|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204320200 on July 26, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 42, 39703-39712, October 18, 2002
Hyaluronan Promotes Signaling Interaction between CD44 and the
Transforming Growth Factor Receptor I in Metastatic Breast
Tumor Cells*
Lilly Y. W.
Bourguignon ,
Patrick A.
Singleton§,
Hongbo
Zhu, and
Bo
Zhou
From the Department of Medicine, University of California, San
Francisco, and the Endocrine Unit, Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
San Francisco, California 94121
Received for publication, May 2, 2002, and in revised form, June 13, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
In this study we have examined the
interaction between CD44 (a hyaluronan (HA) receptor) and the
transforming growth factor (TGF- ) receptors (a family of
serine/threonine kinase membrane receptors) in human metastatic breast
tumor cells (MDA-MB-231 cell line). Immunological data indicate that
both CD44 and TGF- receptors are expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells and
that CD44 is physically linked to the TGF- receptor I (TGF- RI)
(and to a lesser extent to the TGF- receptor II (TGF- RII)) as a
complex in vivo. Scatchard plot analyses and in
vitro binding experiments show that the cytoplasmic domain of
CD44 binds to TGF- RI at a single site with high affinity (an
apparent dissociation constant (Kd) of ~1.78
nM). These findings indicate that TGF- RI contains a
CD44-binding site. Furthermore, we have found that the binding
of HA to CD44 in MDA-MB-231 cells stimulates TGF- RI serine/threonine
kinase activity which, in turn, increases Smad2/Smad3 phosphorylation
and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP) production (well known
downstream effector functions of TGF- signaling). Most importantly,
TGF- RI kinase activated by HA phosphorylates CD44, which enhances
its binding interaction with the cytoskeletal protein, ankyrin, leading to HA-mediated breast tumor cell migration. Overexpression of TGF- RI
by transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells with TGF- RIcDNA stimulates formation of the CD44·TGF- RI complex, the association of
ankyrin with membranes, and HA-dependent/CD44-specific
breast tumor migration. Taken together, these findings strongly suggest
that CD44 interaction with the TGF- RI kinase promotes activation of
multiple signaling pathways required for ankyrin-membrane interaction,
tumor cell migration, and important oncogenic events (e.g.
Smad2/Smad3 phosphorylation and PTH-rP production) during HA and
TGF- -mediated metastatic breast tumor progression.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
CD44, a hyaluronan (HA)1 receptor (1), belongs to a
family of transmembrane glycoproteins
that exist as several isoforms (2). Cell surface expression of certain
CD44 isoforms is closely correlated with breast tumor development and
metastasis (3-8). Most often, CD44 isoforms are up-regulated in breast
carcinomas (3-8). In fact, the presence of a high level of various
CD44 isoform (particularly CD44s (the standard form), CD44v3, and
CD44v10) expression is emerging as an important metastatic tumor marker in a number of carcinomas and is also implicated in the unfavorable prognosis for a variety of cancers (7). Carcinomas expressing high
levels of CD44 isoforms are more malignant than those carcinomas with a
low level of CD44 isoform expression (3-8). Cells expressing a high
level of CD44 isoforms also display enhanced HA binding that increases
their migration capability (9-12). Recently, a number of studies
indicate that interaction of certain extracellular matrix components
(e.g. HA) with cells triggers the cytoplasmic domain of
various CD44 isoforms to bind unique downstream oncogenic signaling
molecules: Tiam1 (9), Vav2 (10), RhoA-activated ROK (11), c-Src kinase
(12), and p185HER2 (13) and to coordinate intracellular
signaling pathways (e.g. Rho/Ras signaling and
receptor-linked/non-receptor-linked tyrosine kinase pathways) leading
to the onset of multiple cellular functions (e.g. tumor cell
growth, migration, and invasion) and breast tumor progression.
CD44 isoforms are also directly involved in the binding of cytoskeletal
proteins such as ankyrin (14, 15). Deletion mutation analyses indicate
that at least two sub-regions within the CD44 cytoplasmic domain
contribute to the ankyrin binding: region I (e.g. the high
affinity ankyrin-binding region) and region II (e.g. the
regulatory region). In particular, the region I ankyrin-binding domain
(e.g. NGGNGTVEDRKPSEL between amino acids 306 and 320 in the
mouse CD44 (14) and NSGNGAVEDRKPSGL between amino acids 304 and 318 in
the human CD44 (15)) is required for hyaluronan-mediated binding and
cell adhesion (14, 15). An ankyrin-binding domain of CD44 isoforms has
also been shown as necessary for oncogenic signaling and tumor cell
transformation (15, 16). Moreover, certain ankyrin fragments
(e.g. the ankyrin repeat domain (ARD) and/or the subdomain 2 (S2) of ARD)) have been identified as an ankyrin-binding region for
both CD44 (16) and Tiam1 (17). Overexpression of these ankyrin
fragments promotes hyaluronan-dependent and CD44-specific
tumor cell migration (16). These observations support the notion that
CD44-ankyrin interaction is not only very important for presenting CD44
properly for hyaluronan binding but is also required for cytoskeleton
activation during hyaluronan signaling.
Cytokines, such as the transforming growth factor (TGF- )
superfamily (18, 19), are multifunctional peptides that are known to
regulate a diverse set of cellular processes by binding to their
specific surface receptors (18, 19). Three mammalian TGF- isoforms
(TGF- 1, TGF- 2, and TGF- 3), coded by different genes, have been
identified (20). TGF- interacts with three surface receptors known
as type I (TGF- RI), type II (TGF- RII), and type III (TGF- III)
receptors (18, 19). TGF- 1 mediates its activity by high affinity
binding to the type II (TGF- II) receptor, which has been identified
as a 70-80-kDa transmembrane protein with a cytoplasmic
serine/threonine kinase domain (18-22). For cellular signaling, the
TGF- RII requires both its kinase activity and association with
members of a series of related 55-kDa TGF- RIs (designated as activin
receptor-like kinase-ALK (1-6 different subtypes)). Of these, only
ALK5 has been shown to represent a functional TGF- RI (18-23).
Subsequently, the TGF- signal is propagated from the plasma
membranes (via TGF- RII/TGF- RI kinases) by phosphorylation of the
Smad proteins that belong to a class of intracellular mediators known
to regulate transcriptional responses and gene expression in the
nucleus (24-26). The type III receptor (TGF- RIII) also binds
TGF- and may function in capturing TGF- for presentation to the
signaling receptors (27, 28). In cancers, the TGF- receptors on
tumor cells are often mutated or functionally defective (29). For
example, defective ligand binding to the cell surface caused by the
absence of TGF- RII, or expression of a truncated form or splice
variant of TGF- RII, may account for the resistance to activated
TGF- in cancer cells (30-32). Some studies also indicate that
decreased expression of TGF- RII may contribute to breast cancer
progression and is related to a more aggressive phenotype in both
in situ and invasive carcinomas (33-36).
TGF- is known to increase parathyroid hormone-related protein
(PTH-rP) production by cancer cells (37). PTH-rP shares many, but not
all, properties of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Both of these hormones
share homology in 8 of the first 13 amino acids and bind to the type 1 PTH receptor (38-40, 44, 45). PTH-rP, like PTH, is a potent activator
of bone resorption but unlike PTH does not appear to stimulate bone
formation (38-40, 44, 45). This makes PTH-rP a particularly potent
osteolytic agent (38-40, 44, 45). Thus, cells expressing PTH-rP in
bone are likely to gain a foothold thereby stimulating the removal of
the calcified matrix (38-40, 44, 45). However, buried within the
matrix of bone are high concentrations of certain cytokines
(e.g. TGF- ) that can feed back on the metastases to
promote their tumor growth (33-36). Mice inoculated with breast tumor
cells (e.g. MDA-MB-231 cells) engineered to express a
dominant-negative form of the TGF- receptor had fewer and smaller
osteolytic metastases (35, 36, 41). The net result in this situation is
that PTH-rP production by breast cancers increases metastasis of breast
cancer to bone. Because both CD44 and TGF- -mediated signaling events
are important in breast tumor progression, the question of whether the
interaction between CD44 and TGF- receptor(s) plays a significant
role in regulating metastatic breast tumor cell-specific behaviors
(e.g. Smad activation, PTH-rP production,
membrane-cytoskeleton interaction, and tumor cell migration) is the
primary focus of this study.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
The breast tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231 cells)
was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and grown
in Eagle's minimum essential medium supplemented with Earle's salt
solution, essential and non-essential amino acids, vitamins, and 10%
fetal bovine serum.
Antibodies and Reagents--
Monoclonal rat anti-human CD44
antibody (Clone, 020; isotype, IgG2b; obtained from
CMB-TECH, Inc., San Francisco) used in this study recognizes a common
determinant of the CD44 class of glycoproteins. For the preparation of
polyclonal rabbit anti-CD44v3 antibody, specific synthetic peptides
(~15-17 amino acids unique for the v3 sequence of CD44) were
prepared, respectively, by the Peptide Laboratories using an Advanced
Chemtech automatic synthesizer (model ACT350). All CD44 antibodies were
prepared using conventional DEAE-cellulose chromatography and tested to
be monospecific (by immunoblot assays). Mouse monoclonal anti-ankyrin
was prepared as described previously (42). Monoclonal mouse anti-HA1
(hemagglutinin epitope) antibody (clone 12 CA5) and rabbit
anti-phospho-Smad2 (Ser-465/467)/Smad3 IgG were obtained from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals and Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., respectively.
Both rabbit anti-TGF- RI IgG (specific for the ALK-5 form of
TGF- RI p55) and rabbit anti-TGF- RII IgG (specific for TGF- RII
p70) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Rabbit
anti-phosphothreonine antibody and rabbit anti-phosphoserine antibody
were purchased from Zymed Laboratories Inc..
Cloning, Expression, and Purification of CD44 Cytoplasmic Domain
(CD44cyt) from Escherichia coli--
The cytoplasmic domain of human
CD44 (CD44cyt) was cloned into pFLAG-AST using the PCR-based cloning
strategy. By using human CD44 cDNA as template, one PCR primer pair
(left, FLAG-EcoRI; right, FLAG-XbaI) was designed
to amplify complete CD44 cytoplasmic domain. The amplified DNA
fragments were one-step cloned into a pCR2.1 vector and sequenced. Then
the DNA fragments were cut out by double digestion with
EcoRI and XbaI and subcloned into EcoRI/XbaI double-digested pFLAG-AST (Eastman
Kodak Co.) to generate FLAG-pCD44cyt construct. The nucleotide sequence
of FLAG/CD44cyt junction was confirmed by sequencing. The recombinant
plasmids were transformed to BL21-DE3 to produce FLAG-CD44cyt fusion
protein. The FLAG-CD44cyt fusion protein was further purified by
anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel column (Kodak). The nucleotide sequence of
primers used in this cloning protocol is as follows:
FLAG-EcoRI,
5'-GAGAATTCGAACAGTCGAAGAAGGTGTCTCTTAAGC-3'; FLAG-XbaI, 5'-AGCTCTAGATTACACCCCAATCTTCAT-3'.
Cell Transfection--
The cDNA encoding human TGF- RI
(full-length) (43) is driven by the cytomegalovirus promoter and
preceded by the hemagglutinin epitope (HA1) tag in the expression
vector pCGN-Bam, which contains the hygromycin-resistant gene as a
selection marker. To establish a transient expression system, cultured
cells (e.g. MDA-MB-231 cells or COS-7 cells) were
transfected with two plasmid DNAs (e.g. HA1-tagged
TGF- RIcDNA or vector alone) using LipofectAMINE 2000. These
transfectants were then analyzed for their protein expression (e.g. TGF- RI-related proteins) by
immunoprecipitation/immunoblot, TGF- RI kinase activity, TGF- RI
interaction with CD44 and ankyrin, as well as breast tumor cell
migration assays as described below.
Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation Techniques--
Unlabeled
MDA-MB-231 cells (or surface-biotinylated) were solubilized in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 1.0% Nonidet P-40, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 5 µg/ml
aprotinin. The sample was then centrifuged at 14,927 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant was analyzed by SDS-PAGE
in a 5 or 7.5% polyacrylamide gel. Separated polypeptides were then
transferred onto nitrocellulose filters. After blocking nonspecific
sites with 2% bovine serum albumin, the nitrocellulose filters were
incubated with each of the specific immuno-reagents (e.g.
rat anti-CD44 IgG (5 µg/ml), rabbit anti-CD44v3 IgG (5 µg/ml),
rabbit anti-TGF- RI IgG (5 µg/ml), and rabbit anti-TGF- RII IgG
(5 µg/ml)) followed by incubating with horseradish peroxidase-labeled immunoreagents (e.g. goat anti-rat IgG, goat anti-rabbit
IgG, or goat anti-mouse IgG) or ExtrAvidin peroxidase (to detect
surface-biotinylated proteins). The blots were then developed by the
ECL system (Amersham Biosciences). For analyzing the complex
formation between endogenous TGF- RI, TGF- RII, or ankyrin into
CD44v3 complex, MDA-MB-231 cells treated with various reagents
(e.g. HA (50 µg/ml; Sigma) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml; R & D
Systems) or pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody followed by HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment or without any treatment)
were solubilized by 1.0% Nonidet P-40 and immunoprecipitated with rat
anti-CD44 antibody followed by anti-TGF- RI (or anti-TGF- RII or
anti-ankyrin)-mediated immunoblot, or
anti-phosphoserine/anti-phosphothreonine-mediated immunoblot, or
immunoprecipitated with anti-TGF- RI antibody followed by
anti-CD44-mediated immunoblot or
anti-phosphoserine/anti-phosphothreonine-mediated immunoblot,
respectively. In some experiments, MDA-MB-231 cells (e.g.
untransfected or transfected with HA1-tagged TGF- RIcDNA or
vector only) (either treated with HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or without any treatment) were immunoprecipitated with rabbit
anti-CD44v3 IgG followed by immunoblotting with rat anti-CD44 (or mouse
anti-HA1 (hemagglutinin epitope) IgG or mouse anti-ankyrin IgG) for
1 h at room temperature followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (or goat anti-mouse IgG)
(1:10,000 dilution) at room temperature for 1 h.
In some experiments, Nonidet P-40-solubilized cell lysate (isolated
from cells treated with HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or
pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody followed by HA (50 µg/ml) or
TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment or without any treatment) was analyzed by
SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with rabbit anti-phospho-Smad2 (50 µg/ml) or immunoprecipitated with anti-Smad3 followed by
anti-phosphothreonine, anti-phosphoserine, and anti-Smad3-mediated
immunoblot, respectively. These blots were then treated with
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and ECL chemiluminescence reagent.
In Vitro Binding of CD44cyt to the TGF- RI--
Aliquots
(0.5-1 ng of protein) of HA1-tagged TGF- RI (isolated from COS-7 or
MDA-MB-231 cells)-conjugated Sepharose beads were incubated in 0.5 ml
of binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.05% Triton X-100) containing various concentrations (10-800 ng/ml) of
125I-labeled cytoplasmic domain of CD44 (CD44cyt) fusion
protein (5,000 cpm/ng protein) at 4 °C for 4 h. Specifically,
equilibrium-binding conditions were determined by performing a time
course (1-10 h) of 125I-labeled CD44cyt binding to
TGF- RI at 4 °C. The binding equilibrium was found to be
established when the in vitro CD44-TGF- RI binding assay
was conducted at 4 °C after 4 h. Following binding, the CD44-TGF- RI-conjugated beads were washed extensively in binding buffer, and the beads-bound radioactivity was counted. Nonspecific binding was determined using a 50-100-fold excess of unlabeled CD44cyt
in the presence of the same concentration of 125I-labeled
CD44cyt. Nonspecific binding, which represented ~20% of the total
binding, was always subtracted from the total binding. Our binding data
are highly reproducible. The values expressed under "Results"
represent an average of triplicate determinations of 3-5 experiments
with an S.D. less than ±5%.
Protein Phosphorylation Assay in Vitro--
The kinase reaction
was carried out in 50 µl of the reaction mixture containing 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 7 mM MgCl2,
0.1% CHAPS, 0.1 µM calyculin A, 100 µM
[ -32P]ATP (15-600 mCi/mmol), purified enzymes
(e.g. 100 ng of TGF- RI kinase isolated from MDA-MD-231
cells either treated with HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or
without any treatment), and 1 µg of cellular proteins
(e.g. myelin basic protein and purified CD44v3). After
incubating at 30 °C for 2 h, the reaction mixtures were boiled
in SDS-sample buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE. The protein bands were
revealed by silver stain, and the radiolabeled bands were visualized by
fluorography or analyzed by liquid scintillation counting.
Binding of 125I-Labeled Ankyrin to
CD44v3--
Purified 125I-labeled ankyrin (0.35 nM protein, 1.5 × 104 cpm/ng) was
incubated with purified CD44v3 (bound to anti-CD44v3-conjugated beads)
(0.80 µg of protein in TGF- RI phosphorylated or unphosphorylated form, prepared according the methods described above) in 0.5 ml of the
binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM
NaCl, 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, and 0.05% Triton X-100).
Binding was carried out at 4 °C for 5 h under equilibrium
conditions. Equilibrium conditions were determined by performing a time
course (e.g. 1-10 h) of the binding reaction. Following
binding, the beads were washed in the binding buffer, and the
bead-bound radioactivity was determined. Nonspecific binding was
determined in the presence of either a 100-fold excess of unlabeled
ankyrin or using bovine serum albumin-conjugated Sepharose beads.
Nonspecific binding was ~20-30% of the total binding and was
subtracted from the total binding.
Measurement of PTH-rP Production--
Breast tumor cells
(MDA-MB-231 cells) were washed three times with serum-free (SF)-DMEM
and incubated in 3 ml of SF-DMEM containing various reagents
(e.g. HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or anti-CD44 antibody plus HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment or without any treatment) for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 humidified chamber. Subsequently, PTH-rP concentrations
in the conditioned medium and cells were determined using a two-site
immunoradiometric assay (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan
Capistrano, CA) that detects concentrations as low as 0.3 pM PTH-rP (35, 36). Statistical analysis was done using the
Student's t test. All data were expressed as the mean ± S.D.
Cell Migration Assay--
Twenty four transwell units were used
for monitoring in vitro cell migration as described
previously (9-12). Specifically, the 8-µm porosity polycarbonate
filters were used for the cell migration assay (9-12). MDA-MB-231
cells (~1 × 104 cells/well in phosphate-buffered
saline, pH 7.2) (in the presence or absence of HA (50 µg/ml) or
TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) rat anti-CD44 antibody (50 µg/ml) or cytochalasin
D (20 µg/ml)) were placed in the upper chamber of the transwell unit.
In some cases, MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with either HA1-tagged
TGF- RI bcDNA or vector alone. The medium containing high glucose
DMEM supplemented with 50 µg/ml hyaluronan was placed in the lower
chamber of the transwell unit. After 18 h of incubation at
37 °C in a humidified 95% air, 5% CO2 atmosphere,
vital stain
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
(Sigma) was added at a final concentration of 0.2 mg/ml to both
the upper and the lower chambers and incubated for an additional 4 h at 37 °C. Migratory cells at the lower part of the filter were
removed by swabbing with small pieces of Whatman filter paper. Both the
polycarbonate filter and the Whatman paper were placed in dimethyl
sulfoxide to solubilize the crystal. Color intensity was measured in
570 nm. Cell migration was determined by measuring the percent of total
cells that migrated to the lower side of the polycarbonate filters by
standard cell number counting methods as described previously (9-12).
The CD44-specific cell migration was determined by subtracting
nonspecific cell migration (i.e. cells migrate to the lower
chamber in the presence of rat anti-CD44 antibody treatment) from the
total migratory cells in the lower chamber. Each assay was set up in
triplicate and repeated at least 3 times. All data were analyzed
statistically using the Student's t test, and statistical
significance was set at p < 0.01.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of CD44 and TGF- Receptor Expression in Breast
Tumor Cells--
Breast cancer cells overexpress several variant
isoforms of the transmembrane protein, CD44 (3-8). These different
CD44 variant (CD44v) isoforms appear to confer on breast cancer cells
the malignant properties of increased invasion, migration, and
proliferation (46).
To examine CD44 expression on the surface of breast tumor cells
(MDA-MB-231 cells), we have utilized surface biotinylation techniques
and a specific monoclonal rat anti-CD44 antibody (recognizing a common
determinant of the CD44 class of glycoproteins, including various
variant isoforms)-mediated immunoprecipitation (Fig.
1, lane 1). Our results
indicate that multiple surface-biotinylated polypeptides (~125, 85, 70, and 55 kDa) are selectively immunoprecipitated with the monoclonal
rat anti-CD44 antibody (Fig. 1, lane 1). In order to further
identify the presence of particular CD44 isoform(s) in MDA-MB-231
cells, we immunoblotted these rat anti-CD44-precipitated surface
proteins with a specific rabbit antibody against CD44v3. Our data show
that a single band of the CD44v3 protein is expressed in MDA-MB-231
cells (Fig. 1, lane 2) which corresponds to the surface-labeled 85-kDa polypeptide (Fig. 1, lane 1). No
CD44-containing material is observed in control samples when normal rat
IgG or pre-immune rabbit IgG is used in these experiments (data not
shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Analysis of CD44v3·TGF-
receptor complex in human breast tumor cells (MDA-MB-231
cells). Unlabeled MDA-MB-231 cells (or surface-biotinylated) were
solubilized in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM
NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, and 1% Nonidet P-40 buffer
followed by SDS-PAGE analyses and immunoblot and/or immunoprecipitation
by various immuno-reagents (e.g. rabbit anti-CD44v3 and/or
anti-TGF- RI and -RII antibodies) as described under "Materials and
Methods." Lane 1, immunoprecipitation of
surface-biotinylated MDA-MB-231 cells using monoclonal rat anti-CD44
antibody (recognizing a common determinant of the CD44 class of
glycoproteins, including variant isoforms). Lane 2,
immunoblot of rat anti-CD44-immunoprecipitated materials with rabbit
anti-CD44v3 antibody. Lane 3, immunoprecipitation of
surface-biotinylated MDA-MB-231 cells using rabbit anti-CD44v3 antibody
(note that a 55-kDa polypeptide is in the complex with CD44v3).
Lane 4, detection of TGF- RI in the CD44v3 complex by
anti-CD44v3-mediated immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting
with anti-TGF- RI-specific antibody (note that the TGF- RI is
detected in the complex with CD44v3). Lane 5, detection
of TGF- RII in the CD44v3 complex by anti-CD44v3-mediated
immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting with
anti-TGF- RII-specific antibody (note that the TGF- RII is not
detected in the complex with CD44v3). Lane 6, detection
of CD44v3 in the TGF- RI complex by anti-TGF- RI-mediated
immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting with
anti-CD44v3-specific antibody. Lane 7, immunoblot of
MDA-MB-231 cell lysate with anti-TGF- RII antibody.
|
|
Cytokines, such as TGF- , are known to regulate cellular processes by
binding to their specific surface receptors (18, 19). Previous studies
(47) have shown that both TGF- receptor I (RI, ~55-kDa
polypeptide) and TGF- receptor II (RII, ~70-80-kDa polypeptide)
are expressed in breast tumor cells such as MDA-MB-231 cells. In this
study, using surface biotinylation techniques and specific anti-CD44v3
immunoprecipitation, we have determined that the 85-kDa surface CD44v3
and a 55-kDa surface protein are closely associated in a complex in
MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 1, lane 3). We have also analyzed
these anti-CD44v3-precipitated immunocomplexes by immunoblotting with
either anti-TGF- RI (Fig. 1, lane 4) or TGF- RII
antibody (Fig. 1, lane 5). Our results reveal the presence of the TGF- RI protein (~55-kDa polypeptide) (Fig. 1, lane
4) but not the TGF- RII protein (Fig. 1, lane 5) in
the anti-CD44v3-immunoprecipitated materials. Furthermore, we have
carried out anti-TGF- RI-mediated immunoprecipitation followed by
anti-CD44v3 immunoblot (Fig. 1, lane 6). The results of this
procedure indicate that the 85-kDa CD44v3 band is also present in
anti-TGF- RI-immunoprecipitated materials (Fig. 1, lane
6). In order to confirm that the failure of the TGF- RII
association with CD44v3 is not due to the lack of TGF- RII expression
in MDA-MB-231 cells, we have conducted an immunoblot analysis of
MDA-MB-231 cell lysate using anti-TGF- RII antibody. Our results
clearly indicate that the 70-80-kDa TGF- RII is expressed in
MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 1, lane 7). These findings clearly
establish the fact that CD44v3 is physically linked to the TGF RI
in vivo in the breast tumor cells (MDA-MB-231 cells). The
fact that CD44v3 forms a complex with TGF- RI (but not TGF- RII) suggests that a specific interaction occurs between CD44v3 and TGF- RI.
To further test whether TGF- receptors such as TGF- RI are
involved in the direct binding to CD44 in vitro, we have
used purified recombinant TGF- RI and the FLAG-tagged cytoplasmic
domain of CD44 (FLAG-CD44cyt) fusion protein to identify the
TGF- RI-binding site on the CD44 molecule. Specifically, we have
tested the binding of TGF- RI to 125I-labeled
FLAG-CD44cyt under equilibrium binding conditions. The results of a
Scatchard plot analysis presented in Fig.
2 demonstrate that the cytoplasmic domain
of CD44 (CD44cyt) binds to TGF- RI at a single site with high
affinity with an apparent dissociation constant (Kd)
of ~1.78 nM. These findings further support the notion
that a strong binding interaction occurs between CD44 and
TGF- RI.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Scatchard plot analysis of the binding
interaction between 125I-labeled FLAG-CD44cyt and
TGF- RI. Various concentrations of
125I-labeled FLAG-CD44cyt were incubated with the
TGF- RI-coupled beads at 4 °C for 4 h. Following binding,
beads were washed extensively in binding buffer, and the bead-bound
radioactivity was counted. As a control, 125I-labeled
FLAG-CD44cyt was also incubated with uncoated beads to determine the
binding observed due to the nonspecific binding of the ligand.
Nonspecific binding, which represented ~20% of the total binding,
was always subtracted from the total binding. Our binding data are
highly reproducible. The values expressed under "Results" represent
an average of triplicate determinations of 3-5 experiments with an
S.D. less than ±5%.
|
|
HA-activated CD44/TGF- RI Kinase and Signaling
Events--
HA is known to be involved in certain pathophysiological
processes. For example, high levels of HA in solid tumors
(e.g. breast tumors) appear to be closely associated with
tumor progression and metastasis (48, 49). In this study, we have
determined that CD44v3-associated TGF- RI serine/threonine kinase is
significantly up-regulated by HA treatment as detected by
anti-phosphoserine immunoblot (Fig.
3A, lane 2) or
anti-phosphothreonine immunoblotting, respectively (Fig. 3B,
lane 2). The level of TGF- RI serine/threonine phosphorylation is relatively low in untreated cells (Fig. 3, A, lane 1, and B, lane
1) or those cells pre-treated with anti-CD44 followed by HA
treatment (Fig. 3, A, lane 3, and
B, lane 3). As a positive control, we have
confirmed that TGF- activates TGF- RI serine and threonine kinases
(Fig. 3, A, lane 4, and B,
lane 4). No significant inhibition of serine/threonine
phosphorylation on TGF- RI is observed in cells treated with
anti-CD44 followed by TGF- treatment (Fig. 3, A,
lane 5, and B, lane
5). These observations strongly support the conclusion that
HA-mediated TGF- RI kinase activity is CD44-dependent,
whereas TGF- -stimulated TGF- RI kinase activity does not involve
CD44. Of course, we cannot preclude the possibility that HA is also
capable of interacting with other binding protein(s) which is(are)
linked to TGF- -regulated signaling pathways.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Detection of TGF- RI
phosphorylation. MDA-MB-231 cells treated with various reagents
(e.g. HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or pre-treated
with anti-CD44 antibody followed by HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- (50 ng/ml) treatment or without any treatment) were solubilized by 1.0%
Nonidet P-40 and immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-TGF- RI
antibody followed by anti-phosphoserine- (A) and
anti-phosphothreonine (B)-mediated immunoblot as described
under "Materials and Methods." Lane 1, untreated
cells; lane 2, cells treated with HA (50 µg/ml);
lane 3, cells pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody
followed by HA (50 µg/ml); lane 4, cells treated with
TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml); lane 5, cells pre-treated with
anti-CD44 antibody followed by TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment.
|
|
Both Smad2/Smad3 phosphorylation (24-26, 37) and PTH-rP production
(35-37, 41) are known to be closely associated with TGF- signaling.
In this study, we have observed that both Smad2/Smad3 phosphorylation
(Fig. 4, A, lane
2, and B, lane 2) and PTH-rP production
(Fig. 5B) occur during HA
activation of TGF- RI serine/threonine kinases (Fig. 3, A,
lane 2, and B, lane 2). As a
positive control, we have confirmed that activation of TGF- RI
serine/threonine kinases by TGF- also promotes Smad2/Smad3
phosphorylation (Fig. 4, A, lane 4, and
B, lane 4) and PTH-rP production (Fig.
5D) in MDA-MB-231 cells. We believe that HA-mediated
TGF- RI kinase activation (Fig. 3, A, lane
2, and B, lane 2) leading to
Smad2/Smad3 phosphorylation and PTH-rP production is CD44-specific
because control samples (either without HA treatment (Fig. 4,
A, lane 1, and B, lane
1, and Fig. 5A) or pre-treatment with anti-CD44
followed by HA addition (Fig. 4, A, lane 3,
and B, lane 3, and Fig. 5C)) display
very low levels of CD44-associated TGF- RI kinase activity (Fig. 3, A, lane 2 and B, lane 2).
Consequently, no significant amount of Smad2/Smad3 phosphorylation
(Fig. 4, A, lanes 1 and 3, and B, lanes 1 and 3) and PTH-rP (Fig. 5,
A and C) is detected under these conditions. It
is also noted that no significant reduction of Smad2/Smad3
phosphorylation (Fig. 4, A, lane 5, and
B, lane 5) or PTH-rP production (Fig.
5E) occurs in cells pre-treated with anti-CD44 followed by
TGF- treatment. Therefore, we believe that these results provide
strong evidence that the physiological ligand for CD44v3, HA, plays an
important role in activating CD44v3-associated TGF- RI kinase
activity required for the onset of Smad2 (or Smad3)-mediated nuclear
activities and PTH-rP production during the progression of breast
cancers.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Detection of Smad protein
phosphorylation. MDA-MB-231 cells treated with various reagents
(e.g. HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or pre-treated
with anti-CD44 antibody followed by HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment or without any treatment) were immunoblotted with
anti-phospho-Smad2 (A) or solubilized by 1.0% Nonidet P-40
and immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Smad3 (B)
followed by anti-phosphothreonine (a), anti-phosphoserine
(b), and anti-Smad3 (c)-mediated immunoblot as
described under "Materials and Methods." Lane 1,
untreated cells; lane 2, cells treated with HA (50 µg/ml); lane 3, cells pre-treated with anti-CD44
antibody followed by HA (50 µg/ml); lane 4, cells treated
with TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml); lane 5, cells pre-treated
with anti-CD44 antibody followed by TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml)
treatment.
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Measurement of PTH-rP production. Breast
tumor cells (MDA-MB-231 cells) were washed three times with SF-DMEM and
incubated in 3 ml of SF-DMEM containing various reagents
(e.g. HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or anti-CD44
antibody plus HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment or
without any treatment) for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 humidified chamber. Subsequently, both cells and the
conditioned medium will be collected and analyzed for the production of
PTH-rP using 125I-labeled anti-PTH-rP antibodies and
radioimmunoassay according to the procedures described under
"Materials and Methods." Statistical analysis was done using the
Student's t test. All data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. A, untreated cells; B, cells
treated with HA (50 µg/ml); C, cells pre-treated with
anti-CD44 antibody followed by HA (50 µg/ml); D,
cells treated with TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml); E, cells
pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody followed by TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml)
treatment.
|
|
Effects of TGF- Receptor Kinase-mediated CD44 Phosphorylation on
Ankyrin Binding and Tumor Cell Migration--
A number of
serine/threonine kinases have been shown to be involved in the
regulation of CD44 phosphorylation during HA signaling (11, 50-52). In
MDA-MB-231 cells, the level of CD44v3 phosphorylation in the absence of
HA treatment is very low (Fig. 6,
A, lane 1, and B, lane
1), whereas the amount of CD44v3 phosphorylation increases significantly during HA treatment (Fig. 6, A, lane
2, and B, lane 2) as detected by
anti-threonine and anti-serine antibody, respectively. To test whether
CD44 functions as a possible cellular substrate(s) of TGF- RI kinases
in MDA-MB-231 cells during HA signaling, we have examined the ability
of TGF RI kinase to phosphorylate CD44v3. Specifically, we have
analyzed the stoichiometry of CD44 phosphorylation by TGF- RI kinase,
along with myelin basic protein (MBP) phosphorylation as a positive
control (Table I). Our results indicate
that approximately ~1.2 mol of phosphate becomes maximally
incorporated into 1 mol of CD44v3 using TGF- RI kinase isolated from
MDA-MB-231 cells treated with HA (Table I). We have also found that
~1 mol of phosphate becomes maximally incorporated into 1 mol of MBP
by HA-activated TGF- RI kinase (Table I). In contrast,
phosphorylation of CD44v3 and MBP appears to be minimal (at most ~0.1
mol of phosphate incorporated into per mol of CD44v3 or ~0.15 mol of
phosphate incorporated into per mol of MBP) using TGF- RI kinase
isolated from MDA-MB-231 cells without any HA treatment (Table I).
Because the stoichiometry of CD44 phosphorylation by HA-activated
TGF- RI is comparable with that of MBP phosphorylation (by
HA-activated TGF- RI), we conclude that CD44v3 is a good cellular
substrate for TGF- RI.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Detection of CD44 phosphorylation.
MDA-MB-231 cells treated with various reagents (e.g. HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody
followed by HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment or without
any treatment) were solubilized by 1.0% Nonidet P-40 and
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-CD44v3 followed by
anti-phosphothreonine (A) or anti-phosphoserine
(B) as described under "Materials and Methods."
Lane 1, untreated cells; lane 2, cells
treated with HA (50 µg/ml); lane 3, cells pre-treated
with anti-CD44 antibody followed by HA (50 µg/ml); lane 4,
cells treated with TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml); lane 5,
cells pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody followed by TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Stoichiometry analysis of CD44v3 phosphorylation by TGF- RI kinase
The kinase reaction used in these experiments was the same as described
under "Materials and Methods." The amount of [ -32P]ATP
incorporated into CD44v3 and myelin basic protein (MBP) by TGF- RI
kinase (isolated from HA-treated or -untreated cells) was measured as
described under "Materials and Methods."
|
|
Phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic domain of CD44 has been shown to be
important for its interaction with certain cytoskeletal proteins such
as ankyrin (11, 14, 15, 50, 53-55). In this study we have examined the
effect of TGF- RI kinase-mediated CD44 phosphorylation on ankyrin
binding. Specifically, the highly phosphorylated form of CD44v3 (by
TGF- RI kinase isolated from HA-activated MDA-MB-231 cells) (as shown
in Table I) was incubated with 125I-labeled ankyrin. Our
results indicate that the total amount of 125I-ankyrin
binding to the TGF- RI kinase-phosphorylated form of CD44v3 (Fig.
7A) is significantly higher
than that unphosphorylated form of CD44v3 (Fig. 7B). These
results clearly support the notion that phosphorylation of the
cytoplasmic domain of CD44v3 by activated TGF RI kinase enhances its
binding interaction with ankyrin. It is likely that this interaction is
required for the activation of membrane-associated cytoskeleton
function.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
125I-Ankyrin binding to
TGF- RI-phosphorylated CD44v3. Purified
125I-labeled ankyrin (~0.35 nM protein,
1.5 × 104 cpm/ng) was incubated with CD44v3 (bound to
anti-CD44v3-conjugated beads) (~0.80 µg of protein in
TGF- RI-phosphorylated or unphosphorylated form) in 0.5 ml of the
binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM
NaCl, 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, and 0.05% Triton X-100) as
described under "Materials and Methods." Following binding, the
beads were washed in the binding buffer, and the bead-bound
radioactivity was determined. Nonspecific binding was determined in the
presence of a 100-fold excess of unlabeled ankyrin. A,
the amount of 125I-ankyrin binding to highly phosphorylated
CD44v3 (by TGF- RI kinase). B, the amount of
125I-ankyrin binding to minimally phosphorylated CD44v3 (in
the absence of TGF- RI kinase).
|
|
We have also demonstrated that in the absence of HA a low amount of
ankyrin is associated with CD44v3 as analyzed by anti-CD44v3-mediated immunoprecipitation followed by anti-ankyrin immunoblot in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 8, lane 1). HA
treatment of cells recruits a significant amount of ankyrin (Fig. 8,
lane 2) into a complex with CD44v3 (Fig. 8, lane
2). When cells were pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody followed
by HA treatment, the recruitment of ankyrin into CD44v3 is greatly
reduced (Fig. 8, lane 3). These results are consistent with
previous findings showing HA is capable of inducing the accumulation of
ankyrin into CD44 complexes (42). Interestingly, TGF- is also
causing ankyrin recruitment into CD44v3 (Fig. 8, lane 4). No
obvious reduction of CD44v3-ankyrin complex formation is observed in
MDA-MB-231 cells pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody followed by
TGF- treatment (Fig. 8, lane 5). These results strongly
suggest that the TGF- receptor (in particular, TGF- RI) is not
only physically complexed with CD44v3 but also functionally coupled to
CD44v3-ankyrin-based cytoskeleton functions.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Analysis of CD44v3-ankyrin complex in human
breast tumor cells (MDA-MB-231 cells). Unlabeled MDA-MB-231 cells
treated with various reagents (e.g. HA (50 µg/ml) or
TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) or pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody followed by
HA (50 µg/ml) or TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml) treatment or without any
treatment) were solubilized by 1.0% Nonidet P-40 and
immunoprecipitated with anti-CD44v3 followed by anti-ankyrin as
described under "Materials and Methods." Lane 1,
untreated cells; lane 2, cells treated with HA (50 µg/ml); lane 3, cells pre-treated with anti-CD44
antibody followed by HA (50 µg/ml); lane 4, cells
treated with TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml); lane 5, cells
pre-treated with anti-CD44 antibody followed by TGF- 1 (50 ng/ml)
treatment).
|
|
Effects of TGF- RI Overexpression on CD44-Ankyrin Interaction and
HA-mediated Breast Tumor Migration--
In order to correlate
CD44-TGF- RI kinase signaling with breast tumor cell-specific
behaviors (e.g. membrane-cytoskeleton interaction and tumor
cell migration), we have transiently transfected the breast tumor cells
(MDA-MB-231 cells) with a HA1-tagged TGF- RIcDNA (Fig.
9A) and vector alone (Fig.
9B). By using anti-CD44v3-mediated immunoprecipitation of
MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with HA1-tagged TGF- RIcDNA followed
by immunoblotting with various antibodies (e.g. anti-CD44,
anti-HA1, or anti-ankyrin antibody), we have determined that CD44v3 is
expressed at comparable levels in these two transfectants (Fig. 9,
A, lane a, and B, lane
a) and that only HA1-tagged TGF- RI (Fig. 9B,
lane b), but not the vector control sample (Fig.
9A, lane b), is co-precipitated with CD44v3 (Fig.
9B, lane b). By using the same
anti-CD44v3-mediated immunoprecipitation procedures, only a low level
of ankyrin (Fig. 9A, lane c) was detected in the
CD44v3 immunocomplex isolated from cells transfected with vector alone.
Overexpression of TGF- RI by transfecting MDA-MB-231 cells with
TGF- RIcDNA promotes a significant increase in ankyrin recruitment into CD44v3·TGF- RI complex. These findings
suggest that TGF- RI overexpression mimics HA and/or TGF-
signaling in the induction of CD44v3-ankyrin complex formation.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Analysis of the signaling complex formation
in MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with
TGF- RIcDNA. MDA-MB-231 cells
transfected with vector alone (A) or HA1-tagged
TGF- RIcDNA (B) were solubilized by Nonidet P-40 (as
described above) and immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-CD44v3 antibody followed by immunoblotting with various
immuno-reagents (e.g. anti-CD44 (lane
a), anti-HA1 (lane b), or anti-ankyrin
(lane c), respectively).
|
|
Furthermore, by using in vitro migration assays, we have
demonstrated that incubation of untransfected MDA-MB-231 cells with either HA or TGF- stimulates active tumor cell migration (Table II). However, transfection of MDA-MB-231
cells with TGF- RIcDNA also significantly stimulates CD44
cytoskeleton-dependent breast tumor cell migration (Table
II) as compared with vector-transfected cells (Table II). Furthermore,
treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with the microfilament inhibitor,
cytochalasin D, causes a significant inhibition of HA- and
TGF- -mediated as well as TGF- RIcDNA-transfected breast tumor
cell migration (Table II). Taken together, these findings strongly
suggest that both HA and TGF- promote CD44-ankyrin-linked cytoskeleton activation required for metastatic breast tumor cell migration.
 |
DISCUSSION |
CD44 contains a variable extracellular domain, a single spanning
23-amino acid transmembrane domain, and a 70-amino acid cytoplasmic domain (56). Nucleotide sequence analyses reveal that many CD44 isoforms (derived from alternative splicing mechanisms) are variants of
the standard form, CD44s (2). CD44 isoforms have been detected on
highly metastatic breast tumor cell lines, and transfection of these
molecules confers metastatic properties to otherwise non-metastatic
cells (9-13, 15, 16, 46). By using CD44-specific antibodies, we have
found that metastatic breast tumor cells (e.g. MDA-MB-231
cell line) express several CD44 isoforms including CD44v3 (Fig. 1). The
level of CD44v3 isoform expression often increases as the histologic
grade of each of the breast tumors progresses. In fact, there is a
direct correlation between CD44v3 isoform expression and increased
histologic grade of the malignancy (5, 8). These lines of evidence
suggest that expression of certain CD44v3 isoform(s) may be an accurate
predictor of eventual survival (e.g. nodal status, tumor
size, and grade) during breast cancer progression (6). CD44v3 has a
heparin sulfate addition site in the membrane-proximal extracellular
domain of the molecule that confers the ability to bind heparin
sulfate-binding growth factors (58). The attachment of growth factor(s)
to the heparin sulfate sites on CD44v3 may be responsible for the onset
of breast tumor-associated angiogenesis. In breast tumor cells, CD44v3
is also closely associated with matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-9 (gelatinase B), in the plasma membrane (59). Furthermore, MMP-9 is
present in a proteolytically active form and is preferentially localized at the "invadopodia" of the breast tumor cells (59). Therefore, it is likely that the close interaction between CD44v3 and
the active form of MMP-9 in the invadopodia structure of breast tumor cells may be required for the degradation of extracellular matrix
during breast tumor cell invasion and metastasis.
HA is one of the major components of the extracellular matrix
glycosaminoglycan. All CD44 isoforms contain a link module HA-binding site in their extracellular domain (60). Thus, CD44 is considered to be
one of the major HA receptors (60). Both CD44 and HA are overexpressed
at sites of tumor attachment (48, 49). The binding of HA to CD44 is
implicated in the stimulation of a variety of cellular functions
including tumor progression (9-13). It is known that CD44 has
intricate links to signal transduction processes. In particular, the
intracellular domain of CD44 binds to certain cytoskeletal proteins
such as ankyrin (11, 14, 15, 50, 53-55) and ERM proteins (ezrin,
radixin, and moesin) (61). The transmembrane interaction between CD44
isoforms and ankyrin/ERM provides a direct link between the
extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. In addition, CD44 couples
with tyrosine kinases (e.g. c-Src kinase and
p185HER2 kinase) (12, 13) and serine/threonine kinesis
(e.g. protein kinase C and Rho-binding kinase) (11, 50). In
cancers, the selective interaction between CD44 and its binding
partners has been shown to promote a number of downstream effector
functions leading to HA-mediated tumor cell-specific behaviors (1).
TGF- signaling plays a central role in regulating a variety of
cellular responses and acts as a growth stimulator or inhibitor, depending on the cellular context (18, 19). It is now generally accepted that TGF- is one of the important regulators in the pathogenesis of human cancers, including breast cancers (33-36, 62,
63). Many late stage or invasive/metastatic breast tumors overexpress
TGF- which, perhaps due to autocrine and paracrine effects of
TGF- , influences tumor cell growth, invasion, and metastasis (19,
62, 63). Three types of TGF- receptors (e.g. RI, RII, and
RIII) belonging to the family of serine/threonine kinase membrane
receptors have been identified (18-23, 27, 28). TGF- signaling
often involves TGF- binding to TGF- RII which recruits and
phosphorylates TGF- RI leading to a series of biological events
including phosphorylation of Smad family of proteins (18-26). TGF- RIII, which has no known signaling motif, appears to bind and
present TGF- to TGF- RII (27, 28). Alterations of TGF- signaling are generally thought to contribute to the development and
progression of human breast cancer (29-32). It has been reported that
many TGF- s are secreted in a latent form and are converted to an
active form. CD44-associated MMP-9 has been found to be involved in the
cleavage of TGF- from a latent form into an active form (64).
Therefore, it is clear that a close relationship exists between
CD44-associated MMPs and the production of an active form of TGF- .
However, the question of whether there is a direct interaction between
CD44 and TGF- receptor(s) during breast cancer progression has not
been addressed previously.
In this study we have found that both the TGF- type I and II
receptors (RI and RII) are expressed in MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 1).
However, only TGF- type I receptor (RI) (but not type II (RII)) is
closely associated with CD44 in metastatic breast tumor cells
(MDA-MD-231 cells) (Fig. 1). An in vitro binding assay using two proteins (TGF- type I receptor (TGF- RI) and FLAG-tagged CD44
cytoplasmic domain (FLAG-CD44cyt)) confirms that the TGF- RI is
directly involved in the interaction with the cytoplasmic domain of
CD44 (Fig. 2). Moreover, HA activates TGF- RI kinase activity (Fig.
3) leading to Smad protein phosphorylation (Fig. 4) in a CD44-dependent manner, whereas TGF- -stimulated TGF-
kinase activity (Fig. 3) and Smad protein phosphorylation (Fig. 4) do
not appear to involve CD44. Thus, HA and TGF- bind to their own
specific receptors (e.g. CD44 or TGF- receptors), but
their respective downstream signaling pathway(s) appear to be tightly
linked in MDA-MB-231 cells. Phosphorylated forms of Smad2 (or Smad3),
which often form a complex with Smad4 in the cytosol, have been shown to be translocated into the nucleus for transcriptional activation of
many genes (24-26). A recent study (65) demonstrated that human breast
carcinoma cells examined by tissue microarrays frequently contain the
phosphorylated form of Smad proteins. Therefore, HA and
TGF- -activated Smad protein phosphorylation may contribute one of
the important factors required for the onset of breast cancer progression.
In patients with advanced breast cancers, the malignant cells often
metastasize to the bone (66-69). It is now known that TGF- receptor-mediated signaling plays an integral role in stimulating osteolytic bone metastasis by inducing the production of PTH-rP by the
tumor cells (66). PTH-rP was originally isolated and cloned from tumors
removed from patients with the common paraneoplastic syndrome called
humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (66-69). We have now determined
that TGF- receptor-mediated signaling leads to an increase in PTH-rP
production by the breast cancer cells (in the MDA-MB-231 cell line)
(Fig. 5). The fact that HA activates PTH-rP production in a
CD44-specific manner (Fig. 5) suggests that HA-CD44 signaling is also
involved in breast tumor-specific hormone production required for
breast cancer progression. Other studies have shown that stimulation of
PTH-rP by TGF- is regulated through mRNA stabilization (37) or
is controlled by a novel Smad3/Ets1 synergism on the P3 promoter of the
PTH-rP (70). The question of which mechanism(s) (i.e.
mRNA stabilization and/or Smad3-Ets1 interaction) is(are) involved
in HA-CD44-mediated PTH-rP expression in the MDA-MB-231 cell awaits
future investigation.
In addition, our results indicate that both HA and TGF- are capable
of inducing CD44 phosphorylation in vivo (Fig. 6). Moreover, TGF- RI kinase isolated from MDA-MB-231 cells can directly
phosphorylate CD44 in vitro (Table I). Biochemical analyses
indicate that the stoichiometry of CD44 phosphorylation by TGF- RI
isolated from HA-activated MDA-MB-231 cells is comparable with that of
MBP phosphorylation (by HA-activated TGF- RI) (Table I). Therefore,
we conclude that CD44 may function as one of the cellular substrates
for the TGF- RI kinase. Our findings are consistent with previous
studies (11, 50-52) showing CD44 can be phosphorylated by several
serine-threonine kinases. It is likely that TGF- RI kinase is
phosphorylating certain CD44 site(s) such as threonine (amino acids
341, 347, or 351) and serine (amino acids 318, 325, 327, 339, or 356).
The identification of the specific phosphorylation site(s) is currently
undergoing investigation. Isacke and co-workers (51, 52) have reported that serine (amino acid 325) is the principal CD44 phosphorylation site(s) by serine-threonine kinases and that mutation of this residue
blocks CD44-mediated cell migration but not HA binding (51, 52). Thus,
the interaction between phosphorylated CD44 and specific intracellular
component(s) (e.g. cytoskeletal protein(s)) may be required
for cell migration.
Several lines of evidence indicate that the transmembrane interaction
between the cytoplasmic domain of CD44 and cytoskeletal proteins
(e.g. ankyrin) plays an important role in CD44-mediated oncogenic signaling (15, 16). In particular, the S2 subdomain (but not
other subdomains) of the ARD binds to CD44 directly (16); overexpression of the S2 subdomain of ARD promotes CD44-mediated tumor
cell migration (16). Ankyrin is also involved in the up-regulation of a
Rac1-specific guanine nucleotide (GDP/GTP) exchange factor, Tiam1
(T lymphoma invasion and
metastasis), in metastatic breast tumor cell migration
(17). In this study we have observed that CD44 phosphorylation by
HA-activated TGF- RI kinase stimulates its binding to the
cytoskeletal protein ankyrin both in vitro (Fig. 7) and
in vivo (Fig. 8). To elucidate further TGF- RI interaction with CD44 and ankyrin in vivo, we have transfected
MDA-MB-231 cells with HA1-tagged TGF- RIcDNA (Fig. 9). Our data
also confirm that overexpression of the HA1-tagged TGF- RI promotes
its association with CD44v3 (Fig. 9) and stimulates recruitment of
ankyrin into the CD44v3·TGF- RI complex (Fig. 9) leading to
breast tumor cell migration (Table II). Finally, we have found that
treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with cytochalasin D (Table II) induces a
reversal of tumor cell-specific phenotypes such as tumor cell migration (Table II). This finding suggests that some actin polymerization or
microfilamentous cytoskeleton is required in this event. It is quite
possible that the recruitment of ankyrin into CD44v3 induced by either
HA/TGF- signaling (Fig. 8) or TGF- RI overexpression (Fig. 9)
could contribute to cytoskeleton-mediated breast tumor cell migration
(Table II). A previous study (57) has shown that HA is able to bind
TGF- 1 directly. Therefore, it is possible that the
HA·TGF- 1 complex in the extracellular matrix also plays a
role in stimulating oncogenic signaling and cytoskeletal activation during breast tumor progression
As summarized in Fig. 10, we propose
that CD44v3 is tightly complexed with TGF- RI. This CD44v3-associated
TGF- RI kinase can be activated by HA and/or TGF- leading to
phosphorylation of Smad proteins (Smad2 and Smad 3) and PTH-rP
production which is known to cause breast tumor metastasis (in
particular, osteolytic bone metastasis). Moreover, HA and/or
TGF- -activated CD44v3-TGF- RI kinase is also capable of
phosphorylating CD44v3. Most importantly, CD44v3 phosphorylation
enhances its binding to the cytoskeletal protein ankyrin which, in
turn, interacts with the cytoskeleton and induces tumor cell migration.
Therefore, we believe that CD44v3-TGF- RI interaction promotes
activation of multiple signaling pathways required for ankyrin-membrane
interaction, tumor cell migration, and important oncogenic events
(e.g. Smad2/Smad3 phosphorylation and PTH-rP production)
during HA- and TGF- -mediated breast tumor progression.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
A proposed model for the interaction
between CD44v3 and TGF- receptor I
(RI) during oncogenic signaling and breast tumor
progression. CD44v3 (containing the v3 exon-encoded structure) is
tightly complexed with TGF- RI. This CD44v3-associated TGF- RI
kinase can be activated by HA and/or TGF- leading to phosphorylation
of Smad proteins (Smad2 and Smad 3) and PTH-rP production which is
known to cause metastasis (e.g. osteolytic bone metastasis).
Moreover, HA- and/or TGF- -activated CD44v3-TGF- RI kinase is also
capable of phosphorylating CD44v3. Most importantly, CD44v3
phosphorylation enhances its binding to the cytoskeletal protein
ankyrin which, in turn, interacts with the cytoskeleton and induces
tumor cell migration. In conclusion, we believe that CD44v3-TGF- RI
interaction plays a pivotal role in the activation of multiple
signaling pathways required for ankyrin-membrane interaction, tumor
cell migration, and important oncogenic events (e.g.
Smad2/Smad3 phosphorylation and PTH-rP production) during HA- and
TGF- -mediated breast tumor progression.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Gerard J. Bourguignon for assistance in the preparation of this paper. We
also thank Dr. Falko Diedrich for help in data preparation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by United States Public
Health Service Grants CA66163 and CA78633 and Department of Defense Grant DAMD 17-99-1-9291.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed:
Endocrine Unit (111N), Dept. of Medicine, University of California, San
Francisco, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., San
Francisco, CA 94121. Tel.: 415-221-4810 (Ext. 3321); Fax: 415-383-1638;
E-mail:lillyb@itsa.ucsf.edu.
§
Supported by an American Heart Association predoctoral fellowship.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204320200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HA, hyaluronan;
TGF- , transforming growth factor ;
PTH, parathyroid hormone;
PTH-rP, parathyroid hormone-related protein;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium;
SF, serum-free;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
MMP, matrix metalloproteinase;
ARD, ankyrin repeat domain.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Turley, E. A.,
Nobel, P. W.,
and Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
4589-4592[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Screaton, G. R.,
Bell, M. V.,
Jackson, D. G.,
Cornelis, F. B.,
Gerth, U.,
and Bell, J. I.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
12160-12164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(2000)
J. Mamm. Gland Biol. & Neoplasia
6,
287-297
|
| 4.
|
Dall, P.,
Heider, K.-H.,
Sinn, H.-P.,
Skroch-Angel, P.,
Adolf, G.,
Kaufmann, M.,
Herrlich, P.,
and Ponta, H.
(1995)
Int. J. Cancer
60,
471-477[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Iida, N.,
and Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(1995)
J. Cell. Physiol.
162,
127-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Kaufmann, M.,
Heider, K. H.,
Sinn, H. P.,
von Minckwitz, G.,
Ponta, H.,
and Herrlich, P.
(1995)
Lancet
345,
615-619[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Sy, M. S.,
Mori, H.,
and Liu, D.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Oncol.
9,
108-112[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Kalish, E.,
Iida, N.,
Moffat, F. L.,
and Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(1999)
Front. Biosci.
4,
1-8[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Zhu, H.,
Shao, L.,
and Chen, Y. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1829-1838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Zhu, H.,
Zhou, B.,
Diedrich, F.,
Singleton, P. A.,
and Hung, M. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
48679-48692
|
| 11.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Zhu, H.,
Shao, L.,
Zhu, D.,
and Chen, Y. W.
(1999)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
43,
269-287[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Zhu, H.,
Shao, L.,
and Chen, Y. W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
7327-7336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Zhu, H.,
Chu, A.,
Iida, N.,
Zhang, L.,
and Hung, M. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27913-27918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lokeshwar, V. B.,
Fregien, N.,
and Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
1099-1109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Zhu, D.,
and Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(1998)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
39,
209-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Zhu, D.,
and Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(2000)
J. Cell. Physiol.
183,
182-195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Zhu, H.,
Shao, L.,
and Chen, Y. W.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
177-191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Massague, J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
753-791[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Blobe, G. C.,
Schiemann, W. P.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(2000)
N. Engl. J. Med.
342,
1350-1358[Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Messague, J.,
Cheifetz, S.,
Laiho, M.,
Ralph, D. A.,
Weis, F. M. B.,
and Zentella, A.
(1992)
Cancer Surv.
12,
81-103[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Wrana, J. L.,
Attisano, L.,
Carcamo, J.,
Zentella, A.,
Doody, J.,
Laiho, M.,
Wang, X.-F.,
and Massague, J.
(1992)
Cell
71,
1003-1014[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Wrana, J. L.,
Attisano, L.,
Wieser, R.,
Ventura, F.,
and Massague, J.
(1994)
Nature
370,
341-347[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Chen, X.,
Weisberg, E.,
Fridmacher, V.,
Watanabe, M.,
Naco, G.,
and Whitman, M.
(1997)
Nature
389,
85-89[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Heldin, C.-H.,
Miyazono, K.,
and ten Dijke, P.
(1997)
Nature
390,
465-471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Massague, J.,
and Wotton, D.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
1745-1754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Shi, Y.
(2001)
Bioessays
23,
223-232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Lopez-Casilla, F.,
Cheifetz, S.,
Doody, J.,
Andres, J. L.,
Lane, W. S.,
and Massague, J.
(1991)
Cell
67,
758-795
|
| 28.
|
Wang, X.-F.,
Lin, H. Y., Ng-,
Eaton, E.,
Downward, J.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Weinberg, R. A.
(1991)
Cell
67,
797-805[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Carcamo, J.,
Zentella, A.,
and Massague, J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
1573-1581[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Kalkhoven, E.,
Roelen, B. A. J.,
de Winter, J. P.,
Mummery, C. L.,
van den Eijnden-van Raaij, A. J. M.,
van der Saag, P. T.,
and van der Burg, B.
(1995)
Cell Growth Differ.
6,
1151-1161[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Kadin, M. E.,
Cavaille-Coll, M. W.,
Gertz, R.,
Massague, J.,
Cheifetz, S.,
and George, D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
6002-6006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Park, K.,
Kim, S.-J,
Ban, Y.-J.,
Park, J.-G.,
Kim, N. K.,
Roberts, B. A.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8772-8776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Oft, M.,
Heider, K.-H.,
and Beug, H.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1243-1252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Wu, G.,
Fan, R. S., Li, W.,
Srinnivas, V.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7749-7756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Yin, J. J.,
Selander, K.,
Chirgwin, J. M.,
Dallas, M.,
Grubbs, B. G.,
Wieser, R.,
Massague, J.,
Mundy, G. R.,
and Guise, T. A.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
197-206[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Yoneda, T.,
Williams, P. J.,
Hiraga, T.,
Niewolna, M.,
and Nishimura, R.
(2001)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
16,
1486-1495[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Merryman, J. I.,
DeWille, J. W.,
Werkmeister, J. R.,
Capen, C. C.,
and Rosol, T. J.
(1994)
Endocrinology
134,
2424-2430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Goltzman, D.,
and Henderson, J. E.
(1996)
in
Principles of Bone Biology
(Bilezekian, J. P.
, Raisz, L. G.
, and Rodan, G. A., eds)
, pp. 809-826, Academic Press, New York
|
| 39.
|
Kai, H. Y.,
and Stewart, A. F.
(1996)
in
Principles of Bone Biology
(Bilezekian, J. P.
, Raisz, L. G.
, and Rodan, G. A., eds)
, pp. 347-362, Academic Press, New York
|
| 40.
|
Segre, G. V.
(1996)
in
Principles of Bone Biology
(Bilezekian, J. P.
, Raisz, L. G.
, and Rodan, G. A., eds)
, pp. 377-403, Academic Press, New York
|
| 41.
|
Yin, J. J.,
Taylor, S. D.,
Dallas, M.,
Massague, J.,
Mundy, G. R.,
and Guise, T. A.
(1996)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
11,
S139
|
| 42.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Lokeshwar, V. B.,
Chen, X.,
and Kerrick, W. G. L.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
6634-6644[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Franzen, P.,
ten Dijke, P.,
Ichijo, H.,
Yamashita, H.,
Schulz, P.,
Heldin, C. H.,
and Miyazono, K.
(1993)
Cell
75,
681-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Budayr, A. A.,
Nissenson, R. A.,
Klein, R. F.,
Pun, K. K.,
Clark, O. H.,
Diep, D.,
Arnaud, C. D.,
and Strewler, G. J.
(1989)
Ann. Intern. Med.
111,
807-812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Hawker, C. D.
(1983)
in
Assay of Calcium-regulating Hormones
(Bikle, D. D., ed)
, pp. 218-218, Springer-Verlag, New York
|
| 46.
|
Iida, N.,
and Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(1997)
J. Cell. Physiol.
171,
152-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Koli, K. M.,
and Arteaga, C. L.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
970-977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Smith, H. S.,
Stern, R.,
Liu, E.,
and Benz, C.
(1991)
Basic Life Sci.
57,
329-337[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Yeo, T. K.,
Nagy, J. A.,
Yeo, K. T.,
Dvorak, H. F.,
and Toole, B. P.
(1996)
Am. J. Pathol.
148,
1733-1740[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Kalomiris, E. L.,
and Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8113-8119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Lewis, C. A.,
Townsend, P. A.,
and Isacke, C. M.
(2001)
Biochem. J.
357,
834-850
|
| 52.
|
Peck, D.,
and Isacke, C. M.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
1595-1601[Abstract]
|
| 53.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Lokeshwar, V. B., He, J.,
Chen, X.,
and Bourguignon, G. J.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
4464-4471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.
(1996)
Curr. Top. Membr.
43,
293-312
|
| 55.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Zhu, D.,
and Zhu, H.
(1998)
Front. Biosci.
3,
637-649
|
| 56.
|
Goldstein, L. A.,
Zhou, D. F. H.,
Picker, L. J.,
Minty, C. N.,
Bargatze, R. F.,
Ding, J. F.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1989)
Cell
56,
1063-1072[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Locci, P.,
Marinucci, L.,
Lilli, C.,
Martinese, D.,
and Becchetti, E.
(1995)
Cell Tissue Res.
281,
317-324[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Bennett, K.,
Jackson, D. G.,
Simon, J. C.,
Tanczos, E.,
Peach, R.,
Modrell, B.,
Stamenkovic, I.,
Plowman, G.,
and Aruffo, A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
687-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Bourguignon, L. Y. W.,
Gunja-Smith, Z.,
Iida, N.,
Zhu, H. B.,
Young, L. J. T.,
Muller, W.,
and Cardiff, R. D.
(1998)
J. Cell. Physiol.
176,
206-215[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Banerji, S. N. I. J.,
Wang, S. X.,
Clasper, S., Su, J.,
Tammi, R.,
Jones, M.,
and Jackson, D. G.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
789-801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Tsukita, S.,
Oishi, K.,
Sato, N.,
Sagara, I.,
Kawai, A.,
and Tsukita, S.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
391-401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Chirgwin, J. M.,
and Guise, T. A.
(2000)
Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expr.
10,
159-178[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Tobin, S. W.,
Douville, K.,
Benbow, U.,
Brinckerhoff, C. E.,
Memoli, V. A.,
and Arrick, B. A.
(2002)
Oncogene
21,
108-118[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Yu, Q.,
and Stamenkovic, I.
(2000)
Gene Dev.
14,
163-176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Xie, W.,
Mertens, J. C.,
Reiss, D. J.,
Rimm, D. L.,
Camp, R. L.,
Haffty, B. G.,
and Reiss, M.
(2002)
Cancer Res.
62,
497-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 66.
|
Guise, T. A.,
and Mundy, G. R.
(1998)
Endocr. Rev.
19,
18-54[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Aaron, A. D.
(1994)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
272,
1206-1209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 68.
|
Powell, G. J.,
Southy, J.,
Danks, J. A.,
Stillwell, R. G.,
Hayman, J. A.,
Henderson, M. A.,
Bennett, R. C.,
and Martin, T. J.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
3059-3061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Hortobagyi, G. N.,
Theriault, R. L.,
Porter, L.,
Blayney, D.,
Lipton, A.,
Sinoff, C.,
Wheeler, H.,
Simeone, J. F.,
Seaman, J.,
and Knight, R. D.
(1996)
N. Engl. J. Med.
335,
1785-1791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 70.
|
Lindemann, R. K.,
Ballschmieter, P.,
Nordheim, A.,
and Dittmer, J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
46661-46670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Webber, R. H. Jenkins, S. Meran, A. Phillips, and R. Steadman
Modulation of TGF{beta}1-Dependent Myofibroblast Differentiation by Hyaluronan
Am. J. Pathol.,
July 1, 2009;
175(1):
148 - 160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-J. Hsu, L. Schultz, Q. Hong, K. Van Moer, J. Heath, M.-Y. Li, F.-J. Lai, S.-R. Lin, M.-H. Lee, C.-P. Lo, et al.
Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Signaling via Interaction with Cell Surface Hyal-2 and Recruitment of WWOX/WOX1
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 5, 2009;
284(23):
16049 - 16059.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Luo, C. Fielding, A. Phillips, and D. Fraser
Interleukin-1 beta regulates proximal tubular cell transforming growth factor beta-1 signalling
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
May 6, 2009;
(2009)
gfp208v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Webber, S. Meran, R. Steadman, and A. Phillips
Hyaluronan Orchestrates Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-dependent Maintenance of Myofibroblast Phenotype
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 3, 2009;
284(14):
9083 - 9092.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, W. Xia, and G. Wong
Hyaluronan-mediated CD44 Interaction with p300 and SIRT1 Regulates {beta}-Catenin Signaling and NF{kappa}B-specific Transcription Activity Leading to MDR1 and Bcl-xL Gene Expression and Chemoresistance in Breast Tumor Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 30, 2009;
284(5):
2657 - 2671.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, K. Peyrollier, W. Xia, and E. Gilad
Hyaluronan-CD44 Interaction Activates Stem Cell Marker Nanog, Stat-3-mediated MDR1 Gene Expression, and Ankyrin-regulated Multidrug Efflux in Breast and Ovarian Tumor Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 20, 2008;
283(25):
17635 - 17651.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Meran, D. W. Thomas, P. Stephens, S. Enoch, J. Martin, R. Steadman, and A. O. Phillips
Hyaluronan Facilitates Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-mediated Fibroblast Proliferation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2008;
283(10):
6530 - 6545.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Huebener, T. Abou-Khamis, P. Zymek, M. Bujak, X. Ying, K. Chatila, S. Haudek, G. Thakker, and N. G. Frangogiannis
CD44 Is Critically Involved in Infarct Healing by Regulating the Inflammatory and Fibrotic Response
J. Immunol.,
February 15, 2008;
180(4):
2625 - 2633.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ouhtit, Z. Y. Abd Elmageed, M. E. Abdraboh, T. F. Lioe, and M. H.G. Raj
In Vivo Evidence for the Role of CD44s in Promoting Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Liver
Am. J. Pathol.,
December 1, 2007;
171(6):
2033 - 2039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Meran, D. Thomas, P. Stephens, J. Martin, T. Bowen, A. Phillips, and R. Steadman
Involvement of Hyaluronan in Regulation of Fibroblast Phenotype
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 31, 2007;
282(35):
25687 - 25697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, E. Gilad, and K. Peyrollier
Heregulin-mediated ErbB2-ERK Signaling Activates Hyaluronan Synthases Leading to CD44-dependent Ovarian Tumor Cell Growth and Migration
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 6, 2007;
282(27):
19426 - 19441.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Hamilton, S. F. Fard, F. F. Paiwand, C. Tolg, M. Veiseh, C. Wang, J. B. McCarthy, M. J. Bissell, J. Koropatnick, and E. A. Turley
The Hyaluronan Receptors CD44 and Rhamm (CD168) Form Complexes with ERK1,2 That Sustain High Basal Motility in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 1, 2007;
282(22):
16667 - 16680.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, K. Peyrollier, E. Gilad, and A. Brightman
Hyaluronan-CD44 Interaction with Neural Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein (N-WASP) Promotes Actin Polymerization and ErbB2 Activation Leading to beta-Catenin Nuclear Translocation, Transcriptional Up-regulation, and Cell Migration in Ovarian Tumor Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 12, 2007;
282(2):
1265 - 1280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Tolg, S. R. Hamilton, K.-A. Nakrieko, F. Kooshesh, P. Walton, J. B. McCarthy, M. J. Bissell, and E. A. Turley
Rhamm-/- fibroblasts are defective in CD44-mediated ERK1,2 motogenic signaling, leading to defective skin wound repair
J. Cell Biol.,
December 18, 2006;
175(6):
1017 - 1028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Li, C.-H. Heldin, and P. Heldin
Inhibition of Platelet-derived Growth Factor-BB-induced Receptor Activation and Fibroblast Migration by Hyaluronan Activation of CD44
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 8, 2006;
281(36):
26512 - 26519.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ohno, H.-J. Im, C. B. Knudson, and W. Knudson
Hyaluronan Oligosaccharides Induce Matrix Metalloproteinase 13 via Transcriptional Activation of NF{kappa}B and p38 MAP Kinase in Articular Chondrocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 30, 2006;
281(26):
17952 - 17960.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, E. Gilad, A. Brightman, F. Diedrich, and P. Singleton
Hyaluronan-CD44 Interaction with Leukemia-associated RhoGEF and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Promotes Rho/Ras Co-activation, Phospholipase C{epsilon}-Ca2+ Signaling, and Cytoskeleton Modification in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 19, 2006;
281(20):
14026 - 14040.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M.A. Rouschop, N. Claessen, S. T. Pals, J. J. Weening, and S. Florquin
CD44 Disruption Prevents Degeneration of the Capillary Network in Obstructive Nephropathy via Reduction of TGF-beta1-Induced Apoptosis
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
March 1, 2006;
17(3):
746 - 753.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Knepper, A. M. Miller, J. Choi, R. D. Wertz, M. J. Nolan, W. Goossens, S. Whitmer, B. Y. J. T. Yue, R. Ritch, J. M. Liebmann, et al.
Hypophosphorylation of Aqueous Humor sCD44 and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
August 1, 2005;
46(8):
2829 - 2837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Misra, S. Ghatak, and B. P. Toole
Regulation of MDR1 Expression and Drug Resistance by a Positive Feedback Loop Involving Hyaluronan, Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase, and ErbB2
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 27, 2005;
280(21):
20310 - 20315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, E. Gilad, K. Rothman, and K. Peyrollier
Hyaluronan-CD44 Interaction with IQGAP1 Promotes Cdc42 and ERK Signaling, Leading to Actin Binding, Elk-1/Estrogen Receptor Transcriptional Activation, and Ovarian Cancer Progression
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 25, 2005;
280(12):
11961 - 11972.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Choi, A. M. Miller, M. J. Nolan, B. Y. J. T. Yue, S. T. Thotz, A. F. Clark, N. Agarwal, and P. A. Knepper
Soluble CD44 Is Cytotoxic to Trabecular Meshwork and Retinal Ganglion Cells In Vitro
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
January 1, 2005;
46(1):
214 - 222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, P. A. Singleton, F. Diedrich, R. Stern, and E. Gilad
CD44 Interaction with Na+-H+ Exchanger (NHE1) Creates Acidic Microenvironments Leading to Hyaluronidase-2 and Cathepsin B Activation and Breast Tumor Cell Invasion
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 25, 2004;
279(26):
26991 - 27007.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ito, J. D. Williams, D. J. Fraser, and A. O. Phillips
Hyaluronan Regulates Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Receptor Compartmentalization
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 11, 2004;
279(24):
25326 - 25332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ito, J. D. Williams, D. Fraser, and A. O. Phillips
Hyaluronan Attenuates Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-Mediated Signaling in Renal Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells
Am. J. Pathol.,
June 1, 2004;
164(6):
1979 - 1988.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M.A. Rouschop, M. E. Sewnath, N. Claessen, J. J.T.H. Roelofs, I. Hoedemaeker, R. van der Neut, J. Aten, S. T. Pals, J. J. Weening, and S. Florquin
CD44 Deficiency Increases Tubular Damage But Reduces Renal Fibrosis in Obstructive Nephropathy
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
March 1, 2004;
15(3):
674 - 686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, P. A. Singleton, H. Zhu, and F. Diedrich
Hyaluronan-mediated CD44 Interaction with RhoGEF and Rho Kinase Promotes Grb2-associated Binder-1 Phosphorylation and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Signaling Leading to Cytokine (Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor) Production and Breast Tumor Progression
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 8, 2003;
278(32):
29420 - 29434.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|