JBC Transcription and Nuclear Factor Monoclonals

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205769200 on August 30, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 45, 42471-42479, November 8, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/45/42471    most recent
M205769200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by You, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hanaoka, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by You, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hanaoka, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Roles of Mcm7 and Mcm4 Subunits in the DNA Helicase Activity of the Mouse Mcm4/6/7 Complex*

Zhiying YouDagger §, Yukio Ishimi||, Hisao MasaiDagger , and Fumio Hanaoka§**

From the Dagger  Department of Cell Biology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, 18-22 Honkomagome 3-chome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8613, § RIKEN (Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), Hirosawa 2-1, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, the || Biomolecular Science and Technology Department, Mitsubishi Kagaku Institute of Life Sciences, 11 Minamiooya, Machida, Tokyo 194-8511, and the ** Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, and CREST (Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology), Japan Science and Technology Corporation, 1-3 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Received for publication, June 11, 2002, and in revised form, August 15, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mcm, which is composed of six structurally related subunits (Mcm2-7), is essential for eukaryotic DNA replication. A subassembly of Mcm, the Mcm4/6/7 double-trimeric complex, possesses DNA helicase activity, and it has been proposed that Mcm may function as a replicative helicase at replication forks. We show here that conserved ATPase motifs of Mcm7 are essential for ATPase and DNA helicase activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex. Because uncomplexed Mcm7 displayed neither ATPase nor DNA helicase activity, Mcm7 contributes to the DNA helicase activity of the Mcm complex through interaction with other subunits. In contrast, the Mcm4/6/7 complex containing a zinc finger mutant of Mcm4 with partially impaired DNA binding activity exhibited elevated DNA helicase activity. The Mcm4/6/7 complex containing this Mcm4 mutant tended to dissociate into trimeric complexes, suggesting that the zinc finger of Mcm4 is involved in subunit interactions of trimers. The Mcm4 mutants lacking the N-terminal 35 or 112 amino acids could form hexameric Mcm4/6/7 complexes, but displayed very little DNA helicase activity. In conjunction with the previously reported essential role of Mcm6 in ATP binding (You, Z., Komamura, Y., and Ishimi, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8003-8015), our data indicate distinct roles of Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7 subunits in activation of the DNA helicase activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA helicase plays a central role in the replication of chromosomal DNA. It couples the free energy of ATP hydrolysis to separation of a DNA duplex into its component strands. DNA helicase is associated with a set of subactivities including DNA binding, nucleotide binding, and ATP hydrolysis, all of which cooperatively work for DNA unwinding (1, 2). The Mcm family proteins (Mcm2-7) interact with one another to form a complex that plays an essential role in the initiation of DNA replication (3-7). A recent demonstration that the Mcm4/6/7 complex can form a hexameric complex with active helicase activity suggests that the Mcm complex may be part of the replicative DNA helicase of eukaryotes (8-13).

All six Mcm proteins contain DNA-dependent ATPase motifs in their central domains, including Walker motifs A and B, which are widely conserved in ATPases and DNA helicases (14, 15). In addition, four of the Mcm proteins (Mcm2, Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7) contain a zinc finger motif, which may function in protein-protein interactions or nucleic acid binding (3, 16). The ATPase and zinc finger motifs are highly conserved in Mcm proteins from yeast to mammalian cells, suggesting their crucial roles in the functions of Mcm.

We have identified DNA helicase activity in the human Mcm4/6/7 protein complex (8) and subsequently demonstrated that it is intrinsic to mammalian Mcm4/6/7 complexes (9). DNA helicase activity was also demonstrated in the Mcm4/6/7 complex of fission yeast (10, 11). To elucidate the mechanism of the DNA helicase functions of the Mcm4/6/7 complex and to obtain insight into the physiological significance of this activity, biochemical studies with a series of mutants of the Mcm4/6/7 complex were undertaken. Our previous studies with mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes in which the ATP-binding motifs of the Mcm6 protein were mutated showed that the mutation preferentially affected the high affinity binding of ATP and inactivated the DNA helicase activity, although the ATPase activity was not significantly affected. A mutation in an ATP-binding motif of the Mcm4 protein affected the ssDNA1 binding activity of the complex and led to moderate inhibition of the DNA helicase activity (9). In the present study, the roles of ATP-binding motifs of Mcm7 and those of the zinc finger motif of Mcm4 in various activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex were examined. Our results indicate that ATPase motifs of Mcm7 are essential for the ATP hydrolytic and DNA helicase activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex, whereas Mcm7 alone does not possess these activities, and that zinc finger motif mutants of Mcm4 display enhanced DNA helicase activity, with altered subunit assembly and partially impaired DNA binding activity. We have shown that the N-terminal region of the Mcm4 protein is also required for DNA helicase activity. Our results indicate distinct roles of each subunit of the Mcm4/6/7 complex in the execution of its helicase activity. A possible model of the helicase action of Mcm is discussed on the basis of these findings.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Generation of Mutant Forms of Mouse Mcm7 and Mcm4 cDNAs-- Site-directed mutagenesis of the Mcm7 and Mcm4 genes was conducted with the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The oligonucleotides 5'-GGCGTGTGCTGCATTGCTGCGTTTGACAAGATGGCC-3' and 5'-GACCCTGGTGTGGCCGCAGCTCAGCTCCTATCTTAC-3' were used as primers to prepare the histidine-tagged Mcm7DE and Mcm7KS mutants (where "DE" refers to the Asp444 and Glu445 residues in the Walker B motif mutated to alanine, and "KS" refers to the highly conserved Lys386 and Ser387 residues in the Walker A motif mutated to alanine), respectively, in pBluescript II SK(-). The oligonucleotides 5'-GAGGCCTTTTTCCAAGCCCAAGTCGCTGCCCACACCACCCGG-3' and 5'-GCTGAGCCCTGCAGTGCTGTGCACGCCCACACTACCCACAGC-3' were used as primers to introduce Cys-to-Ala mutations at amino acids 305 and 308 and amino acids 327 and 330 of Mcm4 in pBluescript II SK(-), resulting in Mcm4CC1 and Mcm4CC2, respectively. Deletion mutants of Mcm4 were generated by PCR amplification. First, to amplify the N-terminal fragments of the Mcm4 gene product (amino acids 35-148 and 112-148 as EcoRI-HindIII fragments), oligonucleotides 5'-GAGAGAGAATTCATGGGACATCATCATCATCATCACGGAAGACGTAGAGGCGAAGATTC-3' and 5'-GAGAGAGAATTCATGGGACATCATCATCATCATCACGGACAGAGGCCAGATCTGGGCTC-3', respectively, in combination with 5'-TTACATGTTGCCACATTCAC-3' were used as primers. The amplified fragments were digested with EcoRI plus HindIII and ligated to the Mcm4 C-terminal fragment (amino acids 149-862), resulting in Mcm4Delta N35 and Mcm4Delta N112, respectively. The mutagenized His6-Mcm7 genes were subcloned into the pAcUW31 vector (Pharmingen) bearing wild-type Mcm2. Similarly, the mutant His6-Mcm4 genes were cloned into the same vector bearing full-length Mcm6 (9). The nucleotide sequences of all the mutants were confirmed by DNA sequencing with an Applied Biosystems automated sequencer.

Purification of Mutant Mcm Complexes and Mcm7 Protein Expressed in Insect Cells-- Mcm complexes containing Mcm7 mutants were expressed in HighFive insect cells by co-infection of Mcm2/7KS or Mcm2/7DE together with wild-type Mcm4/6 (9). The mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes were purified by nickel column chromatography, histone-Sepharose column chromatography, and glycerol gradient centrifugation as described previously (9). The Mcm4CC1/6/7 or Mcm4CC2/6/7 complex was similarly expressed in HighFive cells after co-infection of FLAG-tagged Mcm7 with Mcm4CC1/6 or Mcm4CC2/6 and was purified by consecutive steps involving Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid affinity chromatography, anti-FLAG antibody M2-agarose affinity chromatography, and glycerol gradient centrifugation. On the nitrilotriacetic acid column, proteins bound to the beads were eluted three times by adding 1 bed volume of buffer containing 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 300 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol supplemented with 200 mM imidazole (pH 7.5). The eluted fractions were mixed with anti-FLAG antibody M2-agarose beads (Sigma) equilibrated with buffer A (50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 300 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol) and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h on a rocking platform. After washing the resin three times with 10 bed volumes of buffer A, bound proteins were eluted three times by incubation at 4 °C for 15 min with 1 bed volume of buffer A containing 0.2 mg/ml FLAG peptide. The eluted fractions were pooled and further purified by glycerol gradient centrifugation at 36,000 rpm for 16 h (Beckman TLS55 rotor) on a 15-35% linear glycerol gradient as described previously (9) or on a Mono Q column in a SMART system (Amersham Biosciences) in which the peak fractions containing the zinc finger mutant complexes eluted at 0.3 M NaCl. The presence of a FLAG tag at the C terminus of Mcm7 did not affect various biochemical functions of the Mcm4/6/7 complex. The FLAG-tagged Mcm7 protein, singly expressed in insect cells, was purified by consecutive steps involving anti-FLAG antibody M2-agarose affinity chromatography, Mono Q column chromatography, a second run of anti-FLAG antibody M2-agarose affinity chromatography, and finally 15-35% glycerol gradient centrifugation at 36,000 rpm for 16 h.

DNA Helicase and ATPase Assays-- A 17-mer oligonucleotide (5'-GTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC-3'; Takara Biomedical, Tokyo, Japan) was labeled at the 5'-end with polynucleotide kinase in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP and then annealed to M13mp18 ssDNA (Takara Biomedical). The annealed labeled substrate was purified on a Quantum Prep PCR Kleen spin column (Bio-Rad). Approximately 5-10 fmol of substrate was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h with the indicated amounts of Mcm proteins in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 20 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 10 mM Mg(CH3COO)2, 10 mM ATP, and 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin as described previously (9).

The conditions for ATPase assays were the same as for DNA helicase assays, except that the substrate was omitted, and 2 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP and 2 µg of heated-denatured salmon sperm DNA or 0.75 µg of 67-mer oligonucleotide were added. After incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, aliquots (0.5 µl) were spotted onto a polyethyleneimine-cellulose TLC plate, and the ATP and Pi were separated by chromatography in 1 M formic acid and 0.5 M LiCl. The extent of ATP hydrolysis was quantified by using a Fuji BAS 2500 Bio-Image analyzer.

ssDNA Binding and ATP Binding Assays-- Mcm proteins were incubated with the labeled 37-mer oligonucleotide (9) at 37 °C in buffer containing 10 mM sodium creatine phosphate, 5 mM ATP, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM DTT, 0.01% Triton X-100, and 15 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) for 30 min. Glutaraldehyde (10%) was then added to the reaction mixture at a final concentration of 0.1%, and the incubation was continued for 10 min. The reaction mixture was applied to 5% native polyacrylamide gel in Tris/glycine buffer. We did not observe any effect of the presence of ATP on the gel shift patterns of the Mcm complexes under the conditions employed. Nitrocellulose filter binding assays were conducted as previously described (10). Reaction mixtures (15 µl) contained 25 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaOAc, 10 mM Mg(CH3COO)2, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.25 mM AMP-PNP, and 20 fmol of 5'-end-labeled 37-mer oligonucleotide. Proteins were added, and reaction mixtures were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixtures, diluted by addition of 85 µl of wash buffer (25 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaOAc, 10 mM Mg(CH3COO)2, and 1 mM DTT), were filtered through alkaline-treated 0.45-µm HA nitrocellulose filters (Millipore) (17). The filters were washed three times with wash buffer, and the radioactivity retained on the filters was subjected to liquid scintillation counting. ATP binding assays were conducted as previously described (9).

Immunoprecipitation Analyses with in Vitro Synthesized Mcm Protein Subunits-- Mouse wild-type Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7 and mutants Mcm4CC1 and Mcm4CC2 were cloned into the pBluescript II plasmid (Stratagene). Mcm proteins were synthesized on these template DNAs in vitro in the presence of [35S]methionine in the TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega, Madison, WI) as suggested by the manufacturer. The reaction mixture was diluted with 400 µl of buffer B (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.3 M sodium glutamate, 2 mM Mg(CH3COO)2, 10% glycerol, 0.01% Triton X-100, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and then concentrated to 50 µl using a Microcon-10 column (Amicon, Inc.). This procedure removed free [35S]methionine from the reaction mixtures. The TNT product of Mcm4 (wild-type or mutant) was mixed with an equal amount of Mcm6 or Mcm7, diluted to 30 µl with buffer B containing 1 mM DTT, and then incubated with 1 µl of anti-mouse Mcm4 antibody (serum generously provided by Dr. Hiroshi Kimura) at 4 °C for 2 h. Protein A-Sepharose (15 µl; Amersham Biosciences) was added, and the incubation was continued for an additional 1 h. Immunocomplexes were washed five times with buffer B containing 1 mM DTT; the bound and unbound proteins were electrophoresed on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel; and the radioactivity on the gel was analyzed with the Fuji Bio-Image analyzer.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression and Purification of Mouse Mutant Mcm4/6/7 Complexes Containing ATPase Motif Mutations in Mcm7-- Two mutations that changed specific amino acids located in the well conserved DNA-dependent ATPase motifs of Mcm7 were generated by site-directed mutagenesis (Fig. 1). The highly conserved lysine and serine residues (KS) in the Walker A motif and the aspartic and glutamic acid residues (DE) in the Walker B motif were changed to alanine in the Mcm7 protein (Mcm7DE and Mcm7KS, respectively). These amino acids have been implicated in the nucleotide hydrolytic and DNA unwinding activities of various ATPases and DNA helicases (18-22). To express these mutant Mcm4/6/7 proteins, HighFive insect cells were co-infected with two recombinant baculoviruses, Mcm2/His6-Mcm7 (DE or KS) and His6-Mcm4/6. The mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes were purified to near homogeneity by Ni2+-agarose chromatography, histone H3/H4-Sepharose column chromatography (23), and glycerol gradient centrifugation (9) as described previously (Fig. 2A).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Mutants of Mcm4 and Mcm7 constructed and characterized in this study. The DNA-dependent ATPase motifs A-D and the conserved zinc finger motif in Mcm4 and Mcm7 are indicated. The mutagenized amino acids in motifs A and B of Mcm7 as well as those in the zinc finger motif of Mcm4 are indicated.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Mcm4/6/7 complexes containing an Mcm7 Walker A or B motif mutant. The histone-Sepharose fractions containing mutant Mcm4/6/7 proteins were pooled and further fractionated by glycerol gradient centrifugation. The peak fractions were pooled and concentrated by Microcon-30 centrifugation. The final preparations containing purified proteins were analyzed on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (59:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) (A) or on 5% native acrylamide gel (79:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) (C), followed by silver staining. Western blotting was conducted to estimate the amount of each subunit present in the purified fractions with antibodies against the proteins indicated (B). Lane 1, Mcm4/6/7DE (30 ng); lane 2, Mcm4/6/7KS (30 ng); lane 3, wild-type (WT) Mcm4/6/7 (30 ng); lane 4, Mcm2/4/6/7 (40 ng). Depending on the conditions of electrophoresis, the Mcm7 protein appeared as two bands upon SDS-PAGE. They may be generated from modification of the protein or from alternative initiation of translation. The Mcm7 protein was more strongly silver-stained than the other subunits. Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining showed a roughly stoichiometric presence of each subunit (data not shown). Thy, thyroglobulin; Fer, ferritin; Cat, catalase.

Glycerol gradient sedimentation indicated that the mutant complexes sedimented at ~550 kDa, a value almost identical to that of the wild-type complex (data not shown). Examination of the purified proteins by SDS-PAGE revealed that the three subunits largely formed stoichiometric complexes in both mutants (Fig. 2A). The levels of contaminating Mcm2 protein in the purified Mcm4/6/7 complexes were examined by Western blotting (Fig. 2B). The results show that the amounts of Mcm2 protein present in the Mcm4/6/7 complexes were similar in the wild-type and mutant Mcm7 proteins and were <5% of the amount present in the helicase-inactive Mcm2/4/6/7 complex containing the same amounts of Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7 subunits (Fig. 2B, upper panel) (data not shown). This level of Mcm2 does not inhibit the helicase activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex (9). Analyses of the mutant complexes on a nondenaturing acrylamide gel indicated that they predominantly existed as hexameric complexes, like the wild-type complex (Fig. 2C), indicating that complex formation is not affected by the Mcm7 mutations.

Mutations in the Walker A or B Motif of the Mcm7 Protein Result in Reduction of ATPase and DNA Helicase Activities-- We then characterized the biochemical properties of the mutant complexes. The mutations resulted in almost no (Mcm4/6/7KS) or significantly reduced (Mcm4/6/7DE) DNA helicase activity (Fig. 3A). The levels of ATPase activities of the mutant complexes were also significantly lower than that of the wild-type Mcm4/6/7 complex (Fig. 3B). However, they retained ssDNA and ATP binding activities that were nearly comparable to those detected with the wild-type complex (Fig. 3, C and D). The above results indicate that ATPase motifs of Mcm7 are essential for the DNA helicase and ATP hydrolytic activities expressed by the Mcm4/6/7 complex.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Mutations in the conserved ATPase motifs of the Mcm7 protein result in reduction of the ATPase and DNA helicase activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex. A, DNA helicase assays were conducted as described under "Experimental Procedures" with Mcm4/6/7DE, Mcm4/6/7KS, and the wild-type (WT) Mcm4/6/7 complexes at the amounts indicated. The fractions of the displaced oligonucleotide were quantified and are plotted. B, the ATPase activities of the mutant and wild-type Mcm4/6/7 complexes were measured in the presence of heat-denatured salmon sperm DNA as described under "Experimental Procedures." The released phosphate was calculated and is plotted for each mutant and wild-type Mcm4/6/7 complex. C, the ssDNA binding activity, as measured by gel shift assays of 20 fmol of 37-mer single-stranded oligonucleotide (9), was quantified from the amount of the shifted DNA at ~550 kDa and is plotted for each mutant and wild-type Mcm4/6/7 complex. The values are the averages of three independent experiments, and error bars are shown. D, ATP binding assays were conducted as previously described (9). Equal amounts (1.5 µg) of wild-type Mcm4/6/7 (lane 2) and Mcm4/6/7DE (lane 3) complexes were incubated with [alpha -32P]ATP under UV irradiation and analyzed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, followed by autoradiography. Lane 1, no protein.

Uncomplexed Mcm7 Protein Does Not Have DNA Helicase or ATPase Activity-- The above results suggest that Mcm7 may directly contribute to the DNA helicase and ATPase activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex. Therefore, we examined whether a single polypeptide of the Mcm7 protein possesses ATP hydrolytic and DNA helicase activities. The Mcm7 protein fraction obtained after three steps of purification (see "Experimental Procedures") was further fractionated by glycerol gradient centrifugation. The proteins in these fractions were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4A). The major peak of the Mcm7 protein sedimented at fractions close to catalase (230 kDa), indicating that Mcm7 may form a trimeric complex. The ATPase and DNA helicase activities were then measured using this purified protein fraction. As shown in Fig. 4 (B and C), neither ATPase nor DNA helicase activity was detected in the Mcm7 protein preparations. These results indicate that Mcm7 itself is deficient in ATP hydrolytic and DNA helicase activities and suggest that it may contribute to the DNA helicase and ATPase activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex through interacting with other subunits.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Purification of uncomplexed Mcm7 protein and its ATPase and DNA helicase activities. The Mcm7 protein fraction, prepared by anti-FLAG antibody affinity column chromatography, was fractionated by centrifugation at 36,000 rpm for 16 h on a 15-35% glycerol gradient, and each fraction was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by silver staining (A). The positions of molecular mass markers (Thy, thyroglobulin; Cat, catalase; BSA, bovine serum albumin) are indicated along with their molecular sizes. Fractions 8 and 9 on the glycerol gradient were pooled and concentrated, and ATPase (B) and DNA helicase (C) activities were examined as described under "Experimental Procedures." In B and C, the released phosphate (Pi in pmol; the background in the absence of added protein was taken as 0) and displaced oligonucleotides (% of the total) were quantified, and the values are presented at the bottom of each lane.

The Mcm4/6/7 Complex with a Mutation in the Zinc Finger Motif of Mcm4 Tends to Disassemble into Trimers-- Four of the six Mcm subunits (Mcm2, Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7) contain a conserved zinc finger motif (CX2CX18CX2C), suggesting that they may be involved in protein-protein interactions, protein folding stability, or DNA-protein interactions (24-26). To elucidate the roles of the zinc finger motif of the Mcm4 protein in the biochemical activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex, we replaced the first or second pair of cysteines in Mcm4 with alanine by site-directed mutagenesis and expressed it as an Mcm4/6/7 complex (Mcm4CC1/6/7 or Mcm4CC2/6/7, respectively) (Fig. 1). These mutant complexes, carrying a histidine tag and a FLAG tag at the N terminus of Mcm4 and at the C terminus of Mcm7, respectively, were purified by Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid column chromatography, FLAG affinity column chromatography, and glycerol gradient centrifugation (Fig. 5A).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mutations in the zinc finger motif of the Mcm4 protein in the Mcm4/6/7 complex result in unstable hexamers, reduced ssDNA binding activity, and increased DNA helicase activity. A, the wild-type (WT) Mcm4/6/7 (left panels) and Mcm4CC2/6/7 (right panels) complexes, purified on nickel and anti-FLAG antibody affinity columns, were separated by 15-30% glycerol gradient centrifugation as described under "Experimental Procedures." Each fraction was loaded onto 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (37.5:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide; upper left panel), 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (59:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide; upper right panel), or 5% native polyacrylamide gel (lower panels); and proteins were stained with silver. B, the wild-type (WT) and mutant Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7 proteins were synthesized in vitro in the presence of [35S]methionine. Approximately the same amounts of Mcm4 and Mcm6 (upper panels) or Mcm4 and Mcm7 (lower panels) were mixed as indicated, and immunoprecipitation was carried out with anti-Mcm4 antibody. Input (15% of total) and bound proteins were run on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (37.5:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide), and proteins were detected by autoradiography. C, the final preparations of the wild-type and zinc finger mutants of Mcm4/6/7 (150 ng each), used in the various assays described for D-G, were prepared by concentrating glycerol gradient peak fractions (wild-type complex, pool of fractions 3-5; and zinc finger mutant complex, pool of fractions 6-8) and subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by silver staining. D, ATPase assays were conducted under the standard conditions with various amounts of a zinc finger mutant (Mcm4CC2/6/7) or the wild-type Mcm4/6/7 complex as indicated. The reactions contained a 67-mer oligonucleotide DNA at 50 ng/µl. The released phosphate (Pi in pmol; the background in the absence of added protein was taken as 0) was quantified, and the values are presented at the bottom of each lane. E, the ssDNA binding activities of the wild-type and zinc finger mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes were measured as described under "Experimental Procedures." The gray arrow indicates the position of the Mcm4/6/7 hexamer (550 kDa) in complex with the 37-mer DNA. The positions of protein molecular mass markers (Thy, thyroglobulin; Fer, ferritin) upon glycerol gradient and native gel electrophoresis are indicated by black arrows. The protein-free oligonucleotides have run off the gel. The intensities of the shifted bands were quantified, and the relative extent of binding, with the intensity of the shifted DNA with 50 ng of the wild-type protein being taken as 100, is presented below each lane. F, nitrocellulose filter binding assays of the wild-type and mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes were conducted with 20 fmol of labeled 37-mer oligonucleotide. The amounts of DNA-protein complexes generated are plotted against the concentration of Mcm proteins. The values are the averages of three independent experiments, and error bars are shown. G, the DNA helicase activities of the zinc finger mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes, as indicated, were measured along with the wild-type complex as described under "Experimental Procedures." The displaced oligonucleotides (%) were quantified and are plotted.

The wild-type Mcm4/6/7 complex sedimented at 500-600 kDa, whereas the Mcm4CC2/6/7 complex peaked at fractions slightly larger than catalase (232 kDa) (Fig. 5A, upper panels). Examination of each fraction on a nondenaturing acrylamide gel revealed that the mutant complex contained a significant amount of 280-kDa trimers, whereas the wild-type complex was almost exclusively composed of 550-kDa hexameric complexes (Fig. 5A, lower panels). Similar results were obtained with the Mcm4CC1/6/7 complex (data not shown). These results indicate that mutations in the zinc finger result in disassembly of the hexameric complex into trimers. Therefore, the zinc finger motif of Mcm4 is likely to be involved in the stable assembly of the hexameric structure.

To address the molecular basis of the instability of the Mcm4/6/7 hexamer containing an Mcm4 zinc finger mutant, we examined the interaction of wild-type or mutant Mcm4 with Mcm6 and Mcm7. When in vitro synthesized wild-type Mcm4 was mixed with Mcm6 or Mcm7 similarly synthesized in vitro, anti-Mcm4 antibody efficiently immunoprecipitated Mcm6 or Mcm7, respectively (Fig. 5B, lane 2). Approximately 20% of the input Mcm6 and Mcm7 was immunoprecipitated. Lower bands in the bound fraction may be degradation products of Mcm4. These results indicate that Mcm4 interacts with both Mcm6 and Mcm7 under our experimental conditions. The Mcm6 and Mcm7 proteins were co-immunoprecipitated with the mutant Mcm4 proteins with similar efficiency (Fig. 5B, lanes 3 and 4), indicating that the zinc finger mutations of Mcm4 do not affect its interaction with the Mcm6 or Mcm7 protein. We speculate that they may alter the overall structure of the Mcm4/6/7 protein, thus affecting the dimerization of the Mcm4/6/7 trimeric complex.

Increased DNA Helicase Activity of Mcm4/6/7 with Mcm4 Zinc Finger Mutants-- The purified Mcm4/6/7 complexes containing the zinc finger mutants contained the three subunits at a stoichiometry identical to that of the wild-type complex, as judged by SDS-PAGE analyses (Fig. 5C). The two zinc finger mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes retained the DNA-dependent ATPase activities at a level comparable to that of the wild-type complex in the presence of ssDNA (Fig. 5D) (data not shown). In gel shift assays, the complex formation was significantly reduced in the Mcm4CC1/6/7 complex and reduced by ~50% in Mcm4CC2/6/7 (Fig. 5E). A similar reduction of DNA binding was observed also in filter binding assays with the mutant complexes (Fig. 5F). These results indicate that the zinc finger mutations reduce the DNA binding activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex.

In contrast, these mutant complexes exhibited increased DNA helicase activities. The specific activities of both zinc finger mutants were 2-fold higher than that of the wild-type complex (Fig. 5G). Possible mechanisms of how reduced stability of hexameric structures and DNA binding activity may contribute to enhanced DNA helicase activity will be discussed later.

Attenuation of DNA Helicase Activity in Mcm4/6/7 Containing an N-terminal Deletion of Mcm4-- The N-terminal region of Mcm4 contains arginine clusters and several potential cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation sites ((T/S)XXP or (S/T)P) (Fig. 6A). It has been suggested that the phosphorylation of Mcm4 is involved in the regulation of chromatin binding of Mcm proteins (27) or in the inhibition of the DNA helicase activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex (28, 29). Serine/arginine residues have been implicated in nucleic acid binding (30, 31). N-terminal 35- and 112-amino acid deletions were introduced into histidine-tagged Mcm4, and the resulting truncated proteins (His6-Mcm4Delta N) were coexpressed in insect cells with Mcm6 and FLAG-tagged Mcm7. Mcm4Delta N35/6/7 and Mcm4Delta N112/6/7 were purified by a procedure similar to that used for the other mutants. The truncated Mcm4 polypeptides contained in the purified complexes migrated upon SDS-PAGE as expected (Fig. 6B). The N-terminal deletion of Mcm4 did not significantly affect the assembly of the mutant Mcm4 proteins into the Mcm4/6/7 hexameric complex (Fig. 6B) (data not shown). The two truncated Mcm4 mutants were poorly phosphorylated by Cdk2/cyclin A kinase in vitro, consistent with the notion that the major cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation sites of Mcm4 lie in the N-terminal region of the protein (28, 29) (data not shown).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Biochemical properties of mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes containing N-terminally truncated Mcm4. A, amino acid sequence of the N-terminal region of mouse Mcm4. Consensus sites for phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinases ((S/T)XXP), SP and TP sequences, and the arginine residues (R or SR) that may be involved in DNA binding are indicated by double underlining, single underlining, and boldface letters, respectively. B, mutant Mcm4/6/7 complexes (Mcm4Delta N35/6/7 and Mcm4Delta N112/6/7) were separated on a 15-30% glycerol gradient; each fraction was electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (37.5:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide); and proteins were stained with silver. C and D, DNA helicase and ATPase activities, respectively, were measured under standard conditions with the mutant and wild-type (WT) Mcm4/6/7 complexes at the amounts indicated. The displaced oligonucleotides (% of the total) were quantified, and the values are presented at the bottom of each lane in C. In D, the values are the averages of three independent experiments, and error bars are shown. Thy, thyroglobulin; Cat, catalase; BSA, bovine serum albumin.

These two mutants displayed significantly reduced DNA helicase activity (Fig. 6C). In contrast, the ATPase and ATP binding activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex were not affected by the N-terminal truncations of Mcm4 (Fig. 6D) (data not shown). These results suggest that the N-terminal region of Mcm4 contributes to the DNA helicase activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex in some unknown manner.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Accumulating evidence points to an essential role of the Mcm complex as a replicative DNA helicase at replication forks. The DNA helicase activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex, first reported in humans, now appears to be conserved generally in eukaryotes (8, 10). A previous mutational study of Mcm subunits at ATP-binding motifs indicated essential roles of Mcm4 and Mcm6 in ssDNA binding and ATP binding, respectively (9). In this study, to further elucidate the mechanisms of the DNA helicase actions of Mcm4/6/7, we analyzed the roles of the ATP-binding motifs of Mcm7 as well as those of the zinc finger motif and another domain of Mcm4 in various biochemical activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex.

ATPase Mutants of Mcm7-- We have shown here that the conserved NTP-binding motifs of Mcm7 play crucial roles in expression of the DNA helicase and ATP hydrolytic activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex by examining the activities of an Mcm4/6/7 mutant containing an Mcm7 Walker A or B motif mutant. Mutagenesis studies with various helicases and other nucleotide-binding proteins have shown that the Walker A and B motifs are critical for nucleotide hydrolysis (18-22).

In contrast, two mutant complexes showed the wild-type level of ATP and DNA binding activities (Table I), consistent with our previous results that they are mediated mainly by the Mcm6 and Mcm4 proteins, respectively (9). These results indicate that the well conserved ATP-binding motifs of Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7 are required for DNA helicase functions and that each plays distinct functions in helicase activation. Because Mcm7 alone does not show any DNA helicase or ATPase activity, it contributes to the ATPase and helicase actions of the Mcm4/6/7 complex through interactions with the Mcm4 and Mcm6 proteins.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of biochemical properties of mutants Mcm4/6/7 complexes

It was recently reported that the Walker motifs of all six subunits are required for nucleotide hydrolytic activity of the purified Mcm2/3/4/5/6/7 heterohexamer of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (32). Interestingly, a combination of the Walker mutants of some of the Mcm subunits reactivated the nucleotide hydrolytic activity of the complex. Thus, proper alignment of active ATPase subunits in the hexamer appears to be required for ATP hydrolytic activity. The single Walker mutation of Mcm4 or Mcm6 may be tolerated for expression of the ATPase activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex, presumably because sequential ATP hydrolysis by component subunits can be maintained. However, it should be noted that ATP hydrolysis by the Mcm4/6/7 complex is stimulated by DNA binding, whereas that by the Mcm2/3/4/5/6/7 hexameric complex is independent of DNA (32).2 Thus, the mechanisms of ATP hydrolysis by both complexes may be intrinsically different from each other. It was shown that T7 phage-encoded DNA helicase (T7gp4) in hexamer form possesses two classes of dTTP-binding sites and catalyzes the sequential hydrolysis of two nucleotides (33). The helicase action of Mcm4/6/7 may be similar to that of T7gp4 in that two Mcm7 molecules in the Mcm4/6/7 hexamer could be responsible for sequential ATP hydrolysis, and the "two-site sequential NTPase model" (1) may apply for Mcm4/6/7 helicase.

Mutations in Mcm4 Affect DNA Binding and Helicase Activities-- On the other hand, zinc finger mutations of Mcm4 showed partially impaired ssDNA binding activity and a tendency to disassemble into trimers. These mutants exhibited 2-fold higher DNA helicase activity compared with the wild-type protein. It was recently reported that an archaeal Mcm mutant containing a similar zinc finger mutation showed no DNA helicase and ATPase and reduced DNA binding activities (34), indicating essential roles of the zinc finger structures in its helicase function. Archaeal Mcm is a homohexameric helicase, whereas mammalian Mcm4/6/7 is a dimer of heterotrimers. Construction and characterization of similar zinc finger mutants of Mcm6 and Mcm7 will provide further clues to the precise roles of zinc fingers of the mammalian Mcm complex. In contrast, the DNA helicase activity was severely impaired in the Mcm4/6/7 complex containing an N-terminally truncated Mcm4 protein. We previously reported that a Walker A mutant of Mcm4 led to reduced ssDNA binding and DNA helicase activities (9). These results indicate essential roles of the Mcm4 protein in the helicase actions of Mcm4/6/7, presumably by affecting its DNA binding activity.

Possible Mechanism of Stimulation of DNA Helicase Activity in Mcm4 Zinc Finger Mutants-- Zinc finger motifs play important roles in protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions (24-26). Our results indicate that mutations in the zinc finger motif of the Mcm4 protein destabilize the hexameric structures, which are the functional forms for binding to ssDNA. This may be the reason why these mutants show reduced binding to ssDNA. The zinc finger regions of SV40 and polyoma virus T antigens were also reported to contribute to protein-protein interactions required for hexamer and double-hexamer formation at the origins (35, 36). Co-immunoprecipitation assays did not show a defect in the interaction of the Mcm4 mutant with Mcm6 or Mcm7, and the mutant Mcm4/6/7 trimeric complexes with stoichiometric composition could be purified from baculovirus-infected HighFive cells on affinity columns. Thus, the zinc finger motif of Mcm4 is likely to be involved in the assembly of the Mcm4/6/7 trimeric complex into hexamers, and the assembly reaction requires self-interaction of the Mcm4 protein. The mutant Mcm complexes exhibited over 2-fold higher levels of helicase activity compared with the wild-type complex. It was previously reported that the DNA helicase activity of a monomeric SV40 T antigen was ~2-fold higher than that of a hexamer (37). Thus, stimulation of DNA helicase activity by destabilization of a hexamer may be common to hexameric helicases.

DNA helicases interact with DNA in a sequence-independent manner, and their binding to DNA should be flexible enough to permit their mobility along the DNA strand. Attenuated DNA binding caused by a mutation in the zinc finger region of Mcm4 may generate more mobility on DNA, leading to more active helicase. The zinc finger region may be involved in transient binding and release of DNA required for processive helicase action. Thus, the zinc finger region of Mcm4, essential for regulated helicase actions as a hexamer, may contribute to both protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions in the Mcm complex. The zinc finger domains of other Mcm subunits (Mcm2, Mcm6, and Mcm7) may also play similar roles. Mutagenesis studies in yeast indicated that the zinc finger structure of Mcm2 is crucial for its functions in vivo (38).

Role of the N-terminal Region of Mcm in DNA Helicase Activity-- Deletion of the N-terminal 35 or 112 amino acids of Mcm4 resulted in almost completely impaired DNA helicase, but did not affect the ability to form hexameric complexes and to hydrolyze ATP. The effects of the N-terminal deletions of Mcm4 on the DNA binding activity of Mcm4/6/7 were complex. Mcm4Delta N35 showed reduction by ~40%, whereas Mcm4Delta N112 showed an ~50% increase in DNA binding (Table I) (data not shown). The deleted segment contains arginine-rich stretches of amino acids that may be involved in interaction with DNA. It was previously reported that a mutation in a similar arginine-rich segment (RXRXRR) of the DnaB protein, the replicative helicase of bacteria, results in decreased DNA helicase and DNA binding activities (39). It should be noted that the N-terminal region of Mcm4 contains multiple serine/threonine residues, some of which may be phosphorylation sites of cyclin-dependent kinase and other kinases. It is an intriguing possibility that the interaction of Mcm with DNA and its helicase activity are regulated by phosphorylation of the N-terminal region of the Mcm4 protein. However, at the moment, we cannot rule out the possibility that the truncations caused alterations of the overall structure of the protein complex.

Both a Walker A mutation described previously (Table I) (9) and a zinc finger mutation described in this study resulted in reduced DNA binding activity, but showed differential effects on DNA helicase activity. This indicates that these segments are involved in interaction with DNA in distinct manners. The zinc finger mutation may alter the overall structure of the complex, affecting subunit assembly as well as DNA binding activity, which turned out to be stimulatory for DNA helicase. On the other hand, the Walker A mutant may be deficient in coupling of ATP hydrolysis to DNA unwinding, as shown in T7gp4 helicase (19).

Models of the DNA Helicase Actions of the Mcm4/6/7 Complex-- Two models, termed "inchworm" and "active rolling," have been proposed for the actions of DNA helicases (2, 40). The processive functions of the Mcm4/6/7 helicase, involving three heterologous subunits, may require complex and coordinated roles for each subunit to permit the highly regulated actions of this putative eukaryotic replicative helicase. The DnaB homohexameric helicase forms mainly trimers in the absence of Mg2+, and addition of Mg2+ converts the trimers to hexamers (41). Mcm4/6/7 also forms stable trimers, which are converted to hexamers, and this conversion involves the zinc finger motif of Mcm4. Our results suggest the presence of at least two separate protein-protein interfaces on Mcm4, one for trimer formation and the other for multimerization of trimers. Electron microscopic studies of the Mcm4/6/7 hexamer demonstrated a doughnut shape with a 2-3-nm diameter hole in the center (42). An active Mcm4/6/7 helicase of fission yeast appears to consist of two hexamers at a fork (11). The mammalian Mcm4/6/7 complex also binds to a fork structure as a dimer of hexamers.2

Our earlier studies established that Mcm4 and Mcm6 play a major role in DNA binding and ATP binding, respectively (9). Now we have determined that Mcm7 contributes to DNA helicase activity through facilitating hydrolysis of ATP. Based on these findings, we propose a model of sequential DNA unwinding by the Mcm4/6/7 hexamer. The Mcm4/6/7 complex binds to DNA through the actions of Mcm4, and then ATP binds to Mcm6. After formation of a transition-state structure facilitating ATP hydrolysis, nucleotide hydrolysis is carried out by the Mcm7 protein. Efficient helicase action is likely to be provided by close communication of the three subunits to achieve coordinated DNA translocation and duplex DNA unwinding. Further structural information is needed to understand the helicase actions of Mcm more precisely.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Hiroshi Kimura for the generous gift of anti-mouse Mcm4 antibody and Dr. Takeshi Mizuno for helpful suggestions during the course of this work.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan and by the RIKEN Board of Directors Fund.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom corresponding should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-5685-2264; Fax: 81-3-5685-2932; E-mail: yzhiying@rinshoken.or.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 30, 2002

2 Z. You, Y. Ishimi, F. Hanaoka, and H. Masai, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; DTT, dithiothreitol; AMP-PNP, beta ,gamma -imidoadenosine 5'-triphosphate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Patel, S. S., and Picha, K. M. (2000) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 651-697[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Lohman, T. M., and Bjornson, K. P. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 169-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Tye, B. K. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 649-686[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kelly, T. J., and Brown, G. W. (2000) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 829-880[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Tye, B. K., and Sawyer, S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34833-34836[Free Full Text]
6. Diffley, J. F. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 2819-2830[Free Full Text]
7. Lei, M., and Tye, B. K. (2001) J. Cell Sci. 114, 1447-1454[Abstract]
8. Ishimi, Y. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24508-24513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. You, Z., Komamura, Y., and Ishimi, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8003-8015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Lee, J. K., and Hurwitz, J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18871-18878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Lee, J. K., and Hurwitz, J. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 54-59[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Labib, K., Tercero, J. A., and Diffley, J. F. (2000) Science 288, 1643-1647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Aparicio, O. M., Weinstein, D. M., and Bell, S. P. (1997) Cell 91, 59-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Koonin, E. V. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 2541-2547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Gorbalenya, A. E., and Koonin, E. V. (1993) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3, 419-429
16. Kearsey, S. E., and Labib, K. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1398, 113-136[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. McEntee, K., Weinstock, G. M., and Lehman, I. R. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 857-861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Rehrauer, W. M., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 1292-1297[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Washington, M. T., Rosenberg, A. H., Griffin, K., Studier, F. W., and Patel, S. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26825-26834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Patel, S. S., Hingorani, M. M., and Ng, W. M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 7857-7868[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Weng, Y., Czaplinski, K., and Peltz, S. W. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5477-5490[Abstract]
22. Marintcheva, B., and Weller, S. K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 6605-6615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Ishimi, Y., Ichinose, S., Omori, A., Sato, K., and Kimura, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24115-24122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Perrier, V., Surewicz, W. K., Glaser, P., Martineau, L., Craescu, C. T., Fabian, H., Mantsch, H. H., Barzu, O., and Gilles, A. M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 9960-9967[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Mackay, J. P., and Crossley, M. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 1-4[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Cox, E. H., and McLendon, G. L. (2000) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4, 162-165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Hendrickson, M., Madine, M., Dalton, S., and Gautier, J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1223-1228
28. Ishimi, Y., Komamura-Kohno, Y., You, Z., Omori, A., and Kitagawa, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16235-16241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Ishimi, Y., and Komamura-Kohno, Y. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34428-34433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Cao, W., and Garcia-Blanco, M. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20629-20635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Turnage, M. A., Brewer-Jensen, P., Bai, W. L., and Searles, L. L. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8198-8208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Schwacha, A., and Bell, S. P. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 1093-1104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Hingorani, M. M., Washington, M. T., Moore, K. C., and Patel, S. S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5012-5017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Poplawski, A., Grabowski, B., Long, S. E., and Kelman, Z. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 49371-49377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Loeber, G., Stenger, J. E., Ray, S., Parsons, R. E., Anderson, M. E., and Tegtmeyer, P. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 3167-3174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Rose, P. E., and Schaffhausen, B. S. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 2842-2849[Abstract]
37. Dean, F. B., Borowiec, J. A., Eki, T., and Hurwitz, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14129-14137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Yan, H., Gibson, S., and Tye, B. K. (1991) Genes Dev. 5, 944-957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Biswas, E. E., and Biswas, S. B. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 10929-10939[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Bird, L. E., Subramanya, H. S., and Wigley, D. B. (1998) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 14-18[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Bujalowski, W., Klonowska, M. M., and Jezewska, M. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31350-31358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Sato, M., Gotow, T., You, Z., Komamura-Kohno, Y., Uchiyama, Y., Yabuta, N., Nojima, H., and Ishimi, Y. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 300, 421-431[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
E. Liu, A. Y.-L. Lee, T. Chiba, E. Olson, P. Sun, and X. Wu
The ATR-mediated S phase checkpoint prevents rereplication in mammalian cells when licensing control is disrupted
J. Cell Biol., November 19, 2007; 179(4): 643 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
E. Olson, C. J. Nievera, E. Liu, A. Y.-L. Lee, L. Chen, and X. Wu
The Mre11 Complex Mediates the S-Phase Checkpoint through an Interaction with Replication Protein A
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(17): 6053 - 6067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. R. Choudhury, P. S. Malik, D. K. Singh, M. N. Islam, K. Kaliappan, and S. K. Mukherjee
The oligomeric Rep protein of Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV) is a likely replicative helicase
Nucleic Acids Res., December 4, 2006; 34(21): 6362 - 6377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Ghosh, M. Kemp, G. Liu, M. Ritzi, A. Schepers, and M. Leffak
Differential Binding of Replication Proteins across the Human c-myc Replicator.
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(14): 5270 - 5283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Z. You and H. Masai
DNA binding and helicase actions of mouse MCM4/6/7 helicase
Nucleic Acids Res., May 25, 2005; 33(9): 3033 - 3047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Kinoshita and E. M. Johnson
Site-specific Loading of an MCM Protein Complex in a DNA Replication Initiation Zone Upstream of the c-MYC Gene in the HeLa Cell Cycle
J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 2004; 279(34): 35879 - 35889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Kasiviswanathan, J.-H. Shin, E. Melamud, and Z. Kelman
Biochemical Characterization of the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus Minichromosome Maintenance (MCM) Helicase N-terminal Domains
J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28358 - 28366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]