Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M207229200 on September 4, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 45, 42958-42963, November 8, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/45/42958    most recent
M207229200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-Cuenca, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-Cuenca, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Sex-dependent Thermogenesis, Differences in Mitochondrial Morphology and Function, and Adrenergic Response in Brown Adipose Tissue*

Sergio Rodríguez-CuencaDagger, Esperanza Pujol§, Roberto Justo, Margalida Frontera§, Jordi Oliver, Magdalena Gianotti, and Pilar Roca||

From the Departament de Biologia Fonamental i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de les Illes Balears, E-07071 Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Received for publication, July 18, 2002, and in revised form, September 3, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Gender-related differences in brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis of 110-day-old rats were studied by determining the morphological and functional features of BAT. The adrenergic control was assessed by studying the levels of beta 3- and alpha 2A-adrenergic receptors (AR) and by determining the lipolytic response to norepinephrine (beta 1-, beta 2-, beta 3-, and alpha 2-AR agonist), isoprenaline (beta 1-, beta 2-, and beta 3-AR agonist), and CGP12177A (selective partial beta 3-AR agonist but beta 1- and beta 2-AR antagonist) together with post-receptor agents, forskolin and dibutyryl cyclic AMP. The female rats that had greater oxygen consumption showed higher UCP1 content, a higher multilocular arrangement, and both longer cristae and higher cristae dense mitochondria in BAT indicating heightened thermogenic capacity and activity; this picture is accompanied by a more sensitive beta 3-AR to norepinephrine signal (EC50 10-fold lower for CGP12177A) and a lower expression of alpha 2A-AR than male rats. Taken together, our results support the idea that the BAT hormonal environment could be involved in the control of different elements of lipolytic and thermogenic adrenergic pathways. Gender dimorphism is both at receptor (changing alpha 2A-AR density and beta 3-AR affinity) and post-receptor (modulating the links involved in the adrenergic signal transduction) levels. These changes in adrenergic control could be responsible, at least in part, both for the important mitochondrial recruitment differences and functional and morphological features of BAT in female rats under usual rodent housing temperatures.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Adaptive thermogenesis constitutes a critical component of energy expenditure, playing an important role in obesity and response to cold, particularly in rodents (1). Within this overall response, brown adipose tissue (BAT)1 is the main effector of non-shivering thermogenesis, with UCP1 as the principal mediator (2, 3). UCP1 is an inner-membrane mitochondrial protein whose function is to uncouple the respiratory chain from ATP synthesis by dissipating the proton gradient generated by the respiratory chain as heat (4).

Activity and expression of UCP1 is under adrenergic control. The main physiological regulator of BAT thermogenesis is norepinephrine (NE), released by sympathetic terminals that densely innervate this tissue, which promotes thermogenesis activation in two ways. First, adrenergic stimulation promotes BAT differentiation increasing the UCP1 expression (2, 5), mitochondriogenesis (5, 6), and cellular proliferation of brown adipocytes (7, 8), reviewed in Lafontan et al. (9). Second, adrenergic stimulation increases release of FFA, which are positive UCP1 modulators (11, 12), supporting the concept that lipolysis represents the flux-generating step controlling BAT respiration (10).

The effects of catecholamines on thermogenic and lipolytic activity are mainly mediated by adrenergic receptors (9). In adipocytes, the beta -adrenoreceptors (beta 1-AR, beta 2-AR, and beta 3-AR), positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase, co-exist with alpha 2-AR, negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase (11). In rodents, beta 3-AR is quantitatively the most abundant of adrenoreceptors in brown adipocytes (12) and is the most important adrenoreceptor coupled to the induction of UCP1 synthesis (13, 14); it is also the predominant receptor to mediate agonist-induced lipolysis in adipocytes (15, 16). However, it has been well established that the alpha 2/beta 3-AR balance is key in the regulation of thermogenesis and lipolysis by modulating the net adrenergic signal response in the adipocyte (17).

Gender dimorphism in energy metabolism has been established, and in particular some differences have been found in brown adipose tissue thermogenic capacity (18-20). On the other hand, it is known that there is a positive correlation between the energy metabolism of a tissue and the general morphological features of the mitochondria of this tissue, such as the number and size of mitochondria and also the surface area and cristae density (cristae length per mitochondrial area) (21).

Thus, this study was designed to investigate further gender dimorphism in BAT thermogenesis and its adrenergic control and also to analyze whether the gender differences in thermogenic capacity and activity correspond to particular mitochondrial morphological features.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Animals-- 110-Day-old Wistar rats, 32 female and 32 male rats (supplied by CRIFFA, Barcelona, Spain), were randomized into the following four studies: thermogenic BAT parameters, indirect calorimetry, electron microscopic analysis, and lipolysis determination. They were housed in group cages (2 rats/cage) at 22 °C, with a 12-h light and 12-h dark cycle (lights on at 08:00 h), with free access to water and food.

Indirect Calorimetry-- Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were assessed with a Power Lab analyzer (ADInstruments PTY Ltd., Australia). Oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) were measured independently in four experiments (14 male and 14 female rats) by open circuit respirometry (flow rate 1 liter/min). VO2 and VCO2 were adjusted for mass (ml·min-1 × kg0.75). A separate value for respiratory quotient (RQ = VCO2/VO2) was calculated. Animals were allowed to become acclimated for 30 min before data collection was initiated, which was continued for 2 h before the beginning of the 12-h light cycle. Room temperature was maintained at 22 °C. Data recordings were made every 120 s and were averaged over the entire collection period.

Sacrifice and Isolation of Samples-- All animals (8 male and 8 female rats) were killed by decapitation at the start of the light cycle. The interscapular BAT depot was dissected and weighed. The BAT was then homogenized in HEPES/sucrose buffer (250 mM sucrose, 1 mM HEPES, 0.2 mM EDTA) with a Teflon/glass homogenizer. Homogenate was used for total protein content, cytochrome-c oxidase (COX; EC 1.9.3.1) activity determination, and Western blot analysis. Protein concentration was measured by the method of Lowry et al. (22). COX activity was measured using a spectrophotometric method (23); DNA was measured using diaminobenzoic acid method (24), and the triglyceride content was measured using the Folch extract (25) and determined with a Sigma chemical kit (triglycerides triglyceride (INT)20).

Preparation of Isolated Adipocytes and Lipolysis Assays-- Brown adipocytes were isolated from BAT of each rat (7 male and 7 female rats) by modification of the method of O'Donnell and Horwitz (55). Cell counts were performed with an improved Neubauer hemocytometer.

Measurements of lipolytic activity were performed by incubating isolated adipocytes (125,000 cells/ml) at 37 °C in a shaking bath in 0.5 ml of KRB buffer (modified with 4% bovine serum albumin, 10 mM glucose, 250 units/ml penicillin, and 250 µg/ml streptomycin) in the presence of various concentrations of lipolytic agents under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in O2, and then incubated for 60 min in a 37 °C shaking (49 cpm) water bath. The ligands and concentrations used in this study are as follows: norepinephrine (beta 1-, beta 2-, beta 3-, and alpha 2-AR agonist), isoprenaline (beta 1-, beta 2-, and beta 3-AR agonist), CGP12177A (selective partial beta 3-AR agonist but beta 1- and beta 2-AR antagonist), forskolin (stimulating adenylyl cyclase) from 10-9 to 10-4 M, and dibutyryl cyclic AMP (stimulating protein kinase A) from 10-9 to 10-3 M. After 60 min of incubation, the reaction was stopped in an ice water bath for 30 min to allow the adipocytes to separate from the buffer, and aliquots (200 µl) of the cell-free medium were taken to determine the glycerol concentration, as an index of lipolysis. The glycerol content of the deproteinated supernatant was determined enzymatically with a Sigma chemical kit (triglyceride (GPO-Trinder) number 337).

Western Blot for UCP1 and Adrenergic Receptors (alpha 2A-AR and beta 3-AR)-- Varying amounts of BAT total protein of homogenate (15 µg for UCP1 and 25 µg for adrenergic receptor) were fractionated by SDS-PAGE (12% polyacrylamide for UCP1 and 9% polyacrylamide for adrenergic receptors) according to Laemmli (26) and electrotransfered onto a nitrocellulose filter as described elsewhere (27). Staining with Ponceau S was used to provide visual evidence for correct loading and electrophoretic transfer of proteins to nitrocellulose filter. Blocking and development of the immunoblots were performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting analysis system (Amersham Biosciences). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against UCP1 and goat polyclonal antibodies against alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor and beta 3-adrenergic receptor were used as primary antibodies. Bands in films were analyzed by scanner photodensitometry and quantified using the Kodak 1D Image Analysis Software.

Autoradiograms of membrane proteins revealed a protein exhibiting an apparent molecular mass of 32, 58, and 55 kDa, for UCP1, beta 3-AR, and alpha 2A-AR, respectively. The difference between the values obtained for beta 3-AR and alpha 2A-AR and the corresponding calculated molecular mass based on the deduced amino acids of rat genes, is attributed to the presence of carbohydrate moiety (28).

Electron Microscopic Analysis-- For electron microscopic examination, BAT was carefully removed and placed in ice-cold fixative buffer (2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M trihydrated sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2) for 6 h. The specimens were then washed four times in 0.2 M trihydrated sodium cacodylate buffer and postfixed (1% OsO4) for 2 h. The fixed pellets were dehydrated in graded acetone steps, stained with 2% uranyl acetate overnight, and embedded in Spurr's resin. Ultrathin sections for electron microscopy, about 50 nm thick, were stained with saturated lead citrate solution and examined by a Hitachi H-600 electron microscope at 75 kV. Transmission electron micrographs were obtained at magnifications of ×2,500 for locularity analysis and ×15,000 for mitochondrial analysis.

For morphometric studies, scanning and transmission electron micrographs were analyzed by Scion Image and Zeiss KS-100 software. In the case of locularity evaluation, the analysis was performed randomly in a double-blind test; sections (three from each animal) were independently graded (by five people) for degree of multilocularity. In the case of mitochondrial morphology, the analysis was performed randomly from 340 mitochondria from three animals per group.

Materials-- All enzymes, substrates, and coenzymes were obtained from Sigma. Antibody for UCP1 was obtained from Alpha Diagnostic International (San Antonio, TX), and antibodies for beta 3-AR and alpha 2A-AR were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (±)-Norepinephrine bitartrate salt, (-)-isoproterenol (+)-bitartrate salt (isoprenaline), forskolin, dibutyryl cyclic AMP, bovine serum albumin (fraction V), and Clostridium histolyticum collagenase type II were obtained from Sigma. (±)-CGP12177A was obtained from Research Biochemicals International. Reagents for glycerol determination and routine chemicals used were from Sigma, Panreac (Spain), Amersham Biosciences, and Cultek (Spain).

Statistical Analysis-- The lipolytic activity was expressed as a percentage stimulation over basal lipolysis levels. All agonists caused a concentration-dependent stimulation of glycerol release that reached a plateau at the highest agonist concentrations. Dose-response curves for agonists and the differences between male and female rats in the maximal capacity and EC50 differences were fitted with nonlinear regression analysis for sigmoidal curves using GraFit computer program (R. J. Leatherbarrow, version 4, Erithacus Software Ltd.). This data processing allowed us to calculate the maximal stimulation of the glycerol release induced by each agonist, and EC50 was used as an affinity value. Likewise the differences between male and female rats in the maximal capacity and EC50 values were obtained with the same program. The level of probability was set at p < 0.05 as statistically significant.

With respect to body and tissue weights, COX activity, protein, DNA, triglyceride content and oxygen consumption, adrenergic receptor levels, basal lipolysis, and morphometric analysis, differences between groups were assessed by Student's t test. The analysis was performed with SPSS 10.0 for Windows. The level of probability was set at p < 0.05 as statistically significant.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Characteristics of BAT in Male and Female Rats-- Previous studies (19, 20) have clearly demonstrated that female rats show a lower threshold temperature for cold-induced thermogenic response, showing a higher thermogenic capacity at 22 °C, the usual rodent housing temperature, than males. Thus, in order to establish further the characterization of this response, some BAT parameters were obtained in female and male rats (see Table I). Female rats showed clear signs of BAT recruitment compared with males; their BAT depot represented a higher percentage of total body mass (47% with respect to males) showing marked BAT hypertrophia with a lower DNA content and higher triglyceride and protein content. The greater amount of protein has been attributed to an increase of mitochondrial protein (20).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Effect of gender on body weight and general BAT parameters in male and female rats
Data are the means ± S.E. of 8 animals per group. Significant differences are from Student's t test (p < 0.05).

Although there was no significant difference in specific COX activity (IU/mg protein) between genders (see Table II), female rats had a higher COX activity per g of tissue (38% with respect to males). The UCP1 levels (per mg of protein) were higher in female rats (representative Western blots are given in Fig. 1), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Nevertheless, the levels of UCP1 per g of tissue were 70% higher (statistically different) in female rats than male rats. In the same way, the UCP1 content corrected per Kg0.75 was, in females, ~2-fold that of males. The COX/UCP1 ratio was lower in female rats, which could indicate a tendency to higher uncoupling of the respiratory chain from ATP synthesis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Effect of gender on BAT levels of UCP1 and alpha 2A-, beta 3-AR, and protein levels in male and female Wistar rats
UCP1 and adrenergic receptor mean values of the male rats were set as 100%; calculated ratios of COX/UCP1 and alpha 2A/beta 3-AR of male rats were set as 1. The data represent the means ± S.E. of 8 animals per group. Significant differences are from Student's t test (p < 0.05).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Representative Western blot of beta 3-AR, alpha 2A-AR, and UCP1 levels in interscapular brown adipose tissue of male and female rats. 25 µg of total protein was loaded for adrenergic receptor and 15 µg for UCP1. Developed Western blot nitrocellulose membranes were exposed to Hyperfilm ECL (Amersham Biosciences), and representative bands in film are shown.

As commented previously, the alpha 2/beta 3-AR balance is key in the regulation of thermogenesis and lipolysis in BAT by modulating the net adrenergic signal response. It has been established that a lower alpha 2/beta 3-AR ratio would lead to a greater thermogenic and lipolytic activity and vice versa (18, 29, 30). In this study, the protein levels of alpha 2A-AR were lower in female than male rats, ~50% (representative Western blot is given in Fig. 1). With respect to beta 3-AR protein levels, there were no differences between genders. However, considering the levels of alpha 2A-AR and beta 3-AR per g of tissue, the profile was modified, with female rats showing higher values of beta 3-AR and slightly lower levels of alpha 2A-AR. Thus, the lower alpha 2A-/beta 3-AR ratio in female rats supports the fact that under low adrenergic stimulation they show a higher thermogenic capacity than males.

Respirometry-- Considering the gender differences in BAT thermogenic capacity, it was interesting to study whether this feature was found in BAT energy expenditure. Because global oxygen consumption is held to correlate positively with BAT oxygen consumption (31), the whole animal O2 consumption, CO2 release, and RQ value were measured (see Table III). Female rats showed a higher O2 consumption than males; this increase was on the order of 30%. In accordance with this increase, the values of CO2 released also reached higher levels in female rats. In this way, female rats had a higher energy expenditure than males. The RQ showed no significant differences between genders.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Effect of gender on O2 consumption, CO2 production, and respiratory quotient (RQ) in male and female rats
Data are the means ± S.E. of 14 animals per group. Significant differences are from Student's t test (p < 0.05).

Histological Analysis in BAT-- In addition, in order to evaluate further whether the findings commented above (concerning thermogenic features of brown adipose tissue in both males and females) were reflected in particular histological characteristics, a whole tissue histological study was performed. Thus, female BAT showed a more shaped multilocular brown adipocyte structure, i.e. numerous small lipid droplets dispersed in the cytoplasmic space around a central nucleus (see Fig. 2). This picture is characteristic of the greater thermogenic activation situation of this tissue (32), indicating that female rats showed an increased thermogenic activity in BAT compared with male rats.


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Representative mitochondrial images of IBAT of male and female Wistar rats. White line represents 1 µm.

Mitochondrial Morphometric Study in BAT of Male and Female Rats-- Because mitochondria do not always have the same distribution or the same morphological or biochemical features varying in several physiological situations (33), the mitochondrial morphometric parameters were also studied in order to analyze the existence of gender-related differences. Thus, the area, perimeter, cristae length, and cristae density were measured (see Table IV). Female rats showed a greater size of mitochondria than males: larger area (20%), longer perimeter (10%), greater cristae length (42%), and higher mitochondrial cristae density (14%) than male rats. In Fig. 3, representative photographs of BAT mitochondria from male and female rats can be observed. It is possible to appreciate that female BAT had bigger mitochondria and a greater amount of cristae.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV
Effects of gender on the mitochondrial morphometric parameters in BAT
The data represent the mean ± S.E. from 340 mitochondria of 3 animals per group and were analyzed by Student's t test. Significant differences (p < 0.05).


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Representative interscapular brown adipose tissue electronic microscopy images of male and female rats. White line represents 10 µm.

Gender Differences in Lipolytic Activity in Isolated Brown Adipocyte Cells-- It is well established that catecholamines secreted from the sympathetic nerves in BAT promote mitochondriogenesis (7), general recruitment (37, 38), and thermogenesis (34). At this point several questions may arise, The first is whether the gender differences in the morphology and function of BAT are due to a distinct NE release in this tissue. Along these lines, gender-related differences in sympathetic outflow in BAT have been established; thus, McDonald et al. (35) demonstrated that 6-month-old 26 °C housed female rats show a higher sympathetic activity on BAT by measuring NE turnover. Furthermore, estradiol treatment has been shown to restore sympathetic nervous system activity and outflow in BAT of ovariectomized rats (36).

Second, the sympathetic signaling to BAT is not necessarily a full indicator of thermogenic responsiveness, suggesting in this way that differences with respect to signal transduction could also be involved in thermogenesis activity in BAT (37, 38). In order to go further into this issue, functional effects of different adrenoreceptor agonists were studied: norepinephrine (beta 1-, beta 2-, beta 3-, and alpha 2-AR agonist), isoprenaline (beta 1-, beta 2-, and beta 3-AR agonist), and CGP12177A (selective partial beta 3-AR agonist but beta 1- and beta 2-AR antagonist), in isolated brown adipose cells from female and male rats. Thus, the EC50 value and maximal lipolytic capacity as a percentage of basal lipolysis are compiled in Table V.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V
Effect of gender on adrenergically stimulated lipolytic activity of isolated fat cells from interscapular brown adipose tissue of male and female rats
Data are means ± S.E. of 7 animals per group. The lipolytic activity was expressed as a percentage of stimulation over basal lipolysis. Maximal action over basal lipolysis, EC50, and significant differences were obtained using the GraFit computer program.

Isolated adipocytes from female and male rats showed no differences in basal lipolysis. All agonists stimulated lipolysis in a concentration-dependent pattern.

In male adipocytes the potency rank for agonists was isoprenaline > norepinephrine > CGP12177A. In female adipocytes the potency rank was isoprenaline > CGP12177A > norepinephrine. In the latter, norepinephrine gave a greater maximal stimulation (+30%) and showed a marked affinity response to CGP12177A treatment compared with male rats (see Table V and Fig. 4), whereas female rats had a lower affinity in the case of isoprenaline treatment.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Analysis of the dose-response curve for CGP12177A-induced glycerol release in isolated brown adipocytes from male (open symbols) and female (closed symbols) rats.

Norepinephrine, which stimulates both alpha 2A-AR and beta -AR, acted as a full agonist in the case of females, showing approximately 99% intrinsic activity with respect to the isoprenaline maximal effect, whereas in male rats it was only a partial agonist with approximately 66% intrinsic activity. In the latter, this would point to the higher presence of an inhibitory effect, due to alpha 2A-AR. In addition, the results obtained when increasing doses of NE were tested in the presence of RS79948 (alpha 2A-AR antagonist) point to the inhibitory effects of alpha 2A-AR being more important in male rats than in females (data not shown). The lower alpha 2A-AR pool in female rats could contribute, at least in part, to the observed gender-dependent variations in BAT thermogenic and lipolytic response.

It is also worth noting that the affinity of beta 3-AR to its agonist CGP12177A is more than 1 order of magnitude higher in female than in male rats, without any gender differences in beta 3-AR functional receptor pool (determined by the maximal capacity value). These data suggest that under low physiological NE concentrations, the beta 3-AR of female rats would be more activated.

On the other hand, several links in the lipolytic and thermogenic pathway should also be considered when it comes to establishing adrenergic signal response differences. Thus, both forskolin, which mimics nonspecific beta -agonist effects and the combined effects of adenylyl cyclase-coupled receptors, and Bt2cAMP, which mimics the effects of protein kinase A-interacting factors, were used in adipocytes isolated from male rats. The maximal stimulation was obtained with Bt2cAMP, which was higher in males than females (see Table VI), whereas there were no differences in forskolin-induced response. These data suggest that all the links involved in the adrenergic signal transduction pathway could be important to establish gender dimorphism in the control of thermogenesis and lipolysis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VI
Effect of gender on post-receptor level stimulated lipolytic activity of isolated fat cells from interscapular brown adipose tissue of male and female rats
Data are means ± S.E. of 7 animals per group. The lipolytic activity was obtained using the GraFit computer program, and expressed as a percentage of stimulation over basal lipolysis.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

In this paper, gender differences in the thermogenic response, adrenergic control pathway, and morphology of BAT in 110-day-old rats have been reported.

Female rats had a higher energy expenditure than males such as can be concluded from the oxygen consumption values. Likewise, there was a clear sign of BAT thermogenesis activation; their BAT depot represented a greater percentage of total body mass, with marked BAT hypertrophy, a higher multilocular arrangement of lipid droplets, greater UCP1 levels, and a lower COX/UCP1 ratio.

The gender dimorphism observed in the thermogenic capacity and activity was accompanied by differences in mitochondrial morphological features. Thus, the female rats, more thermogenically activated, showed larger and more active mitochondria (greater mitochondrial size, longer cristae, and higher cristae density) in comparison with males; these parameters are considered as an index of functional activity of mitochondria (39). This increased size of mitochondria and greater number of cristae per mitochondrion in BAT have been reported under different conditions like cold exposure, which stimulates the activity of BAT (40, 41), reflecting their role in heightened metabolic activity during thermogenesis, but never before had gender-dependent differences in morphological features been established.

As far as the signal transduction pathway of the thermogenic activation is concerned, gender differences have been found for different adrenoreceptor protein levels, which might contribute to explaining, at least in part, the gender differences in thermogenic and lipolytic parameters. In this study, female rats expressed lower levels per mg of protein of alpha 2A than males, with no observed gender differences in beta 3-AR levels, thus the alpha 2A/beta 3-AR ratio was double in male rats than females. Therefore, the results obtained in this paper could help to understand that under low adrenergic stimulation (22 °C usual rodent housing temperature), female rats have a higher thermogenic response than males. Thus, in females, this lesser presence of alpha 2A-AR, a receptor with high affinity for catecholamines and clearly involved in the inhibition of lipolysis (14), could be responsible for the higher thermogenic activity due to a lower inhibitory effect on thermogenic and lipolytic signal transduction pathway. Moreover, BAT of female rats has a more sensitive beta 3-AR to NE signal (EC50 10-fold lower for CGP12177A), leading to a higher signal for lipolytic and thermogenic activation with identical levels of NE.

One of the causes for these gender differences in thermogenic activity and control could be dependent, at least in part, on the action of sex steroid hormones. Hence, both in vivo and in vitro studies have documented that sex steroid hormones modify both lipolytic signal transduction pathway by changing the responsiveness and/or density of beta - and alpha 2A- AR (42-47) and the thermogenic regulatory system by acting directly on brown adipocytes (48-50). In particular, it has been demonstrated that 17beta -estradiol modulates both beta 3-AR affinity and density suggesting both genomic and non-genomic effects (51).

Moreover, the study carried out on forskolin and Bt2cAMP reveals that gender dimorphisms not only were in the regulation points in lipolysis and thermogenesis important at receptor level but also at postreceptor level. In the latter level, sexual hormonal effects have been well established (52-54).

    CONCLUSIONS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

Taken together, our results support the idea that brown adipose tissue hormonal environment could be involved in the different elements of lipolytic and thermogenic adrenergic pathway activation. Gender dimorphism is both at receptor (changing alpha 2A-AR density and beta 3-AR affinity) and at postreceptor (modulating the links involved in the adrenergic signal transduction) levels. These changes in the adrenergic control could be responsible, at least in part, both for the important mitochondrial recruitment differences and functional and morphological features of BAT in female rats under usual rodent housing temperature (22 °C), a more activated BAT with a higher multilocular arrangement, greater mitochondrial machinery (bigger mitochondria and higher cristae density), and finally a higher thermogenic capacity and activity.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank M. Pocoví and Dr. F. Hierro from the Servei Cientific-técnic of Universitat de les Illes Balears for their technical assistance with the electron microscopic analyses.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e Investigación Científica Grants BFI2000-0988-C06-04 and BFI2000-0988-C06-06.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by a grant of the Universitat de les Illes Balears.

§ Supported by a grant of the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.

Supported by grant from the Comunitat Autònoma de les Illes Balears.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dra. Pilar Roca, Dept. Biologia Fonamental i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de les Illes Balears. Cra. Valldemossa km 7.5. E-07071-Palma de Mallorca, Spain. Tel.: 34-971-17-31-72; Fax: 34-971-173184; E-mail: pilar.roca@uib.es.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M207229200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: BAT, brown adipose tissue; NE, norepinephrine; Bt2cAMP, dibutyryl cyclic AMP; UCP1, uncoupling protein 1; AR, adrenergic receptor; FFA, free fatty acids; COX, cytochrome-c oxidase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES

1. Himms-Hagen, J. (1990) FASEB J. 4, 2890-2898[Abstract]
2. Nedergaard, J., Golozoubova, V., Matthias, A., Asadi, A., Jacobsson, A., and Cannon, B. (2001) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1504, 82-106[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Matthias, A., Ohlson, K. B., Fredriksson, J. M., Jacobsson, A., Nedergaard, J., and Cannon, B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 25073-25081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Ricquier, D., and Bouillaud, F. (2000) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 529, 3-10[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Herron, D., Rehnmark, S., Nechad, M., Loncar, D., Cannon, B., and Nedergaard, J. (1990) FEBS Lett. 268, 296-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Nechad, M., Nedergaard, J., and Cannon, B. (1987) Am. J. Physiol. 253, C889-C894[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Bronnikov, G., Houstek, J., and Nedergaard, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 2006-2013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Valladares, A., Porras, A., Alvarez, A. M., Roncero, C., and Benito, M. (2000) J. Cell. Physiol. 185, 324-330[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Lafontan, M., Barbe, P., Galitzky, J., Tavernier, G., Langin, D., Carpene, C., Bousquet-Melou, A., and Berlan, M. (1997) Hum. Reprod. 12 Suppl. 1, 6-20[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Atgie, C., D'allaire, F., and Bukowiecki, L. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, C1136-C1142[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Lafontan, M., and Berlan, M. (1995) Endocr. Rev. 16, 716-738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Bengtsson, T., Cannon, B., and Nedergaard, J. (2000) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 347, 643-651[CrossRef]
13. Rehnmark, S., Nechad, M., Herron, D., Cannon, B., and Nedergaard, J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 16464-16471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Chaudhry, A., and Granneman, J. G. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, R147-R153[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Germack, R., Starzec, A. B., Vassy, R., and Perret, G. Y. (1997) Br. J. Pharmacol. 120, 201-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Zhao, J., Cannon, B., and Nedergaard, J. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, R2002-R2011[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Valet, P., Grujic, D., Wade, J., Ito, M., Zingaretti, M. C., Soloveva, V., Ross, S. R., Graves, R. A., Cinti, S., Lafontan, M., and Lowell, B. B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34797-34802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Rodriguez, E., Monjo, M., Rodriguez-Cuenca, S., Pujol, E., Amengual, B., Roca, P., and Palou, A. (2001) Pfluegers Arch. 442, 396-403[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Roca, P., Rodriguez, A. M., Oliver, P., Bonet, M. L., Quevedo, S., Pico, C., and Palou, A. (1999) Pfluegers Arch. 438, 628-634[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Quevedo, S., Roca, P., Pico, C., and Palou, A. (1998) Pfluegers Arch. 436, 689-695[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ghadially, F. N. (1988) Ultrastructural Pathology of the Cell and Matrix , 3rd Ed. , p. 194, Butterworth-Heinemann, London
22. Lowry, O., Rosebrough, N., Farr, A., and Randall, R. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275[Free Full Text]
23. Wharton, D., and Tzagoloff, A. (1967) Methods Enzymol. 10, 245-246[CrossRef]
24. Thomas, P. S., and Farquhar, M. N. (1978) Anal. Biochem. 89, 35-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Folch, J., Lees, M., and Sloane-Stanley, G. H. (1957) J. Biol. Chem. 226, 497-503[Free Full Text]
26. Laemmli, U. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Puigserver, P., Llado, I., Palou, A., and Gianotti, M. (1991) Biochem. J. 279, 575-579[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Cervantes-Olivier, P., Durieu-Trautmann, O., Delavier-Klutchko, C., and Strosberg, A. D. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 3765-3770[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. LLado, I., Rodríguez-Cuenca, S., Pujol, E., Monjo, M. E., Estrany, M., Roca, P., and Palou, A. (2002) Obesity Res. 4, 296-309
30. Mauriege, P., Galitzky, J., Berlan, M., and Lafontan, M. (1987) Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 17, 156-165[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Gomez-Ambrosi, J., Fruhbeck, G., Aguado, M., Milagro, F. I., Margareto, J., and Martinez, A. J. (2001) Int. J. Mol. Med. 8, 103-109[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. McBennet, S. M., Andrews, J. F., Challoner, D., and Jakobson, M. E. (1993) Obesity in Europe , pp. 399-406, John Libbey & Co. Ltd., London
33. Lanni, A., Moreno, M., Lombardi, A., and Goglia, F. (1996) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 28, 337-343[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Himms-Hagen, J. (1991) Front. Neuroendocrinol. 12, 38-93
35. McDonald, R. B., Hamilton, J. S., and Horwitz, B. A. (1993) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 204, 117-121[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Yoshida, T., Nishioka, H., Yoshioka, K., and Kondo, M. (1987) Metabolism 36, 1-6[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. McDonald, R. B., and Horwitz, B. A. (1999) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 31, 507-516[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Nava, M. P., Fernandez, A., Abelenda, M., and Puerta, M. (1994) Pfluegers Arch. 426, 40-43[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Loncar, D., Afzelius, B. A., and Cannon, B. (1988) J. Ultrastruct. Mol. Struct. Res. 101, 199-209[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Morroni, M., Barbatelli, G., Zingaretti, M. C., and Cinti, S. (1995) Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 19, 126-131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Cinti, S. (2001) Proc. Nutr. Soc. 60, 319-328[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. De Pergola, G., Holmang, A., Svedberg, J., Giorgino, R., and Bjorntorp, P. (1990) Acta Endocrinol. 123, 61-66[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Giudicelli, Y., Dieudonne, M. N., Lacasa, D., Pasquier, Y. N., and Pecquery, R. (1993) Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 48, 91-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Lacasa, D., Agli, B., Pecquery, R., and Giudicelli, Y. (1991) Endocrinology 128, 747-753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Pecquery, R., Dieudonne, M. N., Cloix, J. F., Leneveu, M. C., Dausse, J. P., and Giudicelli, Y. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 206, 112-118[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Bouloumie, A., Valet, P., Daviaud, D., Prats, H., Lafontan, M., and Saulnier-Blache, J. S. (1994) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 269, 95-103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Xu, X. F., De, Pergola, G., and Bjorntorp, P. (1991) Endocrinology 128, 379-382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Abelenda, M., and Puerta, M. (1999) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 141, 630-636[Abstract]
49. Puerta, M., Abelenda, M., Nava, M. P., and Fernandez, A. (1993) Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 71, 858-861[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Pedersen, S. B., Bruun, J. M., Kristensen, K., and Richelsen, B. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 288, 191-197[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Malo, A., and Puerta, M. (2001) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 145, 87-91[Abstract]
52. Xu, X., De, Pergola, G., Eriksson, P. S., Fu, L., Carlsson, B., Yang, S., Eden, S., and Bjorntorp, P. (1993) Endocrinology 132, 1651-1657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Pecquery, R., Dieudonne, M. N., Leneveu, M. C., and Giudicelli, Y. (1990) Endocrinology 126, 241-245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Lacasa, D., Denis, D., Agli, B., De, Mazancourt, P., and Giudicelli, Y. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1224, 527-532[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. O'Donnell, M. E., and Horwitz, B. A. (1982) Am. J. Physiol. 242, C46-C51[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. W. Irwin, J. Yao, R. T. Hamilton, E. Cadenas, R. D. Brinton, and J. Nilsen
Progesterone and Estrogen Regulate Oxidative Metabolism in Brain Mitochondria
Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 3167 - 3175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
A. Valle, R. Guevara, F. J. Garcia-Palmer, P. Roca, and J. Oliver
Sexual dimorphism in liver mitochondrial oxidative capacity is conserved under caloric restriction conditions
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): C1302 - C1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
B. Colom, J. Oliver, P. Roca, and F. J. Garcia-Palmer
Caloric restriction and gender modulate cardiac muscle mitochondrial H2O2 production and oxidative damage
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2007; 74(3): 456 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Rodriguez-Cuenca, M. Monjo, M. Gianotti, A. M. Proenza, and P. Roca
Expression of mitochondrial biogenesis-signaling factors in brown adipocytes is influenced specifically by 17beta-estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2007; 292(1): E340 - E346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. Anzulovich, A. Mir, M. Brewer, G. Ferreyra, C. Vinson, and R. Baler
Elovl3: a model gene to dissect homeostatic links between the circadian clock and nutritional status
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 2690 - 2700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R. Justo, J. Boada, M. Frontera, J. Oliver, J. Bermudez, and M. Gianotti
Gender dimorphism in rat liver mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and biogenesis
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): C372 - C378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Valle, A. Catala-Niell, B. Colom, F. J. Garcia-Palmer, J. Oliver, and P. Roca
Sex-related differences in energy balance in response to caloric restriction
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2005; 289(1): E15 - E22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Rodriguez-Cuenca, M. Monjo, A. M. Proenza, and P. Roca
Depot differences in steroid receptor expression in adipose tissue: possible role of the local steroid milieu
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2005; 288(1): E200 - E207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. T. Truong, J. J. Erasmus, R. F. Munden, E. M. Marom, B. S. Sabloff, G. W. Gladish, D. A. Podoloff, and H. A. Macapinlac
Focal FDG Uptake in Mediastinal Brown Fat Mimicking Malignancy: A Potential Pitfall Resolved on PET/CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1127 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. W.D. Yeung, R. K. Grewal, M. Gonen, H. Schoder, and S. M. Larson
Patterns of 18F-FDG Uptake in Adipose Tissue and Muscle: A Potential Source of False-Positives for PET
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1789 - 1796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Monjo, A. M. Rodriguez, A. Palou, and P. Roca
Direct Effects of Testosterone, 17{beta}-Estradiol, and Progesterone on Adrenergic Regulation in Cultured Brown Adipocytes: Potential Mechanism for Gender-Dependent Thermogenesis
Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4923 - 4930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. G. Nickerson, S. G. Dugan, G. Drouin, S. F. Perry, and T. W. Moon
Activity of the unique {beta}-adrenergic Na+/H+ exchanger in trout erythrocytes is controlled by a novel {beta}3-AR subtype
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2003; 285(3): R526 - R535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/45/42958    most recent
M207229200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-Cuenca, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez-Cuenca, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement