![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 45, 42815-42820, November 8, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
¶
From the
Division of Dermatology, Department of
Medicine, University of California and Veterans Affairs Medical
Center, San Diego, California 92161 and the § Department of
Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
Received for publication, May 20, 2002, and in revised form, August 28, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FGF-7 is induced after injury and induces
the proliferation of keratinocytes. Like most members of the FGF
family, the activity of FGF-7 is strongly influenced by binding to
heparin, but this glycosaminoglycan is absent on keratinocyte cell
surfaces and minimally present in the wound environment. In this
investigation we compared the relative activity of heparan sulfate and
chondroitin sulfate B (dermatan sulfate), glycosaminoglycans that are
present in wounds. A lymphoid cell line (BaF/KGFR) containing the FGF-7 receptor (FGFR2 IIIb) was treated with FGF-7 and with various glycosaminoglycans. FGF-7 did not support cell proliferation in the
absence of glycosaminoglycan or with addition of heparan sulfate or
chondroitin sulfate A/C but did stimulate BaF/KGFR division in the
presence of dermatan sulfate or highly sulfated low molecular weight
fractions of dermatan. Dermatan sulfate also enabled
FGF-7-dependent phosphorylation of mitogen-activated
protein kinase and promoted binding of radiolabeled FGF-7 to
FGFR2 IIIb. In addition, dermatan sulfate and FGF-7 stimulated growth
of normal keratinocytes in culture. Thus, dermatan sulfate, the
predominant glycosaminoglycan in skin, is the principle cofactor
for FGF-7.
Glycosaminoglycans
(GAGs)1 and proteoglycans are
emerging as key regulators of a variety of cellular behaviors involved
in development, homeostasis, and disease. Heparin, heparan sulfate (HS), and hyaluronic acid are GAGs that have been studied extensively in relation to their roles in anticoagulation, growth factor signaling, and connective tissue support. Less well studied, dermatan sulfate (DS)
is the predominant GAG expressed in the skin and is released at high
concentrations during wound repair, making it a particularly interesting topic for evaluation in relation to growth factors active
in wounds. Wound fluid-derived DS, as well as physiologic concentrations of commercially purified DS, has been shown to promote
FGF-2 function (1). DS and DS proteoglycans also bind to and influence
the activity of other heparin- and HS-binding proteins including
hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (2), thrombin (3), heparin
cofactor II (4, 5), fibronectin (6), platelet factor-4 (7), regulated
on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) (8), and
interferon- FGF-7 or keratinocyte growth factor is a polypeptide mitogen that
belongs to the family of fibroblast growth factors. Whereas some FGF
family members bind to multiple FGF receptors (FGFRs 1-4) (11) and
stimulate proliferation in a variety of cell types, FGF-7 binds only to
a splice variant of FGFR2 (FGFR2 IIIb) and is a highly specific
paracrine growth factor for epithelial cells (12, 13). FGF-7 and its
receptor are believed to be important for normal wound healing. The
expression of FGF-7 and FGFR2 IIIb are induced in wounds (14, 15), and
the application of FGF-7 to wounds has been shown to promote healing
(16, 17). Heparin and HS can support FGF-7 signaling, like that of
other FGF family members. These GAGs are believed to act as stabilizing
cofactors for the ligand-receptor interaction (18-20). Interestingly,
heparin can also inhibit FGF-7 receptor binding and activity at higher concentrations in some cells (21-23). Because DS and FGF-7 are both
induced in wounds, and the FGF-7 signaling pathway is regulated differentially by heparin compared with other FGF ligands, we have
asked whether DS serves as a cofactor for FGF-7.
In this study, we used a previously described GAG- and FGFR-deficient
cell line engineered to express the FGF-7 receptor (FGFR2 IIIb) (21) to
ask whether the addition of exogenous DS affects FGF-7 binding to and
signaling through its receptor. Our results show that DS is superior to
HS and approaches the effectiveness of heparin in its ability to
promote FGF-7-FGFR2 IIIb binding and cellular proliferation. This
effect is specific for FGF-7 as the activity of another ligand of
FGFR2 IIIb, FGF-1, is not supported by the addition of exogenous DS.
These findings strongly support the premise that DS is the
physiologically relevant cofactor for FGF-7.
Materials
Heparin sodium salt from porcine intestine, heparan sulfate from
bovine kidney, heparan sulfate from porcine intestine, and chondroitin
sulfate A/C (70% A and 30% C) from bovine trachea were purchased from
Sigma. Dermatan sulfate (chondroitin sulfate B) with a molecular mass
range from 11 to 25 kDa was purchased from Seikagaku America
(Falmouth, MA). Unfractionated dermatan sulfate (MW 35 + 5) and
DS fractions DO (MW 50 + 5) and DT (MW 25 + 5) were purchased from
Celsus Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH. Human recombinant FGF-7 and FGF-1
were from R & D Systems. Disuccinimidyl suberate was from Pierce.
Carrier free Na125I was from Amersham Biosciences. Unless
indicated, all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma. HiTrapTM
heparin HP columns and QAE-Sephadex A-25 beads were purchased from
Amersham Biosciences. Penicillin/streptomycin, L-glutamine, trypsin, and RPMI 1640 were obtained from
Invitrogen. Medium 154CF and human keratinocyte growth supplement for
NHK culture were purchased from Cascade Biologicals. Fetal calf
serum was purchased from Hyclone. The Cell Titer 96 non-radioactive cell proliferation kit was purchased from Promega, and the Blyscan proteoglycan and GAG assay system was obtained from Accurate Chemical Scientific Corp.
Wound Fluid Glycosaminoglycan Isolation and Quantitation
Human wound fluid was collected, and GAGs were isolated and
quantified as described previously (1). Briefly, GAGs were isolated
from post-surgical wound fluid collected within 24 h by anion
exchange chromatography using QAE-Sephadex A-25 beads (Amersham
Biosciences). Sulfated GAG was measured with the sulfate-binding cationic dye, dimethylene blue, according to the manufacturer's instructions for the Blyscan proteoglycan and GAG assay system (Accurate Chemical Scientific Corp.).
Cell Culture and Proliferation Assays
BaF/KGFR Cells--
Preparation and culture of mouse
lymphocyte BaF3 cells stably transfected with FGFR2 IIIb and designated
BaF/KGFR has been described previously (21). Cells were selected
routinely in heparin (5 µg/ml) and FGF-1 (10 ng/ml) in RPMI
containing L-glutamine (2.92 mg/ml), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (50 µg/ml) for at least 1 week and then
cultured in RPMI containing 10% interleukin-3 conditioned
media, 10% FCS, L-glutamine, and
penicillin/streptomycin. Interleukin-3 conditioned media was prepared
from WEHI-3B cells grown in RPMI +10% FCS (24). Prior to GAG
treatment, cells were rinsed in additive-free RPMI three times to
remove any traces of cytokine. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at
2 × 105 cells/well in a final volume of 100 µl/well. GAG and ligand dilutions were made in RPMI containing 10%
FCS, penicillin/streptomycin, and L-glutamine. Cells were
cultured for 48 to 72 h, and cell proliferation was determined.
NHK Cells--
Normal human keratinocytes were isolated and
cultured as described (25). Cells were maintained in 154CF medium with
human keratinocyte growth supplement (0.2% (v/v) bovine pituitary
extract, 5 µg/ml bovine insulin, 0.18 µg/ml hydrocortisone, 5 µg/ml bovine transferrin, and 0.2 ng/ml human epidermal growth
factor), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (50 µg/ml),
L-glutamine (2.92 mg/ml), and 0.06 mM
Ca2+). For proliferation assays, cells were seeded in
96-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/well. When cell
confluence reached ~30%, cells were rinsed three times in growth
factor-free medium (154CF medium without human keratinocyte growth
supplement, designated basal medium). GAGs and FGF-7 were diluted in
basal medium for stimulation. Cells were cultured for 48 h, and
cellular proliferation was determined. Proliferation assays were
carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions for the
Promega Cell Titer 96 non-radioactive cell proliferation kit. Relative
cell number was determined as the quotient of the
A570 determined for experimental samples to
A570 of cells in identical wells grown in basal
medium alone. In some experiments, results of proliferation
assay were confirmed by manual cell counts using a hemocytometer.
Phosphorylation of p44 and p42 MAP Kinase
BaF/KGFR cells in culture were washed three times and then
incubated for 18 h in RPMI containing 0.1% FCS,
penicillin/streptomycin, and L-glutamine prior to addition
of test reagents. After 2 h of exposure, 3 × 105
cells were extracted in 0.05 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCL, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaF, 10% glycerol, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and
15 µl of this extract were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel prior to
transfer to nitrocellulose (Osmonics, Westborugh, MA). Western blot was
performed with anti-phospho MAP kinase or anti-non-phospho MAP kinase
per the manufacturer's instructions (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.).
Phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated p44/42 control proteins (Cell
Signaling Technology, Inc.) were evaluated simultaneously to confirm
sensitivity and specificity of Western blot.
Radioiodination of FGF-7, Cell Surface Receptor Binding, and
Cross-linking
Recombinant FGF-7 was radioiodinated using the chloramine T
method as described (26). Free iodine was separated from labeled FGF-7
using HiTrapTM heparin-Sepharose columns. The specific activity of the
labeled ligand was low, ~3 × 104 cpm/ng.
FGF-7 binding to BaF/KGFR cells was performed as described (26).
Briefly, 2.5 × 106 cells were suspended in 500 µl
of binding buffer in the presence or absence of GAGs (1 µg/ml
heparin, 50 µg/ml DS, 10 µg/ml DT, 100 µg/ml DO, and 100 µg/ml
HS) and I125-FGF-7 (5 ng/ml) and incubated for 2 h at
4 °C. Chemical cross-linking was performed according to the
manufacturer's instructions with disuccinimidyl suberate. Following
cross-linking, cells were lysed in 50 µl of buffer (10 mM
Tris, pH 7, 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA). Binding was
quantified using a Genesys 5000 series multiwell GAGs Isolated from Wound Fluid Support FGF-7-dependent
Cellular Proliferation--
Human wound fluid contains abundant
amounts of soluble GAGs, with DS and HS at concentrations up to 65 µg/ml. At these physiologic concentrations both DS and HS can promote
FGF-2-dependent proliferation (1). To determine whether
wound fluid-derived glycosaminoglycan (WFGAG) stimulates
FGF-7-dependent signaling, we used BaF3 cells, a
GAG-deficient mouse lymphocyte cell line stably expressing the FGFR2
IIIb receptor (designated BaF/KGFR) that binds FGF-7 and FGF-1 (11, 21,
27, 28). Cells were cultured with 50 µg/ml WFGAG or 0.5 µg/ml
heparin with or without 5 ng/ml FGF-1 or FGF-7 for 72 h, and
cellular proliferation was measured. Neither ligand nor GAG alone
significantly stimulated cell growth above background levels (Fig.
1). In the presence of heparin, FGF-7
stimulated growth by ~3.0-fold. WFGAG resulted in an approximate
doubling of the proliferative effect of FGF-7.
Dermatan Sulfate Acts as a Cofactor for FGF-7- but Not
FGF-1-dependent Cellular Proliferation--
We next asked
whether the addition of pure DS, a major component of WFGAG, to
BaF/KGFR cells would affect FGF-7 signaling. Cells were cultured with
commercially available purified DS (at 50 µg/ml). The absence of
contaminating heparin or HS in the DS preparations was
confirmed by independent analysis of monosaccharide composition by the
University of California, San Diego Glycobiology Core Facility.
Cellular proliferation increased in a dose-dependent manner
with increasing amounts of FGF-7 (Fig.
2a). By contrast, FGF-1 was
not as effective in promoting cell proliferation with DS. As expected
based on prior reports (29), heparin (1 µg/ml) enhanced the
proliferative activity of both FGF-1 and FGF-7 (data not shown).
The concentration of sulfated GAGs in wound fluid has been reported to
range between 15 and 65 µg/ml (1). We saw more than a 2-fold
stimulation when 50 µg/ml DS was combined with 5 ng/ml or more of
FGF-7 but only ~1.5-fold stimulation with FGF-1 in similar amounts.
To determine the effect of a range of DS concentrations on FGF-1 and
FGF-7, we compared approximately equipotent amounts of FGF-1 (5 ng/ml)
and FGF-7 (2 ng/ml, the minimum concentration capable of inducing an
increase in cell proliferation at 50 µg/ml DS) (Fig.
2b). Both FGF-7 and FGF-1 showed a
dose-dependent increase in cell proliferation in response
to DS, but DS always potentiated a greater increase in cell
proliferation by FGF-7. A 2-fold increase in cell number was
induced by 2.5 µg/ml DS and FGF-7 whereas 250 µg/ml DS was required
to stimulate a similar response in the presence of FGF-1.
Dermatan Sulfate Supports FGF-7-dependent Cellular
Proliferation More Than Heparan Sulfate or Chondroitin Sulfate
A/C--
Heparin is frequently used in vitro as
a required cofactor for FGF-dependent signaling and to
study the three-dimensional structure of the GAG·FGFR·FGF complex
believed to be required for this signaling to take place (30-32).
However, as mast cells (the sole source of cutaneous heparin) are
present in very low numbers in the skin under physiologic conditions,
we asked whether the abundant native GAGs (HS and chondroitin sulfates
(CS)) support FGF-7-dependent cellular proliferation.
Because GAG structure varies between tissues, and this may affect
GAG-FGF binding, we tested HS from two sources (33, 34). Porcine
intestinal heparin, bovine kidney HS, porcine intestine HS, CS A/C
(70% CS A and 30% CS C), and DS were tested with 5 ng/ml FGF-7 at
concentrations ranging from 0 to 50 µg/ml. Consistent with our
previous results, heparin led to the highest increase in proliferation
at low doses, stimulating it ~3-fold over control levels at a
concentration of 10 µg/ml (Fig. 3). At
concentrations similar to those found in wounds, DS stimulated
FGF-7-dependent proliferation to a maximum of 4.5-fold at
25 µg/ml. Comparatively, HS from porcine origin and CS A/C had
minimal stimulatory effects on FGF-7 although bovine kidney HS had
activity at high concentrations (50 µg/ml) that approached
heparin.
DS Supports FGF-7-dependent Phosphorylation of MAP
Kinase--
To directly evaluate rapid downstream events after FGF-R2
occupancy, the phosphorylation of p44 and p42 MAP kinases
(extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2) was studied in
BaF/KGFR cells. Cells were serum-starved in 0.1% FCS for 18 h and
then exposed for 2 h to fresh medium alone, FGF-7, DS, or
the combination of FGF-7 and DS. Phosphorylation of p44/42 MAP kinases
was only seen when DS and FGF-7 were present together (Fig.
4).
DS Fractions Have Differential Effects upon
FGF-7-dependent Cellular Proliferation--
The ability of
certain GAGs to bind to and stimulate their protein partners depends
upon their structure, size (number of disaccharides), and sulfation
pattern. These elements combine to form discrete preferentially bound
cassettes within the heterogeneous GAG molecule (35-39). To begin to
investigate this possibility for DS, we used unfractionated and
fractionated DS species from Celsus Laboratories (designated DO and DT,
respectively) that differ by size and sulfation (Table
I). These preparations of DS, which
differentially affect the anticoagulant effect of activated protein C
(40), were added to BaF/KGFR cells with 5 ng/ml FGF-7. Native,
unfractionated DS and the low molecular weight fraction (DT) at 50 µg/ml resulted in a 4.5- and 5-fold induction in cellular proliferation, respectively (Fig. 5). The
high molecular weight fraction (DO) induced cell growth by only
1.6-fold at this concentration. Increasing the concentration of DO by
10-fold (to 500 µg/ml) did not result in an effect equal to that of
the other species. Interestingly, DT supports
FGF-7-dependent cellular proliferation at a 10-fold lower
dose (5 µg/ml) than unfractionated DS.
Dermatan Sulfate Enhances the Binding of FGF-7 to Its Cell Surface
Receptor--
Based upon our assumption that the proliferative effects
of DS stem from its ability to promote the binding of FGF-7 to its receptor, we next attempted to demonstrate this effect. Radioiodinated FGF-7 was incubated with BaF/KGFR cells in the presence of heparin (1 µg/ml), DS (50 µg/ml), DT (10 µg/ml), DO (100 µg/ml), and HS (100 µg/ml), and a cross-linking reaction was performed. The GAG concentrations were chosen based upon the results obtained in our
proliferation assays. DS increased the binding of labeled FGF-7 by
6.9-fold compared with control (Fig.
6a, no GAG).
Heparin increased binding by 9.1-fold. In agreement with the
proliferation assay results, DT exceeded the amount of binding
supported by unfractionated DS and approached that of heparin (8-fold
increase over control). In all cases binding was observed as two bands resolved by SDS-PAGE that correspond to the expected sizes of a monomer
and dimer of the receptor·ligand complex (Fig. 6b). DO had
no significant effect on binding, and HS did not support binding above
background. All reactions were carried out using molar concentrations
of GAGs equivalent to those used in proliferation assays.
Dermatan Sulfate Enhances the Proliferative Effect of FGF-7 in
Normal Human Keratinocytes--
We next extended our results to a more
physiologically relevant cell system. FGF-7 is a potent mitogen for
keratinocytes and has also been shown to modulate differentiation (13,
41). Primary cultures of human keratinocytes in basal medium
were treated with 5 ng/ml FGF-7 in the presence of heparin or DS.
Cellular proliferation was assessed after 48 h in culture. DS at 5 µg/ml supported FGF-7-dependent growth in keratinocytes
to a level that exceeded heparin and FGF-7 or FGF-7 alone (Fig.
7). Interestingly, this effect was seen
at a 10-fold lower concentration than was required for
FGF-7-stimulated proliferation in the BaF/KGFR system but decreased at
higher DS concentrations. A similar trend was noted for FGF-10, another
FGFR2 IIIb ligand that has been shown to promote proliferation in
keratinocytes (data not shown) (42). As expected, no growth was
observed for cells treated with GAG alone.
In the present work we have demonstrated how a physiologically
relevant WFGAG, DS, affects FGF-7. Most FGF family members require the
presence of GAGs to bind to and signal through their tyrosine kinase
receptors (24, 43, 44). These effects presumably result from either
(a) the stabilization of the receptor·ligand complex (45,
46) or (b) by acting as an extracellular stockpile for
growth factors (47, 48). Heparin and HS have been the traditional focus
of GAG-FGF interactions. These GAGs share structural aspects, but their
availability to cells in vivo is not likely to be
equivalent. HS is ubiquitous in the extracellular matrix, cell surface,
and basement membrane. DS is located primarily in the extracellular
matrix of skin. Heparin, however, is sequestered in mast cells and only
becomes available to the tissue upon recruitment and degranulation of
this cell type. DS is more similar structurally to HS than the other
chondroitin sulfates as both DS and HS contain iduronate residues. The
core proteins to which DS and HS are attached show altered expression
patterns during development, pathogenesis, and wounding (49-52). No
such regulation has been shown for serglycin, the primary core protein
on which heparin is found. These observations suggest that heparin may
have limited relevance to the functional significance of GAG and growth
factor interactions seen in vitro to an in vivo
system such as wound repair where FGF-7 is expressed abundantly.
Previous work has demonstrated that FGF-2-dependent
activity is enhanced by DS derived from wound fluid (1). The present data show that FGF-7-dependent proliferation is also
enhanced by a wound fluid-derived GAG mixture (Fig. 1) and that this
effect can be reproduced with the use of purified DS (Fig. 2). One
explanation for the observed effect of DS upon FGF-7 signaling is
contamination of the DS reagent with heparin or HS. Analysis performed
by the Glycobiology Core Facility at our institution (by acid
hydrolysis followed by high pH anion exchange chromatography with
pulsed amperometric detection) found that the DS used in our assays
contains N-acetyl galactosamine, iduronate, and glucuronate.
N-Acetyl glucosamine was not detected significantly,
confirming the absence of heparin and HS contamination. Furthermore,
the proliferative effect of DS was likely to be directly through the
interaction of FGF-7 with its receptor, because downstream
phosphorylation of MAP kinase was observed within 2 h. Within this
time period secondary effects on cell growth that could manifest
themselves within the 48-72-h time periods of the proliferation assays
become less likely.
WFGAG and DS stimulated FGF-7-dependent cell proliferation
to a much greater extent than FGF-1 (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Even at
high, and likely supraphysiologic, concentrations of DS (Fig. 2b) or FGF-1 (Fig. 2a),
FGF-1-dependent cellular proliferation was not enhanced,
suggesting that the effect of DS is selective for FGF-7. This may
represent the physiological situation or reflect diminished activity of
the recombinant growth factors used in this study. However, this
differential effect of GAGs upon FGF-dependent binding and
activity has been shown previously. Glypican-1, a heparan sulfate
proteoglycan, enhances FGF-1 receptor binding and cellular
proliferation but does not support either the binding or activity of
FGF-7 in BaF/KGFR cells and mouse keratinocytes (21, 53). Our data
support these results. HS had less effect upon
FGF-7-dependent cellular proliferation over a range of
concentrations (Fig. 3) and did not support cell surface receptor
binding (Fig. 6). The differential potentiation and binding of FGF-1
and FGF-7 are supported by, and in the case of HS likely explained by,
their dependence upon unique oligosaccharides that differ by size and sulfation patterns (29). In addition, we have shown that the size and
sulfation level of DS affect both proliferation and receptor binding
(see Fig. 5 and Fig. 6). Proliferation and cell surface binding studies
performed with equivalent molar concentrations of GAG and ligand showed
similar results, thus supporting the hypothesis that the action of DS
is similar to mechanisms described previously for heparin. The highest
molecular weight DS fraction, DO (charge to mass ratio 0.12-0.13),
had minimal effectiveness in promoting FGF-7-dependent
proliferation and did not support FGF-7 binding to FGFR2 IIIb. By
contrast, the lowest molecular weight fraction, DT (charge to mass
ratio 0.23-0.29), has a higher charge to mass density than either DO
or unfractionated DS and was more active and potent than native DS.
This fraction approached the effectiveness of heparin in promoting
cellular proliferation. This derivative is also more active than either
unfractionated DS or DO in enhancing activated protein
C-dependent anticoagulation (40). DT is enriched in
4,6-di-O-sulfated N-acetyl galactosamine residues, but no other structural information is available currently.
Unfractionated heparin exhibits differential effects upon FGF-7,
supporting receptor binding and cellular proliferation at low
concentrations but inhibiting both events at higher doses (21, 22). We
did not observe an inhibitory effect by heparin upon either binding
FGF-7 to FGFR2 IIIb or FGF-7-dependent proliferation in our BaF/KGFR studies. This is likely because of the relatively low
concentration of heparin (1 µg/ml) used in our assays. Prior studies
have reported that heparin enhances FGF-dependent cellular proliferation at this concentration (21, 29). We did however observe
inhibition of FGF-7-dependent proliferation at increasing concentrations of DS in normal human keratinocytes. Thus, as has been reported previously with heparin, facilitation of FGF-7 activity by DS is highly dependent on the concentration of DS available to the cell.
One question raised by our findings is whether the nature of DS in
wound fluid differs (in terms of oligosaccharide size) from that
present normally in the extracellular matrix. Other molecules in the
extracellular matrix and the skin microenvironment, such as the
perlecan core protein, can also serve as ligands for FGF-7 (54). Thus,
the structural requirements for FGF-7 binding and potentiation of
receptor activation are complex. Further investigation of DS structure
is needed to characterize how DS size and sulfation affect FGF-7:FGFR2
IIIb binding and the affinity constants of these interactions. As more
structural information becomes available from the study of the various
GAGs, it will become clear that particular subdomains within GAGs
(e.g. highly sulfated regions rich in iduronate residues),
or other ligands, will prove to differentially affect FGF family member
signaling. Such information will not only advance our understanding of
the basic mechanisms of GAG function but will also help us understand
the basic science of wound healing. The current observations illustrate
that cellular synthesis and availability of GAGs must be considered
when extending models of GAG and growth factor interactions from the
test tube to the tissue. In the case of events associated with the
skin, DS may exceed HS for many heparin-dependent processes
characterized previously.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(9, 10). Thus, although less well understood, DS-protein interactions are likely to be important events in control of several cellular behaviors.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-counter.
Receptor·ligand complexes were resolved on a 4-20% gradient
gel and visualized using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager Screen and
Storm Phosphorimager.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
WFGAGs support FGF-7-dependent
proliferation in BaF/KGFR cells. Cells were seeded in 96-well
plates as described with 5 ng/ml FGF-1 or FGF-7 and heparin (1 µg/ml)
or human wound fluid-derived GAG (WFGAG) (50 µg/ml) as indicated.
Following a 3-day incubation, cell number was determined as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Relative cell number is expressed
as a proportion of untreated control. Data are mean ± S.E. of
triplicates and are representative of five independent
experiments.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
FGF-7-dependent cellular
proliferation is enhanced in a dose-dependent manner by
increasing either the dermatan sulfate or the ligand.
a, dose response to FGF-7 or FGF-1. Cells were seeded in
96-well plates as described in the presence of 50 µg/ml dermatan
sulfate and treated with increasing concentrations of FGF-1 or FGF-7.
Cells were cultured for 72 h, and cellular proliferation was
determined. Relative cell number is expressed as a proportion of
control in the absence of dermatan sulfate. Data are mean ± S.E.
of triplicates and are representative of three independent experiments.
b, dose response to dermatan sulfate. BaF/KGFR cells were
seeded in a 96-well plate as described in the presence of 5 ng/ml of
FGF-1 or 2 ng/ml FGF-7. DS was added at increasing concentrations (3.9 to 250 µg/ml), cells were cultured for 72 h, and cellular
proliferation was determined. Relative cell number is expressed as a
proportion of control in the absence of dermatan sulfate. Data are
mean ± S.E. of triplicates and are representative of two
independent experiments.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Dermatan sulfate exceeds heparan sulfate and
chondroitin sulfates A/C in its ability to support
FGF-7-dependent cellular proliferation. BaF/KGFR cells
were seeded in 96-well plates as described in the presence of FGF-7
with the following glycosaminoglycans: dermatan sulfate (
),
heparin (
), bovine kidney heparan sulfate (
), porcine intestine
heparan sulfate (
), or chondroitin sulfate A/C (
). Cells were
cultured for 72 h, and cellular proliferation was determined.
Relative cell number is expressed as a proportion of control in the
absence of FGF-7. Data are mean ± S.E. of triplicates and are
representative of three independent experiments.

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Dermatan sulfate enables
FGF-7-dependent phosphorylation of MAP kinase.
BaF/KGFR cells were cultured for 18h in low serum (0.1% FCS) and then
exposed for 2 h to fresh media alone (lane
3), 50 µg/ml dermatan sulfate (lane 4), 5 ng/ml
FGF-7 (lane 5), FGF-7 and Dermatan sulfate (lane
6), or interleukin-3 containing BaF growth media (lane
7). Lanes 1 and 2 contain control
preparations of p44 and p42 MAP kinases in the phosphorylated or
unphosphorylated forms, respectively. a shows a Western blot
with antibody specific to phosphorylated forms of p44/p42. b
shows Western blot with antibody specific to unphosphorylated forms of
p44/p42 and demonstrates that similar amounts of cell extract were
applied to lanes 3-7.
Characteristics of dermutan sulfate fractions

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Dermatan sulfate fractions differentially
affect FGF-7-dependent cellular proliferation.
BaF/KGFR cells were seeded in 96-well plates as described with 5 ng/ml
FGF-7 with the following glycosaminoglycans: heparin 0.5 µg/ml,
dermatan sulfate 50 µg/ml, large MW dermatan sulfate (DO) at 5, 50, and 500 µg/ml, and low molecular weight dermatan sulfate (DT) at 5, 50, and 500 µg/ml. Cells were cultured for 72 h, and cellular
proliferation was determined. Relative cell number is expressed as a
proportion of control for each GAG in the absence of FGF-7. Data are
mean ± S.E. of triplicates and are representative of three
independent experiments.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Dermatan sulfate enhances the binding of
FGF-7 to its cell surface receptor. 2.5 × 106
BaF/KGFR cells were washed with PBS and incubated in binding buffer in
the presence of iodinated FGF-7 alone or FGF-7 with porcine intestinal
heparin (HEP; 1 µg/ml), DS (50 µg/ml), DT (10 µg/ml),
DO (100 µg/ml), or HS (100 µg/ml) for 2 h at 4 °C and
washed to remove unbound ligand. A cross-linking reaction was
performed, and the products were counted in a
-counter, separated by
4-20% gradient SDS-PAGE, and visualized using a PhosphorImager.
a, mean counts/min. The data are triplicates, and
S.E. is indicated. This experiment is representative of five
independent experiments. b, SDS-PAGE resolution of
cross-linked products. FGF-7 alone (lane 1) or FGF-7 plus 1 µg/ml heparin (lane 2), 50 µg/ml DS (lane 3),
10 µg/ml DT (lane 4), or 100 µg/ml HS (lane
5) are shown. The position of the putative monomer (M)
and dimer (D) ligand·receptor complexes are indicated by
the arrows to the left of the
panel. The position of the molecular weight markers are
indicated.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
DS enhances FGF-7-dependent
growth in normal human keratinocytes. Normal primary human
keratinocytes were maintained in defined growth medium
supplemented with bovine pituitary extract, bovine transferrin, bovine
insulin, human epidermal growth factor, and hydrocortisone prior to
being "stepped down" into basal medium lacking growth
supplements. 5 ng/ml FGF-7 was added to the culture medium alone or in
the presence of 5 to 250 µg/ml dermatan sulfate or 1 µg/ml heparin.
Cells were maintained in culture for 48 h when cellular
proliferation was determined. Data are mean ± S.E. of
triplicates and are representative of three independent
experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Hermann van Halbeek and Brad Hayes of the University of California, San Diego Glycobiology Research and Training Center for the analysis of DS. We thank Dr. Anna Di Nardo for NHK isolation and assistance with culture.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant 5T32CA81211 (to J. M. T.), grants from the Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum and the Israel Ministry of Science (to D. R.), and by National Institutes of Health Grant AR45676 and a Veterans Affairs merit award (to R. L. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Dermatology, Dept. of Medicine, University of California, San Diego and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161. Tel.: 858-552-8585 (ext. 6149); Fax: 858-552-7436; E-mail: rgallo@ucsd.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204959200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: GAG, glycosaminoglycan; DS, dermatan sulfate; HS, heparan sulfate; FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor; WFGAG, wound fluid-derived glycosaminoglycan; CS, chondroitin sulfate; MW, molecular weight; FCS, fetal calf serum; MAP, mitogen-activated protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Penc, S. F.,
Pomahac, B.,
Winkler, T.,
Dorschner, R. A.,
Eriksson, E.,
and Gallo, R. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28116-28121 |
| 2. |
Lyon, M.,
Deakin, J. A.,
Rahmoune, H.,
Fernig, D. G.,
Nakamura, T.,
and Gallagher, J. T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
271-278 |
| 3. |
Liaw, P. C.,
Becker, D. L.,
Stafford, A. R.,
Fredenburgh, J. C.,
and Weitz, J. I.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
20959-20965 |
| 4. | Mascellani, G., Liverani, L., Bianchini, P., Parma, B., Torri, G., Bisio, A., Guerrini, M., and Casu, B. (1993) Biochem. J. 296, 639-648 |
| 5. |
Maimone, M. M.,
and Tollefsen, D. M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
18263-18271 |
| 6. | Walker, A., and Gallagher, J. T. (1996) Biochem. J. 317, 871-877 |
| 7. |
Cella, G.,
Boeri, G.,
Saggiorato, G.,
Paolini, R.,
Luzzatto, G.,
and Terribile, V. I.
(1992)
Angiology
43,
59-62 |
| 8. | Kuschert, G. S., Coulin, F., Power, C. A., Proudfoot, A. E., Hubbard, R. E., Hoogewerf, A. J., and Wells, T. N. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 12959-12968[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Camejo, E. H.,
Rosengren, B.,
Camejo, G.,
Sartipy, P.,
Fager, G.,
and Bondjers, G.
(1995)
Artherioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
15,
1456-1465 |
| 10. | Lortat-Jacob, H., Turnbull, J. E., and Grimaud, J. A. (1995) Biochem. J. 310, 497-505 |
| 11. |
Ornitz, D. M., Xu, J.,
Colvin, J. S.,
McEwen, D. G.,
MacArthur, C. A.,
Coulier, F.,
Gao, G.,
and Goldfarb, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15292-15297 |
| 12. |
Finch, P. W.,
Rubin, J. S.,
Miki, T.,
Ron, D.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1989)
Science
245,
752-755 |
| 13. |
Rubin, J. S.,
Osada, H.,
Finch, P. W.,
Taylor, W. G.,
Rudikoff, S.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
802-806 |
| 14. |
Werner, S.,
Peters, K. G.,
Longaker, M. T.,
Fuller-Pace, F.,
Banda, M. J.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6896-6900 |
| 15. |
Marchese, C.,
Chedid, M.,
Dirsch, O. R.,
Csaky, K. G.,
Santanelli, F.,
Latini, C.,
LaRochelle, W. J.,
Torrisi, M. R.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
1369-1376 |
| 16. |
Pierce, G. F.,
Yanagihara, D.,
Klopchin, K.,
Danilenko, D. M.,
Hsu, E.,
Kenney, W. C.,
and Morris, C. F.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
179,
831-840 |
| 17. |
Staiano-Coico, L.,
Krueger, J. G.,
Rubin, J. S.,
D'Limi, S.,
Vallat, V. P.,
Valentino, L.,
Fahey, T., III,
Hawes, A.,
Kingston, G.,
and Madden, M. R.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
178,
865-878 |
| 18. |
Bottaro, D. P.,
Rubin, J. S.,
Ron, D.,
Finch, P. W.,
Florio, C.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
12767-12770 |
| 19. | LaRochelle, W. J., Sakaguchi, K., Atabey, N., Cheon, H. G., Takagi, Y., Kinaia, T., Day, R. M., Miki, T., Burgess, W. H., and Bottaro, D. P. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 1765-1771[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Hsu, Y. R., Nybo, R., Sullivan, J. K., Costigan, V., Spahr, C. S., Wong, C., Jones, M., Pentzer, A. G., Crouse, J. A., Pacifici, R. E., Lu, H. S., Morris, C. F., and Philo, J. S. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 2523-2534[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Berman, B.,
Ostrovsky, O.,
Shlissel, M.,
Lang, T.,
Regan, D.,
Vlodavsky, I.,
Ishai-Michaeli, R.,
and Ron, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36132-36138 |
| 22. |
Reich-Slotky, R.,
Bonneh-Barkay, D.,
Shaoul, E.,
Bluma, B.,
Svahn, C. M.,
and Ron, D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32279-32285 |
| 23. |
Ron, D.,
Bottaro, D. P.,
Finch, P. W.,
Morris, D.,
Rubin, J. S.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
2984-2988 |
| 24. |
Ornitz, D. M.,
Yayon, A.,
Flanagan, J. G.,
Svahn, C. M.,
Levi, E.,
and Leder, P.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
240-247 |
| 25. | Freshney, I. R. (2000) Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique , 4th Ed. , pp. 345-349, Wiley-Liss, New York |
| 26. |
Ron, D.,
Reich, R.,
Chedid, M.,
Lengel, C.,
Cohen, O. E.,
Chan, A. M.,
Neufeld, G.,
Miki, T.,
and Tronick, S. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5388-5394 |
| 27. |
Miki, T.,
Fleming, T. P.,
Bottaro, D. P.,
Rubin, J. S.,
Ron, D.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1991)
Science
251,
72-75 |
| 28. | Shaoul, E., Reich-Slotky, R., Berman, B., and Ron, D. (1995) Oncogene 10, 1553-1561[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Ostrovsky, O.,
Berman, B.,
Gallagher, J.,
Mulloy, B.,
Fernig, D. G.,
Delehedde, M.,
and Ron, D.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
2444-2453 |
| 30. | Schlessinger, J., Plotnikov, A. N., Ibrahimi, O. A., Eliseenkova, A. V., Yeh, B. K., Yayon, A., Linhardt, R. J., and Mohammadi, M. (2000) Mol Cell 6, 743-750[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Pellegrini, L., Burke, D. F., von Delft, F., Mulloy, B., and Blundell, T. L. (2000) Nature 407, 1029-1034[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | DiGabriele, A. D., Lax, I., Chen, D. I., Svahn, C. M., Jaye, M., Schlessinger, J., and Handrickson, W. A. (1998) Nature 393, 812-817[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Friedl, A., Chang, Z., Tierney, A., and Rapraeger, A. C. (1997) Am J Pathol 150, 1443-1455[Abstract] |
| 34. |
Maccarana, M.,
Sakura, Y.,
Tawada, A.,
Yoshida, K.,
and Lindahl, U.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17804-17810 |
| 35. | Kawashima, H., Atarashi, K., Hirose, M., Hirose, J., Yamada, S., Sugahara, K., and Miyasaka, M. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 30, 30 |
| 36. | Kreuger, J., Salmivirta, M., Sturiale, L., Gimenez-Gallego, G., and Lindahl, U. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 13, 13 |
| 37. | Delehedde, M., Lyon, M., Vidyasagar, R., McDonnell, T. J., and Fernig, D. G. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 17, 17 |
| 38. |
Lyon, M.,
Deakin, J. A.,
and Gallagher, J. T.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
1040-1046 |
| 39. | Gallagher, J. T. (2001) J. Clin. Invest. 108, 357-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Fernandez, J. A., Petaja, J., and Griffin, J. H. (1999) Thromb. Haemostasis 82, 1462-1468[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Marchese, C., Rubin, J., Ron, D., Faggioni, A., Torrisi, M. R., Messina, A., Frati, L., and Aaronson, S. A. (1990) J. Cell. Physiol. 144, 326-332[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Marchese, C., Felici, A., Visco, V., Lucania, G., Igarashi, M., Picardo, M., Frati, L., and Torrisi, M. R. (2001) J. Invest. Dermatol. 116, 623-628[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Rapraeger, A. C., Guimond, S., Krufka, A., and Olwin, B. B. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 245, 219-240[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Rapraeger, A. C.,
Krufka, A.,
and Olwin, B. B.
(1991)
Science
252,
1705-1708 |
| 45. |
Kan, M.,
Wang, F., Xu, J.,
Crabb, J. W.,
Hou, J.,
and McKeehan, W. L.
(1993)
Science
259,
1918-1921 |
| 46. |
Guimond, S.,
Maccarana, M.,
Olwin, B. B.,
Lindahl, U.,
and Rapraeger, A. C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23906-23914 |
| 47. | Vlodavsky, I., Bar-Shavit, R., Ishai-Michaeli, R., Bashkin, P., and Fuks, Z. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 268-271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. |
Saksela, O.,
Moscatelli, D.,
Sommer, A.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
743-751 |
| 49. | Tumova, S., Woods, A., and Couchman, J. R. (2000) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 32, 269-288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. | Brown, C. T., Applebaum, E., Banwatt, R., and Trinkaus-Randall, V. (1995) J. Cell. Biochem. 59, 57-68[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. | Oksala, O., Salo, T., Tammi, R., Hakkinen, L., Jalkanen, M., Inki, P., and Larjava, H. (1995) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 43, 125-135[Abstract] |
| 52. | Kim, C., Goldberger, O., Gallo, R., and Bernfield, M. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 797-805[Abstract] |
| 53. |
Bonneh-Barkay, D.,
Shlissel, M.,
Berman, B.,
Shaoul, E.,
Admon, A.,
Vlodavsky, I.,
Carey, D. J.,
Asundi, V. K.,
Reich-Slotky, R.,
and Ron, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12415-12421 |
| 54. |
Mongiat, M.,
Taylor, K.,
Otto, J.,
Aho, S.,
Uitto, J.,
Whitelock, J. M.,
and Iozzo, R. V.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7095-7100 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Osborne, R. A. Daniel, K. Desilva, and R. B. Seymour Antithrombin activity and disaccharide composition of dermatan sulfate from different bovine tissues Glycobiology, March 1, 2008; 18(3): 225 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Lendvay, R. Sweet, C.-H. Han, T. Soygur, J.-F. Cheng, J. C. Plaire, J. S. Charleston, L. B. Charleston, S. Bagai, K. Cochrane, et al. Compensatory paracrine mechanisms that define the urothelial response to injury in partial bladder outlet obstruction Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F1147 - F1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Purushothaman, J. Fukuda, S. Mizumoto, G. B. ten Dam, T. H. van Kuppevelt, H. Kitagawa, T. Mikami, and K. Sugahara Functions of Chondroitin Sulfate/Dermatan Sulfate Chains in Brain Development: CRITICAL ROLES OF E AND iE DISACCHARIDE UNITS RECOGNIZED BY A SINGLE CHAIN ANTIBODY GD3G7 J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2007; 282(27): 19442 - 19452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Li, A. K. Shetty, and K. Sugahara Neuritogenic Activity of Chondroitin/Dermatan Sulfate Hybrid Chains of Embryonic Pig Brain and Their Mimicry from Shark Liver: INVOLVEMENT OF THE PLEIOTROPHIN AND HEPATOCYTE GROWTH FACTOR SIGNALING PATHWAYS J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2007; 282(5): 2956 - 2966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. C. Miller, C. E. Costello, A. Malmstrom, and J. Zaia A tandem mass spectrometric approach to determination of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate oligosaccharide glycoforms Glycobiology, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 502 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. McDowell, B. A. Frazier, D. R. Studelska, K. Giljum, J. Chen, J. Liu, K. Yu, D. M. Ornitz, and L. Zhang Inhibition or Activation of Apert Syndrome FGFR2 (S252W) Signaling by Specific Glycosaminoglycans J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 6924 - 6930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Taylor and R. L. Gallo Glycosaminoglycans and their proteoglycans: host-associated molecular patterns for initiation and modulation of inflammation FASEB J, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 9 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Bao, M. S. G. Pavao, J. C. dos Santos, and K. Sugahara A Functional Dermatan Sulfate Epitope Containing Iduronate(2-O-sulfate){alpha}1-3GalNAc(6-O-sulfate) Disaccharide in the Mouse Brain: DEMONSTRATION USING A NOVEL MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY RAISED AGAINST DERMATAN SULFATE OF ASCIDIAN ASCIDIA NIGRA J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 23184 - 23193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Kozma, K. Olczyk, G. Wisowski, A. Glowacki, and R. Bobinski Alterations in the Extracellular Matrix Proteoglycan Profile in Dupuytren's Contracture Affect the Palmar Fascia J. Biochem., April 1, 2005; 137(4): 463 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Taylor, J. A. Rudisill, and R. L. Gallo Structural and Sequence Motifs in Dermatan Sulfate for Promoting Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 (FGF-2 |