Interferons Inhibit Tumor Necrosis Factor-
-mediated
Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Activation via Interferon Regulatory
Factor-1 Binding Competition with NF-
B*
Josiane
Sancéau
,
Douglas D.
Boyd§,
Motoharu
Seiki¶, and
Brigitte
Bauvois
From the
Unité 365 INSERM, Section de
Recherche, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France,
§ Department of Cancer Biology, MD Anderson Cancer Center,
Houston, Texas 77030, and ¶ Department of Cancer Cell Research,
Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
Received for publication, March 27, 2002, and in revised form, July 2, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Enhanced expression of matrix
metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) correlates with invasion during tumor
progression. Interferons (IFNs) inhibit MMP-9 activation in response to
tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
), and the latter activates the
MMP-9 gene through NF-
B. Understanding the molecular
basis for MMP-9 inhibition may provide tools to control cell invasion.
The data reported here show the critical role of interferon regulatory
factor-1 (IRF1) in the inhibition of MMP-9. (i) IFN treatment
suppresses TNF-
-induced MMP-9 reporter activity in STAT1(+/+) cells
but not in STAT1(
/
) cells. (ii) IRF1 transfection blocks
TNF-
-mediated MMP-9 activation. (iii) IFNs phosphorylate STAT1 and
induce IRF1 but do not affect I
-B degradation nor NF-
B nuclear
translocation. (iv) Nuclear NF-
B (p50/p65) and IRF1, but not STAT1,
bind to the MMP-9 promoter region containing an
IFN-responsive-like element overlapping the NF-
B-binding site. (v)
Recombinant IRF1, although unable to bind to an NF-
B consensus
sequence, competes with NF-
B proteins for binding to the
MMP-9 promoter. (vi) Conversely recombinant p50/p65 proteins reduce IRF1-DNA binding. (vii) In cells cotransfected with
IRF1 and/or p65 expression vectors, an excess of IRF1 reduces MMP-9
reporter activity, whereas an excess of p65 blocks the inhibitory effect of IFN-
. Thus, in contrast to the known synergism between IRF1 and NF-
B, our data identify a novel role for IRF1 as a
competitive inhibitor of NF-
B binding to the particular
MMP-9 promoter context.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Invasion and metastasis of tumor cells is a multiple process, in
which cell motility is accompanied by uncontrolled degradation of
basement membrane and components of the extracellular matrix (1, 2).
Matrix metalloproteinases
(MMPs)1 are a family of
related zinc-containing proteinases that have the ability to degrade
most extracellular matrix (3, 4). One member of the MMP family, MMP-9
(gelatinase B, 92-kDa), contains fibronectin-like domains for collagen
binding and is capable of degrading type I, IV, V, VII, and XI
collagens and laminin (1, 3-5). Such proteolytic ability suggests that
MMP-9 ultimately regulates cell migration, tumor growth, and
angiogenesis (1-4). MMP-9 is overexpressed in many human malignancies
including solid tumors and hematological neoplasms (3, 4, 6-8).
MMP-9 promoter activity is induced coincidentally with
invasion during tumor progression (9). In vitro
overexpression of MMP-9 confers metastatic phenotype (10-12).
The promoter of MMP-9 possesses several functional enhancer
element-binding sites including three AP-1 sites, a non-consensus NF-
B site, an Ets site, an Sp-1 site, and a retinoblastoma element (5, 13-17). A functional AP-2 element downstream to the previous AP-1-responsive element in the MMP-9 promoter was recently
identified, and both of these factors appear important for MMP-9
transcription in keratinocytes (18). Accumulated data demonstrated that
TNF-
may activate or induce MMP-9 expression through pathways
leading to activation of NF-
B, Sp-1 and AP-1 (11, 13, 16, 17). Recent lines of evidence indicate a role for interferons (IFNs) in the
repression of MMP-9 expression (19-27). We and others (6, 20, 22-25,
27) showed that MMP-9 production in vitro by various cell
types was inhibited by IFNs. However, the events downstream of IFNs
that lead to inhibition of MMP-9 synthesis have not yet been elucidated.
In IFN signaling, activation of the associated tyrosine kinases
JAK1/TYK2 (for IFN-
and IFN-
) or JAK1/JAK2 (for IFN-
) leads to
phosphorylation of latent transcriptional factors termed signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT), followed by their
subsequent dimerization, nuclear translocation, and site-specific DNA
binding leading to gene activation (28-32). IFN-
and IFN-
activate both STAT1 and STAT2, which heterodimerize and activate transcription by binding to an IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE)
in conjunction with a 48-kDa protein of a different DNA binding family
(28, 32). IFN-
activates STAT1, which binds to an IFN-
-activated
site to induce various gene promoters including that coding for the
transcription factor interferon-responsive factor-1 (IRF1) (28, 29, 31,
32). Newly synthesized IRF1 in turn can activate the expression of
several genes including 2'-5'-oligo(A) synthetase,
IFN-
, and PKR genes (33, 34).
In the current work, we chose to determine the transcriptional
mechanism by which IFN represses MMP-9 expression. We utilized EW-7
human cells derived from Ewing's sarcoma previously shown by us to be
sensitive to the antiproliferative effects of IFNs (35),
IRF1-transfected EW-7 cells (35), as well as the deficient STAT1
(
/
) human fibrosarcoma U3A cells and their parental STAT1 (+/+)
2Ftgh cells (36). We report that IFN-induced IRF1 inhibits NF-
B-dependent activation of MMP-9 by binding to the
promoter region overlapping the NF-
B-binding site.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents and Antibodies--
Recombinant human (rHu)-IFN-
2a
(specific activity 2 × 108 units/mg) was provided by
Hoffmann-La Roche (Basel, Switzerland); rHu-IFN-
1a (specific
activity 4 × 108 units/mg) was from Area-Serono
International (Geneva, Switzerland); rHu-IFN-
(specific activity
2 × 107 units/mg) was from Roussel Uclaf
(Romainville, France). IFN biologic activity was assessed by antiviral
protection against vesicular stomatitis virus on human Wish cells
(ATCC, CCL-25). Monoclonal antibodies against pS727-STAT1 and
pY701-STAT1 were from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. Polyclonal antibodies
against human STAT1 (p91), IRF1, and NF-
B family members were from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Tebu, France). Purified Sp-1 protein was from
Promega (France). Renaissance Enhanced Luminol Reagent was from
PerkinElmer Life Sciences. M-PERTM mammalian protein
extraction reagent and NE-PERTM nuclear and cytoplasmic
extraction reagents were from Pierce.
Cell Lines and Culture--
Human Ewing's sarcoma EW-7 cells
were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) containing 10%
heat-inactivated FCS (Myoclone Plus, Invitrogen) and 10 µg/ml
gentamycin in a humidified 37 °C incubator (5% CO2).
EW-7/TA and EW-7/TA/IRF1 cell lines (35) were grown as parental EW-7
cells except for addition of puromycin (2.5 µg/ml, Sigma) and G418
(500 µg/ml, Invitrogen). IRF1 protein was induced by doxycycline (2 µg/ml, Sigma) which was added 24 h before cell harvesting. Human
fibrosarcoma U3A and 2Ftgh cell lines (36) were maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated FCS, in the presence of hygromycin B (250 µg/ml,
Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
Transient Transfections--
Luciferase constructs containing
elements of the MMP-9 promoter (
634 bp to +30 bp,
603 to
+30,
531 to +30,
144 to +30, and
73 to +30) have been described
by Gum et al. (14). Plasmids DNA cloned in
DH5
competent cells (Invitrogen) were prepared with the
Quantum Preparation Kit (Bio-Rad). 20 × 106 cells
were mixed gently with 10 µg of dried supercoiled MMP-9 promoter plasmid and were electroporated as described previously (37).
Cells were stimulated 16 h after electroporation with IFNs (1000 units/ml) or with TNF-
(10 units/ml), alone or in combination, in
fresh medium containing 10% FCS. After 24 h of stimulation, cells
were analyzed for luciferase activity according to the manufacturer's
recommendations (Luciferase Assay System, Promega) or for
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity as described previously
(37).
Cotransfection Experiments--
EW-7 cells (20 × 106 in 200 µl of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium)
were mixed with 15 µg of supercoiled plasmid DNA, p65/pc-DNA-3, or
IRF1/pc-DNA-3 and were electroporated as described previously (37).
Basic pc-DNA3 was used as control. After 6 h, the medium was
changed, and cells were distributed in a 12-well tissue culture plate,
and the culture was continued for 36 h. Then supercoiled MMP-9 promoter DNA (
634) was transfected using
LipofectAMINETM 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the
manufacturer's recommendations (1 µg of DNA/1 × 105 cells/well). After 6 h, cells were stimulated in
the same medium for 24 h with IFN-
(1000 units/ml) or with
TNF-
(10 units/ml) or both stimuli. Cells were further analyzed for
luciferase activity according to the manufacturer's recommendations
(Luciferase Assay System, Promega).
In Vitro Transcription and Translation--
For production of
recombinant proteins (IRF1, p50, and p65), IRF1/pc-DNA-3, p50/pc-DNA-3,
and p65/pc-DNA-3 (1 µg each plasmid-DNA) were transcribed by T7 RNA
polymerase and translated by nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte
lysate according to the manufacturer's recommendations (TNTR-T7 Quick-coupled Transcription/Translation System,
Promega). Basic pc-DNA3 was used as control translation product. For
construction of human IRF1 expression vector, the full-length IRF1
cDNA derived from pCMV-IRF1 vector provided by Dr. J. Hiscott was
subcloned into pc-DNA3 vector (Invitrogen). P50/pc-DNA3 and p65/pc-DNA3 were from Dr. F. Arenzana.
Nuclear Extracts and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
(EMSA)--
Nuclear extracts (from 40 × 106
cells) were prepared, and EMSA experiments were performed as described
by Sancéau et al. (37). Nuclear proteins (10 µg)
were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with radiolabeled probe (30,000 cpm). After resolution of the nucleoprotein complexes by a
non-denaturing electrophoresis, the gel was dried and exposed overnight
to a PhosphorImager screen (Amersham Biosciences). For competition
experiments, appropriate antibodies (1 µg) were mixed directly with
nuclear extracts and binding buffer for 30 min at 4 °C before adding
the radiolabeled probe. For direct DNA occupancy, recombinant proteins
(IRF1, p50, and p65 proteins, or recombinant Sp-1 protein, increasing
volumes 0.5-2 µl) were mixed with the radiolabeled probe (30,000 cpm) in EMSA buffer conditions. After 30 min of incubation at 4 °C,
the reactions were resolved by non-denaturing electrophoresis, like the
usual EMSA. A 44-bp DNA fragment that spans the
619 to
575 region of the human MMP-9 promoter and encompasses the
NF-
B-binding site was generated by annealing two complementary
oligonucleotides (Genset, Paris, France), 5'-AGA CAG GGG TTG CCC CAG
TGG AAT TCC CCA GCC TTG
CCT-3' and 3'-GTC CCC AAC GGG GTC ACC TTA AGG GGT CGG AAC GGA TCG-5'
(the NF-
B-binding site of MMP-9 is underlined). The synthetic
oligonucleotide 5'-CTA GAC AGA GGG GAT TTC CGA GAG GTT-3' covering the
consensus NF-
B-binding site from the human immunoglobulin
light
chain enhancer or the synthetic oligonucleotide 5'-CCT TGG GTT TTC CCA
TGA GTT C-3' covering the NF-
B-binding site of the IL-6
promoter as described previously (37) were used. The
32P-labeling probes were generated by the Klenow fill-in
reaction (Stratagene) of the annealing fragment.
Western Blot Analysis--
Following cell (10 × 106 cells/ml) stimulation with IFNs (1000 units/ml) or with
TNF-
(10 units/ml), alone or in association, for the indicated
times, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and
nuclear or cytosolic extracts were prepared as described previously
(37). 20 mM anti-phosphatase mixture (sodium orthovanadate, NaF,
-glycerophosphate), 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and 10 µg/ml protease inhibitors (pepstatin, leupeptin,
aprotinin) were added to each buffer used. Protein content in the
supernatants was determined using Bradford's method. Equivalent
amounts of protein (60 µg) were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE and
blotted to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). Membranes
were hybridized and processed as described previously (35) using enhanced chemiluminescence protein detection (Renaissance Enhanced Luminol Reagent, PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Immunoreactive protein bands were detected by autoradiography on Hyperfilms (Amersham Biosciences).
Reverse Transcriptase-PCR--
RNA extraction (by SV Total RNA
Isolation System, Promega) from Ewing cells and subsequent cDNA
synthesis were conducted as described previously (35). MMP-9 cDNA
(296 bp) was amplified using the sense primer 5'-GGA GAC CTG AGA ACC
AAT CTC-3' and the antisense primer 5'-TCC AAT AGG TGA TGT TGT CGT-3'
according to published sequences (38). To normalize the PCR products,
the
2-microglobulin gene was amplified as described by
Bauvois et al. (6). The PCR products were visualized by
electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose gel containing 0.2 µg/ml ethidium
bromide. The NIH Image 1.44 b11 software was used for the analysis.
Enzyme-linked Immunoabsorbent Assays--
The conditioned media
from Ewing cells were harvested under sterile conditions and frozen
before MMP-9 or IL-6 contents were determined using a commercial ELISA
kits from R & D Systems (Abingdon, UK). Controls included
FCS-supplemented RPMI 1640 medium alone incubated under the same conditions.
Gelatinolytic Zymography--
Analysis of MMP-9 activity was
carried out in 7.5% (w/v) SDS-PAGE containing 0.1% gelatin (w/v) as
described elsewhere (39). Equal amounts of culture media (10-20 µl)
were applied to the gel in Laemmli sample buffer lacking
-mercaptoethanol. The recombinant pro-MMP-9 with a molecular
mass of 92 kDa (R & D Systems) was used as positive control. Samples
were preincubated for 60 min with 0.5 mM
aminophenylmercuric acid (APMA, Sigma) which activates the pro-form to
the activated form. Gelatinolytic activities of both pro-MMP-9 and
active MMP-9 were detected as transparent bands on the background of
Coomassie Blue-stained gelatin. The NIH Image 1.44
11 software was
used for the analysis of the bands, after acquisition in an Appligene
densitometer (Oncor).
 |
RESULTS |
IFNs Inhibit TNF-
-dependent Activation of MMP-9 in
EW-7 Cells--
As assessed by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay
(ELISA), day 1-cultured EW-7 cells in the absence or presence of IFNs
spontaneously released no detectable amounts of MMP-9 into the culture
conditioned medium (Fig. 1A).
TNF-
up-regulates the expression of MMP-9 in various cell types (4,
5, 13). Similarly, treatment of EW-7 cells with TNF-
(10 units/ml)
resulted in marked stimulation of MMP-9 protein levels (Fig.
1A). MMP-9 stimulation in response to TNF-
was
dose-dependent, with maximal effects being obtained for
doses of 1000 units/ml. Although without any effect on unstimulated EW-7 cells, IFN-
and IFN-
reduced production of MMP-9 of
TNF-
-treated cells (Fig. 1A). Under our conditions,
TNF-
/IFN combination (TNF 10 units/ml, IFN 1000 units/ml) did not
induce any death signaling in EW-7 cells. Zymography analysis showed
the presence of a gelatinase activity at 92 kDa in the conditioned
media of TNF-
-stimulated cells, consistent with the pattern of
recombinant pro-MMP-9 (Fig. 1B, top panel).
Preincubation of TNF-
-stimulated cell supernatant with APMA resulted
in conversion of pro-MMP-9 to an active form of 82 kDa (Fig.
1B, top panel). Gelatinolytic activity of MMP-9 was decreased in the conditioned media of TNF-
-stimulated cells treated with IFN-
or IFN-
for 24 h (Fig. 1B,
top panel), and such inhibition of MMP-9 production in
response to IFN was dose- and time-dependent; maximal
inhibitory effects were obtained for doses of 5000 units/ml IFN (Fig.
1B, middle panel), and TNF-
-mediated accumulation of MMP-9 in the culture medium was blocked 12 h after addition of IFN (Fig. 1B, bottom panel).
Moreover, the protein levels were related to the levels of expression
of MMP-9 transcript (296 bp) detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR
(Fig. 1C) suggesting that inhibition of MMP-9 production by
IFNs reflected decreased MMP-9 mRNA amounts in TNF-
-activated
cells.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Inhibition of
TNF- -dependent activation of MMP-9
in EW-7 cells by IFNs. EW-7 cells (1 × 106
cells/ml) were cultured for 24 h in the absence or presence of
TNF- (10 units/ml) and/or IFNs (103 units/ml).
A, MMP-9 production (pg/ml) in the culture supernatants
of EW-7 cells were determined by ELISA. Values represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 20). B, analysis of
gelatinolytic activity in the culture media of EW-7 cells cultured for
24 h in the absence or presence of TNF- and/or IFNs. The
enzymatic activity of MMP-9 was analyzed using zymography performed
with equal amounts of protein loaded. Gelatinolytic activities are
detected as clear bands in the gel. Activation of pro-MMP-9 by APMA
(0.5 mM) results in an 82-kDa active form (bottom
panel). 10 units/ml TNF- -induced gelatinase activity was
inhibited in a dose-dependent manner with increasing
concentrations of IFN- (10, 100, 1000, and 5000 units/ml,
middle panel) and a time-dependent manner (10 units/ml TNF- alone or in the presence of 103 units/ml
IFN- for 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, or 50 h, two lower
panels). C, the cDNAs from EW-7 cells cultured
for 24 h in the absence or presence of TNF- and/or IFNs were
used as templates for PCRs using specific primers for MMP-9 or
2-microglobulin as described under "Experimental
Procedures." PCR products were run on 1.2% agarose gels.
|
|
TNF-
-dependent Activation of the MMP-9 Promoter
Requires a Region Containing One Potential IFN-responsive Element
Overlapping the NF-
B-binding Site--
To define the promoter
region of MMP-9 necessary for both transcriptional MMP-9 activation by
TNF-
and subsequent inhibition by IFNs in EW-7 cells, functional
analysis of the 5'-flanking region of the human MMP-9 gene
was carried out using the
670 to +30 fragment (700 bp) as well as a
series of 5'-deletions of the MMP-9 promoter, linked to a
luciferase reporter plasmid (Fig. 2A). We transiently
transfected EW-7 cells with these plasmids. As shown in Fig.
2B, the
670 construct of the MMP-9 5'-flanking region
yielded a 9-fold increase in luciferase activity in response to TNF-
treatment. No significant response to IFNs alone was observed (Fig.
2B). Combined treatment with TNF-
and IFN resulted in
significant reduction of luciferase activity (30% inhibition with
IFN-
, 45% inhibition with IFN-
, and up to 70% inhibition with
IFN-
). Similar results were observed after transfection of the
634
and
603 fragments (Fig. 2B). However, cells transfected with shorter fragments expressed a low basal luciferase activity that
was not enhanced by TNF-
(Fig. 2B). Interestingly, this promoter fragment between
603 and
531 regions contained one non-consensus NF-
B-binding site (between
600 and
590) and an Sp-1-binding site (between
562 and
555) (13, 14). Equally important, this region also contains eight nucleotides matching an IFN
enhancer core sequence (5'-GGAATTCC-3') previously identified in
IFN-response genes (40, 41) (Fig. 2A). Thus, it is possible that this putative IFN-responsive element (IRE), which overlaps with
the NF-
B-binding site (Fig. 2A), participates in the
negative regulation of MMP-9 gene transcription.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of
TNF- -dependent activation of MMP-9
in EW-7 cells by IFNs requires a region 603 to 531 in the
5'-flanking sequence of the MMP-9 promoter.
A, schematic map of the MMP-9 promoter
showing the cis-regulatory elements and the series of 5'-deletions
( 634, 603, 531, 141, and 73). B, EW-7 cells
were transiently transfected with the different constructs and then
cultured 24 h in the absence (control) or presence of TNF- or
IFNs or combinations of TNF- /IFNs. Luciferase activity was
determined from cell lysates as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Results of one experiment representative of six separate
experiments are shown.
|
|
The transcription factors STAT1 and IRF1 are intracellular
signal-transducing molecules in IFN signaling (28, 29, 31-34). STAT1
activated by both classes of IFNs is able to bind to ISRE (28, 31, 32).
IRF1 binds ISRE sequences that may overlap with IRE sequences (33, 34,
42). Moreover, human IL-6, whose mechanism of transcriptional
activation involves the STAT3 signaling pathway (43), did not affect
TNF-
-activated MMP-9 gene transcription (Fig.
2B) nor the MMP-9 activity induced by TNF-
in EW-7 cells (data not shown). Based on these observations, we next investigated the
involvement of STAT1/IRF1-signaling pathways in IFN-mediated inhibition
of TNF-
-activated MMP-9 expression.
Absence of STAT1 Prevents IFN-mediated Inhibition of
TNF-
-mediated MMP-9 Expression--
The role of STAT1 in the
down-regulation of TNF-
-activated MMP-9 expression was assessed
using human EW-7 and 2Ftgh cells, and the IFN-unresponsive U3A cells,
deficient in STAT1 (36), and derived from the parental 2Ftgh cell line.
Reporter assays using MMP-9 promoter region
634 construct
showed that both wild-type 2 Ftgh STAT1 (+/+) and U3A STAT1 (
/
)
cells, respectively, yielded a 5- and 8-fold increase in luciferase
activation in response to TNF-
(Fig.
3A). As expected, IFN
treatment inhibited the MMP-9 reporter activity in TNF-
-treated
2Ftgh cells similarly to TNF-
-treated EW-7 cells (Fig.
3A). However, IFN treatment did not affect the MMP-9
reporter activity induced by TNF-
in STAT1 (
/
) U3A cells (Fig.
3A). This was reflected by ELISA that clearly showed that IFNs achieved a marked inhibition of MMP-9 production in EW-7 and 2Ftgh
cells treated with TNF-
without altering MMP-9 levels released by
TNF-
-treated U3A cells (Fig. 3B). In parallel,
TNF-
-induced MMP-9 gelatinase activity was significantly reduced in
supernatants of 2Ftgh cells treated with TNF-
and IFN but not in
those of TNF-
-treated U3A cells (data not shown). These data
establish a central role for STAT1 in the IFN-mediated inhibition of
TNF-
-induced MMP-9 expression.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Critical roles of STAT1 and IRF1 in the
regulation of TNF- -mediated MMP-9
gene activation. A, EW-7, 2Ftgh, U3A, EW-7/TA,
and EW-7/TA/IRF1 cell lines were transfected with the MMP-9
promoter region 634 construct and then cultured for 24 h in the
absence or presence of TNF- (10 units/ml) or IFNs (1000 units/ml) or
combinations of TNF- /IFNs. Luciferase activity was determined from
cell lysates as described under "Experimental Procedures."
B, MMP-9 production (pg/ml/106 cells) in
the 24-h cultured supernatants of EW-7, 2Ftgh, U3A, EW-7/TA, and
EW-7/TA/IRF1 cells, transfected with the MMP-9 promoter
region 634 construct, and cultured in the absence or presence of
TNF- and/or IFNs, was determined by ELISA.
|
|
Inducible Overexpression of IRF1 Inhibits TNF-
-mediated MMP-9
Activation--
To test whether IRF1 contributed to the inhibition of
MMP-9 gene expression, we used an inducible form of IRF1.
Consequently, we used a tetracycline-inducible system utilizing the
reverse tTA activator that permits doxycycline-inducible expression of IRF1 (35, 44). Cell clones EW-7/TA/IRF1 and the control EW-7/TA were
transfected with the human MMP-9 promoter region
634
construct and treated with TNF-
. EW-7/TA cells yielded an 8-fold
increase in luciferase activation in response to TNF-
(Fig.
3A), whereas TNF-
treatment did not significantly
increase the luciferase activity in EW-7/TA/IRF1 cells (Fig.
3A). ELISA confirmed that the levels of MMP-9 released by
EW-7/TA/IRF1 cells treated with TNF-
were lower than those released
by TNF-
-treated parental EW-7/TA cells (Fig. 3B). Thus,
IRF1 overexpression inhibits TNF-
-stimulated MMP-9 expression.
Inhibition of TNF-
-dependent Activation of MMP-9 by
IFNs Is Accompanied by STAT1 Activation and IRF1 Induction--
We
next performed Western blot analyses to determine whether STAT1 was
effectively activated in IFN-stimulated cells. Binding of IFNs to their
receptors resulted in oligomerization of receptor subunits and
subsequent activation of JAK1, TYK2 (for IFN-
and IFN-
), JAK1,
and JAK2 (for IFN-
) which then activate STAT1 through tyrosine
phosphorylation resulting in dimerization, nuclear translocation, and
DNA binding of STAT1 (28, 31, 32). Serine (Ser-727) phosphorylation was
also required for maximal transactivating capacity of STAT1 (29, 31).
Nuclear extracts were prepared from untreated, IFN-, and/or
TNF-
-treated EW-7 cells for 30 min or 18 h. As shown in Fig.
4A, induced levels of
tyrosine- and serine-phosphorylated STAT1 were already observed at
30 min of stimulation with IFN-
, and IFN-
STAT1 activation by
IFNs was rather persistent because amounts of tyrosine- and
serine-phosphorylated STAT1 were still augmented in the nuclei of
EW-7 cells treated with IFNs for 18 h (Fig. 4B). In
parallel, STAT1 protein levels were not significantly affected with
time following IFN treatment (Fig. 4, A and B).
TNF-
neither influenced STAT1 protein nor its phosphorylation (Fig.
4, A and B). 18 h of stimulation by IFNs
also resulted in tyrosine and serine phosphorylation of STAT1 in 2Ftgh
STAT-1 (+/+) cells (Fig. 4C). As expected, no STAT1 was detected in nuclei extracts obtained from U3A STAT-1 (
/
) cells (Fig. 4D).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Western blot analysis of STAT1, IRF1,
NF- B, and I -B
proteins, and status of tyrosine and serine phosphorylation of STAT1 in
response to TNF- and/or IFNs. Nuclear or
cytoplasmic cell extracts were obtained from cells untreated or treated
with TNF- (10 units/ml) and/or IFNs (1000 units/ml). Immunoblotting
and protein detection were performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." A, STAT1, IRF1, serine- and
tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT1 were detected in the nuclear extracts of
EW-7 cells treated for 30 min; B, EW-7 cells treated
for 18 h; C, 2Ftgh cells treated for 18 h;
D, U3A cells treated for 18 h; E,
detection of cytoplasmic I -B and nuclear NF- B p65 in EW-7 cells
treated for 18 h.
|
|
Unlike STAT1, which is activated within minutes of ligand binding to
the receptor, the IRF family members including IRF1 constitutes a
secondary wave of response to the IFN signal (33, 34). We therefore
tested whether IFNs could induce IRF1 in EW-7, 2Ftgh, and U3A cells. As
shown in Fig. 4, B and C, stimulation of EW-7 or
2Ftgh cells for 18 h with IFN-
or IFN-
induced IRF1 protein. In agreement with previous observations (45), IFN-
was the best
inducer of IRF1. The TNF-
/IFN combination resulted in a more
pronounced induction of IRF1 protein in these two cell lines when
compared with stimulation with cytokines alone (Fig. 4, B and C). As expected, IRF1 was not detected in
IFN-unresponsive U3A cells untreated or treated with IFNs and/or
TNF-
(Fig. 4D). These data indicate that IRF1, as a
downstream mediator of STAT1, is efficiently induced in STAT1-positive
cells. Finally, in contrast to TNF-
, IFN-
neither blocked the
I
-B degradation nor the TNF-
-induced translocation of p65 from
cytosol to nucleus (Fig. 4E).
IRF1 Induced in IFN-
-activated EW-7 Cells Binds to the MMP-9
Promoter--
To determine the contribution of STAT1 and/or IRF1 in
the MMP-9 promoter activity, we performed EMSA. Nuclear
extracts from EW-7 cells stimulated for 3 or 16 h with TNF-
(10 units/ml) and/or IFN-
(1000 units/ml) were isolated, and equal
amounts of proteins were incubated with the radiolabeled MMP-9 probe
covering the region between
619 and
575 (see Fig. 2A).
As shown in Fig. 5A, the
patterns of the protein-DNA complexes were different for EW-7 cells
stimulated for 3 or 16 h. At 3 h, two inducible complexes (C1
and C2) were detectable after either TNF-
or TNF-
/IFN-
stimulation (Fig. 5A). Addition of antibodies against
NF-
B p50 subunit supershifted the C2 complex, whereas antibodies
against NF-
B p65 subunit supershifted both C1 and C2 complexes (Fig. 5B). Addition of IRF1 or STAT1 antibodies did not affect the
formation of C1 and C2 complexes bound to the MMP-9 probe, indicating
that such complexes contained neither IRF1 nor STAT1 proteins (Fig. 5B). Moreover, no changes were detected with the addition of
respective matched isotype antibodies (data not shown). This
demonstrated that the C1 and C2 complexes inducible by TNF-
after
3 h were, respectively, the dimers of NF-
B p65/p65 and
p50/p65.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Binding of NF- B (p50
and p65) and IRF1 to the MMP-9 promoter.
A, nuclear extracts were prepared from EW-7 cells after
a 3- or 16-h treatment with TNF- (10 units/ml) or IFN- (1000 units/ml) or both, and then were incubated with the
32P-labeled MMP-9 probe ( 619 to 575), and the protein
DNA binding was analyzed by EMSA. B, EW-7 nuclear
extracts after a 3-h IFN- /TNF- treatment were assayed for protein
DNA binding activity in the presence of p50 or p65 or IRF1 or STAT1
antibodies. C, EW-7 nuclear extracts after a 16-h
treatment with TNF- , or IFN- , or both were assayed for protein
DNA binding activity as in B. D, EW-7
nuclear extracts after a 16-h IFN- - /TNF- treatment were
assayed for protein DNA binding activity. E, EW-7
nuclear extracts after a 3- or 16-h treatment with TNF- , or IFN- ,
or both were incubated with the 32P-labeled immunoglobulin
NF- B consensus probe and assayed for protein DNA binding activity as
in B. NS, nonspecific band.
|
|
After 16 h induction, TNF-
only induced the binding of
the C2 complex (Fig. 5A), whereas IFN-
induced the
binding of a third lower DNA-protein complex C3 (Fig. 5A).
Both C2 and C3 complexes were detected in response to TNF-
and
IFN-
(Fig. 5A). Again, the identity of C2 was confirmed
by supershift with antibodies against p50 and p65, whereas anti-IRF1
and anti-STAT1 had no effect on the mobility of this complex bound to
the MMP-9 probe (Fig. 5C, panels TNF-
and
TNF-
+ IFN-
). The mobility and abundance of the C3
complex were not affected by antibodies against p50, p65, and STAT1
(Fig. 5C, panels IFN-
and TNF-
+ IFN-
), whereas a decrease in C3 formation associated with a
complex supershift was seen with IRF1 antibodies (Fig. 5C,
panels IFN-
and TNF-
+ IFN-
). In STAT1
(
/
) U3A cells, 16 h of TNF-
treatment induced the
formation of the C2 complex (p50/p65), whereas IFN-
treatment did
not lead to C3 complex formation (data not shown). Moreover, the
comparison of levels of the IRF1-DNA complex (C3) for each IFN (compare
Fig. 5, A and D) correlated with the difference
in magnitude of repression of each IFN toward MMP-9 as shown above by
zymography (Fig. 1B, zymography (Fig. 1B,
IFN-
> IFN-
> IFN-
). Again, both C2 and C3
complexes were formed in the presence of TNF-
+ IFN-
/-
(Fig.
5D).
Moreover, when EW-7 nuclear extracts were analyzed for binding to the
immunoglobulin NF-
B consensus motif (37), we observed only the
appearance of C1 and C2 complexes with TNF-
, composed of p50 and p65
NF-
B subunits as assessed by the addition of respective antibodies (Fig. 5E). Control isotype antibodies were
ineffective (data not shown). No C3 complex was detectable in cells
stimulated with IFN-
(Fig. 5E).
To ensure further that IRF1 binds to the MMP-9 promoter, we
performed direct DNA/protein binding experiments using human
recombinant IRF1, p50, and p65 proteins (0.5, 1, and 2 µl), and the
radiolabeled MMP-9 promoter fragment covering nucleotides
between
619 and
575, in the absence of endogenous nuclear proteins
(Fig. 6A). As controls,
in vitro translated proteins derived from the empty vector
or the Sp-1 coding sequence were used. No DNA-protein complexes were
evident with in vitro translated proteins derived from the empty vector or the Sp-1 (Fig. 6A). As expected, recombinant
NF-
B p50 and p65 proteins bind to their respective sites of the
MMP-9 promoter (Fig. 6A). The increased formation
of DNA-protein complexes correlated with the increasing quantities of
recombinant p50 and p65 proteins added to each reaction (Fig.
6A). When the radiolabeled MMP-9 probe was incubated with
recombinant IRF1, a major DNA-IRF1 complex formed (Fig. 6A).
These results indicate that recombinant p50 and p65 proteins (activated
by TNF-
) as well as recombinant IRF1 (induced by IFN-
)
specifically bind to the MMP-9 promoter.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Competitive binding of IRF1 to the
NF- B-binding site of the MMP-9
promoter. A, for direct DNA occupancy,
recombinant proteins IRF1, p50, and p65 NF- B proteins (increasing
volumes 0.5-2 µl) were mixed with the radiolabeled probe in EMSA
buffer conditions. The reaction products were then resolved by
non-denaturing electrophoresis like the usual EMSA as detailed under
"Experimental Procedures." The empty vector and the purified Sp1
protein were used as controls. B, nuclear extracts of
EW-7 cells after a 16-h IFN- or IFN- /TNF- treatment were
assayed for protein DNA binding activity in the presence of increasing
quantities of recombinant proteins (p50, p65, or IRF1) as described
under "Experimental Procedures." C, EW-7 cells were
transiently cotransfected with the expression vectors p65 or IRF1 or
the empty vector as control and the MMP-9 promoter region
634 construct as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Luciferase activity was determined from cell-stimulated lysates. Values
represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
D, cotransfections of the expression vectors p65 and
IRF1 using the indicated amount (1 or 5 µg) in EW-7 cells. Luciferase
activity was determined 24 h after the MMP-9 promoter
region 634 construct transfection, without cells stimulation. Values
represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 3).
|
|
IRF1 Binds to a DNA Sequence of the MMP-9 Promoter Fragment
Overlapping the NF-
B-binding Site--
To establish which DNA
elements in the MMP-9 promoter are recognized by IRF1, we
tested the effects of recombinant proteins (p65, p50, and IRF1, from
0.5 to 2 µl) on the formation of C1, C2, and C3 complexes. As shown
in Fig. 6B, recombinant p65, p50, and IRF1 proteins, added
to nuclear extracts from untreated EW-7 cells, led to the formation of
three protein-DNA complexes with different mobilities (Fig.
6B, cont). Two of the complexes corresponded to
the C2 and C3 positions, and the third complex migrated slower than the
expected C1 complex, suggesting a p65 multimer. Whether these
recombinant proteins interfere with the formation of C1, C2, or C3
complexes was investigated next. Increasing amounts of p50, p65, or
IRF1 proteins were added to the binding reaction mixtures containing
the nuclear extracts and the MMP-9 promoter probe (
619 to
575). As increasing amounts of p65 or p50 proteins were added to
IFN-
- and/or TNF-
-treated nuclear extracts, the abundance of C1
and C2 complexes increased (Fig. 6B), and this was
associated with a concomitant decrease in the amounts of the C3 complex
(Fig. 6B, IFN-
and TNF-
+ IFN-
). Increasing amounts of IRF1 led to the appearance of the
C3 complex in TNF-
-treated nuclear extracts (Fig. 6B,
TNF-
), whereas IRF1 diminished the abundance of the C2
complex in TNF-
- and/or IFN-
-treated nuclear extracts (Fig.
6B, TNF-
, TNF-
+ IFN-
). This
result demonstrates that IRF1 is capable of competing with p50 and p65
NF-
B subunits at their respective binding sites. Moreover, our
competition assays suggest that the preferential binding of p50, p65,
or IRF1 to the MMP-9 promoter is related to their relative
nuclear abundance in EW-7 cells.
To provide further evidence that competition between IRF1 and NF-
B
(p65) dictates MMP-9 promoter activity, EW-7 cells were cotransfected with the IRF1 and/or p65 expression vectors or the empty
vector and the luciferase reporter driven by the MMP-9
promoter region
634 construct (Fig. 6, C and
D). Following cell stimulation for 18 h with IFN-
and/or TNF-
, we observed that production of p65 blocked the
inhibitory effects of IFN-
in EW-7 cells treated by TNF-
+ IFN-
(Fig. 6C). Conversely, production of IRF1 blocked MMP-9 promoter activity in TNF-
-treated cells (Fig.
6C). When EW-7 cells were transiently cotransfected with
IRF1 and p65 expression vectors alone or together, and the luciferase
reporter driven by the MMP-9 promoter region
634 construct
(without exogenous stimulation), p65 alone increased luciferase
activity, whereas IRF1 alone did not markedly modify the basal
luciferase activity (Fig. 6D). Moreover, an excess of IRF1
(5 µg) relative to p65 (1 µg) reduced MMP-9 reporter activity by
~30%, whereas an excess of p65 (5 µg) relative to IRF1 (1 µg)
restored the level of luciferase activity observed after transfection
of p65 expression vector alone (Fig. 6D).
IFNs and TNF-
Synergistically Induce IL-6 Expression in EW-7
Cells--
We showed previously (37) that synergistic induction of the
IL-6 gene by TNF-
and IFN-
in human monocytic cells
involved cooperation between the IRF1 and NF-
B p65 homodimers. We
thus investigated whether TNF-
plus IFN treatment of EW-7 cells
could regulate the expression of IL-6. As shown in Fig.
7A, TNF-
alone was able to
induce IL-6 production, whereas IFNs were without effect. Addition of
IFN-
, IFN-
, or IFN-
to TNF-
enhanced such production (Fig.
7A). EW-7 cells, transiently transfected with the plasmid
construct linking IL-6 promoter containing the NF-
B site
to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene, expressed increased activity in the presence of TNF-
(Fig. 7B), and
the addition of the three IFNs significantly enhanced this activity (Fig. 7B). IFN treatment alone did not induce the
IL-6 promoter activity (Fig. 7B). In parallel,
EMSA indicated that stimulation with TNF-
, but not by IFN-
,
resulted in the formation of two DNA-protein complexes to the
IL-6-NF-
B probe, respectively identified as C1 and C2 complexes of
NF-
B (Fig. 7C). IFN-
did not induce the formation of
the IRF1-DNA complex (Fig. 5C). This was confirmed by
assessing the abilities of recombinant proteins p50 and p65, but not
IRF1, to bind to the IL-6 promoter (Fig. 7D).
These data are in agreement with our previous study showing that the
synergistic induction of the IL-6 gene by IFN-
and
TNF-
involved cooperation between NF-
B and IRF1 which binds to an
IFN enhancer core sequence close but distinct to the NF-
B-binding
site (37). These results show that the combination of TNF-
and IFNs
in EW-7 cells divergently acts on IL-6 and MMP-9 gene
expression.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Synergistic induction of IL-6 by
TNF- and IFNs in EW-7 cells. EW-7 cells
(1 × 106 cells/ml) were cultured for 24 h in the
absence or presence of TNF- (10 units/ml) and/or IFNs
(103 units/ml). A, IL-6 production (pg/ml)
in the culture supernatants of EW-7 cells was determined by ELISA.
B, EW-7 cells were transiently transfected with the
human IL-6 promoter and then cultured for 24 h in the
absence or presence of TNF- or IFNs or TNF- + IFNs.
Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity was determined from cell
lysates as described under "Experimental Procedures."
C, nuclear extracts prepared from EW-7 cells treated
for 18 h with TNF- (10 units/ml), or IFN- (1000 units/ml),
or both were incubated with the 32P-labeled IL-6-NF- B
probe, and the protein DNA binding was analyzed by EMSA. Nuclear
extracts were assayed for protein DNA binding activity in the presence
of p50, p65, or IRF1 antibodies. NI, non-immune serum;
NS, nonspecific band. D, for direct DNA
occupancy, recombinant proteins IRF1, p50, and p65 NF- B proteins
(0.5 and 1 µl) were mixed with the IL-6 probe, and the reaction
products were then resolved by EMSA.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The efficacy of IFNs has been exploited in maintenance therapy for
patients with malignancies, including leukemias and various types of
carcinoma (46-49). The antitumor effects of IFNs have been attributed
to the inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of cell
differentiation, immunomodulation, and alteration of the level of gene
expression in target cells (46-49). Previous in vivo and
in vitro studies indicated that MMP-9 production and
activity in various normal and tumoral cell types could be inhibited by IFNs (6, 19-27). In the present study, we show that
IFN-mediated inhibition of MMP-9 expression occurs through IRF1 which
competes for NF-
B binding to the MMP-9 promoter.
Results from luciferase reporter assays in the EW-7 cell line indicated
that the MMP-9 promoter region spanning from
603 bp to
531 bp, which contains the NF-
B and Sp-1-binding sites, is
required for stimulation by TNF-
as well as for subsequent inhibition by IFNs. Studies on MMP-9 activation have identified NF-
B
as a main effector of MMP-9 gene expression activated by the
TNF-
signaling pathway (13, 14). The EMSAs performed here
demonstrating activation of NF-
B (p50/p65) DNA binding activity by
TNF-
in EW-7 cells confirmed this. A recent study (26) reported the
existence of two potential ISRE-binding sites within the
700-bp 5'-flanking sequence of the human MMP-9 gene. Moreover, we
found an IRE-like sequence (sharing homologies with the motif
designated pIRE, for palindromic IFN-responsive element, according to
Miyamoto et al. (40)), located in the promoter of MMP-9
within the
601/
584 bp overlapping the non-consensus NF-
B-binding
element of the MMP-9 gene (Fig. 1D). The
transcription factors STAT1 and IRF1 activated by IFNs may bind ISRE or
IRE sequences (28, 24-31, 42). Ma et al. (50) recently
reported the critical role of STAT1 in IFN-
and -
suppression of
MMP-9 gene expression in using STAT1-deficient murine
astrocytes and U3A cells. The present data are in agreement with these
observations and reveal the mechanism beyond STAT1. We provide
different lines of evidence for the involvement of IRF1 in the
IFN-inhibited transcriptional response of the MMP-9 promoter. First, our transfection experiments using STAT1 (
/
) U3A
cells confirmed the absolute requirement of STAT1 in the inhibition of
TNF-
-mediated MMP-9 activation. Second, ectopic expression of IRF1
in EW-7 cells prevented MMP-9 activation by TNF-
, indicating that
the presence of IRF1 was associated with MMP-9 gene
inhibition. Third, IFNs induced IRF1 while not affecting I
-B
degradation and NF-
B activation. Fourth, in contrast to STAT1, IRF1
bound to the MMP-9 promoter, specifically by an IFN-response
element that overlapped with the non-consensus NF-
B-binding site
(
600 to
590). Fifth, IRF1 diminished the DNA binding of NF-
B
p50/p65 subunits, and conversely p50 or p65 proteins competed for
IRF1-DNA binding. Finally, in cells cotransfected with IRF1 and p65
expression vectors, an excess of IRF1 protein reduces MMP-9 reporter
activity, whereas an excess of p65 protein blocks the inhibitory effect of IFN-
. Together, these results underline the direct inhibitory action of IRF1 on NF-
B-mediated MMP-9 gene activation.
Further support was given by mutation studies showing that mutation of the IRF1-binding sequence (5'-GGAATTCC-3'), which blocks IRF1 binding,
also blocked the binding of NF-
B and consequently prevented the
increase in activity of the MMP-9 promoter construct upon TNF-
treatment (data not shown). TNF-
may activate IRF1 directly through NF-
B sequences located in its promoter (51). In the present
report, TNF-
also increased IRF1 levels in EW-7 cells at 18 h.
Thus, inhibition of MMP-9 expression in the long term may possibly be
achieved by a complementary mechanism resulting from the combined
effects of TNF-
and IFN that increase the synthesis of IRF1.
Recent evidence (19) indicates that IFN-
-mediated inhibition of
MMP-13 expression by transformed human epidermal keratinocytes is
associated with STAT1 activation. Whether STAT1 is involved in direct
suppression of MMP-13 gene transcription, however, remains to be demonstrated (19). In another study, IFN-
(through IRF1 induction) sensitized ME-180 cervical cancer cells to TNF-
-induced apoptosis by inhibiting NF-
B activity (51), but IRF1 did not interact with NF-
B (52).
Interestingly, our findings have to be reconsidered in the context of
the recent discovery of the negative regulation of MMP-9 expression by
a metastasis suppressor Kiss-1 (53). Kiss-1 indirectly down-regulated
NF-
B binding to the MMP-9 promoter by preventing nuclear
localization of NF-
B (p50/p65) (34). The gene of Kiss-1 maps to chromosome 1q32, and its sequence predicts a secreted protein
with a molecular mass of 15.4 kDa (54, 55). Thus, IFNs and Kiss-1 may
exert possible overlapping antitumoral activities through different
modes of action, as seen for the regulation of MMP-9 expression.
By contrast, published data (37, 45, 57-59) reported the existence of
a synergistic in vitro and in vivo cross-talk
between NF-
B and IRF1 for the induction of inflammatory genes.
NF-
B synergizes with IRF1 on adjacent consensus sequences to induce the transcription of the genes coding for vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (58), major histocompatibility complex class I (56), inducible nitric-oxide synthetase (59), and IFN-
(57). According to
our previous results (37), we report here that the 5'-flanking region
of the human IL-6 gene transfected in EW-7 cells is
up-regulated in response to TNF-
and that IFNs synergize IL-6
activity through IRF1 and Sp-1 activation. The present data serve to
demonstrate an opposite effect of IRF1 in which this molecule
counteracts the effects of NF-
B in the particular MMP-9
promoter context.
In other cell types, MMP-9 has been shown to influence cell invasion
through proteolysis of the extracellular matrix (1, 3-5), leading to
the subsequent release of the molecules sequestered in the
extracellular matrix which exert themselves through direct chemotactic
and/or proliferative activities on cells (1, 3-5). IFN-
in
vitro diminished the capacity of leukocytes to infiltrate an
endothelial cell monolayer through a reduction of released MMP-9 (23,
27). In line with these observations, we found a good correlation
between loss of EW-7 cell adhesion to collagen IV and MMP-9 proteolytic
activity. Activation of recombinant MMP-9 with APMA inhibited EW-7 cell
adhesion to collagen IV, thus suggesting the capacity of IFNs, through
MMP-9 inhibition, control EW cell adhesion.
In summary, our study demonstrates that IRF1 is essential for the
repression of MMP-9 expression by blocking NF-
B binding to the
collagenase promoter. The comprehension of this mechanism may provide
new therapeutic strategies for targeting MMP-9 gene expression involved in tumor growth and metastasis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. G. R. Stark (Imperial
Cancer Research Fund, London, UK) for kindly providing the 2Ftgh and
STAT1-deficient U3A cell lines; Dr. G. Lenoir (Département de
Pédiatrie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, Paris, France),
Dr. O. Delattre, and T. Melot (INSERM U509, Institut Curie, Section
Recherche, Paris, France) for providing the Ewing's sarcoma EW-7 cell
line; Dr. J. Hiscott (Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research,
Quebec, Canada) for providing the IRF1 cDNA derived from pCMV-IRF1
vector; Dr. F. Arenzana (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) for providing the p50/pc-DNA3 and p65/pc-DNA3; Roussel-Uclaf (Romainville, France) for supplying IFN-
, Hoffmann-La Roche (Basel, Switzerland) for supplying IFN-
2a; and Ares-Serono (Geneva, Switzerland) for supplying IFN-
. We are grateful to C. Sylvestri for valuable technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from INSERM and Grant 5424 from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Unité 365 INSERM, Institut Curie, Pavillon Pasteur, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France. Tel.: 01-42-34-67-11; Fax: 01-44-07-07-85; E-mail: Brigitte.Bauvois@curie.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202959200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MMP-9, metalloproteinase-9;
IFNs, interferons;
TNF-
, tumor necrosis
factor-
;
IRF1, interferon regulatory factor-1;
APMA, aminophenylmercuric acid;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
EMSAs, electrophoretic
mobility shift assays;
ISRE, IFN-stimulated response element;
rHu, recombinant human;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay;
IL, interleukin;
STAT, signal transducers and activators of
transcription.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Moses, M. A.
(1997)
Stem Cells
15,
180-189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Tomanek, R. J.,
and Schatteman, G. C.
(2000)
Anat. Rec.
261,
126-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
McCawley, L. J.,
and Matrisian, L. M.
(2000)
Mol. Med. Today
6,
149-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Nelson, A. R.,
Fingleton, B.,
Rothenberg, M. L.,
and Matrisian, L. M.
(2000)
J. Clin. Oncol.
18,
1135-1149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Opdenakker, G.,
Van den Steen, P. E.,
Dubois, B.,
Nelissen, I.,
Van Coillie, E.,
Masure, S.,
Proost, P.,
and Van Damme, J.
(2001)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
69,
851-859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
| |