|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204467200 on July 17, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 39, 35969-35979, September 27, 2002
Homologous-pairing Activity of the Bacillus subtilis
Bacteriophage SPP1 Replication Protein G35P*
Silvia
Ayora §,
Riccardo
Missich ,
Pablo
Mesa ,
Rudi
Lurz¶,
Shixin
Yang ,
Edward H.
Egelman , and
Juan C.
Alonso **
From the Departmento de Biotecnología
Microbiana, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, Consejo Superior
de Investigaciones Científicas, Campus Universidad
Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain, the
§ Departamento de Biología Molecular, Universidad
Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain, the
¶ Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Genetik, Ihnestrasse
73, D-14195 Berlin, Germany, and the Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Received for publication, May 7, 2002, and in revised form, July 15, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Genetic evidence suggests that the SPP1-encoded
gene 35 product (G35P) is essential for phage
DNA replication. Purified G35P binds single-strand DNA
(ssDNA) and double-strand (dsDNA) and specifically interacts with
SPP1-encoded replicative DNA helicase G40P and SSB protein
G36P. G35P promotes joint molecule formation between a circular ssDNA and a homologous linear dsDNA with an ssDNA
tail. Joint molecule formation requires a metal ion but is independent
of a nucleotide cofactor. Joint molecules formed during these reactions
contain a displaced linear ssDNA strand. Electron microscopic analysis
shows that G35P forms a multimeric ring structure in ssDNA
tails of dsDNA molecules and left-handed filaments on ssDNA.
G35P promotes strand annealing at the AT-rich region of
SPP1 oriL on a supercoiled template. These results
altogether are consistent with the hypothesis that the homologous
pairing catalyzed by G35P is an integral part of SPP1 DNA
replication. The loading of G40P at a D-loop
(ori DNA or at any stalled replication fork) by
G35P could lead to replication fork reactivation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage SPP1 encapsidates its
dsDNA1 into an empty
procapsid by a processive headful packaging mechanism, using a
linear head-to-tail concatemer as a substrate (1). SPP1 replication
begins at a "unique" origin and proceeds unidirectionally (2-4).
However, two SPP1 replication origins, which are 32 kb away from each
other (oriL and oriR) in a linear molecule, have been mapped (3-6; see Fig. 1 below). Previously, it has been shown that G38P, G39P, and G40P are the only
SPP1-encoded functions necessary and sufficient to drive theta
replication from the cis-acting oriL region in an otherwise
non-replicative element in B. subtilis cells (7).
Accumulation of ring-to-ring, theta type, SPP1 replication intermediates, however, has not been observed by electron microscopy examination of SPP1-infected cells (3). Upon infection, SPP1 circular
and sigma molecules were detected, but branched replication intermediates have not been observed (3-5). The generation of concatemeric SPP1 DNA is at least dependent on phage-encoded
(G38P, G39P, G40P, G34.1P,
G35P, and G36P, see Fig. 1 below) and
host-encoded (DNA PolIII, DnaG, and DNA topoisomerases) replication
proteins but is independent of host-encoded components of the primosome (e.g. DnaB, DnaD, and DnaI) and recombination proteins
(RecA, AddAB, and RecF) (5-10). Furthermore, we could show that the
SPP1 plating efficiency is indistinguishable on wt, priA1,
and priA1 dnaB75
strains.2
Analysis of SPP1 conditional-lethal mutants for their capacity to
synthesize phage DNA has lead to the identification of two different
complementation groups. Whereas mutants in genes 38, 39, and 40 show a block in DNA replication,
mutants in genes 34.1 and 35 show a normal
initiation but a replication arrest phenotype (5, 6, 10). Genes
38, 39, and 40 and genes
34.1, 35, 36, and 36.1 are
early transcribed genes that form part of two different operons (Fig.
1A). G36P, which is a helix-destabilizing
single-stranded binding protein and shares 46% identity with B. subtilis SSB protein, does not seem to be essential under
laboratory growth conditions (10). The activity of G36.1P,
which shares a significant degree of identity with group I endonuclease
proteins, remains to be characterized.
The initiation of theta-type replication at SPP1 oriL has
been defined. In vitro studies reveal that multiple copies
of G38P bound to its cognate site (AB and ab boxes, Fig.
1B) induce local unwinding of the adjacent AT-rich sequence
(DUE region) present within oriL or oriR (7, see
Fig. 1B). The helicase loader, G39P, specifically interacts with the replisome organizer, G38P,
and with G40P·ATP (6, 11). G40P·ATP is a
bona fide hexameric DNA helicase with a 5' to 3' unwinding
polarity (12-14). G39P directs the assembly of
G40P·ATP to G38P-bound oriL and
allows the loading and subsequent activation of the
G40P·ATP helicase (11). G40P·ATP bound to the
ssDNA region at the unwound AT-rich region interacts with DnaG and the
subunit of DNA PolIII and then theta type replication
initiates (7, 12).3 However,
very little is known about the mechanism(s) involved in the recover of
collapsed replication forks and in the generation of linear
concatemeric SPP1 DNA.
The picture of how replication proceeds has changed over the last
decade (reviewed in Refs. 15-17). It is now assumed that the one or
replication forks formed at the replication origin become inactivated
at high frequency, for example as a result of roadblocks in or
on the template strands. In bacteria, the repair of this stalled
replication fork requires the RecA, RecBCD, RecF, RecG, and/or RuvABC
recombination proteins that may create a D-loop that is
recognized by a component of the primosome (see Refs. 15-17). It has
been shown that the PriA protein bound to the branched DNA molecule
(recombination intermediate) directs the assembly of a new replication
fork at the site through the loading of a primosome for theta type DNA
replication (17). Furthermore, recent studies demonstrate that
recombination intermediates formed between a linear duplex and
supercoiled DNA are substrates for a DNA synthesis reaction where
products longer than unit length are generated (18).
Although the presence of redundant pathways that could account for the
recovery of an arrested replication fork and for the accumulation of
concatemeric SPP1 DNA cannot be ruled out, we have previously shown
that SPP1 replication does not require host-encoded homologous
recombination proteins and components of the D-loop primosome assembly (Refs. 19 and 20, and this work). Furthermore, there
are several lines of evidence that support the idea that SPP1 encodes
in its genome recombination functions that may drive the restart of
stalled replication forks and the switch from theta to sigma type of
replication. First, plasmid transduction is markedly increased when
homology between the plasmid and SPP1 is provided (9). Second, SPP1
infection triggers the appearance of long concatemeric plasmid linear
molecules whose synthesis is dependent on homology, and phage-encoded
functions, but independent of host-encoded recombination or primosome
assembly functions (e.g. RecA, DnaB, etc.), whereas in
non-infected cells synthesis of concatemeric plasmid molecules is
dependent of both RecA and DnaB (21, 22). It is likely, therefore, that
SPP1 may encode for a system that coordinates the processing of
inactivated replication forks and the subsequent fork reactivation and
the synthesis of concatemeric SPP1 DNA.
G35P and G34.1P share an overall identity of 40 and 18% with the Escherichia coli recombination proteins
RecT and RecE, respectively. RecT is a SSA protein and RecE is an
ATP-independent 5' 3' exonuclease, both encoded by the defective
lambdoib Rac prophage (reviewed in Ref. 15). Unlike the homologous
recombination systems of lambdoid phages (e.g.
-red, P22-erf, etc.) that are required for
growth in recA mutants (reviewed in Refs. 23 and 24), G35P and G34.1P are essential SPP1 replication
proteins in both wt and recA host strains (3, 5, 10).
Sedimentation studies of DNA synthesized by SPP1tsI20F (impaired in
G34.1P, see Fig.
1A) or SPP1tsI17 (impaired in
gene 35) in wt-infected cells, at the restrictive
temperature, revealed that only a small percentage of the phage DNA can
be recovered in a fast sedimenting form (concatemeric DNA). In both
cases SPP1 particles of less than unit length (30-35 kb in size)
accumulated (5). Consistent with this DNA arrest phenotype, and
considering the unidirectional movement of the SPP1 replication fork,
we can assume, that any event initiated at oriL stops 30-35
kb away, in G35P and G34.1P mutants at
non-permissive temperature, suggesting that G35P and
G34.1P are involved in fork reactivation and the generation
of concatemeric DNA. Furthermore, this distance is consistent with the hypothesis that G38P bound at
oriR might work as a roadblock that would collapse any
replication fork started at oriL, being the generated
replication intermediates of ~32 kb (22).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Physical and genetic map of the SPP1
replication operons. A, the SPP1 genome length and its
mature size are presented. The SPP1 DNA digested with EcoRI
is denoted. The pac sites are indicated by upward
arrows. The relevant SPP1 early promoters are shown
(PE2 and PE3); the ends of the
gray arrows point to the transcription start site and the
direction of transcription. The location of relevant replication genes
and the mapping of mutations that render SPP1 impaired in DNA synthesis
are indicated. B, the SPP1 DNA sequence of oriL
and oriR (top strand) is presented in a 5' to 3'
polarity (thick straight line), and the relevant nucleotides
are denoted. The directly repeated boxes ab and
AB (framed) and the AT-rich region
(framed with broken lines) are indicated. The
distance between the boxes AB and ab is
indicated. Points were introduced into the sequence to maximize
homology.
|
|
To understand how concatemeric DNA initiates, we began the
characterization of G35P. We found that G35P
binds ssDNA and forms filaments. G35P preferentially
catalyzes, in an ATP-independent manner, SSA between a circular ssDNA
and a homologous 3' tail of linear dsDNA. G35P
preferentially catalyzes SSA between a 3'-ssDNA and the homologous
AT-rich region of oriL on a supercoiled molecule and
specifically interacts with the G40P DNA helicase and
G36P SSB proteins. The results presented provide the first
evidence that the SPP1 replication/recombination protein,
G35P, might direct the assembly of the hexameric replicative
helicase G40P at a D-loop structure by a new
primosome assembly mechanism that does not require the primosome
assembly proteins of B. subtilis.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Phages--
E. coli
strain JM103 (25) and BL21(DE3) (26) were used. B. subtilis
YB886 and its isogenic priA1::Em and
priA1::Em dnaB75 derivatives have been
previously described (7, 8). Plasmids pBT318, pBT320, and pBT430 (6);
pBT323 (11); pCB163 (7); pLysS (26); and pUC18 and phage M13mp18 (25)
have been previously described. The plating efficiency of an SPP1 stock
was measured in four independent experiments for wt, priA1,
and priA1 dnaB75 strains.
Enzymes and
Reagents--
Isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside and
rifampicin were from Calbiochem. DNA restriction and modification
enzymes were purchased from MBI or Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
[ -32P]dATP, [ -32P]ATP, Sephadex
G-100, DEAE, Superose 12, and Q-Sepharose were from Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech. Phosphocellulose was from Whatman. PEI was from Sigma.
DNA Manipulations and Substrates--
The 6065-bp
HindII-MscI-cleaved M13mp18 duplex DNA fragment
was gel-purified. Linear 6065-bp M13mp18 DNA molecules having an ssDNA
3' termini (3'-tailed dsDNA) or an ssDNA 5' terminus (5'-tailed dsDNA)
were prepared by incubation of DNA with T7 gene 6 exonuclease or with
E. coli ExoIII, respectively. About 50% of both
substrates had an ssDNA tail with a length of ~140 nt, measured as
the percent of substrate resistant to PvuI or
BglI digestion, which are located 140 or 170 bp,
respectively, from the restriction site dsDNA end.
Viral M13mp18 DNA was first annealed with a 20-nt oligonucleotide
containing the EcoRI restriction site and then linearized with EcoRI. The DNA ends were blunted in the presence of
[ -32P]dATP, and the labeled viral M13mp18 linear ssDNA
was purified. The 194-nt -32P-labeled
EcoRI-FspI ssDNA was prepared by annealing
5'-end-labeled oligonucleotide (5'-GCAACTGTTGGGAAGGGCG-3') to Rf
M13mp18 and extending it by PCR up to the EcoRI site, and
the product was gel-purified.
Oligonucleotides 1 through 4 were prepared by annealing 5'-end-labeled
oligonucleotides to pCB163 and extended by PCR as follows: oligonucleotide 1 (230-mer), the 5'-TACCTCCCGGACAATATTAG-3' primer was
extended up to the StyI site; oligonucleotide 2 (215-mer), 5'-ATTGTCCGGGAGGTAGTCGGAG-3' extended up to the HincII site;
oligonucleotide 3 (215-mer), 5'-GACGGCCTTAAATAGTCATCGCCC-3' extended up
to the SspI site. Oligonucleotide 4 (230-mer),
5'-GTAAACAATTTCCTCAAACTCTGCC-3' extended up to the SspI
site. The oligonucleotides 1 through 4 were gel-purified. The
concentration of DNA is expressed as moles of nt for ssDNA or moles of
bp for dsDNA.
Protein Manipulations--
G38P, G39P, and
G40P were purified as previously described (6, 12).
G36P purification will be described elsewhere. SPP1 G35P was purified to apparent homogeneity from an
E. coli BL21(DE3) strain lacking the
Rac-defective prophage. Soluble G35P was precipitated by
PEI. G35P was recovered from the pellet by addition of 50 ml of buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5% glycerol)
containing 500 mM AS. The proteins of the supernatant, free
of cell debris, DNA, and E. coli RecA protein, were
precipitated twice by addition of solid AS to a final concentration of
60% saturation. Dialyzed G35P was purified in three
different chromatographic steps (phosphocellulose, DEAE, and
Q-Sepharose). The sequence of the first 15 amino-terminal residues of
the purified protein was determined. The amino-terminal sequence of the
G35P polypeptide was identical to the sequence predicted
from the gene 35 (10), except that the initiator methionine was not present.
The molar extinction coefficient for G35P was calculated to
be 22390 M 1 cm 1, as described
previously (11). The G35P concentration was determined by
using the above molar extinction coefficient and is expressed as moles
of protein dimers.
Molecular Mass Determination--
The native molecular mass of
G35P was determined by gel filtration fast protein liquid
chromatography using a Superose 12 HR 10/30 column. Chromatography was
carried out in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 5%
glycerol) containing 100 mM NaCl and the presence or the
absence of 5 mM MgCl2 at 4 °C with a flow
rate of 0.5 ml/min, and the A280 was measured.
G35P (7 or 30 µM) was applied onto the column.
A standard curve of Kav versus
log10 of relative mobility was determined as recommended by
Amersham Biosciences. Protein standards were: chymotrypsinogen A, 25 kDa; BSA, 68 kDa; aldolase, 158 kDa; and catalase, 232 kDa.
Filter Binding and EMSA--
The formation of
G35P·M13mp18 -32P·ssDNA or
G35P·M13mp18 -32P·dsDNA
complexes was measured in buffer B (25 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM ME, 0.05 mg/ml BSA, 5% glycerol) in the presence or the absence of 5 mM MgCl2 by using alkali-treated filters
(Millipore, type HAWP 0.45 µm) as described by Missich et
al. (7). All reactions were performed in duplicate.
The 194-nt -32P-EcoRI-FspI ssDNA
or 194-bp -32P-EcoRI-FspI dsDNA
fragments (1 µM) were used to analyze the binding of
G35P to DNA through EMSA in buffer B in the presence or the
absence of MgCl2. The reaction was stopped and separated in
a 6% ndPAGE under high ionic strength conditions as previously
described (7). Gels were run for 3 h at 150 V at 4 °C and dried
prior to autoradiography.
Protein Affinity Chromatography--
G35P or BSA
proteins (6 µM) were covalently cross-linked to the
Affi-Gel-10 (1 ml) resin as recommended by the manufacturer (Bio-Rad).
G36P, G38P, G39P, or G40P
(1 µM) was loaded onto the column that had been
equilibrated with binding buffer C (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM ME, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 5%
glycerol, 0.1 mM ATP, 0.1% CHAPS) containing 50 mM NaCl. Columns were washed with 20 column volumes of
buffer C containing 50 mM NaCl. Bound fractions were eluted
with 5 volumes of buffer C containing 1 M NaCl. Fractions of 100 µl were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Joint Molecule Formation Assay--
The assay measures the
formation of a stable complex between linear 6065-bp M13mp18 dsDNA (30 µM) bearing an ssDNA termini (3'-tailed or 5'-tailed
dsDNA) or blunt-ended dsDNA and circular M13mp18 ssDNA (30 µM). Both substrates were incubated with increasing concentrations of G35P (48 nM to 1.56 µM) in buffer D (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM ME, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.05 mg/ml
BSA, 5% glycerol) containing 25 or 100 mM NaCl, during 10 min at 30 °C. The reactions were stopped by adding EDTA, SDS, and
proteinase K, and the samples were fractionated by AGE (0.8%) with
EtBr (11). The gel was photographed under UV irradiation. Joint
molecules were quantified by densitometry of photographic negatives.
A labeled oligonucleotide 1 to 4 (120 nM, in nt) and
supercoiled homologous pCB163 (8.4 µM, in bp) were
incubated with 62 nM G35P in buffer D containing
100 mM NaCl at 30 °C for 15 min. The reactions were
stopped by adding EDTA, SDS, and proteinase K, and samples were
separated by AGE. The gels were dried and analyzed by autoradiography.
The signal was quantified using a PhosphorImager (Amersham Biosciences).
Electron Microscopy--
Reactions (10 µl) containing
3'-tailed dsDNA (30 µM) and circular M13mp18 ssDNA (30 µM) were incubated with G35P (780 nM) for 10 min at 30 °C under standard strand exchange
conditions in 50 mM NaCl. For the analysis of the joint
molecules, upon deproteinization, cytochrome c spreading in
the presence of 50% formamide and carbonate buffer on a water
hypophase was used as described by Spiess and Lurz (27). The
protein·DNA complexes, which were separated from unbound protein by
Sepharose CL-4B gel filtration, were fixed with glutaraldehyde and
adsorption to mica and prepared for EM as described previously (27).
Single particle image analysis was performed on images of unfixed,
negatively stained samples as previously described (28), using a
reference-free algorithm to generate averages (29).
Isolation of G40P Loaded on Joint Molecules--
Joint molecules
were prepared with supercoiled plasmid pCB163, oligonucleotides 1-4,
and G35P, in the presence of 1 mM ATP, as
described before. After incubation during 15 min at 30 °C, G40P (80 nM) was added, and the reaction was
continued for another 10 min at 30 °C. Aliquots of the reaction were
taken and deproteinized to analyze and quantify the extent of the
D-loops formed, and isolation of G40P bound to
the joint molecules from unbound G40P was performed by gel
filtration chromatography on a Sepharose CL-6B as previously described
(11). G40P was detected in the different fractions by
Western blot.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of G35P--
Soluble G35P, which was
purified to 99% homogeneity as assayed by SDS-PAGE and quantitative
analysis of the amino-terminal amino-acid sequence, was assayed for its
ability to act as dsDNA or ssDNA nuclease (exo- or endonuclease), to
hydrolyze ATP in the presence or absence of ssDNA or dsDNA, to unwind
DNA, to bind ssDNA or dsDNA, and to interact with SPP1-encoded
replication proteins. From these activities tested we observed that
purified G35P protein is able to bind DNA and to interact
with at least G40P and G36P.
G35P consists of 287 amino acid residues corresponding to a
molecular mass of 32,000 Da (10). The native molecular mass of purified
G35P was estimated by size fractionation through a Superose
12 fast protein liquid chromatography gel filtration column in buffer A
containing 100 mM NaCl. In the presence or in the absence
of 5 mM MgCl2, at low G35P
concentrations (7 µM), G35P elutes in two
peaks of similar area, one narrow peak corresponding to
Mr 65,000 and one broad peak corresponding to
Mr 250,000-350,000. At high G35P
concentrations (30 µM), G35P elutes mainly in
a broad peak, with Mr 250,000-350,000, in the
presence or in the absence of MgCl2. If we assume that
G35P is spherical in shape, it is likely that, under the
G35P concentrations assayed, G35P is in an
equilibrium between a dimer and a higher order oligomer in solution. We
cannot rule out, however, that G35P is an elongated monomer
with a large Stokes radius.
G35P Interacts Preferentially with ssDNA--
The affinity of
G35P for linear 7,250-nt M13mp18 ssDNA (1 µM)
was determined by filter binding assays by following the rate of
complex formation as a function of G35P concentration (Fig. 2A). G35P·ssDNA
complex formation was not linear at low protein concentrations and
appeared to be sigmoidal at high G35P concentrations. The
Kapp of the G35P·ssDNA complex,
which in this case is equal to protein concentration midpoint, was
estimated to be ~ 14 nM and ~ 26 nM at pH 7.5, 30 °C in buffer B in the absence and the presence of 5 mM MgCl2, respectively. It is
likely, therefore, that, both in the absence or presence of 5 mM MgCl2, G35P interacts with ssDNA
with a weak cooperativity. To analyze the type of complexes formed by
G35P with ssDNA, EMSA was used. G35P does not
bind to segments as short as the 26-nt ssDNA fragment of
different sequence, indicating that there is a minimum length required
for stable binding, but the formation of G35P·194-nt ssDNA
complexes was observed by EMSA (Fig. 2B). At molar ratio of
1 G35P per 80-nt or 40-nt (1:80 or 1:40), G35P
forms multiple and diffuse complexes with the 194-nt
32P·ssDNA, whereas at higher molar ratios (1:20 and 1:10)
one discrete complex was observed (Fig. 2B, lanes
2, 3, and 10). The
Kapp value of the G35P·ssDNA
complex was estimated by EMSA to be ~18 and ~36 nM at
pH 7.5, 30 °C in buffer B in the absence and the presence of 5 mM MgCl2, respectively.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of magnesium in binding of
G35P to DNA. A, M13 mp18
-32P·ssDNA (1 µM in nt) (open
and filled squares) or M13 mp18 -32P·dsDNA
(1 µM in bp) (open and filled
circles) was brought to room temperature in buffer B, containing 5 mM MgCl2 (filled symbols) or in the
absence of the metal ion (open symbols); increasing amounts
of G35P dimers (0.75 to 1560 nM) were added and
the incubation was continued for 10 min at 30 °C. Binding of
G35P was analyzed by calculating the DNA retained on the
filter as described under "Experimental Procedures." B,
G35P·ssDNA; C, G35P·dsDNA complex
formation analyzed by EMSA. The 194-nt -32P·ssDNA (1 µM in nt, B) or 194-bp
-32P·dsDNA (1 µM in bp, C)
was incubated with increasing concentrations of G35P in
buffer B, in the presence or absence of 5 mM
MgCl2 for 10 min at 30 °C and then loaded onto a 6%
ndPAGE. In lanes 1 and 9, no protein was added.
In B, increasing amounts of G35P were added in
lanes 8 to 2, and 16 to 10 (1.5 to 100 nM). In C, the amount of
G35P added doubles from 4.5 to 300 nM in
lanes 8 to 2, and 16 to 10. CI and CI-IV, denote the protein·DNA
complexes, and FD denotes free DNA.
|
|
The affinity of G35P for linear 7250-bp M13mp18 dsDNA (1 µM) was determined by filter binding assays also in the
absence or the presence of Mg2+ (5 mM
MgCl2) (Fig. 2A). The G35P·dsDNA
complex retained by the filter was less than 65%. In the plateau
region, where all the blunted linear dsDNA is presumably saturated with
G35P, only 55-62% retention are observed, even at a
G35P concentration greater than 1.5 µM.
Similar results were observed at 25 and 50 to mM NaCl; hence, we can assume that the protein·dsDNA complexes show a poor stability. Under these experimental conditions, we observed that, in
the absence of Mg2+, at pH 7.5 and 30 °C,
G35P binds to linear 32P·M13mp18 dsDNA with a
Kapp of ~90 nM and 300 nM at pH 7.5, 30 °C in buffer B in the absence and the
presence of 5 mM MgCl2, respectively (Fig.
2A). Both, in the absence or the presence of 5 mM MgCl2, at low G35P molar ratios
(1:27) one discrete G35P·194-bp 32P·dsDNA
complex was formed (CI complex), and at larger ratios (1:13 to 1:3.3)
slow moving protein·DNA complexes were observed (CII to CIV) (Fig.
2C, compare lanes 5 with 2 and
13 with 10). Under these conditions, the
Kapp value of G35P·dsDNA complex
formation was ~100 and ~300 nM in the absence or the
presence of 5 mM MgCl2, respectively.
Hence, in the absence of Mg2+, G35P binds with
5-fold higher affinity to ssDNA over dsDNA, and this preference is even
larger in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2. In the
latter case, the protein binds with 8-fold higher affinity to ssDNA
than to dsDNA.
G35P Promotes the Formation of Joint
Molecules--
G35P shares a 40% overall identity with the
RecT protein (data not shown). RecT has been shown to promote the
formation of joint molecules between a circular ssDNA and a homologous
linear dsDNA having an ssDNA tail (30). To address whether
G35P also catalyzes joint molecule formation, linear
blunt-ended 6065-bp M13mp18 dsDNA was incubated with circular M13mp18
ssDNA and G35P in buffer D containing either 25 or 100 mM NaCl during 10 min at 30 °C. The samples were
deproteinized, and the DNA forms separated by AGE. As shown in Fig.
3, lanes 2 and 8,
G35P fails to form any new product that migrates slower than
the linear dsDNA, when the dsDNA is blunt-ended. However, when linear
6065-bp M13mp18 dsDNA, with ~50% of the molecules containing an
ssDNA tail with an average of ~140-nt either at the 5' or the 3', was
incubated with circular M13mp18 ssDNA and G35P, the
accumulation of a discrete new band that migrates more slowly than
linear dsDNA was observed (Fig. 3). End products of the strand exchange
reaction (relaxed dsDNA and linear ssDNA) as detected in the presence
of B. subtilis RecA protein did not accumulate (data not
shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Formation of joint molecules by
G35P. The strand exchange reaction mixtures (10 µl) contained G35P (780 nM), circular M13mp18
ssDNA (30 µM), 3'-tailed (30 µM) M13mp18
linear dsDNA, or 5'-tailed (30 µM) M13mp18 linear dsDNA
or blunt-ended M13mp18 linear dsDNA in buffer D containing 25 or 100 mM NaCl. The reaction mixture was incubated at 30 °C for
10 min and the deproteinized products analyzed by AGE. The symbols + and denote the presence of absence of the indicated product.
C, control linear ds an circular M13mp18
ssDNA.
|
|
In the presence of low NaCl (25 mM) annealing of the
circular ssDNA and the linear dsDNA containing a 3'-tail accounted to ~37% of the total dsDNA, whereas ~17% of annealed molecules were observed when the 5'-tail dsDNA template was used with a
G35P concentration of 780 nM (1 dimer per 35 nt
of ssDNA) (Fig. 3, lanes 6 and 4). No further
increase in the yield of the products was obtained at higher protein
concentrations (data not shown). Because the length of the ssDNA tail
is not uniform in both substrates, due to exonuclease treatment, we
cannot rule out that the different yield observed with the 3'-tail over
5'-tail substrates is a consequence of any difference in length in both
substrates. To address this question we have compared joint molecule
formation with the same substrates, at low or high NaCl concentrations.
At 100 mM NaCl concentration, the circular ssDNA
annealed to the 3'-tailed dsDNA by ~21% and to the 5'-tailed dsDNA
by ~7% (Fig. 3, lanes 12 and 10). Hence, at
low NaCl, G35P shows a preference for substrates having
3'-tails over 5'-tails of ~2-fold, and this difference is enlarged in
the presence of 100 mM NaCl. It is likely, therefore, that
the protein might bind better to linear DNA having a 3'-tail than to
linear DNA having a 5'-tail and that G35P shows some
polarity in the reaction. Identical results are obtained when
G35P is first incubated with linear dsDNA and the pre-formed
complex is then incubated with circular ssDNA or when the first
incubation is with ssDNA. The formation of this new product,
which was dependent on incubation with G35P, was not
observed when proteinase K was added at the same time that
G35P or MgCl2 was omitted or EDTA was added.
Titration with MgCl2 shows an optimum for joint molecule formation at ~5 mM (data not shown). The formation of
this new product, which could be reversed by heating at 100 °C, does
not require the addition of a nucleotide cofactor, and its presence does not alter the yield of the reaction. It is likely, therefore, that
G35P is free of contaminating enzymes capable of generating an ssDNA tail on the linear dsDNA substrate (e.g.
exonucleases). Because the formation of SSA between tailed-dsDNA
and homologous ssDNA is independent of the presence of a nucleotide
cofactor, we can rule out that a DNA helicase could separate both DNA
strands: the reaction lacks a nucleotide cofactor that is essential for all DNA helicases.
Visualization of the Joint Molecules Formed by G35P--
To
analyze whether the annealed products observed by AGE are the product
of the annealing reaction of the complementary ssDNA tails present in
the linear substrate with the circular ssDNA or if some exchange has
taken place, G35P, at a concentration of 1 G35P
molecule per 35 nt of ssDNA, was incubated with circular M13mp18 ssDNA
and linear 6065-bp M13mp18 dsDNA having a 3' ssDNA end, the reaction
was deproteinized, and the products were examined by EM. Under these
conditions, about 20-25% of total linear 3'-tailed M13mp18 dsDNA
molecules were joined to homologous circular M13mp18 ssDNA (Fig.
4A). At short times of
incubation, the complex formed by the annealing of the single-stranded
region of the linear duplex and the homologous circular ssDNA molecule,
leading to a sigma-shaped structure, was observed (data not shown).
After 10 min of incubation, one of the DNA strands from the linear
duplex DNA was displaced by the circular ssDNA (alpha-shaped
structures). As revealed in Fig. 4, the short displaced strand is of
ssDNA nature and a stretch of dsDNA of roughly comparable length has
been formed on the circular ssDNA molecule. Neither sigma- nor
alpha-shaped structures were observed when G35P was omitted
(data not shown). The base pairing of the linear 3'-tailed DNA with the
circular ssDNA did not exceed 2000 nt (Fig. 4B, data not
shown), and the end products of the strand exchange reaction (relaxed
dsDNA and linear ssDNA) were not observed.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Electron microscopic analysis of the products
of the strand exchange reaction. Reactions (10 µl) containing
circular M13mp18 ssDNA (30 µM), 3'-tailed (30 µM) M13mp18 linear dsDNA, and G35P (780 nM) in buffer D containing 50 mM NaCl were
incubated at 30 °C for 10 min, and the deproteinized products were
analyzed by EM. In A, a gallery of partially double-stranded
circles with dsDNA and ssDNA branches attached to the
circle. The branch of dsDNA and ssDNA is indicated by an
arrowhead. ss denotes the presence of an adjacent
single circular M13mp18 ssDNA molecule. B, schematic
representation of the joint molecules presented in A.
|
|
G35P Forms Ring Structures on Short ssDNA Tails and Nucleoprotein
Filaments with ssDNA--
To visualize the type of complexes formed by
G35P with the substrates used for the strand exchange
reaction, the protein, at a concentration of 1 G35P molecule
per 35 nt of ssDNA, was incubated with circular M13mp18 ssDNA and
linear 6065-bp M13mp18 dsDNA having a 3' ssDNA end, and the products
were directly examined by EM without deproteinization. G35P
bound to ssDNA changed the compact bush-like structures typical of
protein-free ssDNA to relatively open, circular structures resembling
pearls of a necklace (see Fig.
5A).
G35P·circular M13mp18 ssDNA complexed with 3'-tailed M13mp18 dsDNA (joint molecules) was also observed (Fig. 5B).
In accordance with its preferential binding to ssDNA,
G35P·dsDNA complexes were not observed at the protein
concentration used, but the ssDNA ends of the 3'-tailed dsDNA were
covered by doughnut-shaped oligomers of G35P (Fig.
5B, denoted by arrowheads). From the volume occupied by the G35P ring structure, it could be predicted
that it is an oligomer formed by seven to eight protomers. This is consistent with the observation that G35P has a mass of
250,000-350,000 Da in solution (see above).

View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Visualization of G35P bound
to ssDNA and 3'-tailed dsDNA. Reactions (10 µl) containing
circular M13mp18 ssDNA (30 µM) and G35P (780 nM) in buffer D containing 50 mM NaCl were
incubated at 30 °C for 10 min, then 3'-tailed (30 µM)
M13mp18 linear dsDNA was added and incubated for 10 min. The
protein·DNA complexes were purified by gel filtration and analyzed by
electron microscopy. In A, a gallery of
G35P·ssDNA molecules and in B,
G35P·ssDNA complexed as joint molecules with 3'-tailed
dsDNA. G35P assembled as a ring on the ssDNA tails of the
linear DNA is indicated by black arrows. The magnification
is ~60,000×. Bar, 200 nm. C, segments of
G35P·ssDNA filaments were sorted by pitch. Reference-free
averages (29) were generated for subsets having a pitch of 85 (n = 289), 90 (n = 375), 95 (n = 845), 100 (n = 1712), and 105 (n = 572).
|
|
Inspection of the electron micrographs of negatively stained
G35P·ssDNA complexes revealed a striated pattern, which is
suggestive of helical filaments, and these helices were determined to
be left-handed by rotary shadowing (data not shown). To analyze these structures, 8867 short segments were selected from these filament images. Analysis of these segments showed that there was a one-start helix with a variable pitch, a range greater than 85-105, and a mean
of ~95 (Fig. 5C). The filaments have a clear polarity, but
the periodicities arising from subunits along this continuous helix
must be extremely weak, because they were not observed.
The observation that the filaments were formed only in the presence of
ssDNA suggests that these filaments contain ssDNA. Unfortunately, no
information is available about the location of the ssDNA within this
protein filament.
G35P Promotes SSA at the Unwound AT-rich Region on a Supercoiled
DNA Substrate and Loads G40P at This Region--
Previously, it has
been reported that (i) the DNA helix at the tandemly repeated AT-rich
region present at replication origins is thermodynamically instable and
(ii) supercoiling of DNA, in the absence of the initiator proteins,
induces localized unwinding (DUE) at the same sequence opened by the
initiator protein (31). The ability of G35P to catalyze the
assimilation of ssDNA, into the homologous supercoiled plasmid-borne
SPP1 replication origin oriL (SPP1-DUE) or into a region
with lower prediction of unwinding by supercoiling, was assayed. Four
different oligonucleotides (1 to 4) have been synthesized (Fig.
6A). The
32P-labeled 230-nt-long oligonucleotides 1 and 4 have a
region of homology of 40 nt, at either the 5'- or 3'-ends,
respectively, with the AT-rich region of oriL; whereas the
32P-labeled 215-nt-long oligonucleotides 2 and 3 show only
a short region of homology (10 nt) with the AT-rich region of
oriL at the 5'- or 3'-ends, respectively (Fig.
6A). G35P has a similar affinity for the four
ssDNA segments as measured by EMSA (data not shown).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
D-loop formation at SPP1
oriL. A, the SPP1 oriL
region. The double line represents the DNA, the shaded
regions within are the G38P cognate sites (boxes
ab and AB), and the bubble region denotes
the adjacent AT-rich segment. The relevant restriction sites are
indicated. Schematic shows the oligonucleotides used in the experiment.
Oligonucleotide 1 and 4, and 2 and 3, are complementary, respectively.
B, -32P-labeled oligonucleotides (120 nM) were incubated with supercoiled pCB163 DNA containing
oriL (8 µM) and 62 nM
G35P in buffer D containing 100 mM NaCl at
30 °C for 30 min. The reaction products were deproteinized and
separated by 0.8% AGE. Gels were dried and analyzed by
autoradiography. The symbols + and denote the presence or
absence of the indicated product.
|
|
G35P, at a concentration of 1 G35P per 135 bp of
supercoiled dsDNA, was incubated with the labeled oligonucleotides and
then with the homologous supercoiled plasmid-borne SPP1-DUE. The
samples were deproteinized and analyzed by AGE. G35P
preferentially promoted the formation of a stable complex between
oligonucleotide 4 and the plasmid DNA that co-migrated with supercoiled
plasmid DNA on an agarose gel (Fig. 6B). The amount of SSA
in three independent experiments was quantified and found to be 13%,
3%, 6%, and 24% for oligonucleotides 1 through 4, respectively. The
oligonucleotides 4 and 3, which have a region homologous to the AT-rich
region of oriL at their 3'-end, base-paired to one strand of
the supercoiled plasmid molecule with 2-fold higher efficiency than
that of their respective counterparts. The reaction required an
Mg2+ cation but did not require a nucleotide cofactor.
Similarly, to join the molecule formation, the optimum
Mg2+ concentration was 5 mM (data not shown)
and the protein showed some preference for pairing the oligonucleotide
that enters the SPP1-DUE region in a 3' orientation (Fig.
6B, lanes 4 and 16). The percentage of
D-loops formed was independent of the order of incubation
of the DNA substrates with G35P. The migration distance of
the reaction product on the agarose gel was identical to that of the
D-loop product formed by B. subtilis RecA. SSA
was not observed when the plasmid molecule was relaxed with DNase I
prior incubation with G35P (data not shown).
When an ssDNA segment complementary to another region of the
supercoiled plasmid DNA was used, 3-5% joint molecule formations were
observed, similar to the yield with ssDNA segments 2 and 3, which only have 10-nt annealing to the AT-rich region (data not shown).
It is therefore likely that G35P promotes SSA between a
pre-existing unwound region (e.g. AT-rich region of
oriL, DUE region) and that the region of homology needs to
have a minimum length (see Ref. 20 and this work).
We have previously shown that (i) the loading of G40P at the
oriL region is dependent on the replisome organizer,
G38P, and the helicase loader G39P (11) and (ii)
G40P preferentially binds to ssDNA regions with no potential
secondary structures and to ssDNA as short as 10-12 nt in length
(13).3 In both E. coli and B. subtilis, the loading of the replicative helicase onto collapsed
replication forks is a PriA-dependent step (8, 17). Because
SPP1 replication is independent of PriA, DnaB, DnaD, and DnaI
primosomal proteins (Ref. 4 and this work), it can be assumed that
D-loops catalyzed by G35P might have some role
on the loading of G40P into ssDNA. To address whether G35P creates an ssDNA region of sufficient length to which
the replicative helicase G40P can be loaded and, therefore,
the replisome established at this region, joint molecules promoted by
G35P between supercoiled plasmid pCB163 and oligonucleotides
1-4, in the presence of 1 mM ATP, were prepared. Then
G40P (80 nM) was added, and the reaction was
incubated for another 10 min at 30 °C. The free G40P was
separated from G40P bound to the joint molecules by gel
filtration chromatography, and the amount of G40P loaded on
the different D-loops formed was quantified. Accordingly to
the yield of D-loops formed with the different ssDNA
segments, different yields in the loading of G40P could be
observed. When D-loops were formed with oligonucleotides 2 and 3 and supercoiled plasmid pCB163, no G40P could be
detected in the DNA-containing fractions, whereas when oligonucleotides
1 and 4 were used about 6 and 15% of total input G40P,
respectively, was present and associated with the joint molecules (data
not shown). It is likely, therefore, that in both cases the region of
ssDNA created by the annealing of the invading oligonucleotide to the
complementary strand promoted by G35P has a length that is
sufficient to load G40P at the D-loop region.
Alternatively, the loading of G40P is stimulated by a direct
protein-protein interaction, and G35P is sufficient for loading G40P at the D-loop, as suggested by the
high efficiency in the loading of G40P at joint molecules
(compare the percentage of input G40P present in the
D-loops with the percentage of D-loops formed
with oligonucleotides 1 and 4).
G35P Interacts with G40P and G36P--
G35P
preferentially catalyzes strand invasion on a pre-existing
unwound region; i.e. as the AT-rich region at the origins of
replication of SPP1 (see above). To address whether G35P
could recruit any replication protein at this site, we analyzed whether G35P physically interacts with four (G36P,
G38P, G39P, and G40P) of the six
SPP1-encoded replication products (except for the G34.1P and
G36.1P endonucleases). We immobilized the proteins
G35P or BSA (6 µM), as a control, on an
Affi-Gel 10 matrix. G36P, G38P, G39P,
and G40P were then loaded (1 µM) separately
onto the matrix. As shown in Table I, the
DNA helicase protein, G40P, and the SSB, G36P,
were retained by G35P bound to the column, whereas the
replisome organizer, G38P, the helicase loader,
G39P, or BSA were not retained by the same column. None of
the proteins bind to the BSA column. It is likely, therefore, that
G35P physically interacts with both G36P and
G40P.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Protein affinity chromatography of G35P
NaCl concentration used for elution of proteins (1 µM)
loaded in buffer C containing 50 mM NaCl in the different
affinity columns.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
G35P Is a Bona Fide ATP-independent SSA Protein--
The
characterization of G35P revealed a significant biochemical
similarity with evolutionarily distinct families of ATP-independent SSA
proteins that form rings, filaments, or both. Many of these families
appear to be primarily of bacteriophage origin, namely the RecT/Red ,
Erf, and Rad52 families (see Ref. 32). The RecT/Red family comprises
the Rac-deficient prophage RecT, phage protein ( - ), and
SPP1 G35P proteins, the Erf family comprises the phage P22
Erf protein (P22-Erf), and the Rad52 family comprises the Rad52
eukaryotic protein and putative proteins of phage origin (see Ref. 32).
A biochemical similarity with ATP-independent SSA complex proteins of
eukaryotic origin, namely the hXRCC3·hRad51C/hRad51L2 and
hXRCC2·hRad51D/hRad51L3 (33-35), was also observed. One common feature in these families of proteins is their ability to form rings
composed by a divergent number of subunits with different requirements.
Although ring formation seems to be independent of Mg2+ for
the eukaryotic proteins hRad52 and hXRCC2·hRad51D (33, 35, 36) and
G35P (this work), Mg2+ seems to be essential for
ring formation for RecT and - (37, 38). In the case of
G35P, ring formation seems to be
concentration-dependent, whereas this possibility has not
been analyzed for the eukaryotic ATP-independent strand-annealing
proteins. Furthermore, the broad peak obtained with G35P
suggests a heterogeneity in the number of subunits that compose the
ring. This is consistent with the polymorphism observed with the
- protein when examined by electron microscopy (38) and suggests
a dynamic behavior in all this family of proteins.
- protein seems to be the only protein of this family that does
not form filamentous structures on ssDNA (38). The filamentous structures with ssDNA observed under the electron microscope for hRad52, hXRCC2·hRad51D complex, and the hXRCCc3·hRad51C complex do
not seem to have a helical structure and can be composed of stacked
rings packed in an edge to edge manner (33-36). However, the filaments
observed for G35P with ssDNA are helical and have a clear
polarity (Fig. 5C). Furthermore, - protein seems to be
the only protein of this family to filament on dsDNA, and filament formation required the dsDNA substrate to have an ssDNA tail to start
filamentation, where the protein first assembles as a ring structure
(38). Similarly to - , G35P, binds to dsDNA with an
ssDNA tail forming a ring structure with the tails (Fig.
5B), but accordingly to its preferential binding to ssDNA,
no protein was bound to the dsDNA region of the DNA substrate. The
ssDNA tails on the linear dsDNA used in Fig. 5B were
obtained by exonuclease treatment and are no longer then ~140 nt;
therefore, it is likely that, depending on the length of the ssDNA,
G35P forms rings or filaments with a helical structure with
ssDNA.
G35P and RecT catalyze joint molecule formation between a
linear dsDNA having an ssDNA tail and its homologous circular ssDNA, where some strand displacement is observed. RecT preferentially catalyzes this reaction at a low concentration of Mg2+
(<0.35 mM MgCl2) (30, 39), with similar
efficiency with substrates having a 3'- or a 5'-tail (39);
G35P, however, performs limited strand exchange at high
Mg2+ concentrations (5 mM) with 2- to 3-fold
higher efficiency with substrates having a 5'-tail.
G35P (Fig. 6), RecT (39), hRad52 (33), hXRCC2·hRad51D
complex (34), and the hXRCC3·hRad51C complex (35) have been shown to
catalyze DNA strand invasion between an oligonucleotide and a
homologous supercoiled plasmid DNA, but the requirements for this
reaction seem to be different. Although RecT does not require
Mg2+ for D-loop formation, it is required for
D-loops formed with G35P and the
hXRCC2· hRad51D and hXRCC3-hRad51C complexes, but the optimum
Mg2+ concentrations are in each case different (34, 35).
The differences in the Mg2+ requirements correlate with
their preferential binding for dsDNA or ssDNA and suggest that,
although the products of the reaction are the same, mechanistically
this group of proteins may act in a different way. Many proteins of
these family such as RecT (39) and hRad52 (33) bind
preferentially to dsDNA at no or low Mg2+ concentrations,
and this is the optimum Mg2+ concentration required for
D-loop formation. However, incubation of the protein first
with dsDNA inhibits the joint molecule reaction and suggests that these
proteins need to contact dsDNA but in a prefixed order.
G35P, however, performs D-loop formation and limited strand exchange at high Mg2+ concentrations, where
the protein does not bind to dsDNA (Fig. 2).
Although all these proteins have been considered so far as
recombination proteins, the functional similarities between the SPP1
replication protein, G35P, and phage-encoded - ,
P22-erf, and RecT suggest that they could work in the processing of
inactivated replication forks and the generation of concatemeric linear
substrates that are encapsidated into empty procapsids. Furthermore,
the functional similarity between the phage-encoded homologous-pairing proteins and hRad52 and the hXrcc2·hRad51D and hXrcc3·hRad51C complexes, despite lacking obvious sequence homology, suggest that the
human proteins may also act in the assembly of replication forks after
stalling. In fact, yeast Rad52 has been shown to play a major role in
BIR, a process that has been shown to be rad51-independent (40). In the case of the phage recombination systems, a limited exonuclease activity associated with the SSA protein may play an active
role in the annealing process (41), although the presence of an
exonuclease in not obvious in the human recombination proteins.
G35P Might Direct the Assembly of a New Replication Fork: A
Model--
Genetic evidence suggests that SPP1 mutants impaired in the
putative 5' to 3' exonuclease G34.1P or homologous-pairing
G35P accumulate less than unit-length DNA molecules (30-35
kb in length) under non-permissive conditions (5). Why would the
failure to use the recombination proteins G34.1P or
G35P alone lead to a DNA arrest phenotype? Previously, it
was shown that such a defect cannot be overcome by any of the host
recombination nor by the DnaA- and
PriA-DnaB-DnaD-DnaI-dependent assembly pathways (see the
introduction). Here we show that G35P catalyzes SSA and
promotes D-loop formation, which are features associated
with bona fide homologous-pairing proteins. Because SPP1
replication is independent of host-encoded primosomal components, and
G35P physically interacts with G40P and
G36P, we assume that G35P may be involved in
recombination-dependent replication and it might help in
the re-establishment of a stalled replication fork at oriR
or at any other stalled region.
We hypothesize that, after the initial phase of initiation of theta
type SPP1 replication at oriL (6, 7), the progression of the
replication fork might be stalled when the replication fork encounters
G38P bound at oriR (roadblock) in the absence of
an overt DNA damage (see Fig. 7) or at
any region in the presence of a DNA damage. The stalled replication
fork breaks, and the broken fork is rescued by a process dependent on
phage-encoded G35P and G34.1P functions. After
Skalka (23, 24), Formosa and Alberts (42), Viret et al.
(18), and Kuzminov (15), we propose that G34.1P exonuclease
may degrade the 5'-end of the linear dsDNA of a collapsed replication
fork at oriR or at any other stalled region generating 3'
overhangs to which G35P binds (Fig. 7A).
G35P-mediated joint molecule formation could provide a
3'-end to anneal at oriR on a second supercoiled SPP1
molecule (Fig. 7B). Recently it has been shown that the
RecE/RecT and - / - pairs physically interact, and homologous
pairing was favored with respect to the exonuclease activity (41).
Because RecT, - , and G35P belong to the same family of
SSA proteins (32), it is likely that G35P physically
interacts with G34.1P.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Roadblock as a model for the shift from theta
to sigma replication. A, G38P bound to
oriL or oriR blocks replication fork progression.
After stalling, a nick in the leading strand (bottom part)
will be processed by the putative 5' 3' exonuclease,
G34.1P, to generate a 3'-ssDNA tail on which
G35P will polymerize, whereas a nick in the lagging strand
(top part), will not require further processing, and
G35P will polymerize on it. B, model for SPP1
initiation of sigma type DNA replication. G38P recognizes AB
boxes of the SPP1 replication origin (oriL or
oriR), and binds to them in an ATP-independent fashion,
opening the adjacent AT-rich region, where G36P binds with
high affinity. A G35P·ssDNA filament pairs with the
leading strand of the unwound region. By direct
G35P·G36P interactions, a remodeling of both
proteins can take place, so that the
G39P·G40P·ATP complex can be loaded in the
unwound region by the ATP-dependent ssDNA binding capacity
of G40P, as well as the interactions between G35P
and G40P, and G39P and G38P,
respectively. G38P·G39P, which forms a
heterodimer, dissociates G39P from the
G39P·G40P·ATP complex, and releases
G38P from the origin. G40P helps the assembly of
DnaG and perhaps DNA PolIII at the AT-rich region. The 3'-OH end of the
paired strand could be used to prime the leading strand and DnaG could
provide the primer for lagging strand synthesis. The arrow
indicates the direction of helicase movement.
|
|
We envisage two pathways, one that is
G38P-dependent and one
G38P-independent, for the assembly of the hexameric
replicative helicase G40P at a replication fork or at a
re-established fork. In the case of the
G38P-dependent pathway, G35P, by
protein-protein interaction, might cause a local remodeling of
G36P, bound to the G38P-promoted locally melted
AT-rich region on oriR or oriL and catalyze SSA
(Fig. 7B). G35P alone or in combination with G38P, again by protein-protein interaction, stimulates the
loading of the G39P·G40P·ATP complex at the
ssDNA region. The interaction of G38P with G39P
remodels the G39P·G40P·ATP inactive complex and releases G40P·ATP of the
G39P·G40P·ATP complex. Then, the interaction
of G35P with G40P·ATP stabilizes the later at
the open complex (Fig. 7B). In the case of the
G38P-independent pathway, G35P would catalyze SSA
at any pre-existing unwound homologous ssDNA region to which
G36P is bound and cause a local remodeling of
G36P. G35P would stimulate the loading of the
G39P·G40P·ATP complex or free
G40P·ATP at the unwound region by
G35P·G40P·ATP interaction. However, a
mechanism for activation/remodeling of the G40P hexameric
DNA helicase has to be envisaged if G35P stimulates loading
of the inactive G39P·G40P·ATP complex.
Because G39P synthesis is halted and its relative amount
drops after min 18 of post-infection infection, whereas G40P
remains constant (43), we assume that G35P might load free
G40P·ATP at the unwound region. Then, in both replication
assembly pathways, G40P·ATP bound to ssDNA directs the
assembly of DnaG and DNA PolIII in an ATP-independent manner (12).3 There is no indication as to whether the
3'-OH end of the G35P-promoted SSA may act as a primer to
initiate concatemeric DNA synthesis (sigma replication) on the invaded
supercoiled template or whether DnaG is responsible also for the
synthesis of the leader strand primers.
This model is consistent with the observations that: (i) SPP1
replication begins at a unique origin and proceeds unidirectionally, but two SPP1 replication origins have been mapped (3-6), (ii) G38P binds to oriL with higher affinity than to
oriR, and theta thype replication initiates at
oriL (7), (iii) SPP1 replication is unidirectional, and a
replication fork that starts at oriL and might stop at
oriR will duplicate a 32-kb DNA segment (22) (Fig. 1), (iv)
a SPP1 duplex circle with a multiunit linear appendage has been
observed (3), and (v) G39P synthesis halts at late times
after infection, whereas G40P synthesis remains constant during the entire lytic cycle (43). It is likely, therefore, that the
stalled fork at the DSB could provide the means for the switch from
theta to sigma type replication, and replication restart is dependent
on the G35P and G34.1P functions.
The features presented in this model could have mechanistic
implications for understanding the replication of HSV virus or phage
(reviewed in Refs. 44 and 45). HSV type 1 genome and its
replication have several features in common with phage SPP1: (i) both
have two distinct replication origins (SPP1, oriL and oriR; HSV type 1, oriS and
oriL) of similar sequence, (ii) after initiation
by the theta replication mode, replication switches to the rolling
circle mode, and (iii) molecules consisting of duplex circles with
multiunit linear appendages have been observed by EM (3, 46, 47).
Replication of bacteriophage also initiates by the theta
replication mode, and at late times of infection, sigma type
replication starts (45). theta replication initiates
bidirectionally but for the switch from theta to sigma type of
replication, unidirectional theta replication, which is driven by
limiting amounts of DnaA, is required (48). In the case of phage concatemeric replication, it was suggested that the -O protein bound
to the -ori might create a physical barrier that permits
only one round of unidirectional theta replication both in
vivo and in vitro (49, 50). The broken fork could be
rescued either by the concerted action of Red products ( - and
- proteins, "functional counterpart" of SPP1 G35P,
and G34.1P) or by the host recombination and repair
machinery (see Refs. 23, 24, and 51). This is consistent with the fact
that the red genes are not essential, although
involved in replication (23, 51).
The proposed model also indicates that generation of the sigma
type of replication will not be random but will occur preferentially at
origins of replication or places where pre-existing unwound regions
exist. This hypothesis is consistent with the fact that BIR events also are initiated non-randomly and occur adjacent to an autonomous replicating sequence (52).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are very grateful to Emilio Camafeita for
performing the G35P protein sequencing and matrix-assisted
laser desorption ionization time-of-flight spectrometry. We thank
Patrice Polard for the B. subtilis priA1 dnaB75
mutant strains, Begoña Carrasco for providing highly purified
B. subtilis RecA protein, and Sophia Passy-Tolar for initial
image analysis of the helical filaments. R. M. thanks the European
Union for support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants BMC2000-0548 and
BIO2001-4342-E from Dirección General de
Investigación-Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología
(DGI-MCYT) and QLRT-2000-00365 from the European Union (to
J. C. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 34-91-585-4546;
Fax: 34-91-585-4506; E-mail. jcalonso@cnb.uam.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204467200
2
S. Ayora and J. C. Alonso, this work.
3
M. Martinez, P. Mesa, and J. C. Alonso,
unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
dsDNA, double-stranded DNA;
ssDNA, single-stranded DNA;
nt, nucleotide(s);
AGE, agarose gel electrophoresis;
AS, ammonium sulfate;
ME, -mercaptoethanol;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
BIR, break-induced
replication;
DSB, double -strand break;
DUE, DNA unwinding element;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
GXP, gene
X product;
ndPAGE, non-denaturing PAGE;
PEI, polyethyleneimine;
PolIII, DNA polymerase III;
SSA, single-strand
annealing;
wt, wild type;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
EM, electron microscopy;
HSV, herpes simplex virus.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Chai, S.,
Lurz, R.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
252,
386-398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Klotz, G.
(1973)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
120,
95-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Ganesan, A. T.,
Andersen, J. J.,
Luh, J.,
and Effron, M.
(1976)
in
Microbiology 1976
(Schlessinger, D., ed)
, pp. 319-325, American Society of Microbiology, Washington D. C.
|
| 4.
|
McIntosh, P. K.,
Dunker, R.,
Mulder, C.,
and Brown, N.
(1978)
J. Virol.
28,
865-876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Burger, K. J.,
and Trautner, T. A.
(1978)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
166,
277-285[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Pedré, X.,
Weise, F.,
Chai, S.,
Lüder, G.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
236,
1324-1340[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Missich, R.,
Weise, F.,
Chai, S.,
Lurz, R.,
Pedré, X.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
270,
50-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Bruand, C.,
Farache, M.,
McGovern, S.,
Ehrlich, S. D.,
and Polard, P.
(2001)
Mol Microbiol.
42,
245-255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Alonso, J. C.,
Lüder, G.,
and Trautner, T. A.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
3723-3728[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Weise, F.,
Chai, S.,
Lüder, G.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(1994)
Virology
202,
1046-1049[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Ayora, S.,
Stasiak, A.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
288,
71-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Ayora, S.,
Lange, U.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
439,
59-62[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Ayora, S.,
Weise, F.,
Mesa, P.,
Stasiak, A.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(2002)
Nucleic Acids Res.
30,
2280-2289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Bárcena, M.,
San Martín, C.,
Weise, F.,
Ayora, S.,
Alonso, J. C.,
and Carazo, J. M.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
283,
809-819[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Kuzminov, A.
(1999)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63,
751-813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Cox, M. M.,
Goodman, M. F.,
Kreuzer, K. N.,
Sherratt, D. J.,
Sandler, S. J.,
and Marians, K. J.
(2000)
Nature
404,
37-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Marians, K. J.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
10,
151-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Xu, L.,
and Marians, K. J.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
14321-14328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Viret, J.-F.,
Bravo, A.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(1991)
Microbiol. Rev.
55,
675-683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Alonso, J. C.,
Lüder, G.,
and Trautner, T. A.
(1992)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
236,
60-64[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Bravo, A.,
and Alonso, J. C.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
4651-4657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Alonso, J. C.,
Lüder, G.,
Stiege, A. C.,
Chai, S.,
Weise, F.,
and Trautner, T. A.
(1997)
Gene
204,
201-221[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Skalka, A. M.
(1974)
in
Mechanisms in Recombination
(Grell, R. F., ed)
, pp. 421-432, Plenum Publishing, New York
|
| 24.
|
Skalka, A. M.
(1977)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
78,
201-237[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Studier, F. W.
(1991)
J. Mol. Biol.
219,
37-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Yanisch-Perron, C.,
Vieira, J.,
and Messing, J.
(1985)
Gene (Amst.)
33,
103-119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Spiess, E.,
and Lurz, R.
(1988)
Meth. Microbiol.
20,
293-323
|
| 28.
|
Yang, S., Yu, X.,
Seitz, E. M.,
Kowalczykowski, S. C.,
and Egelman, E. H.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
314,
1077-1085[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Penczek, P.,
Radermacher, M.,
and Frank, J.
(1992)
Ultramicroscopy
40,
33-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Hall, S. D.,
and Kolodner, R. D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3205-3209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Kowalski, D.,
and Eddy, M. J.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
4335-4344[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Lakshminarayam, M. I.,
Koonin, E. V.,
and Aravind, L.
(2002)
BMC Genomics
3,
8[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Kagawa, W.,
Kurumizaka, H.,
Ikawa, S.,
Yokoyama, S.,
and Shibata, T.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
35201-35208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Kurumizaka, H.,
Ikawa, S.,
Nakada, M.,
Eda, K.,
Kagawa, W.,
Takata, M.,
Takeda, S.,
Yokoyama, S.,
and Shibata, T.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
5538-5543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Kurumizaka, H.,
Ikawa, S.,
Nakada, M.,
Enomoto, R.,
Kagawa, W.,
Kinebuchi, T.,
Yamazoe, M.,
Yokoyama, S.,
and Shibata, T.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
14315-14320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Stasiak, A. Z.,
Larquet, E.,
Stasiak, A.,
Muller, S.,
Engel, A.,
Van Dyck, E.,
West, S.,
and Egelman, E. H.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
337-340[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Thresher, R. J.,
Makhov, A. M.,
Hall, S. D.,
Kolodner, R. D.,
and Griffith, J. D.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
254,
364-371[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Passy, S. I.,
Yu, X.,
Li, Z.,
Radding, C. M.,
and Egelman, E. H.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4279-4284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Noirot, P.,
and Kolodner, R. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12274-12280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Kraus, E.,
Leung, W. Y.,
and Haber, J. E.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
8255-8262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Muyrers, J. P. P.,
Zhang, Y.,
Buchholz, F.,
and Stewart, A. F.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1971-1982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Formosa, T.,
and Alberts, B. M.
(1986)
Cell
47,
793-806[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Weise, F.
(1997)
Charakterisierung von an der Replikation des Bakteriophogen SPP1 beteiligten Gene. Dissertation thesis
, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany
|
| 44.
|
Boehmer, P. E.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
347-384[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Taylor, K.,
and Wegrzyn, G.
(1995)
FEMS Microbiol Rev.
17,
109-119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Severini, A.,
Scraba, D. G.,
and Tyrrell, D. L.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
3169-3175[Abstract]
|
| 47.
|
Skaliter, R.,
Makhov, A. M.,
Griffith, J. D.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
1132-1136[Abstract]
|
| 48.
|
Baranska, S.,
Gabig, M.,
Wegrzyn, A.,
Konopa, G.,
Herman-Antosiewicz, A.,
Hernandez, P.,
Schvartzman, J. B.,
Helinski, D. R.,
and Wegrzyn, G.
(2001)
Microbiology
147,
535-547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Bastia, D.,
and Sueoka, N.
(1975)
J. Mol. Biol.
98,
305-320[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Dodson, M.,
Echols, H.,
Wickner, S.,
Alfano, C.,
Mensa-Wilmot, K.,
Gomes, B.,
LeBowitz, J.,
Roberts, J. D.,
and McMacken, R.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
7638-7642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Stahl, F. W.,
Kobayashi, I.,
and Stahl, M. M.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
181,
199-209[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Malkova, A.,
Signon, L.,
Schaefer, C. B.,
Naylor, M. L.,
Theis, J. F.,
Newlon, C. S.,
and Haber, J. E.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
1055-1060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Manfredi, B. Carrasco, S. Ayora, and J. C. Alonso
Bacillus subtilis RecO Nucleates RecA onto SsbA-coated Single-stranded DNA
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 5, 2008;
283(36):
24837 - 24847.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Canas, B. Carrasco, S. Ayora, and J. C. Alonso
The RecU Holliday junction resolvase acts at early stages of homologous recombination
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 1, 2008;
36(16):
5242 - 5249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Lopez-Torrejon, M. I. Martinez-Jimenez, and S. Ayora
Role of LrpC from Bacillus subtilis in DNA transactions during DNA repair and recombination
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 10, 2006;
34(1):
120 - 129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Carrasco, S. Ayora, R. Lurz, and J. C. Alonso
Bacillus subtilis RecU Holliday-junction resolvase modulates RecA activities
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 15, 2005;
33(12):
3942 - 3952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Bouchard and S. Moineau
Lactococcal Phage Genes Involved in Sensitivity to AbiK and Their Relation to Single-Strand Annealing Proteins
J. Bacteriol.,
June 1, 2004;
186(11):
3649 - 3652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ayora, B. Carrasco, E. Doncel, R. Lurz, and J. C. Alonso
Bacillus subtilis RecU protein cleaves Holliday junctions and anneals single-stranded DNA
PNAS,
January 13, 2004;
101(2):
452 - 457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Canchaya, C. Proux, G. Fournous, A. Bruttin, and H. Brussow
Prophage Genomics
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
June 1, 2003;
67(2):
238 - 276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bailey, S. E. Sedelnikova, P. Mesa, S. Ayora, J. P. Waltho, A. E. Ashcroft, A. J. Baron, J. C. Alonso, and J. B. Rafferty
Structural Analysis of Bacillus subtilis SPP1 Phage Helicase Loader Protein G39P
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 18, 2003;
278(17):
15304 - 15312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. S. Vellani and R. S. Myers
Bacteriophage SPP1 Chu Is an Alkaline Exonuclease in the SynExo Family of Viral Two-Component Recombinases
J. Bacteriol.,
April 15, 2003;
185(8):
2465 - 2474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|