![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 46, 44507-44512, November 15, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, July 31, 2002, and in revised form, September 6, 2002
We found that caveolin-2 is targeted to the
surface of lipid droplets (Fujimoto, T., Kogo, H., Ishiguro, K.,
Tauchi, K., and Nomura, R. (2001) J. Cell
Biol. 152, 1079-1085) and hypothesized that the lipid droplet
surface is a kind of membrane. To elucidate the characteristics of the
lipid droplet surface, we isolated lipid droplets from HepG2 cells and
analyzed them by cryoelectron microscopy and by mass spectrometry. By
use of cryoelectron microscopy at the stage temperature of 4.2 K, the lipid droplet surface was observed as a single line without any
fixation or staining, indicating the presence of a single layer of
phospholipids. This result appeared consistent with the hypothesis that
the lipid droplet surface is derived from the cytoplasmic leaflet of
the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and may be continuous to it.
However, mass spectrometry revealed that the fatty acid composition of
phosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidylcholine in lipid droplets is
different from that of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. The ample
presence of free cholesterol in lipid droplets also suggests that their
surface is differentiated from the bulk endoplasmic reticulum membrane. On the other hand, although caveolin-2 Lipid droplets have been regarded as a depot of neutral lipids.
They exist most abundantly in adipose cells and steroid-producing cells
but can be found in virtually any kind of cell. The core of lipid
droplets is occupied by triacylglycerol and cholesterol ester in
various ratios depending on the cell type (1), but information on the
lipid droplet surface has been scarce. Recently we as well as others
showed that caveolins can exist in the lipid droplet surface (2-4).
Caveolins, i.e. caveolin-1, 2, 3, are membrane proteins that
are incorporated to the sphingolipid/cholesterol-enriched membrane
microdomain and form the framework of caveolae (5). Furthermore, lipid
droplets were reported to contain other microdomain proteins,
i.e. Lyn and mitogen-activated protein kinase, as
well as abundant free cholesterol (6-8). These results suggest that the lipid droplet surface is a kind of membrane and that it might have
some similarity to the microdomain.
However, electron microscopy of conventional resin-embedded ultrathin
sections cannot visualize any membranous structure around the lipid
droplet. In the ultrathin section of specimens fixed by aldehydes and
then by osmium tetroxide, the lipid droplet content appears vacant, and
its periphery is usually seen as a thin intermittent line. In many
diagrams, the lipid droplet surface has been depicted as a phospholipid
monolayer with the hydrophilic headgroup facing the cytoplasm and the
hydrophobic acyl chains extending into the lipid droplet content (9,
10). It has also been assumed that lipid droplets form by accumulation
of neutral lipids between the two leaflets of the endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)1 membrane. However,
evidence to support the above assumptions is scarce. Only
freeze-fracture electron microscopy showed that the fracture plane
along the lipid droplet surface is occasionally continuous with the
cytoplasmic leaflet of the ER membrane (11, 12).
We wanted to examine whether the lipid droplet surface is really a
phospholipid monolayer. Because it is difficult to retain lipid-rich
structures by conventional morphological methods, we took advantage of
cryoelectron microscopy that can observe biological specimens at the
atomic resolution without fixation or staining (13). Furthermore, to
gain information about the lipid droplet phospholipids, we analyzed the
fatty acid composition of phospholipids by mass spectrometry. The
microscopy showed that the lipid droplet surface is indeed a
hemi-membrane, or a phospholipid monolayer, and mass spectrometry
revealed that the fatty acid composition of the lipid droplet
phospholipids is distinct from that of rough ER and
cholesterol/sphingolipid-rich microdomain. The result not only
questions the current hypothesis on the mechanism of lipid droplet
formation but also provides a firm basis for further studies on the
physiological function of lipid droplets.
Antibodies--
Mouse anti-caveolin-2 antibody (BD
Transduction Laboratories), mouse anti-adipose differentiation-related
protein (ADRP) antibody (Progen), and colloidal gold-conjugated
secondary antibody (Amersham Biosciences) were obtained from respective suppliers.
Isolation of Lipid Droplets by Subcellular
Fractionation--
HepG2 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium added with 10% fetal calf serum. A HepG2 cell line
stably expressing human caveolin-2 Isolation of Low Density Floating Fractions and
Microsomes--
Triton X-100-insoluble floating fraction (TIFF) was
obtained by treating cells with 1% Triton X-100; a light scattering
band at the interface of 5%/35% sucrose solutions after
ultracentrifugation was collected by aspiration (14). In some
experiments, 1% Triton X-100 was substituted with either 0.025%
Triton X-100 (15) or 500 mM sodium carbonate (pH 11) (16),
and fractions were obtained from the top. In this report, only the
fraction obtained by the 1% Triton X-100 procedure is called TIFF, and
the others are referred to by separate names. Rough microsome,
representing rough ER, was obtained from cycloheximide-treated cells as
a fraction at the interface of 1.5 M/1.8 M
sucrose (17). Crude microsome was prepared by centrifuging a
postmitochondrial supernatant for 60 min at 140,000 × g.
Cryoelectron Microscopy--
Lipid droplet suspension placed on
microgrid was rapidly plunged into liquid ethane cooled by liquid
nitrogen (18). The specimen was transferred into a JEOL 3000SSF
cryoelectron microscope using a cryotransfer device and observed at a
stage temperature of 4.2 K. Micrographs were taken using the minimum
dose system to alleviate the radiation damage (19). A defocus value was set at 1-2 µm to increase the image contrast. The electron radiation to the specimen was less than 5,000 electrons/nm2, which
does not seriously damage the vitrified biological specimen at the temperature.
Freeze-fracture Immunoelectron Microscopy--
Lipid droplet
suspension prepared from clone A-8 was placed between thin copper
plates and rapidly frozen by the metal sandwich method (20) and then
freeze-fractured in a Balzers BAF400D. Platinum/carbon replicas were
treated with 1% SDS and labeled for caveolin-2 by the procedure
described previously (21).
TLC and Quantification of Lipids--
The total lipids
were extracted from lipid droplets and crude microsome (22). For TLC,
the sample from lipid droplets was subjected to DEAE-cellulose column
chromatography to separate acidic and non-acidic lipids (23). They were
chromatographed on HPTLC plates (Silica Gel 60, Merck) by
chloroform-methanol-acetic acid-formic acid-water (35:15:6:2:1) and
then by hexanes-diisopropyl ether-acetic acid (65:35:2), and charred by
cupric acetate-phosphoric acid. Free cholesterol and total
phospholipids in lipid extracts were quantified, and the relative molar
ratio was obtained (24, 25).
Capillary Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray
Ionization (Cap-LC/ESI) Mass Spectrometry--
The lipids
extracted from isolated lipid droplets were subjected to silica gel
column to reduce the content of neutral lipids, which disturbs the
analysis of phospholipids by Cap-LC/ESI mass spectrometry. The
Cap-LC/ESI mass spectrometry analysis was done as described previously
(26). Briefly, after chromatographic separation of phospholipids by
normal-phase Cap-LC column (Deverosil Si60, Nomura Chemicals),
the sample was analyzed by a Quattro II triple-stage quadrupole mass
spectrometer (Micromass) equipped with an electrospray ion source.
Identification of individual molecular species of each phospholipid
class was performed by the theoretical mass data.
Cryoelectron Microscopy of Lipid Droplets--
Conventional
electron microscopy of resin-embedded sections did not reveal membrane
structure in the rim of lipid droplets in HepG2 cells (data not shown).
To directly visualize the lipid droplet surface structure, we adopted
cryoelectron microscopy that can visualize ultrastructures at high
resolution. Liposomal membrane, or a phospholipid bilayer, was observed
as two parallel lines by this method without any fixation or staining
(27).
By rapid freezing, isolated lipid droplets were embedded in thin
vitreous ice formed in microgrid holes (Fig.
1A). On the stage cooled to
4.2 K, the specimen was scanned at a low magnification with a minimum
electron dose. After adjusting focus in a locus distant from the
object, micrographs were taken by using the minimum dose system (19).
The diameter of isolated lipid droplets observed by cryoelectron
microscopy was 258 ± 88 nm. It was considerably smaller than
747 ± 340 nm, which was observed as the diameter of lipid
droplets in resin-embedded ultrathin sections of HepG2 cells by
conventional electron microscopy. The difference indicates that lipid
droplets were disrupted into small fragments during isolation.
Lipid droplets were observed as round structures (Fig. 1, B
and D); the content was of low electron density, but the rim
was observed as a single electron-dense line of about 2-2.5 nm in width (Fig. 1C). The result directly demonstrates
that a single row of phosphorus atoms, or a phospholipid
monolayer, covers the lipid droplet surface. A small number of
structures, whose content showed a higher electron density than lipid
droplets, were delineated with two parallel lines of the same width
(Fig. 1E); they are thought to be a contaminating membrane
organelle having a bilayer membrane.
Some lipid droplets were seen to have concentric parallel lines spaced
regularly (Fig. 1D). The outermost line was the thickest, whereas the inner lines became thinner gradually and finally became invisible. A structure that seems to correspond to the concentric lines
was seen by freeze-fracture of isolated lipid droplets; among lipid
droplets with simple homogenous content, some showed multiple fracture
faces or onion skin-like morphology (Fig.
2A). Furthermore,
anti-caveolin-2 antibody labeled not only the outermost fracture face
but also the inner fracture planes (Fig. 2B). Initially we
thought that the lipid droplets with the concentric rings represent a
unique population; we assumed that they may be folded phospholipid mono- and bilayers made upon the hydrolysis of lipid esters (28, 29).
However, in contrast to membrane whorls observed by conventional electron microscopy, the concentric lines are aligned with complete regularity without any intervening spaces, and in numerous layers. Moreover, when unfixed intact cells were rapidly frozen and
freeze-fractured, the onion skin-like morphology was found only very
infrequently (data not shown). Thus we currently surmise that the
multiple concentric lines could be an artifact generated by
homogenization and/or temperature shifts during the isolation
procedure. However, further studies will be needed to understand the
nature of the concentric rings in isolated lipid droplets.
Recovery of Lipid Droplet Caveolin-2 Fatty Acid Composition of Lipid Droplet Phospholipids--
By TLC,
lipid droplets were shown to contain phosphatidylcholine (PC) and free
cholesterol as well as abundant cholesterol ester and triglyceride. On
the other hand, other phospholipids, including sphingomyelin,
phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, and phosphatidylinositol,
could not be detected by the charring method we used (data not shown).
Quantification showed that the molar ratio of total phospholipids and
free cholesterol is 4.33 ± 1.45 for lipid droplet and 3.25 ± 0.37 for postmitochondrial crude microsome. The crude microsome
should contain the plasma membrane and the ER as well as other
intracellular membranes. Considering that most free cholesterol exists
in the plasma membrane (31), the result indicates that the molar
content of free cholesterol in the lipid droplet surface is lower than
that in the plasma membrane but higher than that in the ER. In
contrast to the result in adipocytes (8), however, filipin did not
label lipid droplets in HepG2 cells (data not shown). The result
suggests that the free cholesterol content of lipid droplets may be
quite different between adipocytes and non-adipocytes.
Lipid droplets have been hypothesized to occur by accumulation of
neutral lipids between the two leaflets of the ER membrane (9); they
may either detach from the ER or remain connected to it. The surface of
lipid droplet is thus assumed to be derived from the cytoplasmic
leaflet of the ER membrane. If the lipid droplet surface is continuous
with the ER membrane, composition of phospholipids in the lipid droplet
surface may be similar to that of the ER. As an alternative
possibility, accumulation of caveolin-2
The fatty acid pattern of PC obtained by a low ionization voltage (30 V) was similar between lipid droplet and rough microsome: molecular
species of mass/charge (m/z) 786.4 (diacyl 36:2,
e.g. 18:0-18:2), 760.4 (diacyl 34:1, e.g.
16:0-18:1), and 732.4 (diacyl 32:1, e.g. 16:0-16:1) were
observed as major peaks (Fig. 3A). In contrast, PC in TIFF
was enriched with long fatty acids with a high degree of saturation:
m/z 818.3 (diacyl 38:0, e.g.
18:0-20:0), 788.4 (diacyl 36:1, e.g. 18:0-18:1), and 760.4 (diacyl 34:1, e.g. 16:0-18:1) were prominent. The data
obtained by this mode represent the mass of whole PC molecules and do
not resolve individual fatty acids. On the other hand, by using a high
ionization voltage (90 V), acyl chains are detached from PC by
in-source collision, and each chain can be resolved as a unique peak.
By this analysis, lipid droplets and rough microsome showed distinct
patterns (Fig. 3B): for example, the peak of
m/z 281.2 (18:1) stood out for lipid droplets,
but the peaks of m/z 281.1 (18:1) and 279.0 (18:0) were seen for rough microsome. The result indicates that the
major portion of m/z 786.4 was PC of 18:1-18:1
in lipid droplets, whereas the same peak in rough microsome contained a
considerable amount of PC (18:0-18:2). By the same token, the relative
abundance of m/z 253.2 (16:1) implies that the
peak of m/z 758.4 in lipid droplets may contain
more PC (16:1-18:1) than in rough microsome, whereas the latter may be
enriched with PC (16:0-18:2). Furthermore, lyso-PC analyzed by
the 30-V mode also gave distinct patterns for lipid droplets and rough
microsome (Fig. 3C): peaks of m/z
522.1 (acyl 18:1) and 494.1 (acyl 16:1) were high in lipid droplets,
whereas they were low or invisible in rough microsome and TIFF, and
m/z 524.2 (acyl 18:0) and 496.3 (acyl 16:0) were
prominent in the same region. Collectively these data indicate that the
lipid droplet surface is distinct from the rough ER membrane,
nor is it similar to the sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich microdomain.
The surface of lipid droplets has been speculated to be a
phospholipid monolayer because hydrophobic lipid esters may exist stably in the aqueous cytoplasm only when covered with
amphiphilic molecules with hydrophilic moiety facing outward.
Yet most likely, the only experimental result that supports the
speculation has been a few freeze-fracture pictures showing the
continuity of a putative ER membrane leaflet and the lipid droplet
surface (11, 12). In the present study, we employed a cryoelectron
microscope, which is able to visualize biological specimens with
minimal damage and has been used extensively to decipher
three-dimensional molecular structures at atomic resolution
(e.g. Ref. 32). The cryoelectron microscopy has shown
previously that the envelope of the influenza A virus is a phospholipid
monolayer underlain with a protein layer (33). By this technique, a
single electron-dense line representing a row of phosphorus atoms was
observed in the surface of isolated lipid droplets. It contrasts with
two parallel lines seen in the liposomal membrane (27), which is a
phospholipid bilayer, and thus proves for the first time that the lipid
droplet surface is a phospholipid monolayer.
The presence of a phospholipid monolayer in the surface is consistent
with the current model that lipid droplets are formed by lipid ester
deposition between the two leaflets of the ER membrane and may remain
connected to it (9, 10). Distribution of acetyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase-1, a major enzyme that synthesizes cholesterol ester, in the entire ER (Ref. 34 and data not shown) seems to indicate
that lipid droplets may bud anywhere along the membrane. However,
Cap-LC/ESI mass spectrometry showed that fatty acid moieties of PC and
lyso-PC in lipid droplets are distinct from those in rough microsome,
which is thought to be equivalent to the rough ER. The result does not
deny the possibility that the lipid droplet surface is generated from
the ER membrane but indicates that the former is a highly
differentiated domain. Mature lipid droplets may possibly exist as a
structure independent of the ER; alternatively, the lipid droplet may
be connected to the ER, but some molecular mechanism may demarcate the
lipid droplet surface from the bulk ER membrane as postulated for other
ER domains (35). Whichever possibility is the case, we suppose that
esters synthesized in wide areas of the ER do not deposit
indiscriminately but are concentrated to loci specialized to make lipid
droplets. ADRP or other lipid droplet-associated proteins may be
involved in the process.
A peculiar feature of lipid droplets revealed by Cap-LC/ESI mass
spectrometry is the abundance of unsaturated fatty acids in lyso-PC.
How and where the unique lyso-PC was generated is not known, but
phospholipase A2, reported to exist in lipid
droplets of leukocytes (6), may be involved. If so, lyso-PC in lipid droplets is derived from a rather rare population of PC with an unsaturated acyl chain in position 1. The relative abundance of PC with
two mono-unsaturated acyl chains (i.e. 18:1-18:1 and
16:1-18:1) in lipid droplets (Fig.
4B) is in line with the
speculation. The origin of the rare PC species is also unknown. They
may be synthesized in the ER and sequestered to lipid droplets;
interaction with neutral lipids might be involved in the accumulation
of unsaturated acyl chains. However, it is also possible that the
unique species were newly formed in lipid droplets; in this case, the
continuous turnover of lipid esters and the resultant release and
incorporation of fatty acids are thought to be closely related to the
surface composition.
Major contamination in the lipid droplet fraction is excluded by the
absence of marker enzymes of other organelles (2), but a possibility of
minor contamination by phospholipids may need to be considered.
However, using the same cell homogenate as a starting material, PCs
with two mono-unsaturated acyl chains are found abundantly only in the
lipid droplet and far less so in the microsome or TIFF. Furthermore,
using the Cap-LC/ESI mass spectrometric technique, PC obtained
from several cell and membrane preparations did not show the
characteristics found with the lipid droplet.2 These results make
it unlikely that the PCs found in the lipid droplet occur densely in a
soluble phase and adhere to any existing membrane promiscuously.
In previous studies, sequestration of caveolins to lipid droplets was
found to be induced or increased dramatically when cells were treated
with brefeldin A (2, 3). The result was interpreted to indicate
that caveolins first concentrated in the ER membrane and then moved to
the lipid droplet by lateral diffusion through the membrane continuity.
However, two questions were raised concerning this interpretation: one
was why caveolins could be concentrated markedly in lipid droplets and
the other was why caveolins sequestered to lipid droplets were not
chased out even after brefeldin A was discontinued. The latter question
may be answered readily by assuming that the lipid droplet surface is
not continuous to the ER membrane. Yet then, the former question can be
answered only by supposing a specific transport mechanism because
brefeldin A-induced concentration of caveolins appears to occur even in
pre-existing lipid droplets. Interestingly, a recent study showed that
newly synthesized cholesterol esters are incorporated to pre-existing
droplets containing triglycerides (36). It is plausible that lipid
esters, possibly along with phospholipids, may be transported
from the ER to lipid droplets by an unknown mechanism, and
caveolins might exploit the machinery under some circumstances.
Cap-LC/ESI mass spectrometry also showed that the lipid droplet surface
is different from the sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich microdomain in the
fatty acid composition. Interestingly, TIFF contained a higher
proportion of long saturated fatty acids than rough microsome, whereas
lipid droplet did not. The result indicates that not only interaction
between sphingolipid and cholesterol but also interaction between
saturated phospholipid and cholesterol are important in forming the
microdomain, as predicted from model membrane studies (37). Based on
the finding of caveolin sequestration, we speculated previously that
the lipid droplet surface might have a property similar to the
microdomain (2). However, the present result does not support the
supposition in terms of the fatty acid composition. Furthermore, TLC
showed that the relative amount of sphingomyelin and free cholesterol
in comparison with PC is far less in lipid droplets than in TIFF (data
not shown). Thus lipid composition does not appear to be the cause of
caveolin sequestration to lipid droplets. As far as HepG2 cells are
concerned, caveolin-2 TIFF obtained by the 1% Triton X-100 method has been thought as the
in vitro correlate of the sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich microdomain (38). We found that caveolin-2 In summary, the present study showed that the lipid droplet surface is
a phospholipid monolayer with a unique fatty acid composition. Lipid
droplets had been regarded as a simple reservoir of neutral lipids and
as rather an inert structure. However, in view of recent findings
indicating accumulation of proteins related to various diseases (39,
40), it is imperative to study how lipid droplets are formed, modified,
and regulated. The properties revealed here should give a firm basis
for the forthcoming studies.
We are most grateful to Dr. Y. Fujiyoshi
(Kyoto University) for suggesting the use of cryoelectron microscopy,
actually taking micrographs, and critically reading the
manuscript. We also thank M. Murata and T. Okumura for technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Japanese
Government and a research grant from the Novartis Science Foundation (to T. F.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
81-52-744-2000; Fax: 81-52-744-2011; E-mail:
tfujimot@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M207712200
2
R. Taguchi, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
ADRP, adipose differentiation-related protein;
Cap-LC/ESI, capillary liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
TIFF, Triton X-100-insoluble floating
fraction.
The Surface of Lipid Droplets Is a Phospholipid Monolayer with a
Unique Fatty Acid Composition*
,
,
¶
Department of Anatomy and Molecular Cell
Biology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai, Showa, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan and the § Department
of Molecular Biology, Nagoya City University, Graduate School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3-1 Tanabe-dori, Mizuho,
Nagoya 467-8603, Japan
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and adipose
differentiation-related protein, both localizing in lipid droplets,
were enriched in the low density floating fraction, the fatty acid
composition of the fraction was distinct from lipid droplets.
Collectively, the result indicates that the lipid droplet surface is a
hemi-membrane or a phospholipid monolayer containing cholesterol but is
compositionally different from the endoplasmic reticulum membrane or
the sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich microdomain.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(clone A-8) (2), kept in the
presence of 200 µg/ml G418, was also used for some experiments. Cells
were disrupted by nitrogen cavitation and subjected to sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation as described (2). The lipid droplet layer
floating on the surface was used in subsequent studies. Absence of
contamination by other organelles was confirmed by Western blotting of
marker molecules.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (165K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Cryoelectron microscopy of
isolated lipid droplets. A, a low magnification
micrograph of lipid droplets on a microgrid. Lipid droplets
(arrow) are embedded in vitreous ice in microgrid holes (the
rim of a hole is indicated by an arrowhead). Bar,
1 µm. As shown in B, a lipid droplet is observed as a
round structure with a content of low electron density. Bar,
50 nm. C, a high magnification view of the rectangular
portion in panel B. A single electron-dense line is clearly
seen in the rim of the lipid droplet. Bar, 10 nm.
D, three lipid droplets with a rim of a single line.
Bar, 50 nm. As shown in E, a small structure
(arrow) with a slightly higher electron density than lipid
droplets is lined with two parallel electron-dense lines. A lipid
droplet with multiple parallel lines is also shown
(arrowheads). Bar, 50 nm.

View larger version (100K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Freeze-fracture electron microscopy of
isolated lipid droplets. As shown in A, many lipid
droplets show a single surface layer (arrows), whereas some
are fractured in multiple layers (arrowhead). As shown in
B, by immunogold labeling of the freeze-fracture replica of
lipid droplets, caveolin-2 was labeled not only in the outermost layer
but also in several other fracture planes (arrowheads).
Bar, 500 nm.
in Low Density Floating
Fractions--
In HepG2 expressing caveolin-2
without caveolin-1,
caveolin-2
was found exclusively around lipid droplets by
immunofluorescence microscopy. The molecule existed as monomers or
small oligomers (data not shown) as reported previously for other cell
lines (30). When the same cell was homogenized in the presence of 1%
Triton X-100 and subjected to sucrose density gradient
ultracentrifugation, caveolin-2
concentrated in soluble fractions
and was not recovered from the detergent-insoluble buoyant fractions
(data not shown). However, by substituting 1% Triton X-100 with 500 mM sodium carbonate or 0.025% Triton X-100, caveolin-2
was recovered from the low density fractions (Fig.
3).

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Concentration of ADRP and
caveolin-2
to low density floating
fractions. HepG2 expressing caveolin-2
was homogenized in
either 500 mM sodium carbonate (pH 11) or 0.025% Triton
X-100 and then subjected to sucrose density gradient
ultracentrifugation. By both procedures, ADRP and caveolin-2
were
floated to low density fractions.
and its recovery in low
density fractions, might occur because the lipid droplet surface is
similar to the sphingolipid/cholesterol microdomain. To examine these
possibilities, we compared the fatty acid composition of PC and lyso-PC
in lipid droplets, rough microsome (representing rough ER), and TIFF
(representing the sphingolipid/cholesterol microdomain) by
Cap-LC/ESI mass spectrometry.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Cap-LC/ESI mass spectrometry of phospholipids
in lipid droplets, rough microsome, and TIFF, all of which were
isolated from HepG2 cells. Only the data obtained by the positive
ion mode are shown, although the negative ion mode data were also
collected and confirmed the positive ion mode data. A, PC
analyzed by the low voltage (30 V) mode. Lipid droplets and rough
microsome showed a similar profile, whereas TIFF produced a distinct
result; fatty acids in TIFF were longer and with a higher degree of
saturation than those in the other two samples. B, PC
analyzed by the high voltage (90 V) mode. In-source collision revealed
that the fatty acid composition of lipid droplets and rough microsome
is different in several aspects. C, lyso-PC analyzed by the
low voltage (30-V) mode. Lipid droplets showed a unique composition of
fatty acids distinct from rough microsome and TIFF.
was found almost exclusively around lipid
droplets, but caveolin-2
was mostly found in the Golgi and only
minimally in lipid droplets; furthermore, caveolin-1 was not recruited
to lipid droplets unless treated with brefeldin A (2). The differential behavior of caveolins may provide a clue to elucidate the mechanism of
transport to lipid droplets.
in the lipid droplet was
completely solubilized with 1% Triton X-100 in the cold but floated to
low density fractions when 500 mM sodium carbonate or
0.025% Triton X-100 was used in cell homogenization. The low density
fractions obtained by the sodium carbonate protocol were reported to be
enriched with the same molecules as TIFF (16). However, whether the two
preparations really represent the same membrane domain has not been
rigorously tested. On the other hand, the fractions collected by the
0.025% Triton X-100 method were presumed to contain molecules with
less affinity to the sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich microdomain (15).
The present result showed that although the lipid composition is
distinct, molecules in the lipid droplet surface are enriched in the
same fraction as the sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich microdomain. It
awaits further studies to determine whether the result indicates some
similarity in the property of the two domains or simply indicates that
the low density fractions obtained by the sodium carbonate and 0.025%
Triton X-100 protocols could contain non-microdomain constituents.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Zweytick, D.,
Athenstaedt, K.,
and Daum, G.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1469,
101-120[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Fujimoto, T.,
Kogo, H.,
Ishiguro, K.,
Tauchi, K.,
and Nomura, R.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
1079-1085 3.
Ostermeyer, A. G.,
Paci, J. M.,
Zeng, Y.,
Lublin, D. M.,
Munro, S.,
and Brown, D. A.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
1071-1078 4.
Pol, A.,
Luetterforst, R.,
Lindsay, M.,
Heino, S.,
Ikonen, E.,
and Parton, R. G.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
1057-1070 5.
Parton, R. G.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
542-548[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Yu, W.,
Bozza, P. T.,
Tzizik, D. M.,
Gray, J. P.,
Cassara, J.,
Dvorak, A. M.,
and Weller, P. F.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
152,
759-769[Abstract]
7.
Yu, W.,
Cassara, J.,
and Weller, P. F.
(2000)
Blood
95,
1078-1085 8.
Prattes, S.,
Horl, G.,
Hammer, A.,
Blaschitz, A.,
Graier, W. F.,
Sattler, W.,
Zechner, R.,
and Steyrer, E.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
2977-2989[Abstract]
9.
Murphy, D. J.,
and Vance, J.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
109-115[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Brown, D. A.
(2001)
Curr. Biol.
11,
R446-449[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Blanchette Mackie, E. J.,
Dwyer, N. K.,
Barber, T.,
Coxey, R. A.,
Takeda, T.,
Rondinone, C. M.,
Theodorakis, J. L.,
Greenberg, A. S.,
and Londos, C.
(1995)
J. Lipid Res.
36,
1211-1226[Abstract]
12.
Peixoto de Menezes, A.,
and Pinto da Silva, P.
(1979)
Lab. Invest.
40,
545-553[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Fujiyoshi, Y.,
Mizusaki, T.,
Morikawa, K.,
Yamagishi, H.,
Aoki, Y.,
Kihara, H.,
and Harada, Y.
(1991)
Ultramicroscopy
38,
241-251[CrossRef]
14.
Brown, D. A.,
and Rose, J. K.
(1992)
Cell
68,
533-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Field, K. A.,
Holowka, D.,
and Baird, B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4276-4280 16.
Song, K. S., Li,
Shengwen,
Okamoto, T.,
Quilliam, L. A.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9690-9697 17.
Morimoto, T., and Sabatini, D. D. (1998) in Cells: A
Laboratory Manual (Spector., D. L., Goldman., R. D., and
Leinwand., L. A., , eds), pp. 1, 37.1-37.22, Cold Spring Harbor
Press, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
18.
Adrian, M.,
Dubochet, J.,
Lepault, J.,
and McDowall, A. W.
(1984)
Nature
308,
32-36[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Fujiyoshi, Y.,
Kobayashi, T.,
Ishizuka, T.,
Uyeda, N.,
Ishida, Y.,
and Harada, Y.
(1980)
Ultramicroscopy
5,
459-468
20.
Fujimoto, T.,
and Fujimoto, K.
(1997)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
45,
595-598 21.
Fujimoto, K.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
3443-3449[Abstract]
22.
Fiske, C. H.,
and Subbarrow, Y.
(1925)
J. Biol. Chem.
66,
325
23.
Macala, L. J., Yu, R. K.,
and Ando, S.
(1983)
J. Lipid Res.
24,
1243-1250[Abstract]
24.
Rouser, G.,
Siakotos, A. N.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1966)
Lipids
1,
85-86[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Gamble, W.,
Vaughan, M.,
Kruth, H. S.,
and Avigan, J.
(1978)
J. Lipid Res.
19,
1068-1070[Abstract]
26.
Taguchi, R.,
Hayakawa, J.,
Takeuchi, Y.,
and Ishida, M.
(2000)
J. Mass. Spectrom.
35,
953-966[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Tahara, Y.,
and Fujiyoshi, Y.
(1994)
Micron
25,
141-149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
McGookey, D. J.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1983)
J. Cell Biol.
97,
1156-1168 29.
van Meer, G.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
F29-F34 30.
Li, S.,
Galbiati, F.,
Volonte, D.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
Engelman, J. A.,
Das, K.,
Scherer, P. E.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1998)
FEBS. Lett.
434,
127-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Lange, Y.,
Swaisgood, M. H.,
Ramos, B. V.,
and Steck, T. L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
3786-3793 32.
Sato, C.,
Ueno, Y.,
Asai, K.,
Takahashi, K.,
Sato, M.,
Engel, A.,
and Fujiyoshi, Y.
(2001)
Nature
409,
1047-1051[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Fujiyoshi, Y.,
Kume, N. P.,
Sakata, K.,
and Sato, S. B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
318-326[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Chang, C. C.,
Chen, J.,
Thomas, M. A.,
Cheng, D.,
Del Priore, V. A.,
Newton, R. S.,
Pape, M. E.,
and Chang, T. Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29532-29540 35.
Stone, S. J.,
and Vance, J. E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
34534-34540 36.
Kellner-Weibel, G.,
McHendry-Rinde, B.,
Haynes, M. P.,
and Adelman, S.
(2001)
J. Lipid Res.
42,
768-777 37.
Schroeder, R.,
London, E.,
and Brown, D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12130-12134 38.
Brown, D. A.,
and London, E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
17221-17224 39.
Cole, N. B.,
Murphy, D. D.,
Grider, T.,
Rueter, S.,
Brasaemle, D.,
and Nussbaum, R. L.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
6344-6352 40.
Shi, S. T.,
Polyak, S. J., Tu, H.,
Taylor, D. R.,
Gretch, D. R.,
and Lai, M. M.
(2002)
Virology
292,
198-210[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Orlicky, G. DeGala, C. Greenwood, E. S. Bales, T. D. Russell, and J. L. McManaman Multiple functions encoded by the N-terminal PAT domain of adipophilin J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2008; 121(17): 2921 - 2929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ohsaki, J. Cheng, M. Suzuki, A. Fujita, and T. Fujimoto Lipid droplets are arrested in the ER membrane by tight binding of lipidated apolipoprotein B-100 J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2008; 121(14): 2415 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takeda and A. Nakano In vitro Formation of a Novel Type of Membrane Vesicles Containing Dpm1p: Putative Transport Vesicles for Lipid Droplets in Budding Yeast J. Biochem., June 1, 2008; 143(6): 803 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Accioly, P. Pacheco, C. M. Maya-Monteiro, N. Carrossini, B. K. Robbs, S. S. Oliveira, C. Kaufmann, J. A. Morgado-Diaz, P. T. Bozza, and J. P.B. Viola Lipid Bodies Are Reservoirs of Cyclooxygenase-2 and Sites of Prostaglandin-E2 Synthesis in Colon Cancer Cells Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 68(6): 1732 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Ducharme and P. E. Bickel Minireview: Lipid Droplets in Lipogenesis and Lipolysis Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 942 - 949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Maya-Monteiro, P. E. Almeida, H. D'Avila, A. S. Martins, A. P. Rezende, H. Castro-Faria-Neto, and P. T. Bozza Leptin Induces Macrophage Lipid Body Formation by a Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase- and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin-dependent Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2203 - 2210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Brasaemle Thematic review series: Adipocyte Biology. The perilipin family of structural lipid droplet proteins: stabilization of lipid droplets and control of lipolysis J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2547 - 2559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hellerer, C. Axang, C. Brackmann, P. Hillertz, M. Pilon, and A. Enejder Monitoring of lipid storage in Caenorhabditis elegans using coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy PNAS, September 11, 2007; 104(37): 14658 - 14663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Tsuiki, A. Fujita, Y. Ohsaki, J. Cheng, T. Irie, K. Yoshikawa, H. Senoo, K. Mishima, T. Kitaoka, and T. Fujimoto All-trans-Retinol Generated by Rhodopsin Photobleaching Induces Rapid Recruitment of TIP47 to Lipid Droplets in the Retinal Pigment Epithelium Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2858 - 2867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Fujimoto, H. Itabe, T. Kinoshita, K. J. Homma, J. Onoduka, M. Mori, S. Yamaguchi, M. Makita, Y. Higashi, A. Yamashita, et al. Involvement of ACSL in local synthesis of neutral lipids in cytoplasmic lipid droplets in human hepatocyte HuH7 J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 1280 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bartz, W.-H. Li, B. Venables, J. K. Zehmer, M. R. Roth, R. Welti, R. G. W. Anderson, P. Liu, and K. D. Chapman Lipidomics reveals that adiposomes store ether lipids and mediate phospholipid traffic, J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 837 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Krogerus, O. Samuilova, T. Poyry, E. Jokitalo, and T. Hyypia Intracellular localization and effects of individually expressed human parechovirus 1 non-structural proteins J. Gen. Virol., March 1, 2007; 88(3): 831 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Cho, E. S. Shin, P. J. Park, D. W. Shin, H. K. Chang, D. Kim, H. H. Lee, J. H. Lee, S. H. Kim, M. J. Song, et al. Identification of Mouse Prp19p as a Lipid Droplet-associated Protein and Its Possible Involvement in the Biogenesis of Lipid Droplets J. Biol. Chem., January 26, 2007; 282(4): 2456 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nagayama, T. Uchida, and K. Gohara Temporal and spatial variations of lipid droplets during adipocyte division and differentiation J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 9 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Wan, R. C. N. Melo, Z. Jin, A. M. Dvorak, and P. F. Weller Roles and origins of leukocyte lipid bodies: proteomic and ultrastructural studies FASEB J, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 167 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. FUJIMOTO and Y. OHSAKI Cytoplasmic Lipid Droplets: Rediscovery of an Old Structure as a Unique Platform Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2006; 1086(1): 104 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Prats, M. Donsmark, K. Qvortrup, C. Londos, C. Sztalryd, C. Holm, H. Galbo, and T. Ploug Decrease in intramuscular lipid droplets and translocation of HSL in response to muscle contraction and epinephrine J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 2392 - 2399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Robenek, O. Hofnagel, I. Buers, M. J. Robenek, D. Troyer, and N. J. Severs Adipophilin-enriched domains in the ER membrane are sites of lipid droplet biogenesis J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2006; 119(20): 4215 - 4224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |