Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110917200 on July 8, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 38, 35496-35502, September 20, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/38/35496    most recent
M110917200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Groblewski, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Groblewski, G. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Identification of Annexin VI as a Ca2+-sensitive CRHSP-28-binding Protein in Pancreatic Acinar Cells*

Diana D. H. Thomas, Kala M. Kaspar, William B. Taft, Ning Weng, Lance A. Rodenkirch, and Guy E. GroblewskiDagger

From the Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Received for publication, November 14, 2001, and in revised form, June 7, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

CRHSP-28 is a member of the tumor protein D52 protein family that was recently shown to regulate Ca2+-stimulated secretory activity in streptolysin-O-permeabilized acinar cells (Thomas, D. H., Taft, W. B., Kaspar, K. M., and Groblewski, G. E. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 28866-28872). In the present study, the Ca2+-sensitive phospholipid-binding protein annexin VI was purified from rat pancreas as a CRHSP-28-binding protein. The interaction between CRHSP-28 and annexin VI was demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation and gel-overlay assays and was shown to require low micromolar levels of free Ca2+, indicating these molecules likely interact under physiological conditions. Immunofluorescence microscopy confirmed a dual localization of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI, which appeared in a punctate pattern in the supranuclear and apical cytoplasm of acini. Stimulation of cells for 5 min with the secretagogue cholecystokinin enhanced the colocalization of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI within regions of acini immediately below the apical plasma membrane. Tissue fractionation revealed that CRHSP-28 is a peripheral membrane protein that is highly enriched in smooth microsomal fractions of pancreas. Further, the content of CRHSP-28 in microsomes was significantly reduced in pancreatic tissue obtained from rats that had been infused with a secretory dose of cholecystokinin for 40 min, demonstrating that secretagogue stimulation transiently alters the association of CRHSP-28 with membranes in cells. Collectively, the Ca2+-dependent binding of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI, together with their colocalization in the apical cytoplasm, is consistent with a role for these molecules in acinar cell membrane trafficking events that are essential for digestive enzyme secretion.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Secretion of digestive enzymes from the exocrine pancreas is a nutrient-driven process whereby the ingestion of a meal stimulates neural and humoral pathways that directly mediate the activation of pancreatic acinar cells (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Cell stimulation involves the acute elevation of intracellular Ca2+, a pivotal signaling event for the exocytosis of zymogen-containing secretory granules at the apical plasma membrane (1-3). In screening for signaling proteins that regulate acinar cell function, CRHSP-281 was identified based on its Ca2+-sensitive phosphorylation in response to secretagogue stimulation (4). We recently established an important regulatory role for CRHSP-28 in the acinar cell secretory pathway by demonstrating that introduction of CRHSP-28 protein into streptolysin-O-permeabilized acini significantly enhanced Ca2+-stimulated digestive enzyme secretion following the loss of cytosolic proteins from the intracellular compartment (5).

CRHSP-28, also known as CSPP28 in gastric mucosa (6), is a member of the tumor protein D52 (TPD52) family (7, 8) that is highly expressed in exocrine epithelial cells throughout the digestive system (9). The TPD52 proteins share in common a conserved coiled-coil motif that supports homo- and heteromeric interactions among family members (10). In acinar cells, chemical cross-linking studies indicate CRHSP-28 is part of a large insoluble protein complex (5) that localizes in a punctate pattern on vesicular structures in the supranuclear and apical cytoplasm (9). Supporting these findings, CRHSP-28/D52 has been localized to vesicular structures in the perinuclear cytoplasm of cultured cells (11) and was recently reported to interact with MAL2 by yeast two-hybrid screening (12). MAL2 is a member of a family of lipid-associated proteins that regulate apical targeting of intracellular vesicles in epithelial cells (13, 14).

In screening for proteins that interact with CRHSP-28 in pancreas, we recently identified 35- and 70-kDa binding proteins that co-immunoprecipitated with CRHSP-28 from acinar lysates and bound with recombinant CRHSP-28 in a gel-overlay assay (5). The 70-kDa protein co-purified with zymogen granule membranes, consistent with a secretory role for CRHSP-28 in acinar cells. Further, subcellular fractionation of the binding proteins was markedly altered when lysates were prepared in the presence of Ca2+, resulting in a redistribution of both molecules from a cytosolic to a Triton X-100 insoluble fraction. The present study describes the purification of the 70-kDa CRHSP-28-binding protein as annexin VI and further demonstrates a colocalization of these molecules in the apical cytoplasm of acinar cells. Based on recent studies establishing a role for annexin VI in endocytic trafficking (15-17), it is proposed that CRHSP-28 may function at multiple steps in acinar cell membrane trafficking involving digestive enzyme secretion and zymogen granule membrane retrieval from the apical plasma membrane.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Soybean trypsin inhibitor, benzamidine, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and Triton X-100 were purchased from Sigma, essential amino acid solution from Invitrogen, and a protease inhibitor mixture from Calbiochem. Bovine serum albumin and peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody were from Amersham Biosciences, protein A beads from Pierce, and protein determination reagent from Bio-Rad. Purified bovine brain annexin VI and anti-rabbit annexin VI antibody (k80102r) were purchased from Bio Design International. Goat anti-human annexin VI (sc1930) and corresponding antigen, rabbit anti-human Rab4 (sc312), fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-goat IgG, and peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat IgG secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Alexafluor 594-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG was from Molecular Probes. The characterization of affinity-purified anti-CRHSP-28 polyclonal antibodies was detailed previously (9).

Isolation of Rat Acini-- Pancreatic acinar cells were isolated from adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats by collagenase digestion as previously described (18, 19). Cells were suspended in an acinar buffer consisting of (in mM) 10 HEPES, 137 NaCl, 4.7 KCl, 0.56 MgCl2, 1.28 CaCl2, 0.6 Na2HPO4, 5.5 D-glucose, 2 L-glutamine, and an essential amino acid solution. The buffer was supplemented with 0.1 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, gassed with 100% O2, and adjusted to pH 7.4.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy-- Pancreatic lobules were prepared by microdissection of a rat pancreas that had been injected with phosphate-buffered saline containing (in mM) 137 NaCl, 2.7 KCl, 4.3 Na2HPO4, 1.4 KH2PO4, and 0.1 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor. Isolated lobules were incubated in the above acinar buffer at 37 °C with gentle shaking. Following indicated treatments, lobules were gently pelleted and fixed in 4% formaldehyde prepared from paraformaldehyde. Immunofluorescence microcopy was conducted on 6-µm-thick cryostat sections as described (9). Annexin VI immunoreactivity with antibody sc1390 was characterized using a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-goat IgG (1:200). Antigen competition studies were conducted by preincubating annexin VI antibody with a 10-fold molar excess of peptide antigen for 2 h at room temperature, prior to an overnight incubation with the tissue. For dual immunofluorescence localization of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI, CRHSP-28 immunoreactivity was detected using Alexafluor 594-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000). Tissue was analyzed using a Bio-Rad model 1024 confocal microscope with a mixed krypton/argon gas laser. For dual immunofluorescence measurements, fluorophores were individually excited at the appropriate wavelength to ensure no overlapping excitation occurred between channels. Captured images were overlaid using Bio-Rad software and then converted to TIF files for processing using Photoshop software.

Annexin VI Purification-- Acini prepared from two pancreases were sonicated at 4 °C in a lysis buffer containing (in mM) 50 Tris base (pH 7.4), 2 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.1 phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 benzamidine, and protease inhibitor mixture. Following a 30-min incubation at 4 °C, a detergent-insoluble fraction (P1) was obtained by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 30 min. Detergent-insoluble proteins were sonicated again in the same buffer without CaCl2 and containing 5 mM EGTA. Proteins released by EGTA treatment were obtained in the soluble fraction (S2) following a second centrifugation, and the 70-kDa CRHSP-28-binding protein was analyzed by gel-overlay assay as previously described (5). S2 fractions enriched in the binding protein were stockpiled from multiple experiments and separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis as described (19). The Coomassie Blue-stained CRHSP-28-binding protein was excised from multiple gels and digested with trypsin. Tryptic fragments were separated by HPLC and submitted for microsequence analysis as described (4). N-terminal amino acid sequencing was conducted by the Michigan State University Microsequence facility.

Tissue Fractionation-- Rats were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane, and jugular veins were cannulated for infusion of hormone. A secretory dose of cholecystokinin (CCK) (300 pmol/kg/h) was infused in 0.9% saline at a rate of 1 ml/h for 40 min prior to removal of the pancreas. Tissue fractionation was conducted essentially as described (20). Two rat pancreases were minced in five volumes of a buffer containing (in mM) 10 MOPS, pH 6.8, 250 sucrose, 0.1 MgCl2, 0.1 phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 benzamidine. Tissue was homogenized by three strokes of a motor-driven homogenizer (5,000 rpm) using a Teflon pestle with 0.5-1-mm clearance. A post-nuclear supernatant was prepared by centrifugation at 150 × g for 10 min and then further centrifuged at 1,300 × g for 15 min to produce a white pellet enriched in zymogen granules overlaid by a brown pellet enriched in mitochondria. The remaining supernatant was centrifuged 12,000 × g for 13 min to obtain a lysosome-enriched pellet and then centrifuged again at 100,000 × g for 1 h to separate microsomal and cytosolic fractions. Smooth and rough microsomal fractions were prepared as previously described (21). Briefly, a sucrose gradient composed of 1.3, 0.86, 0.5, and 0.25 M sucrose was prepared in homogenization buffer. Crude microsomes were layered between the 0.5 and 0.25 M sucrose layers and then centrifuged at 160,000 × g for 1 h. Membrane fractions isolated from the 1.3/0.86 and 0.86/0.5 M sucrose interface represented the rough and smooth microsomal fractions, respectively.

Other Assays-- Immunoprecipitations were conducted as detailed previously (22). To determine the Ca2+ sensitivity of CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding, gel-overlay assays were conducted as described (5) using a binding buffer containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.3% Tween 20, 5% bovine serum albumin, 5 mM EGTA, and enough CaCl2 to create the desired final concentration of free Ca2+. The quantity of Ca2+ added to the buffer was calculated based on dissociation constants using a computer program as described (23). Acinar lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and incubated with recombinant CRHSP-28 (4 µg/ml) for 1 h at room temperature. Binding proteins were detected using affinity-purified CRHSP-28 antiserum (1 µg/ml). Protein binding was quantified by densitometric analysis using a model DNA35 scanner interfaced with the Protein and DNA Imageware System (PDI, Huntington Station, NY).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Annexin VI Is a CRHSP-28-binding Protein-- Using a gel-overlay technique to screen for proteins that interact with CRHSP-28, we recently identified two binding proteins of 35 and 70 kDa (5). Both proteins partitioned into a Triton X-100-insoluble fraction of lysates prepared in the presence of Ca2+. The Ca2+ dependence of this redistribution was exploited to purify the 70-kDa binding protein from pancreatic acinar cells (Fig. 1A). Lysates were prepared in the presence of 0.2% Triton X-100 and 1 mM Ca2+, and a detergent-insoluble fraction (P1) highly enriched in binding proteins was obtained by centrifugation. The 70-kDa protein was subsequently released from the insoluble material by chelating Ca2+ using EGTA. Proteins in the EGTA released fraction (S2) were combined from multiple preparations and then separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis as a final purification step (Fig. 1B). Of the two CRHSP-28-binding proteins, only the 70-kDa molecule was readily detected by Coomassie staining, and was present as a closely spaced doublet with a pI of ~5.5-6.0. Tryptic fragments of the 70-kDa binding protein were separated by HPLC (Fig. 1C). Microsequence analysis of fraction 21 from the HPLC trace yielded high quality sequence of a 14-amino acid peptide with 100% homology to amino acids 472-485 of rat annexin VI, a Ca2+-sensitive phospholipid and cytoskeletal binding protein (24).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Purification of annexin VI as a CRHSP-28-binding protein from rat pancreas. A, gel-overlay analysis was used to follow the purification of the 70-kDa CRHSP-28-binding protein. An acinar cell homogenate (start) was prepared in a buffer containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and 1 mM CaCl2. Triton X-100 soluble (S1) and insoluble (P1) fractions were separated by centrifugation. P1 was sonicated in 5 mM EGTA to release the 70-kDa binding protein, which was recovered in the soluble fraction (S2) following a second centrifugation. B, proteins recovered in the S2 fraction were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Gel overlay and Coomassie staining were used to detect the 70-kDa binding protein (shown by arrow). The purified binding protein strongly reacted with annexin VI k80102r antiserum (1:1,000) by immunoblotting. C, the purified 70-kDa binding protein was digested with trypsin and peptides were separated by HPLC. Fraction 21 was submitted for microsequence analysis. A 14-amino acid peptide was sequenced with 100% homology to amino acids 472-485 of rat annexin VI.

As the molecular mass, pI and Ca2+-mediated redistribution of the 70-kDa binding protein in subcellular fractions were essentially identical to that reported for annexin VI in other cell types, specific antibodies were used to verify its identity in acinar cells. A polyclonal antibody raised against the N-terminal 16 amino acids of rabbit annexin VI specifically reacted with the purified 70-kDa binding protein on two-dimensional gels (Fig. 1B). The annexin VI immunoreactive protein migrated as a closely-spaced doublet following SDS-PAGE and was identical in size to signals obtained from an annexin VI-enriched membrane fraction from lung, as well as purified bovine annexin VI protein (Fig. 2A). Similar results were obtained using a separate polyclonal antibody raised against the N-terminal 19 amino acids of human annexin VI (Fig. 2C). The annexin VI immunoreactive protein underwent a pronounced redistribution from cytosolic to detergent-insoluble fractions of lysates prepared in the presence of 1 mM Ca2+. These results are identical to our recent report showing a Ca2+-sensitive translocation of the 70-kDa CRHSP-28-binding protein from cytosolic to particulate fractions of an acinar lysate (5). The CRHSP-28/annexin VI interaction was additionally confirmed by demonstrating that recombinant CRHSP-28 strongly bound to purified bovine annexin VI in the gel-overlay assay (Fig. 2B). Collectively, these data indicate that the previously identified 70-kDa CRHSP-28-binding protein is indeed annexin VI.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Annexin VI expression in acinar cells. A, annexin VI was analyzed by immunoblotting an acinar cell lysate (30 µg), a purified membrane fraction from bovine lung (2 µg), and purified bovine annexin VI protein (Ann. VI) (1 µg) with k80102r antibodies (1:1,000). Annexin VI is present as a 70-kDa protein doublet. B, comparison of a gel-overlay assay conducted on an acinar cell lysate (30 µg) and purified bovine annexin VI (1 µg) showing that recombinant CRHSP-28 strongly interacts with purified annexin VI protein. C, annexin VI translocates from a cytosolic to a Triton X-100-insoluble fraction of acinar cells in the presence of Ca2+. Lysates were prepared in 5 mM EGTA or 1 mM CaCl2. Cytosolic (Cyto) fractions were first isolated in the absence of Triton X-100 by centrifugation. The particulate fraction was sonicated in the same buffer containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and centrifuged. The resulting soluble fraction represented cell membranes (Mem), and pellet represented the Triton X-100 insoluble fraction (TX100-insol). Proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting with annexin VI sc1930 antibodies (1:100). A gel-overlay assay of an acinar lysate showing the 70-kDa CRHSP-28-binding protein was conducted on the left side of the adjoining membrane for comparison.

Ca2+-dependent CRHSP-28/Annexin VI Binding in Vitro-- The interaction between CRHSP-28 and annexin VI was further demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitating the proteins from an acinar cell lysate (Fig. 3). Interestingly, no CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding was detected when lysates were prepared in the absence of Ca2+. However, inclusion of Ca2+ in the lysis buffer promoted a strong association between the two proteins, which readily coimmunoprecipitated together. Conducting immunoprecipitations in the presence of Ca2+ resulted in ~50% of the annexin VI protein translocating to the detergent-insoluble fraction, which was then removed by centrifugation prior to immunoprecipitation (see Fig. 2C). This sedimentation of annexin VI made it difficult to quantify the Ca2+ sensitivity of CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding by coimmunoprecipitation, as variable amounts of annexin VI moved to the detergent-insoluble fraction in the presence of Ca2+. As an alternative, the Ca2+ sensitivity of CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding was measured in vitro using the gel-overlay assay (Fig. 4). In initial experiments, gel overlays were conducted in the presence of milk protein, which contains ample amounts of Ca2+. Removal of Ca2+ from the buffer using EGTA resulted in a complete loss of CRHSP-28 binding (data not shown). As a substitute, bovine serum albumin was included in the buffer and CRHSP-28 binding was measured while clamping the free Ca2+ concentration at various levels. Consistent with the Ca2+-sensitive coimmunoprecipitation, CRHSP-28 binding to annexin VI occurred over a micromolar range of free ionized Ca2+. CRHSP-28 binding reached a plateau at 10-100 µM Ca2+ with an EC50 of ~2.5 µM Ca2+. Binding increased slightly (< 20%) at 1 mM Ca2+; however, no further interaction was detected at Ca2+ concentrations as high as 10 mM (data not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Coimmunoprecipitation of annexin VI with CRHSP-28. Cell lysates were prepared in a buffer containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and either 5 mM EGTA or 1 mM CaCl2. Following immunoprecipitation (IP) with CRHSP-28 antibodies and protein A beads (Prt-A), proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-annexin VI antibody (Ab) sc1930. Identical results were obtained using the gel-overlay assay with CRHSP-28 protein to identify annexin VI (data not shown). Note that the coimmunoprecipitation of annexin VI with CRHSP-28 was dependent on the presence of Ca2+ in the lysate (compare lanes 2 and 6).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Ca2+ sensitivity of CRHSP-28 binding to annexin VI. Equal amounts of an acinar cell lysate (40 µg) were separated by electrophoresis and analyzed by gel-overlay assay with recombinant CRHSP-28 protein (4 µg/ml). The assay buffer contained 5 mM EGTA and enough CaCl2 to achieve the indicated concentrations of free Ca2+. CRHSP-28 binding to annexin VI was quantified by densitometry. Data are the mean and standard error of three or four determinations for each point.

Tissue Fractionation of CRHSP-28 and Annexin VI in Pancreas-- CRHSP-28 is a hydrophilic protein that partitions into both soluble and membrane fractions following cell lysis (9, 5, 11). To characterize the association of CRHSP-28 with membranes, a crude microsomal fraction of a pancreatic homogenate was treated under alkaline conditions with Na2CO3, then re-isolated by centrifugation to separate peripheral and integral membrane proteins (Fig. 5). As a positive control, the small G-protein Rab4, which anchors to phospholipids via a geranylgeranyl moiety (25), was analyzed by immunoblotting and found to remain largely associated with the membrane fraction following alkaline treatment. In contrast, CRHSP-28 was completely recovered in the soluble fraction following alkaline treatment, indicating that it is not an integral membrane protein but instead is peripherally associated with these structures.


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   CRHSP-28 is a peripheral membrane protein. Pancreatic microsomes (Micro) were suspended in 0.1 M NaCO3, pH 11, for 30 min at 4 °C. Following centrifugation, the content of CRHSP-28 and Rab4 in the soluble (Sol) and membrane (Insol) fractions (40 µg/lane) was analyzed by immunoblotting.

Subcellular fractionation of rat pancreas demonstrated that CRHSP-28 was largely localized to a microsomal fraction (Fig. 6). As previously reported (9), no CRHSP-28 signal was detected in purified zymogen granules. Further, little or no CRHSP-28 was present in fractions enriched in mitochondria or lysosomes. In contrast, annexin VI was present at similar levels in all subcellular fractions tested including zymogen granules, mitochondria, and lysosomes. Interestingly, treatment of animals with a secretory dose of CCK for 40 min prior to tissue fractionation significantly increased the amount of CRHSP-28 recovered in the cytosolic fraction and, correspondingly, decreased the amount of the protein recovered in the microsomal fraction. Hormone treatment had no effect on annexin VI fractionation. Further fractionation of crude microsomes by sucrose gradient centrifugation demonstrated that both CRHSP-28 and annexin VI were predominantly associated with the smooth microsomal fraction composed mainly of Golgi, plasma membrane, and endosomes.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Subcellular fractionation of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI in rat pancreas. Rat pancreases were obtained from animals treated as control or infused with a secretory dose (300 pmol/min/kg body weight) of cholecystokinin for 40 min. A postnuclear supernatant (PNS) was prepared and subjected to differential centrifugation to isolate fractions that were enriched in zymogen granules (ZG), mitochondria (Mito), lysosomes (Lyso), crude microsomes (Micro), and a 100,000 × g supernatant (Cyto). Crude microsomes from control animals were further separated into smooth (SM) and rough microsomes (RM) by sucrose gradient centrifugation. Anti-CRHSP-28 and anti-annexin VI antibody k80102r were used for immunoblotting each fraction (40 µg/lane).

Immunofluorescence Localization of Annexin VI in Acinar Cells-- Immunofluorescence localization of annexin VI was conducted on 0.5-µm-thick optical sections of pancreatic lobules and demonstrated that the protein was present in a punctate pattern throughout the basal and apical cytoplasm (Fig. 7). Annexin VI staining was evident in the juxtanuclear regions of cells but was largely absent from nuclei. This same pattern of annexin VI immunofluorescence was detected using both anti-human and anti-rabbit annexin VI polyclonal antibodies. No signal was observed in sections when primary antibody was omitted from the incubations (data not shown). Further, preabsorption of the annexin VI antibody with a 10-fold molar excess of antigen completely abolished annexin VI staining, demonstrating the specificity of this localization (Fig. 7C).


View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Immunofluorescence localization of annexin VI in pancreatic lobules. Rat pancreatic lobules were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, and annexin VI localization was analyzed in 0.5-µm-thick optical sections by confocal microscopy. Anti-annexin VI antibody sc1930 (1:50) was detected using a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody (1:200). A, immunofluorescence localization of annexin VI and corresponding differential contrast image (B) demonstrating a punctate pattern of annexin VI immunoreactivity throughout the acinar cell cytoplasm. C, the annexin VI antibody was preincubated with a 10-fold molar excess of antigen prior to incubation with the tissue. D, differential contrast image of field shown in panel C.

Colocalization of CRHSP-28 and Annexin VI in Acinar Cells-- The subcellular distribution of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI was examined using dual immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 8). As previously reported (9), CRHSP-28 was highly localized to the apical cytoplasm of acini extending from the supranuclear region to the apical plasma membrane (Fig. 8A). Low levels of CRHSP-28 staining were present in basal regions of cells. As indicated above (Fig. 7), annexin VI immunofluorescence was detected in a punctate pattern throughout the cytoplasm, including apical regions of acini just below the acinar lumen (Fig. 8B, arrows). Overlay of the CRHSP-28 and annexin VI images demonstrated a pronounced overlapping of the proteins throughout the supranuclear and apical cytoplasm (Fig. 8C). Little or no overlap of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI occurred in the basal cytoplasm where annexin VI staining was evident. Incubation of lobules for 5 min with CCK promoted the accumulation of both CRHSP-28 annexin VI staining to regions immediately below the apical membrane. Although quantitative immunofluorescence was not conducted, this effect was seen in multiple experiments and was also evident upon ionomycin stimulation of lobules. The co-localization of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI in control and secretagogue-stimulated acini supports the biochemical data demonstrating a Ca2+-sensitive interaction between these proteins and is consistent with an important role for these molecules in acinar cell membrane trafficking.


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Colocalization of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI in pancreatic lobules. Cryostat sections were prepared from formaldehyde-fixed pancreatic lobules treated as control or with 10 nM CCK for 5 min. Affinity-purified CRHSP-28 and anti-annexin VI sc1930 antibodies were detected using Alexafluor 594- and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies, respectively. CRHSP-28 and annexin VI antibodies were used at final concentrations of 1 µg/ml and 1:50, respectively. A and D, CRHSP-28 localization is shown in red. B and E, annexin VI localization is shown in green. C and F, overlay of the CRHSP-28 and annexin VI images showing that CCK stimulation enhances the accumulation of both proteins below the apical membrane. Asterisks indicate location of nuclei. Arrows indicate the apical plasma membrane just below the acinar lumen.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Annexin VI is a member of an extended family of Ca2+-dependent phospholipid-binding proteins reported to function in diverse cellular processes related to signaling, membrane trafficking, and cytoskeletal dynamics (24, 26). Annexin proteins are characterized by the presence of at least four conserved tandem repeats of 70 amino acids that mediate their interaction with negatively charged phospholipids in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Annexin VI is unique in that it contains eight such repeats arranged in a two-lobed configuration that is separated by a linker region (27). The flexibility of the linker region supports both parallel and perpendicular orientations of the two lobes and, as such, is thought to impart the many dynamic properties of the annexin VI protein (27).

Annexin VI has been implicated as an important regulatory component of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (15-17, 28), although the primary significance of the protein in this process remains unclear (29). Lin et al. (28) used an in vitro system to demonstrate that annexin VI is required for the Ca2+- and ATP-dependent budding of clathrin-coated pits from membranes. Subsequent studies in intact fibroblasts indicated that annexin VI functions by directing the remodeling of membrane-bound spectrin during vesicle budding (15). In addition to modulating endocytosis at the plasma membrane, annexin VI was shown to be present in a late endocytic compartment of epithelial cells (30-34), where it is thought to direct the delivery of endosomal vesicles to lysosomes (16, 17). Interestingly, in smooth muscle, annexin VI plays a dynamic role in regulating reversible interactions between actin-cytoskeletal components and the caveolar fraction of the sarcolemma during muscle contraction (35, 36). Collectively, these studies suggest that annexin VI plays a generalized role in Ca2+-dependent cellular processes involving transient interactions between membrane and cytoskeletal proteins.

The binding of CRHSP-28 with annexin VI required low micromolar concentrations of free Ca2+ in vitro, indicating the likelihood that these molecules interact under physiological conditions (1-3). A specific interaction between CRHSP-28 and annexin VI was supported by dual immunofluorescence microscopy colocalizing these proteins within the apical cytoplasm of acinar cells. Furthermore, the apparent recruitment of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI to the cell apex upon secretagogue stimulation also supports a Ca2+-regulated interaction. The Ca2+ dependence of CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding is remarkably similar to the Ca2+-dependent interaction of annexin VI with negatively charged phospholipids and suggests that these molecules interact by a similar molecular mechanism. CRHSP-28 contains three clusters of negatively charged acidic residues (amino acids 16-20, 34-39, and 48-50) present within the amino half of the protein (4). These concentrated regions of negative charge may potentially support Ca2+-dependent interactions of CRHSP-28 with either of the phospholipid binding domains of annexin VI.

Our previous study (5) demonstrating a role for CRHSP-28 in acinar cell secretion strongly suggests that CRHSP-28 be associated with zymogen granules. Although CRHSP-28 was highly localized around zymogen granules in the apical cytoplasm, the protein was not detected when immunoblotting purified fractions of these organelles. Conversely, annexin VI was clearly detected in purified zymogen granules (Fig. 6) and zymogen granule membranes (5) prepared in the absence of added Ca2+. A Ca2+-independent association of annexin VI with membranes has previously been described in a number of tissues including liver and mammary epithelial cells (22, 32, 34). Therefore, it is possible that CRHSP-28 is recruited to zymogen granules via an interaction with annexin VI during periods of elevated cellular Ca2+. Indeed, numerous studies have documented that the highest levels of free Ca2+ achieved following secretagogue stimulation occur immediately below the apical membrane and are believed to be necessary to trigger the exocytosis of zymogen granules (1-3). Zymogen granules have been shown to be enriched in cholesterol- and sphingolipid-containing microdomains, and, further, these structures are essential for granule maturation and apical secretion in acini (37). In smooth muscle, annexin VI has been shown to regulate reversible interactions of the actin cytoskeleton with cholesterol- and glycosphingolipid-rich membrane microdomains (35, 36). Thus, similar to its role in smooth muscle contraction, annexin VI may regulate interactions between zymogen granules and actin-cytoskeletal components of the subapical web in acini. The actin-rich subapical web in acinar cells has been shown to play an integral role in regulating both the exocytosis of zymogen granules and the subsequent retrieval of granule membranes from the apical plasmalemma (38-40).

CRHSP-28 and annexin VI were diffusely localized in the apical cytoplasm of acini under both basal and CCK-stimulated conditions. The diffuse nature of the immunofluorescence staining precluded a precise localization of the proteins to specific membrane compartments. Because significant cytosolic pools of both CRHSP-28 and annexin VI exist, these data may reflect a dynamic and reversible association of these molecules with membranes. Cell fractionation studies indicated CRHSP-28 was equally present in both soluble and particulate fractions of acinar lysates. Further, CRHSP-28 was peripherally associated with membranes, as NaCO3 treatment efficiently released the protein from pancreatic microsomes. We recently showed that the leakage of CRHSP-28 from streptolysin-O-permeabilized acini was significantly enhanced over 15 min under conditions of elevated cellular Ca2+, suggesting that cell stimulation promoted a translocation of CRHSP-28 within the cytoplasm (5). Interestingly, we have determined that phosphorylated CRHSP-28 is primarily released from permeabilized acini following CCK stimulation, whereas the nonphosphorylated protein is associated exclusively with membrane fractions.2 These findings are consistent with the current study showing that the recovery of CRHSP-28 in cytosolic fractions of pancreas was significantly enhanced following a 40-min infusion of CCK in vivo. Collectively, these findings support a dynamic association of CRHSP-28 with membranes that is significantly altered by secretagogue stimulation.

The question remains as to the Ca2+-independent association of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI with endosome-enriched microsomal fractions of pancreas. One possibility is that CRHSP-28 binds to annexin VI during periods of elevated Ca2+ to support the movement of zymogen granules across the actin-rich subapical web. CRHSP-28 and annexin VI would then enter the plasma membrane during zymogen granule fusion and be retrieved from the apical membrane during endocytosis. The finding that the association of CRHSP-28 with endosome-enriched microsomes was detected in the absence of added Ca2+ further suggests CRHSP-28 entered a stable complex with additional membrane-bound proteins. Supporting this, we recently demonstrated by covalent cross-linking experiments that CRHSP-28 is part of a large molecular mass complex (>300 kDa) in acini that partitions into membrane fractions following cell lysis (5). The large mass of this complex is consistent with an association of CRHSP-28 with a multiprotein complex. Further, in accordance with the CCK-enhanced cytosolic localization of CRHSP-28 in vivo and the Ca2+-enhanced release of the protein from permeabilized cells (5), CRHSP-28 may be dissociated from this complex via its Ca2+-mediated phosphorylation. CRHSP-28 phosphorylation occurs on at least two serine residues and is a transient event, reaching maximal levels within 2 min and fully dephosphorylating over 60 min in the continued presence of secretagogues (4). The transient phosphorylation of CRHSP-28 is clearly consistent with the movement of the protein into the cytoplasm, where it may be dephosphorylated by constitutively active serine/threonine protein phosphatases. Once dephosphorylated, CRHSP-28 would be available to support subsequent zymogen granule trafficking events.

Interestingly, it was recently reported that CRHSP-28 specifically interacts with a member of the MAL protein family by yeast two-hybrid analysis and in vitro pull-down assays (12). MAL proteins are known to regulate apical targeting of vesicles in renal epithelial cells and, similar to annexin VI, are targeted to cholesterol and sphingolipid-rich microdomains on secretory granules (13, 14). Moreover, MAL proteins have been shown to cycle from the apical plasma membrane back to the Golgi compartment on endocytic vesicles (41). Although MAL proteins are essential for apical membrane targeting in polarized epithelia, the precise molecular function of these proteins has not been described. Clearly, further experimentation directly examining the role of CRHSP-28 and its associated proteins in zymogen granule trafficking and membrane retrieval is necessary to understand how this molecule modulates acinar cell function.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We extend a special thanks to Dr. Stephen Ernst for helpful suggestions on performing immunofluorescence microscopy on pancreatic tissue and Dr. Joseph Leykam and staff at the Michigan State University Microsequence Facility for help in sequencing the annexin VI protein.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants WISO4221 and WIS04444 from the United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research Education and Extension Service Program, by American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant IRG-58-011-42-2, and by National Science Foundation Award MCB-0094154 (to G. E. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin, 1415 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706. Tel.: 608-262-0884; Fax: 608-262-5860; E-mail: groby@ nutrisci.wisc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110917200

2 D. D. H. Thomas and G. E. Groblewski, unpublished observation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CRHSP-28, calcium-regulated heat-stable protein of 28 kDa; TPD52, tumor protein D52 family; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; CCK, cholecystokinin; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Williams, J. A., and Yule, D. I. (1993) in The Pancreas (Go, V. L. W. , Dimango, E. P. , Gardner, J. D. , Lebenthal, E. , Reber, H. A. , and Scheele, G. A., eds), 2nd Ed. , pp. 167-189, Raven Press, New York
2. Williams, J. A., Groblewski, G. E., Ohnishi, H., and Yule, D. I. (1997) Digestion 58, 42-45
3. Muallem, S., and Lee, M. G. (1997) Cell Calcium 22, 1-4[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Groblewski, G. E., Wishart, M. J., Yoshida, M., and Williams, J. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31502-31507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Thomas, D. H., Taft, W. B., Kaspar, K. M., and Groblewski, G. E. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 28866-28872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Parente, J. A., Jr., Goldenring, J. R., Petropoulos, A. C., Hellman, U., and Chew, C. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20096-20101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Byrne, J., Mattei, M.-G., and Basset, P. (1996) Genomics 35, 523-532[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Nourse, C. R., Mattei, M.-G., Gunning, P., and Byrne, J. A. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1443, 155-168[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Groblewski, G. E., Yoshida, M., Yao, H., Williams, J. A., and Ernst, S. A. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, G219-G226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Sathasivam, P., Bailey, A. M., Crossley, M., and Byrne, J. A. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 288, 56-61[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Balleine, R. L., Fejzo, M. S., Sathasivam, P., Basset, P., Clarke, C. L., and Byrne, J. A. (2000) Genes Chromosomes Cancer 29, 48-57[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Wilson, S. H., Bailey, A. M., Nourse, C. R., Mattei, M. G., and Byrne, J. A. (2001) Genomics 76, 81-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Cheong, K. H., Zacchetti, D., Scheeberger, E. E., and Simons, K. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 6241-6248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Martin-Belmonte, F., Puetollano, R., Millan, J., and Alonso, M. A. (2000) Mol. Biol. Cell. 11, 2033-2045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kamal, A., Ying, Y.-S., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 937-947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Grewal, T., Heeren, J., Mewawala, D., Schnitgerhans, T., Wendt, D., Salomon, G., Enrich, C., Beiseigel, U., and Jackle, S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 33806-33813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Pons, M., Grewal, T., Rius, E., Schnitgerhans, T., Jackle, S., and Enrich, C. (2001) Exp. Cell Res. 269, 13-22[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Burnham, D. B., and Williams, J. A. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 10523-10528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Wishart, M. J., Groblewski, G. E., Göke, B. J., Wagner, A. C. C., and Williams, J. A. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 267, G676-G686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Hofbauer, B., Saluja, A. K., Lerch, M. M., Bhagat, L., Bhatia, M., Lee, H. S., Frossard, J. L., Adler, G., and Steer, M. L. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, G352-G362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Kleene, R., Zdzieblo, J., Wege, K., and Kern, H.-F. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 2539-2548[Abstract]
22. Groblewski, G. E., Wang, Y., Ernst, S. A., Kent, C., and Williams, J. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1437-1442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Kitagawa, M., Williams, J. A., and De Lisle, R. C. (1990) Am. J. Physiol. 259, G157-G164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Hawkins, T. E., Merrifield, C. J., and Moss, S. E. (2000) Cell Biochem. Biophys. 33, 275-296[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Valentijn, J. A., Gien, L. T., Valentijn, K. M., and Jamieson, J. D. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 268, 847-852[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Donnelly, S. R., and Moss, S. E. (1997) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53, 533-538[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Avila-Sakar, A. J., Kretsinger, R. H., and Creutz, C. E. (2000) J. Struct. Biol. 130, 54-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Lin, H. C., Sudhof, T. C., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1992) Cell 70, 283-291[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Hawkins, T. E., Roes, J., Rees, D., Monkhouse, J., and Moss, S. E. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8028-8032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Jackle, S., Beisiegel, U., Rinninger, F., Grigoleit, A., Bock, A., Groger, I., Greten, H., and Windler, E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1026-1032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Weinman, J. S., Feinberg, J. M., Rainteau, D. P., Gaspera, B. D., and Weinman, S. J. (1994) Cell Tissue Res. 278, 389-397[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Turpin, E., Russo-Marie, F., Dubois, T., de Paillerets, C., Alfsen, A., and Bomsel, M. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1402, 115-130[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Ortega, D., Pol, A., Biermer, M., Jackle, S., and Enrich, C. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 261-269[Abstract]
34. Lavialle, F., Rainteau, D., Massey-Harroche, D., and Metz, F. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1464, 82-94
35. Babiychuk, E. B., and Draeger, A. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 150, 1113-1123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Babiychuk, E. B., Palstra, R.-J. T. S., Schaller, J., Kampfer, U., and Draeger, A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35191-35195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Schmidt, K., Schrader, M., Kern, H.-F., and Kleene, R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 14315-14323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Valentijn, K. M., Gumkowski, F. D., and Jamieson, J. D. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 81-96[Abstract]
39. Valentijn, K., Valentijn, J. A., and Jamieson, J. D. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 266, 652-661[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Muallem, S., Kwiatkowska, K., Xu, X., and Yin, H. L. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 589-598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Puertolloano, R., and Alonso, M. A. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 3435-3447[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
C. S. Chew, X. Chen, H. Zhang, E. A. Berg, and H. Zhang
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent phosphorylation of tumor protein D52 on serine residue 136 may be mediated by CAMK2{delta}6
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): G1159 - G1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Bode, A. Luken, C. Kerkhoff, J. Roth, S. Ludwig, and W. Nacken
Interaction between S100A8/A9 and Annexin A6 Is Involved in the Calcium-induced Cell Surface Exposition of S100A8/A9
J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2008; 283(46): 31776 - 31784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Shehata, I. Bieche, R. Boutros, J. Weidenhofer, S. Fanayan, L. Spalding, N. Zeps, K. Byth, R. K. Bright, R. Lidereau, et al.
Nonredundant Functions for Tumor Protein D52-Like Proteins Support Specific Targeting of TPD52
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 14(16): 5050 - 5060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Wang, J. Xu, N. Mabjeesh, G. Zhu, J. Zhou, M. Amin, D. He, F. F. Marshall, H. E. Zhau, and L. W.K. Chung
PrLZ Is Expressed in Normal Prostate Development and in Human Prostate Cancer Progression
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 6040 - 6048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Zhang, J. Wang, B. Pang, R.-x. Liang, S. Li, P.-t. Huang, R. Wang, L. W.K. Chung, H. E. Zhau, C. Huang, et al.
PC-1/PrLZ Contributes to Malignant Progression in Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8906 - 8913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Weng, D. D. H. Thomas, and G. E. Groblewski
Pancreatic Acinar Cells Express Vesicle-associated Membrane Protein 2- and 8-Specific Populations of Zymogen Granules with Distinct and Overlapping Roles in Secretion
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9635 - 9645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. Tiacci, P.-L. Orvietani, B. Bigerna, A. Pucciarini, G. L. Corthals, V. Pettirossi, M. P. Martelli, A. Liso, R. Benedetti, R. Pacini, et al.
Tumor protein D52 (TPD52): a novel B-cell/plasma-cell molecule with unique expression pattern and Ca2+-dependent association with annexin VI
Blood, April 1, 2005; 105(7): 2812 - 2820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
D. D. H. Thomas, N. Weng, and G. E. Groblewski
Secretagogue-induced translocation of CRHSP-28 within an early apical endosomal compartment in acinar cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): G253 - G263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Cho, H.-M. Ko, J.-M. Kim, J.-A Lee, J.-E. Park, M.-S. Jang, S. G. Park, D. H. Lee, S.-E. Ryu, and B.-C. Park
Positive Regulation of Apoptosis Signal-regulating Kinase 1 by hD53L1
J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 16050 - 16056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Wang, J. Xu, O. Saramaki, T. Visakorpi, W. M. Sutherland, J. Zhou, B. Sen, S. D. Lim, N. Mabjeesh, M. Amin, et al.
PrLZ, a Novel Prostate-Specific and Androgen-Responsive Gene of the TPD52 Family, Amplified in Chromosome 8q21.1 and Overexpressed in Human Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 64(5): 1589 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. M. Kaspar, D. D. H. Thomas, W. B. Taft, E. Takeshita, N. Weng, and G. E. Groblewski
CaM kinase II regulation of CRHSP-28 phosphorylation in cultured mucosal T84 cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): G1300 - G1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/38/35496    most recent
M110917200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Groblewski, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, D. D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Groblewski, G. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement