|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206723200 on September 4, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 45, 43262-43270, November 8, 2002
Reversible Unfolding of FtsZ Cell Division Proteins from Archaea
and Bacteria
COMPARISON WITH EUKARYOTIC TUBULIN FOLDING AND ASSEMBLY*
José Manuel
Andreu §,
María Angela
Oliva , and
Octavio
Monasterio¶
From the Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas,
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas,
Velázquez 144, 28006 Madrid, Spain and the
¶ Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias,
Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile
Received for publication, July 8, 2002, and in revised form, August 25, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The stability, refolding, and assembly properties
of FtsZ cell division proteins from Methanococcus
jannaschii and Escherichia coli have been
investigated. Their guanidinium chloride unfolding has been studied by
circular dichroism spectroscopy. FtsZ from E. coli and
tubulin released the bound guanine nucleotide, coinciding with an
initial unfolding stage at low denaturant concentrations, followed by
unfolding of the apoprotein. FtsZ from M. jannaschii released its nucleotide without any detectable secondary structural change. It unfolded in an apparently two-state transition at larger denaturant concentrations. Isolated FtsZ polypeptide chains were capable of spontaneous refolding and GTP-dependent
assembly. The homologous eukaryotic tubulin monomers misfold in
solution, but fold within the cytosolic chaperonin CCT. Analysis
of the extensive tubulin loop insertions in the FtsZ/tubulin common
core and of the intermolecular contacts in model microtubules and
tubulin-CCT complexes shows a loop insertion present at every element
of lateral protofilament contact and at every contact of tubulin with
CCT (except at loop T7). The polymers formed by purified FtsZ have a
distinct limited protofilament association in comparison with microtubules. We propose that the loop insertions of tubulin and its
CCT-assisted folding coevolved with the lateral association interfaces
responsible for extended two-dimensional polymerization into
microtubule polymers.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The eukaryotic cytoskeletal proteins actin and tubulin probably
have common ancestors with their respective prokaryotic homologs MreB
(1) and FtsZ (2). MreB is a nucleotide-binding protein that is
essential for bacterial rod shape (3), whereas the GTP-binding protein
FtsZ is the key component of the prokaryotic cell division machinery
(4). Archaeal FtsZ from Methanococcus jannaschii (2) and
eukaryotic tubulin (5) share a common core of similarly folded
N-terminal nucleotide-binding and middle structural domains. Their main
differences include the tubulin C-terminal domain and several of the
complex surface loops of tubulin; however, most of the seven
nucleotide-binding loops are well conserved between FtsZ and tubulin,
which constitute a distinct family of GTPases (6). No structure of a
bacterial FtsZ has so far been reported. Tubulin  -dimers assemble
into microtubules, long cylinders made of laterally associated
protofilaments that form the mitotic spindle. Tubulin interacts with
microtubule-associated proteins and with motor proteins mainly through
its C-terminal domains. Docking the electron crystallographic structure
of tubulin dimers (5, 7) into lower resolution electron density maps of
microtubules has generated pseudo-atomic models of microtubules (8-10). On the other hand, FtsZ assembles at the future site of cell
division, forming the so called Z-ring (11, 12), the structure of which
has resisted observation. The Z-ring is stabilized by the binding of
the C-terminal end of FtsZ to cell division proteins FtsA and ZipA;
FtsA and ZipA recruit FtsK, which in turn interacts with the other
septal proteins FtsQ, FtsL, FtsW, FtsI, and FtsN (4, 13). FtsZ monomers
form in vitro polymers made of tubulin-like protofilaments
with the characteristic 4-nm axial spacing (14, 15). Bacterial FtsZ
expressed in mammalian cells does not co-assemble with microtubules,
but can be induced to form other filaments (16). It is conceivable that
the structural complexity of tubulin relative to FtsZ has evolved
together with its assembly into microtubules.
Folding of many newly synthesized proteins in the cytosol is assisted
by molecular chaperones (17). Actin and tubulin are the paradigm of
eukaryotic proteins that require the cytoplasmic chaperonin
CCT1 (TriC) for their
in vivo or in vitro folding (18-21). On the
other hand, the ease of overproducing soluble FtsZ and MreB in bacteria suggests that these proteins may be able to fold spontaneously. In
fact, FtsZ was not identified as an in vivo substrate of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL (although it is a two- -domain
protein), but the less abundant cell division inhibitor MinD was (22); and FtsZ did not bind to GroEL or CCT in vitro (23).
However, HscA (a protein of the Hsp70 family) and DnaK have been
implicated in FtsZ ring formation through a chaperone-like activity
(24). Monomers of - and -tubulin bind to CCT in a quasi-native
conformation in which the N-terminal, middle, and C-terminal domains
are apparently opened up in the chaperonin cavity, and it has been
proposed that the eukaryotic chaperonin coevolved with tubulin and
actin (25, 26). Upon ATP binding, CCT undergoes a structural change
that closes the tubulin monomer into its native GTP-binding
conformation, followed by ATP hydrolysis by CCT and tubulin release
(27).
In this work, we have investigated the stability, folding, and assembly
ability of refolded FtsZ molecules in comparison with tubulin. For this
purpose, we first studied the unfolding by guanidinium chloride
(GdmCl) of FtsZ from the
hyperthermophilic archaeon M. jannaschii and from the
bacterium Escherichia coli by circular dichroism
spectroscopy. The unfolding of E. coli FtsZ and of tubulin from calf brain was multistage, starting with nucleotide release. M. jannaschii FtsZ unfolded in a single stage at higher
GdmCl concentrations at 25 °C; however, it released its nucleotide
at lower denaturant concentrations. The unfolding of FtsZ by GdmCl was
reversible, yielding refolded FtsZ capable of GTP-dependent assembly, whereas the denaturation transitions of tubulin could not be
reversed. We further analyzed the structures and assemblies of FtsZ and
tubulin, which suggest that the loop insertions of tubulin and its
CCT-assisted folding coevolved with the lateral association interfaces
responsible for two-dimensional polymerization into microtubules.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Proteins, Concentration Measurements, and
Chemicals--
M. jannaschii FtsZ with a C-terminal
Gly-Ser-His6 extension (Mr 39,891, 372 residues) (2) was overproduced in E. coli BL21(DE3) pLys
and purified by HiTrap Ni2+ chelating affinity and
Sephacryl S400 (Amersham Biosciences) size-exclusion chromatography. It
typically contained ~0.8 nucleotide bound, of which 80% was GDP and
20% was GTP; and it was stored concentrated (10-30 mg
ml 1) at 70 °C (28). Its guanine nucleotide content
was spectrophotometrically determined after extraction with cold 0.5 N HClO4 employing an extinction coefficient of
12,400 M 1 cm 1 at 254 nm (29).
The concentration of M. jannaschii FtsZ was determined from
its absorption spectrum in 6 M GdmCl, after subtraction of
the absorbance due to the guanine nucleotide ( 254 = 13,620 M 1 cm 1 and
280 = 8100 M 1
cm 1 in 6 M GdmCl) (28), employing apoprotein
extinction coefficients of 280 = 6970 M 1 cm 1 and 254 = 4275 M 1 cm 1 (calculated for 1 Trp, 1 Tyr, and 8 Phe residues) (30, 31). The approximate extinction
coefficients determined for native M. jannaschii FtsZ are
11,600 M 1 cm 1 at 254 and 280 nm
when containing 0.8 mol of nucleotide after dilution in neutral buffer
and 13,000 M 1 cm 1 at 280 nm and
14,200 1 cm 1 at 254 nm when containing 1.0 mol of nucleotide typically after equilibration of the native protein
in GDP- or GTP-containing buffer. M. jannaschii FtsZ without
the unnatural Gly-Ser-His6 extension was constructed from
the same plasmid, pHis17-mjFtsZ-H6 (2), and purified by
ammonium sulfate precipitation and ion-exchange and hydrophobic
chromatography.2
E. coli FtsZ (Mr 40,324, 383 residues) was overproduced in E. coli BL21(DE3) and purified
by two cycles of Ca2+-induced precipitation, followed by
Mono Q anion-exchange chromatography (32). It typically contained
1.0 GDP bound per FtsZ and was stored concentrated (20-50 mg
ml 1) at 70 °C. Its concentration was
spectrophotometrically determined in 6 M GdmCl,
after subtraction of the nucleotide absorption (as described
above), employing extinction coefficients of 280 = 3840 M 1 cm 1 and
254 = 2750 M 1
cm 1 (note that E. coli FtsZ has no Trp
residues and 3 Tyr and 13 Phe residues).
Bovine brain tubulin  -dimers were purified by ammonium sulfate
precipitation, batch DEAE-Sephadex anion-exchange
chromatography, and Mg2+-induced precipitation
(33-35) and stored concentrated (~100 mg ml 1) under
liquid nitrogen. Tubulin  -dimers have 896 residues and a
molecular weight of 99,929, calculated for the major tubulin isotypes
from pig brain, not taking into account other isotypes and
post-translational modifications (for review, see Ref. 36). Tubulin
contained 1.6-2.0 mol of bound GTP. Tubulin dimer concentration was
spectrophotometrically determined at 276 nm employing the previously
measured extinction coefficients of 109,000 M 1 cm 1 in 6 M GdmCl
(the value calculated as described above for 8 Trp and 35 Tyr residues
and 1.8 ± 0.2 GTP is 109,000 ± 2000 M 1
cm 1) and 116,000 M 1
cm 1 in neutral buffer after light scattering correction
(34).
GdmCl and dithiothreitol (DTT) were from Calbiochem (Ultrol
grade), and TCEP was from Interchim. Pipes, Hepes, Mes, and GDP were from Sigma. GTP (lithium salt) was from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals. Other analytical grade chemicals were from Merck.
Circular Dichroism and Fluorescence Spectroscopy--
CD spectra
were acquired with Jasco 720 and 810 spectropolarimeters employing 1-mm
cells in thermostatted cell holders (0.1- and 0.2-mm cells for spectra
below 210 nm). The temperature was measured with a small thermocouple
placed into the cells. Four scans of each sample or buffer (1-nm
bandwidth and measurement interval, 20 nm min 1 scan
speed, and 4-s time constant) were averaged, but not smoothed. Accurate
CD measurements at fixed wavelengths were made from 5- to 10-min time
recordings of each sample (10-s intervals and 16-s time constant). CD
data (millidegrees) were reduced to mean residue ellipticity values
(degrees cm2 dmol 1) with Jasco J700 and J800
software and plotted with SigmaPlot. Fluorescence measurements were
made with a Fluorolog 3-221 instrument (Jobin Yvon-Spex,
Longiumeau, France) employing 2-nm excitation and 5-nm emission bandwidths.
Protein Unfolding--
Solutions of GdmCl were prepared
gravimetrically, and their concentration was confirmed by refractometry
(37). Concentrated protein stock solutions were diluted into 6 or 8 M GdmCl and 5 mM DTT solutions in buffer.
Alternately, more concentrated FtsZ solutions in 6 M GdmCl
were prepared by gravimetric addition of 1.009 mg of GdmCl/µl of
protein stock. Proteins were held a minimum of 0.5 h in 6 M GdmCl at 25 °C before refolding. For protein
refolding, the denaturant concentration was reduced by dialysis
(4 °C, >16 h) or by dilution (50- or 100-fold) in buffer. Buffers
were 20 mM Pipes-KOH and 5 mM DTT (pH 7.5) for
FtsZ and 10 mM sodium phosphate and 5 mM DTT
(pH 7.0) for tubulin.
Equilibrium GdmCl unfolding and refolding curves (37, 38) were
determined by careful dilution of native and denatured proteins,
respectively, into the corresponding GdmCl solutions in the same
buffers with 5 mM DTT, followed by equilibration (in an
Eppendorf Thermostat Plus) and CD measurements at 5 ± 1, 25 ± 1, and 42 ± 1 °C. At 25 °C, M. jannaschii
FtsZ required a minimum of 36 h to reach equilibrium in the
transition GdmCl range in both directions (but only a few minutes at 0 and 6 M GdmCl), whereas E. coli FtsZ required
2 h and tubulin required 1 h for equilibration at
intermediate GdmCl concentrations. Measurements of GdmCl-induced unfolding of M. jannaschii FtsZ at 55 ± 1 and 70 ± 1 °C were made by directly taking CD time recordings until
attainment of equilibrium (<100 min at 55 °C and <20 min at
70 °C) using cuvettes sealed with Teflon stoppers.
Nucleotide Release--
Measurements of nucleotide release
induced by GdmCl were made by protein depletion. The applicable
conditions were designed simulating sedimentation with the program
SIMCEN10 (kindly provided by Dr. Allen P. Minton, NIDDK,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) employing known molecular
weights and sedimentation coefficients and were empirically confirmed
in each case. Solutions of M. jannaschii FtsZ in 20 mM Pipes-KOH, 2 mM TCEP, and 0-4 M GdmCl (pH 7.5) were centrifuged in a Beckman TL120 rotor at 120,000 rpm
for 4 h at 25 °C. The nucleotide released was
spectrophotometrically measured in the upper half (0.5 ml) of each
tube, which was carefully removed and found to be depleted of protein.
Buffer blanks were employed, and the measurements were corrected by the
small sedimentation of GDP in samples without protein. Solutions of
E. coli FtsZ in 20 mM Pipes-KOH, 250 mM KCl, 2 mM TCEP, 10 µM GDP, and
0-1 M GdmCl (pH 7.5) were centrifuged for 3 h and
measured as described above. Solutions of tubulin in 10 mM
sodium phosphate, 2 mM DTT (which gave an acceptable
interference in this case; 2 mM TCEP precipitated tubulin),
10 µM GTP, and 0-1 M GdmCl (pH 7.0) were
centrifuged for 1 h and measured as described above.
FtsZ Assembly--
Solutions of M. jannaschii FtsZ
that had been dialyzed in the cold against 250-500 volumes of 20 mM Pipes-KOH, 2 mM DTT, and 10 µM
nucleotide (pH 7.5) were brought to 50 mM Pipes-KOH, 2 mM DTT, 10 µM nucleotide, 50 mM
KCl, and 1 mM EDTA (pH 6.5) (M. jannaschii FtsZ assembly buffer) at room temperature by addition of small volumes
of concentrated Pipes-KOH (pH 6.5), KCl, EDTA, and HCl, and their
concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically. Note that
M. jannaschii FtsZ partially precipitated if directly transferred to cold M. jannaschii FtsZ assembly buffer due
to the His6 tag added for purification
purposes.2 M. jannaschii FtsZ was placed into a
fluorometer cuvette thermostatted at 55 °C, and its 350 nm light
scattering at a 90° angle was monitored with a Shimadzu RF540
spectrofluorometer operating in the ratio mode (2-nm excitation and
emission band pass and ordinate scale of 1). M. jannaschii
FtsZ assembly was initiated by addition of 6 mM
MgCl2 followed by 1 mM GTP to the cuvette.
E. coli FtsZ in 6 M GdmCl or buffer was diluted
50- or 100-fold into cold 50 mM Mes-KOH, 50 mM
KCl, 2 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2 (pH
6.5) (E. coli FtsZ assembly buffer); its light scattering
was monitored at 30 °C (as described above, except for a 32- or
64-fold more sensitive ordinate scale); and assembly was initiated with
1 mM GTP. FtsZ samples were adsorbed to carbon-coated
grids, negatively stained with 2% uranyl acetate, and observed under
Jeol 1200 EX electron microscopes.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Equilibrium Unfolding of Archaeal FtsZ--
FtsZ from M. jannaschii and from E. coli and tubulin from calf brain
have similar far-ultraviolet CD spectra (Figs.
1A, 3A, and
4A, respectively) characterized by a maximum at 190-192 nm (~20,000 degrees cm2 dmol 1) and two minima
at 209 and 220-222 nm (in the range of 10,000 to 13,000 degrees
cm2 dmol 1), with slightly different shapes
(CD222/CD209 ratios of 0.91 for M. jannaschii FtsZ, 0.83 for E. coli FtsZ, and 1.01 for
tubulin). The solution conditions employed (without added
Mg2+) favor unassociated E. coli FtsZ
monomers (32) and tubulin  -dimers (39); M. jannaschii
FtsZ shows incipient oligomerization, which can be reduced by ionic
strength (28). The three spectra were insensitive to protein
concentration (0.1-2 mg ml 1). The similarity of
these CD spectra could be expected from the large sequence conservation
between archaeal and bacterial FtsZ (37% identical residues) and the
extended secondary structural conservation between FtsZ and tubulins
despite their low sequence identity (6, 40).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, CD spectra of M. jannaschii FtsZ at 25 °C. Solid line, native FtsZ
dialyzed against 20 mM Pipes-KOH and 2 mM DTT
(pH 7.5); dashed line, FtsZ unfolded with 6 M
GdmCl in same buffer; circles, FtsZ refolded from 6 M GdmCl by dialysis as described under
"Experimental Procedures." B, equilibrium GdmCl
unfolding curve of FtsZ (0.15 mg ml 1) at 25 °C.
Closed circles, increasing GdmCl concentrations; open
circles, reverse experiment made by dilution from 5.7 M GdmCl; +, centrifugation measurements of nucleotide
released from FtsZ (scale on the right ordinate). The
solid line is a two-state model fit (37) to the collected CD
data, yielding [GdmCl]1/2 = 3.13 ± 0.04 M,
cooperativity parameter m = 2740 ± 340, and an
unfolding free energy change of
G0app = 8.6 kcal
mol 1 (at 0 M GdmCl). Inset:
closed squares, [GdmCl]1/2 values determined at
several temperatures; open squares, values for the second
transition of the unfolding of E. coli FtsZ (see Fig. 3).
The arrows at 37 and 85 °C mark the optimal growth
temperatures of E. coli and M. jannaschii,
respectively.
|
|
M. jannaschii FtsZ rapidly acquired a CD spectrum
characteristic of disordered polypeptides in >5 M GdmCl
(Fig. 1A, dashed line). Remarkably, when the
denaturant was dialyzed in the cold, M. jannaschii FtsZ
recovered a CD spectrum indistinguishable from the native spectrum
(Fig. 1A, circles and solid line,
respectively). Similar results were obtained with 10 µM
GDP, 10 µM GTP, or without nucleotide in the dialysis
buffer; these dialyzed samples contained 1.0 mol (GDP), 0.8 (GTP), and
0.5 (no addition) of nucleotide/FtsZ, respectively. Similar CD results
were also obtained upon 50-fold dilution of FtsZ solutions in 6 M GdmCl into buffer at 2, 25, or 53 °C (data not shown).
At 80 °C, there was a 20% decrease in the CD value at 222 nm
without denaturant with respect to the value at 25 °C, suggesting a
partial thermal unfolding of the protein. At this high temperature,
M. jannaschii FtsZ partially refolded upon dilution to an
extent of ~45% from a comparison with the CD values of the controls
at 222 nm.
Determination of the equilibrium GdmCl unfolding-refolding curve of
M. jannaschii FtsZ at 25 °C from the CD data at 222 nm indicated a single-stage transition between ~2.2 and 4 M
GdmCl, which was fully reversible within experimental error and had a [GdmCl]1/2 (midpoint) at 3.1 M GdmCl (Fig.
1B). There is no evidence for any residual structure above 5 M GdmCl. The curve could be fitted by a two-state
equilibrium model (Fig. 1B, solid line),
suggesting (but not proving) that both domains of M. jannaschii FtsZ unfold simultaneously. Deletion of the unnatural
C-terminal Gly-Ser-His6 extension from the M. jannaschii FtsZ protein had no significant effect on the
GdmCl unfolding-refolding curve. The [GdmCl]1/2 values
determined at three other temperatures from the change in the CD value
at 222 nm were as follows: 5 °C, 2.3 M; 55 °C, 2.8 M; and 70 °C, 2.2 M (Fig. 1B,
inset). This indicates that M. jannaschii FtsZ is
maximally stabilized at ~40 °C, and it is less stable in the cold
and at higher temperatures; from the trend of the data, FtsZ may be
marginally stable at the 85 °C optimal growth temperature of
M. jannaschii (41).
Monitoring the unfolding of M. jannaschii FtsZ by the change
in fluorescence emission intensity of its single tryptophan
(Trp319, which is in the second domain, roughly
diametrically opposite of the nucleotide-binding site) indicated a
similar transition centered at 3.2 M GdmCl (data not
shown). However, the release of the nucleotide bound to FtsZ, measured
in the solution after sedimenting the protein, took place at lower
denaturant concentrations (midpoint of ~1.5 M GdmCl), at
which the CD change was practically negligible (nucleotide release was
confirmed by chromatography in Sephadex G-25 columns equilibrated in 1 and 2 M GdmCl). This indicates that the average secondary
structure of M. jannaschii FtsZ at 25 °C is practically
insensitive to GDP binding and that the unfolding measured by CD
spectroscopy is that of the apoprotein. However, the nucleotide binding
must further stabilize the native protein, and it is known to induce
local structural changes in M. jannaschii FtsZ (28).
M. jannaschii FtsZ in 6 M GdmCl could be
separated from the nucleotide by chromatography on Sephadex G-25 (Fig.
2, curves a; 0.9 mol of
nucleotide released per FtsZ). However, when unfolded M. jannaschii FtsZ was diluted from 6 to 0.12 M GdmCl in
the cold and chromatographed on a column without denaturant, the
protein bound again ~80% of its released nucleotide (Fig. 2,
curves b; 0.2 mol of nucleotide released per FtsZ), even in
this experiment carried out in the absence of added nucleotide. This
indicate that GdmCl-unfolded M. jannaschii FtsZ can easily regain functionality.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Nucleotide binding by refolded M. jannaschii FtsZ. Curves a, FtsZ (6.4 nmol)
released its bound nucleotide in 6 M GdmCl, as determined
by chromatography on a Sephadex G-25 column (0.9 × 25 cm; 1-ml
fractions) equilibrated in 6 M GdmCl and 10 mM
sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) at 25 °C and by spectrophotometric
measurement. Closed circles, absorbance measurements at 254 nm; open circles, absorbance measurements at 280 nm (there
were 5.6 nmol of FtsZ in the first peak and 5.3 nmol of released
guanine nucleotide in the second peak). Curves b, FtsZ held
in 6 M GdmCl (0.4 mM FtsZ, 0.016 ml, 30 min,
25 °C) was diluted 50-fold into cold buffer without denaturant and
then chromatographed on a similar Sephadex G-25 column equilibrated in
20 mM Pipes-KOH and 1 mM DTT (pH 7.5) at
5 °C. FtsZ bound again most of its nucleotide (the first peak
contained ~6 nmol of FtsZ, and the second peak decreased to 1.1 nmol
of released guanine nucleotide).
|
|
Equilibrium Unfolding of Bacterial FtsZ--
E. coli
FtsZ unfolded in GdmCl (Fig.
3A, dashed line),
and it refolded upon dilution of the denaturant in 20 mM
Pipes and 5 mM DTT (pH 7.5) at 25 °C, as judged from the
CD spectra, in which 93-97% of the 222 nm ellipticity of the native
protein was typically recovered (Fig. 3A, open
circles and solid line, respectively). A similar result
was obtained in 100 mM potassium glutamate, 200 mM potassium acetate, 5 mM magnesium acetate,
and 20 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.5) (potassium glutamate-acetate
buffer), resembling the physiological osmolytes in the E. coli cytoplasm (42) (within the experimental error from
subtracting the dichroism of L-glutamate). The spectrum
obtained by dilution in ice-cold E. coli FtsZ assembly buffer containing 5 mM DTT (pH 6.5) matched the CD
spectrum of the native control. However, complete refolding of
E. coli FtsZ was not obtained by dialysis (in Pipes/DTT or
E. coli FtsZ assembly buffer/DTT with 10 µM
GTP), in which this protein partially refolded and lost most of the
nucleotide (data not shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, CD spectra of E. coli FtsZ
at 25 °C. Short-dashed and solid lines, native
FtsZ in 20 mM Pipes-KOH and 5 mM DTT (pH 7.5)
with 0 M and 0.1 M GdmCl, respectively;
long-dashed line, unfolded FtsZ in 4 M GdmCl;
open circles, FtsZ refolded from 5.7 M GdmCl by
50-fold dilution; dashed-dotted line, FtsZ in 1 M GdmCl; closed circles, FtsZ refolded by
dilution from 5.7 to 1.11 M GdmCl. B,
equilibrium unfolding of FtsZ (0.20 mg ml 1 in same buffer
at 25 °C) (circles) and nucleotide release from FtsZ (+).
An unfolding-refolding curve in the buffer employed for the nucleotide
release measurements (20 mM Pipes-KOH, 250 mM
KCl, 2 mM TCEP, and 10 µM GDP (pH 7.5)) gave
similar results.
|
|
E. coli FtsZ was very sensitive to low concentrations of
GdmCl. Its 25 °C equilibrium unfolding-refolding curve showed
two reversible stages (Fig. 3B). The first stage had an
amplitude of ~30% of the total change and took place between 0.1 and
0.8 M GdmCl; the second stage proceeded between ~1 and
1.6 M GdmCl (Fig. 3B). Monitoring the unfolding
of E. coli FtsZ with the emission intensity of the tyrosines
showed a change centered at ~1 M GdmCl, compatible with
the CD results (data not shown). The first CD stage coincided with the
release of bound GDP, suggesting that ordering of part of the secondary
structure of E. coli FtsZ, perhaps at its nucleotide-binding
domain, is induced by nucleotide binding. It should be noted that GDP
was relatively inefficiently bound by E. coli FtsZ at low
ionic strength. It was spontaneously released from E. coli
FtsZ in 20 mM Pipes (pH 7.5) containing 0 or 2 mM TCEP and 10 µM GDP (0.8 mol of GDP
released per FtsZ during a 2-h centrifugation at 25 °C). The
nucleotide loss was reduced by 50 mM KCl, by 50 mM NaCl, or by 5 mM MgCl2 (0.2-0.3
mol of GDP released per FtsZ) and suppressed by 250 mM KCl
or potassium glutamate-acetate buffer (0.0 mol of GDP released per
FtsZ). E. coli FtsZ chromatographed on Sephadex G-25
columns equilibrated in the same buffer with 250 mM KCl
released <0.04 mol of GDP at 25 °C (2 h), but ~0.8 mol of GDP at
42 °C (1.5 h). Dilution-refolded E. coli FtsZ was able to
bind GTP and to hydrolyze it similarly to the native protein, as
indicated by the assembly experiments described below. The
[GdmCl]1/2 values of the second unfolding transition were
~0.8 M at 5 °C, 1.2 M at 25 °C, 1.3 M at 42 °C, and 1.0 M at 61 °C. At 42 and
61 °C in the absence of denaturant, the CD value at 222 nm was
~80% of the value at 25 °C, and only a single transition was
observed, suggesting that the first transition had been thermally
induced and that the observed (second) transition is the unfolding of the apoprotein.
Comparison of the GdmCl unfolding of FtsZ from E. coli and
from M. jannaschii shows important differences. The results
suggest that the native structure of E. coli FtsZ is
stabilized by nucleotide binding. In contrast, no effect of the tightly
bound nucleotide on the more stable secondary structure of M. jannaschii FtsZ was observed. A thermophilic protein may be
stabilized with respect to its mesophilic homologs at 25 °C by an
extension or increase of the stability parabola, rather than by a shift
to higher temperatures (43). An approximate comparison of the unfolding
[GdmCl]1/2 versus temperature profiles of FtsZ
from M. jannaschii and from E. coli (Fig.
1B, inset) shows that (i) the thermophilic
apoprotein was much more stable that mesophilic FtsZ over a similar
temperature range; and (ii) at the optimal growth temperatures of their
respective organisms, the stability of both proteins should be
comparably low. In the macromolecularly crowded prokaryotic cytosol,
macromolecules that do not bind FtsZ should stabilize its compact
native structure relative to the less compact unfolded forms due to a
volume exclusion effect (44), and nonspecific aggregation of FtsZ
folding intermediates might be prevented by molecular chaperones
(17).
Non-reversible Unfolding of Eukaryotic Tubulin--
Similar
unfolding-refolding experiments were performed with bovine brain
tubulin. Unlike FtsZ, the GdmCl unfolding of tubulin was not reverted
upon dilution of the denaturant, but the protein misfolded into a state
characterized by a CD spectrum with a single minimum at ~220 nm (Fig.
4A, open circles)
and about half the ellipticity of native tubulin
(short-dashed and solid lines). The shape of this
spectrum is suggestive of a -sheet aggregate formed in the absence
of denaturant from the previously unfolded protein. Dilution into cold
glycerol-containing assembly buffer (10 mM sodium
phosphate, 3.4 M glycerol, 6 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 0.1 mM GTP,
pH 6.5) gave a similar misfold. The equilibrium unfolding curve of
tubulin monitored by CD spectroscopy at 222 nm showed (like that of
E. coli FtsZ) two stages; the first one took place below 0.6 M GdmCl and encompassed the dissociation of 1.6 mol of
bound GTP/tubulin  -dimer (Fig. 4B; tubulin underwent a
spontaneous partial release of 0.6 mol of GTP/dimer at 0 M
GdmCl during the 1.5-h centrifugation). This was followed by a plateau at ~1 M GdmCl and a second broad unfolding process
between ~1.5 and 4 M GdmCl (Fig. 4B,
closed circles). Tubulin had a tendency to precipitate in 1 M GdmCl, but not at higher denaturant concentrations. The reversal curve (Fig. 4B, open circles)
followed the second stage of the denaturation curve; but below 1 M GdmCl, it remained at a practically constant value. This
might give the wrong impression, that the second stage of denaturation
was reversible and that only the first stage did not reverse. However,
the CD spectrum of tubulin after dilution from 6 to 1 M
GdmCl (Fig. 4A, closed circles) was
superimposable with that of tubulin misfolded by dilution from 6 to
0.12 M GdmCl (open circles), and both were different from the CD spectrum of partially unfolded tubulin in 1 M GdmCl (dashed-dotted line). Finally,
when tubulin in 1 M GdmCl was diluted to 0.1 M
GdmCl, it also acquired an identical misfolded CD spectrum. Therefore,
we concluded that neither of the GdmCl denaturation stages of tubulin
could be reversed under our experimental conditions. The unfolding of
tubulin by urea is known to be multistage (45, 46); low concentrations
of guanidinium salts enhance, by charge shielding, tubulin
polymerization into aberrant microtubules and aggregates (47). The
non-reversible thermal denaturation of  -tubulin is independent of
having GTP or GDP at the exchangeable -tubulin site (48).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A, CD spectra of tubulin from bovine
brain. Short-dashed and solid lines, native
tubulin with 0 and 0.12 M GdmCl, respectively, in 10 mM sodium phosphate and 5 mM DTT (pH 7.0);
long-dashed line, unfolded tubulin in 4.5 M
GdmCl; open circles, tubulin misfolded from 5.5 M GdmCl by 50-fold dilution; dashed-dotted line,
tubulin in 1 M GdmCl; closed circles, tubulin
misfolded by dilution from 5.5 to 1.12 M GdmCl.
B, unfolding curve of tubulin (0.15 mg ml 1)
(closed circles) and the reverse experiment (open
circles) made by dilution from 5.9 M GdmCl (same
buffer at 25 °C). +, measurements of nucleotide released from
tubulin (scale on the right ordinate).
|
|
The structural stability of the tubulin  -dimer is linked to the
binding of a Mg2+ ion coordinated with the GTP permanently
bound to the -subunit (7, 29, 48). Purified tubulin in the absence
of divalent cations or stabilizing co-solvents is known to age at
neutral pH, with relaxation of its CD spectrum (34, 49). Nucleotide binding also contributes to actin stability (50). It has been proposed
to participate in the final stage of CCT chaperonin-assisted folding of
tubulin (26, 51), which is supported by the observation that the
nucleotide release coincided with the first stage of tubulin unfolding
(Fig. 4B).
Assembly of Refolded FtsZ from M. jannaschii and from E. coli--
To confirm the functionality of refolded FtsZ, its
assembly was qualitatively characterized. Similar to native M. jannaschii FtsZ, FtsZ refolded from 6 M GdmCl
by dialysis underwent GTP- and Mg2+-dependent
assembly, as monitored by light scattering (Fig.
5A, traces a and
b, respectively). M. jannaschii FtsZ consumed
GTP (Fig. 5A, trace c), and both the native and
refolded proteins reversibly formed cable-like filamentous polymers
(Fig. 6A), the assembly
mechanism of which will be described in detail
elsewhere.2 From these results, we concluded that
spontaneously refolded M. jannaschii FtsZ assembles
similarly to the native protein.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Assembly of native and refolded FtsZ
monitored by light scattering. A: trace a,
native M. jannaschii FtsZ dialyzed as described in the
legend to Fig. 1 and supplemented with M. jannaschii FtsZ
assembly buffer with 10 µM GTP (12 µM
FtsZ); trace b, a parallel sample of FtsZ refolded from 6 M GdmCl by dialysis; trace c, a control of
native FtsZ directly diluted into assembly buffer without GTP (14 µM FtsZ). Assembly at 55 °C was initiated by addition
of 6 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM GTP at the
points indicated by the arrows. B: trace
a, 8 µM E. coli FtsZ refolded by dilution
from 6 to 0.12 M GdmCl in E. coli FtsZ
assembly buffer to which 1 mM GDP was added at 30 °C at
time 0; trace b, same as trace a, but with
assembly started by 1 mM GTP addition; traces
c-e, assembly of 8 µM FtsZ in same buffer with
0.12, 0.06, and 0 M GdmCl, respectively.
|
|

View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A, electron micrograph of the polymers
formed by refolded M. jannaschii FtsZ (4 min after GTP
addition) (see Fig. 5A, trace b).
Bar = 200 nm. B, assembly products of
dilution-refolded E. coli FtsZ (4 µM FtsZ and
0.06 M GdmCl) with 1 mM GTP. C, a
control with 1 mM GDP. Bar = 100 nm.
|
|
E. coli FtsZ dialyzed in the same buffer as M. jannaschii FtsZ or against E. coli FtsZ assembly buffer
partially recovered its assembly ability (~40-50% of the
GTP-specific light scattering), but it formed curly polymers distinct
from those of native FtsZ (data not shown). E. coli FtsZ
refolded by direct 50- and 100-fold dilutions from 6 M
GdmCl into E. coli FtsZ assembly buffer assembled in a GTP-
and Mg2+-dependent manner (Fig. 5B,
traces a and b), yielding 50-60% of the maximal
light scattering value of the control (trace c). Residual GdmCl strongly affected the assembly (Fig. 5B, traces
c-e). Dilution-refolded FtsZ formed thin polymers made of one to
several protofilaments (Fig. 6B), which were
indistinguishable from native protein polymers and are characteristic
of E. coli FtsZ (32, 52). From these experiments, we
concluded that spontaneously refolded E. coli FtsZ is able
to specifically undergo GTP-dependent self-assembly in a
manner qualitatively similar to that of the native protein. Tubulin
misfolded from GdmCl formed non-microtubule aggregates (data not
shown). Note that purified FtsZ forms inhomogeneous filamentous FtsZ
polymers, but that bacterially expressed vertebrate - and
-tubulin polypeptide chains, once refolded with chaperonin and
cofactors, can assemble into microtubules (21).
Analysis of the Tubulin Loop Insertions in the FtsZ/Tubulin Common
Core and the Structural Elements Forming Axial and Lateral Contacts in
Model Microtubules and Those Binding to CCT--
In view of the
spontaneous folding of purified FtsZ and the proposal that eukaryotic
chaperonin evolved with the actin and tubulin cytoskeleton (25, 26), we
asked which tubulin zones require CCT-assisted folding and whether they
have a defined role in microtubule assembly. The C- atoms in the
secondary structural elements of the common cores of -tubulin and
FtsZ are superimposable with a 2.4-Å root mean square deviation, which
increases to a 4.3-Å root mean square deviation if the loops are
included (6). The structure-based sequence alignments of tubulin and
FtsZ (Fig. 2 in Ref. 6 and Fig. 3 in Ref. 26) show 10 insertions in - and -tubulin monomers with respect to FtsZ (not counting the N-
and C-terminal non-homologous portions of both proteins). These insertions locate to tubulin loops and add up to 85-90 extra residues (~30%) over the 300-residue homologous core of FtsZ. However, there
are only three small insertions and 9-10 extra residues in FtsZ that
are not present in tubulin. The characteristic C-terminal domain of
tubulin (helices H11 and H12 and the acidic C termini) replaces S11 and
S12 and the C-terminal extensions of FtsZ. Bacterially expressed
constructs encompassing the 48 and 52 C-terminal residues of - and
-tubulin are soluble and can be induced to form H12 with
trifluoroethanol (54), suggesting that at least part of the C-terminal
domains of tubulin may fold by themselves. On the other hand, complete
- and -chains from vertebrate tubulin and constructs including
their nucleotide-binding or middle domains are typically
insoluble,3 which suggests
that these domains of tubulin are unable to fold spontaneously, in
contrast with the spontaneous folding of FtsZ. Therefore, it appears
that the extensive loop insertions of tubulin contribute to its
inability to spontaneously fold. It has not actually been proven
whether the main elements responsible are the loop insertions or
other features of the same domains such as the solvent-buried interface
with the C-terminal domain.
The tubulin loop insertions on the common FtsZ/tubulin fold speak
of acquired functional interactions. Inspection of the locations of these insertions (Fig. 7) indicates
that they are excluded from the nucleotide-binding sites at the central
parts of the axial contact interfaces between tubulin monomers, which
are conserved in the FtsZ/tubulin family of protofilament-forming
GTPases (8, 15). Instead, they map to more peripheral positions (Fig.
7A), at the sides (Fig. 7B) and at the back (Fig.
7C) of the tubulin monomer. Table
I lists the sets of tubulin secondary
structural elements that contain insertions (Insert column, 10 elements), those proposed to participate in the axial contacts (Axial
column, 11 elements) or in the lateral contacts (Lateral column, eight elements) in model microtubules, and those involved in the tubulin-CCT model contacts (CCT column, eight elements). Inspection of Table I
shows that (i) the Insert set does not include the Axial set or vice
versa; (ii) the Insert set includes the Lateral set; and (iii) the
Insert set includes the CCT set as well, with the exception of the
conserved nucleotide-binding loop T7 (26), and the Lateral + CCT sets
include the Insert set, except for T7. Regarding the lateral contacts,
all the structural elements that have been tentatively associated with
the lateral interactions between microtubule protofilaments coincide
with one of the loop insertions in the FtsZ/tubulin common core. These
elements include the three main zones of lateral contact, which are the
M-loop (for microtubule loop), H3 and its C-terminal loop, and part of
the long H1-S2 loop (6, 10). Moreover, even at the residue level, all
but one of the residues listed within lateral contact distance in model
microtubules (9) are associated with insertion loops (Fig.
7D). Based on this analysis, we propose that the loop
insertions of tubulin coevolved with the lateral protofilament
association to form microtubules, an ability that has not been observed
at all in its protofilament-forming homolog FtsZ. As an interesting
analogy, subunit/subunit interactions within actin filaments (a twisted
pair of protofilaments) involve sequence insertions that are not
present in the bacterial homolog MreB and that can make different
contacts in F-actin polymorphs (55); in contrast to actin, filamentous
MreB consists of pairs of straight parallel protofilaments (1).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Mapping of tubulin zones that are not present
in its homolog FtsZ. A-C are ribbon diagrams
of -tubulin (from the  -dimer (Protein Data Bank code
1JFF); in yellow) in which the residues that are not present
in FtsZ (Protein Data Bank code 1FSZ) have been colored
green. These are the insertions in the FtsZ/tubulin common
core and the C-terminal two-helix domain of tubulin. A, view
from the (+)-end of a protofilament, with the microtubule outside at
the top (the GDP bound in the center of the axial interface and Taxol
at the luminal face are shown); B, tangential view from the
side, with the outside at the right (the GTP and Mg2+ bound
to the -tubulin subunit of the dimer are shown at the bottom);
C, view from the inside of a microtubule. D shows
the sequence of pig brain -tubulin, in which the tubulin insertions
in a structure-based alignment of tubulins and FtsZ (Fig. 3 in Ref. 26)
are marked in boldface, the residues within lateral contact
distance in model microtubules (Fig. 5 in Ref. 9) are in
red, and residues both in insertions and in lateral contact
are underlined and in boldface red. The secondary
structural elements (7) are marked H (helix) and
S (sheet) or are unmarked (loop). Note that from 37 residues
of -tubulin involved in lateral contacts in model microtubules, 24 are at the insertion loops, 12 flank insertion loops, and 1 is in the
middle of helix H3.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Structural elements of the FtsZ/tubulin common core that have
insertions in tubulin (Insert column, insertions larger than a single
residue), that have been proposed to take part in axial interactions
(Axial column) or in lateral interactions (Lateral column) between
tubulin molecules in microtubules, or that bind to chaperonin (CCT
column)
|
|
It has been suggested that CCT coevolved with tubulin to counteract the
folding problems associated with new zones involved in polymerization
(26). With regard to the eight zones of tubulin that are in
contact with the chaperonin in tubulin-CCT model complexes (Table I,
CCT column), five are involved in lateral interactions in microtubules,
two correspond to the tubulin insertion loops that are not involved in
lateral interactions (loops H8-S7 and S9-S10), and the other is
conserved loop T7. This is a remarkable correlation, considering that
CCT encircles open tubulin monomers, entailing a binding topology
different from that of tubulin dimers in the microtubule wall.
Accepting that the present tubulins and FtsZ arose from a common
protofilament-forming ancestor, we suggest that the CCT-assisted
folding of tubulin specifically coevolved with the lateral association
interfaces responsible for extended two-dimensional
polymerization into microtubules. The coevolution of the tubulin loop
inserts with the lateral microtubule contacts and hence CCT-assisted
folding is supported by the different nature of the lateral contacts in
FtsZ polymers and microtubules, which is outlined below.
Comparison of Tubulin with FtsZ Assemblies Suggests That the
Elemental Polymer Formed by Purified FtsZ Is a Distinct Double-stranded
Filament with a Non-propagated Lateral
Contact--
Microtubules are pseudo-helical polymers formed by
parallel protofilaments of  -tubulin dimers; the tubulin dimers
laterally associate by propagated homologous / and /
lateral interactions (it is only microtubule cylindrical closure that
involves related / and / interactions) (for review, see
Ref. 56). The less well defined assembly products of FtsZ monomers
in vitro are made of tubulin-like protofilaments (14, 15)
that associate in diverse manners (Fig. 6). Although purified M. jannaschii FtsZ can form, with Ca2+ and GMPCPP,
cable-like helical tubes of lengths comparable to the inner
circumference of a bacterium (57), the assembly of FtsZ proteins
typically yields a variety of filamentous polymers and sheets. Assembly
of M. jannaschii FtsZ is
cooperative.4 A basic pattern
in the assembly of M. jannaschii FtsZ is the lateral
association of two FtsZ parallel protofilaments with an axis of
symmetry between them, forming thick filaments; the thick filaments
associate into larger polymers such as cables and sheets of
antiparallel thick filaments
(15),2 using lateral
interactions necessarily different from those forming the protofilament
pair. The protofilament pairing interface of FtsZ in the model thick
filament (15) approximately corresponds to the microtubule luminal face
of tubulin. This association pattern is clearly incompatible with the
formation of microtubule-like two-dimensional polymers in which the
same lateral interactions that form a protofilament pair propagate
across the polymer width. Purified bacterial FtsZ typically assembles
into polymers made of few protofilaments (Fig. 6), unless additives
such as DEAE-dextran or a lipid surface is employed (14, 32, 52, 53,
58, 59). E. coli FtsZ forms in vivo highly
dynamic assemblies (60), the nature of which remains elusive; it is
possible that they also have a limited two-dimensionality,
consisting of very few protofilaments stabilized by interaction with
other septal proteins.
Conclusions--
In this work, we have analyzed the folding and
assembly of archaeal and bacterial FtsZ in comparison with the
eukaryotic structural homolog tubulin. The GdmCl-induced unfolding of
FtsZ proteins from M. jannaschii and E. coli was
essentially reversible, unlike that of tubulin. Both FtsZ and tubulin
released their bound nucleotide at relatively low GdmCl
concentrations. In the case of E. coli FtsZ and tubulin,
this coincided with the first unfolding stage of both proteins at
25 °C, which was followed by other unfolding process(es), suggesting
a nucleotide-dependent structural stabilization. However,
dissociation of the nucleotide tightly bound to M. jannaschii FtsZ insignificantly modified the secondary
structure of this protein, which unfolded in a single stage at higher
GdmCl concentrations. Isolated FtsZ polypeptide chains were capable of
spontaneous folding, followed by GTP-dependent
self-assembly. It is not known whether FtsZ folding may be further
facilitated by molecular chaperones, but its assembly is modulated by
other cell division proteins. On the other hand, tubulin did not fold
spontaneously, but did fold with the assistance of the eukaryotic
chaperonin CCT. Analysis of the extensive tubulin insertion loops in
the FtsZ/tubulin common core and of the contacts in model microtubules
and tubulin-CCT complexes suggests that the loop insertions of tubulin
and its CCT-assisted folding coevolved with the lateral association
interfaces responsible for extended two-dimensional polymerization into
microtubules. This proposal is supported by comparison of
microtubules with the distinct paired protofilament FtsZ polymers.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. J. F. Díaz, S. Huecas, M. Menendez, G. Rivas, M. Vicente, and J. M. Valpuesta (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas,
Madrid) for helpful discussions and Maribel López (Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Chile) for technical help.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by MCyT Grant
BIO99-0859-C03-02/BIO2000-0748, the Programa de Grupos
Estratégicos de la Comunidad de Madrid (to J. M. A.), an
FPI predoctoral fellowship (to M. A. O.), and
FONDECYT Grant 1010848 (to O. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 34-91-561-1800 (ext. 4380); Fax: 34-91-562-7518; E-mail:
j.m.andreu@cib.csic.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206723200
2
M. A. Oliva, and J. M. Andreu,
unpublished data.
3
G. Pucciarelli and J. M. Andreu,
unpublished data.
4
S. Huecas and J. M. Andreu, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CCT, chaperonia
containing tailless polypeptide 1;
GdmCl, guanidinium chloride;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
TCEP, tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine
hydrochloride;
Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
Mes, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
GMPCPP, guanosine
5'-( , -methylenetriphosphate).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
van den Ent, F.,
Amos, L. A,
and Löwe, J.
(2001)
Nature
413,
39-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Löwe, J.,
and Amos, L. A.
(1998)
Nature
391,
203-206[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Jones, L. J. F.,
Carballido-Lopez, R.,
and Errington, J.
(2001)
Cell
104,
913-922[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Rothfield, L.,
Justice, S.,
and Garcia-Lara, J.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
33,
423-448[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Nogales, E.,
Wolf, S. G.,
and Downing, K. H.
(1998)
Nature
391,
199-203[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Nogales, E.,
Downing, K. H.,
Amos, L. A.,
and Löwe, J.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
451-458[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Löwe, J., Li, H.,
Downing, K. H.,
and Nogales, E.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
313,
1045-1057[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Nogales, E.,
Whittaker, M.,
Milligan, R. A.,
and Downing, K. H.
(1999)
Cell
96,
79-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Meurer-Grob, P.,
Kasparian, J.,
and Wade, R.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
8000-8008[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Chacón, P.,
and Wriggers, W.
(2002)
J. Mol. Biol.
317,
375-384[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Bi, E.,
and Lutkenhaus, J.
(1991)
Nature
354,
161-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Ben-Yehuda, S.,
and Losick, R.
(2002)
Cell
109,
257-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Pichoff, S.,
and Lutkenhaus, J.
(2002)
EMBO J.
21,
685-693[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Erickson, H. P.,
Taylor, D. W.,
Taylor, A. K.,
and Bramhill, D.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
519-523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Löwe, J.,
and Amos, L. A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
2364-2371[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Yu, X. C.,
Margolin, W.,
Gonzalez-Garay, M. L.,
and Cabral, F.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
2301-2311[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Hartl, F. U.,
and Hayer-Hartl, M.
(2002)
Science
295,
1852-1858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Gao, Y.,
Thomas, J. O.,
Chow, R. L.,
Lee, G. H.,
and Cowan, N. J.
(1992)
Cell
69,
1043-1050[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Yaffe, M. B.,
Farr, G. W.,
Miklos, D.,
Horwich, A. L.,
Sterlicht, M. L.,
and Sternlicht, H.
(1992)
Nature
358,
245-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Thulasiraman, V.,
Yang, C. F.,
and Frydman, J.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
85-95[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Shah, C., Xu, C. Z.,
Vickers, J.,
and Williams, R.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
4844-4852[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Houry, W. A.,
Frishman, D.,
Eckerskorn, C.,
Lottspeich, F.,
and Hartl, U.
(1999)
Nature
402,
147-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Dobrzynski, J. K.,
Sternlicht, M. L.,
Peng, I.,
Farr, G. W.,
and Sternlicht, H.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
3988-4003[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Uehara, T.,
Matsuzawa, H.,
and Nishimura, A.
(2001)
Genes Cells
6,
803-814[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Llorca, O.,
Martin-Benito, J.,
Ritco-Vonsovici, M.,
Grantham, J.,
Hynes, G. M.,
Willison, K.,
Carrascosa, J.,
and Valpuesta, J. M.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
6971-6979
|
| 26.
|
Llorca, O.,
Martin-Benito, J.,
Gomez-Puertas, P.,
Ritco-Vonsovici, M.,
Willison, K.,
Carrascosa, J.,
and Valpuesta, J. M.
(2001)
J. Struct. Biol.
135,
205-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Llorca, O.,
Martin-Benito, J.,
Grantham, J.,
Ritco-Vonsovici, M.,
Willison, K.,
Carrascosa, J.,
and Valpuesta, J. M.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
4065-4075[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Diaz, J. F.,
Kralicek, A.,
Mingorance, J.,
Palacios, J. M.,
Vicente, M.,
and Andreu, J. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
17307-17315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Correia, J. J.,
Baty, L. T.,
and Williams, R. C.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
17278-17284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Edelhoch, H.
(1967)
Biochemistry
6,
1948-1954[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Fasman, G. D.
(ed)
(1992)
Practical Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
, pp. 81-83, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL
|
| 32.
|
Rivas, G.,
Lopez, A.,
Mingorance, J.,
Ferrandiz, M. J.,
Zorrilla, S.,
Minton, A. P.,
Vicente, M.,
and Andreu, J. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
11740-11749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Lee, J. C.,
Frigon, R. P.,
and Timasheff, S. N.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
7253-7262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Andreu, J. M.,
and Timasheff, S. N.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
6465-6476[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Andreu, J. M.,
Perez-Ramirez, B.,
Gorbunoff, M. J.,
Ayala, D.,
and Timasheff, S. N.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
8356-8368[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Ludueña, R. F.
(1998)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
178,
207-275[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Pace, C. N.,
and Scholtz, J. M.
(1997)
in
Protein Structure, a Practical Approach
(Creighton, T. E., ed), 2nd Ed.
, pp. 299-321, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
| 38.
|
Eftink, M.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
259,
487-512[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Frigon, R. P.,
and Timasheff, S. N.
(1975)
Biochemistry
14,
4559-4566[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
de Pereda, J. M.,
Leynadier, D.,
Evangelio, J.,
Chacon, P.,
and Andreu, J. M.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
14203-14215[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Jones, W. J.,
Leigh, J. A.,
Mayer, F.,
Woese, C. R.,
and Wolfe, R. S.
(1983)
Arch. Microbiol.
136,
254-261[CrossRef]
|
| 42.
|
Record, M. T., Jr.,
Courtenay, E. S.,
Cayley, S.,
and Guttman, H. J.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
190-194[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Jaenicke, R.,
and Böhm, G.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
8,
738-748[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Minton, A. P.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
78,
101-109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Sackett, D. L.,
Bhattacharyy, B.,
and Wolff, J.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
12868-12878[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Guha, S.,
and Bhattacharyya, B.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
13208-13213[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Wolff, J.,
Knipling, L.,
and Sackett, D. L.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
5910-5920[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Menendez, M.,
Rivas, G.,
Diaz, J. F.,
and Andreu, J. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
167-176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Prakash, V.,
and Timasheff, S. N.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
160,
499-515[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Schuler, H.,
Lindberg, U.,
Schutt, C. E.,
and Karlsson, R.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
476-486[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Farr, G. W.,
Scharl, E. C.,
Schumacher, R. J.,
Sondek, S.,
and Horwich, A. L.
(1997)
Cell
89,
927-937[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Mukerjee, A.,
and Lutkenhaus, J.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
823-832[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Lu, C.,
Stricker, J.,
and Erickson, H. P.
(1998)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
40,
71-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Jimenez, M. A.,
Evangelio, J. A.,
Aranda, C.,
Lopez-Brauet, A.,
Andreu, D.,
Rico, M.,
Lagos, R.,
Andreu, J. M.,
and Monasterio, O.
(1999)
Protein Sci.
8,
788-799[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Galkin, V.,
VanLoock, M. S.,
Orlova, A.,
and Egelman, E. H.
(2002)
Curr. Biol.
12,
570-575[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Nogales, E.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
69,
277-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Löwe, J.,
and Amos, L. A.
(2000)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
381,
993-999
|
| 58.
|
Lu, C.,
Reedy, M.,
and Erickson, H. P.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
164-170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Romberg, L.,
Simon, M.,
and Erickson, H. P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11743-11753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Stricker, J.,
Maddox, P.,
Salmon, E. D.,
and Erickson, H. P.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99,
3171-3175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Huecas, C. Schaffner-Barbero, W. Garcia, H. Yebenes, J. M. Palacios, J. F. Diaz, M. Menendez, and J. M. Andreu
The Interactions of Cell Division Protein FtsZ with Guanine Nucleotides
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 28, 2007;
282(52):
37515 - 37528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Michie, L. G. Monahan, P. L. Beech, and E. J. Harry
Trapping of a Spiral-Like Intermediate of the Bacterial Cytokinetic Protein FtsZ.
J. Bacteriol.,
March 1, 2006;
188(5):
1680 - 1690.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Schlieper, M. A. Oliva, J. M. Andreu, and J. Lowe
Structure of bacterial tubulin BtubA/B: Evidence for horizontal gene transfer
PNAS,
June 28, 2005;
102(26):
9170 - 9175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Anand, H. Rajeswari, P. Gupta, R. Srinivasan, S. Indi, and P. Ajitkumar
A C-terminal deletion mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis FtsZ shows fast polymerization in vitro
Microbiology,
May 1, 2004;
150(5):
1119 - 1121.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Huecas and J. M. Andreu
Energetics of the Cooperative Assembly of Cell Division Protein FtsZ and the Nucleotide Hydrolysis Switch
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 14, 2003;
278(46):
46146 - 46154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Oliva, S. Huecas, J. M. Palacios, J. Martin-Benito, J. M. Valpuesta, and J. M. Andreu
Assembly of Archaeal Cell Division Protein FtsZ and a GTPase-inactive Mutant into Double-stranded Filaments
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2003;
278(35):
33562 - 33570.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Santra and D. Panda
Detection of an Intermediate during Unfolding of Bacterial Cell Division Protein FtsZ: LOSS OF FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES PRECEDES THE GLOBAL UNFOLDING OF FtsZ
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 6, 2003;
278(24):
21336 - 21343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|