![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 39, 36244-36252, September 27, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
¶
From the
Centre for Thrombosis and Vascular Research
and § Surgical Professional Unit, St. Vincents Hospital,
The University of New South Wales,
Sydney 2052, Australia
Received for publication, January 16, 2002, and in revised form, April 16, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The FasL/Fas system has been implicated in smooth
muscle cell apoptosis and atherosclerotic plaque instability, a process that can lead to plaque rupture, precipitating myocardial infarction and sudden death. The transcriptional mechanisms regulating FasL gene
expression in vascular smooth muscle cells are poorly understood. We
recently described a novel mechanism mediating inducible FasL gene
expression in smooth muscle cells involving the zinc finger transcription factor Sp1 (Kavurma, M. M., Santiago, F. S.,
Bofocco, E., and Khachigian, L. M. (2001) J. Biol.
Chem. 276, 4964-4971). We now show that FasL gene expression is
governed by cooperative activation between Sp1 and the Ets family of
transcription factors. The overexpression of Ets-1 was sufficient to
induce FasL promoter-dependent expression and protein
synthesis. Ets-1 activation of the promoter was abrogated either by
deletion or mutation of the Sp1 binding site. The overexpression of
Ets-1 together with Sp1 produced cooperative activation of the FasL
promoter. Sp1 induction of the FasL promoter was abrogated by an Ets-1
mutant lacking the activation domain. Conversely, Ets-1 activation of
the promoter was blocked by an Sp1 mutant bearing the DNA-binding
domain. The mutation of the Fas Ligand (FasL)1 is a
cytotoxic type II transmembrane protein and member of the tumor
necrosis factor family (1). The engagement of FasL with its
receptor Fas initiates trimerization of Fas, resulting in the
recruitment of the death-inducing signaling complex (1, 2) whose
principal components include accessory molecules Fas-associated death
domain and pro-caspase 8 (2). Immediately after recruitment,
pro-caspase 8 is proteolytically processed and in turn activates the
execution phases of apoptosis (3-5).
FasL has been implicated in atherosclerotic plaque instability (6, 7).
Smooth muscle cells are the principal cells in the plaque capable of
producing collagen fibers required to maintain tensile strength (8, 9).
FasL-dependent smooth muscle cell apoptosis within
vulnerable regions may lead to plaque instability and rupture,
processes that can precipitate myocardial infarction and sudden death.
The molecular mechanisms regulating FasL gene expression in vascular
smooth muscle cells are poorly understood. However, studies in other
cell types have revealed the existence of binding sites in the FasL
promoter for NFAT (10), Egr-1 (10), Egr-2 (10), Egr-3 (11),
NF Ets proteins have been implicated in the regulation of genes involved
in diverse cellular processes, such as proliferation, differentiation,
development, transformation, and apoptosis (14-16). Ets factors
typically bear a conserved winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain
(17) that recognize a core motif
5'GGA(A/T)3' whose flanking
nucleotides determine specificity (14, 17). Members of this family
include Ets-1, Ets-2, PU.1, Fli-1, GABP Transfections and Luciferase Assays--
WKY12-22/WKY3M-22
smooth muscle cells were maintained in Waymouth's medium (Invitrogen),
pH 7.4, supplemented with 1 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen), 10 units/ml penicillin, 10 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10%
fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5%
CO2. Transient transfections were performed at 60%
confluency together with the indicated constructs and 1 µg of the
internal control plasmid pRL-TK using FuGENE 6 transfection agent
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Luciferase activity was quantified
24 h after transfection using the dual luciferase assay system
(Promega), and luciferase activity was normalized with the data
generated from pRL-TK.
Plasmid Constructs--
The fragments of the FasL promoter was
amplified by PCR from FasL-hsLuc (a gift of Dr. Shailaja Kasibhatla,
La Jolla Institute of Cellular Immunology, San Diego, CA) and
blunt end-cloned into pGL3-basic ( Western Blot for FasL--
WKY3M-22 smooth muscle cells were
transfected with the indicated constructs for 24 h. The medium was
then replaced with serum-free medium for an additional 12 h. The
supernatant was collected and concentrated using Centricon-10 columns
(Millipore), and proteins from the supernatant were resolved by 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto Immobilon-P
transfer membranes (Millipore). The membrane was blocked overnight in
phosphate-buffered saline containing 5% skim milk and 0.05% Tween 20. FasL was detected with FasL polyclonal antibodies (1:100, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) and chemiluminescence.
Immunohistochemistry--
Immunohistochemical analysis on human
carotid endarterectomy specimens was performed essentially as described
previously (24).
Immunoprecipitation Studies--
Immunoprecipitation experiments
were performed in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines
(Dynal). 3 µg of Sp1 rabbit polyclonal IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
and 15 µl of magnetic Dynabeads (M-20 Sheep anti-Rabbit IgG, Dynal)
were incubated overnight at 4 °C with gentle shaking. Smooth muscle
cell nuclear extracts (20 µl) were incubated with the washed coated
beads for 60 min using bidirectional rotation at 4 °C. Several
washes were performed prior to Western blot analysis.
Generation of Recombinant Glutathione S-Transferase Ets-1
Protein--
BL21 transformants of pGEXEts-1DBD (residues Pro-386 to
Glu-494) were grown to A0.6-0.8 at 600 nm and stimulated with 0.1 M
isopropyl-1-thio- DNase I Footprint Analysis--
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
WKY12-22
nuclear extracts or recombinant Ets-1 protein were incubated with
indicated 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides in a
total volume of 20 µl containing 10 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 8.0, 50 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5% glycerol, 1 µg of salmon sperm
DNA, 5% sucrose, 1 µg of poly(dI·dC), and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The mixture was incubated for 10-15 min
at 4 °C. In competition assays, nuclear extracts were incubated with
unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide or Ets-1, Sp1, and pCNA
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) prior to the addition of the probe.
The samples were resolved by 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography.
Ets-1 Is Expressed in Human Atherosclerotic Lesions--
We
recently determined that FasL gene expression in vascular smooth muscle
cells is under the transcriptional control of the zinc finger
transcription factor Sp1, which in turn is regulated by atypical PKC Ets-1 Activates FasL Gene Expression--
Inspection of the FasL
promoter revealed the existence of several putative Ets binding sites
(EBS). To determine the capacity of Ets-1 to modulate endogenous FasL
protein expression in vascular smooth muscle cells, we performed
Western immunoblot analysis with antibodies targeting FasL. The
overexpression of Ets-1 compared with the backbone control vector pKCR3
increased FasL immunoreactivity (Fig.
2A). Sp1 overexpression in
this system also increased FasL protein levels (Fig. 2A),
indicating that Ets-1 like Sp1 is sufficient to confer FasL gene
expression. To determine whether FasL is under the transcriptional
control of Ets-1, transient transfection analysis was performed with
the Firefly luciferase construct FasL-hsLuc under the
influence of 1.3 kilobases of the FasL promoter, and the reporter
activity was determined. FasL promoter activity was induced by Ets-1.
In contrast, expression vectors generating Fli-1 and PU.1 had no effect
on FasL promoter-dependent expression (Fig. 2B).
A cotransfection of FasL-hsLuc with increasing concentrations of
Ets-1-pKCR3 revealed dose-dependent Ets-1 activation of the FasL promoter (Fig. 3A). These
data demonstrate selective activation of FasL by this prototypical Ets
family factor.
Ets-1 Activation of FasL Expression Is
Sp1-dependent--
To determine whether Sp1 is involved in
Ets-1 induction of the FasL promoter, we performed a transient
co-transfection analysis using Ets-1-pKCR3 together with
mSp1FasL-hsLuc, a FasL promoter construct bearing a mutation in the Sp1
binding element ( Mutants of Ets-1 or Sp1 Ablate Cooperative Activation of FasL
Promoter--
To provide further support for positive collaboration
between Ets-1 and Sp1 at the FasL promoter in smooth muscle cells, we generated a dominant-negative (DN) mutant of Ets-1 bearing only the
DNA-binding domain. Sp1 activation of the FasL promoter (Fig. 4, column 3) was abrogated in
the presence of DN-Ets-1 mutant (Fig. 4, column 4).
Conversely, the Ets-1 activation of the promoter (Fig. 4, column
7) was blocked by DN-Sp1 (pEBGSp1) containing the DNA-binding
domain of Sp1 (Fig. 4, column 8). These results demonstrate
the reliance of intact Sp1 for Ets-1 activation of the FasL promoter
and intact Ets-1 for Sp1 activation. Moreover, these data suggest that
the Ets-1/Sp1 cooperativity observed may involve the physical
interaction between these factors in these cells.
The GGAA Element between Ets-1 and Sp1 Physically Interact and Bind the FasL
Promoter--
The cooperative activation of the FasL promoter by Ets-1
and Sp1 in smooth muscle cells suggest that these factors may indeed physically interact. We performed immunoprecipitation experiments to
determine whether in smooth muscle cells these factors physically associate with one another. Magnetic beads coated with Sp1 antibodies were incubated with smooth muscle cell nuclear extract prior to Western
blot analysis with antibodies to Ets-1. This produced readily
detectable Ets-1 immunoreactivity sourced from the nuclear extracts
(Fig. 6A). When the blot was
stripped and reprobed with antibodies targeting Sp1, the
immunoreactivity of the expected size was detected (Fig.
6A). These findings demonstrate that Ets-1 physically
interacts with Sp1 in smooth muscle cells.
We next performed electrophoretic mobility shift analysis to determine
whether the Ets response element in the FasL promoter could support the
interaction of Ets-1 and Sp1. EMSA using recombinant Ets-1 and a
consensus Ets-1 oligonucleotide supported the formation of a specific
nucleoprotein complex (Fig. 6B). This complex was also
apparent with 32P-labeled Oligo
The positive supershift using Sp1 antibodies suggested that complex II
(Fig. 6, C and D) contains Sp1. However,
Oligo
The functional studies in Fig. 3A revealed that
Ets-1 activation of the FasL promoter requires the existence of an
intact Sp1 element (
Atherosclerotic plaque rupture can lead to acute coronary syndromes
including myocardial infarction and death. The underlying factors and
mechanisms precipitating plaque rupture are poorly understood. However,
accumulating evidence suggests that instability may arise from smooth
muscle cell apoptosis. For example, comparison of coronary
atherectomy specimens from patients with unstable and stable angina
revealed a significantly lower content of smooth muscle cells and
greater apoptosis in unstable versus stable lesions (25).
Similarly, human plaque smooth muscle cells show higher rates of
apoptosis in culture than smooth muscle cells from normal vessels (27).
Although the mechanism is not entirely known, FasL gene expression has
been implicated in this process (28). We recently demonstrated a
proapoptotic role for Sp1 by activating FasL expression in smooth
muscle cells via the
Ets factors modulate the transcription via cooperative interactions
with nuclear factors. These include NF
In summary, this study introduces a new player, Ets-1, in the complex
transcriptional regulation of FasL gene expression. Ets-1 activation of
the FasL promoter is critically dependent upon physical and cooperative
interactions with the zinc finger nuclear protein Sp1. Mutations that
perturb the capacity of Sp1 or Ets-1 to bind recognition elements in
the FasL promoter impair the capacity of either factor to induce gene expression.
365GGAA
362
element in the FasL promoter abolished Ets-1 activation and attenuated Sp1-inducible gene expression. Immunoprecipitation and supershift experiments revealed that endogenous Ets-1 and Sp1 physically interact
and co-occupy this site. Thus, FasL gene expression in vascular smooth
muscle cells is mediated by cooperativity between Ets-1 and Sp1.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B (12), and AP-1 (12). We recently reported that FasL gene
expression in smooth muscle cells is controlled by Sp1, which is in
turn regulated by the atypical protein kinase
(PKC
) (13).
, Elf-1, Sap-1, PEA-3,
Elk-1, Elk-2, erg and ergB. A key characteristic that Ets
transcription factors display is their ability to regulate transcription through interactions with other nuclear factors. For
example, Ets proteins functionally interact with NF
B (18), AP-1
(19), Pax (20), Tax (21, 22), and Sp1 (21, 23). Here we demonstrate
that FasL transcription in smooth muscle cells is regulated by Ets-1,
cooperative interactions with Sp1, and a distinct recognition element
in the FasL promoter.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
756FasL-hsLuc,
395FasL-hsLuc,
322FasL-hsLuc, and
271FasL-hsLuc). mSp1-FasL-hsLuc has been
described previously (13).
756mGGAAFasL-hsLuc was generated using the
QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The
following primers were used to generate
756mGGAAFasL-hsLuc,
5'-GCTCTGCAGGATCCCATTCCGGTGAGCATAGCCTAC-3' and
5'-GTAGGCTATGCTCACCGGAATGGGATCCTGCAGACG-3'. Ets-1-pKCR3 was obtained
from Ian Cassidy (Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia), and the backbone
pKCR3 was generated by restriction enzyme digest EcoR1
separating the chicken Ets-1 cDNA. pEBGNLS and pEBGSp1 were obtained from Gerald Thiel (Institute for Genetics, University of
Cologne, Cologne, France), CMV-Sp1 was obtained from Robert Tjian
(Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA), Fli-1-pcDNA3 was obtained from Melissa
Holmes (Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia), and PU.1-pcDNA3 was obtained from Robert Passey (Department of Pathology, University of New
South Wales, New South Wales, Australia). DN-Ets-1 and pGEXEts-1DBD
(Ets-DNA-binding domain) were generated by the amplification of the
DNA-binding domain by PCR and blunt end-cloned into pKCR3 or pGEX4T-2
(Amersham Biosciences), respectively. The primer sequences are as
follows: forward Ets-1 domain, 5'-CCTGTCATTCCTGCCGC-3' and, reverse
Ets-1 domain, 5'-CCTCTGGTGTGTAGCCC-3'.
-D-galactopyranoside for 3-6 h at
30 °C with shaking. Bacteria were pelleted and sonicated in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1.43 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1.44 mM
-mercaptoethanol, and 0.5% Triton X-100. Glutathione
S-transferase-conjugated agarose beads were added to the
supernatant and incubated on a rotary shaker for 1 h at 4 °C.
The beads were washed several times in wash buffer (50 mM,
Tris pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1.43 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1.44 mM
-mercaptoethanol, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40) and eluted at 22 °C for
10 min in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 10 mM of
reduced glutathione.
756FasL-hsLuc was digested
with EcoRI and HindIII to generate a 475-bp
fragment of the FasL promoter prior to 5' end labeling with
[
-32P]dATP and purification using MicroBio-Spin
Columns (Bio-Rad). This labeled double-stranded fragment was further
digested with BglII and subsequently purified. DNase I
footprint analysis was performed using 70,000 cpm of probe, 1 mg/ml
poly(dI·dC), 10 mg/ml BSA, 10× footprint buffer (50% glycerol, 50 mM MgCl2, 500 mM NaCl, and 25 mM HEPES, pH 8.0) and increasing amounts of recombinant Ets-1. Reactions proceeded on ice for 1 h followed by digestion with 2 units of DNase I in 25 mM NaCl, 10 mM
HEPES, pH 5.0, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM
CaCl2 for 5 min. The digestions were stopped by the
addition of phenol-chloroform, and the DNA was precipitated with
ethanol and resuspended in 5 µl of formamide-loading buffer prior to
boiling for 2 min. The reactions were resolved on a 10% sequencing gel
and visualized by PhosphorImager.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(13). This pathway has important implications to smooth muscle cell
apoptosis and the potentially fatal consequences of atherosclerotic
plaque instability but has not yet been localized to a pathologic
setting. An immunohistochemical analysis of human atherosclerotic
plaques revealed constitutive Sp1 expression throughout the diseased
lesion as well as normal media (Fig. 1).
In contrast, the activated form of PKC
(phosphorylated on
Thr410) was exclusively detected in atherosclerotic lesions
particularly within shoulders (Fig. 1), which are prone to later
rupture (25). FasL immunopositivity was also confined to the lesion
(Fig. 1). Both PKC
-Thr410 and FasL expression was
localized to
-SM actin (Ac)+ smooth muscle cells
undergoing apoptosis based on in situ TUNEL (terminal
deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling) (Fig. 1)
and CPP32 (caspase 3) staining (data not shown). Because Sp1 has
been reported to physically associate with the prototypical
helix-turn-helix Ets family member Ets-1 in non-vascular cell types
(23, 26), we hypothesized that Ets-1 may be involved in FasL gene
regulation, possibly in concert with Sp1. To date, Ets-1 has not been
localized in human atherosclerotic arteries, nor has it been linked to
the FasL transcription in any cell type. Immunohistochemical analysis
revealed that Ets-1 is expressed by
-actin+ smooth
muscle cells in human atherosclerotic lesions, coincident with Sp1 and
FasL immunoreactivity (Fig. 1).

View larger version (125K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Ets-1, Sp1, and FasL immunoreactivity in
smooth muscle cells of human carotid atherosclerotic plaques.
Smooth muscle cells are identified by
-SM-actin+
staining. TUNEL+ and PKC
-Thr410
immunopositivity is indicated in the figure. The figure is
representative of staining observed in three carotid endarterectomy
specimens. I, intima; M, media; C,
core.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Ets-1 activates FasL gene expression in
smooth muscle cells. A, Western blot analysis using
samples from WKY3M-22 cells overexpressing Ets-1 and Sp1. 40 µg of
Ets-1-pKCR3 and 15 µg of CMV-Sp1 (together with respective backbone
controls) were used. Coomassie Blue-stained gel indicates unbiased
protein loading. B, Ets-1 selectively activates the FasL
promoter. Transient transfection analysis in WKY12-22 cells
overexpressing Ets-1 with FasL-hsLuc and Ets family members is shown. 3 µg of indicated expression constructs were used, 3 µg of backbones
pKCR3 and pCDNA3 were used, and 15 µg of FasL promoter reporter
construct were used throughout. Firefly luciferase activity
was normalized to Renilla activity. Error bars
represent the mean ± S.E. The data are representative of two
independent determinations.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Ets-1 activates the FasL promoter.
A, Ets-1 activates FasL promoter activity in a
dose-dependent manner. Transient transfections with
WKY12-22 cells expressing Ets-1 with FasL-hsLuc or mSp1FasL-hsLuc are
shown. B, Ets-1 and Sp1 activate the FasL promoter in a
cooperative manner, which is abrogated by the Sp1 mutation in the FasL
promoter. C, cooperativity between Ets-1 and Sp1 is
demonstrated at the level of FasL protein. 40 and 60 µg of
Ets-1-pKCR3 and 15 µg of CMV-Sp1 (together with respective backbone
control vectors) were transfected into WKY3M-22 smooth muscle cells for
FasL Western analysis. Coomassie Blue-stained gel indicates unbiased
protein loading. Unless indicated otherwise, cotransfection with 15 µg of FasL-hsLuc or mSp1FasL-hsLuc was used throughout. Luciferase
activity was normalized to Renilla activity. Error
bars represent the mean ± S.E. The data are representative
of two independent determinations.
82GGGCGG
277 to
282TTTCTT
277). This mutant reporter
construct was unable to mediate Ets-1 activation of the FasL promoter
over a 20-fold concentration range of the Ets-1 expression vector (Fig.
3A), indicating that the Sp1 binding element is essential
for Ets-1 activation of the FasL promoter. We next expressed Ets-1 and
Sp1 with the FasL promoter in a transient co-transfection setting.
Ets-1 and Sp1 each independently induced wild-type FasL
promoter-dependent expression (Fig. 3B). Co-expression of both factors was more effective than the expression of
either factor alone, producing cooperative activation of the FasL
promoter (Fig. 3B). However, mSp1FasL-hsLuc failed to
support Sp1, Ets-1, or Sp1/Ets-1 activation (Fig. 3B),
demonstrating that the cooperativity between Ets-1 and Sp1 is mediated
via the
282GGGCGG
277 element in the FasL
promoter. To demonstrate Ets-1/Sp1 cooperativity at the level of
endogenous FasL, we evaluated the effect of Ets-1 and Sp1 on FasL
protein expression by Western blot analysis. FasL expression induced by
a fixed amount of Ets-1 and Sp1 was augmented when the stoichiometry
between these factors was increased in favor of Ets-1 (Fig.
3C). In contrast, FasL immunoreactivity was not detected
when identical amounts of the respective backbones were used (Fig.
3C).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Ets-1 and Sp1 cooperate to activate the FasL
promoter. Cooperativity between Ets-1 and Sp1 is established using
DN-mutant constructs. Co-transfection analysis in WKY12-22 smooth
muscle cell is shown. Unless indicated, 15 µg of FasL-hsLuc were used
throughout. Luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla.
Error bars represent the mean ± S.E. The data are
representative of two independent determinations.
395 and
322 Is Required for Ets-1
Activation of the FasL Promoter--
We next performed 5' deletion and
transient transfection analysis to delineate the actual region in the
FasL promoter mediating Ets-1 activation. Ets-1 induced the reporter
activity in smooth muscle cells transfected with construct
756FasL-hsLuc and
395FasL-hsLuc (Fig.
5A). In contrast, constructs
322FasL-hsLuc and
262FasL-hsLuc failed to respond to Ets-1
activation (Fig. 5A). These findings indicate that Ets-1
activation of the FasL promoter is mediated by bps spanning the
region
395 and
322. Inspection of the promoter sequence revealed an
Ets site with a core motif 5'-GGAA-3' (Fig. 5B,
356/
352). Fig. 5C demonstrates that
recombinant Ets-1 protein (DNA-binding domain, residues Pro-386 to
Glu-494) protects the putative Ets-1 binding site from partial DNase I
digestion in a dose-dependent manner. This protection was
abolished by the presence of 5-fold molar excess of unlabeled
oligonucleotide
381/
346 (Oligo
381/
346) (Fig. 5A),
which includes the putative
356GGAA
352 Ets
response element. To demonstrate the functionality of this element, we
introduced a transverse mutation at this site
(
356GGAA
352 to
356TTCC
352) in construct
756FasL-hsLuc,
generating construct
756mGGAAFasL-hsLuc, and then performed
co-transfection experiments with Ets-1 and Sp1. Fig. 5D
demonstrates the positive activation by Ets-1 and Sp1 either alone or
together on the FasL promoter. In contrast, when the same experiments
were performed using the GGAA mutant (
756mGGAAFasL-hsLuc), Sp1
transactivation was attenuated, and Ets-1 induction either alone or
together with Sp1 was abolished (Fig. 5D). These findings
demonstrate that Ets-1 and Sp1 activation of the FasL promoter requires
an intact GGAA binding motif.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Ets-1 activation of the FasL promoter is
determined between regions spanning from
395 and
322. A,
transfection analysis using FasL-hsLuc and 5' derivatives. 3 µg of
Ets-1-pKCR3 and pKCR3 were used. B, sequence from human FasL
promoter. One core GGAA (EBS) has been identified. The Sp1 binding
element and the EBS are italicized. Underlined
sequences indicate probes used in EMSA, Oligo
381/
346 and
Oligo
296/
265. C, DNase I footprint analysis of the FasL
promoter. 2 and 8 µl of recombinant Ets-1 were used. Unlabeled 5×
molar excess Oligo
381/
346 was used in competition assays. Putative
transcription factor binding sites are noted. D, mutation of
365/
362 element abrogates Ets-1 activation of the FasL promoter.
Unless indicated, 3 µg of Ets-1-pKCR3 and CMV-Sp1 are used throughout
with relative backbones. 15 µg of FasL-hsLuc, 5' derivatives of
FasL-hsLuc, and
756mFasL-hsLuc were used. Luciferase activity was
normalized to Renilla. Error bars represent the
mean ± S.E. The data are representative of two independent
determinations.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Ets-1 and Sp1 form a complex.
A, immunoprecipitation studies demonstrate a physical
association between Ets-1 and Sp1. B, Ets-1 binding is
abrogated by the mutation of GGAA element. EMSA using indicated
double-stranded 32P-labeled Oligo and recombinant Ets-1
protein is shown. Sequence of Oligo-Ets is 5'-GAT CTC GAG CAG GAA GTT
CGA-3' (29). Sequence of Oligo
381/
346 is 5'-CGT CTG CAG GAT CCC
AGG AAG GTG AGC ATA GCC TAC-3'. Sequence of
mOligo
381/
346 is 5'-CGT CTG CAG GAT CCC ATT CCG GTG AGC ATA GCC
TAC-3'; the putative EBS is underlined. C, Ets-1 binding is
abrogated by the addition of cold excess Oligo
381/
346. The NF
B
oligonucleotide sequence is 5'-GGA TGC CAT TGG GGA TTT CCT CTT TAC TGG
AGT T-3'. D, Ets-1 and Sp1 are involved in a nucleoprotein
complex at the FasL promoter. Supershift studies using
[32P]Oligo
381/
346, WKY12-22 nuclear extracts, and
indicated antibodies are illustrated. EMSA was performed as described
under "Experimental Procedures," and nucleoprotein complexes were
visualized by autoradiography. NE, nuclear extracts.
381/
346 (Fig.
6B). The interaction was no longer supported when the GGAA
motif in [32P]Oligo
381/
346 was mutated to TTCC (Fig.
6B). EMSA from nuclear extracts produced three specific
nucleoprotein complexes (Fig. 6C, complexes
I-III) whose formation was blocked by 50-fold molar excess
of unlabeled probe but was unaffected by the same fold excess of an
unrelated oligonucleotide bearing the NF
B binding site (Fig.
6C). Supershift analysis using antibodies to Ets-1, Sp1, and
pCNA identified the protein components of complex I to contain Ets-1
and Sp1, complex II to contain Sp1, and complex III to be neither Ets-1
nor Sp1 (Fig. 6D). These results indicate that Sp1 and Ets-1
co-occupy this region of the FasL promoter (complex I).
381/
346 does not bear a consensus Sp1 binding site (Fig.
5B). To determine whether Sp1 can directly bind this region
of the promoter, we performed EMSA using
[32P]Oligo
381/
346 and recombinant Sp1.
[32P]Oligo
381/
346 did not support a Sp1·DNA
complex (Fig. 7A), whereas
[32P]Oligo
296/
265 containing a functional Sp1 site
(13) produced a nucleoprotein complex (Fig. 7A). Thus, it
appears that the FasL promoter Ets response element hosts a complex
between Ets-1 and Sp1, although Sp1 alone cannot directly contact DNA.
Sp1 may associate with other factor(s) that interact with DNA at
this site.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Sp1 does not physically bind to
381/
346
region. A, EMSA was performed using
[32P]Oligo
381/
346,
[32P]Oligo
295/
265 and recombinant Sp1 (Promega).
B, Ets-1 does not interact with double-stranded
[32P]
295/
265. C, mutation in the Sp1 site
abrogates Sp1 binding. Sequence of [32P]Oligo
296/
265
is 5'-ATC AGA AAA TTG TGG GCG GAA ACT TCC AGG-3'. Sequence
of [32P]mOligo
296/
265 is 5'-ATC AGA AAA TTG TTT TCT
TAA ACT TCC AGG-3'. The Sp1 element is underlined. EMSA was performed
as described under "Experimental Procedures," and nucleoprotein
complexes were visualized by autoradiography. NE, nuclear
extracts.
282GGGCGG
277). We used
EMSA to determine whether Ets-1 physically associates with Sp1 at this
downstream site (Fig. 5B).
[32P]Oligo
296/
265 as expected (13) produced an Sp1
supershift from nuclear extracts (Fig. 7B). This was
abolished when the Sp1 binding site was mutated from GGGCGG to TTTCTT
(Fig. 7C). However, unlike
[32P]Oligo
381/
346 (Fig. 6D), an Ets-1
supershift was not observed with [32P]Oligo
296/
265
(Fig. 7B). These findings indicate that Ets-1 physically
associates with Sp1 at the
381/
346 site but not the
296/
265
site in the FasL promoter.
282GGGCGGG
277 element
in a PKC
-dependent manner (13). This study now shows that Ets-1 in collaboration with Sp1 binds and activates the FasL promoter via the
356GGAA
352 element and
induces FasL expression. Whether the existence of a second putative Ets
motif (
372GGAT
369) also mediates FasL
promoter expression is presently under investigation in our laboratory.
Dominant-negative experiments revealed that the structural integrity of
Ets-1 and Sp1 is critical for the cooperative activation of the FasL
promoter by these factors. Our demonstration that Ets-1, Sp1, and FasL
are expressed in apoptotic smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic
lesions supports the main finding of this study that Ets-1 and Sp1
alone and together regulate FasL in smooth muscle cells.
B (18), AP-1 (19), Pax (20),
and Tax (22). This study is the first to demonstrate that Ets-1/Sp1
cooperativity mediates the expression of FasL. Such cooperativity has
been observed in other promoters. For example, Ets-1/Sp1 activates
MRG1 expression in fibroblasts (26), glycoprotein IIb gene
expression in megakaryocytes (23), and together with Tax facilitates
PTHrP promoter transactivation (21). Based on these findings, we
propose that the Ets-1/Sp1 activation of FasL transcription involves a
direct physical association between these factors upstream in the
promoter where Sp1 can also bind independently of Ets-1 but does not
contact DNA (Fig. 8). In contrast, Ets-1
does not appear to associate with the Sp1 complex at the proximal site.
Because the Sp1 binding element is located in close proximity to sites
for NFAT and NF
B, it is probable that these other factors may play a
role in the stereo-specific enhancer complex involving Ets-1 and
Sp1.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Schematic of proposed interactions between
regulatory elements involved in the transcriptional regulation of
FasL. Sp1 physically associates with Ets-1, and the nucleoprotein
complex at
381/
346 can be supershifted with antibodies to either
Sp1 or Ets-1. Sp1 binds this region independently of Ets-1 but does not
directly contact the promoter. Ets-1 in contrast is unable to associate
with promoter-bound Sp1 at
296/
265. The
296/
265 site is a
"hot spot" with putative recognition elements for NF
B and NFAT
in close proximity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Ian Cassidy for the Ets-1
expression vector (University of Queensland), Melissa Holmes
(University of New South Wales) and Denis Hickstein (University of
Washington) for the Fli-1 expression vector, Robert Tjian (University
of California) for the Sp1 expression vector, Gerald Thiel (University
of Cologne) for the dominant-negative Sp1 vector, Robert Passey
(University of New South Wales) for the PU.1 expression vector, and
Alex Toker (Harvard Medical School) for the PKC
-Thr410 antibody.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the New South Wales State Department of Health and by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Principal Research Fellow of the NHMRC. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Centre for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, Dept. of Pathology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. Tel.: 61-2-9385-2537; Fax: 61-2-9385-1389; E-mail: L.Khachigian@unsw.edu.au.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 22, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200463200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
FasL, Fas
Ligand;
PKC
, protein kinase
;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
EBS, Ets binding site;
DN, dominant-negative.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Nagata, S. (1997) Cell 88, 355-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Green, D. R. (1998) Cell 94, 695-698[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Ashkenazi, A.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1998)
Science
281,
1305-1308 |
| 4. |
Thornberry, N. A.,
and Lazebnick, Y.
(1998)
Science
281,
1312-1316 |
| 5. |
Wolf, B. B.,
and Green, D. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20049-20052 |
| 6. |
Geng, Y. J.,
Henderson, L. E.,
Levesque, E. B.,
Muszynzki, M.,
and Libby, P.
(1997)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
17,
2200-2208 |
| 7. | Geng, Y. J., Liao, H.-S., and Macgovern, J. (1998) Circulation 98 (Suppl. I), I-48 |
| 8. |
Kockx, M. M.,
De Meyer, G. R. Y.,
Muhring, J.,
Jacob, W.,
Bult, H.,
and Herman, A. G.
(1998)
Circulation
97,
2307-2315 |
| 9. |
Kockx, M. M.,
and Herman, A. G.
(2000)
Cardiovasc. Res.
45,
736-746 |
| 10. | Xiao, S., Matsui, K., Fine, A., Zhu, B., Marshak-Rothstein, A., Widom, R. L., and Ju, S.-T. (1999) Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 3456-3465[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Mittelstadt, P. R.,
and Ashwell, J. D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3744-3751 |
| 12. | Kasibhatla, S., Brunner, T., Genestier, L., Echeverri, F., Mahboubi, A., and Green, D. R. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 543-551[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Kavurma, M. M.,
Santiago, F. S.,
Bofocco, E.,
and Khachigian, L. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
4964-4971 |
| 14. | Sementchenko, V. I., and Watson, D. K. (2000) Oncogene 19, 6533-6548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Yordy, J. S., and Muise-Helmericks, R. C. (2000) Oncogene 19, 6503-6513[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Li, R., Pei, H., and Watson, D. K. (2000) Oncogene 19, 6514-6523[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Wasylyk, B., Hahn, S. L., and Giovane, A. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 211, 7-18[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Bassuk, A. G., Anandappa, R. T., and Leiden, J. M. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 3563-3573[Abstract] |
| 19. | Bassuk, A. G., and Leiden, J. M. (1995) Immunity 3, 223-237[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Fitzsimmons, D.,
Hodsdon, W.,
Wheat, W.,
Maira, S. M.,
Wasylyk, B.,
and Hagman, J.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2198-2211 |
| 21. |
Dittmer, J.,
Masison-Pise, A.,
Clemens, K. E.,
Choi, K.,
and Brady, J. N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4953-4958 |
| 22. |
Gitlin, S. D.,
Dittmer, J.,
Shin, R. C.,
and Brady, J. N.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
7307-7316 |
| 23. |
Block, K. L.,
Shou, Y.,
and Poncz, M.
(1996)
Blood
88,
2071-2090 |
| 24. |
Santiago, F. S.,
Lowe, H. C.,
Bobryshev, Y. V.,
and Khachigian, L. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
41143-41149 |
| 25. |
Bauriedel, G.,
Hutter, R.,
Welsch, U.,
Bach, R.,
Sievert, H.,
and Lüderitz, B.
(1999)
Cardiovasc. Res.
41,
480-488 |
| 26. |
Han, B.,
Liu, N.,
Yang, X.,
Sun, H. B.,
and Yang, Y. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
7937-7942 |
| 27. |
Bennett, M. R.,
Littlewood, T. D.,
Schwartz, S. M.,
and Weissberg, P. L.
(1997)
Circ. Res.
81,
591-599 |
| 28. | Cai, W., Devaux, B., Schaper, W., and Schaper, J. (1997) Atherosclerosis 131, 177-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Tajima, A., Miyamoto, Y., Kadowaki, H., and Hayashi, M. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1492, 377-384[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Y. Tan, V. C. Midgley, M. M. Kavurma, F. S. Santiago, X. Luo, R. Peden, R. G. Fahmy, M. C. Berndt, M. P. Molloy, and L. M. Khachigian Angiotensin II-Inducible Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-D Transcription Requires Specific Ser/Thr Residues in the Second Zinc Finger Region of Sp1 Circ. Res., February 29, 2008; 102(4): e38 - e51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Crook, M. Olive, H.-H. Xue, T. H. Langenickel, M. Boehm, W. J. Leonard, and E. G. Nabel GA-binding protein regulates KIS gene expression, cell migration, and cell cycle progression FASEB J, January 1, 2008; 22(1): 225 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jiang, Y. Wei, J. Shen, D. Liu, X. Chen, J. Zhou, H. Zong, X. Yun, X. Kong, S. Zhang, et al. Functional Interaction of E1AF and Sp1 in Glioma Invasion Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2007; 27(24): 8770 - 8782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sato and K. Furukawa Sequential Action of Ets-1 and Sp1 in the Activation of the Human beta-1,4-Galactosyltransferase V Gene Involved in Abnormal Glycosylation Characteristic of Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 27702 - 27712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-L. Yao, Y.-C. Lin, P. Sawhney, and J. H. Richburg Transcriptional Regulation of FasL Expression and Participation of sTNF-{alpha} in Response to Sertoli Cell Injury J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2007; 282(8): 5420 - 5431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Maroni, P. Bendinelli, E. Matteucci, and M. A. Desiderio HGF induces CXCR4 and CXCL12-mediated tumor invasion through Ets1 and NF-{kappa}B Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 267 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Oettgen Regulation of Vascular Inflammation and Remodeling by ETS Factors Circ. Res., November 24, 2006; 99(11): 1159 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Barre, N. Venkatesan, J. Magdalou, P. Netter, S. Fournel-Gigleux, and M. Ouzzine Evidence of calcium-dependent pathway in the regulation of human {beta}1,3-glucuronosyltransferase-1 (GlcAT-I) gene expression: a key enzyme in proteoglycan synthesis FASEB J, August 1, 2006; 20(10): 1692 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakatsuka, T. Sokabe, K. Yamamoto, Y. Sato, K. Hatakeyama, A. Kamiya, and J. Ando Shear stress induces hepatocyte PAI-1 gene expression through cooperative Sp1/Ets-1 activation of transcription Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): G26 - G34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Castellano, B. Vire, M. Pion, V. Quivy, D. Olive, I. Hirsch, C. Van Lint, and Y. Collette Active Transcription of the Human FASL/CD95L/TNFSF6 Promoter Region in T Lymphocytes Involves Chromatin Remodeling: ROLE OF DNA METHYLATION AND PROTEIN ACETYLATION SUGGEST DISTINCT MECHANISMS OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL REPRESSION J. Biol. Chem., May 26, 2006; 281(21): 14719 - 14728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ogawa, T. Nomiyama, T. Nakamachi, E. B. Heywood, J. F. Stone, J. P. Berger, R. E. Law, and D. Bruemmer Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Suppresses Telomerase Activity in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Circ. Res., April 14, 2006; 98(7): e50 - e59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sugimoto, K. Okamura, S. Sugimoto, M. Satou, T. Hattori, D. E. Vance, and T. Izumi Sp1 Is a Co-activator with Ets-1, and Net Is an Important Repressor of the Transcription of CTP:Phosphocholine Cytidylyltransferase {alpha} J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40857 - 40866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Bonello, Y. V. Bobryshev, and L. M. Khachigian Peroxide-Inducible Ets-1 Mediates Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor-{alpha} Gene Transcription in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2005; 167(4): 1149 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Sohn, C. B. Deming, D. C. Johns, H. C. Champion, C. Bian, K. Gardner, and J. J. Rade |