![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 38, 34933-34940, September 20, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, May 13, 2002, and in revised form, July 9, 2002
Herbs have been used for medicinal purposes,
including the treatment of diabetes, for centuries. Plants containing
flavonoids are used to treat diabetes in Indian medicine and the
green tea flavonoid, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), is reported to
have glucose-lowering effects in animals. We show here that the
regulation of hepatic glucose production is decreased by EGCG.
Furthermore, like insulin, EGCG increases tyrosine phosphorylation of
the insulin receptor and insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), and it
reduces phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene expression in a
phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent manner. EGCG also
mimics insulin by increasing phosphoinositide 3-kinase,
mitogen-activated protein kinase, and p70s6k
activity. EGCG differs from insulin, however, in that it affects several insulin-activated kinases with slower kinetics. Furthermore, EGCG regulates genes that encode gluconeogenic enzymes and
protein-tyrosine phosphorylation by modulating the redox state of the
cell. These results demonstrate that changes in the redox state may
have beneficial effects for the treatment of diabetes and suggest a
potential role for EGCG, or derivatives, as an antidiabetic agent.
For centuries, folk medicine has employed plants and herbs for
their medicinal and protective abilities. Recent epidemiologic research
shows a positive correlation between the consumption of fruits,
vegetables, grains, and legumes and the prevention of chronic
illnesses. Phytochemicals, naturally occurring plant biochemicals that
give plants their color and flavor, may improve or prevent a number of
chronic diseases because of their anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic,
antioxidant, and anticarcinogenic activity (1). The polyphenols, which
include more than 4000 identified flavonoids, comprise one of the
largest groups of active phytochemicals (2).
Green tea, a beverage commonly consumed in Asian countries, is a
significant source of a type of flavonoids called catechins. The green
tea catechins include ( One of the hallmarks of diabetes is the inability of insulin to inhibit
hepatic glucose production. It has been suggested that increased
gluconeogenesis is a main source of increased hepatic glucose
production and that the ability of insulin to regulate transcription of
the rate-controlling gluconeogenic enzymes, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase), may contribute to this problem. This point is underscored by the
observation that in several animal models of type II diabetes and
obesity, PEPCK mRNA levels are increased 2-3-fold over that
observed in non-diabetic animals, despite the higher circulating
insulin levels observed in the diabetic animals (11-13). Also,
transgenic mice that over-express PEPCK display a diabetes-like
syndrome (14).
The rate of transcription of the hepatic PEPCK gene is increased by
several hormones, including glucocorticoids, retinoic acid, and
glucagon (via its second messenger, cAMP) (15-18). Insulin dominantly
represses PEPCK gene transcription (19-21). The use of specific kinase
inhibitors revealed that PI3K, but neither MAPK nor p70s6k,
is involved in the insulin response of the PEPCK gene (22). A variety
of other agents is insulinomimetic in the sense that these compounds
reduce PEPCK mRNA levels. Such compounds include phorbol esters,
compounds that elicit oxidative and cellular stress (such as
H2O2 and sodium arsenite), and the cytokines
tumor necrosis factor- Vanadate, a potent protein-tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, also mimics
several of the metabolic actions of insulin. For instance, vanadate
lowers blood glucose in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, inhibits
lipolysis in adipocytes, and increases glucose transport into L6
myotubes (27-31). Unlike insulin, however, the above-listed effects of
vanadate are independent of PI3K activity whereas the effects of
insulin are PI3K-dependent (30, 31). Vanadate may act
in vivo by enhancing insulin sensitivity and prolonging
insulin action, effects that seem to be related to protein-tyrosine
phosphatase (PTP) inhibition (32). Furthermore, vanadate directly
inhibits the activity of two key gluconeogenic enzymes, PEPCK and
G6Pase, which also contributes to decreased blood glucose levels in
diabetic animals (33, 34).
The above-listed observations reveal that, although many diverse
signals regulate glucose metabolism, an understanding of these
signaling pathways should aid in the development of pharmacological agents to treat diabetes. A suitable antidiabetic agent should have
actions similar to insulin, or it should bypass the defects in insulin
action characterized by insulin resistance. Since EGCG reduces blood
glucose by an unknown mechanism, the purpose of this study is to
examine the effect of green tea compounds on insulin signaling
pathways, gene expression, and glucose production. Our experiments
reveal that EGCG has some insulinomimetic activities in hepatoma cells
and that it differs from many other identified repressors of PEPCK gene
expression in that it acts in a PI3K-dependent manner. In
contrast to insulin, however, the metabolic effects of EGCG are
somewhat delayed and seem to depend on redox-dependent changes in the cell.
Glucose Production Assay--
H4IIE rat hepatoma cells were
treated with a combination of 500 nM dexamethasone and 0.1 mM 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP in the presence or absence
of insulin (Sigma-Aldrich) or EGCG (Sigma-Aldrich), for 5 h at
37 °C. Cells were incubated for an additional 3 h in glucose
production buffer (glucose-free Dulbecco's modified essential medium,
pH 7.4, containing 20 mM sodium lactate and 2 mM sodium pyruvate without phenol red) with dexamethasone
and 0.1 mM 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP in the presence or
absence of insulin or EGCG. At the end of this incubation, 0.5 ml of
medium was taken to measure the glucose concentration in the culture
medium using a glucose assay kit (Sigma 510-A) (35). Cells were
collected and lysed, and the total protein concentration was measured
(Bio-Rad) to correct for cell count.
Primer Extension and Ribonuclease Protection Assays--
Total
RNA for both primer extension reactions and ribonuclease protection
assays was isolated with Tri-Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc.,
Cincinnati, OH) using the instructions provided by the
manufacturer. The PC28 and ACT25 oligonucleotides, which are
complimentary to the mRNAs of the rat PEPCK and Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis--
H4IIE or HepG2
hepatoma cells were grown to confluence in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 2.5% (v/v) newborn calf serum and
2.5% (v/v) fetal calf serum. H4IIE cells were serum-deprived for
24 h and then incubated in serum-free DMEM in the presence or
absence of 10 nM insulin or various concentrations of EGCG.
After different time points, cell extracts were prepared with a
detergent lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 20 mM
NaP2O7, 0.2% Triton X-100, 10 nM microcystin, 0.1% p70s6k Assay--
One milligram of protein from
H4IIE cells was immunoprecipitated with 2.5 µg of rabbit polyclonal
antibody specific for p70s6k (Santa Cruz sc-230), and the
immune complexes were precipitated with 20 µl of packed protein
A-Sepharose beads. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times in
detergent lysis buffer and two times in 50 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM paranitrophenylphosphate, and 10 nM
microcystin (kinase buffer). Five micrograms of S6 substrate peptide
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) dissolved in kinase buffer were added
to the washed beads in a volume of 10 µl. Kinase assays were
initiated with the addition of 10 µl of 333 µM ATP
containing 10 µCi of [ PKB Assay--
PKB was immunoprecipitated from 1.0 mg of H4IIE
cellular protein extracts with 2 µg of anti-Akt1/PKB PI3K Assay--
IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated from 1.5 mg of
H4IIE cellular protein extracts with 3 µg of a rabbit polyclonal
antibody (Santa Cruz sc-559), and the immune complexes were
precipitated with 20 µl of packed protein A-Sepharose beads.
Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with wash buffer 1 (phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% Nonidet P-40 and 100 mM Na3VO4), two times with wash
buffer 2 (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 500 mM
LiCl) and two times with kinase assay buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA).
The beads were dissolved in 50 µl of kinase assay buffer, followed by
the addition of 10 µl of 100 mM MgCl2 and 20 µg of phosphatidylinositol (Sigma-Aldrich). The phosphatidylinositol
was sonicated in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EGTA before adding to the beads. The reactions were
started by the addition of 5 µl of an ATP stock solution (0.88 mM ATP containing 30 µCi of [ Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species--
Intracellular
reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was measured using
2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH) (Sigma-Aldrich), which is
oxidized to the fluorescent product 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) by
ROS (36). Cells were incubated with various hormonal treatments or EGCG
for 4 h and subsequently washed two times with phosphate-buffered
saline. Serum-free media containing 10 µM DCFH was added,
and cells were examined using a C5810 series charge-coupled device
camera (Hamamatsu) attached to a DMIBR-E inverted microscope (Leica).
Data were normalized to that obtained from cells incubated in
serum-free DMEM.
EGCG Decreases Glucose Production in Hepatoma Cells--
The
production of glucose in response to insulin or EGCG was examined in
H4IIE rat hepatoma cells incubated in medium containing pyruvate and
lactate as substrates for gluconeogenesis. H4IIE cells were chosen for
these experiments because they produce glucose in response to hormones
in both a physiological and consistent manner. The cells were treated
with a combination of 500 nM dexamethasone and 0.1 mM 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP (Dex/cAMP) in the presence or absence of insulin or EGCG, for 5 h to maximize glucose
production capacity. Cells were incubated for an additional 3 h
with Dex/cAMP, with or without insulin or EGCG, in glucose production
buffer (described under "Experimental Procedures"). At the end of
this incubation, 0.5 ml of medium was taken to measure the glucose concentration in the culture medium using a glucose assay kit (Sigma
510-A). Insulin, at physiologic concentrations of 10 nM, and 25 µM EGCG were comparable in repressing glucose
production to basal levels (Fig. 2).
Higher concentrations of EGCG had no further glucose-lowering effect
(data not shown).
Similar inhibition of glucose production was observed in hepatocytes
after EGCG treatment but not after insulin treatment (data not shown).
Others have shown that insulin does not inhibit glucose release from
gluconeogenic substrates in either periportal or perivenous hepatocytes
(37). Although the reason for this phenomenon is unclear, it is
possible that components of the insulin signaling pathway necessary for
repression of gluconeogenesis are disabled during the hepatocyte
isolation procedure. Interestingly, these data imply that EGCG may act
by a different mechanism than insulin, as discussed later.
EGCG Represses PEPCK and G6Pase Gene Expression in a
PI3K-dependent Manner--
The decreased glucose
production observed after EGCG treatment could be related to reduced
expression of genes that encode gluconeogenic enzymes. PEPCK gene
expression is increased by Dex/cAMP and is dominantly repressed by
insulin in H4IIE cells (16, 17, 19, 20). H4IIE cells were therefore
treated with Dex/cAMP in the presence or absence of various
concentrations of EGCG for 4 h, and RNA was isolated for primer
extension analysis to measure PEPCK and EGCG and Insulin Activate Similar Signaling Pathways--
Insulin
activates PI3K, PKB, and p70s6k in H4IIE cells (22). The
effect of EGCG on these kinases was therefore measured using in
vitro kinase assays (Table I). H4IIE
cells were incubated with 10 nM insulin or 50 µM EGCG for 10, 120, or 240 min, and each of these
kinases was isolated and its activity was determined. Insulin and EGCG
activated PI3K within 10 min. The activation by insulin was much more
robust and remained high, even at 240 min. However, in the presence of
EGCG, PI3K activity continued to increase at 240 min. Insulin caused a
2-3-fold increase in PKB activity, whereas EGCG caused only a small,
but insignificant, increase in PKB activity. Insulin also caused a
2-fold increase in p70s6k activity, whereas the activation
by EGCG was lower and only significant after 240 min. The smaller
effect of EGCG on the activation of these kinases is equivalent to that
observed after treatment of H4IIE cells with 0.01 nM
insulin, which causes an ~50% reduction in PEPCK mRNA levels
(data not shown). These data, combined with the data that shows that LY
294002 reverses EGCG-mediated repression of PEPCK and G6Pase gene
expression, suggest that a small increase of PI3K activity may be
sufficient to repress these genes.
EGCG Increases the Level of Tyrosine-phosphorylated Proteins in
H4IIE Cells--
The observed effects of EGCG on enzymes in the
insulin kinase cascade may be caused by the inhibition of
protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity or by increased protein-tyrosine
kinase activity. To determine whether EGCG increases the level of
tyrosine phosphorylation, H4IIE cells were treated for various times
with 50 µM EGCG. Cell lysates were then prepared, and
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis using a
phosphotyrosine-specific antibody. As shown in Fig.
4 (panel A), insulin and EGCG
both increase a number of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in H4IIE
cells. EGCG increased the tyrosine phosphorylation of some of the same
proteins as insulin, and it affected some additional proteins. EGCG
also seemed to affect the level of tyrosine phosphorylation over a different time scale, because some proteins were affected within 30 min, whereas others were modified between 2 and 4 h.
Insulin increases tyrosine phosphorylation on IR-
The effect of EGCG on tyrosine phosphorylation of the IGF-1 receptor
(IGF-1R) was also examined (Fig 4, panel C). H4IIE cells express low levels of IGF-1R, so Hep G2 cells were used for this experiment. Hep G2 cells were incubated with IGF-1 or EGCG, and the
EGCG Has Pro-oxidant Activity in Hepatoma Cells--
ROS have been
implicated in the regulation of protein kinase cascades and in the
inhibition of PTPs (39, 40). It is therefore possible that
pro-oxidative activity of EGCG in hepatoma cells could explain the
increased levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins observed in these
cells. H4IIE cells were incubated with DCFH to test whether EGCG
increases ROS production. ROS produced in cells causes oxidation of
DCFH, yielding the fluorescent product DCF (36). H4IIE cells were
treated in the presence or absence of EGCG, and DCF fluorescence was
measured (Fig. 5). A punctate pattern of
fluorescence was seen after EGCG treatment, most of which was localized
in the perinuclear region. This suggests that EGCG has pro-oxidant
activity in hepatoma cells. Insulin had no effect on DCF fluorescence
(data not shown). The increase in DCF fluorescence was
dose-dependent, because approximately half the fluorescence
was measured when cells were treated with 25 µM EGCG compared with 50 µM EGCG (56.2 ± 7.0 compared with 109.4 ± 48, respectively), when assessed by a spectrofluorometer
(excitation, 500 nm; emission, 530 nm). It was difficult to accurately
measure the fluorescence at lower EGCG concentrations. The
EGCG-mediated increase in DCF fluorescence was abolished by co-treating
the cells with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a glutathione
precursor and scavenger of ROS (Fig. 5). Superoxide dismutase (SOD), a
scavenger of superoxide anions, also decreased the number of cells that fluoresced. These results suggest that EGCG increases ROS production in
H4IIE cells. Despite the rise in ROS, treatment of H4IIE cells with up
to 1 mM EGCG had no adverse effects on cell viability as
assessed by 1-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-3,5-diphenylformazan assays (data not shown).
NAC and SOD Reverse the Effect of EGCG on Tyrosine Phosphorylation
and PEPCK/G6Pase Gene Expression--
Because ROS
production seems increased after treatment of H4IIE cells with EGCG,
the effect of NAC and SOD on tyrosine phosphorylation of H4IIE cellular
proteins was examined. H4IIE cells were treated with NAC or SOD for 30 min before treatment with insulin or EGCG for 2 h. Cells were
harvested, and cell lysates prepared as described in Fig. 4,
panel A. Both NAC and SOD completely reversed the
effect of EGCG on protein-tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig.
6). SOD had no effect on insulin-mediated
protein-tyrosine phosphorylation. However, NAC partially reversed the
tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins around 85 kDa but did not affect
the tyrosine phosphorylation of larger proteins (around 150-200 kDa)
(Fig. 6, panel A). The effect of NAC and SOD on PEPCK and
G6Pase gene expression was also examined. As expected, NAC and SOD
completely reversed EGCG-mediated PEPCK and G6Pase gene repression. NAC
partially inhibited the effect on insulin-mediated repression of the
PEPCK gene, but not the G6Pase gene (Fig. 6, panels B and
C). These results show that EGCG regulates tyrosine
phosphorylation and gene expression by a redox-dependent
mechanism and provides additional evidence that the PEPCK and G6Pase
genes are regulated by multiple signaling pathways.
Although the Western diet is thought to contribute to an increased
lifetime risk of certain diseases, such as cancer and diabetes, plant-based diets offer protective effects (41-43). Tea consumption, especially green tea, is associated with a lower incidence of human
cancer (6). EGCG, the main polyphenolic constituent of green tea, may
prevent carcinogenesis by several different mechanisms, including
inhibition of angiogenesis, impairment of cell cycle progression,
induction of glutathione S-transferase, and decreased production of ROS (6, 41-45).
Several reports have suggested that EGCG and related compounds possess
antidiabetic activity and EGCG significantly decreases blood glucose
when injected into lean and obese Zucker rats (8, 10, 46). Our results
reveal that EGCG is insulinomimetic in that it lowers glucose
production in H4IIE cells and decreases the expression of genes that
control gluconeogenesis, such as the PEPCK and G6Pase genes. Also, EGCG
activates the same kinases as insulin and promotes the phosphorylation
of insulin signaling proteins, such as IRS-1 and IR- The effects of EGCG are reversed by NAC and SOD, whereas those of
insulin are mostly unaffected, suggesting that the former acts by a
different mechanism. In most cell types, EGCG is an antioxidant.
However, in hepatoma cells, EGCG is a pro-oxidant. This is not
completely unexpected because other compounds, such as ascorbate, can
act either as an antioxidant or pro-oxidant, depending on the cellular
environment (47). Curcumin, a phytochemical responsible for the color
of turmeric, has antioxidant activity in many different cell types but
displays pro-oxidant qualities in the presence of transition metals,
such as copper, which exist in the kidney and liver at relatively high
concentrations (48).
The data presented here suggest that EGCG regulates protein-tyrosine
phosphorylation by modulating the redox state of the cell. One possible
mechanism for the observed actions of EGCG in hepatoma cells is the
inhibition of PTPs, which contain an oxidizable cysteine in their
active site (39, 49). It is possible that EGCG causes oxidation of this
cysteine residue in redox-sensitive phosphatases, and NAC and SOD
reverse this effect. Several PTPs, including PTP-1B and leukocyte
antigen-related phosphatase, dephosphorylate the insulin receptor and
IRS-1, making these phosphatases candidates for modification by ROS
produced in response to EGCG (50-52). It is noteworthy that disruption
of the PTP-1B gene in mice leads to symptoms similar to those observed
in Zucker rats injected with EGCG, such as decreased obesity and blood
glucose levels and increased insulin sensitivity (8, 53, 54). We are
currently testing the effect of EGCG on purified PTPs to test this idea.
This study demonstrates that EGCG causes many of the same cellular
effects as insulin, including repression of glucose production and
PEPCK and G6Pase gene expression. EGCG, however, seems to exert these
effects by modulation of the redox state of the cell. Thus, EGCG
analogs or other novel phytochemicals may be identified that have
insulin-like effects. Further experiments directed at determining the
mechanisms of EGCG action may lead to the identification of molecular
targets for the generation of therapeutic agents useful in the
treatment of diabetes.
We thank Cathy Caldwell for excellent
technical assistance and Deborah Brown for manuscript preparation.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK02887 (to M. W.-L.), DK35107 (to D. K. G.) and the Veterans Affairs Research Service.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204672200
The abbreviations used are:
EGCG, (
Epigallocatechin Gallate, a Constituent of Green Tea, Represses
Hepatic Glucose Production*
,
,
,
, and
¶
Department of Molecular Physiology and
Biophysics, § Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt
University School of Medicine, and the ¶ Veterans Affairs
Hospital, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0615
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
)-epigallocatechin gallate
(EGCG),1
(
)-epigallocatechin, (
)-epicatechin gallate, and (
)-epicatechin (Fig. 1) (3). EGCG is the most abundant
of these catechins, and many healthful benefits, including
anticarcinogenic, antioxidant, antiangiogenic, and antiviral
activities, have been attributed to EGCG (4-7). EGCG may also possess
antidiabetic activity. In a recent report, injection of EGCG into lean
and obese Zucker rats significantly lowered blood glucose and insulin
levels, and green tea extract increased glucose metabolism in
adipocytes (8, 9). Additionally, (
)-epicatechin, which is
structurally similar to EGCG, is the active compound in the extract of
Pterocarpus marsupium Roxb bark, which is traditionally used
in Indian folk medicine to treat diabetes (10).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Structure of tea catechins. This figure
shows the structure of the four main tea catechins, EGCG,
(
)-epicatechin gallate, (
)-epigallocatechin, and
(
)-epicatechin.
, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1.
These agents differ from insulin, however, in that they repress PEPCK
gene transcription in a PI3K-independent manner (20, 23-26).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin genes at
positions 102-129 and 42-67, were used in primer extension assays as
described previously (22). Ribonuclease protection assays were
performed according to the instructions provided with the Ambion
(Austin, TX) RPAII kit, as described previously (35). The rat
glucose-6-phosphatase RNA probe was generated from polymerase chain
reactions in which the downstream primer contained the T7 promoter. A
5-µl aliquot of the polymerase chain reaction was added directly to
the components of the Ambion Maxiscript kit, with
[
-32P]UTP to produce radiolabeled RNA.
-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 M phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, and 1 µg/ml leupeptin). Lysates were adjusted to 1 ml in lysis buffer before addition of the specific antisera used to
immunoprecipitate the
-subunit of the insulin receptor (IR-
),
IRS-1, or IGF-1R. The immunoprecipitations were carried out in
reactions containing 2.5 mg of cell lysate and 2.5 µg of antiserum
for 1.5 h at 4 °C. Protein A- or protein G-Sepharose
beads (25 µl) were then added for an additional 1.5-h incubation
followed by two washes of the immunoprecipitates in lysis buffer. The
washed immunoprecipitates were dissolved in 45 µl of SDS sample
buffer, boiled for 3 min, and proteins (30 µg per lane) were resolved
by SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane
and probed with specific antibodies for 2 h, followed by
incubation with an anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase (1:5000). Immunoreactive proteins were
detected using the ECL immunodetection system obtained from Amersham
Biosciences, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Alternatively, cell lysates were prepared as described above and directly dissolved in SDS sample buffer for analysis of
proteins (PKB, p70s6k, and MAPK) by immunoblot analysis.
-32P] ATP. Reactions were
allowed to proceed at 37 °C for 30 min and stopped with the addition
of 20 µl of 40% trichloroacetic acid. Forty microliters of the
reaction mixture was transferred to P81 phosphocellulose paper and
washed three times with 0.75% phosphoric acid for 5 min per wash,
followed by one wash with acetone for 5 min at room temperature. Five
milliliters of scintillation fluid was added, and samples were read by
scintillation counting.
pleckstrin
homology domain, agarose (Upstate Biotechnology) for 90 min. The
enzyme/antibody-agarose complex was washed three times with buffer A
(50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM Na3VO4,
0.1% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM
sodium fluoride, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, pepstatin, and
leupeptin, and 1 µM microcystin), twice with buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.03% (w/v) Brij-35, 0.1 mM EGTA, and 0.1% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol), and twice with assay dilution buffer (20 mM MOPS, pH 7.2, 25 mM
-glycerol phosphate, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, and 1 mM dithiothreitol). Ten microliters of
assay dilution buffer was added to the enzyme/antibody-agarose complex,
followed by the addition of 10 µl of cAMP-dependent
protein kinase inhibitor peptide (10 µM stock), and 10 µl of Akt/PKB substrate peptide (Upstate Biotechnology). Reactions
were started by the addition of 10 µl of 333 µM ATP
containing 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP and incubated at
37 °C for 30 min. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 20 µl
of 40% trichloroacetic acid and washed and quantitated as described
above for p70s6k assays.
-32P]ATP,
3000 Ci/mmol and 20 mM MgCl2) and incubated at
room temperature for 10 min. Reactions were stopped by the addition of
20 µl of 6 N HCl and 160 µl of chloroform:methanol (1:1) and
spotted onto a silicon TLC plate treated with 1% potassium oxalate.
The TLC plate was developed by chromatography in
chloroform:methanol:H2O:ammonium hydroxide
(120:94:11:16).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
EGCG inhibits glucose production in H4IIE
cells. H4IIE cells were treated with Dex/cAMP in the presence or
absence of 10 nM insulin or increasing concentrations of
EGCG for 5 h. The cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered
saline and then were incubated in glucose-free DMEM, pH 7.4, supplemented with 20 mM sodium lactate and 2 mM
sodium pyruvate for 3 h in the presence of Dex/cAMP with or
without insulin or EGCG. The glucose concentration was measured in the
extracellular medium as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Results are presented as percentages relative to the glucose produced
by Dex/cAMP-treated H4IIE cells (100%). Data represent the mean of
three experiments ± S.E., (*p < 0.05, Student's
t test).
-actin (as a control)
mRNA levels. EGCG, in a concentration-dependent manner,
reduced PEPCK mRNA, as shown in Fig.
3 (panel A). Insulin reduces
PEPCK gene expression by a PI3K-dependent mechanism, and the effect of insulin is blocked by the PI3K inhibitors wortmannin and
LY 294002. MAPK is not involved, however, since MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase inhibitors do not affect the regulation of PEPCK gene expression by insulin (22). H4IIE cells were treated with
EGCG in the presence of LY 294002 or U0126, a MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase inhibitor, to determine whether PI3K or
MAPK is involved in EGCG-mediated PEPCK gene repression. As observed
with insulin, only LY 294002 reversed the effect of EGCG on PEPCK gene
expression (Fig. 3, panel B), suggesting the involvement of
PI3K, but not MAPK, in EGCG-mediated repression of the PEPCK gene. The
G6Pase gene is hormonally regulated in a manner similar to that of the
PEPCK gene, and insulin also represses this gene by a
PI3K-dependent mechanism (38). The effect of EGCG on G6Pase
gene expression was also examined using ribonuclease protection assays,
with expression of the
-actin gene serving as a control (Fig. 3,
panel C). Insulin and EGCG both repress expression of the
G6Pase gene in a PI3K-dependent manner. These results
suggest that EGCG mimics insulin action by repressing glucose
production and the expression of genes that control hepatic gluconeogenesis.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
EGCG represses PEPCK and G6Pase gene
expression in a PI3K-dependent manner. H4IIE cells
were treated for 4 h with Dex/cAMP in the presence or absence of
10 nM insulin or increasing concentrations of EGCG. In
experiments using kinase inhibitors, cells were pretreated with 20 µM LY 294002 or 25 µM U0126 for 30 min.
Total RNA was isolated and used for primer-extension experiments to
measure PEPCK or
-actin mRNA (panels A and
B), as described under "Experimental Procedures." PEPCK
mRNA was normalized to
-actin mRNA and the response to
Dex/cAMP was arbitrarily set at 100%. The data represent the average
of six experiments ± S.E. (panel A) (**, p < 0.01, Student's t test) or five experiments ± S.E.
(panel B) (*, p < 0.05 Student's
t test). Ribonuclease protection assays were used to detect
G6Pase and
-actin mRNA. The data shown in panel C is
representative of five separate experiments (*, p < 0.05, Student's t test).
Effect of insulin and EGCG on kinase activity

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
EGCG increases the tyrosine phosphorylation
of IR-
, IRS-1, and IGF-1R. H4IIE cells
were treated for 30-240 min with 10 nM insulin or 50 µM EGCG, and cell lysates were prepared and analyzed by
immunoblot analysis with antibodies specific for phosphotyrosine
(panel A). Regions in which changes in protein-tyrosine
phosphorylation levels were observed are marked by lines on the side of
the immunoblot. IR-
or IRS-1 was immunoprecipitated from H4IIE cells
after 30-180 min of treatment with 10 nM insulin or 50 µM EGCG and analyzed by immunoblotting with a
phosphotyrosine-specific antibody (panel B). The results
presented in panels A and B are representative of
three separate experiments. The effect of IGF-1 or EGCG on the tyrosine
phosphorylation of IGF-1R
was examined in Hep G2 cells (panel
C). These cells were treated for 30-180 min with 100 ng/ml IGF-1
or 50 µM EGCG, and IGF-1R
was immunoprecipitated and
analyzed by immunoblotting with a phosphotyrosine-specific antibody.
The result presented is representative of three separate
experiments.
, IRS-1, and IRS-2.
IR-
and IRS-1 were therefore immunoprecipitated and analyzed for
tyrosine phosphorylation using phosphotyrosine-specific antibodies to
determine whether EGCG affects the phosphorylation of these proteins in
H4IIE cells. These cells do not express sufficient amounts of IRS-2 for
analysis. Insulin and EGCG both increase the tyrosine phosphorylation
of IR-
and IRS-1 (Fig. 4, panel B). Insulin increased the
tyrosine phosphorylation of both proteins within 30 min, as expected.
EGCG also increased the levels of tyrosine phosphorylation within 30 min, but further increases were noted up to 3 h. The extent of
tyrosine phosphorylation of these proteins elicited by EGCG was not as
robust as that observed with insulin. However, EGCG does promote the
association of active PI3K with IRS-1, as shown in Table I.
-subunit of the IGF-1R was immunoprecipitated for analysis with the
phosphotyrosine-specific antibody. As observed with the insulin
receptor, EGCG caused a small delayed increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of the IGF-1R
-subunit.

View larger version (101K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
EGCG increases the production of ROS in H4IIE
cells. H4IIE cells were treated with 50 µM EGCG in
the presence or absence of 10 mM NAC or 100 units/ml SOD
for 4 h. Cells were washed two times with phosphate-buffered
saline, and serum-free medium containing 10 µM DCFH was
added. Cells were examined with a C5810 series charge-coupled device
camera attached to a DMIBR-E inverted microscope. Data were normalized
to that obtained from cells incubated in serum-free DMEM.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
NAC and SOD reverse the effects of EGCG.
The experiments described in the legends to Figs. 3 and 4 were repeated
with the inclusion of either 10 mM NAC or 100 units/ml SOD
to examine the effect of these compounds on EGCG-mediated
protein-tyrosine phosphorylation (panel A), EGCG-mediated
repression of the PEPCK gene (panel B), or EGCG-mediated
repression of the G6Pase gene (panel C). H4IIE cells were
treated for 2 h with 10 nM insulin or 50 µM EGCG in the presence or absence of NAC or SOD. Cell
lysates were prepared and used in immunoblot analysis with a
phosphotyrosine-specific antibody (panel A). The lines on
the side of the immunoblot indicate changes in protein-tyrosine
phosphorylation. Cells were also treated for 4 h with 10 nM insulin or 50 µM EGCG in the presence or
absence of 10 mM NAC or 100 units/ml SOD to examine the
effect of these compounds on PEPCK gene expression in primer-extension
assays, which were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3.
PEPCK mRNA was normalized to
-actin mRNA, and the response
to Dex/cAMP was arbitrarily set at 100%. A graphical representation of
three to seven experiments and a representative primer-extension
reaction are shown in panels B and C (**,
p < 0.01, Student's t test; *,
p < 0.05, Student's t test).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
. Interestingly,
EGCG has similar effects in primary hepatocytes and hepatoma cells in
that it increases the level of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins,
including the insulin receptor, and it represses PEPCK gene expression
(data not shown).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular
Physiology and Biophysics, 707 Light Hall, Vanderbilt University School
of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-0615. Tel.: 615-322-7004; Fax:
615-322-7236; E-mail: daryl.granner@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
)-epigallocatechin gallate;
PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate
carboxykinase;
G6Pase, glucose-6-phosphatase;
PI3K, phosphoinositide
3-kinase;
PKB, protein kinase B;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium;
PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase;
DCFH, 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate;
DCF, 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein;
IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate-1;
IGF, insulin-like growth factor;
IGF-1R, IGF-1 receptor;
Dex, dexamethasone;
NAC, N-acetylcysteine;
SOD, superoxide dismutase;
ROS, reactive
oxygen species;
IR-
,
-subunit of the insulin receptor;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic
acid.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Craig, W. J.
(1999)
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
70,
491S-499S 2.
Hollman, P. C.
(1997)
Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.
51,
S66-S69[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Guo, Q.,
Zhao, B.,
Shen, S.,
Hou, J., Hu, J.,
and Xin, W.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1427,
13-23[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Katiyar, S. K.,
and Mukhtar, H.
(1997)
J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl.
27,
59-67[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Yang, C. S.,
and Wang, Z. Y.
(1993)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
85,
1038-1049 6.
Cao, Y.,
and Cao, R.
(1999)
Nature (Lond.)
398,
381[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Nakayama, M.,
Suzuki, K.,
Toda, M.,
Okubo, S.,
and Hara, Y.
(1993)
Antivir. Res.
21,
289-299[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Kao, Y. H.,
Hiipakka, R. A.,
and Liao, S.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
980-987 9.
Broadhurst, C. L.,
Polansky, M. M.,
and Anderson, R. A.
(2000)
J. Agric. Food Chem.
48,
849-852[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Ahmad, F.,
Khalid, P.,
Khan, M. M.,
Rastogi, A. K.,
and Kidwai, J. R.
(1989)
Acta Diabetol. Lat.
26,
291-300[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Hofmann, C. A.,
Edwards, C. W., III,
Hillman, R. M.,
and Colca, J. R.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
735-740[Abstract]
12.
Noguchi, T.,
Matsuda, T.,
Tomari, Y.,
Yamada, K.,
Imai, E.,
Wang, Z.,
Ikeda, H.,
and Tanaka, T.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
328,
145-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Shafrir, E.,
Barash, V.,
Zederman, R.,
Kissilevitz, R.,
and Diamant, Y. Z.
(1994)
Isr. J. Med. Sci.
30,
32-41[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Valera, A.,
Pujol, A.,
Pelegrin, M.,
and Bosch, F.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9151-9154 15.
Granner, D.,
and Pilkis, S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
10173-10176 16.
Lucas, P. C.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
61,
1131-1173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Hanson, R. W.,
and Reshef, L.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
581-611[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Hall, R. K.,
Scott, D. K.,
Noisin, E. L.,
Lucas, P. C.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5527-5535 19.
Granner, D.,
Andreone, T.,
Sasaki, K.,
and Beale, E.
(1983)
Nature (Lond.)
305,
549-551[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Sasaki, K.,
Cripe, T. P.,
Koch, S. R.,
Andreone, T. L.,
Petersen, D. D.,
Beale, E. G.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
15242-15251 21.
O'Brien, R. M.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1996)
Physiol. Rev.
76,
1109-1161 22.
Sutherland, C.,
O'Brien, R. M.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15501-15506 23.
Sutherland, C.,
Tebbey, P. W.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1997)
Diabetes
46,
17-22[Abstract]
24.
Christ, B.,
and Nath, A.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
320,
161-166[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Christ, B.,
Nath, A.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Jungermann, K.
(1994)
Hepatology
20,
1577-1583[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Hill, M. R.,
and McCallum, R. E.
(1992)
Infect. Immun.
60,
4040-4050 27.
Valera, A.,
Rodriguez-Gil, J. E.,
and Bosch, F.
(1993)
J. Clin. Investig.
92,
4-11[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Brichard, S. M.,
Desbuquois, B.,
and Girard, J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
91,
91-97[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Bosch, F.,
Hatzoglou, M.,
Park, E. A.,
and Hanson, R. W.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
13677-13682 30.
Li, J.,
Elberg, G.,
Sekar, N.,
bin He, Z.,
and Shechter, Y.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
2274-2279 31.
Tsiani, E.,
Bogdanovic, E.,
Sorisky, A.,
Nagy, L.,
and Fantus, I. G.
(1998)
Diabetes
47,
1676-1686[Abstract]
32.
Fantus, I. G.,
and Tsiani, E.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
182,
109-119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Mosseri, R.,
Waner, T.,
Shefi, M.,
Shafrir, E.,
and Meyerovitch, J.
(2000)
Metabolism
49,
321-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Westergaard, N.,
Brand, C. L.,
Lewinsky, R. H.,
Andersen, H. S,
Carr, R. D.,
Burchell, A.,
and Lundgren, K.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
366,
55-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Wang, J. C.,
Stafford, J. M.,
Scott, D. K.,
Sutherland, C.,
and Granner, D. K.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14717-14721 36.
Chandel, N. S.,
McClintock, D. S.,
Feliciano, C. E.,
Wood, T. M.,
Melendez, J. A.,
Rodriguez, A. M.,
and Schumacker, P. T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
25130-25138 37.
Ikezawa, Y.,
Yamatani, K.,
Ohnuma, H.,
Igarashi, M.,
Daimon, M.,
Manaka, H.,
and Sasaki, H.
(2001)
J. Lab. Clin. Med.
138,
387-392[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Dickens, M.,
Svitek, C. A.,
Culbert, A. A.,
O'Brien, R. M.,
and Tavare, J. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
20144-20149 39.
Robinson, K. A.,
Stewart, C. A.,
Pye, Q.,
Floyd, R. A.,
and Hensley, K.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
365,
211-215[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Robinson, K. A.,
Stewart, C. A,
Pye, Q. N.,
Nguyen, X.,
Kenney, L.,
Salzman, S.,
Floyd, R. A.,
and Hensley, K.
(1999)
J. Neurosci. Res.
55,
724-732[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Liberto, M.,
and Cobrinik, D.
(1996)
Cancer Lett.
154,
151-161
42.
Steinmetz, K. A.,
and Potter, J. D.
(1996)
J. Am. Diet. Assoc.
96,
1027-1039[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Segasothy, M.,
and Phillips, P. A.
(1999)
QJM
92,
531-544 44.
Chou, F. P.,
Chu, Y. C,
Hsu, J. D.,
Chiang, H. C.,
and Wang, C. J.
(2000)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
60,
643-650[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Stoner, G. D.,
and Mukhtar, H.
(1995)
J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl.
22,
169-180[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Hii, C. S.,
and Howell, S. L.
(1984)
Diabetes
33,
291-296[Abstract]
47.
Sakagami, H.,
and Satoh, K.
(1997)
Anticancer Res.
17,
221-224[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Ahsan, H.,
Parveen, N.,
Khan, N. U.,
and Hadi, S. M.
(1999)
Chem. Biol. Interact.
121,
161-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Denu, J. M.,
and Tanner, K. G.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
5633-5642[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
50.
Goldstein, B. J.,
Bittner-Kowalczyk, A.,
White, M. F.,
and Harbeck, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4283-4289 51.
Salmeen, A,
Andersen, J. N.,
Myers, M. P.,
Tonks, N. K.,
and Barford, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell.
6,
1401-1412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
52.
Mooney, R. A.,
Kulas, D. T.,
Bleyle, L. S.,
and Novak, J. S.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
235,
709-712[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
53.
Elchebly, M.,
Payette, P.,
Michaliszyn, E.,
Cromlish, W.,
Collins, S.,
Loy, A. L.,
Normandin, D.,
Cheng, A.,
Himms-Hagen, J.,
Chan, C. C.,
Ramachandran, C.,
Gresser, M. J.,
Tremblay, M. L.,
and Kennedy, B. P.
(1999)
Science (Wash. D. C.)
283,
1544-1548
54.
Klaman, L. D.,
Boss, O.,
Peroni, O. D.,
Kim, J. K.,
Martino, J. L.,
Zabolotny, J. M.,
Moghal, N.,
Lubkin, M.,
Kim, Y. B.,
Sharpe, A. H.,
Stricker-Krongrad, A.,
Shulman, G. I.,
Neel, B. G.,
and Kahn, B. B.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
5479-5489
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bose, J. D. Lambert, J. Ju, K. R. Reuhl, S. A. Shapses, and C. S. Yang The Major Green Tea Polyphenol, (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate, Inhibits Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, and Fatty Liver Disease in High-Fat-Fed Mice J. Nutr., September 1, 2008; 138(9): 1677 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chanda, S.-J. Kim, I.-K. Lee, M. Shong, and H.-S. Choi Sodium arsenite induces orphan nuclear receptor SHP gene expression via AMP-activated protein kinase to inhibit gluconeogenic enzyme gene expression Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2008; 295(2): E368 - E379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. Stote and D. J. Baer Tea Consumption May Improve Biomarkers of Insulin Sensitivity and Risk Factors for Diabetes J. Nutr., August 1, 2008; 138(8): 1584S - 1588S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C Venables, C. J Hulston, H. R Cox, and A. E Jeukendrup Green tea extract ingestion, fat oxidation, and glucose tolerance in healthy humans Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 778 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Govorko, S. Logendra, Y. Wang, D. Esposito, S. Komarnytsky, D. Ribnicky, A. Poulev, Z. Wang, W. T. Cefalu, and I. Raskin Polyphenolic compounds from Artemisia dracunculus L. inhibit PEPCK gene expression and gluconeogenesis in an H4IIE hepatoma cell line Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2007; 293(6): E1503 - E1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||