JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203917200 on July 26, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 39, 36878-36888, September 27, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/39/36878    most recent
M203917200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eklund, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kakar, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eklund, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kakar, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

SHP1 Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase Regulates HoxA10 DNA Binding and Transcriptional Repression Activity in Undifferentiated Myeloid Cells*

Elizabeth A. EklundDagger §||, Inna GoldenbergDagger §, YuFeng LuDagger §, Jelena Andrejic**, and Renu Kakar**Dagger Dagger

From the Dagger  Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611, § The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, and  Chicago Lakeside Veterans Administration Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 60611, the Dagger Dagger  Birmingham Veterans Administration Hospital, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, and the ** Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294

Received for publication, April 23, 2002, and in revised form, July 22, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The homeodomain protein HoxA10 interacts with negative cis elements to repress gene transcription in undifferentiated myeloid cells. The CYBB and NCF2 genes, which encode the gp91PHOX and p67PHOX proteins, are two such HoxA10 target genes. During interferon gamma -induced myeloid differentiation, tyrosine phosphorylation decreases HoxA10 DNA binding affinity and transcriptional repression. Therefore, decreased HoxA10 repression contributes to increased CYBB and NCF2 transcription in differentiating myeloid cells. The current studies investigate modulation of HoxA10 repression activity during myelopoiesis. We determine that phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the conserved homeodomain decreases HoxA10-DNA binding. We also determine that interaction of the homeodomain phosphotyrosine residues with an adjacent domain in the HoxA10 protein is necessary for decreased DNA binding affinity. Since SHP1 protein-tyrosine phosphatase antagonizes myeloid differentiation and decreases CYBB and NCF2 transcription, we investigated the influence of SHP1-protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) on HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation. We find that SHP1-PTP activity increases HoxA10 target gene repression in undifferentiated myeloid cells. Consistent with this, SHP1-PTP interacts with HoxA10 and decreases homeodomain-tyrosine phosphorylation. These investigations suggest that SHP1-PTP activity, in undifferentiated myeloid cells, influences HoxA10 repression of myeloid-specific genes. Therefore, increased HoxA10 repression of myeloid gene transcription is a molecular mechanism for SHP1 inhibition of myeloid differentiation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Myelopoiesis is characterized by differentiation stage-specific transcription of defined sets of genes, resulting in acquisition of the mature myeloid phenotype (1). For example, early myeloid differentiation is characterized by transcription of genes encoding hematopoietic cytokines, midmyeloid differentiation is characterized by transcription of granule protein genes, and late myeloid differentiation is characterized by transcription genes encoding phagocyte respiratory burst oxidase proteins (1-3). Some differentiation stage-specific myeloid gene transcription is regulated by differentiation stage-restricted transcription factors, such as AML1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (1). However, other transcription factors, such as PU.1, interferon consensus sequence-binding protein (ICSBP),1 and HoxA10, are involved in gene transcription throughout myelopoiesis but have distinct differentiation stage-specific functions.

Recent investigations of myeloid gene transcription indicate that post-translational modification alters function of some transcription factors as myeloid differentiation proceeds. For example, nonphosphorylated PU.1 interacts with AML1 and activates gene transcription in early myeloid differentiation (4). In differentiated myeloid cells, serine-phosphorylated PU.1 interacts with interferon regulatory factors and activates transcription of genes characteristic of the mature phenotype (5-7). The ICSBP is another factor with differentiation stage-specific activity that depends on post-translational modification. In undifferentiated myeloid cells, nonphosphorylated ICSBP represses BCLX transcription (8). In differentiated myeloid cells, tyrosine-phosphorylated ICSBP interacts with PU.1, IRF1, and CBP to activate transcription of various myeloid-specific genes (5-7).

The homeodomain protein HoxA10 is also functionally regulated by post-translational modification during myeloid differentiation. Understanding the function of this transcription factor is important, because disregulation of HoxA10 is associated with leukemogenesis in murine models and human disease (9, 10). In undifferentiated myeloid cells, HoxA10 blocks differentiation by repressing transcription of myeloid-specific genes, such as the genes encoding the respiratory burst oxidase proteins gp91PHOX and p67PHOX (CYBB and NCF2 genes, respectively) (11). During cytokine-induced differentiation of myeloid cell lines, HoxA10 is tyrosine-phosphorylated, which decreases HoxA10 DNA binding affinity (11). These results suggest that HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation provides a mechanism for differentiation stage-specific HoxA10 function.

Previous investigations suggest that SHP1 protein-tyrosine phosphatase (SHP1-PTP) regulates differentiation stage-specific transcription factor phosphorylation. SHP1 is a "hematopoietic specific" PTP that antagonizes myeloid differentiation (14-16). Consistent with this, inhibition of SHP1-PTP activity, in undifferentiated myeloid cell lines, increases transcription of the CYBB and NCF2 genes (17). This suggests the hypothesis that SHP1-PTP substrates include transcription factors involved in CYBB and NCF2 transcription.

The current studies investigate regulation of HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation and repression activity. We determine that interaction of phosphotyrosine residues in the HoxA10-homeodomain with an adjacent domain in the HoxA10 protein decreases DNA binding affinity. Our current studies indicate that SHP1-PTP activity impacts HoxA10-mediated transcriptional repression in myeloid cell lines. We also determine that SHP1-PTP activity influences the HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation state in myeloid cell lines and ex vivo cultured myeloid cells from SHP1-deficient mice. Therefore, these investigations link post-translational modification that regulates HoxA10 function with a phosphatase intermediate that effects this modification.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmids and PCR Mutagenesis: Reporter Constructs and Plasmids for Protein Expression-- Artificial promoter/reporter constructs were generated as previously described (18) in the minimal promoter/reporter vector, p-TATACAT (19) (obtained from Dr. A. Kraft, University of Colorado, Denver, CO). Constructs were generated with three copies (in the forward orientation) of the consensus sequence for HoxA10/Pbx binding (p-a10TATACAT) (2) or four copies (in the forward direction) of the -94 to -134 bp sequence from the CYBB promoter (p-cybbTATACAT). This CYBB promoter sequence has previously been demonstrated to function as a repressor element in myeloid cell lines (11).

The cDNA for human HoxA10 was obtained from C. Largman (University of California, San Francisco, CA) (20). This cDNA sequence represents the major transcript that is encoded in mammalian hematopoietic cells, encoding a 393-amino acid, 55-kDa protein (21). Wild type HoxA10 cDNA sequence was subcloned into the pcDNAamp vector for in vitro translation and the pSRalpha and pcDNA3.1his vectors for expression in mammalian cells (22).

HoxA10 5' truncation mutant cDNAs were generated by PCR, using primers that incorporate the genuine HoxA10 Kozak consensus sequence and an ATG. Truncation mutants were generated that included HoxA10 amino acids (aa) 140-393, 195-393, 267-393, 267-320, and 320-393. These mutant cDNA sequences were subcloned into the pcDNAamp vector for in vitro translation. The 267-320 aa HoxA10 truncation mutant was subcloned into the pGEX3 vector for expression in Escherichia coli as a GST fusion protein. A HoxA10 cDNA sequence with point mutation of the two tyrosine residues in the homeodomain (tyrosines 326 and 343 to phenylalanine) was generated by site-directed mutagenesis, using the CLONTECH QuikChange protocol (per the manufacturer's instructions (Stratagene)). Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 cDNA was subcloned into the pcDNAamp vector for in vitro translation and into the pSRalpha and pcDNA3.1his vectors for transfection experiments. Mutant cDNAs were sequenced to verify that no unintended mutations had been introduced.

The cDNAs for SHP1-PTP and CS453-SHP1-PTP (dominant negative), subcloned into the pSX vector, were obtained from Dr. Stuart Frank (Birmingham Veterans Affairs Hospital and the Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham) (24). These SHP1 cDNAs were also subcloned into the pcDNAamp vector for in vitro translation.

Oligonucleotides-- Oligonucleotides were synthesized by the Core Facility of the University of Alabama, Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, or the Core Facility of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University. Oligonucleotides were as follows: derived consensus sequence for Pbx/HoxA10 binding (dsA10), 5'-tgcgatgatttatgaccgc-3'; the similar sequence from the CYBB promoter (-94 to -134 bp) (dscybbA10) (25), 5'-ttcagttgaccaatgattattagccaattttctgataaaa-3'. In these oligonucleotides, the HoxA10 core is in boldface type, the Pbx core is in italics, and CCAAT boxes are underlined.

Myeloid Cell Line Culture-- The human myelomonocytic cell line U937 (25) was obtained from Andrew Kraft. Cells were maintained and differentiated as described (5, 6, 11). U937 cells were treated with 200 units/ml human recombinant IFNgamma (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs)-- Nuclear extract proteins were prepared by the method of Dignam (26) with protease inhibitors (as described) (17) and phosphatase inhibitors (as indicated). Oligonucleotide probes were prepared, and EMSA and antibody supershift assays were performed as described (11). Antiserum to HoxA10 (not cross-reactive with other Hox proteins) was obtained from Covance Research Products (Richmond, CA) and from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA).

In Vitro Translated Proteins and Tyrosine Dephosphorylation-- In vitro transcribed HoxA10 and Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 mRNA were generated from linearized template DNA, using the Riboprobe system, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega, Madison, WI). In vitro translated proteins were generated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega). Control (unprogrammed) lysates were generated in similar reactions in the absence of input RNA.

In vitro translated proteins and nuclear proteins were tyrosine-dephosphorylated with Yop protein-tyrosine phosphatase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). Proteins (either 10 µl of in vitro translated protein or 2 µg of nuclear proteins) were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C, in a 20-µl reaction volume with 50 units of Yop and 1× reaction buffer, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Control proteins were incubated, similarly, in 1× reaction buffer, without Yop. In other experiments, in vitro translated HoxA10 proteins were incubated as above but in reactions in which 10 µl of in vitro translated SHP1 or CS453-SHP1 was substituted for Yop PTP. In vitro translated proteins were assayed for tyrosine phosphorylation state by anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation of [35S]methionine-labeled proteins (see below).

EMSA with the in vitro translated proteins was performed as described (11). The amount of mutant and wild type HoxA10 proteins in DNA-binding reactions was equalized by SDS-PAGE of [35S]methionine-labeled proteins.

Transfection and Reporter Gene Assays-- Cells were transfected by electroporation as described (11). U937 cells (32 × 106/sample) were transfected with 70 µg of p-TATACAT or p-cybbTATACAT; 30 µg of pSRalpha , HoxA10/pSRalpha , or Y326F/Y343F HoxA10/pSRalpha ; and 15 µg of p-CMVbeta -gal (to normalize for transfection efficiency). Transfectants were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2, followed by 24 h with or without IFNgamma (200 units/ml). Preparation of cell extracts, beta -galactosidase, and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) assays was performed as described (27, 28).

To generate stable transfectants, U937 cells (32 × 106) were transfected with 50 µg of plasmid: SHP1/pSX, CS453-SHP1/pSX, or control pSX. Cells were incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 10% fetal calf serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1 mg/ml Geneticin (G418) to select for stable transfectants. Expression of the various proteins was verified by Western blots of cell lysates, according to standard procedures, with commercially available antibodies. Functional expression of the proteins was verified by a protein-tyrosine phosphatase assay, using a commercially available kit (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY). These U937 stable transfectants have been previously described (17).

Ex Vivo Culture of Murine Bone Marrow-derived Myeloid Cells-- Bone marrow cells were obtained from the femurs of wild type C57BL/6J or C57BL/6J-Hcphme-v (viable moth-eaten or SHP1-/-) mice, obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, MA). Bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells were recovered and ex vivo cultured in cytokines, as described in Ref. 29. Bone marrow-derived cells were cultured for 48 or 72 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf serum and 10% 5× WEHI conditioned medium, supplemented with recombinant murine GM-CSF (10 ng/ml; Upstate Biotechnology). These conditions result in a population of predominantly myeloid progenitor cells (29).

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting-- Immunoprecipitations were performed with 100 µg of nuclear proteins extracted from U937 stable transfectants with SHP1-PTP, CS453-SHP1, or vector control. Proteins were immunoprecipitated with HoxA10 antiserum (Covance Research Products) or control rabbit preimmune serum (11). Proteins were immunoprecipitated for 4 h at 4 °C, with 2 µl of HoxA10 antiserum or 2 µl of control rabbit preimmune serum, followed with a 1-h incubation with 30 µl of 50% staphylococcus protein A-Sepharose bead slurry, as described (17). Immunoprecipitated proteins were washed with RIPA buffer, eluted in SDS sample buffer, and separated on 12% SDS-PAGE. Immunoprecipitated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, and the blots were sequentially probed with anti-HoxA10 (goat polyclonal; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (murine monoclonal 4G10; Upstate Biotechnology). Immunoreactive proteins were detected by chemiluminescence, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Biosciences).

Immunoprecipitation experiments were also performed with in vitro translated HoxA10 proteins, with and without preincubation with SHP1 or CS435-SHP1. In these experiments, 20 µl of in vitro translated, [35S]methionine-labeled HoxA10 protein was preincubated with 10 µl of in vitro translated, unlabeled SHP1 protein (in Yop buffer, as described above). In vitro translated proteins were diluted into "denaturing lysis buffer" and subjected to boiling, followed by dilution with RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors, as described (11). Proteins were incubated with either 1 µl of anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10; Upstate Biotechnology) or irrelevant antibody (mouse anti-rabbit IgG) for 4 h at 4 °C, followed by a 1-h incubation with 15 µl of 50% staphylococcus protein A-Sepharose bead slurry. Beads were washed with RIPA buffer, and proteins were eluted in SDS sample buffer, separated on 12 or 15% SDS-PAGE. The SDS gels were fixed and dried, and immunoprecipitating HoxA10 proteins were identified by autoradiography.

Immunoprecipitation experiments to detect the tyrosine phosphorylation state of HoxA10 were performed with U937 cells, U937 transfectants, or ex vivo cultured murine bone marrow cells. In some experiments, cells were disrupted in "denaturing lysis buffer" (U937 transfectants with HoxA10/pcDNA31.his or Y326F/Y343F HoxA10/pcDNA3.1his or murine bone marrow cells), as previously described (17). In other experiments, U937 nuclear proteins were diluted with denaturing lysis buffer and subjected to boiling (17). Cellular proteins (100-300 µg) were diluted with RIPA buffer (with protease inhibitors), incubated with either HoxA10 antiserum (rabbit polyclonal from Covance) or anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (murine monoclonal 4G10; Upstate Biotechnology) (or irrelevant control antibody, as described above), and collected with staphylococcus protein A-Sepharose, as described (17). Immunoprecipitates were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, and proteins were detected by Western blotting with HoxA10 antibody (goat polyclonal; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, as above.

GST Fusion Protein "Pull-down" Assays-- JM109 E. coli transformed with 267-320-amino acid HoxA10/pGEX3 or control pGEX3 was grown to log phase, supplemented with 0.1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside, and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with shaking. The cells were harvested and resuspended in HN buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.1 M NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% Triton X-100, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 mM NaF) and sonicated on ice. Debris was removed by centrifugation, and the lysate was incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with glutathione-agarose beads (Sigma) and washed extensively with HN buffer. The beads were preincubated for 30 min at 4 °C with 5 µl of control rabbit reticulocyte lysate and then for 1 h with 20 µl of [35S]methionine-labeled in vitro translated protein and washed extensively in HN buffer. Proteins were eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer and separated on 15% SDS-PAGE, and an autoradiograph was performed.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Phosphotyrosine Residues in the HoxA10 Homeodomain Regulate DNA-binding Affinity-- Previously, we found that HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation decreases HoxA10 binding to the CYBB repressor element, the derived HoxA10/Pbx1 DNA-binding consensus sequence, and a homologous sequence in the NCF2 promoter (11). We demonstrated that IFNgamma -induced differentiation of U937 myeloid cells results in HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1A) (11), which is temporally associated with decreased HoxA10 DNA binding and increased CYBB and NCF2 transcription (11). We concluded that post-translational modification modulates HoxA10 function during myeloid differentiation. To understand regulation of HoxA10 transcriptional repression activity during myelopoiesis, it will be important to determine the mechanism by which tyrosine phosphorylation alters HoxA10 DNA binding affinity. In these investigations, we initially approached this question by identifying phosphotyrosine residues that modulate HoxA10 DNA binding affinity.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Multiple HoxA10 tyrosine residues are phosphorylated during IFNgamma -induced differentiation of myeloid cells. A, HoxA10 is tyrosine-phosphorylated during IFNgamma differentiation of U937 myeloid cells. U937 cells were cultured for 48 h, with and without IFNgamma (200 units/ml). Nuclear proteins were isolated and immunoprecipitated with an antibody to HoxA10, under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. Proteins were analyzed by Western blot, as indicated. IFNgamma differentiation increases HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation state but not total HoxA10 protein, consistent with our previous data (11). B, distribution of tyrosine residues in the HoxA10 protein. Graphic representation of the HoxA10 protein; tyrosine residues are indicated with an asterisk, and the homeodomain is indicated as HD. Location of the HoxA10 truncation mutants used in these investigations relative to the tyrosine residues and the DNA-binding homeodomain is also indicated.

To identify tyrosine residues involved in HoxA10 DNA binding, we generated a series of HoxA10 cDNA truncation mutants. These mutant cDNAs were designed to maintain the integrity of the HoxA10 DNA-binding homeodomain (amino acids 320-393) but sequentially delete the 12 HoxA10 tyrosine residues. Truncated cDNAs were generated encoding HoxA10 amino acids 140-393, 195-393, and 267-393. The 140-393 truncation includes 7 of the 12 HoxA10 tyrosine residues, 195-393 includes 4 tyrosine residues, and the 267-393 truncation includes only the 2 tyrosine resides in the homeodomain (see Fig. 1B). These mutant HoxA10 cDNAs were used to generate in vitro translated proteins in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. These proteins were used in an EMSA with HoxA10/Pbx1-binding DNA probes, as we have described (11).

Previously, we determined that in vitro translated HoxA10 is tyrosine-phosphorylated and that Yop tyrosine phosphatase treatment decreases HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation (11). In those investigations, Yop tyrosine phosphatase treatment increased in vitro binding of HoxA10 to DNA probes representing either the CYBB repressor element or the derived HoxA10/Pbx1 DNA binding consensus (11). To identify these regulatory phosphotyrosine residues, we performed EMSA with HoxA10-DNA-binding probes and in vitro translated HoxA10-truncation mutants, with and without Yop tyrosine phosphatase treatment. In initial control experiments, tyrosine phosphorylation of these HoxA10 truncation mutants was demonstrated by anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation. Additionally, Yop tyrosine phosphatase decreased tyrosine phosphorylation of each of these truncation mutants (not shown).

As in our previous investigations, Yop treatment increases binding of in vitro translated, wild type HoxA10 to DNA probes representing the derived HoxA10/Pbx1 consensus sequence and the CYBB repressor element. Similarly, Yop treatment increases DNA binding of all three HoxA10 truncation mutants to these two HoxA10-binding DNA probes (shown for the 193-393 and 267-393 HoxA10 mutants (Fig. 2A)). Since only the homeodomain tyrosine residues are common to all of these HoxA10 truncation mutants, we hypothesized that phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the HoxA10 homeodomain decreases DNA binding affinity.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the HoxA10 homeodomain decreases DNA binding affinity and transcriptional repression. A, phosphorylation of the tyrosine residues in the homeodomain decreases HoxA10 DNA binding affinity. EMSA was performed with a DNA probe representing the derived HoxA10/Pbx1 binding consensus sequence and HoxA10 truncation mutants, in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. In vitro translated proteins were incubated with or without Yop tyrosine phosphatase as follows: 1) control HoxA10 aa 195-393; 2) Yop-treated HoxA10 aa 195-393; 3) control HoxA10 aa 267-393; 4) Yop-treated HoxA10 aa 267-393. The arrows indicate specific binding of in vitro translated proteins. B, mutation of tyrosine residues 326 and 343 to phenylalanine abolishes Yop PTP-induced increase in HoxA10 DNA binding affinity. EMSA was performed with a DNA probe representing the derived HoxA10/Pbx1 binding consensus sequence and HoxA10 or Y326/344F HoxA10, in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. In vitro translated proteins were incubated with or without Yop tyrosine phosphatase as follows: 1) control HoxA10, 2) Yop-treated HoxA10; 3) control Y326F/Y343F HoxA10; 4) Yop-treated Y326F/Y343F HoxA10. The arrow indicates specific DNA binding of HoxA10 protein. C, HoxA10 with mutation of the homeodomain tyrosine residues represses transcription in IFNgamma -differentiated U937 cells. U937 cells were co-transfected with an artificial promoter construct with four copies of the repressor element from the CYBB gene (p-cybbTATACAT) or empty vector control (p-TATACAT) and a vector to overexpress HoxA10, Y326F/Y343F HoxA10, or empty vector control (pSRalpha ). Reporter gene activity was assayed with and without IFNgamma -induced differentiation of the transfectants. Wild type HoxA10 represses reporter expression from the CYBB repressor element in undifferentiated but not differentiated U937 cells, consistent with our previous results. In contrast, Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 represses the CYBB repressor containing an artificial promoter construct in U937 cells with and without IFNgamma differentiation. In undifferentiated U937 transfectants, transcriptional repression by Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 was significantly more efficient than wild type HoxA10. D, overexpressed HoxA10 and Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 are tyrosine-phosphorylated during IFNgamma differentiation of U937 cells. U937 cells were transfected with a vector to overexpress epitope-tagged HoxA10 or Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 (or vector control) and incubated for 48 h, with or without IFNgamma . Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to the epitope tag (anti-xpress tag and anti-His6 tags) under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. Western blots were analyzed for tyrosine phosphorylation of the immunoprecipitated proteins, as indicated. Both wild type and Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 were somewhat tyrosine-phosphorylated in undifferentiated U937 cells, and tyrosine phosphorylation (but not protein abundance) of both overexpressed proteins was increased by IFNgamma treatment of the transfectants.

To specifically investigate the role of the two HoxA10 homeodomain tyrosine residues in DNA binding affinity, we mutated these residues (Tyr326 and Tyr343) to phenylalanine (Y326F/Y343F HoxA10). Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 was in vitro translated in reticulocyte lysate and used in EMSA with HoxA10-binding DNA probes, as above. Consistent with our hypothesis, Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 demonstrated increased binding to these DNA probes, in comparison with an equivalent amount of wild type HoxA10 (Fig. 2B). Additionally, Yop treatment did not further increase DNA binding of Y326F/Y343F HoxA10. Therefore, these investigations suggested that we had correctly identified the phosphotyrosine residues that decrease DNA binding of in vitro translated HoxA10.

Phosphorylation of Homeodomain Tyrosine Residues Regulates HoxA10 Repression Activity during IFNgamma -induced U937 Differentiation-- In our previous studies, we determined that overexpression of HoxA10 represses expression of the endogenous CYBB and NCF2 genes in undifferentiated U937 myeloid cells (11). These genes encode the respiratory burst oxidase proteins gp91PHOX and p67PHOX, which are expressed at low levels in undifferentiated U937 cells. Consistent with this, we previously found that HoxA10 overexpression represses reporter gene expression from an artificial promoter/reporter construct containing a minimal promoter linked to multiple copies of either the derived HoxA10/Pbx1 binding consensus or the proximal repressor element from the CYBB gene (referred to as p-a10TATACAT and p-cybbTATACAT, respectively) (11).

IFNgamma differentiation of U937 cells results in acquisition of functional characteristics of mature myeloid cells, including respiratory burst activity and phagocytosis. Consistent with this, IFNgamma differentiation of U937 cells increases transcription of the CYBB and NCF2 genes (5). In our previous investigations, IFNgamma -differentiation of U937 cells abolished HoxA10 repression of reporter gene expression from HoxA10-binding artificial promoter/reporter constructs (11). We hypothesized that the inability of HoxA10 to repress transcription in IFNgamma -treated U937 cells was due to decreased DNA binding affinity of tyrosine-phosphorylated HoxA10 in these cells.

Therefore, we were interested in determining whether phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the homeodomain regulates HoxA10 repression activity in differentiating U937 cells. To test the functional significance of HoxA10 Tyr326 and Tyr343, we performed U937 transfection experiments, similar to those described above for wild type HoxA10. If the phosphotyrosine residues that influence HoxA10 DNA binding have been correctly identified, we hypothesized that Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 would repress artificial promoter constructs with HoxA10-DNA-binding sites in both undifferentiated and IFNgamma -differentiated U937 cells. We co-transfected U937 cells with an artificial promoter/reporter construct with multiple copies of the HoxA10 binding site from the CYBB gene (or control minimal promoter/reporter vector; p-TATACAT) and a plasmid to overexpress either wild type HoxA10 or Y326F/Y343F HoxA10.

Consistent with our previous results, reporter expression from p-cybbTATACAT was significantly repressed by overexpression of wild type HoxA10, in undifferentiated U937 cells (54.9 ± 18.8% decrease in CAT activity; p = 0.02, n = 3). Additionally, overexpressed Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 significantly represses reporter expression from the HoxA10-binding artificial promoter construct (p-cybbTATACAT) (90.9 ± 18.2% decrease in CAT activity; p = 0.0086, n = 3) (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, overexpressed Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 represses p-cybbTATACAT significantly more efficiently than overexpressed wild type HoxA10 (79.8 ± 8.2% decrease in CAT activity with Y326F/Y343F Hoxa10 versus wild type HoxA10; p = 0.003, n = 3).

We next investigated whether overexpressed Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 represses transcription from the HoxA10-binding artificial promoter construct in IFNgamma -treated U937 cells. According to our previous investigations, HoxA10 is tyrosine-phosphorylated under these conditions (11). Consistent with our previous results, overexpressed wild type HoxA10 does not significantly repress reporter expression from p-cybbTATACAT in IFNgamma -differentiated U937 cells (p = 0.17, n = 3) (Fig. 2C). In contrast, overexpressed Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 significantly represses p-cybbTATACAT reporter expression in IFNgamma -differentiated U937 transfectants (55.1 ± 6.6% decrease in CAT activity with Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 versus vector control; p = 0.002, n = 3). These results are consistent with our hypothesis that phosphorylation of the two homeodomain tyrosine residues decreases HoxA10 DNA binding affinity, and therefore transcriptional repression activity, during myeloid differentiation.

However, an alternative explanation for these results is that mutation of tyrosines 326 and 343 prevents phosphorylation of the remaining 10 HoxA10 tyrosine residues. To investigate this, we determined the tyrosine phosphorylation state of overexpressed wild type and Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 in U937 cells. U937 cells were transfected with mammalian expression vectors to overexpress an epitope-tagged form of wild type or Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 (or empty vector control). In these experiments, the pcDNA3.1his vector was used to express HoxA10 with six-histidine and "xpress" epitope tags. The transfectants were incubated for 48 h, either with or without IFNgamma treatment, as in the experiments described above. Cells were harvested and lysed under conditions that prevent co-precipitation of other proteins. Lysates were subjected to anti-tag immunoprecipitation, and Western blots were evaluated for tyrosine phosphorylation state of the overexpressed, epitope-tagged protein (Fig. 2D).

We found that there was some tyrosine phosphorylation of overexpressed wild type and Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 in U937 cells. However, this tyrosine phosphorylation increased during IFNgamma differentiation of the transfectants (although the abundance of the overexpressed protein did not). This result is consistent with mutation of tyrosine residues 326/343 resulting in a specific, but not general, decrease in HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation. These results also indicate that HoxA10 overexpression results in some tyrosine phosphorylation. This is consistent with overexpression of other transcription factors involved in myeloid gene transcription (17), as will be discussed below.

Phosphorylated Homeodomain Tyrosine Residues Interact with HoxA10 Amino Acids 267-320-- Therefore, our data suggest that phosphorylation of the two homeodomain tyrosine residues decreases HoxA10 DNA binding affinity during IFNgamma differentiation of U937 cells. However, this new data do not immediately appear consistent with data from our previous investigations. Previously, we investigated the function of an alternatively spliced form of HoxA10, referred to as short A10 (21). Short A10 transcripts are found in myeloid leukemia cell lines but not in primary leukemia cells or in normal myeloid cells (21). In the short A10 transcript, a unique sequence encoding 4 amino acids not found in "wild type" HoxA10 is spliced to sequence encoding HoxA10 amino acids 317-393 (21). Therefore, the 15-kDa short A10 protein includes the DNA-binding homeodomain (including Tyr326 and Tyr343 of HoxA10). Our previous investigations indicate that Yop tyrosine phosphatase treatment did not increase DNA binding affinity of in vitro translated short A10 (11). In transfection experiments, short A10 repressed reporter expression from artificial promoter constructs with HoxA10 DNA-binding sites, although significantly less efficiently than the 55-kDa form of HoxA10 (11). Consistent with these in vitro DNA binding results, short A10 repression activity was not abrogated by IFNgamma -differentiation of U937 cells. These results suggest that the phosphotyrosine residues that decrease HoxA10 DNA binding affinity are not within the short A10 protein.

However, the short A10 protein includes the two HoxA10 homeodomain tyrosine residues found to be involved in DNA binding affinity in the experiments above. Specifically, the short A10 EMSA results directly contradict our results with the Yop-treated amino acid 267-393 HoxA10 truncation mutant. Comparison of short A10 and 267-393 aa HoxA10 cDNA sequences indicates that short A10 includes 4 amino acids that are not found in 267-393 aa HoxA10 and that 267-393 aa HoxA10 encodes 46 amino acids not present in short A10. We hypothesized that these amino acids might influence DNA binding activity, resulting in differences between the two truncated HoxA10 proteins. To investigate this possibility, we generated an additional mutant HoxA10 cDNA sequence, which encodes amino acids 320-393. In vitro translated 320-393 aa HoxA10 was used in EMSA with HoxA10/Pbx binding DNA probes, as above.

We were somewhat surprised to discover that Yop tyrosine phosphatase treatment did not increase in vitro binding of 320-393 aa HoxA10 to HoxA10-binding DNA probes (Fig. 3A). Consistent with this, 320-393 aa HoxA10 had increased DNA binding affinity, in comparison with 55-kDa HoxA10. These results suggest that HoxA10 DNA binding affinity is determined both by tyrosine residues in the homeodomain and by amino acids 267-320. A possible mechanism for this is physical interaction between phosphotyrosine residues 326/343 and amino acids 267-320. Such an interaction could alter accessibility of the HoxA10 homeodomain for potential DNA-binding sites. The corollary of this hypothesis would be that nonphosphorylated Tyr326/Tyr343 does not interact with amino acids 267-393.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Amino acids 267-320 are necessary for phosphotyrosine residues in the homeodomain to decrease HoxA10 DNA binding affinity. A, HoxA10 sequences outside of the homeodomain contribute to HoxA10 DNA binding affinity. EMSAs were performed with a DNA probe representing the HoxA10/Pbx DNA-binding consensus sequence and HoxA10 truncation mutants, in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. In vitro translated proteins were incubated with or without Yop tyrosine phosphatase, as follows: 1) control HoxA10 aa 320-393 (homeodomain only); 2) Yop-treated HoxA10 aa 320-393; 3) control HoxA10 aa 267-393; 4) Yop-treated HoxA10 aa 267-393. The arrows indicate specific shifted proteins. B, interaction of HoxA10 amino acids 267-320 with amino acids 320-393 requires phosphorylation of tyrosines 326 and 343. HoxA10 aa 276-320 were expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein with GST. HoxA10 aa 320-393 and Y326F/Y343F 320-393 were in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Interaction of HoxA10 267-320/GST or GST with HoxA10 320-393 or Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 320-393 was identified by co-precipitation. HoxA10 267-320/GST interacts with HoxA10 320-393 but not Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 320-393, as indicated. Neither in vitro translated protein interacts with control GST.

To investigate this hypothesis, we determined the ability of the HoxA10 homeodomain to directly interact with HoxA10 amino acids 267-320 in vitro. HoxA10 amino acids 267-320 were expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase (267-320 aa Hoxa10/GST) and purified by affinity to glutathione-agarose. Interaction of HoxA10 amino acids 267-320 with 320-393 was demonstrated by co-purification of in vitro translated, [35S]methionine-labeled 320-393 aa HoxA10 by 267-320 aa HoxA10/GST, but not control GST (Fig. 3B). This result is consistent with the first part of our hypothesis, that the HoxA10 amino acids 267-320 interact with the HoxA10 homeodomain. Therefore, we determined whether this interaction was dependent on phosphorylation of the tyrosine residues in the homeodomain.

To do this, we investigated the ability of 267-320 aa HoxA10/GST to affinity co-purify in vitro translated, 35S-labeled 320-393 aa Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 (a truncation mutant with mutation of tyrosine residues 326 and 343 to phenylalanine). In contrast to "wild type" 320-393 aa HoxA10, Y326F/Y343F 320-393 aa HoxA10 did not affinity-co-purify with 267-320 aa HoxA10/GST (Fig. 3B). In initial control experiments, we demonstrated that in vitro translated 320-393 aa HoxA10 (but not Y326F/Y343F 320-393 aa HoxA10) is tyrosine-phosphorylated (as demonstrated below). This result suggests that the interaction of these two HoxA10 domains is dependent on phosphorylation of the homeodomain tyrosine residues. Therefore, this result is consistent with the second part of our hypothesis, that differentiation induced phosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the HoxA10 homeodomain induces interaction with another domain in the HoxA10 protein.

SHP1-PTP Activity Increases HoxA10 Transcriptional Repression in Undifferentiated U937 Cells-- In previous investigations, we found that activity of SHP1 protein-tyrosine phosphatase decreases transcription of the CYBB and NCF2 genes in undifferentiated myeloid cells (17). These results are consistent with the phenotype of SHP1-PTP-deficient (viable moth-eaten, or me v-/-) mice, which is characterized by an increase in differentiating myeloid cells with activated neutrophils and monocytes in the peripheral blood. Additionally, ex vivo cultured myeloid cells from SHP1-/- mice (me v-/- mice) undergo accelerated differentiation to mature phagocytes in the presence of cytokines, in comparison with normal murine myeloid cells (12-14).

Consistent with this murine model, we previously found increased CYBB and NCF2 transcription in undifferentiated U937 cells, stably overexpressing dominant negative SHP1 (CS453-SHP1) (17). Additionally, we found decreased CYBB and NCF2 transcription in IFNgamma -differentiated U937 cells, stably overexpressing SHP1 (see Ref. 17 for characterization of these lines). We found that overexpression of CS453-SHP1 increases, and overexpression of SHP1 decreases, reporter gene expression from constructs with either the CYBB or NCF2 promoter (17). In these previous studies, we found abundant endogenous and overexpressed SHP1 protein in the nucleus, suggesting that transcription factors would be reasonable SHP1-PTP substrates (17).

Based on these previous investigations, we hypothesized that SHP1-PTP might decrease HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation. If this hypothesis is correct, SHP1-PTP would increase HoxA10 transcriptional repression, decreasing CYBB and NCF2 transcription in undifferentiated myeloid cells. Such a result would link SHP1-PTP activity to transcriptional repression of myeloid-specific genes, identifying a mechanism regulating HoxA10 function. To investigate this, we used U937 stable transfectants overexpressing SHP1, CS453-SHP1, or vector control (pSX) (17). These U937 stable transfectants were co-transfected with a vector to overexpress HoxA10 and an artificial promoter construct with multiple copies of a HoxA10/Pbx binding site linked to a minimal promoter and reporter (p-cybbTATACAT, described above).

We were intrigued to find that overexpression of SHP1 significantly increases the ability of overexpressed HoxA10 to repress reporter gene activity via the repressor element from the CYBB gene (33.2 ± 6.2% decrease in CAT activity in the presence of SHP1 overexpression; p = 0.027, n = 3) (Fig. 4A). Consistent with this, overexpression of CS453-SHP1 significantly decreases the efficiency of HoxA10 repression of the p-cybbTATACAT construct (73.3 ± 10.2% increase in CAT activity in the presence of dominant negative SHP1 overexpression; p = 0.031, n = 3). Indeed, there was no significant difference in p-cybbTATACAT reporter gene activity with and without overexpression of HoxA10, in U937 cells overexpressing dominant negative SHP1 (HoxA10 versus control vector; p = 0.34, n = 4). These results suggest that SHP1-PTP activity influences HoxA10 repression activity.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   SHP1-PTP activity in U937 cells increases HoxA10 transcriptional repression and DNA binding but decreases HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation. A, inhibition of SHP1-PTP in undifferentiated U937 cells increases HoxA10 transcriptional repression activity. U937 cells stably overexpressing SHP1, CS453-SHP1, or vector control were co-transfected with an artificial promoter construct with four copies of the repressor element from the CYBB gene (p-cybbTATACAT) or empty vector control (p-TATACAT) and a vector to overexpress HoxA10, Y326F/Y343F HoxA10, or empty vector control (pSRalpha ). Reporter gene assays demonstrate that overexpression of SHP1 increases and CS453-SHP1 decreases repression of p-cybbTATACAT by overexpressed HoxA10 (but not control p-TATACAT). In contrast, neither SHP1 nor CS435-SHP1 overexpression influences Y326F/Y343F HoxA10-mediated repression of p-cybbTATACAT. B, inhibition of SHP1-PTP activity in undifferentiated U937 cells increases HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation. Nuclear proteins were isolated from U937 cells stably expressing CS453-SHP1 or control vector pSX. HoxA10 was immunoprecipitated from cell lysate proteins under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins and separated by SDS-PAGE. Western blots were probed with antibodies to phosphotyrosine and to HoxA10, as indicated. HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation was significantly increased in U937 cells overexpressing dominant negative SHP1-PTP in comparison with control vector transfectants. C, inhibition of SHP1-PTP activity in undifferentiated U937 cells decreases HoxA10-Pbx1 complex DNA binding. EMSAs were performed with a DNA probe representing the HoxA10/Pbx1 binding CYBB repressor element and nuclear proteins isolated from U937 cells stably expressing the following: 1) control pSX vector; 2) CS453-SHP1; 3) SHP1-PTP. Inhibition of SHP1-PTP activity decreases and overexpression of SHP1-PTP increases HoxA10/Pbx1 binding to the CYBB repressor element in vitro.

If we have correctly identified HoxA10 tyrosine residues that mediate DNA binding affinity, our data suggest that these residues would be substrates for SHP1-PTP. Therefore, we investigated whether the influence of SHP1-PTP activity on HoxA10 repression involves the HoxA10 homeodomain tyrosine residues (326 and 343). To do this, we co-transfected U937 cells, stably overexpressing SHP1, CS452-SHP1, or control vector, with a vector to overexpress Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 and the p-cybbTATACAT construct, as above. Although Y326F/Y344F HoxA10 represses the HoxA10-binding artificial promoter construct, neither overexpressed SHP1-PTP nor CS453-SHP1-PTP alters Y326F/Y343F HoxA10 repression of p-cybbTATACAT reporter expression (Fig. 4A). Therefore, these results are consistent with a role for SHP1-PTP in regulation of HoxA10 repression activity via the homeodomain tyrosine residues.

SHP1-PTP Influences HoxA10 Tyrosine Phosphorylation in U937 Myeloid Cells-- The above investigations imply that SHP1-PTP activity influences HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation in undifferentiated U937 cells. Therefore, we investigated HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation state in U937 cells overexpressing CS453-SHP1. Nuclear protein fractions were isolated from these cells and immunoprecipitated with an antibody to HoxA10 (rabbit polyclonal) under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed for HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation by Western blot (Fig. 4B). Tyrosine phosphorylation of HoxA10 immunoprecipitated from dominant negative SHP1-expressing U937 cells is increased in comparison with HoxA10 immunoprecipitated from control (empty) vector transfectants. However, there is no difference in abundance of total HoxA10 protein in these two cell lines (empty vector versus dominant negative SHP1).

In our previous investigations, we used DNA probes representing the CYBB proximal repressor element, a homologous NCF2 sequence, or the derived HoxA10/Pbx1 consensus DNA-binding site in EMSA with nuclear proteins from undifferentiated myeloid cell lines. We found that a low mobility complex that interacts with each of these DNA probes is immunoreactive with antibodies to HoxA10 and Pbx1 (11). We also found that either IFNgamma differentiation or sodium orthovanadate treatment of U937 cells decreases HoxA10-Pbx1 complex binding (11). Consistent with these observations, Yop tyrosine phosphatase treatment of U937 nuclear proteins decreases binding of this complex to HoxA10/Pbx binding probes (11).

To determine the role of SHP1-PTP activity in HoxA10 DNA binding, we performed EMSA with HoxA10/Pbx binding probes and nuclear proteins from U937 cells overexpressing SHP1, CS453-SHP1, or vector control. In EMSA with nuclear proteins from CS453-SHP1-overexpressing cells, in vitro binding of the HoxA10-Pbx protein complex to HoxA10/Pbx binding probes is decreased (Fig. 4C), consistent with increased HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation in these cells (Fig. 4B). In contrast, overexpression of SHP1 slightly increases interaction of the HoxA10-Pbx complex to these probes.

SHP1-PTP Influences HoxA10 Tyrosine Phosphorylation in Cultured Murine Myeloid Cells-- In our previous experiments, the influence of SHP1-PTP activity on HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation could be a manifestation of the U937 transformed phenotype. To address this, we investigated HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation in ex vivo cultured myeloid cells from viable moth-eaten mice (me v-/- mice), comparing the results with cells cultured from control wild type mice (C57BL/CJ). Viable moth-eaten mice lack SHP1 and manifest myeloid abnormalities. In these investigations, we took advantage of previous work indicating that a population of predominantly committed myeloid progenitors can be isolated from normal murine bone marrow cells and cultured, short term, in IL-3 and GM-CSF (29).

Bone marrow cells from SHP1-/- mice and control mice were cultured in IL-3 with GM-CSF, and cells were harvested after 48 and 72 h. Lysate proteins were analyzed for SHP1-PTP activity (as described (17)). SHP1-PTP activity was present in control cultured myeloid cells but not in SHP1-/- cells, consistent with previous investigations (23, 30). Cultured cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. At both time points, abundance of tyrosine-phosphorylated HoxA10 was greater in SHP1-/- cells cultured than in cells cultured from wild type mice (Fig. 5A). However, it is possible that the absence of SHP1 increases HoxA10 protein in these cells. To investigate that possibility, we performed another series of immunoprecipitation experiments.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Absence of SHP1-PTP increases HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation in ex vivo cultured murine myeloid cells. A, tyrosine-phosphorylated HoxA10 is increased in ex vivo cultured bone marrow cells from viable moth-eaten mice in comparison with control mice. Murine bone marrow myeloid cells were cultured in IL-3 and GM-CSF for 48 and 72 h. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibody to phosphotyrosine, under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. Western blots were probed with antibody to HoxA10, as indicated. Increased tyrosine-phosphorylated HoxA10 is present in ex vivo cultured bone marrow cells from viable moth-eaten mice in comparison with control C57BL mice. B, absence of SHP1-PTP increases HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation, but not HoxA10 protein abundance, in cultured murine bone marrow myeloid cells. Murine bone marrow myeloid cells from viable moth-eaten and control C57BL mice was cultured in IL-3 plus GM-CSF for 48 or 72 h. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with antibody to HoxA10 (goat polyclonal) under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. Western blots were performed and probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody or HoxA10 antibody (rabbit polyclonal), as indicated. Abundance of tyrosine-phosphorylated HoxA10, but not total HoxA10 protein, is increased in ex vivo cultured myeloid cells from viable moth-eaten mice in comparison with control mice.

Therefore, ex vivo murine bone marrow cells, cultured in IL-3 and GM-CSF, were also analyzed for HoxA10 protein abundance. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-HoxA10 antibody, under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed for HoxA10 protein abundance and tyrosine phosphorylation by Western blot (Fig. 5B). We observed that HoxA10 protein abundance was approximately equivalent, with or without endogenous SHP1-PTP. Consistent with the results above, phosphorylated HoxA10 was more abundant in ex vivo cultured myeloid cells from mice lacking SHP1 than in cells cultured from wild type mice.

SHP1-PTP Activity Influences HoxA10 Tyrosine Phosphorylation State in Vitro-- The preceding experiments employed cell lysates, which are a complex mix of proteins. Therefore, we investigated the ability of recombinant SHP1 to dephosphorylate in vitro translated HoxA10. SHP1 and CS453-SHP1 were in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate (17). Protein-tyrosine phosphatase activity assays of the recombinant proteins were performed using a colorimetric assay (as described (17)). As expected, SHP1, but not CS453-SHP1, demonstrates PTP activity. In vitro translated HoxA10 ([35S]methionine-labeled) was incubated with either SHP1 or CS453-SHP1 (unlabeled), under the same conditions used for Yop PTP dephosphorylation (11). Tyrosine phosphorylation of in vitro translated HoxA10 was determined by anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation under conditions that do not co-immunoprecipitate SHP1 or CS453-SHP1. We found that incubation with SHP1, but not catalytically inactive SHP1, decreases in vitro translated HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 6A).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   SHP1-PTP activity decreases HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation in vitro. A, SHP1-PTP dephosphorylates HoxA10 in vitro. SHP1 and CS453-SHP1 were in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate (unlabeled), and HoxA10 was in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate ([35S]methionine-labeled). HoxA10 was incubated with either SHP1 or CS453-SHP1, followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and HoxA10 was detected by autoradiography. HoxA10 incubated with catalytically inactive SHP1, but not wild type SHP1, was immunoprecipitated by antibody to phosphotyrosine. B, SHP1-PTP dephosphorylates amino acid 320-393 HoxA10 in vitro. SHP1 and CS453-SHP1 were in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate (unlabeled) and amino acid 320-393 HoxA10 was in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate ([35S]methionine-labeled). Amino acid 320-393 HoxA10 was incubated with either SHP1 or CS453-SHP1, followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody under conditions that do not co-precipitate other proteins. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and 320-393 HoxA10 was detected by autoradiography. 320-393 HoxA10 incubated with catalytically inactive SHP1, but not wild type SHP1, was immunoprecipitated by antibody to phosphotyrosine. C, SHP1-PTP activity increases DNA binding of in vitro translated HoxA10. EMSA was performed with a DNA probe representing the derived HoxA10/Pbx binding sequence and in vitro translated HoxA10 incubated with the following: 1) in vitro translated CS453-SHP1; 2) in vitro translated SHP1. The arrow represents the specific shifted HoxA10 protein complex. SHP1-PTP activity is associated with increased HoxA10 DNA binding affinity.

To determine whether the tyrosine residues in the HoxA10 homeodomain are substrates for SHP1, similar experiments were performed with the in vitro translated, 320-393 amino acid HoxA10 truncation mutant. In vitro translated 320-393 amino acid HoxA10 ([35S]methionine-labeled) was incubated with either in vitro translated SHP1 or CS453-SHP1 (unlabeled), and tyrosine phosphorylation of 320-393 amino acid HoxA10 was determined by anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation, as above. Similar to the results above, incubation with in vitro translated SHP1, but not catalytically inactive SHP1, decreases tyrosine phosphorylation of in vitro translated 320-393 amino acid HoxA10 (Fig. 6B). This experiment is possible, because SHP1 interacts with its substrates via the domain that includes the target tyrosine residues.

Based on these results, we investigated whether SHP1-PTP treatment increases the DNA binding affinity of in vitro translated HoxA10. These experiments were designed to link dephosphorylation by SHP1-PTP with change in HoxA10 DNA binding activity. EMSA were performed with a probe representing the derived HoxA10/Pbx consensus sequence and in vitro translated HoxA10, preincubated with either in vitro translated SHP1 or CS453-SHP1 (Fig. 6C). Similar experiments were performed with a DNA probe representing the HoxA10-binding CYBB repressor element (not shown). Consistent with our hypothesis, SHP1-PTP treatment, but not control CS453-SHP1 treatment, increases HoxA10 binding affinity to the DNA probes.

SHP1-PTP Interacts Directly with HoxA10-- The preceding experiments suggest that SHP1-PTP activity influences the tyrosine phosphorylation state of HoxA10. The ability of HoxA10 to serve as a substrate for SHP1-PTP would be further substantiated by demonstration of direct interaction between HoxA10 and SHP1-PTP proteins. Therefore, we expressed SHP1 in E. coli as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase (SHP1/GST) and purified the fusion protein by affinity to glutathione-agarose. We found that in vitro translated HoxA10 co-precipitates with SHP1/GST fusion protein but not with control GST protein (Fig. 7A).


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   HoxA10 interacts directly with SHP1-PTP. A, in vitro translated HoxA10 interacts directly with recombinant SHP1. HoxA10 was in vitro translated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate (labeled with [35S]methionine), and SHP1 was expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase (SHP1/GST). Interaction of HoxA10 with SHP1/GST or GST control was determined by co-precipitation. SHP1/GST, but not control GST, co-precipitated HoxA10. B, HoxA10 co-immunoprecipitates with SHP1 from undifferentiated U937 cell lysates. Nuclear proteins were isolated from undifferentiated U937 cells, and protein was immunoprecipitated with an antibody to SHP1 under nondenaturing conditions. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot, probed for SHP1 or HoxA10, as indicated. HoxA10 co-precipitated with SHP1 from U937 nuclear proteins.

The results of this assay suggest that SHP1-PTP interacts directly with HoxA10, in vitro. To determine whether SHP1 and HoxA10 interact in myeloid cells, we investigated co-precipitation of SHP1-PTP and HoxA10 in U937 cell lysate proteins. Undifferentiated U937 lysates were precipitated with an anti-SHP1 antibody and the immunoprecipitates analyzed by Western blot. We found that HoxA10 co-immunoprecipitates with antibody to SHP1 but not with irrelevant control antibody (Fig. 7B). Therefore, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that HoxA10 interacts with SHP1-PTP in undifferentiated myeloid cells.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previously, we found that tyrosine phosphorylation decreases HoxA10 DNA binding, thereby decreasing HoxA10-mediated transcriptional repression of myeloid-specific genes (11). Since HoxA10 is tyrosine-phosphorylated during myeloid differentiation (11), this provides a mechanism for regulating HoxA10 activity in differentiating cells. In the current investigations, we identify the phosphotyrosine residues that decrease HoxA10 DNA-binding affinity and a mechanism by which phosphorylation of these residues impacts DNA binding. In the current studies, we also determine that these regulatory tyrosine residues are a substrate for SHP1-PTP. Therefore, these investigations indicate that SHP1-PTP activity, in undifferentiated myeloid cells, contributes to HoxA10-mediated transcriptional repression.

We found that DNA binding affinity is decreased by phosphorylation of two tyrosine residues in the HoxA10 homeodomain. Consistent with this, a homeodomain tyrosine mutant form of HoxA10 represses transcription, via the CYBB HoxA10-binding repressor element, in both undifferentiated and IFNgamma -differentiated U937 cells. In contrast, wild type HoxA10 represses, via this repressor element, only in undifferentiated U937 transfectants. These results suggest that the HoxA10 homeodomain tyrosine residues are phosphorylated during IFNgamma -induced U937 differentiation, decreasing DNA binding and transcriptional repression. This is of interest because homeodomain sequences are more than 80% identical in HoxA9, -10, and -11 (three "Abd" Hox proteins), including conservation of the two tyrosine residues. Therefore, our results suggest that phosphorylation of homeodomain tyrosine residues the may be a general mechanism for regulation of Abd HoxA protein activity.

In undifferentiated U937 cells, overexpressed, homeodomain tyrosine mutant HoxA10 represses transcription, via the CYBB repressor element, more efficiently than overexpressed, wild type HoxA10. Consistent with this, overexpressed HoxA10 is somewhat tyrosine-phosphorylated in undifferentiated U937 cells. This suggests that basal phosphorylation of tyrosines 326 and 344 in undifferentiated U937 cells decreases transcriptional repression by overexpressed, wild type HoxA10. Alternatively, substitution of phenylalanine for tyrosine may increases HoxA10 DNA binding affinity by causing phosphorylation-independent alteration of the homeodomain. Although homeodomain tyrosine mutant HoxA10 represses in both IFNgamma -treated and untreated U937 cells, repression is less efficient in differentiated transfectants. One possibility is that additional HoxA10 tyrosine residues influence transcriptional repression, independent of DNA binding (e.g. residues involved in protein-protein interactions). Alternatively, IFNgamma may activate positive acting transcription factors, which interact with the CYBB sequence in the artificial promoter construct. If such hypothetical factors do not compete with HoxA10 for DNA binding, activation could occur in IFNgamma -treated cells, despite HoxA10 binding to the repressor element.

Since HoxA10 binds to DNA via the homeodomain, we initially hypothesized that tyrosine phosphorylation directly interferes with DNA-protein interaction. However, tyrosine phosphorylation did not influence in vitro DNA binding affinity of a HoxA10 homeodomain-only truncation mutant. Further investigations indicated that both the homeodomain and amino acids 267-320 (with no tyrosines) are necessary for tyrosine phosphorylation to decrease HoxA10 DNA binding affinity. Consistent with this, phosphotyrosine residues in the homeodomain interact with HoxA10 amino acids 267-320. These results suggest two possible mechanisms by which HoxA10 homeodomain tyrosine phosphorylation might decrease DNA-binding affinity. The first is that homeodomain tyrosine phosphorylation induces HoxA10 folding, rendering the homeodomain unavailable for DNA binding. The second possibility is that tyrosine phosphorylation leads to formation of HoxA10 homodimers, unable to participate in DNA binding. Such homodimers have not been identified but would represent an interesting mechanism of regulation. Investigations are planned to identify specific HoxA10 residues that interact with homeodomain phosphotyrosines. Such results might clarify functional differences among Abd HoxA proteins, which are not well conserved outside of the homeodomain.

To understand the events regulating HoxA10-mediated repression, we investigated regulation of HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation. Previously, we found that SHP1-PTP activity decreases transcription of the CYBB and NCF2 genes in undifferentiated myeloid cell lines (17). Additionally, we found that SHP1-PTP activity decreases tyrosine phosphorylation of IRF1 and ICSBP, providing one mechanism for SHP1 inhibition of CYBB and NCF2 transcription (17). In these studies, we determined that SHP1-PTP also regulates the HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation state. We found that inhibition of SHP1-PTP activity decreases wild type HoxA10-mediated repression, via the repressor element from the CYBB gene. In contrast, inhibition of SHP1-PTP activity did not influence the transcriptional repression by homeodomain tyrosine mutant HoxA10 in this assay, suggesting that SHP1-PTP influences tyrosine phosphorylation of the HoxA10 homeodomain. Consistent with these results, tyrosine phosphorylation of HoxA10 is increased in dominant negative SHP1-expressing U937 cells.

However, these experiments were performed in a myeloid leukemia cell line cell line. It is possible that the results represent a manifestation of the transformed phenotype. To investigate the influence of SHP1 on HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation in a nontransformed model of myelopoiesis, we employed cultured myeloid cells from viable moth-eaten (SHP1-/-) mice. We found that HoxA10 tyrosine phosphorylation (but not abundance) is increased in cultured myeloid cells from SHP1-/- mice, in comparison with control mice. In these experiments, we used unsorted populations of cultured myeloid cells, derived from total murine bone marrow by Ficoll-Hypaque (after red cell lysis), followed by culture in IL-3 and GM-CSF. Based on experience with normal murine bone marrow cells (29), these cultures would be anticipated to contain committed myeloid progenitors. However, based on experience with ex vivo cultured murine spleen cells (23, 30), it is possible that cultured SHP-/- bone marrow myeloid cells are more differentiated than control cells under the same cytokine conditions. This possibility does not adversely affect interpretation of our results, since we hypothesize that HoxA10-induced repression of myeloid-specific genes antagonizes differentiation. This hypothesis implies that events that reverse HoxA10 transcriptional repression also induce differentiation. Therefore, accelerated ex vivo differentiation of SHP1-/- monocytes (as in Refs. 29 and 30) may be related to the absence of SHP1 dephosphorylation of transcription factors that regulate progression of myeloid differentiation, such as HoxA10, IRF1, and ICSBP.

Therefore, these investigations indicate that HoxA10 DNA binding is regulated by interaction of phosphotyrosine residues in the homeodomain with an adjacent domain in HoxA10, that HoxA10 is a substrate for SHP1, and that SHP1-PTP activity regulates HoxA10 repression activity in differentiating myeloid cells. Since homeodomain tyrosine residues are conserved over the Abd group of HoxA proteins (HoxA9 to -13), our investigations suggest a mechanism for regulating the functional activities of this important group of transcription factors.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the following grants (to E. A. E.): a Veteran's Administration Merit Review, a Translational Research Award from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America, and National Institutes of Health Grant CA95266.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Olson Pavilion, Rm. 8527, 710 N. Fairbanks Ct., Chicago, IL. E-mail: e-eklund@northwestern.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203917200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ICSBP, interferon consensus sequence-binding protein; IFNgamma , interferon gamma ; aa, amino acid(s); EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; RIPA, radioimmune precipitation assay; PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; IL, interleukin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Tenen, D. G., Hromas, R., Licht, J. D., and Zhang, D-E. (1997) Blood 90, 489-516[Free Full Text]
2. Royer-Pokora, B., Kunkle, L. M., Monaco, A. P., Goff, S. C., Newburger, P. E., Baehner, R. L., Cole, F. S., Curnutte, J. T., and Orkin, S. H. (1986) Nature 322, 32-38[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Leto, T. L., Lomax, K. J., Volpp, B. D., Nunio, H., Sechler, J. M. G., Nauseef, W. M., Clark, R., Gallin, J. I., and Malech, H. L. (1990) Science 248, 727-730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Petrovick, M. S., Heibert, S. W., Friedman, A. D., Hetherington, C. J., Tenen, D. G., and Zhang, D. E. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3915-3925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Eklund, E. A., Jalava, A., and Kakar, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13957-13965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Eklund, E. A., and Kakar, R. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 6095-6105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Rehli, M., Poltorak, A., Schwarzfischer, L., Krause, S. W., Andersen, R., and Beutler, B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9773-97781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Gabriele, L., Phung, J., Fukumoto, J., Segal, D., Wang, I. M., Giannakakou, P., Giese, N. A., Ozato, K., and Morse, H. C. (1999) J. Exp. Med. 190, 411-421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Thorsteinsdottir, U., Sauvageau, G., Hough, M. R., Dragowska, W., Lansdorp, P. M., Lawrence, H. J., Largman, C., and Humphries, R. K. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 495-505