Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205524200 on August 7, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 43, 40189-40195, October 25, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/43/40189    most recent
M205524200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Localization of the Thyroid Peroxidase Autoantibody Immunodominant Region to a Junctional Region Containing Portions of the Domains Homologous to Complement Control Protein and Myeloperoxidase*

Jin Guo, Sandra M. McLachlan, and Basil RapoportDagger

From the Autoimmune Disease Unit, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute and School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90048

Received for publication, June 4, 2002, and in revised form, July 15, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Thyroid peroxidase (TPO) autoantibody epitopes are largely restricted to an immunodominant region (IDR) on the extracellular region of the native molecule. Localization of the IDR has been a longstanding and difficult goal. The TPO extracellular region comprises a large myeloperoxidase-like domain, linked to the plasma membrane by two smaller domains with homology to complement control protein (CCP) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), respectively. Recent studies have focused on the CCP- and EGF-like domains as the putative location of the TPO autoantibody IDR. To address this issue, we attempted to express on the surface of transfected cells native TPO in which the CCP- and EGF-like domains were deleted, either together or individually. We used a quartet of human monoclonal autoantibodies that define the TPO IDR, as well as polyclonal TPO autoantibodies in patients' sera, to detect these mutated TPO molecules by flow cytometry. The combined CCP/EGF-like domain deletion did not produce a signal with TPO autoantibodies but did not traffic to the cell surface. In contrast, both monoclonal and polyclonal autoantibodies recognized TPO with the juxtamembrane EGF-like domain deleted equally as well as the wild-type TPO on the cell surface. TPO with the CCP-like domain deleted expressed normally on the cell surface, as determined using the polyclonal mouse antiserum. Nevertheless, this modified TPO molecule was recognized very poorly by both the human monoclonal autoantibodies and the polyclonal autoantibodies in patients' sera. In conclusion, we have clearly excluded the juxtamembrane EGF-like domain as being part of the IDR. In contrast, a component of the CCP-like domain does contribute to the IDR. These data, together with findings from other studies, localize the TPO autoantibody IDR to the junction of the CCP-like domain and the much larger myeloperoxidase-like domain on TPO.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Thyroid peroxidase (TPO),1 a heme-containing glycoprotein on the thyrocyte apical membrane that plays a key role in thyroid hormone biosynthesis, is also the dominant autoantigen in human autoimmune thyroiditis (1-3). A remarkable feature of polyclonal TPO autoantibodies in the sera of all patients is that their epitopes are largely directed to a restricted area on the native antigen, termed the immunodominant region (IDR)(reviewed in Ref. 4). This epitopic profile contrasts with antibodies generated in mice by immunization with purified TPO together with adjuvant, which have a wide range of epitopes on both native and denatured TPO (5). Even within the IDR, TPO autoantibodies in an individual patient maintain the same epitopic fingerprint over many years (lack of epitope spreading) (6), a phenomenon that appears to have a genetic basis (7).

The role of TPO autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of disease is debated. Some evidence supports their involvement in thyrocyte damage by antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity (8, 9). Perhaps more important is the influence of antibodies complexed to antigen in modulating antigen processing with enhancement or suppression of presentation of different T cell determinants (10). Identification of the TPO IDR may, therefore, provide important information for understanding the immunopathological mechanism underlying autoimmune thyroiditis and may facilitate identification of molecules for immunosuppression of disease. Consequently, there has been much effort over the past decade, utilizing different approaches, to identify the precise amino acids that comprise the TPO IDR, a difficult task because of the need to work with the native molecule and the lack of information on the three-dimensional structure of TPO.

TPO is a 933-amino acid residue molecule with a single membrane-spanning region (11-13). The major extracellular portion of the TPO molecule (amino acid residues 1-745) has high (~42%) homology to myeloperoxidase (MPO), an intracellular enzyme whose three-dimensional structure has been determined (14). The extracellular region of TPO also contains a juxtamembrane segment (amino acid residues 741-838) with a complement control protein (CCP)-like domain and an epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain (13, 15)(Fig. 1). Numerous studies (for example, Refs. 16-26) over the past decade have reported human TPO autoantibody epitopes in disparate locations throughout the MPO-like region. More recently, the CCP- and EGF-like portions of TPO have received much attention as containing a conformational B cell epitope for TPO autoantibodies (15, 27, 28). The present study was undertaken to address the question of the relative importance of the CCP- and EGF-like domains in the IDR of TPO autoantibodies in human autoimmune thyroid disease.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

TPO Deletion Mutants-- The cDNA for human TPO (11) in pcDNA3.1 was used as template for deletions. The following TPO codons were deleted from the cDNA by generating overlapping PCR fragments using Pfu (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)(Fig. 1): (i) codons 741-794 (CCP-like domain of TPO); (ii) codons 795-838 (EGF-like domain); and (iii) codons 741-838 (both CCP- and EGF-like domains). The upstream oligonucleotide primer contained the internal ClaI site in TPO (codons 631 and 632). The downstream oligonucleotide primer included an XbaI site in the vector multiple cloning site. After ClaI and XbaI restriction, the cDNA fragments were substituted for the corresponding regions in the wild-type TPO cDNA in pcDNA3.1. The PCR-generated fragments and their cloning sites were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing.

Expression of TPO and Detection by Flow Cytometry-- COS-7 cells were cultured in 10-cm diameter dishes in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and standard antibiotics. Plasmids (10 µg) for the wild-type TPO, the three different TPO deletion mutants, and the empty vector were transiently transfected into the COS-7 cells using FuGENE 6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the method of the manufacturer. Two days after transfection, cells were resuspended by mild trypsinization and used for flow cytometry. The following antibodies were used in a final volume of 0.1 ml: (i) polyclonal TPO antiserum (dilution 1:50) pooled from 5 BALB/c mice immunized with purified recombinant human TPO together with complete Freund's adjuvant (30); (ii) 4 recombinant human monoclonal autoantibodies to TPO expressed as Fab (TR1.8, TR1.9, WR1.7, and SP1.5; 10 µg/ml) (31); and (iii) 11 sera (dilution 1:50) from patients with thyroid autoimmunity known to contain TPO autoantibodies.

Antibody binding was detected with mouse anti-human kappa  phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal antibody or goat anti-mouse heavy plus light chain phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal antibody (both from Caltag, Burlingame, CA). Assays also included cells incubated with buffer alone or second antibody alone. Flow cytometry was performed (10,000 events) using a FACScan with Cellquest Software (BD PharMingen).

Competition by Monoclonal TPO Autoantibodies for Serum Antibody Binding to TPO-- The competition assays were performed as previously described (30, 31). In brief, the polyclonal mouse antiserum to TPO (see above) was incubated with [125I]TPO for 1 h at room temperature (~15,000 cpm, total volume 200 µl). Competition for this binding to [125I]TPO was performed by including a pool (10-8 M each) of four recombinant human monoclonal TPO autoantibodies expressed as Fab (TR1.8, TR1.9, WR1.7, and SP1.5) (30, 31). These four Fab define the TPO autoantibody immunodominant region. In the same assay, we included human serum with TPO autoantibodies (pool of sera from eight patients). Preliminary experiments were performed to determine the dilution of the mouse and human sera to achieve binding values of ~15% in the absence of the monoclonal TPO autoantibodies. Such dilution is necessary to obtain maximal inhibition of TPO binding by a saturating concentration of monoclonal autoantibodies. Immune complexes were precipitated using Pansorbin (Calbiochem) for the human sera (31) and Sac-Cel (IDS, Boldon, Great Britain) for the mouse sera (30), as previously described in detail. Nonspecific binding (~3% of total cpm) was subtracted to calculate the percentage of specific binding.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Deletion of Both CCP- and EGF-like Domains in TPO-- To determine directly whether the TPO autoantibody IDR was contained, wholly or in part, in the CCP- and EGF-like domains of TPO, we transfected COS-7 cells with TPO cDNA in which both of these domains (amino acid residues 741-838) were deleted (Fig. 1, Del-CCP/EGF). In this construct, the major MPO-like domain (residues 1-740) was linked to the membrane-spanning and intracellular components of TPO. For detection of the autoantibody IDR, we performed flow cytometry with four recombinant monoclonal human autoantibodies, expressed as Fab, that define this region (31). A representative example of these experiments, using one of the monoclonal human TPO autoantibodies (TR1.9) is shown in Fig. 2A. Because not all transiently transfected COS-7 cells express TPO on the surface, we expressed our data as the percentage gated in M2 rather than mean fluorescence. None of the monoclonal autoantibodies (TR1.8, TR1.9, WR1.7, and SP1.5, each to one quadrant of the IDR) produced a specific signal when tested with cells transfected with the TPO mutant (Fig. 2B). In contrast, as positive controls in the same experiments, the monoclonal autoantibodies readily recognized the wild-type TPO on the cell surface. As expected, no signal was observed with any of these antibodies when tested on cells transfected with the empty vector.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Depiction of the linear amino acid sequence of TPO with its domains. The extracellular region has homology to myeloperoxidase (MPO, amino acid residues 1-740) (13, 37); complement control protein (CCP, residues 741-794); and epidermal growth factor (EGF, residues 795-838) (13, 15). In the present study we deleted the CCP- and EGF-like domains in TPO, individually or in combination, leaving the membrane-spanning and intracellular regions intact.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Deletion of the CCP- and EGF-like domains in TPO. COS-7 cells were transfected with the cDNA for TPO with both the CCP- and the EGF-like domains deleted (Del-CCP/EGF). As controls, cells were also transfected with the cDNA for wild-type TPO or the empty vector (vector). A, examples of flow cytometric data contributing to panels B and C. Data are shown for the human monoclonal autoantibody TR1.9 and the polyclonal mouse antiserum to TPO (see "Materials and Methods"). Because transient transfection does not produce TPO expression in all cells, mean or median fluorescence values cannot be used. Therefore, we expressed the data as the percentage of cells attaining an arbitrary level of fluorescence above the non-expressing cells; the M2 gate is indicated. Flow cytometric data in subsequent figures utilized the same M2 gate. B, flow cytometry using four recombinant human monoclonal autoantibodies expressed as Fab (TR1.9, TR1.8, WR1.7, and SP1.5, 10 µg/ml; see "Materials and Methods"). Background binding was assessed using purified normal human IgG. Data shown for the M2 gate are the mean ± S.E. of values from three separate experiments. C, flow cytometry using a polyclonal mouse antiserum to TPO (pool of five mice immunized with purified TPO together with complete Freund's adjuvant; dilution 1:50). Background binding was assessed using normal mouse IgG. The percentage of cells within the M2 gate is shown as the mean ± S.E. of values from three separate experiments.

Two possible explanations existed for the inability of the monoclonal human autoantibodies to recognize TPO with the CCP/EGF-like domains deleted. Either the TPO autoantibody IDR was completely contained within the CCP/EGF-like domains or, alternatively, the consequence of the deletion was failure of the mutated TPO molecule to normally fold and/or traffic to the cell surface. To distinguish between these two possibilities we used a polyclonal murine antiserum with widely diverse epitopes extending beyond the autoantibody IDR (30). As with the monoclonal human autoantibodies, this serum failed to recognize cells transfected with TPO with the CCP/EGF-like domains deleted (Fig. 2, A and C). These data indicated failure of the mutant TPO to traffic to the cell surface, rather than loss of the TPO autoantibody IDR.

Deletion of the EGF-like Domain in TPO-- Because deletion of a smaller segment, rather than the entire CCP/EGF-like segment, could be compatible with cell surface expression, we deleted the juxtamembrane EGF-like domain alone (Fig. 1, Del-EGF). After transient transfection of COS-7 cells, flow cytometry was performed with the four monoclonal autoantibodies to the TPO immunodominant region (TR1.8, TR1.9, WR1.7, and SP1.5). All four recognized Del-EGF on the cell surface relative to the background signal observed with normal human IgG. One representative experiment is shown in Fig. 3A. There was no difference between monoclonal autoantibody recognition of Del-EGF and the wild-type TPO. No specific signals were evident with cells transfected with the empty vector. Data from three experiments are summarized in Fig. 3B.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Deletion of the EGF-like domain in TPO. COS-7 cells were transfected with the cDNA for TPO with the EGF-like domain deleted (Del-EGF). As controls, cells were also transfected with the empty vector (vector) with the cDNA for wild-type TPO. A, flow cytometry using four recombinant human monoclonal autoantibodies expressed as Fab (TR1.9, TR1.8, WR1.7, and SP1.5, 10 µg/ml; see "Materials and Methods"). Background binding was assessed using purified normal human IgG. B, summary of data from three separate experiments, such as shown in Fig. 3A. Data are expressed as the percentage of cells in the M2 gate. Bars indicate the mean ± S.E. of values obtained in the three experiments. C, flow cytometry using a polyclonal mouse antiserum to TPO (dilution 1:50). Background binding was assessed using normal mouse IgG. The percentage of cells within the M2 gate are shown as the mean ± S.E. of values from three separate experiments.

Consistent with equal monoclonal autoantibody recognition of Del-EGF and wild-type TPO, the polyclonal mouse serum to TPO, with a much broader range of epitopes, produced similar signals on flow cytometry using cells expressing Del-EGF and the wild-type TPO (Fig. 3C). These data clearly demonstrate that the EGF-like domain on TPO is not a component of the TPO IDR.

Deletion of the CCP-like Domain in TPO-- Finally, we studied TPO with the CCP-like domain deleted (Fig. 1, Del-CCP). The same four monoclonal autoantibodies that define the TPO immunodominant region (TR1.8, TR1.9, WR1.7, and SP1.5) were used in flow cytometry following transient transfection of COS-7 cells with the expression vector containing the cDNA for Del-CCP. Signals with the human monoclonal autoantibodies were weak but discernibly greater than with normal human serum used as a negative control. No specific signal was observed with cells transfected with the empty vector. In contrast to Del-CCP, the human monoclonal autoantibodies all gave a strong signal when tested with COS-7 cells expressing the wild-type TPO. Data from a representative experiment are shown in Fig. 4A, and the values from three experiments are summarized in Fig. 4B.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Deletion of the CCP-like domain in TPO. COS-7 cells were transfected with the cDNA for TPO with the CCP-like domain deleted (Del-CCP). As controls, cells were also transfected with the cDNA for the wild-type TPO and the empty vector (vector). A, flow cytometry using four recombinant human monoclonal autoantibodies expressed as Fab (TR1.9, TR1.8, WR1.7, and SP1.5)(10 µg/ml; see "Materials and Methods"). Background binding was assessed using purified normal human IgG. B, summary of data from three separate experiments, such as shown in Fig. 4A. Data are expressed as the percentage of cells in the M2 gate. Bars indicate the mean ± S.E. of values obtained in the three experiments. C, flow cytometry using a polyclonal mouse antiserum to TPO (dilution 1:50). Background binding was assessed using normal mouse IgG. The percentage of cells within the M2 gate is shown as the mean ± S.E. of values from three separate experiments.

As for TPO with both CCP- and EGF-like domains deleted (see above), the very weak signal observed with Del-CCP could be because of impaired folding and/or transport of the modified molecule to the cell surface. Dramatically, however, and in contrast to Del-CCP/EGF, the polyclonal mouse antiserum to TPO recognized Del-CCP very well, producing a signal only slightly less than with the wild-type TPO (Fig. 4C). The dissociation between monoclonal autoantibody and polyclonal mouse antiserum recognition of the same Del-CCP cells clearly establishes that deletion of TPO amino acid residues 741-794 eliminates or obscures the TPO autoantibody, IDR.

The slightly lower recognition by the polyclonal mouse antiserum of Del-CCP relative to the wild-type TPO would be consistent with this antiserum having epitopes both within and without the human autoantibody IDR (30). To confirm this observation, we used a pool of the four monoclonal TPO autoantibody Fab to the IDR (10-8 M each) to compete for the mouse serum binding to [125I]TPO. This pool of Fab only partially inhibited, by about 40%, the mouse antiserum binding to TPO (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the Fab inhibited TPO binding by a pool of eight sera from patients with autoimmune thyroid disease to a much greater extent (88%). The polyclonal mouse antiserum, therefore, recognizes a broader range of epitopes on the TPO surface than the human autoantibodies (Fig. 5B) and is hence less affected than the autoantibodies by deletion of the CCP-like region on TPO.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The polyclonal mouse antiserum to TPO recognizes a broader range of epitopes on the surface of TPO than do autoantibodies in patients' sera. A, competition for [125I]TPO binding by polyclonal TPO antibodies from immunized mice and by polyclonal TPO autoantibodies in the sera of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. TPO autoantibody-positive sera from eight patients were pooled. Competition was performed using a pool of four monoclonal human autoantibodies expressed as Fab that define the IDR (WR1.7, SP1.5, TR1.8, TR1.9; 10-8 M each) (31). TPO binding in the absence of the four Fab pool is expressed as 100% (open bar). The binding in the presence of the four Fab is shown by the black bar (mean ± S.D. of duplicate values). B, schematic representation of the epitopes on the surface of native TPO recognized by human autoantibodies and antibodies from mice immunized with TPO. Within the TPO autoantibody IDR there is some overlap between the epitopes of the four human monoclonal autoantibodies (31).

Recognition of TPO Deletion Mutants by Polyclonal TPO Autoantibodies in Patients' Sera-- Definitive proof that the TPO autoantibody IDR was either deleted or obscured in Del-CCP would be reproduction of the human monoclonal autoantibody data with polyclonal TPO autoantibodies in the sera of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. We, therefore, performed flow cytometry using 11 randomly selected sera with TPO autoantibodies. As anticipated, all sera recognized COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the cDNA encoding wild-type TPO (Fig. 6A). As observed with the monoclonal human autoantibodies, the polyclonal TPO autoantibodies barely recognized Del-CCP yet interacted with Del-EGF to the same extent as with wild-type TPO. As a positive control for the level of Del-CCP expression, the polyclonal mouse serum to TPO with epitopes both within and outside the IDR gave a signal with Del-CCP only slightly less than with the wild-type TPO and with Del-EGF (Fig. 6B).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Polyclonal TPO autoantibody recognition of TPO deletion mutants. A, flow cytometry with 11 randomly selected TPO autoantibody-positive sera from patients with autoimmune thyroid disease (diluted 1:50). Sera were tested with COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the empty vector (vector) and with the vector containing the cDNAs for the wild-type TPO (wt-TPO), TPO with the CCP-like domain deleted (Del-CCP), and TPO with the EGF-like domain deleted (Del-EGF). Data are expressed as the percentage of cells in the M2 gate (see Fig. 2A). Net values for individual patient sera are shown after subtraction of M2 gating observed with normal serum. B, flow cytometry with polyclonal TPO antibodies in a serum pool of five mice immunized with purified TPO. The cells were the same as described in panel A. Depiction of the data is also the same as panel A except that normal mouse serum was used to calculate the net M2 value.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

TPO is a highly unusual member of the peroxidase family in that it is a membrane-associated protein with its large functional region orientated toward the exterior of the thyroid follicular cell. TPO is also the primary enzyme involved in thyroid hormone synthesis, a process involving iodination of thyroglobulin stored extracellularly in the thyroid follicular lumen. Autoantibodies to the extracellular region of TPO are a sine qua non in active autoimmune (Hashimoto's) thyroiditis and are also present in the majority of patients with Graves' disease, which together are the most common autoimmune diseases affecting humans. Polyclonal TPO autoantibody epitopes in all patients are largely restricted to one facet of the native molecule, the IDR with an epitopic `fingerprint' that remains constant over many years and clusters in families (5, 31).

Understanding the basis for this remarkable phenomenon requires, as a first step, identification of the precise TPO amino acids that comprise the IDR. This task has, however, been exceptionally difficult and has led to much data with disparate conclusions (for example, Refs. 16-26). The primary reason for this difficulty is that the epitopes comprising the IDR are highly conformational and almost certainly discontinuous (reviewed in Ref. 32). In addition, a number of points are frequently misunderstood, including the following. (i) Recognition of a TPO polypeptide fragment by autoantibodies in the majority of patients' sera is insufficient to establish that this fragment is part of the immunodominant region. Serum autoantibodies are polyclonal, and a signal can be obtained from the minority of autoantibodies with epitopes outside the IDR. (ii) Competition for autoantibody binding to native TPO by immune sera generated in animals may involve steric hindrance by very large molecules rather than direct overlap of epitopic sites. Competition with much smaller, monomeric and monoclonal Fab is more likely to yield reliable conclusions. (iii) Based on the closely homologous MPO three-dimensional structure (14), shown empirically by chimeric MPO-TPO studies to be similar to that of TPO (33), numerically distant amino acids in the TPO primary sequence may be closely associated in the native molecule and vice versa.

The CCP/EGF-like domain of TPO is a very interesting candidate for containing, at least in large part, the autoantibody IDR. It is the most unique component of TPO, without any comparable segment in MPO (a soluble molecule not associated with the cell membrane). Indeed, considerable recent evidence has supported the concept that the CCP/EGF-like domain contains TPO autoantibody epitopes (15, 27). Tyrosine 772 is particularly implicated as being involved in the IDR (28). Although elegant, these studies have a number of limitations, having been performed with polypeptide fragments that are not necessarily in the native conformation, involving detection with polyclonal autoantibodies or competition with intact murine monoclonal antibodies (not monoclonal human autoantibodies and not Fab).

In the present study, we have directly determined the interaction between human monoclonal TPO autoantibodies (expressed as Fab) with the native antigen expressed on the cell surface. Deletion of the entire CCP/EGF-like domain (amino acid residues 741-838) resulted in a TPO molecule that did not traffic normally to the cell surface. However, deletion of only the EGF-like domain was informative. Our data demonstrate that the four human monoclonal autoantibodies that define the TPO IDR, as well as polyclonal TPO autoantibodies in patients' sera, all bind to TPO-Del-EGF expressed on the cell surface as well as to the wild-type TPO. On this basis, we can definitively exclude the juxtamembrane EGF-like domain (amino acids 795-838) as being part of the TPO IDR.

Individual deletion of the CCP-like domain (amino acid residues 741-794) also yielded interesting and informative data. Del-CCP (like Del-EGF) expressed normally on the cell surface, as determined using a murine polyclonal antiserum with epitopes both within and outside the TPO autoantibody IDR (30). In striking contrast to Del-EGF, however, binding to Del-CCP by the four monoclonal autoantibodies to the IDR, as well as by polyclonal autoantibodies in patients' sera, was markedly diminished relative to the polyclonal mouse antiserum to TPO. Three possible explanations for this observation are the following. (i) A significant component of the IDR lies within the CCP-like region. (ii) Truncation of this region leads to steric hindrance for autoantibody binding (perhaps, in part, by bringing the major MPO domain closer to the plasma membrane). (iii) It results from a combination of these two events.

Data from other studies provide insight into the foregoing issue. First, an amino acid (Lys713) in the epitope of human monoclonal autoantibody TR1.9 (one of the quartet that define the IDR) has been identified by a direct footprinting approach (26). The identification of Lys713 is consistent with previous evidence that TPO autoantibodies interact with the mAb no. 47/c21 epitopic region on TPO (amino acid residues 713-721) (16, 17). Lys713 is in the MPO-like domain of TPO, upstream of but closely adjacent to the CCP-like domain of TPO. Therefore, the CCP-like domain of TPO does not contain the entire autoantibody IDR. Mutation of Lys713 only slightly reduces autoantibody affinity (26). Because of the discontinuous nature of TPO autoantibody epitopes, the contact amino acids on the MPO-like region adjacent to Lys713 are unknown; it is presently not possible to precisely eliminate all the contact amino acids in the MPO-like region without severely disrupting folding and expression of the molecule. In contrast, deletion of the CCP-like region (feasible because it is a separate structural module) will eliminate all autoantibody contact amino acids within the region and will have a more marked effect on autoantibody binding.

A second study2 providing insight into the present observations involves TPO autoantibodies obtained by screening a human immunoglobulin gene combinatorial library on the isolated CCP/EGF-like domain of TPO. This library is rich in yielding TPO autoantibodies when screened on purified, intact TPO (34, 35). In contrast, only two rare IDR TPO autoantibodies were obtained with purified CCP/EGF-like polypeptide, and only on low stringency screening. These data suggest that a major component of the IDR lies within the MPO-like region of TPO. Other evidence for the importance of the MPO-like domain in the IDR is that C-terminal-truncated TPO molecules lacking the CCP/EGF-like domains of TPO (synthesized as cell-free translates) were recognized by human autoantibodies (36). Finally, in the present study, the similar effect of the CCP-like domain deletion on binding of TPO autoantibody Fab (monoclonals) and intact autoantibody IgG (patients' sera) suggests that loss of part of the IDR played a greater role than steric hindrance in reducing autoantibody recognition. All these data, taken together, suggest that the TPO autoantibody IDR contains portions of the MPO- and CCP-like domains and, therefore, bridges these two domains. A conceptual diagram of this interaction is depicted in Fig. 7.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Schematic representation of TPO and its structural domains. TPO, (933 amino acids; the numbering shown includes its signal peptide) is a largely extracellular protein with a single membrane-spanning region. The amino-terminal portion of TPO has high homology with myeloperoxidase (MPO) (13, 37). TPO amino acid residues 1-121 are homologous to the MPO prosequence, and the largest TPO domain (MPO-like) corresponds to the large MPO subunit. Not present in MPO (a soluble protein not tethered to the plasma membrane) are two smaller juxtamembrane domains with homology to the complement control protein (CCP-like) and to epidermal growth factor (EGF-like) (13, 15). Human TPO autoantibodies interact with the extracellular region of native (not denatured) TPO (reviewed in Ref. 32). The MPO prosequence-like domain does not contribute to the autoantibody binding immunodominant region (IDR) (29). One amino acid, Lys713, (K713) has been determined by direct footprinting to lie within the TR1.9 mAb epitope within the IDR (26). Therefore, the IDR lies, at least in part, within the MPO-like domain of TPO. From the known three-dimensional structure of MPO (14), TPO Lys713 can be deduced to be adjacent to the CCP-like domain. There is conflicting evidence as to whether the IDR largely involves the CCP/EGF-like (15, 27, 28) or MPO-like domains (24, 36). The present study demonstrates for the first time that the IDR does not include the EGF-like domain. Moreover, deletion of the CCP-like domain greatly diminishes TPO autoantibody recognition of TPO. All these data taken together indicate that the TPO IDR lies at the junction of the MPO- and CCP-like domains (shaded area).

In conclusion, we have analyzed the contribution to the TPO autoantibody, IDR, of the unique CCP- and EGF-like domains of TPO that link the MPO-like domain to the plasma membrane. We have clearly excluded the juxtamembrane EGF-like domain as being part of the IDR. In contrast, a component of the CCP-like domain does contribute to the IDR. These data, together with information from other studies, localize the TPO autoantibody IDR to the junction of the CCP-like domain and the much larger MPO-like domain on TPO.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK36182.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Suite B-131, Los Angeles, CA 90048. Tel.: 310-423-0555; Fax: 310-423-0221; E-mail: rapoportb@cshs.org.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 7, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205524200

2 Pichurin, P., Guo, J., Estienne, V., Carayon, P., Ruf, J., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (2002) Thyroid, in press.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TPO, thyroid peroxidase; IDR, immunodominant region; MPO, myeloperoxidase; CCP, complement control protein; EGF, epidermal growth factor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Czarnocka, B., Ruf, J., Ferrand, M., Carayon, P., and Lissitzky, S. (1985) FEBS Lett. 109, 147-152
2. Portmann, L., Hamada, N., Heinrich, G., and DeGroot, L. J. (1985) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 61, 1001-1003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Seto, P., Hirayu, H., Magnusson, R. P., Gestautas, J., Portmann, L., DeGroot, L. J., and Rapoport, B. (1987) J. Clin. Invest. 80, 1205-1208[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 1253-1259[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ruf, J., Toubert, M., Czarnocka, B., Durand-Gorde, J., Ferrand, M., and Carayon, P. (1989) Endocrinology. 125, 1211-1218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Jaume, J. C., Burek, C. L., Hoffman, W. H., Rose, N., McLachlan, S. M., and Rapoport, B. (1996) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 104, 115-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Jaume, J. C., Guo, J., Pauls, D. L., Zakarija, M., McKenzie, J. M., Egeland, J. A., Burek, C. L., Rose, N. R., Hoffman, W. H., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (1999) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 1424-1431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Rodien, P., Madec, A.-M., Morel, Y., Stefanutti, A., Bornet, H., and Orgiazzi, J. (1992) Autoimmunity 13, 177-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Guo, J., Jaume, J. C., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (1997) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 925-931[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Simitsek, P. D., Campbell, D. G., Lanzavecchia, A., Fairweather, N., and Watts, C. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 181, 1957-1963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Magnusson, R. P., Chazenbalk, G. D., Gestautas, J., Seto, P., Filetti, S., DeGroot, L. J., and Rapoport, B. (1987) Mol. Endocrinol. 1, 856-861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Kimura, S., Kotani, T., McBride, O. W., Umeki, K., Hirai, K., Nakayama, T., and Ohtaki, S. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 5555-5559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Libert, F., Ruel, J., Ludgate, M., Swillens, S., Alexander, N., Vassart, G., and Dinsart, C. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 4193-4196[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Zeng, J., and Fenna, R. E. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 226, 185-207[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Estienne, V., Blanchet, C., Niccoli-Sire, P., Duthoit, C., Durand-Gorde, J. M., Geourjon, C., Baty, D., Carayon, P., and Ruf, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35313-35317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Finke, R., Seto, P., Ruf, J., Carayon, P., and Rapoport, B. (1991) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 73, 919-921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Libert, F., Ludgate, M., Dinsart, C., and Vassart, G. (1991) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 73, 857-860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Zanelli, E., Henry, M., and Malthiery, Y. (1992) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 87, 80-86[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Frorath, B., Abney, C. C., Scanarini, M., Berthold, H., Hunt, N., and Northemann, W. (1992) J. Biochem. 111, 633-637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Maastricht, J., Koenig, R. J., Kaplan, M. M., Arscott, P., Thompson, N., and Baker Jr, J. R. (1992) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 75, 121-126[Abstract]
21. Tonacchera, M., Cetani, F., Costagliola, S., Alcalde, L., Uibo, R., Vassart, G., and Ludgate, M. (1995) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 132, 53-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Arscott, P. L., Koenig, R. J., Kaplan, M. M., Glick, G. D., and Baker Jr, J. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4966-4973[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Grennan Jones, F., Ziemnicka, K., Sanders, J., Wolstenholme, A., Fiera, R., Furmaniak, J., and Rees Smith, B. (1999) Autoimmunity 30, 157-169[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Hobby, P., Gardas, A., Radomski, R., McGregor, A. M., Banga, J. P., and Sutton, B. J. (2000) Endocrinology 141, 2018-2026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Gardas, A., Watson, P. F., Hobby, P., Smith, A., Weetman, A. P., Sutton, B. J., and Banga, J. P. (2000) Redox. Rep. 5, 237-241[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Guo, J., Yan, X.-M., McLachlan, S. M., and Rapoport, B. (2001) J. Immunol. 166, 1327-1333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Estienne, V., Duthoit, C., Vinet, L., Durand-Gorde, J. M., Carayon, P., and Ruf, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8056-8062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Estienne, V., Duthoit, C., Blanchin, S., Montserret, R., Durand-Gorde, J. M., Chartier, M., Baty, D., Carayon, P., and Ruf, J. (2002) Int. Immunol. 14, 359-366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Nishikawa, T., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (1994) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 79, 1648-1654[Abstract]
30. Jaume, J. C., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (1999) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 1651-1657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Chazenbalk, G. D., Portolano, S., Russo, D., Hutchison, J. S., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 92, 62-74[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. McLachlan, S. M., and Rapoport, B. (2000) Intern. Rev. Immunol. 19, 587-618[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Nishikawa, T., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 1000-1006[Abstract]
34. Guo, J., Wang, Y., Jaume, J. C., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (1999) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 117, 19-29[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Pichurin, P., Guo, J., Yan, X., Rapoport, B., and McLachlan, S. M. (2001) Thyroid 11, 301-313[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Xiong, Z., Farilla, L., Guo, J., McLachlan, S., and Rapoport, B. (2001) Thyroid 11, 227-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kimura, S., and Ikedo-Saito, M. (1988) Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 3, 113-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. Lionaki, S. L. Hogan, R. J. Falk, M. S. Joy, H. Chin, C. E. Jennette, J. C. Jennette, and P. H. Nachman
Association between thyroid disease and its treatment with ANCA small-vessel vasculitis: a case control study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3508 - 3515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Dubska, J. P. Banga, D. Plochocka, G. Hoser, E. H. Kemp, B. J. Sutton, A. Gardas, and M. Gora
Structural Insights into Autoreactive Determinants in Thyroid Peroxidase Composed of Discontinuous and Multiple Key Contact Amino Acid Residues Contributing to Epitopes Recognized by Patients' Autoantibodies
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5995 - 6003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
O. F. Lai, N. Zaiden, S. S. Goh, N.-E. Mohamed, L. L. Seah, K. S. Fong, V. Estienne, P. Carayon, S. C. Ho, and D. H C Khoo
Detection of thyroid peroxidase mRNA and protein in orbital tissue.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 155(2): 213 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Bresson, M. Pugniere, F. Roquet, S. A. Rebuffat, B. N-Guyen, M. Cerutti, J. Guo, S. M. McLachlan, B. Rapoport, V. Estienne, et al.
Directed Mutagenesis in Region 713-720 of Human Thyroperoxidase Assigns 713KFPED717 Residues as Being Involved in the B Domain of the Discontinuous Immunodominant Region Recognized by Human Autoantibodies
J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 39058 - 39067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Bresson, M. Cerutti, G. Devauchelle, M. Pugniere, F. Roquet, C. Bes, C. Bossard, T. Chardes, and S. Peraldi-Roux
Localization of the Discontinuous Immunodominant Region Recognized by Human Anti-thyroperoxidase Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9560 - 9569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Ferrand, V. Le Fourn, and J.-L. Franc
Increasing Diversity of Human Thyroperoxidase Generated by Alternative Splicing. CHARACTERIZATION BY MOLECULAR CLONING OF NEW TRANSCRIPTS WITH SINGLE- AND MULTISPLICED mRNAs
J. Biol. Chem., January 31, 2003; 278(6): 3793 - 3800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/43/40189    most recent
M205524200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement