|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205513200 on August 12, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 42, 39515-39524, October 18, 2002
Differential, Tissue-specific, Transcriptional Regulation of
Apolipoprotein B Secretion by Transforming Growth Factor *
Karnail
Singh ,
Olcay A.
Batuman §,
Hassan O.
Akman ,
Mamdouh H.
Kedees ,
Varsha
Vakil , and
M. Mahmood
Hussain ¶
From the Departments of Anatomy and Cell Biology,
§ Medicine, and ¶ Pediatrics, SUNY Downstate Medical
Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203
Received for publication, June 4, 2002, and in revised form, August 9, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is required for the
assembly and secretion of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. ApoB
synthesis is constitutive, and post-translational mechanisms modulate
its secretion. Transforming growth factor (TGF- ) increased apoB
secretion in both differentiated and nondifferentiated Caco-2 cells and
decreased secretion in HepG2 cells without affecting apolipoprotein A-I
secretion. TGF- altered apoB secretion by changing steady-state
mRNA levels and protein synthesis. Expression of SMAD3 and SMAD4
differentially regulated apoB secretion in these cells. Thus, SMADs
mediate dissimilar secretion of apoB in both the cell lines by
affecting gene transcription. We identified a 485-bp element, 55 kb
upstream of the apob gene that contains a SMAD binding
motif. This motif increased the expression of chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase in Caco-2 cells treated with TGF- or transfected
with SMADs. Hence, TGF- activates SMADs that bind to the 485-bp
intestinal enhancer element in the apob gene and increase
its transcription and secretion in Caco-2 cells. This is the first
example showing differential transcriptional regulation of the
apob gene by cytokines and dissimilar regulation of one
gene in two different cell lines by TGF- . In this regulation, the
presence of cytokine-responsive motif in the tissue-specific enhancer
element confers cell-specific response.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The B apolipoproteins,
apoB-1001 and apoB-48, are
necessary for triglyceride-rich lipoprotein assembly and neutral lipid
transport in the body (1). There is only one apob gene in
the human genome, and its expression is limited to the liver,
intestine, and heart (2-6). The gene consists of 29 exons and 28 introns and exists as a 47.5-kb DNase-sensitive domain (7, 8). The
presence of proximal 5-kb and distal 1.5-kb sequences is sufficient for the expression of the apob gene in the liver and heart of
mice (9, 10). However, elements required for the transgenic expression of the apob gene in the intestine are located between 54 and
62 kb upstream of the structural gene (11). Within this region, 315-, 485-, and 690-bp enhancer elements have been identified. These elements
increase the expression of the basal promoter activity in intestinal
cells (12-14). Thus, the tissue-specific expression of the
apob gene depends on the far upstream, proximal, and distal sequences.
The apob gene transcription is believed to be constitutive,
and apoB levels are thought to change primarily by co- and
post-translational mechanisms. First, it was demonstrated that various
perturbations that increase apoB secretion do not affect apoB mRNA
levels (15). Second, it was demonstrated that oleic acid
supplementation increases apoB secretion in HepG2 cells by inhibiting
the intracellular degradation (16). Subsequent studies led to the
understanding that co- and post-translational mechanisms involving
degradation of nascent apoB are primarily involved in the modulation of
apoB secretion (17-21). However, apoB expression studies have
challenged this concept and indicated that transcriptional mechanisms
may also play a role in the control of apoB secretion. For example, the
amounts of apoB secreted by rat hepatoma McA-RH7777 cells stably
transfected with human apoB cDNAs were correlated with increases in
apoB mRNA levels (22). Similarly, increased plasma apoB levels were
correlated with the human transgene copy number in mice (3, 23-25). It
is conceivable that human apoB might have escaped the co- and
post-translational mechanisms in rats and mice, leading to increased
secretion. It is also possible that overexpression might have burdened
the post-translational control mechanisms and enhanced apoB secretion.
It remains to be determined whether modest changes in the transcription
of the endogenous apob gene would affect apoB secretion in
human cells.
Transforming growth factor (TGF- ) is a family of cytokines that
play a widespread role in various biological processes such as growth,
development, differentiation, apoptosis, embryogenesis and
anti-inflammation (26, 27). These cytokines are produced by most cell
types and exert paracrine, autocrine, and endocrine effects by
interacting with their cell surface serine/threonine kinase TGF-
receptors type I and type II. TGF- binds to type II receptors and
induces phosphorylation of the type I receptors. The phosphorylated
receptor I in turn phosphorylates the receptor SMADs. The
phosphorylated receptor SMADs bind to SMAD4, and the complex
translocates to the nucleus. The receptor SMADs and SMAD4 complex
affects the transcription of various genes by directly interacting with
the DNA sequences present in the promoter, enhancer, or repressor
elements or through physical interactions with other transcriptional
co-activators or co-repressors (26, 27). Ubiquitylation and
proteosome-dependent degradation of receptor SMADs in the nucleus provide a way to terminate the TGF- responses (26, 27). This
TGF- /SMAD signaling system has been shown to alter the transcription
of various genes such as collagen (28), the tissue plasminogen
activator inhibitor (29), the p21/WAF1/CiP1 cell cycle inhibitor (30),
and apoCIII (31). In addition to SMADs, mitogen-activated protein
kinases (MAP kinases) have also been shown to be the downstream
mediators of the TGF- response in many cell types and regulate gene
expression (27, 32-35).
TGF- has been postulated to play an important role in the normal
growth and differentiation of the intestinal and hepatic cells. TGF-
expression is the highest in the villus cells and the lowest in the
crypt cells (36). Enterocytes not only secrete cytokines but also
express their receptors (36, 37). It is known that TGF- levels are
increased during liver regeneration (38). Bissell et al.
(38) have shown that TGF- levels increase in hepatocytes after
injury and in lipocytes during inflammation and fibrosis. HepG2,
hepatoma, and Caco-2 (colon carcinoma) cells have been used as models
of human hepatic and intestinal cells, respectively, to study
lipoprotein assembly and cytokine response (39, 40). In HepG2 cells,
TGF- is expressed constitutively in an autocrine fashion and affects
the hepatic gene expression by binding to its cell surface receptors.
TGF- increases apoCIII expression in these cells (31). Caco-2 cells
express many acute phase proteins inducible by cytokines (41) and have
detectable levels of TGF- mRNA (37). It has been shown that
proinflammatory cytokines like IL-1 , IL-6, and tumor necrosis
factor- decrease the secretion of apoB by Caco-2 cells, whereas
anti-inflammatory TGF- increases apoB secretion (42). The effect of
TGF- on apoB secretion by liver cells has not been described. Here,
we show that TGF- differentially affects apoB secretion in these cells, and this effect is mediated by SMAD3 and SMAD4. Furthermore, a
cis-element has been localized to 55 kb upstream of the
apob gene that responds to TGF- and increases apoB
secretion in Caco-2 cells.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Recombinant TGF- 2 was from R & D Systems,
Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). Antibodies used for the determination of apoB
have been described (43, 44). Bovine serum albumin (BSA), MAP kinase inhibitor PD98059, and other chemicals were from Sigma. Monoclonal anti-apoA-1 antibody, 4H1, was from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. Polyclonal anti-apoA-1 antibodies were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. The -galactosidase assay kit was from Invitrogen. [14C]Chloramphenicol and Trans-35S label were
from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Irvine, CA).
Plasmids--
The human and mouse promoter/enhancer plasmids,
85CAT, 690CAT, 315CAT, 485(F)CAT, and 485(R)CAT have been described
before (12, 14) and were kindly provided by Dr. Beatriz Levy-Wilson (Stanford University) (45). In these plasmids, expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) is under the control of various
apoB promoter/enhancer elements. The 3TP-Lux construct (a gracious gift
from Dr. Joan Massague (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New
York, NY)) contains three AP-1 sites from a collagenase promoter, a
SMAD binding region from the PAI-1 promoter, and an
adenovirus E4 promoter (46). Dr. Rik Derynck and Ying Zhang (University
of California, San Francisco, CA) generously provided the expression
vectors encoding the human SMAD3 and SMAD4 (47).
Cell Cultures and TGF- Treatments--
Caco-2 (human colon
carcinoma) cells were cultured (37 °C, 5% CO2,
humidified atmosphere) in 75-mm2 flasks (Corning
Glassworks, Corning NY) in high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (DMEM) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS),
L-glutamine, and antibiotic/antimycotic mixture. Cells from
70-80% confluent flasks were seeded onto polycarbonate micropore
membranes that were inserted into Transwells® (24-mm diameter, 3-µm
pore size; Corning Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA), and then the media
were changed every other day for 14-36 days. For experiments, the
apical and the basolateral sides were washed three times with DMEM, and
the cells were then incubated for 8-24 h in DMEM plus 0.1% BSA. This
was to minimize the exposure of these cells to cytokines present in
FBS. Cells were then washed and incubated with 2.0 ml of DMEM plus
0.1% BSA on the apical sides of the Transwells. The basolateral sides
received 2.0 ml of DMEM supplemented with 0.1% BSA and different
concentrations of either TGF- 1 or TGF- 2. Cells were then
incubated (37 °C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere) for
17 h. The basolateral conditioned media were used for the
determination of apoB and apoA-I levels (48).
HepG2 (human hepatoma) cells were cultivated in 75-mm2
flasks (Corning Glass) in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS,
L-glutamine and antibiotic/antimycotic mixture at 37 °C
in 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cells from 70-80%
confluent flasks were seeded into six-well plates (Corning Costar
Corp.). Subconfluent (70-80%) cell monolayers were washed thrice with
DMEM and incubated for 8-24 h in the presence of DMEM plus 0.1% BSA
to minimize their exposure to cytokines present in the serum. These
cells were then washed and incubated for 17 h (37 °C, 5%
CO2, humidified atmosphere) with 2.0 ml of DMEM containing
0.1% BSA along with different concentrations of either TGF- 1 or
TGF- 2. The culture media and cells were collected for further processing.
Synthesis of ApoB--
After 17 h of incubation with
TGF- 2, differentiated Caco-2 and HepG2 cells were washed with DMEM.
HepG2 cells received 2.0 ml of methionine/cysteine-free DMEM containing
0.1% BSA and 10 ng/ml of TGF- 2. In the case of Caco-2 cells, the
apical sides received 2.0 ml of methionine/cysteine-free DMEM plus
0.1% BSA, and the basolateral side received 2.0 ml of
methionine/cysteine-free DMEM plus 0.1% BSA containing 10 ng/ml of
TGF- 2. After 1 h, 100 µCi of Trans-[35S] label
were added to each well (to the apical side in the case of Caco-2
cells), and the cells were then incubated for the indicated time
periods. Cells were washed with cold DMEM containing methionine and
cysteine and were lysed with 0.5 ml of immunoprecipitation lysis buffer
(phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% deoxycholate, 1% SDS, 1%
Triton X-100, 20 mM methionine, 1 mM cysteine,
and protease inhibitor mixture). The cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatants were precleared with 10 µl of protein A + G-Sepharose and used for
immunoprecipitation. Precleared cell lysates and the media (basolateral
media in the case of Caco-2 cells) were incubated overnight at 4 °C
in a rocker with 5 µl of sheep anti-human apoB antibodies. The
antigen-antibody complexes were precipitated by adding 20 µl of
protein A + G-Sepharose and rocking at 4 °C for 2 h. The
samples were spun at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 2 min, and the
supernatants were discarded. The pellets were washed three times with
immunoprecipitation lysis buffer and once with PBS and were finally
suspended in 1× Laemmli sample buffer. The suspensions were heated at
95 °C for 5 min and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 2 min. The
clear supernatants were applied to SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and
proteins were separated by electrophoresis. The gels were fixed, dried,
and exposed to the PhosphorImager screen. The intensity of each band
was quantified with ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences).
RNA Quantifications--
HepG2 cells and differentiated Caco-2
cells were incubated for 17 h either with or without 10 ng/ml
TGF- 2. The total RNA was extracted from the cells using Trizol
reagent (Invitrogen) by following the manufacturer's
instructions. The total RNA (15 µg) was then run on a denaturing
agarose gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane in 20× SSC
(20× 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate).
The RNA was cross-linked to the membrane by exposing it to the UV
light. Prehybridization was carried out for 3 h in Quikhyb
hybridization solution (Stratagene), and hybridization was carried out
in the same solution in the presence of radiolabeled probes and 100 µg/ml denatured and sheared salmon sperm DNA. To prepare different
radiolabeled probes, apoB and GAPDH fragments were amplified and
labeled with [ -32P]dCTP by using the Random Primers
DNA Labeling System (Invitrogen). Membranes were then washed with 2×
SSC, 0.1% SDS and exposed overnight to a PhosphorImager screen, and
RNA levels were quantified with ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences).
For RT-PCR, 1 µg of total RNA isolated from nontreated and
TGF- -treated Caco-2 and HepG2 cells was used. A blend of Omniscript and Sensiscript reverse transcriptase provided in the QuantiTect RT Mix
(QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA) was used
according to the manufacturer's instructions to reverse transcribe and
amplify apoB and GAPDH sequences. Primers used for apoB and GAPDH were
gcactctgcaggggatcccccagatgattggagag and tgatgcccatatttgtcac (apoB) and
cagcccagaacatcatccctg and tgttacttataccgatgtcgttg (GAPDH). The reverse
transcription was performed at 50 °C for 15 min and stopped by
incubating at 95 °C for 15 min. This treatment also denatures the
newly synthesized template cDNA and activates TaqDNA
polymerase. PCR conditions were 94 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. The products were
electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel, and the bands were quantified by scanning.
Transient Expression of Transgenes--
Varying amounts (5-10
µg) of plasmid DNAs along with 1 µg of an internal reference
plasmid (pCMV- -gal) were incubated with Fugene-6 (Roche Diagnostic)
and introduced to subconfluent (~70%) monolayers of Caco-2 and HepG2
cells in 75-mm2 flasks and then incubated for 24 h. An
equal number of cells were then transferred to six-well plates or
Transwells. After 24 h, the cells were washed with DMEM and
incubated for 8 h with DMEM containing 0.1% BSA, washed, and
treated with or without TGF- . Three wells received DMEM plus 0.1%
BSA containing 10 ng/ml TGF- , whereas the remaining three wells
served as controls (in the case of Transwells, TGF- was added to the
basolateral side). The cells were incubated for 17 h at 37 °C,
5% CO2 in humidified atmosphere, and the medium (from the
basolateral side in the case of Transwells) was collected and assayed
for apoB mass. Cells were washed and collected in lysis buffer (Promega
Corp., Madison, WI). The cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at
10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and supernatants were used for the
determination of cellular protein levels and different enzyme activities.
Other Methods--
Cell protein was quantified by the Bradford
method (49) using Coomassie Blue reagent (Pierce). ApoB and apoA-I were
quantified by sandwich ELISA (43, 44). The -galactosidase and CAT
activities were assayed as described previously (50, 51). The CAT
activity levels were quantified with PhosphorImager analysis and the
ImageQuant program and were corrected for transfection efficiencies
between the flasks by dividing with the -galactosidase activity
values. Luciferase activity was measured as per the manufacturer's
instructions (Promega Corp.).
 |
RESULTS |
Differential Effects of TGF- on ApoB Secretion by Caco-2 and
HepG2 Cells--
To investigate the effect of TGF- on apoB
secretion by HepG2 and differentiated (17-20 days postplating), Caco-2
cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of TGF- 2 (Fig.
1). The amount of apoB secreted by the
control Caco-2 and HepG2 cells was 944 ± 59 and 1266 ± 82 ng/well, respectively, in agreement with our earlier studies (44, 48,
52-54). In Caco-2 cells, TGF- 2 showed a
concentration-dependent increase in the amount of apoB
secreted into the basolateral medium. At 10 ng/ml, TGF- 2 increased
apoB secretion by 56 ± 10%. The increases ranged from 20 to 80%
in different experiments. At higher concentrations, no further increase
in apoB secretion was observed, indicating that the maximum effect was
achieved at 10 ng/ml TGF- 2. In contrast, TGF- 2 showed a
concentration-dependent decrease in the amount of apoB
secreted by HepG2 cells (Fig. 1). The decrease in apoB secretion was
20% at 5 ng/ml and reached a maximum of 30% inhibition at 15 ng/ml.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of different concentrations of
TGF- 2 on the secretion of apoB by
differentiated Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. Caco-2 cells were plated on
six-well Transwells and used after 16 days. For experiments, the cells
were preincubated with DMEM for 24 h and subsequently treated with
TGF- . For this treatment, Caco-2 cells received DMEM on the apical
side and DMEM containing different concentrations of TGF- (0-20
ng/ml) on the basolateral side. After 17 h, the amounts of apoB
present in the basolateral media were quantified by ELISA performed in
triplicate as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data
are representative of three independent experiments. HepG2 cells were
plated in 24-well plates and used after 2 days. For experiments, the
cells were preincubated with DMEM for 24 h and subsequently
treated with TGF- . HepG2 cells received different concentrations of
TGF- in DMEM. After 17 h, the amounts of apoB present in the
media were quantified by ELISA performed in triplicate.
|
|
Next, we compared the effect of TGF- 1 and TGF- 2 on apoB secretion
in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 2). Both
TGF- 1 and TGF- 2 augmented (16-25%) apoB secretion in Caco-2
cells and attenuated (23-30%) apoB secretion in HepG2 cells,
indicating that both of these molecules have similar biologic effects.
In subsequent experiments, we only used TGF- 2 because of more
consistent results and relatively better responses. To determine the
earliest time point required for TGF- 2 to exert its effects on apoB
secretion, we performed time course experiments. These experiments
revealed that statistically significant differential effects on apoB
secretion in both cell lines were first apparent after 8 h of
treatment (data not shown). These studies showed that TGF-
differentially regulates apoB secretion in intestine and liver-derived
cell lines.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of TGF- 1 and
TGF- 2 on apoB secretion by Caco-2 and HepG2
cells. Caco-2 cells were plated in six-well Transwells, cultured
in DMEM plus 20% FBS for 14 days, preincubated in DMEM containing
0.1% BSA for 24 h, and incubated with DMEM plus 0.1% BSA
containing 10 ng/ml of TGF- 1 ( 1) or TGF- 2
( 2) for 18 h. HepG2 cells were plated in 24-well
plates, preincubated in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA for 24 h, and
incubated in DMEM plus 0.1% BSA with 10 ng/ml of TGF- 1 or TGF- 2
for 18 h. Controls (C) received DMEM containing 0.1%
BSA only. ELISA measured apoB in the conditioned media. The data
are representative of two independent experiments.
|
|
Effect of TGF- Is Independent of the State of Differentiation of
Caco-2 Cells--
In the studies described above, a major difference
between Caco-2 and HepG2 cells was their state of differentiation; the Caco-2 cells were plated in Transwells and allowed to differentiate for
about 2 weeks, whereas HepG2 cells were used 2-3 days after plating.
Thus, diverse effects of TGF- might be related to the differentiation of Caco-2 cells. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of TGF- on Caco-2 cells after 2 days of plating along with HepG2 cells (Fig. 3). As seen
before, treatment of HepG2 cells with TGF- decreased apoB secretion
by ~25%. As expected, nondifferentiated Caco-2 cells secreted
(54 ± 7 ng/well) significantly smaller amounts of apoB than the
differentiated cells (see above), in agreement with other studies (48,
52). Nonetheless, treatment of these cells increased apoB secretion by
26% (Fig. 3). These experiments were extended to study the effect of
TGF- during the entire course of differentiation of Caco-2 cells.
Determination of the differentiation of Caco-2 cells by measuring
sucrase activity has been described before (48). Cells were plated in
Transwells, and the effect of TGF- was studied at different times
(5, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, and 36 days after plating) as described in the legend to Fig. 1. TGF- increased (20-90%) the
secretion of apoB by Caco-2 cells at all of the time periods tested.
Such long term cell culture experiments could not be performed with
HepG2 cells because these cells do not differentiate with time;
instead, they come off the plates. These studies point out that the
increased secretion of apoB by TGF- was independent of the
differentiation of Caco-2 cells.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of TGF- in
nondifferentiated Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 and HepG2 cells were plated
in six-well plates and allowed to grow up to 60-70% confluence (~48
h postplating). The cells were then incubated in DMEM plus 0.1% BSA
for 24 h. Subsequently, they were incubated in triplicate with 2 ml of DMEM containing 0.1% BSA in the presence or absence of 10 ng/ml
TGF- 2 for 8 h. The conditioned medium was used to measure the
mass of apoB as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
To determine the specificity of TGF- action, we studied the effects
of TGF- on cellular protein levels and apoA-I secretion (Table
I). TGF- treatment had no
significant effect on cellular protein levels in both cell lines. In
accordance with the studies described above, TGF- treatment
significantly increased (43%) apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells. In
contrast, TGF- had no significant effect on apoA-I secretion in
these cells. In HepG2 cells, TGF- significantly decreased (35%)
apoB secretion and is in concert with the studies described above. The
secretion of apoA-I appeared to increase by ~11%, but this effect
was no longer statistically significant when corrected for cell
protein. We also studied the effect of TGF- 2 on the secretion of
apoA-I in differentiated Caco-2 cells and observed no significant
effect (data not shown). Thus, TGF- specifically and differentially
modulates apoB secretion and exerts no significant effect on the
cellular protein levels and apoA-I secretion in these cells.
TGF- Alters Steady State ApoB mRNA Levels--
Next, we
attempted to understand the mechanisms involved in the differential
regulation of apoB secretion in these cells. It is known that apoB
synthesis is constitutive (15), and the amounts of apoB secreted are
generally modulated by intracellular degradation (17, 19, 20). To
evaluate the role of intracellular degradation as a possible mechanism
for TGF- effects, we performed pulse-chase experiments. These
studies revealed that the major effect of TGF- was at the end of the
pulse period. After a 30-min pulse, the amounts of apoB100 in HepG2
cells treated and untreated with TGF- were 33291 and 22065 PhosphorImager units, respectively. Thus, TGF- -treated HepG2 cells
synthesized 33% less apoB100 than the control cells. To study this
effect further, cells were either treated or not with TGF- for
17 h and pulsed with Trans-35S-label for various
times, and the amounts of apoB in cells were quantified after
immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4). The amounts
of apoB100 present in TGF- -treated HepG2 cells were lower (30-60%) at all times than in the control cells (Fig. 4A). Except for
one time point, the amounts of apoB100 present in TGF- -treated
Caco-2 cells were higher (40-110%) than in the control cells (Fig.
4B). Similarly, TGF- -treated cells contained more apoB48
than the control Caco-2 cells (Fig. 4C). These studies
indicate that TGF- differentially affects apoB synthesis in these
cells.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
TGF- differentially
affects apoB synthesis in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. HepG2 and
differentiated Caco-2 cells were first pretreated for 17 h with or
without TGF- (10 ng/ml) in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA. Second, they
were treated or not with TGF- in methionine- and cysteine-free DMEM
for 1 h. Finally, the cells were labeled with 100 µCi of
Trans-35S label for different indicated times in the
presence or absence of TGF- . Cells were washed with cold DMEM
containing methionine and cysteine and were collected in
immunoprecipitation lysis buffer as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Cell lysates were first incubated with protein A + G-agarose for 1 h at 4 °C and centrifuged. The supernatants
were then incubated with 5 µl of sheep anti-human apoB antibodies and
20 µl of protein A + G-agarose for 17 h at 4 °C. The
immunoprecipitates were washed twice and suspended in 1× Laemmli
sample buffer, and proteins were separated using 4-12%
SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels. Electrophoresed gels were fixed,
dried, and exposed to a PhosphorImager screen. The intensity of each
band was quantified with ImageQuantTM software.
|
|
Consideration was then given to the possibility that the modulation of
apoB synthesis may be related to changes in the steady state apoB
mRNA levels. Total RNA was isolated from the control cells and
cells treated with 10 ng/ml TGF- for 17 h. Northern blot
analysis revealed that TGF- increased steady state levels of apoB
mRNA in Caco-2 cells by 54% and decreased its levels by 39% in
HepG2 cells (Fig. 5A). Changes
in mRNA levels were also studied by RT-PCR. In these experiments,
conditions were optimized for the maximum apoB amplification, and the
size of the apoB fragment amplified was smaller than that of GAPDH.
Probably for these reasons, the amounts of apoB amplified were
qualitatively higher than GAPDH. Nonetheless, comparative studies
showed that TGF- treatment increased (50%) apoB mRNA levels in
Caco-2 cells and decreased (38%) in HepG2 cells (Fig. 5B).
Thus, TGF- differentially affects the steady state levels of apoB
mRNA in these cells.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
TGF- treatment
affects steady state apoB mRNA levels in Caco-2 and HepG2
cells. A, Northern analysis. HepG2 and differentiated
Caco-2 cells were treated either with or without TGF- (10 ng/ml) for
17 h as described in the legend to Fig. 1 and under
"Experimental Procedures." The cells were washed with PBS, and the
total RNA was isolated using Trizol RNA extraction reagent. The RNA (15 µg) was used for Northern blot analysis as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The bands corresponding to apoB and
GAPDH were quantified, and the ratios were calculated. The ratios in
the control cells were normalized to 100%. C and
T, RNA obtained from control and TGF- -treated cells,
respectively. The data are representative of four independent
experiments. B, RT-PCR. 1 µg of total RNA from nontreated
(C) and TGF- -treated (T) cells were used for
RT-PCR using a QuantiTect RT-PCR kit as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The products were separated on agarose gels and
quantified.
|
|
TGF- Signaling via SMADs Dissimilarly Affects ApoB Secretion in
Caco-2 and HepG2 Cells--
The effect of TGF- on apoB mRNA
levels indicated that TGF- might affect apoB gene transcription. To
our knowledge, TGF- has not been shown to affect mRNA stability.
However, TGF- is known to alter gene expression by modulating gene
transcription (26, 27, 55, 56). It is also known that mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAP kinases) and SMAD proteins are involved in the
downstream mediation of the TGF- response in many cell types (27,
55, 55-59). In order to investigate the involvement of MAP kinases, we
used a specific inhibitor, PD98059 (27, 32-34). We reasoned that, if
MAP kinases were involved, inhibition of MAP kinases would abolish the
modulation of apoB secretion by TGF- . Caco-2 and HepG2 cells were
treated with TGF- in the presence or absence of PD98059 (Table
II). TGF- increased apoB secretion by
39% in Caco-2 cells. Surprisingly, PD98059 alone increased apoB
secretion by 80% in these cells. Treatment of these cells with TGF-
and PD98059 augmented apoB secretion greater than that observed for the
individual treatments. In fact, the 111% increase was close to the
calculated additive increase of 119%. Again, in HepG2 cells, TGF-
decreased apoB secretion by 25%. Surprisingly, PD98059 also attenuated
apoB secretion. In this case, the decrease was 27%. Both TGF- and
PD98059 decreased apoB secretion by 41%, an inhibition that was more
than the individual responses and was comparable with the expected
additive change of 52%. Most likely, TGF- and PD98059 independently
and additively modulate apoB secretion in these cells. Thus, TGF-
does not appear to modulate apoB secretion via the MAP kinase
pathway.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Effect of PD98059 and TGF- on apoB secretion by Caco-2 and HepG2
cells
Caco-2 cells were plated in 12-well Transwell plates and allowed to
differentiate for 3 weeks. HepG2 cells were transferred to 12-well
plates and used after 3 days. Cells were incubated in DMEM containing
0.1% BSA for 8 h. Subsequently, cells were treated as described
below for 17 h in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA. Conditioned medium
was used in triplicate to measure apoB levels. Cell monolayers were
extracted in lysis buffer and used in triplicate for protein
determination. The data are representative of two independent
experiments.
|
|
To investigate the potential role of SMAD proteins in the
TGF- -mediated signal transduction, we overexpressed these proteins in HepG2 and Caco-2 cells (Fig. 6).
First, the effect of overexpression of SMADs on the expression of
luciferase in the 3TP-Lux reporter plasmid was studied in HepG2 cells
untreated and treated with TGF- (Fig. 6A). In 3TP-Lux,
luciferase is under the control of SMAD binding enhancer elements
derived from the PAI-1 gene (46). HepG2 cells
transfected with 3TP-Lux showed basal levels of luciferase activity,
and this activity was increased 3-fold after TGF- treatment (Fig.
6A). Co-expression of 3TP-Lux with SMAD3 and SMAD4 resulted in a 43-fold increase in the basal expression of luciferase. TGF- treatment increased this activity to 69-fold of the basal activity in
untreated cells. These control studies indicate that HepG2 cells
respond to TGF- and SMAD expression and are in agreement with other
studies (31, 46). Next, we studied the effect of the overexpression of
SMADs on apoB (Fig. 6B) and apoA-I (Fig. 6C)
secretion in HepG2 cells. The treatment of control cells (not overexpressing SMADs) with TGF- resulted in 29% decreased secretion of apoB by HepG2 cells (Fig. 6B). More importantly,
overexpression of SMAD3 and -4 decreased the secretion of apoB by
~40% when compared with untreated controls (Fig.
6B, SMADs 3 & 4, untreated). TGF- treatment of these cells did not potentiate the effects of SMADs. In
contrast to apoB, the secretion of apoA-I was unaffected by the TGF-
treatment of control cells and by the overexpression of SMADs (Fig.
6C). TGF- treatment of SMAD-expressing cells, however,
slightly increased (~10%) apoA-I secretion (Fig. 6C). Next, we studied the effect of overexpression of SMADs on apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells (Fig. 6D). Treatment of control
cells with TGF- resulted in a significant increase (~43%) in apoB
secretion. A similar increase (~34%) in apoB secretion was also
observed by the overexpression of SMAD3 and -4. TGF- treatment of
SMAD-expressing cells did not further potentiate the effect of SMADs on
apoB secretion. The secretion of apoA-I by Caco-2 cells remained
unperturbed by all of these manipulations (Fig. 6E). These
studies showed that the overexpression of SMADs mimics the effect of
TGF- treatment in both cell lines and that SMAD-expressing cells are
resilient to TGF- treatment. Thus, we conclude that SMAD3 and -4 mediate the differential effect of TGF- on apoB secretion in both
cell lines.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Modulation of apoB secretion by
TGF- is mediated by SMADs. HepG2 cells.
One 75-mm2 flask received 5 µg of 3TP-Lux vector, 5 µg
of CMV- -galactosidase plasmid, and 20 µg of salmon sperm DNA
complexed with Fugene-6 (control). Another flask received 10 µg each
of CMV-SMAD3 and CMV-SMAD4 expression vectors instead of the salmon
sperm DNA (SMAD3 and -4). After 24 h, cells from each flask were
transferred to a six-well plate. After 8 h of subculturing in
serum-containing media, the cells were incubated in DMEM containing
0.1% BSA for 24 h. Cells were then treated in triplicate with
DMEM plus 0.1% BSA in the presence (TGF- ) or absence (untreated) of
10 ng/ml TGF- 2 for 17 h. Medium was used for apoB and apoA-I
measurements. Cells were collected in 500 µl of 1× lysis buffer
(Promega Corp.) and were used to measure cellular protein levels and
luciferase and -galactosidase activities. A, the
luciferase activity corrected for the -galactosidase activity.
B and C, the amounts of apoB and apoA-I,
respectively, present in the media. Approximately 60% confluent
Caco-2 cells in two 75-mm2 flasks were exposed to
DNA-Fugene-6 complexes for 24 h as described above for HepG2
cells. The cells were subcultured into six-well Transwell plates and
maintained in DMEM containing 20% FBS for 48 h. Cells were
pretreated with DMEM containing 0.1% BSA for 24 h and treated or
not with 10 ng/ml TGF- for 17 h. Basolateral medium was used
for apoB (D) and apoA-I (E) measurements.
|
|
Identification of Enhancer Elements in the apob Gene
That Respond to TGF- --
It is known that SMADs modulate gene
transcription by interacting with either cis-elements or
transcription factors (27, 55-57, 59). To determine whether SMADs were
modulating apob gene expression by directly interacting with
cis-elements, we studied the effects of TGF- on the expression of
CAT under the control of a minimal apoB promoter. The minimal promoter
sequences required for apoB expression in the liver and intestinal
cells are 85 to +121 bp (4). For this reason, the 85CAT construct
(Fig. 7A) was transiently
transfected in HepG2 and Caco-2 cells, and the effect of TGF- was
studied on the expression of the CAT activity (Fig. 7B). CAT
expression was minimal under the control of a minimal promoter
( 85CAT) in both cell lines. More importantly, the expression of CAT
was not affected by TGF- treatment in these cells. Furthermore, overexpression of SMADs had no effect on 85CAT expression in Caco-2
cells. These studies indicated that the minimal apoB promoter does not
respond to TGF- treatment and SMAD overexpression.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Identification of cis-elements in the
apob gene required for increased apoB secretion in
Caco-2 cells. A, schematic diagram of different
expression vectors. In the 85CAT expression vector, CAT is under the
control of a minimal apoB promoter composed of 85 to +121 bp. The numbers represent the location of the
base pairs in relation to the transcription start site of the
apob gene. In the 690CAT expression plasmid, a mouse 690-bp
intestinal enhancer element is placed upstream of the minimal apoB
promoter in a forward direction as found in the apob gene.
In the 315CAT construct, CAT expression is under the control of the
315-bp human intestinal enhancer element in the forward direction. CAT
expression in 485(F)CAT and 485(R)CAT vectors is under the control of
the 485-bp human intestinal enhancer element in the forward and reverse
orientations, respectively. B, HepG2 and Caco-2 cells were
transfected with 85CAT or 690CAT expression vectors with or without
SMAD3 and -4 (S 3+4) expression vectors as
described in the legend to Fig. 6. Cells were subcultured in six-well
plates and treated or not with TGF- as described in the legend to
Fig. 6 and under "Experimental Procedures." C, Caco-2
cells (75-mm2 flasks, ~70% confluent) were transfected
with various indicated expression vectors. After 24 h, each flask
was subcultured into six-well plates. After 32 h, the cells were
treated or not in triplicate with TGF- for 17 h as described in
the legend to Fig. 6 and under "Experimental Procedures." Cell
lysates were used to measure protein concentration, -galactosidase,
and CAT activities.
|
|
In some instances, it has been shown that SMADs bind to CAGAC sequences
and modulate gene transcription (56, 60). To identify the presence of
the TGF- response element, we searched for SMAD binding sequences in
the apob gene. We found a SMAD-binding site in a 690-bp
sequence 55 kb upstream of the mouse apob gene that confers
intestinal expression (12). To determine whether these sequences were
responsible for the increased apoB secretion after TGF- treatment in
Caco-2 cells, we expressed CAT under the control of a minimal apoB
promoter in the presence and absence of the mouse intestinal enhancer
element (Fig. 7B, 690CAT). The 690-bp enhancer element
increased the expression of CAT by 17-fold in Caco-2 cells. More
importantly, the CAT expression increased (~40%) after TGF-
treatment. Furthermore, co-expression of 690CAT with SMAD3 and -4 (690CAT + S3 + 4) resulted in a
21-fold increase in the enzyme activity. However, TGF- treatment did
not potentiate this response in the presence of SMADs. Next, we
determined whether 690CAT would respond to TGF- in HepG2 cells.
Expression of 690CAT in HepG2 cells was higher than 85 CAT, and this
expression was increased after TGF- treatment. These studies
indicated that the TGF- -responsive element is indeed present in the
690-bp enhancer element present in the mouse apob gene. If
functionally active, this sequence would enhance apoB secretion in both
liver and intestine-derived cell lines.
Subsequently, we turned our attention to the regulatory elements in the
human apob gene. Antes et al. (12) identified a 315-bp human intestinal enhancer element that was homologous to the
690-bp mouse intestinal enhancer element. Subsequently, they also
identified a 485-bp sequence upstream of the 315 bp required for the
intestinal expression of apoB (14). The 485-bp sequence contains a SMAD
binding site, whereas the 315-bp sequence does not. We examined whether
these sequences respond to TGF- (Fig. 7C). In accordance
with the studies of Antes et al. (12, 13), both 315-bp
(315CAT) and 485-bp (485(F)CAT) enhancer elements increased the level
of CAT expression in Caco-2 cells. TGF- treatment had no significant
effect on the CAT activity when expressed under the control of the
315-bp enhancer element. In contrast, TGF- increased the CAT
expression under the control of the 485-bp enhancer element.
Furthermore, expression of the CAT activity under the 485-bp enhancer
(485(R)CAT) element in a reverse orientation failed to respond to
TGF- . Note that the 485-bp element in reverse orientation does not
act as an enhancer and is in concert with earlier reports (14). These
studies establish that the 485-bp enhancer element that contains a SMAD
binding site in the forward orientation responds to TGF- in Caco-2 cells.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Differential Effects of TGF- on ApoB Secretion in Liver and
Intestine-derived Cells--
The present studies demonstrate that
TGF- has dissimilar effects on apoB secretion in Caco-2 and HepG2
cells. These two cell lines have been used extensively as models for
intestinal and hepatic lipoprotein assembly and secretion and to study
tissue-specific cytokine responses (39, 40). TGF- increased apoB
secretion in Caco-2 cells and decreased secretion in HepG2 cells (Figs. 1-3). The differential effect was specific to apoB, since apoA-I secretion was unaffected by TGF- . The increased secretion of apoB by
Caco-2 cells after TGF- treatment is in agreement with the studies
of Murthy et al. (42). They showed that TGF- increased apoB synthesis, had no effect on intracellular apoB degradation, and
increased the secretion of apoB and triacylglycerols. The effect of
TGF- on apoB secretion in HepG2 cells has not been described before.
In contrast to TGF- , tumor necrosis factor- has been shown to
decrease apoB secretion in both Caco-2 and HepG2 cells (61-63). It is
known that TGF- up- and down-regulates different genes in different
tissues. For example, the expression of apoCIII (31) is increased in
HepG2 cells, and the expression of CD36 (32) is decreased in
macrophages. However, we are unaware of dissimilar regulation of the
same gene in different tissues by TGF- . Thus, the differential
regulation of apoB secretion in two different cell lines represents a
new mode of regulation by cytokines.
TGF- is known to inhibit cell proliferation and modulate
differentiation (26, 36, 55, 57, 60). It was conceivable that the
decreased secretion of apoB in HepG2 cells was related to decreased
cellular proliferation. Treatment of these cells with TGF- for
17 h did not affect cellular protein levels, indicating that
during the experimental conditions TGF- did not induce significant cellular proliferation (Table I, Fig. 6). Consideration was given to
the possibility that apoB secretion by Caco-2 cells might be related to
the cellular differentiation. We observed that TGF- exerts its
effect at all times and is independent of the differentiation state of
Caco-2 cells (Figs. 2 and 3). Thus, the modulation of apoB secretion by
TGF- is not related to the proliferative or differentiated states of
these cells.
Transcriptional Mechanisms Are Involved in the Regulation of ApoB
Secretion--
Attempts to understand the mechanisms involved in the
regulation of apoB secretion revealed that TGF- altered steady state mRNA levels and apoB synthesis in these cell lines (Figs. 4 and 5).
Studies in Caco-2 cells showing increased synthesis and increased mRNA levels after exposure to TGF- are in agreement with those of Murthy et al. (42). Based on these observations, we
hypothesized that TGF- was regulating the transcription of the
apob gene. The hypothesis was confirmed by the use of
reporter constructs expressing CAT under the control of apoB gene
promoter/enhancer sequences. TGF- increased the CAT activity when
expressed under the control of intestinal enhancer elements that
contain a SMAD binding TGF- -responsive element. These studies
suggest that TGF- modulates apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells by
altering apoB gene transcription.
Although post-translational mechanisms are recognized
as major regulatory steps in the secretion of apoB (15, 17),
transcriptional regulation may also play an important role in the
control of apoB levels and may be of therapeutic importance. For
example, changes in apoB secretion have been correlated with changes in
mRNA levels in HepG2 cells treated with 25-hydroxycholesterol (64)
and different amino acids (65, 66). Overexpression of apoB in cells
results in increased apoB mRNA levels and apoB secretion (22). The
transgenic expression of apoB in mice results in increased plasma apoB
levels (23, 24, 67). A mutation in the human apob gene
promoter that increases transcription has been correlated with
increased apoB plasma levels in humans (68). Thus, it is likely that
tweaking the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms might modulate apoB levels. Alterations in the transcriptional control are expected to
result in modest changes due to the interplay between various positive
and negative control mechanisms that coordinate apob gene
transcription. Modest changes in apoB levels are desirable, because
both overexpression and deficiency of apoB lead to metabolic and
pathologic disorders.
One Command, Same Messengers, Different Outcomes--
TGF- is
known to transduce signals by MAP kinases (27, 32-34) or by SMADs (27,
55-57, 59). We had anticipated that the two different mechanisms might
lead to differential apoB secretion in two different cell lines.
Inhibition of MAP kinases resulted in an additive response with TGF-
(Table II) excluding the involvement of MAP kinases as downstream
mediators/regulators of the TGF- response in both of the cell lines.
In contrast, overexpression of SMAD3 and -4 in these cells mimicked the
TGF- response, and cells overexpressing SMADs did not alter apoB
secretion in response to TGF- . Thus, we conclude that the
differential response to TGF- in both cells is mediated by SMADs.
Several studies have established that the TGF- signaling pathway is
mediated by SMADs. In HepG2 cells, transcriptional regulation of SMAD7
by TGF- requires the participation of SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD4 (69).
In these cells, TGF- induces furin transcription involving SMAD2 and
SMAD4 (70). Liu et al. have demonstrated that
TGF- -induced phosphorylation of SMAD3 is required for the inhibition
of epithelial cell proliferation (71). SMADs have been shown to
participate in TGF- -induced regulation of p21 and apoCIII in HepG2
cells (30, 31). Furthermore, constitutive phosphorylation and nuclear
localization of SMAD3 have been correlated with increased collagen gene
transcription in activated hepatic stellate cells (72). In the
intestinal epithelial cells, overexpression of oncogenic
ras has been shown to decrease SMAD4 expression, inhibit
interaction of SMAD4 with SMAD2/SMAD3, and repress TGF- -mediated growth inhibition (73).
How do SMADs bring about differential regulation in two different cell
lines? We have identified the SMAD binding site in the intestinal
enhancer element of the apob gene and showed that this
enhancer element responds to TGF- and increases the expression of a
reporter gene. Thus, the increased apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells is
due to the binding of SMADs to the intestinal enhancer 55 kb upstream
of the apob gene. We speculate that SMADs may interact with
other transcription factors required for liver expression, inhibit
their binding to cis-elements, and decrease apoB secretion in HepG2 cells. Thus, the cell-specific response is most likely determined by the tissue-specific regulatory elements of the gene. TGF- uses SMADs in both cell lines as messengers to convey its signal. The outcome of the signal in the two cell lines is different, because the apob gene uses different tissue-specific
enhancer elements for its expression in the intestine and liver.
Genetic Context Defines TGF- Responsiveness of the apob
Gene--
TGF- is known to cause different responses in different
types of cells, and its effect is generally explained in terms of the
"cellular" context (27, 60). For example, TGF- stimulates cellular proliferation in fibroblasts and inhibits it in keratinocytes (27, 60). It is generally believed that the binding of SMADs to the
CAGAC sequence and their association with adapters, partners, co-activators, or co-repressors define the cellular context. Based on
the following discussion, we propose that the gene itself may define
the TGF- response and that SMADs are the transducers and not the
determining factors in regulating apolipoprotein gene expression.
Furthermore, a combination of different responses by individual genes
may define the cellular context of TGF- action.
First, the presence of the CAGAC sequence does not always confer
TGF- responsiveness. It is known that apoCIII, a member of the
apoAI·apoCIII·apoAIV gene complex, responds to TGF- (31). However, our studies indicate that apoA-I does not respond to TGF- .
Thus, the presence of a SMAD binding site in the control region of a
gene does not always confer TGF- responsiveness. Second, different
control elements respond differently to the same signal, and the extent
of the response varies in the same cell. For example, TGF- treatment
increases 3TP-Lux expression and decreases apoB expression in HepG2
cells (Fig. 6). SMAD overexpression increases 3TP-Lux expression by
severalfold and is further augmented after TGF- treatment (Fig.
6A). In contrast, SMAD overexpression decreases apoB
secretion by ~30%, and this response is resilient to further TGF-
treatment. Most likely, the effect of SMADs is counterbalanced by other
factors that bind apob enhancer elements. Third, evidence
for the genetic context comes from the studies with 690CAT (Fig. 7).
The 690-bp enhancer elements respond to TGF- by increasing the CAT
in both HepG2 and Caco-2 cells. Thus, if an enhancer element is
transcriptionally active, then it will respond similarly in both the
cell lines. Thus, we propose that the genetic context determines the
TGF- responsiveness.
In summary, we have shown that TGF- dissimilarly affects apoB
secretion in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. TGF- binds to its cell surface
receptors and activates SMADs that in turn move to the nucleus and
dissimilarly regulate apob gene transcription in these cells. In Caco-2 cells, SMADs most likely bind to the 485-bp intestinal enhancer in the apob gene and enhance its transcription,
leading to an increase in apoB secretion. The differential regulation of apoB secretion by TGF- appears to represent a novel mode of regulation by cytokines involving signaling mechanisms that target tissue-specific enhancer elements. In this type of regulation, two
organs express the same gene using two different tissue-specific regulatory elements. The presence of different cytokine-responsive elements in these tissue-specific regulatory regions allows for dissimilar regulation by cytokines. These studies raise the possibility that signaling mechanisms modulate apoB secretion, and a tweaking of
these mechanisms can be of therapeutic interest in changing apoB levels.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The technical assistance of Zeng-Xiu Liu and
Yong Meng is gratefully acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants DK-46900 and HL-64272 (to M. M. H.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
An Established Investigator of the American Heart Association.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Anatomy and Cell
Biology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave., Box 5, Brooklyn, NY 11203. Fax: 718-270-2436; E-mail:
mahmood.hussain@downstate.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205513200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
apo, apolipoprotein;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
TGF- , transforming growth factor ;
IL, interleukin;
BSA, bovine serum
albumin;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
RT, reverse
transcriptase;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
CMV, cytomegalovirus.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Havel, R. J.,
and Kane, J. P.
(1995)
in
The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disorders
(Scriver, C. R.
, Beaudet, A. L.
, Sly, W. S.
, and Valle, D., eds)
, pp. 1841-1851, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York
|
| 2.
|
Young, S. G.
(1990)
Circulation
82,
1574-1594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Kim, E.,
and Young, S. G.
(1998)
J. Lipid Res.
39,
703-723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Levy-Wilson, B.
(1995)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
50,
161-190[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hussain, M. M.,
Kancha, R. K.,
Zhou, Z.,
Luchoomun, J., Zu, H.,
and Bakillah, A.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1300,
151-170[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Zannis, V. I.,
Kan, H. Y.,
Kritis, A.,
Zanni, E.,
and Kardassis, D.
(2001)
Front. Biosci.
6,
D456-D504[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Ludwig, E. H.,
Blackhart, B. D.,
Pierotti, V. R.,
Caiati, L.,
Fortier, C.,
Knott, T.,
Scott, J.,
Mahley, R. W.,
Levy-Wilson, B.,
and McCarthy, B. J.
(1987)
DNA
6,
363-372[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Ludwig, E. H.,
Levy-Wilson, B.,
Knott, T.,
Blackhart, B. D.,
and McCarthy, B. J.
(1991)
DNA Cell Biol.
10,
329-338[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Borén, J.,
Véniant, M. M.,
and Young, S. G.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
1197-1202[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Nielsen, L. B.,
Sullivan, M.,
Vanni-Reyes, T.,
Goldberg, I. J.,
and Young, S. G.
(1999)
J. Mol. Cell Cardiol.
31,
695-703[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
McCormick, S. P. A., Ng, J. K.,
Véniant, M.,
Borén, J.,
Pierotti, V.,
Flynn, L. M.,
Grass, D. S.,
Connolly, A.,
and Young, S. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11963-11970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Antes, T. J.,
Goodart, S. A.,
Huynh, C.,
Sullivan, M.,
Young, S. G.,
and Levy-Wilson, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26637-26648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Antes, T. J.,
Namciu, S. J.,
Fournier, R. E.,
and Levy-Wilson, B.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
6731-6742[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Antes, T. J.,
Goodart, S. A.,
Chen, W.,
and Levy-Wilson, B.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
6720-6730[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Pullinger, C. R.,
North, J. D.,
Teng, B. B.,
Rifici, V. A.,
Ronhild de Brito, A. E.,
and Scott, J.
(1989)
J. Lipid Res.
30,
1065-1077[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Dixon, J. L.,
Furukawa, S.,
and Ginsberg, H. N.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
5080-5086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Dixon, J. L.,
and Ginsberg, H. N.
(1993)
J. Lipid Res.
34,
167-179[Abstract]
|
| 18.
|
Fisher, E. A.,
and Ginsberg, H. N.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
17377-17380[Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Yao, Z.,
Tran, K.,
and McLeod, R. S.
(1997)
J. Lipid Res.
38,
1937-1953[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
Fisher, E. A.,
Pan, M.,
Chen, X., Wu, X.,
Wang, H.,
Jamil, H.,
Sparks, J. D.,
and Williams, K. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
27855-27863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Gillian-Daniel, D. L.,
Bates, P. W.,
Tebon, A.,
and Attie, A. D.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99,
4337-4342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Selby, S. L.,
and Yao, Z.
(1995)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
15,
1900-1910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Linton, M. F.,
Farese, R. V., Jr.,
Chiesa, G.,
Grass, D. S.,
Chin, P.,
Hammer, R. E.,
Hobbs, H. H.,
and Young, S. G.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
92,
3029-3037[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Callow, M. J.,
Stoltzfus, L. J.,
Lawn, R. M.,
and Rubin, E. M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2130-2134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Fan, J. L.,
McCormick, S. P. A.,
Krauss, R. M.,
Taylor, S.,
Quan, R.,
Taylor, J. M.,
and Young, S. G.
(1995)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
15,
1889-1899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Massague, J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
753-791[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Massague, J.
(2000)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
1,
169-178[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Vindevoghel, L.,
Kon, A.,
Lechleider, R. J.,
Uitto, J.,
Roberts, A. B.,
and Mauviel, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13053-13057[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Dennler, S.,
Itoh, S.,
Vivien, D.,
Ten Dijke, P.,
Huet, S.,
and Gauthier, J. M.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3091-3100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Moustakas, A.,
and Kardassis, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6733-6738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Kardassis, D.,
Pardali, K.,
and Zannis, V. I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
41405-41414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Han, J.,
Hajjar, D. P.,
Tauras, J. M.,
Feng, J.,
Gotto, A. M., Jr.,
and Nicholson, A. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1241-1246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Chin, B. Y.,
Petrache, I.,
Choi, A. M.,
and Choi, M. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11362-11368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Atfi, A.,
Djelloul, S.,
Chastre, E.,
Davis, R.,
and Gespach, C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1429-1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Bhowmick, N. A.,
Zent, R.,
Ghiassi, M.,
McDonnell, M.,
and Moses, H. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
46707-46713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Barnard, J. A.,
Beauchamp, R. D.,
Coffey, R. J.,
and Moses, H. L.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
1578-1582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Eckmann, L.,
Jung, H. C.,
Schurer-Maly, C.,
Panja, A.,
Morzycka-Wroblewska, E.,
and Kagnoff, M. F.
(1993)
Gastroenterology
105,
1689-1697[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Bissell, D. M.,
Wang, S. S.,
Jarnagin, W. R.,
and Roll, F. J.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
447-455[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Javitt, N. B.
(1990)
FASEB J.
4,
161-168[Abstract]
|
| 40.
|
Levy, E.,
Mehran, M.,
and Seidman, E.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
626-635[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Molmenti, E. P.,
Ziambaras, T.,
and Perlmutter, D. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14116-14124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Murthy, S.,
Mathur, S. N.,
Varilek, G.,
Bishop, W.,
and Field, F. J.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.
270,
G94-G102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Hussain, M. M.,
Zhao, Y.,
Kancha, R. K.,
Blackhart, B. D.,
and Yao, Z.
(1995)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
15,
485-494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Bakillah, A.,
Zhou, Z.,
Luchoomun, J.,
and Hussain, M. M.
(1997)
Lipids
32,
1113-1118[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Antes, T. J.,
and Levy-Wilson, B.
(2001)
DNA Cell Biol.
20,
67-74[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Wieser, R.,
Attisano, L.,
Wrana, J. L.,
and Massague, J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7239-7247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Derynck, R.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Feng, X. H.
(1998)
Cell
95,
737-740[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Luchoomun, J.,
and Hussain, M. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
19565-19572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Edlund, T.,
Walker, M. D.,
Barr, P. J.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1985)
Science
230,
912-916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Gorman, C. M.,
Moffat, L. F.,
and Howard, B. H.
(1982)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
1044-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Luchoomun, J.,
Zhou, Z.,
Bakillah, A.,
Jamil, H.,
and Hussain, M. M.
(1997)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
17,
2955-2963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Nayak, N.,
Harrison, E. H.,
and Hussain, M. M.
(2001)
J. Lipid Res.
42,
272-280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Zhou, Z.,
Luchoomun, J.,
Bakillah, A.,
and Hussain, M. M.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1391,
13-24[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Attisano, L.,
and Wrana, J. L.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
235-243[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Massague, J.,
and Wotton, D.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
1745-1754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Christian, J. L.,
and Nakayama, T.
(1999)
Bioessays
21,
382-390[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Laping, N. J.,
Grygielko, E.,
Mathur, A.,
Butter, S.,
Bomberger, J.,
Tweed, C.,
Martin, W.,
Fornwald, J.,
Lehr, R.,
Harling, J.,
Gaster, L.,
Callahan, J. F.,
and Olson, B. A.
(2002)
Mol. Pharmacol.
62,
58-64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Baker, J. C.,
and Harland, R. M.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
7,
467-473[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Massague, J.,
and Chen, Y. G.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
627-644[Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Murthy, S.,
Mathur, S. N.,
and Field, F. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
9222-9229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Mehran, M.,
Seidman, E.,
Marchand, R.,
Gurbindo, C.,
and Levy, E.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.
269,
G953-G960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Ettinger, W. H.,
Varma, V. K.,
Sorci-Thomas, M.,
Parks, J. S.,
Sigmon, R. C.,
Smith, T. K.,
and Verdery, R. B.
(1994)
Arterioscler. Thromb.
14,
8-13[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Dashti, N.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
7160-7169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Zhang, Z.,
Sniderman, A. D.,
Kalant, D., Vu, H.,
Monge, J. C.,
Tao, Y.,
and Cianflone, K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26920-26926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 66.
|
Cianflone, K.,
Zhang, Z., Vu, H.,
Kohen-Avramoglu, R.,
Kalant, D.,
and Sniderman, A. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29136-29145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Chiesa, G. L.,
Johnson, D. F.,
Yao, Z.,
Innerarity, T. L.,
Mahley, R. W.,
Young, S. G.,
Hammer, R. H.,
and Hobbs, H. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23747-23750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 68.
|
Van't Hooft, F. M.,
Jormsjo, S.,
Lundahl, B.,
Tornvall, P.,
Eriksson, P.,
and Hamsten, A.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
1686-1694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Stopa, M.,
Anhuf, D.,
Terstegen, L.,
Gatsios, P.,
Gressner, A. M.,
and Dooley, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
29308-29317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 70.
|
Blanchette, F.,
Rudd, P.,
Grondin, F.,
Attisano, L.,
and Dubois, C. M.
(2001)
J. Cell. Physiol.
188,
264-273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 71.
|
Liu, X.,
Sun, Y.,
Constantinescu, S. N.,
Karam, E.,
Weinberg, R. A.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10669-10674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 72.
|
Inagaki, Y.,
Mamura, M.,
Kanamaru, Y.,
Greenwel, P.,
Nemoto, T.,
Takehara, K.,
Ten Dijke, P.,
and Nakao, A.
(2001)
J. Cell. Physiol.
187,
117-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 73.
|
Saha, D.,
Datta, P. K.,
and Beauchamp, R. D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
29531-29537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Iqbal and M. M. Hussain
Intestinal lipid absorption
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
June 1, 2009;
296(6):
E1183 - E1194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Bartolome, B. Arteta, M. J. Martinez, Y. Chico, and B. Ochoa
Kupffer cell products and interleukin 1? directly promote VLDL secretion and apoB mRNA up-regulation in rodent hepatocytes
Innate Immunity,
August 1, 2008;
14(4):
255 - 266.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Fatma, R. Yakubov, K. Anwar, and M. M. Hussain
Pluronic L81 enhances triacylglycerol accumulation in the cytosol and inhibits chylomicron secretion
J. Lipid Res.,
November 1, 2006;
47(11):
2422 - 2432.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Anwar, H. J. Kayden, and M. M. Hussain
Transport of vitamin E by differentiated Caco-2 cells
J. Lipid Res.,
June 1, 2006;
47(6):
1261 - 1273.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Allen, K. B. Piontek, E. Garrett-Mayer, M. Garcia-Gonzalez, K. L. Gorelick, and G. G. Germino
Loss of polycystin-1 or polycystin-2 results in dysregulated apolipoprotein expression in murine tissues via alterations in nuclear hormone receptors
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
January 1, 2006;
15(1):
11 - 21.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Iqbal and M. M. Hussain
Evidence for multiple complementary pathways for efficient cholesterol absorption in mice
J. Lipid Res.,
July 1, 2005;
46(7):
1491 - 1501.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|