8452 diode array spectrophotometer.

EPR Measurements-- The EPR spectra were recorded at X-band on a Bruker ESP 300E, fitted with a Bruker ER4116DM dual mode cavity and an Oxford ESR 900 helium flow cryostat. The signals were measured at different microwave powers to prevent power saturation. They were quantitated by comparing double integrals of spectra with high spin Co(II) in either 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 20% glycerol or 100 mM MES, pH 6.0, 1.2 M NaCl, 20% glycerol depending on which pH the cobalt substitution of R2 was performed. The spectra were recorded under identical non-saturating microwave power.

Crystallization and X-ray Data Collection-- The R2 crystals were grown in hanging drops as described earlier (32) using 7.5 mg/ml protein in the presence or absence of 3.8 equivalents of Co(II)/R2 dimer and 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.7, containing 1.2 M NaCl. Diffraction below 3 Å resolution was observed at BM01A (Swiss-Norwegian Beamline, SNBL) and a dataset to 2.2 Å resolution was collected at ID14-1 at European Synchrotron Radiation Facilities (ESRF), Grenoble, France. Map interpretation showed binding only of mononuclear cobalt in site 2 (the site farthest away from the tyrosyl radical site Tyr-177; see Fig. 7B). To increase the binding of cobalt, the crystals of apoR2 were soaked in 5 mM CoCl2 for 3 h, and the pH was increased gradually to about 6 by adding 1 M sodium acetate. Sodium ascorbate (2 mM) was added to the solution to prevent oxidation of the Co(II) ions. One crystal was transferred to a cryosolution of 25% glycerol, 5 mM Co(II), and 2 mM sodium ascorbate and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. A 2.4 Å dataset was collected on a MAR CCD detector at beamline ID14-3 at ESRF in Grenoble. The 120 frames were measured, processed in DENZO, and merged in Scalepack (33) and gave 99.3% completeness (15,274 unique reflections) between 30.0 and 2.4 Å resolution, a Rmerge of 9.5% and I/sigma I value of 9.6.

Refinement and Model Building-- Although our cobalt-substituted R2 and apoR2 proteins were crystallized using the same conditions as for the iron-reconstituted mouse R2 protein reported by Kauppi and co-workers (16, 32), the cell dimensions (space group C2221, one monomer in the asymmetric unit) were shorter. Therefore, the molecular replacement technique had to be used for the structure determination. The R2 protein (PDB 1XSM) was used as search model, and all water molecules and the single iron ion were deleted. The rotation and translation searches were carried out with the CNS program package (34).

After the rigid body refinement, simulated annealing and positional refinement in CNS electron density maps (Fo-Fc and 2Fo-Fc) showed well defined electron density at an 8-sigma level for the cobalt ions in the proposed metal center in the protein. The program O (35) was used for map inspection and model building. The cobalt ions were included in the coordinate file, and 113 water molecules were added in several iterations to the model and refined in CNS. Only water molecules with well defined density and reasonable hydrogen bond geometry were chosen. The refinement brought R and Rfree based on 5% of the data down to 21.8 and 29.7%, respectively.

The 65-352-residue model of the Co(II)-substituted R2 protein refined to 2.4 Å showed good stereochemistry with deviations from ideal geometry of 0.024 Å for bond lengths, 2.1° for bond angles, and 21.8° for dihedral angles. In the CNS package (34), the mean coordinate error was estimated to be 0.31 Å for the entire structure. The program PROCHECK (36) estimated that 89.0% of the nonglycine and proline residues were in the most favored regions, whereas 9.5 and 1.5% were found either in other allowed or in generously allowed regions, respectively. Four amino acids (Arg-79, Phe-81, Arg-149, and Glu-307) in the latter mentioned region are all in flexible loops at the surface of the protein and have high temperature factors. The coordinates for the structures of mono-Co(II)-R2 and di-Co(II)-R2 are deposited in the Protein Data Bank and have been assigned PDB ID 1h0o.pdb and 1h0n.pdb, respectively.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

EPR Evidence for Formation of a Magnetically Coupled Dinuclear Co(II) Cluster-- In this study, we have substituted the natural iron cluster with cobalt. We chose Co(II) because it would make a good model for the native dinuclear ferrous cluster of the enzyme. The mouse apoR2 protein after purification was pretreated with hydroxyurea and EDTA to remove all iron before incubation with Co(II). Aqueous solutions of Co(II) are readily oxidized to Co(III). The air-sensitive Co(II) buffer solutions were made fresh just before use. Unlike the very air-sensitive diferrous R2 protein, the cobalt-containing form of mouse R2 (Co(II)-R2) shows no difference in oxidation state whether the reconstitution was performed aerobically or anaerobically (data not shown). Unless otherwise indicated, all of the work represented in this paper is done aerobically. This apparent insensitivity to dioxygen is consistent with reports of other cobalt-substituted proteins such as the anaerobic prepared cobalt-substituted R2 protein from E. coli (28). This protein did not appear to bind or activate dioxygen.

Incubation of R2 with a Large Excess of Cobalt-- The reconstitution was first made at pH 7.6 by the aerobic addition of 10 molar excess of Co(II)/apoR2 dimer (typical [R2] was 0.2-0.5 mM). This yielded a pink cobalt R2 derivative within seconds. The sample was passed down a small Sephadex G-25 column at 4 °C to remove any unbound cobalt from the protein. The EPR spectrum at 4 K of the gel-filtered Co(II)-R2 sample had a broad signal from 50 to 370 mT, typical of Co(II) high spin S = 3/2 (Fig. 1, dotted line).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Evidence for EPR-silent Co(II) in Co(II)-R2. At 10 K, X-band EPR spectra of Co(II)-R2, pH 7.6 (dotted line), and Co(II)-R2 denatured (1.4 M HCl, 12 h at room temperature) (solid line) are shown. The protein concentration was 0.2 mM. Instrumental conditions: microwave frequency, 9.6 GHz; microwave power, 0.2 mW; modulation, 1.0 mT.

Systems with S > 1/2 can be described by the spin Hamiltonian (23, 24, 28, 37-40)
    H<SUB><UP>s</UP></SUB>=&bgr; · S · g · B+D(S<SUB>z</SUB><SUP>2</SUP>−S(S+1)/3+E/D (S<SUB>x</SUB><SUP>2</SUP>−S<SUB>y</SUB><SUP>2</SUP>)) (Eq. 1)
in which beta  is the Bohr magneton, B is the applied magnetic field, g is the Landé matrix, D is the axial zero-field splitting parameter, and E is the rhombic zero field splitting parameter. |E/D|  ranges between 0 and 1/3.  |E/D|  = 0 corresponds to the fully axial case, and  |E/D|  = 1/3 is the fully rhombic case.

The observed broad axial X-band EPR signal from Co(II)-R2 is typical for the lowest Kramers doublet (Ms = ± 1/2) from S = 3/2 high spin mononuclear Co(II) species. The signal has a geff at ~170 mT (g ~ 4.1) with a gmax value at ~ 5.4 and a signal at g = 2.02 over a temperature range from 3.6 to 30 K. The g values of the Co(II)-R2 sample are close to the theoretical axial S = 3/2 g values at 4.0, 4.0, and 2.0. Different traces of Co(II) low spin (S = 1/2) impurities are observed above g = 2. No tyrosyl radical was generated during the aerobic reaction of apoR2 with Co(II) (Fig. 1, dotted line).

A full occupancy of the native µ-oxo-diferric binding site will give a binding stoichiometry of 4 metal ions/R2 dimer. Quantitation of the observed broad axial gmax ~ 5.4 EPR signal from the gel-filtered Co(II)-R2 sample against Co(II) in buffer showed that about 15-20% of the expected metal binding sites were occupied with EPR-active Co(II). To rule out the presence of EPR-silent Co(III), a reduction of the protein with dithionite was performed. This gave no change in the observed EPR signal (data not shown). The Co(II)-R2 sample was acid denatured (1.4 M HCl, 12 h at room temperature). The EPR spectrum of the acid-denatured Co(II)-R2 sample (Fig. 1, solid line) showed an increase in the intensity of the Co(II) S = 3/2 EPR signal compared with the intensity from the Co(II)-R2, pH 7.6, sample (Fig. 1, dotted line). Assuming that the intensity of the Co(II) signal after acid denaturation represents all Co(II) bound to R2, the results suggest that 80% of the metal binding sites in the Co(II)-R2 sample at pH 7.6 was occupied with EPR-silent Co(II). The EPR spectra of Co(II) in buffer did not change in shape or intensity when HCl was added. These results imply that the majority of the Co(II) atoms bound to R2 at pH 7.6 interact with each other to form a magnetically coupled dinuclear site that cannot be detected by perpendicular mode X-band EPR. The binding ratio of cobalt to R2 indicates that most of the available metal sites are occupied with magnetically coupled cobalt atoms in the gel-filtered Co(II)-R2 sample.

The Formation of the Dinuclear Co(II) Cluster-- The formation of the perpendicular mode X-band EPR-silent metal site at pH 7.6 can be followed by preparing EPR samples with an increasing ratio of Co(II) to apoR2 without gel filtration. The EPR spectra from the titration of R2 with 1-8 equivalents Co(II) are identical in shape to the spectrum observed from the gel-filtered Co(II)-R2 sample, although with different intensities (Fig. 2, B and C). When the ratio of the concentration of added Co(II) to apoR2 reached the level at which formation of magnetically coupled dinuclear cobalt sites becomes possible, the relative intensity of the gmax = 5.4 Co(II) S = 3/2 EPR signal from the cobalt-substituted R2 will no longer be comparable in intensity with that of a buffer sample of CoCl2 of identical concentration (Fig. 2, A and B). Thus, a quantitation of the Co(II) EPR signal of a sample containing 4 equivalents of cobalt/R2 dimer shows that the intensity drops to about 60% of the EPR signal from the same amount of cobalt in buffer. This means that about 40% of the cobalt bound to R2 is EPR-silent, and 60% behaves as Co(II) in buffer.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The EPR-active Co(II) in Co(II)-R2 at pH 7.6 and 6.0. At 0.2 mW and 10 K, the X-band EPR spectra of 1.8 mM Co(II) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 20% glycerol (* 0.2) (A), 4 equivalents of Co(II)-R2 dimer (4 Co(II)-R2) in the same buffer as A (B), and 6 equivalents of Co(II)-R2 dimer (6 Co(II)-R2) in the same buffer as A are shown (C). At 127 µW, 3.8 K, the X-band EPR spectra of 1.8 mM Co(II) in 0.1 M MES, 1.2 M NaCl, pH 6.0 (* 0.2) (D) and 6 equivalents of Co(II)/R2 dimer (6 Co(II)-R2) in the same buffer as D (E) are shown. [R2] = 0.3 mM in all samples. Instrumental conditions: microwave frequency, 9.6 GHz; modulation, 1.0 mT.

To quantify the observed EPR signal, the D value has to be positive. The microwave power saturation behavior at different temperatures can give a D value using the method of Makinen and co-workers (37, 38). Fig. 3, A and B, shows the effect of microwave power saturation at 3.6 and 5.8 K of the gmax signal from samples where 4 and 6 equivalents of cobalt/R2 dimer were added, respectively. Fig. 3B also shows the behavior of identical concentrations of Co(II) in buffer at 3.6 K (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 20% glycerol). Table I summarizes the EPR relaxation parameters of the gmax signal from the different samples at different temperatures. The parameters of the saturation curves in terms of microwave power at half-saturation P1/2 and b are summarized in Table I. The parameter b describes the contribution of nonhomogeneous broadening (41) to the saturation curve as shown in Equation 2,
I&agr;1/(1+P/P<SUB>1/2</SUB>)<SUP>b/2</SUP> (Eq. 2)
where I is the EPR amplitude and P is the microwave power.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Microwave power saturation of the gmax 5.4 component of the Co(II) signals. Continuous traces are computer fits (Equation 2). [R2] = 0.5 mM in all samples. EPR microwave power saturation curves of A are 4 equivalents of Co(II)/apoR2 at 3.6 K (black-square) and 5.8 K (open circle ). B, 6 equivalents of Co(II)/apoR2 at 3.6 K (black-triangle) and 5.8 K (down-triangle) and 3 mM Co(II) in buffer (black-down-triangle ) at 3.6 K (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 20% glycerol).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Microwave power saturation P1/2 values of the gmax 5.4 component at 3.6 and 5.8 K of Co(II)-substituted R2 and Co(II) in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 20% glycerol
P1/2 and b values were estimated from computer fitting of the microwave saturation curves. The P1/2 values do change slightly with b = 1; letting b float improves the fitting.

The P1/2 values were estimated to 0.2-0.3 mW at 3.6 K and 8-16 mW at 5.8 K with b ~ 0.7 or b = 1 for both Co(II)-R2 samples. The P1/2 for the Co(II) in buffer was estimated to 0.3 mW at 3.6 K. The saturation behaviors of the three samples are similar (Table I). In the Co(II)-R2 samples, there might be a small fraction of mononuclear Co(II) bound to R2. Integration of the EPR signal under nonsaturating conditions demonstrates a 20-30% decrease at 5.8 K compared with 3.6 K. A negative D value would have increased the EPR-active Co(II) signal when the temperature was increased. Taken together with the microwave saturation behavior this shows a positive D value for the EPR-active species in Co(II)-R2 (37, 38). The acid-treated Co(II)-R2 also has EPR properties identical to the high spin EPR-active Co(II) in Co(II)-R2 and in buffer (data not shown). The observed cobalt signals in all three of these samples have similar positive and large D values. This validates the quantitation of the EPR-active Co(II) in Co(II)-R2. It also shows that the majority of the EPR-active Co(II) present in mouse Co(II)-R2 is very similar to Co(II) in buffer.

Fig. 4 presents the amount of EPR-active Co(II) in the Co(II)-R2 samples (dotted line) when increasing amounts of Co(II) are added to apoR2. At 100%, all Co(II) added is EPR-active, whereas lower values show the presence of EPR-silent cobalt. With 1 equivalent of Co(II)/R2 dimer, ~ 90% of the cobalt is EPR-active. Addition of more equivalents of Co(II) decreases the intensity of the signal compared with the same amount of cobalt in buffer. This demonstrates the formation of the dinuclear cobalt site that is magnetically coupled and may therefore be EPR-silent in perpendicular mode. The lowest relative amount of EPR-active Co(II) and a nearly saturated cluster is at ~ 6 equivalents of Co(II) added per R2 dimer. Adding 8 equivalents of Co(II)/R2 dimer gave an EPR signal with ~ 60% intensity compared with the same amount of Co(II) in buffer. If R2 is saturated when 8 equivalents of Co(II) is added per R2 dimer this should give an intensity of the observed S = 3/2 Co(II) EPR signal corresponding to ~ 50% of the signal observed for the same amount of Co(II) in buffer. The result indicates nearly saturated dinuclear sites with ~ 4 equivalents of EPR-silent dinuclear Co(II)/R2 dimer when 8 equivalents are added. The titration illustrates that the affinity for Co(II) is low, and more than 4 Co(II)/R2 dimer is needed to occupy fully the four well defined metal binding sites in the mouse R2 dimer.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Formation of the dinuclear Co(II) cluster followed by EPR and light absorption. The dotted line represents the EPR-active Co(II) in Co(II)-R2 when different amounts of Co(II) are added to apoR2 ([R2] = 0.5 mM). 100% is when all Co(II) added to R2 is EPR-active. The solid line represents the sigmoidal fitting of the data of the A550 nm absorption band intensity when different amounts of Co(II) are added to apoR2 (using the program Origin 6.1; OriginLab Corporation, www.OriginLab.com). Similar fittings are obtained using a four-binding Adair equation (with four largely different binding constants), a cooperative equation or a Hill equation with the Hill coefficient in the range from 4 to 4.7 (using the program GraFit Version 4 and nonlinear regression, Erithacus Software Limited, www.erithacus.com/grafit).

Light Absorption Spectra of Co(II)-R2-- The visible spectrum of the fully occupied Co(II)-R2 (Fig. 5A, solid line) is clearly red shifted and more intense than the spectrum of Co(II) in buffer solution (Fig. 5A, dotted line). The induction of this red shift was followed spectrophotometrically by adding increasing amounts of cobalt to the apoR2 protein (Figs. 4 and 5B). The appearance of the 550 nm absorption maximum was not significant until the addition of 2-3 equivalents of cobalt/R2 dimer and saturated by ~ 7 equivalents of Co(II)/R2 dimer. The creation of the dinuclear cluster observed by EPR also confirmed this low affinity for cobalt. The affinity toward cobalt is lower for mouse R2 compared with that reported for cobalt-substituted E. coli R2 where there is saturation with 4 equivalents of Co(II)/R2 dimer (28).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Cobalt-dependent formation of the pink chromophore in R2. A, visible absorption spectra of Co(II) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 20% glycerol ([Co(II)] = 24 mM) (dotted line), and R2 saturated with cobalt ([R2] = 0.5 mM) (solid line). Molar absorptivity is given per Co(II). B, Co(II) titration of apoR2. Visible absorption spectra of apoR2 in the presence of 1 (. . . . . ), 2 (×), 3 (), 4 (down-triangle), 5 (black-square), 7 (black-down-triangle ), and 8 (- - -) molar equivalents of Co(II) ion/R2 dimer are shown.

The formation of the 550 nm chromophore when cobalt binds to apoR2 can be fitted to a sigmoidal binding model (Fig. 4, solid line). This indicates a strong cooperative interaction between the protein and the dinuclear Co(II) center. The dinuclear site is formed concomitantly with a strong 550 nm absorption. Possibly both Co(II) ions contribute to the observed pink color because both binding sites of Co(II) have almost the same geometry (see below, Fig. 7B). The affinity for the dinuclear Co(II) cluster is low because 2 mM Co(II) is needed for half-saturation of 0.5 mM R2. Co(II) binding to R2 followed by light absorption at pH 7.6 corresponds well with the EPR behavior because both demonstrate the presence of a fully occupied dinuclear site at 7-8 equivalents of Co(II)/R2 dimer.

Comparison with the Cobalt-substituted R2 from E. coli-- The anaerobic cobalt-substituted R2 from E. coli showed a pink color and had a very similar absorption spectra regarding intensity and lambda max to what we have observed for the Co(II)-substituted R2 from mouse (28). The EPR spectrum of Co(II)-R2 from E. coli is typical for S = 3/2 high spin mononuclear Co(II) species, and the intensity of the signal is consistent with the Co(II) atoms not being magnetically coupled when bound to the R2 protein. More hyperfine structure and the presence of a rhombic component are seen for the EPR-active Co(II) in the cobalt-substituted E. coli R2 than we observe for the cobalt-substituted mouse R2 at pH 7.6. This is probably due to the fact that the EPR-active Co(II) observed for mouse R2 is mostly Co(II) in buffer and not mononuclear cobalt bound to R2 as in E. coli R2. For our cobalt-substituted mouse R2 protein, most of the cobalt was silent in perpendicular mode EPR.

Evidence for a Ferromagnetically Coupled Dinuclear Cobalt Cluster in R2-- The EPR and light absorption studies of Co(II)-R2 were performed at pH 7.6. In this paper, we present the first crystal structure of a fully occupied metal site in mouse R2 at pH 6 (see below, Fig. 7). At pH above that, the crystals dissolve in the buffer. To be able to compare the EPR and light absorption results with the crystal structure, we prepared a Co(II)-R2 EPR sample as close to crystal conditions as possible. The EPR spectrum of the Co(II)-R2 prepared in 0.1 M MES, pH 6.0, 1.2 M NaCl, 20% glycerol, did show an EPR signal of high spin Co(II) S = 3/2, similar to what we observed when the sample was prepared at pH 7.6, although with a more pronounced shoulder at ~ 100 mT and possible hyperfine structure (Figs. 2E and 6A). At pH 6.0, the intensity of the S = 3/2 signal is also low compared with that of identical concentrations of cobalt in buffer (Fig. 2, D and E). This shows that if the reconstitution is carried out at pH 7.6 or 6.0, most of the cobalt bound to R2 will form magnetically coupled dinuclear sites. In addition, the pH 6.0 sample contains a low field perpendicular mode EPR signal at g ~ 9.2, both at 127 µW (Fig. 2E) and more clearly visible at 10 mW (Fig. 6A), where Co(II) in buffer is partially saturated. The g ~ 9.2 signal is not clearly visible even at a microwave power of 10 mW for the sample prepared at pH 7.6 (data not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The presence of an integer spin EPR signal. A, the X-band EPR spectra of 6 Co(II)-R2 at pH 6.0, [R2] = 0.3 mM, 10 mW, 3.8 K, perpendicular mode EPR at 9.6 GHz. B, same sample as in A, 127 µW, 3.8 K, parallel mode EPR at 9.4 GHz (four accumulations). C, same sample as in A, 0.5 mW, parallel mode EPR at 9.4 GHz, 3.8 K (solid line) and 10 K (dotted line). D, same sample as in A, 127 µW, parallel mode EPR at 9.4 GHz, 3.8 K, (solid line, four accumulations) and 8 Co(II)-R2 at pH 7.6, 127 µW, parallel mode EPR at 9.4 GHz, 3.8 K, [R2] = 0.5 mM (dotted line, four accumulations). All spectra were obtained with a 1.0 mT modulation amplitude.

In parallel mode EPR, the only signal observed for the Co(II)-R2 samples prepared at both pH 7.6 and 6.0 at 3.8 K is a low field signal at g ~ 12 (Fig. 6, B and D). The parallel mode EPR signal can be described as a broad negative peak, expanding from 20 to 120 mT at X-band. The Co(II) S = 3/2 signal is no longer EPR-active as expected. The g ~ 12 signal is strong enough to be observed below 0.1 mW. The shape of the parallel mode signal as well as the shift in g value compared with the signal observed in perpendicular mode EPR is typical for integer spin signals (42, 43). The integer spin signal observed for the diferrous form of the mouse R2 protein showed a similar behavior (44).

The intensity of the g ~ 12 integer spin signal at pH 6.0 decreased when the temperature rose to 10 K (Fig. 6C) and was hardly observed at higher temperatures, indicating that the signal arises from a ground-state transition. The observed g value at 12 is the expected theoretical geff value for an Ms = ± 3 transition. We assign the signal to arise from the Ms = ± 3 ground state spin system that would arise from a ferromagnetic coupling of the two high spin S = 3/2 Co(II) ions in the dinuclear cobalt site.

Both ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic coupling are observed in other dinuclear cobalt-substituted proteins. A ferromagnetic-coupled dinuclear cobalt center was observed in a Co(II)-substituted hemocyanin (45) and a Co(II)-substituted aminopeptidase from Aeromonas proteolytica (46). The cobalt-substituted dinuclear form of aminopeptidase from A. proteolytica showed that most of the Co(II) added to the protein has no mononuclear S = 3/2 EPR signal. A signal with a g value ~ 12 was observed in parallel mode EPR. This signal is very similar to what we observe for the cobalt-substituted mouse R2. Bennett and Holz (46) assign this signal to a S = 3 spin system that would arise from a ferromagnetic coupling of two high spin S = 3/2 Co(II) ions in the active site of the aminopeptidase (46).

The appearance of the integer spin EPR signal was found to depend on pH. As pH decreases from 7.6 to 6.0, the intensity of the Ms = ±3 signal increases (Fig. 6D). Ms = ±3 signals are difficult to quantify because no good standard exists to enable measurement of this type of signal. The reason why the signal is more pronounced at pH 6.0 than 7.6 is probably because of Delta  (another zero field splitting parameter in integer spin EPR) being higher at pH 7.6 and therefore difficult to detect with X-band EPR (hv approx  0.3 cm-1). The resonance condition for an integer spin signal is (42, 43):
(hv)<SUP>2</SUP>=&Dgr;<SUP>2</SUP>+(&bgr;g<SUB><UP>eff</UP></SUB>B<UP>cos</UP>&thgr;)<SUP>2</SUP> (Eq. 3)
where Delta  is the zero field splitting of the spin doublet which gives rise to the resonance, geff is the effective g value along a principal axis of the zero field coordinate frame, and theta  is the angle between that principal axis and the static field B. Lowering the pH to 6.0 might lead to changes in Delta  to below or around 0.3 cm-1 so that a higher fraction becomes EPR-active under X-band parallel mode EPR conditions. Such a difference in Delta  was suggested to be the reason why an integer spin signal in the X-band parallel EPR mode for the diferrous form of the mouse R2 protein can be observed (44) and not for the diferrous form of the E. coli R2.

The perpendicular mode EPR signal from the sample prepared at pH 6.0 might consist of free Co(II) in the buffer overlapping with a rhombic signal as seen by the shoulder at 100 mT. This EPR signal resembles the signal observed for the cobalt-substituted R2 from E. coli protein (28) and could represent a mononuclear occupied metal site of mouse Co(II)-R2.

X-ray Structure of Co(II)-substituted R2 from Mouse-- In the first experiments, the mouse R2 crystals were cocrystallized with 3.8 equivalents of Co(II)/R2 dimer at pH 4.7. These conditions only led to crystals with partially mononuclear occupancy of the metal binding site 2 (the site farthest away from the radical Tyr-177, see below). Both EPR and light absorption data had revealed that the affinity for Co(II) is weak. This might be because of the open structure around the metal site leading to loss of bound cobalt into the solution as for iron or because the cobalt is not the natural element for R2. To get fully occupied metal centers, the 4 equivalents of Co(II)/R2 dimer had to be increased. To find the proper conditions for a fully occupied metal site, the crystals were studied under a microscope to determine the incubation time and the right concentration of Co(II) to use in the soaking solution.

In this work we managed to raise the pH in the Co(II)-R2 crystals to 6. The mono-iron mouse R2 structure was solved at pH 4.7 (16). In both structures, only residues 65-352 of the 390 amino acids are seen in the electron density maps, indicating that the N- and C-terminal ends are flexible. Two peaks in the proposed metal binding site are clearly seen in the difference-Fourier maps 2Fo-Fc showing that the cobalt ions were bound to the protein with full occupancies after soaking the crystals in a 5 mM Co(II) solution for 3 h at room temperature (Fig. 7A). Average temperature factors for dicobalt R2 mouse protein main chain and side chains are 36.8 and 38.2 Å2, respectively; for the site 1 cobalt ion, 37.4 Å2; and for the site 2 cobalt ion, 29.4 Å2. This shows that site 2 has a higher occupancy of cobalt ions and less flexibility than site 1 at pH 6. 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   The 2.4 Å resolution structure of the dinuclear cobalt cluster of mouse R2. A, electron density map (2Fo-Fc) contoured at 2sigma (blue) and 6sigma (red) for the metal binding site in mouse Co(II)-R2. The cobalt ions are seen in green. The figure was drawn with Bobscript (65), a modified version of Molscript (66). B, the dicobalt center of R2 with ligands Asp-139, Glu-170, His-173, Glu-233, His-270, Glu-267, and the radical site Tyr-177. The cobalt-ligand interactions are marked with dotted lines. The figure was made in Bobscript (65).

Fig. 7A shows the electron density, and Fig. 7B shows a model of the metal ligands, the cobalt ions, and the stable free radical site Tyr-177. All residues that make interactions with the cobalt ions are well defined in the density map. The glutamic acids at 170 and 267 have a bidentate bridging binding mode to the cobalt ions. The binding of Asp-139 and His-173 to the Co(II) in site 1 (Co1) and Glu-233 and His-270 to the Co(II) in site 2 (Co2) make both metal ions 4-coordinated. The distance between the cobalt ions is 3.40 Å (Table II).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Interatomic distances (Å) in Co(II)-R2 from mouse, diferrous R2 from E. coli, and diferrous MMOH (M. capsulatus)

Mononuclear and Dinuclear Cobalt R2 Mouse Structures-- The protein crystallizes only at pH 4.7, and at this pH when cocrystallized with cobalt only one of the metal sites is occupied with mononuclear cobalt (site 2). The occupancy of only one of the metal binding sites is the same as was observed in the first x-ray structure of mouse R2 by Kauppi et al. (16). The mono-iron mouse R2 crystals were soaked in a solution of ferrous salt at pH 4.7. This increased the occupancy on the already occupied site without any detectable binding at the second site. We managed to increase the pH in our crystals by simultaneously soaking the crystals in a buffer solution containing Co(II). This treatment also led to occupancy of site 1. A comparison of the monocobalt-substituted structure at pH 4.7 and the dicobalt-substituted structure at pH 6 of mouse R2 is presented in Fig. 8A. In the monocobalt structure, only site 2 is occupied by cobalt ions. The cobalt atom is 4-coordinated, and the ligands are Glu-170, His-270, Glu-233, and Glu-267. Greatest flexibility is shown by the carboxylate ligands upon binding of the second cobalt ion. The occupation of site 1 moves Asp-139 closer to the metal site, and a change in the orientation is observed. The orientation of Glu-233 is also altered. In the dinuclear structure, Glu-267 and Glu-170 make carboxylate bridges between the cobalt ions. The histidines (at 173 and 270) do not change significantly. They form the rigid framework of the binding site. Upon increasing the pH to 6, we do not observe any changes in the position of the stable radical Tyr-177 or the hydrogen bonding pattern and position of the amino acids involved in the radical transport pathway. Neither do we observe any changes in the acceptability and the hydrophobicity of the environment around the metal site compared with the structure at pH 4.7 solved by Kauppi et al. (16).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Comparisons with mononuclear cobalt-substituted R2. A, comparison of the binding mode of cobalt in the mononuclear (light blue) and the dinuclear (pink) metal center of mouse R2. The figure was made using Molscript (66). B, the mononuclear cobalt center of mouse R2 in light blue compared with the structure of the mononuclear iron center of mouse R2 in dark blue (PDB 1XSM). The metal ions are seen in gray (iron) and black (cobalt).

Comparisons of the Mononuclear Co(II) and Iron Mouse R2 Structures (Both at pH 4.7)-- The monocobalt structure is overall similar to the previously reported mono-iron structure (16) (Fig. 8B). The iron ion (probably Fe(III)) is located closer to Glu-267 and has a bidentate binding mode. In the monocobalt structure, the cobalt ion makes only one interaction with this residue. His-270 and His-173 have similar orientations in the two structures. In Glu-170, Glu-233, and Asp-139, small changes in the orientation are observed. Other significant differences in the structures are only seen in the flexible loop areas on the surface of the enzyme and probably have no influence on the formation of the active site in R2.

Structural Implications: Co(II)-R2 from Mouse Compared with the Reduced Wild Type of E. coli R2 and MMOH-- Soluble MMOH and class I RNR are members of the same class of iron-oxygen proteins (7). Although the chemistry performed by the iron-oxygen proteins and their overall structures differ markedly, some of their active sites can be strikingly similar. Their metal sites contain carboxylate and histidine ligands. The essential carboxylate ligands are shown to be able to adopt several conformations that can also vary with the oxidation state of the metals (5, 19, 25-27, 47, 48). Carboxylate shifts are believed to be important to accommodate different redox states during redox cycling of these kinds of centers.

The x-ray structures of the dinuclear clusters of the cobalt-substituted mouse R2 and the diferrous R2 E. coli are similar (Fig. 9, pink and black structures, respectively). In both complexes, the metal ions are 4-coordinated and have the same binding mode to their ligands. The histidines His-173(His-118) and His-270(His-241) show very little variation in their orientation in the different x-ray structures (E. coli numbering in parentheses). Significant variations in the position of all of the carboxylate ligands Glu-267/Glu-233/Asp-139/Glu-170 are observed. Compared with E. coli, both Glu-233(Glu-204) and Asp-139(Asp-84) move closer to the metal binding sites forcing the metal atoms closer together, and therefore the metal distance between Co1 and Co2 becomes 0.5 Å shorter that the corresponding metal to metal distance in the diferrous wild type E. coli (3.9 Å) (19) (Table II). This agrees well with the EPR studies showing that the cobalt ions in mouse R2 have a strong magnetic coupling, whereas this is not the case for the diferrous ions in E. coli R2, which are weakly antiferromagnetically coupled (49). The most interesting change that we observe in the cobalt-substituted mouse structure compared with that of the reduced wild type E. coli structure is the carboxylate shift seen for the bridging carboxylate ligand Glu-267 compared with the E. coli counterpart Glu-238.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Superposition of the Co(II)-R2 from mouse, diferrous E. coli R2, and diferrous MMOH from M. capsulatus metal sites. The dicobalt center of mouse R2 (pink) displayed with metal-binding ligands and Tyr-177, compared with the diferrous center of E. coli R2 (black, PDB 1XIK) and the chemically reduced wild type MMOH from M. capsulatus (green, PDB 1FYZ). The metal ions and water molecules are seen in gray and red, respectively, and outlined in their respective colors. The figure was made using Molscript (66).

Even though mouse and E. coli R2 proteins belong to the same RNR class (class Ia), and their metal ions ligands are conserved, several differences in the behavior of these two clusters are observed. The redox properties of the R2 protein from mouse are significantly different from those of the R2 from E. coli. For example, the reduced mouse R2 in glycerol exhibits an integer EPR signal with a g value observed around 14 (44) which is not shown for the E. coli enzyme. The mixed valence form (Fe(II)Fe(III)) of mouse R2 can be induced by a mild chemical reduction with a 30% yield (44, 50). In the E. coli R2 protein, this redox state is only produced in small amounts. Even using drastic conditions as high pH only increases the yield to ~ 5%. The coupling between the iron atoms in the oxidized state is weaker in mouse than in E. coli (51, 52). The redox properties of the mouse R2 iron-oxygen center resemble those of MMOH. In MMOH, both the integer spin signal in the reduced form and the mixed valence state is observed (7, 53, 54). The x-ray structure of the dinuclear cobalt cluster in R2 from mouse reveals that it is similar to the chemically reduced di-iron form of MMOH from Methylococcus capsulatus (48, 55) (Fig. 9, MMOH represented in green). The reduced structure of MMOH contains two iron centers bridged by one µ-1,3- and one µ-1,1-carboxylate ligand. One histidine and one monodentate glutamate are coordinated to each iron, and additional water is bound to one of the irons. Both iron atoms in the metal center are 5-coordinated. The Glu-144 in the MMOH structure and the Glu-170 in the cobalt-substituted mouse R2 structure are in similar orientations as are the histidines (Fig. 9). MMOH has a water molecule that hydrogen bonds to Glu-114. This water is absent in both the cobalt-substituted mouse R2 and the diferrous E. coli R2 structure. The orientation of the carboxylate ligands in the Co(II)-R2 mouse structure resembles the MMOH counterparts more than the E. coli counterparts do. This might contribute to the observed 3.4 Å Co1-Co2 distance in Co(II)-R2 being closer to the 3.3 Å Fe1-Fe2 distance in MMOH than the 3.9 Å Fe1-Fe2 distance in E. coli R2 (Table II).

In the reduced form of MMOH, Glu-243 has a bidentate chelating mode to Fe2 along with monodentate bridging between the iron atoms. This µ-(eta 1,eta 2) coordination is suggested by Eklund et al. (5), Andersson et al. (47), and Merkx et al. (56) to be a well suited conformation for binding of oxygen without any large structural changes in the di-iron-oxygen cluster. Such an orientation is also found in the reduced MMOH mimic mutant D84E of E. coli R2 (57). The dioxygen bound state has not been trapped in R2 because the iron-oxygen species is highly reactive. In the crystal structure of the azide-soaked R2 E. coli mutant F208A/Y122F, azide binds to the iron farthest away from tyrosine 122 (site 2), inducing a carboxylate shift with Glu-238 (47). In analogy with how azide binds, oxygen is suggested to bind at site 2 and induce this carboxylate shift. The observed conformations of the carboxylate ligand, Glu-267 in cobalt-substituted mouse R2 resembles the MMOH counterpart Glu-243 more than the E. coli counterpart Glu-238, this might enhance the protein affinity for oxygen binding. Also, in an oxidized structure of manganese-substituted wild type E. coli R2, which probably contains a mixed valence state (Mn(II)Mn(III)), a similar carboxylate shift is observed for the bridging carboxylate ligand Glu-238 (26). The flexibility seen in Glu-238 makes this amino acid a key residue controlling oxygen activation in E. coli R2. A preliminary three-dimensional structure of the reduced diferrous form of the mouse R2 protein confirms an orientation of ligand Glu-267 (data not shown) related to what is seen in the structures of the counterparts of MMOH and the azide-soaked R2 E. coli mutant F208A/Y122F. The Co(II)-R2 structure could therefore serve as a functional model for the very air-sensitive native diferrous enzyme. Information on reduced R2 is essential for determining the mechanism of oxygen activation in RNR and the radical generation cycle. Such information will also aid the interpretation of spectroscopic data. For example, the integer spin EPR signal of the diferrous form of mouse R2 observed either with perpendicular or parallel mode EPR has been analyzed further by using saturation magnetization (44). The two ferrous ions were assigned the same sign and magnitude for the D values, indicating no or weak magnetic coupling in this study. The ferromagnetic coupling of the cobalt ions in Co(II)-R2 could support another possible interpretation of the saturation magnetization data assuming different signs of the D values and a weak magnetic coupling between the ferrous irons. This is consistent with magnetic circular dichroism analysis of both the diferrous form of R2 from E. coli (49) and mouse (58).2

The stability of the iron/radical center is the most striking difference between the mouse and the E. coli RNR R2 proteins (5, 7). The metal site of the mouse enzyme is labile at physiological conditions, and a continuous supply of ferrous iron and oxygen is needed to keep the enzyme fully active (21, 59, 60). The expression of the mouse R2 protein is normally regulated by the cell cycle (61, 62). A novel study indicated that during low oxygen (hypoxic) conditions the human R2 protein might be an oncoprotein (63). The first step from resting apoR2 in the cells is binding of Fe(II) to apoprotein and the subsequent reaction with oxygen to form the stable tyrosyl radical and the µ-oxo-diferric center. It was suggested recently by Bollinger and co-workers (64) that the formation of the reactive Fe(II)-R2 complex is slower than the ensuing steps in which oxidized intermediates are formed for mouse R2. In the E. coli R2 reaction, formation of the complex is slightly faster (5-10-fold) than the final radical-producing step. The greater flexibility seen in all of the four carboxylate ligands of mouse R2 compared with E. coli R2 might contribute to the low affinity for Fe(II) or Co(II) and to the fact that the Fe(II) incorporation in mouse is slower. The same R2 mouse dimer has to carry out several redox cycles, as is also the case for MMOH. For the E. coli R2 enzyme the radical iron-oxygen cluster is stable (20) when formed, and the protein does not have to be reloaded with iron and oxygen again to create the radical needed for the reduction of the substrate. This might be one of the reasons why the bridging ligand Glu-267 in mouse has an orientation more suited for oxygen activation than that of the wild type E. coli counterpart Glu-238.

By studying the Co(II) binding properties of apoR2 by EPR and x-ray crystallography, we show that the cobalt ions bind to the well defined metal ion binding sites of R2. We managed to increase the pH in the mouse R2 crystals from the previously reported 4.7 to 6. The cobalt-substituted structure of mouse R2 is a good tool for probing the so far unknown coordination environment of the metal ions bound to mouse R2 and is a useful structural model of the unstable and native diferrous form of the protein (58). The observed orientation of the bridging ligand Glu-267 might be important for the continuous regeneration of the more exposed metal site of native mouse R2 compared with the E. coli R2 enzyme. This ferromagnetically coupled cobalt center might also have relevance for other native cobalt-containing enzymes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful for help by the staff at beamlines ID14-1, ID14-3, and BM01A Swiss-Norwegian Beam Line (SNBL) at ESRF, Grenoble. We thank Professor Lars Thelander, University of Umeå, for generously providing the E. coli strain overproducing mouse R2.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Norwegian Research Council (to K. K. A.), the Norwegian Cancer Society (to K. K. A.), European Union Training and Mobility of Researchers Program ERBMRFXCT980207, Iron-Oxygen Protein network (to K. K. A.), and the synchrotron group of the Oslo region founded by the Norwegian Research Council.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1h0o and 1h0n) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 47-2285-6625; Fax: 47-2285-4443; E-mail: k.k.andersson@biokjemi.uio.no.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203358200

2 K. R. Strand, Y.-S. Yang, K. K. Andersson, and E. I. Solomon, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: RNR, ribonucleotide reductase; CNS, crystallography NMR software; Co(II)-R2, cobalt-containing form of mouse R2; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; MMOH, methane monooxygenase hydroxylase; mT, millitesla.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Thelander, L., and Reichard, P. (1979) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 48, 133-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Reichard, P. (1988) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57, 349-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Reichard, P. (1993) Science 260, 1773-1777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Jordan, A., and Reichard, P. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 71-98[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Eklund, H., Uhlin, U., Färnegårdh, M., Logan, D. T., and Nordlund, P. (2001) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 77, 177-268[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Sintchak, M. D., Arjara, G., Kellogg, B. A., Stubbe, J., and Drennan, C. L. (2002) Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 293-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Andersson, K. K., and Gräslund, A. (1995) Adv. Inorg. Biochem. 43, 359-408
8. Nordlund, P., Sjöberg, B.-M., and Eklund, H. (1990) Nature 345, 593-598[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Stubbe, J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 5329-5332[Free Full Text]
10. Uhlin, U., and Eklund, H. (1994) Nature 370, 533-539[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Sjöberg, B.-M. (1997) Struct. Bond. 88, 139-173
12. Bollinger, J. M., Jr., Tong, W. H., Ravi, N., Huynh, B. H., Edmondson, D. E., and Stubbe, J. (1994) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 8024-8032
13. Rova, U., Goodtzova, K., Ingemarson, R., Behravan, G., Gräslund, A., and Thelander, L. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 4267-4275[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Ekberg, M., Pötsch, S., Sandin, E., Thunnissen, M., Nordlund, P., Sahlin, M., and Sjöberg, B.-M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21003-21008[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Thelander, L., and Gräslund, A. (1994) Metal Ions Biol. Syst. 30, 109-129
16. Kauppi, B., Nielsen, B. B., Ramaswamy, S., Kjøller-Larsen, I., Thelander, M., Thelander, L., and Eklund, H. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 262, 706-720[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Tanaka, H., Arakawa, H., Yamaguchi, T., Shiraishi, K., Fukuda, S., Matsui, K., Takei, Y., and Nakamura, Y. (2000) Nature 404, 42-49[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Guittet, O., Hakansson, P., Voevodskaya, N., Fridd, S., Gräslund, A., Arakawa, H., Nakamura, Y., and Thelander, L. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 27, 40647-40651
19. Logan, D. T., Su, X.-D., Åberg, A., Regnstöm, K., Hajdu, J., Eklund, H., and Nordlund, P. (1996) Structure 9, 1053-1057
20. Atkin, C. L., Thelander, L., Reichard, P., and Lange, G. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 7464-7472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Mann, G. J., Gräslund, A., Ochiai, E.-I., Ingemarson, R., and Thelander, L. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 1939-1947[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Schmidt, P. P., Rova, U., Katterle, B., Thelander, L., and Gräslund, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21463-21472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Banci, L., Bencini, A., Benelinni, C., Gatteschi, D., and Zanchini, C. (1982) Struct. Bond. 52, 37-86
24. Bertini, I., and Luchianti, C. (1984) Adv. Inorg. Biochem. 6, 71-111[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Atta, M., Nordlund, P., Åberg, A., Eklund, H., and Fontecave, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20682-20688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Högbom, M., Andersson, M. E., and Nordlund, P. (2001) J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 6, 315-323[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Högbom, M., Huque, Y., Sjöberg, B.-M., and Nordlund, P. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 1381-1389[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Elgren, T. E., Ming, L.-J., and Que, L. J. (1994) Inorg. Chem. 33, 891-894
29. Roderick, S. L., and Matthews, B. W. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 3907-3912[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kobayashi, M., and Shimizu, S. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 261, 1-9[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Nielsen, B. B., Kauppi, B., Thelander, M., Thelander, L., Kjøller-Larsen, I., and Eklund, H. (1995) FEBS Lett. 373, 310-312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326
34. Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., GrosseKunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nigles, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]