|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201297200 on July 5, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 38, 35240-35247, September 20, 2002
The Glycan Domain of Thrombopoietin (TPO) Acts in
trans to Enhance Secretion of the Hormone and Other
Cytokines*
Hannah M.
Linden and
Kenneth
Kaushansky
From the Division of Hematology, University of Washington School of
Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195
Received for publication, February 7, 2002, and in revised form, June 21, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Thrombopoietin (TPO), the primary regulator of
platelet production, is composed of an amino-terminal 152 amino acids,
sufficient for activity, and a carboxyl-terminal region rich in
carbohydrates (183 residues) that enhances secretion of the molecule.
Full-length TPO is secreted at levels 10-20-fold greater than
truncated TPO. By introducing into mammalian cells a novel cDNA
encoding the TPO secretory leader linked to its carboxyl-terminal
domain (TPO glycan domain (TGD)), we tested whether TGD could function
in trans to enhance secretion of TPO. The artificial TGD
was secreted, inactive in proliferation assays, and did not inhibit TPO
activity. However, when co-transfected with a cDNA encoding
truncated TPO, TGD enhanced secretion 4-fold, measured by specific
bioassay and immunoassay. TGD also enhanced secretion of granulocyte
monocyte colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor but did not
affect the production of erythropoietin, interleukin-3, growth hormone, or of full-length TPO. To localize TGD function, we added an
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal to TGD and, separately,
deleted the secretory leader. Deletion of the secretory leader
attenuated the secretory function of TGD, whereas addition of the ER
retention signal did not alter its function. To investigate the
physiologic role of TGD in folding and proteasomal protection, we
tested full-length and truncated TPO in assays of protein refolding,
and we examined protein stability in the presence of proteasome
inhibitors. We found that truncated TGD re-folds readily and that
proteasome-mediated degradation contributes to the poor secretion of
truncated TPO. We conclude that TGD enhances secretion of TPO and can
additionally function as an inter-molecular chaperone, in part because
of its ability to prevent degradation of the hormone. The cellular
location of TGD action is likely to be within the ER or earlier in the secretory pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Thrombopoietin (TPO)1 is
the principal cytokine that regulates megakaryocyte development and
platelet production (1). TPO acts at both early (2) and late stages of
megakaryopoiesis (3, 4), alone and in synergy with other cytokines (5). The hormone also acts in synergy with erythropoietin (EPO) to stimulate
erythropoiesis (6). Subsequent studies have revealed TPO to be both
necessary and sufficient for full MK1 maturation (6). As a therapeutic
agent TPO has been shown to speed platelet recovery following
myelosuppressive therapy in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (7,
8). In addition, the biological effects of TPO are not limited to the
MK lineage; the growth of erythroid (burst forming unit-erythrocyte)
and myeloid (colony forming unit-granulocyte macrophage) colony-forming
cells is also expanded by TPO in vitro, and its use in
normal and myelosuppressed mice and non-human primates leads to
enhanced recovery of multiple hematopoietic lineages (9, 10). Finally,
TPO affects the survival and proliferation of primitive hematopoietic
stem cells in vitro (11, 12) and in vivo (13). In
this manner, clinical benefit may be derived from the administration of
TPO to enhance peripheral blood stem cell collection (14) and the
ex vivo expansion of primitive hematopoietic cells (15). TPO
may thus offer patients with primary and acquired hematological
disorders a significant therapeutic benefit.
Thrombopoietin is a 335-amino acid polypeptide produced in multiple
organs, first cloned as a ligand for the orphan hematopoietic cytokine
receptor proto-oncogene c-mpl. Like EPO, GH, and
other members of the hematopoietic cytokine family, the amino-terminal region of TPO is predicted to fold into a left-handed four-helix bundle
protein. The amino acids of this domain of TPO (residues 1-152) share
greater homology with EPO than does any other pair of hematopoietic
cytokines (22% identity, and an additional 24% sequence similarity
(16)). Our laboratory and others (17-19) have demonstrated that
the amino-terminal (or cytokine-like) domain of TPO is
adequate for receptor binding, signaling, and supporting cellular proliferation.
In addition to the four-helical bundle domain, and unlike all other
known members of the hematopoietic cytokine family, the TPO gene
encodes a carboxyl-terminal polypeptide extension (residues 153-335),
a serine- and a proline-rich domain remarkable for abundant carbohydrate modification, and a lack of homology to other known proteins. Glycosylation of this carboxyl-terminal (or glycan) domain
has been experimentally determined (residues 153-246) and predicted
(residues 246-332) in human TPO (20). The glycosylation of TPO
accounts for approximately one-half of its observed 70-kDa molecular
mass. Not surprisingly, the inter-species (mouse-human) homology of TPO
is greatest in the amino-terminal receptor-binding domain (93%);
however, the carboxyl-terminal domain retains 74% homology, suggesting
that it also serves an important physiologic function.
In previous work our laboratory and others (19, 21, 22) have shown that
the TPO glycan domain (TGD) functions to enhance secretion; in our
hands deletion of the TGD reduced TPO secretion ~20-fold.
Interestingly, several bacterial proteases display a two-domain
structure, a protease domain, and a proregion essential for secretion,
shown to facilitate the folding of the parent compound prior to
extracellular proteolytic cleavage (reviewed in Refs. 23 and 24).
Furthermore, several of these proregions have been studied and shown to
function both in cis (covalently linked to their
corresponding enzyme) and in trans (when co-expressed from a
different gene). Co-transfection of cDNAs encoding a normal proregion with a cDNA encoding a protein either lacking a proregion or with a mutated proregion can rescue the protein from aggregation or
destruction and hence facilitate protein secretion (25-30). However,
in some instances, the proregion is unable to rescue the parent protein
to enhance secretion in trans (31, 32) or has only a modest
effect (33). The function of mammalian proregions and their ability to
function with an extended range of target proteins among protein
families have been less well defined. Here we report that the TGD
functions in trans to substantially enhance secretion of the
truncated protein and of some, but not all, other cytokines.
The specific role(s) of proregions as well as their subcellular site of
action is diverse. Notably, in another member of the hematopoietic
cytokine family, the prolactin proregion is essential for secretion;
mutation of the proregion results in accumulation of aggregates in the
endoplasmic reticulum (34). The proregion of human neutrophil defensin
is essential for secretion; the proregion of this protein is anionic
(35, 59, 60), can neutralize the activity of the protein prior
to cleavage, and contains a region that is essential for proper
subcellular sorting to granule-like vacuoles in cells. Similarly, the
proregion of von Willebrand factor (vWF) promotes inter-dimer disulfide
bond formation, multimer formation, and targets vWF to storage granules
in several in vitro studies (36, 37). These conclusions were
confirmed by the finding that a naturally occurring mutation in the
proregion of vWF resulted in impaired multimerization and secretion. In
the studies reported here, we show that the activity of TGD appears to
take place within the endoplasmic reticulum or earlier in the secretory pathway.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
PCR Mutagenesis--
The cDNA-encoding murine TPO (described
previously in Ref. 16) was used as a template for PCR-based
mutagenesis. To facilitate iodination and purification, PCR-based
site-directed mutagenesis was used to add a poly(Tyr) and poly(His)
terminus and to mutate an Arg-Arg (Arg-153 Arg-154) potential
cleavage site to Gln-Gln. Oligonucleotides were designed to generate
two forms of murine TPO, full-length (TPO 1-335) and a truncated form
(TPO 1-152), with a poly(Tyr) and poly(His) carboxyl terminus using a
strategy we have described previously (38). The secretory efficiency (as measured by ELISA) and function (as measured by MTT assay, see
below) of TPO 1-335 did not differ from that of wild type mTPO,
confirming that mutation of the Arg-Arg site and addition of the
poly(Tyr) and poly(His) tail were functionally silent. Site-directed
mutagenesis was also used to generate a deletion mutein of TPO in which
the entire receptor binding domain (residues 4-174) was removed,
termed the TPO glycan domain (TGD); we then modified this construct
further by using site-directed mutagenesis to construct TGD variants
with a Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu endoplasmic retention signal at the carboxyl
terminus (TGD-KDEL) and one lacking the secretory leader (TGD-SL). Fig.
1 illustrates the cDNA constructs utilized in this study. Each mTPO construct was cloned into the mammalian expression vector pDX (39).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Diagram of TPO muteins. The TPO and TGD
constructs used in our studies are illustrated. In the center of the
figure is TPO 1-335, the native murine (m) TPO, with glycan
domain derivatives (lacking the entire receptor binding domain)
immediately below, and two truncated yet biologically active TPO forms
above. Locations of O- and N-linked residues as
identified and proposed by Hoffman et al. (20) are denoted
by the letters O and N. The filled
diamond region denotes the secretory leader, the
unfilled region denotes the receptor binding or
erythropoietin (EPO)-like domain, and the gray shaded
region denotes the glycan domain. The TGD mutein includes the secretory
leader of TPO, the first three coding residues of the RBD, followed by
residues 173-335 of mTPO, the majority (all but the first 20 residues)
of the glycan domain. TGD-SL encodes the same sequence as TGD, but the
secretory leader is deleted and replaced by a single Met initiation
codon, and TGD-KDEL encodes the same sequence as TGD but adds an
endoplasmic retention signal (Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu) to the carboxyl terminus
of the construct. TPO 1-238 encompasses the RBD plus the first 86 residues of the TGD. TPO 1-152 encompasses the entire RBD, a spacer
(show in diagonal markings, containing Ser, Ala, and Gly
residues without identity or homology to TPO) and a poly(Tyr) and
poly(His) (pYpH) tail. Note that TPO 1-152 shares no glycan
domain residues with TGD. Restriction mapping and DNA sequencing
verified the cDNA sequence of each TPO glycomutein and truncation,
and the cDNA was subcloned into the mammalian expression vector pDX
(39).
|
|
Transfection of Cell Lines--
Cytokine or TGD cDNA
expression vectors were co-transfected using LipofectAMINE®
(Invitrogen), Lipofectin® (Invitrogen), or calcium phosphate into the
rodent fibroblast cell lines BHK with a second plasmid encoding RSV-CAT
(chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) to control for transfection
efficiency, used at one-tenth the concentration of the cytokine
expression vector (40). Cells were then cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium with 2% fetal calf serum and penicillin,
streptomycin, and fungizone. In co-transfection experiments with TGD
constructs, equal amounts of cytokine cDNA were transfected with
TGD cDNA (e.g. 1 µg each for a 2-ml plate). At 24-72
h post-transfection, supernatants were collected and cells counted and
lysed. Supernatants were assayed for TPO (see below) and lysates for
CAT activity (see below). For all transient transfection experiments,
at least two different plasmid preps were utilized. To develop stable
transfected cell lines, the TGD encoding cDNA was co-transfected
with a plasmid encoding dihydrofolate resistance, at one-tenth the
concentration of the cytokine-containing plasmids. Cells were selected
and grown in 1 µM methotrexate-containing media, and the
supernatant was assayed for TGD secretion and RNA by RT-PCR to confirm
the stable expression of TGD.
Metabolic Labeling--
In some experiments cDNA expression
vectors were used to produce metabolically labeled proteins. Six hours
following transient transfection, cultures were trypsinized and split
into two plates to allow metabolic labeling of half the transfected
cells, and the remaining cells were left unlabeled in standard culture
medium. Eighteen hours following transfection adherent cells were
washed, and the supernatant was replaced with Met- and Cys-deficient
media (Invitrogen) for 1 h. The media were again replaced with
Met- and Cys-deficient media containing 1% dialyzed fetal calf serum, antibiotics, and 50 µCi/ml 35S-labeled Met and Cys
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and incubated overnight. Supernatants were
then collected and clarified, and cells were trypsinized, counted, and
lysed for CAT assays. The parallel non-labeled culture supernatant was
evaluated for mTPO by ELISA (see below).
For experiments using reticulocyte lysates (TNT® SP6 Coupled
Reticulocyte Lysate System, Promega), standard protocols supplied by
the manufacturer were followed (using RedivueTM
35S from Amersham Biosciences for metabolic labeling). The
constructs shown in Fig. 1 were cloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen)
downstream of the Sp6 promoter. Reticulocyte lysate transcripts were
electrophoretically size-fractionated on a gradient gel
(NOVEXTM, 4-20% acrylamide), which was then dried,
exposed to film overnight, and then to a PhosphorImaging screen for
2 h.
Immunoprecipitation--
Two anti-peptide antibodies were
generously provided by T. Kato at Kirin Pharmaceuticals; each
anti-peptide antibody was directed against a region of the
receptor-binding domain of rat TPO. RT1 reacts with a 20-residue region
of the putative first helix
(9PRLLNKLLRDSYLLHSRLSQ28) and RT2
is directed against a 21-residue segment of the putative AB
loop (46FSLGEWKTQTEOSKAQDILGA66). Murine and
rat sequences are highly conserved in this region differing at only 2 and 1 residues, respectively (anti-peptide antibodies directed against
similar regions of human TPO have been described previously (41)).
Immunoprecipitation of metabolically labeled tissue culture
supernatants was performed using standard protocols. Briefly, 1 ml of
metabolically labeled tissue culture supernatant was pre-cleared by
incubation with 20 µl of protein A-agarose beads (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) for 1/2 h; phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
leupeptin, and aprotinin were added to diminish proteolysis (as
described previously (42)), and 1% Tween 20 was used to diminish
nonspecific binding. Each supernatant was then incubated overnight with
10 µg/ml of the anti-TPO peptide antibody at 4 °C. Protein
A-agarose beads were added to precipitate the antibody-TPO complex, and
the beads were washed with RIPA buffers as described previously (19)
and then denatured and eluted from staphylococcus A beads by
boiling in a loading buffer with 2% -mercaptoethanol. The
immunoprecipitated TPO forms were size-fractionated by electrophoresis through 10% polyacrylamide gels, soaked in AmplifyTM
enhancer (Amersham Biosciences), dried down, and exposed to
PhosphorImaging screens overnight.
Biological Activity Assay--
Baf/3 cells transfected with the
mouse Mpl receptor were used to assay for TPO activity (16). Cells were
grown and maintained in IL-3, washed, plated at a concentration of
10,000 cells per well in 100 µl of media in 96-well plates, and
incubated for 36 h with serial dilutions of tissue culture
supernatants. Wild type mTPO supernatant of known concentration was
used to generate a standard curve and determine maximal proliferation
of Baf/Mpl cells for each assay.
3[4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, (MTT
Sigma) was then added and was followed 5 h later by a lysis
buffer. Optical density was measured by using an ELISA plate reader
(EL-340 Biotek Instruments) to measure the absorbance at 570-630 nm in
order to assess the intracellular conversion of tetrazolium to
formazan. Sample activity was determined by comparison to the standard
at half-maximal proliferation. The cell line used for these experiments
was more sensitive to IL-3 than to TPO; however, as measurement of
response to TPO was our desired effect, we have based our results on
percentage of mTPO-induced maximal activity. Similarly, MO7e cells,
which constitutively express c-Kit and GM-CSF (and a low level of Mpl)
receptors and proliferate in response to SCF and GM-CSF, were used to
assay for these cytokines. To test SCF activity selectively, Baf/murine Kit receptor cells were also utilized in MTT assays. Baf/EPO receptor cells were used to measure EPO activity, and Baf/3 cells were used to
measure IL-3 activity in similar assays. In a similar fashion,
megakaryocyte assays were used to quantify SDF-1, as described
previously (43).
Folding Assay--
The activation of mitogen-activated protein
kinase (MAPK) in Baf/Mpl cells was utilized to read out evidence of
complete refolding of denatured TPO, in a similar fashion to the assay
employed by Baker et al. (44) to demonstrate refolding of
-lytic protease. Full-length TPO was generously provided by Dr. Don
Foster (Zymogenetics Inc., Seattle, WA), and truncated hormone
(containing the amino-terminal 162 residues) was generously provided by
Dr. Takashi Kato (Kirin Pharmaceuticals, Takasaki, Japan). Equipotent
solutions of truncated and full-length hormone were verified by equal
activity in MTT assays using Baf/Mpl cells, as described above. Each
protein was then denatured in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride
(GdnHCl) at room temperature overnight and heated to 65 °C for 10 min to fully denature the protein (as described previously (45)) A
roughly 0.8 M solution of the protein was then diluted into
cold phosphate-buffered saline with 0.01% bovine serum albumin
at room temperature to effectively dilute the protein concentration and
GdnHCl 200-fold. The protein was then allowed to refold over a time
course of 0-30 min, and aliquots of the refolded protein were then
immediately added to starved Baf/Mpl cells, resulting in a final
concentration of 0.015 mM GdnHCl. 1 × 106
starved Baf/Mpl cells in serum-free media were incubated with diluted
protein samples for 2 min in a total volume of 10 ml at 37 °C and
then immediately poured into 40 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline; the cells were pelleted and lysed in freshly prepared lysis
buffer (46) and frozen at 0 °C. Whole cell lysates were size-fractionated by electrophoresis through 8% polyacrylamide gels
and transferred to nitrocellulose, blocked with 3% bovine serum
albumin, and probed for phosphorylated (activated) MAPK (Cell
Signaling antibody number 9101L), and MAPK protein (Cell Signaling antibody number 9109), as we have described previously (47).
Repeated optimization assays demonstrated that a minimum of 2 min at
37 °C was necessary for visualization of MAPK phosphorylation and
that the addition of trace quantities of GdnHCl to native protein and
starved cells did not impair MAPK activation.
Proteasome Inhibitor Assay--
The proteasome inhibitor ALLN
was used to determine whether intracellular protein degradation might
account for the reduced secretion of truncated forms of TPO. COS cells
were tested for tolerance to ALLN (Calbiochem 108909 Calpain Inhibitor
dissolved in Me2SO), and a time course of TPO expression
following transient transfection was examined to determine the optimal
timing of metabolic labeling and proteasome inhibition. COS cells were
transiently transfected as described above, with truncated and
full-length TPO in parallel; serum-free, liposome-, and TPO
plasmid-containing media were washed off the cells, and they were
allowed to recover at 37 °C overnight in media with 2% fetal calf
serum. The following day the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered
saline and Cys- and Met-deficient media were added with radiolabeled
35S as described above. Following a 4-h incubation with
labeled culture medium, ALLN or diluent (Me2SO) was then
added to the culture to achieve a final concentration of 50 mM, and cells were incubated additionally at 37 °C for
12 h. Supernatants were collected, and cells were harvested and
lysed as described above. Similarly, supernatants and cell lysates were
analyzed by immunoprecipitation (IP), size fractionation, and
PhosphorImaging quantitation as described above.
Reporter Gene Assay--
Standard protocols were used to assay
CAT activity (40, 48) and thereby correct for transfection efficiency.
Cellular lysates were diluted in 0.25 M Tris and incubated
with acetyl-CoA and [14C]chloramphenicol. Following ethyl
acetate extraction, thin layer chromatography was performed to allow
quantitation of chloramphenicol acetylation. If transfection efficiency
varied by more than 4-fold between samples, we did not include the
results from corresponding supernatants in our analysis.
Immune Assay--
Supernatants were tested in paired samples
using a commercial ELISA for mTPO (MTP00,
QuantikineTM M from R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN); in
this immunoassay the lower limit is 62.5 pg/ml. The antibodies for this
ELISA were also purchased separately and their TPO-binding epitopes
were mapped, using purified truncated forms of mTPO, to identify which region(s) of TPO they detect. Both the monoclonal catch antibody and
the polyclonal detection antibody detected mTPO by IP and standard
Western blot techniques. The monoclonal antibody detected full-length
TPO and a truncated TPO form 50 kDa in length but failed to detect
shorter forms of TPO, where the polyclonal antibody detected 18-, 20-, 30-, 50-, and 70-kDa forms of TPO, folded and denatured, suggesting
that at least part of the epitope of the monoclonal antibody maps to a
segment of TPO in the region of amino acids 200-250. Based on the
mapping experiments of the antibodies utilized by the ELISA, we did not
use the assay to measure truncated TPO proteins (e.g. TPO
1-152), but we assumed that the commercial assay will measure 1 ng of
TPO 1-335 or 1 ng of TGD roughly the same given the steric constraints
of the antibodies and the relative sizes of the mTPO derivative
proteins. Commercial assays for EPO, granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; R & D Systems), as well as human
GH (chemiluminescent assay for hGH, Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San
Juan Capistrano, CA) were utilized to measure the corresponding cytokines.
RT-PCR--
RNA was prepared from established BHK cell lines
using standard protocols. RT-PCR was performed as described previously
(49) using primers specific for the glycan domain of murine TPO, and for a housekeeping gene (glyceraldehyde-3-phospate dehydrogenase) as a
control. Cell lines were established following transfection of the
cDNA constructs shown in Fig. 1 and shown to have levels of
mRNA well above the background of the parent cell line.
 |
RESULTS |
Our previous studies demonstrated that deletion of the
carboxyl-terminal domain of TPO reduced secretion of the molecule by 10-20-fold. To explore the function of this discrete region of the
protein on the synthesis, processing, and secretion of TPO, we
expressed a protein encompassing only the TPO secretory leader and the
carboxyl-terminal domain of the protein (TGD) in mammalian cells and
assessed its effect on TPO production.
TGD Is Secreted and Is Inactive as a Thrombopoietin--
Although
transiently transfected cells did not secrete enough TGD to be measured
by our immunologic methods (ELISA or by 35S labeling and
IP), stably transfected cell lines engineered to express TGD (with and
without the addition of 4 Met residues) expressed and secreted enough
protein to be readily detected by the commercial ELISA, 200-500 pg/ml.
We tested the supernatant from our highest TGD expressing cell line in
MTT assays alone and with TPO for inhibitory or stimulatory effects.
TGD alone did not stimulate proliferation of the TPO receptor bearing
cells, Baf/Mpl, or of MO7e cells. To test for inhibitory effects of
TGD, we tested the TGD supernatant in proliferation assays in which half-maximal amounts of TPO had been added; addition of TGD (in over
25-fold molar excess) did not inhibit TPO 1-152 or TPO 1-335-induced activity. TGD also failed to inhibit IL-3 stimulation of Baf3 cells or
GM-CSF-induced proliferation of MO7e cells in similar assays.
TGD Enhances Secretion of TPO, GM-CSF, and SCF in Trans--
To
test TGD for its effects on TPO production, we transiently
co-transfected TGD with cDNA expression vectors for full-length and
truncated TPO, GM-CSF, SCF, IL-3, EPO, hGH, and SDF-1, and we measured
expression of each cytokine using bioassays, immunoassays, and
metabolic labeling experiments. Each experiment was performed using
either TGD co-transfection or co-transfection of a sham plasmid of the
same parent vector encoding an irrelevant cytokine. TGD enhanced
secretion of truncated TPO (TPO 1-152) 4-fold, measured by specific
bioassay (Table I). By using
35S metabolic labeling, we also found a similar level of
enhanced secretion of TPO 1-152 in the supernatants of cells
transiently transfected with TGD and TPO 1-152, compared with
supernatants from cells transiently transfected with TPO 1-152 and a
sham plasmid (Fig. 2). TGD also enhanced
secretion of immunoreactive and bioactive hGM-CSF 3-4-fold, and
bioactive mSCF 4-5-fold but did not enhance secretion of bioactive or
immunoreactive mEPO, bioactive IL-3, or immunoreactive hGH (see Table
I).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Secretion of cytokines co-transfected with TGD
Secretion of each cytokine was measured following co-transfection with
a sham cytokine or with TGD. All cytokines (except hGH) were measured
by activity assays, using one or two cell lines expressing the cognate
receptor (as described under "Experimental Procedures").
Additionally, secretion of TPO 1-238 was measured by quantitation of
metabolically labeled protein by immunoprecipitation and
PhosphorImaging, and secretion of EPO, GM-CSF, and hGH were
measured by ELISA. Activity values were normalized by reporter gene
assays (to control for transfection efficiency) and by cell count; we
then compared expression of TGD plus cytokine to sham co-transfection
to record the relative enhanced activity measured by our assays.
Base-line activity of each cytokine plus sham was arbitrarily rated 1, and thus the relative fold-enhancement of TGD constructs is presented.
Each cytokine was tested in 2-5 separate experiments, and samples were
each tested in pairs; pooled results are shown with the S.E. of these
measurements.
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Secretion of TPO and truncated forms with and
without TGD. Shown are representative PhosphorImaging exposures of
immunoprecipitation experiments (using an anti-peptide antibody
directed against the receptor binding domain of TPO) of
35S-labeled TPO from supernatants of BHK cells transiently
transfected with TPO and either a sham cytokine or TGD. The
precipitates were size-fractionated by polyacrylamide electrophoresis,
dried down, and exposed to a PhosphorImaging screen for 2-24 h. Each
truncated TPO form is shown in comparison with the full-length hormone.
A shows TPO 1-335 co-transfected with a sham cytokine
(1st lane) and with TGD (2nd lane). B
shows TPO 1-335 (1st lane), TPO 1-238 with sham cytokine
(2nd lane), TPO 1-238 co-transfected with TGD (3rd
lane), TPO 1-152 with sham co-transfection (4th lane),
and TPO 1-152 with co-transfection of TGT (5th lane). TPO
1-238 alone and with TGD is more apparent at differing exposures and
was well above background by PhosphorImaging techniques. TPO 1-152
co-transfected without TGD was barely detectable above background by
PhosphorImaging; however, crude unlabeled supernatant collected in
parallel from all TPO forms, with and without TGD was active in
proliferation assays. Secretion rates (normalized for cell count,
transfection efficiency, and number of radiolabeled residues per
molecule of protein) relative to TPO 1-335 measured by
PhosphorImaging (Amersham Biosciences PhosphorImager, using
ImageQuant) were 16.5% for TPO 1-238 plus sham cytokine, 36% for TPO
1-238 plus TGD, 0.75% for TPO 1-152 and sham cytokine, and 4.75%
for TPO 1-152 plus TGD.
|
|
To test whether the function of TGD persisted when the domain is
embedded in its native state (i.e. as part of the
full-length hormone), we examined the effects of co-expressing TPO
1-335 with GM-CSF or SCF. The secretion of GM-CSF (as measured by
immunoassay) and SCF (measured by Baf3/kit cells) was no different with
and without co-transfection of TPO 1-335 (data not shown).
To determine whether TGD could enhance secretion of molecules already
containing some or all of the TGD region, we tested whether
co-transfection of a TGD cDNA expression vector augmented secretion
of a series of TPO truncation muteins, TPO 1-335, TPO 1-238, and TPO
1-152. As shown in Fig. 2 and Table I, TGD enhanced secretion of TPO
fully devoid of TGD (TPO 1-152), but inclusion of 64 residues (TPO
1-238) reduced and inclusion of the full-length proregion TPO 1-335
eliminated the favorable effect of TGD on TPO secretion.
To begin to identify the cellular site at which TGD enhances TPO
secretion, similar co-transfection experiments were conducted with a
TGD that remains tethered in the endoplasmic reticulum by virtue of a
tetrapeptide localization signal (KDEL (50)) or one that fails to enter
the secretory pathway by elimination of the SL sequence (Fig. 1). As
anticipated, the mTPO ELISA did not detect TGD in the culture
supernatants from these cell lines or from transient transfections.
However, these cell lines were shown to have abundant TGD message by
RT-PCR (data not shown). The TPO 1-152 expression vector was
co-transfected with TGD-KDEL or a sham vector and into BHK cells, and
TPO secretion was monitored. We found that targeting TGD to the
endoplasmic reticulum did not affect TPO 1-152 secretion (see Table
II). In contrast, elimination of the SL
from TGD substantially reduced the capacity of the domain to enhance
secretion.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
TPO secretion following co-transfection of TGD derivatives
TPO 1-335 and TPO 1-152 secretion were measured following
co-transfection with either a sham cytokine, TGD, TGD-KDEL, or TGD-SL
using Baf3/mMpl cells to assay activity. Activity values were
normalized by reporter gene assays (to control for transfection
efficiency) and by cell count. Base-line activity of TPO plus sham
cytokine was arbitrarily assigned a value of 1, and thus the relative
fold-enhancement of TGD constructs is presented. Each TGD construct was
tested in 3-5 separate experiments, and paired samples were tested in
activity assays; pooled results are shown with the S.E. of these
measurements.
|
|
TGD Constructs in Cell Lines Confirm the Results of Transient
Co-transfection Assays--
The above results were obtained using
transient co-transfection assays. To examine further the capacity of
TGD to affect TPO secretion, four BHK cell lines stably expressing TGD
at a low level (TGD-L), high level (TGD-H), without a secretory leader (TGD-SL), and one with an endoplasmic reticulum retention signal (TGD-KDEL) were established and then transiently transfected with several cytokine expression vectors, and the levels of the encoded cytokines were compared with control BHK cells. As expected, TGD could
be detected at low and high levels from the TGD lines by ELISA;
however, no immunoreactive material was detected in the supernatants of
BHK cells stably expressing TGD-SL, TGD-KDEL, or control BHK cells
prior to transfection with TPO expression vectors. We found that
transiently transfected TPO 1-335 was secreted equally well from all 5 types of cell lines, as measured by bioassay (see Table
III). However, transient transfection of
TPO 1-152 resulted in a 1.8-fold greater secretion of TPO 1-152 in
TGD-L BHK cells, 4.1-fold greater in TGD-H BHK cells, and 4-fold
greater in TGD-KDEL than in control BHK cells. In contrast, TGD-SL
cells expressed only 1.4-fold more TPO 1-152 than control BHK cells in
these experiments. Similarly, transient transfection of SCF and GM-CSF
expression vectors into these same cells led to 3.8- and 4.1-fold
enhanced secretion of GM-CSF and 2.7- and 3.0-fold enhanced secretion
of SCF in TGD cells and TGD-KDEL cells, respectively (see Table
IV). In contrast, in TGD-SL cells, only
2.3- and 1.5-fold enhanced secretion was appreciated of GM-CSF and SCF,
respectively.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Secretion of truncated TPO from stable cell lines of TGD variants
Transient expression of TPO 1-335 and TPO 1-152 was measured from
stable cell lines producing various TGD derivatives and from the parent
BHK cell line. Each transfection was tested in 4-6 separate
experiments; S.E. of these measurements is shown. Supernatants were
assayed for activity in a proliferation assay using Baf/3 cells
expressing the Mpl receptor. Activity values were normalized by
reporter gene assays (to control for transfection efficiency) and by
cell count. Base-line activity of TPO in the parent cell line was
arbitrarily rated 1, and thus the relative expression in the
TGD-expressing lines is reported here.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Secretion of cytokines from stable cell lines of TGD variants
Transient expression of hGM-CSF and mSCF was measured from cell lines
stably expressing TGD derivatives and from the parent cell line. Each
transfection was tested in 3-4 separate experiments; S.E. of these
measurements is shown. Supernatants were assayed for activity in
proliferation assays using Mo7e cells (which constitutively express
GM-CSF receptor and a low level of the SCF receptor c-Kit) and using
Baf3 cells expressing c-Kit. Activity values were normalized by
reporter gene assays (to control for transfection efficiency) and by
cell count. Base-line activity of each cytokine in the parent cell line
was arbitrarily rated 1, and thus the relative expression in the TGD
expressing lines is reported here.
|
|
In Vitro Translation of TPO--
All of the above experiments were
conducted in cell lines, either transiently or in a stably expressing
subline of BHK cells. To determine whether the reduced secretion
characteristic of TPO 1-152 (compared with TPO 1-335) is an intrinsic
property of the encoded polypeptide, or related to a post-translational
processing event related to the secretory pathway, we utilized a rabbit
reticulocyte lysate to translate TPO 1-152, TPO 1-238, and TPO 1-335
proteins. As shown in Table V and Fig.
3, we found that in contrast to both the
10-20-fold enhanced secretion observed between full-length and
truncated TPO (19), and the 4-fold enhanced secretion of TPO 1-152
co-transfected with TGD or TGD-KDEL in intact mammalian cell lines),
TPO 1-335 was translated only 2-fold better than TPO 1-152 in rabbit
reticulocyte lysates. Thus we conclude that enhanced mRNA
translation alone does not account for the enhanced secretion of
TPO 1-152 with TGD in cis or in trans.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table V
Translation of TPO forms by reticulocyte lysates
Reticulocyte lysates were utilized to express TPO, TPO 1-238, and TPO
1-152 in 3 separate experiments. Shown here are the pooled data. The
quantity of 35S-labeled protein was assessed by PhosphorImaging
(Amersham Biosciences PhosphorImager, using ImageQuant), compared with
35S-TPO 1-335 and normalized for the anticipated number of
incorporated radiolabeled residues.
|
|

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Production of TPO and truncated TPO by
reticulocyte lysates. Rabbit reticulocyte lysates were utilized to
express TPO 1-335 (1st lane, predicted molecular mass of 40 kDa), TPO 1-238 (2nd lane, predicted molecular mass of 28 kDa), and TPO 1-152 (4th lane, predicted molecular mass of
23 kDa) in the presence of 35S, and then
electrophoretically sized on a gradient gel (4-20%), and quantitated
by PhosphorImaging techniques. Correcting for the anticipated number of
incorporated radiolabeled residues, the relative expressions of TPO
1-335, TPO 1-238, and TGD are 100, 44, and 20%.
|
|
Folding of TPO with and without TGD--
To test potential
physiologic roles of TGD, we studied the rate of refolding of truncated
and full-length TPO in a surrogate folding assay based on the capacity
of native TPO to phosphorylate MAPK in Baf/Mpl cells. Solutions of
truncated and full-length TPO were tested in activity assays of Baf/Mpl
cells to verify equal potency. Separately, the two proteins were
denatured and allowed to refold in parallel for each assay, and a
single starved batch of Baf/mMpl cells was utilized for read-out of
protein activity. The 2-min incubation of proteins with cells resulted
in a net time course from 2 to 32 min. These assays were performed 5 times, with fresh protein preparations and freshly starved Baf/Mpl
cells. As shown in Fig. 4 the full-length
protein re-folded at the same rate or slightly more slowly than the
truncated protein.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Folding assay of full-length and truncated
TPO. Purified concentrated TPO 1-335 and TPO 1-162 were
separately denatured and allowed to refold over the time course as
shown from 2 to 32 min. Control TPO (not previously denatured, but less
concentrated) is shown in the 1st lane. Activity, manifest
by initiation of MAPK phosphorylation, was used as a surrogate measure
of TPO refolding and is seen as two bright bands at 44 and 42 kDa.
|
|
Proteasome Inhibition Effects on Secretion of TPO Forms--
To
determine whether proteasome degradation is a significant mechanism of
intracellular TPO destruction prior to secretion in our culture system,
transiently transfected COS cells were incubated for 12 h in the
presence of ALLN or vehicle alone (Me2SO), both
using standard cultures and radiolabeling conditions. As ALLN and cell
lysates are inhibitory in biological activity assays, only immune
assays were used to measure the effect of proteasome inhibition on TPO
production. As shown in Fig. 5, ALLN did
not significantly increase TPO 1-335 production nor increase the
amount of TPO 1-152 secreted into the culture medium. These findings were confirmed by ELISA for TPO 1-335 production, and by activity assays of dialyzed supernatants from transient transfections of both
TPO forms incubated with ALLN (data not shown). Interestingly, the
addition of a proteasome inhibitor allowed detection of TPO 1-152 from
lysates of transiently transfected cells. Although we have detected TPO
forms in transfected and selected cell lines, we have been unable to
detect TPO forms in transiently transfected cell lines without the
addition of a proteasome inhibitor. As shown in Fig. 5, ALLN did not
allow detection of TPO 1-335 in lysates.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Proteasome inhibition assay.
Immunoprecipitates from 35S-labeled supernatants and
lysates from COS cells transiently transfected with TPO 1-335 and
TPO 1-152 and treated with diluent alone or the proteasome inhibitor
ALLN are shown fractionated on separate gels. The immunoprecipitates
were size-fractionated by polyacrylamide electrophoresis, dried down,
and exposed a to PhosphorImaging screen for 2-24 h.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our laboratory and others (19, 21) have previously demonstrated
that the carboxyl terminus of TPO enhances secretion of the hormone and
in cis modestly inhibits the activity of the protein, as
would be the anticipated role of a proregion. In this work we have
further characterized the function and cellular localization at which
the glycan domain acts. We demonstrated that the glycan domain can
function independently to enhance secretion of the receptor-binding
domain of TPO and that the secretion of TGD into the culture medium is
not necessary for the protein to exert its effects, as tethering of TGD
to the endoplasmic reticulum does not diminish its activity. As we
could not detect TGD immunologically from either transient expression
or established cell lines expressing the tethered construct, TGD-KDEL,
we believe this protein was effectively restricted to the ER and not
secreted. Therefore, we suspect that the cellular location of the
activity of TGD is within the endoplasmic reticulum, as in
vitro translation does not differ substantially between TPO 1-335
and TPO 1-152, and the addition of an endoplasmic retention signal
does not abrogate TGD function. Given the observed cellular location of
activity, putative roles of the glycan domain in enhancing secretion of TPO include enhancing the folding of the receptor binding domain, as
has been shown with several bacterial proregions, and/or reducing ER-associated degradation.
The major finding in this paper, that TGD can augment the secretion of
the ligand-binding domain of TPO in trans, could be because
of artifacts of our experimental detection systems. However, we do not
believe this is the case. TGD alone does not stimulate proliferation of
the cell lines used in our bioassay studies (Baf3/Mpl or MO7e) nor does
it inhibit stimulation of growth by a number of ligands, IL-3, TPO,
SCF, and GM-CSF. Hence, we do not believe that the TGD has interfered
with the measurement of the secretion of these ligands in activity
assays. Moreover, we have employed three types of assays (bioassay,
immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled supernatants, and ELISA using
different antibodies) to confirm our findings, and the effects of TGD
on protein secretion are relatively specific, both within the cytokine
family and among different mutants of TPO. For example, secretion of
TPO 1-152 was enhanced but TPO 1-335 was not, and TGD failed to
enhance secretion of hGH and EPO (both members of the hematopoietic
growth factor family) or the unrelated cytokine SDF-1 (data not shown).
The mechanism by which TGD enhances secretion was also studied; we
examined two potential actions of TGD, enhancing refolding of denatured
TPO and protecting the protein from proteasome-mediated degradation.
Enhanced folding or stabilization of an intermediate state has been
seen with several proregions (23, 51) and elegantly demonstrated
in vitro, for subtilisin B and -lytic protease (44, 52).
We performed similar studies, and we found that the
unfolded receptor-binding domain was able to re-fold as
readily as the full-length hormone, suggesting that the influence of
TGD on folding is not significant. However, the kinetic limits of our
refolding assay (the soonest we can assay is at 2 min) are significant. It is possible that with an assay that could follow folding more rapidly and/or at lower temperatures, significant differences would
emerge between truncated TPO and the full-length hormone, TGD, in
cis. Nonetheless, the lack of difference at physiologic temperatures between the two TPO forms suggests that the impact of
TGD on protein folding is, at most, minor.
An additional candidate mechanism to help explain the beneficial
effects of TGD on TPO secretion is that the former protects the parent
hormone from proteasome-mediated proteolysis and thereby leads to
greater protein secretion. ERAD occurs when misfolded proteins are
translocated to the cytosol for proteasomal degradation (53). We tested
the possibility that ERAD is decreased by TGD by examining the effect
of proteasome inhibition on COS cells transiently transfected with
full-length and truncated TPO. We found that the TPO 1-152, lacking
TGD, was rescued by proteasome blockade, as it was detected in lysates.
However, the truncated TPO was not better secreted in the presence of
ALLN, suggesting that once the poorly folded protein is translocated
into the cytosol, even if it is protected from degradation, it cannot
be further rescued for secretion. It is also possible that our failure
to detect increased secretion in the presence of a proteasome inhibitor could be due to a general reduction in metabolic function in cells treated with ALLN. Interestingly, as glycosylation has been shown to
retard ERAD (54), we can speculate that TPO 1-335, with its heavily
glycosylated TGD intact, deters ERAD which occurs more briskly when the
TGD is not present in TPO 1-152. The limitations of our experimental
methods preclude elucidation of the mechanism by which TGD prevents
proteasomal degradation. Nonetheless, it is apparent from our
experiments that one role of TGD is to prevent the cytokine from ERAD,
and protection from this intracellular fate is a prerequisite to secretion.
The ability of a proregion to exert effects (enhanced secretion,
intracellular targeting, folding, and inhibition) in trans has been demonstrated by several groups for different proteins (30, 51,
52, 55, 56). For bacterial proteases, deletion of the proregion (or
mutation of the active region) results in absolute loss of secretion,
unlike for TPO, in which progressive deletion of the proregion resulted
in progressive loss of secretory efficiency but not an absolute loss of
secretion. The range of restoration of activity by
trans-complementation rescue is from 5% for yeast proteinase A (28) to
80% for aqualysin I (57), with most examples, such as Rhizopus
niveus aspartic proteinase-I, Rhizopus oryzae lipase,
and alkaline extracellular protease, restoring function by 30-50%
(26, 27, 29). Hence, our data for enhanced secretion of truncated TPO
with its proregion in trans are consistent with the enhanced
levels of secretion seen with bacterial protease proregions. With the
exception of TGF- and activin A, no other examples of mammalian
proregions functioning in trans to enhance secretion have
been reported previously. Moreover, for TGF- and activin A the
restoration of secretion was far more modest than that seen in our
studies with TPO. In studies similar to ours testing two members of the
TGF- superfamily, Gray and Mason (33) found no secretion of activin
A and TGF- 1 when each protein was expressed without its respective
proregion, and with the proregion expressed in trans, we
observed only modest secretion (2.4 and 9%, respectively, of that when
the protein is expressed in its native state with its proregion in
cis).
Another characteristic feature of bacterial protease proregions is
their capacity to inhibit the activity of the parent protein, exerting
a regulatory function to limit activity, both prior to and upon
cleavage from the parent protein. The TPO proregion also appears to
inhibit activity of the full-length protein, but only weakly
(~4-fold) in cis and does not appear to inhibit the
protein in trans. It is possible that we have not produced
enough TGD to reach a maximal inhibitory effect, but the molar ratio of
TGD to TPO 1-152 in our inhibition experiments likely exceeds
100:1.
Our studies confirm the activity of the glycan domain of TPO by
demonstrating an effect of TGD in trans. However, when
expressed as part of a full-length TPO molecule, TGD does not enhance
secretion of other cytokines nor can it additionally enhance secretion
of TPO 1-335. This suggests that the functional ratio of TGD to
cytokine is 1:1. Although cleavage of TPO can be demonstrated in
vitro (58), it is unclear if TPO is cleaved in vivo
allowing truncated TPO and TGD to co-exist under natural biologic
conditions. We suspect that if TPO 1-152 and TGD were generated
in vivo by proteolysis, the resulting TPO would be slightly
more potent, and TGD as a disparate protein would not inhibit truncated
TPO. Our experimental conditions preclude more detailed studies of the
association between TPO 1-152 and TGD. From our experiments in which
TGD constructs are tethered to the ER, we infer that the two proteins
are associated within the ER. The association between the secreted
proteins is weak, as we do not observe both proteins by
co-immunoprecipitation (data not shown) and TGD does not reduce the
activity of TPO, truncated TPO, or other cytokines.
In summary, we have previously identified a role for the evolutionarily
unique glycan domain of thrombopoietin. Here we have demonstrated that
the function of the TGD is robust enough to persist when the region is
separated from the parent protein, and we have begun to characterize
the promiscuity of this function and the cellular location of the
activity. TGD functions to enhance secretion of some but not all
members of the hematopoietic growth factor family. It is puzzling that
this effect was not manifest in our experiments with EPO, the closest
structural homologue of TPO. The function of TGD is minimal at the
level of protein translation, as our experiments with reticulocyte
lysates and a TGD cDNA expression vector lacking a secretory leader
failed to show significant changes in protein production or secretion, respectively. However, TGD secretion, or progress beyond the
endoplasmic reticulum, is not necessary for its function, as the
addition of an endoplasmic retention signal did not diminish the
effects of TGD expression in trans. Further studies in
vitro may determine the precise mechanisms of TGD activity.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants K08DK02665-02 (to H. L.), R01DK49855, and R01CA31615 (to
K. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address and to whom correspondence should be addressed:
UCSD Medical Center, 402 Dickinson St., Ste. 380, San Diego, CA
92103-8811. Tel.: 619-543-2259; E-mail: kkaushansky@ucsd.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 5, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201297200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TPO, thrombopoietin;
RBD, receptor binding domain;
TGD, TPO glycan domain;
EPO, erythropoietin;
GM-CSF, granulocyte monocyte colony-stimulating factor;
SCF, stem cell factor or Kit ligand;
IL-3, interleukin-3;
MK, megakaryocyte;
TGF, transforming growth factor;
SDF-1, stromal
cell-derived factor 1;
ERAD, endoplasmic reticulum-associated
degradation;
BHK, baby hamster kidney;
MTT, 3[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
GdnHCl, guanidine hydrochloride;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
SL, secretory leader;
GH, growth hormone;
hGH, human GH;
IP, immunoprecipitation;
RT, reverse
transcriptase;
vWF, von Willebrand factor;
mTPO, murine TPO.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kaushansky, K.
(1998)
N. Engl. J. Med.
339,
746-754[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Zeigler, F. C.,
de-Sauvage, F.,
Widmer, H. R.,
Keller, G. A.,
Donahue, C.,
Schreiber, R. D.,
Malloy, B.,
Hass, P.,
Eaton, D.,
and Matthews, W.
(1994)
Blood
84,
4045-4052[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Debili, N.,
Wendling, F.,
Katz, A.,
Guichard, J.,
Breton Gorius, J.,
Hunt, P.,
and Vainchenker, W.
(1995)
Blood
86,
2516-2525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Kaushansky, K.
(1995)
Blood
86,
419-431[Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Broudy, V. C.,
Lin, N. L.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(1995)
Blood
85,
1719-1726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Kaushansky, K. K.,
Broudy, V. C.,
Grossman, A.,
Humes, J.,
Lin, N.,
Ren, H. P.,
Bailey, M. C.,
Papayannopoulou, T.,
Forstrom, J. W.,
and Sprugel, K. H.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
1683-1687[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Vadhan-Raj, S.,
Verschraegen, C. F.,
Bueso-Ramos, C.,
Broxmeyer, H. E.,
Kudelka, A. P.,
Freedman, R. S.,
Edwards, C. L.,
Gershenson, D.,
Jones, D.,
Ashby, M.,
and Kavanagh, J. J.
(2000)
Ann. Intern. Med.
132,
364-368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Basser, R. L.,
Underhill, C.,
Davis, I.,
Green, M. D.,
Cebon, J.,
Zalcberg, J.,
MacMillan, J.,
Cohen, B.,
Marty, J.,
Fox, R. M.,
and Begley, C. G.
(2000)
J. Clin. Oncol.
18,
2852-2861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Kaushansky, K.,
Lin, N.,
Grossmann, A.,
Humes, J.,
Sprugel, K.,
and Broudy, V. C.
(1996)
Exp. Hematol.
24,
265-269[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Akahori, H.,
Shibuya, K.,
Obuchi, M.,
Nishizawa, Y.,
Tsuji, A.,
Kabaya, K.,
Kusaka, M.,
Ohashi, H.,
Tsumura, H.,
Kato, T.,
and Miyazaki, H.
(1996)
Br. J. Haematol.
94,
722-728[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Sitnicka, E.,
Lin, N.,
Priestly, G. V.,
Broudy, V. C.,
Wolf, N. S.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(1996)
Blood
87,
4998-5005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Kobayashi, M.,
Laver, J. H.,
Kato, T.,
Miyazaki, H.,
and Ogawa, M.
(1996)
Blood
88,
429-436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Solar, G. P.,
Kerr, W. G.,
Zeigler, F. C.,
Hess, D.,
Donahue, C.,
de Sauvage, F. J.,
and Eaton, D. L.
(1998)
Blood
92,
4-10[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Somlo, G.,
Sniecinski, I.,
ter Veer, A.,
Longmate, J.,
Knutson, G.,
Vuk- Pavlovic, S.,
Bhatia, R.,
Chow, W.,
Leong, L.,
Morgan, R.,
Margolin, K.,
Raschko, J.,
Shibata, S.,
Tetef, M.,
Yen, Y.,
Forman, S.,
Jones, D.,
Ashby, M.,
Fyfe, G.,
Hellmann, S.,
and Doroshow, J. H.
(1999)
Blood
93,
2798-2806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Piacibello, W.,
Sanavio, F.,
Garetto, L.,
Severino, A.,
Bergandi, D.,
Ferrario, J.,
Fagioli, F.,
Berger, M.,
and Aglietta, M.
(1997)
Blood
89,
2644-2653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Lok, S.,
Kaushansky, K.,
Holly, R. D.,
Kuijper, J. L.,
Lofton-Day, C. E.,
Oort, P. J.,
Grant, F. J.,
Heipel, M. D.,
Burkhead, S. K.,
Kramer, J. M.,
et al..
(1994)
Nature
369,
565-568[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Bartley, T. D.,
Bogenberger, J.,
Hunt, P., Li, Y. S., Lu, H. S.,
Martin, F.,
Chang, M. S.,
Samal, B.,
Nichol, J. L.,
Swift, S.,
et al..
(1994)
Cell
77,
1117-1124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Hunt, P., Li, Y. S.,
Nichol, J. L.,
Hokom, M. M.,
Bogenberger, J. M.,
Swift, S. E.,
Skrine, J. D.,
Hornkohl, A. C., Lu, H.,
Clogston, C.,
et al..
(1995)
Blood
86,
540-547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Linden, H. M.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
3044-3051[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Hoffman, R. C.,
Andersen, H.,
Walker, K.,
Krakover, J. D.,
Patel, S.,
Stamm, M. R.,
and Osborn, S. G.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
14849-14861[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Muto, T.,
Feese, M. D.,
Shimada, Y.,
Kudou, Y.,
Okamoto, T.,
Ozawa, T.,
Tahara, T.,
Ohashi, H.,
Ogami, K.,
Kato, T.,
Miyazaki, H.,
and Kuroki, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
12090-12094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Ahn, H. K.,
Chung, J. Y.,
Park, S. K.,
Joo, S. M.,
Kook, P. S.,
and Koh, Y. W.
(1999)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
47,
729-733[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Eder, J.,
and Fersht, A. R.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
16,
609-614[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Baker, D.,
Shiau, A. K.,
and Agard, D. A.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol.
5,
966-970[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Silen, J. L.,
and Agard, D. A.
(1989)
Nature
341,
462-464[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Fabre, E.,
Tharaud, C.,
and Gaillardin, C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
15049-15055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Fukuda, R.,
Horiuchi, H.,
Ohta, A.,
and Takagi, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9556-9561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
van den Hazel, H. B.,
Kielland-Brandt, M. C.,
and Winther, J. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
18002-18007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Beer, H. D.,
Wohlfahrt, G.,
Schmid, R. D.,
and McCarthy, J. E.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
319,
351-359[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Baier, K.,
Nicklisch, S.,
Maldener, I.,
and Lockau, W.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
241,
750-755[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Valverde, V.,
Delmas, P.,
Kaghad, M.,
Loison, G.,
and Jara, P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15821-15826[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Phillips, M. A.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
6771-6776[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Gray, A. M.,
and Mason, A. J.
(1990)
Science
247,
1328-1330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Haynes, R. L.,
Zheng, T.,
and Nicchitta, C. V.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17126-17133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Valore, E. V.,
and Ganz, T.
(1992)
Blood
79,
1538-1544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Journet, A. M.,
Saffaripour, S.,
and Wagner, D. D.
(1993)
Thromb. Haemostasis
70,
1053-1057[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Journet, A. M.,
Saffaripour, S.,
Cramer, E. M.,
Tenza, D.,
and Wagner, D. D.
(1993)
Eur. J. Cell. Biol.
60,
31-41[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Matous, J. V.,
Langley, K.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(1996)
Blood
88,
437-444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Kaushansky, K.,
O'Hara, P. J.,
Hart, C. E.,
Forstrom, J. W.,
and Hagen, F. S.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
4861-4867[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Shoemaker, S. G.,
Hromas, R.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9650-9654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Tahara, T.,
Kuwaki, T.,
Matsumoto, A.,
Morita, H.,
Watarai, H.,
Inagaki, Y.,
Ohashi, H.,
Ogami, K.,
and Kato, T.
(1998)
Stem Cells
16,
54-60[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Drachman, J. G.,
Griffin, J. D.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4979-4982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Wang, Q.,
Miyakawa, Y.,
Fox, N.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(2000)
Blood
96,
2093-2099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Baker, D.,
Sohl, J. L.,
and Agard, D. A.
(1992)
Nature
356,
263-265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Hamburger, J. B.,
Chen, E.,
Narhi, L. O., Wu, G. M.,
and Brems, D. N.
(1998)
Proteins
32,
495-503[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Miyakawa, Y.,
Oda, A.,
Druker, B. J.,
Kato, T.,
Miyazaki, H.,
Handa, M.,
and Ikeda, Y.
(1995)
Blood
86,
23-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Rojnuckarin, P.,
Miyakawa, Y.,
Fox, N. E.,
Deou, J.,
Daum, G.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
41014-41022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K.
(eds)
(1995)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, Vol. 1
, pp. 9.7.1-9.7.6, Greene and Wiley Interscience, New York
|
| 49.
|
McCarty, J. M.,
Sprugel, K. H.,
Fox, N. E.,
Sabath, D. E.,
and Kaushansky, K.
(1995)
Blood
86,
3668-3675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Munro, S.,
and Pelham, H. R.
(1987)
Cell
48,
899-907[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
O'Donohue, M. J.,
and Beaumont, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26477-26481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Zhu, X. L.,
Ohta, Y.,
Jordan, F.,
and Inouye, M.
(1989)
Nature
339,
483-484[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Werner, E. D.,
Brodsky, J. L.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13797-13801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
de Virgilio, M.,
Kitzmuller, C.,
Schwaiger, E.,
Klein, M.,
Kreibich, G.,
and Ivessa, N. E.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
4059-4073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Baker, D.,
Silen, J. L.,
and Agard, D. A.
(1992)
Proteins
12,
339-344[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Silen, J. L.,
Frank, D.,
Fujishige, A.,
Bone, R.,
and Agard, D. A.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
1320-1325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Lee, Y. C.,
Ohta, T.,
and Matsuzawa, H.
(1992)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
71,
73-77[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Kato, T.,
Oda, A.,
Inagaki, Y.,
Ohashi, H.,
Matsumoto, A.,
Ozaki, K.,
Miyakawa, Y.,
Watarai, H.,
Fuju, K.,
Kokubo, A.,
Kadoya, T.,
Ikeda, Y.,
and Miyazaki, H.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4669-4674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Liu, L.,
and Ganz, T.
(1995)
Blood
85,
1095-1103[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Barker, R. L.,
Gleich, G. J.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1988)
J. Exp. Med.
168,
1493-1498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|