Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205513200 on August 12, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 42, 39515-39524, October 18, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/42/39515    most recent
M205513200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Differential, Tissue-specific, Transcriptional Regulation of Apolipoprotein B Secretion by Transforming Growth Factor beta *

Karnail SinghDagger , Olcay A. BatumanDagger §, Hassan O. AkmanDagger , Mamdouh H. KedeesDagger , Varsha VakilDagger , and M. Mahmood HussainDagger ||

From the Departments of Dagger  Anatomy and Cell Biology, § Medicine, and  Pediatrics, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203

Received for publication, June 4, 2002, and in revised form, August 9, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Apolipoprotein B (apoB) is required for the assembly and secretion of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. ApoB synthesis is constitutive, and post-translational mechanisms modulate its secretion. Transforming growth factor beta  (TGF-beta ) increased apoB secretion in both differentiated and nondifferentiated Caco-2 cells and decreased secretion in HepG2 cells without affecting apolipoprotein A-I secretion. TGF-beta altered apoB secretion by changing steady-state mRNA levels and protein synthesis. Expression of SMAD3 and SMAD4 differentially regulated apoB secretion in these cells. Thus, SMADs mediate dissimilar secretion of apoB in both the cell lines by affecting gene transcription. We identified a 485-bp element, 55 kb upstream of the apob gene that contains a SMAD binding motif. This motif increased the expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in Caco-2 cells treated with TGF-beta or transfected with SMADs. Hence, TGF-beta activates SMADs that bind to the 485-bp intestinal enhancer element in the apob gene and increase its transcription and secretion in Caco-2 cells. This is the first example showing differential transcriptional regulation of the apob gene by cytokines and dissimilar regulation of one gene in two different cell lines by TGF-beta . In this regulation, the presence of cytokine-responsive motif in the tissue-specific enhancer element confers cell-specific response.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The B apolipoproteins, apoB-1001 and apoB-48, are necessary for triglyceride-rich lipoprotein assembly and neutral lipid transport in the body (1). There is only one apob gene in the human genome, and its expression is limited to the liver, intestine, and heart (2-6). The gene consists of 29 exons and 28 introns and exists as a 47.5-kb DNase-sensitive domain (7, 8). The presence of proximal 5-kb and distal 1.5-kb sequences is sufficient for the expression of the apob gene in the liver and heart of mice (9, 10). However, elements required for the transgenic expression of the apob gene in the intestine are located between 54 and 62 kb upstream of the structural gene (11). Within this region, 315-, 485-, and 690-bp enhancer elements have been identified. These elements increase the expression of the basal promoter activity in intestinal cells (12-14). Thus, the tissue-specific expression of the apob gene depends on the far upstream, proximal, and distal sequences.

The apob gene transcription is believed to be constitutive, and apoB levels are thought to change primarily by co- and post-translational mechanisms. First, it was demonstrated that various perturbations that increase apoB secretion do not affect apoB mRNA levels (15). Second, it was demonstrated that oleic acid supplementation increases apoB secretion in HepG2 cells by inhibiting the intracellular degradation (16). Subsequent studies led to the understanding that co- and post-translational mechanisms involving degradation of nascent apoB are primarily involved in the modulation of apoB secretion (17-21). However, apoB expression studies have challenged this concept and indicated that transcriptional mechanisms may also play a role in the control of apoB secretion. For example, the amounts of apoB secreted by rat hepatoma McA-RH7777 cells stably transfected with human apoB cDNAs were correlated with increases in apoB mRNA levels (22). Similarly, increased plasma apoB levels were correlated with the human transgene copy number in mice (3, 23-25). It is conceivable that human apoB might have escaped the co- and post-translational mechanisms in rats and mice, leading to increased secretion. It is also possible that overexpression might have burdened the post-translational control mechanisms and enhanced apoB secretion. It remains to be determined whether modest changes in the transcription of the endogenous apob gene would affect apoB secretion in human cells.

Transforming growth factor beta  (TGF-beta ) is a family of cytokines that play a widespread role in various biological processes such as growth, development, differentiation, apoptosis, embryogenesis and anti-inflammation (26, 27). These cytokines are produced by most cell types and exert paracrine, autocrine, and endocrine effects by interacting with their cell surface serine/threonine kinase TGF-beta receptors type I and type II. TGF-beta binds to type II receptors and induces phosphorylation of the type I receptors. The phosphorylated receptor I in turn phosphorylates the receptor SMADs. The phosphorylated receptor SMADs bind to SMAD4, and the complex translocates to the nucleus. The receptor SMADs and SMAD4 complex affects the transcription of various genes by directly interacting with the DNA sequences present in the promoter, enhancer, or repressor elements or through physical interactions with other transcriptional co-activators or co-repressors (26, 27). Ubiquitylation and proteosome-dependent degradation of receptor SMADs in the nucleus provide a way to terminate the TGF-beta responses (26, 27). This TGF-beta /SMAD signaling system has been shown to alter the transcription of various genes such as collagen (28), the tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor (29), the p21/WAF1/CiP1 cell cycle inhibitor (30), and apoCIII (31). In addition to SMADs, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAP kinases) have also been shown to be the downstream mediators of the TGF-beta response in many cell types and regulate gene expression (27, 32-35).

TGF-beta has been postulated to play an important role in the normal growth and differentiation of the intestinal and hepatic cells. TGF-beta expression is the highest in the villus cells and the lowest in the crypt cells (36). Enterocytes not only secrete cytokines but also express their receptors (36, 37). It is known that TGF-beta levels are increased during liver regeneration (38). Bissell et al. (38) have shown that TGF-beta levels increase in hepatocytes after injury and in lipocytes during inflammation and fibrosis. HepG2, hepatoma, and Caco-2 (colon carcinoma) cells have been used as models of human hepatic and intestinal cells, respectively, to study lipoprotein assembly and cytokine response (39, 40). In HepG2 cells, TGF-beta is expressed constitutively in an autocrine fashion and affects the hepatic gene expression by binding to its cell surface receptors. TGF-beta increases apoCIII expression in these cells (31). Caco-2 cells express many acute phase proteins inducible by cytokines (41) and have detectable levels of TGF-beta mRNA (37). It has been shown that proinflammatory cytokines like IL-1beta , IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha decrease the secretion of apoB by Caco-2 cells, whereas anti-inflammatory TGF-beta increases apoB secretion (42). The effect of TGF-beta on apoB secretion by liver cells has not been described. Here, we show that TGF-beta differentially affects apoB secretion in these cells, and this effect is mediated by SMAD3 and SMAD4. Furthermore, a cis-element has been localized to 55 kb upstream of the apob gene that responds to TGF-beta and increases apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Recombinant TGF-beta 2 was from R & D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). Antibodies used for the determination of apoB have been described (43, 44). Bovine serum albumin (BSA), MAP kinase inhibitor PD98059, and other chemicals were from Sigma. Monoclonal anti-apoA-1 antibody, 4H1, was from the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. Polyclonal anti-apoA-1 antibodies were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. The beta -galactosidase assay kit was from Invitrogen. [14C]Chloramphenicol and Trans-35S label were from ICN Biomedicals, Inc. (Irvine, CA).

Plasmids-- The human and mouse promoter/enhancer plasmids, -85CAT, 690CAT, 315CAT, 485(F)CAT, and 485(R)CAT have been described before (12, 14) and were kindly provided by Dr. Beatriz Levy-Wilson (Stanford University) (45). In these plasmids, expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) is under the control of various apoB promoter/enhancer elements. The 3TP-Lux construct (a gracious gift from Dr. Joan Massague (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY)) contains three AP-1 sites from a collagenase promoter, a SMAD binding region from the PAI-1 promoter, and an adenovirus E4 promoter (46). Dr. Rik Derynck and Ying Zhang (University of California, San Francisco, CA) generously provided the expression vectors encoding the human SMAD3 and SMAD4 (47).

Cell Cultures and TGF-beta Treatments-- Caco-2 (human colon carcinoma) cells were cultured (37 °C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere) in 75-mm2 flasks (Corning Glassworks, Corning NY) in high glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), L-glutamine, and antibiotic/antimycotic mixture. Cells from 70-80% confluent flasks were seeded onto polycarbonate micropore membranes that were inserted into Transwells® (24-mm diameter, 3-µm pore size; Corning Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA), and then the media were changed every other day for 14-36 days. For experiments, the apical and the basolateral sides were washed three times with DMEM, and the cells were then incubated for 8-24 h in DMEM plus 0.1% BSA. This was to minimize the exposure of these cells to cytokines present in FBS. Cells were then washed and incubated with 2.0 ml of DMEM plus 0.1% BSA on the apical sides of the Transwells. The basolateral sides received 2.0 ml of DMEM supplemented with 0.1% BSA and different concentrations of either TGF-beta 1 or TGF-beta 2. Cells were then incubated (37 °C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere) for 17 h. The basolateral conditioned media were used for the determination of apoB and apoA-I levels (48).

HepG2 (human hepatoma) cells were cultivated in 75-mm2 flasks (Corning Glass) in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, L-glutamine and antibiotic/antimycotic mixture at 37 °C in 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cells from 70-80% confluent flasks were seeded into six-well plates (Corning Costar Corp.). Subconfluent (70-80%) cell monolayers were washed thrice with DMEM and incubated for 8-24 h in the presence of DMEM plus 0.1% BSA to minimize their exposure to cytokines present in the serum. These cells were then washed and incubated for 17 h (37 °C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere) with 2.0 ml of DMEM containing 0.1% BSA along with different concentrations of either TGF-beta 1 or TGF-beta 2. The culture media and cells were collected for further processing.

Synthesis of ApoB-- After 17 h of incubation with TGF-beta 2, differentiated Caco-2 and HepG2 cells were washed with DMEM. HepG2 cells received 2.0 ml of methionine/cysteine-free DMEM containing 0.1% BSA and 10 ng/ml of TGF-beta 2. In the case of Caco-2 cells, the apical sides received 2.0 ml of methionine/cysteine-free DMEM plus 0.1% BSA, and the basolateral side received 2.0 ml of methionine/cysteine-free DMEM plus 0.1% BSA containing 10 ng/ml of TGF-beta 2. After 1 h, 100 µCi of Trans-[35S] label were added to each well (to the apical side in the case of Caco-2 cells), and the cells were then incubated for the indicated time periods. Cells were washed with cold DMEM containing methionine and cysteine and were lysed with 0.5 ml of immunoprecipitation lysis buffer (phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% deoxycholate, 1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 20 mM methionine, 1 mM cysteine, and protease inhibitor mixture). The cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatants were precleared with 10 µl of protein A + G-Sepharose and used for immunoprecipitation. Precleared cell lysates and the media (basolateral media in the case of Caco-2 cells) were incubated overnight at 4 °C in a rocker with 5 µl of sheep anti-human apoB antibodies. The antigen-antibody complexes were precipitated by adding 20 µl of protein A + G-Sepharose and rocking at 4 °C for 2 h. The samples were spun at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 2 min, and the supernatants were discarded. The pellets were washed three times with immunoprecipitation lysis buffer and once with PBS and were finally suspended in 1× Laemmli sample buffer. The suspensions were heated at 95 °C for 5 min and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 2 min. The clear supernatants were applied to SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and proteins were separated by electrophoresis. The gels were fixed, dried, and exposed to the PhosphorImager screen. The intensity of each band was quantified with ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences).

RNA Quantifications-- HepG2 cells and differentiated Caco-2 cells were incubated for 17 h either with or without 10 ng/ml TGF-beta 2. The total RNA was extracted from the cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) by following the manufacturer's instructions. The total RNA (15 µg) was then run on a denaturing agarose gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane in 20× SSC (20× 0.15 M NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate). The RNA was cross-linked to the membrane by exposing it to the UV light. Prehybridization was carried out for 3 h in Quikhyb hybridization solution (Stratagene), and hybridization was carried out in the same solution in the presence of radiolabeled probes and 100 µg/ml denatured and sheared salmon sperm DNA. To prepare different radiolabeled probes, apoB and GAPDH fragments were amplified and labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP by using the Random Primers DNA Labeling System (Invitrogen). Membranes were then washed with 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS and exposed overnight to a PhosphorImager screen, and RNA levels were quantified with ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences).

For RT-PCR, 1 µg of total RNA isolated from nontreated and TGF-beta -treated Caco-2 and HepG2 cells was used. A blend of Omniscript and Sensiscript reverse transcriptase provided in the QuantiTect RT Mix (QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR Kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions to reverse transcribe and amplify apoB and GAPDH sequences. Primers used for apoB and GAPDH were gcactctgcaggggatcccccagatgattggagag and tgatgcccatatttgtcac (apoB) and cagcccagaacatcatccctg and tgttacttataccgatgtcgttg (GAPDH). The reverse transcription was performed at 50 °C for 15 min and stopped by incubating at 95 °C for 15 min. This treatment also denatures the newly synthesized template cDNA and activates TaqDNA polymerase. PCR conditions were 94 °C for 15 s, 55 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. The products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel, and the bands were quantified by scanning.

Transient Expression of Transgenes-- Varying amounts (5-10 µg) of plasmid DNAs along with 1 µg of an internal reference plasmid (pCMV-beta -gal) were incubated with Fugene-6 (Roche Diagnostic) and introduced to subconfluent (~70%) monolayers of Caco-2 and HepG2 cells in 75-mm2 flasks and then incubated for 24 h. An equal number of cells were then transferred to six-well plates or Transwells. After 24 h, the cells were washed with DMEM and incubated for 8 h with DMEM containing 0.1% BSA, washed, and treated with or without TGF-beta . Three wells received DMEM plus 0.1% BSA containing 10 ng/ml TGF-beta , whereas the remaining three wells served as controls (in the case of Transwells, TGF-beta was added to the basolateral side). The cells were incubated for 17 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in humidified atmosphere, and the medium (from the basolateral side in the case of Transwells) was collected and assayed for apoB mass. Cells were washed and collected in lysis buffer (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The cell lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and supernatants were used for the determination of cellular protein levels and different enzyme activities.

Other Methods-- Cell protein was quantified by the Bradford method (49) using Coomassie Blue reagent (Pierce). ApoB and apoA-I were quantified by sandwich ELISA (43, 44). The beta -galactosidase and CAT activities were assayed as described previously (50, 51). The CAT activity levels were quantified with PhosphorImager analysis and the ImageQuant program and were corrected for transfection efficiencies between the flasks by dividing with the beta -galactosidase activity values. Luciferase activity was measured as per the manufacturer's instructions (Promega Corp.).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Differential Effects of TGF-beta on ApoB Secretion by Caco-2 and HepG2 Cells-- To investigate the effect of TGF-beta on apoB secretion by HepG2 and differentiated (17-20 days postplating), Caco-2 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of TGF-beta 2 (Fig. 1). The amount of apoB secreted by the control Caco-2 and HepG2 cells was 944 ± 59 and 1266 ± 82 ng/well, respectively, in agreement with our earlier studies (44, 48, 52-54). In Caco-2 cells, TGF-beta 2 showed a concentration-dependent increase in the amount of apoB secreted into the basolateral medium. At 10 ng/ml, TGF-beta 2 increased apoB secretion by 56 ± 10%. The increases ranged from 20 to 80% in different experiments. At higher concentrations, no further increase in apoB secretion was observed, indicating that the maximum effect was achieved at 10 ng/ml TGF-beta 2. In contrast, TGF-beta 2 showed a concentration-dependent decrease in the amount of apoB secreted by HepG2 cells (Fig. 1). The decrease in apoB secretion was 20% at 5 ng/ml and reached a maximum of 30% inhibition at 15 ng/ml.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of different concentrations of TGF-beta 2 on the secretion of apoB by differentiated Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. Caco-2 cells were plated on six-well Transwells and used after 16 days. For experiments, the cells were preincubated with DMEM for 24 h and subsequently treated with TGF-beta . For this treatment, Caco-2 cells received DMEM on the apical side and DMEM containing different concentrations of TGF-beta (0-20 ng/ml) on the basolateral side. After 17 h, the amounts of apoB present in the basolateral media were quantified by ELISA performed in triplicate as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data are representative of three independent experiments. HepG2 cells were plated in 24-well plates and used after 2 days. For experiments, the cells were preincubated with DMEM for 24 h and subsequently treated with TGF-beta . HepG2 cells received different concentrations of TGF-beta in DMEM. After 17 h, the amounts of apoB present in the media were quantified by ELISA performed in triplicate.

Next, we compared the effect of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 on apoB secretion in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 2). Both TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 augmented (16-25%) apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells and attenuated (23-30%) apoB secretion in HepG2 cells, indicating that both of these molecules have similar biologic effects. In subsequent experiments, we only used TGF-beta 2 because of more consistent results and relatively better responses. To determine the earliest time point required for TGF-beta 2 to exert its effects on apoB secretion, we performed time course experiments. These experiments revealed that statistically significant differential effects on apoB secretion in both cell lines were first apparent after 8 h of treatment (data not shown). These studies showed that TGF-beta differentially regulates apoB secretion in intestine and liver-derived cell lines.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 2 on apoB secretion by Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. Caco-2 cells were plated in six-well Transwells, cultured in DMEM plus 20% FBS for 14 days, preincubated in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA for 24 h, and incubated with DMEM plus 0.1% BSA containing 10 ng/ml of TGF-beta 1 (beta 1) or TGF-beta 2 (beta 2) for 18 h. HepG2 cells were plated in 24-well plates, preincubated in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA for 24 h, and incubated in DMEM plus 0.1% BSA with 10 ng/ml of TGF-beta 1 or TGF-beta 2 for 18 h. Controls (C) received DMEM containing 0.1% BSA only. ELISA measured apoB in the conditioned media. The data are representative of two independent experiments.

Effect of TGF-beta Is Independent of the State of Differentiation of Caco-2 Cells-- In the studies described above, a major difference between Caco-2 and HepG2 cells was their state of differentiation; the Caco-2 cells were plated in Transwells and allowed to differentiate for about 2 weeks, whereas HepG2 cells were used 2-3 days after plating. Thus, diverse effects of TGF-beta might be related to the differentiation of Caco-2 cells. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of TGF-beta on Caco-2 cells after 2 days of plating along with HepG2 cells (Fig. 3). As seen before, treatment of HepG2 cells with TGF-beta decreased apoB secretion by ~25%. As expected, nondifferentiated Caco-2 cells secreted (54 ± 7 ng/well) significantly smaller amounts of apoB than the differentiated cells (see above), in agreement with other studies (48, 52). Nonetheless, treatment of these cells increased apoB secretion by 26% (Fig. 3). These experiments were extended to study the effect of TGF-beta during the entire course of differentiation of Caco-2 cells. Determination of the differentiation of Caco-2 cells by measuring sucrase activity has been described before (48). Cells were plated in Transwells, and the effect of TGF-beta was studied at different times (5, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, and 36 days after plating) as described in the legend to Fig. 1. TGF-beta increased (20-90%) the secretion of apoB by Caco-2 cells at all of the time periods tested. Such long term cell culture experiments could not be performed with HepG2 cells because these cells do not differentiate with time; instead, they come off the plates. These studies point out that the increased secretion of apoB by TGF-beta was independent of the differentiation of Caco-2 cells.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of TGF-beta in nondifferentiated Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 and HepG2 cells were plated in six-well plates and allowed to grow up to 60-70% confluence (~48 h postplating). The cells were then incubated in DMEM plus 0.1% BSA for 24 h. Subsequently, they were incubated in triplicate with 2 ml of DMEM containing 0.1% BSA in the presence or absence of 10 ng/ml TGF-beta 2 for 8 h. The conditioned medium was used to measure the mass of apoB as described under "Experimental Procedures."

To determine the specificity of TGF-beta action, we studied the effects of TGF-beta on cellular protein levels and apoA-I secretion (Table I). TGF-beta treatment had no significant effect on cellular protein levels in both cell lines. In accordance with the studies described above, TGF-beta treatment significantly increased (43%) apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells. In contrast, TGF-beta had no significant effect on apoA-I secretion in these cells. In HepG2 cells, TGF-beta significantly decreased (35%) apoB secretion and is in concert with the studies described above. The secretion of apoA-I appeared to increase by ~11%, but this effect was no longer statistically significant when corrected for cell protein. We also studied the effect of TGF-beta 2 on the secretion of apoA-I in differentiated Caco-2 cells and observed no significant effect (data not shown). Thus, TGF-beta specifically and differentially modulates apoB secretion and exerts no significant effect on the cellular protein levels and apoA-I secretion in these cells.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I

Effect of TGF-beta on apoB and apoA-1 secretion

Caco-2 cells from a 75-mm2 flask were plated in six-well Transwells and cultured in DMEM containing 20% FBS. After 48 h, the cells were switched to DMEM plus 0.1% BSA for 24 h. Subsequently, they were treated either with or without 10 ng/ml TGF-beta in triplicate for 17 h in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA. HepG2 cells from a 75-mm2 flask were plated in six-well plates and cultured in DMEM plus 10% FBS. After 24 h, the cells were changed to DMEM plus 0.1% BSA for 24 h. Subsequently, they were treated either with or without 10 ng/ml TGF-beta in triplicate for 17 h in DMEM plus 0.1% BSA. ApoB and apoA-I levels were quantified in triplicate by ELISA. Cell monolayers were extracted in lysis buffer and used for protein determinations using the Bradford method (49). The data are representative of three independent experiments.

TGF-beta Alters Steady State ApoB mRNA Levels-- Next, we attempted to understand the mechanisms involved in the differential regulation of apoB secretion in these cells. It is known that apoB synthesis is constitutive (15), and the amounts of apoB secreted are generally modulated by intracellular degradation (17, 19, 20). To evaluate the role of intracellular degradation as a possible mechanism for TGF-beta effects, we performed pulse-chase experiments. These studies revealed that the major effect of TGF-beta was at the end of the pulse period. After a 30-min pulse, the amounts of apoB100 in HepG2 cells treated and untreated with TGF-beta were 33291 and 22065 PhosphorImager units, respectively. Thus, TGF-beta -treated HepG2 cells synthesized 33% less apoB100 than the control cells. To study this effect further, cells were either treated or not with TGF-beta for 17 h and pulsed with Trans-35S-label for various times, and the amounts of apoB in cells were quantified after immunoprecipitation (Fig. 4). The amounts of apoB100 present in TGF-beta -treated HepG2 cells were lower (30-60%) at all times than in the control cells (Fig. 4A). Except for one time point, the amounts of apoB100 present in TGF-beta -treated Caco-2 cells were higher (40-110%) than in the control cells (Fig. 4B). Similarly, TGF-beta -treated cells contained more apoB48 than the control Caco-2 cells (Fig. 4C). These studies indicate that TGF-beta differentially affects apoB synthesis in these cells.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   TGF-beta differentially affects apoB synthesis in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. HepG2 and differentiated Caco-2 cells were first pretreated for 17 h with or without TGF-beta (10 ng/ml) in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA. Second, they were treated or not with TGF-beta in methionine- and cysteine-free DMEM for 1 h. Finally, the cells were labeled with 100 µCi of Trans-35S label for different indicated times in the presence or absence of TGF-beta . Cells were washed with cold DMEM containing methionine and cysteine and were collected in immunoprecipitation lysis buffer as described under "Experimental Procedures." Cell lysates were first incubated with protein A + G-agarose for 1 h at 4 °C and centrifuged. The supernatants were then incubated with 5 µl of sheep anti-human apoB antibodies and 20 µl of protein A + G-agarose for 17 h at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitates were washed twice and suspended in 1× Laemmli sample buffer, and proteins were separated using 4-12% SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels. Electrophoresed gels were fixed, dried, and exposed to a PhosphorImager screen. The intensity of each band was quantified with ImageQuantTM software.

Consideration was then given to the possibility that the modulation of apoB synthesis may be related to changes in the steady state apoB mRNA levels. Total RNA was isolated from the control cells and cells treated with 10 ng/ml TGF-beta for 17 h. Northern blot analysis revealed that TGF-beta increased steady state levels of apoB mRNA in Caco-2 cells by 54% and decreased its levels by 39% in HepG2 cells (Fig. 5A). Changes in mRNA levels were also studied by RT-PCR. In these experiments, conditions were optimized for the maximum apoB amplification, and the size of the apoB fragment amplified was smaller than that of GAPDH. Probably for these reasons, the amounts of apoB amplified were qualitatively higher than GAPDH. Nonetheless, comparative studies showed that TGF-beta treatment increased (50%) apoB mRNA levels in Caco-2 cells and decreased (38%) in HepG2 cells (Fig. 5B). Thus, TGF-beta differentially affects the steady state levels of apoB mRNA in these cells.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   TGF-beta treatment affects steady state apoB mRNA levels in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. A, Northern analysis. HepG2 and differentiated Caco-2 cells were treated either with or without TGF-beta (10 ng/ml) for 17 h as described in the legend to Fig. 1 and under "Experimental Procedures." The cells were washed with PBS, and the total RNA was isolated using Trizol RNA extraction reagent. The RNA (15 µg) was used for Northern blot analysis as described under "Experimental Procedures." The bands corresponding to apoB and GAPDH were quantified, and the ratios were calculated. The ratios in the control cells were normalized to 100%. C and T, RNA obtained from control and TGF-beta -treated cells, respectively. The data are representative of four independent experiments. B, RT-PCR. 1 µg of total RNA from nontreated (C) and TGF-beta -treated (T) cells were used for RT-PCR using a QuantiTect RT-PCR kit as described under "Experimental Procedures." The products were separated on agarose gels and quantified.

TGF-beta Signaling via SMADs Dissimilarly Affects ApoB Secretion in Caco-2 and HepG2 Cells-- The effect of TGF-beta on apoB mRNA levels indicated that TGF-beta might affect apoB gene transcription. To our knowledge, TGF-beta has not been shown to affect mRNA stability. However, TGF-beta is known to alter gene expression by modulating gene transcription (26, 27, 55, 56). It is also known that mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAP kinases) and SMAD proteins are involved in the downstream mediation of the TGF-beta response in many cell types (27, 55, 55-59). In order to investigate the involvement of MAP kinases, we used a specific inhibitor, PD98059 (27, 32-34). We reasoned that, if MAP kinases were involved, inhibition of MAP kinases would abolish the modulation of apoB secretion by TGF-beta . Caco-2 and HepG2 cells were treated with TGF-beta in the presence or absence of PD98059 (Table II). TGF-beta increased apoB secretion by 39% in Caco-2 cells. Surprisingly, PD98059 alone increased apoB secretion by 80% in these cells. Treatment of these cells with TGF-beta and PD98059 augmented apoB secretion greater than that observed for the individual treatments. In fact, the 111% increase was close to the calculated additive increase of 119%. Again, in HepG2 cells, TGF-beta decreased apoB secretion by 25%. Surprisingly, PD98059 also attenuated apoB secretion. In this case, the decrease was 27%. Both TGF-beta and PD98059 decreased apoB secretion by 41%, an inhibition that was more than the individual responses and was comparable with the expected additive change of 52%. Most likely, TGF-beta and PD98059 independently and additively modulate apoB secretion in these cells. Thus, TGF-beta does not appear to modulate apoB secretion via the MAP kinase pathway.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Effect of PD98059 and TGF-beta on apoB secretion by Caco-2 and HepG2 cells
Caco-2 cells were plated in 12-well Transwell plates and allowed to differentiate for 3 weeks. HepG2 cells were transferred to 12-well plates and used after 3 days. Cells were incubated in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA for 8 h. Subsequently, cells were treated as described below for 17 h in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA. Conditioned medium was used in triplicate to measure apoB levels. Cell monolayers were extracted in lysis buffer and used in triplicate for protein determination. The data are representative of two independent experiments.

To investigate the potential role of SMAD proteins in the TGF-beta -mediated signal transduction, we overexpressed these proteins in HepG2 and Caco-2 cells (Fig. 6). First, the effect of overexpression of SMADs on the expression of luciferase in the 3TP-Lux reporter plasmid was studied in HepG2 cells untreated and treated with TGF-beta (Fig. 6A). In 3TP-Lux, luciferase is under the control of SMAD binding enhancer elements derived from the PAI-1 gene (46). HepG2 cells transfected with 3TP-Lux showed basal levels of luciferase activity, and this activity was increased 3-fold after TGF-beta treatment (Fig. 6A). Co-expression of 3TP-Lux with SMAD3 and SMAD4 resulted in a 43-fold increase in the basal expression of luciferase. TGF-beta treatment increased this activity to 69-fold of the basal activity in untreated cells. These control studies indicate that HepG2 cells respond to TGF-beta and SMAD expression and are in agreement with other studies (31, 46). Next, we studied the effect of the overexpression of SMADs on apoB (Fig. 6B) and apoA-I (Fig. 6C) secretion in HepG2 cells. The treatment of control cells (not overexpressing SMADs) with TGF-beta resulted in 29% decreased secretion of apoB by HepG2 cells (Fig. 6B). More importantly, overexpression of SMAD3 and -4 decreased the secretion of apoB by ~40% when compared with untreated controls (Fig. 6B, SMADs 3 & 4, untreated). TGF-beta treatment of these cells did not potentiate the effects of SMADs. In contrast to apoB, the secretion of apoA-I was unaffected by the TGF-beta treatment of control cells and by the overexpression of SMADs (Fig. 6C). TGF-beta treatment of SMAD-expressing cells, however, slightly increased (~10%) apoA-I secretion (Fig. 6C). Next, we studied the effect of overexpression of SMADs on apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells (Fig. 6D). Treatment of control cells with TGF-beta resulted in a significant increase (~43%) in apoB secretion. A similar increase (~34%) in apoB secretion was also observed by the overexpression of SMAD3 and -4. TGF-beta treatment of SMAD-expressing cells did not further potentiate the effect of SMADs on apoB secretion. The secretion of apoA-I by Caco-2 cells remained unperturbed by all of these manipulations (Fig. 6E). These studies showed that the overexpression of SMADs mimics the effect of TGF-beta treatment in both cell lines and that SMAD-expressing cells are resilient to TGF-beta treatment. Thus, we conclude that SMAD3 and -4 mediate the differential effect of TGF-beta on apoB secretion in both cell lines.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Modulation of apoB secretion by TGF-beta is mediated by SMADs. HepG2 cells. One 75-mm2 flask received 5 µg of 3TP-Lux vector, 5 µg of CMV-beta -galactosidase plasmid, and 20 µg of salmon sperm DNA complexed with Fugene-6 (control). Another flask received 10 µg each of CMV-SMAD3 and CMV-SMAD4 expression vectors instead of the salmon sperm DNA (SMAD3 and -4). After 24 h, cells from each flask were transferred to a six-well plate. After 8 h of subculturing in serum-containing media, the cells were incubated in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA for 24 h. Cells were then treated in triplicate with DMEM plus 0.1% BSA in the presence (TGF-beta ) or absence (untreated) of 10 ng/ml TGF-beta 2 for 17 h. Medium was used for apoB and apoA-I measurements. Cells were collected in 500 µl of 1× lysis buffer (Promega Corp.) and were used to measure cellular protein levels and luciferase and beta -galactosidase activities. A, the luciferase activity corrected for the beta -galactosidase activity. B and C, the amounts of apoB and apoA-I, respectively, present in the media. Approximately 60% confluent Caco-2 cells in two 75-mm2 flasks were exposed to DNA-Fugene-6 complexes for 24 h as described above for HepG2 cells. The cells were subcultured into six-well Transwell plates and maintained in DMEM containing 20% FBS for 48 h. Cells were pretreated with DMEM containing 0.1% BSA for 24 h and treated or not with 10 ng/ml TGF-beta for 17 h. Basolateral medium was used for apoB (D) and apoA-I (E) measurements.

Identification of Enhancer Elements in the apob Gene That Respond to TGF-beta -- It is known that SMADs modulate gene transcription by interacting with either cis-elements or transcription factors (27, 55-57, 59). To determine whether SMADs were modulating apob gene expression by directly interacting with cis-elements, we studied the effects of TGF-beta on the expression of CAT under the control of a minimal apoB promoter. The minimal promoter sequences required for apoB expression in the liver and intestinal cells are -85 to +121 bp (4). For this reason, the -85CAT construct (Fig. 7A) was transiently transfected in HepG2 and Caco-2 cells, and the effect of TGF-beta was studied on the expression of the CAT activity (Fig. 7B). CAT expression was minimal under the control of a minimal promoter (-85CAT) in both cell lines. More importantly, the expression of CAT was not affected by TGF-beta treatment in these cells. Furthermore, overexpression of SMADs had no effect on -85CAT expression in Caco-2 cells. These studies indicated that the minimal apoB promoter does not respond to TGF-beta treatment and SMAD overexpression.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Identification of cis-elements in the apob gene required for increased apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells. A, schematic diagram of different expression vectors. In the -85CAT expression vector, CAT is under the control of a minimal apoB promoter composed of -85 to +121 bp. The numbers represent the location of the base pairs in relation to the transcription start site of the apob gene. In the 690CAT expression plasmid, a mouse 690-bp intestinal enhancer element is placed upstream of the minimal apoB promoter in a forward direction as found in the apob gene. In the 315CAT construct, CAT expression is under the control of the 315-bp human intestinal enhancer element in the forward direction. CAT expression in 485(F)CAT and 485(R)CAT vectors is under the control of the 485-bp human intestinal enhancer element in the forward and reverse orientations, respectively. B, HepG2 and Caco-2 cells were transfected with -85CAT or 690CAT expression vectors with or without SMAD3 and -4 (S 3+4) expression vectors as described in the legend to Fig. 6. Cells were subcultured in six-well plates and treated or not with TGF-beta as described in the legend to Fig. 6 and under "Experimental Procedures." C, Caco-2 cells (75-mm2 flasks, ~70% confluent) were transfected with various indicated expression vectors. After 24 h, each flask was subcultured into six-well plates. After 32 h, the cells were treated or not in triplicate with TGF-beta for 17 h as described in the legend to Fig. 6 and under "Experimental Procedures." Cell lysates were used to measure protein concentration, beta -galactosidase, and CAT activities.

In some instances, it has been shown that SMADs bind to CAGAC sequences and modulate gene transcription (56, 60). To identify the presence of the TGF-beta response element, we searched for SMAD binding sequences in the apob gene. We found a SMAD-binding site in a 690-bp sequence 55 kb upstream of the mouse apob gene that confers intestinal expression (12). To determine whether these sequences were responsible for the increased apoB secretion after TGF-beta treatment in Caco-2 cells, we expressed CAT under the control of a minimal apoB promoter in the presence and absence of the mouse intestinal enhancer element (Fig. 7B, 690CAT). The 690-bp enhancer element increased the expression of CAT by 17-fold in Caco-2 cells. More importantly, the CAT expression increased (~40%) after TGF-beta treatment. Furthermore, co-expression of 690CAT with SMAD3 and -4 (690CAT + S3 + 4) resulted in a 21-fold increase in the enzyme activity. However, TGF-beta treatment did not potentiate this response in the presence of SMADs. Next, we determined whether 690CAT would respond to TGF-beta in HepG2 cells. Expression of 690CAT in HepG2 cells was higher than -85 CAT, and this expression was increased after TGF-beta treatment. These studies indicated that the TGF-beta -responsive element is indeed present in the 690-bp enhancer element present in the mouse apob gene. If functionally active, this sequence would enhance apoB secretion in both liver and intestine-derived cell lines.

Subsequently, we turned our attention to the regulatory elements in the human apob gene. Antes et al. (12) identified a 315-bp human intestinal enhancer element that was homologous to the 690-bp mouse intestinal enhancer element. Subsequently, they also identified a 485-bp sequence upstream of the 315 bp required for the intestinal expression of apoB (14). The 485-bp sequence contains a SMAD binding site, whereas the 315-bp sequence does not. We examined whether these sequences respond to TGF-beta (Fig. 7C). In accordance with the studies of Antes et al. (12, 13), both 315-bp (315CAT) and 485-bp (485(F)CAT) enhancer elements increased the level of CAT expression in Caco-2 cells. TGF-beta treatment had no significant effect on the CAT activity when expressed under the control of the 315-bp enhancer element. In contrast, TGF-beta increased the CAT expression under the control of the 485-bp enhancer element. Furthermore, expression of the CAT activity under the 485-bp enhancer (485(R)CAT) element in a reverse orientation failed to respond to TGF-beta . Note that the 485-bp element in reverse orientation does not act as an enhancer and is in concert with earlier reports (14). These studies establish that the 485-bp enhancer element that contains a SMAD binding site in the forward orientation responds to TGF-beta in Caco-2 cells.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Differential Effects of TGF-beta on ApoB Secretion in Liver and Intestine-derived Cells-- The present studies demonstrate that TGF-beta has dissimilar effects on apoB secretion in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. These two cell lines have been used extensively as models for intestinal and hepatic lipoprotein assembly and secretion and to study tissue-specific cytokine responses (39, 40). TGF-beta increased apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells and decreased secretion in HepG2 cells (Figs. 1-3). The differential effect was specific to apoB, since apoA-I secretion was unaffected by TGF-beta . The increased secretion of apoB by Caco-2 cells after TGF-beta treatment is in agreement with the studies of Murthy et al. (42). They showed that TGF-beta increased apoB synthesis, had no effect on intracellular apoB degradation, and increased the secretion of apoB and triacylglycerols. The effect of TGF-beta on apoB secretion in HepG2 cells has not been described before. In contrast to TGF-beta , tumor necrosis factor-alpha has been shown to decrease apoB secretion in both Caco-2 and HepG2 cells (61-63). It is known that TGF-beta up- and down-regulates different genes in different tissues. For example, the expression of apoCIII (31) is increased in HepG2 cells, and the expression of CD36 (32) is decreased in macrophages. However, we are unaware of dissimilar regulation of the same gene in different tissues by TGF-beta . Thus, the differential regulation of apoB secretion in two different cell lines represents a new mode of regulation by cytokines.

TGF-beta is known to inhibit cell proliferation and modulate differentiation (26, 36, 55, 57, 60). It was conceivable that the decreased secretion of apoB in HepG2 cells was related to decreased cellular proliferation. Treatment of these cells with TGF-beta for 17 h did not affect cellular protein levels, indicating that during the experimental conditions TGF-beta did not induce significant cellular proliferation (Table I, Fig. 6). Consideration was given to the possibility that apoB secretion by Caco-2 cells might be related to the cellular differentiation. We observed that TGF-beta exerts its effect at all times and is independent of the differentiation state of Caco-2 cells (Figs. 2 and 3). Thus, the modulation of apoB secretion by TGF-beta is not related to the proliferative or differentiated states of these cells.

Transcriptional Mechanisms Are Involved in the Regulation of ApoB Secretion-- Attempts to understand the mechanisms involved in the regulation of apoB secretion revealed that TGF-beta altered steady state mRNA levels and apoB synthesis in these cell lines (Figs. 4 and 5). Studies in Caco-2 cells showing increased synthesis and increased mRNA levels after exposure to TGF-beta are in agreement with those of Murthy et al. (42). Based on these observations, we hypothesized that TGF-beta was regulating the transcription of the apob gene. The hypothesis was confirmed by the use of reporter constructs expressing CAT under the control of apoB gene promoter/enhancer sequences. TGF-beta increased the CAT activity when expressed under the control of intestinal enhancer elements that contain a SMAD binding TGF-beta -responsive element. These studies suggest that TGF-beta modulates apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells by altering apoB gene transcription.

Although post-translational mechanisms are recognized as major regulatory steps in the secretion of apoB (15, 17), transcriptional regulation may also play an important role in the control of apoB levels and may be of therapeutic importance. For example, changes in apoB secretion have been correlated with changes in mRNA levels in HepG2 cells treated with 25-hydroxycholesterol (64) and different amino acids (65, 66). Overexpression of apoB in cells results in increased apoB mRNA levels and apoB secretion (22). The transgenic expression of apoB in mice results in increased plasma apoB levels (23, 24, 67). A mutation in the human apob gene promoter that increases transcription has been correlated with increased apoB plasma levels in humans (68). Thus, it is likely that tweaking the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms might modulate apoB levels. Alterations in the transcriptional control are expected to result in modest changes due to the interplay between various positive and negative control mechanisms that coordinate apob gene transcription. Modest changes in apoB levels are desirable, because both overexpression and deficiency of apoB lead to metabolic and pathologic disorders.

One Command, Same Messengers, Different Outcomes-- TGF-beta is known to transduce signals by MAP kinases (27, 32-34) or by SMADs (27, 55-57, 59). We had anticipated that the two different mechanisms might lead to differential apoB secretion in two different cell lines. Inhibition of MAP kinases resulted in an additive response with TGF-beta (Table II) excluding the involvement of MAP kinases as downstream mediators/regulators of the TGF-beta response in both of the cell lines. In contrast, overexpression of SMAD3 and -4 in these cells mimicked the TGF-beta response, and cells overexpressing SMADs did not alter apoB secretion in response to TGF-beta . Thus, we conclude that the differential response to TGF-beta in both cells is mediated by SMADs.

Several studies have established that the TGF-beta signaling pathway is mediated by SMADs. In HepG2 cells, transcriptional regulation of SMAD7 by TGF-beta requires the participation of SMAD2, SMAD3, and SMAD4 (69). In these cells, TGF-beta induces furin transcription involving SMAD2 and SMAD4 (70). Liu et al. have demonstrated that TGF-beta -induced phosphorylation of SMAD3 is required for the inhibition of epithelial cell proliferation (71). SMADs have been shown to participate in TGF-beta -induced regulation of p21 and apoCIII in HepG2 cells (30, 31). Furthermore, constitutive phosphorylation and nuclear localization of SMAD3 have been correlated with increased collagen gene transcription in activated hepatic stellate cells (72). In the intestinal epithelial cells, overexpression of oncogenic ras has been shown to decrease SMAD4 expression, inhibit interaction of SMAD4 with SMAD2/SMAD3, and repress TGF-beta -mediated growth inhibition (73).

How do SMADs bring about differential regulation in two different cell lines? We have identified the SMAD binding site in the intestinal enhancer element of the apob gene and showed that this enhancer element responds to TGF-beta and increases the expression of a reporter gene. Thus, the increased apoB secretion in Caco-2 cells is due to the binding of SMADs to the intestinal enhancer 55 kb upstream of the apob gene. We speculate that SMADs may interact with other transcription factors required for liver expression, inhibit their binding to cis-elements, and decrease apoB secretion in HepG2 cells. Thus, the cell-specific response is most likely determined by the tissue-specific regulatory elements of the gene. TGF-beta uses SMADs in both cell lines as messengers to convey its signal. The outcome of the signal in the two cell lines is different, because the apob gene uses different tissue-specific enhancer elements for its expression in the intestine and liver.

Genetic Context Defines TGF-beta Responsiveness of the apob Gene-- TGF-beta is known to cause different responses in different types of cells, and its effect is generally explained in terms of the "cellular" context (27, 60). For example, TGF-beta stimulates cellular proliferation in fibroblasts and inhibits it in keratinocytes (27, 60). It is generally believed that the binding of SMADs to the CAGAC sequence and their association with adapters, partners, co-activators, or co-repressors define the cellular context. Based on the following discussion, we propose that the gene itself may define the TGF-beta response and that SMADs are the transducers and not the determining factors in regulating apolipoprotein gene expression. Furthermore, a combination of different responses by individual genes may define the cellular context of TGF-beta action.

First, the presence of the CAGAC sequence does not always confer TGF-beta responsiveness. It is known that apoCIII, a member of the apoAI·apoCIII·apoAIV gene complex, responds to TGF-beta (31). However, our studies indicate that apoA-I does not respond to TGF-beta . Thus, the presence of a SMAD binding site in the control region of a gene does not always confer TGF-beta responsiveness. Second, different control elements respond differently to the same signal, and the extent of the response varies in the same cell. For example, TGF-beta treatment increases 3TP-Lux expression and decreases apoB expression in HepG2 cells (Fig. 6). SMAD overexpression increases 3TP-Lux expression by severalfold and is further augmented after TGF-beta treatment (Fig. 6A). In contrast, SMAD overexpression decreases apoB secretion by ~30%, and this response is resilient to further TGF-beta treatment. Most likely, the effect of SMADs is counterbalanced by other factors that bind apob enhancer elements. Third, evidence for the genetic context comes from the studies with 690CAT (Fig. 7). The 690-bp enhancer elements respond to TGF-beta by increasing the CAT in both HepG2 and Caco-2 cells. Thus, if an enhancer element is transcriptionally active, then it will respond similarly in both the cell lines. Thus, we propose that the genetic context determines the TGF-beta responsiveness.

In summary, we have shown that TGF-beta dissimilarly affects apoB secretion in Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. TGF-beta binds to its cell surface receptors and activates SMADs that in turn move to the nucleus and dissimilarly regulate apob gene transcription in these cells. In Caco-2 cells, SMADs most likely bind to the 485-bp intestinal enhancer in the apob gene and enhance its transcription, leading to an increase in apoB secretion. The differential regulation of apoB secretion by TGF-beta appears to represent a novel mode of regulation by cytokines involving signaling mechanisms that target tissue-specific enhancer elements. In this type of regulation, two organs express the same gene using two different tissue-specific regulatory elements. The presence of different cytokine-responsive elements in these tissue-specific regulatory regions allows for dissimilar regulation by cytokines. These studies raise the possibility that signaling mechanisms modulate apoB secretion, and a tweaking of these mechanisms can be of therapeutic interest in changing apoB levels.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The technical assistance of Zeng-Xiu Liu and Yong Meng is gratefully acknowledged.

    FOOTNOTES

* The work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-46900 and HL-64272 (to M. M. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| An Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Anatomy and Cell Biology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Ave., Box 5, Brooklyn, NY 11203. Fax: 718-270-2436; E-mail: mahmood.hussain@downstate.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205513200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: apo, apolipoprotein; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; FBS, fetal bovine serum; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; TGF-beta , transforming growth factor beta ; IL, interleukin; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; RT, reverse transcriptase; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; CMV, cytomegalovirus.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Havel, R. J., and Kane, J. P. (1995) in The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disorders (Scriver, C. R. , Beaudet, A. L. , Sly, W. S. , and Valle, D., eds) , pp. 1841-1851, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York
2. Young, S. G. (1990) Circulation 82, 1574-1594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Kim, E., and Young, S. G. (1998) J. Lipid Res. 39, 703-723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Levy-Wilson, B. (1995) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 50, 161-190[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Hussain, M. M., Kancha, R. K., Zhou, Z., Luchoomun, J., Zu, H., and Bakillah, A. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1300, 151-170[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Zannis, V. I., Kan, H. Y., Kritis, A., Zanni, E., and Kardassis, D. (2001) Front. Biosci. 6, D456-D504[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Ludwig, E. H., Blackhart, B. D., Pierotti, V. R., Caiati, L., Fortier, C., Knott, T., Scott, J., Mahley, R. W., Levy-Wilson, B., and McCarthy, B. J. (1987) DNA 6, 363-372[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Ludwig, E. H., Levy-Wilson, B., Knott, T., Blackhart, B. D., and McCarthy, B. J. (1991) DNA Cell Biol. 10, 329-338[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Borén, J., Véniant, M. M., and Young, S. G. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1197-1202[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Nielsen, L. B., Sullivan, M., Vanni-Reyes, T., Goldberg, I. J., and Young, S. G. (1999) J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 31, 695-703[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. McCormick, S. P. A., Ng, J. K., Véniant, M., Borén, J., Pierotti, V., Flynn, L. M., Grass, D. S., Connolly, A., and Young, S. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11963-11970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Antes, T. J., Goodart, S. A., Huynh, C., Sullivan, M., Young, S. G., and Levy-Wilson, B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 26637-26648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Antes, T. J., Namciu, S. J., Fournier, R. E., and Levy-Wilson, B. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6731-6742[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Antes, T. J., Goodart, S. A., Chen, W., and Levy-Wilson, B. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6720-6730[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Pullinger, C. R., North, J. D., Teng, B. B., Rifici, V. A., Ronhild de Brito, A. E., and Scott, J. (1989) J. Lipid Res. 30, 1065-1077[Abstract]
16. Dixon, J. L., Furukawa, S., and Ginsberg, H. N. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5080-5086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Dixon, J. L., and Ginsberg, H. N. (1993) J. Lipid Res. 34, 167-179[Abstract]
18. Fisher, E. A., and Ginsberg, H. N. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17377-17380[Free Full Text]
19. Yao, Z., Tran, K., and McLeod, R. S. (1997) J. Lipid Res. 38, 1937-1953[Abstract]
20. Fisher, E. A., Pan, M., Chen, X., Wu, X., Wang, H., Jamil, H., Sparks, J. D., and Williams, K. J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 27855-27863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Bates, P. W., Tebon, A., and Attie, A. D. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 4337-4342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Selby, S. L., and Yao, Z. (1995) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15, 1900-1910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Linton, M. F., Farese, R. V., Jr., Chiesa, G., Grass, D. S., Chin, P., Hammer, R. E., Hobbs, H. H., and Young, S. G. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 92, 3029-3037[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Callow, M. J., Stoltzfus, L. J., Lawn, R. M., and Rubin, E. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2130-2134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Fan, J. L., McCormick, S. P. A., Krauss, R. M., Taylor, S., Quan, R., Taylor, J. M., and Young, S. G. (1995) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15, 1889-1899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Massague, J. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 753-791[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Massague, J. (2000) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 169-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Vindevoghel, L., Kon, A., Lechleider, R. J., Uitto, J., Roberts, A. B., and Mauviel, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13053-13057[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Dennler, S., Itoh, S., Vivien, D., Ten Dijke, P., Huet, S., and Gauthier, J. M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3091-3100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Moustakas, A., and Kardassis, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 6733-6738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Kardassis, D., Pardali, K., and Zannis, V. I. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 41405-41414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Han, J., Hajjar, D. P., Tauras, J. M., Feng, J., Gotto, A. M., Jr., and Nicholson, A. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1241-1246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Chin, B. Y., Petrache, I., Choi, A. M., and Choi, M. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11362-11368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Atfi, A., Djelloul, S., Chastre, E., Davis, R., and Gespach, C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1429-1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Bhowmick, N. A., Zent, R., Ghiassi, M., McDonnell, M., and Moses, H. L. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 46707-46713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Barnard, J. A., Beauchamp, R. D., Coffey, R. J., and Moses, H. L. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1578-1582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Eckmann, L., Jung, H. C., Schurer-Maly, C., Panja, A., Morzycka-Wroblewska, E., and Kagnoff, M. F. (1993) Gastroenterology 105, 1689-1697[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Bissell, D. M., Wang, S. S., Jarnagin, W. R., and Roll, F. J. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 447-455[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Javitt, N. B. (1990) FASEB J. 4, 161-168[Abstract]
40. Levy, E., Mehran, M., and Seidman, E. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 626-635[Abstract]
41. Molmenti, E. P., Ziambaras, T., and Perlmutter, D. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14116-14124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Murthy, S., Mathur, S. N., Varilek, G., Bishop, W., and Field, F. J. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 270, G94-G102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Hussain, M. M., Zhao, Y., Kancha, R. K., Blackhart, B. D., and Yao, Z. (1995) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 15, 485-494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Bakillah, A., Zhou, Z., Luchoomun, J., and Hussain, M. M. (1997) Lipids 32, 1113-1118[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Antes, T. J., and Levy-Wilson, B. (2001) DNA Cell Biol. 20, 67-74[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Wieser, R., Attisano, L., Wrana, J. L., and Massague, J. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7239-7247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Derynck, R., Zhang, Y., and Feng, X. H. (1998) Cell 95, 737-740[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Luchoomun, J., and Hussain, M. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 19565-19572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Edlund, T., Walker, M. D., Barr, P. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1985) Science 230, 912-916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L. F., and Howard, B. H. (1982) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Luchoomun, J., Zhou, Z., Bakillah, A., Jamil, H., and Hussain, M. M. (1997) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17, 2955-2963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Nayak, N., Harrison, E. H., and Hussain, M. M. (2001) J. Lipid Res. 42, 272-280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Zhou, Z., Luchoomun, J., Bakillah, A., and Hussain, M. M. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1391, 13-24[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Attisano, L., and Wrana, J. L. (2000) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 235-243[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Massague, J., and Wotton, D. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 1745-1754[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Christian, J. L., and Nakayama, T. (1999) Bioessays 21, 382-390[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Laping, N. J., Grygielko, E., Mathur, A., Butter, S., Bomberger, J., Tweed, C., Martin, W., Fornwald, J., Lehr, R., Harling, J., Gaster, L., Callahan, J. F., and Olson, B. A. (2002) Mol. Pharmacol. 62, 58-64[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Baker, J. C., and Harland, R. M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7, 467-473[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Massague, J., and Chen, Y. G. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 627-644[Free Full Text]
61. Murthy, S., Mathur, S. N., and Field, F. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9222-9229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Mehran, M., Seidman, E., Marchand, R., Gurbindo, C., and Levy, E. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 269, G953-G960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Ettinger, W. H., Varma, V. K., Sorci-Thomas, M., Parks, J. S., Sigmon, R. C., Smith, T. K., and Verdery, R. B. (1994) Arterioscler. Thromb. 14, 8-13[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64. Dashti, N. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 7160-7169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
65. Zhang, Z., Sniderman, A. D., Kalant, D., Vu, H., Monge, J. C., Tao, Y., and Cianflone, K. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26920-26926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. Cianflone, K., Zhang, Z., Vu, H., Kohen-Avramoglu, R., Kalant, D., and Sniderman, A. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29136-29145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
67. Chiesa, G. L., Johnson, D. F., Yao, Z., Innerarity, T. L., Mahley, R. W., Young, S. G., Hammer, R. H., and Hobbs, H. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23747-23750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68. Van't Hooft, F. M., Jormsjo, S., Lundahl, B., Tornvall, P., Eriksson, P., and Hamsten, A. (1999) J. Lipid Res. 40, 1686-1694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
69. Stopa, M., Anhuf, D., Terstegen, L., Gatsios, P., Gressner, A. M., and Dooley, S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 29308-29317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70. Blanchette, F., Rudd, P., Grondin, F., Attisano, L., and Dubois, C. M. (2001) J. Cell. Physiol. 188, 264-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
71. Liu, X., Sun, Y., Constantinescu, S. N., Karam, E., Weinberg, R. A., and Lodish, H. F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10669-10674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
72. Inagaki, Y., Mamura, M., Kanamaru, Y., Greenwel, P., Nemoto, T., Takehara, K., Ten Dijke, P., and Nakao, A. (2001) J. Cell. Physiol. 187, 117-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
73. Saha, D., Datta, P. K., and Beauchamp, R. D. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 29531-29537[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Iqbal and M. M. Hussain
Intestinal lipid absorption
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2009; 296(6): E1183 - E1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
N. Bartolome, B. Arteta, M. J. Martinez, Y. Chico, and B. Ochoa
Kupffer cell products and interleukin 1? directly promote VLDL secretion and apoB mRNA up-regulation in rodent hepatocytes
Innate Immunity, August 1, 2008; 14(4): 255 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Fatma, R. Yakubov, K. Anwar, and M. M. Hussain
Pluronic L81 enhances triacylglycerol accumulation in the cytosol and inhibits chylomicron secretion
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 2422 - 2432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
K. Anwar, H. J. Kayden, and M. M. Hussain
Transport of vitamin E by differentiated Caco-2 cells
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1261 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
E. Allen, K. B. Piontek, E. Garrett-Mayer, M. Garcia-Gonzalez, K. L. Gorelick, and G. G. Germino
Loss of polycystin-1 or polycystin-2 results in dysregulated apolipoprotein expression in murine tissues via alterations in nuclear hormone receptors
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 11 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
J. Iqbal and M. M. Hussain
Evidence for multiple complementary pathways for efficient cholesterol absorption in mice
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1491 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/42/39515    most recent
M205513200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement