|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206948200 on July 19, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 39, 36782-36786, September 27, 2002
Analysis of Double Knockout Mice Lacking Aquaporin-1
and Urea Transporter UT-B
EVIDENCE FOR UT-B-FACILITATED WATER TRANSPORT IN
ERYTHROCYTES*
Baoxue
Yang and
A. S.
Verkman
From the Departments of Medicine and Physiology, Cardiovascular
Research Institute, University of California,
San Francisco, California 94143-0521
Received for publication, July 11, 2002, and in revised form, July 19, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We reported increased water permeability and a
low urea reflection coefficient in Xenopus oocytes
expressing urea transporter UT-B (former name UT3), suggesting that
water and urea share a common aqueous pathway (Yang, B., and Verkman,
A. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9369-9372).
Although increased water permeability was confirmed in the
Xenopus oocyte expression system, it has been argued
(Sidoux-Walter, F., Lucien, N., Olives, B., Gobin, R., Rousselet, G.,
Kamsteeg, E. J., Ripoche, P., Deen, P. M., Cartron, J. P., and Bailly, P. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30228-30235) that UT-B does not transport water when expressed at
normal levels in mammalian cells such as erythrocytes. To quantify
UT-B-mediated water transport, we generated double knockout mice
lacking UT-B and the major erythrocyte water channel, aquaporin-1
(AQP1). The mice had reduced survival, retarded growth, and defective
urinary concentrating ability. However, erythrocyte size and morphology were not affected. Stopped-flow light scattering measurements indicated
erythrocyte osmotic water permeabilities (in cm/s × 0.01, 10 °C): 2.1 ± 0.2 (wild-type mice), 2.1 ± 0.05 (UT-B
null), 0.19 ± 0.02 (AQP1 null), and 0.045 ± 0.009 (AQP1/UT-B null). The low water permeability found in AQP1/UT-B null
erythrocytes was also seen after HgCl2 treatment of UT-B
null erythrocytes or phloretin treatment of AQP1 null erythrocytes. The
apparent activation energy for UT-B-mediated water transport was low,
<2 kcal/mol. Estimating 14,000 UT-B molecules per mouse erythrocyte,
the UT-B-dependent Pf of 0.15 × 10 4 cm/s indicated a substantial single channel water
permeability of UT-B of 7.5 × 10 14
cm3/s, similar to that of AQP1. These results
provide direct functional evidence for UT-B-facilitated water transport
in erythrocytes and suggest that urea traverses an aqueous pore in the
UT-B protein.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
UT-B1 (original names
UT3 and UT11) is a 42-kDa facilitated urea transporter expressed in
mammalian erythrocytes, renal vasa recta, and other sites (1-4).
Humans lacking UT-B (Jk null blood group) have low urea permeability in
erythrocytes and manifest a mild impairment in maximal urinary
concentrating ability (5-9). Transgenic mice lacking UT-B also have
very low erythrocyte urea permeability (45-fold lower than normal) and
were found to have a urea-selective urinary concentrating defect (4).
Members of a related family of facilitated urea transporters (UT-A) are expressed primarily in kidney and are encoded by a different gene producing multiple protein isoforms by alternative splicing
(10-12).
In screening membrane transporters for intrinsic water permeability, we
found that UT-B (but not UT-A isoforms) increased osmotically driven
water transport when expressed heterologously in Xenopus
oocytes (13). UT-B-facilitated water transport was blocked by urea
transport inhibitors, and reflection coefficient measurements indicated
a common water/urea pathway. Increased water permeability in
Xenopus oocytes expressing UT-B was subsequently confirmed
by Sidoux-Walter et al. (14); however, they concluded that
UT-B-facilitated water transport does not occur under physiological conditions. They reasoned, based on water versus urea
permeability measurements in oocytes expressing different levels of
UT-B, that UT-B-associated water permeability occurs only when UT-B
expressed at non-physiological high levels. The issue has remained
unsettled as to whether UT-B can transport water in natively UT-B
expressing cells such as erythrocytes.
The mechanism of water transport in erythrocytes has been a subject of
long-standing interest. Although it is now established from
measurements in AQP1 null erythrocytes that AQP1 provides the major
pathway for water transport (15-17), there remains unsubstantiated older evidence that erythrocytes have significant protein-mediated mercurial-insensitive water permeability that is presumably
AQP1-independent (18). There is also older conflicting data about
whether some water and urea share a common pathway across the
erythrocyte plasma membrane with a wide range of reported urea
reflection coefficients ( urea) from <0.5 to 1.0 (19-22). Technically, the high urea permeability in erythrocytes
probably precludes an accurate biophysical determination of
urea. The value of urea must be near 1.0 if water moves only through AQP1 and membrane lipids, because AQP1 has
been shown to be urea-impermeable (23, 24). However, if some water
moves through a common aqueous pathway through UT-B shared by urea, then urea might be less than 1.0.
The purpose of this study was to resolve the question of
whether UT-B transports water in erythrocytes and hence whether the UT-B protein contains an aqueous pore and whether erythrocyte urea must be near unity. We generated double knockout
mice lacking UT-B and AQP1, reasoning that UT-B-mediated water
transport might be measurable in erythrocytes lacking the principal
erythrocyte water transporter, AQP1. We found significantly reduced
water permeability in AQP1/UT-B-deficient erythrocytes compared with AQP1-deficient erythrocytes, providing quantitative information on the
single channel water permeability of UT-B. A secondary purpose of this
study was to investigate urinary concentrating ability in mice lacking
AQP1 and UT-B together. As in erythrocytes, AQP1 and UT-B are
coexpressed in microvascular endothelial cell membranes in descending
renal vasa recta. We hypothesized that the double knockout mice may
have a profound urinary concentrating defect because of extensive
disruption of the countercurrent multiplication and exchange mechanisms.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Generation of AQP1/UT-B Double Knockout
Mice--
AQP1/UT-B double knockout mice were generated by intercross
of the single AQP1 and UT-B knockouts. The breeding of F2 generation double heterozygous mice yielded 11 AQP1/UT-B knockout mice of 270 pups.
Water Permeability Measurements--
Fresh erythrocytes obtained
by tail bleeding (~50 µl/bleed) were washed three times in
phosphate-buffered saline to remove plasma and the cellular buffy coat.
Stopped-flow measurements were done on a Hi-Tech Sf-51 instrument.
Suspensions of erythrocytes (~0.5% hematocrit) in phosphate-buffered
saline were subjected to a 250-mM inwardly directed
gradient of sucrose. The kinetics of decreasing cell volume was
measured from the time course of 90° scattered light intensity at 530 nm wavelength. Osmotic water permeability coefficients
(Pf) were computed from the light scattering time course as described previously (24). In some experiments, 0.3 mM HgCl2 or 0.7 mM phloretin was
added to the erythrocyte suspension before stopped-flow experiments.
Erythrocyte Size and Morphology--
Erythrocyte number,
hematocrit, and mean cell volume were measured by the Hematology
Laboratory at San Francisco General Hospital. For light microscopy,
blood cells were smeared onto glass slides and stained with eosin
y-methylene blue using the HEMA3 stain set (Biochemical Sciences
Inc.).
Immunofluorescence and Immunoblot Analysis--
Red blood cell
smears on glass slides were fixed in acetone/methanol (1:1) and
incubated for 30 min with phosphate-buffered saline containing 1%
bovine serum albumin and then with anti-AQP1 (1:1000) or UT-B antiserum
(1:500) for 1 h at 23 °C in phosphate-buffered saline
containing 1% bovine serum albumin. Slides were rinsed with 2.7% NaCl
followed by phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with a secondary
Cy3-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit F(ab)2 fragment (1:200, Sigma) for
visualization by fluorescence microscopy. Immunoblot analysis of ghost
membranes from erythrocytes, prepared by hypotonic lysis and washing,
was carried out by standard procedures as described (25).
Renal Function Studies--
For analysis of urine osmolalities,
urine samples were collected by gentle bladder massage. Urine
osmolalities were measured by freezing point depression osmometry
(Micro-osmometer, Precision Systems, Inc.).
 |
RESULTS |
AQP1/UT-B double knockout mice were generated by intercross of
AQP1 and UT-B null mice. The double knockout mice were grossly phenotypically normal just after birth. Of 270 mice born in 32 litters
from breeding of double heterozygous mice, there were 11 double
knockout mice, consistent with the predicted 1:16 Mendelian ratio.
However, the growth and survival of the double knockout mice were
impaired. Fig. 1A shows that
the double knockout mice were ~30% smaller by body weight than
wild-type littermates at age 11 days. Although >90% of living AQP1
and UT-B null mice that were genotyped at 5 days remained alive to
adulthood, only 50% of the double knockout mice were alive at 10 days,
and all double knockout mice died by 2 weeks. Urinary concentrating
function was compared by measurement of urine osmolality. As
shown in Fig. 1B, urine osmolality in double knockout mice
(553 ± 55 mosM) was similar to that in AQP1 knockout
mice (604 ± 18 mosM) but significantly lower than in
wild-type mice (816 ± 34 mosM). Because of the small size of the mice, detailed serum analyses were not done.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Phenotype of wild-type, AQP1, UT-B, and
AQP1/UT-B null mice. A, body weight of mice of indicated
genotype at age 11 days (mean ± S.E., 6 mice per group,).
B, urine osmolality in the same group of mice measured
during free access to water. *, p <0.01 compared with
wild-type mice.
|
|
Blood was analyzed for erythrocyte number, size, and AQP1 and UT-B
expression. Table I summarizes peripheral
blood analysis. Erythrocyte number and hematocrit were slightly greater
in AQP1 and AQP1/UT-B null mice than wild-type and UT-B null mice,
which may be a consequence of relative mild dehydration. The mean
corpuscular size was not significantly different among the genotypes.
Morphology was similar in erythrocytes from mice of the four genotypes
as examined in stained smears by light microscopy (Fig.
2A, top
panels).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Hematological properties of erythrocytes
Data are mean ± S.E.M. for five sets of measurements on
erythrocytes from different mice. RBC, red blood cell count; HCT,
hematocrit; MCV, mean cell volume.
|
|

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
AQP1 and UT-B expression in
erythrocytes. A, erythrocyte morphology in eosin
y-methylene blue-stained smears (top). Scale
bar, 10 µm. Immunofluorescence localization of AQP1 and UT-B in
erythrocyte smears (bottom). B, immunoblot
analysis of erythrocyte plasma membranes from mice of indicated
genotype as probed by anti-AQP1 and anti-UT-B antibodies.
|
|
Immunocytochemistry of the permeabilized erythrocytes showed a plasma
membrane staining pattern for AQP1 protein in erythrocytes from
wild-type and UT-B null mice (Fig. 2A, middle
panels). Examination of multiple smears showed similar AQP1
staining in the wild-type and UT-B null mice. No AQP1 staining was seen
in AQP1 and AQP1/UT-B null erythrocytes. Comparable UT-B immunostaining
was seen in erythrocytes from wild-type and AQP1 null mice (Fig.
2A, bottom panels). The weaker UT-B
versus AQP1 staining is because of lower UT-B expression and
differences in antibodies. No UT-B immunostaining was seen in UT-B and
AQP1/UT-B null erythrocytes. Immunoblot analysis confirmed these
findings (Fig. 2B). AQP1 protein was seen in erythrocyte membranes from wild-type and UT-B null mice as a band at ~28 kDa, representing non-glycosylated protein and a more diffuse band at 34-40
kDa representing the glycosylated protein. UT-B protein was seen as a
band of 40-46 kDa in erythrocytes from wild-type and AQP1 null mice.
An ~90-kDa nonspecific band was seen in erythrocytes of all genotypes.
Osmotic water permeability was measured by stopped-flow light
scattering from the time course of scattered light intensity in
response to a 250-mM inwardly directed osmotic gradient of sucrose. The light scattering signal amplitude is inversely related to
erythrocyte cell volume. Representative original light scattering data
are shown for erythrocytes from mice of the four genotypes in Fig.
3A under control conditions
and after brief incubation with the AQP1 inhibitor, HgCl2,
and the UT-B inhibitor, phloretin. Experiments were done initially at a
low temperature (10 °C) where the strongly
temperature-dependent lipid-mediated water permeability should be minimized. The data are presented on two contiguous time
scales to show clearly the initial rate of decreasing cell volume as
well as the maximal signal change after full osmotic equilibration.
Osmotic equilibration was rapid (~250 ms) in wild-type and UT-B
null mice. Water permeability was reduced ~11-fold in AQP1-deficient
erythrocytes and further reduced ~4.2-fold in AQP1/UT-B null
erythrocytes. The AQP1 inhibitor HgCl2 reduced water
permeability strongly in wild-type and UT-B null erythrocytes but had
no effect on water permeability in AQP1 and AQP1/UT-B null
erythrocytes. Notably, water permeability was similar in UT-B and
AQP1/UT-B null erythrocytes after HgCl2 inhibition. The
urea transport inhibitor, phloretin, had little effect on water
transport in erythrocytes from wild-type, UT-B, and AQP1/UT-B null
mice; however, there was partial inhibition of water permeability in
AQP1 null erythrocytes. The decrease in scattered light intensity at
late times probably represents slow sucrose (and water) influx due to
perturbation of the membrane by phloretin. There was less of a decrease
at late times using 0.1 mM phloretin (instead of 0.7 mM) but similar inhibition of water permeability in AQP1
null erythrocytes.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Erythrocyte water permeability measured by
stopped-flow light scattering. Osmotic water permeability was
measured from the time course of erythrocyte volume in response to a
250-mM inwardly directed sucrose gradient. A,
measurements in erythrocytes from mice of indicated genotype done at
10 °C under control conditions (left) and in the presence
of 0.3 mM HgCl2 (middle) or 0.7 mM phloretin (right). B, averaged
osmotic water permeability coefficients (Pf) for
experiments done as in A (mean ± S.E., 3 mice of each
genotype). *, p <0.01 compared with no inhibitor. +,
p <0.01 compared with wild-type (comparing no inhibitor
Pf).
|
|
Averaged data are summarized in Fig. 3B. Erythrocytes from
wild-type and UT-B null mice had high water permeability
(Pf ~ 0.02 cm/s) that was not inhibited
significantly by phloretin. Water permeability in AQP1 null
erythrocytes (Pf ~0.0019 cm/s) was
similar to that in wild-type erythrocytes after HgCl2.
Water permeability in AQP1/UT-B null erythrocytes was quite low
(Pf ~0.00045 cm/s), insensitive to inhibitors,
and similar to that in UT-B null erythrocytes after HgCl2
and in AQP1 null erythrocytes after phloretin. Together these data
provide strong evidence for UT-B-facilitated water transport in erythrocytes.
Temperature dependence measurements were done to further investigate
the mechanisms of erythrocyte water transport and the nature of
UT-B-facilitated water transport. Fig.
4A shows representative original light scattering data for erythrocyte water permeability at
four temperatures. Water transport was fast in erythrocytes from
wild-type and UT-B null mice and weakly
temperature-dependent. The lower water permeability in AQP1
null erythrocytes was more strongly temperature-dependent,
increasing ~3-fold from 10 to 35 °C. Water permeability in
AQP1/UT-B null erythrocytes was even more strongly
temperature-dependent, increasing ~9-fold from 10 to
35 °C. Fig. 4B (top) summarizes the data as an
Arrhenius plot of ln Pf versus
reciprocal absolute temperature, where the slope is proportional to the
activation energy Ea. Pf
was weakly temperature-dependent for wild-type and UT-B
null erythrocytes. Stronger temperature dependence was observed in AQP1
null erythrocytes (apparent Ea 7.3 kcal/mol) and
AQP1/UT-B null erythrocytes (Ea 19 kcal/mol). The high Ea of 19 kcal/mol strongly suggests
water diffusion through the lipid bilayer.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Temperature dependence of osmotic water
permeability. A, water permeability was measured as in Fig.
3 at indicated temperatures. B, Arrhenius plot of ln
Pf versus reciprocal absolute
temperature for erythrocytes of indicated genotype (top).
Arrhenius plot for UT-B-dependent erythrocyte water
permeability, where PfUT-B indicates
the difference in Pf in AQP1 null
versus AQP1/UT-B null erythrocytes (bottom). See
"Results" for Arrhenius activation energies.
|
|
Fig. 4B (bottom) shows an Arrhenius plot in which
the temperature dependence of the UT-B-mediated component of
erythrocyte water permeability
(PfUT-B) was computed from the
difference in Pf measured in AQP1 null versus AQP1/UT-B null erythrocytes.
Ea for the UT-B-mediated water permeability was
<2 kcal/mol, providing biophysical evidence for a water passage
through a UT-B-associated aqueous channel.
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study reports direct functional evidence that UT-B in
mammalian erythrocytes is able to transport water. We found that osmotic water permeability in erythrocytes from mice lacking both AQP1
and UT-B was 4.2-fold lower than that in erythrocytes from mice lacking
AQP1 alone. A similar low water permeability was found in erythrocytes
from AQP1 null mice after UT-B inhibition by phloretin and in
erythrocytes from UT-B null mice after inhibition of AQP1 by
HgCl2. UT-B-facilitated water transport was weakly temperature-dependent, as found in Xenopus
oocytes expressing UT-B (13). These results explain why the
activation energy of erythrocyte water transport after mercurial
inhibition or AQP1 deletion is substantially lower than expected for
lipid-mediated water transport (26). They also provide a molecular
basis for the conclusion of Dix and Solomon (18), based on studies of membrane perturbing agents, that the mercurial-insensitive water permeability in erythrocytes involves in large part a protein pathway.
Based on the quantitative data here, Fig.
5 summarizes the contributions of protein
and lipid pathways for water and urea transport in mouse erythrocytes.
At 10 °C, ~90% of water is transported through AQP1, 8% through
UT-B, and the remainder through the lipid membrane. The vast majority
of urea is transported through UT-B. At 37 °C, ~79% of water is
transported through AQP1, 6% through UT-B, and the remainder through
the lipid membrane.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Relative contributions of AQP1, UT-B, and the
lipid bilayer to erythrocyte water and urea permeability. See
"Discussion" for explanations.
|
|
The results obtained here using a genetic approach permit computation
of a lower limit for erythrocyte urea. Using the data in
Fig. 5 and assuming a urea of zero for UT-B-mediated
water transport, erythrocyte urea is predicted to be
0.92. This is probably a significant underestimate of erythrocyte
urea because urea for UT-B-mediated water
transport is at least 0.3 based on oocyte data (13), giving erythrocyte
urea ~0.95. These values are consistent with the data
of Levitt and Mllekoday (19), reporting a urea of near
unity, but disagree with low urea values of 0.5-0.7 reported in a series of studies by Solomon and colleagues (18, 22, 27),
where urea was probably underestimated because of the
confounding effect of rapid diffusional urea transport.
Urine osmolalities in AQP1/UT-B double knockout mice and AQP1 null mice
were similar, indicating that impairment of vasa recta water and urea
transport together does not produce a profound nephrogenic diabetes
insipidus with hypotonic urine as found in mice lacking AQP3 (17, 28).
However, the limited survival of the double knockout mice precluded
studies of urinary concentrating ability in adult mice after maximal
urinary concentrating function has developed. Analysis of proximal
tubule (29, 30), thin descending limb of Henle (31), and descending
vasa recta (32) function has indicated that the impaired urinary
concentrating ability in AQP1 null mice results primarily from
defective countercurrent multiplication and exchange, producing a
hypoosmolar renal medullary interstitium (33). The urea-selective
urinary concentrating defect in UT-B null mice appears to result from
impairment of urea recycling from the renal medullary interstitium to
the descending vasa recta (4). Recognizing the caveat that adult double
knockout mice could not be studied, our finding that the urinary
concentrating defect in AQP1/UT-B is similar to that in AQP1 null mice
suggests that little urea recycling occurs after disruption of the
medullary concentration gradients of NaCl and urea.
It is interesting to compare the intrinsic (single channel) water
permeabilities of AQP1 versus UT-B. We measured similar osmotic water and urea permeabilities in mouse and human erythrocytes (not shown). Assuming, as in human erythrocytes, that there are 14,000 copies of UT-B and 200,000 copies of AQP1 (9) per mouse erythrocyte
plasma membrane, then there is ~1 UT-B molecule per 14 AQP1
molecules. From the data in Fig. 3, AQP1 contributes 13 times more than
UT-B to erythrocyte water permeability. Thus, the single channel (per
molecule) water permeability of UT-B in erythrocytes is very similar to
that of AQP1 (7.5 × 10 14 cm3/s). The
presence of a continuous aqueous pathway through UT-B that efficiently
facilitates osmosis is an interesting observation that may account for
the exceptionally high transport turnover rate of UT-B (2-6 × 106 s 1, Ref. 34), as high as that of ion
channels and >2-3 orders of magnitude greater than that of classic
carriers and active transporters. Atomic resolution structural analysis
of UT-B, as recently completed for AQP1 (35), should define the aqueous pore traversing the UT-B protein.
The AQP1/UT-B double knockout mice generated for the experiments here
had significant impairment in their growth compared with single
knockout mice deficient in AQP1 or UT-B. The AQP1/UT-B double knockout
mice died in their first 2 weeks of life. The reason(s) for the
impaired growth and survival of AQP1/UT-B null mice were not
established from the data presented here. AQP1 is expressed in
erythrocytes, as well as in epithelial cells in kidney, choroid plexus,
ciliary body, and in multiple endothelial capillaries including renal
vasa recta. UT-B is expressed in erythrocytes, urinary bladder
epithelium, brain astrocytes, renal vasa recta endothelia, and as yet
unidentified sites in colon, heart, liver, and testis (1-4, 36, 37).
AQP1 and UT-B are thus coexpressed only in erythrocytes and renal vasa
recta. With no evidence of hemolysis (normal hematocrit, reticulocyte
count, serum haptoglobin, and lactate dehydrogenase), it seems unlikely
that defective erythrocyte function is responsible for impaired mouse
growth and survival. Defective urinary concentrating ability may be
responsible for failure of the double knockout mice to thrive, based on
the observation that mouse kidneys readily develop obstructive renal
failure after polyuria, as found in transgenic mice lacking functional
aquaporins 2 and 3 (17, 38), the vasopressin V2-receptor (39), and the
NKCC2 (40). We did not investigate in detail the cause of impaired survival in AQP1/UT-B double knockout mice, given the focus of
this study on erythrocyte UT-B function.
In summary, the data here indicate that erythrocyte UT-B functions as
an efficient water transporter, although the absolute contribution of
UT-B to total water transport in normal erythrocytes is small because
of the fewer copies of UT-B than AQP1. Although we believe that water
movement through UT-B is unlikely to be physiologically important in
erythrocytes, kidney, or other tissues in which UT-B is expressed, we
propose that the aqueous pore through UT-B is important in its highly
efficient urea transport function. Mutagenesis and structural
studies should be informative in this regard.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. L. Vetrivel for help in
computations and Liman Qian for mouse breeding.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK35124, HL58198, HL60288, EB00415, and EY13574 and Grant R613
from the National Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: 1246 Health Sciences
East Tower, Cardiovascular Research Inst., University of California,
San Francisco, CA 94143-0521. Tel.: 415-476-8530; Fax: 415-665-3847;
E-mail: byang@itsa.ucsf.edu; www.ucsf.edu/verklab.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206948200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
UT, urea
transporter;
AQP, aquaporin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Olives, B.,
Neau, P.,
Bailly, P.,
Hediger, M. A.,
Rousselet, G.,
Cartron, J. P.,
and Ripoche, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31649-31652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Tsukaguchi, H.,
Shayakul, C.,
Berger, U. V.,
Tokui, T.,
Brown, D.,
and Hediger, M. A.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
1506-1515[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Sands, J. M.,
Timmer, R. T.,
and Gunn, R. B.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
F321-F339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Yang, B.,
Bankir, L.,
Gillespie, A.,
Epstein, C. J.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
10633-10637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Edwards-Moulds, J.,
and Kasschau, M. R.
(1988)
Vox Sang.
55,
181-185[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Frohlich, O.,
Macey, R. I.,
Edwards-Moulds, J.,
Gargus, J. J.,
and Gunn, R. B.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
260,
C778-C783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Sands, J. M.,
Gargus, J. J.,
Fröhlich, O.,
Gunn, R. B.,
and Kokko, J. P.
(1992)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
2,
1689-1696[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Olives, B.,
Mattei, M. G.,
Huet, M.,
Neau, P.,
Martial, S.,
Cartron, J. P.,
and Bailly, P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15607-15610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Lucien, N.,
Sidoux-Walter, F.,
Roudier, N.,
Ripoche, P.,
Huet, M.,
Trinh-Trang-Tan, M. M.,
Cartron, J. P.,
and Bailly, P.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
34101-34108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Nakayama, Y.,
Naruse, M.,
Karakashian, A.,
Peng, T.,
Sands, J. M.,
and Bagnasco, S. M.
(2001)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1518,
19-26[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Bagnasco, S. M.,
Peng, T.,
Janech, M. G.,
Karakashian, A.,
and Sands, J. M.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
281,
F400-F406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Fenton, R. A.,
Cottingham, C. A.,
Stewart, G. S.,
Howorth, A.,
Hewitt, J. A.,
and Smith, C. P.
(2002)
Am. J. Physiol.
282,
F630-638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Yang, B.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9369-9372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Sidoux-Walter, F.,
Lucien, N.,
Olives, B.,
Gobin, R.,
Rousselet, G.,
Kamsteeg, E. J.,
Ripoche, P.,
Deen, P. M.,
Cartron, J. P.,
and Bailly, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30228-30235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Mathai, J. C.,
Mori, S.,
Smith, B. L.,
Preston, G. M.,
Mohandas, N.,
Collins, M.,
van Zijl, P. C.,
Zeidel, M. L.,
and Agre, P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1309-1313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Ma, T.,
Yang, B.,
Gillespie, A.,
Carlson, E. J.,
Epstein, C. J,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4296-4299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Yang, B., Ma, T.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
624-628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Dix, J. A.,
and Solomon, A. K.
(1984)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
773,
219-230[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Levitt, D. G.,
and Mlekoday, H. J.
(1983)
J. Gen. Physiol.
81,
239-253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Mayrand, R. R.,
and Levitt, D. G.
(1983)
J. Gen. Physiol.
81,
221-237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Brahm, J.
(1983)
J. Gen. Physiol.
82,
1-23[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Chasan, B.,
and Solomon, A. K.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
821,
56-62[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Zeidel, M. L.,
Ambudkar, S. V.,
Smith, B. L.,
and Agre, P.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
7436-7440[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
van Hoek, A. N.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18267-18269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Yang, B.,
Fukuda, N.,
van Hoek, A.,
Matthay, M. A., Ma, T.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2686-2692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Macey, R. I.
(1984)
Am. J. Physiol.
246,
C195-C203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Toon, M. R.,
and Solomon, A. K.
(1996)
J. Membr. Biol.
153,
137-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Ma, T.,
Song, Y.,
Yang, B.,
Gillespie, A.,
Carlson, E. J.,
Epstein, C. J,
and Verkman, A. S.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4386-4391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Vallon, V.,
Verkman, A. S.,
and Schnermann, J.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
F1030-F1033
|
| 30.
|
Schnermann, J.,
Chou, C. L., Ma, T.,
Traynor, T.,
Knepper, M. A.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9660-9664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Chou, C. L.,
Knepper, M. A.,
van Hoek, A. N.,
Brown, D.,
Yang, B., Ma, T.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
491-496[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Pallone, T. L.,
Edwards, A., Ma, T.,
Silldorff, E. P.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
105,
215-222[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Verkman, A. S.
(2002)
Exp. Nephrol.
10,
235-240[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Mannuzzu, L. M.,
Moronne, M. M.,
and Macey, R. I.
(1993)
J. Membr. Biol.
133,
85-97[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Sui, H.,
Han, B. G.,
Lee, J. K.,
Walian, P.,
and Jap, B. K.
(2001)
Nature
414,
872-878[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Timmer, R. T.,
Klein, J. D.,
Bagnasco, S. M.,
Doran, J. J.,
Verlander, J. W.,
Gunn, R. B.,
and Sands, J. M.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
281,
C1318-C1325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
| Trinh-Trang-Tan, M. M., Lasbennes, F., Gane, P., Roudier,
N., Ripoche, R., Cartron, J. P., and Bailly, P. (2002)
Am. J. Physiol., in press
|
| 38.
|
Yang, B.,
Gillespie, A.,
Carlson, E. J.,
Epstein, C. J.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2775-2779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Yun, J.,
Schoneberg, T.,
Liu, J.,
Schulz, A.,
Echelbarger, C. A.,
Promeneur, D.,
Nielsen, S.,
Sheng, H.,
Grinberg, A.,
Deng, C.,
and Wess, J.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
106,
1361-1371[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Takahashi, N.,
Chernavvsky, D. R.,
Gomez, R. A.,
Igarashi, P.,
Gitelman, H. J.,
and Smithies, O.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
5434-5439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Godara, C. Smith, J. Bosse, M. Zeidel, and J. Mathai
Functional characterization of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae urea transport protein, ApUT
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
April 1, 2009;
296(4):
R1268 - R1273.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Callies, T G Cooper, and C H Yeung
Channels for water efflux and influx involved in volume regulation of murine spermatozoa
Reproduction,
October 1, 2008;
136(4):
401 - 410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. MacIver, C. P. Smith, W. G. Hill, and M. L. Zeidel
Functional characterization of mouse urea transporters UT-A2 and UT-A3 expressed in purified Xenopus laevis oocyte plasma membranes
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
April 1, 2008;
294(4):
F956 - F964.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Sands
Critical Role of Urea in the Urine-Concentrating Mechanism
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
March 1, 2007;
18(3):
670 - 671.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Levin, R. de la Fuente, and A. S. Verkman
Urearetics: a small molecule screen yields nanomolar potency inhibitors of urea transporter UT-B
FASEB J,
February 1, 2007;
21(2):
551 - 563.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Pannabecker and W. H. Dantzler
Three-dimensional architecture of inner medullary vasa recta
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
June 1, 2006;
290(6):
F1355 - F1366.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. S. Stewart, C. Graham, S. Cattell, T. P. L. Smith, N. L. Simmons, and C. P. Smith
UT-B is expressed in bovine rumen: potential role in ruminal urea transport
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
August 1, 2005;
289(2):
R605 - R612.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Yang and L. Bankir
Urea and urine concentrating ability: new insights from studies in mice
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
May 1, 2005;
288(5):
F881 - F896.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Klein, J. M. Sands, L. Qian, X. Wang, and B. Yang
Upregulation of Urea Transporter UT-A2 and Water Channels AQP2 and AQP3 in Mice Lacking Urea Transporter UT-B
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
May 1, 2004;
15(5):
1161 - 1167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-H. Liu, U. Ludewig, B. Gassert, W. B. Frommer, and N. von Wiren
Urea Transport by Nitrogen-Regulated Tonoplast Intrinsic Proteins in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2003;
133(3):
1220 - 1228.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Zhang and A. Edwards
Theoretical effects of UTB urea transporters in the renal medullary microcirculation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2003;
285(4):
F731 - F747.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Pallone, M. R. Turner, A. Edwards, and R. L. Jamison
Countercurrent exchange in the renal medulla
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
May 1, 2003;
284(5):
R1153 - R1175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Pallone, Z. Zhang, and K. Rhinehart
Physiology of the renal medullary microcirculation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
February 1, 2003;
284(2):
F253 - F266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|