|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204050200 on July 17, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 40, 37741-37746, October 4, 2002
Periodic DNA Methylation in Maize Nucleosomes and Demethylation
by Environmental Stress*
Nicolas
Steward ,
Mikako
Ito,
Yube
Yamaguchi,
Nozomu
Koizumi, and
Hiroshi
Sano§
From the Research and Education Center for Genetic Information,
Nara Institute of Science and Technology,
Nara 630-0101, Japan
Received for publication, April 25, 2002, and in revised form, June 24, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
When maize seedlings were exposed to cold stress, a
genome-wide demethylation occurred in root tissues. Screening of
genomic DNA identified one particular fragment that was demethylated
during chilling. This 1.8-kb fragment, designated ZmMI1,
contained part of the coding region of a putative protein and part of a
retrotransposon-like sequence. ZmMI1 was transcribed only
under cold stress. Direct methylation mapping revealed that
hypomethylated regions spanning 150 bases alternated with
hypermethylated regions spanning 50 bases. Analysis of nuclear DNA
digested with micrococcal nuclease indicated that these regions
corresponded to nucleosome cores and linkers, respectively. Cold stress
induced severe demethylation in core regions but left linker regions
relatively intact. Thus, methylation and demethylation were periodic in
nucleosomes. The following biological significance is conceivable.
First, because DNA methylation in nucleosomes induces alteration of
gene expression by changing chromatin structures, vast demethylation
may serve as a common switch for many genes that are simultaneously
controlled upon environmental cues. Second, because artificial
demethylation induces heritable changes in plant phenotype (Sano,
H., Kamada, I., Youssefian, S., Katsumi, M., and Wabilko, H. (1990)
Mol. Gen. Genet. 220, 441-447), altered DNA methylation
may result in epigenetic inheritance, in which gene expression is
modified without changing the nucleotide sequence.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
DNA of higher eukaryotes is characterized by the presence of
5-methylcytosine
(m5C)1 nucleotides,
comprising up to 30% of the total cytosines. In vertebrates,
m5C is located almost exclusively in CpG, whereas in plants
it occurs in both CpG and CpNpG (1). The distribution within the genome is non-random and varies depending on the tissue and the developmental stages. The physiological function of m5C is essentially to
silence gene expression, which is important for host DNA defenses
against incorporation of "parasitic" DNA (2, 3). Two systems are
involved: one directly blocks transcriptional machinery attached to
promoter regions of genes by altering DNA structure and the other
indirectly interferes with transcription by influencing nucleosome
conformation and stability (4). Recent studies indicated the latter to
occur frequently, as shown by various disorders due to abnormal
chromosome structures that are caused by defective DNA methylation (5).
One hallmark of cancer cells is local hypermethylation and global
hypomethylation of chromosomal DNA (6). Abnormal methylation in the
promoter regions of regulatory genes may indeed result in cancer
development (7). Using antisense inhibition of DNMT1, a maintenance
type DNA methyltransferase, about 10% of all genes in cultured mouse
cells were found to be activated (8). These observations confirmed that
DNA methylation functions as a global repressor of gene expression (9).
The reverse case, i.e. global demethylation has also been
inferred to be critical during embryogenesis in mammals (9, 10). What controls the on-off switch for DNA methylation, however, is still largely unclear. While a set of DNA methyltransferases has been identified in various organisms, including plants, the presence of DNA
demethylases is controversial (7). Among several candidate proteins,
5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase was shown to induce genome-wide
demethylation upon transfection into mouse myoblasts (11). Whatever the
mechanism may be, reprogramming of DNA methylation appears to be
fundamental in normal development (10).
Epigenetic inheritance is defined as change in gene expression without
base sequence alteration (12). This typically occurs during somatic
cell differentiation, in which the clonal expansion of a single cell
leads to a diversity of cell types (13). Such a cellular inheritance is
common during ontogeny but is usually erased before gametes are
produced (14). In plants, however, it has long been known that
epigenetically acquired traits can be sexually transmitted, as
exemplified by flax (Linum) (15). In this case, epigenetic
changes were induced by external factors such as nutrients and
temperature (16, 17). Consequently, the idea has been proposed that an
environmental stimulus can induce heritable chromatin modifications as
an adaptive response (18). It is established that some clonal
epigenetic changes are mediated through DNA methylation (6,
13), but evidence is limited for involvement of the latter in
inheritance of acquired characteristics (19). We have previously shown
that a single exposure of germinated rice seeds to the DNA
demethylating agent, 5-azadeoxycytidine, induced dwarfism at maturity
(20). Genomic DNA isolated from dwarf plants showed a 16% reduction in
the m5C content in comparison with DNA from untreated
plants. Both hypomethylation and dwarfism were transmitted to
progeny for at least three generations (20). Thus, the acquired
phenotype due to acquired changes in DNA methylation was heritable.
However, whether or not such an epigenetic inheritance occurs under
natural condition remained to be solved.
In this report we provide support for the conclusion that levels of DNA
methylation change in the cores of nucleosomes in maize root tissues in
response to cold stress or environmental cues. This finding allowed us
to speculate that DNA methylation may function as a common switch of
gene expression and that naturally induced changes in DNA methylation
may result in heritable epigenetic modification of gene expression.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plant Materials and Cold Treatments--
Maize seeds (Zea
mays L. cv. Golden Arrow) were germinated and hydroponically grown
in a one-fifth strength Murashige and Skoog medium (Nihon Seiyaku,
Tokyo, Japan) under continuous light for 13 days at 23 °C and 70%
relative humidity in a growth cabinet. Cold-pulse experiments were
performed by transferring 13-day-old seedlings to an incubator at
4 °C for 6 days and then returning samples to 23 °C for a further
7 days. Light and humidity conditions were kept constant throughout the
experimental periods.
High Pressure Liquid Chromatography Analysis--
Root tissues
were collected from 10 seedlings at the end of each treatment step, and
DNA was extracted using a Nucleon phytopure kitTM (Amersham
Biosciences). A 100-µg aliquot of genomic DNA was incubated with 110 ng of RNase A (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) at 37 °C for 2 h
to remove RNA contamination. After ethanol precipitation and
denaturation at 100 °C for 5 min, DNA was digested with 2 units of
nuclease P1 (Sigma) at 37 °C for 20 h, followed by
dephosphorylation with 20 units of calf intestine alkaline phosphatase
(Takara, Otsu, Japan) at 37 °C for 2 h. The sample was
fractionated by Ultrafree-MCTM PL-10 microcentrifuge tubes (Millipore,
Bedford, MA), and the permeate was injected into a SupelcosilTM
LC-18-S column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). Separation was performed with a 2.5-20% methanol gradient in the presence of 50 mM
KH2PO4 (pH 4.3).
Fluorescent Immunostaining Histochemistry--
Root tips were
harvested from seedlings that were germinated and cultured at 23 °C
for 8 days (untreated control) or cultured at 23 °C for 3 days and
at 4 °C for following 5 days (cold-treated). Samples were fixed in
an acetic acid:ethanol 1:3 solution for 16 h, rinsed in distilled
water, and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in a digestion solution
containing 4% cellulase RSTM (Onozuka, Tokyo, Japan), 1% pectolyase
Y-23, and 1 mM EDTA at pH 4.2 (21). Immunostaining were
essentially performed as described (22) using an anti-5-methylcytosine
monoclonal antibody (23) diluted in PBST (phosphate-buffered
saline, 0.05% Tween 20) (1:100), and anti-mouse fluorescein
isothiocyanate (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) diluted 1:100 in
PBST as the secondary antibody. Chromosomes were mounted in 1 µg/ml
4',6 diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)/VectashieldTM solution (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Fluorescent images of DAPI and
fluorescein isothiocyanate were observed by a AX70 microscope equipped
with UV- and B excitation filters (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and captured
separately using a CoolSNAP-HQ CCD camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ),
and visualized with the assistance of PhotoShop (ver. 5, Adobe, San
Jose, CA).
Methylated CpG Island Screening--
DNA samples were extracted
from roots of control untreated seedlings and 6-day-old cold-treated
seedlings as described above. Methylated CpG island amplification was
performed by successive digestion of 5 µg of genomic DNA using
SmaI and XmaI (24). SmaI cleaves
unmethylated 5'-CCCGGG-3', giving blunt-end products, whereas
XmaI cleaves the same sequence regardless of the methylation status, generating cohesive-end products. To prepare a cohesive-end adaptor, 50 µM each oligonucleotides
5'-CCGGTAGCTAATGAACCAT-3' and 5'-ATCGATTACTTGGTA-3' were mixed in TE
buffer and annealed at 65 °C for 5 min. A 500-ng aliquot of digested
DNA was then ligated to 1 pmol of adaptor with 400 units of T4 ligase
(Takara) at 37 °C for 16 h. This procedure yields only
XmaI-digested DNA ligated to the adaptor. The resultant
fragments were amplified by PCR with 30 cycles of 96 °C for 20 s, 58 °C for 25 s, and 72 °C for 2 min using the single
adaptor-specific primer 5'-ATGGTTCATTAGCTACCGGG-3', ExTaqTM (Takara)
and 250 µM dNTPs. Differential display screening was
performed with DNA fragments amplified by second PCR using the initial
PCR product as a template and one of 10-base oligonucleotide primers
(Operon Technologies, Alameda, CA). Several hundred PCR products were
separated on an agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.
Migration patterns were compared between DNA samples originating from
control and cold-treated seedlings, and fragments amplified exclusively
from control DNA were selected as putative demethylated CpG islands.
Southern Hybridization, Genomic Library Screening, and Reverse
Transcriptase-PCR--
Genomic DNA samples from roots were digested
with either MspI or HapII (Takara), separated on
agarose gels, and transferred to HybondTM-N+ membranes
(Amersham Biosciences). For library screening genomic DNA was digested
with BamHI and fractionated on an agarose gel. A fraction
containing ~1-1.6 kb of DNA was extracted and ligated to a
ZAP ExpressTM BamHI/alkaline phosphatase-treated
vector (Stratagene). Membranes were probed with a radioactively labeled
599-bp ZmMI1 fragment (GenBankTM/EBI accession no.
AF453523). For reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis total RNA was
prepared by the aurintricarboxylic acid method (25) and treated with
DNaseI (Takara) and cDNA were synthesized using an
oligo-dT17 as the primer and Super ScriptTM II
(Invitrogen). cDNA was used as a template for ZmMI1
transcript-specific amplification (forward,
5'-GTCCGGGAGCTTCCTTAAGC-3' and reverse, 5'-CCTTCAATGAGCTCCTGCTC-3') or actin transcript-specific
amplification (forward, 5'-CGAACAACTGGTATTGTGATGG-3' and reverse,
5'-TGCTGAAAAGTGCTGAGAGAAG-3'). Samples were separated by
electrophoresis on agarose gels and visualized with ethidium bromide staining.
Cytosine Methylation Mapping--
Total genomic DNA was digested
with XbaI (Takara) and subjected to bisulfite modification
(26). The modified DNA was subjected to PCR using
ZmMI1-specific primers (forward,
5'-GAGGAAGAGAAAGGGAGAG-3' and reverse,
5'-AAATCCATTTTCTATTCATTTATTC-3'), ExTaq enzyme (Takara), 250 µM each dATP and dTTP, and 125 µM each dGTP
and dCTP. To remove partially and non-modified sequences, PCR products
were digested with AluI, for which sites were found to be
rarely or never methylated by preliminary methylation mapping. A
1015-bp AluI-resistant fraction was extracted after an
agarose gel electrophoresis, ligated to the pGEM-T Easy VectorTM
(Promega, Madison, WI), and cloned in JM109 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
The sequence was determined with an ABI PRISM BigDyeTM Terminator DNA
sequencing kit and a 3100 Genetic Analyzer automated sequencer (Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Mononucleosomal DNA Assay--
Roots from 13-day-old seedlings
were harvested, and a pure preparation of nuclei was obtained by
centrifugation on a 30% PercollTM cushion (Amersham Biosciences)
(27). A 60-µg of nuclei suspension was digested with 4 units of
micrococcal nuclease (Takara) at 37 °C for 4 min and fractionated on
a 2.5% NuSieveTM 3:1 agarose gel (BioWhittaker Molecular
Applications, Rockland, ME). A fraction containing ~200 bp
corresponding to mononucleosomal DNA was extracted using a
Prep-A-GeneTM kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). PCR was performed using
mononucleosomal ~200-bp fragments or total genomic DNA as the control
template and five sets of primers designed for the ZmMI1
sequence: set 1 (forward, 5'-CTGCGTGAACCATGTTGATTGC-3' and reverse,
5'-GGCACCATACAGGTGATTGGATTTC-3'); set 2 (forward,
5'-CCAATCACCTGTATGGTGCCTC-3' and reverse, 5'-ATGCCACACGCTGGTCATC-3');
set 3 (forward, 5'-TTGGATGACCAGCGTGTGG-3' and reverse,
5'-CTATGGCTCCTAAGTCGCGTGG-3'); set 4 (forward,
5'-GAGCGGTCACCGTGCGATC-3' and reverse, 5'-GCACAACTGGCAATCCAAGGTC-3');
and set 5 (forward, 5'-AGATGGTTGTAGATGTAATCCAGACCTTG-3' and reverse,
5'-GACTCAGTGCATAGTAAAAATGGACGG-3'). The optimal cycle number was
determined to ensure an exponential range of amplification, and the
loading amount of amplified DNA to agarose gel was selected to ensure a
linear range of signal intensity after ethidium bromide staining.
Amplified DNA was quantified by densitometric Image Gauge V3.3 software
(Fuji Film Science Laboratory and Kohshin Graphic Systems, Tokyo, Japan).
 |
RESULTS |
Genome-wide Demethylation upon Cold Stress--
Analyses of maize
DNA methyltransferase ZmMET1 during chilling (28) and of
vernalization in Arabidopsis thaliana (29) revealed that
cold stress might induce modification of the DNA methylation status. To
obtain confirmatory evidence, we examined the level of total
m5C in maize seedlings grown at 23 °C for 13 days and
then maintained at 4 °C for up to 6 days. At the end of this
treatment, growth had halted and tissue necrosis was apparent on leaf
edges. Plants were then returned to normal culture conditions at
23 °C for an additional 7 days to allow recovery of frail growth,
although the plants ultimately died after 2 weeks. Genomic DNA was
extracted from leaf blades, stem mesocotyls, and root tissues at each
step and subjected to nuclease P1 and phosphatase digestions to yield nucleosides, which were analyzed by high pressure liquid
chromatography. The methylation level estimated from the ratio of
m5C to cytosine was little affected in leaf blades
and stem mesocotyls, m5C accounting for ~20% of the
total cytosines throughout the treatment period (Fig.
1, A and B). In
contrast, the methylation level clearly decreased in roots upon cold
treatment (Fig. 1C). A notable feature was that, even after
seedlings were returned to normal growth conditions, the decreased
methylation level did not recover but rather continued to decline,
reaching one third of the original level (Fig. 1C). The
global status of methylation and its alteration upon cold treatment was
histochemically examined in 8-day-old seedlings using antibodies
against m5C. The distribution of m5C was not
random in and among chromosomes (Fig. 2). In
a chromosome, heavily methylated regions alternated with
undermethylated regions. Some chromosomes were less methylated than
others (Fig. 2). A hypomethylated region in chromosome 4 was assigned
to the knob, which consists of TR-1 repeats forming fold-back DNA
segments (30). However, no distinct difference was observed in
methylation patterns among chromosomes from untreated and cold-treated
seedlings (data not shown), probably due to the inability of antibodies to provide quantitative analysis under the experimental condition.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Proportion of m5C to total
cytosine residues in maize genomic DNA. Amount of m5Cs
in leaf blades (A), stem (B), and root tissues
(C) was quantified by high pressure liquid chromatography.
DNA samples were extracted from 13-day-old seedlings grown under
23 °C (day 0), from seedlings that were further
cold-treated at 4 °C for 8 days (day 8), and from
seedlings returned to 23 °C for 3 days (day 11) and 7 days (day 18) after cold treatment. Reference cultivation
without cold treatment was performed in parallel. The ratio of
m5C to total cytosine is expressed in percentage
(%) by shaded and closed bars for untreated and
cold-treated samples, respectively.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
DNA methylation patterns in
chromosomes. Methylated sites were revealed by indirect
immunofluorescence labeling with monoclonal anti-m5C
antibodies. Samples were from 8-day old seedlings grown at 23 °C.
DAPI staining images (A) and fluorescein
isothiocyanate signal images by staining with monoclonal
anti-m5C antibodies followed by the second antibodies
(B) are merged (C). Bars indicate 5 µm. Arrowheads indicate chromosome 4, which is enlarged in
insets. A distinctly weak signal site was found on
cytogenetically visible knob of chromosome 4 (indicated by
arrows).
|
|
Isolation and Characterization of Demethylated Genomic
Sequences--
To identify specific sequences demethylated in root
tissues upon cold stress, methylated CpG island amplification (24) and PCR differential display screening were performed. Initial screening identified nine genomic fragments that were possibly demethylated on
chilling (data not shown), one of which (registered as GenBankTM/EBI accession no. AF453523) was further used as the probe and analyzed by
Southern blot hybridization using MspI and HapII
m5C-sensitive restriction enzymes. An ~0.6-kb fragment
was distinct in DNA from cold-treated seedlings, whereas it was absent
in DNA from untreated seedlings (Fig.
3A). This indicated two cytosines in CCGG to be methylated in controls but demethylated in chilled samples, this being confirmed later by direct methylation mapping sequencing (data not shown). The isolated fragment was used as the
probe to screen a genomic DNA library, and a 1756-bp fragment was
finally isolated (registered as GenBankTM/EBI accession no. AF453522)
(Fig. 3B). This genomic fragment, designated as
ZmMI1, showed a similarity at the 3'-region from position
~1400 with the PREM-1 long terminal repeat (registered as
GenBankTM/EBI accession no. U03681), a putative retroelement
(Fig. 3B). A part of common sequences between 480 and 800 matched well to a maize 348-bp expressed sequence tag clone, which was
induced upon salt stress to seedlings (registered as GenBankTM/EBI
accession no. AI967092) (Fig. 3B). The copy number of
ZmMI1 was estimated to be ~40-50 by Southern blot
signal intensity analysis (data not shown). To identify possible transcription of this sequence, a cDNA library was screened and six
clones were obtained. All of the sequences, however, slightly differed
each other, probably reflecting transcription from different loci
(registered as GenBankTM/EBI accession nos. AF468668 through AF468672). The position of poly(A) addition was around 1100 (Fig.
3B). The level of transcription was examined by reverse transcriptase-PCR and found to increase during cold treatments (Fig.
3C). These results indicate that ZmMI1 consists
of a retroposon-like sequence and a part of a gene, which is
demethylated and transcriptionally activated upon cold stress.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Properties of ZmMI1.
A, Southern blots analyses. Genomic DNA extracted from root
tissues (10 µg per lane) from seedlings untreated (23 °C) or
cold-treated (4 °C) was digested with either MspI or
HapII, separated on an agarose gel, blotted, and probed with
a 599-bp radioactively labeled ZmMI1 fragment (registered as
GenBankTM/EBI accession no. AF453523). The size of the hybridizing
signals is indicated along with the position of DNA molecular markers.
B, schematic representation of ZmMI1 genome DNA
sequence (registered as GenBankTM/EBI accession no. AF453522) isolated
from a genomic DNA library, showing partial homology with the cDNA
fragments (registered as GenBankTM/EBI accession nos. AF468668 through
AF468672) isolated from a cDNA library screening with an expressed
sequence tag clone (registered as GenBankTM/EBI accession no.
AI967092) and a retroelement PREM-1 partial sequence (registered
as GenBankTM/EBI accession no. U03681). Dotted lines
indicate sequences not determined. The region subjected to methylation
mapping is indicated by double arrows. C,
induction of ZmMI1 transcripts upon cold treatments. Total
RNA was isolated from seedlings treated or untreated with cold stress
as described above, and reverse transcriptase-PCR was performed to
quantify ZmMI1 transcripts. actin
transcripts were simultaneously estimated for the RNA loading control.
Note that ZmMI1 transcripts increased concomitantly with,
but decreased independently, on demethylation.
|
|
Periodic Distribution of m5C in the ZmMI1
Region--
The methylation status in ZmMI1 was directly
examined by the bisulfite modification method. Genomic DNA was
extracted from roots of three batches each containing ~10 seedlings
grown, handled as described above, and subjected to bisulfite
treatment. An 886-bp region of ZmMI1 (positions between 440 and 1326, Fig. 3B) was amplified by PCR and cloned, the
sequence determined, and the positions and frequencies of
m5C mapped (Fig. 4 and see also
the supporting information). The results revealed two distinct features
of DNA methylation: periodic oscillation of the pattern and non-random
demethylation on cold treatment. m5C does not occur
uniformly but rather periodically within ~200 bases. The heavily
methylated region, in which up to 100% of the methylatable sites are
saturated with m5C, comprises ~45 bases. The relatively
undermethylated region, in which only ~60% of methylatable sites are
m5C, comprises ~145 bases. The two alternate, forming a
periodic oscillation pattern in terms of DNA methylation level (Fig.
4A).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Distribution and frequency of m5C
in ZmMI1 locus. Genomic DNA was extracted from
roots of 3 batches each containing ~10 seedlings grown at 23 °C
(A), cold-treated at 4 °C for 7 days (B) and
returned to 23 °C with additional 7 days (cold-chased)
(C). After bisulfite modification, a 886 bp region of
ZmMI1 locus was amplified with PCR, cloned and sequence
determined. Numbers of examined clones were 64 for control
(A), 75 for cold-treated (B) and 34 for
cold-chased (C) samples. Position of C in ZmMI1
genomic sequence is indicated on the horizontal axis and frequency of
m5C in the C at the indicated position is expressed on the
vertical axis (%). The average methylation frequencies were 38.2% in
control (A), 24.7% in cold-treated (B) and
22.5% in cold-chased (C) samples. (D) Global
distribution and proportion of m5C among
cytosine-containing motifs in the mapped 886 bases of ZmMI1
sequence in seedlings grown at 23 °C (open bar), cold-treated at
4 °C for 7 days (shaded bar) and returned to 23 °C with
additional 4 days (closed bar). Numbers of cytosine-containing motifs
in the mapped sequence were 83 for CpG, 66 for CpNpG, 121 for others
(orphan C) in total 255 cytosines. Values for methylated motifs are
indicated as percentages (%).
|
|
Non-random Demethylation by Cold Stress--
An average of 38.4%
cytosine residues in ZmMI1 were methylated when seedlings
were cultivated at 23 °C (Fig. 4, A and D). This methylation level declined to 24.7% after 5 days of chilling (Fig. 4, B and D). When cold-treated samples were
returned to 23 °C and cultivated for additional 7 days
(cold-chased), demethylation persisted and the level declined further
to 22.5% (Fig. 4, C and D). However, the change
did not occur uniformly but rather preferentially in the ~145-base
regions, with depression of some methylation sites from 75% to 5%.
The ~45-base region with high methylation remained generally
unaffected (Fig. 4, B and C). Another aspect of
the demethylation was cytosine motif specificity. Demethylation of CpG
was more distinct than that of CpNpG (Fig. 4D). Some
isolated cytosine residues (orphan C) in these samples
appeared to be remethylated (Fig. 4D). Because CpG and CpNpG
are uniformly distributed along the ZmMI1 sequence, some
factor(s) independent of sequence may be responsible for periodic
methylation and preferential demethylation.
Association of the Methylation Pattern with the Nucleosomal
Structure--
The periodic oscillation pattern in every 200 bases
suggests an association with the nucleosome structure. To assess this possibility, root nuclei were extracted from seedlings and subjected to
digestion with micrococcal nuclease, which preferentially cleaves chromatin DNA in the spacer regions. Resultant ~200-base fragments were isolated (Fig. 5A) and
subjected to PCR in parallel with control undigested genomic DNA.
Primers were designed to independently amplify five ~150-base
fragments, each containing either hypermethylated or hypomethylated
regions (Fig. 5B). When genomic DNA was used as the template
for PCR with five sets of primers, corresponding fragments were equally
well amplified (Fig. 5C). When nuclease-digested 200-base
DNA fragments were employed, fragments containing hypomethylated regions were more efficiently amplified than those containing hypermethylated regions (Fig. 5C). This suggested that
micrococcal nuclease preferentially cleaved DNA around the
hypermethylated regions. In other words, ~145-base regions enriched
with hypomethylated cytosines were resistant to nuclease and hence
corresponded to the core, whereas ~45-base regions enriched with
hypermethylated cytosines were sensitive to nuclease and hence
corresponded to the linker regions. We concluded therefore that DNA in
the core and linker regions of nucleosomes was hypo- and
hypermethylated, respectively. However, whether or not such
differential methylation patterns correlated with the mode of nuclease
digestion was not clear from the present finding.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Methylation pattern in nucleosomes.
A, isolation of mononucleosomal DNA fraction. Intact
chromatin extracted from isolated maize seedlings nuclei was subjected
to micrococcal nuclease digestion, and resulting DNA fragments were
subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. A 200-bp fragment indicated
by the arrow was collected and used for further analysis.
B, schematic illustration of methylation frequency and PCR
positions. Methylation frequency on the ZmMI1 locus in
untreated seedlings is illustrated after Fig. 4A. Fragments
1, 3, and 5 were expected to be amplified from hypermethylated regions
and Fragments 2 and 4 from hypomethylated regions. C,
template efficiency. PCR was performed with 200-bp mononucleosomal DNA
fragments (upper gel) or with total genomic DNA
(lower gel) as the template. Products were subjected to
agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized with ethidium bromide
staining. Numbers correspond to those illustrated in B. D, ratio of amplification from a 200-bp DNA template to
those from total genomic DNA. Amount of each fragment was
densitometrically estimated from ethidium bromide staining, and
relative ratio of obtained values for a 200-bp DNA template to those
for genomic DNA (taken as 100%) was determined. Numbers correspond to
those illustrated in B.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Nucleosomes are organized into precise positions on DNA by signals
in the sequence (31). One such signal has been proposed to be
m5C, but the experimental evidence is controversial. For
example, opposite results as to preferential binding of histone H1 to
methylated DNA have been reported (32, 33), and currently the
interaction between histones and methylated DNA is in general not
considered to be specific. However, under certain circumstances,
nucleosome assembly appears to depend on CpG methylation (31, 34). This suggests a dynamic interaction between methylated DNA and proteins that
constitute chromatin. Methylation of histones was shown to be essential
for triggering DNA methylation in filamentous fungi, and it was
suggested that propagation of DNA methylation patterns is dependent on
feed-back loops between modification of chromatin proteins and DNA
(35). Our result showing periodic oscillation of DNA methylation within
the nucleosomal structure is consistent with this view and further
suggests a positive role for methylation in determining the chromatin
infrastructure. Our findings also substantiate occurrence of
demethylation upon environmental stress.
During differentiation of mammalian cells, genome-wide loss of DNA
methylation occurs, for which active or passive mechanisms have been
proposed (11, 36). In active demethylation, m5C is
enzymatically removed from DNA, and in passive demethylation, newly replicated DNA is not methylated (11). Our results with maize
indicate that genome-wide demethylation occurs, possibly through active
demethylation, because chilled tissues immediately ceased DNA
replication (28). A rapid and active decrease in global DNA methylation
was also observed during seed germination of Silene
latifolia (37). Active demethylation is catalyzed by
5-methylcytosine DNA glycosidase (11, 36), although such activity has
not yet been found in plants. A specific feature of our findings was
that demethylation predominantly occurred at the nucleosome core
regions as revealed by direct methylation mapping. A question arises,
then, as to how such a differential demethylation pattern is formed.
Currently we have no explanation for this, but some clues for
speculation are available. For example, nucleosome cores are proposed
to be located outside the 30-nm fiber, which is composed of a unit of
six nucleosomes. Linker regions are connected by histone H1 inside the
fiber. This structure makes 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase more
accessible to the core than to the linker. Alternatively,
5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase may be selectively recruited to the
core by specific protein(s) such as, for example, 5-methylcytosine
binding proteins. Another distinct finding of the direct methylation
mapping is ubiquitous demethylation at CpG, CpNpG and other sites,
suggesting no restriction to only one strand of DNA. This means that,
for remethylation, de novo methyltransferase activity is
necessary. If this enzyme is absent in quiescent cells, for example, in
root tissues, the methylated status can not be restored. This could
account for the apparently progressive demethylation in
cold-chased seedlings.
While the average methylation level of total genomic DNA in untreated
root tissues was ~18%, that of ZmMI1 was 38%, 2-fold higher. This indicates a heterogeneous distribution of m5C
in the genome, consistent with the histochemical observations, and
suggests ZmMI1 to be located in heterochromatin. However, because demethylation occurred throughout the genome, including the
ZmMI1 sequence, the periodic methylation pattern found in the latter may be common to other parts of genome. If so, the occurrence of demethylation mainly in the core regions of nucleosomes could induce an alteration of chromatin structure and thus influence gene expression. Increase in ZmMI1 transcripts substantiates
this hypothesis. The advantage of this feature is that expression of many genes could be simultaneously controlled. Indeed, it was estimated
that plants may express as many as several hundred genes upon cold
stress (38). It is attractive to speculate that plants have developed
the methylation/demethylation system to simultaneously regulate a vast
number of genes at once, rather than to individually regulate
each gene. Alternatively, because ~70% of the maize genome is
composed of retroposon-like sequences (39) and because demethylation has been shown to reactivate transposons (40), the global demethylation possibly transcriptionally activates such sequences to translocate, resulting in secondary activation/inactivation of other genes (41).
However, the reason why such demethylation occurs only in root tissues
is not clear. One explanation might be that above-ground parts are
equipped with a more complete self-defense system than those
underground, as exemplified by the presence and absence of
maintenance-type DNA methyltransferase in the respective tissues (28).
Heredity of epigenetic modification, or acquired traits, in response to
environmental conditions has long been speculated, and DNA methylation
has been proposed as one of its promoters (13). In animal cells,
however, DNA methylation patterns are strictly regulated in somatic
cells so that upon gametogenesis those that are acquired are usually
completely erased and not transmitted to the progeny (14). In plants,
the distinction between somatic and germ cells is less obvious in
comparison with animals, making possible transmission of acquired DNA
methylation patterns. We have experimentally shown this by treatment of
germinated rice seeds with 5-azadeoxycytidine, a chemical that
powerfully induces demethylation of DNA in vivo (20). At
maturity, plants exhibited a global demethylation and altered
phenotypes, including dwarfism. The acquired traits and demethylation
patterns were inherited for up to at least six
generations.2 Thus alteration of
DNA methylation can induce changed expression of some genes, resulting
in a new phenotype, both of which are heritable (20).
Our above-mentioned experiments suggested that the acquired trait due
to an acquired methylation pattern is sexually transmittable, but
evidence of methylation patterns changing depending on the environment
was missing. The present study showed that this can indeed occur.
However, maize roots are differentiated tissues consisting of somatic
cells and they do not form germ cells. In this context, the
demethylation pattern would not be transmittable to progeny. The fact
that no obvious demethylation was observed in stem mesocotyl tissues,
which contain cells with the potentiality to develop into germ cells,
suggests that these latter are well protected against environmental
stresses in terms of DNA methylation. However, if a DNA methylation
pattern did change, it could result in heritable epimutations. If such
mutations were advantageous for survival, they might persist for
generations. An example is the flower morphology change in
Linaria vulgaris, considered to be the result of
hypermethylation of the Lcyc gene which occurred 250 years
ago (42). Also, in plants, vegetative reproduction is not rare as seen
with tuber propagation, making it possible to directly transmit altered
methylation patterns to the next generation. We therefore speculate
that Lamarckian inheritance does exist, being mediated through DNA methylation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Prof. A. B. Pardee and
Dr. A. Goodmann for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants for the Core Research for
Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) from the Japan Science and
Technology Corporation (JST), and Grant JSPS-RFTF 00L01604 for the
Research for the Future Program from the Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF453523 and AF453522 for ZmMI1 and AF468668
through AF468672 for corresponding cDNAs.
Recipient of Research Fellowships 00177 from CREST and JSPS.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-743-72-5650;
Fax: 81-743-72-5659; E-mail: sano@gtc.aist-nara.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204050200
2
N. Steward, M. Ito, Y. Yamaguchi, N. Koizumi,
and H. Sano, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
m5C, 5-methylcytosine;
DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindoleDAPI.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Gruenbaum, Y.,
Naveh-Many, T.,
Cedar, H.,
and Razin, A.
(1981)
Nature
292,
860-862[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Yoder, J. A.,
Walsh, C. P.,
and Bestor, T. H.
(1997)
Trends Genet.
13,
335-340[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Colot, V.,
and Rossignol, J. L.
(1999)
Bioessays
21,
402-411[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Bird, A. P.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(1999)
Cell
99,
451-454[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Robertson, K. D.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(2000)
Nat. Rev. Genet.
1,
11-19[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Smith, S. S.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
302,
1-7[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Jones, P. A.,
and Takai, D.
(2001)
Science
293,
1068-1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Jackson-Grusby, L.,
Beard, C.,
Possemat, R.,
Tudoe, M.,
Fambrough, D.,
Csankovszki, G.,
Dausman, J.,
Lee, P.,
Wilson, C.,
and Lander, E.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
27,
31-39[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Bird, A.
(2002)
Genes Dev.
16,
6-21[Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Reik, W.,
Dean, W.,
and Walter, J.
(2001)
Science
293,
1089-1093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Jost, J. P.,
Oakeley, E. J.,
Zhu, B.,
Benjamin, D.,
Thiry, S.,
Siegmann, M.,
and Jost, Y.-C.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
4452-4461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Riggs, A. D.,
and Porter, T. N.
(1996)
in
Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation
(Russo, V. E. A.
, Martienssen, R. A.
, and Riggs, A. D., eds)
, pp. 29-45, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 13.
|
Holliday, R.
(1993)
in
DNA Methylation: Molecular Biology and Biological Significance
(Jost, J. P.
, and Saluz, H. P., eds)
, pp. 452-468, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland
|
| 14.
|
Reik, W.,
and Walter, J.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Genet.
2,
21-32[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Smith, J. M.
(1990)
J. Theor. Biol.
143,
41-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Durrant, A.
(1962)
Heredity
17,
27-61[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Cullis, C. A.
(1983)
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
1,
117-131[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Jablonka, E.,
and Lamb, M. J.
(1989)
J. Theor. Biol.
139,
69-83[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Martienssen, R. A.,
and Colot, V.
(2001)
Science
293,
1070-1074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Sano, H.,
Kamada, I.,
Youssefian, S.,
Katsumi, M.,
and Wabilko, H.
(1990)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
220,
441-447[CrossRef]
|
| 21.
|
Fukui, K.,
and Iijima, K.
(1991)
Theor. Appl. Genet.
81,
589-596
|
| 22.
|
Ohmido, N.,
and Fukui, K.
(1997)
Plant Mol. Biol.
35,
963-968[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Sano, H.,
Imokawa, M.,
and Sager, R.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
951,
157-165[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Toyota, M., Ho, C.,
Ahuja, N.,
Jair, K. W., Li, Q.,
Ohe-Toyota, M.,
Baylin, S. B.,
and Issa, J. P.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
2307-2312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Verwoerd, T. C.,
Dekker, B. M.,
and Hoekema, A.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
2362[Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Raizis, A. M.,
Schmitt, F.,
and Jost, J. P.
(1995)
Anal. Biochem.
226,
161-166[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Yamaguchi, J.,
Lim, P. Y.,
Aratani, K.,
and Akazawa, T.
(1992)
Cell Struct. Func.
17,
87-92[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Steward, N.,
Kusano, T.,
and Sano, H.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
3250-3259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Finnegan, E. J.,
Peacock, W. J.,
and Dennis, E. S.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8449-8454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Ananiev, E. V.,
Phillips, R. L.,
and Rines, H. W.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
10785-10790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Davey, C.,
Pennings, S.,
and Allan, J.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
267,
276-288[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
McArthur, M.,
and Thomas, J. O.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1705-1714[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Campoy, F. J.,
Meehan, R. R.,
McKay, S.,
Nixon, J.,
and Bird, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26473-26481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Godde, J. S.,
Kass, S. U.,
Hirst, M. C.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24325-24328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Tamaru, H.,
and Selker, E. U.
(2001)
Nature
414,
277-283[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Zhu, B.,
Benjamin, D.,
Zheng, Y.,
Angliker, H.,
Thiry, S.,
Siegmann, M.,
and Jost, J. P.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
5031-5036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Zluvova, J.,
Janousek, B.,
and Vyskot, B.
(2001)
J. Exp. Bot.
52,
2265-2273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Thomashow, M. F.
(1994)
in
Arabidopsis
(Meyerowitz, E. M.
, and Somerville, C. R., eds)
, pp. 807-834, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 39.
|
Bennetzen, J. L.
(2000)
Plant Mol. Biol.
42,
251-269[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Dennis, E. S.,
and Brettell, R. I.
(1990)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond-Biol. Sci.
362,
217-229
|
| 41.
|
Miura, A.,
Yonebayashi, S.,
Watanabe, K.,
Toyama, T.,
Shimada, H.,
and Kakutani, T.
(2001)
Nature
411,
212-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Cubas, P.,
Vincent, C.,
and Coen, E.
(1999)
Nature
401,
157-161[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Akimoto, H. Katakami, H.-J. Kim, E. Ogawa, C. M. Sano, Y. Wada, and H. Sano
Epigenetic Inheritance in Rice Plants
Ann. Bot.,
August 1, 2007;
100(2):
205 - 217.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Boyko, P. Kathiria, F. J. Zemp, Y. Yao, I. Pogribny, and I. Kovalchuk
Transgenerational changes in the genome stability and methylation in pathogen-infected plants: (Virus-induced plant genome instability)
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 12, 2007;
35(5):
1714 - 1725.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Sekhon, T. Peterson, and S. Chopra
Epigenetic Modifications of Distinct Sequences of the p1 Regulatory Gene Specify Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns in Maize
Genetics,
March 1, 2007;
175(3):
1059 - 1070.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-N. Hashida, T. Uchiyama, C. Martin, Y. Kishima, Y. Sano, and T. Mikami
The Temperature-Dependent Change in Methylation of the Antirrhinum Transposon Tam3 Is Controlled by the Activity of Its Transposase
PLANT CELL,
January 1, 2006;
18(1):
104 - 118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wada, H. Ohya, Y. Yamaguchi, N. Koizumi, and H. Sano
Preferential de Novo Methylation of Cytosine Residues in Non-CpG Sequences by a Domains Rearranged DNA Methyltransferase from Tobacco Plants
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 24, 2003;
278(43):
42386 - 42393.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Luo and D. Preuss
Strand-biased DNA methylation associated with centromeric regions in Arabidopsis
PNAS,
September 16, 2003;
100(19):
11133 - 11138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|