![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 38, 35219-35224, September 20, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Groupe de Recherche en Transport Membranaire,
Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada
Received for publication, May 2, 2002, and in revised form, July 19, 2002
rkST1, an orphan cDNA of the SLC5 family
(43% identical in sequence to the sodium myo-inositol
cotransporter SMIT), was expressed in Xenopus
laevis oocytes that were subsequently voltage-clamped and
exposed to likely substrates. Whereas superfusion with glucose and
other sugars produced a small inward current, the largest current was
observed with myo-inositol. The expressed protein, which we
have named SMIT2, cotransports myo-inositol with a
Km of 120 µM and displays a
current-voltage relationship similar to that seen with SMIT (now called
SMIT1). The transport is Na+-dependent, with a
Km of 13 mM. SMIT2 exhibits
phlorizin-inhibitable presteady-state currents and
substrate-independent "Na+ leak" currents similar to
those of related cotransporters. The steady-state cotransport current
is also phlorizin-inhibitable with a Ki of 76 µM. SMIT2 exhibits stereospecific cotransport of both
D-glucose and D-xylose but does not transport
fucose. In addition, SMIT2 (but not SMIT1) transports
D-chiro-inositol. Based on previous
publications, the tissue distribution of SMIT2 is different from that
of SMIT1, and the existence of this second cotransporter may explain
much of the heterogeneity that has been reported for inositol transport.
The first members of the vertebrate cotransporter protein family
SLC5, which includes the high affinity Na+/glucose
cotransporter (SGLT1) and the Na+/myo-inositol
cotransporter (SMIT), were isolated over a decade ago based on
expression of the proteins in Xenopus laevis
oocytes (1, 2). Although substrates as diverse as proline, iodide, and
vitamins (3) are transported by this family of proteins, the best
characterized transporters remain SGLT1 and SMIT. There are also
several "orphan" transporters whose cDNA has been cloned either
by using labeled cDNA from members of the SLC5 family as biochemical probes or by comparing SLC5 sequence information in silico to data stored in DNA data bases (3); the newly discovered sequences are orphans in that they have no known function. Some of the
orphan protein sequences are particularly similar to the protein
sequences for SGLT1 and SMIT (4, 5) and presumably transport substrates
similar or identical to either glucose or its isomer
myo-inositol. The SLC5 proteins with known functions have
generally been studied by voltage-clamp experiments because these
proteins are electrogenic. Also, presteady-state currents are
associated with expression of these proteins at the cell surface, and
some (but not all, e.g. xSGLT1L (6)) SLC5 proteins also exhibit a substrate-independent Na+ current
("Na+ leak").
myo-Inositol (MI)1
is the most biologically abundant stereoisomer of the inositols,
cyclic polyols which serve as precursors to molecules involved in
several important aspects of cell physiology, including cell signaling
via the inositol phosphate pathways (7) and the production of
phospholipids involved in cell adhesion and vesicular trafficking (8).
MI also serves as a "compatible osmolyte" used to control
intracellular osmolarity in various tissues, including kidney, brain,
and endothelium (9-11). Although mammalian serum levels of MI are
normally between 30 and 70 µM (12-14), the MI levels
within mammalian cells can attain 30 mM (15). There appear
to be several transport mechanisms involved in the active uptake of MI
into various types of cells (16-19), and examples of tissues seeming
to lack active transport of MI have also been described (20-22). In
particular, one transporter that exhibits similar affinities for MI and
for its epimer D-chiro-inositol has been
demonstrated in the hepatic cell culture line HepG2 (18); in contrast,
transport of D-chiro-inositol is not observed
with the SMIT transporter (18). The proteins known to transport MI in
mammals are SMIT and HMIT, a H+/MI cotransporter from a
completely different protein family (23).
In this work, we have found that a novel Na+/MI cotransport
activity is associated with expression of one of the orphan proteins of
the SLC5 family (rkST1) (4) in Xenopus oocytes. The
substrate specificities and transport kinetics of this protein exhibit
both functional similarities to the previously cloned SMIT transporter as well as obvious differences, including the transport of
D-chiro-inositol. The existence of this second
cotransporter may explain some of the heterogeneity that has been
reported for Na+/MI uptake.
Materials--
Unless otherwise noted, all of the chemicals were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. D-glucose,
D-xylose, and L-xylose were analyzed by high
pressure liquid chromatography (courtesy of Douglas Heimark, Insmed
Inc., Glen Allen, VA); none of the three sugars contained detectable
levels of MI (>0.1%). D-chiro-Inositol and
L-chiro-inositol were from Industrial Research
Ltd. (Lower Hutt, New Zealand). Phlorizin was diluted at least 1:1000
from a 500 mM solution in ethanol. For studies where the
concentration of phlorizin was varied, phlorizin crystals were
dissolved directly into the saline solution.
DNA and RNA Preparation--
The coding region of the rabbit
cDNA rkST1 (4) was obtained by PCR on renal cDNA using
the phosphorylated oligonucleotides GATCTCACCATGGAGAGCAGCACCAGCA
and CTAGTCTAGGCGAAGTAGCCCCAGAGGAA (AlphaDNA, Montreal, Canada)
and Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene, San Diego, CA). The ends
of the PCR product were digested with Exonuclease III to yield 5'
overhangs (24). Following this, the DNA product was ligated between the
BglII and SpeI sites of pT7T3, a vector designed
for strong expression of transcripts in oocytes (kindly provided by Dr.
Paul Krieg, University of Texas at Austin). Following purification of
the recombinant plasmid, an aliquot of the DNA was cleaved by digestion
with EcoRI, followed by in vitro transcription
using T7 RNA polymerase (25).
The identity of the cloned PCR product was confirmed by dideoxy
sequencing. There were 8 base pairs that differed from the published
rabbit rsKT1 cDNA sequence, resulting in one conservative alteration in the protein sequence (T173A)*.
Oocyte Preparation--
The oocytes were removed from gravid
female X. laevis frogs (Connecticut Valley Biological Supply
Co., Southampton, MA) under tricaine anesthesia. The individually
dissected oocytes were placed into a Ca2+-free buffered
saline solution (200 millosmolar) and defolliculated by
collagenase digestion. The oocytes were maintained at 18 °C in
Barth's solution (90 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 0.82 mM MgSO4, 0.41 mM
CaCl2, 0.33 mM
Ca(NO3)2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.6)
supplemented with 5% horse serum (26) (except where described), 2.5 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml
streptomycin. RNA (46 nl, 0.1 µg/µl unless otherwise noted) was
injected into the oocytes 1 day after surgical isolation; the oocytes
were assayed for transporter activity at 5-8 days after the injection.
Steady-state Current Measurements--
The oocyte currents were
measured with a standard two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique as
described previously (27). In brief, a commercial amplifier (oocyte
clamp model OC-725, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT) and a data
acquisition system (RC Electronics, Santa Barbara, CA) were used to
send voltage pulses to the oocyte as well as to simultaneously record
membrane current and voltage signals. The oocyte was superfused (~1.5
ml/min) with a saline solution containing 90 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 0.82 mM MgCl2, 0.74 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES-Tris, pH 7.6. After microelectrode impalement, a membrane potential stabilization
period of 1-10 min was observed. Oocytes whose membrane potential was
less negative than Measurement and Analysis of Presteady-state Currents--
For
the recording of presteady-state currents, the voltage pulse duration
was reduced to 50 ms, and the sampling rate was increased to 0.1 ms/point. The membrane potential was stepped from +50 mV to Expression of rkST1 in Xenopus oocytes was impeded by a
lethal effect of the protein on the host cells. Injection of 46 nl of
rkST1 mRNA at a concentration of 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 µg/µl
resulted in the death of all oocytes by the third day following
injection (as judged either visibly or by membrane potential
measurement) when incubated in serum-free Barth's solution; injection
of 0.1 µg/µl mRNA caused about half of the oocytes to die. The
mortality rate was reduced by inclusion of 5% horse serum in the
incubation medium (26), which resulted in survival of all oocytes
injected with 0.1 µg/µl mRNA as well as half of those injected
with 0.25 µg/µl mRNA. Inclusion of either 500 µM
phlorizin or 5 mM MI in the Barth's solution did not
affect the survival rate. Subsequent experiments were performed after
injecting oocytes with 46 nl of 0.1 µg/µl mRNA and maintaining
the oocytes in Barth's solution containing 5% serum.
The initial indication that the rkST1 protein was expressed in the
oocyte plasma membrane was provided by the presteady-state currents
created by briefly stepping the membrane potential of oocytes from the
holding potential of The oocytes expressing rkST1 were then superfused with several
substrates, including glucose and MI, while the oocyte membrane potential was held at
Identification of a Novel
Na+/myo-Inositol Cotransporter*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
35 mV were discarded. The membrane potential was
then held at
50 mV, following which a voltage range from +75 mV to
175 mV was covered in 25-mV steps. The oocyte membrane potential was
stepped to the new levels for 250-ms intervals, and traces were
analyzed by averaging the signal in a window of 50 ms positioned after
the decay of capacitive transient currents. The measurements are
generally taken in the absence and in the presence of a particular
substrate, and the substrate-specific current is determined by
subtraction of one current from the other. When the concentration of
NaCl was diminished, it was isotonically replaced with
N-methyl-D-glucamine chloride. All of the
steady-state and presteady-state current experiments were performed at
room temperature (24 °C).
175 mV in
25-mV increments from a holding potential of
50 mV. The currents
measured in the presence of 0.5 mM phlorizin were
subtracted (point by point) from the total currents measured in a
saline solution ([Na+]out = 30 mM). The displaced charge (Q) was obtained by
integrating the transient portion of the presteady-state currents, and
the Q versus Vm curve was fitted to
the following Boltzmann equation,
where Qhyp and
Qdep are the charges transferred at
hyperpolarizing and depolarizing Vm,
z is the valence of the mobile charge, V0.5 is the Vm at which
half of the charge is transferred, and F, R, and
T are the usual constants. Fitting was done using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (Origin 6.1, OriginLab Corp.,
Northampton, MA).
(Eq. 1)
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
50 mV to intermediate levels between
175 mV
and +50 mV. As seen in Fig. 1, control
(water-injected) oocytes display a capacitive current that decays
within 1.5-2.5 ms. Oocytes injected with rkST1 mRNA display an
additional current that continues to decay well after the membrane
potential has stabilized at a new level. This is similar to the
presteady-state currents observed with other cotransporter proteins
(28-30), confirming that an exogenous protein has been expressed at
the plasma membrane. Although not all membrane proteins are likely to
be characterized by presteady-state currents when expressed in
ovo, this phenomenon holds true for all of the SLC5 family members
that have been examined.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Presteady-state current recordings. The
oocytes were held at a membrane potential of
50 mV, which was then
stepped to levels between +50 mV and
175 mV for 50-ms periods. A
series of recordings of the membrane potential from a typical oocyte
undergoing this voltage clamp protocol is shown (A). The
total currents across the oocyte membrane were measured and are
displayed for typical oocytes that had been injected with water
(B) or with rkST1 mRNA (C). NaCl was present
at 90 mM in this series of experiments, but no MI was
present.
50 mV. A large, reversible, steady-state inward
current was associated with exposure to 1 mM MI (Fig.
2), whereas a much smaller current was
associated with exposure to 1 mM glucose. Superfusion with
1 mM
-methylglucose, a specific substrate for SGLT1, did
not cause any current flow through rkST1, whereas a small inward
current was blocked by application of 0.5 mM phlorizin,
similar to substrate-independent currents seen with other
cotransporters (31, 32). Because the protein evinced the greatest
currents following exposure to MI, we have named it SMIT2, and we
suggest that the first SMIT protein be renamed SMIT1, with the consent
of the original authors.2 A
large current was also observed with superfusion of
D-chiro-inositol, but only a very small current
was seen with L-chiro-inositol superfusion. None
of these currents were seen in the absence of sodium.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Substrate transport through the rkST1 (SMIT2)
protein. The oocyte was clamped at
50 mV and superfused with a
saline solution containing 90 mM NaCl. The substrates were
superfused at a concentration of 1 mM; phlorizin was
superfused at a concentration of 500 µM.
To better characterize the substrate specificity of this transporter,
we superfused SMIT2-expressing oocytes with 50 mM of either
MI or a variety of sugars to be able to compare SMIT2 transport with
results similarly obtained by others with SGLT1 and SMIT1 (28) (Fig.
3). The solutions contained 65 mM NaCl, and tonicity was maintained by the inclusion of 50 mM mannitol in the absence of MI or other sugars (mannitol
did not induce measurable currents through SMIT2). To eliminate the
variability caused by the different levels of SMIT2 expression in
individual oocytes, the results from each oocyte are expressed as
percentages of the current observed when 50 mM MI was
applied to the same oocyte. There are several intriguing differences
between the substrate specificities of SMIT1 and SMIT2. The most
obvious is that SMIT2 has a greater affinity for D-glucose
than does SMIT1, because 50 mM D-glucose produces a current through SMIT2 that is over half the size of the
current seen with 50 mM MI but less than 25% of the MI
current is seen when 50 mM D-glucose is applied
to SMIT1 (28). SMIT2 exhibits stereospecificity, transporting
D-glucose and D-xylose but not their
L-stereoisomers. None of the other sugars tested with SMIT2
induced significant currents. SMIT1, in contrast, transports L-fucose and L-xylose (but not their
D-isomers) and does not distinguish between D-
and L-glucose. Neither does SMIT1 distinguish between
-methylglucose and D-glucose, whereas SMIT2 displays far
more transport of D-glucose than of
-methylglucose at 50 mM substrate. Although L-fucose has been shown
to inhibit SMIT1 (33), we found no inhibition of the SMIT2 current
associated with 100 µM MI when 5 mM
L-fucose was added to the MI (data not shown).
|
The current-voltage (I-V) relationship of SMIT2 was examined by
subtracting the currents measured in the absence of MI from those
observed in the presence of 1 mM MI; the difference between them represents the substrate-dependent current passing
through SMIT2. No MI-dependent current was observed in
control (water-injected) oocytes, whereas superfusion of MI causes a
large inward current through SMIT2, which increased in magnitude as the
membrane potential grew more negative (Fig.
4). The current showed no evidence of having attained a maximal level at the most negative potential used
(
175 mV), which is similar to the I-V curve seen with SMIT1 expression but unlike the shape of the I-V curve for SGLT1 (28). The
currents for the phlorizin-sensitive sodium leak associated with SMIT2
were also examined at different membrane potentials (Fig. 4). The
magnitude of this current at highly negative potentials is on the order
of 5% of the substrate-dependent current, similar to the
size of the SGLT1 leak current (31). The outward sodium leak currents
at positive potentials are negligible, unlike those seen with SGLT1
(31).
|
We have also examined the voltage sensitivity of the kinetic constants
of SMIT2. The Km value for MI remains quite constant, near 120 µM, over the voltage range of
175 mV
to
25 mV (Fig. 5A); this is
approximately twice as high as the Km for SMIT1
(which is also relatively voltage-independent). The kinetic parameters
at membrane potentials more positive than
25 mV were found to be
unreliable because of a vanishingly small steady-state
MI-dependent current. Not surprisingly, the calculated Imax values found while varying MI or sodium
concentrations both comprise curves that conform to the I-V curve seen
in Fig. 4 at the relatively high MI concentration of 1 mM
with 90 mM sodium (Fig. 5B). The
Km for sodium was lowest at the most negative potentials, rising quickly when the membrane potential approached zero.
One noteworthy difference between the sodium affinities of the two SMIT
proteins is that the SMIT2 Km reached an extremely
low value (2.7 mM) at
175 mV, whereas the
Km values seen with SMIT1 appears to attain a lower
limit near 40 mM (28). The sodium Km
value for SGLT1, by comparison, presents a voltage dependence that
appears very similar to that seen with SMIT2 (31). At
50 mV,
our data was fit to the Hill equation and produced a Hill coefficient
of 1.4 (data not shown), indicating significant cooperativity, which
suggests a stoichiometry greater than 1:1. It should also be mentioned
that, at
50 mV, the Km for
D-chiro-inositol is 130 ± 10 µM, and the Imax is identical to
that seen with MI (Fig. 2). The Km for D-glucose is ~30 mM at
50 mV, whereas the
Imax appears identical to that determined with
MI.
|
We turned to measurements of the reversal potential to further pursue
the question of stoichiometry (34). In the presence of 100 µM MI, varying concentrations of phlorizin were used
while recording the MI-dependent current (Fig.
6). As analyzed by competitive inhibition, a Ki of 76 µM was
obtained. Analysis of the phlorizin-sensitive current showed very
little outward current, and even conditions of preloading with MI or
with lower external [Na] failed to induce a reliable reversal
potential. Consequently, we were unable to use the reversal potential
of the Na+/MI current to estimate the stoichiometry of the
cotransport protein, as had been done for SGLT1 (34).
|
The presteady-state currents associated with SMIT2 expression in
Xenopus oocytes were examined by subtracting the currents measured in the presence of 0.5 mM phlorizin from those
measured in the absence of phlorizin (Fig.
7). No MI was present, and the sodium
concentration was reduced to 30 mM to bring the
V0.5 toward more positive potentials. The
presteady-state currents are present whenever the potential is clamped
to a new value; there are also some steady-state currents caused by the
substrate-independent current that passes through SMIT2. Integration of
the presteady-state current produced a transferred charge
versus potential curve, which can be fitted with a Boltzmann
relation described by a Qmax value of 11.7 ± 0.5 nC, a V0.5 of
11 ± 3 mV, and a
z value of 1.21 ± 0.05. Given these z and
Qmax values, the number of transporters/oocyte can be calculated at 5.8 × 1010. Assuming a
IMI of 200 nA at
50 mV, the turnover rate must
be either 23 s
1 (assuming a Na+:MI
stoichiometry of 1:1) or 11.5 s
1 (assuming a
Na+:MI stoichiometry of 2:1).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The SMIT2 cDNA was first cloned in 1994 by Hitomi and Tsukagoshi (4) using PCR with degenerate primers against a conserved sequence motif. Sequence analysis and comparison within the SLC5 family suggested a 12-14 TMS protein with 49 and 43% sequence identity to SGLT1 and SMIT1, respectively. SMIT2 RNA had been detected in brain, kidney, heart, skeletal muscle, spleen, liver, placenta, lung, leukocytes, and neurons (4, 35, 36), but the function of the protein had never been established.
Identifying the function of an orphan cotransporter in Xenopus oocytes can be greatly aided by first establishing that the protein is actually expressed at the cell membrane. A number of other orphan proteins have not displayed significant currents after exposure to a battery of possible substrates, and there are examples where this has occurred because the protein was not expressed at the cell surface during heterologous expression in oocytes (23). The presteady-state currents displayed by SMIT2 are large and long-lived, enabling us to easily observe them and giving us confidence that the orphan protein was correctly expressed at the cell surface.
SMIT2, when expressed in oocytes, transports MI with a Km (120 µM) closely corresponding to the 70 µM human plasma concentration of MI (14) and well below the 470 µM concentration reported for cerebrospinal fluid (37) and has a substantial Imax that compares well with other sodium-coupled cotransporters. Furthermore, the Km for glucose is well above normal serum glucose levels. It seems clear that MI is the physiological substrate for the protein; although D-chiro-inositol is transported as readily as MI, the average serum level of D-chiro-inositol is less than 100 nM (38), and thus D-chiro-inositol transport represents a minor physiological role for SMIT2. It should be noted that there has been one previous publication suggesting the names SMIT1, SMIT2, and SMIT3 for three alternate transcripts from the SLC5A3 gene (39); we suggest that these be named SMIT1a, SMIT1b, and SMIT1c, in which we have the consent of the authors of that work.3
SMIT2 displays properties that are similar to those of the best studied
sodium-coupled transporter, SGLT1. Like SGLT1, SMIT2 is
phlorizin-sensitive, has a sodium leak and presents presteady-state currents; the sodium activation is slightly cooperative, suggesting a
stoichiometry of 2 sodium for 1 MI molecule; and its estimated turnover
rate is of the order of 10. On the other hand, it also presents very
noticeable differences versus SGLT1. The I-V relationship does not saturate at negative membrane potentials, indicating that, as
seems to be the case for SMIT1, a voltage-dependent step remains rate-limiting throughout the voltage range studied. The sugar
affinity remains approximately constant from
25 to
175 mV. One of
the most striking differences between SMIT1 and SMIT2 is that SMIT2
displays specificity for the D-stereoisomers of the most
prevalent biological substrates (chiro-inositol and
glucose), whereas SMIT1 has no such preference. These differences in
substrate selectivity may be useful for delineating the functional
differences between the two proteins in vivo, where they are
both expressed in kidney and brain (2, 36). The lack of transport of
galactose by SMIT2 conforms to a motif proposed recently in which
proteins of the SLC5 family that have a threonine at the position
homologous to residue 460 in human SGLT1 are able to transport
galactose, whereas the other SLC5 proteins (such as SMIT2) do not
transport galactose (40).
A recent publication described the human SMIT2 cDNA sequence and examined the distribution of SMIT2 expression by Northern blot analysis (41). SMIT2 appears to be quite widely distributed, although it is not present in small intestine and some other tissues. In particular, SMIT2 is well expressed in brain, heart, muscle, kidney, and liver. In other work, SMIT1 and SMIT2 have been detected in neurons, both in glial cells and in astrocytes (35). Because the control of MI uptake into the cells of the central nervous system has been suggested to be related to the control of a variety of psychiatric illnesses (42-44), a better understanding of the roles for SMIT1 and SMIT2 in brain may aid the investigation of these maladies. The group that identified the human homologue of SMIT2 has also examined the possibility of a link between this gene and an inherited disorder of infantile convulsions that has been mapped to this region of the genome but found no link between carriers of the disease and specific polymorphisms within the cDNA.
SMIT2 appears to be similar to a cotransporter from HepG2 cells that was previously shown to transport MI and D-chiro-inositol with similar affinities (18). As was seen for SMIT2, the novel transporter described in these cell cultures displayed similar Km values for the two inositols and exhibited competition from D-glucose but not from L-glucose. The same cell line also appeared to express SMIT1, indicating that the two proteins can coexist in the same cells. No information is yet available regarding the distribution of the two cotransporters between the different plasma membrane domains in these polarized cells. Lack of inhibition of SMIT2 by L-fucose suggests that SMIT2 is not involved in several transport phenomena involving competition between L-fucose and MI, including diabetic neuropathy (45). It should be noted, however, that SMIT2 has a greater affinity for glucose than does SMIT1 and is thus more likely to be affected by increased glucose levels during untreated diabetes.
The SMIT2 peptide sequence is most closely related to the Xenopus SGLT1-like protein (xSGLT1L). They are 67% identical, whereas SMIT2 is only 43% identical to SMIT1 and 49% identical to SGLT1. It is difficult to firmly establish whether SMIT2 and xSGLT1L represent true orthologues; by comparison there is 75% identity between the human SGLT1 and SGLT3 peptide sequences. Functional comparison of the two proteins is also ambiguous; although xSGLT1L transports both MI and glucose, its affinity for MI is half that of SMIT2, whereas xSGLT1L has a lower Km for glucose (6.3 mM versus ~30 mM for SMIT2). Furthermore, the Ki for phlorizin interaction with xSGLT1L is 6.3 µM, whereas it inhibits SMIT2 with a Ki of 76 µM. The current-voltage relationships for the two proteins are also somewhat different because xSGLT1L, like SGLT1, appears to reach a plateau in the current obtained as the potential becomes quite negative. SMIT2, on the other hand, generates increasingly large currents as the potential becomes more negative, similar to that seen with SMIT1. SMIT2 also displays sodium leak currents (substrate-independent, phlorizin-inhibitable), whereas xSGLT1L has no sodium leak currents. The strongest evidence that SMIT2 and xSGLT1L represent different proteins is that the distribution of SMIT2 is primarily in the kidney, liver, heart, and brain (but not intestine), whereas xSGLT1L is found primarily in the intestine and kidney (6, 46). It seems likely that the two proteins are orthologous but that they serve somewhat different roles in mammals and amphibians.
There have been a number of reports that indicate multiple MI transport
activities in different tissues, and the identification of SMIT2 may
illuminate some of these situations. Precise location of SMIT2 in
vivo will require immunohistochemical techniques. The substrate
specificity of SMIT2 does match that of a transporter that has been
observed in renal proximal tubule apical membranes (47). Because the
RNAs coding for SMIT1, SMIT2, and HMIT appear to be absent from small
intestine (2, 23, 41), the identification of the intestinal MI
transporter remains to be determined. The presence of three distinct MI
cotransporters in brain tissues complicates the issue of MI metabolism
in the central nervous system, which has gained prominence with the
recent identification of MI depletion as the mechanism of action of
three drugs commonly used to treat bipolar affective disorder (48).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Groupe de Recherche en
Transport Membranaire, P.O. Box 6128 succ. "Centre-Ville" Montréal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada. Tel.: 514-343-6111 (ext.
3289); Fax: 514-343-7146; E-mail: coady@magellan.umontreal.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204321200
2 J. S. Handler, personal communication.
3 M. J. Stevens, personal communication.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: MI, myo-inositol; I-V, current-voltage.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hediger, M. A., Coady, M. J., Ikeda, T. S., and Wright, E. M. (1987) Nature 330, 379-381[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Kwon, H. M.,
Yamauchi, A.,
Uchida, S.,
Preston, A. S.,
Garcia-Perez, A.,
Burg, M. B.,
and Handler, J. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6297-6301 |
| 3. | Wright, E. M. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 280, F10-F18 |
| 4. | Hitomi, K., and Tsukagoshi, N. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1190, 469-472[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Pajor, A. M. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1194, 349-351[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Nagata, K., Hori, N., Sato, K., Ohta, K., Tanaka, H., and Hiji, Y. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, G1251-G1259[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Downes, C. P., and Macphee, C. H. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 193, 1-18[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Toker, A., and Cantley, L. C. (1997) Nature 387, 673-676[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Nakanishi, T., Balaban, R. S., and Burg, M. B. (1988) Am. J. Physiol. 255, C181-C191[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Wiese, T. J., Dunlap, J. A., Conner, C. E., Grzybowski, J. A., Lowe, W. L., and Yorek, M. A. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, C990-C997[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Trachtman, H. (1992) Pediatr. Nephrol. 6, 104-112[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Ashizawa, N., Yoshida, M., and Aotsuka, T. (2000) J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 44, 89-94[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | MacGregor, L. C., and Matschinsky, F. M. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 141, 382-389[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Dolhofer, R., and Wieland, O. H. (1987) J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 25, 733-736[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Schmolke, M., Bornemann, A., and Guder, W. G. (1990) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 371, 909-916[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Nakanishi, T.,
Turner, R. J.,
and Burg, M. B.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
6002-6006 |
| 17. | Novak, J. E., Turner, R. S., Agranoff, B. W., and Fisher, S. K. (1999) J. Neurochem. 72, 1431-1440[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Ostlund, R. E., Jr.,
Seemayer, R.,
Gupta, S.,
Kimmel, R.,
Ostlund, E. L.,
and Sherman, W. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10073-10078 |
| 19. |
Cammarata, P. R.,
Chen, H. Q.,
Yang, J.,
and Yorio, T.
(1992)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
33,
3572-3580 |
| 20. | Sigal, S. H., Yandrasitz, J. R., and Berry, G. T. (1993) Metabolism 42, 395-401[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Noh, S. J., Kim, M. J., Shim, S., and Han, J. K. (1998) J. Cell. Physiol. 176, 412-423[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Warfield, A., Hwang, S. M., and Segal, S. (1978) J. Neurochem. 31, 957-960[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Uldry, M., Ibberson, M., Horisberger, J. D., Chatton, J. Y., Riederer, B. M., and Thorens, B. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 4467-4477[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Kaluz, S.,
Kolble, K.,
and Reid, K. B.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
4369-4370 |
| 25. | Pokrovskaya, I. D., and Gurevich, V. V. (1994) Anal. Biochem. 220, 420-423[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Quick, M. W., Naeve, J., Davidson, N., and Lester, H. A. (1992) BioTechniques 13, 357-361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Coady, M. J., Jalal, F., Chen, X., Lemay, G., Berteloot, A., and Lapointe, J. Y. (1994) FEBS Lett. 356, 174-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Hager, K., Hazama, A., Kwon, H. M., Loo, D. D., Handler, J. S., and Wright, E. M. (1995) J. Membr. Biol. 143, 103-113[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Mackenzie, B.,
Loo, D. D.,
Panayotova-Heiermann, M.,
and Wright, E. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32678-32683 |
| 30. | Forster, I. C., Wagner, C. A., Busch, A. E., Lang, F., Biber, J., Hernando, N., Murer, H., and Werner, A. (1997) J. Membr. Biol. 160, 9-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Umbach, J. A.,
Coady, M. J.,
and Wright, E. M.
(1990)
Biophys. J.
57,
1217-1224 |
| 32. |
Forster, I.,
Hernando, N.,
Biber, J.,
and Murer, H.
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol
112,
1-18 |
| 33. | Yorek, M. A., Stefani, M. R., Dunlap, J. A., Ro, K. S., and Davidson, E. P. (1991) Diabetes 40, 1016-1023[Abstract] |
| 34. |
Chen, X. Z.,
Coady, M. J.,
Jackson, F.,
Berteloot, A.,
and Lapointe, J. Y.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
69,
2405-2414 |
| 35. | Poppe, R., Karbach, U., Gambaryan, S., Wiesinger, H., Lutzenburg, M., Kraemer, M., Witte, O. W., and Koepsell, H. (1997) J. Neurochem. 69, 84-94[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Barak, Y., Levine, J., Glasman, A., Elizur, A., and Belmaker, R. H. (1996) Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 20, 729-735[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Spector, R.,
and Lorenzo, A. V.
(1975)
Am. J. Physiol.
228,
1510-1518 |
| 38. |
Ostlund, R. E., Jr.,
McGill, J. B.,
Herskowitz, I.,
Kipnis, D. M.,
Santiago, J. V.,
and Sherman, W. R.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
9988-9992 |
| 39. | Porcellati, F., Hosaka, Y., Hlaing, T., Togawa, M., Larkin, D. D., Karihaloo, A., Stevens, M. J., Killen, P. D., and Greene, D. A. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C1325-C1337[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Diez-Sampedro, A.,
Wright, E. M.,
and Hirayama, B. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
49188-49194 |
| 41. | Roll, P., Massacrier, A., Pereira, S., Robaglia-Schlupp, A., Cau, P., and Szepetowski, P. (2002) Gene (Amst.) 285, 141-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Benjamin, J.,
Levine, J.,
Fux, M.,
Aviv, A.,
Levy, D.,
and Belmaker, R. H.
(1995)
Am. J. Psychiatry
152,
1084-1086 |
| 43. |
Fux, M.,
Levine, J.,
Aviv, A.,
and Belmaker, R. H.
(1996)
Am. J. Psychiatry
153,
1219-1221 |
| 44. |
Levine, J.,
Barak, Y.,
Gonzalves, M.,
Szor, H.,
Elizur, A.,
Kofman, O.,
and Belmaker, R. H.
(1995)
Am. J. Psychiatry
152,
792-794 |
| 45. | Sima, A. A., Dunlap, J. A., Davidson, E. P., Wiese, T. J., Lightle, R. L., Greene, D. A., and Yorek, M. A. (1997) Diabetes 46, 301-306[Abstract] |
| 46. | Eid, S. R., Terrettaz, A., Nagata, K., and Brändli, A. W. (2002) Int. J. Dev. Biol. 46, 177-184[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Silbernagl, S., Völker, K., and Dantzler, W. H. (2001) I.U.P.S. XXXIVth International Congress, Abstract number 853, CD-ROM for the 2001 meeting (iups.mcw.edu) |
| 48. | Williams, R. S., Cheng, L., Mudge, A. W., and Harwood, A. J. (2002) Nature 417, 292-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Bissonnette, K. Lahjouji, M. J. Coady, and J.-Y. Lapointe Effects of hyperosmolarity on the Na+-myo-inositol cotransporter SMIT2 stably transfected in the Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): C791 - C799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Aouameur, S. Da Cal, P. Bissonnette, M. J. Coady, and J.-Y. Lapointe SMIT2 mediates all myo-inositol uptake in apical membranes of rat small intestine Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): G1300 - G1307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Gagnon, C. Frindel, and J.-Y. Lapointe Effect of Substrate on the Pre-Steady-State Kinetics of the Na+/Glucose Cotransporter Biophys. J., January 15, 2007; 92(2): 461 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. F. Nascimento, L. M. A. Lessa, M. R. Kerntopf, C. M. Sousa, R. S. Alves, M. G. R. Queiroz, J. Price, D. B. Heimark, J. Larner, X. Du, et al. Inositols prevent and reverse endothelial dysfunction in diabetic rat and rabbit vasculature metabolically and by scavenging superoxide PNAS, January 3, 2006; 103(1): 218 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bourgeois, M. J Coady, and J.-Y. Lapointe Determination of transport stoichiometry for two cation-coupled myo-inositol cotransporters: SMIT2 and HMIT J. Physiol., March 1, 2005; 563(2): 333 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bissonnette, M. J. Coady, and J.-Y. Lapointe Expression of the sodium-myo-inositol cotransporter SMIT2 at the apical membrane of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells J. Physiol., August 1, 2004; 558(3): 759 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Coady, M.-H. Chang, F. M. Charron, C. Plata, B. Wallendorff, J. F. Sah, S. D. Markowitz, M. F. Romero, and J.-Y. Lapointe The human tumour suppressor gene SLC5A8 expresses a Na+-monocarboxylate cotransporter J. Physiol., June 15, 2004; 557(3): 719 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Gagnon, P. Bissonnette, L.-M. Deslandes, B. Wallendorff, and J.-Y. Lapointe Glucose Accumulation Can Account for the Initial Water Flux Triggered by Na+/Glucose Cotransport Biophys. J., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 125 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Jin and A. Seyfang High-affinity myo-inositol transport in Candida albicans: substrate specificity and pharmacology Microbiology, December 1, 2003; 149(12): 3371 - 3381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Silbernagl, K. Volker, and W. H. Dantzler Tubular reabsorption of myo-inositol vs. that of D-glucose in rat kidney in vivo et situ Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): F1181 - F1189. |