JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206618200 on August 13, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 43, 41157-41162, October 25, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/43/41157    most recent
M206618200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liou, G.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Lin-Chao, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liou, G.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Lin-Chao, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

DEAD Box RhlB RNA Helicase Physically Associates with Exoribonuclease PNPase to Degrade Double-stranded RNA Independent of the Degradosome-assembling Region of RNase E*

Gunn-Guang LiouDagger §, Hsiang-Yu ChangDagger ||, Chi-Shen LinDagger ||, and Sue Lin-ChaoDagger **

From the Dagger  Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan, the § Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan, and the || Institute of Biochemistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan

Received for publication, July 3, 2002, and in revised form, August 12, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Escherichia coli RNA degradosome is a multicomponent ribonucleolytic complex consisting of three major proteins that assemble on a scaffold provided by the C-terminal region of the endonuclease, RNase E. Using an E. coli two-hybrid system, together with BIAcore apparatus, we investigated the ability of three proteins, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), RhlB RNA helicase, and enolase, a glycolytic protein, to interact physically and functionally independently of RNase E. Here we report that Rh1B can physically bind to PNPase, both in vitro and in vivo, and can also form homodimers with itself. However, binding of RhlB or PNPase to enolase was not detected under the same conditions. BIAcore analysis revealed real-time, direct binding for bimolecular interactions between Rh1B units and for the RhlB interaction with PNPase. Furthermore, in the absence of RNase E, purified RhlB can carry out ATP-dependent unwinding of double-stranded RNA and consequently modulate degradation of double-stranded RNA together with the exonuclease activity of PNPase. These results provide evidence for the first time that both functional and physical interactions of individual degradosome protein components can occur in the absence of RNase E and raise the prospect that the RNase E-independent complexes of RhlB RNA helicase and PNPase, detected in vivo, may constitute mini-machines that assist in the degradation of duplex RNA in structures physically distinct from multicomponent RNA degradosomes.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

RNA metabolism is a complex process affecting the control of gene expression. In bacteria, a multicomponent ribonucleolytic complex termed the RNA degradosome (1-4) has been identified as playing an important role in the control of mRNA degradation (for recent reviews, see Refs. 5-11). The multicomponent complex consists of: the RNA endonuclease RNase E, whose activity is essential for Escherichia coli cell growth (12-14), RNA processing (15, 16), and degradation (17, 18); the 3'-5' exoribonuclease PNPase (19); RhlB RNA helicase (20); and enolase (21), an enzyme involved in the glycolytic pathway and other chaperonin proteins (3, 22). Interestingly, in addition to mRNAs, highly structured, stable RNA fragments have also been found to be associated with RNA degradosome complexes (3, 23), which implies quality control by the RNA degradosome for the biogenesis of stable RNAs. Degradosome complexity and its cooperation with individual protein components acting on degradation-targeted RNA, in vivo, remains to be discovered.

Various approaches revealing protein-protein interactions in the degradosome indicate that the C-terminal region of RNase E serves as a scaffold that directly binds PNPase, RhlB RNA helicase, and enolase (24, 25). No other interactions among these component proteins have been detected (25) or reported. Recently, a mini-degradosome complex (26) containing the scaffold region (without the N-terminal enzymatic region of RNase E), RhlB RNA helicase, and PNPase was reconstituted in vitro. These experiments revealed a functional interaction between RhlB RNA helicase and PNPase: RhlB helicase bound to the RNase E C-terminal region leads to subsequent ATP-activated degradation of a stem-loop segment intermediate RNA by PNPase. In the absence of the RNase E C-terminal region, RNA degradation does not occur. This led to the proposal that interaction between both RNase E-bound PNPase and RhlB helicase attacks the 3'-end of a structured mRNA (26). Recently, it has been shown that, in vivo, the steady state levels of individual component degradosome proteins differ and that degradosome protein components can exist both bound and unbound to RNase E (27). Thus the potential exists for the formation of protein complexes other than those formed on the RNase E scaffold to target RNAs for degradation. Here, we have addressed this question by investigating possible interactions among degradosome protein components independently of RNase E. We show, both in vivo and in vitro, that RhlB RNA helicase binds directly to PNPase and that the binding aids double-stranded RNA degradation by PNPase. These findings indicate that functionally important interactions between degradosome components can occur in the absence of the degradosome scaffold and suggest the existence of a dynamic network of degradosome components in vivo that targets various kinds of structured RNAs for rapid degradation by PNPase-RhlB complexes.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bacterial Strains and Plasmids-- The E. coli strains BZ99 (his Delta trpE5 mukB106 smbB199 (lambda ))(28) and DHP1 (F- glnV44(AS) recA1 endA1 gyrA96(Nalr) thi1 hsdR17 spoT1 rfbD1 cya)(29) were used to overexpress degradosome protein components and study in vivo protein-protein interactions, respectively. BZ99 contains a truncated rne gene that encodes amino acids 1-602 of the Rne protein. DHP1 is an adenylate cyclase (cya)-deficient derivative of DH1 (30). The plasmid pGP1-2, containing the T7 RNA polymerase gene under the control of a temperature-sensitive bacteriophage lambda  repressor (31), was used to conditionally induce the synthesis of individual proteins. A PCR-generated EcoRI-XhoI fragment encoding full-length PNPase or RhlB RNA helicase and a NdeI-BamHI fragment encoding full-length enolase, were individually inserted into FLAG-containing vectors (the corresponding plasmids were termed pflag-PNP, pflag-RhlB and pflag-ENO). Proteins were purified using an M2 affinity column as described (3). To study protein-protein interactions, a series of pT18- or pT25-based vectors (29) encoding genes of interest were constructed: pT25RE12, pT25PNP, pT25ENO, pT25RhlB, pT25RhlB1, pT25RhlB2, pT25RhlB3, pT25RhlB12, pT25RhlB13, and pT25RhlB23. These constructs were generated by the insertions of a PCR-generated PstI-BamHI fragment encoding truncated peptides of Rne (i.e. RE12: residues 684-784), full-length PNPase, enolase, RhlB RNA helicase and some distinct motifs of RhlB polypeptide (i.e. RhlB1: residues 1-194; RhlB2: residues 194-368; RhlB3: residues 351-421; RhlB12: residues 1-368; RhlB13: residues 1-194, and 368-421; RhlB23: residues 194-421, respectively), into the pT25-based vector. Plasmids pPNPT18, pRhlBT18, and pENOT18, were generated by the insertions of a PCR-generated XhoI-HindIII fragment encoding full-length PNPase, RhlB, helicase and enolase, respectively, into the pT18-based vector (29). All plasmid constructs were partially sequenced to confirm correct open reading frames.

E. coli Two-hybrid Assay-- E. coli two-hybrid assays were performed on MacConkey agar plates containing 1% maltose as described (29). Antibiotic concentrations were 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 34 µg/ml chloramphenicol. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for ~2-3 days; photographs of individual plates were taken using the Kodak DC120 digital camera (Eastman Kodak) with KDS1D program (Eastman Kodak).

The strength of interactions between individual pairs of proteins was determined by assaying beta -galactosidase activity on bacterial suspensions as previously described (32). For individual protein assays, log-phase 30 °C bacterial cultures at cell densities of ~2-5 × 108 cells/ml (A600 of ~0.3-0.7) were used. Under identical experimental condition, we also carried out beta -galactosidase activity measurements, resulting from the interaction between T25-zip and T18-zip leucine zipper motifs (29) to normalize individual protein assays. For individual pairs of protein-protein interactions, triplicate samples or more were studied.

Protein Purifications and Western Blot Analyses-- The FLAG-tagged PNPase, RhlB RNA helicase, and enolase were purified as previously described (3) except that cell debris was removed from cell lysate by centrifugation at 18,000 × g (versus 10,000 × g) for 15 min. To purify unbound protein components, the supernatant was precipitated with 60% (instead of 40%) saturation of ammonium sulfate, incubated on ice for 15-30 min and pelleted down by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min. The pellet was washed with 60% saturated ammonium sulfate in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min. The pellet was dissolved in buffer A containing 20% glycerol, adjusted to 12.5 ml, and filtered with a 0.45-µm filter. The protein was then purified on an anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Sigma) column according to the manufacturer's instruction by using 1 ml of solution of synthetic FLAG oligopeptide (1 mg/ml) (PAN Laboratory, Stanford University). Prior to elution, 1 ml of 0.1 mg/ml FLAG oligopeptide solution and 2 ml of buffer A containing 20% glycerol were used to remove/wash weakly interacting proteins. For BIAcore surface plasmon resonance analysis, the purified proteins were then dialyzed against 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing 50 mM NaCl at 4 °C overnight. The enzymatic activities were monitored as described (see later section on activity assays).

BIAcore Surface Plasmon Resonance Analysis-- Real time protein-protein interactions were examined on a BIAcore instrument (BIAcore X). RhlB RNA helicase and bovine serum albumin were immobilized on different flow cells of a CM5 sensor chip using an amine-coupling kit (Amersham Biosciences). Briefly, the chip surface was first activated by injection of 35 µl of 1:1 mixture of 0.4 M N-ethyl-N'-(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride and 0.1 M N-hydroxysuccinimide. Native RhlB RNA helicase (70 µl of 35 µg/ml) in 100 mM phosphate buffer, 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.0, (optimal buffer components as determined by trial preconcentration experiments) was immobilized on one flow cell, and an additional flow cell was prepared as a blank background by immobilization of bovine serum albumin (50 µg/ml) under the same buffer conditions. Remaining activated groups on each flow cell were blocked by injection of 35 µl of 1 M ethanolamine HCl, pH 8.5. The chip was then washed twice with 10 µl of 0.1 M NaOH to remove any non-covalently bound proteins. Finally, the system was primed with the running buffer (100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl).

The interaction assays were performed with a constant (10, 20, or 30 µl/min as indicated) flow rate at 25 °C. Individually distinct concentrations, ranging from 5 to 50 nM (as shown in Fig. 3) of purified native RhlB RNA helicase, PNPase, or enolase were injected as analytes. The chemical binding groups were regenerated by sequentially washing the analytes with 10 µl of injection of 0.1 M NaOH, 0.1 M glycine-HCl (pH 3.5) and 10% ethanol until a background level was attained.

Helicase Activity and PNPase Activity Assays-- RNA oligonucleotides used for RNA helicase unwinding and the PNPase degradation assay were double-stranded substrates that resulted from the annealing of a short single-stranded oligo 5'-AGC GCA GUA CC and its complementary longer single stranded oligo 5'-ACA GUA UUU GGU ACU GCG CUC U (synthesized by Dharmacon Research Inc.). Underlined nucleotides indicate the complementary region with the short strand RNA oligo. The RNA sequences of long strand RNA are identical to the 5'-end sequences of RNAI, the antisense RNA of ColEI-type plasmids (18), and contain an RNase E cleavage site (33-35). Both strands were 5'-end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP as described previously (35). The labeled RNA strands were hybridized to form duplex RNA substrates made by combining "short" and "long" RNA in a 1:1.5 ratio. The excess of long RNA ensured that the majority of the labeled RNA formed duplex RNA substrates. RNA annealing was performed by adding equal volumes of 2× hybridization buffer (40 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.6, 1 M NaCl, 0.2% SDS, 2 mM EDTA) to long and short RNA mixtures, in which samples were heated to 95 °C for 5 min and then slowly cooled to room temperature. The duplex RNAs (25 fmol) were incubated with purified RhlB RNA helicase alone or with mixtures of PNPase and RhlB RNA helicase at 37 °C in final reaction volumes of 20 µl containing 20 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 70 mM KCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mg of bovine serum albumin, 1 mM magnesium acetate, and 3 mM ATP. Each reaction was terminated by adding a 2 µl of stop solution (2.2% Ficoll 400, 0.11 M EDTA, 1.1% SDS, 0.275% bromphenol blue, 0.275% xylene cyanol FF). Samples were separated on a 16% polyacrylamide native gel (19:1 bisacrylamide) in 1× TBE. Labeled RNAs were visualized by autoradiography and quantified by LAS-1000 plus (Fuji Film).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Degradosome Protein Components Are Able to Interact in Vivo Independently of RNase E-- General methods to identify interacting proteins or to study protein-protein interactions have been developed extensively. Among them, the two-hybrid systems currently represent the most powerful in vivo approaches. Here, we applied the E. coli two-hybrid approach (29) to study possible interactions among degradosome protein components. Individual degradosome component proteins were fused to two complementary fragments of the catalytic domain of Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase into plasmids pT25- and pT18-based vectors, as described under "Experimental Procedures." As seen in Fig. 1A, the pink/red phenotypes displayed on MacConkey/maltose plates demonstrates that RhlB RNA helicase is able to interact not only with the RE12 fragment (residues 684-784 of RNase E region are sufficient for interaction with the helicase)1 but also with itself and the PNPase. However, under the same conditions, no interactions between the RhlB and enolase or enolase and PNPase (Fig. 1C) were detected. We quantified the beta -galactosidase activity in individual transformants grown to log-phase culture to determine the efficiency of adenylate cyclase functional complementation, representative of the strength of functional interactions between two protein components (29). As shown in Fig. 1B, the strength of functional interactions is similar between RhlB RNA helicase-RE12 and RhlB-RhlB RNA helicases and both are stronger (about 4-fold) than that of the RhlB RNA helicase-PNPase interaction. Consistently, the beta -galactosidase activity assay indicated a lack of any interaction between enolase and the two degradosome component proteins, RhlB and PNPase (Fig. 1, B and C).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Degradosome protein-protein interactions as demonstrated by the E. coli two-hybrid system. The various chimeric degradosome protein-constructs used for individual complementation assays are shown. MacConkey/maltose agar plate assays and beta -galactosidase activity assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, C, chimeric degradosome protein-construct pairs T25RhlB-RE12T18, T25RhlB-RhlBT18, and T25RhlB-PNPT18, but not isolated individual chimeric proteins, revealed a positive interaction as shown by the red colony phenotype. The positive control T25Zip-ZipT18's interaction is also shown. No interactions between construct pairs T25RhlB-EnoT18 and T25Eno-PNPT18 were detected. A reversed chimeric construct of the Eno-PNP construct pair (i.e. T25PNP-EnoT18) confirmed a lack of protein-protein interaction between enolase and PNPase. B, beta -galactosidase assay used to study the relative strength of protein-protein interactions. The chimeric Zip-dimer was used as positive control, (reaction activity was normalized to 100% and compared with other chimeric pair interactions) as shown. The results represent the mean value from at least three independent cultures: RE12, fragment of RNase E, which is sufficient for an interaction with RhlB RNA helicase; PNP, PNPase; RhlB, RhlB RNA helicase; and ENO, enolase. All plasmid constructs encoding individually chimeric proteins are described under "Experimental Procedures."

Individually Specific Interactions between RhlB RNA Helicase, PNPase, and RE12 Are through the C-terminal Region of RhlB-- To identify the regions of RhlB RNA helicase directly responsible for its protein-protein interactions, several truncated RhlB derivatives were constructed as described under "Experimental Procedures," based on the predicted conserved sequence and functional motifs of a DEAD box helicase family (36, 37). As shown in Fig. 2A, RhlB1 consists of the ATPase motif. RhlB2 consists of the RhlB RNA helicase region including helicase and RNA interaction motifs. RhlB3 consists of the C-terminal region and lacks any conserved motifs. RhlB12, RhlB13, and RhlB23 consist of RhlB1 and -2, RhlB1 and -3, and RhlB2 and -3, respectively.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Specific interaction between RhlB RNA helicase and PNPase is mediated via the C-terminal region of RhlB, a region not adequate by itself for RhlB-RhlB self-interaction. A, a schematic diagram shows the conserved regions of the DEAD box helicase family as regards E. coli RhlB RNA helicase and its truncated derivatives RhlB1, RhlB2, RhlB3, RhlB12, RhlB13, and RhlB23. Amino acid residues of individual derivatives are indicated. B-J, the E. coli two-hybrid assay was performed to study chimeric protein interactions as described in Fig. 1 in which bacteria were grown on either MacConkey/maltose plates (B, E, H) or were cultured in the presence of isopropyl beta -D-thiogalactoside plus appropriate antibiotics (D, G, J) (Karimova et al., Ref. 29). The chimeric protein interaction pairs are also shown (C, F, I). beta -galactosidase assays were used to study the strength of protein-protein interactions. The positive control (T25Zip-ZipT18) and the method used for comparison of protein-protein interaction strength are described in the legend to Fig. 1. The results showed there is no self-interaction detected between various RhlB-truncated derivatives except for a full-length RhlB-RhlB interaction; the interaction between RhlB and PNPase is associated with the C-terminal region of RhlB.

In the E. coli two-hybrid system, both color phenotypes on MacConkey/maltose plates and beta -galactosidase activity assays showed that RhlB23 was sufficient to interact with RE12 and PNPase (Fig. 2, B-D, E-G, respectively). Interestingly, the region of RhlB sufficient for interaction with PNPase and RE12 fails to interact with itself. RhlB RNA helicase self-interaction requires full-length RhlB RNA helicase (Fig. 2, H and J).

The beta -galactosidase activity assay indicates that the strength of interaction between RhlB23 and RE12 is a little weaker than that between full-length RhlB RNA helicase and RE12 (Fig. 2D). In contrast, the strength of interaction between RhlB23 and PNPase is similar to that between full-length RhlB RNA helicase and PNPase (Fig. 2G).

Real-time Detection of Protein-Protein Interaction by BIAcore Analyses Reveals Specific, Direct Binding of RhlB RNA Helicase to Itself and PNPase but Not to Enolase-- To examine direct interactions between components of the degradosome, we used purified component proteins and an in vitro real-time binding assay using BIAcore apparatus (38). The unbound and FLAG-tagged protein components PNP, RhlB RNA helicase, and enolase were purified from BZ99 (an E. coli mutant containing only the RNase E N-terminal region (amino acid residues 1-602)), and their enzymatic activities were confirmed, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Fig. 3A shows Coomassie Blue staining of high purity purified proteins. For the BIAcore surface plasmon resonance analyses (38), RhlB RNA helicase was first immobilized on a CM5 sensor chip, and different concentrations of three distinct native degradosome proteins, enolase, RhlB helicase, and PNPase (Fig. 3, B-D), were individually injected over the chip surface, and the sensorgrams recorded. In these analyses, the sensorgrams, in general, show an initial rapid increase in response units upon protein injection followed by the association of injected proteins with molecules coated on the chip and a slower association phase characteristic of reversible protein interaction, resulting in a plateau indicative of interacting saturation or equilibrium (Fig. 3). After a change of buffer, there is a rapid decrease in response unit/signal followed by the dissociation phase. As shown in Fig. 3B, the sensorgrams did not detect any RhlB-enolase interaction, whereas significant interaction responses were detected for RhlB with itself and with PNPase (Fig. 3, C and D, respectively). These results indicated that RhlB helicase was able to directly interact with PNPase and itself but not with enolase (Fig. 3B). The sensorgrams (Fig. 3, C-E) also indicated that the affinity of the RhlB RNA helicase interaction with itself was higher than that of its interaction with PNPase (only 12.5 nM is shown in Fig. 3E). These results are consistent with the results of our E. coli two-hybrid assay (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Kinetic analyses of degradosome protein component interactions. A, Coomassie Blue staining of purified proteins PNPase, RhlB RNA helicase, and enolase separated by 8% SDS-PAGE. Protein purification is described under "Experimental Procedures." B-D, kinetic data set collected for individual analytes (i.e. degradosome protein components) binding to an RhlB-surface chip. Degradosome component proteins at various concentrations, as indicated, were injected over the RhlB surface. Injections were carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures." Normalized binding responses for enolase (B), RhlB RNA helicase (C), and PNPase (D) were reproducible for individual injections (data not shown). Individual injections were performed at least four to five times. E, comparison of the kinetic data for RhlB RNA helicase, enolase, and PNPase, respectively, injected over the RhlB surface chip. No response was detected for enolase-RhlB, however, a "strong" response was detected for PNPase-RhlB, and an even stronger response for RhlB-RhlB interaction reaction. A detailed account for the basic shape of the graph can be found under "Experimental Procedures" and "Results."

We further addressed whether the non-monomeric form of RhlB RNA helicase can directly interact with PNPase. As shown by sensorgrams, purified RhlB RNA helicase interacted with itself, after which these self-associated molecules of RhlB RNA helicase were still able to bind to PNPase (Fig. 4). Thus, these results illustrated that under the experimental conditions carried out, a dimeric (or multimeric) form of RhlB RNA helicase can physically bind to PNPase.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Self-interacted form of RhlB-RhlB RNA helicase binds to PNPase. The distinct protein analytes and their concentrations are indicated on the sensorgram. RhlB RNA helicase was injected over the RhlB chip surface; after the dissociation phase, injection of the second analyte (i.e. the PNPase) over the RhlB-RhlB surface was carried out to generate the data presented in this sensorgram.

RhlB RNA Helicase Shows Functional Interaction with PNPase Independent of RNase E-- In contrast to previously reported degradosome studies, which used a mini-degradosome complex containing the C-terminal region of RNase E, here we assessed the possibility of functional interaction between RhlB and PNPase in the absence of RNase E. The unwinding activity of RhlB RNA helicase was examined using classical gel electrophoresis assays (39), as described under "Experimental Procedures." Both single-stranded RNA oligonucleotides were labeled with 32P and annealed to form a double-stranded RNA substrate (labeled as double-stranded RNA). As shown in Fig. 5 RhlB RNA helicase was able to unwind duplex RNA (Fig. 5, lanes 2-7), and this effect was RhlB-concentration-dependent (compare lanes 6 and 7 versus 5). As a result of the unwinding activity of RhlB, a decrease in double-stranded RNA and an increase in single-stranded RNA were observed. In the absence of RhlB under the same reaction conditions PNPase quickly degraded single stranded RNA (labeled as long or short) but not double-stranded RNA (Fig. 5, lanes 8-10 versus 11). Collectively, these experiments indicate that the unwinding ability of RhlB enables PNPase to rapidly degrade duplex double-stranded RNA.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   RhlB unwinding activity is necessary for PNPase to degrade double-stranded RNAs. Both synthesized long (22 mer) and short (11 mer) RNA substrates were labeled at their 5'-ends with gamma -P32 as indicated with asterisks. Vertical lines between two RNA substrates indicate the double-stranded RNA region. The RNA sequences are described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 1 contains a heat denature control showing separated single strand short and long RNA. Lanes 2-7 are the time courses showing RhlB RNA unwinding activities. Lanes 8-10 are the time courses showing PNPase exoribonuclease activity to degrade single-stranded RNA but not double-stranded RNA. Lane 11 is the time course of the simultaneous reaction between RhlB and PNPase that degrades double-stranded RNA substrates. The nucleotide sequences of both short and long RNA substrates are described under "Experimental Procedures." +, presence of enzyme (0.63 µM); -, absence of enzyme; 2× and 3×, the concentration of enzyme used (1.26 and 1.89 µM, respectively). RhlB, FLAG-RhlB RNA helicase; PNP, FLAG-PNPase.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Here we report that RNA degradosome protein component RhlB interacts with PNPase independently of RNase E, which up to this point has been believed to be the necessary building scaffold for interactions among degradosome proteins. RhlB and PNPase interact through the C-terminal region of RhlB RNA helicase enabling PNPase to degrade double-stranded RNA substrates. We also show that monomers of RhlB interact among themselves, although at a site distinct from the one that interacts with PNPase. It is interesting that Rh1B binds more strongly to itself and to an RNase E fragment than it does to PNPase. There are a number of reasons, both biochemical and cellular, that may explain this result. First, the interaction surface (between the two proteins) may be more favorable for RhlB binding to RNase E than for the RhlB-PNPase interaction. Second, from a cellular perspective, RNase E is a membrane-associated protein of relatively low abundance compared with the highly abundant cytoplasmic PNPase; PNPase is present in E. coli in excess of RNase E and has been detected in cells unattached to the RNase E scaffold (27). If the RhlB-PNPase interaction is stronger than the RhlB-RNase E interaction, this may affect the availability of RhlB to bind to RNase E and form degradosome complexes. This in turn could compromise RNA degradation via a membrane-associated degradosome response.

Our results indicate that to degrade double-stranded RNA, PNPase would need to recruit Rh1B helicase to open the double-stranded RNA secondary structure, thereby allowing the exonuclease action of PNPase to degrade the RNA, lending support to the hypothesis that DEAD box RhlB helicase function is necessary for degradosome-mediated RNA decay. Our findings also suggest that multimers of Rh1B RNA helicase may form and bind directly to molecules of PNPase, independently of RNase E, to form mini-degradation engines in E. coli capable of removing RNA degradation intermediates (products) that have secondary structures.

A 3'-5' exonuclease complex, termed the "exosome," has been identified in yeast cells (41, 42) with exosome protein component equivalents also discovered in mammalian cells (43). Recent modeling experiments (44) suggest that exosomes may use the 3'-5' exonuclease PNPase at their core. Although, E. coli degradosome models have considered RNase E to be at the core of this bacterial ribonucleolytic complex (25), our discovery of PNPase-based complexes that do not include RNase E, provides a molecular basis for alternative pathways of E. coli RNA decay independent of RNase E-mediated endonucleolytic cleavages. Recent evidence suggesting that functional inactivation of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase mRNA in E. coli cell extracts occurs by a mechanism other than endonucleolytic cleavage (45), and earlier findings showing that mutations of the RNase E-encoding rne gene affects chemical half-life but not functional decay (13) are consistent with this view.

It has been suggested that enolase is the beta  subunit of alpha 3beta 2 form PNPase (PNPase is the alpha  subunit) (4), although no experimental proof has been forthcoming. However, our results indicate that RhlB RNA helicase, not enolase, is a native component of the PNPase complex. We detected no binding between enolase and PNPase (a similar conclusion also has been discussed by Kühnel and Luisi (Ref. 46; see "Discussion")). The yeast two-hybrid system also failed to detect any interaction between the two proteins (25). Furthermore, we have shown in this study that RhlB contains as ATP-dependent RNA unwinding ability (not demonstrated prior to this study) and that this ATP-activated unwinding activity enables PNPase to degrade double-stranded RNA; whether the binding of RhlB to PNPase regulates PNPase catalytic activity or vise versa remains to be clarified.

Far Western and yeast two-hybrid analyses of interactions between RNase E truncated polypeptides and RhlB have shown that RhlB binds directly to both the central (500-752) and C-terminal (734-1061) regions of RNase E, suggesting that important determinants for the binding are located in the small overlap region (734-752) of RNase E segments; other interactions among degradosome protein components were not detected (25). Using E. coli two hybrid and BIAcore biosensor analyses, we detected RhlB self-interaction and direct binding to PNPase, in addition to its interaction with the RNase E (684-784). These results indicate that the protein conformation of various fusion products of RhlB and PNPase used for yeast and E. coli two-hybrid analyses differ and thus that it is appropriate to explore multiple approaches for the study of protein-protein interactions. Use of the BIAcore biosensor to analyze real time interactions among degradosome protein components and between protein component and RNA substrates to determine their kinetic constants may help to elucidate the mechanism by which the dynamic processes of degradosome assembly and RNA degradation interrelate.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Plasmid-based vectors pT18 and pT25 and E. coli strains were kindly provided by Dr. D. Ladant, Institut Pasteur, Paris Cedex, France. We thank our English Editing consultant Dr. K. Deen for his constructive comments concerning this manuscript and Drs. S. N. Cohen and C. Wang for their critical comments on this manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by an intramural fund from the Academia Sinica and by the Research Grant NSC90-2321-B-001-005 of Frontier Sciences from the National Science Council, Taiwan, R. O. C. (to S. L.-C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Recipient of postdoctoral fellowship from the National Science Council, Taiwan, R.O.C.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 886-2-2789-9218; Fax: 886-2-27826085; E-mail: mbsue@ccvax.sinica.edu.tw.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 13, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206618200

1 G.-G. Liou, H.-Y. Chang, C.-S. Lin, and S. Lin-Chao, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Carpousis, A. J., Van Houwe, G., Ehretsmann, C., and Krisch, H. M. (1994) Cell 76, 889-900[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Py, B., Causton, H., Mudd, E. A., and Higgins, C. F. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 14, 717-729[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Miczak, A., Kaberdin, V. R., Wei, C. L., and Lin-Chao, S. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 3865-3869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Py, B., Higgins, C. F., Krisch, H. M., and Carpousis, A. J. (1996) Nature 381, 169-172[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Carpousis, A. J., Vanzo, N. F., and Raynal, L. C. (1999) Trends Genet 15, 24-28[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Coburn, G. A., and Mackie, G. A. (1999) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 61, 55-108
7. Grunberg-Manago, M. (1999) Annu. Rev. Genet. 33, 193-227[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Nicholson, A. W. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23, 371-390[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Rauhut, R., and Klug, G. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23, 353-370[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Régnier, P., and Arraiano, C. M. (2000) BioEssays 22, 235-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Steege, D. A. (2000) RNA 6, 1079-1090[Abstract]
12. Apirion, D. (1978) Genetics 90, 659-671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Ono, M., and Kuwano, M. (1979) J. Mol. Biol. 129, 343-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Jain, C., Deana, A., and Belasco, J. G. (2002) Mol. Microbiol. 43, 1053-1064[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ghora, B. K., and Apirion, D. (1978) Cell 15, 1055-1066[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Lin-Chao, S., Wei, C.-L., and Lin, Y.-T. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 12406-12411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Mudd, E. A., Krisch, H. M., and Higgins, C. F. (1990) Mol. Microbiol. 4, 2127-2135[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Lin-Chao, S., and Cohen, S. N. (1991) Cell 65, 1233-1242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Régnier, P., Grunberg-Manago, M., and Portier, C. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 63-68[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Kalman, M., Murphy, H., and Cashel, M. (1991) New Biol. 3, 886-895[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Spring, T. G., and Wold, F. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. 246, 6797-6802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Blum, E., Py, B., Carpousis, A. J., and Higgins, C. F. (1997) Mol. Microbiol. 26, 387-398[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Bessarab, D. A., Kaberdin, V. R., Wei, C.-L., Liou, G.-G., and Lin-Chao, S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 3157-3161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Kaberdin, V. R., Miczak, A., Jakobsen, J. S., Lin-Chao, S., McDowall, K. J., and von Gabain, A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11637-11642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Vanzo, N. F., Li, Y. S., Py, B., Blum, E., Higgins, C. F., Raynal, L. C., Krish, H. M., and Carpousis, A. J. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2770-2781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Coburn, G. A., Miao, X., Briant, D. J., and Mackie, G. A. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 2594-2603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Liou, G.-G., Jane, W.-N., Cohen, S. N., Lin, N.-S., and Lin-Chao, S. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 63-68[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Kido, M., Yamanaka, K., Mitani, T., Niki, H., Ogura, T., and Hiraga, S. (1996) J. Bacteriol. 178, 3917-3925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Karimova, G., Pidoux, J., Ullmann, A., and Ladant, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5752-5756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Hanahan, D. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 166, 557-580[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Tabor, S., and Richardson, C. C. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 1074-1078[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Miller, J. H. (1972) Experiments in Molecular Genetics , pp. 352-355, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
33. Lin-Chao, S., Wong, T. T., McDowall, K. J., and Cohen, S. N. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10797-10803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. McDowall, K. J., Lin-Chao, S., and Cohen, S. N. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10790-10796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. McDowall, K. J., Kaberdin, V. R., Wu, S. W., Cohen, S. N., and Lin-Chao, S. (1995) Nature 374, 287-290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. de la Cruz, J., Kressler, D., and Linder, P. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 192-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Lüking, A., Stahl, U., and Schmidt, U. (1998) Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 33, 259-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Hutchinson, A. M. (1995) Mol. Biotechnol. 3, 47-54[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Matson, S. W., and Bean, D. W. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 262, 389-405[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Deleted in proof
41. Mitchell, P., Petfalski, E., Shevcheno, A., Mann, M., and Tollervey, D. (1997) Cell 91, 457-466[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Mitchell, P., and Tollervey, D. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 843-846[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Chen, C. Y., Gherzi, R., Ong, S. E., Chan, E. L., Raijmakers, R., Pruijn, G. J., Stoecklin, G., Moroni, C., Mann, M., and Karin, M. (2001) Cell 107, 451-464[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Aloy, P., Ciccarelli, F. D., Leutwein, C., Gavin, A. C., Superti-Furga, G., Bork, P., Böttcher, B., and Russell, R. B. (2002) EMBO Rep. 3, 628-635[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Lee, K., and Cohen, S. N. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23268-23274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Kühnel, K., and Luisi, B. F. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 313, 583-592[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Taghbalout and L. Rothfield
RNaseE and RNA Helicase B Play Central Roles in the Cytoskeletal Organization of the RNA Degradosome
J. Biol. Chem., May 16, 2008; 283(20): 13850 - 13855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. A. R. Worrall, F. S. Howe, A. R. McKay, C. V. Robinson, and B. F. Luisi
Allosteric Activation of the ATPase Activity of the Escherichia coli RhlB RNA Helicase
J. Biol. Chem., February 29, 2008; 283(9): 5567 - 5576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. A. Vincent and M. P. Deutscher
Substrate Recognition and Catalysis by the Exoribonuclease RNase R
J. Biol. Chem., October 6, 2006; 281(40): 29769 - 29775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. P. Deutscher
Degradation of RNA in bacteria: comparison of mRNA and stable RNA
Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2006; 34(2): 659 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P.-H. Lin and S. Lin-Chao
RhlB helicase rather than enolase is the {beta}-subunit of the Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase)-exoribonucleolytic complex
PNAS, November 15, 2005; 102(46): 16590 - 16595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. I. Purusharth, F. Klein, S. Sulthana, S. Jager, M. V. Jagannadham, E. Evguenieva-Hackenberg, M. K. Ray, and G. Klug
Exoribonuclease R Interacts with Endoribonuclease E and an RNA Helicase in the Psychrotrophic Bacterium Pseudomonas syringae Lz4W
J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14572 - 14578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. A. Bernstein, P.-H. Lin, S. N. Cohen, and S. Lin-Chao
Global analysis of Escherichia coli RNA degradosome function using DNA microarrays
PNAS, March 2, 2004; 101(9): 2758 - 2763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
B. Sohlberg, J. Huang, and S. N. Cohen
The Streptomyces coelicolor Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Homologue, and Not the Putative Poly(A) Polymerase, Can Polyadenylate RNA
J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2003; 185(24): 7273 - 7278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
S. Yehudai-Resheff, V. Portnoy, S. Yogev, N. Adir, and G. Schuster
Domain Analysis of the Chloroplast Polynucleotide Phosphorylase Reveals Discrete Functions in RNA Degradation, Polyadenylation, and Sequence Homology with Exosome Proteins
PLANT CELL, September 1, 2003; 15(9): 2003 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. N. Voloshin, F. Vanevski, P. P. Khil, and R. D. Camerini-Otero
Characterization of the DNA Damage-inducible Helicase DinG from Escherichia coli
J. Biol. Chem., July 18, 2003; 278(30): 28284 - 28293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/43/41157    most recent
M206618200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow