Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202524200 on September 13, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 44715-44721, November 22, 2002
Molecular Mechanisms for Lipopolysaccharide-induced Biphasic
Activation of Nuclear Factor-
B (NF-
B)*
Su-Ji
Han
,
Hyun-Mi
Ko
,
Jung-Hwa
Choi
,
Kook Heon
Seo
,
Hyun-Suk
Lee
,
Eun-Kyoung
Choi
,
Il-Whan
Choi§,
Hern-Ku
Lee§, and
Suhn-Young
Im
¶
From the
Department of Biological Sciences, College
of Natural Sciences, The Institute of Basic Sciences, Chonnam
National University, Kwangju 500-757, Korea and the
§ Department of Immunology and Institute for Medical
Sciences, Chonbuk National University Medical School,
Chonju 561-182, Republic of Korea
Received for publication, March 15, 2002, and in revised form, August 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) is an important
transcription factor necessary for initiating and sustaining
inflammatory and immune reactions. The inducers of NF-
B are
well characterized, but the molecular mechanisms underlying multiple
in vivo NF-
B activation processes are poorly
understood. The injection of lipopolysaccharide resulted in a biphasic activation of NF-
B during the 18-h
observation period in various organs of mice. The early and late phases
of NF-
B activation occurred at 0.5-2 h and 8-12 h, respectively. Platelet-activating factor, which is released in response to
lipopolysaccharide injection, was responsible for the activation of the
early phase of NF-
B. The early NF-
B activity led to the induction
of proinflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and
interleukin (IL)-1
, which are known to be efficient inducers of
NF-
B. Using the TNF knockout and IL-1 receptor knockout mice, we
found that TNF and IL-1
had a role in the second phase activation of
NF-
B. These cytokines did promote the synthesis of
platelet-activating factor, which in turn induced the secondary
activation of NF-
B. These observations describe a novel
autoregulatory molecular mechanism for the biphasic activation of
NF-
B.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The transcription factor nuclear factor-
B
(NF-
B)1 was originally
identified as a regulator of the expression of the kappa light-chain
gene in immune B lymphocytes (1). Later, however, NF-
B was observed
to be ubiquitously expressed. NF-
B regulates the expression of
proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, enzymes that generate mediators
of inflammation, immune receptors, and adhesion molecules, all of which
play a key part in the initiation of inflammatory reactions (2, 3).
Inducers of NF-
B activation include proinflammatory cytokines,
growth factors, microbial infections, endotoxin, and oxidant stress (2,
3). Although the early activation of NF-
B in response to a variety
of stimuli has been well documented, recent reports indicate that a
biphasic pattern of NF-
B activation occurs in response to
inflammatory stimuli (4, 5) and microbial infections (6-8). Thus, it
is possible that inflammatory responses may be amplified and
perpetuated by the secondary and prolonged activation of NF-
B. The
precise biological role of biphasic activation of NF-
B in
inflammatory processes is, however, poorly understood.
Regarding the molecular events leading to this process, we have
previously shown that platelet-activating factor (PAF) is responsible
for the early activation of NF-
B in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (9, 10) and microbial infection (11), leading to the gene
expression and protein synthesis of NF-
B-dependent
cytokines (e.g. TNF). Thus, PAF may be the most proximal
mediator involved in triggering inflammatory cascades via its capacity
to activate NF-
B.
In this study, we have investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying
the biphasic activation of NF-
B in response to LPS. We have found
that PAF, which is released in response to LPS injection, activates the
early phase of NF-
B activation. This NF-
B activity leads to
induction of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF and IL-1
) expression,
which leads to another stimulus for the synthesis of PAF, resulting in
the second phase of NF-
B activation. The precise molecular events
leading to biphasic activation of NF-
B in inflammatory processes
are, however, poorly understood.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Animals--
Specific pathogen-free female C57BL/6 were obtained
from the Korean Institute of Chemistry Technology (Daejon, Korea) and were kept in our animal facility for 2 weeks before use. TNF knockout mice (B6;129S-Tnftm1Gk1, TNF
/
), IL-1 receptor (IL-1R)
knockout mice (B6;129S-Il1r1tm1Rom1, IL-1R
/
), and the
original wild type strain (B6129SF2/J) were obtained from the Jackson
Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were used at 8 to 10 weeks of age.
Cell Line--
The murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was
purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD), and
was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal
bovine serum (Invitrogen).
Peritoneal Macrophages--
TNF
/
,
IL-1R
/
, and their wild type mice were injected
intraperitoneal with 2 ml of 3% thioglycollate 3 days prior to
harvesting. Peritoneal macrophages were harvested by lavage, washed,
and maintained in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum.
Reagents--
LPS derived from Escherichia coli
(O111:B4, L3024) was purchased from Sigma. The PAF antagonist BN 50739 (batch 51-884, Mr 596.2, 50 mg/ml in
Me2SO), a ginkoglide-derived synthetic PAF analogue, was a gift from Dr. Pierre Braquet (Institute Henri Beaufour,
Le Plessis Robinson, France). The PAF antagonist, BN 50739, is a
synthetic PAF analogue that inhibits the capacity of PAF to bind to its
receptor (12). The efficacy of the BN 50739 as a PAF antagonist has
been evaluated in previous studies (9-11, 13, 14). Another different
type of PAF receptor antagonist, 2-[N-acetyl-N-(2-methoxy-3-octadecyl-carbamoyloxypropoxy-carbonyl)aminomethyl]-1-ethylpyridinium chloride (CV 6209), was purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). TNF, IL-1
, and IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra) were purchased from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Neutralizing antibodies against TNF and IL-1
were from Endogen (Woburn, MA). Antibodies to
the rel proteins, p50, p52, p65, RelB, and c-Rel, were purchased from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, California). ELISA kits for
detecting TNF and IL-1
were purchased from Endogen.
Gel Shift Assay--
The nuclear extracts were prepared from the
RAW 264.7 cells and various organs as described previously (9-11). To
inhibit endogenous protease activity, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was added. As a probe for the gel
retardation assay, an oligonucleotide containing the
Ig
-chain-binding site (
B, 5-CCGGTTAACAGAGGGGGCTTTCCGAG-3) was synthesized. The two complementary strands were annealed and labeled with [
-32P]dCTP. Labeled oligonucleotides
(10,000 cpm), 10 µg of nuclear extracts, and binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 500 mM KCl, 10 mM EDTA, 50% glycerol, 100 ng of poly (dIdC), and 1 mM dithiothreitol) were incubated for 30 min at room
temperature in a final volume of 20 µl. The reaction mixture
was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 5% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5×
tris-borate/EDTA buffer. Specific binding was controlled by competition
with a 50-fold excess of cold
B or cAMP response element (CRE)
oligonucleotide. For supershift/inhibition assay, 1-2 µg of specific
supershifting antibodies against p50, p52, p65, RelB, or c-Rel
components of NF-
B were incubated with the nuclear extract on ice
for 1 h before the addition of labeled oligonucleotide to the
binding reaction. Signal intensity of specific bands was analyzed
quantitatively using Fluor-STM Imager (Bio-Rad) and plotted as relative intensity.
RT-PCR--
Total RNA was prepared at different time points from
the lungs by a single extraction based on the guanidine isothiocyanate extraction method with the denaturing solution (Sol. D) consisting of 4 M guanidinium thiocyanate, 25 mM sodium citrate
(pH 7.0), 0.5% sarcosyl, and 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol
(9-11). Reverse transcription was performed using 1 µl of total RNA
in a 10 µl reaction mixture (Promega, Madison, WI) containing oligo
(dT)15 and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse
transcriptase. cDNA (1 µl) was amplified by PCR in a Perkin-Elmer
thermal cycler (denaturation for 30 s at 95 °C, annealing for
30 s at 62 °C, and elongation for 30 s at 72 °C) using
TNF (28 cycles), IL-1
(30 cycles), IL-6 (30 cycles), or
-actin
primers (23 cycles). The primers used in these analysis are as
follows: TNF, 5'-CCTGTA GCCCACGTCGTAGC-3' and
5'-TTGACCTCAGCGCTGATGTG-3'; IL-1
, 5'-GATACAAACTGATGAAGCTCGTCA-3' and
5'-GAGATAGTGTTTGTCCACATCCTGA-3'; IL-6, 5'-GAAATGAGAAAAGAGTTGTGC-3' and
5'-CACTAGGTTTGCCGAGTAGAT-3';
-actin, 5'-GGGTCAGAACTCCTATG-3' and
5'-TTGACCTCAGCGCTGATGTG-3'.
Measurement of Plasma PAF--
Blood was collected from the
heart of anesthetized mice and placed into an Eppendorf tube containing
sodium citrate (final concentration 0.38%). Plasma PAF was quantified
as described previously (9, 10) by octadecyl column chromatography
(Amersham Biosciences), thin-layer chromatography, and a scintillation
proximity RIA kit (Amersham Biosciences).
Measurement of Serum TNF and IL-1
--
Serum TNF and IL-1
were quantified by using an ELISA kit from Endogen as instructed by the manufacturer.
Statistical Analysis--
The data are represented as the
mean ± S.E. Statistical significance was determined by the
Student's t test when two data sets were analyzed or,
alternatively, by ANOVA followed by the appropriate post-hoc test for
multiple data sets with the statistical software Staview (version 4.5).
All experiments were conducted two or more times. Reproducible results
were obtained and representative data are therefore shown in the figures.
 |
RESULTS |
PAF Is Involved in the Early Activation of NF-
B--
We first
examined the kinetics of NF-
B activation from 0.5 to 18 h after
LPS injection in the lung. As shown in Fig.
1A, biphasic activation of
NF-
B was evident. The early activation of NF-
B occurred within 30 min of LPS administration, peaked at 1 h, and subsequently
declined to basal level by 6 h. A second phase with relatively
lower levels of activity appeared at 8-12 h post-LPS injection.
Pretreatment with BN 50739 or CV 6209 prior to LPS injection resulted
in abrogation of the early peak of NF-
B as well as the subsequent
second phase of NF-
B activation. Similar effects of the PAF
antagonists were seen in the spleen, liver, and kidneys (data not
shown). These observations confirmed our previous data showing that PAF
is responsible for the LPS-induced early activation of NF-
B (9, 10)
and suggests that the overall process of NF-
B activation in response
to an inflammatory stimulus is multi-phasic in which the first phase of
NF-
B activity acts as an inducer for the next.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Occurrence of LPS-induced biphasic activation
of NF- B and its inhibition by pretreatment
with a PAF antagonist. A, mice were injected with LPS
(50 µg, intravenously), and the lungs were removed at the time
indicated. BN 50739 (400 µg) was administered intraperitoneally 30 min prior to LPS injection. CV 6209 (400 µg) was administered
intraperitoneally 1 h and 10 min prior to LPS injection. Nuclear
extracts from the organs were incubated with an
-32P-labeled B oligonucleotide and electrophoresed on
a 5% polyacrylamide gel. Lane p contained probe incubated
without extract. A 50-fold excess of cold B or cAMP response element
oligonucleotide was added as competitor. B,
supershift/inhibition assay was conducted with 1-2 µg of anti-p50,
p52, p65, RelB, c-Rel, or control rabbit antibody. C, total
RNA was prepared from the lungs, and TNF, IL-1 , IL-6 mRNA
expression was measured by RT-PCR as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.
n = 3 animals for each time point. A representative of
two to seven independent experiments is shown.
|
|
Gel supershift analysis was performed to determine the subunit
composition of the gel-shifted complexes. Anti-p50, anti-p52, anti-p65,
anti-RelB, or anti-c-Rel antibodies were added to the reaction mixtures
prepared from the lungs of LPS-injected mice prior to the addition of
the oligonucleotide probe. Addition of antibody specific for the p50
subunit to the assay reduced the intensity of the DNA-binding activity
but with no visible shift in the mobility of the complex. The addition
of anti-c-Rel antibody resulted in reduced intensity and a weaker shift
in the mobility of the complex in the lungs at 1 h (Fig.
1B). In addition, a slight reduction (10-30%) in the
intensity of anti-p65, anti-p52, or anti-RelB suggests the possible
involvement of these proteins also in complex formation. At 4 h
after LPS injection, in gel shift assay, the complex migrated at a
slower rate as compared with that of 1 h. In supershift assay, the
band of NF-
B complex was mainly reacted with p50 antibody and
partially reacted with antibodies against other NF-
B species
(40-45% reduction of the intensity in the presence of anti-p52 and
anti-RelB antibodies, 30% reduction of intensity in the presence of
anti-c-Rel antibody, and 20% reduction of the intensity in the
presence of anti-p65 antibody, Fig. 1B). These
results indicate activation of multiple NF-
B species in
vivo in response to LPS in which p50 is the predominant subunit,
and the other subunits of NF-
B, such as p52, p65, RelB, and c-Rel,
may occur to a lesser degree.
We examined the transcription of several known
NF-
B-dependent genes, such as TNF, IL-1
, and IL-6. We
have observed that all of these genes are expressed in a biphasic
fashion following LPS injection, indicating that mRNA expression of
some NF-
B-dependent genes parallels NF-
B activation
(Fig. 1C).
TNF and IL-1 Are Involved in the Late Phase Activation of
NF-
B--
The early activation of NF-
B results in the early
expression of inflammatory cytokine genes such as TNF (3, 9, 10) and
IL-1 (3). We have previously reported that blocking of the early
NF-
B activity by PAF antagonist resulted in the inhibition of TNF
production (9) and mRNA expression (11). TNF and IL-1 are known to
be potent inducers of NF-
B activation (15-17). The kinetics of
serum TNF and IL-1
levels after intravenous administration of LPS
showed peak values at 1 h (TNF) or 2 h (IL-1
) and then rapidly declined thereafter (Fig. 2).
These observations suggest that TNF and IL-1 may be responsible for the
second phase activation of NF-
B. To assess this possibility, the
effect of TNF or IL-1 inhibition was examined using
TNF
/
and IL-1R
/
mice, respectively. No
significant impairment of NF-
B activation in either the first or
second phase of activity was observed in these mice (Fig.
3A). These data suggest that
either TNF or IL-1 alone is sufficient for the second phase of NF-
B
activation. In supershift analysis, a similar supershift pattern was
also seen in both TNF
/
and IL-1R
/
mice,
suggesting that TNF or IL-1 deficiency does not affect LPS-induced
activation of the different NF-
B subunits (Fig. 3B). We
next examined the effect of inhibiting both cytokines simultaneously on
the second phase of NF-
B activation. Administration of anti-TNF in
IL-1R
/
mice 10 min prior to LPS injection resulted in a
significant inhibition of the second phase activity of NF-
B (Fig.
4A). This was confirmed in
in vitro experiments. Stimulation of the macrophage cell
line (RAW 264.7) with LPS resulted in the biphasic activation of
NF-
B. Peak values were observed at 30 min and 14-20 h, respectively (Fig. 4B). Pretreatment with BN 50739 or CV 6209 30 min
prior to LPS treatment resulted in abrogation of the early peak of
NF-
B as well as the subsequent second phase of NF-
B activation
(Fig. 4B). Neither anti-TNF Ab nor anti-IL-1
Ab alone
inhibited the LPS-induced second phase activation of NF-
B in the
cells. Using both antibodies did, however, inhibit the late activation
of NF-
B (Fig. 4C). Likewise, the second phase of
LPS-induced NF-
B activation in peritoneal macrophages obtained from
TNF
/
and IL-1R
/
mice was blocked by
pretreatment with IL-1Ra, anti-IL-1
Ab, and anti-TNF Ab,
respectively (Fig. 4D). These data indicate that either TNF
or IL-1 alone is sufficient for the second phase activation of
NF-
B.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Serum levels of TNF and
IL-1 in LPS-injected mice. Blood was
collected following an intravenous injection of 50 µg of LPS at the
time indicated and analyzed for TNF (A) and IL-1
(B) by ELISA. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.
n = 3 animals for each time point. A representative of
three independent experiments is shown.
|
|

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
No significant impairment of the secondary
phase of NF- B activation in
TNF / and IL-1R / mice.
A, mice were intravenously injected with LPS (50 µg), and
the lungs were removed at the time indicated. Nuclear extracts from the
organs were incubated with -32P-labeled B
oligonucleotide and electrophoresed on a 5% polyacrylamide gel.
B, supershift/inhibition assay was performed as described in
the legend to Fig. 1B. n = 3 animals for
each time point. A representative of three to five independent
experiments is shown.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of both TNF and IL-1 is required
to prevent the second phase of NF- B
activation. A, IL-1R / mice were treated
with anti-TNF Ab 30 min prior to LPS injection (50 µg,
intravenously), and the lungs were removed 8 h thereafter.
n = 3 animals for each groups. B, RAW 264.7 cells (1 × 106) were treated with 10 µg/ml of BN
50739 or CV 6209 30 min prior to LPS (0.5 µg/ml) treatment and
collected at the time indicated. C, RAW 264.7 cells (1 × 106) were treated with control IgG, anti-TNF, or
anti-IL-1 Abs 1 h prior to LPS (0.5 µg/ml) treatment and
collected at 16 h. D, peritoneal macrophages from wild
type, TNF / , and IL-1R / mice were
treated with anti-TNF Ab, anti-IL-1 Ab, IL-1Ra, and control IgG
1 h prior to LPS (0.5 µg/ml) treatment and collected at 16 h. Gel shift assays were performed as described in the legend to Fig.
1. The results of the gel shift experiments are shown (upper
panels) and were used for quantitation by densitometry
(lower panels). All values are compared against LPS-treated
control group (A, C, and D) and
0.5 h LPS-treated cells (B). Values are expressed as
mean ± S.E. A representative of three to five independent
experiments is shown. *, p < 0.005 versus
LPS-treated control group.
|
|
TNF or IL-1 Induces the Second Phase of NF-
B Activation
Indirectly via the Action of PAF--
Although TNF and IL-1 are
involved in the secondary activation of NF-
B, it is unclear whether
these cytokines are directly involved or they exert their effects
through the releases and/or synthesis of the secondary mediator(s). The
fact that the long lag period (more than 6-7 h) between the peak
plasma levels of TNF and IL-1
(Fig. 2) and the second peak of
NF-
B activation (Fig. 1) suggests that the latter possibility seems
likely. PAF and TNF and/or IL-1 stimulate the release of each other via
a positive feedback loop (13, 18-21). TNF and IL-1 are released in
response to PAF (18), and in turn, these cytokines stimulate the
release of PAF (19). In fact, many in vivo biological
functions of TNF and IL-1 are mediated through the action of PAF (13, 20, 21). We therefore investigated whether TNF and IL-1 indirectly induce the second phase of NF-
B activation via the action of PAF.
First, we determined the effect of PAF antagonist treatment on the
LPS-induced second phase of NF-
B activity. In vivo
administration of BN 50739 or CV 6209 (Fig.
5A) 4 h after LPS
injection resulted in an abrogation of the secondary activation of
NF-
B. Furthermore, Fig. 5B shows that in vitro
treatment with BN 50739 or CV 6209 4 h after LPS stimulation in
RAW 264.7 cells abrogated the secondary NF-
B activation. The
kinetics of plasma level of PAF following LPS injection paralleled
those of NF-
B activation; the major early peak was seen at around
10-15 min and a small second peak accompanied at around 6 h (Fig.
5C). These data indicate that PAF is involved in the
second phase of NF-
B activation and support the hypothesis that TNF
and IL-1 induce the late synthesis of PAF.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Evidence that PAF is involved in the
secondary activation of NF- B.
A, mice were treated with 400 µg of BN 50739 or CV 6209 4 h after LPS (50 µg, intravenously) injection, and the lungs
were removed at the time indicated. B, RAW 264.7 cells
(1 × 106) were treated with 10 µg/ml of BN 50739 or
CV 6209 4 h after LPS (0.5 µg/ml) treatment and collected at the
times indicated. Gel shift assays were performed as described in the
legend to Fig. 1. C, mice were injected with LPS (50 µg,
intravenously), and blood was collected at the time indicated. Plasma
PAF was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures."
n = 3 animals for each time points. Values are
expressed as mean ± S.E. A representative of three to five
independent experiments is shown.
|
|
Finally, it was determined whether TNF and IL-1 induce NF-
B
activation through PAF. Injection of mice with either TNF or IL-1
alone resulted in NF-
B activation. The ability of TNF and IL-1
to
activate NF-
B either alone or in combination was inhibited by
pretreatment with CV 6209 (Fig.
6A). We performed supershift assays to investigate whether the PAF antagonist has qualitatively different effects on the appearance of different NF-
B forms that are
being activated by TNF or/and IL-1. The supershift assay revealed that
PAF antagonist CV 6209 did not mediate a qualitatively different effect
on the forms of NF-
B but inhibited all NF-
B species (data not
shown). TNF- or IL-1
-induced NF-
B activation in RAW 264.7 cells
and the effect of TNF or IL-1
was inhibited by pretreatment with BN
50739 or CV 6209 (Fig. 6B). These findings indicated
that TNF and IL-1 play an important role in the second phase of NF-
B activation via the action of PAF.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of TNF and/or
IL-1 -induced NF- B
activation by pretreatment with a PAF antagonist. A,
mice were treated with 400 µg CV 6209 (intraperitoneally) 30 min
prior to TNF (0.1 µg, intravenously) and/or IL-1 (0.2 µg,
intravenously) injection, and the lungs were removed at 1 h.
n = 3 animals for each groups. B, RAW 264.7 cells (1 × 106) were treated with 10 µg/ml BN 50739 or CV 6209 30 min prior to TNF (10 ng/ml) and IL-1 (20 ng/ml)
treatment either alone or in combination and collected the cells at 40 min. Gel shift assays were performed on nuclear extracts as described
in the legend to Fig. 1. The results of the gel shift experiments
(upper panels) were used to quantitate the corresponding
relative intensity by densitometry (lower panels). All
values are compared against TNF-treated group and expressed as
mean ± S.E. A representative of three to five independent
experiments is shown. *, p < 0.005 versus
TNF or IL-1 -treated group; **, p < 0.005 versus TNF and IL-1 -treated group.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The transcription factor NF-
B is important for initiating and
sustaining inflammatory reactions. The sustained or biphasic activation
of NF-
B may be responsible for the prolonged inflammatory processes
known to occur in various pathological situations (4, 5) and microbial
infections (6-8). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying NF-
B
activation in inflammatory reactions are poorly understood. In this
study, we demonstrated an autoregulatory pathway of biphasic activation
of NF-
B in response to the inflammatory stimulus LPS. Injection of
mice with LPS resulted in biphasic NF-
B activation in various
organs. We demonstrated that PAF is involved in the early phase
activation of NF-
B based on the findings that (i) the major early
peak of plasma PAF was seen 10-15 min after LPS injection and (ii)
pretreatment with BN 50739 or CV 6209 prior to LPS injection resulted
in abrogation of the early peak of NF-
B. The presence of an early
phase of NF-
B activity in TNF
/
or
IL-1R
/
mice suggests that TNF or IL-1 is not involved
in the first wave of NF-
B activation. It is well known that PAF is
an inducer of NF-
B activation in vitro (22, 23).
Regarding the in vivo role of PAF in NF-
B activation, our
observations also suggest that PAF is a critical mediator in the early
activation of NF-
B (10, 11, 15) in a reactive oxygen
intermediator-dependent manner (14). This early NF-
B
activity induced by PAF results in the expression of a variety of early
response genes. Thus, we believe that PAF acts as a triggering molecule
in initiating a variety of early inflammatory reactions by activating
early NF-
B.
Importantly, we have also demonstrated that either TNF or IL-1 alone,
which is induced by the PAF-dependent early NF-
B
activity, is indirectly responsible for the second phase of NF-
B
activation via the synthesis of PAF. Considering the potential role for
TNF and IL-1 in NF-
B activation (3, 15-17), we initially expected that TNF or IL-1
might play a direct role in the LPS-induced second
phase of NF-
B activation. However, the TNF and IL-1 inhibition studies using TNF
/
and IL-1R
/
mice
revealed that little impairment of biphasic activation of NF-
B in
TNF
/
or IL-1R
/
mice and inhibition of
the second phase of NF-
B activation was achieved by inhibition of
both TNF and IL-1
action in vivo as well as in
vitro, indicating that these cytokines individually play a
significant role in the late phase of NF-
B activation. There was no
significant impairment in late plasma PAF levels after LPS injection in
TNF
/
or IL-1R
/
mice relative to the
control wild type mice (data not shown). These findings indicate that
either TNF or IL-1 alone is sufficient to produce PAF.
PAF is not stored in the cells but is present in the form of an
inactive precursor (alkylacyl-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine) in the
membrane (24). Upon an inflammatory stimulus, phospholipase A2 (PLA2) becomes activated and cleaves the
phospholipid at the 2(R) position, leading to the formation of the
lysophospholipid derivative, lyso-PAF (25). Lyso-PAF is in turn
acetylated by acetyl-transferase into PAF (26). Recent studies (27, 28) have demonstrated that MAP kinase is associated with PAF release through PLA2 activation by phosphorylation. However, the
upstream pathway leading to MAP kinase activation is poorly understood. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which recognize conserved products of
microbial metabolism, play a critical role in innate immunity. TLRs and
members of the IL-1 receptor family share homologies in their
cytoplasmic domains called Toll/IL-1R/plant R gene homology (TIR)
domains (29, 30). Intracellular signaling mechanisms mediated by TIRs
are similar, with MyD88 (31, 32) and TRAF6 (33, 34) having critical
roles. The serine-threonine kinase IL-1 receptor-associated
kinases (IRAKs) are known to involve the signal transduction between
MyD88 and TRAF6 (35, 36). Importantly, a marked impairment of MAP
kinase activity has recently been reported in MyD88- or
IRAK-4-deficient animals (32, 37), suggesting that MyD88 and IRAK may
be upstream mediators requiring MAP kinase activation for
phosphorylation of PLA2. Further studies are required to
address these issues.
The PAF produced in response to TNF and IL-1 in turn is responsible for
the secondary wave of NF-
B activation. Such a conclusion is
supported by the following observations. (i) The plasma PAF levels
paralleled those of NF-
B activation following LPS injection. (ii) BN
50739 or CV 6209 prevented the LPS-induced second phase of NF-
B
activation in vivo as well as in vitro. (iii)
TNF- or IL-1-induced activation of NF-
B was inhibited by the PAF
antagonist BN 50739 or CV 6209. These findings clearly indicate that
together TNF and IL-1 play an important indirect role in the secondary activation of NF-
B via the synthesis of PAF. PAF and proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF and IL-1, stimulate the release of each other by
a positive feedback loop. In fact, many in vivo biological functions of TNF and IL-1 are mediated through the synthesis of PAF
(13, 20, 21). Thus, we provide another example of a positive feedback
loop between PAF and TNF/IL-1 resulting in a second phase of NF-
B activation.
The mechanism underlying TNF- or IL-1-induced NF-
B activation
through PAF has not been fully understood. According to the literature
published so far, TNF or IL-1 appear to activate NF-
B through two
separate pathways, PLA2-independent and
-dependent pathways. The former involves the recruitment of
at least three proteins (TRADD, RIP, and TRAF2) to the type 1 TNF
receptor tail, leading to the sequential activation of the downstream
NF-
B-inducing kinase (NIK) and I
B-specific kinases (IKK
and
IKK
), resulting in the phosphorylation of the two N-terminal
regulatory serines within I
B
(38, 39). However, recent in
vivo studies with the alymphoplasia (aly) mouse, a natural strain
with a mutated NIK (40), and NIK-deficient mice (41) have revealed that
NIK is not a critical element in the TNF signaling pathway to NF-
B activation, indicating that the role of NIK in NF-
B activation through TNF receptor signaling requires further investigation. Apart from this pathway, TNF and IL-1 are also capable of activating PLA2, resulting in biosynthesis of arachidonic acid
metabolites, such as prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and PAF (42-45).
Several reports have demonstrated that PLA2 inhibitors
block TNF-induced NF-
B activation (46, 47). Given this information,
our data suggests an inhibition of TNF- or IL-1-induced NF-
B
activation by PAF antagonists may induce the late phase of NF-
B
activation via the pathway involving PLA2-induced PAF
synthesis. However, it is not clear whether these two pathways operate
separately or in cooperation to activate NF-
B.
Although biphasic activation of NF-
B is supposed to be associated
with sustained inflammatory processes, the precise biological significance of prolonged NF-
B activation is poorly understood. Recently, Lawrence et al. (48) reported that the late
phase activation of NF-
B is associated with the expression of
cyclooxygenase 2-derived anti-inflammatory prostaglandins and the
anti-inflammatory cytokine, transforming growth factor-
1. Thus,
inhibition of the late phase activation of NF-
B protracts
inflammatory responses. This suggests that NF-
B has an
anti-inflammatory role involving the regulation of inflammatory
resolution. If that is the case, given the critical role for PAF in the
induction of the late phase activation of NF-
B in this study,
clinical studies showing no beneficial effect of PAF antagonists in
patients with sepsis (49, 50) supports the anti-inflammatory role of
NF-
B.
Whatever the biological significance of prolonged NF-
B activation,
this study is the first to provide the precise molecular mechanisms for
biphasic activation of NF-
B, which occurs in many inflammatory
conditions. Such a biphasic or prolonged activation of NF-
B may
develop in pathological situations in which the early release of PAF is
abnormally enhanced.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Jon. D. Hennebold for his
critical review and reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Grant DP0555 from the
Korea Research Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be
addressed: Dept. of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Chonnam National University, Kwangju 500-757, Republic of Korea. Tel.:
82-62-530-3414; Fax: 82-62-530-0848; E-mail:
syim@chonnam.chonnam.ac.kr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 13, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202524200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
NF-
B, nuclear
factor-
B;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
PAF, platelet-activating factor;
TNF
/
, TNF-
knockout mice;
IL, interleukin;
IL-1R
/
, IL-1 receptor knockout mice;
IL-1Ra, IL-1
receptor antagonist;
PLA2, phospholipase A2;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
Ab, antibody;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
NIK, NF-
B-inducing kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sen, R.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1986)
Cell
46,
705-716[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1988)
Cell
53,
211-217[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Kopp, E. B.,
and Ghosh, S.
(1995)
Adv. Immunol.
58,
1-27[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Thompson, J. E.,
Phillips, R. J.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H.,
Tempst, P.,
and Ghosh, S.
(1995)
Cell
80,
573-582[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Gukovsky, I.,
Gukovskaya, A. S.,
Blinman, T. A.,
Zaninovic, V.,
and Pandol, S. J.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
G1402-G1414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Sporn, L. A.,
Sahni, S. K.,
Lerner, N. B.,
Marder, V. J.,
Silverman, D. J.,
Turpin, L. C.,
and Schwab, A. L.
(1997)
Infect. Immun.
65,
2786-2791[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Yurochko, A. D.,
Kowalik, T. F.,
Huong, S. M.,
and Huang, E. S.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
5391-5400[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Hauf, N.,
Goebel, W.,
Fiedler, F.,
Sokolovic, Z.,
and Kuhn, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
9394-9399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Im, S. Y.,
Han, S. J., Ko, H. M.,
Choi, J. H.,
Chun, S. B.,
Lee, D. G., Ha, T. Y.,
and Lee, H. K.
(1997)
Eur. J. Immunol.
27,
2800-2804[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Han, S. J.,
Choi, J. H., Ko, H. M.,
Choi, I. W.,
Lee, H. K.,
Lee, O. H.,
and Im, S. Y.
(1999)
Eur. J. Immunol.
29,
1334-1341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Choi, J. H., Ko, H. M.,
Kim, J. W.,
Lee, H. K.,
Han, S. S.,
Chun, S. B.,
and Im, S. Y.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
166,
5139-5144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Braquet, P.,
Touqui, L.,
Shen, T. Y.,
and Vargaftig, B. B.
(1987)
Pharmacol. Rev.
39,
97-145[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Im, S. Y., Ko, H. M.,
Kim, J. W.,
Lee, H. K., Ha, T. Y.,
Lee, H. B., Oh, S. J.,
Bai, S.,
Chung, K. C.,
Lee, Y. B.,
Kang, H. S.,
and Chun, S. B.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
2662-2665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Choi, J. H.,
Chung, W. J.,
Han, S. J.,
Lee, H. B.,
Choi, I. W.,
Lee, H. K.,
Jang, K. Y.,
Lee, D. G.,
Han, S. S.,
Park, K. H.,
and Im, S. Y.
(2000)
Inflammation
24,
385-398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Schutze, S.,
Potthoff, K.,
Machleidt, T.,
Berkovic, D.,
Wiegmann, K.,
and Kronke, M.
(1992)
Cell
71,
765-776[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Liu, Z. G.,
Hsu, H.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
and Karin, M.
(1996)
Cell
87,
565-576[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Malinin, N. L.,
Boldin, M. P.,
Kovalenko, A. V.,
and Wallach, D.
(1997)
Nature
385,
540-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Poubelle, P. E.,
Gingras, D.,
Demers, C.,
Dubois, C.,
Harbour, D.,
Grassi, J.,
and Rola-Pleszczynski, M.
(1991)
Immunology
72,
181-187[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Bussolino, F.,
Camussi, G.,
and Baglioni, C.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
11856-11861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Montrucchio, G.,
Lupia, E.,
Battaglia, E.,
Passerini, G.,
Bussolino, F.,
Emanuelli, G.,
and Camussi, G.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
377-382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Nourshargh, S.,
Larkin, S. W.,
Das, A.,
and Williams, T. J.
(1995)
Blood
85,
2553-2558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Smith, C. S.,
and Shearer, W. T.
(1994)
Cell. Immunol.
155,
292-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Kravchenko, V. V.,
Pan, Z.,
Han, J.,
Herbert, J. M.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Ye, R. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14928-14934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Touqui, L.,
Jacquemin, C.,
Dumarey, C.,
and Vargaftig, B. B.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
833,
111-118[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Murakami, M.,
Nakatani, Y.,
Atsumi, G.,
Inoue, K.,
and Kudo, I.
(1997)
Crit. Rev. Immunol.
17,
225-283[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Gomez-Cambronero, J.,
Nieto, M. L.,
Mato, J. M.,
and Sanchez-Crespo, M.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
845,
511-515[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Hirasawa, N.,
Santini, F.,
and Beaven, M. A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
5391-5402[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Xing, M.,
Firestein, B. L.,
Shen, G. H.,
and Insel, P. A.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
805-814[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
O'Neill, L.
(2000)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
28,
557-563[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Kimbrell, D. A.,
and Beutler, B.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Genet.
2,
256-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Wesche, H.,
Henzel, W. J.,
Shillinglaw, W., Li, S.,
and Cao, Z.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
837-847[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Kawai, T.,
Adachi, O.,
Ogawa, T.,
Takeda, K.,
and Akira, S.
(1999)
Immunity
11,
115-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Cao, Z.,
Xiong, J.,
Takeuchi, M.,
Kurama, T.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1996)
Nature
383,
443-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Lomaga, M. A.,
Yeh, W. C.,
Sarosi, I.,
Duncan, G. S.,
Furlonger, C., Ho, A.,
Morony, S.,
Capparelli, C.,
Van, G.,
Kaufman, S.,
van der Heiden, A.,
Itie, A.,
Wakeham, A.,
Khoo, W.,
Sasaki, T.,
Cao, Z.,
Penninger, J. M.,
Paige, C. J.,
Lacey, D. L.,
Dunstan, C. R.,
Boyle, W. J.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
and Mak, T. W.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1015-1024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Cao, Z.,
Henzel, W. J.,
and Gao, X.
(1996)
Science
271,
1128-1131[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Muzio, M., Ni, J.,
Feng, P.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1997)
Science
278,
1612-1615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Suzuki, N.,
Suzuki, S.,
Duncan, G. S.,
Millar, D. G.,
Wada, T.,
Mirtsos, C.,
Takada, H.,
Wakeham, A.,
Itie, A., Li, S.,
Penninger, J. M.,
Wesche, H.,
Ohashi, P. S.,
Mak, T. W.,
and Yeh, W. C.
(2002)
Nature
416,
750-756[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Ghosh, S.,
May, M. J.,
and Kopp, E. B.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
16,
225-260[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Aggarwal, B. B.
(2000)
Ann. Rheum. Dis.
59 Suppl. 1,
i6-i16[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Shinkura, R.,
Kitada, K.,
Matsuda, F.,
Tashiro, K.,
Ikuta, K.,
Suzuki, M.,
Kogishi, K.,
Serikawa, T.,
and Honjo, T.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
22,
74-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Yin, L., Wu, L.,
Wesche, H.,
Arthur, C. D.,
White, J. M.,
Goeddel, D. V.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(2001)
Science
291,
2162-2165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Godfrey, R. W.,
Johnson, W. J.,
Newman, T.,
and Hoffstein, S. T.
(1988)
Prostaglandins
35,
107-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Hoeck, W. G.,
Ramesha, C. S.,
Chang, D. J.,
Fan, N.,
and Heller, R. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
4475-4479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Konieczkowski, M.,
and Sedor, J. R.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
92,
2524-2532[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Liu, S. J.,
and McHowat, J.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
H1462-H1472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Thommesen, L.,
Sjursen, W.,
Gasvik, K.,
Hanssen, W.,
Brekke, O. L.,
Skattebol, L.,
Holmeide, A. K.,
Espevik, T.,
Johansen, B.,
and Laegreid, A.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
3421-3430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
van Puijenbroek, A. A.,
Wissink, S.,
van der Saag, P. T.,
and Peppelenbosch, M. P.
(1999)
Cytokine
11,
104-110[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Lawrence, T.,
Gilroy, D. W.,
Colville-Nash, P. R.,
and Willoughby, D. A.
(2001)
Nat. Med.
7,
1291-1297[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Vincent, J. L.,
Spapen, H.,
Bakker, J.,
Webster, N. R.,
and Curtis, L.
(2000)
Crit. Care. Med.
28,
638-642[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Suputtamongkol, Y.,
Intaranongpai, S.,
Smith, M. D.,
Angus, B.,
Chaowagul, W.,
Permpikul, C.,
Simpson, J. A.,
Leelarasamee, A.,
Curtis, L.,
and White, N. J.
(2000)
Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother.
44,
693-696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Lockett, M. G. Goebl, and M. A. Harrington
Transient membrane recruitment of IRAK-1 in response to LPS and IL-1{beta} requires TNF R1
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
August 1, 2008;
295(2):
C313 - C323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. V. Groesdonk, S. Schlottmann, F. Richter, M. Georgieff, and U. Senftleben
Escherichia coli Prevents Phagocytosis-Induced Death of Macrophages via Classical NF-{kappa}B Signaling, a Link to T-Cell Activation.
Infect. Immun.,
October 1, 2006;
74(10):
5989 - 6000.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|