|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208270200 on August 14, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 43, 41204-41212, October 25, 2002
ATP-dependent Unwinding of a Minimal Origin of DNA
Replication by the Origin-binding Protein and the Single-strand
DNA-binding Protein ICP8 from Herpes Simplex Virus Type I*
Alireza
Aslani,
Monica
Olsson, and
Per
Elias
From the Department of Medical Biochemistry, Göteborg
University, Box 440, SE 405 30 Göteborg University, Sweden
Received for publication, August 13, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Herpes simplex virus type I origin-binding
protein, OBP, is encoded by the UL9 gene. OBP binds the
origin of DNA replication, oriS, in a cooperative and sequence-specific
manner. OBP is also an ATP-dependent DNA helicase. We have
recently shown that single-stranded oriS folds into a unique and
evolutionarily conserved conformation, oriS*, which is stably bound by
OBP. OriS* contains a stable hairpin formed by complementary base
pairing between box I and box III in oriS. Here we show that OBP, in
the presence of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein ICP8, can
convert an 80-base pair double-stranded minimal oriS fragment to oriS*
and form an OBP-oriS* complex. The formation of an OBP-oriS*
complex requires hydrolysable ATP. We also demonstrate that OBP in the
presence of ICP8 and ATP promotes slow but specific and complete
unwinding of duplex minimal oriS. The possibility that the
OBP-oriS* complex may serve as an assembly site for the herpes virus
replisome is discussed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
DNA replication starts at specific sites on chromosomes referred
to as origins of DNA replication. Sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins recognize the origins of replication and facilitate local unwinding of duplex DNA. Once single-stranded DNA has been exposed the
remaining replication proteins may assemble into a multienzyme complex
frequently referred to as the replisome (1). It is likely that the
origins of DNA replication have structural features that contribute to
the efficiency and regulation of initiation of DNA replication during
one or both of these steps.
Initiation of Herpes simplex virus DNA replication depends on two
largely homologous origins of replication in the viral genome: oriL and
oriS (2-4). There are three copies of the recognition sequence, boxes
I, II, and III, for the origin-binding protein, OBP,1 in oriS, and they are
arranged in two palindromes (5). Box I and box III are part of an
evolutionarily conserved palindrome that forms a stable hairpin in
single-stranded DNA. Box I and box II are separated by an AT-rich
spacer sequence that varies in length and nucleotide composition
between different herpes viruses. In oriS from HSV-1 box I, box II
and the AT-rich sequence form a 46-bp palindrome. Genetic analyses have
demonstrated that the boxes I, II, and III as well as their precise
arrangement in oriS affect the efficiency of
origin-dependent DNA replication in vivo
(5-11).
We have previously demonstrated that heat-treated duplex oriS and
single-stranded oligonucleotides co-linear with the upper strand of
oriS adopt a novel conformation, oriS*, and OBP forms a very stable and
specific complex with oriS* (5, 12). OriS* contains a stable hairpin
formed by complementary base pairing between box I and box III (5, 12).
Biochemical and genetic experiments suggest that this feature is
important not only for the formation of the OBP-oriS* complex but also
for efficient initiation of DNA replication at oriS (12).
The initiator protein, OBP, is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein
and a DNA helicase (4). The DNA helicase activity resides in the
N-terminal part of the protein, which is composed of the ubiquitous
helicase domains 1A and 2A (13, 14). The C-terminal part of the
protein, below referred to as OBP, binds the sequence GTTCGCAC
through interactions in the major groove of DNA (15-18). In addition
OBP forms a specific complex with the viral single-strand
DNA-binding protein ICP8 (19). It has been shown that single-stranded
DNA efficiently disrupts the complex between OBP and ICP8 (20).
We now demonstrate that an OBP-oriS* complex can be formed from an
80-base pair fragment of double-stranded minimal oriS. We also show
that OBP and ICP8 together support specific unwinding of minimal oriS
dependent on ATP. A model for the activation of HSV-1 oriS is
presented. It suggests that the DNA sequence of the origin of
replication directs the folding of DNA into a stable structure
specifically bound by the initiator protein and that this complex may
serve as an assembly site for the replisome.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Nucleotides and DNA--
[ -32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham Biosciences. ATP, ADP, ATP S, and
AMP-PNP were obtained from Roche Diagnostics.
Oligonucleotides were from DNA Technology A/S, Denmark. Unless
otherwise stated they were 80 nucleotides long. The upper strands were
labeled with [ -32P]ATP by T4 polynucleotide kinase.
They were used either as single-stranded oligonucleotides or to make
double-stranded DNA. Complementary strands were annealed in a reaction
mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.8 and 0.1 M NaCl. In the experiments described below oriS consists of
double-stranded DNA, and oriS* is made up of a single-stranded 80-mer
corresponding to the upper strand of oriS as shown in Fig. 1.
We show below the sequences of the oligonucleotides representing the
upper strand of oriS (Fig. 1). Mutations are underlined. oriS(wt),
5'-AAAAGAAGTGAGAACGCGAAGCGTTCGCACTTCGTCCCAATATATATATATTATTAGGGCGAAGTGCGAGCACTGGCGCC-3'; oriS(-Box I),
5'-AAAAGAAGTGAGAACGCGAAGCGGGCGCACTTCGTCCCAATATATATATATTATTAGGGCGAAGTGCGAGCACTGGCGCC-3'; oriS(-Box III),
5'-AAAAGAAGTGAGCCCGCGAAGCGTTCGCACTTCGTCCCAATATATATATATTATTAGGGCGAAGTGCGAGCACTGGCGCC-3'; oriS(-Box I,III),
5'-AAAAGAAGTGAGCCCGCGAAGCGGGCGCACTTCGTCCCAATATATATATATTATTAGGGCGAAGTGCGAGCACTGGCGCC-3'; oriS(136-mer),
5'-CTGCAGGTCGACTCTAGAGGATCCCGGGTAAAAGAAGTGAGAACGCGAAGCGTTCGCACTTCGTCCCAATATATATATATTATTAGGGCGAAGTGCGAGCACTGGCGCCGTGCCCGATCCCCGGGTACCGAGCTCG-3'; oriS(Scrambled),
5'-AGTATGTCGTACAGTCAGACAGTACGACTGTCAAGCAGACTGACAGTCATCAACTGCTACACTCTGATAGTCATGGACTC-3'. T65 is a 65-mer of oligodeoxythymidylate.
Proteins--
OBP and ICP8 were purified from Sf9 cells
using recombinant baculovirus vectors as described (19). The proteins
were ~95% pure as judged by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay.
Gel Retardation Assay--
Ultra pure agarose was purchased from
Invitrogen. Reaction mixtures, 10 µl, with 0.2 nM
radiolabeled oriS or oriS* in a buffer containing 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10% glycerol, 2.5 mM dithiothreitol, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, and
50 mM NaCl were supplemented with 40 nM OBP and
50 nM ICP8 as indicated. The reaction mixtures also
contained 2.5 mM ATP or ATP S, ADP, and AMP-PNP as
indicated. Samples were incubated at 37 °C. The reactions were analyzed on 0.9% agarose gels in a buffer containing 40 mM
Tris acetate, pH 8.0, and 1 mM EDTA. Submarine gels were
run for 90 min at room temperature and a field strength of 7 V/cm. The
gels were dried onto DE81 paper, Whatman, and they were either
autoradiographed overnight at 80 °C or subjected to PhosphorImager analysis.
Exonuclease I Footprinting--
Exonuclease I at a concentration
of 10 units/µl was from Amersham Biosciences. Single-stranded 80-mer
oriS(wt) was radiolabelled at the 5'end. Double-stranded oriS(wt) was
produced by annealing complementary strands as described above. In the
40-µl reaction mixtures 0.8 nM of single-stranded
oriS(wt), oriS*, or double-stranded oriS(wt), oriS, were incubated with
0.16 µM OBP and 0.2 µM ICP8 in a buffer
containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10% glycerol, 2,5 mM dithiothreitol, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 50 mM KCl, and 10 mM ATP as indicated. Incubation was for 90 min at 37 °C
to allow formation of OBP-oriS* complexes from double-stranded DNA. To
remove ICP8 from the protein-DNA complexes 2 µl of T65 was added.
After an incubation for 1 min in 37 °C 1 µl of exonuclease I, 10 units, was added as indicated, and the incubation was allowed to
proceed for another 15 min at 37 °C. The samples were extracted by
phenol, and DNA was precipitated by ethanol. DNA was dissolved in 5 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8. 0.5 µl of formamide loading buffer was added, and the samples were
analyzed on 8% polyacrylamide sequencing gels. Electrophoresis was for
2 h at 600 V. The dried gels were analyzed using a phosphorimager.
Single-stranded radiolabeled 44-, 54-, and 63-mer oligonucleotides
corresponding to the upper strand of oriS were used as markers.
Unwinding of oriS--
Metaphor® agarose was from BioWhittaker
Molecular Applications. The reaction mixture was as described above.
Double-stranded DNA radiolabeled at the upper strand was produced as
described above. The incubation was carried out at 37 °C. The
reaction was stopped after 60 min by addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate
to a final concentration of 0.1%. Samples were analyzed on 3%
Metaphor agarose gels in 40 mM Tris acetate, pH 8.0, and 1 mM EDTA. Electrophoresis was for 2 h at room
temperature at 100 V. The gels were then dried onto DE81 paper,
Whatman, and they were either autoradiographed overnight at 80 °C
or subjected to phosphorimager analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
An OBP-oriS* Complex Formed from Double-stranded Minimal
oriS--
OBP forms a specific and stable complex with either
heat-treated double-stranded oriS or single-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to the upper strand of oriS (Fig.
1A) (5). The novel
conformation of oriS recognized by OBP is referred to as oriS*. OriS*
consists of stable hairpin formed by complementary base pairing between
box I and box III (5). The 3'-part of oriS* is made up of the AT-rich
spacer sequence, and it may also adopt a hairpin conformation (Fig.
1B). A secondary structure prediction using the mfold
program, however, suggests that it is an unstable hairpin that easily
may become single-stranded as temperature is increased from 37 to
45 °C (Fig. 1C) (21-23). We have previously shown that a
mutant version of oriS referred to as oriS(-6AT) leads to reduced
ability to form an OBP-oriS* complex (10, 12). A secondary structure
prediction using mfold indicates that the putative AT-rich hairpin
becomes more stable in this mutant (results not shown). We have also
seen that OBP forms a complex with single-stranded DNA containing a
boxI/boxIII hairpin and a 3' single-stranded tail (5). This DNA ligand not only supports the formation of a stable complex with OBP, but it
also greatly stimulates ATP hydrolysis by OBP (5). It is therefore
likely that oriS* exists as a hairpin with a single-stranded tail when
bound by OBP.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Conformations of HSV-1 oriS.
A, double-stranded HSV-1 minimal oriS. The binding
sites for OBP, boxes I, II, and III are indicated. Two prominent
palindromes in oriS are also shown. B, structure of
oriS* as predicted by mfold at 37 °C. C, structure
of oriS* as predicted by mfold at 45 °C.
|
|
We have now searched for conditions that would allow an 80-bp
double-stranded oligonucleotide containing minimal oriS to be converted
to single-stranded oriS* by OBP. The short version of oriS was formed
by annealing of two 80-mer complementary DNA strands. The single-strand
DNA-binding protein ICP8 and ATP were together with OBP included in the
reaction mixture. The production of oriS* was monitored by the
appearance of a complex between OBP and oriS* detected by agarose gel
electrophoresis under native conditions. The results were initially
difficult to interpret because ICP8 will form a stable and specific
complex with the C terminus of OBP (19). This complex can, however, be
efficiently disrupted by single-stranded DNA (20). In the gel
retardation experiments described below we have therefore added a
65-mer of oligodeoxythymidylate, T65, to the reaction mixture
immediately prior to analysis of protein-DNA complexes by agarose gel
electrophoresis. In this way we can distinguish between the OBP-oriS*
complex and the ternary complex formed between OBP, ICP8, and
oriS*.
We first examined the requirements for the formation of an OBP-oriS*
complex from double-stranded minimal oriS (Fig.
2). Incubation of OBP, ICP8, and ATP with
double-stranded minimal oriS was carried out for 60 min at 37 °C.
T65 was then added as indicated to the reaction mixtures before gel
electrophoresis. We found that incubation of double-stranded minimal
oriS with OBP and ATP produced two complexes referred to as complex I
and complex II (Fig. 2, lane 5). These complexes have been
previously characterized (10). Complex I represents OBP
bound to box I, whereas complex II represents OBP
cooperatively bound to boxes I and II. The addition of T65 did not
significantly affect the formation of complexes I and II (Fig. 2,
lane 6). ICP8 did not bind double-stranded oriS (Fig. 2,
lanes 7 and 8). Simultaneous incubation of OBP,
ICP8, and ATP resulted in the formation of complexes, which migrated
slower than complex II in agarose gels (Fig. 2, lane 9).
Strikingly, addition of T65 reduced the amount of slowly migrating
complexes and produced a unique complex with an electrophoretic
mobility similar to the OBP-oriS* complex (Fig. 2, lanes 2 and 10).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Formation of an OBP-oriS* complex from
double-stranded minimal oriS. Autoradiograph of a gel retardation
experiment. Radiolabelled single-stranded or double-stranded minimal
oriS(wt) were added to incubation mixtures containing OBP, ICP8, and
the OBP-ICP8 complex as indicated. The samples were incubated at
37 °C for 60 min in the presence of ATP. 2 µM T65 was
added immediately prior to agarose gel electrophoresis. Complexes
between OBP and double-stranded oriS are referred to as Complex I and
Complex II. An asterisk indicates the position of the
OBP-oriS* complex.
|
|
A separate experiment was performed in order to further examine the
electrophoretic properties of the putative OBP-oriS* complex (Fig.
3). In the sample analyzed in the first
lane OBP was mixed with a single-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding
to the upper strand of minimal oriS prior to agarose gel
electrophoresis. In the sample analyzed in the second lane OBP, ICP8,
and ATP was first incubated with double-stranded minimal oriS(wt).
Competing T65 was then added prior to agarose gel electrophoresis. The
gel was subjected to phosphorimager analysis. The results show that the
two complexes have identical electrophoretic mobilities.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Electrophoretic mobility of the OBP-oriS*
complex. A gel retardation experiment analyzed by autoradiography
and densitometry using the phosphorimager. Lane 1 (solid line), OBP was mixed with a single-stranded
oligonucleotide corresponding to the upper stand of oriS(wt).
Lane 2 (dotted line), OBP, ICP8, ATP, and
double-stranded oriS(wt) was incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. 2 µM T65 was added immediately prior to agarose gel
electrophoresis. The arrowhead shows the position of free
DNA.
|
|
To further authenticate the OBP-oriS* complex produced from
double-stranded oriS an exonuclease I footprinting assay was developed. Exonuclease I is a 3'-5' processive single-strand specific exonuclease. The single-stranded oriS(wt) 80-mer oligonucleotide oriS* will be
completely degraded by exonuclease I without significant pause sites.
In contrast double-stranded oriS(wt) is completely resistant to
exonuclease I (results not shown). In the presence of OBP and ICP8,
however, two prominent pause sites are detected during the digestion of
oriS* (Fig. 4). The first pause site
corresponds approximately to a 54-mer, whereas the second pause site
corresponds to 38- and 39-mers. The addition of T65, which disrupts the
interaction between OBP and ICP8, does not affect the location of the
pause sites (Fig. 4). When double-stranded oriS is examined we find that incubation with OBP, ICP8, and ATP prior to exonuclease allows detection of the very same pause sites. Addition of T65 does not affect
the location of the pause sites. Importantly, in the absence of ATP
double-stranded oriS is completely resistant to exonuclease I, and no
pause sites are detected (Fig. 4). The results argue that OBP, in the
presence of ICP8 and ATP, is able to form an OBP-oriS* complex from
double-stranded oriS. It also indicates that the helicase domains of
OBP may cover between 4 and 20 nucleotides of single-stranded DNA
extending from the box I/box III hairpin toward the 3'-end.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Exonuclease I footprinting of OBP-oriS*
complexes formed from single-stranded and double-stranded
substrates. Autoradiograph of a sequencing gel. Single-stranded
and double-stranded 80-mer oriS* and oriS was incubated with OBP, ICP,
and ATP to allow formation of OBP-oriS* complexes.
Oligodeoxythymidylate, T65, was added to disrupt the interaction
between ICP8 and OBP. Two characteristic pause sites appearing during
exonuclease I digestion of OBP-oriS* complexes correspond approximately
to 38 and 39-mers and a 54-mer.
|
|
We have also analyzed the effect of mutations in oriS on the formation
of the OBP-oriS* complex (Fig.
5). Box III is of special interest. It does not interact with OBP in double-stranded oriS in a
sequence-specific manner, but it is essential for the formation of
oriS* through complementary base-pairing with box I (5, 15). The
results again show that double-stranded minimal oriS(wt) can be
converted to an OBP-oriS* complex in the presence of ICP8 and ATP (Fig.
5, a and b, lane 4). In contrast, a
mutant version of minimal oriS, oriS(-box III), fails to support the
formation of an OBP-oriS* complex. In this case, the addition of
competing T65 to a reaction mixture containing OBP, ICP8, and ATP
results in reappearance of complexes I and II (Fig. 5, a and
b, lane 8). It should also be noted that a
complex between OBP and a single-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding
to the upper strand of oriS(-box III) is formed with a reduced
efficiency when compared with the OBP-oriS* complex, and it has a
different electrophoretic mobility (Fig. 5, a and
b, lanes 1 and 5). These properties
probably reflect a DNA conformation characterized by complementary base
pairing between boxes I and II as previously discussed (12).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Box III is required for the formation of an
OBP-oriS* complex from double-stranded minimal oriS.
a, autoradiograph of a gel retardation experiment.
Radiolabeled single-stranded or double-stranded oriS(wt) and oriS(-box
III) were added to incubation mixtures containing OBP, ICP8, and the
OBP-ICP8 complex as indicated. The samples were incubated at 37 °C for 60 min in the presence of
ATP. 2 µM T65 was added immediately prior to agarose gel
electrophoresis. Complexes between OBP and double-stranded oriS are
referred to as Complex I and Complex II. An asterisk
indicates the position of the OBP-oriS* complex. b,
analysis by densitometry using the phosphorimager. The solid
lines correspond to lanes 1-4, and the
dotted lines represent lanes 5-8. The
arrowhead shows the position of free DNA.
|
|
The role of ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis was investigated in a
similar set of experiments. We found that ADP, ATP S, and AMP-PNP did
not support the formation of a complex migrating as an OBP-oriS*
complex in agarose gels (Fig. 6). In
contrast, when ATP was present in the reaction mixture we found that
slowly migrating complexes were produced and that these complexes were
disrupted by T65 and replaced by an OBP-oriS* complex (Fig. 6,
lanes 5 and 6). We also noted that in the
presence of ADP complexes accumulated in the wells (lanes 3 and 4). The DNA retained in the wells is not single-stranded
since the addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate will only release duplex
DNA (results not shown, see also Fig. 9b below). The
aggregation of OBP-DNA complexes presumably reflects a conformational
difference between the OBP-ATP complex and the OBP-ADP complex.
Previous studies have also shown the specific OBP-DNA complexes formed
in the absence of the nucleotide cofactor may aggregate but complexes
formed in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates readily enter the
gel (10, 24).

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
ATP but not ADP or ATP analogues support
formation of an OBP-oriS* complex from double-stranded minimal
oriS. Double-stranded oriS was incubated with OBP and ICP8 in
presence of either 2.5 mM ATP, ADP, ATP S, or AMP-PNP.
The reaction was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. 2 µM
T65 was added prior to agarose gel electrophoresis. Complexes between
OBP and double-stranded oriS(wt) are referred to as Complex I and
Complex II. An asterisk indicates the position of the
OBP-oriS* complex.
|
|
The time course for the formation of the OBP-oriS* complex was also
examined. We noted that incubation for 30 min or more at 37 °C was
required in order to produce significant amounts of the OBP-oriS*
complex from duplex DNA (Fig. 7).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
OBP-oriS complexes precede the OBP-oriS*
complex. The time course for the formation of an OBP-oriS* complex
from duplex minimal oriS is shown by an autoradiograph of a gel
retardation experiment. Complexes between OBP and double-stranded oriS
are referred to as Complex I and Complex II. An asterisk
indicates the position of the OBP-oriS* complex.
|
|
These results argue that OBP together with ICP8 can convert
double-stranded DNA containing minimal oriS to an activated form in a
reaction dependent on hydrolysis of ATP. Activated minimal oriS can be
isolated in complex with OBP and ICP8. When these complexes are exposed
to single-stranded DNA ICP8 dissociates, but OBP remains bound to
activated minimal oriS. The complex between OBP and activated minimal
oriS has an electrophoretic mobility identical to the previously
characterized OBP-oriS* complex. These complexes also
present the same exonuclease I digestion patterns. Both
complexes also depend on an intact version of box III. Since box III is
involved in complementary base-pairing with box I in oriS* we suggest
that this base-pairing scheme also occurs in the activated form of
minimal oriS produced by OBP, ICP8, and ATP. Together these
observations suggest that the OBP-oriS* complexes formed from
single-stranded oriS* and double-stranded DNA oriS have the same
composition and structure. It remains to be determined whether the
OBP-oriS* complex is a product of an unwinding reaction or an
intermediate formed during the process leading to complete strand separation.
Unwinding of Minimal oriS--
Several attempts have been made to
demonstrate that OBP can specifically unwind oriS containing
double-stranded DNA. A study using electron microscopy has successfully
demonstrated this phenomenon (25). In contrast, biochemical studies of
OBP-dependent unwinding of oriS have been less successful
(26). It was recently demonstrated that OBP can catalyze complete
unwinding of a short version of oriS provided that the AT-rich spacer
sequence existed in a preformed single-stranded conformation (26). The
unwinding of fully double-stranded oriS was, however, much less
efficient. Encouraged by our observation that an OBP-oriS* complex
could be formed from double-stranded minimal oriS we looked for
experimental conditions that would facilitate analysis of unwinding of
minimal oriS. It was essential to identify experimental conditions that
allowed complete separation of single-stranded oriS* and
double-stranded oriS. We found that this could be acheived in gels
containing 3% Metaphor agarose (Fig. 8).
Using experimental conditions that favor the formation of an OBP-oriS*
complex we could now demonstrate complete unwinding of an 80-bp minimal
oriS duplex (Fig. 8a). Approximately 30% of double-stranded
minimal oriS was converted to single strands (Fig. 8b). The
reaction required OBP and ICP8, and it only occurred in the presence of
hydrolysable ATP (Fig. 9, a
and b).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Unwinding of HSV-1 minimal oriS.
a, an autoradiograph of a Metaphore agarose gel showing
a time course for the formation of single-stranded DNA, ssDNA, from
double-stranded minimal oriS, dsDNA. Reaction conditions are described
under "Experimental Procedures." The samples were treated with
sodium dodecyl sulfate prior to electrophoresis. b,
quantitative analysis of the experiment described above using the
phosphorimager.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Unwinding of minimal oriS requires OBP, ICP8,
and ATP. a, an autoradiograph of a Metaphore
agarose gel showing unwinding of double-stranded minimal oriS, dsDNA.
Reaction mixtures are described under "Experimental Procedures."
They all contain 2.5 mM ATP. OBP and ICP8 were added as
indicated. b, ATP-dependent unwinding of
oriS. Reaction mixtures as described under "Experimental
Procedures" were supplemented with nucleotides as indicated. Samples
were analyzed on Metaphor agarose gels described above.
|
|
Sequence Requirements for OBP-dependent Unwinding of
oriS--
Sequence requirements for initiation of DNA replication are
complex. Studies of HSV-1 oriS have indicated that box I and box II are
required for cooperative binding of OBP to duplex DNA (15-17, 27). In
addition the distance and sequence between box I and box II must be
correct (10). Finally, box III is needed for complementary intrastrand
base pairing with box I (5). We have now surveyed the effects of a
selected set of oriS mutations on OBP-dependent unwinding.
We first compared unwinding of an 80-bp duplex oligonucleotide
corresponding to wild type minimal oriS, oriS(wt), with
either an 80-bp duplex oligonucleotide with the same
nucleotide composition as oriS but with a scrambled nucleotide
sequence, oriS(Scrambled), or an 80-bp minimal oriS duplex with
mutations in box I, oriS(-BoxI). The results show that the scrambled
duplex was a poor substrate for OBP-dependent unwinding. We
estimate that less than 4% of total DNA became single-stranded during
the incubation period (Fig. 10). The
unwinding of the box I mutant was reduced but not abolished.
Approximately 12% of total DNA was retrieved as single strands (Fig.
10). Cooperative binding of OBP to the box I mutant presumably accounts
for the fact that some unwinding albeit reduced was observed in this
instance (15, 17, 27).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Sequence-specific unwinding of minimal
oriS. a, an autoradiograph of a Metaphore agarose
gel showing unwinding of double-stranded minimal oriS, dsDNA. Reaction
conditions are described under "Experimental Procedures." The
double-stranded DNA substrates were oriS(wt); an 80-mer
oriS(Scrambled); a mutant containing two T-G transversions in box
I referred to as oriS(-Box I). b, quantitative
analysis of the experiment described above using the
phosphorimager.
|
|
To explore the connection between unwinding and the formation of the
OBP-oriS* complex we examined oriS with mutations either in box I,
oriS(-Box I), or box III, oriS(-Box III). These mutations severely
reduce formation of the OBP-oriS* complex (12). In addition, a double
mutant that restores complementary base pairing between boxes I and
III, oriS(-boxI,III), was used. We found that unwinding of the
mutant versions of oriS was reduced compared with the wild type
sequence, oriS(wt) (Fig. 11). It is
interesting to note, however, that double mutations in box I and box
III did not have an additive effect (Fig. 11). This observation
correlates with observations on the behavior of the double mutant in
transient replication experiments. In this instance an oriS-containing
plasmid with mutations in box I replicated as efficiently as a plasmid with a box I/box III double mutant (9). Our results argue that there is
a good correlation between the formation of the OBP-oriS* complex and
unwinding of double-stranded minimal oriS.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Mutations in the recognition sequence for
OBP and the length of the oriS fragment affect the efficiency of
unwinding. a, an autoradiograph of a Metaphore
agarose gel showing unwinding of double-stranded minimal oriS, dsDNA.
Reaction conditions are described under "Experimental Procedures."
The double-stranded DNA substrates were oriS(wt); a mutant containing
two T-G transversions in box I referred to as oriS(-Box I); a mutant
containing two G-T transversions in box III referred to as oriS(-Box
III); a mutant combining the previously described transversions
referred to as oriS(-Box I,III); a 136-mer containing the wild type
sequence of HSV-1 oriS referred to as oriS(136-mer). b,
quantitative analysis of the experiment described above using the
phosphorimager.
|
|
We also wanted to examine if the length of double-stranded DNA would
affect the efficiency of OBP-dependent unwinding of oriS. A
longer oriS containing duplex, oriS(136-mer), was studied (Fig. 11). We
found that unwinding of oriS(136-mer) was much less efficient than
unwinding of oriS(wt). This observation might indicate either that
unwinding by OBP and ICP8 alone is restricted in vivo to minimal oriS or that long DNA substrates favor reannealing of complementary strands in vitro.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The results presented here demonstrate that the Herpes
simplex virus type I initiator protein OBP collaborates with the
single-strand DNA-binding protein ICP8 to promote
ATP-dependent activation of HSV-1 oriS. Both OBP and ICP8
are needed to form the OBP-oriS* complex as well as to carry out
complete unwinding of an 80-bp duplex minimal oriS. Below we will
address the conformational changes that double-stranded oriS will
undergo during this process. We will also discuss the role of ICP8
during initiation of DNA replication. Finally, a comparison will be
made between OBP and structurally related DNA helicases that have
different biological roles but may share important mechanistic
properties with OBP.
Binding of initiator proteins to cognate origins of DNA
replication leads to the induction of substantial conformational
changes in DNA. In most instances enzymatic or chemical probes have
been used to detect new conformations. The conformations of the
activated origins of DNA replication remain poorly characterized from a structural point of view. One example could be mentioned. Binding of
SV-40 T-antigen to its origin of replication starts with
sequence-specific recognition of inverted repeats containing the
pentanucleotide 5'-GAGGC-3', and it is accompanied by structural
changes in the early palindrome and the AT-rich sequence surrounding
the central palindrome (28). Ultimately double hexamers of T-antigen
assemble at the origin and encircle the DNA strands. The precise nature of conformational changes the DNA molecule undergoes during this process is not known. The activation of the HSV-1 origin of replication oriS seems to follow a related pathway. Initially the origin-binding protein binds cooperatively to two binding sites in duplex DNA (10,
15). In the presence of the single-strand DNA-binding protein ICP8
duplex DNA is destabilized as determined by an increased hyperchromicity and sensitivity to the single-strand-specific endonuclease P1 (29). The reaction appears to be ATP-independent. The
DNA substrate used in these studies was, however, lacking the box III
region of oriS, and the two strands do not appear to become fully
separated. We now show that OBP and ICP8 in the presence of a DNA
substrate-containing box III is able to completely unwind
double-stranded minimal oriS in an ATP-dependent manner. Unwinding of double-stranded oriS leads to the formation of a stable
DNA structure, oriS*, consisting of a boxI/boxIII hairpin followed by a
single-stranded tail comprising the AT-rich spacer sequence. OBP and
oriS* forms a stable complex, and oriS* is a very efficient activator
of hydrolysis of ATP by OBP (5, 12). Unwinding of oriS and formation of
the OBP-oriS* complex are dependent on intact box I as well
as box III sequences. Our observations suggest that origins of
replication contain not only DNA sequences that are easily unwound, but
they may also contain sequences that allow formation of stable DNA
structures that can be recognized by the initiator protein or other
components of the replication machinery.
ICP8 appears to be required for initiation of DNA replication as well
as elongation since a mutant version of OBP that lacks the sequences at
the C terminus required for binding to ICP8 is deficient in DNA
synthesis as measured in transient replications experiments using
expression plasmids encoding the seven HSV-1 replication proteins (30).
ICP8 may act solely by affecting properties of the initiator protein
through a specific interaction with the C terminus of OBP (19, 30). It
is also possible that ICP8 will bind to single-stranded regions of oriS
exposed during the process of initiation and prevent
reannealing of complementary strands. There is some genetic evidence
that ICP8 may participate in two separate reactions. The HSV-1 mutants
TL4 and TL5, which map in the N terminus of ICP8 appears to fully
complement the HSV-1 mutant n11SV in which 28 amino acids at the very C
terminus have been replaced by the SV40 nuclear localization signal
(31). A distinct role for the C terminus of ICP8 is also indicated by the fact that the mutant dl105 with a deletion mapping at the C
terminus acts in a dominant-negative way and inhibits viral DNA
replication (32). Together these observations argue that ICP8 has at
least two distinct roles. Perhaps the binding of ICP8 to
single-stranded DNA at the replication fork and binding of ICP8 to OBP
during initiation of DNA replication are differentially affected in the
aforementioned mutants.
The crystal structure analyses of the DNA helicases Rep and PcrA have
highlighted universal structural features characterizing DNA and RNA
helicases (14, 33, 34). The RecA-like domains 1A and 2A provide the
scaffold for the conserved helicase motifs involved in binding and
hydrolysis of ATP. It is more difficult to pinpoint specific roles for
the remaining domains. It appears, however, that these enzymes have
composite DNA binding sites that target the enzymes to appropriate DNA
structures. In the case of OBP, sequence-specific binding to duplex DNA
by the C-terminal domain is accompanied by recognition of a
3'-single-stranded tail by the N-terminal helicase domains (5). Both of
these interactions have to be established in order to efficiently
trigger hydrolysis of ATP. In a similar way PriA appears to recognize a
specific DNA structure at the same time as it binds a
3'-single-stranded tail (35). Interestingly, binding of DNA is highly
dependent on the length of the tail. The KD for
binding duplex DNA is decreased ~200-fold when the tail length is
increased from 8 to 12 nucleotides (35). A complementary observation
was made for OBP. The hydrolysis of ATP is dramatically stimulated when the tail length is altered from 7 to 10 nucleotides (12). The exonuclease I digestion experiments presented here indicate that the
helicase domains of OBP cover between 4 and 20 nucleotides of
single-stranded DNA at the 3'-side of the boxI/box III hairpin. These
observations are compatible with the crystal structure analysis of the
SF2 RNA helicase NS3 from hepatitis virus C. In this instance eight
nucleotides of single-stranded deoxyuridylate bind in a groove between
the helicase domains and a C-terminal domain (36).
We suggest that the OBP-oriS* complex is formed during the
activation of HSV-1 oriS and that it might serve as an intermediate during initiation of DNA replication. It could act as an assembly site
for the viral replisome. This model could be tested in several ways.
For example, does the OBP-oriS* complex specifically interact with
helicase-primase and DNA polymerase? It should also be possible to
extend the unwinding experiments described above. What DNA sequences
affect the efficiency of unwinding of oriS? Can OBP unwind extensive
stretches of DNA or is it restricted to act on minimal oriS only? Such
studies should facilitate experiments aiming at establishing a
reconstituted system for HSV-1 DNA replication.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant 2552-B01-15XBC (to P. E.)
from the Swedish Cancer Society and a grant from the Strategic Research
Fund.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 46-31-773-3486;
Fax: 46-31-416108; E-mail: per.elias@medkem.gu.se.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208270200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
OBP, origin-binding
protein;
ICP8, infected cell protein 8;
ATP S, adenosine
5'-O-(thiotriphosphate);
AMP-PNP, adenosine
5'-( , -imino)triphosphate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kornberg, A.,
and Baker, T.
(1992)
DNA replication Second Edition
, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York
|
| 2.
|
Stow, N. D.,
and McMonagle, E. C.
(1983)
Virology
130,
427-438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Weller, S. K.,
Spadaro, A.,
Schaffer, J. E.,
Murray, A. W.,
Maxam, A. M.,
and Schaffer, P. A.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
930-942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Boehmer, P. E.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
347-384[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Aslani, A.,
Macao, B.,
Simonsson, S.,
and Elias, P.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
7194-7199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Lockshon, D.,
and Galloway, D. A.
(1986)
J. Virol.
58,
513-521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Lockshon, D.,
and Galloway, D. A.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
4018-4027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Weir, H. M.,
and Stow, N. D.
(1990)
J. Gen. Virol.
71,
1379-1385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Hernandez, T. R.,
Dutch, R. E.,
Lehman, I. R.,
Gustafsson, C.,
and Elias, P.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
1649-1652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Gustafsson, C. M.,
Hammarsten, O.,
Falkenberg, M.,
and Elias, P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4629-4633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Hammarsten, O.,
and Elias, P.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
1753-1760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Aslani, A.,
Simonsson, S.,
and Elias, P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
5880-5887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Abbotts, A. P.,
and Stow, N. D.
(1995)
J. Gen. Virol.
76,
3125-3130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Subramanya, H. S.,
Bird, L. E.,
Brannigan, J. A.,
and Wigley, D. B.
(1996)
Nature
384,
379-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Elias, P.,
Gustafsson, C. M.,
and Hammarsten, O.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17167-17173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Hazuda, D. J.,
Perry, H. C.,
Naylor, A. M.,
and McClements, W. L.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
24621-24626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Hazuda, D. J.,
Perry, H. C.,
and McClements, W. L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
14309-14315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Simonsson, S.,
Samuelsson, T.,
and Elias, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24633-24639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Boehmer, P. E.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8444-8448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Gustafsson, C. M.,
Falkenberg, M.,
Simonsson, S.,
Valadi, H.,
and Elias, P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19028-19034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
SantaLucia, J., Jr.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1460-1465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
GCG.
(2000)
Wisconsin Package Version 10.1
, Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI
|
| 23.
|
Zuker, M.
(1989)
Science
244,
48-52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Elias, P.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2959-2963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Makhov, A. M.,
Boehmer, P. E.,
Lehman, I. R.,
and Griffith, J. D.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1742-1750[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
He, X.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
5726-5728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Elias, P.,
Gustafsson, C. M.,
Hammarsten, O.,
and Stow, N. D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17424-17429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Borowiec, J. A.,
Dean, F. B.,
Bullock, P. A.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1990)
Cell
60,
181-184[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
He, X.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
3024-3028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Boehmer, P. E.,
Craigie, M. C.,
Stow, N. D.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29329-29334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Gao, M.,
Bouchey, J.,
Curtin, K.,
and Knipe, D. M.
(1988)
Virology
163,
319-329[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Chen, Y. M.,
and Knipe, D. M.
(1996)
Virology
221,
281-290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Korolev, S.,
Hsieh, J.,
Gauss, G. H.,
Lohman, T. M.,
and Waksman, G.
(1997)
Cell
90,
635-647[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Velankar, S. S.,
Soultanas, P.,
Dillingham, M. S.,
Subramanya, H. S.,
and Wigley, D. B.
(1999)
Cell
97,
75-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Nurse, P.,
Liu, J.,
and Marians, K. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25026-25032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Kim, J. L.,
Morgenstern, K. A.,
Griffith, J. P.,
Dwyer, M. D.,
Thomson, J. A.,
Murcko, M. A.,
Lin, C.,
and Caron, P. R.
(1998)
Structure
6,
89-100[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Manolaridis, E. Mumtsidu, P. Konarev, A. M. Makhov, S. W. Fullerton, A. Sinz, S. Kalkhof, J. E. McGeehan, P. D. Cary, J. D. Griffith, et al.
Structural and Biophysical Characterization of the Proteins Interacting with the Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Origin of Replication
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 12, 2009;
284(24):
16343 - 16353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Olsson, K.-W. Tang, C. Persson, L. M. Wilhelmsson, M. Billeter, and P. Elias
Stepwise Evolution of the Herpes Simplex Virus Origin Binding Protein and Origin of Replication
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 12, 2009;
284(24):
16246 - 16255.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Trego, Y. Zhu, and D. S. Parris
The herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA polymerase processivity factor, UL42, does not alter the catalytic activity of the UL9 origin-binding protein but facilitates its loading onto DNA
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 26, 2005;
33(2):
536 - 545.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Trego and D. S. Parris
Functional Interaction between the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Polymerase Processivity Factor and Origin-Binding Proteins: Enhancement of UL9 Helicase Activity
J. Virol.,
December 1, 2003;
77(23):
12646 - 12659.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer
Reconstitution of recombination-dependent DNA synthesis in herpes simplex virus 1
PNAS,
September 2, 2003;
100(18):
10201 - 10206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|