Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206804200 on August 15, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 44, 41318-41325, November 1, 2002
pH-induced Collapse of the Extracellular Loops Closes
Escherichia coli Maltoporin and Allows the Study of
Asymmetric Sugar Binding*
Christian
Andersen
§,
Bettina
Schiffler
,
Alain
Charbit¶, and
Roland
Benz
From the
Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl
für Biotechnologie, Biozentrum der Universität
Würzburg, Am Hubland D-97074 Würzburg, Germany and
¶ INSERM U-411, CHU Necker-Enfants Malades, F-75730 Paris Cedex
15, France
Received for publication, July 9, 2002, and in revised form, August 14, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
LamB (maltoporin) is essential for the uptake of
maltose and malto-oligosaccharides across the outer membrane of
Escherichia coli. Purified LamB was reconstituted in
artificial lipid bilayer membranes forming channels in the
permanently open configuration at neutral pH. Almost complete channel
closure was observed when the pH on both sides of the membrane was
lowered to pH 4. When LamB was added to only one side of the membrane,
the cis-side, and the pH was lowered at either side of the
membrane, the cis- or the trans-side, the response to pH was
asymmetric, suggesting preferential orientation of maltoporin channels
and pH- dependent closure of only one side of the channel.
In experiments with LamB mutants in which major external loops
L4, L6, and/or L9 were deleted, we identified the surface-exposed loops
L4 and L6 as the cause of pH-mediated closure. The pH dependence of the
LamB channel is consistent with the assumption that it inserts in a
preferential orientation into the lipid bilayer. About 70-80% of the
reconstituted channels are oriented with the extracellular entrance
toward the side to which the protein was added (the cis-side) and with
the periplasmic opening on the opposite side (the trans-side). The possibility of closing the channels, which are oriented in the reverse
direction by low pH at the trans-side, allowed the deduction of
channel asymmetry with respect to carbohydrate binding kinetics. Whereas maltose binding was found to be almost symmetric with respect
to the channel orientation, the sucrose and trehalose binding to LamB
was asymmetric. The results are discussed in respect to possible
physiological function of the pH-dependent closure of maltoporin.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The outer membrane protects Gram-negative bacteria against noxious
substances such as bile salts or degrading enzymes like proteinases or
lipases (1, 2). Water-filled channels, the so-called porins, allow the
passage of solutes through this diffusion barrier. Porins are divided
in two classes: general diffusion pores, which sort solutes according
to their molecular mass, and specific pores, which have a
binding site for specific substrates inside the channel and facilitate
the diffusion of these substrates through the outer membrane (3, 4). In
the last few years the structure of several porins were solved by x-ray
crystallography (5-7). Porins are built of three identical polypeptide
subunits (monomers). The common structure of the monomers is a barrel
formed by 16 or 18 antiparallel
-strands connected by small turns on the periplasmic side and by long loops on the extracellular side. In
all known porin structures loop 3, between
-strands 5 and 6, is
folded inside the channel and leads to a decrease in the diameter of
the constriction of the channel. The other loops form a protrusion that
protects the extracellular entrance of the outer membrane channels.
LamB (maltoporin) from Escherichia coli is a specific porin
for malto-oligosaccharides (8, 9). The monomer is composed of 18
-strands, which means that there are nine extracellular loops. The
binding site inside the channel is composed of six aromatic amino acids
that line the channel lumen from the extracellular to the periplasmic
opening (6). In addition to this so-called "greasy slide" there are
several amino acid residues inside the channel that are involved in
malto-oligosaccharide binding (10-12). In a previous study we
investigated the influence of the extracellular loops on maltoporin
function in vivo and in vitro (13). Deletion of
the large loops L4 or L6 leads to instability of the protrusion. This instability influences the binding kinetics of
malto-oligosaccharides entering the pore from the extracellular side.
The deletion of the three major loops (L4, L6, and L9) has no effect on
sugar binding, and the mutant shows wild-type characteristics in
in vitro experiments. So, the interaction of the loops seems
to be crucial for the stability of the protrusion built by loops L4, L6, and L9.
General diffusion pores from E. coli outer membrane have
been shown susceptible to low pH. In particular, low pH leads to channel closure in the case of OmpF, OmpC, and PhoE (14-17) and in a
shift of the voltage dependence (18). Low pH may also be involved in
cadaverine-mediated channel block (19). Atomic force microscopy of OmpF
at low pH suggests that a conformation change of the loops exposed to
the external surface is the reason for channel closure at low pH (20).
Here we investigated the influence of low pH on the properties of the
maltoporin channel, which had not been studied yet at low pH. We show
that pH 4 leads to an almost complete closure of the maltoporin channel
and provide evidence that the closure is due to destabilization of the
protrusion on the extracellular side. This allows some insight into
which direction maltoporin inserts into artificial bilayers and
provides a method of studying sugar binding in a system with oriented
inserted maltoporin channels in lipid bilayer membranes. The results
are discussed in respect to the possible role of maltoporin closure in
protecting the organism from drastic changes of the environment.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Isolation and Purification of LamB Wild-type and LamB Mutants
L4,
L6,
L9v,
L4+L6, and
L4+L6+L9v--
Wild-type LamB
of E. coli was purified as published previously (9,
22). The deletion mutants
L4,
L6,
L9v,
L4+L6, and
L4+L6+L9v affecting loops L4 (residues 148-165), L6 (residues 239-263), and L9 (residues 379-401) were constructed and
purified as has previously been described (13).
Lipid Bilayer Experiments--
Black lipid bilayer membranes
were formed from a 1% solution of diphytanoyl phosphatidylcholine
(Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) in n-decane as
described previously (23). The instrumentation consists of a Teflon
chamber with two aqueous compartments filled with electrolyte (1 M KCl). The compartments are connected by a small circular
hole with a 0.3-mm2 surface area across which the membranes
were formed. The electrolyte solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was
buffered by Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, and citrate/KOH, pH 4.0, respectively, to
a final maximal concentration of 20 mM. To exclude
the possibility that the closure of pores by adding citrate is an
effect of citrate binding to maltoporin comparable with that observed
for malto-oligosaccharide, we also used phosphate buffer,
MES,1 or HCl to decrease the
pH with the same effect as with citrate (data not shown). The membrane
current was measured with a pair of Ag/AgCl electrodes with salt
bridges switched in series with a voltage source and a current
amplifier (Keithley 427 with a four-pole filter or a current to voltage
converter made using a Burr Brown operational amplifier with a
three-pole filter). The feedback resistors of the current amplifier
were between 0.01 and 10 gigaohms. The amplified signal was
monitored with a strip chart recorder to measure the absolute magnitude
of the membrane current.
Maltoporin or the deletion mutants were added from concentrated stock
solutions to both sides or only one side of the membrane. The
reconstitution of channels in the black lipid membrane could be
monitored on a strip chart recorder by a stepwise increase of the
membrane current. The pH of the electrolyte was changed by adding
buffer to the same side (cis-side) or the other side (trans-side) with
respect to the addition of protein (the cis-side). The temperature was
kept at 20 °C and the membrane potential at 20 mV throughout.
Evaluation of the Stability Constants of Carbohydrate Binding
under Asymmetric Conditions--
Binding of maltose and sucrose to
maltoporin were investigated as described in previous publications
(24). Binding of the substrate to the binding site inside the channel
could be detected because the current through the channel is blocked
when the binding site is occupied. Shortly after the membrane turned
black, the protein was added to the aqueous compartment (final
concentration 100 ng/ml). The membrane conductance increased by the
reconstitution of channels. After 20-30 min the increase slowed down.
When the conductance was nearly constant the titration experiment
started, and carbohydrates were added in defined concentrations to one or both sides of the membrane. Subsequently the membrane conductance decreased in a dose-dependent manner as a result of the
channel block for ions because of substrate binding.
In earlier experiments (9, 21) the carbohydrates were added to
the aqueous phase on both sides of the membrane. In the present study
we expanded the protocol in such a way that carbohydrate was also added
to one side of the membrane only, e.g. to either the
cis-side (side'; the side of the addition of LamB,
carbohydrate concentration c') or the trans-side (side"; the
opposite side of the membrane, carbohydrate concentration
c"). In the case where carbohydrate is added to both sides
of the membrane in equal concentration (c' = c"
= c) the relative conductance inhibition is given by
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where Gmax represents the conductance of
a LamB-containing membrane prior to the addition of carbohydrate,
G(c) the conductance in the presence of
carbohydrate, and K the stability constant for carbohydrate
binding. This means that the titration curves can be analyzed using
Lineweaver-Burk plots as shown in previous publications for
carbohydrate-specific porins (9, 24).
The stability constant, K, for carbohydrate binding to the
binding site inside the LamB channel is given by
|
(Eq. 2)
|
k'1 and k"1
represent the on-rate constants for carbohydrate binding from
the cis-side and the trans-side, respectively, to the binding site. The
off-rate constants are given by k'
1 and
k"
1. In the case of symmetric kinetics of
carbohydrate binding to maltoporin (k'1 = k"1 and k'
1 = k"
1), Equation 2 is reduced to
|
(Eq. 3)
|
In contrast, when the carbohydrate is added to only one side of
the membrane (c' = c; c" = 0) and the channels
are fully oriented, the relative conductance inhibition is given by
|
(Eq. 4)
|
or, depending on the orientation of the channels, by
|
(Eq. 5)
|
K' and K" are given by
|
(Eq. 6)
|
Note that K' and K" cannot be compared
with the stability constant K given in Equation 2, as they
do not represent the stability constants for carbohydrate binding to
the binding site inside the channel. Rather, K'/K" reflects
the ratio of the on-rates of the binding processes from the two
different sides (i.e. K'/K" = k'1/k"1).
 |
RESULTS |
Maltoporin Channels Close Reversibly at Low pH--
For the study
of the pH dependence of maltoporin, purified LamB was added to both
sides of the membrane bathed in an aqueous potassium chloride solution
buffered with 2 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8. The membrane conductance
increased in a stepwise fashion caused by reconstitution of maltoporin
into the membrane. When the reconstitution process slowed down and the
membrane conductance became stationary, the pH of the electrolyte
solution on both sides of the membrane was decreased in steps by adding
sodium citrate, pH 4.0 (Fig. 1). The
resulting pH was determined by measuring the pH of a 50-µl sample of
the aqueous compartments using a pH electrode. Lowering the pH to 4.73 by adding the buffer had virtually no influence on membrane
conductance. At pH 4.63 the membrane conductance started to decrease. A
further decrease of the pH to 4.51 and 4.40 and then to 4.28 continued
this process, and the membrane conductance went down to a constant
level of about 5% of its initial value at pH 4.02, which could not be
reduced further at even lower pH. The same influence on LamB-mediated
membrane conductance was also observed when other acids and buffers,
such as MES and phosphate and hydrochloric acid instead of citrate,
were used to decrease the pH. This excludes the possibility that the
decrease of the conductance is caused by a block of the channels by the
binding of citrate to the binding side inside the channel similar to
that observed for malto-oligosaccharides (9). Taken together the decrease in membrane conductance was definitely caused by low pH. The
inset in Fig. 1 shows the fraction of open channels as a
function of pH. It is noteworthy that the experimental data could not
be explained by the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, which suggests that
not a single amino acid is responsible for channel closure. It
seems, moreover, that it is a cooperative process.

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of decreasing pH at both sides of the
membrane on the conductance of a membrane containing about 360 reconstituted maltoporin channels. The aqueous solution contained
1 M KCl buffered with 2 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8, and
increasing amounts of sodium citrate, pH 4, to decrease the pH
(arrows) to the resulting pH indicated above the
arrows. Shifting the pH back to 7.0 by adding Tris, pH 8.0, shows that the pH-induced closure is reversible. The inset
shows the fraction of open channels as function of the pH.
|
|
One possible explanation for this effect is that low pH leads to the
removal of maltoporin from the membrane or the complete destruction of
its channel function. This explanation could be excluded by
shifting the pH back to 7.0 after acidification by the addition of
Tris/HCl, pH 8.0. The membrane conductance increased again and reached
approximately its initial level (before lowering the pH), demonstrating
that the pH-induced decrease was reversible. Thus, we concluded that
maltoporin channels are gated by low pH in a manner similar to that
demonstrated previously for the general diffusion porins OmpF, OmpC,
and PhoE (14, 15, 16, 17). The results suggested also that a
conformational change is responsible for the reversible closure of
the pores at pH levels lower than 4.7.
Only One Side of the Channel Is Blocked by Low pH--
In the next
set of experiments, LamB was added to both sides of the membrane, but
the pH was first lowered to pH 4.0 on one side of the membrane and then
on the other to the same pH (Fig. 2a). When the pH was decreased
on one side to 4.0 (leftmost arrow), membrane conductance
first increased somewhat, probably because of the increased channel
conductance due to increased concentration of protons. Then it
diminished to about 45% of its initial value. A further decrease was
observed when pH was also lowered on the other side to 4.0 (second arrow from left). In agreement with the
results described above, the final conductance reached values of only
about 5-10% of the initial membrane conductance when both sides of
the membrane had a pH of 4.0. Similar to the description above, the
pH-mediated closure was reversible when pH was increased again to 6, first on the trans- and then on the cis-side (two rightmost
arrows).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
pH-induced decrease of the conductance of a
membrane with reconstituted maltoporin channels inserted from both
sides (a) or from one side (the cis-side) (b)
of the membrane. a, the pH is lowered to 4.0 by
adding sodium citrate, pH 4.0, first at the cis-side (leftmost
arrow) and after the conductance decrease came to a standstill at
the trans-side of the membrane (second arrow from
left). The pH-dependent conductance decrease is
fully reversible when the pH is taken first at the trans-side
(second arrow from right) and then at the
cis-side (rightmost arrow) to pH 6. b, the pH was
first lowered in distinct steps to pH 4.1 at the trans-side and then to
the same pH at the cis-side. Note that the pH effect on the cis-side
was much greater than at the trans-side. The aqueous solution contained
1 M KCl buffered with 2 mM Tris/HCl, pH
8.
|
|
Protein was added to both sides of the membrane in the experiments
described above, and the decrease was about 45% of the initial
membrane conductance when the pH on one side was lowered. This behavior
was different when maltoporin was added to only one side of the
membrane (the cis-side, Fig. 2b). Lowering the pH on the
trans-side to 4.1 reduced the conductance by about 20-30% of its
initial value (left side of Fig. 2b) compared
with a reduction of 70-80% in the same experiments when the pH was
decreased on the cis-side to pH 4.1 (right side of Fig.
2b). Again, in both cases the residual membrane conductance
could be reduced to about 5-10% of the initial level also when both
compartments were acidified. These experiments demonstrate that
acidifying only one side of the membrane is sufficient to induce
channel closure. The difference between the experiments in which the
protein was added to one or both sides of the membrane can only be
explained when it is assumed that maltoporin does not insert randomly
but in a preferred orientation into the membranes. Low pH at the
cis-side induces the closure of the pores inserted in the preferred
orientation. The orientation of maltoporin when it is added to one of
the membrane is about 70-80%, which is in agreement with the results
of the experiment described above and also with those of a previous
study (13).
The Channel Monomers in a LamB Trimer Close Independently--
To
detect the pH-induced maltoporin closure on the single-channel level,
we added only a small amount of wild-type protein (final concentration
about 5 ng/ml) to one side of a membrane. After reconstitution of only
one channel into the membrane, the pH was lowered at the cis-side to 4 (left arrow in Fig. 3). First, an increase of the conductance could be observed as seen in the multi-channel experiments, probably caused by the higher single-channel conductance of LamB at an increased proton concentration (pH 4). Subsequently the conductance decreased to almost zero in three distinct
steps of the same size (about 65 picosiemens; see Fig. 3). In
the next step the pH was also lowered to 4 on the trans-side (middle arrow), which had no further effect on conductance.
Then, the pH on the cis-side was neutralized by adding Tris/HCl
(right arrow in Fig. 3). As a consequence the channel opened
again in three distinct steps and had the same conductance as before
the pH was lowered on the cis-side (150 picosiemens). Neutralizing the
trans-side also had no effect on the channel conductance (data not
shown). This experiment demonstrates that the three monomers within a
LamB trimer close and open independently from one another as a reaction
to pH change in the cis-compartment.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Study of pH-dependent maltoporin
closure on the single-channel level. One maltoporin channel was
inserted into the membrane from the cis-side, and the pH was decreased
to 4.0 at the cis-side while stirring (left arrow), causing
a small conductance increase followed by a subsequent closure of the
channel in three distinct steps corresponding to the independent
closure of the maltoporin monomers. Acidifying the trans-side had no
effect (middle arrow). Raising the pH at the
cis-side to 7 (right arrow) resulted in the reopening of the
three channels of the LamB trimer. The aqueous solution contained 1 M KCl buffered with 2 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.
|
|
Extracellular Loops L4 and L6 Are Responsible for
pH- dependent Closure--
In a previous study (13) we
demonstrated that certain LamB loop mutants also showed preferential
orientation and asymmetric carbohydrate binding when added to
only one side of the membrane. Looking for the basis of the pH-induced
channel closure of LamB wild type, we tested maltoporin mutants in
which the three major external loops, L4, L6, and L9, are deleted
separately or in combination. Our previous work (13) showed that
the mutants
L4,
L6,
L9v,
L4+L6, and
L4+L6+L9v are expressed in a LamB-deficient E. coli strain. They can be purified from the outer membrane and form channels when reconstituted in black lipid membranes (13). Each mutant
protein was added to both sides of the membrane, and pH dependence was
tested in the same way as described above for LamB wild type. The
mutant
L4+L6+L9v, in which all three major loops were
deleted, showed no conductance decrease after the pH was lowered to 4.0 on the cis- and the trans-sides (Fig. 4).
This was clear evidence that the pH-induced closure of LamB wild type is not the result of conformational changes inside the channel lumen
but has its origin in the extracellular loops, which become unstable
under acidic conditions and collapse into the channel lumen and block
it for the permeation of ions. Further experiments with the single-loop
deletion mutants
L4,
L6, and
L9v were performed to examine which loops are involved in the closing event. The
mutants
L4 and
L6 as well as the
combination
L4+L6 showed no pH-induced closure, whereas
acidic pH led to the closure of the mutant
L9v. We
therefore concluded that the two major loops, L4 and L6, are
responsible for the closure.

View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The conductance of a membrane with ~700
reconstituted LamB L4+L6+L9v
channels shows no decrease when pH is lowered at the cis- or trans-side
to 4.0 (arrows). 50 ng/ml protein was added to
both sides of the membrane bathed in 1 M KCl buffered with
2 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8. The pH of the aqueous phase was
lowered to 4.1 by adding sodium citrate.
|
|
Combining the knowledge that lowering the pH at the cis-side had a
greater effect when LamB wild type was added to only one side (the
cis-side; see above) and that the extracellular loops are the origin of
the pH-induced closure, we concluded that the preferred orientation of
the LamB trimers in artificial lipid bilayers is with the periplasmic
end first. The extracellular loops point toward the cis-side and lead
to almost complete channel closure when pH is decreased at this side to
pH 4.
Evaluation of Carbohydrate Binding Constants under Asymmetric
Conditions--
The investigation of carbohydrate binding to LamB
under asymmetric conditions has been a problem because the orientation
of maltoporin in artificial membranes was not known. Furthermore it has
been a matter of debate as to whether the channel is asymmetric with
respect to carbohydrate binding and transport (9, 12, 25, 26). The
pH-induced block of reconstituted maltoporin channels offers an elegant
way to manipulate the reconstituted channels, in a way that all
open channels have the same orientation, whereas the channels in the
other orientation are closed. It allowed a detailed investigation of
carbohydrate binding under asymmetric conditions. The asymmetric
binding constants K' and K" and the stability
constant K (see "Experimental Procedures") were derived by titration experiments in which the ion flux through the channels is
blocked when carbohydrate molecules are bound to the binding site
inside the channel. To exclude the possibility that the pH change
influences carbohydrate binding, we used LamB
L4+L6+L9v as
a control. Its carbohydrate binding characteristics were very similar
to that of LamB wild type (9, 13). Because the mutant channels do not
close under acidic conditions (see above), it was possible to determine
the carbohydrate binding constants at pH 4.0. The binding constant of
maltose added to both sides is almost identical
(Kneutral = 200 M
1;
Kacidic = 220 M
1) to
that measured at neutral conditions, demonstrating that the carbohydrate binding is not affected by pH.
The asymmetric carbohydrate-binding experiments were performed in a
manner similar to that described above for the experiments in which the
pH was lowered. The protein was added to one compartment (the
cis-side), and the trans-compartment was acidified to close the
channels oriented with their extracellular side (the side of the loops)
toward the trans-compartment (Fig. 5).
This means that the membrane conductance is due to maltoporin channels
in which the extracellular side points exclusively toward the cis-side. We determined the asymmetric binding constants of maltose, sucrose, and
trehalose added either from the cis-side (extracellular side) or the
trans-side (the periplasmic side). Table
I shows that the binding of maltose is
1.5-fold better if it is added from the cis-side (the external side;
K' = 170 ± 20 M
1) than from
the trans-side (the periplasmic side) of the channel (K" = 110 ± 20 M
1). This result suggests that
the asymmetry of the LamB channel is indeed very small. For sucrose the
asymmetric binding constants K' and K" differed
more substantially (K' = 130 ± 30 M
1 and K" = 6 ± 4 M
1). This means that for sucrose the
difference between cis and trans addition is more than 20-fold. For
trehalose the asymmetric binding constants were also significantly
different. Binding from the extracellular site is 3-fold better than
from the periplasmic side (K' = 42 ± 2 M
1, K' = 13 ± 2 M
1). A comparison with earlier data in which
protein and carbohydrates were added to both sides of the membranes
shows satisfactory agreement with the present data (9). It is
noteworthy that it is impossible without the pH-induced closure of one
population of channels to determine the asymmetric binding constants,
because the conductance decrease in titration experiments is always
caused by channels blocked by substrate entering from their
extracellular or periplasmic side.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Determination of the apparent maltose binding
constant to maltoporin under asymmetric conditions. The membrane
was formed from diphytanoyl phosphatidylcholine/n-decane.
The aqueous phase contained 1 M KCl buffered with 2 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8, and additionally, on the cis-side, 50 ng/ml LamB. The pH on the trans-side was lowered first to pH 4 to close
the maltoporin channels that were reconstituted with the external loops
pointing to the trans-side. Then maltose was added to the trans-side at
the concentrations shown at the top of the figure, which
resulted in a decrease of membrane conductance due to blocking
of the channels by maltose binding from the trans-side. The temperature
was 20 °C, and the applied voltage was 20 mV. The inset
shows a fit of the conductance decrease using Equation 4 and assuming
K" = 90 M 1.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Apparent stability constants for maltose, sucrose, and trehalose
binding to maltoporin from the extracellular or the periplasmic side
The membranes were formed from diphytanoyl
phosphatidylcholine/n-decane. The aqueous solutions
contained about 50 ng/ml LamB at the cis-side and on both sides 1 M KCl buffered with 2 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8. The pH
of the aqueous phase on the cis-side or on the trans-side was lowered
to 4 by adding sodium citrate before the start of the titration
experiments; T = 20 °C; Vm = 20 mV. The
apparent stability constants are given as the mean ± S.D. of at
least four titration experiments similar to that shown in Fig. 5.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Low pH Closes the Maltoporin Channel in an Asymmetric
Manner--
Low pH has a substantial influence on the properties of
maltoporin when it is reconstituted into lipid bilayer membranes. Starting with a pH of about 4.6, the channel closes almost completely for the transport of ions when the aqueous pH is lowered to pH 4.0. The
channel closure is reversible; they open again when the pH is increased
to pH 6. This means that the channel is not removed from the membrane
and not irreversibly destroyed by low pH. It is noteworthy also that
general diffusion pores such as OmpF, OmpC, and the phosphate
starvation-inducible PhoE close reversibly at low pH (14-17). A
similar effect has also been demonstrated for RafY and TolC with a more
specific function (27, 28). This channel closure has been explained in
terms of protection of enteric bacteria against low pH environment when
they pass through the digestive tract. Eliminating the proton influx in the periplasmic space could protect the bacterial cell from damaging the cytoplasmic membrane and from a breakdown of metabolic
processes. It is known that acidic conditions lead to changes in the
expression of outer membrane proteins (15, 29). Also other responses of
the bacterial cells to acidic stress occur at transcriptional or
translational level (30), which means that it takes some time until the
cell is adapted to the acidic conditions. The pH-induced closure of the
outer membrane pores may provide an immediate response to acidic stress
and helps the cell to survive sudden changes of the pH in the environment.
A similar mechanism for LamB makes sense because it is necessary that
all outer membrane channels close when the organism is taken to low pH
for some time; otherwise the protection against low pH would not be
complete. Our experimental results suggest that the LamB channel closes
in an asymmetric manner. When the protein is added to the cis-side of
the membrane and the pH is lowered at the same side to pH 4, about
70-80% of the channels close. Similarly, 20-30% of the channels
close when the pH is lowered to 4 at the trans-side. It is important to
note that the membrane conductance drops almost to zero when both sides
of the membrane are acidified. These results are consistent with the assumption that the maltoporin channel has a preferential but not full
orientation when the protein is added to only one side of the membrane.
All data presented here are consistent with the assumption that the
surface-exposed side points preferentially to the cis-side of the
membrane (see also below).
External Loops L4 and L6 Are Involved in Asymmetric Channel
Closure--
The channel closure could be caused by the large
extracellular loops of LamB (6). This was investigated by studying the pH dependence of a maltoporin loop deletion mutant in which the three
major loops, L4, L6, and L9, are deleted. Our results show that the
mutant
L4+L6+L9v completely lost pH sensitivity.
Therefore the pH-dependent closure of wild type is indeed
caused by instability of the extracellular protrusion formed by these
loops at low pH. Experiments with single-loop deletions could specify
further which loops are involved. The mutants
L4 and
L6 as well as the combination
L4+L6 were
also pH-insensitive, whereas
L9v showed a decrease in
conductance like wild-type protein when the pH was lowered to 4.0. Our
conclusion is that loops L4 and L6 undergo a conformation change under
acidic conditions and collapse into the channel lumen, leading to an
almost complete blockage of the channel for ions and carbohydrates.
This is in good agreement with experiments performed with the general
diffusion pore OmpF from E. coli (20). Here, it was
visualized by atomic force microscopy that the protrusion built by the
major extracellular loops of OmpF becomes unstable at low pH and shows
a conformation change. In our previous work in which we studied the
properties of loop deletion mutants of maltoporin, we showed
that under neutral conditions, mutants
L4 or
L6 exhibit a considerable current noise in single-channel conductance measurements and a reduced affinity for carbohydrates from
the extracellular side compared with wild-type or the
L9v mutant (13). This behavior is consistent with the idea that loops L4
and L6 stabilize each other, and if one of them is missing the
remaining one becomes unstable and flickers at the channel entrance,
leading to a noisy channel conductance signal and reduced sugar binding
from the extracellular side. As we show here, a reduced pH also
destabilizes the assembly of loop L4 and L6, which then collapse into
the channel lumen and block it completely for the passage of ions or
carbohydrate. It is noteworthy that both loops L4 and L6 are required,
because the single-loop deletions
L4 and
L6
were pH-insensitive showing that loop L4 or L6 alone is not sufficient
to block the channel.
The knowledge that maltoporin closes if the environment of the loops is
acidified makes it possible to determine the ratio of maltoporin
molecules inserted in one or the other direction into the lipid
bilayer. The experiments show that 70-80% of the LamB trimers insert
in such a way that the periplasmic side of the maltoporin trimers with
short turns moves through the membrane and points to the
trans-side. This is easy to understand because a considerably higher
energy level probably is needed to move the extracellular side with its
voluminous hydrophilic loops through the hydrophobic membrane interior.
This result is in contrast to previous studies with reconstituted
maltoporin (25, 31). In these studies it has been shown that the
surface-exposed side moves through the lipid bilayer membranes based on
phage lambda and carbohydrate binding. The difference from the
experimental data described here is not clear. It has to be mentioned,
however, that in previous studies using solvent-depleted membranes a
considerable membrane potential (more than 100 mV) is needed for
successful reconstitution of maltoporin (25, 31), whereas the
reconstitution process used here is virtually voltage-independent up to
about 60 mV, i.e. no membrane potential is needed for
successful reconstitution of LamB. It has to be noted that insertion
in vivo does not occur in the preferred orientation we found
here in vitro but in the opposite direction. The mechanism
as to how proteins are inserted into the outer membrane is still not
understood (32) but may need special uptake machinery for correct
orientation of the maltoporin trimers pointing with the loop region to
the cell surface. The machinery may also provide the high energy needed
to move the hydrophilic loops through the hydrophobic permeability
barrier within the outer membrane.
Which Amino Acids Might Be Involved in Channel
Closure?--
The three-dimensional structure of maltoporin is known
from crystallographic studies (6). Our experiments show that loops L4
and L6 are involved in pH-dependent channel closure, which occurs at pH lower than 4.6, suggesting that protonation of aspartate or glutamate residues could play a role in this process. Looking for
such residues within loops L4 and L6, we found some that form hydrogen
bonds and are most likely responsible for maintaining their structure
(Fig. 6). Asp-170 and Asp-237 are located
at the base of loop L4 and loop L6, respectively; Glu-148
connects L4 with L6 via two hydrogen bonds, and the two residues,
Asp-255 and Glu-257 at the tip of loop L6, interact with the residues of loop L9. It is possible that weakening all of these interactions by
lowering the pH leads to the destabilization of the protrusion followed
by loops L4 and L6 collapsing into the channel lumen. When we
investigated the closing events on the single-channel level, we found
that the monomers do not close simultaneously but independently. A
similar behavior was observed with RafY, a pore-forming protein, which
is part of the raf operon of E. coli plasmid
pRSD2 and enables the uptake of raffinose across the outer membrane.
Here, the trimeric nature of the outer membrane channel could be
visualized at pH 6, where the monomers switched reversibly into closed
configuration (27).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Stereo view of a backbone presentation of the
upper part of the maltoporin monomer. Extracellular loops 4, 6, and 9 are labeled L4, L6, and L9,
respectively. Aspartate and glutamate residues forming hydrogen bonds
or salt bridges within L4 and L6 are shown in detail. Under acidic
conditions these interactions may be weakened followed by the
destabilization of the loops. This can lead to the collapse of the
loops into the channel lumen, resulting in the closure of the channel.
This figure was made using WebLab ViewerPro (Accelrys). Protein Data
Bank code, 1MAL.
|
|
pH-dependent Closure of LamB Allows Evaluation of
Asymmetric Binding of Carbohydrates to the Binding Site--
For the
in vitro study of carbohydrate binding to maltoporin the
pH-induced closure represents a useful method to determine the possible
asymmetric binding of carbohydrates. It was used here to eliminate one
population of channels, which means that all remaining open channels
have the same orientation and allow the determination of the apparent
stability constants for carbohydrate binding from the extracellular
(K' = k'1/(k'
1 + k"
1)) and the periplasmic side (K" = k"1/(k'
1 + k"
1)) as pointed out under "Experimental
Procedures." In separate control experiments studying carbohydrate
binding to LamB
L4+L6+L9v under neutral and acidic
conditions, we demonstrated that the pH level had no influence on
carbohydrate binding between pH 4 and 7. The results show that the
apparent stability constant for maltose binding is 1.5-fold greater
when maltose enters the channel from the extracellular side as compared
with the apparent stability constant of maltose binding when it enters
from the periplasmic side. This means that there is a slight asymmetry
for maltose binding to LamB from both sides (i.e.
k'1/k"1 = 1.5), which is in agreement with our previous studies of maltoporin asymmetry (9, 12).
It is, however, again in some contrast with other studies, in which a
higher asymmetry and a higher on-rate from the periplasmic side has
been observed (25, 31).
In vivo experiments have demonstrated that LamB cannot
provide enough sucrose transport across the outer membrane to allow growth on sucrose as sole carbon source (33). Here the asymmetric binding studies reveal an interesting asymmetry for the binding properties of sucrose. The apparent binding constant for sucrose binding from the extracellular side (K') is almost as high
as for maltose (K' = 130 ± 20 M
1), whereas K" from the
periplasmic side is more than 20-fold smaller (6 ± 4 M
1). This difference can be explained by the
structure of the sucrose molecule, which is bent in contrast to
the linear maltose. The crystal structure of the maltoporin-sucrose
complex shows that the glucosyl moiety of sucrose is partially inserted
in the channel constriction. The nonreducing end of the glucosyl moiety
points to the periplasmic side similar to the case for the bound
malto-oligosaccharide molecule (see Fig.
7 and Ref. 34). It is possible that a
sucrose molecule can access only the position between the aromatic
amino acids of the greasy slide on one side and the central tyrosine 118 on the other side if it enters from the extracellular side. Steric
hindrance would make it impossible to access this side if the molecule
enters from the periplasmic side. This explains the low apparent
binding constant K" for sucrose entering from the
periplasmic side, i.e. K'/K" = k'1/k"1 = 20. For
trehalose the apparent binding constant is also smaller when added to
the periplasmic side. Both ends of this disaccharide are nonreducing, which explains the better binding from the extracellular side. The
glycosyl moiety, which enters first from the extracellular side, is in
the optimal orientation. However, when accessed from the
periplasmic side the preceding glycosyl moiety does not fit optimal in
the binding site, which explains the lower apparent binding constant.
In contrast to sucrose is trehalose, a substrate for maltoporin; cells
can grow with trehalose as the sole carbon source. The trehalose
molecule is also bent but not as much as sucrose (35), and its
structure allows a passage through the restriction site. In a previous
publication we calculated the kinetic parameters of the sugar binding
(21). The on-rate of trehalose binding (k1 = 0.5 · 106 M
1s
1)
is half that of maltose (1.1 · 106
M
1s
1) but is 80-fold higher
than that of sucrose (0.0064 · 106
M
1s
1). The off-rate of maltose
and trehalose is over 10,000 s
1. Thus, the uptake of both
carbohydrates is good enough to provide the cells with enough carbon
source, whereas the uptake of sucrose is too low
(k
1 = 39 s
1). The experiments with
trehalose demonstrate that the asymmetric binding of sucrose is an
effect of stereochemistry. On the other hand, stereochemistry alone is
probably not responsible for the fact that LamB transports maltose and
trehalose at high velocity, whereas transport of sucrose is slow.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Longitudinal section through the maltoporin
channel. A sucrose molecule is bound at the constriction site
between the aromatic residues Tyr-6, Tyr-41, and Trp-74 of the greasy
slide and Tyr-118, located at the inwardly folded loop 3. The position
of its glucose residue is similar to a glucose residue of bound
maltose. It is only possible that sucrose assumes this position
if it enters the maltoporin from the extracellular site. Steric
hindrance makes it impossible to assume this position if sucrose enters
from the periplasmic site. The crystal data are taken from Wang
et al. (34). The figure was made using WebLab ViewerPro
(Accelrys). Protein Data Bank code, 1AF6.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We extend our thanks to Frank Orlik for
helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project Be 865/10) and the Fonds der
Chemischen Industrie.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-931-888-4510; Fax: 49-931-888-4509; E-mail:
andersen@biozentrum.uni- wuerzburg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206804200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviation used is:
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Donaldson, D. M.,
Roberts, R. R.,
Larsen, H. S.,
and Tew, J. C.
(1974)
Infect. Immun.
10,
657-666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Rest, R. F.,
Cooney, M. H.,
and Spitznagel, J. K.
(1977)
Infect. Immun.
16,
145-151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Benz, R.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
42,
359-393[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Nikaido, H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3905-3908[Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Cowan, S. W.,
Schirmer, T.,
Rummel, G.,
Steiert, M.,
Ghosh, R.,
Pauptit, R. A.,
Jansonius, J. N.,
and Rosenbusch, J. P.
(1992)
Nature
358,
727-733[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Schirmer, T.,
Keller, T. A.,
Wang, Y. F.,
and Rosenbusch, J. P.
(1995)
Science
267,
512-514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Forst, D.,
Welte, W.,
Wacker, T.,
and Diederichs, K.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
37-46[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Luckey, M.,
and Nikaido, H.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
167-171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Benz, R.,
Schmid, A.,
and Vos-Scheperkeuter, G. H.
(1987)
J. Membr. Biol.
100,
21-29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Dutzler, R.,
Wang, Y. F.,
Rizkallah, P.,
Rosenbusch, J. P.,
and Schirmer, T.
(1996)
Structure
4,
127-134[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Jordy, M.,
Andersen, C.,
Schülein, K.,
Ferenci, T.,
and Benz, R.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
259,
666-678[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Orlik, F.,
Andersen, C.,
and Benz, R.
(2002)
Biophys. J.
83,
309-321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Andersen, C.,
Bachmeyer, C.,
Täuber, H.,
Benz, R.,
Wang, J.,
Michel, V.,
Newton, S. M.,
Hofnung, M.,
and Charbit, A.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
32,
851-867[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Xu, G. Z.,
Shi, B.,
McGroarty, E. J.,
and Tien, H. T.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
862,
57-64[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Heyde, M,
and Portalier, R.
(1987)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
208,
511-517[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Todt, J. C.,
Rocque, W. J.,
and McGroarty, E. J.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
10471-10478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Todt, J. C.,
and McGroarty, E. J.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
189,
1498-1502[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Saint, N.,
Lou, K. L.,
Widmer, C.,
Luckey, M.,
Schirmer, T.,
and Rosenbusch, J. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20676-20680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
DelaVega, A. L.,
and Delcour, A. H.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
6058-6065[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Müller, D. J.,
and Engel, A.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
285,
1347-1351[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Andersen, C.,
Jordy, M.,
and Benz, R.
(1995)
J. Membr. Biol.
105,
385-401
|
| 22.
|
Schülein, K.,
Andersen, C.,
and Benz, R.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
17,
757-767[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Benz, R.,
Janko, K.,
Boos, W.,
and Läuger, P.
(1978)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
511,
305-319[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Benz, R.,
Schmid, A.,
Nakae, T.,
and Vos-Scheperkeuter, G. H.
(1986)
J. Bacteriol.
165,
978-986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Van Gelder, P.,
Dumas, F.,
and Winterhalter, M.
(2000)
Biophys. Chem.
85,
153-167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Orlik, F.,
Andersen, C.,
and Benz, R.
(2002)
Biophys. J.
82,
2466-2475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Andersen, C.,
Krones, D.,
Ulmke, C.,
Schmid, K.,
and Benz, R.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
254,
679-684[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Andersen, C.,
Hughes, C.,
and Koronakis, V.
(2002)
J. Membr. Biol.
185,
83-92[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Chagneau, C.,
Heyde, M.,
Alonso, S.,
Portalier, R.,
and Laloi, P.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
5675-5683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Arnold, C. N.,
McElhanon, J.,
Lee, A.,
Leonhart, R.,
and Siegele, D. A.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
2178-2186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Kullman, L.,
Winterhalter, M.,
and Bezrukov, S. M.
(2002)
Biophys. J.
82,
803-812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Eppens, E. F.,
Nouwen, N.,
and Tommassen, J.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4295-4301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Schmid, K.,
Ebner, R.,
Jahreis, K.,
Lengeler, J. W.,
and Titgemeyer, F.
(1991)
Mol. Microbiol.
5,
941-950[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Wang, Y. F.,
Dutzler, R.,
Rizkallah, P. J.,
Rosenbusch, J. P.,
and Schirmer, T.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
272,
56-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Zhang, P.,
Klymachyov, A. N.,
Brown, S.,
Ellington, J. G.,
and Grandinetti, P. J.
(1998)
Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson.
12,
221-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Muller, N. Wu, and K. Palczewski
Vertebrate Membrane Proteins: Structure, Function, and Insights from Biophysical Approaches
Pharmacol. Rev.,
March 1, 2008;
60(1):
43 - 78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Stegmeier and C. Andersen
Characterization of Pores Formed by YaeT (Omp85) from Escherichia coli
J. Biochem.,
August 1, 2006;
140(2):
275 - 283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Giesemann, T. Jank, R. Gerhard, E. Maier, I. Just, R. Benz, and K. Aktories
Cholesterol-dependent Pore Formation of Clostridium difficile Toxin A
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 21, 2006;
281(16):
10808 - 10815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Yohannes, D. M. Barnhart, and J. L. Slonczewski
pH-Dependent Catabolic Protein Expression dur |