|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110300200 on November 16, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 4, 2750-2755, January 25, 2002
Functional Analysis of Tryptophans 62 and 120 on
HLA-DM*
Amélie
Faubert §,
Angela
Samaan¶, and
Jacques
Thibodeau
From the Laboratoire d'Immunologie
Moléculaire, Département de Microbiologie et
d'Immunologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal,
Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada and ¶ INSERM U462, Hopital
Saint-Louis, 75475, Paris, France
Received for publication, October 26, 2001, and in revised form, November 15, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
In the endocytic pathway of antigen-presenting
cells, HLA-DM catalyzes the exchange between class II-associated
invariant chain peptide (CLIP) and antigenic peptides onto major
histocompatibility complex class II molecules. At low pH of lysosomal
compartments, both HLA-DM and HLA-DR undergo conformational changes,
and it was recently postulated that two partially exposed tryptophans on HLA-DM might be involved in the interaction between the two molecules. To define contact regions on HLA-DM, we have conducted site-directed mutagenesis on those two hydrophobic residues. The HLA-DM
W62A, W120A (DMW62A/W120A) double mutant was
expressed in HLA-DR+ HeLa cells expressing invariant chain,
and the activity of this DM molecule was assessed. Flow cytometry
analysis of cell surface DR-CLIP complexes revealed that
DMW62A/W120A removes CLIP as efficiently as its wild-type
counterpart. DMW62A/W120A was found in the endocytic pathway by immunofluorescence, and DM-DR complexes were
immunoprecipitated from these cells at pH 5. Finally, mutations W62A
and W120A on HLA-DM did not affect the association with HLA-DO. The
complex egresses the endoplasmic reticulum and accumulates in endocytic vesicles. Moreover, DO and DMW62A/W120A were co-immunoprecipitated at pH 7. We conclude that the 62 and 120 tryptophan residues are not required for the activity of DM, nor are
they directly implicated in the interaction with DR or DO.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Major histocompatibility complex class II molecules are primordial
for activation of CD4+ T cells and for immunological response against
pathogens (1). Three major histocompatibility complex II /
heterodimers associate with a trimer of invariant chain (Ii)1 to form a nanomeric
complex in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (2). This association allows
the proper folding and trafficking of the major histocompatibility
complex II molecules (3-5). Gradual proteolysis of Ii occurs in the
endocytic compartments by the sequential action of proteases including
cathepsins (6). A residual peptide of Ii (CLIP) remains in the peptide
groove of the class II molecule and stabilizes the heterodimer by
preventing collapse of the groove (7, 8). For most allotypes, CLIP must
be actively removed to allow binding of antigenic peptides. HLA-DM, a
nonclassical intracellular class II molecule, plays a central role in
the efficiency of antigen presentation as it catalyzes CLIP release
from HLA-DR and stabilizes the class II in a chaperone-like fashion
(9-14). In fact, mice lacking the H2-Ma gene express
a high level of surface class II-CLIP complexes (15-17).
The precise molecular mechanism of action of HLA-DM remains to be
established. X-ray diffraction studies on HLA-DM crystals revealed a
closed peptide-binding groove and an overall quaternary structure
similar to classical class II molecules (18, 19). Time-resolved
fluorescence anisotropy and far-UV circular dichroism spectrum analysis
using soluble HLA-DM revealed that its structure is quite rigid and
that it is not subjected to gross pH-dependent conformational change. However, many other experiments by the same
groups suggest that protonation in the endocytic pathway results in
minor, reversible structural changes exposing hydrophobic regions of
the DM heterodimer (20, 21). For example, fluorescence spectroscopy
studies revealed that hydrophobic tryptophan residues are buried in
native DM and would become more solvent-exposed at
endosomal pH (20). Accordingly, Ullrich et al.
(21) used 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANS), a fluorescent dye binding to hydrophobic protein patches, to demonstrate subtle pH-induced change in DM. Since the interaction of DM with DR reduces ANS binding to both molecules, it was postulated that the surface of
contact comprises these pH-sensitive regions (21, 22).
On the basis of these results, Wiley and co-workers (19) proposed that
two partially exposed tryptophans ( 62, 120), located on the same
lateral surface of DM, could be critical for DR binding. The model
predicts a major interaction between tryptophan 62 of DM and the
protruding phenylalanine 51 of DR, resulting in the breakage of
multiple hydrogen bonds at the end of the groove and in the release of
unstably associated peptides. At least part of this model was recently
confirmed when mutation of DR F51 was shown to abolish the
interaction with DM (23).
To confirm the possible interaction between DR F51 and DM W62, we
have mutated the exposed tryptophan on HLA-DM and tested the ability of
this mutant to release CLIP from HLA-DR. Our results show that this
mutation on DM does not affect DR contact, CLIP release, or the
localization of the protein within the cell. Similar conclusions were
drawn after mutating the second exposed tryptophan at position 120.
Finally, those amino acids substitutions on DM did not affect its
interaction with HLA-DO, an intracellular nonclassical class II
molecule that binds to DM and regulates its activity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids--
DM cDNA was digested by
Ecl136II-ClaI from pMCFR-PAC and subcloned into
EcoRV-ClaI of pBluescript (pBS) (24). The DM
cDNA has been described previously (25). DM and DM cDNAs
from pBluescript were subcloned successively on the same pBudCE4-A
vector (as previously described) (25). The Ii p35 cDNA was obtained
by mutagenesis of the second ATG codon of Ii (kindly provided by Rafick
Sékaly) and subcloned in the BamHI site of SR puro.
Details will be provided elsewhere.
DM and DM Mutagenesis--
Mutations into the DM and
DM cDNA sequences were introduced by PCR overlap extension (26).
Briefly, 5' PCR products were generated from pBS DM and pBS DM
using mutagenic primers (DM W62AEcoRI, 5'-CTG AGC CGC GTC
AGC GAA TTC GGG-3'; DM W120ANspI, 5'-GAA GCC CGC CAC ATA
GCA TGC CAG CAT-3') as well as the universal (DM ) or reverse (DM )
primers. The 3' PCR product was generated using the complementary
mutagenic primers. The two overlapping PCR products were mixed, and a
final PCR was performed using the flanking primers. Fragments were
subsequently subcloned into the PstI-SalI sites of pBSDM and SalI-HindIII of pBSDM , thereby
replacing the wild-type fragment with the PCR product containing the
appropriate mutation. The nucleotide sequence was confirmed by DNA
sequencing using T7 polymerase (Amersham Biosciences). Mutant cDNAs
and wild-type were introduced into pBudCE4-A as
NotI-XhoI (pBSDM ) and
SalI-XbaI (pBSDM ) fragments.
Antibodies--
Monoclonal antibody (mAb) MaP.DM1
(IgG1) is directed against the luminal portion of HLA-DM
(PharMingen International, Oakville, Canada). mAb L243
(IgG2a) binds a specific DR conformational determinant
(27). mAb BU45 (IgG1) binds the C-terminal part of the
human invariant chain (CD74) (The Binding Site, Birmingham, United
Kingdom). mAb Cer-CLIP (IgG1) is directed against the
N-terminal segment of CLIP (PharMingen International) (24). Goat
anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to Alexa Fluor®488 were
obtained from Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR). Biotinylated goat
anti-mouse was from BIO/CAN scientific (Mississauga, Canada), and Texas
Red-coupled streptavidin was from Amersham Biosciences. The anti-DO
serum was produced in C3H mice (H-2k) by
repeated intraperitoneal injections of DAP fibroblasts transfected with
DR and DR18/DO cDNAs (28). Rabbit antisera
against the cytoplasmic tail of HLA-DO or HLA-DM have been
described previously (25). The CD107a-specific monoclonal antibody H4A3
(IgG1) reacts with the heavy glycosylated 100-kDa
lysosome-associated membrane protein (Lamp-1) (Developmental Studies
Hybridoma Bank, NICHD, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA)
Cell Lines and Transfections--
HeLa DR1 (DR plus DR
0101) cells were kindly provided by Dr. R. P. Sékaly. HeLa
DO cells have already been described (25). In order to enrich for
DO-expressing cells, the population was treated with interferon
(PharMingen International) and sorted on magnetic beads for CLIP
expression (Dynal ASA, Olso, Norway). Cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen), 10% fetal
bovine serum (Wisent, St.-Bruno, Canada) with appropriate selective
agents (see below). Stable transfections were done with Fugene6 (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) using 1 µg of DNA per 105 cells.
Selective agents were added to a final concentration of 500 µg/ml
G-418 (Invitrogen), 400 µg/ml puromycin (Sigma), 50 units/ml
hygromycin (Cederlane Laboratories, Hornby, Canada) or 100 µg/ml
ZeocinTM (Cayla, Toulouse, France).
Flow Cytometry Analysis--
Intracellular staining was done as
previously described (25). Briefly, saponin-treated cells were
incubated with the appropriate primary antibody, and then they were
incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) coupled to Alexa
Fluor®488. Cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry on a
FACScalibur® (Becton Dickinson, Mississauga, Canada).
Fluorescence Microscopy--
104 cells
were plated on coverslips in 24-well plates and cultured for 3 days
before staining (25). Cells were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy on
a Zeiss axioscope microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Photographs
were taken with a Zeiss microscope camera MC 100 on Eastman Kodak Co.
elite chrome 400 films.
Immunoprecipitations and Western Blotting--
Cells (4 × 106) were trypsinized, washed in phosphate-buffered saline,
and lysed in 1% Triton X-100 at pH 7 or in CHAPS 1% at pH 5 as
described previously (29). After centrifugation, supernatants were
harvested and incubated with protein G coupled to CNBr-activated
Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) and bound to the appropriate
antibody (L243 mAb or mouse serum anti-DO ). Following washes in
lysis buffer, samples were resuspended in nonreducing buffers and
subjected to SDS-PAGE. After transfer to nylon membranes (Amersham
Biosciences), proteins were blotted with the rabbit anti-DO or
anti-DM sera. Secondary antibody (peroxidase-coupled goat
anti-rabbit; BIO/CAN Scientific) was used at a 1:1000 dilution for
2 h, and the signal was detected using ECL (Amersham Biosciences).
 |
RESULTS |
The crystal structure of DM reveals two partially exposed
tryptophan residues that are thought to interact with HLA-DR and to
participate in CLIP removal (19). Tryptophans 62 and 120 are
located on the same lateral face of HLA-DM in the 1 and 2 domains, respectively (Fig. 1). These
amino acids are highly conserved throughout evolution, emphasizing
their potential importance.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Position of mutations on HLA-DM.
Highlighted tryptophans 62 and 120 (W62 and
W120, respectively) are located on the same lateral face of
HLA-DM in the 1 and 2 domains, respectively. The
GenBankTM accession numbers are NM006120 for DM
(red) and NM002118 for DM (orange)
(10). Molecular modeling was done with Protein Data Bank reference
number 1HDM and analyzed with the Swiss PDB Viewer (19).
|
|
In an effort to define the binding site for HLA-DR and to gain insights
into the mechanism of action of HLA-DM, we mutated those two bulky
aromatic tryptophans to small alanines and tested in vivo
the ability of mutant proteins to remove CLIP from HLA-DR. Various
combinations of mutated and wild-type DM  cDNAs were transfected in HeLa cells expressing DR1 and Ii. DR1 is known to be
dependent on DM for the release of CLIP at acidic pH (30). We obtained
four stable cell lines: DR1 Ii DM, DR1 Ii DMW62A, DR1 Ii
DMW120A, and DR1 Ii DMW62A/W120A.
Expression of DR was monitored at the cell surface, while DM and Ii
were analyzed in permeabilized cells. As measured by flow cytometry,
all cell lines express high levels of the various transfected molecules
(Fig. 2). The proper folding and
intracellular sorting of DM was assessed by immunofluorescence
microscopy. Fig. 3 shows that wild-type HLA-DM (B) accumulates in intracellular vesicles that are
also positive for the lysosomal marker Lamp-1 (G). A
tyrosine-based motif on the cytoplasmic tail of DM is responsible
for its accumulation in endocytic compartments (31-33). The three
mutated forms of DM were also found in peripheral vesicles (Fig. 3,
C-E) and co-localized with Lamp-1 (Fig. 3,
H-J). Control cells lacking DM showed a weak background
using the DM-specific antibody but definite Lamp-1-positive compartments (Fig. 3, A, F, and
arrows). Together with the fact that the MaP.DM1
conformational antibody efficiently recognizes the DM mutants, these
results show that the overall structure of DM is not affected by
replacement of tryptophans 62 and 120.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of HLA-DR, invariant chain, and
HLA-DM in transfected HeLa cells. HeLa DR1 cells were stably
transfected with the p35 form of the invariant chain cDNA, and the
cell population was supertransfected with cDNAs for wild-type or
mutant DM molecules. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on HeLa DR1
Ii, DR1 Ii DM, DR1 Ii DMW62A, DR1 Ii DMW120A,
or DR1 Ii DMW62A/W120A using L243 mAb for surface HLA-DR
staining. BU45 and Map-DM1 mAbs were used for intracellular staining of
Ii and DM, respectively. Alexa 488-coupled GAM was used as secondary
antibody. Open histograms represent the control
fluorescence of HeLa cells incubated in the same conditions.
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Mutants of HLA-DM localize in the endocytic
pathway. DR1 Ii (A and F), DR1 Ii DM
(B and G), DR1 Ii DMW62A
(C and H), DR1 Ii DMW120A
(D and I), and DR1 Ii DMW62A/W120A
(E and J) cells were analyzed for DM
(A-E) and for Lamp-1 (F-J). Immunofluorescence
microscopy analysis was performed on permeabilized cells double-stained
using a rabbit anti-DM polyclonal antibody and a mouse anti-Lamp-1
mAb. Secondary antibodies were Alexa-488 coupled to goat anti-rabbit
and a biotinylated GAM followed by Texas Red-coupled streptavidin. The
arrows point to cells not transfected with HLA-DM.
|
|
The activity of these mutant forms of DM was verified by monitoring the
levels of DR-CLIP complexes at the cell surface of transfected cells.
As demonstrated by many groups, introduction of HLA-DM in deficient
cell lines favors the intracellular exchange of CLIP for more stable
peptides (24, 34, 35). Consequently, CLIP expression is low at the
surface of DM+ cells. The cell surface expression of CLIP
was measured using the Cer-CLIP monoclonal antibody that is specific
for the N terminus of CLIP bound to class II molecules and which does
not recognize the intact invariant chain (24). As shown in Fig.
4A, control DM
cells (HeLa DR1 Ii) express high levels of DR-CLIP complexes at their
surface. On the other hand, cells expressing wild-type or mutant forms
of DM do not express significant levels of CLIP (Fig. 4,
B-E). These results suggest that DR-Ii complexes are sorted
to the endocytic pathway, where Ii is degraded until a last fragment,
CLIP, is actively removed from the peptide binding groove by wild-type
or mutant forms of HLA-DM. To confirm the proper interaction between
the DM mutants and DR, co-immunoprecipitations were carried out at
acidic pH in the CHAPS detergent (36). Fig. 5 shows that DM can be
co-immunoprecipitated by the DR-specific antibody only in cells
expressing both molecules (Fig. 5, left three
lanes). Also, the three mutant forms of DM could all be efficiently co-immunoprecipitated with HLA-DR (Fig. 5). The stronger DM signal obtained by Western blotting on the HeLa DR1 Ii
DMW62A/W120A samples most probably reflects the higher
level of HLA-DR expression on these cells (mean fluorescence value = 789) as compared with the other DM+ transfectants (mean
fluorescence values = 248-374) (Fig. 2). Taken together, these
results show that the mutations W62A and W120A do not affect the
folding, sorting, and activity of HLA-DM, nor its ability to interact
strongly with HLA-DR.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Mutations on HLA-DM do not impair CLIP
release. Surface flow cytometry analysis was performed using
Cer-CLIP monoclonal antibody followed by an Alexa 488-coupled GAM
(filled histograms). Open
histograms represent the control fluorescence of
nontransfected HeLa cells stained in the same conditions.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
HLA-DM mutants bind to HLA-DR.
Transfected HeLa cells were lysed in 1% CHAPS at pH 5, and HLA-DR was
immunoprecipitated using L243 mAb. The samples were analyzed on Western
blot using the DM -specific rabbit serum.
|
|
Although these tryptophan residues are not directly involved in the
binding to HLA-DR, they might very well be crucial for the binding to
HLA-DO. The latter is mostly expressed in B cells and is a nonclassical
class II molecule that modulates the activity of DM (37-39). The mode
of action of DO is not determined, but it clearly affects the peptidic
repertoire when present in physiological amounts in an APC
(40-42).
To further characterize the DO-DM contact regions, wild-type and double
mutant (DMW62A/W120A) DM molecules were stably transfected in HeLa DO+ cells. Expression of both proteins was
confirmed by intracellular staining and flow cytometry (Fig.
6). Since HLA-DO is absolutely dependent
on DM association to egress the ER (43) and gain access to the
endocytic pathway, we first verified the ability of mutant HLA-DM to
direct the transport of DO. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that
HLA-DO reaches the endocytic pathway in the presence of either the
wild-type or the DMW62A/W120A molecule (Fig.
7). As opposed to the diffuse ER-like
pattern of expression observed for DO in DM cells (Fig.
7b), defined HLA-DO-containing vesicles can be seen in
DM+ cells (Fig. 7, d and f). The
co-localization between DO and DMW62A/W120A in the
endocytic pathway (Fig. 7, e and f) strongly
argues for an efficient interaction between the two molecules, allowing
DO to egress the ER.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Expression of HLA-DM and HLA-DO in
transfected HeLa cells. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on
saponin-permeabilized cells using a mouse serum against DO
(left panels) or Map-DM1 mAb (right
panels) followed by Alexa 488-coupled GAM (filled
histogram). Open histograms represent
the control fluorescence of HeLa DM (left panels)
or HeLa cells (right panels) incubated with the
same antibodies.
|
|

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
HLA-DM mutants bind to HLA-DO.
A, immunofluorescence microscopy analysis was performed on
permeabilized cells double-stained using a rabbit anti-DM
(a, c, and e) and a mouse anti-DO
(b, d, and f) sera. Secondary
antibodies were Alexa 488-coupled goat anti-rabbit and a biotinylated
GAM followed by Texas Red-coupled streptavidin. a and
b, HeLa DO; c and d, HeLa DO DM;
e and f, HeLa DO DMW62A/W120A.
B, cells were lysed in 1% Triton X-100 at pH 7, and
co-immunoprecipitations were performed using a DO -specific mouse
serum. Samples were analyzed by Western blotting using the
DM -specific or DO -specific rabbit sera.
|
|
The interaction between DO and DM was confirmed by
co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Cells were lysed in 1% Triton
X-100, and DO was immunoprecipitated using a polyclonal antibody
against the cytoplasmic tail of the chain. Western blotting with
antibodies specific for DM or DO showed that wild-type DM and the
DMW62A/W120A double mutant were both efficiently
co-immunoprecipitated with DO (Fig. 7B). Altogether, these
results suggest that 62 and 120 tryptophans on HLA-DM are
dispensable for the interaction with DR or DO.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Understanding the molecular mechanism by which HLA-DM and
HLA-DM/DO catalyze peptide exchange will allow the development of new
approaches for manipulating antigen loading and presentation. With this
in mind, we have undertaken the mapping of amino acids involved in the
interactions between these molecules. So far, the group of Mellins has
characterized regions of HLA-DR that interact with HLA-DM (23, 44).
Random mutagenesis on HLA-DR allowed the identification of critical
residues on a lateral face encompassing both the 1 and 2 domains.
From these experiments, it was proposed that DM releases unstable
peptides through its "lever effect" on amino acids DR 40 and
51, the last one being critical for stability around the P1 pocket
of the groove (23). A role for DM in destabilizing those P1 anchors was
also proposed from the results of Chou and Sadegh-Nasseri who showed
that mutation of DR1 G86Y rendered the class II rigid (as in a
peptide-bound conformation) and reduced the binding to DM (45).
Based on the crystal structure of HLA-DM, the group of Wiley had
already proposed that the contact between DM Trp 62 and DR Phe 51
could destabilize the P1 pocket and liberate an unstable peptide. Much
experimental evidence points to a critical role of such hydrophobic
residues in the contact between DM and DR. For example, based on
studies measuring the binding of ANS, it was concluded that DR-CLIP
complexes display a larger hydrophobic surface than DR molecules
associated with stable peptides. Also, there is a preferential
association of the two molecules at the acidic pH of endocytic
vesicles, where both molecules would expose hydrophobic residues (21).
The presence of tryptophan residues in those contact regions was
deduced by their preferential binding of ANS as well as from
spectroscopy studies measuring variations in fluorescence emission
between exposed and buried residues (21, 45).
Two of 11 tryptophans are partially exposed and located on the same
lateral surface on the crystal structure of DM. These residues may be
part of the hydrophobic patches that become accessible to ANS at acidic
pH but that are buried in the DM-DR interface (19). While DR Phe 51
could interact with DM Trp 62, tryptophan DM 120 may contact those
hydrophobic residues identified by Mellins and co-workers (23) in the
2 domain of DR and which may serve to increase the affinity for DM.
However, our results presented here do not support such a model.
Mutation of the two tryptophans on DM did not disturb the activity, the
sorting, or the conformation of the protein. Still, the possibility
remains that those mutations could finely tune the specificity of DM
and influence the peptide repertoire of the class II molecules.
The fact that random mutagenesis on HLA-DR allowed the identification
of Phe 51, Leu 184, and Val 186 residues certainly suggests the
involvement of hydrophobic residues on DM as well (23). However,
replacement of residue Glu 187 for a lysine in the 2 domain also
decreased DM binding in these studies. The importance of this charged
residue on DR prompted us to evaluate the potential role of positively
charged DM Lys 109, Lys 115, Arg 93, and Arg 95 residues. However, the simultaneous mutation of these residues did not
inhibit CLIP release by DM in our system (data not shown).
Altogether, our results suggest that the DM/DR interaction relies on
other hydrophobic residues in the above described region or that it may
implicate another interface of DM. Indeed, Fremont et al.
(18) identified two other hydrophobic regions that are located on
distinct faces of the H2-M heterodimer. Site-directed mutagenesis in
the corresponding regions of DM should help delimiting contact sites
with DR.
Finally, our results from immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation
studies revealed that tryptophans 62 and 120 on DM are not
necessary to make contact with HLA-DO. Although DO also undergoes
conformational change following acidification of the environment (46),
it first interacts with DM in the ER, and the strong association is
resistant to lysis in 1% Triton X-100 (43). These observations suggest
that the nature of the interactions is likely to differ between DR-DM
and DO-DM. The existence of a three-molecule complex between DM, DO,
and DR suggests the presence of two distinct functional interfaces on
DM, and random mutagenesis is under way to delineate the contact
regions with HLA-DR and DO (47).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank the Developmental Studies Hybridoma
Bank, NICHD, University of Iowa. We thank Dr. Eric Cohen for the use of
the fluorescence microscope and Serge Sénéchal for
assistance with the flow cytometer. We also thank Georges Azar,
Angélique Belmarre, Alexandre Brunet, Francis Deshaies, and
Hayssam Khalil for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants (to J. T.) from the
Medical Research Council (MRC) of Canada and from the Cancer Research Society Inc.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported in part by a studentship from Pfizer Canada Inc.
Recipient of a fellowship from the MRC. To whom correspondence
should be addressed: Laboratoire d'Immunologie Moléculaire, Dépt. de Microbiologie et d'Immunologie, Université de
Montréal, CP 6128, Succ. Center-Ville, Montréal,
Québec H3C 3J7, Canada. Tel.: 514-343-6279; Fax: 514-343-5701;
E-mail: jacques.thibodeau@umontreal.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 16, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110300200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Ii, invariant
chain;
ANS, 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid;
CLIP, class
II-associated invariant chain peptide;
CHAPS, 3-((3-cholamidopropyl)
dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
GAM, goat anti-mouse;
HLA, human leukocyte antigen;
mAb, monoclonal
antibody.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cresswell, P.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12,
259-293
|
| 2.
|
Roche, P. A.,
Marks, M. S.,
and Cresswell, P.
(1991)
Nature
354,
392-394
|
| 3.
|
Bakke, O.,
and Dobberstein, B.
(1990)
Cell
63,
707-716
|
| 4.
|
Lotteau, V.,
Teyton, L.,
Peleraux, A.,
Nilsson, T.,
Karlsson, L.,
Schmid, S. L.,
Quaranta, V.,
and Peterson, P. A.
(1990)
Nature
348,
600-605
|
| 5.
|
Roche, P. A.,
and Cresswell, P.
(1990)
Nature
345,
615-618
|
| 6.
|
Villadangos, J. A.,
Bryant, R. A.,
Deussing, J.,
Driessen, C.,
Lennon-Dumenil, A. M.,
Riese, R. J.,
Roth, W.,
Saftig, P.,
Shi, G. P.,
Chapman, H. A.,
Peters, C.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1999)
Immunol. Rev.
172,
109-120
|
| 7.
|
Kropshofer, H.,
Vogt, A. B.,
and Hammerling, G. J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8313-8317
|
| 8.
|
Romagnoli, P.,
and Germain, R. N.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1107-1113
|
| 9.
|
Denzin, L. K.,
Hammond, C.,
and Cresswell, P.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
2153-2165
|
| 10.
|
Kelly, A. P.,
Monaco, J. J.,
Cho, S.,
and Trowsdale, J.
(1991)
Nature
353,
571-573
|
| 11.
|
Kropshofer, H.,
Vogt, A. B.,
Moldenhauer, G.,
Hammer, J.,
Blum, J. S.,
and Hammerling, G. J.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6144-6154
|
| 12.
|
Kropshofer, H.,
Arndt, S. O.,
Moldenhauer, G.,
Hammerling, G. J.,
and Vogt, A. B.
(1997)
Immunity
6,
293-302
|
| 13.
|
Denzin, L. K.,
and Cresswell, P.
(1995)
Cell
82,
155-165
|
| 14.
|
Sherman, M. A.,
Weber, D. A.,
and Jensen, P. E.
(1995)
Immunity
3,
197-205
|
| 15.
|
Fung-Leung, W. P.,
Surh, C. D.,
Liljedahl, M.,
Pang, J.,
Leturcq, D.,
Peterson, P. A.,
Webb, S. R.,
and Karlsson, L.
(1996)
Science
271,
1278-1281
|
| 16.
|
Martin, W. D.,
Hicks, G. G.,
Mendiratta, S. K.,
Leva, H. I.,
Ruley, H. E.,
and Van Kaer, L.
(1996)
Cell
84,
543-550
|
| 17.
|
Miyazaki, T.,
Wolf, P.,
Tourne, S.,
Waltzinger, C.,
Dierich, A.,
Barois, N.,
Ploegh, H.,
Benoist, C.,
and Mathis, D.
(1996)
Cell
84,
531-541
|
| 18.
|
Fremont, D. H.,
Crawford, F.,
Marrack, P.,
Hendrickson, W. A.,
and Kappler, J.
(1998)
Immunity
9,
385-393
|
| 19.
|
Mosyak, L.,
Zaller, D. M.,
and Wiley, D. C.
(1998)
Immunity
9,
377-383
|
| 20.
|
Busch, R.,
Reich, Z.,
Zaller, D. M.,
Sloan, V.,
and Mellins, E. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27557-27564
|
| 21.
|
Ullrich, H. J.,
Doring, K.,
Grueneberg, U.,
Jaehnig, F.,
Trowsdale, J.,
and Van Ham, M. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13163-13168
|
| 22.
|
Reich, Z.,
Altman, J. D.,
Boniface, J. J.,
Lyons, D. S.,
Kozono, H.,
Ogg, G.,
Morgan, C.,
and Davis, M. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2495-2500
|
| 23.
|
Doebele, C. R.,
Busch, R.,
Scott, M. H.,
Pashine, A.,
and Mellins, D. E.
(2000)
Immunity
13,
517-527
|
| 24.
|
Denzin, L. K.,
Robbins, N. F.,
Carboy-Newcomb, C.,
and Cresswell, P.
(1994)
Immunity
1,
595-606
|
| 25.
|
Brunet, A.,
Samaan, A.,
Deshaies, F.,
Kindt, T. J.,
and Thibodeau, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
37062-37071
|
| 26.
|
Ho, S. N.,
Hunt, H. D.,
Horton, R. M.,
Pullen, J. K.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
77,
51-59
|
| 27.
|
Panina-Bordignon, P., Fu, X.,
Lanzavecchia, A.,
and Karr, R. W.
(1992)
J. Exp. Med.
176,
1779-1784
|
| 28.
|
Thibodeau, J.,
Lavoie, P. M.,
Samaan, A.,
Corre, J. P.,
Sékaly, R. P.,
and Cazenave, P. A.
(1998)
Mol. Immunol.
35,
885-893
|
| 29.
|
Lavoie, P. M.,
Thibodeau, J.,
Cloutier, I.,
Busch, R.,
and Sekaly, R. P.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6892-6897
|
| 30.
|
Avva, R. R.,
and Cresswell, P.
(1994)
Immunity
1,
763-774
|
| 31.
|
Lindstedt, R.,
Liljedahl, M.,
Peleraux, A.,
Peterson, P. A.,
and Karlsson, L.
(1995)
Immunity
3,
561-572
|
| 32.
|
Copier, J.,
Kleijmeer, M. J.,
Ponnambalam, S.,
Oorschot, V.,
Potter, P.,
Trowsdale, J.,
and Kelly, A.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
1017-1027
|
| 33.
|
Marks, M. S.,
Roche, P. A.,
van Donselaar, E.,
Woodruff, L.,
Peters, P. J.,
and Bonifacino, J. S.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
351-369
|
| 34.
|
Monji, T.,
McCormack, A. L.,
Yates, J. R., III,
and Pious, D.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
4468-4477
|
| 35.
|
Morris, P.,
Shaman, J.,
Attaya, M.,
Amaya, M.,
Goodman, S.,
Bergman, C.,
Monaco, J. J.,
and Mellins, E.
(1994)
Nature
368,
551-554
|
| 36.
|
Sanderson, F.,
Thomas, C.,
Neefjes, J.,
and Trowsdale, J.
(1996)
Immunity
4,
87-96
|
| 37.
|
Jensen, P. E.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
R128-R131
|
| 38.
|
Alfonso, C.,
and Karlsson, L.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18,
113-142
|
| 39.
|
van Ham, M.,
van Lith, M.,
Griekspoor, A.,
and Neefjes, J.
(2000)
Immunogenetics
51,
765-770
|
| 40.
|
van Ham, M.,
van Lith, M.,
Lillemeier, B.,
Tjin, E.,
Gruneberg, U.,
Rahman, D.,
Pastoors, L.,
van Meijgaarden, K.,
Roucard, C.,
Trowsdale, J.,
Ottenhoff, T.,
Pappin, D.,
and Neefjes, J.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
1127-1136
|
| 41.
|
Denzin, L. K.,
Sant'Angelo, D. B.,
Hammond, C.,
Surman, M. J.,
and Cresswell, P.
(1997)
Science
278,
106-109
|
| 42.
|
Perraudeau, M.,
Taylor, P. R.,
Stauss, H. J.,
Lindstedt, R.,
Bygrave, A. E.,
Pappin, D. J.,
Ellmerich, S.,
Whitten, A.,
Rahman, D.,
Canas, B.,
Walport, M. J.,
Botto, M.,
and Altmann, D. M.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
2871-2880
|
| 43.
|
Liljedahl, M.,
Kuwana, T.,
Fung-Leung, W. P.,
Jackson, M.,
Peterson, P. A.,
and Karlsson, L.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
4817-4824
|
| 44.
|
Guerra, C. B.,
Busch, R.,
Doebele, R. C.,
Liu, W.,
Sawada, T.,
Kwok, W. W.,
Chang, M. D.,
and Mellins, E. D.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
4289-4297
|
| 45.
|
Chou, C. L.,
and Sadegh-Nasseri, S.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
1697-1706
|
| 46.
|
Liljedahl, M.,
Winqvist, O.,
Surh, C. D.,
Wong, P.,
Ngo, K.,
Teyton, L.,
Peterson, P. A.,
Brunmark, A.,
Rudensky, A. Y.,
Fung-Leung, W. P.,
and Karlsson, L.
(1998)
Immunity
8,
233-243
|
| 47.
|
Kropshofer, H.,
Vogt, A. B.,
Thery, C.,
Armandola, E. A., Li, B. C.,
Moldenhauer, G.,
Amigorena, S.,
and Hammerling, G. J.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2971-2981
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Finzi, A. Brunet, Y. Xiao, J. Thibodeau, and E. A. Cohen
Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Molecules Promote Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Assembly and Budding to Late Endosomal/Multivesicular Body Compartments
J. Virol.,
October 1, 2006;
80(19):
9789 - 9797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Azar, R.-P. Sekaly, and J. Thibodeau
A Defective Viral Superantigen-Presenting Phenotype in HLA-DR Transfectants Is Corrected by CIITA
J. Immunol.,
June 15, 2005;
174(12):
7548 - 7557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Deshaies, A. Brunet, D. A. Diallo, L. K. Denzin, A. Samaan, and J. Thibodeau
A point mutation in the groove of HLA-DO allows egress from the endoplasmic reticulum independent of HLA-DM
PNAS,
May 3, 2005;
102(18):
6443 - 6448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|