|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205797200 on July 19, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 39, 36527-36533, September 27, 2002
Cannabinoids Protect Astrocytes from Ceramide-induced Apoptosis
through the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Protein Kinase B Pathway*
Teresa
Gómez del Pulgar ,
María L.
de Ceballos§,
Manuel
Guzmán , and
Guillermo
Velasco ¶
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology I, School of Biology, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid and
§ Neurodegeneration Group, Cajal Institute, CSIC,
28002 Madrid, Spain
Received for publication, June 12, 2002, and in revised form, July 16, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cannabinoids, the active components of marijuana
and their endogenous counterparts, exert many of their actions on the
central nervous system by binding to the CB1
cannabinoid receptor. Different studies have shown that cannabinoids
can protect neural cells from different insults. However, those studies
have been performed in neurons, whereas no attention has been focused
on glial cells. Here we used the pro-apoptotic lipid ceramide to
induce apoptosis in astrocytes, and we studied the protective effect
exerted by cannabinoids. Results show the following: (i) cannabinoids
rescue primary astrocytes from C2-ceramide-induced
apoptosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner; (ii)
triggering of this anti-apoptotic signal depends on the
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway; (iii) ERK and
its downstream target p90 ribosomal S6 kinase might be also involved in
the protective effect of cannabinoids; and (iv) cannabinoids protect
astrocytes from the cytotoxic effects of focal C2-ceramide
administration in vivo. In summary, results show that
cannabinoids protect astrocytes from ceramide-induced apoptosis via
stimulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B
pathway. These findings constitute the first evidence for an
"astroprotective" role of cannabinoids.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The effects exerted by marijuana and their derivatives through
9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC)1 and other cannabinoid
constituents have been known for many centuries. However, the molecular
basis of these actions were not understood until the discovery of an
endogenous cannabinoid system comprising two plasma membrane
Gi/o-coupled cannabinoid receptors (CB1 (1) and
CB2 (2)) and a family of endogenous ligands for those
receptors (3, 4). Cannabinoid receptors mediate cannabinoid effects by
coupling to different signaling pathways. Both the CB1 and the CB2 receptor signal inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (5) and stimulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) (6),
whereas the CB1 receptor is also coupled to modulation of
Ca2+ and K+ channels (7), stimulation of the
stress-activated p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinases (8), stimulation of
the focal adhesion kinase (9), hydrolysis of sphingomyelin (10), and
stimulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B
(PI3K/PKB) (11).
The study of the potential therapeutic applications of cannabinoids has
become one of the most exciting areas in the field. Ongoing research is
determining whether cannabinoid ligands may be effective agents in the
treatment of pain, glaucoma, and the wasting and emesis associated with
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and cancer chemotherapy (7, 12). In
addition, cannabinoids are being investigated as potential antitumoral
drugs (13-15) and therapeutic agents for neurological and
neurodegenerative disorders (16, 17). Neuroprotection by cannabinoids
has been related to the CB1-mediated inhibition of
voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels to reduce Ca2+
influx, glutamate release and excitotoxicity (12, 18), and to the
ability of cannabinoids to act as antioxidants (19, 20). However,
nothing is known about the possible protective effect of cannabinoids
on the major cell population of the central nervous system, namely the
astrocytes, despite the pivotal role played by these cells in brain
homeostasis. In addition, although the CB1 receptor is
coupled to PI3K/PKB (11) and ERK activation (6), and both signaling
routes are essential for neural cell survival (21), their possible
involvement in the protection of neural cells by cannabinoids is as yet unknown.
Ceramide, a sphingosine-based lipid, regulates a variety of cellular
processes including differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis (22).
Interestingly, the pro-apoptotic effect of ceramide may be due, at
least partially, to its ability to inhibit PKB (23, 24). In addition,
it has been shown that accumulation of ceramide in astrocytes leads to
apoptosis (25). Here we employed a cell-permeable analog of ceramide to
induce apoptosis in astrocytes, and we studied (i) the protective role
of cannabinoids and (ii) the involvement of PI3K/PKB and ERK pathways
in such effect.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
The following materials were kindly donated:
HU-210 by Dr. R. Mechoulam (Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel); SR
141716 by Sanofi Synthelabo (Montpelier, France); antibodies against total PKB and RSK and the specific PKB/RSK peptide substrate
(cross-tide) by Dr. D. Alessi (University of Dundee, Dundee, UK); and
wild-type and dominant-negative PKB adenoviral vectors by Dr. W. Ogawa
(Kobe University, Kobe, Japan). DNA fragmentation and TUNEL staining kits and biotin-16-dUTP were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals; deoxynucleotidyltransferase was from Invitrogen; streptavidin Alexa
Fluor 488 was from Molecular Probes (Leiden, The Netherlands); wortmannin, LY 294002, PD 098059, Ro 318220, and
C2-ceramide were from Alexis Biochemicals (San Diego, CA);
anti-HA antibody was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals;
anti-phospho-ERK antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa
Cruz, CA); anti-phospho-PKB Thr-308 and phospho-PKB Ser-473 were from
Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA); anti-glial fibrillary acidic
protein (GFAP) polyclonal antibody was from DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark);
ABC complex was from Pierce; and WIN 55,212-2 and THC were from Sigma.
Astrocyte Isolation and Culture--
Cortical astrocytes were
prepared from 24- to 48-h Wistar rats as described previously (25).
Briefly, cerebral hemispheres were dissected in PBS supplemented with
0.33% glucose, treated with trypsin (5 mg/ml, 30 min at 37 °C), and
after stopping the reaction by addition of 10% serum-containing
medium, incubated with DNase I (10 µg/ml, 5 min at 37 °C).
Subsequently cells were mechanically dissociated, centrifuged, and
seeded (3 × 104 cells/cm2) on plastic
plates previously coated with 5 µg/ml poly-L-ornithine and cultured in a mixture of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and
Ham's F-12 medium (1:1, v/v) supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) glucose, 5 mg/ml streptomycin, 5 units/ml penicillin, and 10% fetal calf serum.
After 10-12 days, cells were trypsinized and reseeded until they
reached confluency. Finally, cells were trypsinized, seeded at a
density of 3 × 104 cells/cm2, and 24 h before the experiment transferred to a chemically defined serum-free
medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12
medium (1:1, v/v).
Apoptosis and Cell Viability--
Cell viability was determined
by trypan blue exclusion. Oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation, a
characteristic biochemical feature of apoptotic cell death, was
measured using a nucleosomal DNA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,
which quantitatively records histone-associated DNA fragments,
according to manufacturer's instructions. TUNEL staining was performed
as described previously (26).
PKB and RSK Kinase Assays--
PKB and RSK activities were
determined as described (11). Briefly, PKB or RSK was
immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with 2 µg of anti-PKB or
anti-RSK antibodies bound to protein G-Sepharose, and kinase activity
was determined as the incorporation of [ -32P]ATP into
a specific peptide substrate (GRPRTSSFAEG).
PKB and ERK Phosphorylation--
Western blot analyses were
performed with antibodies that recognize ERK phosphorylated on
Thr-202/Tyr-204, PKB-phosphorylated on Thr-308, and PKB-phosphorylated
on Ser-473.
Adenovirus Infections--
Adenoviral vectors encoding HA-tagged
dominant-negative and wild-type PKB were amplified as described (27).
Astrocytes were transferred to serum-free medium, infected for 3 h
with the corresponding adenoviral vector at the multiplicity of
infection indicated in the figures, washed with PBS, and transferred to
a 10% fetal calf serum medium for 12 h to recover from the
infection. Before performing the experiments, infected cells were
incubated for 24 h in serum-free medium. Pilot experiments using
adenoviruses encoding the green fluorescent protein showed that >95%
were infected in our experimental conditions. Expression of HA-tagged
wild-type and dominant-negative forms of PKB was confirmed in the
infected astrocytes by Western blot analysis with anti-HA antibody.
In Vivo Ceramide Administration--
Male Wistar rats (320-350
g) were anaesthetized with equitesin (3.5 ml/kg) and injected
stereotactically with C2-ceramide (10 mg/ml in
Me2SO) at two sites in the hippocampus. In
preliminary experiments the volume and number of sites of
C2-ceramide injection were established. Twenty µg were
injected into the dorsal dentate gyrus and another 20 µg into the
dorsal hippocampus (anteroposterior, bregma 3.8 mm; lateral 3.0 mm,
and ventral to the surface of the brain 3.4 and 2.6 mm,
respectively). C2-ceramide or vehicle were slowly injected
(1 µl/min). The needle was left in place for 2 min before retraction
to the more dorsal coordinate, and after injection at the second site
left in place for a further 5 min before final retraction. WIN 55,212-2 (2.5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal in 1 ml/kg of 10% Me2SO in
saline) was administered 10 min before anesthetic injection and 30 min
before focal injection. All procedures were conducted according to the
guidelines of the European Community (EC) and were approved by
the ethical committee of the Centro Superior de Investigaciones
Cientificas (CSIC).
Immunohistochemistry--
Two days post-injection animals were
decapitated, the brains removed, and 4-mm coronal slabs around the
injected area cut, fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 3 days, and cryoprotected with 15%
sucrose for 24 h and then with 30% sucrose for a further 24 h at 4 °C. Finally, brain slabs were flash-frozen in hexane
( 70 °C) and stored at 20 °C until sectioned at 45 µm in a
cryostat. TUNEL staining of mounted tissue sections was performed
according to the manufacturer's instructions. GFAP immunostaining was
performed on free-floating sections. Sections were washed 3 times in
PBS, treated with 3% H2O2 for 15 min to block
endogenous peroxidase, and rinsed 3 times in PBS. After incubation with
10% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS containing 0.3% Triton
X-100 for 30 min, sections were incubated with anti-GFAP polyclonal
antibody (1:1000) in PBS containing 1% NGS and 0.3% Triton
X-100 for 6 h at room temperature and overnight at 4 °C. Immunostaining was visualized using the ABC complex and
diaminobenzidine oxidation (0.07% plus 0.05%
H2O2) and analyzed on a Zeiss microscope by an
observer unaware of the different treatments.
Statistics--
Results shown represent means ± S.D.
Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance with a
post hoc analysis by the Student-Neuman-Keuls test.
 |
RESULTS |
Cannabinoids Rescue Primary Astrocytes from Ceramide-induced
Apoptosis--
We employed the pro-apoptotic lipid
C2-ceramide to study the potential protective effect of
cannabinoids in primary astrocyte cultures. As shown in Fig.
1A, ceramide-induced astrocyte
death was notably reduced by incubation with THC or different synthetic cannabinoids. We employed the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 to
characterize this effect further. Protection by WIN 55,212-2 was
dose-dependent (Fig. 1B) and reached a maximum
at 18 h after the addition of the cannabinoid (Fig.
1C). Next, we investigated the nature of ceramide-induced
cell death. Challenge with ceramide induced apoptosis as indicated by
TUNEL (Fig. 2A) and DNA
fragmentation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Fig. 2B),
whereas incubation with the cannabinoid agonist HU-210 prevented
ceramide-induced apoptosis.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cannabinoids rescue primary
astrocytes from ceramide-induced death. Astrocytes were incubated
in serum-free medium for 24 h and treated with 15 µM
C2-ceramide or vehicle (Control) for 90 min.
Then, the medium was changed, and vehicle ( ) or the corresponding
cannabinoid was added. The protective effect of each cannabinoid was
determined at the indicated times as the percentage of viable cells
with respect to the controls. A, cell viability was
determined 18 h after the addition of vehicle or the indicated
cannabinoid (1 µM THC, 25 nM HU-210
(HU), or 25 nM WIN 55,212-2 (WIN)).
B, cell viability was determined 18 h after the
addition of vehicle or the indicated doses of WIN 55,212-2. C, cell viability was determined at the indicated times
after addition of vehicle or 25 nM WIN 55,212-2 (WIN). Results correspond to six different experiments. *,
significantly different (p < 0.01) from the
controls.
|
|

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Cannabinoids prevent ceramide-induced
apoptosis. A, astrocytes were incubated in
serum-free medium for 24 h and treated with 15 µM
C2-ceramide or vehicle (Control) for 90 min.
Then, the medium was changed; vehicle ( ) or 25 nM HU-210
(HU) was added, and apoptotic DNA fragmentation was
determined. Results correspond to four different experiments. *,
significantly different (p < 0.01) from the controls.
B, cells were treated as in A, and
TUNEL staining was performed. Representative micrographs (phase
contrast and TUNEL-stained cells) from one experiment are shown.
Similar data were obtained in two additional experiments.
|
|
The Anti-apoptotic Effect of Cannabinoids Is CB1-,
PI3K-, and ERK-dependent--
We employed pharmacological
inhibitors as a first approach to the mechanism of the anti-apoptotic
action of cannabinoids in astrocytes. Thus, incubation with SR 141716 (a CB1 receptor antagonist), LY 294002 and wortmannin (two
structurally unrelated PI3K inhibitors), PD 098059 (an ERK pathway
inhibitor), and Ro 318220 (a protein kinase C inhibitor that has been
shown to inhibit equally the ERK-downstream kinase RSK (28))
abrogated the anti-apoptotic effect of cannabinoids (Fig.
3), suggesting that this effect is dependent on the CB1 receptor and the PI3K and ERK
pathways.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Pharmacological blockade of the
CB1 receptor and inhibition of PI3K, ERK, or RSK prevent
the protective effect of cannabinoids. Astrocytes were incubated
in serum-free medium for 24 h and treated with 15 µM
C2-ceramide or vehicle (Control) for 90 min.
Then the medium was changed, and cells were incubated with vehicle ( )
or the corresponding inhibitor (1 µM SR 141716 (SR), 200 nM wortmannin (WM), 25 µM LY 294002 (LY), 25 µM PD
098059 (PD), 5 µM Ro 318220 (Ro))
for 15-30 min. Finally vehicle or 25 nM WIN 55,212-2 (WIN) was added to the same medium. Cell viability was
determined 18 h after the addition of vehicle or WIN. Results
correspond to six different experiments. Significantly different (*,
p < 0.01; #, p < 0.05) from the
controls.
|
|
The Anti-apoptotic Effect of Cannabinoids Involves PKB
Activation--
It is well established that stimulation of the
PI3K pathway leads to activation of the anti-apoptotic kinase PKB (29).
As shown in Fig. 4A,
incubation of astrocytes with HU-210 stimulated and incubation with
ceramide inhibited PKB activity. Interestingly, incubation with HU-210
also prevented ceramide-induced inhibition of PKB activity (Fig
4A). Because activation of PKB depends on its
phosphorylation on residues Thr-308 and Ser-473 (29), we monitored the
phosphorylation status of PKB in astrocytes by using specific
antibodies raised against the phosphorylated forms of the kinase. Fig.
4B shows that changes in PKB phosphorylation paralleled
changes in enzyme activity. Thus, incubation of astrocytes with HU-210
increased and incubation with ceramide decreased PKB phosphorylation on
Thr-308 and Ser-473. In addition, after ceramide challenge,
incubation with cannabinoids led PKB phosphorylation to the control
level.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The protective effect of cannabinoids depends
on PKB. A, astrocytes were incubated in serum-free
medium for 24 h and treated with 15 µM
C2-ceramide or vehicle (Control) for 90 min.
Then the medium was changed, and vehicle ( ) or 25 nM
HU-210 (HU) was added. Ten min after stimulation cells were
lysed, and PKB kinase assay was performed. Results represent the
percentage of PKB activity with respect to the controls and correspond
to four different experiments. B, cell lysates used in
A were employed to perform Western blot analyses with
anti-phospho-Ser-473 or anti-phospho-Thr-308 antibodies. A
representative blot of four different experiments is shown.
C and D, astrocytes were infected at the
indicated multiplicities of infection with dominant-negative
(PKB-AA) (C) or wild-type (D) PKB.
Non-infected and infected astrocytes were subsequently incubated in
serum-free medium for 24 h and treated with 15 µM
C2-ceramide or vehicle (Control) for 90 min.
Then the medium was changed, and vehicle ( ) or 25 nM HU
210 (HU) was added. Cell viability was determined 18 h
after the addition of vehicle or HU 210. Results represent the
percentage of cell viability relative to the respective controls and
correspond to four different experiments. *, significantly different
(p < 0.01) from the controls.
|
|
To confirm the involvement of PKB in the anti-apoptotic effect of
cannabinoids, we expressed dominant-negative or wild-type forms of PKB
(27) in astrocytes. Because primary cells are transfected with very low
efficiency, we used adenoviral vectors to ensure that >95% of the
cells express the exogenous proteins. As shown in Fig. 4C,
expression of a dominant-negative form of PKB abrogated the protective
effect of cannabinoids. In addition, infection with the wild-type form
of PKB led to a dose-dependent blockade of the apoptotic
effect of ceramide (Fig. 4D), supporting the notion that
the pro-apoptotic effect of this lipid may be mediated, at least
partially, by PKB inhibition.
PI3K-dependent Stimulation of the ERK Pathway May Be
Involved in the Anti-apoptotic Effect of Cannabinoids--
As data in
Fig. 3 indicated that the protective effect of cannabinoids on
astrocytes could also involve the ERK pathway, we determined the extent
of ERK activation in the cells by using an antibody raised against the
phosphorylated (active) form of this kinase. As shown in Fig.
5A, incubation with HU-210
increased the phosphorylation extent of ERK in the presence and in the
absence of ceramide, whereas incubation with ceramide only slightly
stimulated ERK. Incubation with SR 141716 or wortmannin partially
prevented ERK activation after challenge to ceramide plus HU-210. We
also determined the activity of the ERK downstream kinase RSK. As shown in Fig. 5B, incubation with cannabinoids or ceramide alone
induced a 60-80% stimulation of RSK, and treatment with both
compounds led to an additive stimulation. The latter effect was
prevented by both wortmannin and SR 141716. By contrast, ceramide
stimulation of RSK was not affected by incubation with wortmannin or
SR141716.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
ERK and RSK become overactivated during the
triggering of the survival signal. A, astrocytes
were incubated in serum-free medium for 24 h and treated with 15 µM C2-ceramide or vehicle
(Control) for 90 min. Then the medium was changed, and cells
were incubated with vehicle, 1 µM SR 141716 (SR), or 200 nM wortmannin (WM) for
15-30 min. Vehicle ( ) or 50 nM HU-210 (HU)
was subsequently added to the same medium, and after 10 min cell
lysates were obtained, and finally Western blot analyses using
anti-phospho-ERK antibody were performed. A representative blot of four
different experiments is shown. B, cell lysates were
obtained as in A and assayed for RSK activity. Results
represent the percentage of RSK activity with respect to the controls
and correspond to eight different experiments. *, significantly
different (p < 0.01) from incubations with vehicle. #,
significantly different (p < 0.05) from incubations
with ceramide + HU-210.
|
|
Cannabinoids Protect Brain Astrocytes from Focal
Injection of Ceramide--
We next examined the role of
cannabinoids in protecting astrocytes in vivo. As shown in
Fig. 6A, treatment with WIN
55,212-2 prevented the toxic effects of focal administration of
C2-ceramide in astrocytes. Thus, whereas administration of
ceramide induced an area absolutely devoid of GFAP immunoreactivity
coinciding with the site of injection (the ventral dentate gyrus), rats
treated with WIN 55,212-2 showed a homogeneous GFAP staining throughout the whole hippocampus and did not present an injured area in the zone
of injection. GFAP staining remained increased compared with normal
rats or to the contralateral non-injected hemisphere of the brain in
both cannabinoid- and vehicle-treated rats. In addition, as shown in
Fig. 6B there was a high number of TUNEL-positive nuclei in
ceramide-injected hippocampus that was significantly reduced by
cannabinoid administration (number of TUNEL-positive nuclei/mm2: 994 ± 236 after C2-ceramide
treatment, 624 ± 193 after WIN 55,212-2 plus
C2-ceramide treatment, p < 0.01). No
TUNEL-positive nuclei were observed in vehicle-injected controls.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
WIN 55,212-2 administration prevents
C2-ceramide-induced astrocyte loss in
vivo. Rats were treated with vehicle (10%
Me2SO (DMSO) in saline) or WIN 55,212-2 (2.5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) 30 min before focal injection into the
hippocampus of vehicle (Me2SO) or C2-ceramide
(40 µg). A, representative GFAP staining micrographs
of the hippocampus from the different treatment groups are shown. The
site of injection is indicated (- -). Image from the contralateral
non-injected side is included for comparison. B,
representative TUNEL staining micrographs of the dentate gyrus from the
indicated treatment groups are shown. Micrographs show representative
experiments of 3-5 rats for each treatment.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
During the last few years, a number of reports have indicated that
cannabinoids protect nervous cells from different insults (reviewed in
Refs. 12 and 17). In line with those observations, data presented here
show that cannabinoids, via activation of the CB1 receptor,
protect astrocytes from ceramide-induced apoptosis in vitro
and in vivo. Astrocytes have been traditionally considered as secondary players in the central nervous system scenario, and therefore all the previous studies on the protective role
of cannabinoids on neural cells have involved neurons (see Refs. 18 and
30-34, for example). However, it is currently well established that
astrocytes, the most abundant cells of the mammalian brain, are
involved in numerous functions such as supply of nutrients to neurons
(35), establishment of synapses (36), and generation of neurons (37). In addition, in the context of the present study astrocytes are known
to take up (38) and produce (39) endocannabinoids. Thus, most likely
the complex mechanisms underlying defense against brain injury (and in
particular the mechanisms mediated by cannabinoids) also involve
protection of astrocytes.
Several observations presented in this report indicate that
cannabinoids protect primary astrocytes from ceramide-induced apoptosis
via CB1 receptor-mediated stimulation of the PI3K/PKB pathway. (i) Blockade of the CB1 receptor or inhibition of
PI3K abolishes the protective effect of cannabinoids. (ii) Cannabinoid treatment leads to reactivation of PKB in parallel to prevention of
apoptosis. (iii) Overexpression of a dominant-negative form of PKB
abrogates the protective effect of cannabinoids. It is well established
that challenge with ceramide leads to apoptosis in several experimental
models, and this may be at least partially due to
dephosphorylation and inactivation of PKB by a ceramide-activated phosphatase (23, 24). Our results suggest that cannabinoids (via
activation of the PI3K pathway) and ceramide (via phosphatase activation) may compete for the modulation of PKB activity in astrocytes. Supporting this notion, overexpression of
ceramide-sensitive wild-type PKB abrogated the apoptotic effect of
ceramide. Because activation of PKB triggers the phosphorylation of
different targets involved in preventing apoptosis, including Bad,
forkhead transcription factors, I B kinase, and caspase 9 (29),
ceramide inhibition of PKB could lead to suppression of the survival
signal, whereas cannabinoid-dependent reactivation of the
pathway would restore it.
Expression of a dominant-negative form of PKB abolishes the
protective effect of cannabinoids but does not induce apoptosis by
itself, indicating that the apoptotic effect of ceramide and therefore
the generation of a survival signal may also depend on the modulation
of additional pathways. Thus, several data suggest that the ERK pathway
may participate together with PKB activation in the anti-apoptotic
effect of cannabinoids as follows: (i) inhibition of the ERK pathway
also prevents the protective effect of cannabinoids, and (ii) astrocyte
challenge with cannabinoids leads to activation of both ERK and RSK.
One of the mechanisms whereby ERK prevents apoptosis in neural
cells involves activation of its downstream kinase RSK as this kinase
phosphorylates Bad and the transcription factor cAMP-response
element-binding protein (21). Thus RSK may act synergistically with PKB
to prevent apoptosis (40). In our model, triggering of the
survival signal is accompanied by a consistent activation of ERK and
RSK. Nevertheless, incubation with ceramide leads to apoptosis and
activation of ERK and RSK, although to a lower extent than with
cannabinoid co-treatment. Interestingly, blockade of PI3K prevents the
effect of cannabinoids on ERK and RSK but not ceramide-induced
activation of these kinases. These data are in line with recent results
of our group2 showing that
stimulation of ERK by cannabinoids depends on PI3K and suggest that the
latter may be involved in the pro-survival effect of cannabinoids also
via activation of the ERK/RSK pathway. It is worth noting that RSK
activation also depends on phosphorylation by
3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 on its N-terminal
domain (41). Although that phosphorylation site has been suggested to
be constitutive (41), it cannot be ruled out that under certain circumstances PI3K activation could lead to
3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1-dependent
phosphorylation and activation of RSK (42).
In short, data presented here indicate that
cannabinoids protect primary astrocytes from ceramide-induced apoptosis
via activation of the PI3K/PKB pathway. Our data also suggest that
cannabinoids are involved in protecting astrocytes in vivo.
Although the mechanisms of ceramide generation in astrocytes in
vivo are still unknown, it is possible that exposure to
proinflammatory cytokines (43) or to saturated fatty acids (25) may
increase ceramide production in astrocytes during situations of brain
injury. It is curious that, unlike this protective effect on
astrocytes, cannabinoids induce apoptosis of glioma cells (13, 14,
26). This difference between transformed (glioma) and non-transformed
cells (astrocytes) could be due to their ability to synthesize ceramide
in response to cannabinoids. Thus, cannabinoids induce apoptosis on
glioma cells via stimulation of ceramide synthesis de novo
(26), whereas challenge to cannabinoids does not induce ceramide
synthesis de novo in
astrocytes.3 Taken together,
these data suggest that cannabinoid receptors are coupled to different
pathways and therefore lead to different responses in glioma cells and
astrocytes. Accordingly, cannabinoids are being tested as potential
antitumoral drugs in the treatment of malignant gliomas and, given the
crucial role of astrocytes in brain homeostasis and neuroprotection,
our results raise the suggestive although still speculative idea of
their usage as therapeutic agents for the management of
neurodegenerative disorders.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. D. Alessi, Dr. W. Ogawa, Dr. C. Sutherland, Dr. R. Mechoulam, and Sanofi Synthelabo for
the kind donation of reagents; Dr. J. Lizcano and Dr. I. Galve-Roperh
for helpful suggestions on the signaling experiments; Dr. L. López- Mascaraque and Dr. L. M. García-Segura for
helpful suggestions on the in vivo experiments; and A. Carracedo, Dr. C. Blázquez, Dr. D. Rueda, and M. E. Fernández de Molina for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia y
Tecnologia (MCYT) Grants PM 98/0079, CAM 08.1/0079/2000, and
Fundación Ramón Areces.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, School of Biology, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Tel.: 34 913944668; Fax: 34 913944672; E-mail: gvd@bbm1.ucm.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205797200
2
I. Galve-Roperh, D. Rueda, T. Gómez
del Pulgar, G. Velasco, and M. Guzmán, submitted for publication.
3
T. Gómez del Pulgar, G. Velasco, and M. Guzmán, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
THC, 9-tetrahydrocannabinol;
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase;
GFAP, glial-fibrillary acidic protein;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
PKB, protein kinase B;
RSK, p90
ribosomal S6 kinase;
TUNEL, terminal dUTP nick-end labeling;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
HA, hemagglutinin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Matsuda, L. A.,
Lolait, S. J.,
Brownstein, M.,
Young, A.,
and Bonner, T. I.
(1990)
Nature
346,
561-564[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Munro, S.,
Thomas, K. L.,
and Abu-Shaar, M.
(1993)
Nature
365,
61-65[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Devane, W. A.,
Hanus, L.,
Breuer, A.,
Pertwee, R. G.,
Stevenson, L. A.,
Griffin, G.,
Gibson, D.,
Mandelbaum, A.,
Etinger, A.,
and Mechoulam, R.
(1992)
Science
258,
1946-1949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Mechoulam, R.,
Ben Shabat, S.,
Hanus, L.,
Ligumsky, M.,
Kaminski, N. E.,
Schatz, A. R.,
Gopher, A.,
Almog, S.,
Martin, B. R.,
Compton, D. R.,
Pertwee, R. G.,
Griffin, G.,
Bayewitch, M.,
Barg, J.,
and Vogel, Z.
(1995)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
50,
83-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Howlett, A. C.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
35,
607-634[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Bouaboula, M.,
Poinot Chazel, C.,
Bourrie, B.,
Canat, X.,
Calandra, B.,
Rinaldi-Carmona, M., Le,
Fur, G.,
and Casellas, P.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
312,
637-641
|
| 7.
|
Pertwee, R. G.
(2000)
Expert. Opin. Investig. Drugs
9,
1553-1571[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Rueda, D.,
Galve-Roperh, I.,
Haro, A.,
and Guzmán, M.
(2000)
Mol. Pharmacol.
58,
814-820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Derkinderen, P.,
Toutant, M.,
Kadaré, G.,
Ledent, C.,
Parmentier, M.,
and Girault, J.-A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
38289-38296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Sánchez, C.,
Rueda, D.,
Ségui, B.,
Galve-Roperh, I.,
Levade, T.,
and Guzmán, M.
(2001)
Mol. Pharmacol.
59,
955-959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Gómez del Pulgar, T.,
Velasco, G.,
and Guzmán, M.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
347,
369-373[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Piomelli, D.,
Giuffrida, A.,
Calignano, A.,
and Rodríguez de Fonseca, F.
(2000)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
21,
218-224[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Galve-Roperh, I.,
Sánchez, C.,
Cortés, M.,
Gómez del Pulgar, T.,
Izquiedo, M.,
and Guzmán, M.
(2000)
Nat. Med.
6,
313-319[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Sánchez, C.,
de Ceballos, M. L.,
Gómez del Pulgar, T.,
Rueda, D.,
Corbacho, C.,
Velasco, G.,
Galve-Roperh, I.,
Huffman, J. W. H.,
Ramón y Cajal, S.,
and Guzmán, M.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
5784-5789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Bifulco, M.,
Laezza, C.,
Portella, G.,
Vitale, M.,
Orlando, P., De,
Petrocellis, L.,
and Di Marzo, V.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
2745-2747[Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Baker, D.,
Pryce, G.,
Croxford, J. L.,
Brown, P.,
Pertwee, R. G.,
Huffman, J. W.,
and Layward, L.
(2000)
Nature
404,
84-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Mechoulam, R.,
Panikashvili, D.,
and Sholami, E.
(2002)
Trends Mol. Med.
8,
58-61[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Shen, M.,
and Thayer, S. A.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
54,
459-462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Hampson, A. J.,
Grimaldi, M.,
Axelrod, J.,
and Wink, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8268-8273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Marsicano, G.,
Moosmann, H.,
Lutz, B.,
and Bel, C.
(2002)
J. Neurochem.
80,
448-456[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Yuan, J.,
and Yankner, B. A.
(2000)
Nature
407,
802-809[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Kolesnick, R. N.,
and Krönke, M.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
60,
643-665[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Salinas, M.,
López-Valdaliso, R.,
Martín, D.,
Álvarez, A.,
and Cuadrado, A.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
15,
156-169[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Schubert, K. M.,
Scheid, M. P.,
and Duronio, V.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
13330-13335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Blázquez, C.,
Galve-Roperh, I.,
and Guzmán, M.
(2000)
FASEB J.
14,
2315-2322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Gómez del Pulgar, T.,
Velasco, G.,
Sánchez, C.,
Haro, A.,
and Guzmán, M.
(2002)
Biochem. J.
363,
183-188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Kitamura, T.,
Ogawa, W.,
Sakaue, H.,
Hino, Y.,
Kuroda, S.,
Takata, M.,
Matsumoto, M.,
Maeda, T.,
Konishi, H.,
Kikkawa, U.,
and Kasuga, M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3708-3717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Alessi, D. R.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
402,
121-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Vanhaesebroeck, B.,
and Alessi, D. R.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
346,
561-576
|
| 30.
|
Nagayama, T.,
Sinor, A. D.,
Simon, R. P.,
Chen, J.,
Graham, S. H.,
Jin, K.,
and Greenberg, D. A.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
2987-2995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Sinor, A. D.,
Irvin, S. M.,
and Greenberg, D. A.
(2000)
Neurosci. Lett.
278,
1257-1260
|
| 32.
|
Panikashvili, D.,
Simeonidou, C.,
Ben-Shabat, S.,
Hanus, L.,
Breuer, A.,
Mechoulam, R.,
and Shohami, E.
(2001)
Nature
413,
527-531[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Van der Stelt, M.,
Veldhuis, W. B.,
Bär, P. R.,
Veldink, G. A.,
Vliegenthart, J. F. G.,
and Nicolay, K.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
6475-6479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Van der Stelt, M.,
Veldhuis, W. B.,
van Haaften, G. W.,
Fezza, F.,
Bisogno, T.,
Bär, P. R.,
Veldink, G. A.,
Vliegenthart, J. F. G., Di,
Marzo, V.,
and Nicolay, K.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
8765-8771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Tsacopoulos, M.,
and Magistretti, P. J.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
877-885[Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Ullian, E. M.,
Sapperstein, S. K.,
Christopherson, K. S.,
and Barres, B. A.
(2001)
Science
291,
657-661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Doetsch, F.,
Caillé, I.,
Lim, D. A.,
García-Verdugo, J. M.,
and Álvarez-Buylla, A.
(1999)
Cell
97,
703-716[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Di Marzo, V.,
Fontana, A.,
Cadas, H.,
Schinelli, S.,
Cimino, G.,
Schwartz, J. C.,
and Piomelli, D.
(1994)
Nature
372,
686-691[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Walter, L.,
Franklin, A.,
Witting, A.,
Moller, T.,
and Stella, N.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
20869-20876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Nebreda, A. R.,
and Gavin, A.-C.
(1999)
Science
286,
1309-1310[Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Williams, M. R.,
Arthur, J. S. C.,
Balendran, A.,
Van der Kaay, J.,
Poli, V.,
Cohen, P.,
and Alessi, D. R.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
439-448[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Park, J.,
Hill, M. M.,
Hess, D.,
Brazil, D. P.,
Hofsteenge, J.,
and Hemmings, B. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
37459-37471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Singh, I.,
Pahan, K.,
Khan, M.,
and Singh, A. K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
20354-20362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Giussani, L. Brioschi, R. Bassi, L. Riboni, and P. Viani
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT Pathway Regulates the Endoplasmic Reticulum to Golgi Traffic of Ceramide in Glioma Cells: A LINK BETWEEN LIPID SIGNALING PATHWAYS INVOLVED IN THE CONTROL OF CELL SURVIVAL
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 20, 2009;
284(8):
5088 - 5096.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kano, T. Ohno-Shosaku, Y. Hashimotodani, M. Uchigashima, and M. Watanabe
Endocannabinoid-Mediated Control of Synaptic Transmission
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2009;
89(1):
309 - 380.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bifulco, A. M. Malfitano, S. Pisanti, and C. Laezza
Endocannabinoids in endocrine and related tumours
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
June 1, 2008;
15(2):
391 - 408.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Warrington, B. M. Woerner, G. C. Daginakatte, B. Dasgupta, A. Perry, D. H. Gutmann, and J. B. Rubin
Spatiotemporal Differences in CXCL12 Expression and Cyclic AMP Underlie the Unique Pattern of Optic Glioma Growth in Neurofibromatosis Type 1
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2007;
67(18):
8588 - 8595.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Karanian, S. L. Karim, J. T. Wood, J. S. Williams, S. Lin, A. Makriyannis, and B. A. Bahr
Endocannabinoid Enhancement Protects against Kainic Acid-Induced Seizures and Associated Brain Damage
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
September 1, 2007;
322(3):
1059 - 1066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Zapala and N. J. Schork
Multivariate regression analysis of distance matrices for testing associations between gene expression patterns and related variables
PNAS,
December 19, 2006;
103(51):
19430 - 19435.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Blazquez, A. Carracedo, L. Barrado, P. J. Real, J. L. Fernandez-Luna, G. Velasco, M. Malumbres, and M. Guzman
Cannabinoid receptors as novel targets for the treatment of melanoma
FASEB J,
December 1, 2006;
20(14):
2633 - 2635.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bari, P. Spagnuolo, F. Fezza, S. Oddi, N. Pasquariello, A. Finazzi-Agro, and M. Maccarrone
Effect of Lipid Rafts on Cb2 Receptor Signaling and 2-Arachidonoyl-Glycerol Metabolism in Human Immune Cells
J. Immunol.,
October 15, 2006;
177(8):
4971 - 4980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Pacher, S. Batkai, and G. Kunos
The Endocannabinoid System as an Emerging Target of Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacol. Rev.,
September 1, 2006;
58(3):
389 - 462.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Jia, V. L. Hegde, N. P. Singh, D. Sisco, S. Grant, M. Nagarkatti, and P. S. Nagarkatti
{Delta}9-Tetrahydrocannabinol-Induced Apoptosis in Jurkat Leukemia T Cells Is Regulated by Translocation of Bad to Mitochondria
Mol. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2006;
4(8):
549 - 562.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Aguado, J. Palazuelos, K. Monory, N. Stella, B. Cravatt, B. Lutz, G. Marsicano, Z. Kokaia, M. Guzman, and I. Galve-Roperh
The Endocannabinoid System Promotes Astroglial Differentiation by Acting on Neural Progenitor Cells
J. Neurosci.,
February 1, 2006;
26(5):
1551 - 1561.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bari, N. Battista, F. Fezza, A. Finazzi-Agro, and M. Maccarrone
Lipid Rafts Control Signaling of Type-1 Cannabinoid Receptors in Neuronal Cells: IMPLICATIONS FOR ANANDAMIDE-INDUCED APOPTOSIS
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 1, 2005;
280(13):
12212 - 12220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. G. Ramirez, C. Blazquez, T. G. del Pulgar, M. Guzman, and M. L. de Ceballos
Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Pathology by Cannabinoids: Neuroprotection Mediated by Blockade of Microglial Activation
J. Neurosci.,
February 23, 2005;
25(8):
1904 - 1913.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Taguchi, T. Kondo, M. Watanabe, M. Miyaji, H. Umehara, Y. Kozutsumi, and T. Okazaki
Interleukin-2-induced survival of natural killer (NK) cells involving phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-dependent reduction of ceramide through acid sphingomyelinase, sphingomyelin synthase, and glucosylceramide synthase
Blood,
November 15, 2004;
104(10):
3285 - 3293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Tegeder and G. Geisslinger
Opioids As Modulators of Cell Death and Survival--Unraveling Mechanisms and Revealing New Indications
Pharmacol. Rev.,
September 1, 2004;
56(3):
351 - 369.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Hart, O. M. Fischer, and A. Ullrich
Cannabinoids Induce Cancer Cell Proliferation via Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha}-Converting Enzyme (TACE/ADAM17)-Mediated Transactivation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2004;
64(6):
1943 - 1950.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Derkinderen, E. Valjent, M. Toutant, J.-C. Corvol, H. Enslen, C. Ledent, J. Trzaskos, J. Caboche, and J.-A. Girault
Regulation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase by Cannabinoids in Hippocampus
J. Neurosci.,
March 15, 2003;
23(6):
2371 - 2382.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|