![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 43, 40229-40234, October 25, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, May 22, 2002, and in revised form, August 1, 2002
The visual pigment rhodopsin is characterized by
an 11-cis retinal chromophore bound to Lys-296 via a
protonated Schiff base. Following light absorption the
C11=C12 double bond isomerizes to
trans configuration and triggers protein conformational
alterations. These alterations lead to the formation of an active
intermediate (Meta II), which binds and activates the visual G protein,
transducin. We have examined by UV-visible and Fourier transform IR
spectroscopy the photochemistry of a rhodopsin analogue with an
11-cis-locked chromophore, where cis to
trans isomerization around the
C11=C12 double bond is prevented by a 6-member
ring structure (Rh6.10). Despite this lock, the pigment was
found capable of forming an active photoproduct with a characteristic
protein conformation similar to that of native Meta II. This
intermediate is further characterized by a protonated Schiff base and
protonated Glu-113, as well as by its ability to bind a
transducin-derived peptide previously shown to interact efficiently
with native Meta II. The yield of this active photointermediate is
pH-dependent and decreases with increasing pH. This study
shows that with the C11=C12 double bond being
locked, isomerization around the C9=C10 or the C13=C14 double bonds may well lead to an
activation of the receptor. Additionally, prolonged illumination
at pH 7.5 produces a new photoproduct absorbing at 385 nm, which,
however, does not exhibit the characteristic active protein conformation.
Rhodopsin, a seven-transmembrane helical protein, is composed of
348 amino acids and a ligand, 11-cis retinal, which
covalently binds to the protein through a protonated Schiff base
linkage to the Meta II formation is associated with a movement of helix 6 relative to
helix 3 (12, 13), a translocation of a proton from the Schiff base to
its counterion, Glu-113, and recruitment of a proton from the bulk
solution (14, 15). Using photoaffinity techniques at low temperature
and trapping of different intermediates (16), it was demonstrated that
in the dark state as well as in the bathorhodopsin intermediate, the
The important role that 11-cis double bond isomerization
plays in initiating the photochemically induced reaction was
demonstrated by studies of a series of 11-cis locked
artificial pigments. Picosecond time-resolved spectroscopy of
11-cis locked rhodopsin bearing a 5-member ring did not show
any ground state photoproduct following illumination except for a
long-lived excited state intermediate (17). Excitation of an
11-cis-locked rhodopsin with a 7-member ring produced a
photorhodopsin-like species, whereas locked rhodopsin with an
8-member ring exhibited both photorhodopsin- and bathorhodopsin-like products (18). These results were interpreted by the gradual increase
in the rotational flexibility along the C11=C12
double bond from a 5- to 8-member ring. To further shed light on the primary event of rhodopsin light activation, the photochemistry of
locked pigments was studied under steady state irradiation. Locked
rhodopsin bearing a 5-member ring at In an attempt to investigate whether the 6-member ring locked pigment
(Rh6.10) is capable of producing an active conformation following light absorption, we have studied the photochemistry of
Rh6.10 by UV-visible spectroscopy at different pH
levels. Furthermore, FTIR spectroscopy was employed to monitor protein
conformational changes following light absorption. It was revealed that
the photochemistry of Rh6.10 is pH- dependent. An
active Meta II-like intermediate with a protonated Schiff base is
produced, particularly at low pH, while at high pH, presumably
photoequilibration processes between the 11-cis-like
inactive isomers dominate the photochemistry. In an accompanying
article (24) we further investigate the thermal decay behavior of the
photoproducts of Rh6.10, revealing an interesting slow
photocycling behavior of this visual pigment analog.
Synthesis of 11-cis-locked Retinal (Re6.10)--
The
mixture of locked retinal isomers was synthesized as reported
previously (21, 25). Briefly, Pigment Preparation--
Opsin was prepared from rhodopsin in
washed disk membranes from cattle retinae according to standard
procedures (26, 27) and regenerated with the synthetic chromophores
overnight on ice (28). The isomeric composition of the chromophores was
~50:50 9-cis:9-trans, unless stated
differently. Extraction of excess retinal and retinal oxime was
achieved by two washes with 10 mM heptakis(2,6-di-O-methyl)- FTIR Spectroscopy--
FTIR spectroscopy was performed with a
Bruker IFS 28 spectrometer with a mercury-cadmium-tellurium
detector on sandwich samples with 1 nmol of pigment as described
previously (30). IR spectra, recorded in blocks of 512 scans with a
spectral resolution of 4 cm
Binding of a high affinity peptide analogue derived from transducin was
monitored in sandwich samples prepared with 0.5 nmol of pigment and 20 nmol of peptide 23 (ac-VLEDLKSCGLF) (31).
UV-visible Spectroscopy--
For UV-visible spectroscopy,
sandwich samples identical to the infrared samples were used in a
PerkinElmer Lambda 17 spectrophotometer equipped with a
temperature-controlled sample holder. Illumination was similar to that
used in the IR experiments. Alternatively, a Hewlett Packard 8452A
diode array spectrophotometer was used.
Characterization of Photoproducts at pH 7.5 and 5.0--
Sandwich
samples, often used for IR spectroscopy, contain fully hydrated pigment
films. For rhodopsin in native washed membranes, the use of sandwich
samples offers the possibility of performing both IR and UV-visible
spectroscopy with the same sample type under conditions close to those
found in membrane suspensions. In particular, the Meta I/Meta II
equilibrium of native rhodopsin in membranes is unchanged in this
sample type (11). Sandwich samples of Rh6.10 (consisting of
a 50:50 mixture of the 9-trans and 9-cis isomers;
Scheme 1) gave, following irradiation
for ~ 2 min at pH 7.5, a blue-shifted intermediate (495 nm)
characterized by a smaller extinction coefficient, in keeping with
previously described results (21, 22). Irradiation for ~2 min at pH
5.0 gave a product absorbing similar to that obtained at pH 7.5, yet with a more pronounced blue shift (Fig.
1A). In both cases, the position of the absorption maximum indicates that the retinal Schiff
base remains protonated during formation of these photoproduct states.
To further characterize the intermediates obtained at pH 7.5 and 5.0, we carried out FTIR measurements. The IR spectrum of the photoproduct
obtained at pH 7.5 shows, except for a strong negative chromophore band
at 1205 cm
The contributions of the different isomers to the difference spectrum
obtained at pH 7.5 was examined by using pigments regenerated with only
the 9-cis and the 9-trans isomers, respectively,
instead of a 50:50 mixture (Fig. 1D). The spectra show clear
differences, reflecting the two different isomers,
9,11,13-tricis and 11-cis (Scheme 1), in the
respective initial dark states (21). Under continuous illumination the
different chromophoric isomers may fully interchange, and in the
photostationary equilibrium (after 2 min), the photoproduct isomeric
composition therefore becomes largely independent of the initial
composition. By subtracting the two spectra, the photoproducts cancel
out each other, and we were able to obtain a difference spectrum
corresponding to a transition between the two dark states only, shown
in Fig. 1E in black. A spectrum with a very
similar band structure was obtained after subtraction of residual
contributions of the Meta II-like spectrum obtained at pH 5 (Fig. 1B) from the pH 7.5 spectrum of the 50:50
mixture (Fig. 1C), the result of which is shown as well in
Fig. 1E in gray. We can therefore conclude that,
besides the small contribution of the low-pH photoproduct, the pH 7.5 spectrum is determined largely by a photoequilibration process between the two isomers that constitute the dark states of the pigment. This process also contributes to the spectrum obtained at pH
5.0, as evident from a similar analysis with pure isomers (not shown) but is superimposed there by the large difference bands of the Meta
II-like photoproduct. The same photoequilibration process is described
in more detail in the accompanying article (24), where we analyze the
thermal relaxation behavior of the Rh6.10 photoproducts and
show that Rh6.10 can be photolyzed repeatedly to undergo
identical excitation/relaxation cycles on the time scale of minutes to hours.
The 11-cis-locked Pigment Forms a Photoproduct with an Active State
Conformation--
A more detailed comparison of the FTIR spectrum of
the low-pH photoproduct of Rh6.10 with that of Meta II of
native rhodopsin reveals difference bands that are very similar in
part. In Fig. 2A, we show the difference spectra of both
transitions. As the Schiff base in the low-pH photoproduct remains
protonated, for a better comparison with native rhodopsin, we
show the transition of native rhodopsin to a Meta II state with a
protonated Schiff base. Such a state can be obtained in the presence of
solute anions without changing the active state conformation of Meta
II, as reported previously (32). In the absorption range of protonated carboxylic acids above 1700 cm
To compare the content of the low-pH Meta II-like photoproduct of
Rh6.10 with Meta II of native rhodopsin, we determined the amplitude of the Meta II marker band of Asp-83 at
The structural similarity of the Rh6.10 photoproduct
obtained at pH 5.0 to the active state of native rhodopsin suggests a similar activity of the low-pH photoproduct toward the visual G
protein, transducin. As direct coupling to and activation of transducin
is hampered by the low pH required for formation of the addressed
photoproduct, this proposition was examined by testing its ability to
interact with a specific peptide analogue derived from the transducin
Prolonged Illumination at pH 7.0--
As described above,
illumination of Rh6.10 at neutral pH produces a
blue-shifted intermediate absorbing at about 495 nm. We observed that
further illumination decreases this band and produces a new
photoproduct absorbing at 385 nm (Fig.
4A). The formation of the
latter intermediate is clearly evident by comparing the difference
spectra of the short and long illuminations (Fig. 4B). To
characterize the newly formed 385 nm absorbing intermediate we carried
out FTIR measurements. It is evident that the short (2 min) and long
(additional 5 min) illuminations produce different photoproducts (Fig.
4C) and that the intermediate absorbing at 385 nm does not
exhibit the characteristic protein conformational alterations observed
in native rhodopsin Meta II or in the Rh6.10 Meta
II-like photoproduct.
Artificial pigments, in which isomerization around the critical
double bond was prevented, were studied in both bacteriorhodopsin and
bovine rhodopsin. It was demonstrated that in bacteriorhodopsin locking
of the C13=C14 double bond eliminated proton
pumping activities as well as the regular photocycle (39-42). These
studies concluded that the C13=C14 double bond
is the only bond that can isomerize and that its locking did not open
any detectable new avenue for a different isomerization. Therefore, the
protein catalyzes the C13=C14 isomerization
and, in addition, inhibits isomerization around double bonds other than
C13=C14. In this respect we note that studies
with locked retinals were performed also on rhodopsin of
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Early studies have suggested that activity can be achieved without isomerization of any double bond (43).
However, further studies demonstrated that activity probably required
isomerization of the C13=C14 double bond
because locking this bond abolished activity (44).
The situation might be different in bovine rhodopsin, which, as a
visual pigment, regularly experiences isomerization around the
cis C11=C12 double bond. For
example, it is established that the binding site can accommodate the
9-cis retinal isomer, which forms isorhodopsin and
isomerizes to all-trans following light absorption (8). The
isomerization to all-trans initiates the formation of
photochemically induced intermediates, which eventually lead to
biological activity. In rhodopsin, locking one double bond may possibly
lead to isomerization of another one. However, various locked rhodopsin
artificial pigments did not exhibit photochemically induced
intermediates or biological activity. Recent studies with the
11-cis-locked analogue Rh6.10 (containing a
6-member ring) demonstrated that isomerization around other double
bonds does take place following light absorption (23). Thus, it is
plausible that the specific conformation of the 6-member ring
chromophore in the binding site and/or specific chromophore-protein
interactions enable such an isomerization process. These studies,
however, have also indicated that the usual transducin activation
did not occur at neutral pH (21-23).
Our present studies show that Rh6.10 membranes have a
strongly pH-dependent photochemistry. At neutral pH, the
major photochemical process is merely a photoequilibration
between the two 11-cis-like isomers that form the dark
state of the pigment, 11-cis and 9,11,13-tricis (21). This photoequilibration process (Fig. 1, C-E) is
therefore not associated with major protein conformational alterations, as also confirmed by FTIR measurements and in keeping with the lack of
significant transducin activity reported previously. The situation is
completely different at pH 5.0, where in addition to this
photoequilibration process, about half of the pigment is converted to
an active Meta II-like photoproduct with a protonated Schiff base (Fig
1B). Because the Meta II-like photointermediate of
Rh6.10 at pH 5.0 is characterized by a protonated Schiff
base, we can conclude that the pKa of the
protonated Schiff base in this intermediate is above 5. It was recently
demonstrated that the pKa of the protonated
Schiff base in the native rhodopsin Meta II is ~2 and that it is
considerably elevated by interaction with anions (32). The elevated
pKa observed in the Rh6.10 Meta II-like intermediate indicates an altered Schiff base environment (probably more hydrophilic) relative to that in native Meta II, thereby
forming a "complex" counterion to the protonated Schiff base.
Glu-113, the counterion to the protonated Schiff base in the dark
state, becomes protonated during the activation of Rh6.10, similar to native rhodopsin, despite the fact that the Schiff base does
not deprotonate. The coupling between the pK values of
Glu-113 and the Schiff base is therefore much weaker in the activated
receptor state compared with the dark state, and protonation of
Glu-113 in the activated receptor seems to be determined by the protein
conformational changes rather than by the protonation state of the
Schiff base. This scenario has been suggested recently (14) and
was confirmed in the meantime with native rhodopsin and a variety of
rhodopsin mutants and analogues, which may form an activated state
without deprotonation of the Schiff base (32).
At neutral pH, extended illumination additionally produces a strongly
blue-shifted intermediate absorbing at 385 nm, in agreement with
previous studies (21, 22). FTIR measurements, however, clearly indicate
that formation of this intermediate is not associated with protein
changes characteristic of the active Meta II species, and furthermore,
this intermediate does not bind peptide 23. The nature of this
intermediate should be the subject of future studies.
The question arises as to the mechanism by which an active protein
conformation is produced to a substantial extent at pH 5.0 but only
marginally at pH 7.5. According to their affinities for
11-cis- and all-trans-retinol dehydrogenase, the
four isomers of our 11-cis-locked retinal were classified as
11-cis-like and all-trans-like, respectively
(23); in the dark state of the pigment in membranes, the isomeric
composition of the chromophores is shifted completely to the side of
the 11-cis-like isomers (21). It therefore seems plausible
that the active state conformation at low pH is achieved by
accumulating all-trans-like isomers during illumination. As
the pH is raised, the amount of this Meta II-like species decreases
rapidly to a small residual level of about 10%, and yet no
pH-dependent Meta I-like intermediate could be detected as
a counterpart, which, in analogy to native Meta I, should combine an
all-trans-like chromophore with a still inactive protein
conformation. Instead, the chromophore composition seems to be
dominated largely by the 11-cis-like isomers, and
accumulation of all-trans-like isomers seems to be inhibited
at neutral to alkaline pH. Possible mechanisms for such an inhibition
are discussed in more detail in the accompanying article (24).
A previous study indicated substantial formation of
all-trans-like isomers also at neutral pH (23), which seems
to be in conflict with our results. For those experiments the pigment
was solubilized in detergent, which has a dramatic effect both on the
Meta I/Meta II equilibrium of native rhodopsin (45) and on the
flexibility of the chromophore binding pocket to accommodate different
isomers (46).
Our results clearly show that isomerization around the
C11=C12 double bond of retinal is not per
se a prerequisite for formation of the signaling state in
rhodopsin. An all-trans-like, activating chromophore may be
produced as well by isomerization around other double bonds, and
locking the C11=C12 double bond in a
cis configuration therefore does not necessarily
prevent activation. The active and inactive states of the receptor
protein can instead be formed with whole families of retinal ligands
stabilizing either of the two states with varying efficiency, and even
in the absence of ligands, a pH-dependent equilibrium
between the active and inactive conformations of opsin can be observed
(30). Nevertheless, nature uses the 11-cis to
all-trans isomerization process of retinal exclusively in
all known visual pigments. This is, however, not because it is the only
possible way to convert the receptor protein from an inactive to a
signaling state but rather because it is the most efficient way to
perform photoreception. The 11-cis to all-trans
pathway combines a high quantum yield of photoisomerization with
extremely low dark isomerization rates (47, 48), thus allowing an
exquisite sensitivity of the visual system under low light conditions.
We thank S. Lüdeke, B. Mayer, W. Sevenich, P. Merkt, and K. Zander for discussions and technical
assistance. We also thank the reviewers for helpful suggestions.
*
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (Si 278/16-3,4 to F. S. and Vo 811/1-2 to
R. V.), Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (to F. S.), the AMN Fund for
the Promotion of Science, Culture and Arts in Israel (to M. S.), and the Israel National Science Foundation (659/00 to M. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Holds the Katzir-Makineni professorial chair in chemistry. To
whom correspondence may also be addressed: Dept. of Organic Chemistry,
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Tel.:
972-8-9344320; Fax: 972-8-9344142; E-mail:
Mudi.Sheves@weizmann.ac.il.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205033200
The abbreviations used are:
Meta I/II, metarhodopsin I/II;
FTIR, Fourier transform infrared;
HPLC, high
pressure liquid chromatography;
MS, mass spectroscopy;
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
bis-tris, 2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol.
Rhodopsin with 11-cis-Locked Chromophore Is Capable
of Forming an Active State Photoproduct*
,
¶, and
Department of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann
Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel and the
§ Biophysics Group, Institut für Molekulare Medizin
und Zellforschung, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg,
Hermann-Herder-Strasse 9, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-amino group of Lys-296 in the center of helix 7 (1). Glu-113 at helix 3 serves as the counterion of the protonated Schiff
base (2-4). The recently resolved crystal structure of rhodopsin (5)
provides detailed structural information on the interactions between
the retinal chromophore and its surrounding residues, which contribute
to the red-shifted absorption maximum of the chromophore
(
max 500 nm) relative to protonated retinal Schiff base
in methanol solution (
max 440 nm) and to the high pKa of the protonated Schiff base (6). Following
light absorption, the retinal chromophore isomerizes from
11-cis to trans configuration in 200 fs (7). A
series of photointermediates are produced that can be trapped below
characteristic transition temperatures (8, 9): bathorhodopsin
(
max 543 nm, T <
140 °C),
lumirhodopsin (
max 497 nm, T <
40 °C), and metarhodopsin I (Meta
I,1
max 478 nm) above
40 °C, which equilibrates with metarhodopsin II (Meta
II,
max 380 nm). Meta II is the active species, capable of activating transducin, the visual G protein. The equilibrium between
Meta I and Meta II is affected by temperature, pressure, pH, and
glycerol (9), as well as by ions (10, 11).
-ionone ring is located in the vicinity of Trp-265 in the center of
helix 6, whereas in the lumirhodopsin, Meta I, and Meta II
intermediates, the ring is located in the vicinity of Ala-169 in helix
4. This movement, a flip-over of the chromophoric ring, may trigger
conformational changes in the cytoplasmic membrane loops, which
interact with transducin.
196 °C following either
orange or blue light irradiation did not produce a bathorhodopsin-like species, whereas at 0 °C a hypsochromic product was observed
(19). Analysis of the retinal components by HPLC did not detect new isomers in the photoproduct. In addition, this pigment could not activate cyclic-GMP phosphodiesterase. Illumination of a locked pigment
bearing a 7-member ring did not change its absorption spectrum at
4 °C, and yet it produced 12% of other isomers (20). All of
these results led to the conclusion that
C11=C12 double bond isomerization is a
prerequisite for the phototransduction process in rhodopsin. The
photocascade of a 6-member ring 11-cis-locked pigment was
examined as well (21, 22). Irradiation of this artificial pigment led
to a gradual blue shift of the absorption maximum, with a broad
shoulder around 380 nm and a loss of ~ 40% of the visible
absorbance. The light-induced transducin activation was about 10% that
of Meta II in native rhodopsin. The reason for this marginal activity
was unclear. The four isomers of this 6-member ring
11-cis-locked retinal were separated and reconstituted with
opsin (Scheme 1) (21). During regeneration, the 9,11-dicis and the 11,13-dicis species isomerized thermally in the dark
around the C13=C14 double bond to the
9,11,13-tricis and the 11-cis species, respectively. The two 9-trans as well as the two
9-cis isomers, therefore, gave identical pigments absorbing
at 510 and 494 nm, respectively. Following continuous irradiation, each
of the resulting pigments produced a photoproduct mixture characterized
by a similar absorption (
max 498 nm). The activity of
the pigment, under high light intensities, varied from 6 to 15% of
that of native Meta II. These pigments as well as their corresponding
photoproducts were reexamined recently by HPLC analyses of
detergent-solubilized samples and FTIR spectroscopy of membrane samples
at neutral pH (23). The study concluded that photoisomerization indeed
took place but that the protein moiety did not undergo conformational alterations. Molecular modeling suggested that movement of the
-ionone ring in these pigments is restricted, and therefore it was
suggested that movement of the
-ionone ring is crucial for rhodopsin
activation. This study further classified two of the four isomers as
11-cis-like and the other two as all-trans-like by their affinities for 11-cis- and
all-trans-retinol dehydrogenase, respectively (Scheme 1).
Importantly, the two 11-cis-like isomers, 11-cis
and the 9,11,13-tricis, were the same as previously found to
form the dark states of the pigments (21).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-ionone reacted with 3-methoxy-2-cyclohexenone in the presence of lithium diisopropylamide at
60 °C followed by neutralization, reduction with lithium
diisobutylaluminum hydride, hydrolysis, and water elimination.
Horner-Emmons condensation between the ketone with ethyl
(diethylphosphono)acetate followed by reduction and oxidation afforded
the final mixture of isomers identified by MS and NMR.
-cyclodextrin (Aldrich)
and three washes with distilled water (29). Pigment concentration was
determined using an absorption coefficient of 41,200 M
1 cm
1 (22).
1 and an acquisition time of 1 min, were corrected for temporal base-line drifts. As buffers we used
20 µl of 200 mM citrate, MES, and BTP (bis-tris propane),
in overlapping ranges, containing 200 mM NaCl. Samples were
photolyzed for 120 s (150-watt tungsten lamp) with a >530 nm
long-pass filter, and half-time for reaching a photostationary
state was 20 s at pH 5.0.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Scheme 1.
The four isomers of Rh6.10,
classified as all-trans-like and
11-cis-like (according to Ref. 23).

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Characterization of the photoproducts of
Rh6.10. A, UV-visible spectra of
Rh6.10 before (black) and after photolysis
(gray) obtained at pH 7.5 and 5.0 at 20 °C. At both pH
values, blue-shifted photoproducts with an apparently protonated Schiff
base are observed, yet with a much more pronounced shift at pH 5.0. Tick marks correspond to 50 mOD. B and
C, light-induced FTIR difference spectra "photoproduct
minus initial state" (photoproduct bands are positive in this
representation, whereas bands of the initial state are negative) from
samples identical to those in A show two distinct
photoproducts. At pH 5.0, we observe a difference spectrum similar to
that of Meta II of native rhodopsin with large conformational changes
in the protein during photolysis. At pH 7.5, these changes are
very small, and the major feature of the difference spectrum is a
strong negative chromophore band at 1205 cm
1.
D, difference spectra as in C but from samples
regenerated with pure 9-trans and 9-cis isomers,
respectively. E, the two spectra shown in D were
subtracted (9-cis
9-trans) to cancel
out the photoproducts and to obtain a difference spectrum representing
the transition from the 9-trans dark state to the
9-cis dark state, termed the photoequilibration spectrum
(black spectrum, scaled by 0.5). As a comparison,
the pH 7.5 spectrum of C, from which residual contributions
of the pH 5.0 spectrum were subtracted, is shown in gray in
panel E.
1, only small features (Fig. 1C),
indicating only very modest conformational changes of the pigment
during photolysis at this pH, in agreement with previously published
data (23). At pH 5.0, however, we observed an entirely different
photoproduct, similar to that of native Meta II (see Fig.
2A), with large conformational
changes, as is evident from bands appearing in the difference
spectrum in the amide I and amide II ranges of ~1650 and 1550 cm
1, respectively (Fig. 1B). Also, in the
absorption range of protonated carboxylic acids above 1700 cm
1, large bands in the difference spectrum can be
observed, indicating considerable environmental changes of the involved
groups.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Characterization of the active state
photoproduct of Rh6.10. A, comparison
between "photoproduct minus initial state" FTIR difference spectra
of the low-pH photoproduct of Rh6.10 obtained at pH 5.0 (black spectrum) and the active state photoproduct, Meta II,
of native rhodopsin (gray), both at 10 °C. For easier
comparison we have shown the corresponding Meta II photoproduct with
protonated Schiff base, obtained in the presence of 100 mM sodium thiocyanate (32). B,
absolute yield of the active state photoproduct of
Rh6.10 as a function of pH at 20 °C, determined from the
Asp-83 difference band at
1762/+1747 cm
1 and normalized
to that of native Meta II as described under "Results."
1, where there are
characteristic marker bands of Meta II, both spectra show very similar
difference bands, indicating similar changes in hydrogen bonding for
the membrane-embedded residues, Glu-122 and Asp-83 (33, 34). The
positive band at 1709 cm
1 is slightly down-shifted
compared with the corresponding band of Meta II of native rhodopsin,
which was shown to reflect Glu-113 of the chromophore binding pocket
becoming protonated during the transition to Meta II (35). Similar band
structures around 1650 cm1 are observed as well in the
amide I range, whereas there are deviations in the amide II range
around 1550 cm
1. The latter, however, is superimposed
with the strong ethylenic stretch modes of the respective chromophores.
Also, in the fingerprint range between 1100 and 1300 cm
1,
we observed difference bands characteristic of the respective retinal chromophores.
1768/+1747 cm
1 (33, 34) as a function of pH. We normalized these
values with the total amount of pigment present in the single samples, which was determined from the absolute amide II band intensity at 1550 cm
1 in the absorption spectra. These values were ratioed
against the corresponding value of full Meta II of native rhodopsin.
The data obtained are plotted in Fig. 2B and may serve as a
rough estimate for the amount of Rh6.10 pigment converted
to the active state conformation by photolysis. At the low-pH end,
about 60% of the pigment adopts a Meta II-like conformation. The
reduced yield compared with native rhodopsin is due in part to the
strong overlap of the absorption bands, allowing only the establishment of a photoequilibrium between dark and photoproduct states in Rh6.10, and also presumably to the only partial
regeneration yield during pigment preparation. With increasing pH, the
amount of the active state photoproduct decreases such that there is
less than 10% of this species at pH 7.5 (Fig. 2B).
Importantly, this considerable decrease may not be a direct consequence
of a pH-dependent Meta I/Meta II equilibrium, which is
established in native rhodopsin with a pK of 7.8 at
20 °C, as it is not counterbalanced by the formation of substantial
amounts of a Meta I species, at least not up to pH 8.5. Instead it
reflects a rather general decrease of the total photoproduct yield with
increasing pH in favor of the inactive dark states.
-subunit C terminus, which is known to be involved in receptor-G
protein coupling (36). This analogue, peptide 23 (ac-VLEDLKSCGLF), was previously shown to bind
specifically with high affinity to the active state Meta II of native
rhodopsin (31). Also, in the case of the Meta II-like photoproduct of Rh6.10, we observe characteristic changes between the FTIR
difference spectra obtained in the presence and absence of peptide
(Fig. 3A). The double
difference spectrum, "with peptide
w/o
peptide," gives the peptide binding spectrum, which is very
similar to that obtained for native Meta II (Fig. 3A) and is
in full agreement with previously published peptide binding spectra
(37, 38). Furthermore, we tested the ability of the peptide to
stabilize the Meta II-like photoproduct at the expense of the dark
states in the photoequilibrium during illumination (extra-Meta II
effect). At pH 7.5, where there is only a marginal contribution of the Meta II-like species to the photoproduct, we observed an ~4-fold increase of this active state species in the presence of the peptide (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Binding and selective stabilization of the
Meta II-like photoproduct of Rh6.10 by a
Gt
-derived peptide analog.
A, "photoproduct minus initial state" difference spectra
of Rh6.10 in the absence (gray) and presence
(black) of peptide 23 at pH 5.0. The lower
spectrum in A shows the corresponding peptide binding
spectrum (black), obtained by subtracting the corresponding
difference spectra, with peptide
w/o peptide. For comparison we also show the
respective binding spectrum for native rhodopsin (gray).
B, selective stabilization of the Meta II-like photoproduct
of Rh6.10 (extra-Meta II effect) at pH 7.5 in
the presence of peptide 23. The spectra are to scale.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Characterization of a 385 nm photoproduct
formed at neutral pH under continuous illumination. A,
UV-visible spectra of the dark state of Rh6.10 at pH 7.0 and 20 °C, as well as the photoproducts obtained after 2 and 7 min
of continuous illumination. B, differences of the spectra in
A corresponding to the spectral changes occurring during the
first 2 min and during the subsequent 5 min of illumination.
C, corresponding spectra in the IR.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Arbeitsgruppe
Biophysik, Institut für Molekulare Medizin und Zellforschung,
Hermann-Herder-Str. 9, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany. Tel.:
49-761-203-5391; Fax: 49-761-203-5390; E-mail:
Reiner.Vogel@biophysik.uni-freiburg.de.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Bounds, D.
(1967)
Nature
216,
1178-1181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Zhukovsky, E. A.,
and Oprian, D. D.
(1989)
Science
246,
928-930 3.
Sakmar, T. P.,
Franke, R. R.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8309-8313 4.
Nathans, J.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
9746-9752[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Palczewski, K.,
Kumasaka, T.,
Hori, T.,
Behnke, C. A.,
Motoshima, H.,
Fox, B. A., Le,
Trong, I.,
Teller, D. C.,
Okada, T.,
Stenkamp, R. E.,
Yamamoto, M.,
and Miyano, M.
(2000)
Science
289,
739-745 6.
Steinberg, G.,
Ottolenghi, M.,
and Sheves, M.
(1993)
Biophys. J.
64,
1499-1502 7.
Schoenlein, R. W.,
Peteanu, L. A.,
Mathies, R. A.,
and Shank, C. V.
(1991)
Science
254,
412-415 8.
Matthews, R. G.,
Hubbard, R.,
Brown, P. K.,
and Wald, G.
(1963)
J. Gen. Physiol.
47,
215-240 9.
Lewis, J. W.,
and Kliger, P. S.
(1995)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
35,
289-307
10.
Delange, F.,
Merkx, M.,
Bovee-Geurts, P. H.,
Pistorius, A. M.,
and DeGrip, W. J.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
243,
174-180[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Vogel, R.,
and Siebert, F.
(2002)
Biochemistry
41,
3529-3535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Farrens, D. L.,
Altenbach, C.,
Yang, K.,
Hubbell, W. L.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1996)
Science
274,
768-770 13.
Sheikh, S. P.,
Zvyaga, T. A.,
Lichtarge, O.,
Sakmar, T. P.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1996)
Nature
383,
747-750
14.
Fahmy, K.,
Siebert, F.,
and Sakmar, T. P.
(1995)
Biophys. Chem.
56,
171-181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Arnis, S.,
and Hofmann, K. P.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
7849-7853 16.
Borhan, B.,
Souto, M. L.,
Imai, H.,
Shichida, Y.,
and Nakanishi, K.
(2000)
Science
288,
2209-2212 17.
Kandori, H.,
Matuoka, S.,
Shichida, Y.,
Yoshizawa, T.,
Ito, M.,
Tsukida, K.,
Balogh-Nair, V.,
and Nakanishi, K.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
6460-6467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Mizukami, T.,
Kandori, H.,
Shichida, Y.,
Chen, A. H.,
Derguini, F.,
Caldwell, C. G.,
Bigge, C. F.,
Nakanishi, K.,
and Yoshizawa, T.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
4072-4076 19.
Fukada, Y.,
Shichida, Y.,
Yoshizawa, T.,
Ito, M.,
Kodama, A.,
and Tsukida, K.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
5826-5832[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Akita, H.,
Tanis, S. P.,
Adams, M.,
Balogh-Nair, V.,
and Nakanishi, K.
(1980)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
102,
6372-6374[CrossRef]
21.
DeGrip, W. J.,
van Oostrum, J.,
Bovee-Geurts, P. H.,
van der Steen, R.,
van Amsterdam, L. J.,
Groesbeek, M.,
and Lugtenburg, J.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
191,
211-220[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Bhattacharya, S.,
Ridge, K. D.,
Knox, B. E.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6763-6769 23.
Jang, G. F.,
Kuksa, V.,
Filipek, S.,
Bartl, F.,
Ritter, E.,
Gelb, M. H.,
Hofmann, K. P.,
and Palczewski, K.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
26148-26153 24.
Vogel, R.,
Fan, G.-B.,
Lüdeke, S.,
Siebert, F.,
and Sheves, M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
40222-40228 25.
Van der Steen, R.,
Groesbeek, M.,
Van Amsterdam, L. J. P.,
Lugtenburg, J.,
van Oostrum, J.,
and DeGrip, W. J.
(1989)
Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas
108,
20-28
26.
Papermaster, D. S.
(1982)
Methods Enzymol.
81,
48-52[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Lewis, J.
(1995)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
917,
918-923[CrossRef]
28.
Vogel, R.,
Fan, G. B.,
Sheves, M.,
and Siebert, F.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
8895-8908[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Delange, F.,
Bovee-Geurts, P. H.,
Vanoostrum, J.,
Portier, M. D.,
Verdegem, P. J.,
Lugtenburg, J.,
and DeGrip, W. J.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
1411-1420[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Vogel, R.,
and Siebert, F.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
38487-38493 31.
Martin, E. L.,
Rens-Domiano, S.,
Schatz, P. J.,
and Hamm, H. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
361-366 32.
Vogel, R.,
Fan, G. B.,
Siebert, F.,
and Sheves, M
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
13342-13352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Fahmy, K.,
Jäger, F.,
Beck, M.,
Zvyaga, T. A.,
Sakmar, T. P.,
and Siebert, F.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10206-10210 34.
Rath, P.,
DeCaluwe, L. L.,
Bovee-Geurts, P. H.,
DeGrip, W, J.,
and Rothschild, K. J.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
10277-10282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Jäger, F.,
Fahmy, K.,
Sakmar, T. P.,
and Siebert, F.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
10878-10882[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Hamm, H. E.,
Deretic, D.,
Arendt, A.,
Hargrave, P. A.,
König, B.,
and Hofmann, K. P.
(1988)
Science
241,
832-835 37.
Fahmy, K.
(1998)
Biophys. J.
75,
1306-1318 38.
Nishimura, S.,
Kandori, H.,
and Maeda, A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
15816-15824[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Fang, J.,
Carriker, J.,
Balogh-Nair, V.,
and Nakanishi, K.
(1983)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
105,
5162-5163[CrossRef]
40.
Chang, C.,
Govindjee, R.,
Ebrey, T.,
Bagley, K.,
Dollinger, G.,
Eisenstein, L.,
Marque, J.,
Rodex, H.,
Vittow, J.,
Fang, J.,
and Nakanishi, K.
(1985)
Biophys. J.
47,
509-512 41.
Delaney, J.,
Brack, T.,
Atkinson, G.,
Ottolenghi, M.,
Steinberg, G.,
and Sheves, M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2101-2105 42.
Zhang, Q.,
Ruhman, S.,
Ottolenghi, M.,
Sheves, M.,
Friedman, N.,
Atkinson, G.,
and Delaney, J.
(1996)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
118,
12828-12829[CrossRef]
43.
Foster, K. W.,
Saranak, J.,
Derguini, F.,
Zarrilli, G. R.,
Johnson, R.,
Okabe, M.,
and Nakanishi, K.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
819-824[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Takahashi, T.,
Yoshihara, K.,
Watanabe, M.,
Kubota, M.,
Johnson, R.,
and Derguini, F.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Com.
178,
1273-1277[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Lamola, A. A.,
Yamane, T.,
and Zipp, A.
(1974)
Biochemistry
13,
738-745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Shichida, Y.,
Nakamura, K.,
Yoshizawa, T.,
Trehan, A.,
Denny, M.,
and Liu, R. S. H.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
6495-6499[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Birge, R. R.,
and Barlow, R. B.
(1995)
Biophys. Chem.
55,
115-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Rieke, F.,
and Baylor, D. A.
(1996)
Biophys. J.
71,
2553-2572
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Rupenyan, I. H. M. van Stokkum, J. C. Arents, R. van Grondelle, K. Hellingwerf, and M. L. Groot Characterization of the Primary Photochemistry of Proteorhodopsin with Femtosecond Spectroscopy Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 4020 - 4030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Saranak and K. W. Foster Photoreceptor for Curling Behavior in Peranema trichophorum and Evolution of Eukaryotic Rhodopsins Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1605 - 1612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Y. Chae, J.-H. Kim, W.-J. Park, Y.-G. Kim, H.-Y. Yun, N. S. Kwon, M.-J. Im, and K. J. Baek Distinct pH Modulation for Dual Function of G{alpha}h (Transglutaminase II) J. Biochem., March 1, 2005; 137(3): 407 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ritter, K. Zimmermann, M. Heck, K. P. Hofmann, and F. J. Bartl Transition of Rhodopsin into the Active Metarhodopsin II State Opens a New Light-induced Pathway Linked to Schiff Base Isomerization J. Biol. Chem., November 12, 2004; 279(46): 48102 - 48111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vogel, G.-B. Fan, S. Ludeke, F. Siebert, and M. Sheves A Nonbleachable Rhodopsin Analogue with a Slow Photocycle J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40222 - 40228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||