JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206510200 on September 3, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 45, 42488-42495, November 8, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/45/42488    most recent
M206510200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sugahara, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sugahara, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Structural Recognition by Recombinant Human Heparanase That Plays Critical Roles in Tumor Metastasis

HIERARCHICAL SULFATE GROUPS WITH DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS AND THE ESSENTIAL TARGET DISULFATED TRISACCHARIDE SEQUENCE*

Yukihiko OkadaDagger §, Shuhei YamadaDagger §, Minako Toyoshima, Jian Dong, Motowo Nakajima, and Kazuyuki SugaharaDagger ||

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-8558, Japan and  Tsukuba Research Institute, Novartis Pharma, K.K., Tsukuba 300-2611, Japan

Received for publication, July 1, 2002, and in revised form, August 29, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Human heparanase is an endo-beta -D-glucuronidase that degrades heparan sulfate/heparin and has been implicated in a variety of biological processes, such as inflammation, tumor angiogenesis, and metastasis. Although the cloned enzyme has been demonstrated to have a critical role in tumor metastasis, the substrate specificity has been poorly understood. In the present study, the specificity of the purified recombinant human heparanase was investigated for the first time using a series of structurally defined oligosaccharides isolated from heparin/heparan sulfate. The best substrates were Delta HexUA(±2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S) and Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S) (where Delta HexUA, GlcN, GlcUA, NS, 2S, and 6S represent unsaturated hexuronic acid, D-glucosamine, D-glucuronic acid, 2-N-sulfate, 2-O-sulfate, and 6-O-disulfate, respectively). Based on the percentage conversion of the substrates to products under identical assay conditions, several aspects of the recognition structures were revealed. 1) The minimum recognition backbone is the trisaccharide GlcN-GlcUA-GlcN. 2) The target GlcUA residues are in the sulfated region. 3) The -GlcN(6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS)- sequence is essential but not sufficient as the cleavage site. 4) The IdoUA(2S) residue, located two saccharides away from the target GlcUA residue, claimed previously to be essential, is not indispensable. 5) The 3-O-sulfate group on the GlcN is dispensable and even has an inhibitory effect when located in a highly sulfated region. 6) Based on these and previous results, HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-IdoUA-GlcNAc(6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,±6S)-IdoUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S) (where HexUA represents hexuronic acid) has been proposed as a probable physiological target octasaccharide sequence. These findings will aid establishing a quantitative assay method using the above tetrasaccharide and designing heparan sulfate-based specific inhibitors of the heparanase for new therapeutic strategies.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Interactions between adherent cells and the extracellular environment influence maintenance of cellular functions such as proliferation, differentiation, and migration. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HS-PGs)1 are covalently linked protein-HS glycosaminoglycan (GAG) conjugates found in extracellular matrix (ECM) and on the cell surface of most cells and have been demonstrated to be key components of the cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions (for reviews, see Refs. 1-4). Most of the biological properties of HS-PGs are conferred by the HS moiety, which is a sulfated polydisperse copolymer of alternating GlcN and HexUA (GlcUA or IdoUA) residues (for reviews, see Refs. 5 and 6). HS-GAG binds to and co-localizes with structural proteins, such as fibronectin and collagen in the ECM, providing a framework for matrix organization (for reviews, see Refs. 7-9). Both cell surface and ECM HS-PGs also tether various growth/differentiation factors and cytokines as storage depots of bioactive signaling molecules. There is clear evidence that an association of a ligand with HS-GAGs can activate or stabilize the ligand and also facilitate signal transduction via its high affinity receptor (for reviews, see Refs. 10-12).

The interaction of a ligand with ECM or cell surface HS-PGs is regulated by biosynthesis of specific sulfation sequences, which bind to the ligand (for reviews, see Refs. 5, 13, and 14). Indeed, fine sulfation structures of HS-GAGs change during development, aging, or tumor progression to malignancy, and the abilities of specific ligands to bind HS-PGs are switched (15-18). Another way to alter the functional state of HS-PGs is to degrade and release HS-GAGs from the core proteins, which is achieved by the specific action of an endoglycosidase, heparanase (for reviews, see Refs. 19 and 20). Heparanase is the name of mammalian endoglucuronidase capable of specifically cleaving HS-GAGs and differs from bacterial eliminases such as heparinase and heparitinase (21). The extracellular heparanase has been implicated in basement membrane remodeling after injury or at inflammation sites by destroying HS-GAG chains and in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation by releasing growth factors that are bound to extracellular HS-PGs. There is also evidence that the heparanase activity correlates with the metastatic potential of tumor cells in animal models and increases in the sera of human patients with metastatic cancers (22-24).

The heparanase research had been hampered by the limited abundance and unstable enzyme activity as well as the lack of a simple assay method. Recently, several laboratories have developed a variety of assay methods, purified human heparanase, and isolated the cDNA (25-29). It became clear that heparanases previously purified from various sources are identical and that the heparanase is initially synthesized as an inactive 65-kDa glycoprotein and then processed into the active 50-kDa enzyme by cleavage of the N terminus peptide (for reviews, see Refs. 19 and 20). A direct role of the heparanase in tumor cell invasion was confirmed by the transfection of the sense and antisense heparanase cDNA into cells, which acquired highly and poorly metastatic phenotypes, respectively (26, 30). High expression of the heparanase mRNA was also observed in advanced stage tumors and metastatic cell lines derived from various tissues (27, 28, 31, 32).

The aim of the present study was to explore the substrate recognition property of the human recombinant heparanase. Previously, several attempts were made to define the substrate specificity of the heparanase partially purified from different animal sources (for reviews, see Refs. 19 and 20). Most approaches have involved the structural analysis of the fragments generated by enzymatic cleavage of polymer HS from various tissues and heparin (Hep) polysaccharides derived from the lung and intestine. Specificity studies on human heparanase using structurally defined oligosaccharide substrates have been limited to those performed using partially purified enzyme preparations (33, 34). In the present study, we systematically investigated the specificity of the purified recombinant human heparanase using a number of structurally defined oligosaccharides as substrates and revealed the hitherto unreported specificity of the enzyme, which will aid establishing the quantitative assay methods and designing inhibitors for new therapeutic strategies in highly metastatic cancer and other heparanase-related diseases, notably inflammatory or cardiovascular diseases.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- HS (sodium salt) from bovine kidney and concanavalin A-agarose was purchased from Seikagaku Corp. (Tokyo, Japan). Stage 14 Hep (sodium salt) from porcine intestinal mucosa was obtained from American Diagnostic Inc. (New York). TSK-GEL G3000SWXL was from TOSOH Corp. (Tokyo, Japan). Sephacryl S-300HS and Hep-Sepharose CL-6B columns as well as a prepacked disposable PD-10 column containing Sephadex G-25 medium were purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was from Sigma-Aldrich. Structurally defined oligosaccharides were isolated from porcine intestinal Hep or bovine kidney HS, and their homogeneity was judged by capillary electrophoresis as described previously (35-41).

Preparation of FITC-HS and -Hep-- HS (sodium salt) from bovine kidney and Hep (sodium salt) from porcine intestinal mucosa were labeled with FITC as described previously (25).

Cell Culture-- Human melanoma A375M cells were cultured as monolayers in RPM-I1640 (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and amphotericin B (0.25 mg/ml) in humidified 95% air, 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

Preparation of Human Heparanase-- The 1632-bp-long cDNA coding for a human heparanase was inserted into an expression vector, pcDNA3.1/Hygro (Invitrogen), and the vector was transfected into human melanoma A375M cells using the LipofectAMINETM reagent (Invitrogen). The transfectants were selected by hygromycin resistance and a stable transfectant cell line expressing a high level of recombinant human heparanase was established. After the cells had grown to confluence, they were harvested and homogenized in a lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.2 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 1 µg/ml aprotinin). The cell lysate was then loaded onto a Hep-Sepharose column (5.0 × 10 cm) preequilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 150 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 3.0 ml/min, and heparanase was eluted with the same buffer, containing 1.0 M NaCl as described previously (25). The 1.0 M NaCl-eluted fractions were diluted with an equal volume of the dilution buffer (50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 6.0, containing 0.4% CHAPS) and applied to a concanavalin A-agarose column (2.5 × 10 cm) at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. Heparanase was eluted with 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 6.0, containing 0.5 M NaCl, 0.2% CHAPS, and 0.7 M alpha -methylmannose as described previously (25). The concanavalin A-agarose-eluted fractions were diluted 3.3-fold with 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 6.0, containing 0.2% CHAPS, and loaded onto an immunoaffinity column (1.0 × 5 cm) containing the anti-heparanase polyclonal antibody (42) at a flow rate of 0.18 ml/min. Heparanase was eluted with 0.1 M glycine-HCl, pH 2.7, containing 0.05% CHAPS at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Fractions of 1 ml were collected, and aliquots were used for heparanase assay and SDS-PAGE, which was performed under reducing conditions employing 4-20% gradient polyacrylamide gels (84 × 91 mm) in the Tris-glycine buffer system (43). After electrophoresis, gels were subjected to silver staining. The human heparanase protein was quantified by the BCA protein assay (Pierce).

Determination of Heparanase Activity-- Human heparanase activity was determined from the gel permeation HPLC chromatogram of the enzyme digest of FITC-HS by measuring a forward half area of the peak of the intact FITC-HS as described previously (25). The decrease in this peak area observed after heparanase treatment was measured using an integrator, and the amount of the degraded FITC-HS was calculated from the decrease in fluorescence intensity. One unit was defined as the quantity of the enzyme that degraded 10 ng of FITC-HS/min.

Enzymatic Digestion of FITC-Hep with Human Heparanase-- Enzyme reactions were carried out in 100 µl of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.2, containing 1 µg of FITC-Hep, at 37 °C for 3 h and terminated by the addition of 100 µg of nonlabeled porcine intestinal Hep and subsequent heating at 100 °C for 5 min. The digests were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 5 min to precipitate the insoluble materials. The supernatant fluids were analyzed by gel filtration HPLC on a TSK-GEL G3000SWXL column (0.78 × 30 cm) preequilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 150 mM NaCl and 0.05% (v/w) NaN3 at a flow rate of 1 ml/min.

Enzymatic Digestion of Structurally Defined Oligosaccharides with Human Heparanase-- Structurally defined tetra- or hexasaccharide (0.3 nmol each) isolated from porcine intestinal Hep or bovine kidney HS was digested with 0.88 or 0.44 units of the purified human heparanase in a total volume of 100 µl of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.2, at 37 °C for 21 h or the indicated periods. The enzymatic reactions were terminated as described above. As control experiments, each oligosaccharide was incubated with the heat-inactivated heparanase under the same conditions. Each enzyme digest was analyzed by HPLC on an amine-bound silica column as reported previously (44). Eluates were monitored at 232 nm. The sensitivity of each oligosaccharide to the enzyme was judged by the peak shift to earlier elution positions. The area of the individual peaks was compared before and after heparanase treatment, and the amount of the degraded oligosaccharide was calculated from the decrease in the intact peak area using an integrator.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression and Purification of the Recombinant Human Heparanase-- The pcDNA3/Hygro vector containing the full-length human heparanase cDNA clone was expressed in human melanoma A375M cells. The cell lysate prepared from the stable transfectant cells was subjected to affinity chromatographies using the matrices Hep-Sepharose, concanavalin A-agarose, and anti-heparanase antibody-immobilized Affi-Gel 10 to purify the recombinant enzyme. Aliquots of fractions 1-17 eluted from the anti-heparanase antibody column were subjected to the heparanase assay and SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining (Fig. 1). The strong catalytic activity toward FITC-HS was detected in fractions 6-8. Heparanase is initially synthesized as an inactive 65-kDa glycoprotein that is cleaved at the N terminus to generate an active 50-kDa enzyme (for reviews, see Refs. 19 and 20). Being consistent with this, a 50-kDa band was detected evidently on SDS-PAGE in the fractions containing HS-degrading activity. Silver staining showed a 30-kDa protein band in fractions 6-8 and the faint 65-kDa protein band, which corresponded to the IgG light chain, probably leaking from the antibody-immobilized column and the enzyme precursor, respectively. Fractions 6-8 were combined and used to investigate the substrate specificity of the heparanase. The protein concentration and the heparanase activity of the pooled fractions were measured. The specific activity was 1.6 units/µg of protein.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   SDS-PAGE of the fractions separated by immunoaffinity chromatography using the anti-heparanase antibody-immobilized column. An aliquot of each fraction eluted from an anti-heparanase antibody-immobilized column was analyzed by SDS-PAGE using a 4-20% gradient polyacrylamide gel. Three protein bands are evident by silver staining and have molecular masses of ~30, 50, and 65 kDa, respectively. The 30-kDa band corresponds to the IgG light chain leaked from the antibody-immobilized column. Fractions 6-8 were pooled and used for specificity studies.

Detection of the Human Heparanase Recognition Sites in Porcine Intestinal Hep and Bovine Kidney HS-- The FITC-labeled Hep was incubated with the purified recombinant heparanase to confirm the enzyme activity and also the presence of the heparanase recognition sequences in bovine kidney HS and porcine intestinal Hep chains. The digest was analyzed by gel filtration HPLC on a column of TSK-GEL G3000SWXL as shown in Fig. 2. Although both FITC-HS and -Hep were degraded by the enzyme, the latter appeared to be more susceptible to the heparanase-catalyzed cleavage than the former. Since porcine intestinal Hep contains the heparanase cleavable sites, experiments were undertaken to elucidate the substrate recognition property of the heparanase using a series of structurally defined sulfated oligosaccharides, which were isolated from the repeating disaccharide region of porcine intestinal Hep and bovine kidney HS (41, 45) and included 1 tri-, 28 tetra-, 1 penta-, 9 hexa-, and 3 octasaccharides.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Gel filtration HPLC analysis of the heparanase digests of FITC-labeled HS and Hep. Heparanase digests of FITC-labeled HS (A) and Hep (B) were analyzed by gel filtration HPLC on a column of TSK-GEL G3000SWXL and were monitored by fluorescence intensity caused by FITC as described previously (25) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 490 and 520 nm, respectively. The upper and lower panels show the chromatograms before and after digestion, respectively.

Development of the Assay Conditions and Analytical HPLC Assays of the Recombinant Human Heparanase Using Structurally Defined Oligosaccharides-- The substrate specificity of the human heparanase was investigated using 8 hexa- and 12 tetrasaccharides derived from Hep/HS (Tables I and II). Their fine structures have been established by 500-MHz NMR analysis (35-41). Eighteen contained GlcUA residue(s) at the internal position of each oligosaccharide sequence, whereas the other two contained only Delta HexUA and IdoUA but not GlcUA residues as uronic acid components. These 20 oligosaccharides (0.3 nmol each) were individually incubated with the purified recombinant heparanase under identical conditions (using 0.88 units of the enzyme, at 37 °C for 21 h), and the reaction products from each digestion were analyzed by HPLC on an amine-bound silica column for identification and quantification to compare the relative susceptibilities of the oligosaccharide substrates with the enzyme. Since the elution profile was monitored by absorbance at 232 nm of the Delta HexUA residue at the nonreducing terminus, only the intact substrate and the product derived from the nonreducing side of each substrate were detected, but the product from the reducing side was not due to the lack of Delta HexUA.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
The structure of human heparanase-sensitive oligosaccharides

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
The structure of human heparanase-resistant oligosaccharides

Upon heparanase digestion, Hexa-4 and -7 were almost completely degraded (Fig. 3), and the peaks with UV absorbance were shifted to the elution positions of less negatively charged oligosaccharides. The major digestion product of Hexa-4 was identified as Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-IdoUA-GlcNAc(6S)- GlcUA by co-chromatography with the authentic tetrasulfated pentasaccharide (fraction 6-23 in Ref. 40), confirming that the cleavage had occurred at the glucuronidic bond in Hexa-4 (indicated by the arrow in Table I). Although Hexa-7 has two glucuronidic bonds, which are the possible heparanase cleavage sites (indicated by the arrows in Table I), the major digestion product of Hexa-7 was detected at around 29 min near the elution position of the authentic trisulfated disaccharide Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S) (at approximately 25 min; data not shown), suggesting that the major unsaturated oligosaccharide product is most likely the trisulfated trisaccharide, Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA, and not the pentasulfated pentasaccharide, Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA. The other possible digestion product, the tetrasulfated trisaccharide GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S), derived from the reducing side of the Hexa-7 hexasaccharide, was not detected due to the lack of appreciable UV absorption. It is most likely that the tetrasulfated trisaccharide product GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S) was further degraded into GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA and GlcN(NS,6S) as discussed below. The very small peak detected at ~45 min might be the presumably pentasulfated pentasaccharide, Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA, produced by the cleavage at the glucuronidic linkage on the reducing side, and may represent a minor digestion product. The remaining peaks at the elution position of the intact hexasaccharide substrates in Fig. 3, A and B, may suggest the incompletion of digestion or be derived from minor contaminants in the original samples.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   HPLC analysis of the heparanase digests of Hexa-4 and -7. Heparanase digests of Hexa-4 (A) and Hexa-7 (B) (0.3 nmol each) were analyzed by HPLC on an amine-bound silica column using a linear gradient of NaH2PO4 from 213 to 902 mM over 80 min, as indicated by the dashed lines. The upper and lower panels show the chromatograms of the incubation mixtures using the heat-inactivated heparanase and the active enzyme, respectively. The open arrow in each lower panel indicates the main peak of the heparanase digestion products. The peaks eluted at around 5 and 10 min in each panel were derived from the incubation buffer and the enzyme preparation.

Hexa-1, -8, -15, and -16 showed partial degradation, and Hexa-13S was resistant to the enzyme action under the reaction conditions used (Tables I and II). As representative chromatograms, the HPLC profiles of Hexa-1, -15, and -16 are depicted in Fig. 4. The closed or open arrow in each panel suggests the elution position of the corresponding intact hexasaccharide before digestion or the main peak of the digestion products, respectively. About 26, 59, and 30% of each hexasaccharide was converted to the corresponding product, respectively, under the reaction conditions used. The peak, which remained at the original position, being intact in each panel, was not a resistant component, because these substrates were almost completely degraded with a higher concentration of the enzyme (data not shown). The percentage of the substrate conversion to products should reflect the enzyme preference for the substrate recognition (46), although it is conceivable that the enzyme may become thermally inactivated before completion of the reaction.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   HPLC analysis of the heparanase digests of Hexa-1, -15, and -16. Heparanase digests of Hexa-1 (A), -15 (B), and -16 (C) (0.3 nmol each) were analyzed by HPLC on an amine-bound silica column using a linear gradient of NaH2PO4 from 213 to 803 mM over 80 min as indicated by the dashed lines. The closed or open arrow in each panel indicates the elution position of the corresponding hexasaccharide before digestion or the main product peak from the heparanase digestion, respectively. The peaks eluted at around 5 and 10 min in each panel were derived from the incubation buffer and the enzyme preparation.

Tetrasaccharides were also used to profile the substrate specificity of the recombinant heparanase. Some of them were sensitive to the enzyme despite their small sizes, suggesting that the minimum size for the heparanase recognition is most likely a trisaccharide with the -GlcN-GlcUA-GlcN sequence backbone. As shown in Fig. 5, the heparanase digestion resulted in nearly complete degradation of Tetra-1, Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S), under the conditions used. Tetra-6, -10, -28, and -29 were partially digested, and Tetra-3, -21, -22, -23, -25, -26, and -27 showed no degradation. These results are summarized in Tables I and II. The different susceptibilities of these tetrasaccharides to the heparanase are suggested to be attributable to the differences in the modification patterns by sulfations. Thus, the efficiency (percentage) of the hydrolysis percentage of each substrate at the respective specific cleavage site obtained under these assay conditions was used to investigate the structural requirements for the heparanase action and to depict the substrate specificity of the heparanase as discussed below.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   HPLC analysis of the heparanase digest of Tetra-1. The heparanase digest of Tetra-1 (0.3 nmol) was analyzed by HPLC on an amine-bound silica column using a linear gradient of NaH2PO4 from 16 to 803 mM over 60 min as indicated by the dashed lines. A, the chromatogram of the control incubation using the heat-inactivated heparanase; B, the chromatogram of the digest with the active enzyme. The closed arrow in the upper panel and the open arrow in the lower panel indicate the elution positions of Tetra-1 before digestion and the main product peak from the heparanase digestion, respectively. The peaks eluted at around 5 and 10 min in each panel were derived from the incubation buffer and the enzyme preparation.

Endo-beta -D-glucuronidase Activity of the Heparanase Is Dependent on the Size and High Sulfation of the Oligosaccharide Substrates-- Heparanase cleavage occurred only at glucuronidic linkages but not iduronidic, unsaturated hexuronidic, or glucosaminidic linkage, confirming the endo-beta -D-glucuronidase nature of this enzyme as reported previously (19-21, 47). The percentages of the heparanase-catalyzed conversion of the individual oligosaccharides to products can be used to make a reasonable estimate of the sensitivity of the target glucuronidic linkages. At a cursory glance at Tables I and II, it was noticed that the recombinant human heparanase acted preferentially on the glucuronidic linkages in the highly sulfated regions. The effects of chain lengths, sulfation degrees, and sulfation positions of oligosaccharides on the heparanase action were evaluated below.

First, we noticed the size dependence of the heparanase cleavage of the substrate oligosaccharides. The following four pairs of hexa- and tetrasaccharides were compared in the susceptibilities to the enzyme; Hexa-4 and Tetra-29, Hexa-7 and Tetra-1, Hexa-7S and Tetra-28, or Hexa-15 and Tetra-25 share, around the heparanase cleavage site, the identical tri- or tetrasaccharide sequences such as -GlcNAc(6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S), Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S)-, Delta HexUA-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S)-, or -GlcNAc(6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS), respectively. In each pair, the hexasaccharide was more susceptible to the enzyme than the tetrasaccharide counterpart (Tables I and II). These findings suggest that longer oligosaccharides are most likely better substrates for the human heparanase-catalyzed cleavage, although the minimum size required for recognition is a trisaccharide.

Second, we evaluated for each oligosaccharide substrate the relation between the cleavage efficiency (percentage) and the total number of sulfate groups on the two GlcN residues flanking the GlcUA residue at the heparanase cleavage site. It was found that at least two or three sulfate groups in total on the two GlcN residues were required for the heparanase-catalyzed cleavage of hexa- or tetrasaccharides, respectively, suggesting that the high sulfation density confers on the oligosaccharides the preferential recognition by the enzyme.

Since Hexa-4, -7, and -7S and Tetra-1 were almost completely degraded under the digestion conditions used, they were next digested under milder conditions to make a better comparison of their digestibility to the enzyme; the incubation time was shortened to 1, 5, 10, or 23 h, and the amount of the recombinant enzyme was reduced to 50% (0.44 units). The results on the percentage of cleavage of individual substrates during each incubation period are tabulated in Table III. After 10 h of incubation, Hexa-7 was almost completely converted to products, whereas Hexa-4, Hexa-7S, and Tetra-1 were degraded by 21, 85, and 44%, respectively. The relative rates of the degradation of these oligosaccharides suggest that the order of the substrate preference by the human recombinant heparanase is as follows: Hexa-7 > Hexa-7S > Tetra-1 > Hexa-4.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Comparison of the heparanase digestibility of highly sensitive oligosaccharides
The oligosaccharides (0.3 nmol each) were digested with human recombinant heparanase (0.44 units) for 1, 5, 10, or 23 h, and the digests were analyzed by HPLC as described under "Experimental Procedures."

The 6-O-Sulfated Group on the Nonreducing Side GlcN Residue of the Target GlcUA Is an Important but Not Absolute Requirement-- Some oligosaccharides that have the same degree of sulfation but distinct sequences were degraded with different efficiencies, suggesting that sulfation patterns on GlcN/GlcNAc residues adjacent to the target GlcUA residue also significantly influence the heparanase action. Therefore, the hierarchy of different sulfate groups in the human heparanase recognition was inspected. When the trisaccharide structures around the cleavage sites in Hexa-15, -GlcNAc(6S*)- GlcUA-GlcN(NS), and Hexa-16, -GlcNAc-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S*), are compared, they are different only in the location of the 6-O-sulfate group suggested by an asterisk. Since the human heparanase cleaved Hexa-15 more efficiently than Hexa-16 (59 versus 30%) (Table I), the 6-O-sulfate group of the GlcN residue on the nonreducing side of the cleavage site appears to be preferable for the enzyme recognition over that on the reducing side. When the digestion efficiencies of Tetra-6 and -29 were compared, the latter was more efficiently degraded than the former (44 versus 56%) (Table I). The structural difference between the two was the sulfation positions on the GlcN residue on the nonreducing side of the heparanase cleavage site; Tetra-6, Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS*)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S), has an N-sulfate group on the GlcN residue, and Tetra-29, Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcNAc(6S*)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S), contains a 6-O-sulfate group. However, the GlcNAc(6S) structure on the nonreducing side of the GlcUA is not an absolute requirement for the cleavage, since Hexa-16 and Tetra-6, which lack this structure, were also susceptible to the enzyme action. It appears that the 6-O-sulfation on the GlcNAc residue on the nonreducing side of the cleavage site can be replaced by sulfate groups on other positions of the flanking GlcN residues or those on other residues in the adjacent sequence (see below).

The GlcN(NS) Residue on Reducing Side of the Target GlcUA Is an Essential but Not Sufficient Requirement-- Notably, the oligosaccharides sensitive to the human heparanase always contained an N-sulfated GlcN residue on the reducing side of the targeted glucuronidic linkages, and hence this structure appears to be essential for the heparanase action. Since, however, oligosaccharides that contain a -GlcUA-GlcNAc- sequence and highly sulfated GlcN residues adjacent to the GlcUA residue have never been isolated (12, 45, 48, 49), chemical synthesis of oligosaccharides that contain a unique sequence, such as -GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcNAc(6S)-, will be desirable to define whether the GlcN(NS) structure on the reducing side per se is an absolute requirement for the substrate recognition by the enzyme. However, the glucosamine residue on the immediate reducing side of the target GlcUA in native HS and Hep chains is assumed to be always N-sulfated, as will be discussed below. The enzyme failed to act on Hexa-13S and Tetra-22, which contains only this N-sulfate group on GlcN residues flanking the target GlcUA residue (Table II), suggesting that this GlcN(NS) structure is not sufficient for the heparanase cleavage.

The GlcN(3S) Residue on the Reducing Side of the Target GlcUA Exhibits a Promoting Effect in a Relatively Low Sulfated Sequence but an Inhibitory Effect in a Highly Sulfated Sequence-- It has been reported that heparanase catalyzed the cleavage of the glucuronidic linkage in the antithrombin III-binding heparin octasaccharide, IdoUA-GlcNAc(6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,3S,±6S)-IdoUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-IdoUA(±2S)-2,5-anhydromannitol(6S) (33, 34). However, the susceptibility of the oligosaccharides lacking the GlcN(3S) structure demonstrated in the present study suggests that 3-O-sulfation is not obligatory. Hexa-1, Hexa-8, or Tetra-10 comprises a portion of the antithrombin III-binding pentasaccharide sequence containing the unique 3-O-sulfate group (35, 39, 40). The structures in Hexa-4, Hexa-15, and Tetra-25 lack this particular 3-O-sulfate residing on the reducing terminal GlcN residue found in the corresponding structures of Hexa-1, Hexa-8, and Tetra-10, respectively. Comparison of the data from Tetra-10 and -25 suggested a promoting effect of the 3-O-sulfate group (Tables I and II). Yet, there was no significant difference in susceptibility to the heparanase action between Hexa-8 and -15 (Table I). In contrast, when the data from Hexa-1 and -4 were compared, the inhibitory effect of the 3-O-sulfate group was evident. In summary, a 3-O-sulfate group appears to have a dual effect on the heparanase action, exhibiting a promoting effect when it resides in a relatively low sulfated sequence but an inhibitory effect when located in a highly sulfated sequence.

The observation that the unique GlcN(3S)-containing oligosaccharides served as poorer substrates is consistent with the concept that the Hep-GAG fragments stored in cytoplasmic granules of mast cells have been generated by the postbiosynthetic degradation of Hep-PG by the heparanase action but still contain antithrombin III-binding sites (50-52). Thus, it is reasonable to assume that the glucuronidic linkage in the antithrombin III-binding pentasaccharide does not serve as a good substrate for the heparanase under physiological conditions.

A IdoUA(2S) Residue Located Two Sugar Residues away from the Target GlcUA Residue toward the Reducing Side Is Not an Absolute Requirement-- Pikas et al. (34) suggested the involvement of the 2-O-sulfate group on a hexuronic acid residue located two monosaccharide units away from the cleavage site toward the reducing end in the heparanase action and proposed a minimally O-sulfated hexasaccharide sequence required for the recognition by the heparanases purified from human hepatoma and platelets (Fig. 6A). The panel of the oligosaccharides used in the present study contained no such 2-O-sulfated IdoUA residue on the reducing side of the cleavage site, suggesting that the IdoUA(2S) structure per se is not an absolute requirement for the heparanase action.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Structures of the human heparanase cleavage site in Hep/HS. A, the human heparanase cleavage site proposed by Pikas et al. (34). B, the minimum trisaccharide structure of the human heparanase cleavage site in Hep/HS. The arrow indicates the glucuronidic linkage cleaved by human heparanase. It appears that the highly sulfated structure is critical for the enzyme action. The GlcN(2-N-sulfate) structure on the reducing side and GlcN(6-O-sulfate) structure on the nonreducing side of the cleavage site are considerably important for the substrate recognition by the enzyme. These requisite groups are shown in the largest font size. The additional 2-N-sulfate group on the nonreducing GlcN or 6-O-sulfate group on the reducing GlcN appears to have a promoting effect on the heparanase action. These effectual sulfate groups are shown in the middle font size. The GlcN 3-O-sulfate structure, which is enclosed in the rectangle, causes inhibition of the enzyme in principle, although it also has promoting effects through its negative charge. C, the putative octasaccharide recognition sequence by the human heparanase in native Hep chains deduced from the results obtained by the heparanase digestion experiments of structurally defined oligosaccharides in the present study and the mono- and oligosaccharides previously isolated by bacterial heparinase/heparitinase digestions of porcine intestinal Hep (36, 40, 53) and bovine lung and intestinal Hep (54).

We addressed the question of whether the Delta HexUA(2S) at the nonreducing terminus might substitute for such an IdoUA(2S) residue and be recognized by the enzyme, suspecting the similarity of the steric configuration between IdoUA(2S) and Delta HexUA(2S) structures based on our observation that the 2-O-sulfate group of Delta HexUA(2S) of a disaccharide Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S) can be removed by the human recombinant iduronate-2-O-sulfatase2 (see also Ref. 55). Therefore, we investigated the susceptibilities to the heparanase of the oligosaccharides with or without a 2-O-sulfated Delta HexUA residue. Tetra-28 has the same structure as Tetra-1 but lacks the 2-O-sulfate group on the nonreducing Delta HexUA residue. When these tetrasaccharides were compared, Tetra-28 was more susceptible than Tetra-1 (Table I), supporting the promoting effect of the 2-O-sulfate group. Heparanase digestion experiments on a pair of hexasaccharides, Hexa-7 and Hexa-7S, that was prepared by glycuronate-2-O-sulfatase digestion of Hexa-7 (Tables I and III) also suggest that the sulfate group on the Delta HexUA residue augments the susceptibility of a substrate to the heparanase. Since, however, neither Hexa-7 nor Hexa-7S contains IdoUA(2S) at the position two saccharides away from the enzyme cleavage site toward the reducing side, the IdoUA(2S) structure is not an absolute requirement for the cleavage by the human recombinant heparanase. However, the possibility cannot be excluded that the IdoUA(2S) residue has a promoting effect on the heparanase action. Since the heparanase preparations that Pikas et al. (34) used were partially purified from human hepatoma and platelets, the contradictory specificities may be attributable to possible differences in the enzyme sources, glycoforms, and/or purities as discussed below. Alternatively, the possibility that the IdoUA(2S) residue in question may be critical for polymer HS and Hep chains to be cleaved by the heparanase in the specific conformational orientation under physiological conditions.

The Structure of the Predominant Cleavage Site of the Heparanase-- Based on the results obtained in the present study, we suggest that the minimum trisaccharide cleavage site structure in Hep/HS recognized by the human recombinant heparanase is as illustrated in Fig. 6B. It appears that the highly sulfated structure in the immediate vicinity of the targeted GlcUA residue is critical for the enzyme action. The preference of the heparanase for the GlcN(NS) structure on the reducing side and the GlcN(6S) structure on the nonreducing side was demonstrated. However, the GlcN(NS) on the reducing side and the GlcN(6S) on the nonreducing side are not sufficient, since Tetra-25 was not cleaved by the enzyme. An additional 2-N-sulfate group on the nonreducing GlcN, 6-O-sulfate group on the reducing GlcN, or an additional sulfate group on the adjacent sequence (see Hexa-15) appears to have a promoting effect on heparanase action. The GlcN 3-O-sulfate structure has dual effects as discussed above.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present study, the substrate recognition by the homogenous recombinant human heparanase was examined in detail for the first time using a series of structurally defined oligosaccharides. The findings of the present study demonstrated the importance of the highly sulfated structure, which is located on both sides of the targeted GlcUA residue. Notably, the preferred sulfation positions by the heparanase were revealed; the enzyme cleaves in principle the glucuronidic linkage in the -GlcNAc(6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS)- sequence, although this sequence is not sufficient, and an additional sulfate group on this or adjacent sequence (see Hexa-15) appears to be required.

The elucidated sequence requirement was in good agreement with the cleavage sequence, suggested based on the structures of the remnant cleavage sites found in the penta- and trisaccharides isolated from porcine intestinal native Hep-GAG after digestion with bacterial heparinase/heparitinases (36, 40, 53). Among a series of sulfated oligosaccharides generated by bacterial lyases (45), the unsaturated pentasaccharide, Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-IdoUA-GlcNAc(6S)-GlcUA (fraction 6-23 in Ref. 40 and fraction VI in Ref. 53), and the saturated trisaccharide, GlcN(NS)-IdoUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S) (fraction III-5b in Ref. 36), are of particular interest in view of the recognition sequence by porcine or mammalian heparanase. They are odd-numbered unlike other even-numbered oligosaccharides and appear to be derived from the reducing and nonreducing ends of the parent Hep-GAG chains as discussed previously (36, 40), since they do not possess GlcN at the reducing terminus or Delta HexUA at the nonreducing terminus, respectively. The above mentioned oligosaccharides were most likely generated from the sequence of -HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-IdoUA-GlcNAc(6S)-GlcUA*-GlcN(NS)-Ido- UA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)- by the action of endogenous heparanase on the glucuronidic bond indicated by an asterisk. Although the unsaturated pentasaccharide is a major digestion product (40, 53), the above mentioned trisaccharide was a minor product. In this context, it is noteworthy that Nader et al. (54) identified free GlcN(NS,6S) as one of the major products among other unsaturated di- and tetrasaccharides in the Flavobacterium heparinum haparinase digest of bovine lung and intestine Hep preparations. Based on these findings, the structural characteristics of the predominant saccharide sequence required for the substrate recognition by the heparanase in native Hep polysaccharides could be summarized as shown in Fig. 6C. It is conceivable that human, porcine, and bovine heparanases are similar in their specificity. The proposed structure is consistent with the previous finding by Oldberg et al. (47) for human platelet heparanase and the recent finding by Podyma-Inoue et al. (56) for rat parathyroid heparanase that the predominant GlcN residue on the nonreducing side of the cleavage site GlcUA of was N-acetylated and also overlaps with the structure proposed for human hepatoma and platelet heparanases by Pikas et al. (34) (Fig. 6A), although the present results are apparently contradictory to the previously claimed indispensability of the IdoUA(2S) and GlcN(3S) structures (33, 34, 57). It should also be noted that rat parathyroid heparanase is strikingly different from our enzyme in that it works at neutral and slightly acidic pH values and does not cleave heparin (56).

The presence of a 2-O-sulfate group on a HexUA residue, which is located two residues away from the cleavage site toward the reducing end, turned out to be not obligatory for the enzyme action, which is incompatible with the previous proposal that 2-O-sulfated IdoUA residues in HS are essential for the heparanase action (34, 57). In the previous studies, which demonstrated the importance of IdoUA(2S), partially purified enzymes from human hepatoma and platelets (34) and cultured CHO cells were used (57). Therefore, the partially purified enzyme preparations might contain unidentified regulatory factors that interact with the 2-O-sulfate group and modulate the enzyme activity. The purified platelet heparanase was reportedly a 137-kDa protein (58), which may suggest aggregation or complex formation with other protein(s). The 2-O-sulfate group in question appears to be nonessential for the enzyme action, as suggested previously (59), but may facilitate the enzyme action. Although the formation of intermediate HS breakdown products characteristic of the heparanase action was prevented in the HS 2-O-sulfotransferase-deficient CHO mutant cells, the heparanase transcript was not detected in the purified CHO cell mRNAs (19). Therefore, the major enzyme responsible for degrading HS in CHO cells may be a distinct heparanase(s) (60, 61).

Structural changes in HS in animal models of malignancy have been reported, showing a transformation-associated reduction in charge density of HS chains (for a review, see Ref. 62). In metastasizing tumor cells, heparanase is highly expressed and degrades the ECM and vascular basement membranes (22-26), whereas less sulfated HS chains on the tumor cell surface may evade the attack of the heparanase secreted by the tumor cells themselves. Alternatively, heparanase plays critical roles in tumor growth and metastasis by releasing bioactive HS fragments from the tumor cell surface HS-PGs, which can serve as potent promoters of tumor progression. Being consistent with this concept, HS fragments generated from tumor cell surface HS-PGs by the treatment with bacterial heparinase promoted tumor cell growth mediated through basic fibroblast growth factor signaling pathways (63). In the transition to malignancy in human colon adenoma cells, the overall molecular organization of HS is preserved but distinctly modified in the sulfated domains, and it may contribute to the aberrant behavior of the cancer cells (15).

Tetra-1, Delta HexUA(2S)-GlcN(NS,6S)-GlcUA-GlcN(NS,6S), wasone of the best substrates among the oligosaccharides tested in the present study (Table I). This is the major tetrasaccharide product generated from commercial Hep preparations by the treatment with the bacterial heparinase (3.6 µmol from 100 mg of heparin) (38, 64). Previous heparanase assay methods used heterogeneous Hep/HS polysaccharides as substrates (19, 20). Since the number of the heparanase cleavage sites varies among different Hep/HS preparations, it has been difficult to make a precise comparison of the activities. The use of structurally defined Tetra-1 as a substrate makes it possible to develop a simple and quantitative assay to measure the heparanase activity, which will provide a powerful diagnostic method to assess the invasive state of the cancer.

The findings of the present study also provided clues for developing specific inhibitors for the heparanase. The minimum heparanase recognition sequence contained neither GlcN(3S) nor IdoUA(2S), which are imperative elements for Hep/HS to interact with antithrombin III or basic fibroblast growth factor, respectively (for reviews, see Refs. 5 and 12). Therefore, it should be possible to design oligosaccharide analogs for developing potent heparanase-specific inhibitors by avoiding GlcN(3S) and IdoUA(2S) and hence harmful side effects that may be induced by inhibition or acceleration of those biologically active proteins. Thus, the findings of the present study will lead to a framework toward the development of HS-based anti-cancer or anti-inflammation therapeutics.

    FOOTNOTES

* The work at Kobe Pharmaceutical University was supported in part by the Science Research Promotion Fund from the Japan Private School Promotion Foundation and Grants-in-Aid for Encouragement of Young Scientists 13771416 (to S. Y.) and Scientific Research (B) 12557214 (to K. S.) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, and Sports of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ These authors contributed equally to this work.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-8558, Japan. Tel.: 81-78-441-7570; Fax: 81-78-441-7569.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 3, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206510200

2 S. Yamada, H. Maeda, and K. Sugahara, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HS, heparan sulfate; PG, proteoglycan; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; Hep, heparin; Delta HexUA, 4-deoxy-alpha -L-threo-hex-4-enepyranosyluronic acid; NS, 2-N-sulfate; 2S, 2-O-sulfate; 3S, 3-O-sulfate; 6S, 6-O-sulfate; ECM, extracellular matrix.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. David, G. (1991) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 19, 816-820[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Iozzo, R. V. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 609-652[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Bernfield, M., Gotte, M., Park, P. W., Reizes, O., Fitzgerald, M. L., Lincecum, J., and Zako, M. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 729-777[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Tumova, S., Woods, A., and Couchman, J. R. (2000) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 32, 269-288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Salmivirta, M., Lidholt, K., and Lindahl, U. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 1270-1279[Abstract]
6. Lindahl, U., Kusche-Gullberg, M., and Kjellén, L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24979-24982[Free Full Text]
7. Oldberg, Å., Antonsson, P., Hedbom, E., and Heinegård, D. (1990) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 18, 789-792[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Iozzo, R. V., Cohen, I. R., Grassel, S., and Murdoch, A. D. (1994) Biochem. J. 302, 625-639[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Erickson, A. C., and Couchman, J. R. (2000) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 48, 1291-1306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Stringer, S. E., and Gallagher, J. T. (1997) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 29, 709-714[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Lyon, M., and Gallagher, J. T. (1998) Matrix Biol. 17, 485-493[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Conrad, H. E. (1998) Heparin-Binding Proteins , pp. 301-349, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
13. Kjellén, L., and Lindahl, U. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 443-475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Sugahara, K., and Kitagawa, H. (2000) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 518-527[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Jayson, G. C., Lion, M., Paraskeva, C., Turnbull, J. E., Deakin, J. A., and Gallagher, J. T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 51-57[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Nurcombe, V., Ford, M. D., Wildschut, J. A., and Bartlett, P. F. (1993) Science 260, 103-106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Brickman, Y. G., Nurcombe, V., Ford, M. D., Gallagher, J. T., Bartlett, P. F., and Turnbull, J. E. (1998) Glycobiology 8, 463-471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Feyzi, E., Saldeen, T., Larsson, E., Lindahl, U., and Salmivirta, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13395-13398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Bame, K. J. (2001) Glycobiology 11, 91-98
20. Parish, C. R., Freeman, C., and Hulett, M. D. (2001) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1471, 99-108
21. Nakajima, M., Irimura, T., Di, Ferrante, N., and Nicolson, G. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 2283-2290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Nakajima, M., Irimura, T., Di, Ferrante, D., Di, Ferrante, N., and Nicolson, G. L. (1983) Science 220, 611-613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Nakajima, M., Irimura, T., and Nicolson, G. L. (1988) J. Cell. Biochem. 36, 157-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Vlodavsky, I., Korner, G., Ishai-Michaeli, R., Bashkin, P., Bar-Shavit, R., and Fuks, Z. (1990) Cancer Metastasis Rev. 9, 203-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Toyoshima, M., and Nakajima, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24153-24160[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Vlodavsky, I., Friedmann, Y., Elkin, M., Aingorn, H., Atzmon, R., Ishai-Michaeli, R., Bitan, M., Pappo, O., Peretz, T., Michal, I., Spector, L., and Pecker, I. (1999) Nat. Med. 5, 793-802[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Hulett, M. D., Freeman, C., Hamdorf, B. J., Baker, R. T., Harris, M. J., and Parish, C. R. (1999) Nat. Med. 5, 803-809[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Kussie, P. H., Hulmes, J. D., Ludwig, D. L., Patel, S., Navarro, E. C., Seddon, A. P., Giorgio, N. A., and Bohlen, P. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 261, 183-187[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Fairbanks, M. B., Mildner, A. M., Leone, J. W., Cavey, G. S., Mathews, W. R., Drong, R. F., Slightom, J. L., Bienkowski, M. J., Smith, C. W., Bannow, C. A., and Heinrikson, R. L. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29587-29590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Uno, F., Fujiwara, T., Takata, Y., Ohtani, S., Katsuda, K., Takaoaka, M., Ohkawa, T., Naomoto, Y., Nakajima, M., and Tanaka, N. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 7855-7860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Gohji, K., Okamoto, M., Kitazawa, S., Toyoshima, M., Dong, J., Katsuoka, Y., and Nakajima, M. (2001) J. Urol. 166, 1286-1290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Mikami, S., Ohashi, K., Usui, Y., Nemoto, T. G., Katsube, K., Yanagishita, M., Nakajima, M., Nakamura, K., and Koike, M. (2001) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 92, 1062-1073[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Thunberg, L., Bäckström, G., Wasteson, Å., Robinson, H. C., Ögren, S., and Lindahl, U. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 10278-10282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Pikas, D. S., Li, J., Vlodavsky, I., and Lindahl, U. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18770-18777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Yamada, S., Yoshida, K., Sugiura, M., Sugahara, K., Khoo, K. H., Morris, H. R., and Dell, A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 4780-4787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Yamada, S., Sakamoto, K., Tsuda, H., Yoshida, K., Sugahara, K., Khoo, K. H., Morris, H. R., and Dell, A. (1994) Glycobiology 4, 69-78[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Sugahara, K., Tohno-oka, R., Yamada, S., Khoo, K. H., Morris, H. R., and Dell, A. (1994) Glycobiology 4, 535-544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Yamada, S., Murakami, T., Tsuda, H., Yoshida, K., and Sugahara, K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 8696-8705[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Tsuda, H., Yamada, S., Yamane, Y., Yoshida, K., Hopwood, J. J., and Sugahara, K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10495-10502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Yamada, S., Yamane, Y., Tsuda, H., Yoshida, K., and Sugahara, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1863-1871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Yamada, S., Sakamoto, K., Tsuda, H., Yoshida, K., Sugiura, M., and Sugahara, K. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 838-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Gohji, K., Hirano, H., Okamoto, M., Kitazawa, S., Toyoshima, M., Dong, J., Tatsuoka, Y., and Nakajima, M. (2001) Int. J. Cancer 95, 295-301[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Sugahara, K., Okumura, Y., and Yamashina, I. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 162, 189-197[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Yamada, S., and Sugahara, K. (1998) Trends Glycosci. Glycotech. 10, 95-123
46. Desai, U. R., Wang, H. M., and Linhardt, R. J. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 306, 461-468[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Oldberg, Å., Heldin, C.-H., Wasteson, Å., Busch, C., and Höök, M. (1980) Biochemistry 19, 5755-5762[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Lindahl, U. (1989) in Heparin (Lane, D. A. , and Lindahl, U., eds) , pp. 159-189, Edward Arnold, London
49. Casu, B., and Lindahl, U. (2001) Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 57, 159-206[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Ögren, S., and Lindahl, U. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 2690-2697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Ögren, S., and Lindahl, U. (1976) Biochem. J. 154, 605-611[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Jacobsson, K. G., and Lindahl, U. (1987) Biochem. J. 246, 409-415[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Chuang, W. L., Christ, M. D., Peng, J.,