![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 43, 40528-40535, October 25, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 1, 2002, and in revised form, July 20, 2002
The integrins
Adhesion of fibroblasts to native type I collagen is mediated by
When human dermal fibroblasts are grown in contact with fibrillar
collagen type I, a series of events are triggered. Fibroblasts acquire
phenotypic tissue-like characteristics that are not observed in
fibroblasts grown as monolayer cultures on plastic or on monomeric collagen type I (7, 8). When seeded into these loose networks of
collagen fibrils, fibroblasts down-regulate type I collagen expression
(9), induce MMP-11 synthesis
(10), and activate pro-MMP-2 (11). Furthermore, it has been shown in
fibroblasts that collagen binding to the The snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs) are members of the
Reprolysin family (M13) of metalloproteinases. The ADAMs
(a disintegrin-like and
metalloproteinase)/MDC (metalloproteinase, disintegrin, cysteine-rich) group of proteins
are also members of the Reprolysin family (17). The PIII class of SVMPs
and the ADAMs share homologous metalloproteinase, disintegrin, and
cysteine-rich domains (18). Based on these similarities, the SVMPs have
served as early models for ADAM function. The PIII SVMPs have been
demonstrated to be capable of proteolytically degrading extracellular
matrix and inhibiting platelet aggregation by blocking collagen binding to the Jararhagin, a hemorrhagic metalloproteinase from Bothrops
jararaca, is one of the main venom components responsible for the local and systemic hemorrhage observed in envenomed humans (19). Jararhagin has been shown to degrade components of the basement membrane of the microvasculature and some plasma proteins important for
hemostasis (20, 21). Furthermore, it synergizes hemorrhage by
inhibiting collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation (22).
In the venom, the metalloproteinase domain of jararhagin is often
proteolytically processed generating jararhagin-C, a fragment representing the disintegrin and cysteine-rich domains of jararhagin. The In this study, we have investigated the ability of jararhagin to mimic
fibrillar collagen interaction with fibroblasts to modulate the
expression of the integrin Antibodies and Reagents--
The following antibodies were used:
function blocking mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against the
Cell Culture Conditions and Immunostaining--
Human dermal
fibroblasts obtained by outgrowth from explants were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM glutamine, and 100 units/ml each of penicillin and streptomycin. Fibroblasts were used at passages
1-9. Three-dimensional collagen gels were prepared as described
previously (9). Briefly, type I collagen (3 mg/ml, Vitrogen) and
10× DMEM were combined in a 10:1 ratio and neutralized by the addition
of 0.1 M NaOH. Fibroblasts were seeded into collagen gels
at a density of 1 × 105 cells/ml and incubated at
37 °C. Alternatively, suspensions of fibroblasts were preincubated
with jararhagin, 100 nM, for 20 min at 37 °C before
seeding into collagen gels. Rates of gel contraction were monitored by
determining the remaining surface area.
For integrin binding experiments, cells were detached from confluent
monolayer cultures by trypsinization, collected by centrifugation, and
resuspended in growth medium. Before seeding onto tissue culture plastic plates, the cells were preincubated in the presence of different concentrations of antibodies for 20 min at 37 °C. Cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion.
To detect Adhesion Assay--
Semi-confluent fibroblast monolayer cultures
were trypsinized, and the cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in
DMEM containing 0.5% BSA and insulin, transferrin, and sodium selenite at concentrations as recommended by the manufacturer (Sigma). For
competition assays, antibodies were added to the cell suspension before
plating. Adhesion assays were performed as previously described (26).
Briefly, 96-well microtiter plates were coated with 100 µl of active
or 1,10-phenanthroline-inactivated jararhagin (4 µg/ml), monomeric
collagen type I (40 µg/ml), or 50% FCS at 4 °C overnight. BSA
coating and blockage of nonspecific binding sites were performed by 1-h
incubation with heat-denatured BSA (1% BSA in
Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS) at room temperature. After
washing the wells twice, cells (2 × 104 cells/well)
were seeded and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Non-adherent cells
were removed by washing twice with PBS, and adherent cells were fixed
with 3% formaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.6, and stained with 0.5% crystal
violet in 20% (v/v) methanol. The dye was released from the cells by
addition of 0.1 M sodium citrate in 50% (v/v) ethanol. The
optical density of the released dye solution was determined at 595 nm.
Values were calculated relative to the values obtained for the control
assays (FCS or jararhagin pre-coated plates), which were arbitrarily
set as 100%. Statistical analysis was performed with the ANOVA Dunnett
multiple comparison test.
Binding of Soluble
Microtiter plates were coated with jararhagin and bovine type I
collagen at concentrations of 4 and 40 µg/ml in Tris-buffered saline
(TBS, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl)
containing 3 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 M
acetic acid. After overnight incubation, the wells were blocked with
heat-denatured BSA and incubated with 6 µg/ml soluble
Preparation of Cell Membranes and Western Blot Analysis--
For
preparation of crude plasma membranes, cells were washed twice with PBS
and scraped off the plates with PBS containing the protease inhibitors
aprotinin (10 µg/ml), Pefabloc (0.25 mg/ml), and leupeptin (1 µg/ml). Cell suspensions were subjected to three cycles of
freeze-thaw in a dry ice-ethanol/37 °C bath, and cell lysis was
confirmed microscopically. Lysates were separated from cell nuclei by
centrifugation at 500 × g. Then the supernatant was
centrifuged at 7,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The
crude plasma membranes were washed once with PBS/inhibitors and, after
centrifugation, resuspended in PBS. For preparation of total lysates,
cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed in PBS containing 0.5%
Nonidet P-40. Lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 × g
for 20 min at 4 °C. Protein concentration was determined using a
commercial assay (Bio-Rad).
For Western blotting, equal amounts of protein from the membrane
preparations, lysates, or conditioned media were separated on 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions and transferred onto
Hybond-C SuperTM (Amersham Biosciences). After blockage of nonspecific
binding sites with 5% skimmed milk in PBS containing 0.5% Tween
(v/v), the blots were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight
at 4 °C. Bound primary antibodies were detected using a horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2000, Dako) and visualized
with the ECL system (ECLTM, Amersham Biosciences).
Analysis of Jararhagin Binding to fibroblasts--
Purified
jararhagin was biotin-conjugated with biotin-XX sulfosuccinimidyl
ester. Labeling and purification of biotin-labeled jararhagin were
performed using the FluoReporter® Mini-Biotin-XX protein labeling kit
(Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands). The ability of jararhagin
to displace bound, biotinylated jararhagin from fibroblasts was assayed
by incubating fibroblasts in the presence of biotinylated jararhagin
for 24 h followed by incubation with varying concentrations of
unlabeled jararhagin for an additional 24 h. Cell surface binding
of total jararhagin (jararhagin and biotinylated jararhagin) and
biotinylated jararhagin after the 48 h treatment was determined by
Western blotting of cell lysates prepared by washing twice with cold
PBS and direct lysis in reducing sample buffer. After blotting,
membranes were incubated with anti-jararhagin antibodies (for
visualization of total jararhagin bound) or with extravidin®-peroxidase (for visualization of only biotinylated jararhagin) (1:1000, Sigma) for 1 h and detected as above described.
Zymographic Analysis--
Cells were cultured as monolayers with
or without jararhagin stimulation. At different time points, media were
collected and separated (20 µl/lane) on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels
containing 1 mg/ml bovine gelatin (Sigma). Then gels were washed in
2.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min followed by an overnight incubation in metalloproteinase substrate buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM CaCl2) (28). Gels were stained with
Coomassie Blue R-250 and then destained in water.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated by direct
lysis of the cells in guanidine thiocyanate followed by
phenol-chloroform extraction (29). Total RNA (5 µg) was resolved in
formaldehyde/agarose gels, blotted onto Hybond-N+ membranes
(Amersham Biosciences), and hybridized with random-primed 32P-labeled cDNA probes for MT1-MMP (30), MMP-1 (31),
and the Jararhagin Supports Adhesion of Fibroblasts and Inhibits Collagen
Lattice Contraction
Fibroblasts showed similar adhesion levels to jararhagin- and type
I collagen-coated dishes (Fig.
1A). No significant difference was observed between fibroblast adhesion to jararhagin or
1,10-phenanthroline-inactivated jararhagin. As shown in Fig.
1B, cell adhesion to jararhagin was reduced by ~30% in
the presence of blocking antibodies directed against the
When fibroblasts were pre-treated with jararhagin followed by
incubation of the cells within collagen lattices there was a notable
delay of lattice contraction (Fig. 2). At
24 h untreated fibroblasts contracted the gels to ~30% of the
initial surface area. However, in the presence of 100 nM
jararhagin, similar levels of contraction were not observed until
48 h. Cell viability was comparable in treated and untreated
fibroblast cultures. Because contraction of fibrillar collagen type I
lattices has been shown to be mediated by the integrin
The Reprolysin Jararhagin, a Snake Venom Metalloproteinase,
Functions as a Fibrillar Collagen Agonist Involved in Fibroblast Cell
Adhesion and Signaling*
,
,
,
, and
**
Department of Dermatology, University of
Cologne, Cologne 50924, Germany, the
Biomolecular Research
Facility, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, the
§ Department of Hematology, University of Liverpool,
Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom, and the ¶ Department of
Physiological Chemistry, University of Münster, Münster
48149, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2
1 and
1
1 have been shown to modulate cellular
activities of fibroblasts on contact with fibrillar collagen. Previously it has been shown that collagen binding to
2
1 regulates matrix metalloproteinase
MMP-1 and membrane-type MT1-MMP expression. Jararhagin is a snake venom
metalloproteinase of the Reprolysin family of zinc metalloproteinases,
containing a metalloproteinase domain followed by disintegrin-like and
cysteine-rich domains. Jararhagin blocks type I collagen-induced
platelet aggregation by binding to the
2
1
integrin and inhibiting collagen-mediated intracellular signaling
events. Here we present evidence that, in contrast to the observations
in platelets, jararhagin binding to the integrin receptor
2
1 in fibroblasts produces collagen-like cell signaling events such as up-regulation of MMP-1 and MT1-MMP. Inactivation of the metalloproteinase domain had no effect on these
properties of jararhagin. Thus, in fibroblasts the snake venom
metalloproteinase jararhagin functions as a collagen-mimetic substrate
that binds to and activates integrins. Given the homology between the
metalloproteinase, disintegrin-like and cysteine-rich domains of
jararhagin and those of the members of the ADAMs (a disintegrin-like and
metalloproteinase) family of proteins, this work
demonstrates the potential of the disintegrin-like/cysteine-rich domains in the ADAMs as cellular signaling agents to elicit responses relevant to the biological function of these proteins.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
1 and
2
1
integrin receptors (1, 2). Recently, Knight et al. (3) have
shown that the sequence GFOGER (O, hydroxyproline) in triple-helical
collagen type I and IV is recognized by both
1
1 and
2
1
integrins. Several studies have localized the binding site for collagen
within the I-domain of the
-chain integrin subunit. The I-domain is
composed of about 200 amino acids and shares homology with the von
Willebrand factor A domain (4-6).
2
1 integrin contributes to the
reorganization and contraction of the collagenous matrix (12, 13) and
is responsible for the induction of MMP-1 synthesis (14, 15). The
down-regulation of type I collagen synthesis in this system was due to
collagen binding to the
1
1 integrin (14).
Recently, we observed that, in addition to MMP-1, MT1-MMP is also
induced on both the mRNA and protein levels by the ligation of the
2
1 integrin receptor with fibrillar
collagen (16). The synthesis of the
2
1
integrin was found to be up-regulated in collagen lattices, whereas the expression of other collagen integrin receptors, such as
1
1 and
3
1,
was not affected (13).
2
1 integrin on platelets (17).
2
1 integrin can also interact with
jararhagin-C, but the interaction seems to be weaker than with
jararhagin (23), suggesting that additional N-terminal structures might
be involved in jararhagin-
2
1 binding.
Interestingly, synthetic peptides based on a sequence in the
metalloproteinase domain of jararhagin have been shown to bind to the
I-domain of the recombinant
2 integrin chain thereby preventing the binding of the
2-I domain to collagens I
and IV, and to laminin-1 (24).
2
1 and the
matrix metalloproteinases MMP-1 and MT1-MMP. In contrast to previous
studies performed in platelets, jararhagin binding to fibroblasts led
to cellular activities similar to those induced by fibrillar type I
collagen binding via the
2
1 integrin.
These results suggest that other disintegrin-like/cysteine-rich domain-containing proteins, such as the ADAMs, may be capable of not
only binding to integrins, as has been shown, but also signaling via
integrins to alter cellular events such as gene and protein expression.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 (4B4; Coulter Corporation),
2 (P1E6;
BIOMOL), and
3 (BIOMOL) integrin chains; monospecific mouse antibodies to MT1-MMP were raised against a peptide corresponding to the residues 160-173 of human MT1-MMP (114-1F2; Fuji Chemicals). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to human MMP-1 were kindly provided by Dr.
P. Angel (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany). Function-blocking mouse antibodies raised against the human
1 integrin chain, mouse antibodies against human
HLA-ABC, and antibodies directed against the
1 integrin
subunit antibodies used for immunoblotting were from Chemicon. The
rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against jararhagin were a kind
gift from Dr. R. D. G. Theakston (Liverpool School of
Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK). Jararhagin was purified from the
venom of B. jararaca as previously described (19).
Inactivation of proteolytic activity was performed by a 5-min treatment
with 5 mM 1,10-phenanthroline at 37 °C (25).
2 integrin, fibroblasts were cultured on
chamber slides. After 48 h, cells were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then fixed with cold acetone.
Staining was performed with rabbit anti-
2 antibodies
against the cytoplasmic domain of the protein (Chemicon) overnight at
4 °C in PBS containing 4% BSA, followed by incubation with goat
anti-rabbit-Cy3 antibodies (1:400 in PBS/2% BSA, Dianova) for 1 h
at room temperature in a humidified chamber. Omission of the first
antibody was used as a negative control.
2
1 to
Immobilized Jararhagin--
Recombinant soluble human integrin
2
1 ectodomain heterodimers were prepared
in insect cells using an expression plasmid in which the cytoplasmic
and transmembrane domains were replaced by Fos and Jun dimerization
motifs as described previously (27).
2
1 integrin in the absence or presence of
10 mM EDTA for 2 h at room temperature. Then the wells
were washed twice, and substrate-bound integrin was detected by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a rabbit anti-human
1 integrin antiserum and alkaline phosphatase-coupled
anti-rabbit IgG antibodies as primary and secondary antibodies,
respectively. para-Nitrophenylphosphate was used as the
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay substrate with the product measured
at 405 nm. Each value was measured in duplicate, and standard
deviations were calculated.
2 integrin chain (32).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 or
1 integrin subunits; whereas no
inhibition was noticed with other function-blocking antibodies directed
against
1 or
3 integrins, which both can
serve as collagen receptors (2). Using a combination of both the
2 and
1 antibodies, cell adhesion to
jararhagin was inhibited by up to ~60% in a
dose-dependent manner.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Jararhagin is a cell-adhesive substrate.
A, fibroblasts were seeded on microtiter plates (2 × 104 cells/well) coated with either 4 µg/ml jararhagin or
1,10-phenanthroline-inactivated jararhagin, 40 µg/ml collagen type I,
or 50% FCS as described under "Materials and Methods." BSA-coated
wells were included as a negative control. After 2 h, non-adherent
cells were removed and the adherent cells were stained with crystal
violet after fixation. The bars represent the mean ± S.E. of the optical densities determined after release of the dye from
three independent experiments performed in duplicates. The mean
obtained for FCS-coated dishes (OD595 nm of 0.66 ± 0.08) was arbitrarily set as 100%. B, fibroblasts were
incubated with monoclonal antibodies raised against the
2,
1,
3, or
1 integrin chains (2.5 µg/ml) or with a combination of
antibodies raised against the
2 and
1
integrin chains (2.5 or 5 µg/ml each). Then the cells were seeded on
plates precoated with jararhagin (4 µg/ml) for 2 h. HLA
antibodies (5 µg/ml) were used as a control. The bars
represent the mean ± S.E. of the optical densities of the
released dye from three independent experiments performed in duplicate.
The mean of the optical densities obtained for adhesion to
jararhagin-coated wells without treatment (OD595 nm of
0.5 ± 0.09) was set arbitrarily as 100%. (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.)
2
1 (12-14), these results suggest that
jararhagin delays the contraction by interfering with the
2
1-collagen interaction.

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Jararhagin interferes with collagen gel
contraction. Human fibroblasts were grown in collagen gels in the
absence (white bars) or in the presence of 100 nM (black bars). At the indicated time points
the gel surface area was measured. Contraction is indicated as
percentage of the initial gel surface area, which was set arbitrarily
as 100%. The results represent the mean ± S.E. of two
independent experiments performed in triplicates.
Jararhagin Interaction with the Integrin Receptor
2
1
Previous studies have shown that binding of the
2
1 integrin on platelets by PIII snake
venom metalloproteinases results in an inhibition of the signaling
events normally induced in collagen-stimulated platelets coupled with a
potent inhibition of platelet aggregation (22, 23). To determine
whether jararhagin binds to cell surface proteins, both supernatants
and crude fibroblast membranes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE after 24 and
48 h of incubation with jararhagin (Fig.
3). Immunoblotting using a
jararhagin-specific antibody detected a band of 55 kDa indicating the
presence of jararhagin in the cell culture supernatants. An additional
band of ~33 kDa likely represents the proteolytic degradation
fragment of jararhagin comprising the disintegrin-like/cysteine-rich
domains (jararhagin-C) (Fig. 3A). In membranes isolated at
24 h, a weakly stained 55-kDa band corresponding to intact
jararhagin was detected. The intensity of this band was significantly
increased at 48 h (Fig. 3B). The additional band of 52 kDa might represent unreduced jararhagin or a proteolytically processed
form (13). Additionally, these data suggest that jararhagin binding to
cell surface proteins on fibroblasts offers protection from proteolytic
degradation at the site producing jararhagin-C.
|
An assay was performed to demonstrate the specificity of
binding of jararhagin to the cell surface. In these experiments, unlabeled jararhagin was used to displace biotinylated jararhagin from
the cell surface of fibroblasts. As shown in Fig.
4A, unlabeled jararhagin is
able to displace the cell-surface-associated biotinylated jararhagin in
a concentration-dependent manner.
|
In Fig. 4B, the soluble ectodomain of the
integrin
2
1 binds to immobilized
jararhagin. However, in contrast to collagen type I, the binding of the
soluble
2
1 receptor to jararhagin did not
seem to be dependent upon the presence of divalent cations. This
suggests the possibility of one or more different binding sites for
jararhagin than that for collagen on the receptor molecule.
Jararhagin Treatment of Fibroblasts Grown in Collagen Gel Cultures Did Not Affect Collagen-induced Synthesis of MMPs
After 24 and 48 h of growth in collagen lattices, total RNA
was isolated from fibroblasts pre-treated with 100 nM
jararhagin, and the transcript levels for MMP-1 and MT1-MMP were
assessed by Northern blot analysis (Fig.
5). Control fibroblasts grown in collagen
gels showed increased transcript levels for MT1-MMP and MMP-1 at
24 h with a further increase at 48 h culture. At both time
points, pre-treatment with jararhagin did not result in significant
differences of these transcript levels from those observed in the
untreated cells. In addition, there was a similar increase in integrin
2 mRNA level from both untreated and
jararhagin-treated fibroblasts. Therefore, pre-treatment of fibroblasts
with jararhagin had no apparent effect on fibroblasts grown within
collagen lattices.
|
Jararhagin Treatment of Fibroblast Monolayer Cultures Results in Similar Changes as Observed for Fibroblasts Grown in Collagen Lattices
Morphology--
Analysis of fibroblast cell morphology following
treatment with increasing concentrations of jararhagin showed a
characteristic elongated shape with protrusions of cell extensions
identical to that reported for fibroblasts grown in collagen gels (9). Untreated fibroblasts maintained their characteristic spindle-like morphology with a flattened cell shape (Fig.
6).
|
MMP mRNA Expression--
In contrast to fibroblast growth in
collagen lattices, in which no significant alterations could be
detected, in monolayer cultures treatment with jararhagin produced
significant differences as shown in Fig. 5. In monolayer cultures, only
very low levels of MT1-MMP and MMP-1 transcripts were observed.
However, fibroblasts pre-treated with jararhagin displayed a strong
induction of MT1-MMP and MMP-1 mRNA expression together with
increased
2-integrin transcript levels. These increases
were apparent at 24 h, and by 48 h the increases were
comparable to those obtained with fibroblasts cultured within collagen
lattices. In addition, the induction of MMP mRNA levels was found
to be concentration-dependent, showing maximal stimulation
when the cells were pre-treated with 200 nM jararhagin
(Fig. 7).
|
To test whether the metalloproteinase activity of jararhagin is
required for the induction of MMP-1 and MT1-MMP expression, monolayer
cultures of fibroblasts were treated with active or 1,10-phenanthroline-inactivated jararhagin (22). As shown in Fig.
8, treatment of fibroblasts with
proteolytically inactive jararhagin resulted in no significant
differences in MMP-1 and MT1-MMP mRNA levels when compared with
fibroblasts treated with active jararhagin. The apparent slight
reduction of the mRNA levels observed after treatment with
inactivated jararhagin was due to the presence of the general
metalloproteinase inhibitor 1,10-phenanthroline as shown by the control
fibroblast treatment with 1,10-phenanthroline.
|
MMP Protein Expression--
Western blot analysis of MT1-MMP in
crude membrane preparations from cells treated with jararhagin
displayed increased levels of the active 60-kDa MT1-MMP protein form at
24 h as well as at 48 h as compared with untreated
fibroblasts (Fig. 9A). A low
level of an additional immunoreactive protein of 63-kDa band
corresponding to the unprocessed zymogen was also detected (33, 34).
This increase in MT1-MMP production in treated monolayer culture was paralleled by enhanced pro-MMP-2 activation as indicated by the appearance of the 62/59-kDa forms correspondent to the active enzyme
(Fig. 9B). Analysis of MMP-1 protein in supernatants of cells treated with jararhagin showed increased inactive MMP-1 forms,
52/57 kDa, as well as appearance of active MMP-1, 42/47 kDa, at both 24 and 48 h treatment (Fig. 9C).
|
We also assessed the possibility that the proteolytic activity of jararhagin might be directly involved in MT1-MMP and pro-MMP-2 activation. Treatment of cell membranes, prepared from an MT1-MMP-stable expressing cell line containing only the pro-form of MT1-MMP (34) with jararhagin, did not result in activation of pro-MT1-MMP (data not shown). In addition, treatment of media containing pro-MMP-2 with jararhagin also failed to show activation of the zymogen (data not shown). These observations suggest that neither the activation of pro-MT1-MMP nor the activation of pro-MMP-2 was a result of the proteolytic activity of jararhagin.
2
1 Protein Expression--
As shown
above, jararhagin did not block the
2
1-induced MMP-1 and MT1-MMP
up-regulation in fibroblasts grown in collagen lattices. Surprisingly,
in monolayer cultures, the addition of jararhagin resulted in increased
transcript levels for the
2-integrin subunit and MMP-1
and MT1-MMP indicating an activation rather than inhibition of this
integrin receptor. It has been demonstrated that fibroblasts grown in
collagen lattices respond with an up-regulation the
2
1 integrin expression, whereas there is
no up-regulation when fibroblasts are grown as monolayers (16).
Treatment of fibroblasts with jararhagin followed by growth as
monolayers caused a significant increase of
2
1-integrin immunostaining, whereas no
specific staining was detected in untreated monolayer cultures (Fig.
10A). Western blot analysis
of the
2 integrin subunit in cells treated with
jararhagin displayed slightly increased protein levels at 24 h
followed by a significant increase at 48 h treatment (Fig.
10B). The observed increase in
2 integrin
levels displayed on the cell surface may explain the increase in
jararhagin binding shown in Fig. 3.
|
These data indicate that treatment of fibroblasts with jararhagin gives
rise to changes in gene expression and cellular phenotype similar to
those observed for fibroblasts grown in collagen lattices. Therefore,
in this system jararhagin is capable of acting as a collagen lattice
mimetic by binding to the
2
1 integrin to
activate signal transduction.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In vivo, skin fibroblasts are surrounded by
extracellular matrix components, including fibrillar collagens. As an
approach to the in vivo situation, an in vitro
model was established several years ago, which is believed to resemble
some aspects of the in vivo environment (9, 35). In the
in vitro model, fibroblasts are embedded in a
three-dimensional matrix consisting mainly of fibrillar type I
collagen. The collagenous environment causes
2
1-mediated intracellular signaling
events that result in changes in the expression of a variety of
proteins, including MMP-1, MT1-MMP, and
2
1 integrin (10, 16, 13). Recently, it
has been demonstrated that fibroblasts, when adhered within
three-dimensional matrices compared with adherence as monolayers, have
very different focal adhesion complexes, morphologies, and biological
activities (36). These results underscore the concept that cells
respond differently to different architectures of the extracellular
matrix to which they are adhering.
The snake venom metalloproteinase jararhagin inhibits collagen-induced
platelet aggregation by binding to
2
1
integrin, thereby blocking collagen binding and its subsequent cell
surface receptor-mediated signaling (18, 19). Our interests were in
examining whether the PIII SVMP, jararhagin, could interfere with the
2
1-mediated changes in fibroblasts that
are observed upon contact with fibrillar collagen.
We demonstrated that jararhagin does bind to the fibroblast
cell surface, and, interestingly, the level of binding increases over
time. This can be explained by the increase in cell surface expression
2
1 receptor observed following initial
incubation of fibroblasts with jararhagin. We consider the interaction
of jararhagin with fibroblasts to occur via one or more specific interactions of jararhagin with the cell surface, because bound labeled
jararhagin could be specifically displaced by jararhagin (Fig.
4A).
Fibroblasts binding to immobilized jararhagin was not dependent on the
proteolytic activity of the SVMP (Fig. 8). Preincubation of the
fibroblasts with antibodies against the subunits of the collagen
binding integrins (
2,
1,
3, and
1) or combinations of antibodies
against the
2 and
1 integrin chains
blocked binding to a level of ~40% of the control (Fig.
1B). One possible explanation for the incomplete inhibition
could be that, in addition to
2
1 integrin, other integrins or matrix binding receptors may be involved in fibroblast adhesion to jararhagin. This is not necessarily surprising, given the multiple domains of the protein
(metalloproteinase, disintegrins-like, and cystine-rich), each of which
could be involved in cell surface interactions (37). We demonstrated
that direct binding of the ectodomain of recombinant
2
1 to jararhagin occurred in a
non-cation-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). Most
matrix components, including collagen, bind to the
2
1 integrin in a
cation-dependent manner (38). However, recent reports
described the presence of a non-cation-dependent site on
the I-domain of the
2 subunit that supports binding to
pro-MMP-1 (39). Therefore, jararhagin binds to fibroblasts via
interaction with the
2
1 integrin, albeit at a site different from the cation-dependent site, and
hence the anti-
2 antibodies we used may not function as
effectively to block binding at the non-cation-dependent
site on the I-domain. This offers a possible explanation for the
incomplete blocking of jararhagin to soluble
2
1. Several reports have indicated
2
1 integrin as binding partner for
jararhagin (18, 19, 23), and our results corroborate this. However, we
cannot exclude that other receptors may also be involved in the binding
of jararhagin to the cell surface.
In contrast to fibroblasts grown as monolayers, distinctive changes in
gene expression were observed for fibroblasts grown in collagen
lattices comprised of fibrillar type I collagen (16). Therefore, we
anticipated that treatment of fibroblasts with jararhagin prior to
growth in collagen lattices would compete with the collagen fibrils for
2
1 binding and block the typical
2
1-mediated signaling responses observed
for fibroblasts grown in collagen lattices. However, treatment of
fibroblasts grown in collagen lattices with jararhagin failed to show
any inhibition of the collagen-induced up-regulation of MT1-MMP and
MMP-1 transcript levels. Jararhagin treatment did significantly delay
collagen lattice contraction, a phenomenon that has been shown to be
mediated by the integrin
2
1 (11, 13, 14).
From our data the binding of jararhagin to the
2
1 integrin receptor at the
concentrations tested could only partially compete with the native
substrate collagen. Other investigators have shown a
concentration-dependent inhibition of platelet adhesion to
monomeric collagen in the presence of increasing amounts of jararhagin
or jararhagin-C (23).
Although collagen binding was partially competed by jararhagin
treatment of the fibroblasts (as indicated by the delayed collagen gel
contraction), the collagen-induced MT1-MMP and MMP-1 mRNA expression was unchanged. This suggests that in the jararhagin-bound
2
1 integrin population a similar
signaling phenomenon was occurring that recapitulates the binding of
the integrin to fibrillar collagen. This was further substantiated by
the results in monolayer cultures, whereby jararhagin induced responses
resembling those observed with fibroblasts grown in collagen lattices
(16). These included the induction of MMP-1 and MT1-MMP expression and
pro-MMP-2 activation. The apparent increase in MT1-MMP is modest;
however, it was sufficient to produce the functional stoichiometry
between MT1-MMP, TIMP-2, and pro-MMP-2 such that there is an overall
increase in pro-MMP-2 activation as observed by zymography.
Because the effects observed in jararhagin-treated monolayer cultures
are similar to those occurring within collagen gels, which are mediated
by the engagement of
2
1 integrin, we
infer that jararhagin essentially mimics the effects of the
physiological ligand. This is corroborated by the finding that
jararhagin binds to the soluble ectodomain of the
2
1 integrin.
Although jararhagin could support the binding of the
2
1 ectodomain, it was somewhat surprising
that this was not dependent on divalent cations, because EDTA did not
inhibit the process. Although most of the ligand-integrin interactions
are dependent upon divalent ions (38), there are recent reports
suggesting that collagen binding to the
2 I-domain can
occur in the absence of metal ions (40). These authors suggest that
collagen binding could occur to the "open,"
metal-dependent, and "closed," metal-independent, conformations of the I-domain. Additional studies are planned to better
characterize the binding site for jararhagin on the
2
1 integrin.
The question as which region or regions of jararhagin is/are
responsible for the activities observed on treatment of fibroblasts is
unclear. Different regions of PIII SVMPs have been shown to bind to the
2
1 integrin. One of these regions is
represented by the ECD motif located in the disintegrin-like
domain (41). The second region, the RKKH motif of jararhagin, is
located in the metalloproteinase domain (24). A third possible site is the cysteine-rich domain. The recombinant cysteine-rich domain of
atrolysin A, a PIII SVMP isolated from Crotalus atrox venom, has been shown to inhibit collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation thereby indicating an ability to bind platelet
2
1 integrin (37). Preliminary studies in
our laboratory (data not shown) using venom proteins containing only
the disintegrin-like/cysteine-rich domains have indicated that these
domains can induce similar activities as observed with jararhagin when
used to treat fibroblast. Therefore, it is likely that the proteinase
domain does not play a significant role in these activities.
Data from Kamiguti and colleagues (25) indicated that inhibition of
collagen-induced platelet aggregation occurs by binding of jararhagin
to the I-domain of the
2 integrin subunit on platelets. In contrast, when fibroblasts are treated with jararhagin, activation of the
2
1 integrin receptor was observed
as evidenced by the up-regulation of MMP synthesis. Kamiguti and
colleagues (22) also showed that inhibition of collagen-induced
platelets aggregation results in a reduced collagen-stimulated
phosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase pp72syk.
In platelets, activation and aggregation induced by collagen depends on
the cooperative action of
2
1,
glycoprotein VI, and
IIb
3 (42),
and therefore the binding of jararhagin to
2
1 may not be sufficient for effective
signal transduction. Furthermore, binding of jararhagin to platelet
2
1 may preclude the successful binding of
collagen to
2
1 and/or glycoprotein
VI given the close proximity of these two receptors. These
events could lead to the overall effect of inhibiting platelet
aggregation. However, the situation with fibroblasts is rather
different. The binding of jararhagin to
2
1 integrin is sufficient to induce
cellular signaling events essentially identical to that observed for
fibrillar collagen. Therefore, it seems that, although different cells
may use identical integrins to transduce signals, the presence of other
receptors or cell signal pathways give rise to different activities. As shown by our experiments, in platelets jararhagin can engage the
2
1 receptor to block platelet
aggregation, yet in fibroblasts jararhagin promotes
2
1 receptor-mediated signaling to promote the expression of MMP-1, MT1-MMP, and the
2
1 integrin. Therefore, not
unexpectedly, when considering the activities resulting from the
binding of ligands to signal-transducing receptors, care must be given
to fully understand the relationship of the receptor to other cell
surface receptors as well as the pathways available for transmitting
the signals.
Members of the ADAMs family of Reprolysins have been demonstrated to
bind to various integrins (43). For instance, ADAM 12 and ADAM 15 have
been shown to bind to the
9
1 integrin
through their disintegrin-like/cysteine-rich domains mediating thereby cell-cell contacts (44). In another case, ADAM 23 was shown to bind to
the
v
3 integrin and mediate cell
interactions in cells of neural origin (45). Although this event
promotes sperm-egg fusion, very little data is available on signal
transduction following the ADAM-integrin interaction. Based on the data
presented here, we would suggest that future investigations examining
the potential of cell signaling following integrin engagement by an
ADAM may be a productive path to fully understand the biological
activities of the ADAMs.
In summary, our studies have demonstrated that the snake venom
metalloproteinase jararhagin is a useful tool for studying the
molecular basis of collagen-induced cellular activities in human skin
fibroblasts for comparison and contrast with other cell types.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Drs. B. Eckes, T. Krieg, and M. Aumailley (University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany) for critical discussions. We thank Dr. G. D. Laing (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom) for helping in the purification of jararhagin.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants KR 558/10-1 and BMFT/IDZ 10 (01 GB 950/4), by W. Sander-Stiftung (99.093.1), and by the Köln Fortune Project (86/1999).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: 49-221- 478-5407; Fax: 49-221-478-5949; E-mail: Cornelia.Mauch@medizin.uni-koeln.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 16, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202049200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: MMP-1, matrix metalloproteinase-1; MMP-2, matrix metalloproteinase-2; MT1-MMP, membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SVMP, snake venom metalloproteinases; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FCS, fetal calf serum; BSA, bovine serum albumin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hemler, M. E. (1990) Ann. Rev. Immunol. 8, 365-400[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Hynes, R. O. (1992) Cell 9, 11-25[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Knight, C. G.,
Morton, L. F.,
Peachey, A. R.,
Tuckwell, D. S.,
Farndale, R. W.,
and Barnes, M. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
35-40 |
| 4. | Hughes, A. L. (1992) Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 216-234[Abstract] |
| 5. | Eble, J. A., Golbik, R., Mann, K., and Kühn, K. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4795-4802[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Tuckwell, D. S., Calderwood, D. A., Green, L. J., and Humphries, M. J. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 1629-1637[Abstract] |
| 7. |
Grinnel, F.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
401-404 |
| 8. |
Grinnel, F., Ho, C.-H.,
Lin, Y.-C.,
and Skuta, G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
918-923 |
| 9. | Mauch, C., Hatamochi, A., Scharffetter, K., and Krieg, T. (1988) Exp. Cell Res. 178, 493-503[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Mauch, C., Adelmann-Grill, C. B., Hatamochi, A., and Krieg, T. (1989) FEBS Lett. 250, 301-305[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Seltzer, J. L., Lee, A.-Y., Akers, K. T., Sudbeck, B., Southon, E. A., Wayner, E. A., and Eisen, A. Z. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 213, 365-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Chan, B. M.,
Matsuura, N.,
Takada, Y.,
Zetter, B. R.,
and Hemler, M. E.
(1991)
Science
251,
1600-1602 |
| 13. |
Klein, C. E.,
Dressel, D.,
Steinmayer, T.,
Mauch, C.,
Eckes, B.,
Krieg, T.,
Bankert, R. B.,
and Weber, L.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1427-1436 |
| 14. |
Langholz, O.,
Roeckel, D.,
Mauch, C.,
Kozlowska, E.,
Bank, I.,
Krieg, T.,
and Eckes, B.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1903-1915 |
| 15. |
Riikonen, T.,
Westermarck, J.,
Koivisto, L.,
Broberg, A.,
Kähäri, V.-M.,
and Heino, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13548-13552 |
| 16. | Zigrino, P., Drescher, C., and Mauch, C. (2001) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 80, 68-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Fox, J. W., and Long, C. (1998) in Snake Venom Enzymes (Bailey, G., ed) , pp. 151-178, Alaken Press, Ft. Collins, CO |
| 18. | Jia, L.-G., Shimokawa, K.-I., Bjarnason, J. B., and Fox, J. (1996) Toxicon 34, 1269-1276[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Paine, M. J. I.,
Desmond, H. P.,
Theakston, R. D. G.,
and Crampton, J. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
22869-22876 |
| 20. | Kamiguti, A. S., Hay, C. R. M., Theakston, R. D. G., and Zuzel, M. (1996) Toxicon 34, 627-642[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Hati, R., Mitra, P., Sarker, S., and Bhattacharyya, K. K. (1999) Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 29, 1-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Kamiguti, A. S.,
Markland, F. S.,
Zhou, Q.,
Laing, G. D.,
Theakston, R. D. G.,
and Zuzel, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32599-32605 |
| 23. | De Luca, M., Ward, C. M., Ohmori, K., Andrews, R. K., and Berndt, M. C. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206, 570-576[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Ivaska, J.,
Käpylä, J.,
Pentikäinen, O.,
Hoffren, A.-M.,
Hermonen, J.,
Huttunen, P.,
Johnson, M. S.,
and Heino, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3513-3521 |
| 25. | Kamiguti, A. S., Hay, C. R. M., and Zuzel, M. (1996) Biochem. J. 320, 635-641[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Zigrino, P., Gaietta, G., Zambonin Zallone, A., Pelletier, A. J., and Quaranta, V. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun. 221, 51-58[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Eble, J. A., Wucherpfennig, K. W., Gauthier, L., Dersch, P., Krukonis, E., Isberg, R. R., and Hemler, M. E. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 10945-10955[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Howard, E. W.,
Bullen, E.,
and Banda, M. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13064-13069 |
| 29. | Chomezynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Sato, H., Takino, T., Okada, Y., Cao, J., Shinagawa, A., Yamamoto, E., and Seiki, M. (1994) Nature 370, 61-65[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Angel, P.,
Baumann, I.,
Stein, B.,
Dellus, H.,
Rahmsdorf, H. J.,
and Herrlich, P.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2256-2266 |
| 32. | Hemler, M. E. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 1524-1526 |
| 33. | Lehti, K., Lohi, J., Valtanen, H., and Keski-Oja, J. (1998) Biochem. J. 334, 345-353 |