JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206112200 on July 11, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 38, 34924-34932, September 20, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/38/34924    most recent
M206112200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawar, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawar, Z. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cummings, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Molecular Cloning and Enzymatic Characterization of a UDP-GalNAc:GlcNAcbeta -R beta 1,4-N-Acetylgalactosaminyltransferase from Caenorhabditis elegans*

Ziad S. KawarDagger , Irma Van Die§, and Richard D. CummingsDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma Center for Medical Glycobiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104 and the § Department of Molecular Cell Biology and VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received for publication, June 19, 2002, and in revised form, July 11, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A common terminal structure in glycans from animal glycoproteins and glycolipids is the lactosamine sequence Galbeta 4GlcNAc-R (LacNAc or LN). An alternative sequence that occurs in vertebrate as well as in invertebrate glycoconjugates is GalNAcbeta 4GlcNAc-R (LacdiNAc or LDN). Whereas genes encoding beta 4GalTs responsible for LN synthesis have been reported, the beta 4GalNAcT(s) responsible for LDN synthesis has not been identified. Here we report the identification of a gene from Caenorhabditis elegans encoding a UDP-GalNAc:GlcNAcbeta -R beta 1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (Cebeta 4GalNAcT) that synthesizes the LDN structure. Cebeta 4GalNAcT is a member of the beta 4GalT family, and its cDNA is predicted to encode a 383-amino acid type 2 membrane glycoprotein. A soluble, epitope-tagged recombinant form of Cebeta 4GalNAcT expressed in CHO-Lec8 cells was active using UDP-GalNAc, but not UDP-Gal, as a donor toward a variety of acceptor substrates containing terminal beta -linked GlcNAc in both N- and O-glycan type structures. The LDN structure of the product was verified by co-chromatography with authentic standards and 1H NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, Chinese hamster ovary CHO-Lec8 and CHO-Lec2 cells expressing Cebeta 4GalNAcT acquired LDN determinants on endogenous glycoprotein N-glycans, demonstrating that the enzyme is active in mammalian cells as an authentic beta 4GalNAcT. The identification and availability of this novel enzyme should enhance our understanding of the structure and function of LDN-containing glycoconjugates.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Many of the functional moieties of complex glycoconjugates are in the terminal sequences of N- and O-glycans of glycoproteins and in glycolipids, which are recognized by a growing number of carbohydrate binding proteins (1-4). A common terminal motif that is modified in a variety of ways by the additions of other sugars and sulfate groups is the lactosamine sequence Galbeta 4GlcNAc-R (LacNAc or LN),1 which is generated by a large family of UDP-Gal:GlcNAcbeta -R beta 1,4-galactosyltransferases (beta 4GalTs) acting on terminal GlcNAc residues (5). However, another common terminal motif found in vertebrate and invertebrate glycoconjugates is the GalNAcbeta 4GlcNAc-R (LacdiNAc or LDN) sequence. The LDN motif occurs in mammalian pituitary glycoprotein hormones, where the terminal GalNAc residues are 4-O-sulfated (6) and function as a recognition markers for clearance by the endothelial cell Man/S4GGnM receptor (7). However, nonpituitary mammalian glycoproteins also contain LDN determinants (8-11), indicating that expression of LDN determinants in vertebrate glycoconjugates is more widespread than once thought. In addition, LDN and modifications of LDN sequences are common antigenic determinants in many parasitic nematodes and trematodes (12-17).

The LDN structure can be considered a variant of the more typical LN structure generated by a family of beta 4GalTs that includes the best characterized of all glycosyltransferases, the beta 4GalT I or lactose synthase (18-26). As more members of this family have been studied and the cDNAs encoding them have been cloned, it is evident that they share highly homologous regions within their amino acid sequences (27-36). Interestingly, these regions of homology are also found within the amino acid sequence of a snail UDP-GlcNAc:GlcNAcbeta -R beta 1,4-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (37-39). This latter finding raised the possibility that the beta 4GalNAcT enzyme(s) might also have amino acid sequence homology to members of the beta 4GalT family. However, despite many studies reporting on the activity of a putative beta 4GalNAcT capable of generating LDN sequences (11, 40-46), the gene(s) encoding the putative beta 4GalNAcT responsible for LDN synthesis has not been identified.

In searching for the putative beta 4GalNAcT required for LDN synthesis, we examined genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. The C. elegans genome contains three open reading frames that encode proteins with sequence homology to the beta 4GalT family. One of these open reading frames (ORF R10E11.4; sqv-3) is predicted to encode a protein involved in vulval invagination (47) and is likely to be a UDP-Gal:xylose beta -R beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase (33, 48). Another of these open reading frames (ORF W02B12.11) encodes a protein for which no enzymatic activity has yet been reported. The third open reading frame (ORF Y73E7A.7) was identified more recently than the two mentioned above and therefore had not been reported in previous studies (27, 31). In this study, we have cloned a cDNA corresponding to the latter open reading frame and demonstrate that it encodes a beta 4GalNAcT, which we have termed Cebeta 4GalNAcT. Cebeta 4GalNAcT is active when expressed in mammalian cells in generating LDN determinants on N-glycans of glycoproteins.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- All chemicals and reagents used in this study, unless otherwise indicated, were from Sigma. The C. elegans cDNA library was a gift from Dr. Robert Barstead (Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK). The QIA Quick gel extraction kit was from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). Restriction enzymes were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). The pCR 2.1 vector was from Invitrogen. The pcDNA3.1(+)-TH was a gift from Dr. Alireza R. Rezaie (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO). FuGENE 6 and Complete protease inhibitor mixture were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. N-Glycanase was from Glyko (Novato, CA). HighSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate was from Pierce. GlcNAcbeta 1-3GalNAcalpha 1-O-pNP (core 3-O-pNP) and GlcNAcbeta 1-6GalNAcalpha 1-O-pNP (core 6-O-pNP) were obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Canada). Acceptor compounds (see Table II) 1-3, 5, 9, and 12 were purchased from Sigma, 4 was from Koch-Light Laboratories, and 6-8 were from Toronto Research Chemicals. Compounds 10 and 11 were a kind gift from Dr. L. Anderson (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI), and 14-17 were from Dr. J. Lönngren (University of Stockholm). Compounds 13 (39) and 18-21 (32) were synthesized as described previously. Radiolabeled nucleotide sugars were obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences and were diluted with unlabeled nucleotide sugars (Sigma) to give the desired specific radioactivity.

Cloning and Sequencing of the Cebeta 4GalNAcT cDNA-- A BlastP search of the NCBI nonredundant protein data base for homologues of the human beta 4GalT I (accession number CAA39074) identified a hypothetical protein encoded by an open reading frame in the C. elegans genome designated Y73E7A.7. A cDNA was amplified by PCR from a mixed stage C. elegans cDNA library using primers corresponding to the 5'- and 3'-ends of this open reading frame (5'-GCCACCATGGCTTTTCGTCATTTGGC-3'; 5'-CTAAAAACACGTTGGAAAGTCC-3'). Amplification was carried out at 95 °C for 2:30 min followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 50 s, 53 °C for 50 s, and 72 °C for 1:50 min and then at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR product was purified from an agarose gel slice using a QIA Quick gel extraction kit, cloned into the pCR 2.1 vector, and sequenced on both strands at the Sequencing Facility of the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (Oklahoma City, OK).

Construction of an Expression Vector Encoding a Soluble, Epitope-tagged Form of Cebeta 4GalNAcT-- A PsiI (partial)/PvuII DNA fragment starting at bp 87 of the Cebeta 4GalNAcT open reading frame and extending beyond the stop codon was subcloned into the EcoRV site of the pcDNA 3.1(+)-TH vector. The resulting vector (pCMV-SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT) encodes a fusion protein, designated SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT, which consists of a signal peptide at the N terminus followed by an HPC4 epitope and then the catalytic domain of the Cebeta 4GalNAcT (beginning at Lys30, the first amino acid after the transmembrane domain). The HPC4 epitope is recognized by the Ca2+-dependent monoclonal antibody HPC4 (49, 50). SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT is under the transcriptional control of the cytomegalovirus promoter, which is present in the vector.

Expression of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT-- CHO-Lec8 and CHO-Lec2 cells were transfected with pCMV-SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT using FuGENE 6, according to the manufacturer's instructions, and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum and 600 µg/ml Geneticin to select for stably transformed cells. After 4 weeks of culturing in medium containing Geneticin, the cells were cultured in the same medium without Geneticin, and the culture medium was harvested every 3 days and used to purify SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT. To assay intracellular beta 4GalNAcT activity and for Western blots, cells were washed with 75 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 7.0, and lysed in a buffer of 50 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 7.0, 20 mM MnCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 1× Complete protease inhibitor mixture (EDTA-free). The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 3 min, and the supernatants were used for further analyses.

Purification of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT-- Medium containing SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT was centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 5 min to remove cellular debris and then incubated with HPC4-UltraLink beads (5 mg of HPC4 antibody/ml of beads; 0.1 µl of beads/ml of medium) for 1 h at room temperature on a rotating platform. The beads were collected by centrifugation at 600 × g for 3 min and washed three times with 10 ml of 100 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 7.0, 2 mM CaCl2. The beads were then resuspended in the same buffer with the addition of 20 mM MnCl2 and used as the enzyme source. For Western blot analysis, the bound material was released by incubating the beads in a buffer of 50 mM sodium cacodylate, pH 7.0, 20 mM EDTA for 10 min at room temperature and then collecting the supernatant.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analyses-- Cell lysates were treated with N-glycanase in a buffer of 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, 50 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 0.1% SDS, 0.75% Nonidet P-40 for 3 h at 37 °C. Control treatments were carried out in the same way but without adding N-glycanase. The lysates were then mixed with loading buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE (4-20% gradient), and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin in a buffer of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 0.05% Tween 20 for 5 h at 4 °C. It was then incubated with the primary antibody (mouse monoclonal anti-LDN IgM SMLDN1.1 (16) or HPC4 IgG) in the same buffer (without bovine serum albumin) for 1 h at room temperature, washed in the same buffer, and incubated with the secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated, goat anti-mouse IgM or IgG) as before. The membrane was then washed again, incubated in HighSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate for 2 min at room temperature, and exposed to a BioMax film (Eastman Kodak Co.) for 1 min. The film was then developed using a processing machine (Konica SRX-101).

beta 4GalNAcT Assays-- Standard assays were performed essentially as described previously (45) in a 25-µl reaction mixture containing 2.5 µmol of sodium cacodylate, pH 7.2, 12.5 nmol of UDP-[3H]GalNAc (2.5 Ci/mol), 1 µmol of MnCl2, 0.1 µmol of ATP, 0.1 µl of Triton X-100, 2 µl of beads, and acceptor substrate, containing 25 nmol of terminal GlcNAc at the nonreducing end unless otherwise indicated. Control assays lacking the acceptor substrate were carried out to correct for incorporation into endogenous acceptors, and all assays were carried out in duplicate. All assays were linear with time for up to 180 min. After incubation at 37 °C for 180 min, the reaction was stopped. When oligosaccharides or glycopeptides were the acceptor, the labeled product was separated from unincorporated label by chromatography on a 1-ml column of Dowex 1-X8 (Cl- form) according to Easton et al. (51). When oligosaccharide acceptors with hydrophobic aglycon (pNP) were used as the acceptor, the product was isolated using Sep-Pak C-18 cartridges (Waters) as described (52). The isolated products were assayed for incorporation of radioactivity by liquid scintillation.

High pH Anion Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection (HPAEC-PAD)-- The product catalyzed by SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT using GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP as acceptor was isolated using a Sep-Pak C-18 cartridge (1 cm3) and lyophilized. Three nmol of the product (dissolved in water) were analyzed by a Dionex HPAEC-PAD system, using a PA-1 column with a 100 mM NaOH solution at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The standard containing the authentic LDN structure GalNAcbeta 1-4GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP was synthesized using bovine beta 4GalT I and GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP as the acceptor for UDP-GalNAc in the standard assay described above. Commercially acquired GlcNAcbeta 1-3GalNAcalpha 1-O-pNP (core 3-O-pNP) and GlcNAcbeta 1-6GalNAcalpha 1-O-pNP (core 6-O-pNP) were also used as standards.

Large Scale Synthesis of Product for 1H NMR Analysis-- Synthesis was carried out overnight at 37 °C in a 1-ml reaction mixture containing 50 µmol of sodium cacodylate, pH 7.0, 300 nmol of GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP, 1 µmol of UDP-GalNAc, 20 µmol of MnCl2, 5 µmol of ATP, 3 µmol of NaN3, and 100 µl of beads. The product was then isolated using a Sep-Pak C-18 cartridge (1 cm3) and lyophilized.

400-Mz 1H NMR-- 150 nmol of the product catalyzed by SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT using GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP as acceptor were treated with D2O (99.75 atom %; Merck) three times with intermediate lyophilization. Finally, the sample was redissolved in 400 µl of D2O (99.96 atom %; Sigma-Aldrich). 1H NMR spectroscopy was performed on a Bruker MSL 400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz at a probe temperature of 300 K. Resolution enhancement was achieved by Lorentzian to Gaussian transformation. Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm downfield from internal sodium 4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonate but were actually measured by reference to internal acetone (delta  = 2.225 ppm in D2O).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation of the cDNA Encoded by Y73E7A.7 (Cebeta 4GalNAcT)-- A potential C. elegans open reading frame designated Y73E7A.7 was identified by a BlastP search as encoding a homologue of the human beta 4GalT I. An identical cDNA (GenBankTM accession number AY130767) was amplified by PCR from a mixed stage C. elegans cDNA library using primers corresponding to the 5'- and 3'-ends of this open reading frame, establishing that the gene is expressed in vivo. The cDNA of Y73E7A.7 encodes a predicted 383-amino acid protein with a single transmembrane domain in a type 2 topology, which is a common topological motif in glycosyltransferases. The protein encoded by Y73E7A.7 is predicted to contain six potential N-glycosylation sites and two DVD motifs, which are thought to participate in metal ion binding (53) (Fig. 1). Curiously, the last four potential N-glycosylation sites share an identical sequon (NQT), the significance of which is not clear at this time. The protein sequence encoded by Y73E7A.7 is 35.5% identical to human beta 4GalT I (Fig. 2A) and is more closely related to the first four members of the beta 4GalT family (I, II, III, and IV) than to the other three (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   cDNA and deduced protein sequence of Y73E7A.7 (Cebeta 4GalNAcT). The putative transmembrane domain of the predicted protein encoded by Y73E7A.7 is double underlined; the potentially N-glycosylated Asp residues are in boldface type within boxed sequons, and the DVD motifs are single underlined. This cDNA sequence has been deposited in GenBankTM under accession number AY130767.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Protein sequence comparisons between the protein encoded by Y73E7A.7 (Cebeta 4GalNAcT) and members of the beta 4GalT family. A, alignment of Y73E7A.7 (Cebeta 4GalNAcT) with human beta 4GalT I using the Align and Boxshade programs. Black boxes, identical residues; gray boxes, similar residues. B, phylogenic analysis of Cebeta 4GalNAcT and other beta 4GalT family members using the ClustalW and Drawgram programs.

Expression and Purification of a Soluble, Recombinant Form of the Protein Encoded by Y73E7A.7 (SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT)-- To assess whether Y73E7A.7 encodes an active beta 4-galactosyltransferase or possibly a beta 4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase, a soluble, recombinant form of the protein was generated lacking the cytoplasmic N terminus and transmembrane domain and containing the HPC4 peptide epitope at the new N terminus. This construct was stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary CHO-Lec8 cells. These cells are impaired in the transport of UDP-Gal into the Golgi (54) and consequently generate hybrid- and complex-type N-glycans containing terminal GlcNAc and O-glycans containing the simple Tn antigen GalNAcalpha 1-Ser/Thr (55-57). The transfected cells expressing Y73E7A.7, but not the control mock-transfected cells, acquired a novel intracellular GalNAcT activity in the cell extracts capable of utilizing UDP-GalNAc as the donor and GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP as the acceptor (Fig. 3A). The recombinant protein containing the HPC4 epitope from extracellular medium was bound by HPC4-conjugated beads, confirming the beta 4GalNAcT activity of the enzyme encoded by the Y73E7A.7 (Fig. 3A). A Western blot of the material bound to the HPC4-conjugated beads (Fig. 3B) confirmed that it corresponded to the predicted size of the HPC4 epitope-tagged protein (43.1-kDa peptide plus N-glycans) as discussed below. These data demonstrate that Y73E7A.7 encodes an active beta 4GalNAcT and the enzyme was designated the C. elegans UDP-GalNAc:GlcNAcbeta -R beta 1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (Cebeta 4GalNAcT), and the soluble, HPC4 epitope-tagged version was designated SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression and purification of the protein encoded by Y73E7A.7 (SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT). A, intracellular extracts of wild-type CHO-Lec8 cells (Lec8) and CHO-Lec8 cells expressing a soluble, HPC4 epitope-tagged form of the protein encoded by Y73E7A.7 (SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT; Lec8/GT) were tested for GalNAcT (striped bars) and GalT (black bars) activities using GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP as acceptor. The material captured by HPC4 beads from the extracellular medium from both cell types was also tested for these activities. The activity is indicated in pmol of donor sugar transferred/h for 105 cells (extracts) or 10 ml of medium (beads). B, Western blot using the HPC4 monoclonal antibody of the material captured on HPC4 beads from 10 ml of medium from Lec8/GT cells. The positions of molecular mass markers are indicated on the left in kDa.

Donor and Substrate Specificity of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT-- The enzyme purified from the medium using HPC4-conjugated beads was used in assays to further characterize its activity. In assays to determine its specificity for nucleotide-sugar donors (Table I), SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT efficiently utilized UDP-GalNAc but did not significantly utilize UDP-Gal, UDP-GlcNAc, or UDP-Glc. To define the acceptor specificity of Cebeta 4GalNAcT, the enzyme was tested with a wide variety of acceptors (Table II). SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT efficiently utilizes free GlcNAc and all substrates containing terminal beta -linked GlcNAc in both N- and O-glycan type structures. SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT less effectively utilizes alpha -linked GlcNAc or 6-sulfated GlcNAc and does not utilize acceptors with terminal beta -linked Gal, Glc, or GalNAc. The acceptor substrate specificity of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT is therefore similar to the broad specificity reported for human beta 4GalT I (32). In contrast, the snail beta 4-GlcNAcT has a marked preference for acceptors with beta 1,6-linked terminal GlcNAc (39) (see Table II for a side-by-side comparison).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Sugar nucleotide specificity of the Cebeta 4GalNAcT

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Acceptor Specificity of Cebeta 4GalNAcT and Comparison to Other Members of the beta 4GalT Family

In view of the sequence homology between Cebeta 4GalNAcT and the beta 4GalT family, we examined whether the modifier protein alpha -lactalbumin would affect the acceptor specificity of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT. alpha -Lactalbumin, which is expressed in lactating mammary glands, associates with beta 4GalT I and switches its acceptor specificity from GlcNAc-R to free Glc, thus forming lactose synthase (58). However, unlike its effect on beta 4GalT I, alpha -lactalbumin does not induce SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT to utilize Glc as an acceptor instead of GlcNAc (Table III). alpha -Lactalbumin does appear to slightly depress activity of Cebeta 4GalNAcT toward the free GlcNAc acceptor, suggesting a possible weak interaction between the enzyme and alpha -lactalbumin.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Effect of alpha -lactalbumin on activity of the Cebeta 4GalNAcT

Product Characterization by HPAEC-PAD and 1H NMR-- The product generated by SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT using GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP as acceptor was analyzed by HPAEC-PAD (Fig. 4). The product co-eluted with the authentic GalNAcbeta 1-4GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP standard but not with two other disaccharide-O-pNP standards (GlcNAcbeta 1-3GalNAcalpha 1-O-pNP and GlcNAcbeta 1-6GalNAcalpha 1-O-pNP).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   HPAEC-PAD analysis of the reaction product catalyzed by SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT using GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP as acceptor. A, analysis of the reaction products obtained in the absence of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT. B, analysis of the reaction products obtained in the presence of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT. The arrows indicate the elution positions of reference compounds. a, GalNAcbeta 1-4GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP; b, GlcNAcbeta 1-6GalNAcalpha 1-O-pNP; c, GlcNAcbeta 1-3GalNAcalpha 1-O-pNP; d, GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP. The peak corresponding to GalNAcbeta 1-4GlcNAcbeta 1-O-pNP is shaded.

To further establish the structure of the product generated by SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT using GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP as acceptor, the product was analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 5). The spectrum shows two H-1 doublets at delta  = 5.146 ppm and 4.540 ppm. The coupling constants of the H-1 doublets (10.5 and 8.5 Hz, respectively) indicate that both C-1 atoms are in beta -anomeric conformation (59). The doublet at 5.146 ppm and the signal at delta  = 2.013 ppm can be assigned to the H-1 and the CH3-NAc of GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP by analogy to the resonance positions in GlcNAcbeta 1-4GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP (38). The doublet at delta  = 4.540 ppm and the signal at delta  = 2.077 ppm have shifts that are close to those reported for a beta 4-linked GalNAc residue (44, 45). The NMR spectrum therefore confirms that the analyzed product is GalNAcbeta 1-4GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   400-MHz 1H NMR analysis of the reaction product catalyzed by SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT using GlcNAcbeta 1-S-pNP as acceptor. A, NMR spectrum with close-ups of diagnostic areas. B, NMR data and comparison with data of two related compounds. Data for compound a are from Ref. 44; data for compound b are from Ref. 38.

In Vivo Synthesis of LDN Structures on N-Glycans by SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT-- Since SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT was active in cell extracts when expressed in CHO-Lec8 cells (Fig. 3A), we examined whether it can generate LDN structures on endogenous glycan acceptors in animal cells. Cell lysates from nontransfected CHO-Lec8 and CHO-Lec2 cells and transfected CHO-Lec8 and CHO-Lec2 cells expressing SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT were examined for the presence of LDN determinants by a Western blot analysis using a monoclonal antibody SMLDN1.1 against LDN (16) (Fig. 6A). As indicated above the CHO-Lec8 cells are deficient in UDP-Gal transport into the Golgi (54), whereas the CHO-Lec2 cells are deficient in CMP-sialic acid transport into the Golgi and hence generate nonsialylated glycans terminating in Gal residues (60). Nontransfected CHO-Lec8 and CHO-Lec2 cells did not express detectable levels of LDN determinants as detected by SMLDN1.1 (Fig. 6A). By contrast, both cell lines expressing SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT expressed the LDN epitope on several glycoproteins. It would be predicted that the Cebeta 4GalNAcT might only add GalNAc to N-glycans in CHO cells, since CHO cells produce O-glycans of the core 1 structure (Galbeta 3GalNAcalpha 1 Ser/Thr) lacking in GlcNAc residues (61, 62). Cell extracts derived from CHO cell lines expressing SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT were treated with N-glycanase to determine whether LDN determinants were present in N-glycans. N-Glycanase treatment quantitatively removed the LDN-reactive epitopes from glycoproteins, demonstrating that LDN was expressed exclusively on N-glycans by the SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT. Transfected CHO-Lec2 cells expressed lower levels of LDN determinants than transfected CHO-Lec8, possibly due to competition from endogenous beta 4GalTs, since the cells expressed equivalent amounts of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT as detected by a Western blot using the HPC4 antibody (Fig. 6B). The latter experiment also confirmed the molecular weight of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT, demonstrating that N-glycanase treatment shifted the 59.4-kDa protein to 43.1 kDa, the predicted peptide size of SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   In vivo synthesis of LDN-containing glycans. Western blots of cellular extracts of wild-type CHO-Lec8 cells (lane 1), CHO-Lec8 cells expressing SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT (lanes 2 and 3), wild-type CHO-Lec2 cells (lane 4), and CHO-Lec2 cells expressing SH-Cebeta 4GalNAcT (lanes 5 and 6). The extracts in lanes 3 and 6 have been treated with N-glycanase. The membranes were probed with monoclonal antibodies against LDN (A) or the HPC4 tag (B). The positions of molecular mass markers are indicated on the left in kDa.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results presented here provide several new insights into the biosynthesis of animal cell glycoproteins. We have identified a specific N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase Cebeta 4GalNAcT from C. elegans capable of utilizing UDP-GalNAc as the donor for the transfer of GalNAc residues to terminal GlcNAc residues in a wide variety of acceptors to generate the LacdiNAc (LDN) sequence GalNAcbeta 4GlcNAc-R. The enzyme is a member of the beta 4-galactosyltransferase family, although Cebeta 4GalNAcT is unable to utilize UDP-Gal as the donor. In vertebrate cells, the recombinant form of Cebeta 4GalNAcT is fully functional and capable of generating the LDN structure in complex-type N-glycans of glycoproteins. This represents the first identification of a beta 4GalNAcT capable of generating the LDN sequence in animal glycoconjugates.

Although the LacNAc (LN) sequence Galbeta 4GlcNAc-R is a more general terminal modification in vertebrate glycoconjugates, the LDN sequence also occurs in several vertebrate glycoproteins and glycolipids, including pituitary glycoprotein hormones (63) and other glycoconjugates (8, 11, 64-66). A hormone-specific beta 4GalNAcT enzyme, active in the pituitary gland and other tissues, acts preferentially on glycoproteins containing a specific peptide motif (46, 63, 67-70). The GalNAc residue added to these hormones is subsequently 4-O-sulfated (71-73), and the resulting terminal GalNAc-4-SO4 acts as a clearance signal that regulates their circulatory half-lives (6, 74-76). The addition of the LDN motif to other glycoproteins, such as glycodelin (9, 66) and protein C (8), may also be cell- and protein-specific and may be important to the functional activities of these glycoproteins. In addition to the hormone-specific beta 4GalNAcT, a motif-independent beta 4GalNAcT activity has been detected in extracts from many cells (69), including human 293 cells (11), bovine mammary gland (43), snails (40, 41), insect cells (45), and schistosomes (42, 44). The LDN motif is also a more common structural feature in invertebrate glycoconjugates compared with the LN motif, especially as seen in many parasitic nematodes and trematodes (12-17, 77). However, neither the enzyme(s) nor gene(s) encoding the enzyme responsible for LDN synthesis in invertebrates have previously been defined.

Cebeta 4GalNAcT is clearly a member of the beta 4GalT family of enzymes with homology to the other members found in various species ranging from C. elegans to mammals. Curiously, the GalT I or lactose synthase is capable of utilizing both UDP-Gal and UDP-GalNAc, and in the presence of alpha -lactalbumin, this enzyme is stimulated to utilize UDP-GalNAc as the donor to generate LDN with free GlcNAc as the acceptor (78). Thus, we considered the possibility that the LDN structure might not be generated by a separate enzyme specific for UDP-GalNAc. Therefore, it is especially interesting that the Cebeta 4GalNAcT, although a member of the beta 4GalT family, does not utilize UDP-Gal. Two recent crystallographic studies on beta 4GalT I have shed light on the amino acid residues that are important in donor and acceptor recognition by the enzymes of the beta 4GalT family. The first study demonstrated that changing a tyrosine residue (Tyr289) in the bovine beta 4GalT I to isoleucine altered its donor specificity from UDP-Gal to UDP-GalNAc (21). It is noteworthy that the Cebeta 4GalNAcT contains an isoleucine residue (Ile257) at the corresponding position. The second study identified 12 amino acids in the bovine beta 4GalT I that constitute its acceptor binding site (79). These amino acids vary considerably among members of the beta 4GalT family, and Cebeta 4GalNAcT has between 2 and 4 of these residues in common with each of the other members of this family. The specific amino acids in Cebeta 4GalNAcT responsible for its sugar nucleotide and acceptor specificity await identification.

It is noteworthy that the soluble form of the Cebeta 4GalNAcT, when expressed in CHO-Lec8 or CHO-Lec2 cells, is capable of generating LDN epitopes on cellular glycoproteins. Interestingly, a significant amount of the total Cebeta 4GalNAcT was present in cell extracts compared with extracellular media (Fig. 3A). This implies that the soluble enzyme is sufficiently retained in the cell to allow productive interactions with intracellular acceptor glycoproteins. The mode of retention of the soluble Cebeta 4GalNAcT in CHO cells is not known. Targeting and retention in the Golgi apparatus for many glycosyltransferases requires membrane anchoring, although other domains of the enzymes are also important (80, 81). Similarly, we previously observed that the soluble form of the alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase is also functional within cells (82). However, soluble forms of some other glycosyltransferases inefficiently glycosylate intracellular acceptors (83, 84). It is conceivable that the high concentration of potential terminal GlcNAc-R acceptors in CHO-Lec8 and CHO-Lec2 cells could cause the retention of Cebeta 4GalNAcT in appropriate Golgi compartments, based on the observation that many glycosyltransferases show affinity for their acceptor substrates and can be purified by affinity chromatography on immobilized acceptors (85). The Cebeta 4GalNAcT could also interact with some other Golgi-resident protein, such as another glycosyltransferase, as proposed in the kin recognition hypothesis (86). Overall, our results support the possibility that Golgi retention of glycosyltransferases is likely to be a complex event mediated in part by multiple domains of the enzymes and not necessarily by the transmembrane domains.

Although Cebeta 4GalNAcT is able to act on most of the common types of mammalian N- and O-glycans, there is only a limited knowledge of the glycan structures produced in C. elegans. It has been reported that the LDN motif appears at the reducing end of unusual O-glycans of C. elegans with the predicted sequence R-GalNAcbeta 4GlcNAc-Ser/Thr (87). Whether Cebeta 4GalNAcT is responsible for synthesis of this type of structure is currently unknown, as are the enzymes that can potentially act to extend a glycan from the LDN motif.

The availability of a recombinant, well characterized beta 4GalNAcT active in mammalian cells should help advance our understanding of this type of glycosyltransferase and the structures and functions of LDN-containing glycans. The enzyme can be a valuable tool for both the in vitro and in vivo synthesis of LDN-based glycan structures, which may be used for further studies on their function in both vertebrates and invertebrates, as well as for studying LDN-containing antigenic glycans and pharmaceutical or commercial products.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The technical assistance of Wietske Schiphorst and Ben Bruyneel is greatly appreciated. We thank Dr. Frans de Kanter (Department of Physics, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for help in recording the NMR spectrum.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 CH/HD54832-01 (to R. D. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 975 NE 10th St., BRC Rm. 417, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. Tel.: 405-271-2481; Fax: 405-271-3910; E-mail: richard-cummings@ouhsc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206112200

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AY130767.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LN or LacNAc, Galbeta 4GlcNAc; beta 4GalT, UDP-Gal:GlcNAcbeta -R beta 1,4galactosyltransferase; LDN or LacdiNAc, GalNAcbeta 4GlcNAc; ORF, open reading frame; beta 4GalNAcT, UDP- GalNAc:GlcNAcbeta -R beta 1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase; pNP, 4-nitrophenyl; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; HPAEC-PAD, high pH anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Figdor, C. G., van Kooyk, Y., and Adema, G. J. (2002) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 77-84[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Dodd, R. B., and Drickamer, K. (2001) Glycobiology 11, 71R-79R[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Leffler, H. (2001) Results Probl. Cell Differ. 33, 57-83[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Angata, T., Kerr, S. C., Greaves, D. R., Varki, N. M., Crocker, P. R., and Varki, A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 24466-24474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Amado, M., Almeida, R., Schwientek, T., and Clausen, H. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1473, 35-53[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Smith, P. L., Bousfield, G. R., Kumar, S., Fiete, D., and Baenziger, J. U. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 795-802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Fiete, D., Beranek, M. C., and Baenziger, J. U. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 11256-11261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Yan, S. B., Chao, Y. B., and van Halbeek, H. (1993) Glycobiology 3, 597-608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Van den Nieuwenhof, I. M., Koistinen, H., Easton, R. L., Koistinen, R., Kamarainen, M., Morris, H. R., Van Die, I., Seppala, M., Dell, A., and Van den Eijnden, D. H. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 4753-4762[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Van den Eijnden, D. H., Bakker, H., Neeleman, A. P., Van den Nieuwenhof, I. M., and Van Die, I. (1997) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 25, 887-893[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Do, K. Y., Do, S. I., and Cummings, R. D. (1997) Glycobiology 7, 183-194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. van Remoortere, A., van Dam, G. J., Hokke, C. H., van den Eijnden, D. H., van Die, I., and Deelder, A. M. (2001) Infect. Immun. 69, 2396-2401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Nyame, K., Smith, D. F., Damian, R. T., and Cummings, R. D. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 3235-3243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Srivatsan, J., Smith, D. F., and Cummings, R. D. (1992) Glycobiology 2, 445-452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kang, S., Cummings, R. D., and McCall, J. W. (1993) J. Parasitol. 79, 815-828[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Nyame, A. K., Leppanen, A. M., DeBose-Boyd, R., and Cummings, R. D. (1999) Glycobiology 9, 1029-1035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Nyame, A. K., Leppanen, A. M., Bogitsh, B. J., and Cummings, R. D. (2000) Exp. Parasitol. 96, 202-212[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Powell, J. T., and Brew, K. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 3653-3663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Powell, J. T., and Brew, K. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 3645-3652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Shaper, N. L., Shaper, J. H., Meuth, J. L., Fox, J. L., Chang, H., Kirsch, I. R., and Hollis, G. F. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 1573-1577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Ramakrishnan, B., and Qasba, P. K. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 20833-20839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Ramakrishnan, B., and Qasba, P. K. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 310, 205-218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Asano, M., Furukawa, K., Kido, M., Matsumoto, S., Umesaki, Y., Kochibe, N., and Iwakura, Y. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 1850-1857[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Lu, Q., Hasty, P., and Shur, B. D. (1997) Dev. Biol. 181, 257-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Kotani, N., Asano, M., Iwakura, Y., and Takasaki, S. (2001) Biochem. J. 357, 827-834[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Gastinel, L. N., Cambillau, C., and Bourne, Y. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 3546-3557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Van Die, I., Bakker, H., and Van den Eijnden, D. H. (1997) Glycobiology 7, v-viii[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Almeida, R., Amado, M., David, L., Levery, S. B., Holmes, E. H., Merkx, G., van Kessel, A. G., Rygaard, E., Hassan, H., Bennett, E., and Clausen, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31979-31991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Sato, T., Furukawa, K., Bakker, H., Van den Eijnden, D. H., and Van Die, I. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 472-477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Nomura, T., Takizawa, M., Aoki, J., Arai, H., Inoue, K., Wakisaka, E., Yoshizuka, N., Imokawa, G., Dohmae, N., Takio, K., Hattori, M., and Matsuo, N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13570-13577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Lo, N. W., Shaper, J. H., Pevsner, J., and Shaper, N. L. (1998) Glycobiology 8, 517-526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. van Die, I., van Tetering, A., Schiphorst, W. E., Sato, T., Furukawa, K., and van den Eijnden, D. H. (1999) FEBS Lett. 450, 52-56[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Almeida, R., Levery, S. B., Mandel, U., Kresse, H., Schwientek, T., Bennett, E. P., and Clausen, H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26165-26171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Guo, S., Sato, T., Shirane, K., and Furukawa, K. (2001) Glycobiology 11, 813-820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Lee, J., Sundaram, S., Shaper, N. L., Raju, T. S., and Stanley, P. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13924-13934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Nakamura, N., Yamakawa, N., Sato, T., Tojo, H., Tachi, C., and Furukawa, K. (2001) J. Neurochem. 76, 29-38[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Bakker, H., Van Tetering, A., Agterberg, M., Smit, A. B., Van den Eijnden, D. H., and Van Die, I. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18580-18585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Bakker, H., Agterberg, M., Van Tetering, A., Koeleman, C. A., Van den Eijnden, D. H., and Van Die, I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30326-30333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Bakker, H., Schoenmakers, P. S., Koeleman, C. A., Joziasse, D. H., van Die, I., and van den Eijnden, D. H. (1997) Glycobiology 7, 539-548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Mulder, H., Spronk, B. A., Schachter, H., Neeleman, A. P., van den Eijnden, D. H., De, Jong-Brink, M., Kamerling, J. P., and Vliegenthart, J. F. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 227, 175-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Neeleman, A. P., and van de Eijnden, D. H. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10111-10116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Srivatsan, J., Smith, D. F., and Cummings, R. D. (1994) J. Parasitol. 80, 884-890[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Van den Nieuwenhof, I. M., Schiphorst, W. E., Van Die, I., and Van den Eijnden, D. H. (1999) Glycobiology 9, 115-123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Neeleman, A. P., van der Knaap, W. P., and van den Eijnden, D. H. (1994) Glycobiology 4, 641-651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. van Die, I., van Tetering, A., Bakker, H., van den Eijnden, D. H., and Joziasse, D. H. (1996) Glycobiology 6, 157-164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Smith, P. L., and Baenziger, J. U. (1988) Science 242, 930-933[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Herman, T., and Horvitz, H. R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 974-979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Okajima, T., Yoshida, K., Kondo, T., and Furukawa, K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22915-22918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Stearns, D. J., Kurosawa, S., Sims, P. J., Esmon, N. L., and Esmon, C. T. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 826-832[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Rezaie, A. R., Fiore, M. M., Neuenschwander, P. F., Esmon, C. T., and Morrissey, J. H. (1992) Protein Expression Purif. 3, 453-460[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Easton, E. W., Blokland, I., Geldof, A. A., Rao, B. R., and van den Eijnden, D. H. (1992) FEBS Lett. 308, 46-49[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Palcic, M. M., Heerze, L. D., Pierce, M., and Hindsgaul, O. (1988) Glycoconj. J. 5, 49-63
53. Wiggins, C. A., and Munro, S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7945-7950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Deutscher, S. L., and Hirschberg, C. B. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 96-100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Stanley, P., and Siminovitch, L. (1977) Somatic Cell Genet. 3, 391-405[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Do, S. I., and Cummings, R. D. (1992) J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 24, 153-165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Nagayama, Y., Namba, H., Yokoyama, N., Yamashita, S., and Niwa, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33423-33428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Brew, K., Vanaman, T. C., and Hill, R. L. (1968) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 59, 491-497[Free Full Text]
59. Vliegenthart, J. F., Dorland, L., and van Halbeek, H. (1983) Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 41, 209-374
60. Deutscher, S. L., Nuwayhid, N., Stanley, P., Briles, E. I., and Hirschberg, C. B. (1984) Cell 39, 295-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Sasaki, H., Bothner, B., Dell, A., and Fukuda, M. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 12059-12076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Bierhuizen, M. F., and Fukuda, M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 9326-9330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Manzella, S. M., Hooper, L. V., and Baenziger, J. U. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12117-12120[Free Full Text]
64. Saarinen, J., Welgus, H. G., Flizar, C. A., Kalkkinen, N., and Helin, J. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 259, 829-840[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Bergwerff, A. A., Thomas-Oates, J. E., van Oostrum, J., Kamerling, J. P., and Vliegenthart, J. F. (1992) FEBS Lett. 314, 389-394[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
66. Dell, A., Morris, H. R., Easton, R. L., Panico, M., Patankar, M., Oehniger, S., Koistinen, R., Koistinen, H., Seppala, M., and Clark, G. F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24116-24126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
67. Smith, P. L., and Baenziger, J. U. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 7275-7279[Abstract/