|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110917200 on July 8, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 38, 35496-35502, September 20, 2002
Identification of Annexin VI as a Ca2+-sensitive
CRHSP-28-binding Protein in Pancreatic Acinar Cells*
Diana D. H.
Thomas,
Kala M.
Kaspar,
William B.
Taft,
Ning
Weng,
Lance A.
Rodenkirch, and
Guy E.
Groblewski
From the Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of
Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received for publication, November 14, 2001, and in revised form, June 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
CRHSP-28 is a member of the tumor protein D52
protein family that was recently shown to regulate
Ca2+-stimulated secretory activity in
streptolysin-O-permeabilized acinar cells (Thomas, D. H., Taft,
W. B., Kaspar, K. M., and Groblewski, G. E. (2001)
J. Biol. Chem. 276, 28866-28872). In the present study, the Ca2+-sensitive phospholipid-binding protein
annexin VI was purified from rat pancreas as a CRHSP-28-binding
protein. The interaction between CRHSP-28 and annexin VI was
demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation and gel-overlay assays and was
shown to require low micromolar levels of free Ca2+,
indicating these molecules likely interact under physiological conditions. Immunofluorescence microscopy confirmed a dual localization of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI, which appeared in a punctate pattern in the
supranuclear and apical cytoplasm of acini. Stimulation of cells for 5 min with the secretagogue cholecystokinin enhanced the colocalization
of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI within regions of acini immediately below
the apical plasma membrane. Tissue fractionation revealed that CRHSP-28
is a peripheral membrane protein that is highly enriched in smooth
microsomal fractions of pancreas. Further, the content of CRHSP-28 in
microsomes was significantly reduced in pancreatic tissue obtained from
rats that had been infused with a secretory dose of cholecystokinin for
40 min, demonstrating that secretagogue stimulation transiently alters
the association of CRHSP-28 with membranes in cells. Collectively, the
Ca2+-dependent binding of CRHSP-28 and annexin
VI, together with their colocalization in the apical cytoplasm, is
consistent with a role for these molecules in acinar cell
membrane trafficking events that are essential for digestive enzyme secretion.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Secretion of digestive enzymes from the exocrine pancreas is a
nutrient-driven process whereby the ingestion of a meal stimulates neural and humoral pathways that directly mediate the activation of
pancreatic acinar cells (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Cell stimulation
involves the acute elevation of intracellular Ca2+, a
pivotal signaling event for the exocytosis of zymogen-containing secretory granules at the apical plasma membrane (1-3). In screening for signaling proteins that regulate acinar cell function,
CRHSP-281 was identified
based on its Ca2+-sensitive phosphorylation in response to
secretagogue stimulation (4). We recently established an important
regulatory role for CRHSP-28 in the acinar cell secretory pathway by
demonstrating that introduction of CRHSP-28 protein into
streptolysin-O-permeabilized acini significantly enhanced
Ca2+-stimulated digestive enzyme secretion following the
loss of cytosolic proteins from the intracellular compartment (5).
CRHSP-28, also known as CSPP28 in gastric mucosa (6), is a member of
the tumor protein D52 (TPD52) family (7, 8) that is highly expressed in
exocrine epithelial cells throughout the digestive system (9). The
TPD52 proteins share in common a conserved coiled-coil motif that
supports homo- and heteromeric interactions among family members (10).
In acinar cells, chemical cross-linking studies indicate CRHSP-28 is
part of a large insoluble protein complex (5) that localizes in a
punctate pattern on vesicular structures in the supranuclear and apical
cytoplasm (9). Supporting these findings, CRHSP-28/D52 has been
localized to vesicular structures in the perinuclear cytoplasm of
cultured cells (11) and was recently reported to interact with MAL2 by yeast two-hybrid screening (12). MAL2 is a member of a family of
lipid-associated proteins that regulate apical targeting of intracellular vesicles in epithelial cells (13, 14).
In screening for proteins that interact with CRHSP-28 in pancreas, we
recently identified 35- and 70-kDa binding proteins that
co-immunoprecipitated with CRHSP-28 from acinar lysates and bound with
recombinant CRHSP-28 in a gel-overlay assay (5). The 70-kDa protein
co-purified with zymogen granule membranes, consistent with a secretory
role for CRHSP-28 in acinar cells. Further, subcellular fractionation
of the binding proteins was markedly altered when lysates were prepared
in the presence of Ca2+, resulting in a redistribution of
both molecules from a cytosolic to a Triton X-100 insoluble fraction.
The present study describes the purification of the 70-kDa
CRHSP-28-binding protein as annexin VI and further demonstrates a
colocalization of these molecules in the apical cytoplasm of acinar
cells. Based on recent studies establishing a role for annexin VI in
endocytic trafficking (15-17), it is proposed that CRHSP-28 may
function at multiple steps in acinar cell membrane trafficking
involving digestive enzyme secretion and zymogen granule membrane
retrieval from the apical plasma membrane.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Soybean trypsin inhibitor, benzamidine,
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and Triton X-100 were purchased from
Sigma, essential amino acid solution from Invitrogen, and a protease
inhibitor mixture from Calbiochem. Bovine serum albumin and
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody were from Amersham
Biosciences, protein A beads from Pierce, and protein determination
reagent from Bio-Rad. Purified bovine brain annexin VI and anti-rabbit annexin VI antibody (k80102r) were purchased from Bio Design
International. Goat anti-human annexin VI (sc1930) and corresponding
antigen, rabbit anti-human Rab4 (sc312), fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-goat IgG, and peroxidase-conjugated
anti-goat IgG secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Alexafluor 594-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG was from
Molecular Probes. The characterization of affinity-purified
anti-CRHSP-28 polyclonal antibodies was detailed previously (9).
Isolation of Rat Acini--
Pancreatic acinar cells were
isolated from adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats by collagenase digestion
as previously described (18, 19). Cells were suspended in an acinar
buffer consisting of (in mM) 10 HEPES, 137 NaCl, 4.7 KCl,
0.56 MgCl2, 1.28 CaCl2, 0.6 Na2HPO4, 5.5 D-glucose, 2 L-glutamine, and an essential amino acid solution. The
buffer was supplemented with 0.1 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, gassed with 100% O2, and
adjusted to pH 7.4.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Pancreatic lobules were
prepared by microdissection of a rat pancreas that had been injected
with phosphate-buffered saline containing (in mM) 137 NaCl,
2.7 KCl, 4.3 Na2HPO4, 1.4 KH2PO4, and 0.1 mg/ml soybean trypsin
inhibitor. Isolated lobules were incubated in the above acinar buffer
at 37 °C with gentle shaking. Following indicated treatments,
lobules were gently pelleted and fixed in 4% formaldehyde prepared
from paraformaldehyde. Immunofluorescence microcopy was conducted on
6-µm-thick cryostat sections as described (9). Annexin VI
immunoreactivity with antibody sc1390 was characterized using
a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-goat IgG (1:200). Antigen
competition studies were conducted by preincubating annexin VI antibody
with a 10-fold molar excess of peptide antigen for 2 h at room
temperature, prior to an overnight incubation with the tissue. For dual
immunofluorescence localization of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI, CRHSP-28
immunoreactivity was detected using Alexafluor 594-conjugated
anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000). Tissue was analyzed using a Bio-Rad model
1024 confocal microscope with a mixed krypton/argon gas laser. For dual
immunofluorescence measurements, fluorophores were individually excited
at the appropriate wavelength to ensure no overlapping excitation
occurred between channels. Captured images were overlaid using Bio-Rad
software and then converted to TIF files for processing using Photoshop software.
Annexin VI Purification--
Acini prepared from two pancreases
were sonicated at 4 °C in a lysis buffer containing (in
mM) 50 Tris base (pH 7.4), 2 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.1 phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 2 benzamidine, and protease inhibitor mixture. Following a
30-min incubation at 4 °C, a detergent-insoluble fraction (P1) was
obtained by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 30 min.
Detergent-insoluble proteins were sonicated again in the same buffer
without CaCl2 and containing 5 mM EGTA.
Proteins released by EGTA treatment were obtained in the soluble
fraction (S2) following a second centrifugation, and the 70-kDa
CRHSP-28-binding protein was analyzed by gel-overlay assay as
previously described (5). S2 fractions enriched in the binding protein
were stockpiled from multiple experiments and separated by
two-dimensional electrophoresis as described (19). The Coomassie
Blue-stained CRHSP-28-binding protein was excised from multiple gels
and digested with trypsin. Tryptic fragments were separated by HPLC and
submitted for microsequence analysis as described (4). N-terminal amino
acid sequencing was conducted by the Michigan State University
Microsequence facility.
Tissue Fractionation--
Rats were anesthetized with 1.5%
isoflurane, and jugular veins were cannulated for infusion of hormone.
A secretory dose of cholecystokinin (CCK) (300 pmol/kg/h) was infused
in 0.9% saline at a rate of 1 ml/h for 40 min prior to removal of the
pancreas. Tissue fractionation was conducted essentially as described
(20). Two rat pancreases were minced in five volumes of a buffer
containing (in mM) 10 MOPS, pH 6.8, 250 sucrose, 0.1 MgCl2, 0.1 phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 benzamidine. Tissue was homogenized by three strokes of a motor-driven
homogenizer (5,000 rpm) using a Teflon pestle with 0.5-1-mm clearance.
A post-nuclear supernatant was prepared by centrifugation at 150 × g for 10 min and then further centrifuged at 1,300 × g for 15 min to produce a white pellet enriched in zymogen granules overlaid by a brown pellet enriched in mitochondria. The remaining supernatant was centrifuged 12,000 × g
for 13 min to obtain a lysosome-enriched pellet and then centrifuged
again at 100,000 × g for 1 h to separate
microsomal and cytosolic fractions. Smooth and rough microsomal
fractions were prepared as previously described (21). Briefly, a
sucrose gradient composed of 1.3, 0.86, 0.5, and 0.25 M
sucrose was prepared in homogenization buffer. Crude microsomes were
layered between the 0.5 and 0.25 M sucrose layers and then
centrifuged at 160,000 × g for 1 h. Membrane
fractions isolated from the 1.3/0.86 and 0.86/0.5 M sucrose
interface represented the rough and smooth microsomal fractions, respectively.
Other Assays--
Immunoprecipitations were conducted as
detailed previously (22). To determine the Ca2+ sensitivity
of CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding, gel-overlay assays were conducted as
described (5) using a binding buffer containing 20 mM Tris,
pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.3% Tween 20, 5% bovine serum albumin, 5 mM EGTA, and enough CaCl2 to create
the desired final concentration of free Ca2+. The quantity
of Ca2+ added to the buffer was calculated based on
dissociation constants using a computer program as described (23).
Acinar lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and incubated with recombinant CRHSP-28 (4 µg/ml) for
1 h at room temperature. Binding proteins were detected using
affinity-purified CRHSP-28 antiserum (1 µg/ml). Protein binding was
quantified by densitometric analysis using a model DNA35 scanner
interfaced with the Protein and DNA Imageware System (PDI,
Huntington Station, NY).
 |
RESULTS |
Annexin VI Is a CRHSP-28-binding Protein--
Using a gel-overlay
technique to screen for proteins that interact with CRHSP-28, we
recently identified two binding proteins of 35 and 70 kDa (5). Both
proteins partitioned into a Triton X-100-insoluble fraction of lysates
prepared in the presence of Ca2+. The Ca2+
dependence of this redistribution was exploited to purify the 70-kDa
binding protein from pancreatic acinar cells (Fig.
1A). Lysates were prepared in
the presence of 0.2% Triton X-100 and 1 mM
Ca2+, and a detergent-insoluble fraction (P1) highly
enriched in binding proteins was obtained by centrifugation. The 70-kDa
protein was subsequently released from the insoluble material by
chelating Ca2+ using EGTA. Proteins in the EGTA released
fraction (S2) were combined from multiple preparations and then
separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis as a final purification
step (Fig. 1B). Of the two CRHSP-28-binding proteins, only
the 70-kDa molecule was readily detected by Coomassie staining, and was
present as a closely spaced doublet with a pI of ~5.5-6.0. Tryptic
fragments of the 70-kDa binding protein were separated by HPLC (Fig.
1C). Microsequence analysis of fraction 21 from the HPLC
trace yielded high quality sequence of a 14-amino acid peptide with
100% homology to amino acids 472-485 of rat annexin VI, a
Ca2+-sensitive phospholipid and cytoskeletal binding
protein (24).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Purification of annexin VI as a
CRHSP-28-binding protein from rat pancreas. A,
gel-overlay analysis was used to follow the purification of the 70-kDa
CRHSP-28-binding protein. An acinar cell homogenate (start) was
prepared in a buffer containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and 1 mM
CaCl2. Triton X-100 soluble (S1) and insoluble (P1)
fractions were separated by centrifugation. P1 was sonicated in 5 mM EGTA to release the 70-kDa binding protein, which was
recovered in the soluble fraction (S2) following a second
centrifugation. B, proteins recovered in the S2 fraction
were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Gel overlay and
Coomassie staining were used to detect the 70-kDa binding protein
(shown by arrow). The purified binding protein strongly
reacted with annexin VI k80102r antiserum (1:1,000) by immunoblotting.
C, the purified 70-kDa binding protein was digested with
trypsin and peptides were separated by HPLC. Fraction 21 was submitted
for microsequence analysis. A 14-amino acid peptide was sequenced with
100% homology to amino acids 472-485 of rat annexin VI.
|
|
As the molecular mass, pI and Ca2+-mediated redistribution
of the 70-kDa binding protein in subcellular fractions were essentially identical to that reported for annexin VI in other cell types, specific
antibodies were used to verify its identity in acinar cells. A
polyclonal antibody raised against the N-terminal 16 amino acids of
rabbit annexin VI specifically reacted with the purified 70-kDa binding
protein on two-dimensional gels (Fig. 1B). The annexin VI
immunoreactive protein migrated as a closely-spaced doublet following
SDS-PAGE and was identical in size to signals obtained from an annexin
VI-enriched membrane fraction from lung, as well as purified bovine
annexin VI protein (Fig. 2A).
Similar results were obtained using a separate polyclonal antibody
raised against the N-terminal 19 amino acids of human annexin VI (Fig. 2C). The annexin VI immunoreactive protein underwent a
pronounced redistribution from cytosolic to detergent-insoluble
fractions of lysates prepared in the presence of 1 mM
Ca2+. These results are identical to our recent report
showing a Ca2+-sensitive translocation of the 70-kDa
CRHSP-28-binding protein from cytosolic to particulate fractions of an
acinar lysate (5). The CRHSP-28/annexin VI interaction was additionally
confirmed by demonstrating that recombinant CRHSP-28 strongly bound to
purified bovine annexin VI in the gel-overlay assay (Fig.
2B). Collectively, these data indicate that the previously
identified 70-kDa CRHSP-28-binding protein is indeed annexin VI.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Annexin VI expression in acinar cells.
A, annexin VI was analyzed by immunoblotting an acinar cell
lysate (30 µg), a purified membrane fraction from bovine lung (2 µg), and purified bovine annexin VI protein (Ann. VI) (1 µg) with k80102r antibodies (1:1,000). Annexin VI is present
as a 70-kDa protein doublet. B, comparison of a gel-overlay
assay conducted on an acinar cell lysate (30 µg) and purified bovine
annexin VI (1 µg) showing that recombinant CRHSP-28 strongly
interacts with purified annexin VI protein. C, annexin VI
translocates from a cytosolic to a Triton X-100-insoluble fraction of
acinar cells in the presence of Ca2+. Lysates were prepared
in 5 mM EGTA or 1 mM CaCl2.
Cytosolic (Cyto) fractions were first isolated in the
absence of Triton X-100 by centrifugation. The particulate fraction was
sonicated in the same buffer containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and
centrifuged. The resulting soluble fraction represented cell membranes
(Mem), and pellet represented the Triton X-100 insoluble
fraction (TX100-insol). Proteins were analyzed by
immunoblotting with annexin VI sc1930 antibodies (1:100). A gel-overlay
assay of an acinar lysate showing the 70-kDa CRHSP-28-binding protein
was conducted on the left side of the adjoining membrane for
comparison.
|
|
Ca2+-dependent CRHSP-28/Annexin VI Binding
in Vitro--
The interaction between CRHSP-28 and annexin VI was
further demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitating the proteins from an
acinar cell lysate (Fig. 3).
Interestingly, no CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding was detected when lysates
were prepared in the absence of Ca2+. However, inclusion of
Ca2+ in the lysis buffer promoted a strong association
between the two proteins, which readily coimmunoprecipitated together.
Conducting immunoprecipitations in the presence of Ca2+
resulted in ~50% of the annexin VI protein translocating to the detergent-insoluble fraction, which was then removed by centrifugation prior to immunoprecipitation (see Fig. 2C). This
sedimentation of annexin VI made it difficult to quantify the
Ca2+ sensitivity of CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding by
coimmunoprecipitation, as variable amounts of annexin VI moved to the
detergent-insoluble fraction in the presence of Ca2+. As an
alternative, the Ca2+ sensitivity of CRHSP-28/annexin VI
binding was measured in vitro using the gel-overlay assay
(Fig. 4). In initial experiments, gel
overlays were conducted in the presence of milk protein, which contains
ample amounts of Ca2+. Removal of Ca2+ from the
buffer using EGTA resulted in a complete loss of CRHSP-28 binding (data
not shown). As a substitute, bovine serum albumin was included in the
buffer and CRHSP-28 binding was measured while clamping the free
Ca2+ concentration at various levels. Consistent with the
Ca2+-sensitive coimmunoprecipitation, CRHSP-28 binding to
annexin VI occurred over a micromolar range of free ionized
Ca2+. CRHSP-28 binding reached a plateau at 10-100
µM Ca2+ with an EC50 of ~2.5
µM Ca2+. Binding increased slightly (< 20%)
at 1 mM Ca2+; however, no further interaction
was detected at Ca2+ concentrations as high as 10 mM (data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Coimmunoprecipitation of annexin VI with
CRHSP-28. Cell lysates were prepared in a buffer containing 0.2%
Triton X-100 and either 5 mM EGTA or 1 mM
CaCl2. Following immunoprecipitation (IP) with
CRHSP-28 antibodies and protein A beads (Prt-A), proteins
were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-annexin VI
antibody (Ab) sc1930. Identical results were obtained using
the gel-overlay assay with CRHSP-28 protein to identify annexin VI
(data not shown). Note that the coimmunoprecipitation of annexin VI
with CRHSP-28 was dependent on the presence of Ca2+ in the
lysate (compare lanes 2 and
6).
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Ca2+ sensitivity of CRHSP-28
binding to annexin VI. Equal amounts of an acinar cell lysate (40 µg) were separated by electrophoresis and analyzed by gel-overlay
assay with recombinant CRHSP-28 protein (4 µg/ml). The assay buffer
contained 5 mM EGTA and enough CaCl2 to achieve
the indicated concentrations of free Ca2+. CRHSP-28 binding
to annexin VI was quantified by densitometry. Data are the mean and
standard error of three or four determinations for each point.
|
|
Tissue Fractionation of CRHSP-28 and Annexin VI in
Pancreas--
CRHSP-28 is a hydrophilic protein that partitions into
both soluble and membrane fractions following cell lysis (9, 5, 11). To
characterize the association of CRHSP-28 with membranes, a crude
microsomal fraction of a pancreatic homogenate was treated under
alkaline conditions with Na2CO3, then
re-isolated by centrifugation to separate peripheral and integral
membrane proteins (Fig. 5). As a positive
control, the small G-protein Rab4, which anchors to phospholipids via a
geranylgeranyl moiety (25), was analyzed by immunoblotting and found to
remain largely associated with the membrane fraction following alkaline
treatment. In contrast, CRHSP-28 was completely recovered in the
soluble fraction following alkaline treatment, indicating that it is
not an integral membrane protein but instead is peripherally associated
with these structures.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
CRHSP-28 is a peripheral membrane
protein. Pancreatic microsomes (Micro) were suspended
in 0.1 M NaCO3, pH 11, for 30 min at 4 °C.
Following centrifugation, the content of CRHSP-28 and Rab4 in the
soluble (Sol) and membrane (Insol) fractions (40 µg/lane) was analyzed by immunoblotting.
|
|
Subcellular fractionation of rat pancreas demonstrated that CRHSP-28
was largely localized to a microsomal fraction (Fig. 6). As previously reported (9), no
CRHSP-28 signal was detected in purified zymogen granules. Further,
little or no CRHSP-28 was present in fractions enriched in mitochondria
or lysosomes. In contrast, annexin VI was present at similar levels in
all subcellular fractions tested including zymogen granules,
mitochondria, and lysosomes. Interestingly, treatment of animals with a
secretory dose of CCK for 40 min prior to tissue fractionation
significantly increased the amount of CRHSP-28 recovered in the
cytosolic fraction and, correspondingly, decreased the amount of the
protein recovered in the microsomal fraction. Hormone treatment had no
effect on annexin VI fractionation. Further fractionation of crude
microsomes by sucrose gradient centrifugation demonstrated that both
CRHSP-28 and annexin VI were predominantly associated with the smooth
microsomal fraction composed mainly of Golgi, plasma membrane, and
endosomes.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Subcellular fractionation of CRHSP-28 and
annexin VI in rat pancreas. Rat pancreases were obtained from
animals treated as control or infused with a secretory dose (300 pmol/min/kg body weight) of cholecystokinin for 40 min. A postnuclear
supernatant (PNS) was prepared and subjected to differential
centrifugation to isolate fractions that were enriched in zymogen
granules (ZG), mitochondria (Mito), lysosomes
(Lyso), crude microsomes (Micro), and a
100,000 × g supernatant (Cyto). Crude
microsomes from control animals were further separated into
smooth (SM) and rough microsomes (RM) by sucrose
gradient centrifugation. Anti-CRHSP-28 and anti-annexin VI antibody
k80102r were used for immunoblotting each fraction (40 µg/lane).
|
|
Immunofluorescence Localization of Annexin VI in Acinar
Cells--
Immunofluorescence localization of annexin VI was conducted
on 0.5-µm-thick optical sections of pancreatic lobules and
demonstrated that the protein was present in a punctate pattern
throughout the basal and apical cytoplasm (Fig.
7). Annexin VI staining was evident in
the juxtanuclear regions of cells but was largely absent from nuclei.
This same pattern of annexin VI immunofluorescence was detected using
both anti-human and anti-rabbit annexin VI polyclonal antibodies. No
signal was observed in sections when primary antibody was omitted from
the incubations (data not shown). Further, preabsorption of the annexin
VI antibody with a 10-fold molar excess of antigen completely abolished
annexin VI staining, demonstrating the specificity of this localization
(Fig. 7C).

View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Immunofluorescence localization of annexin VI
in pancreatic lobules. Rat pancreatic lobules were fixed in 4%
formaldehyde, and annexin VI localization was analyzed in
0.5-µm-thick optical sections by confocal microscopy. Anti-annexin VI
antibody sc1930 (1:50) was detected using a fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-goat secondary antibody (1:200).
A, immunofluorescence localization of annexin VI and
corresponding differential contrast image (B)
demonstrating a punctate pattern of annexin VI immunoreactivity
throughout the acinar cell cytoplasm. C, the annexin VI
antibody was preincubated with a 10-fold molar excess of antigen prior
to incubation with the tissue. D, differential contrast
image of field shown in panel C.
|
|
Colocalization of CRHSP-28 and Annexin VI in Acinar Cells--
The
subcellular distribution of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI was examined using
dual immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig.
8). As previously reported (9), CRHSP-28
was highly localized to the apical cytoplasm of acini extending from
the supranuclear region to the apical plasma membrane (Fig.
8A). Low levels of CRHSP-28 staining were present in basal
regions of cells. As indicated above (Fig. 7), annexin VI
immunofluorescence was detected in a punctate pattern throughout the
cytoplasm, including apical regions of acini just below the acinar
lumen (Fig. 8B, arrows). Overlay of the CRHSP-28
and annexin VI images demonstrated a pronounced overlapping of the
proteins throughout the supranuclear and apical cytoplasm (Fig.
8C). Little or no overlap of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI
occurred in the basal cytoplasm where annexin VI staining was evident.
Incubation of lobules for 5 min with CCK promoted the accumulation of
both CRHSP-28 annexin VI staining to regions immediately below the
apical membrane. Although quantitative immunofluorescence was not
conducted, this effect was seen in multiple experiments and was also
evident upon ionomycin stimulation of lobules. The co-localization of
CRHSP-28 and annexin VI in control and secretagogue-stimulated acini
supports the biochemical data demonstrating a
Ca2+-sensitive interaction between these proteins and is
consistent with an important role for these molecules in acinar cell
membrane trafficking.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Colocalization of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI in
pancreatic lobules. Cryostat sections were prepared from
formaldehyde-fixed pancreatic lobules treated as control or with
10 nM CCK for 5 min. Affinity-purified CRHSP-28 and
anti-annexin VI sc1930 antibodies were detected using Alexafluor 594- and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies,
respectively. CRHSP-28 and annexin VI antibodies were used at final
concentrations of 1 µg/ml and 1:50, respectively. A and
D, CRHSP-28 localization is shown in red.
B and E, annexin VI localization is shown in
green. C and F, overlay of the
CRHSP-28 and annexin VI images showing that CCK stimulation enhances
the accumulation of both proteins below the apical membrane.
Asterisks indicate location of nuclei. Arrows
indicate the apical plasma membrane just below the acinar lumen.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Annexin VI is a member of an extended family of
Ca2+-dependent phospholipid-binding proteins
reported to function in diverse cellular processes related to
signaling, membrane trafficking, and cytoskeletal dynamics (24, 26).
Annexin proteins are characterized by the presence of at least four
conserved tandem repeats of 70 amino acids that mediate their
interaction with negatively charged phospholipids in a
Ca2+-dependent manner. Annexin VI is unique in
that it contains eight such repeats arranged in a two-lobed
configuration that is separated by a linker region (27). The
flexibility of the linker region supports both parallel and
perpendicular orientations of the two lobes and, as such, is thought to
impart the many dynamic properties of the annexin VI protein (27).
Annexin VI has been implicated as an important regulatory component of
clathrin-mediated endocytosis (15-17, 28), although the primary
significance of the protein in this process remains unclear (29). Lin
et al. (28) used an in vitro system to
demonstrate that annexin VI is required for the Ca2+- and
ATP-dependent budding of clathrin-coated pits from
membranes. Subsequent studies in intact fibroblasts indicated that
annexin VI functions by directing the remodeling of membrane-bound
spectrin during vesicle budding (15). In addition to modulating
endocytosis at the plasma membrane, annexin VI was shown to be present
in a late endocytic compartment of epithelial cells (30-34), where it
is thought to direct the delivery of endosomal vesicles to lysosomes
(16, 17). Interestingly, in smooth muscle, annexin VI plays a dynamic
role in regulating reversible interactions between actin-cytoskeletal
components and the caveolar fraction of the sarcolemma during muscle
contraction (35, 36). Collectively, these studies suggest that annexin
VI plays a generalized role in Ca2+-dependent
cellular processes involving transient interactions between membrane
and cytoskeletal proteins.
The binding of CRHSP-28 with annexin VI required low micromolar
concentrations of free Ca2+ in vitro, indicating
the likelihood that these molecules interact under physiological
conditions (1-3). A specific interaction between CRHSP-28 and annexin
VI was supported by dual immunofluorescence microscopy colocalizing
these proteins within the apical cytoplasm of acinar cells.
Furthermore, the apparent recruitment of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI to the
cell apex upon secretagogue stimulation also supports a
Ca2+-regulated interaction. The Ca2+ dependence
of CRHSP-28/annexin VI binding is remarkably similar to the
Ca2+-dependent interaction of annexin VI with
negatively charged phospholipids and suggests that these molecules
interact by a similar molecular mechanism. CRHSP-28 contains three
clusters of negatively charged acidic residues (amino acids 16-20,
34-39, and 48-50) present within the amino half of the protein (4).
These concentrated regions of negative charge may potentially support
Ca2+-dependent interactions of CRHSP-28 with
either of the phospholipid binding domains of annexin VI.
Our previous study (5) demonstrating a role for CRHSP-28 in acinar cell
secretion strongly suggests that CRHSP-28 be associated with zymogen
granules. Although CRHSP-28 was highly localized around zymogen
granules in the apical cytoplasm, the protein was not detected when
immunoblotting purified fractions of these organelles. Conversely,
annexin VI was clearly detected in purified zymogen granules (Fig. 6)
and zymogen granule membranes (5) prepared in the absence of added
Ca2+. A Ca2+-independent association of annexin
VI with membranes has previously been described in a number of tissues
including liver and mammary epithelial cells (22, 32, 34). Therefore,
it is possible that CRHSP-28 is recruited to zymogen granules via an
interaction with annexin VI during periods of elevated cellular
Ca2+. Indeed, numerous studies have documented that the
highest levels of free Ca2+ achieved following secretagogue
stimulation occur immediately below the apical membrane and are
believed to be necessary to trigger the exocytosis of zymogen
granules (1-3). Zymogen granules have been shown to be
enriched in cholesterol- and sphingolipid-containing microdomains, and,
further, these structures are essential for granule maturation and
apical secretion in acini (37). In smooth muscle, annexin VI has been
shown to regulate reversible interactions of the actin cytoskeleton
with cholesterol- and glycosphingolipid-rich membrane microdomains (35,
36). Thus, similar to its role in smooth muscle contraction, annexin VI
may regulate interactions between zymogen granules and
actin-cytoskeletal components of the subapical web in acini. The
actin-rich subapical web in acinar cells has been shown to play an
integral role in regulating both the exocytosis of zymogen granules and
the subsequent retrieval of granule membranes from the apical
plasmalemma (38-40).
CRHSP-28 and annexin VI were diffusely localized in the apical
cytoplasm of acini under both basal and CCK-stimulated conditions. The
diffuse nature of the immunofluorescence staining precluded a precise
localization of the proteins to specific membrane compartments. Because
significant cytosolic pools of both CRHSP-28 and annexin VI exist,
these data may reflect a dynamic and reversible association of these
molecules with membranes. Cell fractionation studies indicated CRHSP-28
was equally present in both soluble and particulate fractions of acinar
lysates. Further, CRHSP-28 was peripherally associated with membranes,
as NaCO3 treatment efficiently released the protein from
pancreatic microsomes. We recently showed that the leakage of CRHSP-28
from streptolysin-O-permeabilized acini was significantly enhanced over
15 min under conditions of elevated cellular Ca2+,
suggesting that cell stimulation promoted a translocation of CRHSP-28
within the cytoplasm (5). Interestingly, we have determined that
phosphorylated CRHSP-28 is primarily released from permeabilized acini
following CCK stimulation, whereas the nonphosphorylated protein is
associated exclusively with membrane
fractions.2 These findings
are consistent with the current study showing that the recovery of
CRHSP-28 in cytosolic fractions of pancreas was significantly enhanced
following a 40-min infusion of CCK in vivo. Collectively,
these findings support a dynamic association of CRHSP-28 with membranes
that is significantly altered by secretagogue stimulation.
The question remains as to the Ca2+-independent association
of CRHSP-28 and annexin VI with endosome-enriched microsomal fractions of pancreas. One possibility is that CRHSP-28 binds to annexin VI
during periods of elevated Ca2+ to support the movement of
zymogen granules across the actin-rich subapical web. CRHSP-28 and
annexin VI would then enter the plasma membrane during zymogen granule
fusion and be retrieved from the apical membrane during endocytosis.
The finding that the association of CRHSP-28 with endosome-enriched
microsomes was detected in the absence of added Ca2+
further suggests CRHSP-28 entered a stable complex with additional membrane-bound proteins. Supporting this, we recently demonstrated by
covalent cross-linking experiments that CRHSP-28 is part of a large
molecular mass complex (>300 kDa) in acini that partitions into
membrane fractions following cell lysis (5). The large mass of this
complex is consistent with an association of CRHSP-28 with a
multiprotein complex. Further, in accordance with the CCK-enhanced cytosolic localization of CRHSP-28 in vivo and the
Ca2+-enhanced release of the protein from permeabilized
cells (5), CRHSP-28 may be dissociated from this complex via its
Ca2+-mediated phosphorylation. CRHSP-28 phosphorylation
occurs on at least two serine residues and is a transient event,
reaching maximal levels within 2 min and fully dephosphorylating over
60 min in the continued presence of secretagogues (4). The transient phosphorylation of CRHSP-28 is clearly consistent with the movement of
the protein into the cytoplasm, where it may be dephosphorylated by
constitutively active serine/threonine protein phosphatases. Once
dephosphorylated, CRHSP-28 would be available to support subsequent
zymogen granule trafficking events.
Interestingly, it was recently reported that CRHSP-28 specifically
interacts with a member of the MAL protein family by yeast two-hybrid
analysis and in vitro pull-down assays (12). MAL proteins
are known to regulate apical targeting of vesicles in renal epithelial
cells and, similar to annexin VI, are targeted to cholesterol and
sphingolipid-rich microdomains on secretory granules (13, 14).
Moreover, MAL proteins have been shown to cycle from the apical plasma
membrane back to the Golgi compartment on endocytic vesicles (41).
Although MAL proteins are essential for apical membrane targeting in
polarized epithelia, the precise molecular function of these proteins
has not been described. Clearly, further experimentation directly
examining the role of CRHSP-28 and its associated proteins in zymogen
granule trafficking and membrane retrieval is necessary to understand
how this molecule modulates acinar cell function.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We extend a special thanks to Dr. Stephen
Ernst for helpful suggestions on performing immunofluorescence
microscopy on pancreatic tissue and Dr. Joseph Leykam and staff at the
Michigan State University Microsequence Facility for help in sequencing
the annexin VI protein.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants WISO4221 and WIS04444 from
the United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research
Education and Extension Service Program, by American Cancer Society
Institutional Research Grant IRG-58-011-42-2, and by National Science
Foundation Award MCB-0094154 (to G. E. G.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Nutritional
Sciences, University of Wisconsin, 1415 Linden Dr., Madison, WI
53706. Tel.: 608-262-0884; Fax: 608-262-5860; E-mail: groby@ nutrisci.wisc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110917200
2
D. D. H. Thomas and G. E. Groblewski, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CRHSP-28, calcium-regulated heat-stable protein of 28 kDa;
TPD52, tumor protein
D52 family;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography;
CCK, cholecystokinin;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Williams, J. A.,
and Yule, D. I.
(1993)
in
The Pancreas
(Go, V. L. W.
, Dimango, E. P.
, Gardner, J. D.
, Lebenthal, E.
, Reber, H. A.
, and Scheele, G. A., eds), 2nd Ed.
, pp. 167-189, Raven Press, New York
|
| 2.
|
Williams, J. A.,
Groblewski, G. E.,
Ohnishi, H.,
and Yule, D. I.
(1997)
Digestion
58,
42-45
|
| 3.
|
Muallem, S.,
and Lee, M. G.
(1997)
Cell Calcium
22,
1-4[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Groblewski, G. E.,
Wishart, M. J.,
Yoshida, M.,
and Williams, J. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31502-31507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Thomas, D. H.,
Taft, W. B.,
Kaspar, K. M.,
and Groblewski, G. E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
28866-28872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Parente, J. A., Jr.,
Goldenring, J. R.,
Petropoulos, A. C.,
Hellman, U.,
and Chew, C. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20096-20101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Byrne, J.,
Mattei, M.-G.,
and Basset, P.
(1996)
Genomics
35,
523-532[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Nourse, C. R.,
Mattei, M.-G.,
Gunning, P.,
and Byrne, J. A.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1443,
155-168[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Groblewski, G. E.,
Yoshida, M.,
Yao, H.,
Williams, J. A.,
and Ernst, S. A.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
G219-G226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Sathasivam, P.,
Bailey, A. M.,
Crossley, M.,
and Byrne, J. A.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
288,
56-61[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Balleine, R. L.,
Fejzo, M. S.,
Sathasivam, P.,
Basset, P.,
Clarke, C. L.,
and Byrne, J. A.
(2000)
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
29,
48-57[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Wilson, S. H.,
Bailey, A. M.,
Nourse, C. R.,
Mattei, M. G.,
and Byrne, J. A.
(2001)
Genomics
76,
81-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Cheong, K. H.,
Zacchetti, D.,
Scheeberger, E. E.,
and Simons, K.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6241-6248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Martin-Belmonte, F.,
Puetollano, R.,
Millan, J.,
and Alonso, M. A.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell.
11,
2033-2045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Kamal, A.,
Ying, Y.-S.,
and Anderson, R. G. W.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
937-947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Grewal, T.,
Heeren, J.,
Mewawala, D.,
Schnitgerhans, T.,
Wendt, D.,
Salomon, G.,
Enrich, C.,
Beiseigel, U.,
and Jackle, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33806-33813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Pons, M.,
Grewal, T.,
Rius, E.,
Schnitgerhans, T.,
Jackle, S.,
and Enrich, C.
(2001)
Exp. Cell Res.
269,
13-22[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Burnham, D. B.,
and Williams, J. A.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
10523-10528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Wishart, M. J.,
Groblewski, G. E.,
Göke, B. J.,
Wagner, A. C. C.,
and Williams, J. A.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
G676-G686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Hofbauer, B.,
Saluja, A. K.,
Lerch, M. M.,
Bhagat, L.,
Bhatia, M.,
Lee, H. S.,
Frossard, J. L.,
Adler, G.,
and Steer, M. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
G352-G362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Kleene, R.,
Zdzieblo, J.,
Wege, K.,
and Kern, H.-F.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
2539-2548[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Groblewski, G. E.,
Wang, Y.,
Ernst, S. A.,
Kent, C.,
and Williams, J. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1437-1442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kitagawa, M.,
Williams, J. A.,
and De Lisle, R. C.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
259,
G157-G164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Hawkins, T. E.,
Merrifield, C. J.,
and Moss, S. E.
(2000)
Cell Biochem. Biophys.
33,
275-296[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Valentijn, J. A.,
Gien, L. T.,
Valentijn, K. M.,
and Jamieson, J. D.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
268,
847-852[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Donnelly, S. R.,
and Moss, S. E.
(1997)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
53,
533-538[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Avila-Sakar, A. J.,
Kretsinger, R. H.,
and Creutz, C. E.
(2000)
J. Struct. Biol.
130,
54-62[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Lin, H. C.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Anderson, R. G. W.
(1992)
Cell
70,
283-291[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Hawkins, T. E.,
Roes, J.,
Rees, D.,
Monkhouse, J.,
and Moss, S. E.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
8028-8032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Jackle, S.,
Beisiegel, U.,
Rinninger, F.,
Grigoleit, A.,
Bock, A.,
Groger, I.,
Greten, H.,
and Windler, E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1026-1032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Weinman, J. S.,
Feinberg, J. M.,
Rainteau, D. P.,
Gaspera, B. D.,
and Weinman, S. J.
(1994)
Cell Tissue Res.
278,
389-397[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Turpin, E.,
Russo-Marie, F.,
Dubois, T.,
de Paillerets, C.,
Alfsen, A.,
and Bomsel, M.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1402,
115-130[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Ortega, D.,
Pol, A.,
Biermer, M.,
Jackle, S.,
and Enrich, C.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
261-269[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Lavialle, F.,
Rainteau, D.,
Massey-Harroche, D.,
and Metz, F.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1464,
82-94
|
| 35.
|
Babiychuk, E. B.,
and Draeger, A.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
1113-1123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Babiychuk, E. B.,
Palstra, R.-J. T. S.,
Schaller, J.,
Kampfer, U.,
and Draeger, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35191-35195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Schmidt, K.,
Schrader, M.,
Kern, H.-F.,
and Kleene, R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14315-14323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Valentijn, K. M.,
Gumkowski, F. D.,
and Jamieson, J. D.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
81-96[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Valentijn, K.,
Valentijn, J. A.,
and Jamieson, J. D.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
266,
652-661[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Muallem, S.,
Kwiatkowska, K., Xu, X.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
589-598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Puertolloano, R.,
and Alonso, M. A.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
3435-3447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Chew, X. Chen, H. Zhang, E. A. Berg, and H. Zhang
Calcium/calmodulin-dependent phosphorylation of tumor protein D52 on serine residue 136 may be mediated by CAMK2{delta}6
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
December 1, 2008;
295(6):
G1159 - G1172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Bode, A. Luken, C. Kerkhoff, J. Roth, S. Ludwig, and W. Nacken
Interaction between S100A8/A9 and Annexin A6 Is Involved in the Calcium-induced Cell Surface Exposition of S100A8/A9
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 14, 2008;
283(46):
31776 - 31784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shehata, I. Bieche, R. Boutros, J. Weidenhofer, S. Fanayan, L. Spalding, N. Zeps, K. Byth, R. K. Bright, R. Lidereau, et al.
Nonredundant Functions for Tumor Protein D52-Like Proteins Support Specific Targeting of TPD52
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2008;
14(16):
5050 - 5060.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Wang, J. Xu, N. Mabjeesh, G. Zhu, J. Zhou, M. Amin, D. He, F. F. Marshall, H. E. Zhau, and L. W.K. Chung
PrLZ Is Expressed in Normal Prostate Development and in Human Prostate Cancer Progression
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2007;
13(20):
6040 - 6048.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Zhang, J. Wang, B. Pang, R.-x. Liang, S. Li, P.-t. Huang, R. Wang, L. W.K. Chung, H. E. Zhau, C. Huang, et al.
PC-1/PrLZ Contributes to Malignant Progression in Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2007;
67(18):
8906 - 8913.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Weng, D. D. H. Thomas, and G. E. Groblewski
Pancreatic Acinar Cells Express Vesicle-associated Membrane Protein 2- and 8-Specific Populations of Zymogen Granules with Distinct and Overlapping Roles in Secretion
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2007;
282(13):
9635 - 9645.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Tiacci, P.-L. Orvietani, B. Bigerna, A. Pucciarini, G. L. Corthals, V. Pettirossi, M. P. Martelli, A. Liso, R. Benedetti, R. Pacini, et al.
Tumor protein D52 (TPD52): a novel B-cell/plasma-cell molecule with unique expression pattern and Ca2+-dependent association with annexin VI
Blood,
April 1, 2005;
105(7):
2812 - 2820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. H. Thomas, N. Weng, and G. E. Groblewski
Secretagogue-induced translocation of CRHSP-28 within an early apical endosomal compartment in acinar cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
July 1, 2004;
287(1):
G253 - G263.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Cho, H.-M. Ko, J.-M. Kim, J.-A Lee, J.-E. Park, M.-S. Jang, S. G. Park, D. H. Lee, S.-E. Ryu, and B.-C. Park
Positive Regulation of Apoptosis Signal-regulating Kinase 1 by hD53L1
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 16, 2004;
279(16):
16050 - 16056.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Wang, J. Xu, O. Saramaki, T. Visakorpi, W. M. Sutherland, J. Zhou, B. Sen, S. D. Lim, N. Mabjeesh, M. Amin, et al.
PrLZ, a Novel Prostate-Specific and Androgen-Responsive Gene of the TPD52 Family, Amplified in Chromosome 8q21.1 and Overexpressed in Human Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2004;
64(5):
1589 - 1594.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Kaspar, D. D. H. Thomas, W. B. Taft, E. Takeshita, N. Weng, and G. E. Groblewski
CaM kinase II regulation of CRHSP-28 phosphorylation in cultured mucosal T84 cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
December 1, 2003;
285(6):
G1300 - G1309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|