ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Neuronal Leucine-rich Repeat Protein-3 Amplifies MAPK Activation
by Epidermal Growth Factor through a Carboxyl-terminal Region
Containing Endocytosis Motifs*
Katsumi
Fukamachi
§,
Yoichiro
Matsuoka
¶,
Hiroshi
Ohno
**,
Tetsuya
Hamaguchi
§, and
Hiroyuki
Tsuda
¶
From the
Experimental Pathology, Chemotherapy
Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji,
Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, the
Division of Molecular Membrane
Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University,
Kanazawa 920-0934, Japan, and the ** RIKEN Research
Center for Allergy and Immunology, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan
Received for publication, September 4, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Neuronal leucine-rich repeat
protein-3 (NLRR-3) belongs to the LRR superfamily. Expression of rat
NLRR-3 gene isolated from c-Ha-ras transgenic rat tumor is regulated
mainly through the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway. NLRR-3 was found to
enhance phosphorylation of MAPK when COS-7 cells were transfected with
NLRR-3 and stimulated with a low concentration (0.01 ng/ml) of
epidermal growth factor (EGF), but the amplification of MAPK
phosphorylation by NLRR-3 was no longer observed when the
carboxyl-terminal 30 amino acid stretch containing clathrin-mediated
endocytosis motifs was deleted. A green fluorescent protein-tagged
NLRR-3 localized at the plasma membrane was efficiently internalized in
COS-7 cells, but internalization of a carboxyl-terminal-deleted version
(NLRR
C) was less efficient. The presence of clathrin-adaptor protein
complexes containing NLRR-3 in brain lysate was confirmed by
immunoprecipitation and glutathione S-transferase pull-down
experiments, and affinity column chromatography revealed that the
carboxyl-terminal region of NLRR-3 interacts with
-adaptin.
We propose that NLRR-3 potentiates Ras-MAPK signaling by
facilitating internalization of EGF in clathrin-coated vesicles.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Leucine-rich repeat
(LRR)1 domains were first
identified in an
-2-glycoprotein in human serum (1). They contain
highly hydrophobic amino acids and a repeated structure consisting of about 24 residues (2), and the LRR motif provides an ideal conformation
for binding to other proteins. Neuronal LRR protein (NLRR) genes were
first isolated from a mouse brain cDNA library (3, 4), and three
distinct isoforms, NLRR-1, -2, and -3, have been identified in fish,
frog, mouse, rat, and humans (3-7). These isoforms constitute a novel
LRR protein family containing 11 or 12 LRRs, one immunoglobulin-like
domain, and one fibronectin type III-like domain (5-7). Although,
based on their structural features, NLRRs have been proposed to
function as adhesion molecules or soluble ligand binding receptors,
little is known about their biological activities.
The 170-kDa epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exerts its
biological effects in response to binding of specific polypeptide ligands, including epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor-
. Binding of the ligands leads to activation of the
EGFR catalytic tyrosine kinase domain, autophosphorylation of specific
residues in its carboxyl terminus, and recruitment and phosphorylation
of heterologous signaling proteins such as Shc (8, 9). Shc binds to
activated EGFR and becomes phosphorylated on Tyr317,
creating a binding site for Grb2-Sos (10). Once Ras has been activated
by Sos, GTP-bound Ras interacts with and facilitates activation of
target enzymes, including the serine/threonine kinase Raf (11).
Activated Raf phosphorylates and activates the downstream kinase, the
MAPK/ERK kinase, which in turn phosphorylates and activates MAPK/ERK
(12).
A consequence of EGFR activation is the clustering of ligand-receptor
complexes in clathrin-coated pits, which increases the rate of receptor
internalization (13). Endocytosis of the receptor has been recognized
as an attenuation mechanism that affects long-term EGFR function (14,
15). However, it has been demonstrated that EGF remains associated
predominantly with EGFR in sorting endosomes and that internalized
EGF-EGFR complexes retain equal tyrosine phosphorylation stoichiometry
as well as competency in binding, phosphorylating, and activating
signaling proteins (16-19). This suggests that meaningful signal
transduction might be extended after endocytosis of EGF, and several
studies have revealed that EGFR internalization does indeed amplify
MAPK phosphorylation (17, 18, 20, 21). In this study we found that when
COS-7 cells transfected with NLRR-3 were stimulated with a low
concentration of EGF, NLRR-3 enhanced phosphorylation of MAPK with no
effect on EGFR or Shc phosphorylation; the carboxyl-terminal region of NLRR-3, which contains two endocytosis motifs, seemed responsible for
this effect.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Transfection--
COS-7 and NIH3T3 cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10%
fetal calf serum. Cells were transfected overnight using FuGENE6 (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's
directions, and after starving in serum-free medium (Opti-MEM I,
Invitrogen) for 24 h, they were exposed to EGF (Invitrogen).
Plasmid Constructs--
To construct NLRR-3 protein tagged at
the carboxyl terminus with green fluorescent protein (GFP), the TAG
stop codon of rat NLRR-3 cDNA (7) was removed by PCR with
the forward primer 5'-TTAAGCTTTAAGATGAAGGACGCACCAC-3',
containing the HindIII site (underlined), and the reverse
primer 5'-TACCCGGGACATACTTGTCGGCACAC-3', containing the
SmaI site (underlined). A truncated NLRR-3 construct lacking
aa 676-707 (NLRR
C) was prepared by PCR using the above forward
primer and the reverse primer
5'-TTGGATCCAGCTCACTGAATGCCAAGGT-3', containing the
BamHI site (underlined). The PCR product was excised with
HindIII/SmaI or
HindIII/BamHI and inserted into pEGFP-N1 (Clontech), and the sequence was then confirmed.
To construct the carboxyl terminus of rat NLRR-3 (amino acids 638-707)
tagged with glutathione S-transferase (GST) at the NH2 terminus (GST-W), rat NLRR-3 cDNA (7) was
excised with Sau3AI (blunting)/NotI and
inserted into pGEX-6P-1 (Amersham Biosciences). A NLRR-3 construct
lacking amino acids 676-707 (GST-
C) was prepared by
PCR-based mutagenesis using the primer
5'-TTGTCGACTAAAGCTCACTGAATGCCAAGG-3' containing the
SalI site (underlined). To construct NLRR-3 protein containing the extracellular region of rat NLRR-3 (aa 401-577) tagged
with GST at the NH2 terminus (GST-NLRR3ex), rat NLRR-3 cDNA was excised with EcoRI/Bst1107I
and inserted into pGEX-6P-1.
Expression of GST Fusion Proteins--
GST fusion proteins were
expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21. Protein
expression was induced by 1.0 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 3 h
at 37 °C. The bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 4200 rpm for 20 min, and the pellets were resuspended in buffer A (0.5 mg/ml lysozyme,
10 mM PBS, pH 7.0, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM
PMSF, 20 mM MgCl2, 25 mg/ml DNase I, 1%
Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT). After centrifugation at 4200 rpm
for 20 min, the pellets containing GST fusion protein were lysed in
buffer B (10 mM PBS, pH 7.0, 8 M urea, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT) and
dialyzed against buffer C (10 mM PBS, pH 7.0, 2 M urea, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1%
NaN3) at 4 °C overnight. The lysates were clarified by
centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 30 min, and after
incubation with glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) for
1 h at room temperature, they were washed (three times) with 1%
Triton, 1 mM DTT, 0.1% NaN3, 10 mM
PBS. The bound proteins were then eluted with 10 mM reduced
glutathione in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0.
Generation of Anti-NLRR-3 Polyclonal Antibodies--
A peptide
with the sequence KATAIGVPISMS (aa 696-707) was synthesized and
conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Pierce) for use as the antigen
to obtain polyclonal antibody against the cytoplasmic region of rat
NLRR-3. And GST-NLRR3ex was used as the antigen to obtain polyclonal
antibody against the extracellular region of NLRR-3. Three rabbits were
immunized using these antigens and TiterMax Gold (CytRx Corp.,
Norcross, GA) as an adjuvant. The serum containing the antibody against
the extracellular region of NLRR-3 was precleared with
glutathione-Sepharose 4B coupled with GST. The specific antibodies were
purified by affinity chromatography on HiTrap affinity columns
(Amersham Biosciences) coupled with the corresponding antigens.
Immunofluorescence--
The cells were rinsed twice with PBS and
then fixed for 5 min in 3.7% formalin in PBS. Fixed cells were blocked
in 10% goat serum in PBS for 10 min at room temperature and then
incubated with Alexafluor 568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at a 1:500 dilution. Coverslips were
mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images
were collected by confocal microscopy (Fluoview FV300, Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan).
Immunoprecipitation--
A rat brain was lysed in 3 ml of lysis
buffer (1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.3, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM
EGTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin) by 20-30 strokes in a
tight-fitting Potter homogenizer. The lysates were centrifuged at
100,000 × g for 20 min and precleaned with 20 µl of
protein G-Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (Amersham Biosciences)/300 µl of
lysate for 1 h. After centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 1 min,
supernatants were incubated with 20 µl of anti-NLRR3 (against
cytoplasmic region) or anti-
-adaptin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Santa Cruz, CA) antibody for 8 h followed by overnight incubation
with 20 µl of the protein G-Sepharose beads. Immunoprecipitates were
washed twice with lysis buffer supplemented with 100 mM
NaCl and then five times without NaCl. Immunocomplexes were resuspended
in 40 µl of SDS sample buffer for Western blot analysis. All
procedures were carried out at 4 °C.
Western Blot--
Western blot analysis was performed as
described elsewhere (22). Anti-
-adaptin (20 ng/ml), anti-clathrin
(100 ng/ml) (Santa Cruz), anti-GST (125 ng/ml) (Amersham Biosciences),
anti-EGFR (200 ng/ml), anti-phospho-EGFR (Y1173) (1 µg/ml), anti-MAPK
(16 ng/ml) (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), anti-phospho-MAPK (1 µg/ml), and anti-phospho-Shc (1 µg/ml) (Cell Signaling
Technology, Beverly, MA) antibodies were used. Horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit, anti-goat, and anti-mouse IgG
antibodies (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL) and ECL
plus Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences) were
employed to detect the bound first antibodies.
GST Affinity Column Chromatography--
A rat brain was lysed in
15 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 1% Triton
X-100, 10% glycerol, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF), and insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 125,000 × g for 45 min. The
supernatant was precleared for 2 h with CNBr-activated Sepharose
4B (Amersham Biosciences) coupled with GST and then was incubated
overnight with either the GST-W or GST-
C resin (5 mg protein/ml
gel). Each column was washed with 1 ml of lysis buffer and eluted into
0.3-ml fractions with a step gradient of 150, 250, and 500 mM NaCl (3 ml each). All procedures were performed at
4 °C.
 |
RESULTS |
The Carboxyl-terminal 30-Amino Acid Stretch of NLRR-3 Enhances MAPK
Activation by EGF--
Because the carboxyl terminus of NLRR-3
contains two putative endocytosis motifs (7) and the importance of EGFR
internalization to Ras-MAPK activation has already been established
(17, 18, 20, 21), we investigated the effect of overexpression of
NLRR-3 on MAPK activation through EGFR. COS-7 cells, which express
little, if any, endogenous NLRR-3, were transfected with GFP or
full-length NLRR-3 tagged with GFP at the carboxyl end; after serum
starvation for 24 h, they were challenged with different
concentrations of EGF (0.01, 0.1, and 10 ng/ml). Phosphorylation of
endogenous MAPK was visualized by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-MAPK
antibody. Elevation of MAPK phosphorylation by a low concentration of
EGF (0.01 ng/ml) was detected only in cells transfected with NLRR-3, but robust increases in phosphorylation in response to higher concentrations of EGF were observed in both mock transfected and NLRR-3
transfected cells (Fig. 1A and
data not shown). No EGFR autophosphorylation (at Tyr1173)
or Shc phosphorylation (at Tyr317) was detected at 0.01 ng/ml of EGF, but phosphorylation was readily observed at the higher
concentrations (Fig. 1A and data not shown). It has been
demonstrated that Ras activation with EGF concentrations above 0.02 ng/ml requires phosphorylation of EGFR and/or Shc (12, 23). We now show
that, in the presence of NLRR-3, much lower levels of EGF
(i.e. 0.01 ng/ml) stimulates MAPK phosphorylation downstream
of Ras activation by mechanisms that do not require phosphorylation of
EGFR and Shc. Overexpression of NLRR-3 alone had no effect on the
levels of expression of MAPK or EGFR or on the phosphorylation levels
of MAPK, EGFR, or Shc (Fig. 1). The same results were obtained using
cells transfected with untagged NLRR-3 (data not shown).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
NLRR-3 enhancement of MAPK activation is
dependent on its carboxyl-terminal region. A, COS-7 cells
were transfected with GFP ( ) or NLRR3-GFP (+). After serum
deprivation for 24 h, the cells were exposed to 10 or 0.01 ng/ml
EGF for 15 min. MAPK activity was determined by Western blotting with
anti-phosphpo-MAPK antibody. Specific amplification of MAPK activity in
the NLRR3-GFP transfected cells was observed when exposed to 0.01 ng/ml
EGF. Anti-phospho-EGFR antibody and phospho-Shc antibody are specific
for the corresponding proteins phosphorylated at Tyr1137
(Y1173) and Tyr317 (Y317),
respectively. A 10-µg sample of cell lysate was loaded in each lane.
B, COS-7 cells were mock transfected or transfected with
NLRR3-GFP (NLRR-3) or NLRR C-GFP (NLRR C). Cells were stimulated
with 0.01 ng/ml EGF for 15 min, 1 h, or 4 h. Stimulation of
MAPK phosphorylation was observed at 15 min, 1 h, and 4 h in
the cells transfected with NLRR-3 but not in the mock transfected or
NLRR C transfected cells. Note that expression of none of the NLRR-3
constructs had any effect on the level of MAPK and EGFR. The
expression level of GFP was at least 10-fold higher in mock
(GFP) transfected cells than that of GFP fusion proteins in NLRR-3 or
NLRR C transfected cells (data not shown). A 10-µg sample of cell
lysate was loaded in each lane.
|
|
When COS-7 cells were transfected with full-length NLRR-3 and
challenged with 0.01 ng/ml of EGF, high phosphorylation levels of MAPK
were sustained for at least 4 h, whereas phosphorylation of MAPK
was neither elevated nor sustained in the cells expressing the
carboxyl-terminal deleted form of NLRR-3, NLRR
C (Fig.
1B). We concluded that the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal 30 amino acids (aa) are responsible for NLRR-3 amplification of MAPK phosphorylation.
The Carboxyl-terminal Stretch of NLRR-3 Possesses Clathrin-Adaptor
Protein Complex Binding Motifs--
NLRR-3 possesses a stretch of 9 amino acids (YPPLIN/SLWE) containing two clathrin-mediated endocytosis
motifs, YXX
(where
is bulky hydrophobic amino
acid) and a dileucine-type motif (24-27), which is well conserved in
the NLRR family (Fig. 2A). Indeed, most of the GFP-tagged NLRR-3 was co-localized with clathrin at
the ventral surface of plasma membrane of the COS-7 and NIH3T3 cells (data not shown).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The carboxyl-terminal region of NLRR-3 is
important to endocytosis of the protein. A,
alignment of carboxyl-terminal regions of the NLRR family. A stretch of
11 amino acid is highly conserved in all NLRR family members identified
thus far. This region contains two clathrin-mediated endocytosis
motifs, YPPL and LIN/SLWE. Conserved amino acids are
highlighted. B, COS-7 cells were transfected with
NLRR3-GFP (NLRR-3) or NLRR C-GFP (NLRR C) for
24 h and incubated at 4 or 37 °C with anti-NLRR-3ex antibody
for 4 h. After the incubations, the cells were fixed and incubated
with Alexafluor 568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody, and the
distribution of NLRR3-GFP (left panels) and anti-NLRR-3ex
antibody (middle panels) was visualized by confocal
microscopy. The right panels show the merged images, with
yellow indicating internalized-NLRR-3. Bar, 10 µm.
|
|
The carboxyl-terminal 30-aa stretch was found to be essential for
effective endocytosis of NLRR-3. Full-length NLRR-3 tagged with GFP was
efficiently internalized when COS-7 cells expressing the protein were
incubated at 37 °C (Fig. 2B), whereas considerable amounts of the carboxyl-terminal deletion mutant (NLRR
C) remained at
the plasma membrane after incubation for 4 h at 37 °C (Fig. 2B, arrows in bottom panel). The
plasma membranes of the cells expressing the full-length NLRR-3 and
NLRR
C remained labeled by the anti-NLRR-3 extracellular domain
antibody when incubated at 4 °C (Fig. 2B), indicating
that both forms of the fusion protein were transported to the plasma
membrane and properly oriented at the membrane. Similar results were
obtained when the cells had been incubated for 1 h (data not shown).
Carboxyl-terminal 30 Amino Acid-dependent Interaction
of NLRR-3 with Clathrin-Adaptor Protein
Complex--
Immunoprecipitation, GST pull-down, and affinity column
binding assays were carried out to investigate the physical association between NLRR-3 and the clathrin-adaptor protein complex. A complex isolated from rat brain lysate with anti-
-adaptin antibody contained NLRR-3 and clathrin (Fig.
3A, upper panels),
and in a reverse experiment, clathrin and
-adaptin were identified
in a complex precipitated by anti-NLRR-3 antibody (Fig.
3A, lower panels). This association was confirmed
by GST pull-down experiment using a GST fusion protein containing the
entire cytoplasmic domain described below (data not shown). Thus NLRR-3
can associate with the clathrin-adaptor protein complex under
physiological conditions.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The carboxyl-terminal of NLRR-3 binds to
clathrin-adaptor protein complex. A, rat brain lysate
(3.9 mg) was incubated without ( ) or with (+) anti-NLRR-3 (2 µg) or
-adaptin (1.4 µg) antibody, and then protein G-Sepharose beads
were added. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting
with anti-NLRR-3, clathrin, and -adaptin antibody. B,
GST-W containing aa 638-707 or GST- C containing aa 638-675 was
immobilized on CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B (5 mg protein/ml gel) and
incubated with 33 mg of rat brain lysate. The column was eluted with a
step gradient of 150, 250, and 500 mM NaCl, and 0.3-ml
fractions were collected and analyzed by Western blotting with
anti- -adaptin antibody.
|
|
The site of physical contact of NLRR-3 with the clathrin-adaptor
protein complex was located in the carboxyl-terminal 30 aa containing
the endocytosis motifs. Two GST fusion proteins, one containing the
entire cytoplasmic domain (GST-W) and the other lacking the
carboxyl-terminal 30 aa (GST-
C), were coupled to CNBr-activated
Sepharose 4B, and elution of the clathrin-adaptor protein complex was
monitored by immunoblot with anti-
-adaptin antibody (Fig.
3B). The protein complex bound to GST-W eluted out at 250 mM NaCl, and there was another class of interaction with
higher affinity, with an additional
-adaptin peak observed at 500 mM NaCl (Fig. 3B, upper panel). By
contrast, most of the protein complex was washed out of the column
coupled with GST-
C at 150 mM NaCl, and none was detected
in the eluates at the higher concentrations of NaCl. Based on the above
findings, we concluded that the carboxyl-terminal 30-aa region
of NLRR-3 is responsible for the amplification of MAPK phosphorylation
through association with endocytotic vesicles.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Wennström and Downward (23) demonstrated that low
concentrations of EGF (0.02-0.2 ng/ml) stimulate MAPK through Ras
activation in COS-7 cells. They suggested that phosphorylation of Shc
and subsequent association between Shc and Grb2, rather than binding of
these adaptor molecules to EGFR, is the mechanism responsible for Ras
activation induced by this range of EGF concentrations (23).
Interestingly, we observed stimulation of MAPK phosphorylation in the
parent COS-7 cells by the 0.02 ng/ml concentration of EGF (data not
shown) but not by the 0.01 ng/ml concentration (Fig. 1). At the latter
concentration, EGF clearly increased MAPK phosphorylation in the
presence of NLRR-3 with no detectable amplification of EGFR
(Tyr1173, an Shc binding site) and Shc (Tyr317,
the Grb2 binding site) phosphorylation (Fig. 1A). Therefore, it is less likely that NLRR-3 directly affects the signaling components at the plasma membrane that lead to MAPK stimulation.
The results of our study demonstrated that NLRR-3 amplified MAPK
activation by an extremely low concentration of EGF with no effects on
the levels of expression of EGFR or MAPK or on the phosphorylation of
EGFR and Shc. The carboxyl-terminal 30-aa stretch of NLRR-3 was found
to be responsible for this effect, and the same region bound to the
clathrin-adaptor protein complex. Recent evidence suggests that
receptor tyrosine kinase complexes such as EGFR (16-19), Trk A (28),
platelet-derived growth factor receptor (29), and c-Ret (30) continue
to signal in endosomal compartments after their internalization.
Schoeberl et al. (21) used a computational modeling to
demonstrate that EGFR internalization has a dual role: signal
attenuation at high EGF concentrations (above the Kd = 1-2 nM of EGFR) and signal amplification after
internalization at low EGF concentrations (below the
Kd of EGFR). The concentration of EGF (0.01 ng/ml = 1.7 pM) at which NLRR-3 increased MAPK
phosphorylation was far below the Kd of EGFR. The internalized receptors contributed substantially to activation of MAPK
at this concentration as demonstrated previously (21, 31). No changes
in phosphorylation of EGFR and Shc after exposure to a low
concentration of EGF were observed as a result of expression of NLRR-3
(Fig. 1A), nor was any direct interaction observed between NLRR-3 and EGFR (data not shown). It is likely that NLRR-3 stimulates MAPK phosphorylation at extremely low concentrations of EGF
by associating with clathrin-coated vesicles containing EGFR complexes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to Dr. Gary S. Goldberg for
critical reading of the paper and for discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for
scientific research on priority area from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, a grant-in-aid for
the second-term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control, a
grant-in-aid for cancer research from the Ministry of Health, Labor and
Welfare of Japan and CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipients of research resident fellowships from the Foundation for
Promotion of Cancer Research in Japan.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Experimental
Pathology and Chemotherapy Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan. Tel.: 81-3-3542-2511; Fax: 81-3-3542-3586; E-mail:
yomatsuo@gan2.res.ncc.go.jp or htsuda@gan2.res.ncc.go.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 23, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C200502200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LRR, leucine-rich
repeat;
NLRR-3, neuronal leucine-rich repeat protein-3;
EGF, epidermal
growth factor;
EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase;
aa, amino acid;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
DTT, dithiothreitol.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Takahashi, N.,
Takahashi, Y.,
and Putnam, F. W.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
1906-1910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Rothberg, J. M.,
Jacobs, J. R.,
Goodman, C. S.,
and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
2169-2187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Taguchi, A.,
Wanaka, A.,
Mori, T.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Imai, Y.,
Tagaki, T.,
and Tohyama, M.
(1996)
Mol. Brain Res.
35,
31-40[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Taniguchi, H.,
Tohyama, M.,
and Takagi, T.
(1996)
Mol. Brain Res.
36,
45-52[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hayata, T.,
Uochi, T.,
and Asashima, M.
(1998)
Gene
221,
159-166[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Bormann, P.,
Roth, L. W.,
Andel, D.,
Ackermann, M.,
and Reinhard, E.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
13,
167-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Fukamachi, K.,
Matsuoka, Y.,
Kitanaka, C.,
Kuchino, Y.,
and Tsuda, H.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
287,
257-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
McCormick, F.
(1993)
Nature
363,
15-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
van der Geer, P.,
Hunter, T.,
and Lindberg, R. A.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10,
251-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Pelicci, G.,
Lanfrancone, L.,
Grignani, F.,
McGlade, J.,
Cavallo, F.,
Forni, G.,
Nicoletti, I.,
Pawson, T.,
and Pelicci, P. G.
(1992)
Cell
70,
93-104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Marshall, C. J.
(1996)
Nature
383,
127-128[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Marshall, C.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
732-736[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Chang, C. P.,
Lazar, C. S.,
Walsh, B. J.,
Komuro, M.,
Collawn, J. F.,
Kuhn, L. A.,
Tainer, J. A.,
Trowbridge, I. S.,
Farquhar, M. G.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19312-19320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Wells, A.,
Welsh, J. B.,
Lazar, C. S.,
Wiley, H. S.,
Gill, G. N.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1990)
Science
247,
962-964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Vieira, A. V.,
Lamaze, C.,
and Schmid, S. L.
(1996)
Science
274,
2086-2089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Di Guglielmo, G. M.,
Baass, P. C., Ou, W. J.,
Posner, B. I.,
and Bergeron, J. J.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4269-4277[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Haugh, J. M.,
Huang, A. C.,
Wiley, H. S.,
Wells, A.,
and Lauffenburger, D. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34350-34360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Haugh, J. M.,
Schooler, K.,
Wells, A.,
Wiley, H. S.,
and Lauffenburger, D. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8958-8965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Sorkina, T.,
Bild, A.,
Tebar, F.,
and Sorkin, A.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
317-327[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
Sato, Y.,
Takahashi, M.,
Shibukawa, Y.,
Jain, S. K.,
Hamaoka, R.,
Miyagawa, J.,
Yaginuma, Y.,
Honke, K.,
Ishikawa, M.,
and Taniguchi, N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11956-11962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Schoeberl, B.,
Eichler-Jonsson, C.,
Gilles, E. D.,
and Muller, G.
(2002)
Nat. Biotechnol.
20,
370-375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Matsuoka, Y., Li, X.,
and Bennett, V.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
485-497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Wennstrom, S.,
and Downward, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4279-4288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Ohno, H.,
Aguilar, R. C.,
Yeh, D.,
Taura, D.,
Saito, T.,
and Bonifacino, J. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25915-25921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Ohno, H.,
Stewart, J.,
Fournier, M. C.,
Bosshart, H.,
Rhee, I.,
Miyatake, S.,
Saito, T.,
Gallusser, A.,
Kirchhausen, T.,
and Bonifacino, J. S.
(1995)
Science
269,
1872-1875[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Kirchhausen, T.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
69,
699-727[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Rapoport, I.,
Chen, Y. C.,
Cupers, P.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
and Kirchhausen, T.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2148-2155[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Howe, C. L.,
Valletta, J. S.,
Rusnak, A. S.,
and Mobley, W. C.
(2001)
Neuron
32,
801-814[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Alderton, F.,
Rakhit, S.,
Kong, K. C.,
Palmer, T.,
Sambi, B.,
Pyne, S.,
and Pyne, N. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
28578-28585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Besset, V.,
Scott, R. P.,
and Ibanez, C. F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
39159-39166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Haugh, J. M.,
and Lauffenburger, D. A.
(1998)
J. Theor. Biol.
195,
187-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.