Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205478200 on July 10, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 39, 35887-35895, September 27, 2002
Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase-
Is a Novel Member of the
Functional Family of
-Latrotoxin Receptors*
Valery
Krasnoperov
,
Mary A.
Bittner§,
Wenjun
Mo
,
Leonid
Buryanovsky
,
Thomas A.
Neubert
,
Ronald W.
Holz§,
Konstantin
Ichtchenko
, and
Alexander G.
Petrenko
¶**
From the Departments of
Pharmacology,
¶ Physiology, and Neuroscience and the
Skirball Institute,
New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016 and
the § Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan
Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Received for publication, June 3, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase sigma
(PTP
) is essential for neuronal development and function.
Here we report that PTP
is a target of
-latrotoxin, a strong
stimulator of neuronal exocytosis.
-Latrotoxin binds to the cell
adhesion-like extracellular region of PTP
. This binding results in
the stimulation of exocytosis. The toxin-binding site is located in the
C-terminal part of the PTP
ectodomain and includes two fibronectin
type III repeats. The intracellular catalytic domains of PTP
are not required for the
-latrotoxin binding and secretory response
triggered by the toxin in chromaffin cells. These features of PTP
resemble two other previously described
-latrotoxin receptors,
neurexin and CIRL. Thus,
-latrotoxin represents an unusual
example of the neurotoxin that has three independent, equally potent,
and yet structurally distinct targets. The known structural and
functional characteristics of PTP
, neurexin, and CIRL suggest that
they define a functional family of neuronal membrane receptors with complementary or converging roles in presynaptic function via a
mechanism that involves cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interaction.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
-Latrotoxin stimulates spontaneous neurotransmitter release by
massive synaptic vesicle exocytosis (1). The first steps in the
sequence of
-latrotoxin action include extracellular binding of the
toxin to cell surface membrane proteins called
-latrotoxin receptors
(2, 3). Once bound, toxin molecules interact with the lipid bilayer
that results in their insertion into the membrane and formation of
cation-permeable pores (4, 5). The cation fluxes are responsible for at
least a part of the
-latrotoxin effects (6). In addition, the
inserted fragment of the toxin molecule may interact with some as yet
unidentified intracellular effectors coupled to the exocytosis
machinery (7).
The first studies of
-latrotoxin receptors demonstrated that they
interact with the toxin with high affinity, that their density is low,
and that in the neuro-muscular junctions they co-localize with the
active zones of the nerve terminals (8, 9). Therefore, the
-latrotoxin receptors have been long viewed as specific markers for
the presynaptic release sites. Two neuronal
-latrotoxin-binding
proteins were described previously, neurexin (10, 11) and
CIRL1
(calcium-independent receptor of
-latrotoxin), also called latrophilin, lectomedin, and CL (12, 13, 14). Although they do not share any
sequence homology, either of them can serve as a functionally active
receptor of
-latrotoxin (12, 15). Their signal-transducing membranes
and intracellular domains are not required to support the stimulatory
effect of
-latrotoxin in secretory cells (14, 16). It was therefore
proposed that these receptors serve as targeting sites to bring the
toxin to the necessary location on the cell surface.
Neurexin is a cell surface protein with a single transmembrane domain
and a large extracellular region containing six laminin G domains
interspersed with three EGF domains (17). It binds
-latrotoxin only
in the presence of micromolar concentrations of calcium. Neurexin has
thousands of isoforms due to the existence of three highly homologous
genes, alternative splicing at multiple sites, and the use of two
alternative promoters. The physiological importance of neurexins
remains unknown. Interestingly, neuroligin, an endogenous ligand of
neurexin (18), can function as a post-synaptic trigger for the de
novo formation of presynaptic structure in CNS neurons (19).
CIRL has seven transmembrane domains, suggesting that it functions as a
G protein-coupled receptor. Like neurexin, CIRL has a large
extracellular region with several cell adhesion-like domains. Three
highly similar genes encoding CIRL isoforms are present in the
mammalian genome (19-21). The CIRLs are members of the emerging family
of heptahelical orphan receptors that are chimeras of cell adhesion
molecules and G protein-coupled receptors (reviewed in Refs. 22 and
23). Although information about function is quite limited and available
only for a few members of this family, their structural features
suggest the potential to couple cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix
interaction to intracellular G protein signaling.
Here we report that a known receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase
sigma (PTP
) can function as the third receptor of
-latrotoxin in
the brain. This membrane phosphatase was discovered independently in
several laboratories and is known as PTP
(24), PTP NE-3 (25), PTP-P1
(26), and LAR-PTP2 (27). Genetic studies in mouse and
Drosophila identified PTP
as a protein essential for
neuronal development and axonal pathfinding (28-30). We have shown
that, similarly to two other
-latrotoxin receptors, PTP
interacts
with
-latrotoxin via its extracellular cell adhesion-like region,
and the catalytic protein phosphatase domains are not required for the
toxin-stimulated exocytosis. Thus,
-latrotoxin targets three
structurally unrelated cell adhesion receptors that can activate
multiple signaling pathways.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
-Latrotoxin was freshly purified from Black Widow spider
venom as described (31). The plasmid containing PTP
cDNA and polyclonal antibodies 322 against the N-terminal 80 kDa
subunit and 320 against the C-terminal 76 kDa subunit of PTP
were
kindly provided by Drs. J. Schlessinger (NYU School of Medicine, New York) and A. Ullrich (Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry,
Martinsried). Antibodies against the C-terminal peptide of neurexin
(32) and the anti-p120 and -p85 subunits of CIRL-1 (12) have been
described previously.
Human growth hormone (hGH) was expressed in pXGH5 plasmid under control
of the mouse metallothionein I promoter (33). Incubation with a heavy
metal was not necessary to obtain adequate hGH expression. The plasmid
encoding CIRL (pCDR7) is described (12). Reagents were received from
the following sources: [3H]norepinephrine,
Amersham Biosciences; digitonin, Fluka Chemical Corp.
(Ronkonkoma, NY); collagenase D, Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN); amphotericin B (Fungizone) Gensia Laboratories Ltd.
(Irvine, CA); cell culture reagents (including gentamycin, penicillin/streptomycin, fetal bovine serum, and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium), BioWhittaker (Walkersville, MD).
All other reagents were obtained from Sigma.
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with ECL detection were performed
according to Bio-Rad and Amersham Biosciences protocols, respectively. Transfection of COS cells was performed with ExGen-500 reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Fermentas). Bovine adrenal chromaffin cells were prepared and maintained in culture as described previously (34), except that the medium used was Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12. Cells for transfection were grown in
12-well plates (Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA) and were transfected by
calcium phosphate precipitate 14-18 h after plating (35). Experimental
(PTP
,
1-875, or CIRL; 3 µg/well) and control (pCMVneo; 3 µg/well) plasmids were each mixed with pXGH5 (2 µg/well) prior to
generating the precipitates. Previous work in the laboratory has
demonstrated that this ensures that >95% of transfected cells express
both hGH and the protein of interest (36, 37). hGH is stored in
chromaffin granules and is released concomitantly with endogenous
catecholamine by various secretagogues. Thus, hGH serves as a selective
marker for secretion from transfected cells.
Purification of
-Latrotoxin Receptors
Twenty grams of rat brains were homogenized in 300 ml of an
ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 8.0. After centrifugation for 30 min
at 50,000 × g the obtained pellet was extracted with 2% Triton X-100 in a buffer with 50 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, pH 8.0, for 40 min in the final volume of 200 ml. The extract
was centrifuged for 1 h at 100,000 × g, and the
supernatant was supplemented with 100 mM NaCl and divided
into two equal portions. Each portion was loaded onto 2 ml of either
-latrotoxin or BSA-Sepharose overnight. Matrices were washed with
200 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl, 130 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Triton X-100 buffer, pH 8.0, for 8 h, and the retained proteins were eluted with the same buffer
containing 1 M NaCl.
Protein Identification by Mass Spectrometry
Silver-stained protein bands on an SDS-PAGE were excised under a
tissue culture hood to minimize contamination and de-stained using a
freshly prepared 1:1 solution of 30 mM potassium
ferricyanide and 100 mM sodium thiosulfate. The de-stained
gels were cut into 1-mm3 pieces and washed three times
alternatively with distilled water and acetonitrile. The proteins were
in-gel reductively alkylated and digested (38, 39) with an excess of
sequencing grade unmodified trypsin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The
resulting peptide mixture was extracted and dried under vacuum,
re-suspended in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and desalted using a
ZipTipTM (Millipore) C-18 reverse phase micro column. The
peptides were eluted with 2-3 µl of 70% acetonitrile, and the final
solution was adjusted to 1% acetic acid. The peptide mixture was
loaded into a medium-tip length nanospray needle (Protana, Denmark) and infused at a flow rate of ~40 nl/min into a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Micromass, Beverly, MA). Doubly or triply charged tryptic peptide precursor ions were selected in the quadrupole and
fragmented by collision with Argon, and the masses of fragment ions
were measured in the time-of-flight analyzer. Mass spectra were
acquired and analyzed using MassLynx (Micromass) software. Charge state
deconvoluted mass spectra were either directly submitted to the search
engine Mascot (Matrix Science, UK) or manually interpreted with the
help of PepSeq (Micromass) to search the NCBI non-redundant protein
data base using BLAST.
Immunoprecipitation
One-milliliter aliquots of either solubilized COS cells
transfected with PTP
or solubilized rat brain membranes were
incubated with 15 µl of protein A-agarose and 5 µl of either rabbit
anti-CIRL (anti-p85) or rabbit anti-
-latrotoxin or anti-PTP
320 antibodies. Each set was immunoprecipitated either with or without 10 nM
-latrotoxin. After overnight incubation, the
immunobeads were washed three times with cold 20 mM
Tris-HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and 0.05% Triton X-100, pH 8.0. Remaining proteins were eluted with sample buffer
for analysis by Western blotting with chicken anti-p120 antibody.
-Latrotoxin Binding Analyses
-Latrotoxin Binding with Immunoprecipitated Rat Brain
Membranes--
1-ml aliquots of solubilized rat brain membranes were
immunoprecipitated with anti-PTP
antibody 320 as described above.
Binding assays were performed in a volume of 0.15 ml in the presence of 0.5 nM 125I-
-latrotoxin. No brain extract
and anti-PTP
antibody 320 or brain extracts with the preimmune
antibody were used as negative controls. For an additional control to
measure nonspecific binding, 50-fold excess of unlabeled toxin was
added to the second set of immunoprecipitates.
Transfected COS Cells--
COS cells transfected with PTP
and
rat brain membranes were solubilized with 2% Triton X-100 and
clarified by centrifugation. Obtained supernatants were
immunoprecipitated with 5 µl of antibody 320 and 15 µl of protein
A-agarose overnight in the presence of 0.5 nM
125I-
-latrotoxin. The preimmune serum or the
solubilization buffer was used as negative control. To control for
nonspecific binding, a second set of immunoprecipitates was incubated
with 25 nM unlabeled
-latrotoxin.
Localization of
-Latrotoxin-binding Site of PTP
--
COS
cells were transfected with the expression plasmids
pPTP_1-880, pPTP_1-850, pPTP_1-592, pPTP_1-311,
pPTP_306-850, pPTP_306-734, pPTP_306-685, pPTP_407-734,
pPTP_407-685, pPTP_506-734, pPTP_506-685, pPTP_592-850,
pPTP_604-850, and pPTP_735-850. On day 2, either conditioned
media or Triton X-100 extracts of the cells were incubated overnight
with 15 µl of
-latrotoxin-agarose. The matrices were further
washed three times with 1.25 ml of ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, and 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. The
absorbed proteins were eluted with the SDS sample buffer,
electrophoresed, and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-PTP
322 antibody.
PTP
Deletion Mutants
Generation of Membrane-anchored C-terminal Deletion Mutant of
PTP
--
A 2681-bp fragment of pBlueScript-PTP
digested
with EcoRI/BsrGI was ligated with a 5,538-bp
fragment of pCDR7 (12) digested with EcoRI/BsrGI.
The resulting plasmid, pPTP_1-880, encoded the exodomain (aa 1-850),
transmembrane region of PTP
(aa 851-874), and a short artificial
cytoplasmatic tail, YRGGHF (aa 875-880).
Generation of Soluble C-terminal Deletion Mutants of
PTP
--
Three pairs of primers: 323 and 306, 323 and 307, 323 and
308 (see sequences below) and the plasmid pPTP_1-880 as a template were used in PCR to generate soluble C-terminal deletion mutants of
PTP
. After amplification the products of PCR were digested with
EcoRI/XhoI and ligated with a 4982-bp fragment
isolated after digestion of pPTP_1-880 with
EcoRI/XhoI. The resulting plasmids encoded 1-850
aa, 1-592 aa, and 1-311 aa and were named pPTP_1-850, pPTP_1-592,
and pPTP_1-311, respectively.
Generation of Soluble C- and N-terminal Deletion Mutants of
PTP
--
For easy detection of N-terminally truncated mutants, the
first 52 aa of PTP
, which carry the antibody recognition site, were
fused to the truncated sequences of the PTP
protein. To generate
such mutants, two-step ligations were performed. In the first step, a
254-bp fragment of HindIII-digested product of PCR (oligos
323 and 302) was ligated with a set of HindIII-digested products of PCR (1632 bp, oligos 303 and 306; 1137 bp, oligos 303 and
327; 1284 bp, oligos 303 and 326; 834 bp, oligos 329 and 327; 981 bp,
oligos 329 and 326; 537 bp, oligos 328 and 327; 684 bp, oligos 328 and
326; 774 bp, oligos 304 and 306; 738 bp, oligos 322 and 306; and 345 bp, oligos 305 and 306). In all PCR reactions, pPTP_1-880 was used as
a template. After ligation, DNAs were digested with
EcoRI/XhoI, and the obtained mixtures were
separated on a 1% agarose gel. Bands with appropriate sizes were cut
from the gel and used in the second step of ligation with a 4982-bp
fragment of EcoRI/XhoI-digested pPTP_1-880. The
resulting plasmids were designated as pPTP_306-850 (aa 1-52 fused to
aa 306-850), pPTP_306-734 (aa 1-52 fused to aa 306-734),
pPTP_306-685 (aa 1-52 fused to aa 306-685), pPTP_407-734 (aa 1-52
fused to aa 407-734), pPTP_407-685 (aa 1-52 fused to aa 407-685),
pPTP_506-734 (aa 1-52 fused to aa 506-734), pPTP_506-685 (aa 1-52
fused to aa 506-685), pPTP_592-850 (aa 1-52 fused to aa 592-850),
pPTP_604-850 (aa 1-52 fused to aa 604-850), and pPTP_735-850 (aa
1-52 fused to aa 735-850).
Sequences--
The sequences used were: 302, 5'-ATCAATGGGCGTGGATAG-3'; 303, 5'-TTTTAAGCTTCGTGATCGAGGCCGTTGCT-3'; 304, 5'-TTTTAAGCTTCACCGCGGTTGTGTGC-3'; 305, 5'-TTTTAAGCTTCGGTGGCCAGTTCCCTATC-3'; 306, 5'-TTTCTCGAGTCACTCCTCGCCATCCACAAT-3'; 307, 5'-TTTCTCGAGTCAGAAGGCGCCCAGGCCCTG-3'; 308, 5'-TTTCTCGAGTCAAGCAACGGCCTCGATCAC-3'; 322, 5'-TTTTAAGCTTCATCTCCCCCAAGAACTTC-3'; 323, 5'-TTGGTACCGAGCTCGGAT-3'; 326, 5'-TTTCTCGAGTCAACGAGACTTCCGAAGTGG-3'; 327, 5'-TTTCTCGAGTCACCTGGCGGTGACCGTCTG-3'; 328, 5'-TTTTAAGCTTCAAGACCCAGCAGGGAGTG-3'; and 329, 5'-TTTTAAGCTTCCGCACAGGCGAGCAGGCA-3'.
Secretion Assays
Physiological salt solution contained 145 mM NaCl,
5.6 mM KCl, 5.6 mM glucose, 0.5 mM
ascorbate, 15 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 2.2 mM CaCl2, and 0.5 mM MgCl2, unless
otherwise indicated. hGH was measured with a luminescent assay kit from
Corning Nichols Institute Diagnostics (San Juan Capistrano, CA) (37).
Endogenous catecholamines were measured by spectrofluorometric assay
(40). Stimulated release is calculated as the amount of hGH released
into the incubation medium divided by the total hGH (i.e.
hGH released + hGH remaining in the cells). Data are expressed as
means ± S.E. of the mean unless otherwise indicated. Significance
was determined by Student's t test. Error bars smaller than
symbols were omitted from figures.
 |
RESULTS |
To understand better the mechanism of
-latrotoxin action, we
performed a search for
-latrotoxin-interacting proteins by affinity
chromatography of solubilized brain membranes on immobilized
-latrotoxin. Because the concentration of
-latrotoxin receptors in crude brain membranes is low (about 200 fmol/mg protein), one-step affinity chromatography results only in partial purification of the
receptors. To distinguish between specifically retained proteins that
interact with
-latrotoxin and the nonspecific background, we used
chromatography on BSA-agarose as a control. Detergent extracts of brain
membranes were loaded onto these two columns in identical conditions,
and the eluates with a high-salt buffer were compared by SDS gel
electrophoresis. As a result of this analysis, several bands were
identified that were present only in the eluate from the
-latrotoxin
column but not from the BSA column (Fig.
1A, left panel). In
addition to the bands containing the previously described neurexin (160 and 200 kDa) and CIRL (120 kDa and high-molecular weight aggregates),
two protein bands of ~80 and 70 kDa were observed. These protein
bands were excised from the gel, and their partial amino acid sequences
were determined by tandem mass spectrometry. The peptide sequences
obtained (Table I) unambiguously
identified these protein bands as p80 and p70 subunits of PTP
that
derive from the intracellular proteolytic cleavage of the pro-receptor
(41). p80 is an extracellularly oriented hydrophilic protein with three
immunoglobulin and four fibronectin (the first three of a high homology
to the generic consensus and the fourth of a low homology) domains,
whereas p70 consists of a single transmembrane domain and two
cytoplasmic catalytic domains (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Presence of PTP
in -latrotoxin-agarose
eluates. A, solubilized rat brain membranes were loaded onto
either BSA- or -latrotoxin-agarose as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The aliquots of 1 M NaCl
eluate were analyzed by silver staining (left panel) and
Western blotting (right panels) with the indicated
anti-PTP antibodies. The arrows on the silver-stained gel
indicate the extracellular p80 subunit of PTP (filled),
the intracellular p70 subunit of PTP (gray), and the
extracellular p120 subunit of CIRL (open). The heavily
stained high-molecular weight protein bands in the -latrotoxin
column eluate represent multiple isoforms of neurexin (160-220 kDa)
together with the p85 heptahelical subunit of CIRL, which typically
forms oligomers and aggregates on SDS gels. AB#322, antibody
322; AB#320, antibody 320. B, the domain
structure of PTP .
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Partial amino acid sequences of the proteins specifically retained on
-latrotoxin-agarose
Detergent extracts of crude rat brain membranes were chromatographed on
-latrotoxin-agarose and analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and their partial
amino acid sequences were determined as described under "Materials
and Methods." Leucine and isoleucine, which are indistinguishable by
low energy tandem mass spectrometry used to sequence the peptides, were
assigned according to the similarity of the peptides to known rat
PTP sequence.
|
|
To further verify the identity of the discovered protein and
specificity of its interaction with
-latrotoxin, the eluates were
analyzed by Western blotting with two anti-PTP
antibodies that
recognize either p80 or p70 PTP
subunits. Both antibodies produced
strong staining of the respective protein bands in the
-latrotoxin
column eluate preparation but not in the control one (Fig.
1A, right panel).
Using anti-PTP
antibody, we also performed the experiment that is
reciprocal to the affinity chromatography on immobilized
-latrotoxin. PTP
was immunoprecipitated with antibody, and its affinity to
-latrotoxin was probed by addition of radioactively labeled toxin to the immunoprecipitation mixtures. To assure the specificity of the phosphatase-toxin interaction, three negative controls were performed. First, excess unlabeled
-latrotoxin was
added to displace the labeled toxin. Second, the brain extract was not
added to the mixture to exclude a possibility of direct sorption of
-latrotoxin on either protein A or anti-PTP
antibody. Finally,
preimmune serum was used in a similar immunoprecipitation reaction. The
precipitates were washed and counted for radioactivity. The resulting
data confirmed the specific interaction of PTP
with
-latrotoxin
(Fig. 2).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
-Latrotoxin binding
activity of immunoprecipitated PTP . Detergent
extracts of brain membranes were immunoprecipitated with the antibody
320 (1) either in the presence of 150,000 cpm of
125I- -latrotoxin
(125I- -LTx) only
(gray bars) or with a 50-fold excess of unlabeled toxin
(black bars). In the controls, immunoprecipitation reactions
were set up either without the brain extract (2) or with the
preimmune antibody instead of the immune antibody (3).
|
|
Two known neuronal receptors of
-latrotoxin, neurexin and CIRL,
differ in their Ca2+ requirement for
-latrotoxin
binding. Neurexin interacts with the toxin only in the presence of
micromolar concentrations of Ca2+, whereas
-latrotoxin
binding activity of CIRL does not depend on the Ca2+
presence at all. We therefore tested whether there was any difference in PTP
sorption onto the
-latrotoxin column when chromatography was performed with either high-Ca2+ or low-Ca2+
buffer systems. No significant difference in the amount of purified PTP
under these two conditions was observed on the Western blot (Fig. 3). Thus, the interaction of PTP
with
-latrotoxin does not depend on Ca2+. These results
also suggest that the interaction does not depend on neurexin presence,
since neurexin is not retained on
-latrotoxin-agarose in
low-Ca2+ buffers (10, 31).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
PTP interacts
with -latrotoxin independently of
Ca2+ presence. The detergent extract of crude brain
membranes were chromatographed on -latrotoxin-agarose either with 2 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EDTA supplemented
to all buffers. The samples of the 1 M NaCl eluates were
analyzed by Western blotting with the anti-p120 CIRL
(Anti-CIRL) antibody and anti-PTP antibody 320 (Anti-PTP).
|
|
Because the experiments showing PTP
-
-latrotoxin interaction were
performed using crude membrane extracts, they may be interpreted as
either direct binding of the toxin to phosphatase or indirect complexing that would involve another
-latrotoxin-binding protein, e.g. CIRL. To investigate the possibility of PTP
interaction with CIRL, we immunoprecipitated crude brain membrane
extracts either in the presence or absence of
-latrotoxin with
anti-PTP
antibody and with anti-p85 CIRL and anti-
-latrotoxin
antibodies as controls. The immunoprecipitates were processed for
Western blotting staining with anti-p120 CIRL antibodies. CIRL was
efficiently precipitated with the anti-CIRL antibody independently of
-latrotoxin presence. However, its precipitation with either
anti-
-latrotoxin or anti-PTP
antibody was strictly dependent on
-latrotoxin (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The interaction of PTP
with -latrotoxin does not
require CIRL. A, detergent extracts of crude brain membranes
were immunoprecipitated with either anti- -latrotoxin
(Anti-LTx), two anti-CIRL (anti-p85pept and anti-p85prot),
or anti-PTP antibody 320 or without any added antibody. The
precipitates were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-CIRL
(anti-p120) antibody. All reactions were performed in the presence or
absence of 5 nM -latrotoxin. The competition with
antigen peptides was used as additional control for the specificity of
immunoprecipitation with anti-PTP antibodies (+Pept).
B, detergent extracts of crude brain membranes were
immunoprecipitated with either anti-CIRL (anti-p85pept) or anti-PTP
320 antibody. After overnight incubation the immunomatrices were
extensively washed and analyzed for the binding of 150,000 cpm of
125I- -latrotoxin (gray bars). In controls,
excess non-labeled toxin was included (black bars), or
membrane extracts were omitted (white bars).
|
|
We also performed an experiment in which PTP
was
immunoprecipitated and beads were thoroughly washed and analyzed for
-latrotoxin binding. In a parallel experiment, the interaction of
CIRL with
-latrotoxin was assayed. The results of these experiments
suggest that PTP
can be precipitated separately from CIRL and still
interact with
-latrotoxin (Fig. 4B).
To verify further the identity of PTP
as
-latrotoxin receptor, we
analyzed the
-latrotoxin binding activity of overexpressed PTP
in
non-neuronal cells. Either COS cells or 293 cells were transfected with
a plasmid encoding full-length PTP
, and its expression was confirmed
by Western blotting with anti-PTP
antibodies (Fig.
5A and data not shown). The
two-subunit structure of PTP
results from the intracellular cleavage
of the single chain precursor in its ectodomain close to the
transmembrane region. The results of the Western blot analysis
suggested that PTP
in COS cells was processed essentially in a
similar manner. However, the presence of non-cleaved forms on the
top of the gel indicate lower efficiency of the cleavage in this
artificial expression system as compared with the processing under
physiological condition in brain cells. The expressed PTP
and even
its non-cleaved precursor bound to the
-latrotoxin column in a
specific manner as indicated by soluble
-latrotoxin competition and
lack of binding to BSA-agarose.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
-Latrotoxin binding activity of
recombinant PTPs. A, COS cells were transfected with the
PTP expression plasmid. Triton X-100 extracts of the harvested cells
were chromatographed on either -latrotoxin- or BSA-agarose. The
column eluates were analyzed by Western blotting with the anti-PTP
antibody 322. As an additional control for the specificity of the
interaction, 40 nM soluble toxin was added to the extract
prior to the loading onto -latrotoxin-agarose. As a reference,
native brain PTP purified on -latrotoxin-agarose was
electrophoresed on the same gel (right lane). B,
the detergent extracts of the transfected COS cells were
immunoprecipitated with the antibody 320 (1) either in the
presence of 150,000 cpm of 125I- -latrotoxin only
(gray bars) or with a 50-fold excess of unlabeled toxin
(black bars). In the controls, immunoprecipitation reactions
were set up either without the brain extract (2) or with the
preimmune antibody instead of the immune antibody (3).
|
|
The direct analysis of 125I-
-latrotoxin binding by the
transfected cells revealed a significantly lower, as compared with
CIRL-transfected cells, level of specific binding that may be explained
by lower surface expression of PTP
in non-neuronal cells (data not
shown). The low signal/background ratio did not allow us to estimate
the affinity of the interaction precisely. As an alternative approach to assess the specificity of the interaction between PTP
and
-latrotoxin, the cells overexpressing PTP
were solubilized and analyzed for the binding of 0.2 nM radioactively labeled
-latrotoxin by immunoprecipitation with anti-PTP
antibody. To
control for the specificity of the interaction, excess non-labeled
toxin (5 nM) was added as competitor. In addition, similar
precipitation reactions were set up with the preimmune serum. The
results of these experiments (Fig. 5B) indicate that PTP
is indeed an
-latrotoxin-binding protein. The fact that PTP
exogenously expressed in non-neuronal cells binds
-latrotoxin
indicated that this interaction does not involve any other neuronal
-latrotoxin receptor, CIRL or neurexin, which are not present in COS
cells (data not shown).
In two other
-latrotoxin-binding proteins, neurexin and CIRL, the
toxin-binding sites are located within the extracellular domains (14,
15). It has been shown that the extracellular region of PTP
can be
cleaved off and released into the medium (41). This cleavage is
secondary in relation to the first intracellular processing that
results in the two-subunit complex of PTP
. We tested whether the
soluble ectodomain of PTP
expressed in COS cells can be precipitated
with
-latrotoxin-agarose. The cells were transfected with a plasmid
encoding full-length PTP
, and the conditioned media were incubated
with either
-latrotoxin or BSA-agarose. The absorbed proteins were
eluted and analyzed by Western blotting with the anti-PTP
antibody
that recognizes the extracellular domain. The staining confirmed the
expression of PTP
precursor and its processed forms in the cells. It
also demonstrated the specific interaction of the soluble ectodomain of
PTP
with immobilized
-latrotoxin (data not shown).
Because the extracellular region of PTP
is large and consists of
multiple structural domains we performed an experiment to identify the
-latrotoxin-binding site more precisely. We prepared expression
constructs that represent a series of deletion mutants encoding soluble
fragments of the PTP
ectodomain (Fig.
6A) and used them to transfect
COS cells. The expressed proteins were tested for ability to bind to
the
-latrotoxin matrix (Fig. 6B). For most constructs, we
used the conditioned medium in the binding assay labeled with black
horizontal bars at the top of the blot. However, some mutant proteins
were not secreted efficiently. In those cases, the cells were first
solubilized with Triton X-100, and the extracts were precipitated with
-latrotoxin agarose (white bars at the top of the blot).
The expression of the recombinant proteins was confirmed by direct
Western blotting of cell extracts (Fig. 6C). The results of
the binding analysis indicated that the
-latrotoxin-binding site of
PTP
is located between amino acid residues 407 and 685 and may
include two fibronectin repeats but none of the immunoglobulin
repeats.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Localization of the PTP
-latrotoxin-binding site. A,
the domain structure of PTP deletion mutants. B,
interaction of the deletion mutants with -latrotoxin-agarose was
analyzed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
cell-conditioned media containing the secreted fragments (indicated
with black bars at the top of the blot image) or detergent
extracts of the transfected cells (open bars) were analyzed.
C, expression level of the mutant proteins in the
transfected cells. SS, cells transfected with salmon sperm
DNA.
|
|
The in vitro experiments with solubilized brain membranes
suggested that PTP
is an
-latrotoxin-binding protein. The
question arises whether the interaction of
-latrotoxin with PTP
may occur in vivo and whether the formation of the
toxin-receptor complexes would result in the stimulation of exocytosis.
As shown earlier, brain membranes contain two other families of
functional
-latrotoxin receptors, the neurexins and CIRLs. Similarly
to CIRL, PTP
interacts with
-latrotoxin independently of
Ca2+ presence in the medium. Thus, the experiments with
neurons or neuronal membranes cannot distinguish easily between the
effects related to the interaction of
-latrotoxin with PTP
and
CIRL.
To prove that the complexes of
-latrotoxin with PTP
may exist in
parallel with other receptor-toxin complexes at similar low-toxin
concentrations, we designed the experiment when radioactively labeled
-latrotoxin pre-bound to native brain membranes at a nanomolar
concentration was chemically cross-linked to the membrane receptors.
The preparation was further dissolved under denaturing conditions, and
the toxin-receptor complexes were separately assayed by
immunoprecipitation with antibodies against neurexin, CIRL, PTP
, and another receptor tyrosine phosphatase (RPTP
) as
control. The precipitated 125I-
-latrotoxin was counted
for radioactivity (Fig. 7A),
and the precipitates were further electrophoresed in SDS and
autoradiographed to detect the cross-linked bands (Fig. 7B).
In several independent experiments, we reproducibly observed
cross-linked toxin-receptor complexes with neurexin I
, CIRL-1, and
PTP
but not with RPTP
. The amount of precipitated
-latrotoxin-PTP
complexes was lower than for neurexin and CIRL,
which was consistent with our independent estimates of relative
concentration (Fig. 1). Although the cross-linking produced
high-molecular weight fuzzy bands, the band pattern was clearly
different among PTP
, neurexin, and CIRL. When antibody against the
extracellular subunit of PTP
was used, a band of ~200 kDa was
reproducibly observed that corresponded to the one-to-one complex of
-latrotoxin monomer and the p80 subunit of PTP
. Virtually no
radioactivity could be immunoprecipitated with any antibody when the
cross-linking reagent was not added to the membrane preparation (Fig.
7A), indicating that only covalent receptor-toxin complexes could be precipitated in our experiments. In other important controls, when antigen peptides were used as competition in immunoprecipitation reactions or preimmune sera, no significant amount of radioactivity could be detected in the precipitates (Fig. 7 and data not shown).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Chemical cross-linking of
-latrotoxin complexes with
PTP , neurexin I , and
CIRL-1 in brain membranes. Brain membranes with pre-bound
125I- -latrotoxin were treated with chemical
cross-linking reagent BS3 as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The preparation was further dissolved in
an SDS-containing buffer and subjected to immunoprecipitation
with a panel of antibodies against neurexin I , PTP subunits,
CIRL-1 p120 subunit, and receptor tyrosine phosphatase PTP as
negative control. The precipitates originated from either cross-linked
membranes or the similarly processed preparation without
BS3 addition were counted for radioactivity (A),
electrophoresed, and autoradiographed for 24 h at 70° C.
B, the competition with antigen peptides was used as
additional control for the specificity of immunoprecipitation with
anti-PTP antibodies (+Pept).
|
|
To test whether
-latrotoxin binding to PTP
results in the
functional response typical for this toxin, we analyzed secretion from
chromaffin cells transfected with the PTP
expression plasmid. Chromaffin cells respond to
-latrotoxin stimulation by robust exocytosis of catecholamines (42, 37). To distinguish the secretion
from only a minor portion of actually transfected cells, we used an
earlier developed method based on the co-transfection of the human
growth hormone cDNA followed by the quantification of the human
growth hormone secretion (43). As a negative control, co-transfection
of the empty vector plasmid and human growth hormone construct was
performed. In a parallel experiment, chromaffin cells were
similarly transfected with CIRL, a functional
-latrotoxin receptor
that is known to significantly increase the sensitivity of the cells to
the toxin.
As shown in Fig. 8A, the dose
dependence of
-latrotoxin-stimulated secretion of human growth
hormone from PTP
-transfected chromaffin cells was shifted
significantly to the lower concentrations of the toxin as compared with
mock-transfected cells. To control for the cell viability and secretion
efficiency, the release of catecholamine was measured in parallel (Fig.
8B). Since about 95% of all cells in the preparations were not
transfected, no significant difference was observed in the
catecholamine secretion from CIRL or PTP
-transfected cells in
comparison with mock-transfected cells. These data indicate that PTP
is a functional
-latrotoxin receptor.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Expression of PTP
and its C-terminally truncated mutant increases the sensitivity
of intact chromaffin cells to stimulation by
-latrotoxin. Chromaffin cells were transfected
with plasmids for hGH and either CIRL, PTP , PTP _1-875, or neo (a
control) as described. Four days later, cells were incubated with the
indicated concentrations of -latrotoxin in physiological salt
solution for 6 min. The amounts of hGH (A) and catecholamine
(B) released into the medium and the amounts remaining in
the cells were determined as described (12). Stimulated
secretion was calculated by subtracting the secretion in the absence of
-latrotoxin, which was similar for all groups, from total secretion
in the presence of toxin. Secretion in the absence of -latrotoxin
was 1.57 ± 0.15% (hGH) or 0.23 ± 0.03% (catecholamine).
n = 4 wells/group.
|
|
A similar shift in the dose dependence for
-latrotoxin was achieved
when PTP
-transfected cells were preincubated with
-latrotoxin in
the absence of calcium, and the toxin was removed before addition of
calcium-containing buffer (data not shown). This result indicates that
the calcium-dependent secretion from the PTP
-transfected cells is due to the calcium-independent interaction of the toxin with receptor.
To address the question of whether PTP
signaling is required for the
stimulatory effect of
-latrotoxin, we transfected chromaffin cells
with a PTP
C-terminal deletion mutant that did not have its
intracellular catalytic phosphatase domains but contained the
transmembrane domain. This truncated receptor could support
-latrotoxin-stimulated release in chromaffin cells as well as CIRL
and better than wild-type PTP
(Fig. 8A). This may be
explained either by higher cell surface expression of the non-signaling mutant or by toxic effects on the cells of overexpressed wild-type PTP
that has full signaling potency.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Stimulation of neurotransmitter release with
-latrotoxin
requires binding to neuronal cell surface proteins. The data presented in this paper identify receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTP
as
an
-latrotoxin-binding protein and functionally competent
-latrotoxin receptor. The finding that PTP
is a functional
-latrotoxin receptor is unexpected because two other
-latrotoxin
receptors, neurexin and CIRL, have already been described. Although
each of these three receptors can support
-latrotoxin action
efficiently and independently, no obvious homology can be found between
their sequences. Neurexin is a one-transmembrane cell adhesion protein, whereas CIRL is a hybrid of a cell adhesion molecule with a G protein-coupled receptor (Fig. 9).
The strongest evidence that PTP
is yet another
-latrotoxin
receptor is that its overexpression in chromaffin cells results in a
significant increase in sensitivity to stimulation with low concentrations of
-latrotoxin. The biochemical data with native and
recombinant PTP
confirm the specificity of the direct interaction between
-latrotoxin and PTP
and identify the
-latrotoxin-binding site in the extracellular region of this
receptor. In particular, we have shown by chemical cross-linking that
the
-latrotoxin/PTP
complexes can form in brain membranes at a
low physiologically relevant concentration of
-latrotoxin. Northern
blotting data obtained by other groups indicate that the highest
concentration of PTP
is found in brain tissues (24, 25, 44), which
is also compatible with its proposed role as a functional
-latrotoxin receptor.
The proposed existence of the third functional
-latrotoxin receptor
is in good agreement with the phenotype of recently described double
knock-out mice with inactive neurexin I
and CIRL-1 genes. These mice
showed a physiological response to
-latrotoxin and its binding to
brain membranes at ~25% level as compared with the wild-type animals
(45). In addition to the low-affinity receptors CIRL-2 and neurexin
isoforms, PTP
may constitute a major contribution to the residual
-latrotoxin sensitivity of the neurexin I
- and CIRL-1-deficient mice.
What are the roles of PTP
and the other two receptors in the
-latrotoxin mechanism? Our data suggest that the toxin interacts with the extracellular domain of PTP
. In the chromaffin cell secretion assay, a PTP
mutant with a deleted intracellular region was shown to support
-latrotoxin stimulation even better than wild-type PTP
. We may thus conclude that the direct interaction of
the toxin with the phosphatase catalytic domains is unlikely and that
the PTP
-mediated signaling is not essential for the
-latrotoxin
stimulatory effect in chromaffin cells. Essentially similar data have
been reported previously for CIRL and neurexin exogenously expressed in
chromaffin and PC12 cells (14, 15). Thus, at least in secretory cells,
-latrotoxin receptors serve as targeting sites that attract the
toxin and facilitate its partial insertion into the cell membrane that
ultimately results in the stimulation of exocytosis via channel
formation and/or another yet unknown mechanism. Since small synaptic
vesicle exocytosis has features different from granular exocytosis,
further physiological tests in transfected neurons would be required to
establish unequivocally the role of neuronal receptors in the
-latrotoxin action.
It seems unlikely that evolution has developed a toxin that efficiently
targets three seemingly unrelated proteins. We may therefore speculate
that the
-latrotoxin receptors share not only affinity to the toxin
but also a physiological role that is related to the presynaptic
function. A common structural feature of all three
-latrotoxin
receptors is that they contain large extracellular cell adhesion-like
domains (Fig. 9). It is likely that in neurons PTP
, CIRL, and
neurexin function together as regulators of cell-to-matrix and cell-to
cell interactions in synaptic and possibly other junctions. A possible
mechanistic explanation of the link between the
-latrotoxin receptor
would be the existence of an endogenous ligand that is shared by all receptors and resembles the toxin.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. J. Schlessinger, J. Sap, A. Ullrich, and D. Rotin for providing cDNA clones and antibodies used
in this study. We also thank Drs. J. Schlessinger, J. Sap, R. Llinas,
and P. DeCamilli for stimulating discussion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Public Health Service Grants
R01NS35098 and R01NS34937 from the NINDS, National Institutes of Health (NIH) (to A. G. P.), Grant R01GM59699 from the NIGMS, NIH (to K. I.), a New York University Whitehead Fellowship for Junior Faculty
in Biomedical Sciences (to T. A. N.), and Grant R01DK27959 from the
NIDDK, NIH (to R. W. H.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
New York University Medical Center, 550 First Ave., MSB-320A, New York,
NY 10016. Tel.: 212-263-5969; Fax: 212-263-7133; E-mail: petrea01@med.nyu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 10, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205478200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CIRL, calcium-independent receptor of
-latrotoxin;
PTP, protein-tyrosine
phosphatase;
hGH, human growth hormone;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
aa, amino acids;
RPTP, receptor PTP.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ceccarelli, B.,
Grohovaz, F.,
and Hurlbut, W. P.
(1979)
J. Cell Biol.
81,
163-177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Rosenthal, L.,
and Meldolesi, J.
(1989)
Pharmacol. Ther.
42,
115-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Petrenko, A. G.,
and Krasnoperov, V. G.
(1998)
in
Cellular an Molecular Mechanisms of Toxin Action: Secretory Systems
(Linial, M.
, and Grasso, A., eds)
, pp. 185-212, Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam
|
| 4.
|
Finkelstein, A.,
Rubin, L. L.,
and Tzeng, M. C.
(1976)
Science
193,
1009-1011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Hurlbut, W. P.,
Chieregatti, E.,
Valtorta, F.,
and Haimann, C.
(1994)
J. Membr. Biol.
138,
91-102[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Grasso, A.,
Alema, S.,
Rufini, S.,
and Senni, M. I.
(1980)
Nature
283,
774-776[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Khvotchev, M.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
3250-3262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Meldolesi, J.
(1982)
J. Neurochem.
38,
1559-1569[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Valtorta, F.,
Madeddu, L.,
Meldolesi, J.,
and Ceccarelli, B.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
99,
124-132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Petrenko, A. G.,
Kovalenko, V. A.,
Shamotienko, O. G.,
Surkova, I. N.,
Tarasyuk, T. A.,
Ushkaryov, Y. A,
and Grishin, E. V.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
2023-2027[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Ushkaryov, Y. A.,
Petrenko, A. G.,
Geppert, M.,
and Südhof, T. C.
(1992)
Science
257,
50-56[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Krasnoperov, V. G.,
Bittner, M. A.,
Beavis, R.,
Kuang, Y.,
Salnikow, K. V.,
Chepurny, O. G.,
Little, A. R.,
Plotnikov, A. N., Wu, D.,
Holz, R. W.,
and Petrenko, A. G.
(1997)
Neuron.
18,
925-937[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Lelianova, V. G.,
Davletov, B. A.,
Sterling, A.,
Rahman, M. A.,
Grishin, E. V.,
Totty, N. F.,
and Ushkaryov, Y. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21504-21508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Sugita, S.,
Ichtchenko, K.,
Khvotchev, M.,
and Südhof, T. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32715-32724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Sugita, S.,
Khvotchev, M.,
and Südhof, T. C.
(1999)
Neuron
22,
489-496[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Krasnoperov, V.,
Bittner, M. A.,
Holz, R. W.,
Chepurny, O.,
and Petrenko, A. G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3590-3596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Petrenko, A. G.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
325,
81-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Ichtchenko, K.,
Hata, Y.,
Nguyen, T.,
Ullrich, B.,
Missler, M.,
Moomaw, C.,
and Südhof, T. C.
(1995)
Cell
81,
435-443[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Scheiffele, P.,
Fan, J.,
Choih, J.,
Fetter, R.,
and Serafini, T.
(2000)
Cell
101,
657-669[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Ichtchenko, K.,
Bittner, M. A.,
Krasnoperov, V.,
Little, A. R.,
Chepurny, O.,
Holz, R. W.,
and Petrenko, A. G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5491-5498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Matsushita, H.,
Lelianova, V. G.,
and Ushkaryov, Y. A.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
443,
348-352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
McKnight, A. J.,
and Gordon, S.
(1998)
J. Leukoc. Biol.
63,
271-280[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Hayflick, J. S.
(2000)
J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res.
20,
119-131[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Yan, H.,
Grossman, A.,
Wang, H.,
D'Eustachio, P.,
Mossie, K.,
Musacchio, J. M.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
and Sc |