Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203214200 on September 6, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 46, 43648-43658, November 15, 2002
Nocodazole-induced p53-dependent c-Jun N-terminal
Kinase Activation Reduces Apoptosis in Human Colon Carcinoma HCT116
Cells*
Hong
Zhang
,
Xiaoqing
Shi
,
Qian-Jin
Zhang§,
Maggie
Hampong
,
Harry
Paddon
,
Dewi
Wahyuningsih¶, and
Steven
Pelech
¶
From the
Department of Medicine and the
§ Biomedical Research Centre, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, and ¶ Kinexus
Bioinformatics Corporation,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
Received for publication, April 4, 2002, and in revised form, August 30, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Microtubule-interfering agents are widely
used in cancer chemotherapy, and prognostic results vary significantly
from tumor to tumor, depending on the p53 status. In preliminary
experiments, we compared the expression and phosphorylation profiles of
more than 100 protein kinases and protein phosphatases in human
colorectal carcinoma cell line HCT116 between p53+/+ and p53
/
cells
in response to short term nocodazole treatment through application of
KinetworksTM immunoblotting screens. Among the proteins tracked, the
regulation of the phosphorylation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)1/2 at Thr-183/Tyr-185 was the major difference between p53+/+ and
p53
/
cells. With the loss of the p53 gene, the levels of phosphorylation of Ser-63 of c-Jun and Thr-183/Tyr-185 of JNK1/2 in
p53
/
cells did not increase as markedly as in p53+/+ cells in
response to a 1-h treatment with nocodazole or other
microtubule-disrupting drugs such as vinblastine and colchicine.
Similar observations were also made in MCF-7 and A549 tumor cells,
which were rendered p53-deficient by E6 oncoprotein expression.
However, arsenate-induced JNK activation in p53
/
cells was
preserved. Inhibition of p53 expression by its antisense
oligonucleotide also attenuated nocodazole-induced JNK activation in
p53+/+ cells. Surprisingly, cotransfection of p53+/+ cells with
dominant negative mutants of JNK isoforms and treatment of p53+/+ cells
with the JNK inhibitor SP600125 actually further enhanced
apoptosis in p53+/+ cells by up to 2-fold in response to
nocodazole. These findings indicate that inhibition of p53-mediated
JNK1/2 activity in certain tumor cells could serve to enhance the
apoptosis-inducing actions of cancer chemotherapeutic agents that
disrupt mitotic spindle function.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Given the pivotal roles of microtubules in numerous biological
processes such as mitotic spindle formation, treatment of cells with
nocodazole and other microtubule-interfering agents evokes the
activation of stress response pathways, cell cycle arrest, and the
induction of apoptosis. This accounts for the extensive use of
microtubule-interfering agents in tumor chemotherapy. In recent years,
a great deal of effort has been devoted to elucidating the signaling
pathways that mediate the biological activities of
microtubule-interfering agents (1).
The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a short lived transcription factor
that serves as a key player in the cellular response to a variety of
extra- and intracellular insults, such as DNA damage, oncogenic
activation, and microtubule disruption (2, 3). It is known that p53
exerts its function mainly through transcriptional activation of target
genes such as the CDK1
inhibitor, p21Waf1/Cip1, for arresting the cell
cycle and the proapoptotic protein, Bax, for inducing apoptosis (4, 5).
Similar to other stresses, microtubule disruption results in an
increase of p53 phosphorylation at multiple sites in a drug- and
cell-specific manner, with resultant accumulation of transcriptionally
active protein (6, 7). Recently, we have demonstrated that
nocodazole-induced phosphorylation of p53 at Ser-392, one of its key
activating sites, is mediated through direct p38 MAP kinase stimulation
of casein kinase 2 (CK2) in the HeLa cervical and HCT116 colon
carcinoma cell lines (8, 9).
To explore downstream p53-dependent regulation of signaling
proteins in the early response of cells to nocodazole treatment, we
applied three of our KinetworksTM screens to track quantitatively the
expressions of 75 protein kinases and 25 protein phosphatases and the
states of 31 known phosphorylation sites in these and other
phosphoproteins. This was accomplished by comparing the expression and
phosphorylation profiles of these proteins in a human colon carcinoma
cell line HCT116 p53+/+ and its derivative HCT116 p53
/
, where the
p53 gene was disrupted through homologous recombination (10, 11). Among
the known phosphoproteins tracked, the p53-dependent
increase in the phosphorylation and activation of the c-Jun N-terminal
kinase (JNK) was the only significant difference between p53+/+ and
p53
/
cells. Even though JNK is well known to play an important role
in coordinating the cellular response to stress by phosphorylating the
transcription factors c-Jun and p53 (12, 13), this report is the first
time that a p53-mediated JNK activity has been unambiguously
identified. In addition, we provide evidence for the possible
involvement of the p53-mediated JNK activity in a protective response
elicited by the stress of microtubule disruption.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Lines and Culture Conditions--
HCT116 p53 wild-type
(p53+/+) and knockout derivative (p53
/
) (11) cells were kindly
provided by Dr. Bert Vogelstein (Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
Baltimore, MD). Human breast carcinoma MCF-7 and MCF-7 p53-deficient
derivative, and human lung carcinoma A549 and A549 p53-deficient
derivative were from Dr. Michel Roberge (University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Both MCF-7 and A549 p53-deficient
cell lines are derived from E6 oncogene overexpression. Cells were
maintained in monolayer culture in a humidified 5% CO2
atmosphere at 37 °C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium
(Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and
penicillin/streptomycin.
Antibodies and Chemicals--
Anti-JNK1, p53, MEK4, MKP1, MKP2,
-actin, and horseradish peroxidase)-conjugated secondary antibodies
were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (Santa Cruz, CA).
Anti-phospho-[Thr-183, Tyr-185]JNK polyclonal antibody was purchased
from Promega (Madison, WI). The phospho-[Ser-63]c-Jun antibody was
obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA).
GST-c-Jun(1-79)-agarose conjugate was purchased from StressGen
Biotechnologies (Victoria, BC, Canada). GST-JNK2 agarose conjugate was
obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Nocodazole,
vinblastine, colchicine, taxol, and sodium arsenate were purchased from
Sigma. The JNK inhibitor SP600125 was from Tocris Cookson Ltd.
(Bristol, UK). Other reagents were all from commercial sources, unless
otherwise stated.
Oligonucleotides, Plasmids, and Cell
Transfection--
Fluorescein-labeled phosphorothioate p53
antisense (5'-CCCTGCTCCCCCCTGGCTCC-3') and control nonsense
(5'-CGGTGATCTCCAGAGTATGC-3') oligonucleotides were synthesized by
the NAPS unit of University of British Columbia on a 349 DNA/RNA
synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The antisense
oligonucleotide is complementary to nucleotides 1071-1090 of exon 10 of the p53 gene, which is located in the C-terminal region that is
required for oligomerization of p53 (14). The oligonucleotides were
purified twice by ethanol precipitation. Cells were transfected with
oligonucleotides at the concentrations indicated using Lipofectin
transfection reagent from Invitrogen according to the manufacturer's
protocol. The pcDNA3-HA-MEK4(AL) dominant negative mutant plasmid
was provided by Dr. Jim Woodgett (Ontario Cancer Institute, ON,
Canada), and pLNCX vectors containing wild-type and dominant negative
mutants (APF) of JNKs, HAp40JNK1
,
, HAp40JNK2
,
, were gifts
from Dr. Lynn Heasley (University of Colorado, Denver) (15).
Transfections of HCT116 cells with these constructs were performed
using LipofectAMINE Plus reagent (Invitrogen).
Apoptosis Assays--
For flow cytometry analyses of DNA
staining profile, transfected or nontransfected cells in 100-mm dishes
at ~60-80% confluence were treated with 200 ng/ml nocodazole. At
various times as indicated under "Results," the cells were
harvested by trypsin treatment, combined with floating cells in the
medium, washed once in phosphate-buffered saline, and fixed in methanol
for 30 min at
20 °C. After three washes in phosphate-buffered
saline, the cells were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline
containing 25 µg/ml RNase A and 25 µg/ml propidium iodine at
37 °C for 30 min. The DNA fluorescence was measured using a BD
Biosciences FACScan; data acquisition and analysis were performed with
the Cell Quest software. DNA fragmentation assays were performed as
described by Huang et al. (16).
Western Blot Analysis--
Total cell lysates were prepared as
described previously (17). Briefly, cells were washed with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline, scraped in lysis buffer (20 mM
Tris, 20 mM
-glycerophosphate, 150 mM NaCl,
3 mM EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol) supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 µg/ml
pepstatin A, sonicated for 15 s. Cell debris was removed by
centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Protein
concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (18). Aliquots
of cell lysates were resolved on SDS-PAGE (13% gel), transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with various primary antibodies
followed by relevant horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibodies. The blots were developed with ECL Plus reagent (Amersham
Biosciences), and signals were then captured by Fluor-S
MultiImager and quantified using Quantity One software
(Bio-Rad).
KinetworksTM Analyses--
For the preparation of cytosolic and
particulate fractions for KinetworksTM analyses, cells were homogenized
using a Dounce homogenizer in the above lysis buffer without NaCl and
Nonidet P-40. After ultracentrifugation at 100,000 rpm for 30 min at
4 °C, the supernatant was collected as a cytosolic fraction. The pellet fraction was then rehomogenized in lysis buffer with NaCl and
0.5% Nonidet P-40. After ultracentrifugation, the
detergent-solubilized supernatant was saved as a particulate fraction.
KinetworksTM analyses were performed on 300-600 µg of
protein/sample. The KinetworksTM analyses carried out included KPKS 1.0 for 75 protein kinases, KPPS 1.1 for 25 protein phosphatases, and KPSS
1.0 for 33 phosphoproteins. The immunoblotting analyses involved
probing with mixes of in-house validated primary antibodies from
commercial sources and the application of each mix into a separate lane
of a 20-lane multiblotter (Immunetics). Detailed protocols for the
KinetworksTM analyses can be found at the Kinexus Bioinformatics
website (www.kinexus.ca).
In Vitro Kinase Activity Assay--
For JNK kinase assay,
endogenous JNK was immunoprecipitated from cell lysate using anti-JNK1
antibody. In vitro JNK kinase assay was performed as
described (19). The JNK activity was assayed by phosphorylation of
GST-c-Jun(1-79), as revealed by Western blot analysis using
anti-phospho-[Ser-63]c-Jun antibody. MEK4 kinase activity was assayed
similarly except using GST-JNK2 as substrate, instead of GST-c-Jun,
whose phosphorylation was detected by Western blotting with
anti-phospho-[Thr-183,Tyr-185]JNK antibody.
 |
RESULTS |
Different Phosphorylation Profiles of Signaling Proteins Revealed
by KinetworksTM Analysis May Account for the Different Sensitivities
of p53+/+ and p53
/
Cells to Nocodazole-induced
Apoptosis--
Previous studies have revealed a correlation between
p53 status and sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs
(20-22). The difference in drug response between tumors with wild-type p53 and those harboring p53 loss-of-function mutations can be explained
in part by p53-mediated apoptosis (23). Treatment of HCT116 cells with
200 ng/ml nocodazole induced a much stronger apoptotic response in
p53+/+ cells than in p53
/
cells. As shown in Fig.
1, endonucleolytic cleavage of genomic
DNA, an indicator of apoptosis, was much more evident in p53+/+ than in
p53
/
cells at 72 h (Fig. 1A). Consistent with this,
flow cytometry revealed that most cells from both cell lines were
arrested at G2/M transition (4 n DNA) after a 72-h
nocodazole treatment (Fig. 1, C and D). However,
most of these cells were in G1 phase (2 n DNA) when
cultured in the absence of this microtubule disrupter (Fig.
1B). About 30% of cells contained less than 2 n DNA
content (sub-G1) characteristic of apoptotic cells in
p53+/+ cells (Fig. 1C) compared with less than 13% in
p53
/
cells 72 h after nocodazole treatment (Fig. 1D).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Different sensitivities to nocodazole-induced
apoptosis by HCT116 p53+/+ and
p53 / cells, as
demonstrated by genomic DNA fragmentation assay (A)
and flow cytometry (B-D). A, genomic
DNAs were extracted from cells treated with 200 ng/ml nocodazole for 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h and analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.8%
agarose gel. The p53+/+ cells exhibited a higher extent of DNA
fragmentation at 72 h than the p53 / cells. The 1-kb DNA ladder
from Invitrogen is indicated on the left. Flow cytometry was
performed to assess the percentage of apoptotic cells after treatment
of p53+/+ cells in the absence (B) and presence of 200 ng/ml
nocodazole (C) for 72 h. D, p53 / cells
were also examined by flow cytometry after incubation with 200 ng/ml
nocodazole for 72 h and treatment with propidium iodide. DNA
content is represented on the x axis; the number of cells
counted is represented on the y axis. M1, the
fraction of apoptotic cells containing less than 2n DNA.
|
|
To examine the signaling pathways downstream of p53 which might account
for the difference in apoptosis induction, we undertook an unbiased
proteomics-based approach to focus on signaling proteins that may be
important in mediating the actions of the tumor suppressor protein p53
in response to nocodazole. In preliminary studies, we applied three
KinetworksTM screens to analyze the expression profiles of up to 75 protein kinases and 25 protein phosphatases, as well as the
phosphorylation states of 25 of these protein kinases (Table
I) and 10 other known
phosphoproteins (data not shown) from p53+/+ and p53
/
cells treated
with 200 ng/ml nocodazole for 1 h.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Expression levels of protein kinases and protein phosphatases and
phosphorylation levels of protein kinases in HCT-116 p53+/+ and
p53 / cells
The trace quantity units are arbitrary based on the intensity of ECL
fluorescence detection for target immunoreactive proteins recorded with
a Bio-Rad Fluor-S MultiImager and Quantity One software. The target
proteins were tracked using the KinetworksTM KPKS 1.0, KPPS 1.1 and
KPSS 1.1 screens performed by Kinexus Bioinformatics Corporation. The
phosphorylation sites listed are based on human protein sequences. With
the exceptions of MEK6 and Src, only the results for those protein
kinases and protein phosphatases that yielded signals in excess of
2,500 with pan-specific antibodies are shown. Backgrounds were less
than 500 for these analyses. The actual trace quantity values are
provided for the untreated p53+/+ cells, whereas the other values
reflect the percent differences in the recorded signals relative to the
untreated cytosolic and particulate p53+/+ control cells. Values are
the average of duplicate determinations. The reproducibility of these
signal transduction protein screens was typically within 15%.
|
|
48 distinct protein kinases isoforms were clearly evident in the HCT116
cell lines (listed in Table I), and weaker signals were recorded for 14 other protein kinases (calmodulin-dependent kinase 1, calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase, casein kinase 1
, cGMP-dependent protein kinase, cyclin-dependent
kinases 2, 6, and 9, death-associated kinase 1, JAK2, Lyn, MST1,
protein kinase C
, RhoA kinase, and Syk; data not shown) of 75 kinases that can be detected by the KinetworksTM KPKS 1.0 screen. Of
these 48 kinases, 18 protein kinases revealed expression differences of
49% or greater between the untreated p53+/+ and p53
/
cell lines
when either the cytosolic or particulate fractions of these cells were
investigated separately. In particular, loss of p53 function was
associated with increases in cytosolic CK2, ERK6, MEK6, MEK7, Pim1, and
RafB; increases in particulate MEK1, MEK2, MEK6, Pim1, PKC-
, RafB, and S6 kinase; decreases in cytosolic CDK1, PKC-
1, Rsk1 and Yes; and
reductions in particulate Hpk1, MosI and p40 JNK
(SAPK-
).2 The 3.8-fold or
greater increased productions of Pim1 and MEK6 in the p53
/
cells
were the most striking. These findings indicated extensive alterations
in protein kinase regulation as a function of p53 status.
There were also marked differences in the responses of the p53+/+ and
p53
/
cells to a 1-h exposure to nocodazole. In the p53+/+ cells,
nocodazole led to 1.5-1.7-fold increases in cytosolic CK2 and Csk, and
particulate MEK7, and it was associated with 53-74% reductions in the
levels of cytosolic PKC-
1 and particulate ERK2, ERK3, and Yes (the
Yes change is not likely to be significant because of low signal:noise
ratio). In the p53
/
cells, the nocodazole treatment caused
1.5-3-fold increases in cytosolic Csk, CDK1, CDK7, GCK, PKA, PKC-
1,
Rsk1, Yes, ZAP70, and ZIP kinase, and particulate ERK1, PKC-
, and
p40 JNK; and 57-100% reductions in cytosolic Pim1, and particulate
Csk1 and Fyn. MosI expression was elevated 5-fold in the particulate
fraction of nocodazole-treated p53
/
cells but unaffected in the
p53+/+ cells.
Of 25 different protein phosphatases that could be potentially detected
with the KinetworksTM KPPS 1.1 screen, 15 were clearly detected in the
HCT116 cell lines (Table I), and 5 others were weakly detected
(i.e. LAR, MKP1, MKP3, protein phosphatase 2A catalytic
subunit and protein phosphatase X A'2 subunit; data not shown). In the
p53
/
cells compared with the p53+/+ cells, there were 1.5-2-fold
elevated protein levels of particulate PTP-1B and cytosolic protein
phosphatase 1
catalytic subunit, PTP-PEST, and PTP-1C, and 48-83%
reductions in the expressions of particulate MKP2, P5/PPT, and protein
phosphatase 1
catalytic subunit. The elevation of cytosolic PTP-1C
and reduction of particulate PTP-1C in the p53
/
cells may reflect
translocation of this protein-tyrosine phosphatase.
Nocodazole caused 2.1-2.5-fold increases in the cytosolic levels of
protein phosphatase V catalytic subunit in both the p53
/
and p53+/+
cells, and this might also arise from redistribution of this
phosphatase away from the particulate fraction in at least the p53
/
cells. However, nocodazole treatment also had differential effects on
other protein phosphatases in the two HCT116 cell lines. It selectively
evoked a 2.7-fold increase in cytosolic KAP and 4-fold more particulate
MKP2 in p53
/
cells, and 1.8-2.5-fold increased expressions of
particulate KAP, protein phosphatase 1C
and PTP-1B in p53+/+ cells.
The extensive p53-dependent changes in the levels of the
protein kinases and protein phosphatases in the HCT116 cells were also
accompanied by many altered states of phosphorylation of protein
kinases as detected with phosphorylation site-specific antibodies
employed in the KinetworksTM KPSS 1.1 screen (Fig.
2 and Table I). 19 distinct
phosphorylation sites in 17 different protein kinases were observed to
undergo phosphorylation, and 12 of these kinases demonstrated at least
50% increases or decreases in their phosphorylation signals between
the p53+/+ and p53
/
cell lines in the absence of nocodazole
treatment. After exposure to nocodazole, there were also
p53-dependent changes in phosphorylation states of 11 protein kinases which exceeded 50%. In several cases, the altered
states of phosphorylation reflected at least in part changes in the
protein levels of the various protein kinases. This was observed for
the CDK1 inhibitory Tyr-14, ERK2-activating Thr-185/Tyr-187,
GSK3
-activating Tyr-216, PKB-
- activating Ser-473, Raf1 p72
Ser-259, Rsk1-activating Thr-360/Ser-364, and Src inhibitory Tyr-529
phosphorylation changes.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
KinetworksTM KPSS 1.0 phosphoprotein analysis
of the phosphorylation states of up to 33 known signaling proteins in
p53+/+ (A) and
p53 / HCT116 cells
(B) after a 1-h treatment with 200 ng/ml
nocodazole. Known phosphoproteins are identified below as
numbered bands. Changes in the intensity of phosphorylation
signals that were recorded with Quantity One software from Bio-Rad are
provided as a percent increase or decrease in the p53 / cells
compared with the p53+/+ cells. The major increase in phosphorylation
associated with p53 / was observed for an unidentified 115-kDa
protein that migrated below band 22.
|
|
The "specific phosphorylation" of a protein takes into account the
magnitude of the phosphorylation signal relative to the amount of that
protein in a sample. Therefore, the specific phosphorylations of the
aforementioned protein kinases were not affected markedly by the p53
status or by nocodazole treatment. However, there were cases where loss
of p53 function was associated with increased specific phosphorylation
of protein kinases, and although the specific phosphorylation of these
kinases could be stimulated further by nocodazole in the p53+/+ cells,
this was not evident in the p53
/
cells. For example, the specific
phosphorylation of cytosolic MEK1/MEK2-activating Ser-217/Ser221 was
enhanced in untreated p53
/
cells compared with p53 +/+ cells
(percent change in phosphorylation state versus percent
change in protein level:
384/79 = 4.9-fold),3 and after
nocodazole exposure it was increased (265/103 = 2.6-fold) in
p53+/+ cells, but not further (122/138 = 0.9-fold) in p53
/
cells. Likewise, the specific phosphorylation of cytosolic PKC-
1 Thr-638/Ser-657 (128/38 = 3.4-fold) and Thr-641 (149/38 = 3.9-fold) were increased in untreated p53
/
cells compared with
p53+/+ cells. After nocodazole treatment, these specific
phosphorylations of cytosolic PKC
-1 were reduced in p53
/
cells
(Thr-638/Ser-657 (66/188 = 0.35-fold) and Thr-641 (69/188 = 0.37-fold)) but were enhanced in p53+/+ cells (Thr-638/Ser-657
(111/47 = 2.4-fold) and Thr-641 (91/47 = 1.9-fold)). By
contrast, there was a complete loss of detectable Ser-259 specific
phosphorylation of both cytosolic and particulate p62 Raf1 in untreated
p53
/
cells compared with p53+/+ cells.
Of greatest interest from the KinetworksTM analyses was the
p53-dependent differential regulation of p40 JNK and p47
JNK phosphorylation at their activation sites. In the untreated
p53
/
cells compared with p53+/+ cells, there were marked reductions
of the specific phosphorylations of cytosolic p40 JNK (56/111 = 0.5-fold), particulate p40 JNK (1/51 = 0.02-fold), and cytosolic
p47 JNK phosphorylation (1/109 = 0.01-fold). Although nocodazole
treatment evoked clear stimulations of the specific phosphorylations of
cytosolic (247/116 = 2.1-fold) and particulate (336/90 = 3.7-fold) p40 JNK, and cytosolic (258/100 = 2.6-fold) and
particulate (134/100 = 1.3-fold) p47 JNK in p53+/+
cells, no increases in JNK specific phosphorylation occurred after
exposure of the p53
/
cells to nocodazole. These p53 loss of
function-associated reductions in basal phosphorylation of JNK along
with the abrogation of nocodazole-induced phosphorylation at these
activating sites, revealed that JNK acts downstream of p53 in a
signaling cascade in the HCT116 p53+/+ cells. The remainder of this
study focuses on confirming this finding and establishing its
physiological significance.
Nocodazole-induced JNK Activation Is
p53-dependent--
To confirm the results of the
KinetworksTM analysis with respect to JNK regulation in the two HCT116
cell lines in response to nocodazole, we monitored p40 JNK protein and
phosphorylation levels by Western blot analysis. Maximum
phosphorylation of p40 JNK was induced with 200 ng/ml nocodazole in the
p53+/+ cells in 1 h (Fig. 3,
A and C). By contrast, there was a slightly
higher level of expression of p40 JNK in the p53
/
cells even before nocodazole treatment. However, the protein level of p40 JNK remained relatively constant during the course of treatment (Fig.
3B). These findings further indicate a marked loss in the
ability of this microtubule-interfering agent to activate p40 JNK in
p53
/
cells. In correlation with the higher levels of immunoreactive phosphorylated JNK, the JNK immunoprecipitated from p53+/+ cells treated with nocodazole exhibited much higher phosphotransferase activity toward GST-c-Jun when assayed in vitro compared
with p53
/
counterparts (Fig. 3D). Therefore, the
difference observed after nocodazole treatment in these two cell lines
in p40 JNK phosphorylation was caused by the differential activation of
the kinase.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Nocodazole activates JNK differently in
p53+/+ and p53 / HCT116,
MCF-7, and A549 cells. Cells were treated with 0-500 ng/ml
nocodazole for 1 h (A) or with 200 ng/ml nocodazole for
0-2 h (B and C) before harvesting. MCF-7
(E and F) and A549 (G and
H) parental cells and their p53-deficient derivatives, in
which the p53 protein was inactivated by E6 overexpression, were
treated with 200 ng/ml nocodazole for 1 h. JNK activation was
determined indirectly by immunoblotting with
anti-phospho-[Thr-183,Tyr-185]JNK antibody (A,
C, E, and G). Expression of JNK
protein was determined by immunoblotting of the respective cell lysates
with anti-JNK1 antibody (B, F, and H).
JNK activation in the cells treated with 200 ng/ml nocodazole for
1 h was confirmed further by immunocomplex assay using
GST-c-Jun(1-79) as substrate (D). Phosphorylated GST-c-Jun
was examined by immunoblotting with phospho-[Ser-63]c-Jun
antibody.
|
|
p53-dependent JNK Activation Is a General Response to
Microtubule Depolymerization--
To examine further the dependence of
nocodazole-induced JNK activation on p53 status, we investigated the
effect of nocodazole on JNK activity in p53-deficient derivatives of
two other cell lines, MCF-7 and A549, in which p53 function was
abrogated through expression of viral E6 oncoprotein. Although MCF-7
p53-deficient cells displayed a much higher level of p40 JNK protein
expression, MCF-7 parental cells exhibited a marked increase of
phosphorylated p40 JNK compared with their p53-deficient counterparts
in response to nocodazole treatment (Fig. 3, E and
F). Similarly, a higher degree of JNK phosphorylation was
observed in A549 parental cells upon nocodazole treatment than in A549
p53-deficient cells, although they exhibited similar JNK protein
expression levels (Fig. 3, G and H). Therefore,
it is evident that the p53-dependent JNK activation upon
nocodazole treatment is not limited to HCT116 cells. However, because
of the possible complication of other activities of E6 oncoprotein, we
chose to focus subsequent work on the HCT116 cells.
Furthermore, to ascertain whether the p53-dependent JNK
activation was a general response to microtubule interference, we examined the effects of other microtubule-interfering agents including vinblastine, colchicine, and taxol on JNK activity in HCT116 cells. The
higher degree of JNK phosphorylation in HCT116 p53+/+ cells was
observed after treatment with microtubule-depolymerizing drugs, vinblastine and colchicine (Fig. 4,
A-D), but not with
microtubule-stabilizing drug, taxol (data not shown), indicating that
the p53-dependent JNK activation might be related to the
microtubule-depolymerizing activity of nocodazole, vinblastine, and
colchicine.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
p53 dependence of microtubule-depolymerizing
drugs and arsenate on JNK activation in HCT116 cells. HCT116
p53+/+ and p53 / cells were treated with 1 µM
vinblastine for 1 h (A and B) or colchicine
for 1 h (C and D), or 0.5 µM
sodium arsenate for 30 min (E and F). Cells
treated with dimethyl sulfoxide and H2O were used as
controls for vinblastine and colchicine, respectively. Phospho-JNK
(A, C, and E) and JNK protein
(B, D, and F) were monitored by
Western blot analyses.
|
|
Arsenate and Nocodazole Induce JNK Activation through Different
Pathways--
It was conceivable that the lack of significant
activation of p40 JNK in p53
/
cells upon nocodazole treatment may
result from defects in the JNK signaling pathway in p53
/
cells. To examine this possibility, we used sodium arsenate, a potent activator of stress response pathways involving p38 MAP kinase and JNK, to treat
HCT116 cells. Treatment with 0.5 mM sodium arsenate for 0.5 h increased the phospho- p40 JNK levels in p53
/
cells,
equivalent to, if not better than that observed in the p53+/+ cells
(Fig. 4, E and F). This result indicated that the
stress response JNK pathways were functional in both cell lines and
were independent of the p53 status. Moreover, based on these
observations, it is also reasonable to speculate that sodium arsenate
and nocodazole may regulate JNK activity via distinct upstream
signaling pathways. It further supports the idea that the lack of
significant activation of JNK in p53
/
cells after nocodazole
treatment may be caused by the absence of a functional p53 gene.
p53 Mediates JNK Activation in Response to Nocodazole
Treatment--
To explore further the specific role of p53 for
nocodazole-induced JNK activation, we examined the effect of the p53
antisense oligonucleotide treatment on p40 JNK activation in p53+/+
cells in response to nocodazole treatment. In p53+/+ cells, treatment with an antisense oligonucleotide targeted at the p53 oligomerization domain located near its C terminus at 140 and 500 nM
resulted in 48 and 59% reduction at its protein level, respectively
(Fig. 5A). No significant
difference was observed between nontransfected and nonsense
oligonucleotide-transfected cells in p53 protein levels, indicating
that the reduction of p53 protein level was specific for p53 antisense
oligonucleotide treatment (Fig. 5A).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
p53 antisense oligonucleotide treatment
attenuates JNK activation in p53+/+ cells treated with nocodazole.
HCT116 p53+/+ cells were transfected with a p53-specific antisense
oligonucleotide at the indicated concentrations before nocodazole
treatment. Cells treated with a random oligonucleotide at 140 nM were used as control. The p53 protein levels were
monitored by immunoblotting of total lysates with anti-p53 antibody
(A). JNK activity was determined by immunoblotting with
anti-phospho-[Thr-183,Tyr-185]JNK antibody (B). The
-actin level as shown by immunoblotting with an antibody for
-actin was used as control for equal loading (C). JNK
activity in antisense oligonucleotide-treated cells was further
determined by immunocomplex kinase assay using GST-c-Jun(1-79) as
substrate and detection with phospho-[Ser-63]c-Jun antibody
(D). Numbers below each band indicate
the percentage of intensity relative to control.
|
|
Correlated to the p53 protein level, the levels of active
p40 JNK in the p53 antisense oligonucleotide-treated p53+/+ cells also
decreased by 47 and 53%, respectively, in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 5B).
-Actin was used as an equal loading
control (Fig. 5C). In vitro kinase assay of JNK
immunoprecipitates further confirmed the decrease of JNK
phosphotransferase activity after antisense oligonucleotide treatment
(Fig. 5D).
Based on the above results, we conclude that p53 is required for p40
JNK activation, and it may act upstream of JNK pathway to mediate the
biological activities of nocodazole in HCT116 cells.
Nocodazole Activates JNK by Up-regulating Its Upstream Kinase
MEK4--
The increased phosphorylation and activation of p40 JNK may
arise from increased MEK4 and/or MEK7 phosphotransferase activity and/or decreased MKP1 and MKP2 phosphatase activity. The levels of MKP1
and MKP2 were similar in both HCT116 cell lines and relatively unaffected by nocodazole (Fig. 6,
A and
B).4 Although
there was about 1.6 times more MEK4 protein in anti-MEK4 immunoprecipitates from p53
/
than from p53+/+ cells, the protein level of MEK4 remained relatively constant over the course of nocodazole treatment (Fig. 6D). However, there was a marked
5-fold activation by nocodazole of immunoprecipitated MEK4
phosphotransferase activity toward GST-JNK in p53+/+ cells (Fig.
6C). By contrast, the phosphotransferase activity of the
MEK4 could not be stimulated in the p53
/
cells (Fig.
6C). Therefore, p53 induced activation of p40 JNK at least
in part through stimulation of MEK4.

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Activation of MEK4 is at least in part
responsible for JNK activation in p53+/+ cells treated with
nocodazole. The MPK-1 (A) and MPK-2 (B)
protein phosphatase levels in p53+/+ and p53 / treated for 0-2 h
with 200 ng/ml nocodazole were monitored by immunoblotting with their
respective antibodies. MEK4 phosphotransferase activity was determined
by immunocomplex kinase assay using GST-JNK2 as substrate and detection
with anti-phospho-[Thr-183,Tyr-185]JNK antibody (C). The
level of MEK4 proteins in the MEK4 immunoprecipitates used for the
kinase assays in C were determined by immunoblotting with
anti-MEK4 antibody (D).
|
|
Inhibition of Endogenous p53-dependent JNK Activity
Enhances Apoptosis in p53+/+ cells--
Given the roles of JNK
associated with induction of apoptosis in response to microtubule
disruption, as demonstrated by a number of recent studies (24, 25), an
interesting question arises as to whether the differential JNK
activation in response to nocodazole may account for the different
sensitivity of p53+/+ and p53
/
cells to nocodazole-induced cytotoxicity.
To address this question, we transfected p53+/+ cells with dominant
negative mutants of four different p40 JNK isoforms, JNK1
(APF), JNK1
(APF), JNK2
(APF), and JNK2
(APF), individually, followed by
a 1-h nocodazole treatment to evaluate whether any of these treatments
could inhibit nocodazole-induced apoptosis. No significant difference
in p40 JNK activation was observed between empty vector-transfected control cells and JNK(APF)-transfected cells upon nocodazole treatment (Fig. 7A). Correlated with
this, no apparent effect was seen on apoptosis induction after a 72-h
nocodazole treatment in the cells transfected with each individual
JNK(APF) mutant, as assessed by flow cytometry.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Inhibition of endogenous JNK activity
resulted in increase of apoptosis in p53+/+ cells in response to
nocodazole treatment. Transfection of HCT116 p53+/+ cells with
dominant negative mutants of p40 JNK individually showed no effect on
either endogenous JNK activity or apoptosis in response to nocodazole
treatment (A). Cotransfection of p53+/+ cells with dominant
negative mutants of all four JNK isoforms resulted in a decrease in JNK
phosphotransferase activity (B) but an increase in the
percentage of apoptotic cells as measured by flow cytometry. Incubation
of HCT116 p53+/+ cells with 0.5 µM SP600125 and 200 ng/ml
nocodazole for 1 h resulted in the inhibition of JNK and c-Jun
phosphorylation as well as increased apoptotic response 72 h after
treatment (C, D, and E). Endogenous
JNK phosphotransferase activity in cells was monitored indirectly by
immunoblotting with anti-phospho-[Thr-183,Tyr-185]JNK antibody
(C) and anti-phospho-[Ser-63]c-Jun antibody
(E). Expression of JNK was determined by immunoblotting with
anti-JNK antibody (D). Results from one representative
experiment are shown here. The experiment was repeated three times with
similar results.
|
|
However, when cotransfected with dominant negative mutants of all four
different p40 JNK isoforms, p53+/+ cells exhibited a 38% decrease in
the phosphorylation of endogenous p40 JNK 1 h after nocodazole
treatment compared with vector-transfected control cells (Fig.
7B). Surprisingly, a 1.7-fold increase in the number of
apoptotic cells within 72 h after nocodazole treatment was
detected in the p53+/+ cells cotransfected with all four dominant negative mutants.
SP600125 is a newly identified JNK inhibitor and exhibits
significant selectivity for JNKs, leading to inhibition of both phosphorylation of c-Jun and JNKs (26). When a short term treatment with both nocodazole and SP600125 was administrated, we observed inhibition of JNK and c-Jun phosphorylation in p53+/+ cells in response
to a 1-h SP600125 treatment compared with nocodazole only treatment
(Fig. 7, C-E). When treated with a combination of
nocodazole and SP600125 for 72 h, a ~25% increase in apoptosis was observed in HCT116 p53+/+ cells, whereas no effect was found when
SP600125 was used alone. This is consistent with the inhibitory effect
of JNK activity on apoptosis observed above. Taken together, our
observations indicated that the p53- dependent JNK activation initially induced by nocodazole treatment is more likely to be anti-apoptotic rather than pro-apoptotic.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The extensive use of microtubule-interfering agents in
chemotherapeutic treatment of a variety of human tumors has justified a
great deal of effort devoted to identifying the signaling pathways that
mediate the cellular responses to microtubule disruption. By taking a
broad analysis of signaling pathways through the use of KinetworksTM
proteomics screens, we observed complex changes in the levels of
expression and phosphorylation of many protein kinases and phosphatases
in association with loss of p53 function and in response to nocodazole
treatment (Table I and Fig. 2). Our knowledge of the precise roles of
these regulatory enzymes is insufficient at this juncture to permit
proper interpretation of all of these findings. However, the most
profound difference in nocodazole effects which was dependent upon p53
status was noted for the regulation of JNK. Although both p53 and JNK
have previously been shown to mediate cellular responses to the actions of microtubule-interfering agents, their interrelationships have been
far from clear.
The dependence of nocodaozle-induced JNK activation on p53 status was
examined in three cell lines and their p53-deficient derivatives, in
which the p53 function was disrupted through two distinct approaches. A
transient JNK activation was observed in all three parental cells but
not in their p53-deficient counterparts, indicating that the
p53-dependent JNK activity may be a general response to
nocodazole-induced microtubule disruption and is not just restricted to
a particular cell line. In addition to nocodazole, other
microtubule-depolymerizing agents including vinblastine and
colchicine, but not microtubule-stabilizing taxol, could also elicit
similar JNK activation in p53-dependent manner, which
implied that it is the effects of microtubule-depolymerizing drugs that trigger the p53-dependent JNK activation. The underlying
mechanism for this effect remains to be elucidated.
The failure of JNK activation in nocodazole-treated p53
/
cells
could not be attributed to defects in the stress response pathways
mediated by JNK because arsenate was able to activate JNK in both types
of cell. Furthermore, treatment of p53+/+ cells with p53 antisense
oligonucleotide revealed that the differential activation of JNK in
response to nocodazole resulted from the difference in the p53 status
in these two cell lines, indicating that the p53 tumor suppressor can
act upstream of JNK. This is in sharp contrast to the conclusions drawn
from most published studies that p53 is a downstream effector of JNK.
It has been shown that JNK phosphorylates p53 specifically at Ser-34
and Thr-81 in response to UV irradiation and anisomycin treatment (12, 13, 27), leading to stabilization of p53, which in turn induces expression of p21Waf1/Cip1 and proapoptotic
members of Bcl2 family such as Bax. Similar to our observations, the
correlation between p53 status and JNK activation has been observed
recently in LNCaP (p53+/+) and PC-3 (p53
/
) cells treated with
N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide. However, conclusions drawn
from a study involving two distinct cell lines with different p53
status cannot be considered conclusive (28).
Even though it is still unclear how p53 mediates JNK activation in
response to nocodazole, we have shown here that at least in part, it
acts through up-regulating the activity of the JNK upstream kinase MEK4
without affecting known phosphatases that down-regulate JNK activity.
Moreover, our preliminary data indicate that the p53-mediated JNK
activation is independent of p53 transcriptional activity because
pifithrin
, an inhibitor of p53 transcriptional activity
(29),5 cannot block the JNK
activation upon nocodazole treatment. This is not totally surprising
because transcriptionally independent activities of p53 have also been
documented in several recent studies (3). It would be very interesting
to delineate the signaling pathway that mediates signals from p53 to
JNK by examining the effects of dominant negative mutants of each
component of JNK as well as p53 pathways on the
p53-dependent JNK activity.
There is increasing evidence showing that activation of the JNK
signaling pathways is implicated in regulation of apoptosis (24, 30,
31). However, the exact roles of JNK in promoting or preventing
apoptosis differ and depend on the cell type, apoptosis-triggering signals, and even the duration of JNK activation (32, 33). The
correlation between apoptotic response and JNK activation in p53+/+
cells prompted us to speculate that the p53-dependent JNK
activity might be responsible for inducing apoptosis in response to
nocodazole treatment. Overexpression of nonphosphorylatable dominant
negative mutants of JNK isoforms individually exhibited no effect on
endogenous JNK activity and apoptosis in p53+/+ treated with
nocodazole. This may be caused by functional redundancy among different
isoforms of JNKs. In agreement with this, cotransfection of p53+/+
cells with dominant negative mutants of all four JNK1/2 isoforms
reduced JNK activation induced by nocodazole treatment. However, to our
surprise, instead of an attenuation of the apoptotic response, we
observed a significant increase in the number of apoptotic cells in
cotransfected cells. The results demonstrated that the
p53-dependent JNK activity induced by nocodazole is
anti-apoptotic in the HCT116 cells. Consistent with this, inhibiting
JNK activity by treating p53+/+ cells with nocodazole for 72 h
along with a JNK inhibitor, SP600125, also resulted in an enhanced
apoptotic response compared with those treated with nocodazole only.
Furthermore, our preliminary experiments have shown that cells
expressing MEK4 dominant negative mutant MEK4(AL) also exhibit
increased apoptosis relative to vector controls.5
Although little is known about the detailed mechanisms, the role of JNK
in protecting cells from stress-induced apoptosis has been documented
in many studies. Based on our observations, we propose a hypothesis for
the role of anti-apoptotic JNK activity in p53+/+ cells in response to
nocodazole treatment. Given the important roles of p53 in the cellular
response to stress, treating HCT116 cells with nocodazole elicits a
p53-mediated microtubule damage signal that is expected to be stronger
in p53+/+ than in p53
/
cells. When the damage signal reaches a
certain threshold, cells will activate their defense system, which is
mediated by the p53-dependent JNK activity, in an effort to
repair the damage. However, the prolonged nocodazole treatment in our
study in the end may result in massive destruction of microtubule
structures in p53+/+ cells, which may render the repairing efforts futile.
Several lines of our observations and those of others are in favor of
this hypothesis. First, Chen et al. (32) showed that the JNK
activation in T-cell apoptosis and T-cell activation was distinguished
by the different activation kinetics, persistent versus
transient, respectively. Given the transient nature of the
p53-dependent JNK activity, our data indeed support a
survival role for the JNK activity in the stress response to nocodazole treatment. Second, the roles of MEKK1, a MAP kinase kinase kinase upstream of MEK4, and its dependent JNK activation, in cell survival have been defined by targeted gene disruption in mouse embryonic stem
cell line in response to microtubule disruption by nocodazole (34).
Third, no apparent difference in apoptosis was observed between p53+/+
and p53
/
cells being treated with nocodazole for a shorter time (up
to 48 h), which indirectly supports a role of JNK in protecting
cells from stress-induced apoptosis in p53+/+ cells.5 The
early JNK activation relative to the delayed occurrence of massive
apoptosis implicated the p53-dependent JNK activity as an
initial response to treatment of microtubule-depolymerizing drugs.
However, how this early response event triggers the subsequent apoptosis signaling cascade is still unclear. Finally, our preliminary observations have indicated that there is no increase of apoptosis in
p53+/+ cells transfected with JNK wild-type constructs at 72 h
after nocodazole treatment,5 which is also in agreement
with our hypothesis.
A growth inhibitory effect of JNK was reported by Potapova et
al. (19) in HCT116 p53
/
and other p53-deficient cell lines upon JNK antisense oligonucleotide treatment, which supports the protective role of JNK in human tumor cells lacking functional p53. The
two seemly paradoxical observations in the same cell line could be
resolved if one considers the fact that it is the JNK basal protein
level in nonstressed cells that was the focus of their study, not
stress-induced JNK activity as in our study reported here.
In conclusion, our study provides new insights into the mechanisms of
the cellular response to microtubule disruption. It is the first time
that the p53-dependent JNK activity has been clearly
documented and shown to be associated with cell protection in stress
response to microtubule disruption. Further study will be required to
elucidate the mechanisms by which the JNK exerts its protective role
during this process. Our study may also have clinical implications for
optimizing cancer therapies involving microtubule-interfering drugs in future.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. Bert Vogelstein for
providing HCT116 p53+/+ and p53
/
cell lines, Drs. Lynn Heasley and
Jim Woodgett for JNK constructs, Dr. Liren Tang for p53 antibody, and
Dr. Michel Roberge for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The study was supported in part by an operating grant from
the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (to S. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine,
University of British Columbia, The Brain Research Centre, 1st
Floor, Koerner Pavilion, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada. Tel.: 604-822-9966; Fax: 604-822-9964;
E-mail: spelech@kinexus.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203214200
2
JNK1 and JNK2 have been reported previously to
have at least four different isoforms, p46
, p46
, p54
, and
p54
, because of alternative splicing (34-36). From our study we
believe that p54 JNK corresponds to p47 JNK, and p46 JNK corresponds to
p40 JNK. The difference in the apparent molecular masses may result from different electrophoresis conditions used in the KinetworksTM analysis.
3
The -fold change in specific phosphorylation of
each protein = (100 + % change in phosphorylation state)/(100 + % change in total protein level).
4
Table I shows a reduction in particulate MKP2
without nocodazole treatment and an increase with nocodazole treatment
in p53
/
cells.
5
H. Zhang, X. Shi, and S. Pelech, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase;
CK, casein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal
kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
MEK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase;
MKP, MAP kinase
phosphatase;
PKA, protein kinase A;
PKC, protein kinase C;
PTP, protein-tyrosine kinase. For additional abbreviations, see Table
I.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Gundersen, G. G.,
and Cook, T. A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
81-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Meek, D. W.
(1998)
Cell Signal.
10,
159-166[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Ryan, K. M.,
Phillips, A. C.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
13,
332-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Miyashita, T.,
and Reed, J. C.
(1995)
Cell
80,
293-299[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
El Deiry, W. S.
(1998)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
227,
121-137[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Sablina, A. A.,
Chumakov, P. M.,
Levine, A. J.,
and Kopnin, B. P.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
899-909[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Stewart, Z. A.,
Tang, L. J.,
and Pietenpol, J. A.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
113-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Sayed, M.,
Kim, S. O.,
Salh, B. S.,
Issinger, O. G.,
and Pelech, S. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
16569-16573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Sayed, M.,
Pelech, S. L.,
Wong, C.,
Marotta, A.,
and Salh, B.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
6994-7005[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Waldman, T.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
5187-5190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Bunz, F.,
Dutriaux, A.,
Lengauer, C.,
Waldman, T.,
Zhou, S.,
Brown, J. P.,
Sedivy, J. M.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1998)
Science
282,
1497-1501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Hu, M. C. T.,
Qiu, W. R.,
and Wang, Y. P.
(1997)
Oncogene
15,
2277-2287[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Buschmann, T.,
Potapova, O.,
Bar-Shira, A.,
Ivanov, V. N.,
Fuchs, S. Y.,
Henderson, S.,
Fried, V. A.,
Minamoto, T.,
Alarcon-Vargas, D.,
Pincus, M. R.,
Gaarde, W. A.,
Holbrook, N. J.,
Shiloh, Y.,
and Roni, Z.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
2743-2754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Hirota, Y.,
Horiuchi, T.,
and Akahane, K.
(1996)
Jpn. J. Cancer Res.
87,
735-742[CrossRef]
|
| 15.
|
Butterfield, L.,
Storey, B.,
Maas, L.,
and Heasley, L. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10110-10116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Huang, C.,
Zhang, Z.,
Ding, M., Li, J., Ye, J.,
Leonard, S.,
Shen, H.-M.,
Butterworth, L., Lu, Y.,
Costa, M.,
Rojanasakul, Y.,
Castranova, V.,
Vallyathan, V.,
and Shi, X.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32516-32522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Zhang, H.,
Shi, X.,
Hampong, M.,
Blanis, L.,
and Pelech, S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
6905-6908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Potapova, O.,
Gorospe, M.,
Dougherty, R. H.,
Dean, N. M.,
Gaarde, W. A.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1713-1722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Wu, G. S.,
and El-Deiry, W. S.
(1996)
Nat. Med.
2,
255-256[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
O'Connor, P. M.,
Jackman, J.,
Bae, I.,
Myers, T. G.,
Fan, S.,
Mutoh, M.,
Scudiero, D. A.,
Monks, A.,
Sausville, E. A.,
Weinstein, J. N.,
Friend, S.,
Fornace, A. J., Jr.,
and Kohn, K. W.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
4285-4300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Bunz, F.,
Hwang, P. M.,
Torrance, C.,
Waldman, T.,
Zhang, Y.,
Dillehay, L.,
Williams, J.,
Lengauer, C.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
263-269[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Vousden, K. H.
(2000)
Cell
103,
691-694[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Lee, L.-F., Li, G.,
Templeton, D. J.,
and Ting, J. P. Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28253-28260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Wang, T. H.,
Popp, D. M.,
Wang, H. S.,
Saitoh, M.,
Mural, J. G.,
Henley, D. C.,
Ichijo, H.,
and Wimalasena, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8208-8216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Bennett, B. L.,
Sasaki, D. T.,
Murray, B. W.,
O'Leary, E. C.,
Sakata, S. T., Xu, W.,
Leisten, J. C.,
Motiwala, A.,
Pierce, S.,
Satoh, Y.,
Bhagwat, S., S.,
Manning, A. M.,
and Anderson, D. W.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
13681-13686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Milne, D. M.,
Campell, L. E.,
Campell, D. G.,
and Meek, D. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5511-5518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Chen, Y. R.,
Zhou, G.,
and Tan, T. H.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
56,
1271-1279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Komarov, P. G.,
Komarova, E. A.,
Kondratov, R. V.,
Christov-Tselkov, K.,
Coon, J. S.,
Chernov, M. V.,
and Gudkov, A. V.
(1998)
Science
285,
1733-1737
|
| 30.
|
Wang, T. H.,
Wang, H. S.,
Ichijo, H.,
Giannakakou, P.,
Foster, J. S.,
Fojo, T.,
and Wimalasena, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4928-4936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Tournier, C.,
Hess, P.,
Yang, D. D., Xu, J.,
Turner, T. K.,
Nimnual, A.,
Bar-Sagi, D.,
Jones, S. N.,
Flavell, R. A.,
and Davis, R. J.
(2000)
Science
288,
870-874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Chen, Y. R.,
Wang, X.,
Templeton, D.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Tan, T. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31929-31936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Ip, Y. T.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
205-219[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Yujiri, T.,
Sather, S.,
Fanger, G. R.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1998)
Science
282,
1911-1914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Kallunki, T., Su, B.,
Tsigelny, I.,
Sluss, H. K.,
Derijard, B.,
Moore, G.,
Davis, R.,
and Karin, M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2996-3007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Kyriakis, J. M.,
Woodgett, J. R.,
and Avruch, J.
(1995)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
766,
303-319[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
| Deleted in proof
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore