![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 37, 34264-34270, September 13, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Laboratory of Cellular Biochemistry, RIKEN (The Institute
of Physical and Chemical Research), Saitama 351-0198, Japan
Received for publication, May 2, 2002, and in revised form, June 19, 2002
Employing the expression cloning technique, we
cloned a novel scavenger receptor that is structurally unrelated to
other scavenger receptors. The cloned receptor contained
fasciclin (Fas-1), epidermal growth factor
(EGF)-like, laminin-type EGF-like, and
link domains. Based on the domain structures, we
temporarily named it FEEL-1 (fasciclin,
EGF-like, laminin-type EGF-like, and
link domain-containing scavenger receptor-1). A data base
search suggested the presence of a paralogous gene of FEEL-1, the
full-length cDNA of this gene was also cloned, and its nucleotide
sequence was determined. The deduced amino acid sequence of the clone
indicated that its domain organization is similar to FEEL-1, and we
named this clone FEEL-2. The effect of monoclonal antibodies against
FEEL-1 indicated that FEEL-1 is the major receptor for
1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyl-indocarbo-cyanine perchlorate (DiI)-labeled acetylated low density lipoprotein
(DiI-Ac-LDL) in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Reverse
transcription and PCR analysis revealed that both FEEL-1 and FEEL-2
were expressed in several tissues and expressed highly in the spleen
and lymph node. On the other hand, only FEEL-1 was expressed in
mononuclear cells, particularly resting CD14+ cells.
The transient expression of FEEL-1 and FEEL-2 in Chinese hamster
ovary cells demonstrated that both FEELs could bind to DiI-Ac-LDL. Both
receptors were also found to bind to Gram-negative and Gram-positive
bacteria. These results suggest that FEELs play important roles in the
defense mechanisms against bacterial infection. Finally, the phenotypic
effect of the inhibition of FEEL-1 on vascular remodeling was tested
in vitro using the Matrigel tube formation assay, and we
found a marked reduction in the degree of cell-cell interaction in
anti-FEEL-1 monoclonal antibody-treated cells, suggesting the role of
this receptor in angiogenesis.
Scavenger receptors mediate the endocytosis of chemically modified
lipoproteins, such as acetylated low density lipoprotein (Ac-LDL)1 and oxidized LDL
(Ox-LDL), and have been implicated in the pathogenesis of
atherosclerosis. The scavenger receptor gene family comprises a series
of unlinked genes encoding membrane proteins with multiple ligand
binding activity (1-5). We have cloned a subgroup of this family, the
class F (6, 7) receptor termed SREC (scavenger receptor expressed by
endothelial cell), from a cDNA library prepared from human
umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). SREC mediates the binding
and degradation of Ac-LDL. On the other hand, several scavenger
receptors other than SREC have been reported to be expressed in
endothelial cells (8, 9). In this study, we cloned a novel
scavenger receptor termed FEEL-1, which is expressed in endothelial
cells and is structurally unrelated to other scavenger receptors by
expression cloning. The receptor comprises unique domain structures and
has binding activity to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Moreover, an in vitro tube formation assay suggested that
the receptor might play a role in angiogenesis. Initial
characterization of this novel scavenger receptor together with the
subsequently cloned related receptor, FEEL-2, is reported.
Cell Culture--
The parental CHO-K1 cell was obtained from the
RIKEN Cell Bank and cultured in Ham's F-12 medium with 10%
heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. Human coronary smooth muscle
cells, human coronary arterial endothelial cells, and human umbilical
vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from Clonetics and
maintained in SmGM2, EGM-MV, or EGM medium according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Human brain microvascular endothelial
cells were purchased from Applied Cell Biology Research Institute and
maintained according to the manufacturer's instructions.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis
were as described previously (10) using the ECL Plus Western blotting
Detection Reagents (Amersham Biosciences).
Expression Cloning of Novel Scavenger Receptors--
A cDNA
library was constructed using the pEAK8 vector (Edge BioSystems) and
SuperScriptTM plasmid system for cDNA synthesis and
plasmid cloning (Invitrogen) with poly(A)+ RNA
isolated from HUVECs. The resultant transformants were divided into small pools (~3,000 clones/pool), and the plasmid DNA was purified using the Plasmid Mini kit (Qiagen). The plasmid DNA was
transfected into COS-1 cells using LipofectAMINE Reagent (Invitrogen), and the transiently transfected cells were screened visually for endocytosis of fluorescent DiI-Ac-LDL in the presence of high density
lipoprotein (HDL) (100 µg/ml) and the monoclonal antibody against
SREC (30 µg/ml). A positive pool was serially subdivided and
retested to permit the purification of a single positive plasmid (7). Sequencing was performed using an automated
sequencer (PerkinElmer Life Sciences model 377-18 DNA
Sequencer, PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Cloning of FEEL-2 Full-length cDNA Clone--
A human
spleen cDNA library (Invitrogen) was screened in combination with
PCR and hybridization (11) employing two oppositely oriented primers
from the 5' region of FEEL-2 (5'-GCCAAGGCTGACTGTAAGAG-3' and
5'-TGGTTGGGTCCTGTCTGT-3').
Transient Expression of FEEL-1 or FEEL-2--
Plasmids carrying
the FEEL-1 or FEEL-2 cDNA under control of an
EF-1 Isolation of CHO-K1 Clones Stably Expressing FEEL-1 or
FEEL-2--
Stable expression of FEEL-1 or FEEL-2 cDNAs was
obtained by transfecting pcDNA3-based constructs (containing the
neomycin resistance gene) into parental CHO-K1 cells as
described (7). In this case, 72 h after transfection, cells
were passaged 1:50 into selective medium containing 0.2 mg/ml G418.
Cells resistant to G418 were subcloned by limiting dilution. Expression
of FEEL-1 or FEEL-2 by individual clones of cells was determined by
cellular association of DiI-Ac-LDL and by measuring fluorescence intensity.
Antibody Production and Purification--
Murine monoclonal
antibodies were produced using either CHO cells expressing SREC
(CHO-SREC) or CHO cells expressing FEEL-1 (CHO-FEEL-1) as an immunizer.
Approximately 2 × 105 cells were resuspended in 200 µl of saline and injected into female BALB/c mice intraperitoneally.
Two days after the final injection, the spleen was removed for
fusion with P3X63-Ag8.653 cells using polyethylene glycol 1500 (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). Spent media of the primary cultures were
screened by cellular enzyme-liked immunosorbent assay using parental
CHO-K1, CHO-SREC, or CHO-FEEL-1 cells. The isotype of the selected
monoclonal antibodies was determined by IsoStrip mouse monoclonal
antibody isotyping kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and the
monoclonal antibodies were purified on protein G-Sepharose Fast Flow
(Amersham Bioscience) (for anti-FEEL-1 clone FE-1-1 and FE-1-2) and
ImmunoPure Plus immobilized protein L (Pierce) (for anti-SREC clone
SR-4 and SR-15) column chromatography.
Specific Binding of DiI-Ac-LDL to FEEL-expressing CHO
Cells--
CHO-FEEL-1 or CHO-FEEL-2 cells grown to confluency in
24-well plates were incubated with 1.25-20 µg/ml DiI-Ac-LDL at
4 °C for 2 h. Nonspecific binding was measured in the presence
of 200 µg/ml Ac-LDL and subtracted from the data.
Inhibition of DiI-Ac-LDL Binding to CHO-SREC Cells by Various
Compounds--
The CHO-FEEL-1 cells were incubated with 2 µg/ml
DiI Ac-LDL at 4 °C for 2 h in the presence of various
inhibitors at 200 µg/ml. LDL (d = 1.019-1.063 g/ml)
was prepared as described previously (7). HDL was obtained from
INTRACEL. Acetylation of LDL was achieved by the addition of acetic
anhydride, whereas oxidation was carried out by incubating at 200 µg/ml LDL in 5 mM CuSO4 for 24 h at
37 °C according to a previously described method (7). To quantify
the amount of DiI-Ac-LDL, cells were washed twice with Ham's F-12
medium, washed with 10% fetal calf serum in PBS, and then washed twice
with PBS and solubilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and the fluorescence
intensity was measured at 590/35 nm with the excitation wavelength set
at 530/25 nm employing a fluorescence multiplate reader
(CytoFluorII, PerSeptive Biosystems).
Binding of BioParticles® Fluorescent Bacteria--
CHO cells
transiently transfected with either FEEL-1 or FEEL-2 cDNA in
the pEAK8 vector were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with 2 µg/ml
DiI-Ac-LDL or 30 µg/ml BioParticles® Escherichia coli BODIPY® FL conjugate or BioParticles® Staphylococcus
aureus BODIPY® FL conjugate (Molecular Probes) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. After solubilization with 0.1% Triton
X-100, cellular association of DiI-Ac-LDL or BioParticles®
fluorescent bacteria was measured by its fluorescence intensity
at 530/25 nm with the excitation wavelength set at 485/20 nm (for
BioParticles® fluorescent bacteria) employing a fluorescence multiple
plate reader (CytoFluorII, PerSeptive Biosystems).
Detection of FEEL-1 or FEEL-2 mRNA by Reverse Transcription
(RT)-PCR from Various Human Tissues--
RT-PCR analyses were carried
out according to the manufacturer's instructions using MTCTM cDNA
panels (human I, human II, human immune, and human blood fractions,
CLONTECH) or cDNAs derived from
poly(A)+ RNA prepared from cultured human primary cells
employing the SuperScriptTM first-strand synthesis system for
RT-PCR (Invitrogen). As FEEL-1-specific primers,
5'-AGCTTGCCTAGAGCTCAT-3' and 5'-CAGCCGCTCATGGACACC-3' were
employed, and as FEEL-2-specific primers, 5'-TTTTTCCTTTCTGAAGGC-3' and
5'-CATCCGGGCACTTGACTC-3' were employed.
Modulation of Endothelial Cell Tube Formation on Matrigel by
Monoclonal Antibody against FEEL-1--
The phenotypic effect of the
inhibition of FEEL-1 on vascular remodeling was tested by in
vitro tube formation assay using the MatrigelTM basement membrane
matrix (BD Labware). HUVECs were trypsinized and counted, and then
2.5 × 104 cells were plated onto a 96-well plate with
each well containing 100 µl of the Matrigel basement membrane matrix
in the presence of 30 µg/ml anti-FEEL-1 monoclonal antibody,
anti-SREC monoclonal antibody, or isotype control IgG1 (Sigma) and
cultured for 16 h. To quantify the extent of capillary-like tube
formation, photographs were taken on a Zeiss Axiovert 25 inverted phase
microscope equipped with a cooled CCD camera (C5810, Hamamatsu color
chilled 3 CCD camera, Japan). Images were captured using Adobe
PhotoShop, and areas surrounded by tube network were quantified
using Image Gauge software (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
To determine the contribution of SREC (7) to the activity of
scavenger receptor in endothelial cells, the effect of monoclonal antibodies against SREC (SR-4 and SR-15) on the receptor-mediated uptake of DiI-Ac-LDL was initially examined. Although the antibodies employed significantly inhibited the uptake of DiI-Ac-LDL in CHO-SREC, only slight inhibition was observed in HUVECs (data not shown). These
results suggest the presence of another scavenger receptor in
endothelial cells. The expression cloning of another scavenger receptor
was then conducted in the presence of monoclonal antibody against SREC.
As a result, several cDNA clones were identified, and nucleotide
sequencing revealed that they were all CD36 and LIMPII Analogous-1/scavenger
receptor class B type-I
(CLA-1/SR-BI) cDNA (12, 13). Since CLA-1/SR-BI is also known as an
HDL receptor, we examined the effect of HDL on the scavenger receptor
activity in HUVECs but found no significant inhibition of the activity (data not shown). We again attempted to clone a novel scavenger receptor in the presence of both monoclonal antibodies against SREC and
HDL to reduce the possibility of encountering SREC and CLA-1/SR-BI
cDNA clones during expression cloning. Finally, only one pool was
obtained, and we cloned a single plasmid DNA. Sequence analysis of the
clone indicated that it encodes a novel type I membrane protein (2570 amino acids) (Fig. 1A) that
has a unique domain structure organization. It has 7 fasciclin (Fas-1),
16 EGF-like, 2 laminin-type EGF-like, and 1 link domain near the transmembrane region (Fig. 1B). Based on these domain
structures, we temporarily named it FEEL-1 (fasciclin,
EGF-like-, laminin-type EGF-like, and
link domain-containing scavenger receptor-1). The data base
search revealed a match with functionally uncharacterized human
cDNA, KIAA0246 from KG-1 cells (GenBankTM accession
number D87433) (14), and stabilin-1 cDNA (GenBankTM
accession number AJ275213) and sequence from the human genome sequencing projects, chromosome 3p21.1-9 (GenBankTM
accession number AC006208).
Data base analysis also suggested the presence of a paralogous gene
(15) of FEEL-1 (GenBankTM accession number AL133021,
cDNA DKFZp434E0321). Then a full-length cDNA of this paralogous
gene was cloned, and its nucleotide sequence was determined. The
deduced amino acid sequence indicated that it contained a domain
organization similar to that of FEEL-1, and we named it FEEL-2 (Fig.
1B). It has 7 fasciclin (Fas-1), 15 EGF-like, 2 laminin-type
EGF-like, and 1 link domain near the transmembrane region (Fig.
1B). The overall amino acid sequence identity of FEEL-2 with
FEEL-1 is 39.8%, and 1023 amino acids are identical between FEEL-1 and
FEEL-2 (Fig. 1A).
The fasciclin (Fas-1) domain is originally found in fasciclin I that is
expressed on subsets of axon pathways during neuronal development in
the grasshopper (16), and Fas-1-containing molecules such as As for the intracellular domain, it should be mentioned here that
intracellular amino acid sequences, namely NPVF and NPLY, found in
FEEL-1 and FEEL-2, respectively, serve as an endocytosis signal of
DiI-Ac-LDL. The role of these motifs in the endocytosis of DiI-Ac-LDL
will be reported elsewhere.
After the screening of the human spleen cDNA library, an
alternatively spliced variant that encodes the soluble form of FEEL-1 was cloned, and its exon and intron junction were determined by comparison with genomic DNA sequence (GenBankTM accession
number AC006208). Whether this alternatively spliced form of FEEL-1 is
expressed in tissues is not yet known. However, it is conceivable that
such a receptor in soluble form modulates the pathophysiological
function of FEEL-1 by competing with the ligands (25-28).
The binding of DiI-Ac-LDL was assessed following incubation of the
CHO-FEEL-1 or CHO-FEEL-2 cells with DiI-Ac-LDL. Saturation binding of
DiI-Ac-LDL was observed at 4 °C (Fig.
2A). Scatchard analysis (Fig.
2A, insets) showed the presence of a single class of receptors, and the calculated Kd was 6.9 and 6.6 µg/ml DiI-Ac-LDL for FEEL-1 and FEEL-2, respectively (~13
nM DiI-Ac-LDL), which is comparable with the value for
scavenger receptors on HUVECs (29). It should be noted here that the
binding activity of the FEEL-1-expressing cell was rather low when
compared with that of FEEL-2 expressing cells. It seems that
overexpression of FEEL-1 is not favorable to the isolation of stable
transformants of FEEL-1 in CHO cells.
FEEL-1, a Novel Scavenger Receptor with in
Vitro Bacteria-binding and Angiogenesis-modulating
Activities*
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
promoter (in the pEAK8 vector) or mock pEAK8 vector were transiently expressed in CHO-K1 cells using LipofectAMINE reagent
(Invitrogen) (7). Transient expression of gene activity was tested at
48 h after the start of transfection.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (89K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Primary structures of
FEEL-1 and FEEL-2. A, alignment of the deduced amino
acid (AA) sequences. The deduced amino acid sequences are
aligned by the ClastalW program. Asterisks indicate
the identical amino acids between FEEL-1 and FEEL-2. EGF-like (EGF_1,
C-x-C-x (5)-G-x (2)-C, EGF_2, C-x-C-x (2)-[GP]-[FYW]-x (4, 8)-C in
Prosite data base) and laminin-type EGF-like domains are shown in
boxes. The fasciclin domains are indicated by
red, and the link domain is indicted by blue.
B, schematic representation of domain structures of FEEL-1
and FEEL-2. The deduced domain structures and putative endocytosis
signals are schematically shown. The alternatively transcribed variant
that encodes the soluble form of FEEL-1 is also shown. The sequences of
FEEL-1, FEEL-2, and the soluble form of FEEL-1 have been deposited in
the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank under accession numbers
AB052956, AB052958, and AB052957, respectively.
ig-h3
and periostin (17) have been reported to function as adhesion
molecules. It was recently shown that the Fas-1 domain of the
transforming growth factor-
-induced gene product,
ig-h3, also
contributed to corneal epithelial cell adhesion through interaction with
3
1 integrin (18). The link domain is
a hyaruronan-binding region found in vertebrate proteins that are
involved in the assembly of the extracellular matrix, cell adhesion,
and migration (19, 20). The EGF-like domain includes six cysteine
residues that have been shown (in EGF) to be involved in disulfide bond
formation. One-half of the amino acid sequence of laminin contains
consecutive repeats of about 60 amino acids that include eight
conserved cysteine residues (21). The N-terminal of this domain
(laminin-type EGF-like (LE) domain) is remotely similar to that of the
EGF-like domain. In addition to laminins, the domain is also found in
agrin, perlecan, netrins, and the EGF receptor (21-24). Although the
functional significance of these EGF-like domains is still obscure, a
certain EGF-like domain was shown to mediate homophilic or heterophilic protein-protein interaction. Therefore, it is conceivable that FEEL-1
can interact with various proteins through its domains. To elucidate
the physiological or pathological functions of FEEL-1, it is necessary
to identify and characterize the proteins that interact with
FEEL-1.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Characterization of FEEL-1 and FEEL-2 as
scavenger receptor. A, binding of DiI-Ac-LDL by CHO
expressing either FEEL-1 or FEEL-2. CHO-FEEL-1 or CHO-FEEL-2 cells
grown to confluency in 24-well plates were incubated with 1.25-20
µg/ml DiI-Ac-LDL at 4 °C for 2 h. Nonspecific binding was
measured in the presence of 200 µg/ml Ac-LDL and subtracted from the
data. The inset shows the Scatchard analysis of the data.
B, Western blot analysis of CHO and CHO-FEEL1 cells by the
anti FEEL-1 monoclonal antibody (FE-1-1). C, effect of
monoclonal antibodies on FEEL-1-mediated association of DiI-Ac-LDL to
CHO-FEEL-1 cells and HUVECs. Cellular associations of DiI-Ac-LDL were
measured in the presence of purified monoclonal antibodies to
FEEL-1 (FE-1-1 and FE-1-2) at 30 µg/ml for 2 h at 37 °C.
Results are expressed as means ± S.D. from four independent
experiments.
To determine the contribution of FEEL-1 to the cellular association of DiI-Ac-LDL with endothelial cells (HUVECs), the effect of monoclonal antibodies against FEEL-1 was examined. Specificity of the antibodies employed (FE-1-1 and FE-1-2) was confirmed by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 2B, the FE-1-1 monoclonal antibody recognized an ~250-kDa band corresponding to the expected molecular mass of FEEL-1 in CHO-FEEL-1 cells but not in control CHO cells. The same result was obtained by using the FE-1-2 monoclonal antibody (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 2C, both antibodies significantly inhibited the association of DiI-Ac-LDL to CHO-FEEL-1. Treatment of HUVECs with the antibodies also caused a significant reduction in the degree of DiI-Ac-LDL association. These results suggest that FEEL-1 is one of the major receptors of DiI-Ac-LDL in HUVECs.
To further characterize the binding properties of the FEEL-1, the
receptor activity was measured in the presence of various materials
known as type I and type II macrophage scavenger receptor inhibitors
(Fig. 3). As in the case of macrophage
scavenger receptor and SREC examined for comparison, unlabeled Ac-LDL
as well as dextran sulfate, but not native lipoproteins such as LDL and
HDL, reduced the binding of DiI-Ac-LDL on the cells to the basal level. Ox-LDL partially reduced the binding of DiI-Ac-LDL on the cells. These
results show that the FEEL-1 has a binding specificity similar to those
of the scavenger receptors expressed in HUVECs.
|
RT-PCR analysis employing specific sets of primers revealed that the
expressions of FEEL-1 and FEEL-2 in human tissues were rather
restricted, and high expression levels were observed in the spleen and
lymph node. On the other hand, only FEEL-1 was expressed in mononuclear
cells, particularly CD14+ cells (monocytes) (Fig.
4A). Moreover, FEEL-1 is also
expressed in endothelial cells such as HUVECs, human coronary arterial
endothelial cells, and human brain microvascular endothelial cells, but
no expression of FEEL-2 was detected in the endothelial cells tested (Fig. 4B).
|
Since some scavenger receptors that are expressed in endothelial cells
and macrophages are known to bind to Gram-negative and Gram-positive
bacteria and play a role in host defense and immune response following
bacterial infection (30, 31), we examined the interaction of bacterial
particles with FEELs expressed in CHO cells. As shown in Fig.
5A, a fluorescence
photomicrograph clearly indicated that both FEELs could bind to
Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Quantitative analysis (Fig.
5B) confirmed the binding of bacteria to both FEELs. To
confirm the direct interaction between FEEL-1 and bacteria, the effect
of the FE-1-1 antibody was examined, and we found that the addition of
the antibody caused a decrease in the binding of S. aureus
to the CHO cells that were transiently expressing FEEL-1. These results
suggested that they might play a role in the defense against bacterial
infection. In this context, FEEL-1 expressed in monocytes may play a
role in the antibacterial activity of the cells.
|
The presence of Fas-1 domains in FEELs reminded us of the
interaction of the receptor with some molecules in the extracellular matrix. Therefore, we examined the phenotypic effect of the inhibition of FEEL-1 on in vitro vascular remodeling using the Matrigel
tube formation assay. HUVECs were plated onto a 96-well plate with each
well containing 100 µl of Matrigel in the presence of either the
anti-FEEL-1 monoclonal antibody (FE-1-1) or the isotype control IgG1
and cultured for 16 h. As shown in Fig.
6A, Western blot analysis
indicated that the antibody employed (FE-1-1) recognized one protein
band prepared from HUVECs. Phase-contrast photomicrographs showing
capillary formation on a Matrigel basement membrane matrix indicated a
marked reduction in the degree of cell-cell interaction in anti-FEEL-1
monoclonal antibody-treated cultures (Fig. 6B), and the
quantified area surrounded by capillary-like tube structures of
anti-FEEL-1 monoclonal antibody-treated cultures was larger than
isotype control IgG1-treated cultures (Fig. 6C), indicating that the antibody facilitate the in vitro angiogenesis. We
also examined the effect of the anti-SREC monoclonal antibody (SR-4), which was shown to inhibit the SREC-mediated DiI-Ac-LDL uptake, on the
tube formation, but no effect was detected (Fig. 6B). Since this Matrigel basement membrane matrix tube formation assay has been
used to demonstrate the roles of various growth factors, its receptors,
and adhesion molecules such as various integrins in angiogenesis
in vitro (32), it is possible that FEEL-1 can modulate the
tube formation by interaction with these factors. Further studies are
required to elucidate the contribution of FEEL-1 in capillary-like tube
formation.
|
In summary, we cloned and characterized for the first time the novel
scavenger receptors, human FEEL-1 and FEEL-2. Since several investigators reported that the stimulation of scavenger receptors in
endothelial cells induces the expression of proteins related to
vascular functions (33, 34), determination of the physiological ligand
for FEELs will provide a new insight into the pathological function of
scavenger receptors.
| |
Note Added in Proof |
|---|
As mentioned in the text, FEEL-1 is identical with stabilin-1 first identified as MS-1 antigen (35, 36). It was reported that the antigen is a specific marker of alternatively activated macrophages with increased angiogenic potential (37).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and grants from ONO Medical Research Foundation, Uehara Medical Foundation and The Naito Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AB052956, AB052957, and AB052958.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of
Cellular Biochemistry, RIKEN (The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan. Tel.: 81-48-467-9372; Fax: 81-48-462-4670; E-mail:
adachih@postman.riken.go.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204277200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: LDL, low density lipoprotein; Ac-LDL, acetylated LDL; Ox-LDL, oxidized LDL; HDL, high density lipoprotein; DiI, 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyl-indocarbo-cyanine perchlorate; SREC, scavenger receptor expressed by endothelial cells; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; HUVECs, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; EGF, epidermal growth factor; RT, reverse transcription; FEEL, fasciclin, EGF-like, laminin-type EGF-like, and link domain-containing scavenger receptor; SR-BI, scavenger receptor class B type-I.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Krieger, M., and Stern, D. M. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 645-647[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Platt, N., and Gordon, S. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 649-654[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Herz, J., and Strickland, D. K. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 779-784[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Febbraio, M., Hajjar, D. P., and Silverstein, R. L. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 785-791[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Krieger, M. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 793-797[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Greaves, D. R., Gough, P. J., and Gordon, S. (1998) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 9, 425-432[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Adachi, H.,
Tsujimoto, M.,
Arai, H.,
and Inoue, K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31217-31220 |
| 8. | Sawamura, T., Kume, N., Aoyama, T., Moriwaki, H., Hoshikawa, H., Aiba, Y., Tanaka, T., Miwa, S., Katsura, Y., Kita, T., and Masaki, T. (1997) Nature 386, 73-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Ohtani, K.,
Suzuki, Y.,
Eda, S.,
Kawai, T.,
Kase, T.,
Keshi, H.,
Sakai, Y.,
Fukuoh, A.,
Sakamoto, T.,
Itabe, H.,
Suzutani, T.,
Ogasawara, M.,
Yoshida, I.,
and Wakamiya, N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
44222-44228 |
| 10. |
Adachi, H.,
Tawaragi, Y.,
Inuzuka, C.,
Kubota, I.,
Tsujimoto, M.,
Nishihara, T.,
and Nakazato, H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
3992-3995 |
| 11. | Amaravadi, L., and King, M. W. (1994) BioTechniques 16, 98-103[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Calvo, D.,
and Vega, M. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
18929-18935 |
| 13. |
Acton, S. L.,
Scherer, P. E.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Krieger, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21003-21009 |
| 14. | Nagase, T., Seki, N., Ishikawa, K., Ohira, M., Kawarabayasi, Y., Ohara, O., Tanaka, A., Kotani, H., Miyajima, N., and Nomura, N. (1996) DNA Res. 3, 321-329[Abstract] |
| 15. | Wuilmart, C., and Urbain, J. (1976) J. Immunogenet. (Oxf.) 3, 1-14 |
| 16. | Bastiani, M. J., Harrelson, A. L., Snow, P. M., and Goodman, C. S. (1987) Cell 48, 745-755[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Horiuchi, K., Amizuka, N., Takeshita, S., Takamatsu, H., Katsuura, M., Ozawa, H., Toyama, Y., Bonewald, L. F., and Kudo, A. (1999) J. Bone Miner. Res. 14, 1239-1249[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Kim, J. E.,
Kim, S. J.,
Lee, B. H.,
Park, R. W.,
Kim, K. S.,
and Kim, I. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
30907-30915 |
| 19. | Yang, B., Yang, B. L., Savani, R. C., and Turley, E. A. (1994) EMBO J. 15, 286-296 |
| 20. | Kohda, D., Morton, C. J., Parkar, A. A., Hatanaka, H., Inagaki, F. M., Campbell, I. D., and Day, A. J. (1996) Cell 86, 767-775[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Abe, Y.,
Odaka, M.,
Inagaki, F.,
Lax, I.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Kohda, D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11150-11157 |
| 22. | Rupp, F., Payan, D. G., Magill-Solc, C., Cowan, D. M., and Scheller, R. H. (1991) Neuron 6, 811-823[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Murdoch, A. D.,
Dodge, G. R.,
Cohen, I.,
Tuan, R. S.,
and Iozzo, R. V.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
8544-8557 |
| 24. | Serafini, T., Kennedy, T. E., Galko, M. J., Mirzayan, C., Jessell, T. M., and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1994) Cell 12, 409-424 |
| 25. |
Schleiffenbaum, B.,
Spertini, O.,
and Tedder, T. F.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
229-238 |
| 26. | Gentz, R., Hayes, A., Grau, N., Fountoulakis, M., Lahm, H-W., Ozmen, L., and Garotta, G. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 210, 545-554[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Ozmen, L., Gribaudo, G., Fountoulakis, M., Gentz, R., Landolfo, S., and Garotta, G. (1993) J. Immunol. 150, 2698-2705[Abstract] |
| 28. | Rose-John, S., and Heinrich, P. C. (1994) Biochem. J. 300, 281-290 |
| 29. |
van Hinsbergh, V. W.,
Havekes, L.,
Emeis, J. J.,
van Corven, E.,
and Scheffer, M.
(1983)
Arteriosclerosis
3,
547-559 |
| 30. | Elomaa, O., Kangas, M., Sahlberg, C., Tuukkanen, J., Sormunen, R., Liakka, A., Thesleff, I., Kraal, G., and Tryggvason, K. (1995) Cell 24l, 603-609 |
| 31. | Shimaoka, T., Kume, N., Minami, M., Hayashida, K., Sawamura, T., Kita, T., and Yonehara, S. (2001) J. Immunol. 15, 5108-5114 |
| 32. |
Kubota, Y.,
Kleinman, H. K.,
Martin, G. R.,
and Lawley, T. J.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
1589-1598 |
| 33. |
Boulanger, C. M.,
Tanner, F. C.,
Bea, M. L.,
Hahn, A. W.,
Werner, A.,
and Luscher, T. F.
(1992)
Circ. Res.
70,
1191-1197 |
| 34. | Yuhanna, I. S., Zhu, Y., Cox, B. E., Hahner, L. D., Osborne-Lawrence, S., Lu, P., Marcel, Y. L., Anderson, R. G., Mendelsohn, M. E., Hobbs, H. H., and Shaul, P. W. (2001) Nat. Med. 7, 853-857[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Goerdt, S.,
Walsh, L. J.,
Murphy, G. F.,
and Pober, J. S.
(1991)
J. Cell. Biol.
113,
1425-1437 |
| 36. | Politz, O., Gratchev, A., McCourt, P. A., Schledzewski, K., Guillot, P., Johansson, S., Svineng, G., Franke, P., Kannicht, C., Kzhyshkowska, J., Longati, P., Velten, F. W., Johansson, S., and Goerdt, S. (2002) Biochem. J. 15, 155-164 |
| 37. | Kodelja, V., Muller, C., Tenorio, S., Schebesch, C., Orfanos, C. E., and Goerdt, S. (1997) Immunobiology 197, 478-493[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. N. Harris and P. H. Weigel The ligand-binding profile of HARE: hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfates A, C, and D bind to overlapping sites distinct from the sites for heparin, acetylated low-density lipoprotein, dermatan sulfate, and CS-E Glycobiology, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 638 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. N. Harris, J. A. Weigel, and P. H. Weigel The Human Hyaluronan Receptor for Endocytosis (HARE/Stabilin-2) Is a Systemic Clearance Receptor for Heparin J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2008; 283(25): 17341 - 17350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Kyosseva, E. N. Harris, and P. H. Weigel The Hyaluronan Receptor for Endocytosis Mediates Hyaluronan-dependent Signal Transduction via Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinases J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15047 - 15055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-Y. Park, K.-B. Kang, N. Thapa, S.-Y. Kim, S.-J. Lee, and I.-S. Kim Requirement of Adaptor Protein GULP during Stabilin-2-mediated Cell Corpse Engulfment J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10593 - 10600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-Y. Jung, S.-Y. Park, and I.-S. Kim Stabilin-2 is involved in lymphocyte adhesion to the hepatic sinusoidal endothelium via the interaction with {alpha}M 2 integrin J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2007; 82(5): 1156 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Theriault, H. Adachi, and S. K. Calderwood Role of Scavenger Receptors in the Binding and Internalization of Heat Shock Protein 70 J. Immunol., December 15, 2006; 177(12): 8604 - 8611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-O. Nam, H.-W. Jeong, B.-H. Lee, R.-W. Park, and I.-S. Kim Regulation of Tumor Angiogenesis by Fastatin, the Fourth FAS1 Domain of {beta}ig-h3, via {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 65(10): 4153 - 4161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Greaves and S. Gordon Thematic review series: The Immune System and Atherogenesis. Recent insights into the biology of macrophage scavenger receptors J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 11 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Salmi, K. Koskinen, T. Henttinen, K. Elima, and S. Jalkanen CLEVER-1 mediates lymphocyte transmigration through vascular and lymphatic endothelium Blood, December 15, 2004; 104(13): 3849 - 3857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Prevo, S. Banerji, J. Ni, and D. G. Jackson Rapid Plasma Membrane-Endosomal Trafficking of the Lymph Node Sinus and High Endothelial Venule Scavenger Receptor/Homing Receptor Stabilin-1 (Feel-1/Clever-1) J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 52580 - 52592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kzhyshkowska, A. Gratchev, J.-H. Martens, O. Pervushina, S. Mamidi, S. Johansson, K. Schledzewski, B. Hansen, X. He, J. Tang, et al. Stabilin-1 localizes to endosomes and the trans-Golgi network in human macrophages and interacts with GGA adaptors J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2004; 76(6): 1151 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jozefowski and L. Kobzik Scavenger receptor A mediates H2O2 production and suppression of IL-12 release in murine macrophages J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2004; 76(5): 1066 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shibata, J. Ishii, H. Koizumi, N. Shibata, N. Dohmae, K. Takio, H. Adachi, M. Tsujimoto, and H. Arai Type F Scavenger Receptor SREC-I Interacts with Advillin, a Member of the Gelsolin/Villin Family, and Induces Neurite-like Outgrowth J. Biol. Chem., September 17, 2004; 279(38): 40084 - 40090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tamura, J.-i. Osuga, H. Adachi, R.-i. Tozawa, Y. Takanezawa, K. Ohashi, N. Yahagi, M. Sekiya, H. Okazaki, S. Tomita, et al. Scavenger Receptor Expressed by Endothelial Cells I (SREC-I) Mediates the Uptake of Acetylated Low Density Lipoproteins by Macrophages Stimulated with Lipopolysaccharide J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 30938 - 30944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-O. Nam, J.-E. Kim, H.-W. Jeong, S.-J. Lee, B.-H. Lee, J.-Y. Choi, R.-W. Park, J. Y. Park, and I.-S. Kim Identification of the {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin-interacting Motif of {beta}ig-h3 and Its Anti-angiogenic Effect J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 25902 - 25909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tamura, H. Adachi, J.-i. Osuga, K. Ohashi, N. Yahagi, M. Sekiya, H. Okazaki, S. Tomita, Y. Iizuka, H. Shimano, et al. FEEL-1 and FEEL-2 Are Endocytic Receptors for Advanced Glycation End Products J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 12613 - 12617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||