Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205001200 on September 9, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 44747-44753, November 22, 2002
Rapid Activation of Glycogen Phosphorylase by the Endoplasmic
Reticulum Unfolded Protein Response*
Arvind
Gill
,
Ningguo
Gao, and
Mark A.
Lehrman§
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of
Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9041
Received for publication, May 21, 2002, and in revised form, August 9, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is associated
with misfolding of ER proteins and triggers the unfolded protein
response (UPR). The UPR, in turn, helps restore normal ER function.
Since fastidious N-linked glycosylation is critical for
folding of most ER proteins, this study examined whether metabolic
interconversions of precursors used for glycan assembly were controlled
by the UPR. Thus, eight enzymes and factors with key roles in hexose phosphate metabolism were assayed in cytoplasmic extracts from primary
dermal fibroblasts treated with UPR inducers. Stimulation of only one
activity by the UPR was detected, AMP-independent glycogen
phosphorylase (GP). GP activation required only 20 min of ER stress,
with concurrent decreases in cellular glycogen and elevations of its
metabolites Glc-1-P and Glc-6-P. Addition of phosphatase inhibitors to
enzyme extracts from unstressed cells mimicked the effect of ER
stress on GP activity, suggesting that phosphorylation of GP or a
regulatory factor was involved. These data show that the UPR can
modulate hexose metabolism in a manner beneficial for protein
glycosylation. Since activation of GP appears to occur by a rapid
post-translational process, it may be part of a general strategy of ER
damage control, preceding the well-known transcription-dependent processes of the UPR that are
manifested hours after the occurrence of ER stress.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)1 stress initiates
signals that emerge from the ER lumen, and activate cytoplasmic and/or
nuclear responses, which in turn alter ER function. The general
paradigm of ER stress signaling is termed the unfolded protein response (UPR) (1-3), which can be triggered by agents that cause misfolded proteins to accumulate within the ER lumen, such as dithiothreitol (DTT), tunicamycin (TN), thapsigargin, castanospermine (CSN), and
azetidine-2-carboxylic acid (AZC) (4). Typically, ER stress activates
the stress sensors Ire1p and ATF6 (3) to cause transcription of genes
encoding chaperones, folding enzymes, and other proteins that enhance
ER function. Appearance of the respective gene products occurs several
hours after initiation of ER stress. For such ER proteins, there is no
evidence that regulation by the UPR involves post-translational import
or activation. Additionally, ER stress can temporarily inhibit cellular
protein synthesis, lessening the load of misfolded protein entering the
lumenal space. This occurs within 10-20 min of the application of ER
stress by rapid post-translational phosphorylation of eIF2
by the
PKR-like ER kinase or PERK (5). Translation arrest is reversible (for
example, lasting 2 h in fibroblasts, Ref. 4), allowing the
subsequent translation of mRNAs encoded by UPR-responsive genes.
Previous studies from this laboratory with primary dermal fibroblasts
identified another rapid effect of the UPR, involving N-linked glycosylation of ER proteins (4, 6). ER quality control is highly dependent upon covalent attachment of the
oligosaccharide Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 to
specific asparaginyl residues of nascent ER proteins. This requires the
synthesis of a lipid-linked oligosaccharide (LLO),
Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol. TN is
a specific inhibitor of the synthesis of this LLO and, as a result, its
application with cells causes ER protein misfolding and ER stress.
Conditions that cause accumulation of premature LLO intermediates also
result in ER stress (7). However, it was found that the UPR can
compensate by promoting extension of such premature LLOs to
Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol (6).
Of particular interest is DTT-induced stress, which stimulates LLO
synthesis within 20 min, and is attenuated by adaptation of cells to ER
stress (4). This suggests a form of stress relief in which one or more
components of the pre-existing pathway for generation of
Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol is
activated post-translationally, rather than being synthesized de
novo. No evidence was obtained for UPR activation of hexose
transport or transferases involved in synthesis of
Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol (6).
Since multiple undermannosylated intermediates
(Man2-5GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol) were all extended
by the UPR, it is feasible that the UPR acts by increasing synthesis of
one or more precursors of the mannosyl residues.
In this study we present evidence that AMP-independent glycogen
phosphorylase (GP) can mediate enhanced LLO extension by the UPR.
Activation of GP is rapid, and may be part of a general program of ER
damage control that precedes transcriptional events regulated by the
UPR.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Related Procedures--
Human dermal
fibroblasts, obtained from various sources (see below, Table II), were
cultured and subjected to ER stress with DTT, TN, CSN, or AZC as
described (6). Cells were cultured continuously in medium containing 5 mM glucose in all experiments presented. To verify the
effects of UPR inducing treatments (except TN) on LLO synthesis,
controls (not shown) were performed with cells labeled with 40 µCi/ml
[2-3H]mannose, in which case a 20-min incubation with
medium containing 0.5 mM glucose was used.
[3H]LLOs were extracted with chloroform/methanol/water
(10:10:3), and [3H]oligosaccharides were released from
dolichol-P-P and analyzed by HPLC as described (6).
Cytoplasmic Enzyme Extracts--
Cell monolayers were treated
with streptolysin-O (SLO (Murex brand, distributed by Corgenix, UK)) to
selectively permeabilize the plasma membranes as described (8, 9),
allowing collection of diffusable cytoplasmic components with minimal
physical perturbation or organelle breakage. Each 100-mm dish contained
~1 × 106 cells. After treatment with SLO on ice for
4 min, unbound SLO was removed by washing the monolayers with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline. 2 ml of modified transport buffer
(containing 78 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2,
and 50 mM Na-HEPES, pH 7.4, but lacking DTT as originally formulated, Ref. 8) prewarmed to 37 °C were added. After 15 min at
37 degrees, the dishes were placed on ice for an additional 5 min. The
buffer was collected and used for measurements of hexose-metabolizing enzymes. Protein was measured with a dye binding assay (Bio-Rad) with
bovine serum albumin as a standard. Comparisons of extracts made this
way with extracts made with 1% Triton X-100 showed that Triton X-100
recovered 5-6 times as much protein, but a similar amount of total GP
(not shown). The various stress treatments described in this study did
not influence the amount of total protein recovered in cytoplasmic extracts.
Assays for Hexose Phosphate-metabolizing Enzymes--
Assays
were linear over the incubation periods indicated. Except for PFK, all
enzymes in 0.2 ml of cytoplasmic extract were assayed in 1 ml of buffer
containing 50 mM K-HEPES, pH 7.2, 25 mM KCl,
and 5 mM MgCl2, reactions were performed in the
presence of 1.5 units of glucose-6-P dehydrogenase (Sigma, catalog
number G8529) and 0.2 mM NADP+ (Sigma, catalog
number N0505), and product was assessed spectrophotometrically at 340 nm for the reduction of NADP+ to NADPH, as described (10).
Except for PFK, the incubation times at 37 °C, and other reaction
components, are indicated below for each enzyme. In all cases, assay
values with blank reactions lacking the enzyme substrate were
subtracted out. All data were normalized to protein content.
Hexokinase: reactions were incubated for 15 min with 1 mM
D-glucose and 1 mM Mg-ATP. Phosphoglucose
isomerase (PGI): reactions were incubated for 15 min with 1 mM fructose 6-phosphate. Phosphomannose isomerase (PMI):
reactions were incubated for 2 h with 1 mM mannose 6-phosphate and 7.13 units PGI (Sigma, catalog number P5381). Phosphomannomutase (PMM): reactions were incubated for 2 h with 0.8 mM mannose 1-phosphate, 0.1 mM glucose
1,6-bisphosphate, 0.35 units PMI (Sigma P5153), and 7.13 units of PGI.
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase: reactions were incubated for 15 min with
10 µM fructose 1,6-bisphosphate and 7.13 units of PGI.
Phosphofructokinase (PFK): 0.2 ml of extract was mixed with 1 ml of
buffer containing 1 mM fructose 6-phosphate, 0 or 1 mM Mg-ATP, 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 0.1 mM Na3EDTA, 6 mM MgCl2,
0.16 mM NADH, 0.4 units of aldolase (Roche Diagnostics cat.
102652), 2.4 units of triose-phosphate isomerase (Roche Diagnostics cat. 109762), and 0.4 units of
-glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (Roche Diagnostics cat. 127752), and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C.
The ATP-dependent formation of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate
was determined with an enzyme-linked method (11).
Assay for Cytoplasmic Activators of Phosphofructokinase and
Preparation of Alkaline Extracts--
Fructose 2,6-bisphosphate (or
similar activators) was measured by activation of PFK as described (12,
13). Rabbit muscle PFK (Sigma cat. F2129) and PFK in extracts from
control and stressed cells were tested. Activators were obtained by
alkaline extraction as follows. 100-mm dishes were placed on ice and
washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline twice. 1 ml of 0.1 M NaOH (ice-cold) was added, and cells were scraped,
transferred to a glass tube, and sonicated for 20 s. The mixture
was heated at 80 degrees for 5 min. Samples were cooled on ice and
centrifuged for 20 min at 14,900 rpm in a microcentrifuge. The
supernatants were neutralized using 1 M HEPES (free acid)
and added to PFK assays. In our hands, PFK was activated 2-3-fold by
extracts from control cells.
Measurement of Glycogen Phosphorylase (GP)--
Extracts
prepared by SLO permeabilization (see above) were assayed for GP
activity (14). A 0.2-ml extract was diluted into 1 ml of assay buffer
containing 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.2), 2 mM MgSO4, 1-2 mM
NADP+, 2 µg/ml glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 3 units/ml rabbit muscle PGM, and 3 µM glucose
1,6-bisphosphate. When indicated, 5 mM 5'-AMP was included.
The reaction was initiated by adding 100 µl of 10 mg/ml glycogen
(Sigma cat. G1508). GP activity was determined spectrophotometrically
at 340 nm over a period of 5 h at 37 °C, and values for blank
reactions lacking extract were routinely subtracted out. Over this
period assays were linear for both time and amount of extract. The
reaction was strictly dependent upon the presence of glycogen, PGM, and
orthophosphate (not shown). Data presented for GP activity in the
presence of AMP represent the total activity measured, without
subtraction of activity obtained in the absence of AMP.
Measurement of Glucose 6-Phosphate by Enzyme Assay--
Cellular
alkaline extracts containing hexose phosphates (see above) were
used. Since some hexose phosphates can be modified by alkali, key
results were corroborated (not shown) with 70% ethanol extracts.
Assays (1 ml) included 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM
NADP+, and 0.2 ml of extract. 2 µg/ml glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase (Sigma G7877) was added, and absorbance at 340 nm was
measured after 15 min. Controls performed in the absence of
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase were subtracted out.
Measurement of Hexose Phosphates by Fluorophore-assisted
Carbohydrate Electrophoresis (FACE)--
Cell monolayers were
extracted by scraping into 70% ethanol. The extract was clarified by
centrifugation, dried under N2(g), dissolved in water, and
applied to a 1-ml column of Dowex AG1-X2 (formate form). After washing
with 20 ml of water, which removed essentially all neutral hexose,
hexose phosphates were eluted with 15 ml of 4 M formic acid
(15) and dried under N2(g). Recovery of a Glc-6-P standard
was greater than 90% (not shown). However, hexose 1-phosphates were
highly sensitive to hydrolysis, and under these conditions more than
95% of Glc-1-P standard was recovered as glucose. Thus, glucose
appearing in the 4 M formic acid eluate represented
Glc-1-P. Hexoses and hexose phosphates were modified with
2-aminoacridone (AMAC) and separated with a modified monosaccharide composition gel (16) composed of a 20% acrylamide separating gel with
125 mM Tris borate, pH 8.3 and a 6% acrylamide stacking gel with 63 mM Tris borate, pH 6.8. The running buffer was
0.1 M Tris borate (pH 8.3). All other aspects of the
electrophoresis were similar to those described for commercial
monosaccharide composition gels (Glyko). AMAC-modified sugars were
quantified with a BioScan fluorescence scanner as described (16).
Measurement of Glycogen--
Glycogen was extracted from cell
monolayers in 100-mm dishes, pre-chilled on ice, and washed with
ice-cold PBS, by scraping with 1 ml of ice-cold 70% perchloric acid
followed by sonication at 0 degrees (17). After removal of insoluble
material by centrifugation, aliquots were used for determination of
glucose with or without prior enzymatic degradation of glycogen.
Glycogen degradation was achieved by combining 0.4 ml of extract with
0.2 ml of 1 M KHCO3 and 2 ml of 1 mg/ml
amyloglucosidase (Sigma A3514) solution, followed by shaking at
40 °C for 2 h. The incubation was stopped by adding 1 ml of
70% perchloric acid, neutralized with 2-3 mg solid KHCO3
to a pH of 6.9-7.3, and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min. Glucose
was assayed by mixing up to 0.1 ml of the supernatant with 1 ml of
buffer containing 0.3 M triethanolamine chloride, pH 7.5, 1 mM ATP, 0.1 mM NADP+, 4 mM MgSO4, and 5 µg/ml glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase. After incubation at 37 °C for 5 min, absorbance at
340 nm was determined. Hexokinase (Sigma H5625) was added to a final
concentration of 1.4 units/ml. After an additional 5 min at 37 °C,
absorbance at 340 nm was again determined, from which the first reading
was subtracted to determine the glucose-specific change in absorbance. After subtraction of values obtained without amyloglucosidase treatment
and comparison with standard glucose samples, the quantity of
glycogen-derived glucose was determined.
 |
RESULTS |
Many Activities Associated with Hexose Metabolism Are Unaffected by
ER Stress--
Compared with tissues such as liver, brain, and muscle,
little is known about regulation of glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, or glycogenolysis in dermal fibroblasts. A number of regulatory points in
hexose metabolism with the potential to modulate LLO mannosylation were
therefore evaluated to determine whether they might be regulated by the
UPR (Fig. 1). ER stress conditions shown
previously to stimulate LLO extension were chosen. These conditions did
not cause cytoplasmic stress, itself a potential regulator of hexose metabolism.2 DTT was
particularly useful because it acted within 20 min of addition to
cells, and its effects on LLO extension were due to an ER stress
response rather than a direct chemical reduction of a regulatory enzyme
(4). However, for the current study two significant modifications were
made. First, cells were maintained continuously in medium with 5 mM glucose. In prior studies, a 20-min period in 0.5 mM glucose medium was necessary to provide a pool of
truncated LLOs. Second, TN could not be used in prior studies since it
directly inhibits LLO synthesis. TN was used in the present study since
any UPR effectors should be activated by it.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Metabolic steps examined as effectors of the
UPR. In this study, these eight enzymes and factors involved in
hexose-P metabolism that were candidates for the effects of the UPR on
LLO extension were examined: PMM, phosphomannomutase;
PMI, phosphomannose isomerase; HK, hexokinase;
PGM, phosphoglucomutase; F-1,6-BPase,
fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase; PFK, phosphofructokinase;
Fru-2,6-bisP, fructose 2,6-bisphosphate. The dotted
line indicates the plasma membrane.
|
|
Cytoplasmic extracts were prepared by gentle permeabilization of the
plasma membrane with streptolysin-O (SLO) to minimize release of
material from damaged intracellular organelles (8). Thus, our assays
were limited to readily diffusable components. No changes were observed
for seven key enzymes and co-factors (Table
I). There were no apparent stress effects
on enzymes (phosphomannose isomerase,
phosphomannomutase) that might divert Fru-6-P, a key intermediate in glycolysis, to mannosyl phosphates. No changes were detected in the enzymes (phosphofructokinase,
fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase) or cytoplasmic activators of
phosphofructokinase (such as Fru-2,6-bisP) that regulate
interconversion of Fru-6-P and Fru-1,6-bisP, and thus possibly shift
hexose units from glycolysis to glycoprotein synthesis. Consistent with
the prior lack of evidence for enhanced uptake glucose and mannose from
culture medium (6), no measurable changes were detected for hexokinase.
Phosphoglucomutatase, inhibition of which could prevent storage of
imported hexose as glycogen, was also unaffected. Considering these and
earlier (6) results, it is clear that ER stress does not cause
widespread changes in activities involved in hexose metabolism.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
ER stress does not appreciably stimulate the activities of seven key
enzymes and factors involved in hexose phosphate metabolism
All assays are described under "Experimental Procedures."
Activities are calculated per mg of protein in SLO extracts. PMI, PMM,
PGM, HK, and F1,6BPase activities were all measured in enzyme-linked
assays and are reported as µmol of NADPH formed per min. PFK is
measured as µmol of Fru-1,6-bisP formed per min. Fru-2,6-BP-like
activity per 106 cells is reported as the equivalent pmol of
authentic Fru-2,6-BP giving the same enhancement of PFK activity.
Parentheses indicate the number of times each stress treatment was
tested.
|
|
AMP-independent Glycogen Phosphorylase Activity in Dermal
Fibroblasts Is Increased by ER Stress--
As shown in Fig.
2, panel A, GP activity was
detectable in fibroblasts in both its more active (AMP-independent) and
less active (AMP-dependent) forms. Although detailed
information about this enzyme in fibroblasts is lacking, by extension
from tissues such as liver and muscle it is possible that
phosphorylation converts the less active form, GPb, to the more active
form, GPa (18). Caffeine, which blocks AMP binding to GPb, inhibited
the AMP- dependent activity but not the AMP-independent
activity (Fig. 2, panel B).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
ER stress increases the
AMP-independent activity of glycogen phosphorylase, but not the
AMP-dependent activity, in cytoplasmic extracts of dermal
fibroblast cultures. In this and Figs. 3-5, experiments with
adult fibroblast CRL-1904 (ATCC) are shown. Extracts were prepared by
permeabilization with SLO. GP activities were measured as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Panel A, the effects of
varying 5'-AMP concentrations were tested. Panel B, the
effects of varying concentrations of caffeine were tested in the
absence or presence of 5 mM AMP. Panel C,
fibroblasts were cultured in the absence or presence of 2 mM DTT for 20 min. (n = 8) or 5 µg/ml
TN for 1 h. (n = 7), and GP activities (mean ± S.E.) were measured in the absence ( AMP) or presence (+AMP)
of 5'-AMP.
|
|
When cells were treated with DTT, TN (Fig. 2, panel C), or
AZC (not shown) at concentrations known to cause ER stress (4), AMP-independent GP activity in extracts increased, but
AMP-dependent activity was unaffected. Activation of GP
occurred within 20 min of DTT addition. Direct addition of DTT to
assays, or its inclusion during extract preparation, did not affect GP
activity (not shown). Thus, stimulation by DTT was not due to a direct
chemical reduction of GP or a modulator of GP, as expected since the
cytoplasmic environment in which GP exists is highly reducing. In
addition to the fibroblast culture used in the experiments displayed in the figures, ER stress with DTT or TN increased GPa but not GPb activities in seven other adult and pediatric dermal fibroblast cultures (Table II). The
stimulation of GP by ER stress did not exceed 2-fold, but the following
sections provide evidence that this stimulation was significant.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Effects of DTT- and TN-induced ER stress on
5'-AMP-dependent and -independent glycogen phosphorylase
activities in primary dermal fibroblasts
Glycogen phosphorylase was assayed without or with 5 mM
5'-AMP in cytoplasmic extracts from cells treated in the absence
(control) or presence of 2 mM DTT for 15 min, or 5 µg/ml
TN for 60 min, and normalized to protein content, as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Cultures with CRL designations were from
the American Type Culture Collection. F-12 was a gift of Dr. H. Freeze,
Burnham Institute, and F21-3 was obtained from National Psoriasis
Foundation Tissue Bank. Adult donors were clinically normal. Pediatric
donors were normal or had clinical abnormalities not expected to affect
the parameters measured here. For reasons that are unclear, the average
GP activities among the 5 adult cultures ( AMP, 0.072; +AMP; 0.21)
were higher than those for four pediatric cultures ( AMP, 0.034; +AMP,
0.095). GP activity in only one of 9 cultures, pediatric CRL-1474, did
not respond to ER stress. Since this culture also had the highest GP
activity among the four pediatric cultures, there is a possibility of
constitutive activation of GP.
|
|
Glycogenolysis Is Stimulated by ER Stress--
Dermal fibroblasts
contained, on average, 230 nmol of glycogen-derived glucose per
106 cells. In the presence of orthophosphate, GP converts
glycogen into Glc-1-P. Small but consistent losses of glycogen were
observed with DTT (23 ± 2%, n = 13) and TN
(12 ± 2%, n = 3). For DTT, the decrease occurred
after 15 min of addition. Since cellular glycogen loss may be
counterbalanced by its synthesis, the apparently weaker effect of TN
may be related to the fact that it acted more slowly (within 1 h).
Thus, the resulting glycogenolysis would be more easily compensated by
glycogen synthesis. These losses of glycogen, though small, were more
than adequate to account for downstream effects on hexose phosphates
and LLOs (Table III).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Stoichiometry of hexose flux resulting from ER stress
Estimates are based upon 106 cells. Quantities of
glycogen-derived Glc-1-P were calculated from the amount of glycogen
consumed, as indicated in the text. Cytoplasmic hexose phosphates due
to ER stress were determined by FACE and enzyme assay as described
under "Experimental Procedures," with values from unstressed cells
subtracted out. The total amount of glucose plus mannose in
Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol detected by FACE
in dermal fibroblasts grown in 5 mM glucose
(12) was used to estimate the maximum amount of hexose
that might be needed for complete extension of lipid-linked
oligosaccharides due to ER stress.
|
|
ER Stress Elevates Glucosyl
Phosphates--
Fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis
(FACE) measurements of Glc-1-P showed an increase of 30% above control
after 15 min of DTT treatment and 60% after 30 min (data not shown). The net effect appeared substantial (Table III). Glc-1-P can be condensed with UTP by UDP-Glc pyrophosphorylase, generating UDP-Glc plus pyrophosphate. Alternatively, Glc-1-P can be converted to Glc-6-P
by phosphoglucomutase. Thus, it was likely that a portion of any
Glc-1-P generated would have been converted to these other metabolites.
As shown with an enzyme-linked assay (Fig.
3), DTT, TN, and CSN-induced ER stresses
consistently increased cytoplasmic Glc-6-P (panel A). CSN, a
weak UPR inducer (4), gave the weakest response. The effect of DTT was
observed within 5 min of addition to cell cultures (panel
B), and was maximal after 15 min. Concentrations as small as 0.2 mM were effective (panel C). These results were in accord with the previous demonstration that LLO extension was strongly stimulated by 0.4 mM DTT and occurred within 20 min of addition to cultures (4).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
ER stress elevates cytoplasmic
glucose-6-P. Fiibroblasts were treated in the absence or presence
of ER stress inducers, and cytoplasmic glucose-6-P was measured (nmols
per 106 cells, mean ± S.E.) by enzyme assay as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Panel A,
stresses were 2 mM DTT for 20 min.(n = 8),
200 µg/ml CSN for 24 h (n = 2), or 5 µg/ml TN
for 1 h (n = 4). Panel B, cells were
treated with 2 mM DTT for periods up to 60 min. Panel
C, cells were treated for 20 min with up to 2 mM DTT.
In B and C, data are averages of
duplicates.
|
|
DTT treatment also resulted in elevation of Glc-6-P when measured by
FACE (Fig. 4, panel A). This
increase (~5-fold, panel B) was greater than that measured
by enzyme assay (~2-fold, Fig. 3). Yet, the net increases were
similar, in the range of 3 to 4.5 nmol per 106 cells (Table
III). This suggests that an interfering component in the extract may
have contributed to the background in the enzymatic assay for
Glc-6-P.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
ER stress-dependent increase of
glucose 6-phosphate detected by FACE. Cells were treated in the
absence or presence of 2 mM DTT as described for Fig. 3.
Panel A, monosaccharide profiling gel showing 200 pmol of
D-glucose 6-phosphate (lane 1), 200 pmol of
D-galactose 6-phosphate (lane 2), 100 pmol
of glucose 6-phosphate mixed with material from the 70% ethanol
extract of 104 DTT-treated cells (lane 3), the
sample used for lane 3 but without glucose 6-phosphate (lane
4), and the 70% ethanol extract of 2 × 104
unstressed cells (lane 5). The positions of the two
standards, as well as AMAC-reacting material of unknown structure, are
shown. Panel B, percentage increase of glucose 6-phosphate
and galactose 6-phosphate due to ER stress, determined from the image
in panel A. The 100% values per 106 cells were
0.9 nmol for glucose 6-phosphate and 11 nmol for galactose
6-phosphate.
|
|
Quantitative Assessment of Glycogenolysis as the Basis for LLO
Extension--
Taken together these results indicate that ER stress
activates GP, associated with glycogenolysis and generation of Glc-1-P and Glc-6-P. As shown in Table III, ER stress generates at least 100-fold greater equivalents of hexose-P than needed to support synthesis of
Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol in
these cells as measured by FACE (16). Presumably, the bulk of the
glycogen-derived hexose-P not used for LLO extension is available for glycolysis.
Phosphatase Inhibitors Mimic the Effects of ER Stress on GP
Activity--
In all systems previously examined,
AMP-dependent GPb is converted to AMP-independent GPa by
phosphorylation (18). Thus, a commercial mixture of phosphatase
inhibitors was included during the preparation of extracts to optimize
the determination of ER stress activation of GP. The results (Fig.
5) were unexpected. Phosphatase
inhibitors had no effect on AMP-independent GP activity in extracts
from stressed cells, but they increased the activity from unstressed
cells to levels recovered from stressed cells. Thus, the inclusion of
phosphatase inhibitors during extract preparation had the same effect
on GP activity as treating intact cells with UPR inducers, but these
were not additive. Presumably, the relevant phosphorylation event
occurs not only in the cell, but also in the extract and/or under assay
conditions. Otherwise, the inhibitor mixture should have been without
effect. The implications of these data for regulation by
phosphorylation are considered under the "Discussion" and in Fig.
6 below.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Phosphatase inhibitors mimic the effects of
ER stress on GP activity. A proprietary aqueous mixture of
phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma cat. P5726) including sodium
orthovanadate, sodium molybdate, sodium tartrate, and imidazole was
used. Cells were treated with DTT or TN as in Fig. 3, and cytoplasmic
extracts were prepared with or without 1% (v/v) inhibitor mixture
added to the transport buffer. AMP-independent GP activity was measured
as units/min/mg protein (mean ± S.E., n = 6 for
DTT and n = 2 for TN).
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Model for stimulation of LLO extension by UPR
regulation of glycogenolysis. Accumulation of LLO intermediates,
such as by glucose depletion, results in ER stress. As shown in this
study ER stress activates glycogen phosphorylase (GP). This,
in turn, mobilizes hexose-P from glycogen, resulting in increased
concentrations of precursor substrates needs for extension of LLO
intermediates to mature LLOs. In this figure we speculate that the UPR
may prevent dephosphorylation of GP to an AMP-dependent
state. Other potential modes of regulation suggested by these data
include production of a phosphatase inhibitor that protects GP from
dephosphorylation, activation of a kinase that compensates for GP
dephosphorylation, and/or phosphorylation of a separate regulator of
GP.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study identified AMP-independent glycogen phosphorylase as a
candidate for mediating the ER stress-dependent extension of LLO precursors and increase of
Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol concentration. A number of trivial explanations for these changes had
already been ruled out (Refs. 4 and 6; see the Introduction). Seven
other candidate enzymes and factors were unchanged by ER stress.
Experiments with phosphatase inhibitors were consistent with activation
of AMP-independent GP activity by a
phosphorylation-dependent mechanism. At present, it is not
known whether ER stress controls one of the previously identified
modulators of GP phosphorylation, such as phosphorylase kinase or
protein phosphatase 1 or a novel phosphorylation-dependent
modulator of GP. Although no change in GP activity was detected in
assays in the presence of AMP, suggesting that the total amount of
enzyme was unaffected, it remains possible that GP was also activated
intracellularly by AMP or another cytoplasmic component that
dissociated during analysis.
ER stress increased GP activity by no more than a factor of 2, and only
small amounts of glycogen were consumed. However, activation of GP was
significant. First, as summarized in Table III, the amount of hexose-P
derived from glycogen is over 100 times the amount theoretically needed
to produce substrates for LLO extension. Second, GP is activated,
glycogenolysis is stimulated, and both Glc-1-P and Glc-6-P are produced
by treatment times and concentrations of UPR inducers that are highly
consistent with those that stimulate LLO extension (4). Third, both
biochemical (6) and genetic (19) studies have shown that Glc-6-P is an important source of hexose for LLO synthesis. Fourth, in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, glycogen appears to act as a buffer against accumulation of
LLO intermediates due to glucose deprivation (20). Formal proof that GP
is the UPR effector responsible for extension of LLOs will require
techniques that permit specific inhibition of GP activation.
The effects of GP activation by ER stress on the pathway leading from
glycogen to UDP-Glc, which is the donor substrate for glucose-P-dolichol synthase, remain to be examined. However, two observations suggest that this is also enhanced. In cells that accumulate more Man2-5GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol
than
Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol due to glucose deprivation, ER stress increased the radiochemical amount of
[3H]Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol
in cells when [3H]mannose was used to label mannosyl
residues (6). Yet, the same stress treatments eliminated the appearance
of
[3H]Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol
when [3H]galactose was used to label glucosyl residues
(data not shown). The latter process requires intracellular conversion
of galactose to Gal-1-P, UDP-Gal, UDP-Glc, and glucose-P-dolichol.
Since UDP-Glc is also formed from Glc-1-P resulting from
glycogenolysis, these results could be explained if ER stress elevated
UDP-Glc concentrations and diluted the UDP-[3H]glucose
formed from [3H]galactose. In agreement with this idea,
ER stress enhanced the glucosylation of LLOs in Congenital Disorder of
Glycosylation Type-Ic cells, in which glucosylation of LLOs is
deficient due to a mutation that reduces the activity of
glucose-P-dolichol:Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol glucosyltransferase (4). Thus, elevation of UDP-Glc might stimulate glucose-P-dolichol production and help compensate for the enzymatic defect.
The rapid activation of GP, combined with the evidence for a role of
phosphorylation, strongly suggests regulation by post-translational modification rather than transcription. Among the UPR signaling pathways that have been identified, this is most reminiscent of eIF2
phosphorylation by the ER stress sensing kinase PERK. In fibroblasts,
both GP activation (this study) and eIF2
phosphorylation (4) occur
within 15-20 min of application of ER stress. It will therefore be
interesting to determine whether GP can be activated in a
PERK-deficient cell, such as PERK (
/
) embryonic fibroblasts (21).
Unlike transcriptional mechanisms, some post-translational modifications can be easily reversed. GADD34 has been identified as
promoting dephosphorylation of eIF2
(22), so a similar mechanism may
be responsible for deactivating GP. If ER stress generates a
phosphatase inhibitor (Fig. 6), the UPR may control glycogenolysis by
modulating cycling between phosphorylated and dephosphorylated GP.
Given these results and the information we have recently reported on
the high priority of LLO extension in the UPR (4), the UPR appears to
proceed in two phases. The first phase, which takes place within
minutes of the generation of ER stress, may be responsible for ER
damage control. This phase is characterized by temporary adjustments
that can quickly counteract the causes of ER stress, such as by
increasing the supply of hexose-P for LLO synthesis and energy
production, and by decreasing the amount of protein entering the ER.
However, long-term solutions would occur hours later during the second
phase, characterized by remodeling of the ER in a manner requiring gene transcription.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Ko Uyeda for insightful discussions
about many aspects of this work and help in setting up several of the
assays, and Chris Newgard for valuable guidance in interpreting
glycogen phosphorylase results.
 |
Note Added in Proof |
Corgenix no longer sells SLO. We found
that Sigma product S-140 is also suitable.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM38545 and Welch Foundation Grant I-1168 (both awarded to M. A. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Division of Endocrinology, Dept. of Internal
Medicine, UT-Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8857.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 214-648-2323;
Fax: 214-648-8626; E-mail: mlehrm@mednet.swmed.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 9, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205001200
2
J. Shang and M. A. Lehrman, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
AMAC, 2-aminoacridone;
AZC, L-azetidine-2-carboxylic acid;
CDG, congenital disorder of
glycosylation;
CSN, castanospermine;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
eIF, eukaryotic initiation factor;
FACE, fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate
electrophoresis;
GP, glycogen phosphorylase;
LLO, lipid-linked
oligosaccharide;
PERK, PKR-like ER kinase;
SLO, streptolysin-O;
TN, tunicamycin;
UPR, unfolded protein response.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Patil, C.,
and Walter, P.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
13,
349-356[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Mori, K.
(2000)
Cell
101,
451-454[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Ma, J.,
and Hendershot, L. M.
(2001)
Cell
107,
827-830[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Shang, J.,
Koerner, C.,
Freeze, H. H.,
and Lehrman, M. A.
(2002)
Glycobiology
12,
307-317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Harding, H. P.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Ron, D.
(1999)
Nature
397,
271-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Doerrler, W. T.,
and Lehrman, M. A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
13050-13055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Lehrman, M. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
8623-8626[Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Martys, J. L.,
Shevell, T.,
and McGraw, T. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25976-25984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Anand, M.,
Rush, J. S.,
Ray, S.,
Doucey, M. A.,
Weik, J.,
Ware, F. E.,
Hofsteenge, J.,
Waechter, C. J.,
and Lehrman, M. A.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
487-501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Van Schaftingen, E.,
and Jaeken, J.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
377,
318-320[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Furuya, E.,
and Uyeda, K.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
7109-7112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Van Schaftingen, E.,
Lederer, B.,
Bartrons, R.,
and Hers, H.-G.
(1982)
Eur J Biochem.
129,
191-195[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Uyeda, K.,
Furuya, E.,
and Luby, L. J.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
8394-8399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Robson, R. L.,
and Morris, J. G.
(1974)
Biochem. J.
144,
513-517[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Spiro, M. J.
(1984)
Diabetologia
26,
70-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Gao, N.,
and Lehrman, M. A.
(2002)
Glycobiol.
12,
353-360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Keppler, D.,
and Decker, K.
(1974)
in
Methods Of Enzymatic Analysis
(Bergmeyer, H. U., ed), Vol. 6
, pp. 1127-1131, VCH, Weinheim, Germany
|
| 18.
|
Johnson, L. N.
(1992)
FASEB J.
6,
2274-2282[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Marquardt, T.,
and Freeze, H.
(2001)
Biol. Chem.
382,
161-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
McMahon, R. J.,
and Frost, S. C.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
E640-5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Harding, H. P.,
Zhang, Y.,
Bertolotti, A.,
Zeng, H.,
and Ron, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
5,
897-904[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Novoa, I.,
Zeng, H.,
Harding, H. P.,
and Ron, D.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
153,
1011-1021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Shang, N. Gao, R. J. Kaufman, D. Ron, H. P. Harding, and M. A. Lehrman
Translation attenuation by PERK balances ER glycoprotein synthesis with lipid-linked oligosaccharide flux
J. Cell Biol.,
February 26, 2007;
176(5):
605 - 616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Shang and M. A. Lehrman
Activation of Glycogen Phosphorylase with 5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carboxamide Riboside (AICAR): ASSESSMENT OF GLYCOGEN AS A PRECURSOR OF MANNOSYL RESIDUES IN GLYCOCONJUGATES
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 26, 2004;
279(13):
12076 - 12080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.