![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 41, 38197-38204, October 11, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,From the Growth Factor Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
Received for publication, April 29, 2002, and in revised form, July 19, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MEN1, the gene responsible for
multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, is a tumor suppressor gene that
encodes a protein called menin, of unknown function with no homology to
any known protein. Here we demonstrate that menin interacts with a
putative tumor metastasis suppressor nm23H1/nucleoside diphosphate
(NDP) kinase A in mammalian cells. Given the roles of nm23 as a
multi-functional protein, we searched for the possible function of
menin. Menin has no effect on the known activities of nm23; that is,
nucleoside diphosphate kinase, protein kinase, or GTPase-activating
protein for Ras-related GTPase Rad. However, we found that menin
hydrolyzes GTP to GDP efficiently in the presence of nm23, whereas nm23
or menin alone shows little or no detectable GTPase activity.
Furthermore, menin contains sequence motifs similar to those found in
all known GTPases or GTP-binding proteins and shows low affinity but
specific binding to GTP/GDP. These results suggest that menin is an
atypical GTPase stimulated by nm23.
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal
dominant disorder characterized by the combined occurrence of tumors of
the parathyroid, pancreas, and pituitary that represents one of the
familial cancer syndromes (1, 2). The responsible gene,
MEN1, was localized to chromosome 11q13 (3) and identified by positional cloning (4). More than 400 independent germ line or
somatic mutations distributed over the entire MEN1 coding
region have been identified (5, 6). The majority are nonsense or frameshifts predicting a truncated product, but missense mutations have
also been identified. The nature of the mutations, which are consistent
with a loss-of-function mechanism, and the observation that the loss of
both MEN1 alleles leads to tumor development support the
prediction that MEN1 is a tumor suppressor gene.
Menin, the protein encoded by the MEN1 gene, contains 610 amino acids (4) and is highly conserved among human, mouse (98%) (7),
and rat (97%) (8) and more distantly among zebrafish (75%) (9) and
Drosophila (47%) (10), but there is no known homolog in the
budding yeast. Menin RNA and protein are widely expressed in most human
tissues analyzed (11), leaving the tumor development in endocrine
tissues unaccounted for. Data base analysis of the menin protein
sequence does not reveal homology to any other known proteins or any
apparent conserved motifs, providing no clues as to its function.
However, menin is found predominantly in the nucleus (12) and binds to
transcription factors (13), suggesting its role related to
transcriptional regulation. In addition, the expression of menin
increases as GH4 cells entered S phase (14), suggesting that menin
expression may be cell cycle-regulated. Even so, little is known about
the biological role of menin in tumorigenesis or normal cellular functions.
We have recently identified a putative tumor metastasis suppressor
nm23H1 as a menin-interacting protein in a yeast two-hybrid screen
(15). Nm23, a putative metastasis suppressor, was originally identified
by subtraction cloning in murine melanomas of differing metastatic
potential (16). Transfection of nm23 cDNA into some tumor cell
lines is associated with reduced metastatic potential (17) and cell
motility (18). It is also thought to be involved in development,
cellular proliferation, and differentiation (19). Nm23 belongs to a
family of structurally and functionally conserved proteins of
nucleoside diphosphate (NDP)1
kinases that are major suppliers of nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs),
where ATP is the phosphate donor (20). In human tissue the two major
isoforms are nm23H1 and nm23H2, which are identical to the NDP kinases
A and B, respectively (16, 21). Until recently, NDP kinase activity was
the only known function of nm23, but nm23 has been shown to be a
multi-functional protein with other possible roles. It can also
function as a protein kinase and undergo autophosphorylation on
histidine and serine residues (20, 22, 23). Furthermore, nm23H1 has
been shown to interact with Ras-related GTPase Rad and act as a
GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for Rad, promoting the conversion of
GTP associated with Rad to GDP (24).
Here, we show that menin interacts with nm23 in mammalian cells, and
the menin-nm23 interaction allowed us to find an unexpected activity of
menin. Menin binds GTP with a low affinity and hydrolyzes GTP
efficiently in the presence of nm23. Our data indicate that menin is an
atypical GTPase stimulated by nm23.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
HEK293 and COS-7 cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with
10% fetal calf serum and penicillin/streptomycin. HEK293 and COS-7
cells were transiently transfected with a calcium phosphate
transfection kit (Edge BioSystems) and with Polyfect transfection
reagents (Qiagen), respectively. The cells were used in experiments
30 h after transfection.
Co-immunoprecipitation Assay--
The FLAG-tagged expression
vector pCMV-Tag2 or Myc-tagged expression vector pCMV-Tag3 (Stratagene)
was used to express tagged proteins in the cultured mammalian cells.
HEK293 cells in 100-mm dishes at 4 × 106 cells/dish
were co-transfected with 10 µg of pCMV-Tag2-FLAG expression construct
and 20 µg of pCMV-Tag3-Myc expression construct. The cells were lysed
with 1.2 ml of low stringent lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.8, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P40, and one CompleteTM protease inhibitor mixture tablet (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)/25 ml
of buffer) and sonicated briefly. Cell lysates were centrifuged at
15,000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was
incubated with anti-Myc-agarose affinity gel
(Clontech) or anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Sigma) for
1 h at 4 °C with gentle rocking. After washing four times with
phosphate-buffered saline, the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by
Western blotting using anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma) or anti-Myc antibody (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) as described (25).
NDP Kinase Assay--
For the preparation of glutathione
S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins, pGEX-5X-1 vectors were used
(Amersham Biosciences). The fusion proteins were affinity-purified from
the soluble fraction of cell extract with glutathione-Sepharose beads
(Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
NDP kinase activity was measured with [ In Vivo and in Vitro Phosphorylation--
For in vivo
phosphorylation of menin, COS-7 cells plated at 5 × 105 cells/60-mm dish were transfected with 2 µg of
FLAG-tagged menin expression construct. Metabolic labeling was carried
out in phosphate-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing
5% fetal calf serum and 1 mCi/ml of [32P]orthophosphate
for 3 h. Immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody
was performed as described above. Immunoprecipitated protein was
resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. For in
vitro kinase assay, ~0.1 µg of GST-menin and 0.1 µg of GST-nm23 were incubated in a total volume of 20 µl of kinase buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM
MgCl2, 3 mM MnCl2, and 1 mM DTT) containing 10 µCi of [ GAP Assay--
The Rad-GAP activity was assessed based on the
method of Zhu et al. (24). Briefly, 5 µg of GST-Rad bound
to glutathione-Sepharose beads was loaded with 1 µCi of
[ GTP Hydrolysis Assay--
GST-menin (~0.5 µg: 5 pmol) was
incubated with or without GST-nm23 (0.5 ng) in 30 µl of assay buffer
A at room temperature. The reaction was initiated by the addition of
0.6 µCi of [
GTP hydrolysis assays were also performed using immunoprecipitates of
FLAG-tagged proteins. HEK293 cells (4 × 106
cells/dish) transfected with 30 µg of pCMV-Tag2-FLAG-expression constructs were lysed with either low-stringent lysis buffer described above or stringent lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate,
0.1% SDS, and one CompleteTM protease inhibitor mixture tablet) and
sonicated briefly. Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-tagged proteins was
performed as described above. After washing four times with
phosphate-buffered saline, agarose beads were incubated with assay
buffer A in a final volume of 100 µl, and the reaction was initiated
by the addition of 0.6 µCi of [ GTP Binding Assay--
The GTP binding to menin was assessed
with a modification of filter binding assay (26). GST-menin, GST-Rad,
or GST (40 pmol) were incubated with [ Expression of Menin Mutants--
Menin mutant constructs P12L,
H139D, and P320L were generated by a PCR-based technique and cloned
into pCMV-Tag2B expression vectors. All the constructs were checked by
DNA sequencing. To study the expression levels, HEK293 cells were
co-transfected with expression vectors of one of the FLAG-tagged menin
variants (15 µg) and FLAG-luciferase (15 µg) as a co-transfection
marker to monitor transfection efficiency; the total amount of
transfected plasmid DNA was equalized by adding empty vector. Cell
lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min, and
2 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer was added to the supernatant. The
samples were heated at 100 °C for 5 min, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and
blotted with anti-FLAG antibody as described above.
Menin Interacts with nm23 in Mammalian Cells--
We previously
identified nm23 as a potential menin binding partner in a yeast
two-hybrid screening system and confirmed this association in
vitro by GST pull-down assays (15). To further confirm this
association, we performed a co-immunoprecipitation analysis in
mammalian cells. HEK293 cells were co-transfected with plasmids
expressing FLAG-menin or FLAG-luciferase and Myc-nm23 or
Myc-luciferase, lysed with low-stringent buffer, and immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc or anti-FLAG antibodies. An anti-Myc monoclonal antibody
co-immunoprecipitated FLAG-menin along with Myc-nm23 (Fig.
1, lane 6) but did not
co-immunoprecipitate FLAG-menin along with Myc-luciferase or
FLAG-luciferase along with Myc-nm23 (lanes 4 and
5). In the reciprocal immunoprecipitation, an anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody co-immunoprecipitated Myc-nm23 along with FLAG-menin (Fig. 1, lane 9) but did not co-immunoprecipitate
Myc-luciferase along with FLAG-menin or Myc-nm23 along with
FLAG-luciferase (lanes 7 and 8). These results
indicate that menin associated with nm23 in mammalian cells.
Menin Does Not Affect the NDP Kinase, Protein Kinase, or Rad-GAP
Activity of nm23--
To assess the functional implications of the
binding of menin to nm23, we studied the effects of menin on the
activities of nm23. Nm23 has been shown to be a multi-functional
protein possessing a variety of enzymatic activities including NDP
kinase, protein kinase, and GAP activities. First, to determine whether
menin alters the NDP kinase activity of nm23, both proteins were
expressed in bacteria as GST fusion proteins, purified, and subjected
to a NDP kinase assay. As shown in Fig.
2A, GST-nm23 was able to transfer
Next, we examined the possibility that menin is phosphorylated by nm23.
There are 28 putative phosphorylation sites in menin (5), but it has
not yet been confirmed if menin is phosphorylated. To analyze the
phosphorylation of menin, COS-7 cells transfected with plasmid
expressing FLAG-tagged menin were metabolically labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate and immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG
antibody. We found that FLAG-menin was phosphorylated (Fig.
2B, lane 2). Then, to determine whether nm23 can
phosphorylate menin, GST- menin and GST-nm23 were co-incubated in the
presence of [
Nm23H1 was also shown to act as a specific GAP of the Ras-related
GTPase Rad (24). Therefore, we next examined whether menin affected the
Rad-GAP activity of nm23. GST-Rad-Sepharose was loaded with
[ Co-incubation of Menin with nm23 Efficiently Hydrolyzes
GTP--
As shown above, menin did not affect the Rad-GAP activity of
nm23, which could promote the hydrolysis of GTP bound to Rad; however,
menin-nm23 interaction might be involved in Rad-independent GTP
hydrolysis. To test this hypothesis, GST-menin (0.5 µg) and GST-nm23
(0.5 ng) alone or together were incubated with
[ Menin Contains Several Sequence Motifs Found in All
GTPases--
Based on the possibility that menin is a GTPase like
Rad, we examined if menin has a structure similar to that of known
GTPases or GTP-binding proteins including the Ras-related small GTPases and the Menin Binds GTP--
The presence of similar motifs to those found
in all known GTPases suggests that menin could similarly exhibit GTP
binding activity as well as GTP-hydrolyzing activity. To test this, we examined whether menin directly bound GTP by filter binding assay. Although GST alone did not bind [
We next examined whether the binding of menin to GTP is affected by the
concentration of Mg2+, as observed with many GTPases (28,
29). As shown in Fig. 5C, in the absence of
Mg2+, menin bound GTP only poorly. However, the binding
activity was increased in the presence of Mg2+, and maximum
activation was obtained at 10 mM Mg2+,
indicating that, like many GTPases, menin requires Mg2+ for
GTP binding. GST alone had no activity to bind the guanine nucleotide
at any concentration of Mg2+ from 0-20 mM
(data not shown).
To further characterize the binding of GTP, we carried out competition
experiments with a number of nucleotides and determined whether menin
is a specific guanine nucleotide-binding protein. Binding of
[ Menin Immunoprecipitated from HEK293 Cells Hydrolyzes GTP--
We
found that menin expressed in bacteria as a GST fusion protein
hydrolyzed GTP in the presence of nm23 and bound GTP. To further
confirm this, we investigated whether menin expressed in mammalian
cells exhibited GTP-hydrolyzing activity. We immunoprecipitated FLAG-tagged proteins from transiently transfected HEK293 cells lysed
with a low-stringent buffer and then subjected the immunoprecipitates to a GTP hydrolysis assay. As shown in Fig.
6, A and B,
left panels, immunoprecipitates from empty
vector-transfected cells showed no activity, and immunoprecipitates
from Rad-transfected cells hydrolyzed a small amount of GTP to GDP.
However, immunoprecipitates from menin-transfected cells showed strong
GTP-hydrolyzing activity and converted a large amount of GTP to GDP,
reaching 20% by 5 min. Unexpectedly, menin also produced a small
amount of GMP, whereas Rad or empty vector did not (Fig. 6,
A, left panel, and C).
We found that menin immunoprecipitates hydrolyzed GTP to both GDP and
GMP; however, we have not determined whether the detected activity is
derived from menin itself or menin protein complexed with associated
proteins. To examine whether menin itself can hydrolyze GTP, we further
purified FLAG-menin by immunoprecipitation using a stringent lysis
buffer with an ionic detergent to free the menin from most, if not all,
interacting proteins. Under the stringent conditions, no association
between FLAG-menin and Myc-nm23 was detected (data not shown), whereas
this association was confirmed under the low-stringent conditions
(Fig. 1). Even when purified under stringent conditions, menin
immunoprecipitates were able to convert GTP to GDP (Fig. 6,
A and B, right panels), although the
level of conversion was lower than that shown by menin purified under
the low-stringent conditions (Fig. 6B), and GMP was not detected (Fig. 6A, right panel). There was no
increased GTP hydrolysis by Rad immunoprecipitated under low-stringent
conditions when compared with Rad immunoprecipitated under stringent
conditions, probably due to any detectable association between FLAG-Rad
and Myc-nm23 under low-stringent conditions in this assay (data not shown). In addition, as observed with GST-menin, the menin
immunoprecipitates bound GTP with a 10-fold lower affinity than Rad
immunoprecipitates, whereas empty vector did not (data not shown). From
these results, we confirmed that menin expressed in mammalian cells
bound and hydrolyzed GTP.
Reduced Expression Levels of Menin Mutants Identified in MEN1
Patients--
To examine whether the GTP-hydrolyzing activity of menin
is involved in the pathogenesis of MEN1 tumors, we constructed
FLAG-tagged menin mutants with missense mutations identified in MEN1
patients, P12L, H139D, and P320L, and tried to perform a GTP hydrolysis assay using the immunoprecipitates of these mutants. Immunoprecipitates of these mutants still retained the ability to hydrolyze GTP (Fig. 7A), but we had difficulty in
comparing the GTPase activity because the expression of these mutants
was marked decreased compared with that of wild-type menin in
transiently transfected cells. As shown in Fig. 7B, the
immunoprecipitates of mutants P12L, H139D, and P320L each contained
only a very small amount of protein. To confirm the decreased
expression level of mutants, HEK293 cells were transfected with
FLAG-tagged menin or mutants and FLAG-tagged luciferase as a
co-transfection marker to monitor transfection efficiency, and cell
lysates were blotted with anti-FLAG antibody. As shown in Fig.
7C, unlike wild-type menin, mutants P12L, H139D, and P320L
were expressed at extremely low levels, although FLAG-luciferase was
expressed well in all transfections.
GTP-hydrolyzing and Binding Activity of Menin--
In the present
study, we have shown that menin interacts with nm23 in mammalian cells.
The binding to nm23 has allowed us to uncover the potential activity of
menin. We have demonstrated by using GST fusion proteins that menin
shows no detectable GTP-hydrolyzing activity, and nm23 hydrolyzed GTP
only poorly but that co-incubation of menin with nm23 results in a much
greater conversion of GTP to GDP. It may be possible that the observed
GTP hydrolysis is attributable to the enhancement by menin of the NDP
kinase activity of nm23, which transfers the terminal phosphate from
any NTP to any NDP. However, the observation that menin has little
effect on the NDP kinase activity of nm23 and the fact that Ras-related GTPase Rad exhibits only a low intrinsic GTPase activity but can be
greatly stimulated by nm23 as a Rad-specific GAP (24) gives rise to an
alternative hypothesis, that menin, like Rad, may be a GTPase
stimulated by nm23. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation
that menin protein immunopurified under stringent conditions is able to
hydrolyze GTP to GDP, probably because of the intrinsic GTPase activity
of menin, which is detectable in protein expressed in more native forms
in mammalian cells, unlike bacterially expressed GST-menin.
However, we have not ruled out the possibility that unidentified
menin-associated proteins still bind menin even under stringent
conditions and promote the GTP-hydrolyzing activity of menin. The
hypothesis that menin is a GTPase is also consistent with the GTP
binding of menin. Competition experiments with a number of nucleotides
demonstrating that GTP and GDP are the strongest competitors with
[
The GTPase superfamily comprises at least three subfamilies, that of
the small GTPases (e.g. Ras, Rad), that of the
heterotrimeric G-proteins (e.g. transducin), and that of the
GTPases involved in protein synthesis (e.g. elongation
factor Tu), which are involved in an array of cellular functions
including cell growth, differentiation, membrane trafficking, and
nuclear transport (27, 30, 31). The ability to hydrolyze and bind GTP
and the presence of similar sequence motifs to those commonly found in
GTPases suggest that the functions of menin partially overlap with
those of members of the GTPase superfamily.
However, menin is distinct from most members of the GTPase superfamily
in that it is relatively large (68 kDa) and lacks a canonical form of
the G1 motif or any space before the motif. Moreover, outside the
individual predicted motifs there is no significant homology to any
known GTPase. These features indicate that menin is not a typical
GTPase. Rather, its relatively large protein size and the N-terminal
placement of its GTPase motifs are reminiscent of some atypical GTPases
with multidomains. For example, dynamin GTPase (100 kDa), which
mediates vesicle trafficking, is a multidomain protein whose N-terminal
third contains the GTPase domain (32, 33). Dynamin has been referred to
as a "non-classical" GTPase, to distinguish it from the classical
GTPases that act as regulatory switches, because dynamin uses its
GTPase activity to drive vesiculation (32-34). Interestingly, the
Drosophila homologue of nm23 (Awd) has been shown to be
required for dynamin-dependent synaptic vesicle recycling
(35). Another example is p190 Rho-GAP, which is a multidomain protein
that also contains GTPase motifs at its N terminus and binds GTP but
lacks intrinsic GTPase activity (36, 37). We note that menin contains a
threonine residue instead of asparagine in the conserved
(N/T)KXD GTP binding motif, which is shared by only a small
number of GTPases including dynamin and p190 (27, 33, 36).
If menin functions as a classical GTPase, one might suggest for
example, like Ras, menin serves to regulate cell growth or differentiation by acting as a molecular switch between active GTP-bound and inactive GDP-bound states, where nm23 serves as a
regulator. Alternatively, as a non-classical GTPase, menin might use
its GTP-hydrolyzing activity as a driving force for unidentified functions like dynamin, or it might serve as a functionally distinct regulator of as yet to be characterized signaling cascades.
Our findings suggest that menin is a GTPase substrate for the GAP
activity of nm23. It has been previously shown that nm23 acts as a GAP
for Rad but not for other Ras-related GTPases such as Ras, Rho, Ran,
and Ral (24). This specificity is consistent with the lack of any
detectable sequence homology of nm23 with other GAPs. In addition,
nm23H1 consisting of a four-stranded antiparallel Potential Role of Menin in Tumorigenesis--
In recent years,
several proteins have been shown to interact with menin, providing
clues to the potential functions of menin (13, 41-43). It has been
shown that interaction with JunD induces a repression of JunD-mediated
transactivation on an AP-1 binding site (13) and that menin is
involved in the TGF-
We find it interesting that GMP is also produced by menin
immunoprecipitates from mammalian cells. The observation that the complex of GST-menin and GST-nm23 hydrolyzed GTP to GDP but not to GMP
suggests that, among the menin immunoprecipitates, there would be
unidentified interacting proteins other than nm23, with unique
enzymatic activity to convert GTP to GMP, such as hGBP1 (human
interferon-induced guanylate-binding protein) (46), or with GDPase
activity such as the PCPH oncogene product (47). It would be
interesting to investigate the possible interactions of menin and nm23
with the proteins with such activities.
Loss or mutations of both MEN1 alleles are considered to be
an important step in tumor formation. More than 70% of the germ line
or somatic MEN1 mutations identified in patients with MEN1 are nonsense and frameshifts, predicting a truncation or absence of
menin, but missense mutations have also been identified (5, 6). If
menin activity to hydrolyze GTP is involved in tumorigenesis, menin
missense mutations identified in patients with MEN1 may lead to
decreased GTP-hydrolyzing activity. We have so far found no
experimental confirmation of this prediction. Rather, we observed the
decreased expression levels of menin mutants as commented previously
(13), which leads us to surmise that at least some identified missense
mutations may decrease the half-life of the affected menin protein,
thereby resulting in a reduced steady-state level and, consequently,
loss of function. Consistent with this hypothesis is the fact that
identified mutations are scattered throughout the
MEN1-coding region with no apparent mutational hot spots
(5). Among these mutations, there may also be missense mutations
affecting functionally critical amino acid residues like those involved
in the catalytic mechanism, but such mutations are considered to be
rare in most genetic diseases (48). Furthermore, the instability of
missense or short in-frame deletion mutants has been shown in some
genetic diseases, and these mutations are often situated in regions of
the proteins that are not part of the active site or of interaction
areas or binding sites (48, 49). Therefore, we can postulate that loss
of GTP hydrolysis and/or transcriptional regulation by menin resulting
from the truncation or instability of MEN1 products could
lead to MEN1 tumor formation, although there is no direct evidence to
support this assumption. There are several members of the GTPase
superfamily whose loss is implicated in the development of tumors; for
example, NOEY2, a Ras-related, imprinted tumor suppressor
gene in ovarian and breast cancers, functions as a negative regulator
of cell growth (50), and a recently identified Ras-related gene,
RERG, is implicated as a growth-inhibitory gene in breast
cancer (51). The molecular mechanism for growth suppression by such
GTPases may provide clues as to the role of menin in tumorigenesis.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP as a
phosphate donor and dCDP as an acceptor nucleotide. GST-nm23 (5 ng) was
incubated with 1 µCi of [
-32P]ATP and dCDP (10 µM) in 20 µl of buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and
1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)) at room temperature for 20 min
in the presence of 20 ng of either GST-menin or GST. At each time
point, 1-µl aliquots were removed and directly spotted on the
thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate to resolve radioactive ATP and
dCTP in 0.85 M KH2PO4 (pH 3.4). The
labeled nucleotides were visualized by autoradiography and quantified
with a bio- imaging analyzer (BAS2500; Fuji film).
-32P]ATP
at room temperature for 5 min. The reaction was terminated by the
addition of an equal volume of 2 × SDS sample buffer, the samples
were boiled, and the reaction products were resolved by SDS-PAGE
followed by autoradiography.
-32P]GTP (Amersham Biosciences) in assay buffer A
consisting of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mg/ml bovine serum
albumin at room temperature for 10 min, then washed 3 times with the
same buffer at 4 °C. The [
-32P]GTP-Rad was
incubated with 10 ng of GST-nm23 in the presence of 50 ng of GST-menin
or GST in a final volume of 100 µl at room temperature, and at each
time point, the bound nucleotides were eluted in 20 µl of elution
buffer consisting of 1% SDS and 50 mM EDTA at 65 °C for
5 min. The labeled nucleotides were resolved by TLC and analyzed as
described above.
-32P]GTP. GST-Rad (5 pmol) and GST (5 pmol) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. At
each time point, 1-µl aliquots were removed and directly spotted on
TLC plates to resolve radioactive GDP and GTP and analyzed as described above.
-32P]GTP at room
temperature. The immunoprecipitates each contained ~1 µg of
protein. At each time point, the reaction was stopped by the addition
of 20 µl of elution buffer and heating at 65 °C for 5 min. The
labeled nucleotides were resolved by TLC and analyzed as described
above. For GTP hydrolysis assay of menin mutants, since the expression
level of the mutants was lower than that of wild-type menin, cells were
transfected with 30 µg of mutant plasmids or a smaller amount of
wild-type plasmid (5 µg). The immunoprecipitates, each containing
~0.2 µg of protein, were used. The positions of GTP, GDP, and GMP
on the plates were visualized under UV light by using unlabeled standards.
-32P]GTP (1.5 µCi) in 30 µl of an exchange buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) containing the indicated concentrations of MgCl2 at room temperature.
At given time points, aliquots of 8 µl were spotted in duplicate on
BA 85 nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schuell), and then the
filters were washed 3 times for 5-min with 10 ml of cold washing buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 0.1 mM DTT)
containing the same concentrations of MgCl2 as used in the
binding assay. The radioactivity remaining on the filters was
quantified with a bio-imaging analyzer. GST-Rad and GST were used as
positive and negative controls, respectively. To determine the relative
GTP binding affinity, GST-menin or GST-Rad were incubated with 1 µCi
of [
-32P]GTP in an exchange buffer in the presence of
various concentrations of unlabeled GTP for 60 min. To assess the
specificity of GTP binding, GST-menin was incubated with 1 µCi of
[
-32P]GTP in an exchange buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2 as described above in the absence or
presence of various nucleotides at various concentrations. Incubation
was continued at room temperature for 60 min, after which 8-µl
aliquots were spotted on filters, the filters were washed 3 times with
cold washing buffer containing 20 mM MgCl2, and
the radioactivity was determined as described above.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Menin interacts with nm23 in HEK293
cells. Plasmid expressing FLAG-menin or FLAG-luciferase
(Luc) was co-transfected into HEK293 cells with plasmid
expressing Myc-nm23 or Myc-luciferase. The cell lysates (lanes
1-3) were immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-Myc
antibody-conjugated agarose beads (lanes 4-6) or with
monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody-conjugated agarose beads (lanes
7-9). The immunoprecipitates (IP) were isolated,
subjected to gel electrophoresis, and immunoblotted with a monoclonal
anti-FLAG or anti-Myc antibody. The light chain of mouse IgG was
slightly labeled with the anti-Myc antibody (lane 8).
-phosphate from [
-32P]ATP to dCDP, forming
[
-32P]dCTP. GST-menin had little effect on the NDP
kinase activity of nm23, although there was a slight decrease in the
activity. GST alone as a negative control had no effect on NDP kinase
activity.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Menin does not affect the NDP kinase, protein
kinase, or Rad-GAP activity of nm23. A, effect of menin
on NDP kinase activity. GST-nm23 was incubated with GST-menin or GST
and subjected to an NDP kinase assay with [
-32P]ATP as
a phosphate donor and dCDP as an acceptor nucleotide. B,
in vivo and in vitro phosphorylation of menin.
COS-7 cells transfected with plasmid expressing FLAG-menin were
metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate. Lysed
cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (left panel). For in
vitro phosphorylation, GST-menin was incubated with GST-nm23 or
GST and subjected to in vitro [
-32P]ATP
phosphorylation. Reaction products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography (right panel). C, effect of menin
on Rad-GAP activity of nm23. GST-Rad bound to glutathione-Sepharose
beads was loaded with [
-32P]GTP and washed extensively
and then incubated with GST-nm23 together with GST-menin or GST. At
each time point, the bound nucleotides were eluted and resolved by TLC
and quantified with a bio-imaging analyzer. Data shown are
representative of three experiments.
-32P]ATP for 5 min at room temperature.
The phosphorylation of GST-menin was not detected on the addition of
GST-nm23 (lane 3). In addition, autophosphorylation of nm23
(22) was not altered by the co-incubation with menin (lane
3).
-32P]GTP and incubated with or without GST-nm23 in
the presence of GST-menin or GST. In the absence of nm23, we could not
observe any detectable GTPase activity of Rad within 20 min (Fig.
2C). In contrast, as shown by Zhu et al. (24), in
the presence of GST-nm23 there was a marked increase in the rate of GTP
hydrolysis. However, the Rad-GAP activity of nm23 was not altered by
the co-incubation with GST-menin.
-32P]GTP. GST-menin alone did not show
GTP-hydrolyzing activity, and GST-nm23 hydrolyzed only a small amount
of GTP to GDP (Fig. 3). Intriguingly,
when both nm23 and menin were present, a much greater amount of GTP was
converted to GDP, reaching 20% by 5 min and 45% by 20 min. This
finding suggests one possibility in which menin may enhance the
catalytic activity of nm23 as a NDP kinase that transfers the terminal
phosphate from any NTP to any NDP. However, the observation in this
assay that GST-Rad with undetectable intrinsic GTPase activity
displayed high GTPase activity in the presence of Rad-GAP nm23 (Fig. 3,
lower panel) suggests an alternative possibility that menin,
like Rad, may be a GTPase stimulated by nm23.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Co-incubation of menin with nm23 efficiently
hydrolyzes GTP. GST-menin and GST-nm23, alone or together, were
incubated with [
-32P]GTP at room temperature for 0-20
min. At each time point, radioactive GDP and GTP were resolved by TLC.
The upper panel depicts the percent conversion of GTP to GDP
quantified with a bio-imaging analyzer; the lower panel
shows a representative TLC profile at 20 min of incubation. GST and
GST-Rad were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. This
experiment was repeated three times with similar results.
subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. Although data base
searching has not shown any homology to previously known proteins
including GTPases, we found that menin contains within its N-terminal
region several sequence motifs similar to those found in all known
GTPases (G1 to G4) (27). Fig. 4 shows the consensus sequences for these motifs, which are known to be involved in
GTP binding and GTP hydrolysis, and the corresponding amino acids in
menin. The predicted G1 region (consensus GXXXXGK(S/T)), the
phosphate binding motif, begins at position 2 in the amino acid
sequence of menin, but the highly conserved second glycine is replaced
by glutamine (GLKAAQKT). The G2 region, a conserved threonine, which is
usually conserved within each GTPase family but not between different
subfamilies, cannot unambiguously be identified in the sequence of
menin, but a candidate threonine is found at positions 56 and 62. The
DXXG Mg2+ binding motif (G3) and the
(N/T)KXD guanine binding motif (G4) are found at positions
70-73 and 150-153, respectively. In addition, a motif similar to the
sequence G5 (consensus E(A/C/S/T)SA(K/L)) conserved in the small
GTPases (27), was also found in a non-canonical form (IASAK) at
positions 306-310.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Menin contains several sequence motifs found
in all GTPases. The consensus sequences for GTPase motifs numbered
G1-G5 (27), and corresponding amino acids of menin are shown. The
sequence alignments of consensus motifs found in GTPases of several
families are also shown. Bold type indicates residues conserved in
nearly all GTPases. Predicted GTPase motifs (closed bars)
are shown in the schematic diagram of menin.
-32P]GTP, GST-menin
bound GTP in a time-dependent manner, reaching a maximum by
20 min (Fig. 5A).
However, the relative binding affinity of GST-menin was much lower than
that of GST-Rad (Fig. 5, A and B).

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Menin binds GTP. A, GST
fusion proteins (40 pmol/30 µl) were incubated with 1 µCi of
[
-32P]GTP and subjected to filter binding assay at 10 mM MgCl2, and the amount of
[
-32P]GTP bound to proteins on the filters was quantified with a bio-imaging analyzer. The
lower panel shows an autoradiogram of the radioactivity
remaining on the filters at 20 min of incubation. B,
relative GTP binding affinity of GST-menin and GST-Rad. GST fusion
proteins and [
-32P]GTP were incubated with various
concentrations of unlabeled GTP for 60 min and subjected to filter
binding assay at 10 mM MgCl2. C,
binding of [
-32P]GTP to GST-menin in the absence or
presence of various concentrations of MgCl2. Results shown
in A and C are the means ± S.D. of three
separate experiments. D, binding of
[
-32P]GTP to GST-menin in the presence of competitors.
GST-menin was incubated with [
-32P]GTP in the absence
or presence of various nucleotides at various concentrations for 60 min. The lower panel shows a representative autoradiogram at
a concentration of 0.025 mM of the radioactivity remaining
on the filters. Results shown in B and D are
means from two separate experiments.
-32P]GTP was almost completely blocked by GTP and GDP
at higher concentrations than 0.01 mM, whereas GMP did not
compete (Fig. 5D). ATP, UTP, and CTP also competed to some
extent at high concentrations, but weakly when compared with GTP and GDP.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Menin immunoprecipitates exhibit
GTP-hydrolyzing activity. HEK293 cells transfected with FLAG-menin
expression vector were lysed with low-stringent or stringent buffer and
immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody. The immunoprecipitates were
then incubated with [
-32P]GTP. The reaction was
stopped by the addition of elution buffer and boiling for 5 min. The
labeled nucleotides were resolved by TLC and quantified with a
bio-imaging analyzer. Empty vector pCMV-tag2 and FLAG-Rad expression
vector were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.
A, a representative TLC profile at 20 min of incubation.
B, percent conversion of GTP to GDP quantified with a
bio-imaging analyzer. C, percent GMP hydrolyzed per total
guanine nucleotide (GMP + GDP + GTP). Low stringent and
stringent indicate lysis conditions used in
immunoprecipitation. Data shown are representative of three
experiments.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Decreased expression levels of menin missense
mutants. A, HEK293 cells transfected with 5 µg of
FLAG-tagged menin or 30 µg of mutant expression vector were lysed
with low-stringent buffer, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to
a GTP hydrolysis assay. For preparation of equal amounts of protein, a
smaller amount of wild-type plasmid was transfected. The total amount
of transfected plasmid DNA was equalized by adding empty vector. A
representative TLC profile at 20 min of incubation is shown.
B, HEK293 cells were transfected with 30 µg of FLAG-tagged
menin or mutant expression vector. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with anti-FLAG antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were resolved by
SDS-PAGE. The proteins were visualized on the gel by GelCode Blue Stain
reagent (Pierce) and blotted with anti-FLAG antibody. C,
HEK293 cells were co-transfected with expression vectors of one of the
FLAG-tagged menin variants (15 µg) and FLAG-luciferase
(Luc, 15 µg) as a co-transfection marker to monitor
transfection efficiency. The total amount of transfected plasmid DNA
was equalized by adding empty vector pCMV-tag2. Cell lysates were
blotted with anti-FLAG antibody.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]GTP to bind menin indicates that menin
specifically binds GDP as well as GTP. Moreover, the observed
Mg2+-dependent binding of GTP suggests that
menin binds GTP as a complex with Mg2+, like many GTPases
(28). These binding properties are shared by most GTPases. Considering
that menin binds GTP with a much lower affinity than Rad GTPase, the
lack of an effect of menin on the Rad-GAP activity of nm23 may be
explained by the notion that Rad as competitor completely blocked the
binding of menin to GTP. An alternative possible explanation is that
menin and Rad share the same binding site on nm23, and therefore, menin and Rad are mutually exclusive on binding to nm23. Moreover, we find it
interesting that menin contains several sequence motifs similar to
those found in all GTPases (27), which are known to be involved in GTP
binding and GTP hydrolysis.
-sheet and
surrounding
-helices (38) shows no tertiary structural similarity to
those of GAPs for Ras, Rho, or Ran subfamilies, which are mostly
helical (39). Nor does it contain any arginine residues that are good
candidates for arginine finger, which is often critical for the Ras-GAP
and Rho-GAP activities (39, 40). These observations suggest that nm23 can act on menin or Rad by a distinct catalytic mechanism of GAP action.
-signaling pathway through its interaction with
Smad3 (41), which interacts with JunD. Recently, menin has also been
shown to interact with NF-
B and repress NF-
B-mediated
transactivation (42). These findings provide some evidence that menin
may participate in transcriptional regulation through its association
with transcription factors; however, the molecular mechanism for tumor
suppression by menin remains elusive. We do not know whether the
GTP-hydrolyzing activity of menin plays a key role in transcriptional
regulation, but it is an interesting possibility. Menin has been said
to be a nuclear protein, but it is also found in cytosolic and membrane
fractions (12, 14, 44). Given the facts that most Ras-related proteins are membrane-associated and specific membrane localization is both
essential and central to their biological activity and that nm23
proteins are also found in cytosol or membrane fractions (45), it is
feasible that menin localized to the membrane or cytoplasm would have
distinct roles from that as a transcriptional regulator in the nucleus.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences of the Organization for Pharmaceutical Safety and Research of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a research resident fellowship from the Foundation
for Promotion of Cancer Research of Japan.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-3542-2511; Fax: 81-3-3542-8170; E-mail: nohkura@gan2.ncc.go.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204132200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: NDP, nucleoside diphosphate; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; DTT, dithiothreitol.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Wermer, P. (1954) Am. J. Med. 16, 363-371[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Ballard, H. S., Frame, B., and Hartsock, R. J. (1964) Am. J. Med. 43, 481-516 |
| 3. | Larsson, C., Skogseid, B., Oberg, K., Nakamura, Y., and Nordenskjold, M. (1988) Nature 332, 85-87[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Chandrasekharappa, S. C.,
Guru, S. C.,
Manickam, P.,
Olufemi, S. E.,
Collins, F. S.,
Emmert-Buck, M. R.,
Debelenko, L. V.,
Zhuang, Z.,
Lubensky, I. A.,
Liotta, L. A.,
Crabtree, J. S.,
Wang, Y.,
Roe, B. A.,
Weisemann, J.,
Boguski, M. S.,
Agarwal, S. K.,
Kester, M. B.,
Kim, Y. S.,
Heppner, C.,
Dong, Q.,
Spiegel, A. M.,
Burns, A. L.,
and Marx, S. J.
(1997)
Science
276,
404-407 |
| 5. |
Guo, S. S.,
and Sawicki, M. P.
(2001)
Mol. Endocrinol.
15,
1653-1664 |
| 6. | Tsukada, T., Yamaguchi, K., and Kameya, T. (2001) Endocr. Pathol. 12, 259-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Stewart, C., Parente, F., Piehl, F., Farnebo, F., Quincey, D., Silins, G., Bergman, L., Carle, G. F., Lemmens, I., Grimmond, S., Xian, C. Z., Khodei, S., Teh, B. T., Lagercrantz, J., Siggers, P., Calender, A., de Vem, V. V., Kas, K., Weber, G., Hayward, N., Gaudray, P., and Larsson, C. (1998) Oncogene 17, 2485-2493[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Maruyama, K., Tsukada, T., Hosono, T., Ohkura, N., Kishi, M., Honda, M., Nara-Ashizawa, N., Nagasaki, K., and Yamaguchi, K. (1999) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 156, 25-33[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Manickam, P., Vogel, A. M., Agarwal, S. K., Oda, T., Spiegel, A. M., Marx, S. J., Collins, F. S., Weinstein, B. M., and Chandrasekharappa, S. C. (2000) Mamm. Genome 11, 448-454[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Maruyama, K., Tsukada, T., Honda, M., Nara-Ashizawa, N., Noguchi, K., Cheng, J., Ohkura, N., Sasaki, K., and Yamaguchi, K. (2000) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 168, 135-140[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Wautot, V., Khodaei, S., Frappart, L., Buisson, N., Baro, E., Lenoir, G. M., Calender, A., Zhang, C. X., and Weber, G. (2000) Int. J. Cancer 85, 877-881[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Guru, S. C.,
Goldsmith, P. K.,
Burns, A. L.,
Marx, S. J.,
Spiegel, A. M.,
Collins, F. S.,
and Chandrasekharappa, S. C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1630-1634 |
| 13. | Agarwal, S. K., Guru, S. C., Heppner, C., Erdos, M. R., Collins, R. M., Park, S. Y., Saggar, S., Chandrasekharappa, S. C., Collins, F. S., Spiegel, A. M., Marx, S. J., and Burns, A. L. (1999) Cell 96, 143-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Kaji, H.,
Canaff, L.,
Goltzman, D.,
and Hendy, G. N.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
5097-5101 |
| 15. | Ohkura, N., Kishi, M., Tsukada, T., and Yamaguchi, K. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 282, 1206-1210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Steeg, P. S.,
Bevilacqua, G.,
Kopper, L.,
Thorgeirsson, U. P.,
Talmadge, J. E.,
Liotta, L. A.,
and Sobel, M. E.
(1988)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
80,
200-204 |
| 17. | Leone, A., Flatow, U., King, C. R., Sandeen, M. A., Margulies, I. M. K., Liotta, L. A., and Steeg, P. S. (1991) Cell 65, 25-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Kantor, J. D.,
McCormick, B.,
Steeg, P. S.,
and Zetter, B. R.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
1971-1973 |
| 19. | de la Rosa, A., Williams, R. L., and Steeg, P. S. (1995) Bioessays 17, 53-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Wagner, P. D.,
and Vu, N. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21758-21764 |
| 21. |
Stahl, J. A.,
Leone, A.,
Rosengard, A. M.,
Porter, L.,
King, C. R.,
and Steeg, P. S.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
445-449 |
| 22. |
MacDonald, N. J., De,
la Rosa, A.,
Benedict, M. A.,
Freije, J. M.,
Krutsch, H.,
and Steeg, P. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25780-25789 |
| 23. | Engel, M., Veron, M., Theisinger, B., Lacombe, M. L., Seib, T., Dooley, S., and Welter, C. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 234, 200-207[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Zhu, J.,
Tseng, Y.-H.,
Kantor, J. D.,
Rhodes, C. J.,
Zetter, B. R.,
Moyers, J. S.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14911-14918 |
| 25. |
Ohkura, N.,
Yaguchi, H.,
Tsukada, T.,
and Yamaguchi, K.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
535-543 |
| 26. |
Reynet, C.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1993)
Science
262,
1441-1444 |
| 27. | Bourne, H. R., Sanders, D. A., and McCormick, F. (1991) Nature 349, 117-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Feuerstein, J.,
Goody, R. S.,
and Wittinghofer, A.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
8455-8458 |
| 29. |
John, J.,
Rensland, H.,
Schlichting, I.,
Vetter, I.,
Borasio, G. D.,
Goody, R. S.,
and Wittinghofer, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
923-929 |
| 30. | Downward, J. (1992) Bioessays 14, 177-184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Takai, Y.,
Sasaki, T.,
and Matozaki, T.
(2001)
Physiol. Rev.
81,
153-208 |
| 32. | Yang, W., and Cerione, R. A. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 511-514 |
| 33. | Marks, B., Stowell, M. H., Vallis, Y., Mills, I. G., Gibson, A., Hopkins, C. R., and McMahon, H. T. (2001) Nature 410, 231-235[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Stowell, M. H., Marks, B., Wigge, P., and McMahon, H. T. (1999) Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 27-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Krishnan, K. S., Rikhy, R., Rao, S., Shivalkar, M., Mosko, M., Narayanan, R., Etter, P., Estes, P. S., and Ramaswami, M. (2001) Neuron 30, 197-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Settleman, J., Narasimhan, V., Foster, L. C., and Weinberg, R. A. (1992) Cell 69, 539-549[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Foster, R., Hu, K. Q.,
Shaywitz, D. A.,
and Settleman, J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
7173-7181 |
| 38. | Min, K., Song, H. K., Chang, C., Kim, S. Y., Lee, K. J., and Suh, S. W. (2002) Proteins 46, 340-342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Scheffzek, K., Ahmadian, M. R., and Wittinghofer, A. (1998) Trends. Biochem. Sci. 23, 257-262[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Seewald, M. J., Korner, C., Wittinghofer, A., and Vetter, I. R. (2002) Nature 415, 662-666[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Kaji, H.,
Canaff, L.,
Lebrun, J. J.,
Goltzman, D.,
and Hendy, G. N.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
3837-3842 |
| 42. | Heppner, C., Bilimoria, K. Y., Agarwal, S. K., Kester, M., Whitty, L. J., Guru, S. C., Chandrasekharappa, S. C., Collins, F. S., Spiegel, A. M., Marx, S. J., and Burns, A. L. (2001) Oncogene 20, 4917-4925[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Lemmens, I. H., Forsberg, L., Pannett, A. A., Meyen, E., Piehl, F., Turner, J. J., Van de Ven, W. J., Thakker, R. V., Larsson, C., and Kas, K. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 286, 426-431[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | Huang, S. C., Zhuang, Z., Weil, R. J., Pack, S., Wang, C., Krutzsch, H. C., Pham, T. A., and Lubensky, I. A. (1999) Lab. Invest. 79, 301-310[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. |
Kimura, N.,
and Shimada, N.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
4647-4653 |
| 46. |
Schwemmle, M.,
and Staeheli, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
11299-11305 |
| 47. |
Recio, J. A.,
Paez, J. G.,
Maskeri, B.,
Loveland, M.,
Velasco, J. A.,
and Notario, V.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
1720-1728 |
| 48. | Bross, P., Corydon, T. J., Andresen, B. S., Jorgensen, M. M., Bolund, L., and Gregersen, N. (1999) Hum. Mutat. 14, 186-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. |
Morra, M.,
Simarro-Grande, M.,
Martin, M.,
Chen, A. S.,
Lanyi, A.,
Silander, O.,
Calpe, S.,
Davis, J.,
Pawson, T.,
Eck, M. J.,
Sumegi, J.,
Engel, P., Li, S. C.,
and Terhorst, C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
36809-36816 |
| 50. |
Yu, Y., Xu, F.,
Peng, H.,
Fang, X.,
Zhao, S., Li, Y.,
Cuevas, B.,
Kuo, W. L.,
Gray, J. W.,
Siciliano, M.,
Mills, G. B.,
and Bast, R. C., Jr.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
214-219 |
| 51. |
Finlin, B. S.,
Gau, C. L.,
Murphy, G. A.,
Shao, H.,
Kimel, T.,
Seitz, R. S.,
Chiu, Y. F.,
Botstein, D.,
Brown, P. O.,
Der, C. J.,
Tamanoi, F.,
Andres, D. A.,
and Perou, C. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
42259-42267 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Karhu and L. A. Aaltonen Susceptibility to pituitary neoplasia related to MEN-1, CDKN1B and AIP mutations: an update Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2007; 16(R1): R73 - R79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Papaconstantinou, Y. Wu, H. N. Pretorius, N. Singh, G. Gianfelice, R. M. Tanguay, A. R. Campos, and P.-A. Bedard Menin Is a Regulator of the Stress Response in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2005; 25(22): 9960 - 9972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||