Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204581200 on August 9, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 42, 40106-40111, October 18, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/42/40106    most recent
M204581200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rangaraj, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ludden, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rangaraj, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ludden, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Accumulation of 99Mo-containing Iron-Molybdenum Cofactor Precursors of Nitrogenase on NifNE, NifH, and NifX of Azotobacter vinelandii*

Priya RangarajDagger § and Paul W. LuddenDagger ||

From the  Department of Biochemistry and the Dagger  Center for the Study of Nitrogen Fixation, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Received for publication, May 9, 2002, and in revised form, August 1, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The biosynthesis of the iron-molybdenum cofactor (FeMo-co) of nitrogenase was investigated using the purified in vitro FeMo-co synthesis system and 99Mo. The purified system involves the addition of all components that are known to be required for FeMo-co synthesis in their purified forms. Here, we report the accumulation of a 99Mo-containing FeMo-co precursor on NifNE. Apart from NifNE, NifH and NifX also accumulate 99Mo label. We present evidence that suggests NifH may serve as the entry point for molybdenum incorporation into the FeMo-co biosynthetic pathway. We also present evidence suggesting a role for NifX in specifying the organic acid moiety of FeMo-co.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Dinitrogenase (NifKD, MoFe-protein) and dinitrogenase reductase (NifH, Fe-protein) comprise the two-component complex metalloenzyme nitrogenase (1). Dinitrogenase is an alpha 2beta 2 heterotetramer of the nifK and D gene products, while dinitrogenase reductase is an alpha 2 homodimer of the nifH gene product. The iron-molybdenum cofactor (FeMo-co)1 is the site of substrate reduction (2-4) and resides within the alpha  subunits of dinitrogenase (5). FeMo-co consists of iron, sulfur, and molybdenum atoms in the ratio 7:9:1, and a molecule of homocitrate that serves as a non-protein ligand to the molybdenum atom (6).

Genetic and biochemical studies in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Azotobacter vinelandii have revealed that the products of nifQ, V, B, H, X, N, and E are involved in the biosynthesis of FeMo-co (7-11). However, the exact roles played by many of these nif gene products remain uncertain. A list of the nif gene products involved in FeMo-co biosynthesis and their known/postulated roles in this process is given in Table I. Early on, the studies conducted by Imperial et al. (12) have made clear that the structural genes encoding dinitrogenase, nifK and D, are not required for the biosynthesis of the cofactor per se. This suggested that FeMo-co is synthesized separately and then inserted into cofactor sites in NifKD.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
The nif and non-nif gene products and their roles (known or proposed) in FeMo-co biosynthesis

An in vitro FeMo-co biosynthesis system has been established, which involves mixing extracts from two A. vinelandii strains with complementary defects in the synthesis of FeMo-co; alternatively, the addition of the missing component can be added to complement a particular mutant extract (13). This assay system requires at least homocitrate, molybdate (as a source of molybdenum), MgATP, reductant (sodium dithionite), NifNE, NifH, NifB-cofactor (NifB-co), and NifX.

There is limited information regarding the iron, sulfur, and molybdenum donors to FeMo-co. The metabolic product of NifB, termed NifB-co, has been shown to be comprised only of iron and sulfur (14). Studies by Allen et al. (15) with 55Fe- and 35S-labeled NifB-co have conclusively shown that NifB-co functions as a specific iron and sulfur donor to FeMo-co. However, whether NifB-co is the sole iron and sulfur donor to FeMo-co or if additional components are required for this purpose still needs to be determined.

The in vivo accumulation of molybdenum in A. vinelandii and K. pneumoniae was studied by Pienkos and Brill (16). They reported the accumulation of molybdenum on a non-nif protein termed Mo-storage protein (Mo-sto) in A. vinelandii. The 99Mo incorporation study in a nifDK mutant of K. pneumoniae, by Ugalde et al. (17), revealed that the radiolabel accumulated on a 65-kDa protein. The in vitro FeMo-co biosynthesis system was utilized by Hoover et al. (4) with various homologs of homocitrate to determine which of the organic acids were able to support 99Mo incorporation into NifKD. Allen et al. (18) have used 99Mo and the in vitro biosynthesis system involving various mutant strains of A. vinelandii and have observed the accumulation of 99Mo on the non-nif chaperone-protein, gamma.

In the present study, we have used 99Mo and the purified in vitro FeMo-co biosynthesis system to investigate the pattern of incorporation of the radiolabel. We report the accumulation of a 99Mo-containing FeMo-co precursor on NifNE, NifH, and NifX. We present evidence suggesting that NifH/NifNE complex serves as the entry point for molybdenum into the FeMo-co biosynthetic pathway and that NifX may play a role in specifying the organic acid moiety of FeMo-co.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Leupeptin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), phosphocreatine, creatine phosphokinase, homocitrate lactone, D,L-isocitric acid, D-malic acid, 2 ketoglutarate, tricarballylic acid, and ATP (as disodium salt) were from Sigma Chemical Co. 1,2,4-Butane tricarboxylic acid was from Chem Service (West Chester, PA). Citric acid was obtained from Aldrich Chem Co. Tris base, glycerol, and glycine were from Fisher Scientific Co. Sodium dithionite (DTH) was from Fluka. Acrylamide/bisacrylamide solutions (37.5%:1%), and SDS-PAGE equipment was from Bio-Rad. Carrier-free 99Mo was obtained from the Department of BioMedical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Buffers-- 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) was used throughout unless otherwise noted. All buffers were sparged with nitrogen for at least 20 min prior to alternating cycles of evacuation and flushing with argon on a gassing manifold. DTH was added to a final concentration of 1 mM. Buffers used for protein purification contained 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin and 0.2 mM PMSF.

In vitro FeMo-co Synthesis-- The in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reactions were performed in 9-ml serum vials sealed with serum stoppers. The vials were repeatedly evacuated and flushed with argon gas and rinsed with 0.3 ml of anaerobic buffer. The complete purified in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reaction mixture contained the following components: 0.1 ml of anaerobic buffer, 0.2 nmol of unlabeled sodium molybdate, 100 nmol of homocitrate that had been treated with base to cleave the lactone (pH 8.0), 0.2 ml of an ATP-regenerating system (containing 3.6 mM ATP, 6.3 mM MgCl2, 51 mM creatine phosphate, 20 units/ml creatine phosphokinase, and 6.3 mM DTH in anaerobic buffer), 10 µl of a solution containing NifB-co (0.4 nmol of iron/µl), 7.5-30 µg of purified NifNE, 25 µg of purified NifH, 15 µg of purified NifX, 55 µg of purified apodinitrogenase (alpha 2beta 2gamma 2), and 99Mo (1.5 million cpm, prepared in anoxic Tris-HCl buffer containing 1.7 mM DTH). The total volume of each reaction mixture was 510 µl. The reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 35 min to allow FeMo-co synthesis and the insertion of the newly formed FeMo-co into apodinitrogenase. Reactions that were used to monitor only FeMo-co biosynthesis contained all the components listed above except for apodinitrogenase. The total volume for such reaction mixtures was 490 µl.

Reactions containing various organic acids in place of homocitrate were performed as described by Imperial et al. (19). The final concentrations of the various homocitrate analogs in the in vitro FeMo-co synthesis assay were 8 mM for citrate and malate, 1.6 mM for isocitrate and 2-ketoglutarate, and 16 mM for tricarballylate and for 1,2,4-butane tricarboxylate. Solutions of the various homocitrate analogs were prepared in dilute NaOH and were brought to pH 9.0 prior to their addition to the assay.

100-µl portions of the reaction mixtures were then subjected to anoxic native gel electrophoresis. FeMo-co synthesis activity of duplicate reactions was monitored by the acetylene reduction assay to demonstrate that all components of the reaction mixture were active and functional (45).

Definition of Assays-- In vitro FeMo-co synthesis assays containing all components known to be essential for FeMo-co synthesis, namely NifNE, NifB-co, NifH, and NifX, as well as apodinitrogenase, will be referred to as the complete reaction, while those lacking a specific component will be labeled minus that particular component. Thus, assays lacking NifB-co will be referred to as "minus-NifB-co reaction."

Electrophoresis, Immunoblots, and Visualization of Radioactivity-- Procedures for SDS-PAGE, anoxic native gel electrophoresis, immunoblotting, and for visualization of radioactivity have been described previously (20). Proteins were resolved on 7-20% acrylamide and 0-20% sucrose gradient gels. Proteins in reaction mixtures including apodinitrogenase were resolved on 5-10% acrylamide and 0-20% sucrose. After electrophoresis at 100 mV for 18 h, the gels were dried and exposed to a phosphor screen for 4-6 h. Screens were scanned using a Cyclone storage phosphor system (Packard Instruments). Quantitation of the radiolabel incorporated into proteins was performed using Optiquant software (Packard Instruments). The amount of molybdenum incorporated into proteins was estimated from the known specific activity of 99Mo in the reaction mixture and the quantitation of the amount of radioactivity in the bands by comparison with known amounts of 99Mo blotted on a piece of filter paper.

Purification of Other Components-- Dinitrogenase and NifH were purified as described previously (21). Gamma protein (NafY) was purified from an Escherichia coli strain overexpressing the gamma gene (nafY), as described by Rubio et al.2 Procedures for the purification of NifNE, apodinitrogenase, and NifX have been described by Roll et al. (23), Paustian et al. (24), and Rangaraj et al. (20), respectively. FeMo-co and NifB-co were purified as described by Shah et al. (2, 14). Protein was determined as described previously (25) using bovine serum albumin as standard.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Incorporation of 99Mo into Components of the In Vitro FeMo-co Synthesis Reaction Mixture-- Earlier studies have indicated that the products of nifB, H, N, E, and X are required for the in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reaction (10, 13, 14, 26). Apart from the above-mentioned gene products, NifV and NifQ are also required during FeMo-co biosynthesis in vivo for the production of homocitrate and for a proposed molybdenum processing step, respectively (11, 27, 28). Typically, the in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reaction involves mixing extracts from different mutants defective in the synthesis of the cofactor (13). In contrast, the purified in vitro FeMo-co synthesis system involves the addition of all components known to be required for cofactor synthesis, in their purified forms (10). The purified system yields lower FeMo-co synthesis activity in comparison to a system employing crude cell extracts, thus suggesting the requirement of other component(s) essential for cofactor synthesis (10). Apodinitrogenase, NifNE, NifB-co, NifH, and NifX were purified as described under "Experimental Procedures." The incorporation of 99Mo into components of the in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reaction was monitored by separating the proteins in the reaction mixture on anoxic native gels and by phosphorimage analyses of these gels (Fig. 1). Assignment of the various bands on the gel was accomplished by immunoblotting for the relevant proteins on similar gels. When all components known to be required for FeMo-co synthesis, namely NifNE, NifH, NifX, NifB-co, MgATP, and homocitrate are present (lane 1), incorporation of 99Mo into three distinct bands can be observed. In a minus-homocitrate reaction, as shown in lane 2, there is higher labeling of NifH as well as incorporation of label into a slower-migrating band labeled NifNE. An important feature to be noted here is that the total amount of radiolabel incorporated into the various proteins is higher in lane 2 versus lane 1 of Fig. 1. This result was observed consistently, and one possible explanation for this phenomenon is the inability of the proteins in the complete reaction mixture (lane 1) to bind finished FeMo-co. FeMo-co, being unstable in aqueous solutions, disintegrates, leading to a lower accumulation of the total radiolabel in a "complete" reaction mixture. However, when one of the components necessary for FeMo-co synthesis is missing from the reaction mixture, the cofactor biosynthetic pathway is blocked at a particular step. In this scenario, FeMo-co intermediates are still bound to various proteins, and thus the total amount of radiolabel in reactions missing an essential component for cofactor biosynthesis is higher than the reaction containing all the necessary components.


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Phosphorimager analyses of anoxic native gel illustrating the incorporation of 99Mo into the components of the purified in vitro FeMo-co synthesis system. The in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reactions containing all the components required for the synthesis of FeMo-co excluding apodinitrogenase were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1, reaction including all components required for the biosynthesis of FeMo-co; lane 2, minus-homocitrate reaction; lane 3, minus-MgATP reaction; lane 4, minus-NifH reaction; lane 5, minus-NifX reaction; lane 6, minus-NifNE reaction; lane 7, minus-NifB-co reaction. The table below the figure indicates the presence (+) or absence (-) of the particular component. The positions of NifNE, NifH, and NifX are indicated.

The minus-MgATP (lane 3), minus-NifH (lane 4), minus-NifNE (lane 6), and minus-NifB-co (lane 7) reactions do not show incorporation of radiolabel into any distinct bands. This suggests that the incorporation of 99Mo into NifNE, NifH, and NifX is dependent on the presence of MgATP, NifNE, NifB-co and NifH. The minus-NifX reaction (lane 5), however, showed the incorporation of 99Mo into NifH and to a lesser extent into NifNE, indicating that NifX likely plays a role in the latter part of the cofactor biosynthetic pathway.

Incorporation of 99Mo-containing FeMo-co Precursor into NifNE-- NifNE is believed to play a catalytic role in the early part of the FeMo-co biosynthetic pathway (23). Fig. 1 shows that 99Mo incorporation into NifNE is dependent on the presence of MgATP (lane 3), on NifH (lane 4), and on NifB-co (lane 7). A homocitrate-deficient reaction (lane 2) showed a higher level of incorporation of 99Mo into NifNE, suggesting that FeMo-co biosynthesis may be blocked at the point where homocitrate is added to the FeMo-co precursor. The addition of homocitrate (lane 1) allowed cofactor biosynthesis to proceed beyond this point, and consequently a lower level of labeling of NifNE is observed. The data presented here suggest that the precursor of FeMo-co on NifNE is homocitrate-deficient. Because the incorporation of 99Mo is dependent on the presence of MgATP, NifB-co, and NifH and because NifNE alone in the presence of MgATP did not show any incorporation of 99Mo (data not shown), we conclude that the radiolabel on NifNE is not adventitious. Quantitation of the 99Mo label on NifNE was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" and revealed 0.6 nmol of molybdenum per nmol NifNE.

In the above reactions excess NifNE (30 µg) was used to observe the incorporation of 99Mo label into NifNE. When a catalytic quantity of NifNE (7.5 µg) was used, 99Mo accumulation on NifNE was greatly diminished; but this level of NifNE was sufficient for the radiolabel accumulation on NifH and NifX, as can be observed in Figs. 2 and 3. Prior to this study, 99Mo-labeling of NifNE has not been observed. Previous studies (17, 18) have involved the use of crude cell extracts, and two possible reasons for not observing the incorporation of 99Mo into NifNE could be the interference from other proteins present in the cell extracts, or that the synthesis of FeMo-co is allowed to proceed beyond NifNE. The purified in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reaction is a well-defined system and, being devoid of other extraneous components present in crude enzyme preparations, has facilitated the identification of hitherto undetected incorporation of a FeMo-co precursor into NifNE.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Phosphorimager analyses of anoxic native gel illustrating the incorporation of 99Mo into NifH. The in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reactions containing all the components required for the synthesis of FeMo-co excluding apodinitrogenase were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1, reaction including all components required for the biosynthesis of FeMo-co and excluding gamma; lane 2, minus-homocitrate reaction; lane 3, same as in lane 1 and including NafY (gamma); lane 4, same as in lane 1 and including apodinitrogenase (alpha 2beta 2gamma 2) (the gamma  subunit is NafY); lane 5, reaction containing only NifH and MgATP. The table below the figure indicates the presence (+) or absence (-) of the particular component. The positions of dinitrogenase, NifH, NafY-FeMo-co, and NifX are indicated.


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Phosphorimager analyses of anoxic native gel illustrating the organic acid-dependent incorporation of 99Mo into NifX. The in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reactions containing all the components required for the synthesis of FeMo-co excluding apodinitrogenase were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1, reaction including homocitrate; lane 2, reaction excluding organic acid; lane 3, reaction including isocitrate; lane 4, reaction including malate; lane 5, reaction including 1,2,4-butane tricarboxylate; lane 6, reaction including tricarballylate; lane 7, reaction including citrate; lane 8, reaction including 2-ketoglutarate. The positions of NifH and NifX are indicated.

Incorporation of 99Mo-containing FeMo-co Precursor into NifH-- The purified in vitro FeMo-co synthesis system containing NifH, NifX, NafY, apodinitrogenase, and catalytic amounts of NifNE (7.5 µg) was utilized for the investigation of 99Mo incorporation into NifH. The results shown in Fig. 1 indicate that significant incorporation of the heterometal into NifH occurred only when components known to be required for FeMo-co biosynthesis were present in the reaction mixture. For example, when MgATP, NifNE, or NifB-co (Fig. 1, lanes 3, 6, and 7) were not included in the reaction mixture, no incorporation of 99Mo into NifH could be observed. However, a minimal level of radiolabel was incorporated into NifH when a high concentration of NifH (>5 nmol) was incubated with 99Mo and MgATP (Fig. 2, lane 5). This low level of nonspecific binding to molybdenum possibly occurs at the PO43--binding site in NifH. It should be noted here that Georgiadis et al. (29) have reported the presence of a molybdenum atom in the structure of NifH. In a minus-homocitrate reaction mixture, a higher level of incorporation was consistently observed (lane 2 in Figs. 1 and 2), suggesting that the FeMo-co precursor on NifH lacked homocitrate. Quantitation of radiolabel on NifH performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" indicated 0.54 nmol of molybdenum per nmol NifH. Upon the addition of the non-nif chaperone protein NafY (gamma) to the reaction mixture (Fig. 2, lane 3), the label is seen on a slightly faster migrating species than NifH that is labeled NafY, as judged by the migrating pattern of NafY-FeMo-co species on similar gels as determined by immunoblotting. This demonstrates a transfer of finished FeMo-co from NifH and NifX to NafY. Homer et al. (30) have shown that NafY specifically binds FeMo-co, by in vitro as well as in vivo studies. When purified apodinitrogenase (alpha 2beta 2gamma 2) is added to the reaction mixture (lane 4), the 99Mo label can be observed at the dinitrogenase position with a concomitant decrease in the amount of label associated with NifH and with NifX, indicating that the completed FeMo-co has been inserted into apodinitrogenase.

Incorporation of 99Mo-containing FeMo-co Precursor into NifX-- Using the purified in vitro FeMo-co synthesis system by Shah et al. (10), NifX has been shown to be required for FeMo-co synthesis. When all components known to be required for FeMo-co synthesis are present in the reaction mixture including NifH, NifX, and catalytic amounts of NifNE (7.5 µg), 99Mo-radiolabel is observed on NifX, apart from NifNE and NifH (Fig. 1). This incorporation of 99Mo into NifX is dependent on the presence of MgATP, NifH, NifNE, and NifB-co (Fig. 1, lanes 3, 4 and 6, 7). There was no incorporation of the radiolabel when NifX was incubated by itself with 99Mo in the presence or absence of MgATP (data not shown). However, a minus-NifX reaction could support the incorporation into NifNE as well as NifH (Fig. 1, lane 5), suggesting that NifX plays a role in the latter part of the FeMo-co biosynthetic pathway.

The effect of various organic acids on the incorporation of 99Mo into the components of the purified in vitro FeMo-co biosynthesis system was studied by including various organic acids in the reaction mixture. The reaction mixtures included NifH, NifX, and catalytic amounts of NifNE (7.5 µg) and were performed as described in the "Experimental Procedures" section. The results of this study, shown in Fig. 3, indicate that there is incorporation of 99Mo into NifH as well as NifX. However, while the incorporation of the radiolabel into NifH occurred no matter what organic acid was present in the reaction mixture, the incorporation into NifX was dependent on the presence of certain organic acids. Only homocitrate, isocitrate, malate, citrate, and 2-ketoglutarate could support the incorporation of 99Mo into NifX (Fig. 3, lanes 1, 3, 4, and 7, 8). The organic acids 1,2,4-butane tricarboxylate and tricarballylate (lanes 5 and 6) did not support the synthesis of FeMo-co and the incorporation of radiolabel into NifX. Previous studies by Hoover et al. (4) and by Imperial et al. (19) have shown that both organic acids 1,2,4-butane tricarboxylate and tricarballylate did not support the incorporation of 99Mo into dinitrogenase when homocitrate was replaced with these organic acids. Both 1,2,4-butane tricarboxylate and tricarballylate have also been shown to be incapable of supporting substrate reduction activity. In the present study we have shown that there is minimal incorporation of the radiolabel into NifX when the above organic acids are used in the in vitro FeMo-co biosynthesis system lacking apodinitrogenase. These data suggest a role for NifX in specifying the organic acid moiety of FeMo-co. Interestingly, substitution of citrate for homocitrate seems to enhance accumulation of a FeMo-co precursor (or FeMo-co) on NifX (lane 7). This is consistent with previous results by Hoover et al. (4).

Based on the above results, it seemed likely that NifX played a role in the latter part of the cofactor biosynthetic pathway. To further analyze the role of NifX, we monitored the incorporation of 99Mo label into apodinitrogenase in reactions including and excluding NifX. The in vitro FeMo-co biosynthesis assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The complete reaction (Fig. 4, lane 1) shows the incorporation of 99Mo into dinitrogenase. A specific activity of 134.5 nmol per min per mg of protein was obtained and this suggested the formation of FeMo-co and its insertion into apodinitrogenase (alpha 2beta 2gamma 2). In the absence of NifB-co, NifH, or MgATP there was no incorporation of the radiolabel into dinitrogenase. However, a minus-NifX reaction (lane 4) showed a much lower level of label incorporated into dinitrogenase. This reaction also showed a lower specific activity (29.8 nmol) than the reaction containing NifX. Quantitation of the radiolabel on dinitrogenase revealed ~4.5 times lower level of label on the dinitrogenase band in the minus-NifX reaction when compared with the reaction that contained NifX. These data suggest a role for NifX in the insertion process of the cofactor into apodinitrogenase; however, this role might not be absolutely required.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Phosphorimager analyses of anoxic native gel illustrating the NifX-dependent incorporation of 99Mo into apodinitrogenase. The in vitro FeMo-co synthesis reactions containing all the components required for the synthesis of FeMo-co including apodinitrogenase were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1, reaction including all components required for the biosynthesis of FeMo-co and apodinitrogenase (alpha 2beta 2gamma 2); lane 2, minus-NifB-co reaction; lane 3, minus-NifH reaction; lane 4, minus-NifX reaction; lane 5, minus-MgATP reaction. The table below the figure indicates the presence (+) or absence (-) of the particular component. The position of dinitrogenase is indicated. Specific activities (nmol C2H4 per min per mg apodinitrogenase) are reported; n.d., not determined.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have studied the accumulation of 99Mo into proteins involved in the biosynthesis of FeMo-co. The salient features of the present study are: 1) NifNE, NifH, and NifX accumulate 99Mo-FeMo-co precursors; 2) transfer of 99Mo label from NifH and NifX to NafY or apodinitrogenase, indicating the presence of completed FeMo-co; 3) involvement of NifX in specifying organic acid moiety of FeMo-co; and 4) requirement of NifNE and NifH for the incorporation of molybdenum into the FeMo-co biosynthetic pathway.

Based on the results presented in this study and from previous studies with 55Fe-NifB-co (20), the following hypothesis for the biosynthesis of FeMo-co is consistent with our results. NifNE binds NifB-co; then NifH binds the NifNE-NifB-co complex. Our previous results suggest that NifH and NifNE form a complex (42), and results presented here suggest that only when both NifH and NifNE are present is either protein capable of binding molybdenum. Hence, we propose that the addition of molybdenum to NifB-co occurs within the NifNE-NifB-co-NifH complex to yield a Mo-containing FeMo-co precursor. The binding of NifB-co to NifNE is one of the early steps in FeMo-co biosynthesis. This event has been observed as a change in the mobility of NifNE on anoxic native gels by Roll et al. (23) and by visualizing 55Fe label on NifNE when radiolabeled NifB-co was used by Allen et al. (15) and Rangaraj et al. (20). Because the binding of NifB-co to NifNE does not require the presence of any additional factors such as MgATP or NifH, this step has been suggested as one of the first steps in the cofactor biosynthetic pathway. It is not yet known if any change is brought about in NifB-co upon its binding to NifNE. The role of NifNE in FeMo-co biosynthesis is thought to be that of a scaffold protein upon which FeMo-co is synthesized (44). This is supported by the facts that NifNE and dinitrogenase share high sequence similarity and that apodinitrogenase is not required for FeMo-co synthesis. In A. vinelandii, NifNE is absolutely required for the biosynthesis of FeMo-co as nifN or E mutants show a definite nif- phenotype. However, a recent report by Siemann et al. (31) reveals that in Rhodobacter capsulatus NifNE is not essential for the biosynthesis of FeMo-co, though its presence greatly enhances the content of intact FeMo-co-containing NifDK.

NifB-co has been shown to function as a specific iron and sulfur donor to FeMo-co. It is not known whether all of the iron and sulfur of FeMo-co are donated solely by NifB-co, but it seems likely that a major portion of the iron and sulfur in FeMo-co is derived from NifB-co. Though the structure of NifB-co is yet to be solved, it is known that NifB-co contains iron and sulfur, but not molybdenum (14). NifU and NifS are believed to be involved in mobilizing iron and sulfur (32, 33), respectively, into NifB for the synthesis of NifB-co because NifB-co levels in K. pneumoniae mutants lacking nifS and nifU are greatly decreased.3

The next step in FeMo-co biosynthesis involves NifH. NifH has been shown to be a multifunctional "moonlighting" protein (34) playing diverse roles in the nitrogenase enzyme system: 1) substrate reduction wherein it functions as the obligate electron donor to dinitrogenase (35); 2) the maturation of apodinitrogenase wherein its presence is required for associating NafY with the NafY-deficient apodinitrogenase (36); and 3) the biosynthesis of FeMo-co (8, 26, 37). Its role in substrate reduction is best understood, while the specific role(s) of NifH in the latter two processes is obscure. The facts that several site-specifically altered forms of NifH showing altered MgATP reactivities function in cofactor biosynthesis (38-40) and that the 4Fe-4S cluster of the protein is not required for its function in this process (41) argue for a role that is very different from the NifH role in substrate reduction. We have shown in the present study that a 99Mo-labeled FeMo-co precursor accumulates on NifH and that this accumulation of radiolabel is dependent upon the presence of NifB-co and NifNE as well as MgATP. Because the presence of both NifNE and NifH is required to observe any accumulation of 99Mo, we propose that molybdenum is added to the FeMo-co precursor bound by the NifNE-NifH complex. This hypothesis is further strengthened by the study of L127Delta NifH (a site-specifically altered form of NifH) and NifNE that suggested an interaction of NifH with only the NifB-co associated form of NifNE (42). Studies with 55Fe-NifB-co also show accumulation of a FeMo-co precursor on NifH (20). In a minus-NifH reaction there is no accumulation of molybdenum on any protein, suggesting that NifH is necessary for the entry of molybdenum into the FeMo-co biosynthetic pathway. Data presented in this study suggest that the action of NifH occurs prior to the addition of homocitrate, as a minus-homocitrate reaction showed a higher level of NifH labeling than a reaction wherein homocitrate was present. We have presented evidence for the involvement of NifH along with NifNE in the addition of heterometal, molybdenum, to the cofactor precursor. In this context, it seems likely that VnfH and AnfH, NifH counterparts in the vnf and the anf systems, serve in a similar manner and specify V and Fe respectively, during FeV-co and FeFe-co biosyntheses.

The next step in FeMo-co biosynthesis involves the action of NifX. The presence of NifX is not necessary for the accumulation of 99Mo label on NifH. This suggests that NifX plays a role in the latter part of the FeMo-co biosynthetic pathway. In a previous study we have shown that NifX is capable of binding NifB-co and that a 55Fe-labeled FeMo-co precursor accumulated on NifX (20). Recent data suggest that NifX-bound NifB-co can be transferred to NifNE.2 However, whether this transfer is physiologically relevant remains to be determined. In the present study, we have shown the homocitrate-dependent labeling of NifX, suggesting a role for NifX in specifying the organic acid moiety in FeMo-co. Also, an enhancement in incorporation of the 99Mo-radiolabel into apodinitrogenase in the presence of NifX that also correlates with C2H2 reduction activity has been observed. This suggests a role for NifX in the cofactor insertion process. In this context, VnfX, the NifX homolog in the vanadium nitrogenase system, has also been shown to accumulate a FeV-co precursor, and Rüttimann et al. (43) have shown the homocitrate-dependent transfer of the VnfX-bound FeV-co precursor to apodinitrogenase.

The non-nif protein NafY (aka gamma) has been postulated to function as a chaperone-insertase in the biosynthesis of NifDK. Evidence for the transfer of 99Mo label from NifH and NifX to NafY is seen in Fig. 2, suggesting the completion of FeMo-co synthesis. Homer et al. (30) have shown that NafY binds FeMo-co specifically and have postulated a role for NafY in the cofactor insertion process. However, Rubio et al. (22) have shown that nafY mutants exhibit a nif phenotype only under stress conditions. One interpretation of their data is that NafY is required for the stability of apodinitrogenase in an open conformation that is favorable to the insertion of FeMo-co.

In vivo, FeMo-co biosynthesis might not occur in sequential steps on uncomplexed proteins. A FeMo-co biosynthetic complex comprised of NifNE, NifX, and NifH might possibly exist, to which NifB-co, Mo, and homocitrate are supplied by NifB, NifQ, and NifV, respectively. The FeMo-co produced in the complex might be bound by NafY, which delivers the cofactor to apodinitrogenase. Results presented in this study and other studies were obtained with the use of either purified proteins or the use of cell-free extracts. We believe that the FeMo-co biosynthetic complex in these cases has been teased apart so that FeMo-co biosynthesis can be studied as several individual steps rather than as one concerted, continuous event.

Though the sequence of steps in the FeMo-co biosynthetic pathway is better understood at present than a few years ago, the exact roles played by NifH and NifX in this process remain to be explored. Questions concerning the role of MgATP and whether nucleotide hydrolysis is required for FeMo-co synthesis also remain to be addressed. At some stage reductant is required during the biosynthesis of FeMo-co, presumably for the reduction of Mo(VI) to Mo(IV), the formal oxidation state proposed for molybdenum in FeMo-co (46). The exact step at which reductant is required needs to be addressed. Future studies will be aimed at answering the above questions.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Luis Rubio for purified gamma protein. We thank Vinod Shah, Gary Roberts, and Carmen Rüttimann-Johnson for helpful discussions. We thank Laura Vanderploeg for help with figures.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work has been supported by National Institutes of Health/NIGMS Grant GM35332 (to P. W. L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: Pierce Chemical Co., 3747 N. Meridian Road, Rockford, IL 61105.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, 101 Giannini Hall, Rm. 3100, Berkeley, CA 94720. Tel.: 510-642-7171; Fax: 510-642-4612; E-mail: pludden@nature.berkeley.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 9, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204581200

3 P. Rangaraj and P. W. Ludden, unpublished data.

2 Rubio et al., unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: FeMo-co, iron-molybdenum cofactor; DTH, sodium dithionite.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Burris, R. H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 9339-9342[Free Full Text]
2. Shah, V. K., and Brill, W. J. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 3249-3253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Hawkes, T. R., McLean, P. A., and Smith, B. E. (1984) Biochem. J. 217, 317-321[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Hoover, T. R., Imperial, J., Liang, J., Ludden, P. W., and Shah, V. K. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 3647-3652[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Kim, J., and Rees, D. C. (1992) Nature 360, 553-560[CrossRef]
6. Kim, J., and Rees, D. C. (1992) Science 257, 1677-1682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Roberts, G. P., and Brill, W. J. (1980) J. Bacteriol. 144, 210-221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Filler, W. A., Kemp, R. M., Ng, J. C., Hawkes, T. R., Dixon, R. A., and Smith, B. E. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 160, 371-377[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. McLean, P. A., Smith, B. E., and Dixon, R. A. (1983) Biochem. J. 211, 589-597[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Shah, V. K., Rangaraj, P., Chatterjee, R., Allen, R. M., Roll, J. T., Roberts, G. P., and Ludden, P. W. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181, 2797-2801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Imperial, J., Ugalde, R. A., Shah, V. K., and Brill, W. J. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 158, 187-194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Imperial, J., Shah, V. K., Ugalde, R. A., Ludden, P. W., and Brill, W. J. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 1784-1786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Shah, V. K., Imperial, J., Ugalde, R. A., Ludden, P. W., and Brill, W. J. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 1636-1640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Shah, V. K., Allen, J. R., Spangler, N. J., and Ludden, P. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1154-1158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Allen, R. M., Chatterjee, R., Ludden, P. W., and Shah, V. K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26890-26896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Pienkos, P. T., and Brill, W. J. (1981) J. Bacteriol. 145, 743-751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Ugalde, R. A., Imperial, J., Shah, V. K., and Brill, W. J. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 159, 888-893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Allen, R. M., Roll, J. T., Rangaraj, P., Shah, V. K., Roberts, G. P., and Ludden, P. W. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15869-15874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Imperial, J., Hoover, T. R., Madden, M. S., Ludden, P. W., and Shah, V. K. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 7796-7799[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Rangaraj, P., Ruttimann-Johnson, C., Shah, V. K., and Ludden, P. W. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 15968-15974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Shah, V. K., and Brill, W. J. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 305, 445-454[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Rubio, L. M., Rangaraj, P., Homer, M. J., Roberts, G. P., and Ludden, P. W. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 14299-14305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Roll, J. T., Shah, V. K., Dean, D. R., and Roberts, G. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4432-4437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Paustian, T. D., Shah, V. K., and Roberts, G. P. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 3515-3522[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, A. K., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provezano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., and Klenk, D. C. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 150, 175-179
26. Shah, V. K., Hoover, T. R., Imperial, J., Paustian, T. D., Roberts, G. P., and Ludden, P. W. (1988) in Nitrogen Fixation: Hundred Years After (Bothe, H. , de Bruijn, F. J. , and Newton, W. E., eds) , pp. 115-120, Gustav Fischer, Cologne
27. Hoover, T. R., Shah, V. K., Roberts, G. P., and Ludden, P. W. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 167, 999-1003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Hoover, T. R., Robertson, A. D., Cerny, R. L., Hayes, R. N., Imperial, J., Shah, V. K., and Ludden, P. W. (1987) Nature 329, 855-857[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Georgiadis, M. M., Komiya, H., Chakrabarti, P., Woo, D., Kornuc, J. J., and Rees, D. C. (1992) Science 257, 1653-1659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Homer, M. J., Dean, D. R., and Roberts, G. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24745-24752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Siemann, S., Schneider, K., Behrens, K., Knochel, A., Klipp, W., and Muller, A. (2001) Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 1940-1952[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Fu, W., Jack, R. F., Morgan, T. V., Dean, D. R., and Johnson, M. K. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 13455-13463[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Zheng, L., White, R. H., Cash, V. L., Jack, R. F., and Dean, D. R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2754-2758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Jeffery, C. J. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 8-11[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Ljones, T., and Burris, R. H. (1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 275, 93-101[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Allen, R. M., Homer, M. J., Chatterjee, R., Ludden, P. W., Roberts, G. P., and Shah, V. K. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23670-23674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Robinson, A. C., Dean, D. R., and Burgess, B. K. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14327-14332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Gavini, N., and Burgess, B. K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 21179-21186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Wolle, D., Dean, D. R., and Howard, J. B. (1992) Science 258, 992-995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Rangaraj, P., Ryle, M. J., Lanzilotta, W. N., Ludden, P. W., and Shah, V. K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 19778-19784[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Rangaraj, P., Shah, V. K., and Ludden, P. W. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 11250-11255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Rangaraj, P., Ryle, M. J., Lanzilotta, W. N., Goodwin, P. J., Dean, D. R., Shah, V. K., and Ludden, P. W. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29413-29419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Rüttimann-Johnson, C., Rangaraj, P., Shah, V. K., and Ludden, P. W. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 4522-4526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Brigle, K. E., Weiss, H. C., Newton, W. E., and Dean, D. R. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 1547-1553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Shah, V. K., Ugalde, R. A., Imperial, J., and Brill, W. J. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 3891-3894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Coucouvanis, D. (1993) in Molybdenum Enzymes, Cofactors and Model Systems (Steifel, E. I. , Coucouvanis, D. , and Newton, W. E., eds) , pp. 304-331, ACS Press, Washington, D. C.


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. A. Hernandez, L. Curatti, C. P. Aznar, Z. Perova, R. D. Britt, and L. M. Rubio
From the Cover: Metal trafficking for nitrogen fixation: NifQ donates molybdenum to NifEN/NifH for the biosynthesis of the nitrogenase FeMo-cofactor
PNAS, August 19, 2008; 105(33): 11679 - 11684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Soboh, R. Y. Igarashi, J. A. Hernandez, and L. M. Rubio
Purification of a NifEN Protein Complex That Contains Bound Molybdenum and a FeMo-Co Precursor from an Azotobacter vinelandii {Delta}nifHDK Strain
J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2006; 281(48): 36701 - 36709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Hu, M. C. Corbett, A. W. Fay, J. A. Webber, K. O. Hodgson, B. Hedman, and M. W. Ribbe
From the Cover: Nitrogen Fixation Special Feature: Nitrogenase Fe protein: A molybdate/homocitrate insertase
PNAS, November 14, 2006; 103(46): 17125 - 17130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Curatti, P. W. Ludden, and L. M. Rubio
From the Cover: NifB-dependent in vitro synthesis of the iron-molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase
PNAS, April 4, 2006; 103(14): 5297 - 5301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A.-S. Steunou, D. Bhaya, M. M. Bateson, M. C. Melendrez, D. M. Ward, E. Brecht, J. W. Peters, M. Kühl, and A. R. Grossman
From the Cover: In situ analysis of nitrogen fixation and metabolic switching in unicellular thermophilic cyanobacteria inhabiting hot spring microbial mats
PNAS, February 14, 2006; 103(7): 2398 - 2403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Hu, A. W. Fay, and M. W. Ribbe
Identification of a nitrogenase FeMo cofactor precursor on NifEN complex
PNAS, March 1, 2005; 102(9): 3236 - 3241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/42/40106    most recent
M204581200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rangaraj, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ludden, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rangaraj, P.
Right arrow Articles by Ludden, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement